{"meta":{"query_hash":"882aa78cefde","filters":{"topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems"},"cohort_total":776,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":776,"exported":776,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/882aa78cefde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Game+Theory+and+Voting+Systems"},"results":[{"id":"W101946736","doi":"","title":"On Exact n-Step Domination.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.021644334553096722,"score_gpt":0.2227675887907469,"score_spread":0.20112325423765018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101946736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81058216,0.00019790491,0.0001377741,0.0002321386,0.002448129,0.0001256767,0.00000827549,0.00007110899,0.18619682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939454,0.000020679314,0.000035426317,0.00018268358,0.000023593799,0.000016004238,0.000005741772,0.00002135481,0.0057490934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905616,0.000031034426,0.00036369622,0.00028061998,0.000037768536,0.0002306916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992251,0.00014408417,0.00019869398,0.0003432745,0.000022319637,0.000066549524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007145553,0.0001228649,0.000252343,0.0001446762,0.000110372755,0.00005425078,0.00021082388,0.00008413826,0.0005124557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018853371,0.00014097599,0.00008041942,0.00021829053,0.000028947492,0.00012699637,0.000024755622,0.00012615105,0.0041691232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018845298,0.00009711932,0.0109177865,0.000006276893,0.000016492246,0.000007084206,0.00011656516,0.000011158416,0.0000067603487,0.98580647,0.0026523822,0.0003430432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087798,0.00011831739,0.00820166,0.000019832098,0.000002161757,0.00000762709,0.000031421456,0.00034589716,0.00005739733,0.94545656,0.04468631,0.00019485157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047712856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018094053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18336326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007741286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005919204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99660623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1027077394","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9294","title":"Conventional Machine Learning for Social Choice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Conceptualization; Machine learning; Missing data; Outcome (game theory); Artificial intelligence; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.23728863668513883,"score_gpt":0.31389335682755715,"score_spread":0.07660472014241831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1027077394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82542515,0.00031521037,0.019836415,0.008475917,0.0028166398,0.0016024316,0.00018797311,0.00019951182,0.14114073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969454,0.000003930443,0.00018680631,0.00008474937,0.0002476527,0.00003790389,0.0000031390534,0.000016786644,0.0024736575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872345,0.000010562646,0.00062422233,0.00030673336,0.00008959373,0.00024543275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987858,0.00009341018,0.00064713624,0.000079840574,0.0003284522,0.000065367974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013702146,0.00014419963,0.0003084874,0.00009665102,0.00021349544,0.00009869795,0.00052199495,0.000089264846,0.00013307587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013332623,0.0001318457,0.00015955698,0.00021548188,0.00016856742,0.0001495849,0.00007852654,0.00021810335,0.0002220767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009079506,0.00007321097,0.0043757926,0.00004240103,0.000019816951,3.124637e-8,0.0008386509,0.000051673494,0.0005328126,0.992382,0.0002834554,0.0013093572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015237066,0.00029292604,0.000570179,0.00009157469,0.000012139275,0.0000022581257,0.0009665535,0.036755126,0.021872822,0.9275927,0.011390835,0.00030051742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007743347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073508445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1715202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050610914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030474908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5376512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103001999","doi":"","title":"Large Neighbourhood Unions and Edge-disjoint Perfect Matchings.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Mathematics; Disjoint sets; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.012501938988027766,"score_gpt":0.2048596264232903,"score_spread":0.19235768743526255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103001999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92149603,0.000909018,0.00003282202,0.0002880953,0.0009606502,0.00014136467,0.00004848853,0.00008758809,0.07603592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958388,0.00007807466,0.000031870826,0.00017958459,0.000027188258,0.000012736484,0.000009190496,0.00002872712,0.00379382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884474,0.00004647106,0.0003903423,0.00034664656,0.00003069205,0.0003410884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935794,0.000063108004,0.00012552964,0.00032400189,0.000013568447,0.000115848314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082957005,0.00016051378,0.0003441786,0.000090173075,0.00023322081,0.00009389724,0.00017237362,0.00009919389,0.0019295276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000558712,0.00018140348,0.0000823117,0.00016627634,0.00004350905,0.00017565384,0.00004590469,0.00019264189,0.0014744713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008311527,0.00009960691,0.022711068,0.000019562727,0.000026469637,0.0000032351859,0.0009055942,0.000002844923,0.000009292894,0.9752041,0.0005542668,0.0004556195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010595002,0.00010003033,0.030880984,0.00003240584,0.0000067627752,0.00001744097,0.00012747303,0.00039455277,0.000036171954,0.9396022,0.027454471,0.00028801733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001105515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005295414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07434275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000395466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009036303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05600991476203109,"score_gpt":0.26030724144611855,"score_spread":0.20429732668408745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11392634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.494741,0.16502513,0.0000065864874,0.0007677525,0.0008023219,0.00070399616,0.0003625766,0.000040004925,0.33755064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789414,0.10634276,0.000010937224,0.00011921247,0.00014552417,0.000021991915,0.0000067903775,0.000037519676,0.014373861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828386,0.000026163461,0.0007042336,0.0006813548,0.00002043578,0.000283929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990493,0.000263402,0.0003455817,0.00025951926,0.000018932082,0.00006324545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008074486,0.00036002387,0.0010861219,0.0002920191,0.00016062359,0.000039328173,0.000117868156,0.00032210795,0.000018081326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012718135,0.00040110652,0.00006152032,0.000031377647,0.0005474172,0.00013338214,0.00026880484,0.00042767654,0.000010918237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034093096,0.000020623076,0.023570914,0.00034120653,0.00017186125,0.000018820647,0.0051005036,0.000010134953,7.425487e-8,0.9665999,0.000052958563,0.0040789456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002058439,0.00016724579,0.044654932,0.00058508344,0.000034098277,0.00006797346,0.00203001,0.0001813542,0.0000014013899,0.56223065,0.38669452,0.001294328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023883484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065787096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40436924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010460781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009507906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11888698","doi":"10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00499-0","title":"Comments on ECCC Report TR06-133: The Resolution Width Problem is EXPTIME-Complete","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic colloquium on computational complexity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Lemma (botany); Simple (philosophy); Pebble; Resolution (logic); Mathematics; Argument (complex analysis); Reduction (mathematics); Combinatorics; Computer science; Geometry; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06241613730404857,"score_gpt":0.2656478985926266,"score_spread":0.20323176128857803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11888698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59225416,0.0013372342,0.07699268,0.07291657,0.002054913,0.005039364,0.0009232214,0.00087388395,0.24760798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204963,0.0000061005594,0.0009181599,0.004678504,0.00024622108,0.000044217508,0.00018929642,0.000026591206,0.0018412845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713606,0.0001785569,0.001010357,0.00073615066,0.00023760785,0.0007012845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815667,0.0003127545,0.0007451576,0.00059084536,0.00009500217,0.00009957404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001905242,0.0003241482,0.0005069199,0.0002037489,0.0007428004,0.00014461995,0.000507918,0.00009960285,0.00034303236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008422666,0.00031125644,0.00022771714,0.00045538062,0.00013413609,0.00013164706,0.000049956725,0.00052314275,0.00081514247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002357511,0.00033984915,0.00046593693,0.000010079948,0.00007871774,0.000007321489,0.00029968718,0.00933873,0.000011555012,0.97704774,0.01172472,0.00043989476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010734209,0.0011450811,0.024216399,0.0000440103,0.000009053539,0.00007220339,0.00002173891,0.036283296,0.000027731301,0.84976816,0.086942576,0.00039631227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000910975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021069533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39979547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065424846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011762307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1238745702","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-057","title":"Budgeted social choice: from consensus to personalized decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Variety (cybernetics); Greedy algorithm; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09434534845328871,"score_gpt":0.27366833904457866,"score_spread":0.17932299059128995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1238745702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.892182,0.00012921204,0.0073341005,0.00011909181,0.00061312766,0.00015009902,0.00008728212,0.00008902108,0.09929606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902257,0.0000010133838,0.006909988,0.0005497266,0.0001846418,0.000009636457,0.0000036039953,0.000021056088,0.002094642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887586,0.00002724609,0.00046065034,0.00034966288,0.000032021388,0.00025457586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993329,0.00020444657,0.00017794625,0.00019088648,0.000025863314,0.00006795665],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052802806,0.00012550592,0.00033248164,0.00013005025,0.00015918628,0.00004389304,0.00019930108,0.000105230385,0.0047484864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028097862,0.00013607526,0.000108599845,0.00016010411,0.00003987495,0.000044364086,0.000054802113,0.00008826756,0.0032214154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003184186,0.0001151941,0.09230764,0.000013457515,0.00012513291,0.000010895552,0.011700642,0.0000027658841,0.00025276514,0.8810653,0.007394382,0.0066933814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032069387,0.00018817642,0.45481312,0.00012948042,0.000025623636,0.000009214602,0.0021001145,0.0011679172,0.00053373096,0.42552695,0.11101624,0.0012824979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008848011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007125169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4555384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046700115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074128607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130885469","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8829","title":"Preference Elicitation and Interview Minimization in Stable Matchings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Preference; Matching (statistics); Minification; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Work (physics); Machine learning; Scheme (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13783264841163043,"score_gpt":0.2620666541801558,"score_spread":0.12423400576852536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W130885469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96369857,0.000075452306,0.006306662,0.0011813933,0.000244292,0.00033204746,0.000008579253,0.000028011085,0.028125012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991752,0.000055570235,0.00027615274,0.000118282216,0.000029778505,0.000019954019,7.770998e-7,0.000010945971,0.00031334095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987162,0.00002264859,0.0006880762,0.00032381553,0.00006028249,0.00018898107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999131,0.00008725913,0.0005095487,0.00012330963,0.00011142446,0.00003742697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013713372,0.00013359713,0.00029275895,0.0001552031,0.000080097496,0.00010889851,0.0003644661,0.00007244788,0.00008131668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066115207,0.00012014877,0.00004205364,0.0002990553,0.00011342929,0.00025037033,0.00008073652,0.00016128484,0.000084659114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002323768,0.00004698374,0.0055145277,0.000104798215,0.000004183522,1.9242378e-8,0.0018492532,0.00004456235,0.0010637897,0.9814999,0.000015321648,0.009833418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055700402,0.00014062502,0.0061134053,0.0005676586,0.0000044141443,0.0000014240172,0.0008805069,0.047681697,0.020296391,0.9236754,0.00036528843,0.00021749594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013420869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022215485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057824515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029503437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007825293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48995247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143402542","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_44","title":"Parameterized Enumeration of (Locally-) Optimal Aggregations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Enumeration; Combinatorics; Upper and lower bounds; Swap (finance); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Computer science","score_opus":0.02725714467181971,"score_gpt":0.22007242875851382,"score_spread":0.1928152840866941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143402542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006108938,0.00051977666,0.9834189,0.00012880187,0.000983987,0.00032000965,0.00002383687,0.000028644297,0.008467137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315602,0.000023709186,0.06682638,0.00015399973,0.00021928386,0.000011415511,0.000010930891,0.0000239189,0.0011701363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983185,0.000013849789,0.0007442292,0.00058595784,0.00008979234,0.00024767863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984863,0.00021743344,0.00066267856,0.0004909497,0.00008495162,0.000057702116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008445219,0.00022151925,0.0005346799,0.00048399207,0.00009062561,0.00012989916,0.00055471313,0.00021589582,0.0002635008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001465729,0.0002360693,0.000108071596,0.00018512766,0.00038328566,0.00021986316,0.00012488956,0.00027897485,0.0002706987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018952867,0.000060996263,0.0005611018,0.0001475958,0.000051165436,0.00000715476,0.0017559408,0.07715616,0.0003847323,0.7963574,0.000030772902,0.12346806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005065238,0.00026083237,0.00034877547,0.00052098936,0.00000847089,0.000020715417,4.8969065e-7,0.3439459,0.0016844322,0.64923376,0.0027420078,0.0007271269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000537215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000089344085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000906174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96266264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1438141466","doi":"10.14778/2809974.2809982","title":"Rank aggregation with ties: Experiments and Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Computer Research Institute of Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Aggregation problem; Strong ties; Theoretical computer science; Learning to rank; Machine learning; Interpersonal ties; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02972460171478562,"score_gpt":0.22784222436726287,"score_spread":0.19811762265247726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1438141466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73957485,0.006271348,0.13898668,0.0016751316,0.0002342637,0.000499505,0.00020331929,0.00017112534,0.11238375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827242,0.00020179478,0.0067851073,0.000031429594,0.000018625937,0.000056035835,0.00032027092,0.000029850718,0.009832715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737906,0.0010772615,0.00055976596,0.00067618256,0.000093139184,0.00021457963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691415,0.00030414533,0.0008277797,0.0012576419,0.0005544001,0.00014187186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006250388,0.00023923852,0.0005661246,0.00037063152,0.00016913046,0.00035109415,0.0004762424,0.0002063435,0.00011833659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005135211,0.00025843375,0.00013120692,0.00042087396,0.00015592256,0.00012768312,0.00039798804,0.00028932226,0.00006242785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006162721,0.00051891094,0.13774367,0.0003380031,0.0017448488,0.0000049313976,0.05245198,0.000644461,0.00007587199,0.79966503,0.00066912564,0.0060815476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010658536,0.000012014919,0.09556644,0.009262883,0.0018021483,0.000060264934,0.0049378723,0.3042465,0.02824322,0.44494486,0.09290026,0.0073650125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012594877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033349497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35472018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009998561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005575434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487901217","doi":"10.1023/a:1012059101225","title":"Political Influence, Economic Interests and Endogenous Tax Structure in a Computable Equilibrium Framework: With Application to the United States, 1973 and 1983","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Computable general equilibrium; Homogeneous; Group (periodic table); Economics; Mathematical economics; Politics; Political science; Positive economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Economic system; Macroeconomics; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.025877629360400983,"score_gpt":0.23493999633576018,"score_spread":0.2090623669753592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487901217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99188936,0.00028465,0.0022605308,0.0033647157,0.00006566879,0.0003642078,0.00011104128,0.00003229421,0.0016275086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984728,0.00001840763,0.00012851268,0.0010823994,0.00012365579,0.000033554483,0.000033750155,0.000018949644,0.000087976354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987924,0.0000388063,0.00034530295,0.00037277633,0.000025859126,0.00042482704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911225,0.00025545587,0.00013849398,0.00030163786,0.00002441472,0.00016777554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039456578,0.00014628046,0.00025615408,0.00026553555,0.00007875672,0.0002617049,0.00022443382,0.00009067308,0.000025763384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013473007,0.0001260022,0.00001414568,0.00040045302,0.00008701514,0.00021923921,0.00011117658,0.00022538775,0.000035732708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034373217,0.000028645536,0.45988044,0.000025224455,0.000026097423,0.0000024736596,0.0006367751,0.002486291,0.000011455633,0.5363569,0.000077053985,0.0004342579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017234011,0.00026106142,0.28987446,0.00008681659,0.000012090904,0.00038891233,0.00063645514,0.052637912,0.00001998354,0.10925066,0.54437715,0.0007310956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051538614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014685325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5443001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104855535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000197571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7791131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489745468","doi":"","title":"Strategy-Proof Tie-Breaking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Matching (statistics); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023768397817852543,"score_gpt":0.1602612038950215,"score_spread":0.13649280607716896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489745468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57450175,0.0043492406,0.0016036028,0.000042692078,0.00049209717,0.00012956519,0.0000312843,0.000090030306,0.4187597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98059034,0.000022955099,0.0003001917,0.00005412954,0.00009646091,0.000007173266,0.000007769408,0.000015074487,0.018905884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988919,0.000034647874,0.00034830137,0.0003630612,0.00006466223,0.000297453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918777,0.000026085043,0.00029140417,0.00030628356,0.000041472373,0.0001469827],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035373698,0.00016718701,0.00025287605,0.000179889,0.0019723922,0.00003120001,0.00029667272,0.00013334387,0.00021648157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027990429,0.00020497272,0.00014677804,0.00017240716,0.00013258315,0.00031405807,0.00010046338,0.00015726002,0.00039645933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120210425,0.000111504494,0.08515785,0.00003129762,0.0001132632,0.00033480593,0.01194535,0.00019482014,0.00044926172,0.9004305,0.0002003118,0.0009108399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047936374,0.0007136656,0.46085197,0.0003409424,0.00016382779,0.0029243417,0.03022763,0.0059516267,0.020442974,0.1745887,0.29613474,0.002865947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013768125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032973549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72584176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010231702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001062631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491181859","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.04.001","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Comparative statics; Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Population; Resource allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Class (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07436292279732265,"score_gpt":0.26958138631792233,"score_spread":0.19521846352059968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491181859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938572,0.0010243283,0.0015689335,0.000083909275,0.00032393335,0.00028432577,0.00017206548,0.000036702786,0.0026485783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978348,0.00020577082,0.0001618871,0.000027575268,0.000082824256,0.000074277734,0.000008068838,0.000016355081,0.001588438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878293,0.000023358985,0.0005145633,0.00041787667,0.00001383299,0.00024741638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.00006639819,0.0002960935,0.00021920029,0.000013776657,0.00009907708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037709458,0.00018071094,0.0004192326,0.000087132845,0.000099267665,0.000105025254,0.00010606187,0.000090541405,0.00028191676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008735395,0.00016246137,0.000045510915,0.000032366246,0.00013969507,0.00032156153,0.000041617455,0.000067423185,0.00024861592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009207095,0.00015663695,0.582259,0.000100939986,0.0001199301,0.000005078351,0.0029464737,0.000046843234,0.0011172858,0.31999937,0.00042051746,0.09273587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027237975,0.0003971198,0.9500403,0.00010990917,0.000067002155,0.000077920005,0.0019547225,0.0017688727,0.0010670417,0.031784922,0.008819136,0.0011892468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013691968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009209205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36778134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007656604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014794415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66249824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496464339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1851325","title":"On a Three-Alternative Condorcet Jury Theorem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Social choice theory; Jury; Voting; Private information retrieval; Approval voting; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Type (biology); Majority rule; State (computer science); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.035149016385647165,"score_gpt":0.21530561235198659,"score_spread":0.18015659596633943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496464339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124593,0.0021170252,0.023137031,0.0001093554,0.0009135734,0.00016691258,0.000018172475,0.000049108847,0.16102956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962452,0.00029456857,0.00003613563,0.00014463722,0.00029003088,0.000006183554,0.0000013095795,0.000030874577,0.0029510565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977425,0.000054810564,0.0004756061,0.0002619052,0.000048190745,0.0014169917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913317,0.00006533635,0.00045841513,0.0002353784,0.000029446215,0.00007823659],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032850497,0.00016906974,0.00031618334,0.00019471884,0.00016802289,0.000044399185,0.00040194867,0.000079412996,0.0004839157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011332703,0.00015975698,0.00015901163,0.00011883192,0.00006555966,0.00015867873,0.000026967136,0.0012516888,0.0013103384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100289755,0.00006642631,0.0034540202,0.0000030068018,0.00015325843,0.0000044768362,0.0006528875,0.000007781413,0.0000057691213,0.99415714,0.000040796585,0.0013541474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006382754,0.00052550476,0.0010779083,0.000019465406,0.0000060198354,0.0001518629,0.0003725166,0.0001162602,0.00007469552,0.99598444,0.00084130693,0.0001917346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118834854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012666032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18378595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003974575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015212441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503218943","doi":"","title":"The Daycare Assignment Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Matching (statistics); Stability (learning theory); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; School choice; Stable marriage problem; Mathematical optimization; Class (philosophy); Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07317586105897277,"score_gpt":0.28847718520716414,"score_spread":0.21530132414819136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503218943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08870234,0.0021160834,0.000026851947,0.00054120197,0.0018842266,0.0016884163,0.00020573415,0.000080928105,0.9047542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975737,0.006528141,0.00023762567,0.000052229025,0.00037280048,0.00068342546,0.00003498166,0.00010444391,0.01624935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567586,0.0003103518,0.0015270492,0.0012501545,0.00009431706,0.0011422767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658227,0.0006084137,0.0007164651,0.0018255411,0.000071019545,0.00019627789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008638152,0.00039174096,0.0008171652,0.00042694664,0.00044980575,0.00038807117,0.0016694405,0.0005585119,0.00021696433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045125745,0.00037776103,0.0003001671,0.00013702476,0.00041460898,0.00010176436,0.0014197095,0.0020926045,0.00036760193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019338298,0.0003845816,0.041692168,0.0005886484,0.0005180059,0.000038911385,0.0039922097,0.003670067,0.000014160676,0.8411767,0.0007861258,0.10694506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009126988,0.000214853,0.007425703,0.0004942881,0.000008708286,0.000014506723,0.0016901932,0.0031184207,0.00009646742,0.59752303,0.38726,0.0012411176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002851821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023135975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88850486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010611905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019899478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507782784","doi":"","title":"Social Norms and Rationality of Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Rationality; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Nash equilibrium; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044273036215001255,"score_gpt":0.2756084852402012,"score_spread":0.23133544902519995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507782784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482741,0.0008022565,0.013195091,0.00018616492,0.0015192652,0.00015412008,0.00075738295,0.000041619965,0.035069995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980006,0.000008843446,0.0005158952,0.000049513936,0.0008737105,0.0000054261873,0.00013650027,0.000006524158,0.00040297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.000015865437,0.0006286092,0.0002657367,0.000085590036,0.00016789026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999179,0.0001637552,0.00032474106,0.00018678528,0.000083625346,0.00006207635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012172728,0.000106737585,0.00023872529,0.000092439346,0.00033796736,0.000041558007,0.00012123736,0.00007450889,0.000034098026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046670146,0.000116781244,0.00005525372,0.0001710254,0.00030428474,0.00044446668,0.000070070964,0.00010978444,0.000030356648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003581656,0.000052571344,0.11802958,0.000064071275,0.000030668554,0.00000589869,0.0001635681,0.0000074912455,0.0004231013,0.8809245,0.00019158926,0.000071143346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012702319,0.000079024765,0.6428882,0.00011084486,0.000021088137,0.00011730888,0.00015115862,0.0001329719,0.005501588,0.045459166,0.30371282,0.00055564125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005869603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005329032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007549439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049113965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4762201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509454970","doi":"","title":"ANC Analytical Payoff Functions for Networks with Endogenous Bilateral Long Cheap Talk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Superadditivity; Inefficiency; Stochastic game; Valuation (finance); Link (geometry); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics; Economics; Combinatorics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07546342242587019,"score_gpt":0.28590517371260016,"score_spread":0.21044175128672998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509454970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84578764,0.0015407519,0.005309137,0.0005840054,0.0024904495,0.004223389,0.0009868084,0.00019783288,0.13888001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222785,0.0008375516,0.00036427597,0.000064679196,0.0008145412,0.0006459597,0.00023401929,0.00014283009,0.0046683117],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554586,0.000112675676,0.0013633537,0.0015260892,0.00008063707,0.0013713943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732906,0.00049661833,0.00051749236,0.0012468152,0.000110493,0.0002994978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034610678,0.0004883777,0.0012277749,0.00078720466,0.0003283505,0.00034451296,0.0007295388,0.00072039815,0.00017088937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028473712,0.00053260726,0.0003888747,0.00025784608,0.0003881078,0.0001495474,0.0004397387,0.0017840997,0.000057464284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009732718,0.00077043235,0.0947763,0.0009626062,0.001034411,0.00017112748,0.0008279446,0.8263591,0.000008025506,0.056429397,0.00008592395,0.017601483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015652958,0.0037848065,0.069127835,0.00309889,0.00019748656,0.0008092436,0.0020690348,0.68719983,0.0001254029,0.11413874,0.096046366,0.0077494085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003095611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043282894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14644021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014788707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003366823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510153283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2263942","title":"Existence and Outcome-Uniqueness of Stationary Procedural Bargaining Equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Uniqueness; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.027797946229850858,"score_gpt":0.23857919467074096,"score_spread":0.2107812484408901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510153283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98767984,0.0026052594,0.0043556243,0.0002686284,0.000110215864,0.00013117594,0.0000049552946,0.000015459918,0.0048288694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977134,0.00022967701,0.00035434015,0.000061318846,0.000073933625,0.000008005258,0.0000016613253,0.000015409245,0.0015422952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983663,0.000034974477,0.0006098427,0.00016189102,0.000036844114,0.0007901757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992622,0.000059423368,0.00046159865,0.00010719059,0.000053589887,0.00005596276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018824326,0.000101651014,0.00027240493,0.00012467404,0.00009391283,0.00004955374,0.00016862572,0.000051731568,0.00007224946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014131672,0.00010219808,0.00005607103,0.0001061837,0.000055943263,0.00038797574,0.000030383248,0.00046383232,0.000055370376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009449461,0.000014629972,0.10464138,0.000022351413,0.000038477145,3.3998634e-7,0.00029403254,0.0000066253024,0.00013510871,0.89365846,0.00000969031,0.0011694322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034398123,0.00014714678,0.017132986,0.00002550909,0.000003744181,0.00016779789,0.0014165523,0.00083105,0.000038212125,0.979627,0.00012908186,0.00013693779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112525966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014950478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087508395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014088147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016287007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41675168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510286099","doi":"","title":"Arrow's Theorem in Spatial Environments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Arrow; Mathematical economics; Social welfare function; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Impossibility; Space (punctuation); Voting; Independence (probability theory); Transitive relation; Majority rule; Economics; Welfare; Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.020392436571973024,"score_gpt":0.18562639762439878,"score_spread":0.16523396105242577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510286099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90909845,0.0045833904,0.00096252747,0.00046012222,0.0007168047,0.0005244503,0.0008306978,0.000052446325,0.08277109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98951375,0.0011790444,0.000092407085,0.000025503274,0.00006655388,7.1580627e-7,0.000065382985,0.000014584203,0.009042062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983192,0.00008697176,0.00052624935,0.00069069344,0.00008536385,0.0002915191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982898,0.000104063576,0.0005501969,0.00091982225,0.0000106241305,0.00012547665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046569703,0.00020131635,0.00048325324,0.00018156301,0.00021158824,0.00003870568,0.000613815,0.00012740614,0.00036777055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005482719,0.0002495534,0.00006365392,0.00010088625,0.0002525543,0.0005353067,0.00033747265,0.00015330619,0.0001251345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006927592,0.0021865566,0.814556,0.00044679467,0.00090712693,0.0016597344,0.0031903791,0.00022848733,0.001053424,0.11301227,0.03043225,0.03163423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010700198,0.0005258206,0.24583395,0.00041724162,0.00020470996,0.00021610182,0.001848393,0.007746358,0.00046489734,0.012307583,0.71782,0.0019147692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010330607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020452128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015410582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067662118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516863238","doi":"","title":"Choice, Opportunities, and Procedures: Collected Papers of Kotaro Suzumura. Part I, Rational Choice and Revealed Preference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07968952659356413,"score_gpt":0.24506235395068526,"score_spread":0.16537282735712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516863238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93318224,0.0075778128,0.00041105723,0.00032921945,0.003200829,0.0011293936,0.0142089045,0.00012718099,0.039833378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872257,0.0008934292,0.00083294645,0.00007863881,0.001152688,0.00021929652,0.004044237,0.000032496937,0.00552055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971345,0.00007947183,0.0013768857,0.0009062432,0.00019364583,0.00030923483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739295,0.0004449895,0.0011574366,0.00058381166,0.00025052318,0.00017028188],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855979,0.0004167003,0.0007950602,0.00026640974,0.00046732044,0.00022020884,0.00031073514,0.0003188217,0.000059597714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016243388,0.00047258235,0.000092134076,0.0002070165,0.0006552152,0.00043421358,0.00044811916,0.00044320693,0.000005498373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016897474,0.00030293353,0.1971825,0.0038461064,0.0004482036,0.000051110277,0.00046083258,0.00045052654,0.00035067418,0.78803015,0.0085870195,0.000120992634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026518619,0.00021941315,0.36688638,0.004382091,0.00018585839,0.000306267,0.00019804917,0.0009041394,0.0004119039,0.013316576,0.6084799,0.0020575207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027632585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007957592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7747135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018821255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008425817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524367418","doi":"","title":"Multi-Agent Bilateral Bargaining with Endogenous Protocol","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Renting; Housing discrimination; Census tract; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Economics; State (computer science); Labour economics; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Property value; Business; Public economics; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Finance; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.11391646741605731,"score_gpt":0.31675663113096375,"score_spread":0.20284016371490643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524367418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41170642,0.00031406354,0.00039755678,0.0002617514,0.0014433388,0.13255994,0.00064473995,0.00037509302,0.4522971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404555,0.00015823144,0.002062307,0.000061795334,0.0003084187,0.054253377,0.00004579061,0.00017093684,0.0024836697],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995132,0.00020791106,0.0015763799,0.0016581577,0.00010806108,0.0013174756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723846,0.00020008962,0.0007585693,0.0014415592,0.00008119023,0.00028014998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042052446,0.00055606285,0.0011922548,0.0009533627,0.00026190982,0.0003586934,0.001051491,0.0005939765,0.00022212516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026915947,0.00059858104,0.0002534907,0.00020384554,0.0003252344,0.00015714209,0.000847189,0.0021348875,0.00023501794],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024178543,0.004220039,0.31969666,0.0056993472,0.0020659412,0.0016058567,0.01800463,0.47551662,0.00069455896,0.12570854,0.000048308026,0.044321626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06839055,0.0075731524,0.0918294,0.015530089,0.00010580112,0.0015454171,0.008305351,0.15873411,0.004439395,0.31213677,0.31034446,0.02106552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047496852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015370062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52874905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019812281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004823122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153079438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.281870","title":"The Structure Of Equilibrium Payoffs In Superadditive Coalitional Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Superadditivity; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Reservation; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.011212142257051898,"score_gpt":0.2105053707069511,"score_spread":0.19929322844989922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153079438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913374,0.004646818,0.00038432775,0.00056966074,0.00029038033,0.000079575344,0.000056624627,0.000006861177,0.0026283085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680597,0.0011904942,0.000008683987,0.000035744342,0.00024484334,0.0000013643677,0.000005905796,0.000012622643,0.0016943747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981554,0.00007004755,0.00054892345,0.00014648012,0.00005042473,0.0010286901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993486,0.00014400824,0.00030386346,0.00013497657,0.000034699646,0.00003387264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018320092,0.00010139757,0.00023539581,0.00011496285,0.00010192915,0.0000414543,0.00025905692,0.00006570147,0.00015654982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013404424,0.000082702565,0.00009708901,0.00018284096,0.00007854113,0.00014903807,0.000020884723,0.0008307703,0.000027237993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185128,0.000029284845,0.047513958,0.0000031682064,0.000058124664,0.0000016450864,0.00023043802,0.00006528552,0.00015061996,0.95119065,0.000041439856,0.0006735133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053687376,0.00011781381,0.013946992,0.000019284771,0.0000027492024,0.00029832585,0.0011359473,0.000108039705,0.00010819932,0.9779278,0.0056832186,0.00011473139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008276812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053448067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033566967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030638007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022377043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36093298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536580421","doi":"","title":"Lucas'Counter Example Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematical economics; Dominance (genetics); Futures studies; Relation (database); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07489978475279653,"score_gpt":0.3060261139288195,"score_spread":0.231126329176023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536580421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4622047,0.001804553,0.00003040362,0.00042789362,0.00123577,0.0011059846,0.0004202755,0.00011159862,0.5326588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97727466,0.005284134,0.0004818947,0.00022017163,0.0012363407,0.00025726916,0.00014981926,0.00015043357,0.014945267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481165,0.0002604349,0.0018750954,0.0017280341,0.000101213926,0.0012235624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966487,0.0004978119,0.00051457284,0.0019995945,0.00008883308,0.00025043546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071586124,0.0004930848,0.0013314192,0.0011804563,0.00019215388,0.00038041137,0.0012873174,0.00079503807,0.0012926982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006284107,0.00062810886,0.0003787579,0.00023447277,0.00027522523,0.00019828274,0.0011678225,0.0023289267,0.0009396536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007152604,0.001951112,0.2349295,0.003548814,0.0015627056,0.00024948505,0.009549412,0.038821977,0.00015954045,0.5439164,0.0044458997,0.16014987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017241979,0.00016585094,0.018398264,0.0009373937,0.0000125324195,0.000039451043,0.0005976984,0.02986426,0.000057382735,0.06645602,0.8797218,0.0020251377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056280394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001687995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013409269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016016325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537982990","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.08.002","title":"Centralized allocation in multiple markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Preference; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07626212296768375,"score_gpt":0.24154481937529573,"score_spread":0.16528269640761198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537982990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97939515,0.00026087364,0.005169346,0.0005425674,0.00044589138,0.000105762774,0.0000068040977,0.0000070199258,0.014066579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651617,0.000040277493,0.0029679884,0.00007429386,0.00012214278,0.0000022294064,8.9334395e-7,0.000014887345,0.00026112542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.000033870252,0.0013031034,0.00011220855,0.000024162193,0.00018098103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864864,0.00020419138,0.00080014643,0.0001558318,0.00004056411,0.00015060794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214357,0.00009588768,0.0005089106,0.00018377016,0.000015141332,0.000046271576,0.0002104362,0.00008199863,0.00013375522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011120246,0.00009798162,0.000112328395,0.00006990288,0.000033881635,0.0002587492,0.000023715966,0.00014960644,0.00035809592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022591885,0.00038771358,0.025149807,0.00009082265,0.000069041904,0.000011380303,0.0017958683,0.001554348,0.000015725831,0.9693523,0.00078760466,0.0005594829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003165137,0.000108875836,0.004165788,0.00010377929,0.000007660681,0.00012588904,0.00055303704,0.026474375,0.00011924475,0.95507526,0.00986734,0.000233617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000582459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004162025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024920026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018846875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037606835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46027178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538521242","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_37","title":"Network Bargaining with General Capacities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intersection (aeronautics); Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Graph; Class (philosophy); Unit (ring theory); Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.028893049063614132,"score_gpt":0.19625367510515196,"score_spread":0.16736062604153784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538521242","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001977283,0.0011746753,0.880859,0.00014353654,0.0015070414,0.00025999363,0.0000137742145,0.000066749715,0.1139979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91017836,0.000023442637,0.07630066,0.0018828482,0.0024114102,0.00001627081,0.000008321462,0.00007472161,0.009103954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804115,0.000011984331,0.0005086398,0.00080155407,0.00009847258,0.00053818786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987478,0.0001631815,0.00040668948,0.0005412273,0.000053695116,0.00008740685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097531994,0.00033341962,0.0005969919,0.00033080447,0.0002002749,0.00026293617,0.0006932615,0.00021385656,0.00024242372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003284663,0.00030989063,0.000067402565,0.00019340421,0.00070151134,0.0002224791,0.00016044153,0.00048785537,0.00036003243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006493653,0.000006180944,0.0010184466,0.000031432104,0.000021137672,0.000016090808,0.001089522,0.09152348,0.0000022249226,0.8944726,0.0001165016,0.011695877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020703884,0.00016020972,0.00019251883,0.000387364,0.0000036194365,0.000042226002,7.602089e-7,0.05917524,0.000021187321,0.9325794,0.00656938,0.00066106394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008857988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003312454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014366441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063752304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543368412","doi":"","title":"Essays in Power, Freedom, and Success : Concepts, Measurement, and Applications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Freedom of choice; Epistemology; Game theory; Index (typography); Action (physics); Criticism; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032453124151543694,"score_gpt":0.24016323201992956,"score_spread":0.20771010786838587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543368412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5246518,0.011772243,0.014943251,0.001265174,0.00016808367,0.0006899905,0.00005205214,0.00008937615,0.44636798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988203,0.00008207811,0.00023044412,0.00010168564,0.000064560714,0.000058966958,0.0000010596322,0.000007488794,0.00063338294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.000013231137,0.00029886822,0.00022868137,0.000020234424,0.00013529096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967295,0.00003009703,0.00009158307,0.0001410965,0.0000150464375,0.000049221027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008618104,0.00007513523,0.00018045906,0.000093907154,0.000051801286,0.000047973703,0.0000787055,0.00004805089,0.00020004404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030992596,0.00008240054,0.000014920816,0.00009557548,0.000062818275,0.00013899067,0.000028311253,0.000064173844,0.000090004134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027031836,0.000030773615,0.13249417,0.000014443823,0.0000072885523,1.5087153e-7,0.00021771826,0.000015060728,0.000018253653,0.8656993,0.0001826064,0.0013175287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004017653,0.00012403529,0.25545594,0.00008341367,0.000010482074,0.000025500403,0.000990229,0.0035604949,0.00025420723,0.15336686,0.58108455,0.0010266155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019246333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026504265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7123324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030934163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004411617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33601967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544445256","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.255586","title":"Farsighted Stability in Hedonic Games","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.030293664801967737,"score_gpt":0.20319542157524503,"score_spread":0.1729017567732773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544445256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671598,0.01533809,0.0012740786,0.00057308096,0.00032320953,0.000115522016,0.000005935513,0.00003115788,0.015179087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541664,0.0017858057,0.000017997667,0.000053003852,0.00014055368,0.000004976793,7.739899e-7,0.00001871988,0.0025615448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972869,0.00008169034,0.00065816025,0.0002660803,0.00004119955,0.0016659492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934125,0.00005508443,0.0002918661,0.00023045923,0.000018955985,0.00006235788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003673054,0.0001367267,0.00033592546,0.00022175723,0.00010119771,0.00005780883,0.0002802354,0.000091367176,0.0007931863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001448744,0.00014529692,0.00012564924,0.00028343828,0.000042691503,0.00021546155,0.000021749313,0.001292253,0.000681715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015714935,0.00011529444,0.091446,0.000008926022,0.00004931475,0.0000031520863,0.00058167614,0.000024793735,0.000027067043,0.90531534,0.000044792585,0.002367923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011029121,0.00022277639,0.008276245,0.00002315427,0.000004094372,0.00018375798,0.00079464127,0.0014182084,0.000045989626,0.98032874,0.007297067,0.00030244453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009988011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042380407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08316975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009157353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007874076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8762295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545756310","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7620","title":"Coalitional Structure Generation in Skill Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"Ministry of Education, Science and Technology; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Bounded function; Partition (number theory); Graph; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Representation (politics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Function (biology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08195544025917015,"score_gpt":0.2679893737776672,"score_spread":0.18603393351849704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545756310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837269,0.000016480319,0.00018617087,0.0009997714,0.0007456513,0.00020647881,0.000055233584,0.00001699138,0.0140463095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989763,0.0000062822646,0.00027304125,0.000116103074,0.00021166199,0.00001253888,0.000003101807,0.0000105699855,0.00039043458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987719,0.0000066084617,0.00062825903,0.00031889958,0.000074610856,0.00019972918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.000033746146,0.0004135292,0.0001494247,0.00013740716,0.0000397682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006561009,0.00013364044,0.00024047277,0.00014195932,0.00008653966,0.00009714059,0.00047030096,0.000120825694,0.000705012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890778,0.00011735379,0.0000710337,0.00026094445,0.00016356616,0.00017865974,0.000054287335,0.00035932363,0.00012689171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633767,0.000052114316,0.004372313,0.000016564687,0.000004840262,8.37087e-8,0.0007216127,0.00003738156,0.045963906,0.9475725,0.00006838008,0.0011739155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034199613,0.000050352955,0.0030305418,0.000050739105,0.000002219694,0.0000036231872,0.00029059983,0.0143758785,0.1908839,0.79066795,0.0004283616,0.00018164355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084590436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011725076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15690462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023960696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021086777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7719387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551292152","doi":"","title":"Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and the Nash Bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Allocative efficiency; Transferable utility; Economics; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Cardinality (data modeling); Distribution (mathematics); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07820212990443214,"score_gpt":0.28984303503717423,"score_spread":0.21164090513274209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551292152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88332915,0.0063876873,0.000014670871,0.004751081,0.0007412477,0.002317206,0.00012810025,0.000034389093,0.10229646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97918844,0.017362844,0.000053625903,0.00009523621,0.00027202355,0.00032771804,0.000018441857,0.00004091319,0.0026407319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625933,0.00062482123,0.0010911599,0.0011049268,0.000079982376,0.0008397839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971427,0.0014822923,0.00027613118,0.000951527,0.000052775948,0.00009460308],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027782157,0.00030414175,0.0009051432,0.00055562146,0.000507312,0.00030383974,0.00052039477,0.0003678238,0.000054689826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015215003,0.00025120995,0.00012019067,0.00022062386,0.0018956865,0.00013799648,0.00063565595,0.0018070027,0.000007300087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018537889,0.0002359996,0.067985356,0.0007454138,0.00028478281,0.000011327739,0.027162356,0.0021622484,0.000011289501,0.8346515,0.00006219842,0.0648337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010538321,0.00017242545,0.04262777,0.0009845521,0.000031538,0.00010301198,0.018463893,0.058616675,0.000074604184,0.850961,0.016063694,0.001362468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017129125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005856058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099655725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038027338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552577690","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-21311-3_1","title":"Preference Elicitation and Preference Learning in Social Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Realm; Preference elicitation; Social choice theory; Preference learning; Subject (documents); Social preferences; Usability; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08839179875528548,"score_gpt":0.24018333532145186,"score_spread":0.1517915365661664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552577690","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05899003,0.0015030014,0.86766446,0.00018796355,0.00124253,0.0006154663,0.000020259982,0.000111925954,0.06966435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965163,0.000050342733,0.0020470514,0.000117478805,0.0002513667,0.000008230462,0.000004087103,0.000021398,0.0009837726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813163,0.000027825676,0.0005527712,0.0008532689,0.00008419774,0.00035028503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895316,0.00027742362,0.0004384944,0.00023059204,0.000046317935,0.000053987333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011935977,0.00026248215,0.00047847914,0.0006137386,0.00019154107,0.00014566851,0.0005119267,0.00027883603,0.000053545697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022815789,0.00029544524,0.00004332638,0.00022822693,0.0003357034,0.00026453703,0.00020738038,0.00070553983,0.00006942324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027099482,0.000044698267,0.044535074,0.0002317729,0.00001749992,0.000009874079,0.011238479,0.0039288267,0.00004611305,0.6795552,0.0000067054357,0.26035866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004152891,0.00016937075,0.045202933,0.0004665934,0.0000039328356,0.000008822196,0.0000013580698,0.024981081,0.00006131051,0.92565477,0.0023107578,0.000723791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017122632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015013848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012718888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004958838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555886748","doi":"","title":"The allocation between the EU member states of the seats in the European Parliament Cambridge Compromise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Parliament; Member states; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Economics; European union; Politics","score_opus":0.04101790828583755,"score_gpt":0.22122107331380098,"score_spread":0.18020316502796344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555886748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.735449,0.0035848776,0.004493346,0.019448161,0.0005723362,0.0016397596,0.00020938623,0.000058220754,0.23454487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619937,0.0004898467,0.00015970806,0.00010050844,0.000038671966,0.00006846209,0.00007926402,0.00002970164,0.0028344938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98998076,0.008246174,0.0009248515,0.00043745697,0.00013609392,0.00027467593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389744,0.0019246251,0.0012359733,0.0026106576,0.0002902935,0.000041024894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026091084,0.00022079001,0.00032665956,0.00006359665,0.0005016853,0.0002907626,0.0026984646,0.00009714146,0.000021113447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000652399,0.00012766244,0.00020195817,0.00026161355,0.0003831913,0.000055859506,0.00090415945,0.0006114898,0.000069276284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013866468,0.00035010974,0.07126549,0.00018671683,0.00019312545,8.392342e-7,0.05839355,0.00033681418,0.000046880843,0.8590985,0.0022284545,0.007885652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010908066,0.0000019639642,0.775169,0.0018998728,0.00010290449,0.0000070938922,0.0026460134,0.007584569,0.004839038,0.08677215,0.119044274,0.00084230665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029098138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071052014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77232635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007282535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046855923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90427005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556045938","doi":"","title":"Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristic; Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Political science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05470636016034001,"score_gpt":0.24966453788850218,"score_spread":0.19495817772816218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556045938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440354,0.0015135959,0.014606952,0.000263078,0.00032844298,0.00054903846,0.000060125833,0.00016647424,0.038476877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948906,0.00016203316,0.0018924901,0.000028805503,0.00005680422,0.00006248385,0.0001236369,0.00005293394,0.00273023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958597,0.0019934222,0.0007832177,0.00094679475,0.000100799094,0.00031606772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729013,0.00038840962,0.0008055413,0.0010594056,0.00030398474,0.0001525493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702077,0.00032633406,0.0005229806,0.00028894978,0.00049926026,0.00048049068,0.00056462357,0.00022805444,0.00008308756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027685662,0.00040336713,0.00011262893,0.00017184827,0.00015272148,0.00018087005,0.00046490095,0.00052708207,0.00007137744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034444925,0.003219848,0.023603564,0.00019093645,0.0002036344,0.000015842992,0.03155845,0.00035838663,0.00046445886,0.9386667,0.00007016064,0.0016135474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0117229875,0.00008824458,0.16937281,0.005809896,0.0002890277,0.00065712625,0.03361761,0.30787858,0.01941299,0.43620953,0.005801348,0.009139837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020856457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057147583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006941132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557733319","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_7","title":"Utility in Social Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Axiom; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Preference; Social Welfare; Social preferences; Mathematics; Welfare; Welfare economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07093094075075075,"score_gpt":0.24007619911331038,"score_spread":0.16914525836255961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557733319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076195016,0.0004438578,0.00008502985,0.00012780775,0.00040482346,0.00017100015,0.00009963231,0.000050901333,0.997855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44832882,0.000012584289,0.000017872178,0.00009667435,0.00032872483,0.0000028619716,0.00001277328,0.00002727072,0.55117244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864215,0.00000598568,0.00068881136,0.0004237201,0.000024708093,0.00021462223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933136,0.00004472094,0.00033611528,0.00023850067,0.000011858615,0.00003745021],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005556789,0.00021185483,0.0006001034,0.00020879299,0.000060504317,0.000032051816,0.00020557232,0.00041440802,0.0073331413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002815189,0.00025944912,0.0001765136,0.00002984847,0.000061348845,0.00006155886,0.000046923342,0.0003472226,0.0034808812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041844137,0.000013993289,0.0017077021,0.000048159327,0.000018505822,0.00000294663,0.00013603021,0.0000012109293,9.763395e-8,0.9972802,0.0005272637,0.00025975332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002596404,0.000010182462,0.0029698694,0.000037682617,0.000002004892,8.168655e-7,0.0000057946713,0.000009178403,9.644726e-7,0.6914993,0.30496413,0.00024044863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004706024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002512415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44756687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012625766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025060739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562643333","doi":"10.65109/lhla5263","title":"Coalitional affinity games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Bounded function; Welfare; Class (philosophy); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physics","score_opus":0.04101661651427376,"score_gpt":0.22262972559299377,"score_spread":0.18161310907872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562643333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26324388,0.00024738593,0.0039466443,0.001306031,0.00026136113,0.00006617413,0.000034423883,0.00010004893,0.7307941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892425,0.000004675284,0.00034474357,0.0008073584,0.000117985765,0.0000019066727,0.0000058820015,0.000003402913,0.009471537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946004,0.000009463834,0.00024003406,0.00014975283,0.000013349009,0.00012733602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997062,0.00003062829,0.0000793071,0.00013588522,0.000009032165,0.000038965205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044038906,0.000056890065,0.0001422083,0.00005501017,0.000047498193,0.000030942807,0.000089849666,0.00003857993,0.0018147844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058119487,0.000060917846,0.000054014898,0.000068195266,0.000016214073,0.00008561521,0.000006822801,0.000051335424,0.0022742297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032073985,0.000034582914,0.0051666624,0.0000020841892,0.0000041888857,5.9733725e-7,0.00005888995,0.0000062514305,0.0000151625,0.9921454,0.0023429082,0.00022003062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028005993,0.00007011663,0.09541112,0.00000691741,9.957162e-7,0.0000073954534,0.000050355437,0.0003002198,0.00016913611,0.8354315,0.068095066,0.00017708066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023478826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018422165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72599864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015449037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037869042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569494680","doi":"","title":"Welfare Criteria from Choice: The Sequential Solution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Choice function; Welfare; Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Neutrality; Relation (database); Universal set; Preference relation; Economics; Mathematics; Preference; Computer science; Microeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02440803035362145,"score_gpt":0.18815375820883615,"score_spread":0.16374572785521468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569494680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9095647,0.0093111135,0.0015083222,0.0024636057,0.0023368874,0.00020825776,0.00019051397,0.00012176698,0.07429486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916558,0.000016335362,0.00014917736,0.00011181146,0.00037871258,0.000008595356,0.00004508546,0.00001193495,0.007622509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.00007824422,0.00030422138,0.0003249932,0.00009514944,0.00024428318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914414,0.00004673301,0.00024865338,0.00033404428,0.00006326134,0.0001631562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045255528,0.00014886733,0.00021191778,0.00009207091,0.0027745762,0.00007424798,0.00032935475,0.00012657202,0.000112783506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009408954,0.00015037257,0.00012923357,0.00014448163,0.00015561604,0.00030580384,0.00014248326,0.0001593159,0.00034528846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065634685,0.00015999447,0.07587559,0.000025961675,0.0003191347,0.00027575088,0.02614677,0.0012426347,0.00168913,0.8867625,0.0061541153,0.0006920622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022575487,0.00020417862,0.07609499,0.000055886634,0.000072972034,0.0003042171,0.010748449,0.007854009,0.0013295625,0.024831932,0.8755848,0.0006614672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040833198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016580523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86943066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016999214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011841535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574316389","doi":"10.1007/s00199-015-0867-x","title":"Sharing the surplus in games with externalities within and across issues","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Axiom; Negotiation; Shapley value; Microeconomics; Public finance; Economics; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Game theory; Mathematics","score_opus":0.051546512206519984,"score_gpt":0.2590390413294311,"score_spread":0.20749252912291113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574316389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829335,0.0037647204,0.00009357404,0.00025634601,0.00044394445,0.00013989107,0.000034426397,0.0000342861,0.012299274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99085987,0.000031487605,0.000045487683,0.00011472803,0.00018445718,0.000022383674,0.0000015905065,0.000024614965,0.008715404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988521,0.00006507235,0.00045678054,0.00034441554,0.000015657077,0.00026598206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.00014072341,0.0002538634,0.00035269326,0.0000071978943,0.000066066474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590803,0.00014676299,0.0003358323,0.000066296125,0.000079777645,0.00017493316,0.00029396027,0.000055800363,0.000074461735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007464682,0.00011747918,0.000032222346,0.000041872914,0.00021276108,0.00025893244,0.000106133884,0.00014479696,0.00027915335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009426421,0.000009336948,0.15946545,0.0000149297575,0.000029598574,0.0000036367019,0.024240205,0.0006202894,9.492363e-7,0.8152499,0.000061913604,0.00020951468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013136591,0.00009869209,0.026223147,0.00008783907,0.000003368362,0.00006284532,0.024092825,0.0013965974,0.000101127756,0.9367887,0.009423759,0.0004074493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008434761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041979633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13324231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009759818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016926551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47906622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579694900","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8254","title":"Eliminating the Weakest Link: Making Manipulation Intractable?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development; Australian Government","keywords":"Voting; Veto; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Class (philosophy); Link (geometry); Anti-plurality voting; Theoretical computer science; Condorcet method; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14306801433395716,"score_gpt":0.28666344977243496,"score_spread":0.1435954354384778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579694900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79581153,0.00031234397,0.004794136,0.012543912,0.0017320049,0.00057139306,0.00002596064,0.00009175456,0.18411694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982811,0.000025283445,0.00028050473,0.0002037307,0.00023643227,0.000017139173,0.0000010564802,0.000018115528,0.0009366203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836713,0.000019384695,0.0008365241,0.0003838145,0.00010758809,0.0002855722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843156,0.00015555738,0.000812344,0.00025342306,0.00031398286,0.00003313539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364586,0.00016762328,0.00028983862,0.00007753955,0.0003231146,0.00026582068,0.00066336605,0.00009934367,0.00032129523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013346758,0.00013019396,0.00012775633,0.00047534858,0.00015418204,0.0002185412,0.0001534668,0.00035184552,0.00027323162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018110792,0.000046590438,0.00210384,0.000048433005,0.000015813219,3.8627408e-7,0.0012666958,0.00011078042,0.0038813357,0.9806694,0.000031974858,0.011806643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039822025,0.000082290324,0.0034987517,0.0005718248,0.00001880682,0.000018305922,0.0039087865,0.041162595,0.14478505,0.80411667,0.0014496077,0.00034751932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003413189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001588668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20246957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050366525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031006733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53091556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580842649","doi":"","title":"Cooperation and equity in the river sharing problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Negotiation; Equity (law); Function (biology); Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Profit sharing; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Natural resource economics; Computer science; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.04674849471159012,"score_gpt":0.25883128619154305,"score_spread":0.21208279147995293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580842649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63848525,0.00286043,0.06785657,0.0040594777,0.00023878508,0.0007896841,0.00006399707,0.00008846747,0.2855573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246836,0.00025304838,0.0038559579,0.000106323,0.000024877578,0.00004184273,0.00008925052,0.000018869616,0.00314147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975399,0.00094394136,0.00062564213,0.0005736924,0.000069215675,0.00024765264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770284,0.00054719043,0.00046402076,0.0010072418,0.00022679103,0.00005194157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019191325,0.00017591106,0.00029876744,0.00018872374,0.00020476818,0.00043209866,0.0008243848,0.00020439141,0.000052308023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063249865,0.00017653572,0.000071978866,0.00022848327,0.00014504751,0.00011924981,0.00093337736,0.0005229672,0.000054863965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004030523,0.00012161168,0.01935667,0.00013559945,0.000016315615,0.0000015856879,0.017678188,0.00007247245,0.000030209201,0.95843166,0.000084800726,0.0040668854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018233771,0.0000017256626,0.11583983,0.0041852873,0.000036498262,0.000036505662,0.0007290222,0.062462788,0.002219356,0.7722553,0.038880296,0.001529992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019751105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013218657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35398307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009092079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003142468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7198917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591525418","doi":"","title":"Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance under Responsive Priorities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Toulouse School of Economics; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Monotonic function; Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Resource allocation; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Resource (disambiguation); Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.011742405278199652,"score_gpt":0.17099736111430852,"score_spread":0.15925495583610888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591525418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948491,0.011419135,0.0103408005,0.0010223225,0.00067209173,0.00023642847,0.000032238237,0.0001525331,0.08127532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117393,0.00008198627,0.00038938023,0.000295966,0.000118649245,0.0000054202083,0.000012612936,0.000010015267,0.01791204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888533,0.00005126889,0.0003478163,0.00036449707,0.000083665465,0.00026742037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917597,0.00005714222,0.00027307126,0.00030201278,0.00007063865,0.00012117981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032557274,0.00016803475,0.00025273365,0.00019723109,0.0020407692,0.00004879472,0.00024004167,0.00013488834,0.00004679534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053832995,0.00021576326,0.00013097897,0.00021074912,0.0001164423,0.00037681896,0.00004482515,0.00014611092,0.00023003502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002714047,0.000079867794,0.0109967375,0.000015666976,0.000068953246,0.000114018825,0.0068022455,0.0018728217,0.0034057891,0.9748305,0.0002842709,0.0012576925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027830636,0.00048342426,0.62658346,0.00018719787,0.00007495524,0.0012307315,0.01558031,0.004843286,0.008101389,0.20827007,0.13029157,0.0015705545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021115053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019819173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76656044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017747158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001328239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602125406","doi":"10.1038/35047160","title":"An electoral butterfly effect","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Confusion; Spoilt vote; Voting; Mistake; Secret ballot; Political science; Presidential system; Presidential election; Column (typography); Contingent vote; Group voting ticket; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Telecommunications; Politics","score_opus":0.007218742189821375,"score_gpt":0.2260777342803046,"score_spread":0.2188589920904832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602125406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96351653,0.0014207796,0.000023813822,0.00014802352,0.0003872864,0.000096380325,0.000030995157,0.0000804049,0.034295775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487823,0.0000050661424,0.000044357792,0.00060592114,0.00034833848,0.0000059739345,0.0000142420595,0.000016705451,0.0040811435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.000035740002,0.00018316237,0.0002475836,0.000020863563,0.00019895278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995792,0.000029435181,0.00005974917,0.00026840376,0.000007064389,0.000056140678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051194854,0.00010112501,0.00021286597,0.000059913466,0.00006366248,0.000053562133,0.00019900728,0.00058334786,0.0020085748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027656448,0.00010128494,0.00006506422,0.00013060145,0.000016016696,0.0001370747,0.000004617859,0.0008284578,0.0021972656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032942995,0.0002655139,0.50374633,0.00013787215,0.00012977411,0.000036651276,0.0008612506,0.00020085994,0.0011775427,0.44110438,0.016199224,0.03581118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020042385,0.0012341872,0.1945534,0.000061532985,0.000014704042,0.00005779451,0.000014414788,0.001816563,0.0034984741,0.05095428,0.7447365,0.0010539328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037096124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056944896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72853726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024312301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032026956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607481898","doi":"","title":"Strategy-proof Preference Aggregation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indian Statistical Institute","keywords":"Preference; Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Monotonic function; Status quo; Set (abstract data type); Aggregation problem; Revealed preference; Computer science; Relation (database); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024605457295213202,"score_gpt":0.16969774176117491,"score_spread":0.1450922844659617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607481898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8251797,0.011857925,0.0017846347,0.000087269225,0.0006457329,0.00016228124,0.000036964553,0.00007713162,0.1601684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819052,0.000042290383,0.00017369376,0.000040760373,0.00017807243,0.00000958301,0.000016458556,0.000010565538,0.017623357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902606,0.000040430732,0.00029499366,0.00024767264,0.00007052906,0.00032028952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992275,0.000037131253,0.00026927647,0.0002500834,0.000038526177,0.00017748257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042076787,0.00014253762,0.00020069694,0.00013617458,0.0017230434,0.000034365796,0.0002022335,0.00012274334,0.00009862572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045234887,0.00017221445,0.00009995989,0.00016280804,0.000093549126,0.00055390765,0.00007209735,0.00013571316,0.00041252968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065199936,0.00011474048,0.18592562,0.00003290165,0.00006720282,0.000026117592,0.007087366,0.00060881954,0.00071038055,0.80375445,0.00023805916,0.0013691618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031634457,0.0003279594,0.62394446,0.0002602631,0.00010754737,0.0012630329,0.015475569,0.0053723576,0.023858802,0.052494675,0.27178654,0.0019453717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037184425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115673625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75125974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012204066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081561106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161601248","doi":"10.1007/bfb0006198","title":"Acceptable equilibria in dynamic bargaining games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in control and information sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Embodied cognition; Game theory; Repeated game; Bargaining problem; Sequential game; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01853985780306274,"score_gpt":0.22918072930534822,"score_spread":0.21064087150228547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161601248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005014021,0.006824873,0.020301966,0.0008399833,0.0004709166,0.00046311377,0.00010389699,0.000034049117,0.96594715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676543,0.00025067304,0.0002523155,0.0007269543,0.00007523982,0.000009228645,0.000011647345,0.000007729281,0.0019007709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998491,0.000013293289,0.00090599444,0.00024916648,0.00006822635,0.00027231834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989889,0.00027037557,0.00054250256,0.00013932741,0.000019931573,0.00003893788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645921,0.00020471189,0.00050703116,0.0007236087,0.00009164993,0.00024948962,0.00024241439,0.0002475593,0.00042567734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030770173,0.00019581121,0.000058830006,0.000130714,0.0001656504,0.0016550581,0.00004010893,0.00028147112,0.00019806268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041433163,0.000008694144,0.006974535,0.000071725364,0.000022850312,0.0000013241809,0.0024767048,0.007346067,0.000007956444,0.87054133,0.000017917944,0.11248948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020535616,0.00016938495,0.004614106,0.00039951643,0.0000075328767,0.000015737523,0.00007550789,0.23364766,0.00000584199,0.606276,0.151893,0.00084218004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057196656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001451497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99175143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074659736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000370406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79849494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652252935","doi":"10.65109/csfd9981","title":"Matchings with externalities and attitudes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Research Foundation; Sino-Danish Center; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017396759737642924,"score_gpt":0.18018600354401298,"score_spread":0.16278924380637005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652252935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230486,0.00030743572,0.0011215348,0.00021879112,0.000045195033,0.00007229436,0.0000026913954,0.00003520519,0.07514822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98102945,0.000009520434,0.0007841205,0.00018195834,0.00003363617,0.000012620088,4.1765355e-7,0.0000075787593,0.017940704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996044,0.0000044198555,0.00014783964,0.000129705,0.000009865366,0.00010377638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977636,0.000022393937,0.000063706735,0.00009626942,0.000007694095,0.000033584703],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017546678,0.000058478243,0.00013081219,0.00003735952,0.00004130768,0.00010430488,0.000056122033,0.000020574344,0.00097285066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074153418,0.000047515765,0.000012873244,0.000026129865,0.000037200443,0.00019242712,0.000017173646,0.00003586976,0.00078899483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001712346,0.000007850157,0.26695362,0.000024322133,0.000012989712,3.60892e-7,0.0004226503,0.0000012436467,0.000013842875,0.7322012,0.00019244065,0.0001677769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005164268,0.0001253536,0.65787476,0.00006424802,0.0000027275726,0.000042870663,0.0007181213,0.00022804178,0.00016141286,0.327579,0.01231121,0.00037584963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011146987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012336373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4046222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005889515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012643117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657709721","doi":"10.1029/2003wr002596","title":"Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flathead; Status quo; Conflict resolution; Conflict analysis; Compromise; Operations research; Drainage basin; Politics; Conflict management; Decision maker; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Fishery; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.10980903225742662,"score_gpt":0.31468045960861474,"score_spread":0.20487142735118813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1657709721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789202,0.0005099406,0.000058291942,0.0003231081,0.00007808564,0.0001818756,0.00007276656,0.000014974597,0.01984071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388975,0.00002469781,0.000020701744,0.000028688104,0.000052131865,0.000012007756,0.000006656512,0.000015012899,0.0059503797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835217,0.00015771894,0.00046658877,0.00030936798,0.00015334506,0.00056078617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900174,0.00008941634,0.00010830665,0.00064409286,0.0000735625,0.00008288169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739038,0.00009595839,0.00037224338,0.0006486366,0.00021385189,0.00006810181,0.0005341483,0.000082349754,0.00038626156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012199788,0.00006192334,0.00023554267,0.0009952871,0.00039808583,0.00006205464,0.00020775436,0.00028230963,0.00058520783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017694116,0.00032339897,0.56499016,0.00016332435,0.0022454576,0.000011547894,0.16638385,0.012175113,0.003341305,0.24947214,0.00023438454,0.00048237038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016522902,0.00024165004,0.28953025,0.00009090919,0.00009977955,0.0000035860503,0.0016372832,0.0013264386,0.018591218,0.058618233,0.6277353,0.00047303614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004063124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010543368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62750095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009454638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010151805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1688859996","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12026","title":"Economic Engineering and the Design of Matching Markets: The Contributions of Alvin E. Roth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Economics; Welfare; Key (lock); Human welfare; Industrial organization; Computer science; Market economy; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.013222687377341948,"score_gpt":0.18836405140116752,"score_spread":0.17514136402382557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1688859996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864966,0.0020507283,0.008986509,0.00077312667,0.00054604857,0.0003380372,0.00007662803,0.0000035232945,0.00072879205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881196,0.00045682315,0.00047475914,0.00003088582,0.00012415802,0.000007726959,6.1881923e-7,0.000015788368,0.000077262855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983887,0.000083687715,0.001217787,0.00011316658,0.000013794468,0.00018286274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736106,0.00069139677,0.0016055072,0.00023235733,0.00004565873,0.000064021064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033208958,0.0001265884,0.0006096294,0.00014556272,0.00008525965,0.00007109526,0.00036363112,0.00005937509,0.0001306632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017001471,0.00009085129,0.00017723521,0.000050390605,0.000200322,0.0002740823,0.000044960394,0.00018923247,0.00001968016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023578743,0.000036349473,0.011105525,0.0000737037,0.0005063651,8.111591e-7,0.0018992599,0.04858346,0.00016970476,0.9364318,0.00037500187,0.00058217946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010750013,0.00055590604,0.047305603,0.00073079823,0.00018110899,0.00053402944,0.0033449691,0.12059876,0.0028223014,0.8094025,0.0029252695,0.00084872305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001373738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026863936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12702934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000939423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032469245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3704808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689287262","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2492300","title":"How to Divide Things Fairly","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012120955479563801,"score_gpt":0.19115298891724428,"score_spread":0.17903203343768048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689287262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4608756,0.0027356553,0.48809725,0.011652561,0.0013296205,0.000223079,0.000007205534,0.000108363085,0.034970667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820442,0.00010154282,0.00012180746,0.0005124244,0.0006780523,0.0000044313633,8.9268104e-7,0.00002698973,0.016509667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768496,0.000051584768,0.00035465197,0.000247568,0.000048668717,0.0016125815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992819,0.000056201006,0.0002866242,0.0002232506,0.000028535229,0.00012348584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050454815,0.00013770338,0.00029603078,0.0001835413,0.00020214278,0.0002557213,0.00038598507,0.00007178874,0.000029627783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040048867,0.00014056942,0.00013095576,0.0001593752,0.000019807629,0.00036733953,0.000037117,0.00092207466,0.0006892742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009873474,0.000014456235,0.0035631561,0.00000429059,0.000045845452,4.014008e-7,0.0003156692,0.000017743443,0.00004502883,0.99137664,0.00020440754,0.0044025024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030885456,0.00027537218,0.00077423983,0.000016200147,0.0000042181396,0.00010454134,0.00032752345,0.000107260545,0.000036954163,0.88137466,0.116469406,0.00020079895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005786239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005586536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5211686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003639184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008163845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88594556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175472853","doi":"","title":"Coalitional bargaining with agent type uncertainty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Heuristic; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Bayesian game; Mathematical optimization; Type (biology); Game theory; Rational agent; Bargaining problem; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Repeated game","score_opus":0.19383407547535234,"score_gpt":0.31255340672183773,"score_spread":0.1187193312464854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175472853","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19332714,0.000056352128,0.41547355,0.0020620292,0.0033213976,0.00035151787,0.0001340658,0.00016766618,0.3851063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972762,0.000012548882,0.0007438844,0.00049081043,0.0003409546,0.000009470256,0.000040298488,0.0000184636,0.0010673762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982097,0.000025442281,0.0008149109,0.00046303734,0.00016034012,0.00032653115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988822,0.00014156412,0.0003561652,0.00023672295,0.00026437454,0.000118978125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014455075,0.00018984044,0.00025900928,0.00027159092,0.00011856635,0.0001495672,0.0003485866,0.000083705425,0.002692282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029653477,0.00018826887,0.00007623143,0.00021097153,0.00014626828,0.00014970473,0.000045352586,0.00024326364,0.003037014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002151084,0.00010903002,0.0010411432,0.000004172495,0.00004895692,0.000022810553,0.0004052453,0.0012670498,0.00040333217,0.9920643,0.000060377824,0.004358465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015078878,0.0005723448,0.0037350503,0.00026260733,0.0000068301565,0.00004733483,0.0018313073,0.029375723,0.009320608,0.9442916,0.009701954,0.00070383324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018648541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113248585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80394906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017087533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046358033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757855250","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdw044","title":"Optimal Voting Rules","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Incentive; Ex-ante; Economics; Class (philosophy); Microeconomics; Replicate; Welfare; Incentive compatibility; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Legislature; Computer science; Majority rule; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.07774187470052134,"score_gpt":0.29399880758031627,"score_spread":0.21625693287979492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757855250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18440315,0.78733075,0.00021795483,0.004783005,0.0008733988,0.00037697202,0.00010079119,0.00003756708,0.021876432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8344767,0.16306269,0.00016014634,0.0002680829,0.00022609415,0.00003595362,6.425604e-7,0.000016858558,0.0017528165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986781,0.000046878708,0.00086145476,0.00021513118,0.00001329271,0.00018513319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848264,0.00044252278,0.0007015511,0.00033061433,0.000020923124,0.000021733096],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023908303,0.0001279441,0.0007332103,0.0000419183,0.000087217086,0.0000070850083,0.00030212515,0.00002264279,0.00025684646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045541837,0.000073395146,0.00018355221,0.000035528272,0.00018331483,0.000091218266,0.000111177585,0.000041082658,0.002056244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005309974,0.000011089544,0.0038380513,0.001988467,0.00032046365,3.1398213e-7,0.00028045697,0.000007830947,0.000008118836,0.98484796,0.0040388615,0.0046530883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025437435,0.0004155539,0.010790176,0.058714226,0.00027333657,0.00007884754,0.0015918409,0.00024201446,0.0009278132,0.20266017,0.7197565,0.0020057652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000121027215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018995106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78218776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007170872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008617497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1769021826","doi":"","title":"A Recursive Logit Model for Routing Policy Choice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Logit; Econometrics; Mixed logit; Economics; Logistic regression; Routing (electronic design automation); Machine learning","score_opus":0.1857773199755309,"score_gpt":0.2996714897580311,"score_spread":0.1138941697825002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1769021826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097357,0.00032602774,0.5640697,0.0024548657,0.0005792768,0.00058724,0.00014348932,0.00017627561,0.33430612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725045,0.0000018506165,0.0024364586,0.00047709522,0.00036471756,0.000029862407,0.0000042572883,0.000017842145,0.02416341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913,0.000009226266,0.00034286833,0.00023928653,0.000015871703,0.00026273014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.00009260077,0.00019456907,0.00020066982,0.00004621981,0.00010100729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009326616,0.0000926506,0.00023493869,0.00011694691,0.000059346126,0.000045738354,0.00016446068,0.000072625546,0.000017168173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011691594,0.00009923829,0.000078026584,0.00012344478,0.000020399299,0.00013350949,0.00003256969,0.00005744605,0.00036187205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010307193,0.0000179537,0.0029365602,0.000009722237,0.000012910931,1.10420416e-7,0.0009983358,0.0020544117,0.0000022458346,0.991716,0.0020817416,0.00015969385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007639674,0.00006862419,0.00012608312,0.000011705595,0.000002726842,0.0000025032007,0.00028673903,0.3284617,0.000043891643,0.6543869,0.015628438,0.00021672057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044872455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024893323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009925812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038155154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46512535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809078280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2274167","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items: An Efficient, Envy-Free Algorithm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Algorithm; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.016125720317953212,"score_gpt":0.21679017247716528,"score_spread":0.20066445215921208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809078280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504504,0.0034730546,0.03973153,0.00016411353,0.00048650557,0.00024063756,0.000032330667,0.000040607407,0.0053808102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.00016507527,0.0005206987,0.00003330241,0.00026428688,0.000008330862,0.000006535042,0.00003546309,0.0013155326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972227,0.00009128571,0.00070310815,0.00032528257,0.00010038177,0.001557204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985641,0.0000614286,0.0007164001,0.000456217,0.000070258655,0.00013156503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037635134,0.00019606837,0.00044341848,0.00036219717,0.0002026837,0.000112876485,0.0006789896,0.00010779941,0.00024119743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012578414,0.00019529197,0.00017566993,0.00027549706,0.000062579944,0.00038396852,0.000057732388,0.0009785633,0.00042601104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001764083,0.00035665324,0.024961924,0.000027913122,0.0002149197,0.0000017410795,0.0015046006,0.0009091679,0.00034464514,0.940337,0.00016361855,0.031160163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035293563,0.0015827124,0.014038621,0.000105875944,0.000023024953,0.00022420996,0.0066236663,0.026629664,0.00043455051,0.9449686,0.001103337,0.00073638116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007009914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065363216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047200363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035271226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016457925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79637754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832659264","doi":"10.5555/2034396.2034526","title":"Social distance games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Stability (learning theory); Perspective (graphical); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.08985606472725295,"score_gpt":0.22419852035434082,"score_spread":0.13434245562708785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832659264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11879813,0.00020181111,0.008883688,0.00008782485,0.0002533809,0.000052401927,0.000011540591,0.00007554671,0.8716357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814405,0.000002915673,0.00026261565,0.00010416985,0.0001005244,0.0000059325253,9.671015e-7,0.000008735711,0.018073676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994559,0.000007666153,0.00022995348,0.00015515235,0.000009291868,0.00014199228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997423,0.000009596922,0.000103406426,0.00011269102,0.000006723632,0.000025279369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029751068,0.00005912224,0.00015186609,0.0000383978,0.00006476452,0.000015403055,0.00011961452,0.000040107992,0.0017170947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019926549,0.00006263241,0.000056146782,0.000068797875,0.000037033682,0.00008176525,0.000015995836,0.000045362252,0.0021039266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049265964,0.000020942849,0.025925707,0.0000061349347,0.000008374427,7.0470776e-7,0.0012710663,6.080341e-8,0.0000022426634,0.9713455,0.0012132836,0.00020108164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035805468,0.000043881006,0.07845764,0.0000071349655,0.0000025142285,0.0000032466733,0.0003838325,0.00010787248,0.0003138491,0.7509622,0.16902182,0.00033795898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082355866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008303919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86264235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013465235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002061311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837261747","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1371288","title":"Procedural Choice in Majoritarian Organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.009176513129897647,"score_gpt":0.210570211533956,"score_spread":0.20139369840405835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837261747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96633244,0.004024792,0.0069994307,0.005145186,0.0004637417,0.00020200372,0.0000062009494,0.00005994197,0.016766267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617994,0.00017451789,0.00004427489,0.00021990853,0.00030057787,0.0000015334181,0.000002873136,0.000013447346,0.003062909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981548,0.000023812283,0.00045247856,0.00017259603,0.000027764358,0.0011685402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995725,0.000020776157,0.00020561705,0.00011877725,0.00003252718,0.000049772312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015417753,0.00010038224,0.00020492854,0.00021537764,0.00013085172,0.000063577994,0.0002246385,0.00006769502,0.00007342345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002855162,0.00011145135,0.00004586533,0.00048857933,0.0000127092835,0.00023420335,0.000008275407,0.0008776244,0.0002502165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054878915,0.000053647036,0.045701884,0.0000022353795,0.000015231599,0.0000011613581,0.00020671342,0.00005751828,0.000023980536,0.9532988,0.000050497216,0.0005828381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006290586,0.00016999191,0.03829076,0.000016773405,0.0000030078188,0.00019341677,0.0003739239,0.00016684383,0.000012499776,0.95668256,0.0032813083,0.00017986877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118659744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006918564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029847521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054172124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028221606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45448542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1846071202","doi":"","title":"Elicitation and approximately stable matching with partial preferences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Stability (learning theory); Heuristic; Preference elicitation; Inverse; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Minimax; Mathematics; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Data mining; Machine learning","score_opus":0.032697189407766114,"score_gpt":0.19897700157150142,"score_spread":0.1662798121637353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1846071202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93483865,0.00010535053,0.009092914,0.0000913019,0.000052393752,0.00015399189,0.0000038089936,0.000040354713,0.05562126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636203,0.00000713802,0.0018735005,0.000048766025,0.000030051708,0.000032643416,0.0000025312142,0.000007148275,0.0016361801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948126,0.000010711815,0.0001956307,0.0001658638,0.000014787521,0.00013175697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997288,0.00003410385,0.000104437146,0.0000843358,0.000012652493,0.000035659137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027343823,0.00006473584,0.00013817701,0.000044731794,0.000065964734,0.00013231803,0.00004948464,0.000028664412,0.0004490276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012192252,0.000053042655,0.0000099561275,0.000053066073,0.000024473042,0.00031555616,0.000012670088,0.000041133935,0.00042182356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009782476,0.000023945702,0.067238785,0.0000515067,0.000022123319,2.0997503e-7,0.001560441,0.00006217154,0.00009436423,0.92971325,0.00013408215,0.0010893344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010385296,0.00032150332,0.10123739,0.00007777051,0.00000819504,0.000014505975,0.003863113,0.01163318,0.0011977867,0.87444067,0.0055199848,0.0006473589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010695833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015182862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061523415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068904833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000288414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54218286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868837168","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_19","title":"Network Bargaining: Using Approximate Blocking Sets to Stabilize Unstable Instances","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Extension (predicate logic); Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Independent set; Nash equilibrium; Bargaining problem; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.0607029547653649,"score_gpt":0.2469232900001583,"score_spread":0.18622033523479342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868837168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005195907,0.0041728625,0.9701079,0.00007895785,0.0027064914,0.00047982403,0.000029075041,0.0000850388,0.01714396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92846256,0.00002061248,0.06961376,0.00063336367,0.00097123143,0.000006646067,0.0000037158832,0.00006055327,0.00022753784],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969055,0.000024761324,0.00085269933,0.0010878629,0.0001535595,0.00097558624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981448,0.0002695563,0.0005914177,0.0007340551,0.0000668058,0.00019333062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030383917,0.00043946618,0.00084101135,0.0005395079,0.00033643964,0.0003156048,0.00096605107,0.0002741108,0.00009953627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118965036,0.00047866473,0.0001029073,0.0005422077,0.0002858264,0.0003530846,0.00045932762,0.000515156,0.00009245877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002687097,0.00003845957,0.006140079,0.0001613513,0.000038868915,0.00001814306,0.004150604,0.54077166,0.000057173405,0.41162634,0.000022171955,0.03694829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030737877,0.00011867744,0.00010134223,0.0011510387,0.00001130979,0.000039581428,0.000003022689,0.22231893,0.00014528462,0.7663086,0.0081585925,0.0013362599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005019721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032644322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92326665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036460397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010157318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887821823","doi":"10.1111/ncmr.12063","title":"Done But Not Published: The Dissertation Journeys of Roy J. Lewicki and J. Keith Murnighan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; SPARK (programming language); Generative grammar; Path (computing); Association (psychology); Editorial board; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.141387493744458,"score_gpt":0.33378327879456476,"score_spread":0.19239578505010677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1887821823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90638095,0.0008995908,0.0011461565,0.0033849785,0.00018562924,0.00053502416,0.000010419818,0.000023392635,0.08743386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889389,0.0002443581,0.000051238476,0.000105668114,0.000060996084,0.000029052326,0.000010681373,0.000010333504,0.010548749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988125,0.00013667351,0.00040278817,0.00026397922,0.00015810932,0.0002259764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991727,0.00012731468,0.00019927246,0.00026270346,0.00013542396,0.00010260388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666005,0.00008903909,0.00019190037,0.0003244365,0.00018221086,0.00029565766,0.00019474003,0.000053202486,0.0000703037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023518053,0.00007389749,0.00002744006,0.0003102127,0.0001170589,0.0002952439,0.000108266424,0.00017660226,0.000053576794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007798678,0.000059192418,0.0319445,0.000115456765,0.00007960187,0.0000016885584,0.0048320694,0.000027627482,0.000052626798,0.957076,0.0016656565,0.004067554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005056111,0.0006741318,0.6422409,0.00015579406,0.000042092208,0.000012382422,0.028985264,0.015969425,0.0010185173,0.067188315,0.2380265,0.000630572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004641708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038863225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88988775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003127588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011020907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30134523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897420762","doi":"","title":"Coalitional affinity games and the stability gap","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Bounded function; Welfare; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Social Welfare; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06042044004555721,"score_gpt":0.22289177964980164,"score_spread":0.16247133960424442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897420762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.706855,0.00065443397,0.0015474996,0.004177365,0.00014221547,0.00016894595,0.000040007104,0.00004723073,0.28636733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998037,0.000016974496,0.0000940208,0.0006904694,0.00006427566,0.0000043589725,0.0000023163225,0.0000025144932,0.0010880649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.00004529378,0.00026505356,0.00016714976,0.000015266667,0.00011367187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.00018702017,0.000091452705,0.0001811885,0.000011837351,0.00003213467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017473632,0.00006207236,0.00018429419,0.000023770772,0.000093990806,0.000050611714,0.000086277025,0.000033684355,0.00070238154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001821016,0.000045437308,0.000049181876,0.000053821143,0.00012296689,0.0000760099,0.000015119818,0.000070550945,0.00014616796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025770918,0.00002369259,0.009863279,0.0000042205866,0.000005593207,1.2602356e-7,0.00026316772,0.0000013215401,0.0000031771149,0.98940694,0.00024692368,0.00015578567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078481407,0.000031564316,0.077961095,0.0000037203204,0.0000018309711,0.000004626898,0.0001740289,0.0005086213,0.000050261307,0.9153294,0.005051888,0.000098147524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071477116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008379616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.291182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012317022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043507002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7690585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1913567289","doi":"10.1007/s00291-015-0413-z","title":"Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OR Spectrum","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Blocking (statistics); Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Power (physics); Operations research; Business; Industrial organization; Computer network; Process (computing); Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02700309089256899,"score_gpt":0.22783416986780383,"score_spread":0.20083107897523483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913567289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96983594,0.00037840835,0.00023236411,0.00029071554,0.00034316466,0.00013173294,0.000056352466,0.000018241537,0.028713113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992615,0.000008486373,0.00017482898,0.000032078296,0.000035356836,0.0000059642607,0.0000027317462,0.000007957461,0.0004711143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941945,0.000015937232,0.0002438563,0.00017754044,0.000016827082,0.00012638164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971294,0.000028602533,0.00012532945,0.00007385187,0.00001204176,0.000047231533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003240831,0.00006969679,0.00019270026,0.00010633886,0.000024501305,0.00002755764,0.000042620184,0.000044416705,0.00009258596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053558546,0.00007127171,0.000012997746,0.00021790591,0.00004594141,0.000119841236,0.000003796026,0.00006864575,0.00005291884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009782856,0.000021955399,0.20033371,0.000007702012,0.0000152324055,0.000016405233,0.009283357,0.000037233134,0.000008305635,0.790034,0.00008368773,0.0000605752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054797996,0.0007507221,0.32737556,0.00013347222,0.000010479367,0.000047186466,0.021324681,0.00067711686,0.0008904143,0.6101723,0.032273896,0.0008643842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013402323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039483892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1798617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004881746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021606098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29063758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953722872","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8240","title":"A Dynamic Rationalization of Distance Rationalizability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Voting; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Majority rule; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Preference; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.07806209102858844,"score_gpt":0.27495162629295317,"score_spread":0.19688953526436473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953722872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85229075,0.00035116155,0.08449681,0.003521,0.0008840345,0.00056704495,0.00018223154,0.000047179918,0.05765979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853677,0.000023113034,0.0004159664,0.00005245723,0.000021388998,0.0000136207545,0.0000048991415,0.000008174453,0.00092359254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986476,0.0000145557015,0.0008118048,0.00030089956,0.000097087046,0.00012808359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849623,0.000076200486,0.00069340185,0.00017992225,0.0005260436,0.000028214119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006997287,0.00010653783,0.00027264445,0.00005891653,0.00008784259,0.00004866086,0.00033320254,0.000060876308,0.00043151347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010380157,0.000100597346,0.0001078738,0.000422278,0.00019415148,0.00015717602,0.000059054386,0.000098397344,0.00005915351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030484714,0.00011841032,0.003958209,0.00008494323,0.000012808438,6.063323e-8,0.0005114279,0.00013178385,0.0070353015,0.9875377,0.00002470311,0.0005542093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027059345,0.00003894367,0.0016095937,0.00013915512,0.000004808675,0.000001586327,0.00037046167,0.023137245,0.12716585,0.8470461,0.00033791355,0.0001213043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016031065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014483472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14624605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044716064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053698393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.472477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958846608","doi":"","title":"Élections expérimentales : la désertion stratégique et la participation sous différents modes de scrutin","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031372251043978734,"score_gpt":0.3047383116265234,"score_spread":0.27336606058254465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958846608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85867226,0.0010035395,0.014548757,0.00007617127,0.0011213373,0.00037256684,0.00012831464,0.000097379634,0.12397968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96738416,0.00023503632,0.0007125143,0.00005337874,0.00024346242,0.00022469986,0.00070672034,0.00007241196,0.03036762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970711,0.000641416,0.0011443225,0.0005146728,0.00007118583,0.0005573151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981456,0.00038883023,0.00094138685,0.000298232,0.00005658934,0.00016938226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025118273,0.00038910465,0.00060828007,0.00028631164,0.0003156513,0.00025803022,0.00019520924,0.0007362382,0.0006920639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023039647,0.00048935105,0.00026454293,0.00021580656,0.00008196886,0.00048012342,0.000027758419,0.0005043001,0.0005301933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009554227,0.0010390063,0.15972836,0.00038834472,0.00021231877,0.0000022202057,0.010911126,0.0035279847,0.0022955523,0.8189563,0.00010875909,0.0027344767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013668718,0.00021982931,0.9036304,0.00075686746,0.00020651461,0.000037251077,0.0070840297,0.03012249,0.010686535,0.036896188,0.0075252657,0.0014677534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023466335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016744691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78206015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008070291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959050181","doi":"","title":"Dominating sets with at most k components","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.022151674382142696,"score_gpt":0.21251705296260207,"score_spread":0.19036537858045938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959050181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619966,0.0003395951,0.000018791876,0.00025364113,0.000733671,0.0001531914,0.000020477835,0.000071728005,0.03641229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970512,0.0000067964806,0.0002735011,0.0001398563,0.000022074542,0.000015115835,0.000014684927,0.000030396091,0.0024463963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989007,0.000028128694,0.0004054198,0.00031743155,0.000047231664,0.0003010571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919254,0.00008125006,0.0002945448,0.000317389,0.000026602616,0.000087650114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058277854,0.00015391874,0.00031822865,0.00009247069,0.00019556786,0.00004926721,0.00021795217,0.00007280416,0.00020538364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049612016,0.00016178835,0.000047342157,0.00018296341,0.00005040329,0.00017791876,0.00007466206,0.00012629834,0.0018220098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003228664,0.00010182915,0.08361212,0.000019623667,0.000039773,0.000005398411,0.0006912311,0.00005828938,0.00011894307,0.9140888,0.0008313621,0.00040035514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011918112,0.0006395814,0.12252576,0.00039274356,0.000034726618,0.00015004276,0.0004098977,0.009309863,0.0038349251,0.7172712,0.13136865,0.0021444801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065904416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013065897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19681756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016250121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006667356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964249253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0645-z","title":"Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University; Lunds Universitet; Concordia University","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Best response; Outcome (game theory); Epsilon-equilibrium; Interpretation (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03412768288190568,"score_gpt":0.2646568772223437,"score_spread":0.23052919434043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964249253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982616,0.0011720937,0.00071548094,0.0035945026,0.0009956005,0.00040040154,0.0006394118,0.00009037559,0.009776144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479556,0.000050709656,0.0007601225,0.0010527575,0.0011865372,0.00008401157,0.00011632802,0.000044099714,0.0019098851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830115,0.00007789745,0.00051774393,0.00035678656,0.00007994061,0.0006664662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.000038992723,0.0002271788,0.00020112366,0.000033414675,0.00027391285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009953765,0.00024064693,0.0005184969,0.00013902878,0.0006517708,0.00013608704,0.00017530048,0.00016106364,0.001744827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008573776,0.00026311076,0.00013482619,0.0001345608,0.000027871247,0.00025916248,0.00011710605,0.00012632887,0.0007414027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016363621,0.00004721308,0.0051458427,0.00004574574,0.000073440955,0.0000017174758,0.0033375053,0.0000027001822,0.00018071887,0.9892288,0.0012714395,0.000648526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023393717,0.0001270378,0.02903099,0.000026721815,0.000037176083,0.000011451192,0.0016819799,0.000043147524,0.00078732846,0.20094368,0.7639641,0.0010070091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022157237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012987286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000903338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012410826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964733860","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.004","title":"On the coincidence of the prenucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Shapley value; Coincidence; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Game theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.08175354098697378,"score_gpt":0.2442883157406177,"score_spread":0.16253477475364392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964733860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92727906,0.00012747997,0.00022738997,0.0059998757,0.000090529706,0.00021030774,0.0000055293003,0.0000083250425,0.06605151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991091,0.000006318565,0.000033962973,0.00034391912,0.00004545021,0.000009740458,2.150403e-8,0.0000027347116,0.00044877725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926585,0.00009808192,0.0002716174,0.00013239194,0.00009389525,0.0001381547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985741,0.0010597777,0.00021222359,0.00013025156,0.000009340584,0.000014330526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027744705,0.00006025305,0.0001911759,0.000013197919,0.00094329275,0.000040029332,0.00048339218,0.000031887692,0.00012404675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010967262,0.000025952837,0.00007950137,0.00021969939,0.0025797533,0.000044952732,0.00008711058,0.00008714949,0.00006799336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037352781,0.000014180345,0.0008154252,0.000007775933,0.000004335969,1.0847084e-7,0.0037537778,0.0000053809085,0.0000025294344,0.9951874,0.0001790885,0.000026285565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012526543,0.000021051756,0.0071018157,0.00002208217,0.0000026287116,0.000006554161,0.00035105657,0.0021496702,0.000033422697,0.9899414,0.00019734715,0.000047682868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006653254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030517451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07183003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010009553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012513666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964891449","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.006","title":"Von Neumann–Morgenstern stable sets in matching problems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Distributive lattice; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Independent set; Lattice (music); Stable marriage problem; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Graph; Physics","score_opus":0.020797984713695847,"score_gpt":0.21480625746833512,"score_spread":0.19400827275463928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964891449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658558,0.001840894,0.00097207347,0.00012665511,0.0013270194,0.00011654701,0.00002557756,0.000013337491,0.029722106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967026,0.000036279034,0.00015358577,0.00006202563,0.00036782643,0.0000028120112,0.000002179731,0.00003236259,0.0026403198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780416,0.00009299187,0.0015479639,0.00021394729,0.000024150078,0.00031680992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817103,0.00015963546,0.0013704982,0.00022020085,0.00001697139,0.000061672225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044178497,0.00016295945,0.0005998366,0.00041268195,0.00005633593,0.000092125796,0.00032329722,0.00009610749,0.00039953634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033631488,0.0001758476,0.00017840767,0.000067622954,0.00004241787,0.00047379304,0.000040427654,0.00027974127,0.0004623095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237825,0.00010616831,0.075000055,0.000063113504,0.000056755198,0.000021885302,0.0009120975,0.022274524,0.00018825062,0.90041125,0.0004908569,0.0004026537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010116182,0.00007625564,0.014159805,0.00012325872,0.0000063781586,0.00011447435,0.0003079488,0.00048014458,0.00011790152,0.97508556,0.008257055,0.00025962738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002554521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010212367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07467427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026422023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003411865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7170857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967607367","doi":"10.1086/319550","title":"Competitive Fair Division","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Proxy bid; Pareto principle; Vickrey auction; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Monotonic function; Common value auction; Set (abstract data type); Auction theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Operations management; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.029476299445128192,"score_gpt":0.2426873438941583,"score_spread":0.2132110444490301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967607367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1983155,0.00029442844,0.005659983,0.0027264263,0.0006172148,0.00006418201,0.000015617172,0.00001290568,0.7922937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975631,0.0000062107056,0.00020542687,0.0007561393,0.000531139,0.0000011062252,8.552052e-7,0.000012391072,0.0009235809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856305,0.000032394208,0.00090505247,0.00013478695,0.000023489632,0.0003412416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.00017724327,0.00048199983,0.00013850076,0.00006362381,0.00024296358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008935495,0.00010407808,0.0004478912,0.00018605331,0.000052626707,0.000059834696,0.00021002715,0.00007071845,0.00075751985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017251931,0.00010360227,0.00020247238,0.000074228046,0.00007936578,0.00029110318,0.000031980893,0.0002112758,0.0007634561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012886749,0.00006263204,0.020461477,0.000009806414,0.00003412887,0.000021180847,0.00006232525,0.0000069032903,0.0000028442798,0.97897446,0.00024497975,0.00010637771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006793853,0.0002237017,0.019254196,0.00004835261,0.0000060909324,0.00021659088,0.0003537058,0.00015554325,0.000057537753,0.6544081,0.32442832,0.00016845443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021765813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014666115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7992476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012360753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022902357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968974820","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9121-2","title":"Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bankruptcy; Dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Soviet union; Political science; Geography; Economics; Economy; Business; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05737976568253775,"score_gpt":0.22870524752469656,"score_spread":0.17132548184215882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968974820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8298036,0.0013450732,0.16452111,0.0003614463,0.00047001638,0.00016537214,0.000016238677,0.000047610163,0.0032695422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985238,0.0002161203,0.00048102718,0.00028212307,0.00014811006,0.000011275772,0.000012188313,0.000013056657,0.00031230558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990688,0.00003212457,0.0004354047,0.0002539399,0.000051626677,0.00015811466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.00014420244,0.00012574959,0.00025048657,0.000026749522,0.000057809728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068711356,0.00009993658,0.00017359355,0.00011967411,0.0005255104,0.00006054624,0.00012530436,0.0000736784,0.00009302425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019948694,0.00008393724,0.00006310292,0.00020241739,0.000037422527,0.00023691828,0.00003542018,0.000110725676,0.0003408851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740556,0.00010669104,0.10454014,0.0000149496145,0.000035932597,0.000006116936,0.005316376,0.007295749,0.000046749297,0.8688224,0.0016464896,0.01211103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010776819,0.00009071741,0.12512448,0.0000355796,0.000009700085,0.000112168455,0.00044212447,0.7211161,0.000015962094,0.1366349,0.014964914,0.00037563386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018454027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005058227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73218745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029737248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060321104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4381502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971335524","doi":"10.1006/jeth.2001.2829","title":"Strategy-Proof Probabilistic Decision Schemes for One-Dimensional Single-Peaked Preferences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Class (philosophy); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Characterization (materials science); Probability distribution; Line (geometry); Mathematical economics; Expected value; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10752046308379212,"score_gpt":0.2496006682829871,"score_spread":0.14208020519919498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971335524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97888184,0.0031189618,0.006269342,0.00013744393,0.0013236305,0.0003154583,0.00007739607,0.000017219629,0.009858738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962529,0.000022968827,0.001777415,0.000057596586,0.00050044735,0.000009723709,0.000002239669,0.000028375684,0.0013483313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978886,0.000067029316,0.001438463,0.0002857797,0.000039581584,0.00028050115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971878,0.000896679,0.0014655979,0.00025726427,0.00007266408,0.00012001673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921018,0.000186938,0.00064955244,0.00025562235,0.000110323774,0.00010686626,0.00039130214,0.00012608555,0.0015915676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058970787,0.00018283082,0.00028655317,0.00005349976,0.000103957194,0.00038963297,0.0000345652,0.00018967762,0.00028156824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003382091,0.00036139728,0.0011444245,0.00007624002,0.00023283073,0.0000026670832,0.00031773385,0.0030586228,0.0001807257,0.9775958,0.0012191453,0.015472169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013415385,0.000619141,0.00037239987,0.00015120023,0.000026379304,0.00005332008,0.00012311683,0.0034683596,0.00042243334,0.9845664,0.0085810395,0.00027469857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025158906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042498414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01737109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001826659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003218155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973245383","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2012.04.005","title":"Choosing the best among peers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.027247813925103392,"score_gpt":0.2297254077473563,"score_spread":0.20247759382225292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973245383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79731816,0.00021210601,0.14573874,0.00047592644,0.0016162536,0.00012642195,0.0000032322364,0.000052634587,0.054456536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979633,0.0000018582159,0.0012051492,0.00026947923,0.00045974544,0.0000041441895,2.8205645e-7,0.00000867595,0.00008737769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.000043831093,0.00028617456,0.00026966454,0.00008236134,0.0005427827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991068,0.00016399557,0.000109843255,0.000420712,0.000026776761,0.00017184694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004544037,0.000104417166,0.0001708461,0.00008970795,0.00046146513,0.00020743997,0.0007627077,0.00003696881,0.00014701454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014944881,0.0000774022,0.00005979261,0.00043193492,0.0026110485,0.00041384692,0.00020790218,0.00016353595,0.0010774795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016668668,0.000026102052,0.02756486,0.0000030935917,0.0000028545535,2.6751476e-7,0.0008399918,0.000025959305,0.000011786302,0.9707042,0.00002349837,0.0007956975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000444381,0.00019461878,0.099094875,0.00009274422,0.0000135252585,0.00006276412,0.00041471273,0.101582535,0.0011770236,0.7908248,0.005285302,0.00081274007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013950895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.0530703e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20064513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043469416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008754475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973794372","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.01.002","title":"Network flow problems and permutationally concave games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Concave function; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Function (biology); Order (exchange); Flow network; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06490588326263746,"score_gpt":0.26044456421553025,"score_spread":0.19553868095289278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973794372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5276614,0.0010637193,0.0221264,0.0059532085,0.00027244733,0.00043678473,0.000021113327,0.0001245564,0.4423404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968899,0.0000034007624,0.0019594105,0.00044038607,0.00021468512,0.000006166006,8.0073465e-7,0.0000030868457,0.0004821631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918747,0.000021926198,0.0002993668,0.00020552448,0.000055519457,0.00023019924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996577,0.0001202865,0.00012817839,0.000042432464,0.000011694517,0.000039717583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013616042,0.000075294825,0.00022639103,0.000028555643,0.0003785894,0.00014182081,0.00013216244,0.000051638126,0.00020964714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014139926,0.0000672039,0.00003988588,0.00018803922,0.00026742136,0.00011820412,0.000017538132,0.000055805387,0.0001672853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8316654e-7,0.00002082007,0.0008152022,0.000012903053,0.0000034994687,3.258438e-7,0.001820545,0.00006718521,0.0000036218798,0.9962341,0.00028001604,0.00074085285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008631278,0.000059439022,0.007094913,0.000017130335,0.000001889389,0.0000031082322,0.00015682248,0.004423079,0.0000014692915,0.98667526,0.001379837,0.00010074521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059437752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014616186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46922854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015102761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000819262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2911842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974429698","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0815","title":"Epsilon Cores of Games with Limited Side Payments: Nonemptiness and Equal Treatment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Parameterized complexity; Mathematical economics; Payment; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Finance","score_opus":0.04175621839172083,"score_gpt":0.23870608914174649,"score_spread":0.19694987075002565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974429698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959164,0.0013856133,0.00006059593,0.000081020444,0.00016079945,0.00027817037,0.00013343488,0.000026504096,0.001957458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733144,0.00078619557,0.0001791915,0.000028679544,0.000052970645,0.00006779668,0.000016338843,0.00002538459,0.001512021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987824,0.000015782534,0.00053358136,0.00040055145,0.000015151742,0.0002525168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922985,0.00005792826,0.00035936857,0.00024410791,0.000011260788,0.000097504526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000225663,0.00021077195,0.0005529342,0.00013473655,0.00006842571,0.000060700295,0.000083556006,0.00008299016,0.00016074875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075111766,0.00019030861,0.000055723638,0.00004662294,0.00013793599,0.00016494849,0.000035483106,0.000054275773,0.000046372912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013840616,0.00017312274,0.9745534,0.000034821496,0.00007503488,0.000011047436,0.00076329306,0.00004121433,0.0000944015,0.013873822,0.00002636312,0.010215047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004863489,0.0017068016,0.9719652,0.00013913676,0.00015267891,0.00022767438,0.0014534809,0.00096782,0.000718792,0.0017936096,0.015149396,0.0008619305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092249335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017399278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015123032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063545354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012024811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976804489","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0512-3","title":"Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on the political economy of elections and bargaining","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Social policy; Market economy; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.014507229064009367,"score_gpt":0.2331889889553596,"score_spread":0.21868175989135025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976804489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37453836,0.000055000375,0.00002364133,0.36088353,0.016017428,0.00042723742,0.000110163855,0.00003440356,0.24791022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82431084,8.803515e-7,0.0000036941713,0.00048588662,0.17500392,0.0000112684775,0.0000024331284,0.000007053701,0.000174032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941003,0.000027039958,0.0002011795,0.00017743566,0.000019163663,0.00016515238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996146,0.000109152585,0.00008837783,0.00011805432,0.000024865349,0.000044936976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004531575,0.00007495782,0.00015002248,0.000047809175,0.0005403292,0.000060848994,0.00008918365,0.0000762499,0.00019505943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025022775,0.00005742789,0.00003606391,0.000096724914,0.00010388811,0.000061459665,0.000028787532,0.00023036485,0.000046793008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004583674,0.000011791336,0.0036734552,0.0000058726464,0.000012961859,4.1907594e-8,0.0007439847,2.8037567e-7,0.000011834106,0.97338456,0.021888517,0.00026210546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091736765,0.000049708335,0.015472876,0.0000025091895,0.0000049759165,0.0000016876535,0.0013568565,0.000006414586,0.000055507015,0.036275927,0.9466064,0.00007541056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001683359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010109989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93710864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014348681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005673109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977736172","doi":"10.1145/2229012.2229068","title":"Matching models for preference-sensitive group purchasing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Matching (statistics); Group (periodic table); Purchasing; Computer science; Statistics; Business; Mathematics; Marketing; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12564179848036605,"score_gpt":0.2434993389190268,"score_spread":0.11785754043866076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977736172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31953272,0.00024675328,0.57266617,0.00005558611,0.00052153744,0.0002468161,0.00003916835,0.00006628961,0.10662494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920711,0.0000048838206,0.005210261,0.00012725801,0.00027356818,0.00002718388,0.000008794667,0.00002006983,0.002256863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999129,0.000015425283,0.00031663704,0.000185362,0.000015553425,0.00033799527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995014,0.000110468194,0.00014913578,0.00015257148,0.000014756185,0.00007168735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010755964,0.00010013607,0.00023386203,0.00008083506,0.00011030621,0.00004450665,0.00008704073,0.000065494794,0.000056880956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027962751,0.000104851344,0.00008121752,0.000057935347,0.000018089468,0.00045817392,0.000028721335,0.00006612388,0.0002363346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010749838,0.00003141678,0.00089125347,0.000023159051,0.000018542834,6.843739e-8,0.0022196183,0.00015507954,0.000053664116,0.99607706,0.000050258906,0.0004691073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047042617,0.000052364892,0.0011768838,0.000037038895,0.000006220652,0.000008150149,0.0012393331,0.013751566,0.00039399433,0.97726154,0.005251003,0.00035146638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012323745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053959093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6725384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037694368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024760736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979199119","doi":"10.1177/1465116508095146","title":"Legislative Bargaining in the European Union","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Union Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Legislation; Legislature; Voting; European union; Commission; Member state; Bargaining power; Political science; Member states; Law and economics; Stability and Growth Pact; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.06315036859901381,"score_gpt":0.2287019232533354,"score_spread":0.1655515546543216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979199119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15120399,0.00019277057,0.00310347,0.0003322883,0.00026445204,0.00011125755,0.00002843523,0.000059306425,0.84470403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925532,0.000038206334,0.0000950383,0.00052618707,0.00049724354,0.0000011670633,0.000019302188,0.000051595398,0.006218078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579835,0.002870091,0.0006038668,0.00029048772,0.000051062918,0.00038614564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907994,0.00014371256,0.00024908787,0.00043601773,0.000023141614,0.00006811263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007860776,0.00016039777,0.00021736427,0.00019672383,0.00024881473,0.000052581934,0.00044294613,0.000027339991,0.000040610536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024063773,0.00014927122,0.00007517325,0.00027417703,0.00013265973,0.00014428826,0.000080778096,0.00029508307,0.001833933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010658526,0.00006239705,0.027094027,0.000008576878,0.000011866744,0.00012548175,0.014395794,0.000116995434,0.000009316809,0.95663774,0.0011451197,0.00039162478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011293659,0.00016300136,0.5156184,0.000098257704,0.0000054029842,0.0001692149,0.0018853227,0.00032722822,0.000027175498,0.028498758,0.45150268,0.00057518884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013660046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050657195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005223304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009997466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979750001","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2004.09.004","title":"A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise—why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Disapproval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Stability (learning theory); Margin (machine learning); Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Econometrics; Ranked voting system; Bullet voting; Probabilistic logic; Statistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08906049420113245,"score_gpt":0.2904039379392588,"score_spread":0.20134344373812635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979750001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873297,0.00024692123,0.010535465,0.00055025046,0.0001519166,0.00021034096,0.00020681629,0.000068384936,0.0007001602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828225,0.000013150818,0.00068608887,0.0005889583,0.00020990019,0.000024992838,0.000045066292,0.00001988666,0.00012969108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980229,0.000064997024,0.00070149516,0.0007058987,0.000138024,0.00036667843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913,0.00006479135,0.00028675562,0.00025564374,0.00013614258,0.0001266545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011608355,0.00021290165,0.00042471124,0.000364997,0.00037855114,0.00012895714,0.0001914484,0.00010960053,0.00010832781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002316634,0.0002418086,0.00016631401,0.0010724775,0.00012715749,0.00030415115,0.00003139942,0.00018913107,0.000065405664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011094705,0.0004191026,0.09034716,0.000023476101,0.00028848884,0.0000040477394,0.001285996,0.0108635565,0.0011837161,0.8950493,0.00007613174,0.0003480781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054574525,0.0011946777,0.047472052,0.0001542993,0.00019382696,0.000021073623,0.0023834158,0.32629636,0.12625371,0.48591956,0.006925303,0.0026399759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014963412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011079982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40912974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024160685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055804074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980974411","doi":"10.1007/s13209-011-0038-7","title":"A characterization of the uniform rule without Pareto-optimality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SERIEs","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Monotonic function; Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.043528481413868315,"score_gpt":0.19606570792009118,"score_spread":0.15253722650622287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980974411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660709,0.000021835442,0.00036976192,0.0000550674,0.0002960042,0.00008966656,0.00006981301,0.000018951374,0.033008024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976306,0.0000067678857,0.000105507184,0.000030195493,0.00002807997,0.0000064601604,0.0000046600985,0.0000070342007,0.0021807083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995165,0.000016490709,0.00026463153,0.000098924735,0.000013971965,0.00008950492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.000004668146,0.00026974542,0.000227948,0.000016818629,0.000014826393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003398523,0.000055990415,0.00015421114,0.000023974993,0.000056889556,0.000010028225,0.00013625243,0.00003760915,0.00016461134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003612521,0.000045790428,0.00004575132,0.00008559719,0.000076919874,0.00017359636,0.000031734508,0.000041922773,0.000064308246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002577752,0.000023054054,0.4534334,0.00003854778,0.000015411437,1.0768998e-7,0.0031641452,5.857693e-7,0.0012324263,0.5420039,0.0000040107757,0.000058601592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016038863,0.000052133393,0.90506315,0.000032487605,0.000004768259,0.0000041528383,0.0003609055,0.0000470357,0.022117667,0.06693839,0.00507571,0.00014321537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009666161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014698921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47506556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009847736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063771863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18672794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981628825","doi":"10.2202/1534-5963.1272","title":"Choice under Limited Uncertainty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Property (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Intuition; Probability distribution; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Psychology","score_opus":0.011467347122549248,"score_gpt":0.2255307684801177,"score_spread":0.21406342135756845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981628825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700988,0.003330754,0.0052029025,0.00067203416,0.0010414921,0.00024028505,0.00007903978,0.000092169685,0.28835335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982198,0.00025403954,0.00035202943,0.00041483215,0.00028031933,0.000025511541,0.000021883636,0.000033960187,0.0003976087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980879,0.00004445893,0.00088415295,0.0005094558,0.0000180804,0.00045594558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869126,0.0005656143,0.0002691424,0.0003880682,0.0000144836795,0.00007142743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000825501,0.00020731385,0.00048308758,0.00017339792,0.00006833539,0.000063291496,0.00033349855,0.00014763838,0.0005355506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020625717,0.00023685634,0.00011287003,0.00018334867,0.00045544995,0.00036907755,0.000059725928,0.00022142808,0.00060222385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026136287,0.0000710731,0.013539845,0.000014880724,0.000007120344,0.0000012825574,0.000028326202,0.024789257,0.0000040910804,0.9610684,0.000023306231,0.0004262756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057541026,0.000038389997,0.0034658683,0.000020097892,0.0000024540639,0.0000043797418,0.000054644923,0.007079913,0.000054348424,0.9518991,0.036503974,0.00030140558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011276818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012689826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29723182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018816441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012329336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96587217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982865661","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.003","title":"Product filters, acyclicity and Suzumura consistency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Relation (database); Filter (signal processing); Property (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10485642638607866,"score_gpt":0.285984099229812,"score_spread":0.18112767284373332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982865661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8738452,0.00053878216,0.0003759335,0.0011697997,0.00021155945,0.00012799092,0.000009782162,0.0000365701,0.12368435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984803,0.0000035470864,0.0006397536,0.000115898445,0.00024322637,0.000007955151,3.4342938e-7,0.000004221536,0.00050473615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991327,0.000028048808,0.00029236422,0.00018748484,0.00004798005,0.00031143133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996011,0.00012078531,0.00013305934,0.00007289344,0.000007627491,0.0000645134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435178,0.000079004785,0.00024191441,0.000039565995,0.00040939002,0.000085224696,0.00014161156,0.000039251096,0.0003319009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038642384,0.00006817994,0.000045397777,0.00017646977,0.00049581006,0.00023161515,0.00005196822,0.00006152745,0.00038056023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7000177e-7,0.000048293074,0.027885767,0.000034026874,0.0000052204546,9.9315606e-8,0.0020008872,6.906464e-8,0.000024452227,0.9694164,0.0002429622,0.0003409728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001701227,0.000045246878,0.045118447,0.000024392935,0.000007415301,0.000012239636,0.0010458981,0.00018240079,0.00016594112,0.9459631,0.0069554755,0.00030932407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029711826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000103492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12463508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017138404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057703546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48914587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983553101","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2005.06.002","title":"The k-level facility location game","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Facility location problem; Monotonic function; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Game theory; 1-center problem; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.16215534261250739,"score_gpt":0.3297216512856123,"score_spread":0.16756630867310493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983553101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912769,0.00075902004,0.02471985,0.072147146,0.00028422032,0.0005743509,0.00012925547,0.00005009192,0.010059173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925522,0.000030731073,0.00020822862,0.00043611054,0.00020458238,0.00009178016,0.000016142574,0.000006785211,0.006453431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988586,0.0001565666,0.0003433336,0.00023722938,0.00008079036,0.00032351472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921393,0.00017399355,0.000026415539,0.00042699627,0.00010178534,0.00005689914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003980243,0.000066115674,0.000099487865,0.00012183055,0.0007752896,0.00034137533,0.0003033004,0.00003783305,0.0001811694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063872855,0.000057130943,0.000037632864,0.0003398686,0.0001847713,0.00025519612,0.000044070366,0.00026112268,0.005453194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002274023,0.000106804146,0.0037934433,0.000022190694,0.000052856405,0.0000012820477,0.002639854,0.04978147,0.0023676604,0.9053516,0.02641659,0.009443538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050536235,0.00005277164,0.015648156,0.0000187147,0.0000016209276,0.000006113476,0.0004906657,0.058185425,0.000855396,0.0030210272,0.92091304,0.000301712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003241482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036246012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015423242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026084314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99532115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985089376","doi":"10.1142/s0219198906000825","title":"PROPORTIONALITY AND NON-MANIPULABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Axiom; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Bankruptcy; Truncation (statistics); Independence (probability theory); Simple (philosophy); Law; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.026384118455428405,"score_gpt":0.24519600544847145,"score_spread":0.21881188699304305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985089376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63196117,0.11906286,0.004005023,0.0037023348,0.0011349155,0.0020474265,0.00019079393,0.000117474934,0.23777801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952905,0.0018692208,0.0000746995,0.00035816064,0.00012128067,0.000081850674,0.000031981428,0.000012922667,0.0021593643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983669,0.00009361983,0.0009421427,0.00037536444,0.000058563222,0.00016342664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992098,0.00010227281,0.00037248392,0.0002331595,0.00004855137,0.000033689077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003987533,0.00013634893,0.000398977,0.00009728296,0.00002459237,0.00003700593,0.00022650907,0.00005190948,0.0006339272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029272272,0.00013662042,0.00008929502,0.00013695784,0.000093887305,0.00017601028,0.000054737695,0.0001339341,0.00031528194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010254737,0.00011188853,0.090506226,0.00070483633,0.000017315117,0.0000026964105,0.000047959446,0.000026961121,0.000008383892,0.90713936,0.00012213612,0.0013020006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028551795,0.000018592891,0.11914348,0.0010775216,0.0000051443385,0.000018997405,0.0000068496547,0.00017924921,0.000008232411,0.8268191,0.052241646,0.00019566933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017028545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026686335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36332935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009283931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011729718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6941058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987917715","doi":"10.1561/100.00009022","title":"A Measure of Bizarreness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Path (computing); Population; Mathematics; Compact space; Convexity; Shortest path problem; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining; Demography; Pure mathematics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022831656264808913,"score_gpt":0.2504695862198519,"score_spread":0.22763792995504298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987917715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868408,0.00005060594,0.0026197247,0.0003779789,0.0012022412,0.000031152693,0.000009527664,0.000004222004,0.008863734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925435,2.461472e-7,0.0004521635,0.000037302565,0.00020580894,3.709345e-7,4.551844e-8,0.0000042083325,0.00004550379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864745,0.000018610166,0.0006897671,0.00012782254,0.0001172258,0.00039910592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00008750444,0.00044861122,0.00018544226,0.00018401367,0.00030177794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038009982,0.000067105386,0.0002876147,0.00024545545,0.00006511991,0.00005142814,0.0005252483,0.000049009515,0.00011450437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005437386,0.00005809884,0.00010010093,0.00032214925,0.0005593157,0.00032165722,0.00001074483,0.00023151355,0.000054079475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000622258,0.000046517445,0.011538237,0.000009811209,0.000004500802,0.0000023400437,0.00035968225,6.633009e-7,0.007892594,0.97949713,0.0000088782535,0.0006334069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008814031,0.0014723332,0.16193514,0.00011391764,0.000012447054,0.00042211887,0.0011110136,0.0004024167,0.009077874,0.8228456,0.0013966686,0.00032907378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008178015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006088725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15665154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031066487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010551739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23692021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989656745","doi":"10.4236/tel.2013.36056","title":"Cycles and Rationalization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Mathematical economics; Sequence (biology); Finite set; Microeconomics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010621399667912116,"score_gpt":0.17605009288604828,"score_spread":0.16542869321813616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989656745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96592075,0.00008762808,0.0072277207,0.006584688,0.00020111678,0.00017611723,0.000015046441,0.00004099257,0.01974595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965053,0.000027721859,0.00038013782,0.0027984395,0.00012771813,0.000025297904,0.000010905846,0.000018558996,0.000105882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914366,0.000024121846,0.0003816984,0.00025580078,0.000009480906,0.00018521739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995074,0.00011021713,0.00012560427,0.0001687554,0.0000089243385,0.00007904615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040960577,0.0001048961,0.00021141552,0.000078438985,0.000071705974,0.00012830216,0.00010889202,0.00005615295,0.001530075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007071086,0.00011827558,0.000042452295,0.000036994392,0.00030545474,0.0002222131,0.00003514975,0.000069694,0.0015318011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034648122,0.000009177971,0.0052371807,0.000007811566,0.000014542802,1.6463206e-7,0.00013529157,0.00008328552,0.00014919414,0.9938728,0.00031858034,0.00016846275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025285484,0.000015671341,0.00926069,0.000006339424,0.0000026069663,0.000006477967,0.00003683905,0.007898793,0.00008865086,0.9808695,0.001365272,0.00019632274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024118192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010390493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030584596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003284974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029933499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989892391","doi":"10.1142/s0219198902000653","title":"SOME RESULTS ON (PRE)KERNEL CATCHERS AND THE COINCIDENCE OF THE KERNEL WITH PREKERNEL","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Coincidence; Mathematics; Kernel (algebra); Bounded function; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03575786326103469,"score_gpt":0.2363023372751855,"score_spread":0.2005444740141508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989892391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32008693,0.432844,0.0006043117,0.033957653,0.0024472226,0.0035928874,0.00064906426,0.00012690667,0.205691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706713,0.01629965,0.000015159195,0.0017850384,0.0001254331,0.000046544625,0.000002307114,0.000018138247,0.011036436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844915,0.00022933251,0.0007302765,0.00032029804,0.00011798299,0.00015296461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790704,0.00061849883,0.00082998845,0.00054751127,0.000057872494,0.000039089486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029701751,0.00016768335,0.00043618542,0.000046404806,0.00005966816,0.000037502163,0.0007098065,0.000045845536,0.00018453928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009539304,0.00009532367,0.00014812157,0.00013397951,0.00043580367,0.00013577241,0.000093698596,0.00020974495,0.00021790358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025069676,0.000050791663,0.00083786773,0.00021089305,0.00011876346,0.0000017842386,0.00086451735,0.000059747483,0.0000022216,0.99553794,0.0005989856,0.0014658207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008644747,0.00040255202,0.025502663,0.017082922,0.00019367803,0.0003670865,0.00032439406,0.003907838,0.0002087836,0.77012205,0.1721632,0.0010800996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058566155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039671304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65058434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046757326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008267812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38871863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990199392","doi":"10.5555/1070432.1070517","title":"A group-strategyproof mechanism for Steiner forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Steiner tree problem; Combinatorics; Group (periodic table); Connection (principal bundle); Game tree; Computer science; Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical optimization; Tree (set theory); Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Sequential game","score_opus":0.040429501465461766,"score_gpt":0.229505074404459,"score_spread":0.18907557293899724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990199392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53920275,0.0004375043,0.2950019,0.0015180726,0.0007834748,0.0009921419,0.00013842288,0.00025457097,0.16167116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788268,0.000002962501,0.0033491568,0.00033393473,0.000336772,0.0000817898,0.000009043222,0.000022027558,0.017037494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906546,0.0000068989193,0.0004004191,0.0002606156,0.000015878859,0.0002507424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952793,0.000042338655,0.00014343255,0.00020720044,0.00002159499,0.000057527508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005745186,0.000107345564,0.00022941813,0.00008499217,0.00006885613,0.000051607472,0.00014645845,0.00007835001,0.00036363877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046580535,0.00010796781,0.00010591674,0.00006855368,0.000014249985,0.00016394863,0.000016930175,0.00005086757,0.0008024551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011297166,0.0000387914,0.0010177961,0.000020696145,0.00001705972,2.2159959e-7,0.00007491679,0.000019505589,0.000070951115,0.99746674,0.00063119293,0.0006308155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009648511,0.00016854526,0.0007550872,0.000011027828,0.000004288734,0.0000055150754,0.00006631183,0.009571769,0.0009931582,0.9382309,0.048942298,0.00028626222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039183957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018689003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43962407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031802774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004219631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990515691","doi":"10.1007/s100580200076","title":"Strategy-proof allocation when preferences are single-plateaued","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Preference; Pareto principle; Class (philosophy); Economics; Pareto efficiency; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.1864854268960488,"score_gpt":0.2525098562213508,"score_spread":0.066024429325302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990515691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045167632,0.66476256,0.01922633,0.0015852659,0.0016176921,0.003195253,0.00022433818,0.00017719007,0.26404375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826418,0.014125134,0.0006500231,0.00017763089,0.000102761755,0.000047064128,0.000009256572,0.00002378739,0.002222507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815404,0.0001045175,0.001144266,0.00036271446,0.000022173834,0.00021227705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981406,0.000119493256,0.0012306062,0.00042065533,0.000025948893,0.00006271254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015826671,0.00017569038,0.0007529158,0.00010294322,0.00004544367,0.000040282855,0.0003284347,0.00008314561,0.003255937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013159047,0.0001881758,0.00014113596,0.00006760064,0.000051009974,0.0002566153,0.000021156678,0.000086117354,0.0020340327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006116019,0.0009589535,0.010128966,0.025116665,0.00077107875,0.0000074605714,0.0014668922,0.0028355534,0.00032706108,0.7758458,0.07979963,0.10268075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035169018,0.0021229095,0.0039442787,0.034469932,0.00026783466,0.000095872856,0.0004514737,0.03986016,0.0060863197,0.66646147,0.2387242,0.003998653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030852545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045023553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098129356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012360233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990777695","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0379-3","title":"Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Convexity; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Voting; Truth value; Aggregation problem; Valuation (finance); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Function (biology); Aggregate (composite); Majority rule; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04206439249398311,"score_gpt":0.2360745206155012,"score_spread":0.19401012812151808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990777695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94099075,0.0028942942,0.0011021453,0.0030345095,0.00026244312,0.00023062357,0.00008750157,0.000040351584,0.051357396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931836,0.00004571743,0.00003367745,0.00014973072,0.00012586292,0.0000039220586,0.000009107105,0.0000056028857,0.0003079943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930507,0.00001511506,0.00034018702,0.00017003546,0.000033445227,0.00013614351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.000022839558,0.00024708442,0.000087240216,0.00003368533,0.000032750995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034120667,0.00007958355,0.00025055377,0.00015149057,0.0001550449,0.000024465839,0.00007044258,0.00007180991,0.000060093655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050894676,0.00009051123,0.00007147212,0.00024255703,0.000032329095,0.000120069,0.000014150649,0.000058941387,0.000015471758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070145543,0.00006306337,0.010274223,0.000052462332,0.000030341127,3.805e-7,0.000842546,0.00004213743,0.000011305274,0.97952265,0.0002684136,0.008885453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023754258,0.00045259856,0.44917902,0.00007804393,0.00004885148,0.0000039556558,0.001768653,0.0012865083,0.00023686622,0.49166816,0.05217169,0.00073021767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011760454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043324953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4878545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028054197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038719018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36909407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W199219868","doi":"10.1007/s00224-016-9687-z","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory of Computing Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stable marriage problem; Generalization; Mathematics; Transitive relation; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Time complexity; Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.03372601474166294,"score_gpt":0.20648129487590292,"score_spread":0.17275528013423996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W199219868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810998,0.00075512467,0.06444113,0.000028006163,0.00072760007,0.00022992553,0.00004872319,0.00009394731,0.0525757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915713,0.0000053199615,0.0002671123,0.0000129140635,0.00025561708,0.000006036813,0.000001541619,0.0000260852,0.007854095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838483,0.00019369372,0.000714465,0.00032974966,0.000059676437,0.00031755448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983804,0.0003783489,0.000721078,0.00040585635,0.000049783583,0.00006452061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003107989,0.00016906748,0.00056712254,0.00013795265,0.00009158495,0.000044750293,0.0003330268,0.000071567694,0.000111726265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080269485,0.00011554387,0.00006607006,0.00014003966,0.00013752635,0.00012453961,0.000049306276,0.00006442845,0.0002077012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005845621,0.00002911019,0.021633161,0.00012693519,0.000081632454,0.0000015335634,0.00066085154,0.0003067262,0.00034999414,0.97597045,0.000106018764,0.00067510974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007944112,0.0020981932,0.055442516,0.0061361287,0.00008221033,0.00022130339,0.002944506,0.006932072,0.0064950376,0.8801038,0.028521203,0.0030789194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009984011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018928714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110471435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042283515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017728828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47117424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992540444","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.003","title":"Trading water along a river","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Distribution (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Welfare; Process (computing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management; Computer network; Market economy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06191056375167327,"score_gpt":0.2639435744076436,"score_spread":0.20203301065597035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992540444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87174773,0.0000085330585,0.0010012471,0.0007391566,0.0003082897,0.00006696847,0.0000056077065,0.000037960865,0.12608452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982902,1.8217267e-7,0.0008272748,0.00008388972,0.0002253232,0.0000070253595,4.875124e-7,0.000005224351,0.0005604377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.000013352568,0.00028642072,0.0001977591,0.000049066166,0.00028008808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974215,0.00007161278,0.000069568996,0.00006922816,0.000006155525,0.00004126543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018840601,0.00007081618,0.00020130722,0.000049909435,0.00042853723,0.000115853334,0.0002521516,0.00006859225,0.0016285626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012951987,0.00005211143,0.00007558299,0.000120919845,0.0004635428,0.00014568704,0.000034419045,0.00012017216,0.0014781422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.859368e-7,0.000025993757,0.0024685322,0.00001203898,0.0000038337644,5.948286e-7,0.0039889724,1.8979355e-7,0.00033771788,0.9929211,0.00011083475,0.00012960761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007713467,0.000015664737,0.0014222637,0.0000049539944,0.0000017457327,0.000003828367,0.0001821812,0.0012548366,0.00043582395,0.9927703,0.0037097053,0.000121552286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036689493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068035397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12654243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010076135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043458754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992818571","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0890","title":"(Sophisticated) Stable Sets in Exchange Economies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Von Neumann architecture; Set (abstract data type); Rationality; Space (punctuation); Property (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Exchange economy; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05745302908625478,"score_gpt":0.2258838899126072,"score_spread":0.16843086082635242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992818571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97078145,0.0042813797,0.0000128234105,0.00034351344,0.00055620377,0.00024587297,0.00018632913,0.000046327983,0.023546107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932173,0.0006404422,0.00008814854,0.00009260809,0.000098111195,0.00010662219,0.00000835058,0.000029109327,0.005719328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984588,0.000017625154,0.00064704334,0.00048085445,0.000009442308,0.00038623286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00004493336,0.0002224375,0.00029631215,0.000004438207,0.000104548635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634084,0.00018992875,0.0004897718,0.0002275489,0.0000745233,0.00010309348,0.00016302618,0.00012311527,0.004480212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015814996,0.00023487366,0.00006936587,0.000050451396,0.00008375443,0.00026890342,0.00006242883,0.0001323735,0.002488243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020784832,0.00026281227,0.7665179,0.00011364501,0.00004164942,0.000026591755,0.0021846418,0.00006299884,0.000019464438,0.21078792,0.0039559985,0.016005637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004377047,0.0003184379,0.58547163,0.000120535355,0.000055225737,0.00014532269,0.001003693,0.018197805,0.00012599156,0.029861653,0.35802984,0.002292813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047138662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018410786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35407385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014475042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042747097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993094949","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2014.07.021","title":"The <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si3.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math>-centrum Chinese Postman delivery problem and a related cost allocation game","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Combinatorics; Graph; Mathematics; Submodular set function; Undirected graph; Directed graph; Connectivity; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Strongly connected component; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012281730963888435,"score_gpt":0.21315306689176525,"score_spread":0.20087133592787682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993094949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98201805,0.00030043945,0.0027971095,0.00028271024,0.00029991617,0.0002353132,0.00007715485,0.00011237332,0.013876948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972719,0.00020059192,0.0015044445,0.00019346092,0.00015927984,0.00022406835,0.00013499345,0.00011062932,0.00020061673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977833,0.000034586843,0.0009873552,0.0005015826,0.00017078851,0.0005224029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759966,0.0004596516,0.00097341253,0.0007822496,0.000032182958,0.00015282244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015303381,0.0003266785,0.00034655162,0.00008672126,0.00046565433,0.00034081654,0.0004348233,0.00032325316,0.000022641094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026284528,0.00031941192,0.00020475758,0.00021736795,0.00022639369,0.00021756934,0.00025009,0.0003448333,0.0010077213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007655884,0.000084793246,0.00004797305,0.00036659106,0.00016266589,0.0000044720387,0.0021382868,0.00028436,0.000269074,0.99601305,0.0000899647,0.00046221228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008501669,0.00013781313,0.00016920437,0.00020396961,0.00008355237,0.00006747454,0.00069617096,0.90673625,0.00028073436,0.08808821,0.0022668215,0.0004196462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059694717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003982356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90792483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020627911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039080962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19933852","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.0902181","title":"A geometric approach to judgment aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Condorcet method; Arrow; Representation (politics); Social choice theory; Representation theorem; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Voting","score_opus":0.04099715131174911,"score_gpt":0.21637771193740402,"score_spread":0.1753805606256549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19933852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17069241,0.00033066154,0.13021642,0.00056847255,0.00023233992,0.00029929655,0.000007714166,0.00009978222,0.6975529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98740023,0.000004580213,0.0028799863,0.00084452063,0.00009280874,0.000011510683,0.0000044812214,0.000006365911,0.008755516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919,0.000009141974,0.00032870268,0.00025813337,0.000025255644,0.00018876672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995724,0.000016359227,0.00010064764,0.0002193171,0.000012471534,0.00007879656],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066426233,0.00008258389,0.00019248552,0.00040185166,0.00005183262,0.00005349745,0.000138681,0.00004577408,0.0001321443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087085864,0.00008695612,0.000053832824,0.00065300276,0.0000056177037,0.00008852305,0.000013031158,0.000051337112,0.001990434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062650292,0.00012693235,0.0024448244,0.0000072804364,0.000008496998,2.682175e-7,0.0002537936,0.00028674456,0.000015781594,0.98827225,0.0022324987,0.0063448674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027852072,0.0014573445,0.22559361,0.000081445185,0.000017256429,0.000043519547,0.00070576376,0.012927937,0.0028075082,0.45090327,0.30049574,0.002181415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034718036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.579864e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055087912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029152748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993688296","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1762669","title":"Bargaining with Linked Disagreement Points","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03283845875683449,"score_gpt":0.20171993288807907,"score_spread":0.16888147413124457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993688296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8282618,0.0034231483,0.047019966,0.00022952427,0.00046295495,0.00019952013,0.0000068183563,0.00006666678,0.12032958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967334,0.00025342702,0.000302486,0.00008055941,0.00018969274,0.0000048890024,0.0000013188543,0.000026573533,0.002407605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978479,0.000035381127,0.00043694233,0.00021566491,0.000043530134,0.0014205558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931365,0.000018773848,0.0003730592,0.00018890676,0.00002479826,0.000080782935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030249797,0.00013715401,0.0002542328,0.00012893627,0.00016727307,0.00004162402,0.00025832138,0.000056194276,0.00028157304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004148655,0.00012229856,0.00008147259,0.00012533137,0.000038030612,0.00018604881,0.000023356184,0.000860802,0.000496262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055930297,0.000049042013,0.04412119,0.0000027382969,0.00014655199,0.0000036909967,0.0009679178,0.0000037194577,0.000005399339,0.95371354,0.00001275906,0.000917529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092546997,0.00064908795,0.00692944,0.000035492583,0.000011640871,0.0002964734,0.0018833138,0.00006895811,0.000030745836,0.98734623,0.0015649071,0.00025825523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008367015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119418226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16847163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035742598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015157426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63786095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994128719","doi":"10.5555/365411.365789","title":"Linear reductions of maximum matching","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium on Discrete Algorithms","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02791080801521452,"score_gpt":0.24951552774059851,"score_spread":0.22160471972538398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994128719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69830185,0.00084946677,0.02593168,0.003060581,0.0028929932,0.0005331677,0.00036408193,0.00023623816,0.26782995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188423,0.00014148485,0.0014540828,0.000079529396,0.00043484298,0.000018762017,0.000023859173,0.000038915852,0.0059243175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985841,0.000034515033,0.00064879865,0.0003783947,0.000056244036,0.0002979815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903125,0.000048430185,0.00034781152,0.0004573283,0.000028371978,0.000086833374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006176422,0.00017154057,0.00038950046,0.00021368937,0.00012563687,0.000031150365,0.00024977297,0.00010052423,0.00027134013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003212225,0.00018300314,0.00017023363,0.0002829224,0.00007940038,0.00015765784,0.00004268523,0.00017530087,0.0006868659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017009184,0.00048794175,0.00875839,0.00016707934,0.00032562562,0.0000327335,0.0038921654,0.006852321,0.00464892,0.9709771,0.0013350245,0.0023526023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039921617,0.0017975766,0.008540212,0.00053749024,0.000086988046,0.00031479573,0.0028062055,0.01988195,0.010694482,0.72683305,0.22186977,0.0026453144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021921779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027214637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29358238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004615645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009720596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88285005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994916611","doi":"10.1007/s00355-005-0057-z","title":"Multi_profile welfarism: a generalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Axiom; Anonymity; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Public finance; Economics; Social choice theory; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026223104817041123,"score_gpt":0.23950218741626156,"score_spread":0.21327908259922043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994916611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9204605,0.0022451528,0.0010182768,0.013047171,0.0005068486,0.00028091812,0.00015442188,0.0001650445,0.062121667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633306,0.000021792444,0.0001351271,0.00036765987,0.00095182954,0.000016602238,0.000026718064,0.000016580912,0.0021306179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992812,0.000021103915,0.00026969658,0.00022228673,0.000022812863,0.00018287048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969363,0.000013923153,0.0001427,0.00008773055,0.000018743844,0.000043259763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026994303,0.00009668716,0.00019630135,0.00006109709,0.00039769683,0.000058707512,0.00008099045,0.00011407548,0.00047184824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045967445,0.0001123359,0.000054811888,0.00010724992,0.00003500546,0.0001744864,0.000027828022,0.00008849875,0.0002326945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050549197,0.000040677438,0.059116688,0.000042489246,0.000028536586,4.5954982e-7,0.0022586568,0.000018984101,0.000027800148,0.93060493,0.0018245311,0.006031181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006871498,0.000025702615,0.0915687,0.0000076030265,0.0000071575714,0.0000022182555,0.0003951797,0.00084567984,0.00004252345,0.007993017,0.8981349,0.00029018914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002916758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041043906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92261195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032646574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003069627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5166407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995228035","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2012.6425887","title":"Emergence of coalitions in mean field stochastic systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Mean field theory; Population; Nash equilibrium; Fraction (chemistry); Stability (learning theory); State (computer science); Infinity; Set (abstract data type); Minor (academic); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.054439650108946344,"score_gpt":0.24542362593389486,"score_spread":0.19098397582494853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995228035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63628745,0.0031300934,0.13416415,0.00014853997,0.0025085604,0.00036496218,0.00006944107,0.000050067243,0.22327673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981013,0.0000049632977,0.000052373853,0.000026029815,0.000074834956,0.000014849793,0.0000017758132,0.000005928742,0.0017179475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992089,0.000020441865,0.00046971106,0.00009924589,0.000016660082,0.0001849909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952894,0.00010057992,0.00014636923,0.0001689425,0.000010574659,0.000044605724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081166223,0.000057892976,0.00021523987,0.00012044935,0.000020519054,0.000006873174,0.000096779666,0.000048093505,0.000814377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010412691,0.00006266981,0.00003900022,0.00014419682,0.000015264737,0.000118160126,0.000016947366,0.000056333913,0.0002882359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028013608,0.000054043227,0.044332072,0.000039833234,0.000007833584,9.788838e-8,0.0008325021,0.0003153852,0.000020713842,0.95389616,0.00047364668,0.00002488993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009336155,0.0020260024,0.24499717,0.0026355651,0.00011576793,0.00017938766,0.08851544,0.13977134,0.005417086,0.4471021,0.052582227,0.007321771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009316267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033704615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5067941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008673768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032662535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89168566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996570526","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0600-z","title":"Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social choice theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Conjunction (astronomy); Complement (music); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05602464863029017,"score_gpt":0.2198874131003893,"score_spread":0.16386276447009915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996570526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929974,0.0012493036,0.00024256308,0.0017366239,0.00021899439,0.00015857146,0.00014466933,0.000048530103,0.103203386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.00002303253,0.000034682373,0.000116124924,0.000114195725,0.000008811862,0.0000070026017,0.000010124268,0.0007032857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940497,0.000022263124,0.00022141731,0.0001969124,0.000015309406,0.00013914521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972135,0.000036757923,0.000107131615,0.00006518613,0.000020142577,0.000049404654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024371549,0.000085507876,0.0002003928,0.000050554932,0.00037751728,0.000029471532,0.00004155256,0.000091990754,0.00021996895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039898932,0.00009705684,0.00004635636,0.0000721913,0.00010421195,0.000116220384,0.000017218765,0.00009756943,0.00005891959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006594858,0.000039842565,0.11717941,0.00002539712,0.000037151618,0.0000012870977,0.008727219,5.1873155e-8,0.0000027013473,0.87343884,0.00009254466,0.0004489961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073509174,0.0001341041,0.89103657,0.00002180853,0.000026189044,0.000008035421,0.0054891803,0.000033871405,0.000010339226,0.06406188,0.038111005,0.0003319461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005405204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070307804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80937696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015417532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041457142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39578632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996967738","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00579.x","title":"FIRST IN VILLAGE OR SECOND IN ROME?*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sorting; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Pecking order; Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Competitive equilibrium; Economics; Business; Computer science; Finance; Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03286161172366642,"score_gpt":0.2655408416507969,"score_spread":0.23267922992713047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996967738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77611446,0.010279074,0.000023543855,0.0033158232,0.004159614,0.00055977434,0.00017181448,0.00002942875,0.2053465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936516,0.0054456447,0.00010195091,0.0007490997,0.00019821365,0.00006926725,0.000013894759,0.000018332023,0.00403843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840766,0.000016805423,0.001036432,0.0003421653,0.000017368342,0.000179568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922895,0.000115301744,0.00033963026,0.00026371627,0.000008649489,0.000043775617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014815266,0.00012765046,0.00047264458,0.0002422131,0.000017976705,0.000045859586,0.00044368458,0.00007461257,0.020809982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022338537,0.00013342492,0.00009537825,0.00008269624,0.00002870315,0.00024619736,0.00005449335,0.00023272615,0.0041087465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034014658,0.00012746105,0.14626382,0.0009422257,0.000053950524,0.000035538586,0.00027165507,0.00013367535,0.00001655063,0.8456209,0.0037301641,0.0027700786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006191478,0.000017578934,0.034884684,0.00080056477,0.0000013915145,0.000041969306,0.000010894653,0.0012585686,0.00000942036,0.017199593,0.9448919,0.00026428603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021817668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060042897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94116175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016970585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024122683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998440297","doi":"10.1007/s10100-010-0141-z","title":"Cooperative games under interval uncertainty: on the convexity of the interval undominated cores","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Convexity; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Dominance (genetics); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics","score_opus":0.1167264845443248,"score_gpt":0.31827971286054796,"score_spread":0.20155322831622316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998440297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837811,0.00009392889,0.0006654624,0.003970758,0.00095633004,0.00025186242,0.000044900193,0.000004471263,0.010231189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979845,0.000025132202,0.00003999891,0.00015150457,0.0002191636,0.0000020967318,0.0000017257944,0.000018687586,0.0015571873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997217,0.0013643178,0.0008150122,0.00015937373,0.0001512616,0.0002930464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983435,0.00044553817,0.00023861571,0.00036994892,0.0005079354,0.00009441086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070177605,0.00011205496,0.00028095662,0.00016292863,0.00037106336,0.00020488874,0.00089064904,0.00003401812,0.0006518208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022295853,0.00006453223,0.00017410613,0.00033563885,0.0006862073,0.00014668239,0.00013765374,0.0012286685,0.00013222922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027804793,0.00029364164,0.0034859732,0.00001960321,0.0001982479,0.000015224711,0.0043558264,0.011198118,0.007869682,0.968482,0.003313384,0.0004902609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018897321,0.009843376,0.542043,0.0032052335,0.00014121972,0.0008836645,0.04392999,0.112252146,0.10440617,0.0414551,0.12055091,0.0023918862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053873246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007793275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92702687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006572735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010606635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.713698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998954346","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0784-5","title":"Inefficient committees: small elections with three alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; State (computer science); Majority rule; Economics; Condorcet method; Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Contingent vote; Private information retrieval; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Macroeconomics; Group voting ticket; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02875850210327523,"score_gpt":0.20739214596137043,"score_spread":0.1786336438580952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998954346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96960986,0.00035383686,0.0008265282,0.0027333668,0.00014502075,0.00020359458,0.000022851838,0.000051256975,0.026053712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986703,0.0000068767577,0.000037479545,0.00013977794,0.0002651807,0.000044315457,0.000005911919,0.000014106122,0.0008160537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993813,0.000015205059,0.00019257246,0.0002017061,0.000021276024,0.0001879578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965924,0.00003511193,0.00013224411,0.00009323131,0.000034542158,0.000045656765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014199194,0.000102037986,0.00019641955,0.00006535061,0.00043411867,0.00009771799,0.00010011415,0.000056964345,0.00022746278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026877267,0.00009577288,0.0000403338,0.00013657939,0.00007387348,0.00010852275,0.000025611916,0.00012017597,0.0001413867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057859506,0.00008148559,0.4558164,0.00004582642,0.0000838503,6.5471596e-7,0.00238528,0.0000165825,0.000011483761,0.53920037,0.00044653643,0.0019057937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354993,0.00016204482,0.908243,0.000023672821,0.0000103115835,0.000004329127,0.0017282465,0.00029140158,0.000015348429,0.024416521,0.064019,0.00035064694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019529423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005111993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5147838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024100917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041159506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39055046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999922619","doi":"10.1007/s001820200100","title":"Voting for voters: the unanimity case","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Voting; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Computer security; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04368151745305899,"score_gpt":0.2654214621755924,"score_spread":0.22173994472253344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999922619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8221553,0.0013011309,0.15875292,0.0010261023,0.004766929,0.00019100038,0.000067548506,0.000015565674,0.011723507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785864,0.000010272691,0.0004593153,0.00030613795,0.0004657241,0.0000036775318,6.404805e-7,0.000014879145,0.0008806981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988543,0.00011851386,0.0006877759,0.00011237826,0.00005849635,0.00016855446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811363,0.00066025736,0.0008714183,0.000116801326,0.0001851728,0.000052745134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005949096,0.00009236473,0.00021399173,0.00014000731,0.00007113091,0.00008717786,0.00039323315,0.00004623888,0.00014244783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017057002,0.00007244268,0.00022323692,0.00005603415,0.00006672742,0.00017704419,0.00002065558,0.00016811129,0.00004863517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000936571,0.00004351216,0.0019477309,0.0000061690307,0.00018089598,0.000095820826,0.00085977954,0.00017015992,0.000026146537,0.99520415,0.00019057875,0.0011814057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014216062,0.00016139081,0.00086712337,0.00008026184,0.000023834684,0.007950643,0.0013473437,0.0005071905,0.0006056198,0.93833303,0.04849317,0.00020875683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009898333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034646177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17570336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089818896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024626775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29541266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000621378","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9179-5","title":"Negotiation over Costs and Benefits in Brownfield Redevelopment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Redevelopment; Shapley value; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Management science; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Telecommunications; Political science","score_opus":0.023755830161397293,"score_gpt":0.22379146151859847,"score_spread":0.20003563135720118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000621378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99106866,0.0019958958,0.0032700156,0.00030109356,0.00026033135,0.00018008162,0.0000062016966,0.000023729395,0.0028939971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845606,0.00039837547,0.0005222557,0.0004343779,0.00004855882,0.0000044334847,0.000011865671,0.0000061124747,0.000117981916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901116,0.000019156767,0.00047020425,0.00030476236,0.00004655084,0.00014816957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952805,0.000112604226,0.00016548541,0.00012266009,0.000013289225,0.000057883582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007133507,0.0001056182,0.00020812337,0.00023351652,0.00007872265,0.00008559617,0.000055163535,0.000110783694,0.00006899002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015871659,0.0001146572,0.00002270247,0.0001790238,0.000010969712,0.00027249102,0.000021235315,0.000085767664,0.00003170632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012189663,0.000099570796,0.23023409,0.000010727972,0.0000071982568,0.000002194925,0.0013746739,0.000057379595,0.00011913473,0.44506142,0.0005818733,0.32232985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009224668,0.00008806814,0.94094,0.00006745433,0.0000014887086,0.000004925315,0.000057019002,0.0016618748,0.000038102127,0.05370534,0.0023582196,0.00015503468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006190195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069867776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71070594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006367552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000362221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4675585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.11390321613045822,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.24782670270117096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003305533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96915144,0.0010204064,0.0095231645,0.002009184,0.00027512244,0.00032452864,0.00003696818,0.000027007643,0.017632173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991669,0.000011335465,0.0004120591,0.000016839253,0.00007325394,0.000016171298,0.000017759467,0.0000055360665,0.00028016313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922293,0.0000464811,0.00046525654,0.0001511065,0.000029598079,0.00008460477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.000026043159,0.00032668305,0.000055090433,0.000014172145,0.00001709684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042126904,0.000052752646,0.00020878366,0.000081331906,0.00008886987,0.000012828601,0.000037858666,0.00006137414,0.00030266406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008142253,0.0000625442,0.00003488665,0.0001634272,0.000031716067,0.00009494033,0.00001286887,0.00005934949,0.000010388414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038044614,0.00010050997,0.75725794,0.000051182826,0.000012615425,1.7104448e-7,0.0033828593,0.000031196825,0.000053894368,0.23293172,0.00011408845,0.0060599972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061678444,0.0000516544,0.9571946,0.000017381128,0.000007204992,6.5199737e-7,0.0020263188,0.0032553426,0.00021812657,0.026372964,0.010073127,0.00016584386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001398423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012112889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20655875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027383438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015294995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33139592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004939158","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00503.x","title":"Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Distribution (mathematics); Politics; Set (abstract data type); Axiomatic system; Political science; Law and economics; Game theory; Computer science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09453656013846388,"score_gpt":0.2946040596407902,"score_spread":0.20006749950232627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004939158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5049773,0.4580699,0.00010962152,0.0020619156,0.00053792977,0.00063445873,0.00003981146,0.000018621422,0.033550497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907704,0.20857657,0.00002598518,0.00020317348,0.000051264553,0.000038118735,0.0000025842367,0.0000053274566,0.00032658092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988552,0.00004022658,0.000848815,0.00012297273,0.000012359819,0.00012043469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907166,0.00014402153,0.00053512,0.00022230878,0.000015909674,0.0000110067995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014495696,0.00008986761,0.00057813624,0.0000695983,0.000085459316,0.00000352835,0.00014986926,0.000020950936,0.00005361516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015127033,0.00007219043,0.00009932994,0.00007240842,0.00011563912,0.0001707466,0.000042289852,0.000055925204,0.0004922743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033182,0.0001054136,0.02721134,0.019333614,0.0003849148,0.0000048555044,0.013263151,0.00022688774,0.000022897817,0.90737844,0.029689936,0.0023453815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004752838,0.0006195969,0.14207989,0.046483915,0.00016615831,0.0005397387,0.010672121,0.0037988026,0.0016007043,0.5999967,0.18667695,0.002612607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003959851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011635943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30738175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009102362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054248317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63273543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006131948","doi":"10.1007/s00199-005-0058-2","title":"Price discrimination and efficient matching","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sorting; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); sort; Function (biology); Schedule; Revenue; Incentive; Private information retrieval; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010825319548684405,"score_gpt":0.191941477651572,"score_spread":0.1811161581028876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006131948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775374,0.00082055427,0.0075508314,0.000102922284,0.0004884361,0.00011253839,0.000033511453,0.00005400597,0.11329977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592626,0.0000069947323,0.00014789533,0.000047835176,0.00021644348,0.000010097308,0.0000078167095,0.000019626532,0.0036170234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990586,0.00003802284,0.00040706908,0.0002953264,0.000009535794,0.00019145219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940926,0.0001268378,0.00023627045,0.00018834912,0.0000038509597,0.00003543733],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015048942,0.000110951216,0.00021705971,0.00011657508,0.0001128731,0.00007553503,0.00010965772,0.00005370322,0.0002654739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002148527,0.0001277114,0.00005005026,0.000028712933,0.00005857567,0.00010790022,0.000041541512,0.000072867406,0.0009401212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107557335,0.00001992977,0.002563902,0.000018533068,0.000009097977,5.864065e-7,0.0004891995,0.0013527983,0.00003867759,0.9951193,0.00008281225,0.00029444668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003498835,0.000017722128,0.026211618,0.000017503047,0.0000041993867,0.00001279111,0.00032108082,0.0022093584,0.00010374588,0.96544504,0.005070533,0.00023649586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015810833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009753918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11838884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009689627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057943994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007071308","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.008","title":"Matching markets under (in)complete information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Creative Europe; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Preference; Mechanism (biology); Incomplete markets; Bayesian probability; Economics; Equilibrium selection; Computer science; Best response; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Game theory; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.050791320924413276,"score_gpt":0.233542820059775,"score_spread":0.18275149913536173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007071308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94236684,0.0005601215,0.0068166014,0.0002397372,0.0017171834,0.00007339734,0.000019428539,0.00000933486,0.04819736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988997,0.000017309354,0.00025102813,0.00022791489,0.00022188987,0.0000012201581,0.0000015706551,0.000010844927,0.00036855214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984618,0.00008537254,0.0011706195,0.00008461838,0.000022226932,0.00017535215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984454,0.00015325277,0.0011200755,0.00015575864,0.000024514675,0.00010098821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006245443,0.00010057339,0.00038402385,0.00038274835,0.000026878452,0.00007648907,0.00024913778,0.000066303866,0.00023310127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010022759,0.00010655861,0.00011294445,0.000047868863,0.000030650976,0.0010616067,0.000032537147,0.00019015136,0.0010075815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012429588,0.000016924629,0.004512354,0.000012715776,0.000038558694,0.000002741334,0.0017893832,0.0044718646,0.0000047277313,0.9882288,0.00031665416,0.0004809949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010799501,0.0000481198,0.007671951,0.000040782383,0.0000034147995,0.00009266057,0.0019720357,0.00034143674,0.0000089839605,0.97360915,0.014991933,0.00013959077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002896829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054701854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056532834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003049975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051014686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007779524","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1","title":"Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06625046255528268,"score_gpt":0.2471342989240128,"score_spread":0.18088383636873012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007779524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772338,0.011660894,0.011236887,0.008340298,0.0008286004,0.0033791945,0.002942885,0.00019387611,0.084183566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876946,0.000013638119,0.000046421545,0.0000767007,0.00017052627,0.00013110116,0.000035416786,0.000014892287,0.0007418424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990952,0.00003653986,0.0002829061,0.00027229026,0.000026915395,0.00028611787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960184,0.00009294528,0.00014578972,0.00007734365,0.000021160227,0.000060935272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678893,0.00011023338,0.00021625128,0.000047314767,0.0008001579,0.000075263924,0.000052213763,0.0001084388,0.00006360745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113753966,0.00012575764,0.00006189314,0.000063625346,0.00007642596,0.000095708754,0.000020267467,0.00008903274,0.0000073350834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064588694,0.000049437378,0.01473919,0.00009520972,0.00003812598,1.4874914e-7,0.0005234576,0.000040962623,0.000021318656,0.98370147,0.00046309608,0.0003211368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023087277,0.00019335368,0.047380336,0.00003305446,0.000022929733,0.0000058336204,0.0020933966,0.0008278114,0.000029811215,0.1639527,0.7826708,0.0004812641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007502208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049190057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81974876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041484735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011747149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009959931","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807455","title":"Overlapping coalitions, bargaining and networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Function (biology); Game theory; Subgame; Cover (algebra); Mathematical optimization; Complete information; Symmetric equilibrium; Perfect information; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02163739515257339,"score_gpt":0.2064473057702318,"score_spread":0.1848099106176584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009959931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.583187,0.0005154231,0.023922607,0.0001857065,0.0007578189,0.000094904426,0.000010296845,0.00009665376,0.3912296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971763,0.000017659462,0.0006125406,0.00022022593,0.00018090392,0.0000047593808,0.0000029602309,0.000008653969,0.0017760077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994467,0.000007225663,0.00022958528,0.00016502046,0.0000080032805,0.00014347024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996546,0.000065743734,0.000084127794,0.00013882382,0.000006794723,0.000049947983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006853758,0.000060032937,0.00014218115,0.000053866985,0.00010012459,0.000064064174,0.000059886937,0.000065288186,0.0004515002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007448937,0.00006689459,0.00002563979,0.000059985312,0.000033128006,0.0001008555,0.000025884368,0.00014859185,0.00013466335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001083174,0.0000052961636,0.04218178,0.0000028182676,0.0000067812202,4.1111522e-7,0.00009526307,0.000021476524,0.000048408463,0.957152,0.00023410155,0.0002505911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013129469,0.000086711654,0.13487041,0.00005950162,0.000008812377,0.000085028034,0.00071915,0.10118828,0.00008356941,0.5567445,0.20386098,0.0009800666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007553906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016190872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4139893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004322445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022190986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49436104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010339374","doi":"10.1007/s00199-008-0365-5","title":"A multi-agent bilateral bargaining model with endogenous protocol","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Bargaining problem; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Computer science","score_opus":0.09915231716838434,"score_gpt":0.2365673081796664,"score_spread":0.13741499101128207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010339374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7642979,0.00017176723,0.036105897,0.00005395995,0.0003968158,0.029775118,0.00021264674,0.00038879583,0.16859709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98012865,0.000003271819,0.0026073046,0.00015798965,0.0001474593,0.010564609,0.0000054190677,0.00006634257,0.0063189636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826795,0.00006108568,0.0006714867,0.00054044486,0.00001940704,0.00043965614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989026,0.000069686364,0.0004025003,0.00049082655,0.00001112403,0.0001232201],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011665927,0.0002548202,0.00048681683,0.00017068705,0.00025513954,0.000045621582,0.00031558273,0.00009850579,0.0005187939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002639251,0.00025213783,0.00012570794,0.00005121909,0.00014513076,0.00024085898,0.00006192941,0.00017667915,0.0023995528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042850059,0.00019865243,0.020724725,0.000053786694,0.00018899054,0.0000578743,0.0061663385,0.035079412,0.00030099484,0.93640965,0.00018241366,0.00020866259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020532357,0.0013397731,0.007482622,0.0002453647,0.000044815435,0.0022036647,0.0011851176,0.38132226,0.0040516146,0.5439301,0.03319475,0.0044675535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044027947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004268804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39247954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019390002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066328954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010912066","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.003","title":"Group strategy-proofness and voting between two alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Voting; Mathematical economics; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14575210552786322,"score_gpt":0.3308931207024684,"score_spread":0.18514101517460518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010912066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450878,0.0002693976,0.005594172,0.00020035273,0.0001127009,0.00009783668,0.000009359388,0.000034328266,0.048594072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987774,0.0000010662001,0.0005276291,0.000026096513,0.0004984026,0.0000072391217,5.490788e-7,0.000006027128,0.00015559036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.000040883526,0.00032504607,0.00018768889,0.000059322272,0.00034330995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995004,0.00020148756,0.00017523518,0.00004494456,0.000006443714,0.00007147717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026355642,0.00009129614,0.00027218103,0.00004846132,0.00041822673,0.00014397489,0.0001867966,0.000042595366,0.00013412171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014793056,0.00008014994,0.00004316969,0.00017300886,0.0003655965,0.00034074133,0.00006307287,0.00007671624,0.00017984552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5800672e-7,0.000024011277,0.10882985,0.000025956566,0.0000073014794,9.054667e-8,0.0016212551,3.7609755e-7,0.000009305896,0.888336,0.000006157906,0.001139238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001859927,0.00004226386,0.072667025,0.00002681569,0.000005823221,0.000002305413,0.0010612218,0.0005122593,0.000046389345,0.92489356,0.00033581967,0.00022053707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038609156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018042002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05368962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001772789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032658822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32684198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011679113","doi":"10.1007/s10100-009-0116-0","title":"Cooperative interval games: a survey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Game theory; Interval data; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Operations research; State (computer science); Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Data mining","score_opus":0.18471368184769216,"score_gpt":0.34796021439077696,"score_spread":0.1632465325430848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011679113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541813,0.001123802,0.008971607,0.0011038953,0.0005067892,0.00019113108,0.00006335528,0.000012257699,0.033845875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662906,0.000112090755,0.00031123118,0.00010319562,0.00032748232,5.3639707e-7,0.0000076754795,0.000015711319,0.0024929948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968994,0.0015026779,0.0009062704,0.00018452102,0.000109513414,0.00039758172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988326,0.00011591451,0.00012549073,0.00021423968,0.0005150711,0.0001967218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011308436,0.0001009641,0.00029938412,0.00035060794,0.0002469963,0.00033836943,0.000479268,0.000024533016,0.00039434773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017432056,0.00009254036,0.00010142868,0.0004312007,0.00010649964,0.0003550596,0.00003811822,0.00057294965,0.000686696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009901313,0.002215925,0.041236445,0.000062358755,0.0005249671,0.00093507563,0.0266365,0.034029763,0.0043311617,0.8208354,0.049759507,0.018442744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003919956,0.0053728702,0.90554476,0.00044115479,0.000011053835,0.000456695,0.002199552,0.010305287,0.0010252162,0.0027984541,0.06713524,0.00078973634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032079206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017512677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86430836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103196566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007377242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012697739","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602884","title":"Reasoning about optimal stable matchings under partial information","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Mathematics; Stable marriage problem; Polynomial; Construct (python library); Optimal matching; Order (exchange); Existential quantification; Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.014610879140814128,"score_gpt":0.20010028328558277,"score_spread":0.18548940414476864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012697739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.384237,0.000046791218,0.41366595,0.00019182204,0.0004259145,0.000089714675,0.000010572444,0.0001097544,0.2012225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951794,0.0000034083648,0.0018373438,0.00041922525,0.00012066437,0.000007931918,0.0000118970565,0.000009020004,0.0024110815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999176,0.000018614777,0.00042930528,0.00012972228,0.000024912664,0.00022144424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.00004140581,0.00022285669,0.00018104068,0.000016218777,0.000053562675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012245729,0.00008740054,0.00019202032,0.00008398122,0.00011107445,0.00015373096,0.00011712919,0.00006381544,0.0005970108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010261099,0.00009299907,0.000048821727,0.00008099317,0.000018949031,0.0007041208,0.00003087936,0.00008646689,0.002736595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000740708,0.000008143275,0.004453132,0.00001619956,0.000009739852,4.7441322e-8,0.0004801951,0.0023567474,0.0000061518704,0.9917997,0.00054900773,0.00031350093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015969828,0.00016471071,0.02304095,0.00010699582,0.000009178565,0.000015759453,0.0010726069,0.23055063,0.0006213584,0.15592092,0.58602095,0.0008789378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002741592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036607858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8358788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003091851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005517256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012705428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198910002556","title":"VON NEUMANN, VILLE, AND THE MINIMAX THEOREM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Institut de France","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Minimax theorem; Minimax; Convexity; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Danskin's theorem; Fixed-point theorem; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Brouwer fixed-point theorem","score_opus":0.018777482732672785,"score_gpt":0.2411784849224101,"score_spread":0.2224010021897373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012705428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10037196,0.15989774,0.0012485149,0.014470329,0.0055556893,0.0012644747,0.00013833973,0.00013964028,0.71691334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774598,0.01189638,0.00005510941,0.0030204959,0.00033501195,0.00006133598,0.000009051801,0.000022358492,0.007140473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873614,0.00014315765,0.00061207113,0.00029183808,0.000055245157,0.00016153372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986346,0.0004848704,0.00039540802,0.00038208542,0.000050317718,0.000052713138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051851445,0.00015411219,0.00042179404,0.00006860965,0.000070548944,0.0000767703,0.00054044364,0.00005922533,0.0018397768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010296963,0.000109926135,0.00016465024,0.000089196656,0.00034203404,0.00012866504,0.00009944204,0.0002909376,0.0010793342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004514537,0.000017294746,0.0004681406,0.00011099082,0.00005916409,0.0000012280034,0.00019099993,3.9821182e-7,0.000015082753,0.9921503,0.00041819082,0.0065230452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004960884,0.000012055198,0.0006455338,0.00030942724,0.000013465676,0.000059462487,0.000022829707,0.00009910611,0.000012502935,0.58288676,0.41530368,0.00013907797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014864282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005077892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87708783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014052892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071477384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014915043","doi":"10.1007/s11293-013-9397-8","title":"Candidate Ambition and Advancement under Term Limits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantic Economic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Term (time); Politics; Seekers; Public finance; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.019820937106290445,"score_gpt":0.21361110810772257,"score_spread":0.19379017100143214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014915043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899726,0.00059710734,0.001678545,0.0010021997,0.000788284,0.00014063377,0.000008512205,0.000017313872,0.0057948064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751353,0.0005476666,0.00013802097,0.00028021177,0.00033324872,0.0000098594755,0.0000056555,0.000017428998,0.0011543459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988651,0.000022829336,0.00059149513,0.00022255063,0.000015291165,0.0002827334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992557,0.000041621955,0.00040640208,0.00015086698,0.000012426949,0.00013296724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005539851,0.00012796461,0.00028769803,0.00012186878,0.00016108982,0.00024381957,0.0001233771,0.00005630928,0.0013012625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014532432,0.00013385524,0.000061401974,0.000024183297,0.000045332206,0.00043227192,0.000026098784,0.00015954654,0.0022237012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023630695,0.00007116862,0.4453141,0.00005790361,0.00023364057,0.000010891567,0.00078175205,0.00035374195,0.00036471258,0.5453073,0.0037853187,0.0036958614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003764474,0.00036698498,0.4878568,0.00022910135,0.000036252364,0.001520807,0.00087890663,0.004913286,0.00023266608,0.4686308,0.030418014,0.0011518913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030215664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041845324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07667646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012971547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015502368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015123404","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.002","title":"A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost sharing; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Spanning tree; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Steiner tree problem; Point (geometry); Fixed point; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Tree (set theory); Fixed cost; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10111342676648626,"score_gpt":0.25791261119516407,"score_spread":0.1567991844286778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015123404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134916,0.001259688,0.0032358374,0.00011487441,0.0004536766,0.0011314648,0.00020920105,0.000046329053,0.002199797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919244,0.000093033304,0.0016628391,0.000052953754,0.0001417832,0.00030037772,0.000019137373,0.00003983474,0.0057656416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.0000096400745,0.00054005894,0.00054562814,0.000011397256,0.0003883801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992039,0.000050079576,0.00032771644,0.0002415635,0.000013796133,0.00016293832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451153,0.00019299032,0.000429008,0.00015347672,0.0001670757,0.00012314902,0.0001382386,0.00012575023,0.00017009018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028645358,0.00022885046,0.00007575017,0.000036590594,0.00006757738,0.00032120608,0.00008791148,0.00009924088,0.000059987757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050912873,0.00015145971,0.7892206,0.00025185788,0.00014985274,0.000007667648,0.01611249,0.000050209008,0.00056294695,0.12420511,0.002636502,0.06614218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009652747,0.0010604593,0.79891026,0.0004758727,0.00029089366,0.00019810986,0.004910011,0.03203953,0.0010141124,0.034316566,0.1144143,0.0027171187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011871805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020257123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11177779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009138962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023900991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017492304","doi":"10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x","title":"A minimax procedure for electing committees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Approval voting; Mathematical economics; Rendering (computer graphics); Computer science; Operations research; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.06914424310011429,"score_gpt":0.26906980774074224,"score_spread":0.19992556464062794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017492304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772103,0.00090978073,0.014018227,0.0022570188,0.00077417726,0.000533423,0.000046413934,0.0001888539,0.10406178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950078,0.000002416824,0.00051387347,0.0004836253,0.00059522776,0.00004082503,0.0000105803765,0.000025745298,0.0033199133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876344,0.0000086262535,0.00046364812,0.00029265124,0.000025383722,0.00044623564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989412,0.00042630066,0.00027983636,0.00020770005,0.000053147403,0.00009185296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358961,0.00011237015,0.00024234309,0.00017627838,0.00017611281,0.00012275744,0.00023762742,0.00008964541,0.00008210738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016536014,0.00012953175,0.00009264426,0.00029200234,0.000026083904,0.0002122044,0.00002779523,0.000119108394,0.00015096761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019716725,0.000113589675,0.37764704,0.00017359563,0.000057538884,6.649668e-7,0.0007992307,0.0000018450904,0.000100887824,0.61434233,0.004210851,0.0025327043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008452492,0.00007888287,0.0614612,0.000023642826,0.0000046906075,0.000013736736,0.00028582415,0.00056565605,0.00030841463,0.022124007,0.91393346,0.00035524688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010138237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018807463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016613774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019408419","doi":"10.1287/moor.1070.0294","title":"Truncation Strategies in Matching Markets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Matching (statistics); Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Advice (programming); Complete information; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18420648595213587,"score_gpt":0.3546812017191083,"score_spread":0.1704747157669724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019408419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94185716,0.00016867102,0.0060965936,0.00013095568,0.000041157316,0.0002346481,0.000012476608,0.000011638935,0.051446706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922307,0.00004762511,0.0056447797,0.0000032660735,0.000023761082,0.000041009964,0.0000053949625,0.000011483074,0.0019919493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989296,0.00006936048,0.000582643,0.00015007384,0.00008255481,0.000185757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993698,0.00018250836,0.000054510852,0.00027663753,0.00008895342,0.000027588345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030379354,0.000061428414,0.0002185885,0.00043441154,0.00016862775,0.00006113377,0.00020381884,0.00005242649,0.00021418369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035424915,0.000066252585,0.000033254226,0.0003865466,0.000099858524,0.000271571,0.000039813676,0.00017125125,0.00026867964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037687012,0.00016247311,0.001401811,0.000109268025,0.000007527106,0.000002078248,0.009105158,0.0024864606,0.00050560385,0.9861266,0.000062812855,0.000026433778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000947787,0.00013492651,0.029176284,0.00029022654,0.000002034378,0.00004736791,0.014743531,0.09093818,0.0016316357,0.8610438,0.0006581206,0.00038612034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030359608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000092273076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12508282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049076112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005317876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3453423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024365532","doi":"10.1007/s11135-015-0197-x","title":"Egalitarianism in the rank aggregation problem: a new dimension for democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Condorcet method; Egalitarianism; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Social choice theory; Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Approval voting","score_opus":0.19318677642985135,"score_gpt":0.3334591090208167,"score_spread":0.14027233259096536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024365532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584947,0.0006344479,0.030272318,0.0045524407,0.0005740512,0.000921975,0.000046959944,0.00005431471,0.0044487873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685633,0.000006760212,0.001794991,0.00034371347,0.0001659067,0.000028936563,0.000023570448,0.0000127200565,0.0007670925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831367,0.00025683583,0.0007921995,0.00032141982,0.00006684398,0.00024903676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987831,0.00030563844,0.0003974333,0.0003925248,0.00004626829,0.000075051634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009648956,0.00012406464,0.00035249442,0.00008787743,0.00012332681,0.00009227389,0.0002617072,0.000105985666,0.000020055913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010905997,0.000110811234,0.00011128994,0.00022574885,0.000037192083,0.00028919976,0.000027263462,0.00013869646,0.00026825344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066811066,0.00008390135,0.046370782,0.000054184024,0.000010681498,4.2706392e-7,0.0039024109,0.000044236735,0.000016395277,0.94712794,0.0019876794,0.0003345723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015596406,0.00011925296,0.029180108,0.00003994593,0.0000063874154,0.0000033105566,0.00067578297,0.00079045387,0.000054324173,0.94922477,0.018117886,0.00022814909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073645073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086881785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038361605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081237726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052500967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024627245","doi":"10.1002/nav.20429","title":"Analytic solution for the nucleolus of a three‐player cooperative game","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Sequence (biology); Solution concept; Function (biology); Nucleolus; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Algebraic number; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Characteristic function (probability theory); Scale (ratio); Cooperative game theory; Game theory; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Probability density function; Statistics","score_opus":0.26565426543922893,"score_gpt":0.37807802645165445,"score_spread":0.11242376101242552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024627245","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42227364,0.0020635836,0.5098048,0.002841695,0.0030391093,0.0032872523,0.0012970329,0.00009909567,0.05529383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970177,0.000033774428,0.00048214052,0.000028797796,0.0003300226,0.00006686176,0.000009486886,0.000023898368,0.0020073454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837506,0.000073999196,0.0005472466,0.00034414956,0.00014338129,0.0005161567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659675,0.0020877314,0.00022156312,0.0005471119,0.0004545887,0.00009225395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00677175,0.00012520823,0.00035038925,0.00021222247,0.00031068662,0.000097651995,0.0005480063,0.00016767035,0.0002182995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00765335,0.00010137595,0.0001271239,0.00039546675,0.00065114425,0.00007791049,0.00012301984,0.0006744326,0.0003222548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327711,0.0000899916,0.00325587,0.00006524582,0.00008067553,0.0000017930654,0.00035700962,0.00030741206,0.0017378867,0.9915602,0.0014114539,0.0009996932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017807122,0.0010920306,0.016078155,0.0000649194,0.000035381447,0.000011896274,0.00035425648,0.44867048,0.0014472017,0.47048026,0.059507664,0.00047705852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062525773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059110235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57474405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006983649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000888668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91623276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024661330","doi":"10.5539/mas.v2n4p76","title":"The Shapley Value for Stochastic Cooperative Game","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematical proof; Cooperative game theory; Value (mathematics); Bondareva–Shapley theorem; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Repeated game; Combinatorial game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.05253488490130473,"score_gpt":0.2346072958500699,"score_spread":0.18207241094876517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024661330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13837145,0.0003203325,0.8307209,0.00019705168,0.0003837417,0.0006681303,0.00003949025,0.000058544105,0.029240342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976254,0.000005530934,0.00031803065,0.00015474291,0.000081662045,0.00013418174,0.000001111046,0.000012655961,0.0016666935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877596,0.0000071693867,0.00031667444,0.00043507045,0.000066424494,0.00039872163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991855,0.00019717732,0.00016123186,0.00033393924,0.00004470251,0.000077459685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016563139,0.00011101403,0.00019942099,0.000073519324,0.0011358344,0.00011101512,0.0005840111,0.000035480763,0.000007866212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020198863,0.00009104774,0.000046669098,0.00028716688,0.0007235708,0.00011802126,0.000062266685,0.00009077041,0.00025228786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018818211,0.000016443542,0.000052764903,0.000003375521,0.000004963305,2.128071e-7,0.0019296082,0.0045716832,0.0024409276,0.9906186,0.00006767023,0.00027493737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062585087,0.000077452634,0.0011081209,0.000008669083,0.000002736673,0.000014074374,0.00017997123,0.68428046,0.00097338046,0.30737972,0.005007426,0.00034213983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012553765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031213276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85925394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069249654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006267152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87360346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024830514","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2004.05.003","title":"On demand responsiveness in additive cost sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Axiom; Submodular set function; Economics; Cost sharing; Solidarity; Fixed cost; Monotonic function; Microeconomics; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.028820166648833582,"score_gpt":0.24796845367085876,"score_spread":0.21914828702202518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024830514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98041266,0.0005150844,0.0011786746,0.00015146447,0.0009359754,0.000121086334,0.000040789288,0.000006660914,0.016637618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901974,0.0000517389,0.000054762993,0.00016577027,0.00022664627,0.000004382366,0.0000010656568,0.00002042361,0.00045545402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854493,0.00006926015,0.0009451093,0.00020760683,0.000018156,0.0002149638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983957,0.00041987395,0.00088813814,0.00020017177,0.000018374973,0.000077778364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004174543,0.00012816682,0.000488654,0.00047564533,0.000049029164,0.00004682333,0.00031095845,0.00008412094,0.00035709256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035387487,0.00013735244,0.0001488234,0.00006545704,0.00005559721,0.00027313724,0.000033644017,0.00027264326,0.00055454153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044334243,0.000057787798,0.0030251564,0.0000081772705,0.00004761192,0.00003576472,0.0007115308,0.01264706,0.000018019387,0.9826152,0.000042492346,0.00034786566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019423437,0.00018146,0.008699111,0.00021196995,0.0000043373566,0.00007972642,0.00038354323,0.00005568612,0.00050447177,0.9859517,0.0018078961,0.00017773961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015844396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000125807255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01860711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051392935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000536258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71276945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025307914","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.01.008","title":"Single-plateaued choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convexity; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Voting; Term (time); Independence (probability theory); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10565601980597178,"score_gpt":0.27020075092955526,"score_spread":0.16454473112358348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025307914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59477276,0.000051479463,0.0015698815,0.0015978675,0.00018848445,0.00016862444,0.000005495552,0.00007022075,0.40157518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674815,3.9978624e-7,0.0006598302,0.00018991478,0.0001793647,0.000020249046,4.9247865e-7,0.0000059588715,0.0021956675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907404,0.000021913433,0.00035093597,0.00021508042,0.000055440247,0.00028258166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995346,0.0001760938,0.00015131624,0.00007557414,0.000013457281,0.00004897932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008875184,0.00008118689,0.00023701794,0.00004931785,0.0003366743,0.0002140239,0.0002745977,0.000063821564,0.004334873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036400737,0.00007136413,0.00006933739,0.0002568633,0.0002969147,0.000229586,0.000038567647,0.000064348744,0.007149408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9299954e-7,0.000060451217,0.0026089053,0.000018099761,0.000005324633,1.5508121e-7,0.0007265123,8.360105e-7,0.00007234859,0.9950578,0.0008776786,0.0005715514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009430976,0.000041737396,0.004687503,0.000011287089,0.0000014976935,0.0000014839943,0.00023525853,0.00077866897,0.000057921894,0.984582,0.009357376,0.00015096241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008334482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076763245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40197533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020941943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047220506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026409515","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.023","title":"On weighted balls-into-bins games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ball (mathematics); Bin; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Geometry","score_opus":0.01958480343885642,"score_gpt":0.21519433549914774,"score_spread":0.1956095320602913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026409515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75820464,0.00007011581,0.17628358,0.00047014927,0.00091454183,0.00012318294,0.0000061661704,0.000127058,0.06380059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943957,0.0000072248017,0.0046357396,0.0005857257,0.00017546809,0.0000045233696,8.912408e-7,0.000012136903,0.00018259083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984069,0.00004142764,0.00039386554,0.0006009608,0.00011621147,0.00044065766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891514,0.0002082244,0.00011752596,0.0005246789,0.000042745076,0.00019167941],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014919603,0.00015534178,0.00030343054,0.00022966534,0.0004678285,0.000090904556,0.0008202942,0.000058843794,0.00043860238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013396244,0.00014283041,0.00008390838,0.0005575635,0.0024764452,0.00018492478,0.00016278289,0.00017569901,0.0024413532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120811565,0.000062893814,0.00069522636,0.0000049630116,0.000004188243,0.000009994237,0.0005861034,0.000033162196,0.00002844446,0.9978495,0.00013133431,0.0005821049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028617796,0.0002776544,0.003558865,0.000026483065,0.0000012152288,0.000041072715,0.000005743813,0.055834953,0.00076401123,0.9377236,0.0012127697,0.0002674799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009766718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2868342e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23619108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065764405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002698447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027085885","doi":"10.5539/mas.v4n7p170","title":"The Weak Stable Sets for Fuzzy Cooperative Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02963755814043703,"score_gpt":0.2462144986982765,"score_spread":0.21657694055783946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027085885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720833,0.0003102918,0.1375294,0.0008248813,0.0020475672,0.0012542151,0.00013023251,0.00012185928,0.38569826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954683,0.0000045787397,0.0007181246,0.000101333804,0.000076849676,0.00012770433,0.0000014014441,0.000012118244,0.0034895833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880314,0.0000053609565,0.00028660157,0.0004297883,0.00005655397,0.0004185792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911934,0.00016265934,0.00016548148,0.00042102355,0.00005242154,0.000079089405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002826391,0.00010699229,0.00018048137,0.000067441,0.00097460963,0.0003235651,0.00064033794,0.000048742208,0.00002405312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018241783,0.000085350126,0.00003837657,0.00025363258,0.0005218817,0.00016626039,0.00007366056,0.00015982828,0.0002400557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012341748,0.00001546801,0.00024056774,0.00000495282,0.0000040965083,5.2324076e-8,0.0007182672,0.00010750706,0.025987621,0.9711094,0.00025602087,0.0015436929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005454078,0.000050571773,0.0011703034,0.0000059587787,0.0000028291574,0.0000035533608,0.0004634441,0.11708636,0.0083124535,0.77921885,0.09276423,0.00037602164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017045282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004306917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.523385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029598352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053933367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74960077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032441230","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.875839","title":"Sharing a Polluted River","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Business; Water resource management","score_opus":0.012186336469017187,"score_gpt":0.19363193782938168,"score_spread":0.1814456013603645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032441230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341213,0.0062812935,0.016070489,0.0003645052,0.0004864211,0.00008745842,0.00000956745,0.00006176277,0.04251718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815024,0.0001260566,0.00005120801,0.000045073575,0.0005481149,0.0000022002732,0.000002208784,0.00002170399,0.017701007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782646,0.000016943084,0.00045517294,0.00021162556,0.000031946933,0.0014578482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946475,0.000015778694,0.0003002241,0.00016180848,0.000017238503,0.000040225117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021864478,0.00011206117,0.000222961,0.0001697281,0.00017844139,0.00007657891,0.0002710128,0.00006678096,0.00010195534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029318671,0.000121220524,0.00012481322,0.00016162267,0.00003249493,0.0001756199,0.000027602437,0.00078984094,0.00063718297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095451405,0.000027281718,0.028182976,0.000002727041,0.000043860084,0.0000020335992,0.00007752289,0.00006581654,0.000030381021,0.97115785,0.000087648754,0.00031237438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047196125,0.000059350932,0.006068928,0.000010241225,0.0000043991026,0.00021718042,0.00012227932,0.0002865398,0.000018077899,0.98498005,0.0076012365,0.00015973602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042417506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021857621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047381107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004954089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096491756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.818991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032456884","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.030","title":"The stability of decision making in committees: The one-core","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Outcome (game theory); Politics; Economics; Political stability; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.044949723734670745,"score_gpt":0.22532244303330234,"score_spread":0.1803727192986316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032456884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899593,0.00014318115,0.0018714259,0.0025152299,0.000552628,0.00018806786,0.000015902748,0.000010800037,0.0047434485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863714,0.000026483733,0.00021243024,0.0009743224,0.00010234231,0.000013847995,0.0000011495733,0.000015688916,0.000016586835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.00006786367,0.00080930564,0.00025500744,0.00001754123,0.00023993416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974417,0.0013781411,0.00047722415,0.00067224394,0.000008750882,0.000021908578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054348,0.0001105612,0.00031376144,0.00007255832,0.00015520139,0.000068626774,0.0005462149,0.000053067422,0.000043041247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031130796,0.00008870921,0.00010800746,0.00009035591,0.00016690996,0.00009522711,0.00008211256,0.00018209645,0.000113527414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006330481,0.000042128457,0.28381634,0.000026107826,0.000035220484,2.5720897e-7,0.0016557385,0.0015390705,0.000076425145,0.707001,0.00040695636,0.0053374865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015977864,0.000110222325,0.3517482,0.00018711889,0.000011004393,0.000006729889,0.0010007776,0.028266288,0.00041137746,0.5409641,0.07498567,0.0007107071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009475703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031407122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16603684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009770082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062409385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36174566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033719953","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0210-5","title":"General concepts of value restriction and preference majority","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Preference; Transitive reduction; Mathematics; Generalization; Net (polyhedron); Value (mathematics); Preference relation; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04472247469128788,"score_gpt":0.25731025243563577,"score_spread":0.2125877777443479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033719953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776784,0.00096003513,0.000075134,0.0002331979,0.00020414125,0.00008351576,0.000055967324,0.000013860182,0.020695716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.00008526678,0.000048771908,0.00003120697,0.00013214292,0.0000047661065,0.0000039334363,0.000006141168,0.00035533268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941605,0.00004464908,0.00022502645,0.00017646875,0.000020519245,0.00011729224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969476,0.00002857734,0.00015621126,0.0000665528,0.000019635256,0.000034244844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030901423,0.00007233122,0.00020343163,0.000039460447,0.00018882217,0.000022232342,0.000041379088,0.00009185034,0.000045769284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105935425,0.00008228495,0.000030995263,0.00009028545,0.00006945668,0.00009007157,0.000013941838,0.00007922193,0.00000487479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030111523,0.000012823634,0.1438777,0.000043587905,0.000011602943,1.5431468e-7,0.0005032446,0.0000013937099,0.000025442952,0.85521346,0.000058056437,0.00024948982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009566501,0.000109794004,0.8023714,0.000020888468,0.000015453557,0.0000034616783,0.0008028975,0.000060179176,0.00015977633,0.12858446,0.06662526,0.00028978975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005590415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015877702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.726629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014018597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054581724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33554828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038047385","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2012.04.002","title":"On graphs which can or cannot induce Chinese Postman games with a non-empty core","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Vertex (graph theory); Traverse; Characterization (materials science); Core (optical fiber); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Graph; Undirected graph; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029788432610125332,"score_gpt":0.24329480211644156,"score_spread":0.2135063695063162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038047385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9232239,0.000052117706,0.0014278085,0.00009290477,0.00018600297,0.00054490624,0.00014568453,0.00008470219,0.07424194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965677,0.000006452453,0.0019584836,0.00019640231,0.0001197554,0.000114371236,0.000036320227,0.00007839605,0.0009220691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984046,0.000008086221,0.00059555203,0.00034847614,0.00009308167,0.00055019744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984327,0.00016593558,0.00051733985,0.0006586894,0.000031024323,0.00019429081],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071977725,0.0003520241,0.00066299137,0.0001918169,0.00015491266,0.00007143294,0.00032245583,0.00014311247,0.00016894282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104512226,0.00025551106,0.00007490711,0.0005204711,0.00007162262,0.00010389684,0.000060315993,0.0002649689,0.0003799589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087068714,0.0002084638,0.008048648,0.00025719704,0.000100013574,0.0000021274086,0.008524738,0.000030807027,0.00011865309,0.9823299,0.00023384688,0.000058539885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005003251,0.0010407246,0.040310476,0.00069072563,0.00015119476,0.00014251041,0.007764455,0.0030154497,0.0012038369,0.9351222,0.0021475912,0.0034075726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008201762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012588668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07334381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005835149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026195998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045635999","doi":"10.1257/0002828054825592","title":"Meetings with Costly Participation: Reply","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Economics; Interval (graph theory); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.027528889469893673,"score_gpt":0.26155518356281265,"score_spread":0.23402629409291897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045635999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4600665,0.10332158,0.00092570396,0.02418381,0.0004714287,0.001469399,0.000086682005,0.00031599167,0.4091589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786629,0.009919187,0.00097516546,0.008126232,0.0002816914,0.00011447386,0.000009429341,0.00003751615,0.0018734011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828434,0.000049930983,0.0008933645,0.00045007598,0.000020069307,0.00030219014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982447,0.00007881078,0.0010126723,0.00053641305,0.000015485717,0.000111887726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011979383,0.00017734733,0.0007771946,0.00006247015,0.0000709166,0.00004242372,0.00023767802,0.000018420653,0.0008498423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008565793,0.00017481408,0.00011681558,0.00014285595,0.0001594611,0.0002240265,0.000027071528,0.000093022325,0.007312313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008065683,0.0002157034,0.13127159,0.0013509942,0.0004493359,0.000010812159,0.0009200723,0.00072188413,0.0000071833233,0.52039486,0.044367913,0.30020902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022383698,0.00013298777,0.00428671,0.00045420122,0.000020665379,0.000020841297,0.000029767652,0.00021085009,0.000018583376,0.000486681,0.9937953,0.0003196046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022744125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039764192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94942737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001521046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002379433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050536663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0272-x","title":"Subgame perfect implementation of stable matchings in marriage problems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.020809126429007035,"score_gpt":0.2627575820979687,"score_spread":0.24194845566896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050536663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919394,0.00033837324,0.00010500828,0.000375988,0.000114859366,0.00017738342,0.00005759765,0.000014240626,0.006877106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959683,0.000012887191,0.000018619372,0.000039152794,0.000110571615,0.000006921572,0.000012678935,0.00001132675,0.00019098155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991528,0.000018901781,0.00042085917,0.00016918828,0.000027264483,0.00021101674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999629,0.000039293638,0.00022697556,0.0000628498,0.000014547969,0.000027298487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301534,0.000079712016,0.00023760702,0.00011520214,0.00011160135,0.000024066583,0.00006710745,0.00007070164,0.00020617417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022834274,0.00009384843,0.000043843498,0.0001607514,0.000028361781,0.00014509783,0.000022528353,0.00009070628,0.0000112087955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008614715,0.000026876829,0.796214,0.00017190725,0.000015225447,7.917635e-7,0.0067932103,0.0000021165256,0.00013280007,0.1946769,0.000042276504,0.0019152773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083592505,0.0000578977,0.9629595,0.000021759892,0.0000041949515,9.714522e-7,0.005394792,0.0000087516555,0.0001622167,0.017118394,0.013265529,0.00017005055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048350305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001346618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17755851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041900435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052216797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7309152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051424146","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0511-4","title":"Intergovernmental negotiation, willingness to compromise, and voter preference reversals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Outcome (game theory); Ideal point; Bargaining problem; Economics; Preference; Ideal (ethics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law and economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.027061828627450924,"score_gpt":0.22369747764854733,"score_spread":0.1966356490210964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051424146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928371,0.00007066812,0.0001362733,0.002465631,0.00044479477,0.00014950466,0.00009897999,0.00002521283,0.0037718934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987186,0.0000053565523,0.00007086334,0.00029288203,0.00032119564,0.000011751784,0.0000069446423,0.000011424666,0.00056097785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993368,0.00001296232,0.00022434306,0.0002509876,0.000028754348,0.0001461481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996751,0.000029463923,0.000117309806,0.00009040933,0.000016406346,0.000071342685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024276735,0.00009845101,0.00020049918,0.000030656,0.00025107802,0.000088206936,0.00009291183,0.00009159302,0.00013355001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007804981,0.000109380606,0.000028848897,0.00006630162,0.00004850729,0.00014578547,0.00006109531,0.00013982724,0.000040395647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002788945,0.000047379082,0.6609012,0.00010832568,0.000043984946,7.7267885e-7,0.007198101,0.0000010763623,0.00061238225,0.32793647,0.0009240722,0.0021983727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006533972,0.000063729494,0.8896479,0.000023138608,0.00000850136,0.0000034254288,0.0007542517,0.00005959097,0.00009716476,0.012016253,0.09635039,0.00032223779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028674578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015196393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3159202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018311075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027870085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44604117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052020474","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2014.07.005","title":"Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Australian Research Council; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Heuristic; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18400626271027948,"score_gpt":0.2990024360764078,"score_spread":0.11499617336612833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052020474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59158623,0.000480056,0.4068998,0.00022976767,0.00015881284,0.00019481288,0.000041522762,0.00000819912,0.00040074755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979415,0.000018928275,0.0019156093,0.000016397988,0.000067003675,0.0000059006325,0.0000022470385,0.0000065028726,0.000025888745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992353,0.000024502708,0.0004547439,0.00016050178,0.000021313972,0.000103680424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906665,0.00044523005,0.00030920314,0.0001203026,0.00003858872,0.000020027033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013289549,0.00006585804,0.0002162395,0.00004570629,0.000100862075,0.000022307653,0.00009463635,0.00003730147,0.000012983909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030732545,0.000059150712,0.000036762234,0.00006131053,0.0002374239,0.00006384213,0.000028272874,0.00004051861,0.000005809832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013917188,0.000013903616,0.0048875622,0.00006103236,0.000010568715,2.0969539e-8,0.0005349107,0.00015830292,0.00014978553,0.96683383,0.0000032252633,0.027332956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003892695,0.000105204905,0.013440838,0.00003859117,0.00000862055,0.0000015310776,0.00043599296,0.40197787,0.006588459,0.5765177,0.0007397468,0.00010650441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003016874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005124876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40635526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000047426347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023874366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052867428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198913400033","title":"CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE KAR AND FOLK SOLUTIONS FOR MINIMUM COST SPANNING TREE PROBLEMS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Spanning tree; Minimum spanning tree; Focus (optics); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06472994470482157,"score_gpt":0.25378321654376934,"score_spread":0.18905327183894777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052867428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561591,0.29097462,0.15570523,0.049026683,0.009390154,0.022225864,0.0033801666,0.0003115219,0.21282667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904296,0.0029375355,0.00011557583,0.00060500525,0.00010910888,0.0004407646,0.00002726016,0.00001824812,0.0053169015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896204,0.000059297763,0.0006013992,0.00018604577,0.000035107867,0.00015610314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893004,0.00020271167,0.00051648327,0.00021879442,0.000098768316,0.000033176668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012492905,0.00010039926,0.00029058714,0.0000624456,0.000080421414,0.000038043265,0.00030325734,0.000037182876,0.00035977678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052386173,0.000082396225,0.00013840046,0.00010270316,0.000095743446,0.00016789332,0.00007917694,0.000067707486,0.000118027005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035189923,0.00003703292,0.0015881861,0.00045277635,0.000071491384,3.776939e-8,0.00021543911,0.000010714215,0.00019007218,0.9914858,0.0004909778,0.005454002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007827475,0.000071314185,0.021784343,0.00486017,0.00006802438,0.000028115164,0.000101551406,0.0029004496,0.000085478074,0.5673702,0.40154594,0.00040168344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011915848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020697216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026314678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010571643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39393035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058073069","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0119-x","title":"Top-Pair and Top-Triple Monotonicity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Unanimity; Axiom; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Political science","score_opus":0.014572614985093603,"score_gpt":0.21724274845518812,"score_spread":0.20267013347009452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058073069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96867514,0.0015889279,0.000051451658,0.002227154,0.00021792113,0.00012202785,0.00007500175,0.000051194835,0.026991172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731773,0.000017346141,0.000023115392,0.00013142815,0.0005227108,0.000010476044,0.000010552629,0.000012407069,0.0019542493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992298,0.000019533332,0.00026207417,0.00025876125,0.000021928805,0.00020793454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969417,0.000029844608,0.00012842813,0.000092344104,0.000014228791,0.00004096633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030190917,0.00010929046,0.00025706078,0.000055210054,0.00038877685,0.00007933483,0.00007093207,0.00011978574,0.000090444104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035618705,0.00012457775,0.00005522416,0.00009902425,0.000062783154,0.000120452634,0.000039542592,0.000106759224,0.00003471953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053081617,0.000025261617,0.44505176,0.000045533354,0.000013442242,0.0000010067371,0.0004510499,0.0000011795951,0.000009935123,0.55270505,0.0008708088,0.00081966317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065426616,0.000038004342,0.62923425,0.000008693471,0.0000079304145,0.0000030360604,0.00042620118,0.00007407162,0.000042826254,0.059264977,0.30996954,0.00027616817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021824744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011568966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024171437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040262653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059384236","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3","title":"An Agreement Index with Respect to a Consensus Preorder","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Index (typography); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.023357741022663383,"score_gpt":0.25080412286548137,"score_spread":0.22744638184281799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059384236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414252,0.0002351559,0.05360471,0.0004013898,0.00013134058,0.00027081164,0.000009685581,0.00003708575,0.0038845916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973356,0.000010054721,0.0017367968,0.0006049384,0.00006863168,0.0000059905983,0.0000054729444,0.00000780717,0.00022471772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909014,0.000028248242,0.00033873867,0.00033461457,0.00005457409,0.0001536944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.000065795604,0.0001368275,0.0002543217,0.000027469032,0.00011125317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069254555,0.0001046587,0.00019584715,0.00019574196,0.000101735604,0.00009716664,0.00008529586,0.00005778379,0.00009886597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080812475,0.00009622638,0.000022511445,0.00020544509,0.000014028901,0.00010980009,0.000010969249,0.000061680876,0.00015967376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016761661,0.00046933786,0.16382572,0.000016285761,0.000037654183,0.000015665883,0.003907857,0.0009309039,0.0006064518,0.6593744,0.0019818032,0.16715772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016611642,0.0016381298,0.89218265,0.000065382206,0.000005232109,0.000021202788,0.00025649692,0.004825401,0.00006625759,0.08488202,0.014058797,0.0003372938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037531834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005179852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003342962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045816846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3923998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059561827","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0242-x","title":"Maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation with variable probabilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017390282155391422,"score_gpt":0.2021745656071914,"score_spread":0.18478428345179998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059561827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638493,0.0005202592,0.012196729,0.003985816,0.00026661457,0.0007337608,0.00013750675,0.00014717241,0.118162885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977222,0.0000024970761,0.001274255,0.00019188154,0.000300606,0.00005346396,0.000016104183,0.000019186,0.0004198067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917567,0.0000148039835,0.00022840114,0.00030003945,0.000035152105,0.0002459204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996537,0.000013463727,0.000114408336,0.00011771618,0.00003277875,0.00006794469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000341745,0.00012202007,0.00023775846,0.00006753869,0.00035057883,0.000094299176,0.000095776006,0.00009430242,0.000011483149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048074417,0.00012253567,0.000034383662,0.0002170024,0.00004600773,0.00017023772,0.000026596615,0.00010045257,0.00003361698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001844339,0.00007825362,0.013046176,0.00014908359,0.000034253313,3.3133568e-7,0.0042791553,0.00012071671,0.000004083299,0.98138475,0.000064843814,0.00081990345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023573549,0.00038067158,0.05437133,0.000109978064,0.000027240518,0.000012658751,0.004106369,0.000042200314,0.000049550043,0.8337098,0.10400028,0.0008325829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010040404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007419263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14767496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006871491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016528125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49968597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061176792","doi":"10.1007/s001990050316","title":"Outsiders' threat and consecutive offers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence (biology); Mathematical economics; Economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Key (lock); Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01480560339313146,"score_gpt":0.19213144430074885,"score_spread":0.17732584090761738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061176792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7386048,0.0010433802,0.000098764875,0.00018229625,0.0003132284,0.00013288396,0.00009011055,0.00005955324,0.259475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98145074,0.00012869592,0.00004358141,0.0003554157,0.00013742174,0.000012895019,0.0000049301125,0.000026411166,0.017839931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.000063471314,0.00044195363,0.0004109002,0.000008909126,0.00026886215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923235,0.0002207652,0.00014807071,0.00030099566,0.000003782547,0.00009406293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011492422,0.00016686741,0.0003879288,0.0000970463,0.00011620632,0.000062634004,0.00015837839,0.00009570668,0.008143313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032528278,0.00019320627,0.00008703095,0.000029781608,0.00020987514,0.000179291,0.000026580983,0.00011618338,0.0069041774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007398531,0.0000144513615,0.010863536,0.0000105865165,0.00007131896,0.0000027333695,0.001460682,0.00004439498,0.0000045257843,0.9841634,0.00048575588,0.0028046353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009672342,0.00007426994,0.01042363,0.000023203513,0.000010478016,0.000044010227,0.0008352345,0.00034199024,0.00012313657,0.94306564,0.04364319,0.00044797623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011087763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009293128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24284592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007613957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013555002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99386907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061278102","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0775-6","title":"Shapley–Shubik methods in cost sharing problems with technological cooperation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Anonymity; Shapley value; Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Offset (computer science); Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Cost sharing; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05032072340237173,"score_gpt":0.2856103721619279,"score_spread":0.23528964875955619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061278102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729174,0.0005977528,0.0035705452,0.003990492,0.00009897168,0.000814098,0.000024855823,0.00012303534,0.017862888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987409,0.000013154939,0.00055103254,0.000096681644,0.000083300045,0.00015485981,0.000011446391,0.000013839093,0.00033476585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991196,0.000034450208,0.00030147578,0.00030342487,0.000020187299,0.00022089813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967295,0.000039529645,0.0001255133,0.00010073347,0.000025714931,0.000035552413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006677445,0.00011251228,0.00027231994,0.00009754192,0.00022966291,0.00012521714,0.00012469824,0.00016059773,0.00025697486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009534729,0.00010315385,0.000027115473,0.00024196162,0.0000829253,0.000228829,0.000048552203,0.00019767703,0.00005897719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005403049,0.000052839194,0.27797112,0.00007643831,0.000021971642,9.875595e-7,0.0010998175,0.000031371812,0.00010219908,0.7100227,0.000062694366,0.010552443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023740148,0.00025627122,0.7986874,0.00013687156,0.000013876814,0.000013156967,0.0030790383,0.003488015,0.00011035546,0.09516677,0.095651075,0.0010231632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084176863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015920828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61485595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042300908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037863144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42064917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061329264","doi":"10.1080/07900620500108494","title":"Water Allocation among Multiple Stakeholders: Conflict Analysis of the Waiahole Water Project, Hawaii","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Water Resources Development","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Water resources; Ditch; Population; Water trading; Competition (biology); Business; Resource allocation; Optimal allocation; Water resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Water conservation; Environmental science; Management; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06511568998868027,"score_gpt":0.2412568649452572,"score_spread":0.17614117495657694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061329264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963576,0.000071417315,0.0006686687,0.0011258996,0.0004753385,0.0001354762,0.000014207585,0.000008304295,0.0011430765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969379,0.0000071429236,0.0002609934,0.00012964736,0.00018318027,0.000007889927,0.00002911498,0.000015408534,0.002428749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791056,0.000060584363,0.001356981,0.00019173,0.00022891871,0.00025121713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900556,0.000029103145,0.0005087128,0.00016709595,0.00024303429,0.000046473946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015598414,0.00015086107,0.00038783546,0.0006697137,0.000085959786,0.00011021851,0.0006599738,0.000067702545,0.0002461745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028162409,0.00007860427,0.0002684606,0.00010337948,0.00007579969,0.00026445137,0.00014447965,0.00015674585,0.00008788151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003905999,0.0006423994,0.7106821,0.00006479066,0.010507551,0.000021087948,0.2348309,0.020849386,0.017464897,0.0013244819,0.00051299325,0.002708794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018020854,0.0000665942,0.10324135,0.00014486135,0.0001571682,0.00003837452,0.001626654,0.0026999607,0.28967002,0.00033545503,0.5997744,0.00044304362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013000508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007641548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60744077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018870039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001343772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3205389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063156741","doi":"10.1111/0034-6527.00278","title":"Voting on Majority Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Majority rule; Political science; Library science; Classics; Economic history; Economics; History; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.09021665150497513,"score_gpt":0.3015812920012613,"score_spread":0.2113646404962862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063156741","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12205089,0.71074736,0.000027996251,0.0011299741,0.001230109,0.00046538186,0.00005552065,0.000030106865,0.1642627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100943,0.088084675,0.00008190383,0.0005710192,0.00011520831,0.000032157142,0.0000010957592,0.000015571915,0.0010040373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867415,0.00009601863,0.00080872513,0.00022683537,0.000015417887,0.00017884502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985717,0.0003829655,0.000642008,0.00036399538,0.000017594568,0.000021761212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003367427,0.00014070314,0.00076973357,0.00004557955,0.00012411248,0.000009512611,0.00022197649,0.000025550487,0.0001927509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075658195,0.00010638807,0.0001829824,0.000051038733,0.00011532791,0.0000504034,0.00003977581,0.00009143479,0.0016404319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002042966,0.000013567714,0.0022523352,0.0014406532,0.00013983411,1.8069908e-7,0.00015908762,0.000010093425,4.1734117e-7,0.9939015,0.0016643787,0.00041589243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00100986,0.0002865037,0.0046909344,0.014228502,0.00013043566,0.000030411147,0.0012839118,0.00010494499,0.00037276623,0.4375814,0.53926545,0.0010148752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001598199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030342578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78804344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076797216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009429545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063679188","doi":"10.1007/s10058-003-0101-3","title":"Probabilistic assignments of identical indivisible objects and uniform probabilistic rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Class (philosophy); Anonymity; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Characterization (materials science); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Commodity; Preference; Computer science; Pareto efficiency; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05515193160101946,"score_gpt":0.26031043679700505,"score_spread":0.2051585051959856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063679188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55753124,0.25299743,0.016322121,0.00019830141,0.0017448929,0.007895291,0.0004014356,0.000110207315,0.16279909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918599,0.005654849,0.0020417548,0.000049538157,0.000020821133,0.000050395298,0.000005575753,0.000023813875,0.00029334924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977299,0.00015018122,0.0014840894,0.00036223565,0.00003318089,0.00024043526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982085,0.0003272894,0.00096547866,0.00038460243,0.000026851189,0.000087233035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034914105,0.0001846671,0.0009746491,0.0001269569,0.000039574938,0.000023090459,0.00020754765,0.00007699865,0.00037479994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010831808,0.00019122375,0.00012518157,0.00009179743,0.00015310003,0.00015354478,0.00003558053,0.000084683576,0.00023959484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008455163,0.00009698781,0.0038951267,0.008987503,0.00008047269,8.2532887e-7,0.00011144698,0.000102244514,0.000010615147,0.9861086,0.00020014397,0.00039757806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015043597,0.0006271864,0.0045854812,0.009969542,0.00015900256,0.000059592185,0.00009207346,0.0018213141,0.0007057117,0.97260207,0.007002314,0.0008713408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016134742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013110268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43432868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010300157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007227602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77978784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064898218","doi":"10.1239/jap/1197908809","title":"Bounds for Owen's Multilinear Extension","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Multilinear map; Extension (predicate logic); Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Blocking (statistics); Mathematical economics; Voting; Game theory; Field (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05036639708956518,"score_gpt":0.25760286886966155,"score_spread":0.20723647178009635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064898218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540259,0.00019402432,0.035161443,0.0001398621,0.0007017421,0.00040835893,0.00001570459,0.000017030401,0.009335925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501253,0.0000039590736,0.014359582,0.00009997744,0.00038211883,0.0000045072698,0.0000012867575,0.000014372961,0.000121635225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983235,0.000009847366,0.00116416,0.0002112794,0.000047265832,0.00024395518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983432,0.00022964078,0.00094962766,0.00025020746,0.00012804936,0.00009925936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008378692,0.0001102818,0.0004354494,0.00011890596,0.00008850427,0.000034488563,0.0001890449,0.000107860134,0.000045720528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035114394,0.000103576924,0.0001973624,0.00011579748,0.00006657715,0.000099775854,0.000022432907,0.00018616905,0.00004186526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024617584,0.0006969015,0.01697313,0.00036462455,0.0001229048,0.000005630435,0.0016430204,0.00054173754,0.002353055,0.96351546,0.0009948283,0.01032692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020561132,0.00035012074,0.016112465,0.000034381384,0.000016200736,0.000027329665,0.00021714884,0.00077502633,0.0035062842,0.8925842,0.08403739,0.00028333737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003959032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035572984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08304256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010758765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021900454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42237443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065446059","doi":"10.1109/scc.2010.54","title":"Applying Bargaining Game Theory to Web Services Negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Web service; Service provider; Service (business); Game theory; Nash equilibrium; WS-Policy; Service level; Service-level agreement; Bargaining problem; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Business; Microeconomics; Quality of service; Marketing; Economics; Web development; Telecommunications; Web application security; Law","score_opus":0.016831437525046546,"score_gpt":0.21458269114824735,"score_spread":0.1977512536232008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065446059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7143079,0.000102128535,0.007513829,0.00013371279,0.00093850715,0.0003427105,0.000015450045,0.00015805582,0.27648768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946329,0.0000020051943,0.0010957954,0.0008790905,0.00026823545,0.000071462746,0.0000046746377,0.00002093811,0.0030248857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990833,0.000020566633,0.0003661909,0.00028094303,0.0000234443,0.00022557899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936795,0.00009808634,0.00014302852,0.00028442827,0.000018534849,0.00008796371],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015481558,0.000107284635,0.00020662576,0.00016602107,0.000088205285,0.000104045976,0.00022248566,0.00008579126,0.0009490596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086243395,0.00011520556,0.000053433443,0.00017178725,0.000013906417,0.0001894406,0.00005010273,0.00015601388,0.0035423948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008025646,0.000013482701,0.026248109,0.000016401893,0.00000997123,4.126054e-7,0.0009413206,0.000039679435,0.0017918543,0.9684065,0.000042746557,0.002481479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008838979,0.000101605634,0.021507429,0.00006283422,0.00000913374,0.000014657864,0.0022285013,0.015958533,0.0016524617,0.64774096,0.30893406,0.00090594357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006543641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006330275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014071326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006292251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727666","doi":"10.1177/0951629807080774","title":"Justice Preferences and the Arrow Problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Social welfare function; Arrow; Normative; Economics; Condorcet method; Redistribution (election); Majority rule; Voting; Function (biology); Welfare; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032161730264083276,"score_gpt":0.2570972878179075,"score_spread":0.22493555755382424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7980148,0.0022109493,0.022500118,0.0040456895,0.0010428072,0.00017767058,0.000017075608,0.000013903985,0.17197698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790055,0.0000420288,0.0009091204,0.00037679146,0.00053062395,4.6417148e-7,1.5197318e-7,0.00000881333,0.00023146566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874353,0.000068380745,0.00078706874,0.000088479384,0.000055605098,0.00025693563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825394,0.000942401,0.00048093926,0.00012667995,0.00006645517,0.00012957379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005621144,0.000087479806,0.0003280342,0.00008756439,0.00009657765,0.000064270935,0.00022994858,0.000070221395,0.000079092584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010023605,0.000056095312,0.00009716664,0.000072523304,0.00086658093,0.00007578221,0.000035320558,0.00027179442,0.000029593773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007313266,0.000024083734,0.0010485243,0.000040233157,0.000033468332,0.000004104889,0.0006605177,0.0000035449066,0.0000031415934,0.9978956,0.0001106527,0.0001030193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068836246,0.00010130478,0.00076452544,0.00003735482,0.000039530805,0.00012251058,0.0003895333,0.0001379202,0.000074059615,0.994785,0.0027848545,0.00007501669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070796104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.435494e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19988574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025869504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013650421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31929535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068870728","doi":"10.5565/publmat_59115_06","title":"Fraction-like ratings from preferential voting","year":2015,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Publicacions Matemàtiques","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fraction (chemistry); Voting; Statistics; Combinatorics; Political science; Chromatography; Chemistry; Law","score_opus":0.07975917355629482,"score_gpt":0.26112716131416597,"score_spread":0.18136798775787116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068870728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8727352,0.0048084254,0.018040238,0.004461182,0.0077225957,0.0009075156,0.0014712296,0.00094419153,0.0889094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891465,0.000085544176,0.0010303847,0.00034146503,0.0015394124,0.000080790356,0.0003060528,0.00010058246,0.0073692817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962364,0.00028506014,0.0016047758,0.00097512733,0.00015080617,0.0007478736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682605,0.00027810523,0.0013372734,0.00075251365,0.00029133423,0.00051470194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023581882,0.00046983172,0.00094765186,0.00046141265,0.00035828154,0.0011936253,0.0006516646,0.0004853166,0.0014889926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010870778,0.0005663741,0.00026695943,0.00046973221,0.00011504449,0.0014161419,0.00027595856,0.0006335546,0.004650958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012713297,0.0006650847,0.07987783,0.00017698284,0.0005477647,0.00000827479,0.005092193,0.00009422107,0.00009698778,0.8596848,0.052167725,0.001460958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002319227,0.0003596423,0.011763755,0.0004320355,0.00011776017,0.00002351197,0.004193712,0.01464243,0.0008325745,0.09865015,0.8647354,0.001929788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018355655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009130245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034558732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013163533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070069110","doi":"10.1007/s00182-013-0407-5","title":"Linking the Kar and folk solutions through a problem separation property","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Shapley value; Affine transformation; Steiner tree problem; Set (abstract data type); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Connection (principal bundle); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Separation (statistics); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.03995072654535058,"score_gpt":0.2618093603182075,"score_spread":0.22185863377285692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070069110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43977657,0.0040482683,0.41639918,0.010430764,0.003828083,0.0004258273,0.000037524413,0.000054507036,0.12499928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700606,0.0000656171,0.00058159797,0.00036999368,0.00064758264,0.000004246863,0.0000015853313,0.000011178738,0.0013121678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989532,0.00013877619,0.00058562355,0.0001160107,0.000079812344,0.00012654049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878985,0.0002379147,0.00068678585,0.00011349272,0.00014176796,0.000030193878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035790736,0.000086208034,0.00019039486,0.00009687371,0.0000966728,0.00012185684,0.00034636582,0.00004855891,0.000053672604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028088255,0.000054756234,0.00009498604,0.000055638047,0.000099920806,0.0003350171,0.000057163856,0.00019555072,0.000065892964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006928649,0.000037132813,0.0014789109,0.000008217695,0.000113436836,0.0000017232855,0.0028019066,0.00027219552,0.000104044375,0.9905618,0.00017379898,0.0043775714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004792643,0.00010766106,0.0010806154,0.00011306538,0.000011241918,0.00015430646,0.00020672873,0.0014673042,0.00007313551,0.9093882,0.08681881,0.000099702906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012388062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034671507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55722946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050264633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017296472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22328945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071697652","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.004","title":"Threshold strategy-proofness: on manipulability in large voting problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Lipschitz continuity; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Law","score_opus":0.050713419178953466,"score_gpt":0.24800912576121684,"score_spread":0.19729570658226336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071697652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99351734,0.0004802103,0.00006675977,0.00012147061,0.00034802867,0.0004491089,0.000086224194,0.000048658192,0.004882206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993363,0.000029413259,0.00003198029,0.000066532884,0.00009263915,0.00010592321,0.000010793398,0.000028573979,0.00029784648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.000013871299,0.000738078,0.0006022465,0.00001712615,0.00043266252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.000022263452,0.00024917506,0.00030339282,0.0000059131426,0.000087987195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031884,0.00021121991,0.0004604377,0.00015688674,0.00009442726,0.00011566144,0.00017323393,0.00014060977,0.00020537685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014884443,0.00023877429,0.000086139815,0.000063419546,0.000055226163,0.00022919489,0.00005682049,0.00022442048,0.0004332067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013559432,0.00020734376,0.5668325,0.000050330476,0.000008566271,0.000005844313,0.00043601543,0.0020113543,0.00001292188,0.4294338,0.0000075150474,0.0009802666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030138942,0.00028311598,0.9196818,0.0001370065,0.000012947956,0.000025119496,0.00059133006,0.001510444,0.000099100405,0.072721876,0.0011740895,0.000749286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061731995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067304564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021666483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018686034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072852712","doi":"10.1007/s00199-002-0279-6","title":"Candidate stability and nonbinary social choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematical proof; Arrow; Voting; Generalization; Impossibility; Property (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematics; Path (computing); Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027414449827399708,"score_gpt":0.2205319971908982,"score_spread":0.19311754736349848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072852712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86710614,0.00074997125,0.00023099777,0.00009300531,0.000621836,0.00013557168,0.00010464243,0.000047240876,0.1309106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978561,0.000017098022,0.000044670527,0.00013442477,0.0001722202,0.000015474856,0.000004701872,0.000024878758,0.0017304363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866027,0.00014669036,0.00047239347,0.00042319085,0.000009928962,0.00028752704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917096,0.00023101793,0.0002448002,0.00026792532,0.0000058215182,0.00007947926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002651787,0.00015623131,0.00037323526,0.000080930426,0.0002086221,0.00006144822,0.00014188366,0.00009891422,0.002154769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001449999,0.00018904664,0.0000685236,0.00003905447,0.00015710595,0.00018964183,0.000038784845,0.00013649392,0.0010128713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020530066,0.00002294951,0.027383007,0.000021932012,0.00003458454,7.8485687e-7,0.0009485764,0.0000032324685,0.000030151541,0.9711338,0.00020430009,0.00019614116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010550217,0.00007563696,0.023022644,0.000009140477,0.000010247876,0.000019714862,0.0006944278,0.000099574114,0.00046313606,0.87929994,0.094713874,0.00053662685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008520769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003528522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13074996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013006598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023189674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073696507","doi":"10.1007/s11424-012-0258-3","title":"The sufficient and necessary condition of the major stochastic preference rule in group decision making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Complexity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Mathematical economics; Decision rule; Mathematics; Stochastic modelling; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08141169890930407,"score_gpt":0.2703433213755843,"score_spread":0.18893162246628026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073696507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926941,0.00337235,0.0024662667,0.00005730887,0.0008550688,0.00012878762,0.000008064982,0.0000015758653,0.00041649555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998455,0.000016263684,0.000049221988,0.000013775431,0.000060399223,0.0000019509262,5.465478e-8,0.0000025103316,0.000010319797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988775,0.000060376082,0.0006218053,0.000105468716,0.00014229763,0.00019252251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986465,0.00024652414,0.0008259807,0.0001445336,0.000083655155,0.00005282783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066877645,0.00006449007,0.00022612358,0.00012708889,0.0003218403,0.00010805986,0.00031501628,0.000026880844,0.000002952723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034133455,0.000038831655,0.00002982848,0.0003090625,0.0005248896,0.00038319174,0.00009257068,0.00012653174,0.0000018491426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059933536,0.00010427885,0.27130464,0.00009318174,0.000012177437,5.238066e-7,0.0022783463,0.00027565338,0.0005097583,0.7244242,0.00003927529,0.00089805643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033339244,0.000080904116,0.94792795,0.0005155041,0.0000052492182,0.0001285087,0.0021822115,0.004346548,0.000023291826,0.044251867,0.00011678452,0.00008781529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006305235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013076676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6801723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006052228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002587589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24753681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073789589","doi":"10.4236/tel.2012.24068","title":"Revenue Sharing in Hierarchical Organizations: A New Interpretation of the Generalized Banzhaf Value","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Revenue; Aggregate (composite); Productivity; Earnings; Shapley value; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Hierarchical organization; Task (project management); Production (economics); Interpretation (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Statistics; Management","score_opus":0.01225796509326302,"score_gpt":0.20778097467491757,"score_spread":0.19552300958165456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073789589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98477054,0.00013966074,0.008022753,0.003446262,0.0005798876,0.00019235598,0.00003065148,0.0000143386205,0.0028035403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976038,0.000017556642,0.0005305182,0.0014769374,0.00021005051,0.0000075508074,0.0000055047662,0.000028485585,0.00011960506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867284,0.00008419309,0.0007045976,0.0002264066,0.000019425668,0.00029253567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.00014515333,0.00026102056,0.00037540743,0.0000084992125,0.000087104396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011743291,0.00012349407,0.00033366986,0.00012100879,0.00004567521,0.00003176627,0.00039230584,0.00008199623,0.00029183144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004508425,0.0001200058,0.00009650877,0.0002191438,0.0002299681,0.0001703441,0.000118543074,0.00019756632,0.00014376451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002545604,0.000029481216,0.03842266,0.000015324465,0.000017556365,1.1587158e-7,0.0017734353,0.0015368114,0.0002135081,0.9577845,0.00011312734,0.00006806701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096235075,0.000019920884,0.02203504,0.00009907387,0.000015801284,0.000011175337,0.00006159935,0.024943626,0.0008373126,0.94971,0.00096328725,0.00034079244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092438786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008231648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023406815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011605996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016903474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48936948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075144567","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.30","title":"Social Choice as a Continuous Mapping from IRn→IR: A Group Invariance Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mathematical proof; Group (periodic table); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","score_opus":0.054545762031939705,"score_gpt":0.2544953307521742,"score_spread":0.19994956872023448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075144567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8060972,0.020557635,0.015775641,0.0012074132,0.0026128849,0.0007023365,0.00018511931,0.000041345367,0.15282042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934317,0.002254509,0.003540577,0.0022102827,0.002339426,0.000012919851,0.000011014376,0.000032767886,0.0002553406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969159,0.00019163564,0.002113129,0.00039594603,0.00004126686,0.00034212845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957978,0.00016172702,0.003491473,0.0003404067,0.00004403894,0.00016453487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035700807,0.00028621993,0.0016273739,0.00011433469,0.00013543657,0.0001807716,0.00064143137,0.00018707964,0.000084554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069828343,0.00029266527,0.0005667555,0.00016940704,0.00006293938,0.00033281947,0.000060144284,0.00035048588,0.00088621315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009865631,0.00023830701,0.020461256,0.00013619848,0.00022445769,0.000003320498,0.00043722877,0.00014172512,0.000006075871,0.9555971,0.004935261,0.017720385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280369,0.00021984233,0.007922053,0.00020072397,0.000025564841,0.00005111874,0.00006922541,0.00083895883,0.0000020083737,0.09010178,0.8989217,0.00036663728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014922391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014598786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89398646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035766573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029129998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075784261","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1889(01)00053-7","title":"Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost allocation; Reduction (mathematics); Economics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Total cost; Function (biology); Cost reduction; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.01539574700020116,"score_gpt":0.19474260092555118,"score_spread":0.17934685392535002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075784261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98391825,0.0020111357,0.0055921557,0.0015937131,0.0009883185,0.00024553732,0.00012750603,0.000008358311,0.0055150245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848264,0.00021753082,0.00008626923,0.00004997721,0.00024910425,0.000002728409,0.000002864549,0.000012149704,0.0008967407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862444,0.000036615464,0.0010372339,0.00014308977,0.000023365745,0.00013526139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.00004529943,0.0014538675,0.00013310462,0.00004645005,0.000070679576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010743279,0.000105166466,0.0004769605,0.00021179317,0.00005437863,0.00003742968,0.000111849455,0.00008148956,0.00014473847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050269762,0.00011493266,0.00014983877,0.00004183265,0.00007150991,0.00022999896,0.000010525078,0.0000974339,0.00005910787],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020889513,0.00022599698,0.007249917,0.00006996244,0.0005262029,0.0000026536688,0.0005822752,0.025275955,0.0010652258,0.95513105,0.00075484265,0.008907009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027534715,0.00034043824,0.004140135,0.00007069466,0.00006103728,0.00021872968,0.00020851631,0.9704502,0.000050145805,0.020028248,0.0014510073,0.00022735327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003461977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064427286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021245657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001372572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4686818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076251224","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1809955","title":"The Difference Indifference Makes in Strategy-Proof Allocation of Objects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0371522284156406,"score_gpt":0.21332222902353648,"score_spread":0.1761700006078959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076251224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98741096,0.0032330966,0.003543315,0.000042580832,0.00017139164,0.00010998056,0.000002664758,0.000006936853,0.005479056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790716,0.0010073568,0.00001580129,0.00000792804,0.000044246062,0.0000069446583,6.5037244e-7,0.000010074947,0.0009998215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998265,0.00006699164,0.0005756253,0.0001544639,0.00004155218,0.0008963665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.00006538116,0.0005179476,0.0001894889,0.000030319794,0.000031311403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026927975,0.00010379163,0.00022117236,0.00013098716,0.00011143612,0.000031664225,0.0003914344,0.000066343215,0.000021169935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115045565,0.00008311153,0.000060248127,0.00018240973,0.00006754227,0.00010101131,0.000020622734,0.0007474947,0.000026190823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033973083,0.00005113391,0.073138565,0.000008078558,0.000032876815,5.075894e-7,0.0014787787,0.0000033546685,0.00011503052,0.91984034,8.894145e-7,0.005296481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025309715,0.00020370037,0.12206942,0.00002594544,0.0000024770666,0.000028178107,0.0013554932,0.0001088875,0.0005720993,0.87527674,0.00001100559,0.000092956456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003035458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017426098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048930857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019417264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022779574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33891898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078013764","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00276-7","title":"On resource monotonicity in the fair division problem","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Monotonic function; Endowment; Division (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Arithmetic; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014766753526697216,"score_gpt":0.18677347185957996,"score_spread":0.17200671833288275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078013764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195819,0.000052124615,0.00007448687,0.0053810515,0.00010435883,0.0002787456,0.000024056742,0.000028469074,0.07447484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919118,0.000018991119,0.00006994018,0.007242896,0.000090203044,0.000034166707,0.000008395368,0.000022102533,0.00060148805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986428,0.00006919871,0.00055431965,0.00040497168,0.000017982471,0.00031074233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991283,0.00018458841,0.00017891647,0.00046919938,0.0000019416582,0.000037060527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488725,0.00015627274,0.00028142246,0.00013364444,0.00010998309,0.00010791029,0.00045809787,0.00007149777,0.00037932905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002132675,0.00014894748,0.00010605018,0.00010869894,0.00005148394,0.0001372509,0.000021361922,0.00024905865,0.0020880774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011472993,0.00022196356,0.025361685,0.000030737054,0.00004378945,0.000011541164,0.004907859,0.057398625,0.000030081947,0.89690876,0.009071373,0.0058988333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002834488,0.0003092568,0.082722895,0.00012297521,0.0000072454345,0.000021570731,0.00040311975,0.011485418,0.00012875383,0.24001129,0.6606216,0.0013314115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000133808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022265674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6568975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011634278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042712913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078385256","doi":"10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00057-4","title":"The ultimate control group","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Voting; Organizational structure; Hierarchical organization; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Knowledge management; Operations management; Management science; Economics; Management; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.023485293351820865,"score_gpt":0.2022022072791877,"score_spread":0.17871691392736683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078385256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206614,0.00068857486,0.0026371775,0.00063989393,0.0021506615,0.00016849131,0.00002123763,0.00002160397,0.0016061981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987144,0.00014082949,0.00005272624,0.0000618251,0.0003500976,0.000002625171,0.0000024569183,0.000029560217,0.00064550684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864817,0.000034555018,0.000982421,0.00012243314,0.000023654722,0.00018876101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871236,0.0000692359,0.00090569415,0.00018592102,0.00006331733,0.000063497544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794578,0.00010437278,0.00029206622,0.000104566425,0.0002167967,0.000150945,0.00027701823,0.00007201382,0.0011767518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010429814,0.00008138152,0.00009102433,0.00007488414,0.00004191148,0.00032285546,0.000016328371,0.00014020516,0.0013360238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040206476,0.00036912004,0.5580046,0.000020552869,0.00020765628,0.0000198007,0.0019167801,0.00095141045,0.0027039654,0.42774075,0.004630594,0.003394569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021572057,0.0021223926,0.6223353,0.0002092319,0.00072329753,0.0028202147,0.0020293633,0.022839582,0.009381871,0.05291267,0.25975066,0.0033033513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009891052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030707934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37482807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018832133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053617005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079789365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1015567","title":"Weak Undominance in Scoring Rule Elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scoring rule; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014354873973777629,"score_gpt":0.22028000430737196,"score_spread":0.20592513033359433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079789365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92954594,0.014032085,0.008417219,0.00079135,0.0005518627,0.0001337227,0.000002369094,0.000042600463,0.04648285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203026,0.0018915143,0.000057429435,0.00006193244,0.00027819586,0.0000037084485,6.89719e-7,0.000013338701,0.005662926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976642,0.000035842313,0.0005326855,0.00021926762,0.000031961605,0.0015160053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999476,0.000029126079,0.00027427622,0.00015546291,0.000016282267,0.000048851252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028172573,0.000119820696,0.0002842844,0.00028434256,0.00015140898,0.000055078977,0.00022370202,0.000069294285,0.000029639958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011101554,0.0001378778,0.00010289062,0.00029992542,0.000017965656,0.00024846086,0.000009512848,0.0012037546,0.0002623639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023475728,0.000056502635,0.008086476,0.0000020349498,0.000017591541,0.0000016611837,0.00012788895,0.00011449137,0.000094728864,0.98609877,0.000018636105,0.005357758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000770835,0.00018010041,0.014152868,0.00003324854,0.0000025900579,0.00022949625,0.00032441775,0.00015269789,0.00005348711,0.98097855,0.0029444068,0.00017729208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007032276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027200617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062484324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008114914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018548811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56224936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079982674","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.045","title":"Circumstantial power: Optimal persuadable voters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.11004846466087169,"score_gpt":0.3286839589659798,"score_spread":0.2186354943051081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079982674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78788555,0.00085727824,0.021031173,0.000777289,0.0006720724,0.00009507646,0.000016222895,0.000008107779,0.18865725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948587,0.000019959476,0.0012998086,0.00007643963,0.0006591997,2.5755395e-7,0.0000020580478,0.000025200594,0.003058417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980282,0.00029588654,0.00088050024,0.0001775368,0.00024645575,0.00037137422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882704,0.00021648308,0.0002437855,0.00015484763,0.000383447,0.00017439532],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026775982,0.0000866862,0.0002120139,0.00049026345,0.00025893963,0.00020006525,0.00042597554,0.000026638716,0.0010053098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081125385,0.000086152555,0.000113595284,0.00027627553,0.00012234217,0.0003244529,0.000061035375,0.00052151986,0.0010992043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008821346,0.0003807856,0.013935889,0.000038027552,0.00024991462,0.0012585573,0.0055950466,0.003138042,0.008130669,0.94601876,0.018328844,0.0020433322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062301243,0.0046167066,0.1347857,0.0003360055,0.000012556905,0.001701916,0.0063365204,0.0018070738,0.0037326433,0.0076793036,0.83165044,0.001111052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009033449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.3387795e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011180772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007406175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080156342","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1350540","title":"Incentives and the Structure of Teams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.004952849377539325,"score_gpt":0.19033968436670695,"score_spread":0.18538683498916764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080156342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98384136,0.011541946,0.0011283803,0.0007097905,0.00011864717,0.00007111344,0.000005362179,0.000005721587,0.0025776543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808824,0.0011638175,0.000014564614,0.0000638412,0.00011344939,1.4130993e-7,3.7968022e-7,0.0000044965195,0.0005510856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990188,0.000040735995,0.00030049335,0.00009368977,0.000022477143,0.0005237942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994102,0.00003687712,0.00042066394,0.00009741198,0.000014003471,0.000020827383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016090669,0.00006726292,0.0002139793,0.000057256417,0.000101631435,0.000028449198,0.00015346063,0.000038300437,0.00001979763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008752111,0.00004742829,0.00006117476,0.00007651302,0.00008110813,0.00008342253,0.00001013383,0.00055558915,0.000005619317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045875066,0.000008795851,0.00440031,0.0000022111033,0.000040983214,1.13712275e-7,0.00041736313,0.000005900064,0.000088371424,0.99193907,0.0000064814035,0.0030445307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083867623,0.00010530294,0.004511742,0.000008795044,0.0000048383818,0.00009638721,0.00067363936,0.000063379724,0.00007417829,0.9931501,0.0004141985,0.00005876396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002529069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022939139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01424684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007688872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006278534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24137893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080360262","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2004.02.004","title":"Welfare egalitarianism in non-rival environments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Unanimity; Microeconomics; Economics; Welfare; Robustness (evolution); Social Welfare; Upper and lower bounds; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0152402228181772,"score_gpt":0.21158531591575225,"score_spread":0.19634509309757506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080360262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97550887,0.00062779634,0.0021645576,0.00063469826,0.0014254365,0.00010313955,0.000023727333,0.000005201619,0.019506581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857754,0.000043022115,0.00026550074,0.00010118927,0.0002892468,0.0000022666297,0.0000011059119,0.000024274472,0.0006958299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983048,0.000049235718,0.0011820502,0.00019454434,0.000022610746,0.00024680214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987095,0.00005988742,0.0008992905,0.00023448333,0.0000043156883,0.00009254081],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029988606,0.0001451422,0.0005179644,0.00030463716,0.000055527875,0.00003784458,0.0003551892,0.00010572325,0.0005803472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006756961,0.00015913333,0.00019556376,0.000042790165,0.00006462603,0.00035522785,0.00003965954,0.0002658333,0.00087089516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006509104,0.00008556837,0.0068945847,0.000010555514,0.00006439761,0.000027208094,0.00095975713,0.004874995,0.00006805921,0.98669016,0.000027723405,0.00023187343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027694136,0.00016454128,0.03267647,0.000069995025,0.000008490545,0.00012152109,0.0007413801,0.000040128616,0.0002547823,0.95031744,0.012562166,0.00027369516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005598658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010031193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03637277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049067236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027698965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081436998","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.003","title":"What are the current preoccupations of economic voting research?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Voting; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.23367082036630032,"score_gpt":0.3804469898450158,"score_spread":0.14677616947871547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081436998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94733083,0.049128078,0.000023818799,0.001162113,0.0013349089,0.00037108897,0.000013935953,0.000023450102,0.0006117835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00034384648,0.000011669339,0.000015436004,0.00022735367,0.000100514684,0.0000013336579,0.000010366865,0.00062854815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896175,0.00008068638,0.00044407469,0.00020782105,0.000034949124,0.0002706976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00033739264,0.00031961492,0.00020650223,0.00010204373,0.000026279176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012532001,0.00009175898,0.00029550964,0.00010523792,0.00029877038,0.00011210851,0.00022342648,0.000023155704,0.00007427844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003410158,0.00007193089,0.00007227275,0.0001576251,0.0001759688,0.00033907505,0.0001030423,0.00019491761,0.0009274811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000772589,0.00006112013,0.75943154,0.00012673275,0.00020339298,1.8269944e-7,0.0020820638,0.00011456394,0.000021308731,0.21693654,0.015557501,0.005457338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007383327,0.00033281895,0.6783294,0.00075427827,0.00002138593,0.0000029092757,0.0081355525,0.002438021,0.0007514877,0.24585243,0.06191095,0.00073244405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003897641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003686404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08110213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103039616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011829198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083273514","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0243-2","title":"Social choice, optimal inference and figure skating","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Set (abstract data type); Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Statistical inference; Computer science; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Posterior probability; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.035218126079915146,"score_gpt":0.281705952480601,"score_spread":0.24648782640068584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083273514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96592236,0.00068616285,0.00026157327,0.0013989803,0.00020315518,0.00012755516,0.000055718898,0.000061734165,0.031282783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977132,0.000011811592,0.00005616836,0.00022304725,0.0011914333,0.0000062473828,0.000013470482,0.000019968216,0.00076464866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998849,0.000022686576,0.00039604516,0.00032734283,0.000042719614,0.00036222275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.00014389183,0.00025107054,0.000076359676,0.00003196878,0.00007831808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077343034,0.00016267961,0.00033722742,0.000090028516,0.0008845069,0.00012283679,0.00011265102,0.00021284068,0.00011928976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021970553,0.00019093495,0.00006809716,0.00016555766,0.00011335773,0.00020530884,0.00006696939,0.00024128659,0.00003697637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001707833,0.00004319206,0.4576056,0.00016384113,0.00006144742,0.0000037002546,0.00731092,0.0000020793673,0.00003716674,0.52307844,0.00045226433,0.011224281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082241936,0.00006341006,0.8335613,0.000025347801,0.000014671123,0.000003170869,0.0023030404,0.0000676977,0.000019199451,0.0075167203,0.15513805,0.00046500014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004025278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010789849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5155617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032994343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074863087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7786101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083969644","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400304","title":"Single-Peakedness and Disconnected Coalitions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Perception; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.045915860756792555,"score_gpt":0.22211010023722397,"score_spread":0.17619423948043142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083969644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407826,0.0011651699,0.0079739755,0.0033510178,0.00075908116,0.00007183107,0.00008314441,0.000019387782,0.045793783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854577,0.00002480461,0.0003274888,0.00024451612,0.00036542615,6.018847e-7,6.9765014e-7,0.00001499742,0.0004757094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998843,0.000060225484,0.00070332293,0.00010913636,0.000042749758,0.00024154756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896526,0.00029391807,0.00034753897,0.00014765043,0.000059070317,0.00018654061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629602,0.00009879705,0.00034838534,0.00013529974,0.00007928398,0.00007177465,0.00014832639,0.00007553298,0.00072575966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008662183,0.00009099768,0.00010579552,0.00008925959,0.000435143,0.00011927719,0.000028554477,0.00019495665,0.00008292602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049452524,0.00011410022,0.0010814159,0.00001949311,0.00003100554,0.000009769356,0.000445744,0.0000021063809,0.000025796715,0.9978879,0.00030218088,0.00007552459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043119266,0.00020092812,0.0005121511,0.000053838532,0.000017896118,0.00025245082,0.00019009251,0.0011017023,0.00010513443,0.99227756,0.0047241314,0.00013292511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032992286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.9202955e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057763148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044836263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004149342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7946559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084126087","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2014.06.002","title":"Power theories for multi-choice organizations and political rules: Rank-order equivalence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Perspectives","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Voting; Mathematics; Equivalence class (music); Mathematical economics; Rank (graph theory); Social choice theory; Equivalence relation; Ordinal regression; Shapley value; Ordinal data; Order (exchange); Econometrics; Game theory; Discrete mathematics; Politics; Economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Political science","score_opus":0.07920507547477938,"score_gpt":0.37175037743919237,"score_spread":0.292545301964413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084126087","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3741241,0.002197568,0.55680615,0.00739647,0.0002891685,0.0015778596,0.0005490062,0.00013734575,0.05692235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98665243,0.000033274584,0.007192671,0.00005251113,0.00016947892,0.00012830742,0.0000121930025,0.000026032072,0.00573308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986335,0.0001714166,0.00027408998,0.00042677042,0.000060627324,0.00043357533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822015,0.000660417,0.000024651781,0.0002893422,0.0006785325,0.00012688481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001942402,0.000108065724,0.0002098048,0.00025060883,0.00088469544,0.0003299556,0.00019536373,0.0000761811,0.0003840407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01064693,0.00011032552,0.000034011235,0.00039858176,0.00047392218,0.00031099687,0.000074765136,0.00019080777,0.00022049004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064580063,0.00010789447,0.0027708106,0.000018372019,0.000022030928,1.0508545e-7,0.0056471922,0.000049676375,0.00010612038,0.9911752,0.00007976874,0.000016412874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048961,0.0012125486,0.04465411,0.00016352018,0.000019425588,0.000026306843,0.07854857,0.107589334,0.0007375657,0.72229695,0.038446873,0.0014086777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026652517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010462151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6125283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008676673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005140516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085950285","doi":"10.1007/s10058-007-0028-1","title":"On complexity of lobbying in multiple referenda","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Democracy; Economics; Direct democracy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.23754783185235623,"score_gpt":0.3042732677913916,"score_spread":0.06672543593903535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085950285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67324996,0.10726147,0.04026296,0.00029359455,0.0014850338,0.0025399327,0.0002759279,0.00006322988,0.1745679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957914,0.00272315,0.0012117353,0.000114145325,0.000028017652,0.0000060199213,0.0000049142627,0.000014119189,0.00010653932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805284,0.000065635184,0.0014216179,0.00024426414,0.000016593047,0.00019903878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982753,0.0004607544,0.00086922524,0.00034107803,0.000012340286,0.00004132927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005358698,0.00012037658,0.0008315625,0.00019561115,0.000018524714,0.000004469955,0.00022210795,0.000055986475,0.00037371926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003237577,0.0001349309,0.00013163165,0.000099483244,0.00007963754,0.00007010106,0.000022815118,0.00009508231,0.00034311722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006119804,0.00009651479,0.010527731,0.0029655881,0.000032246095,0.0000013656381,0.00009346268,0.00023533698,0.000041046802,0.98269457,0.00040758084,0.002843339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006317082,0.0013236866,0.091139175,0.041005865,0.000053808028,0.000029457018,0.00022497517,0.008046212,0.009514104,0.8026566,0.037524723,0.0021643485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014660603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028332968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32254142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121282435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017209584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55023223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089349773","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0112-4","title":"Maximal Domain for Strategy-proof Rules in Allotment Economies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Preference; Allotment; Variable (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Disequilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025099615735910543,"score_gpt":0.2341309164835523,"score_spread":0.20903130074764176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089349773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725294,0.0009834217,0.0001028116,0.0015974507,0.00015330761,0.00029682927,0.0002602913,0.000023292787,0.024053201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856776,0.000006638244,0.00009666584,0.00005743166,0.00044580695,0.00007439633,0.000044886358,0.00001625656,0.00069013477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990793,0.000015937416,0.00037953324,0.0002596866,0.000014763743,0.0002507724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996945,0.000040202583,0.0001544778,0.00007475284,0.000010554179,0.00002546575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040454598,0.00012072436,0.0002955545,0.00008100134,0.00022246099,0.00007767456,0.000089290246,0.00010749844,0.00007103241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014338521,0.00014028906,0.00007834333,0.000050788145,0.000050004233,0.00012666715,0.000020916437,0.00006952675,0.000025393481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001578406,0.00004578272,0.083127536,0.00006425109,0.000014873756,6.9039737e-7,0.00031515837,0.000016776554,0.000005294142,0.91550845,0.00024878018,0.0006366109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013178432,0.00008183331,0.3845596,0.000012355698,0.0000046080395,0.0000010923385,0.00092887407,0.00006246215,0.00001957413,0.51847875,0.09424318,0.00028986397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093785994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054659136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39702973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006146117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006784477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5720822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091587857","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.11.001","title":"Statistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical inference; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Computer science; Majority rule; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical model; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1709722279674939,"score_gpt":0.34039747293678774,"score_spread":0.16942524496929384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091587857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8211612,0.00012680407,0.15578218,0.00030987337,0.00011592315,0.00019977737,0.000093045885,0.00002575911,0.022185449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903814,0.0000011543402,0.009365636,0.000014978546,0.00007297756,0.000012355329,0.0000026328637,0.0000036958108,0.00014517203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991836,0.000017341948,0.00044230395,0.0001445048,0.000055725737,0.0001565244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.00042736463,0.00022749923,0.000044809847,0.000019334157,0.000024495284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008838372,0.00005644916,0.00030854472,0.000042057905,0.00033063657,0.000020725873,0.00014465337,0.000046780107,0.00015246554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006077862,0.000051371968,0.00005904592,0.00011334943,0.00052209233,0.0000699964,0.000015574367,0.00003297091,0.00011113877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004148678,0.00007207242,0.0074718236,0.000050972878,0.0000049200116,7.46243e-8,0.0017056847,0.000003651115,0.000009511129,0.98998946,0.00029314402,0.0003945597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012974151,0.000093545656,0.0055477433,0.000014429985,0.000002881469,0.0000011277172,0.0003591342,0.0060374113,0.00025206574,0.9868509,0.00062165404,0.00008936974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001850339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014028001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16922021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013669827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010969823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25430226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092618195","doi":"10.1016/j.indag.2013.07.008","title":"Lexicographic preferences representable by real-branching trees with countable height: A dichotomy result","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indagationes Mathematicae","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Lexicographical order; Branching (polymer chemistry); Countable set; Tree (set theory); Combinatorics; Linearization; Preference; Extension (predicate logic); Discrete mathematics; Nonlinear system; Computer science","score_opus":0.02192167036158392,"score_gpt":0.20884609679383492,"score_spread":0.186924426432251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092618195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8850331,0.00035348494,0.0041601094,0.0003370967,0.000107250446,0.0006757348,0.00006210449,0.00014933276,0.10912182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992301,0.000048091388,0.0012384417,0.000050053877,0.00006708832,0.00027398142,0.000034410798,0.000034858003,0.0059520695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998264,0.00004905911,0.00078453857,0.00044815504,0.00010576547,0.0003484707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985001,0.00022126244,0.00059085595,0.00051970046,0.00007229328,0.000095780815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079213653,0.00021783212,0.00048306916,0.00018850804,0.00025293493,0.00033084187,0.00030693755,0.00010364739,0.0008801869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011328929,0.00018477539,0.00006838633,0.00041041157,0.00011977135,0.0007753725,0.00003614084,0.00015320988,0.0010561581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052602114,0.0005281852,0.1490662,0.0005301784,0.000345753,0.0000028673892,0.009059284,0.00013118789,0.000936702,0.8272724,0.011562642,0.0005119869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015739369,0.00024325101,0.023578001,0.00059704785,0.000034048862,0.00003184572,0.0022523191,0.0040661437,0.0016483286,0.9562073,0.008811405,0.0009563711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001315791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006629644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12893488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034264554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015404912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094045559","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2012-0006","title":"A Simple Bargaining Procedure for the Myerson Value","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Negotiation; Graph; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.021792430562208653,"score_gpt":0.2233797024792038,"score_spread":0.20158727191699516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094045559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94192827,0.0018157129,0.027600404,0.010263626,0.0010553901,0.0009910222,0.000049506558,0.000023173512,0.016272886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781287,0.00013024299,0.00028730527,0.0009371904,0.0005874346,0.000019354417,8.5015705e-7,0.000032513562,0.00019226184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985397,0.000068179805,0.0009321329,0.000118481046,0.000025855383,0.0003156783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969939,0.0016424032,0.0008626966,0.00033379125,0.000070946335,0.00009623817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043139057,0.00015188068,0.0004209812,0.00006894115,0.00024373879,0.0001392218,0.0007843936,0.000089346875,0.00046232008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008406341,0.00009186312,0.00026669717,0.00006941049,0.00034663838,0.00020503905,0.00006213697,0.0002866827,0.00021759917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007578491,0.00002291018,0.00045378646,0.000013733904,0.0001113979,1.2065958e-7,0.0008605536,0.0014558154,0.000015980622,0.99537945,0.001196668,0.0004137977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048254197,0.00018686548,0.00066507445,0.000019562201,0.000036561018,0.000060814793,0.001353789,0.029190682,0.00010394275,0.9616993,0.0060617924,0.00013906596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018317094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.97542e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055884566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007237788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003541285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50620806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094786392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.05.004","title":"Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematics; Tournament; Transitive relation; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Finite set; Transitive closure; Set (abstract data type); Closure (psychology); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Axiom of choice; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Set theory; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.024854315058667042,"score_gpt":0.23501538092675447,"score_spread":0.21016106586808744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094786392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641663,0.00053940766,0.010014276,0.00037515082,0.00032712676,0.00006888198,0.000010510315,0.000010214382,0.024488164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942139,0.00008728272,0.004735909,0.00015106969,0.00036553826,6.92946e-7,4.4565436e-7,0.00002080337,0.0004243597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828666,0.000011610176,0.0012938925,0.00014558973,0.000023006594,0.00023921102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.00050302094,0.0008701247,0.00017407957,0.00003033292,0.00017175835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031664753,0.00012482282,0.0005643929,0.00017460372,0.000057573747,0.00007653952,0.00020161014,0.00010567544,0.00021931213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004893316,0.00012250707,0.00013842131,0.00004521062,0.000072665294,0.0002455039,0.000041503346,0.00018671321,0.00027481111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751639,0.000109549626,0.0063344496,0.00009068532,0.000086231485,0.000006500011,0.0005000842,0.000051607665,0.000026698248,0.99084926,0.00011011603,0.0017973012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009498604,0.00015612185,0.008050605,0.00008087517,0.000017916313,0.00028293385,0.00029331175,0.0017277723,0.00026244833,0.97092825,0.016992528,0.00025736555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049170962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032611642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03004763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006752398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000129835025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49956933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095237287","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015","title":"Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Set (abstract data type); Status quo; Computer science; Mathematics; Aggregation problem; Relation (database); Economics; Data mining; Statistics; Voting","score_opus":0.049660570646219655,"score_gpt":0.2229314150855681,"score_spread":0.17327084443934845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095237287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935513,0.00042322642,0.0003125599,0.000110435016,0.0002518566,0.00018016263,0.00011769968,0.000032438875,0.0050203023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965153,0.00008333873,0.00007889923,0.000045220313,0.000121768724,0.000055489956,0.000018565537,0.000014148087,0.0030673146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.000018679038,0.00040405936,0.00034572213,0.000009000096,0.00017386365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945533,0.000037743026,0.0002057162,0.00021383393,0.000008720472,0.00007868052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036594618,0.00012694839,0.00027453594,0.00007517902,0.00011628148,0.0001653504,0.000085447864,0.00007784474,0.00028624322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069589,0.00014242106,0.00003337813,0.000024168956,0.00009892731,0.0002683809,0.000039120336,0.00007208851,0.000109974746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009425216,0.00004227493,0.37106577,0.00006122392,0.00001826908,4.419017e-7,0.0010273684,0.000018021597,0.00007403577,0.602154,0.000051615916,0.02547751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007979075,0.00021231515,0.93718135,0.00005608563,0.000027057982,0.000038704326,0.00053804246,0.0035089243,0.00024567876,0.047346387,0.009465803,0.00058175344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014343664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033331846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56611556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024412906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000086760365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5807763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095409339","doi":"10.1145/1855118.1855133","title":"The story of set disjointness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGACT News","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Media studies; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.036596624647452204,"score_gpt":0.24102023511922727,"score_spread":0.20442361047177507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095409339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98114526,0.0003221184,0.00008412789,0.0009881833,0.0015773405,0.00011045387,0.000035489873,0.00002466176,0.015712366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673057,0.000021240729,0.00007007421,0.00006131839,0.00018356905,0.000008968446,0.000002790062,0.000014158483,0.0029073316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924725,0.000039564755,0.00034756717,0.00016557545,0.000023810564,0.00017623778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829626,0.0005147078,0.0003133954,0.00081419246,0.000017079414,0.000044338256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014424762,0.00008489689,0.0002180658,0.000046562338,0.00016833165,0.00003341041,0.00053215044,0.000070843016,0.00015524539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012102646,0.000068412286,0.00009041687,0.00009300816,0.00010298367,0.000086535816,0.0000761037,0.00029504692,0.00044193634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003104681,0.00005324164,0.086726174,0.000040208044,0.000059207858,0.0000014853925,0.001896132,0.000008534506,0.0029091912,0.89477676,0.0071607283,0.006337276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005323118,0.00008524207,0.06878293,0.000018849882,0.000007173437,0.000008782574,0.0008478172,0.00009630274,0.0025872912,0.15589078,0.7708134,0.0003291373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013326966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012304688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7636526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010010518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011576482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56803447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095827365","doi":"10.1007/s11127-006-9120-2","title":"Choosing a runoff election threshold","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Surface runoff; Public finance; Condorcet method; Metric (unit); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Voting; Political science; Politics; Law; Operations management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.032929946582231154,"score_gpt":0.21538816422916662,"score_spread":0.18245821764693548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095827365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65545595,0.0009827741,0.0025389257,0.001569247,0.0009545249,0.0001493961,0.000015586513,0.0002055255,0.33812806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189997,0.0000041016297,0.00006759982,0.00021527999,0.0008426244,0.00001843142,0.0000151358045,0.000020955114,0.0069158943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895185,0.000013945024,0.00039217752,0.00029398134,0.000031397216,0.0003166708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941313,0.000050185234,0.00021126261,0.0002474919,0.000026935188,0.00005096698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069821835,0.000108848086,0.00020347815,0.00019145389,0.0001556863,0.00021729128,0.00016645971,0.00008083677,0.0002920088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013889215,0.00012841109,0.00007855282,0.00036426878,0.00002535792,0.00035279716,0.000025751579,0.00013496683,0.0007914975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030473304,0.00008111086,0.19352698,0.000020364616,0.0000166912,6.919985e-7,0.00005254246,0.000034829616,0.0001674119,0.8006848,0.0049089394,0.0005025645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053977245,0.0000297782,0.121301755,0.000014828912,0.0000035525907,0.000014092502,0.000016911772,0.0020554997,0.00020526981,0.07476495,0.8007313,0.00032226264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090513646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012279664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7958224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009615922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011115982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096644678","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0131-1","title":"Anonymous Single-profile Welfarism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Welfare","score_opus":0.02186610708643378,"score_gpt":0.20583522945013813,"score_spread":0.18396912236370436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096644678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73302895,0.0015709756,0.00012230877,0.0032260874,0.0005247998,0.00016514651,0.00016178624,0.00012744483,0.26107252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423945,0.0000041071053,0.000042316246,0.00013492345,0.0009806742,0.000013413725,0.000033725024,0.000023494173,0.004527877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902755,0.000022947714,0.00034632438,0.00029523415,0.000031114287,0.00027685732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.000028900693,0.00018968842,0.00012074395,0.000020381754,0.00004101423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000274123,0.00013624862,0.00028843238,0.000076445576,0.00047836895,0.00009735096,0.00011217665,0.00015495102,0.00043345208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034889046,0.00015887094,0.000086195534,0.00014189829,0.00007159779,0.0001340503,0.00003655013,0.00012905855,0.00024330828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006197589,0.00008217048,0.06583471,0.00005878636,0.000022160333,0.000003383149,0.00044782713,0.0000017424095,0.00008760463,0.9287217,0.0031404204,0.0015932446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008542834,0.000082130675,0.2581368,0.000014093622,0.000012543222,0.0000072881544,0.0005577356,0.000046591816,0.00008751916,0.07159176,0.6680975,0.0005117375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014701318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000711167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003919432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037474185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64785695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097079137","doi":"","title":"Party formation in collective decision-making","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Democracy; Majority rule; Group decision-making; Pairwise comparison; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Public administration; Business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06556685602417188,"score_gpt":0.310758537828072,"score_spread":0.2451916818039001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097079137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64264745,0.0006318052,0.00013356631,0.00010400471,0.00087851635,0.001094487,0.00017672266,0.00004119529,0.35429224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940184,0.0022132879,0.00051834894,0.000044783457,0.00017836185,0.0003050607,0.000019961864,0.00006199737,0.0026398343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959451,0.0002443653,0.0017918532,0.0010582735,0.0000889938,0.0008714076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969545,0.0012864833,0.0006456278,0.0009390997,0.000063594256,0.000110720386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053261053,0.0003289036,0.0009736328,0.0017156266,0.00017229514,0.000250118,0.00075217447,0.00061469176,0.00042444354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017624042,0.00042409496,0.00021223143,0.00039875193,0.00014569743,0.00028122996,0.0006887783,0.0017886123,0.000251988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009828614,0.001612834,0.2055964,0.001842462,0.00039276548,0.00031641356,0.025125753,0.17918123,0.000021126438,0.1261154,0.001200052,0.4576127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023861455,0.00021049188,0.034358256,0.002569049,0.0000051530737,0.000045608584,0.002134034,0.27155608,0.000045695942,0.65419495,0.03079413,0.0017003695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092697526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004972235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52807957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029395563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012304228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097665815","doi":"10.7202/602289ar","title":"La démocratie : oui, mais laquelle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037775848122372904,"score_gpt":0.23395994122448804,"score_spread":0.19618409310211515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097665815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61324275,0.014156946,0.0024620993,0.014875832,0.0038863507,0.0005671426,0.0004166026,0.00018833236,0.35020393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87587005,0.0008980246,0.00080889644,0.002795445,0.00096729863,0.000025148893,0.000030385982,0.00006056911,0.11854418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963668,0.00039867172,0.0014846395,0.00086964166,0.000027893002,0.0008523484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973844,0.0006291112,0.00080040167,0.00087306596,0.00004406566,0.00026893624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026530665,0.00051028456,0.0010800381,0.00027413663,0.00020027575,0.00037391402,0.000588493,0.000800774,0.0029809931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040056158,0.00068386755,0.00042139122,0.00025736578,0.00022537692,0.00062461296,0.00007519653,0.000676295,0.0051953034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047705027,0.00028670952,0.0038243632,0.00012174471,0.00011770517,0.000033092234,0.0028541118,0.00012292039,0.000029085384,0.9558207,0.006857334,0.02988457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007787959,0.00027376815,0.0054989466,0.00020860841,0.000021492195,0.00007964686,0.00041462778,0.0006923517,0.000331796,0.29731512,0.69363743,0.0007474151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033311773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006551717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6867801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034260936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000769498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097909533","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2009.07.004","title":"Two-sided matching with interdependent values","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Interdependence; Stability (learning theory); Mechanism (biology); Complete information; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Machine learning; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01813848267765415,"score_gpt":0.2380659692204766,"score_spread":0.21992748654282246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097909533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129921,0.0008741185,0.007744667,0.00030260728,0.00080611615,0.00007369619,0.000008862042,0.00001978375,0.07717802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973867,0.000021939111,0.0007094644,0.00027487034,0.0005550722,5.8061994e-7,6.9502045e-7,0.000020109774,0.0010305669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848187,0.000107484506,0.0009892458,0.0001800693,0.000024775154,0.00021656856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816394,0.00017942787,0.0013034974,0.00023382518,0.000021330803,0.00009796729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042456994,0.00015259976,0.00051749905,0.0002518398,0.00007062508,0.00009897672,0.0003604469,0.000043890326,0.00038182348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005993911,0.00013683124,0.00018626747,0.000035380286,0.00004486,0.00038442522,0.000022451162,0.00024863996,0.00040443518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019546972,0.000053862474,0.0019826195,0.0000073083756,0.000133467,0.000026933136,0.0015489758,0.0018971243,0.00009603517,0.9921976,0.00017025792,0.0016903508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012736873,0.00034707235,0.003518522,0.00013763826,0.000015763493,0.00039402538,0.0010743814,0.000074513846,0.0002556542,0.99198985,0.0006981214,0.00022076006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001053412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035152968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084394574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017021898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026310752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5579816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099084709","doi":"10.1007/s001820400177","title":"Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictator; Object (grammar); Resource (disambiguation); Simple (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Sequence (biology); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.030265495735515378,"score_gpt":0.25094157691034585,"score_spread":0.22067608117483048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099084709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74867463,0.0012695742,0.23766454,0.0026119957,0.002164467,0.00034517812,0.00006607044,0.000059096317,0.0071444623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977034,0.00003756384,0.0008232983,0.00028765647,0.0005818137,0.000009345225,0.0000033780032,0.000028194523,0.00052536145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.000038392114,0.00079250324,0.00014185223,0.00007975919,0.00014414576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846977,0.00016666458,0.00097604585,0.000132447,0.00020096175,0.00005409837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027644632,0.000100802215,0.00025403415,0.0002599465,0.000035994966,0.00007076464,0.00050576543,0.00006795293,0.000038617352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045899407,0.00010196742,0.00020109751,0.00006107118,0.000057009733,0.0002407224,0.000028652332,0.00014662632,0.000101812446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029528525,0.00013724348,0.00046733205,0.000014553035,0.0001925402,0.0000047114,0.0017248822,0.0068770065,0.00031822696,0.98833257,0.0000936713,0.0015419811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018874609,0.00021759755,0.00068269717,0.00012123752,0.00001026342,0.00010583165,0.00018493722,0.00013716471,0.001674674,0.9554955,0.039334785,0.00014787838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014236151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028878571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24902877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020533448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038213377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41581106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099182741","doi":"","title":"THE ART OF COMPROMISE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Ratification; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Bargaining problem; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public economics; Public administration; Microeconomics; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.055647511207695094,"score_gpt":0.29807586158277993,"score_spread":0.24242835037508484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099182741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4447613,0.0018367252,0.000012725663,0.0008647635,0.0011976863,0.0009862875,0.00022575528,0.000037606424,0.55007714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500575,0.006699497,0.00022113402,0.000032812633,0.00037808783,0.00016007149,0.000026370531,0.000062977946,0.0174133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965612,0.0002035784,0.0016189357,0.0007997703,0.00007764004,0.0007388417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966383,0.000886628,0.00079232326,0.0014937487,0.00006433137,0.00012465559],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007285558,0.00027570073,0.0008756711,0.00043272137,0.00020553866,0.00015671915,0.0012791968,0.0004086705,0.00016191129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006654569,0.00027737627,0.0002920737,0.0001281724,0.0005162807,0.000073267234,0.00085090974,0.0014963655,0.00026771607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062892586,0.0009989094,0.07751894,0.0012542816,0.0009065664,0.00002802592,0.0032314048,0.049593646,0.000104855935,0.64583886,0.0025044184,0.2173912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015079214,0.00018164644,0.014242975,0.0005182499,0.00000842954,0.000013671497,0.00080484484,0.032688703,0.00022901612,0.1223767,0.826383,0.0010448329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008034509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001644108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8238786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049806904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013414334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100581723","doi":"","title":"Condorcet admissibility: Indeterminacy and path-dependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Judgement; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Majority rule; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Voting; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Path (computing); Scope (computer science); Choice set; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07801215494727368,"score_gpt":0.21981548797087425,"score_spread":0.14180333302360057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100581723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059323,0.00016119023,0.0026272861,0.0000740351,0.00017508617,0.00027081784,0.00019817872,0.00009884553,0.090462245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942362,0.0001098467,0.0011439514,0.00013948785,0.00004237359,0.0000019666745,0.000017680803,0.000029613882,0.0042789103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783766,0.000277254,0.00046815365,0.0008464974,0.00009530156,0.0004751015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977176,0.0008517896,0.00036730623,0.000685974,0.00006609661,0.00031123302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009094903,0.00030457444,0.00053332443,0.00055619434,0.0005068367,0.00005774142,0.0007548148,0.00015808786,0.00043767452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077058974,0.00036078182,0.00018539805,0.00036041043,0.0003428221,0.00037346073,0.0005678087,0.0006327086,0.00013932097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057640305,0.00039075865,0.06975573,0.000054997232,0.00020019838,0.00023173625,0.015355909,0.000007930841,0.00018095566,0.9107161,0.000068997804,0.0024602662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012605123,0.003931053,0.50751424,0.0024625957,0.0002634632,0.00057400094,0.060481556,0.03561543,0.0007007753,0.3174822,0.05318293,0.0051866327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091689674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045386393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016638392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065109176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.24666437402838567,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104257901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790661,0.002423818,0.000025882322,0.0040040463,0.0004117823,0.00021707415,0.000022507946,0.000030992385,0.013797817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854904,0.000018240164,0.000002110985,0.00049036735,0.00075713627,0.000012448499,0.0000054712095,0.000010285418,0.00015488199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00005724478,0.00040279023,0.00023749226,0.000035819685,0.00027247364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956185,0.00006796598,0.00022353313,0.000103635306,0.000013288216,0.000029737059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009817745,0.00012326428,0.00030409082,0.000081985614,0.0004502652,0.00019967028,0.00017482194,0.00009463563,0.000012893255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084885396,0.00011604469,0.00005936672,0.00017950134,0.000030374433,0.00019549772,0.000017547907,0.00021042269,0.000045143654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064713217,0.000045236353,0.1043201,0.000076102995,0.000014159123,0.000005036644,0.009095325,0.000004172253,0.000039966566,0.881052,0.0000443246,0.0052970764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012970718,0.00016584451,0.8386058,0.0003389501,0.000016313492,0.00002259437,0.02890939,0.00041143177,0.000011539613,0.005967327,0.1235439,0.0007097872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008102963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005292658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037128644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036683118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47321653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104879829","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0132-0","title":"Rationalizability of choice functions on general domains without full transitivity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationalizability; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Element (criminal law); Transitive reduction; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Graph; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.02047996664975399,"score_gpt":0.2355434718199226,"score_spread":0.21506350517016862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104879829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726536,0.00013915618,0.0008030482,0.0013152431,0.00021602816,0.00014584724,0.0004016919,0.00003209509,0.024293242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981172,0.0000020293062,0.000023781136,0.00007649068,0.0006800914,0.000014777029,0.000052029533,0.000011641553,0.0010219613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991292,0.000053910317,0.00035944485,0.00025690295,0.000041923595,0.00015866451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955297,0.00007760274,0.00018478662,0.00011796671,0.00003503753,0.000031632448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041859856,0.000112641654,0.0002913478,0.00006065514,0.00035668022,0.000028003526,0.00006262809,0.00010526556,0.00014713859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000552204,0.00012602397,0.00010855408,0.00012980102,0.00010239858,0.000108725435,0.000010439086,0.0001047021,0.00002260362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029361743,0.00015906691,0.33067366,0.00007203656,0.000031707066,2.537106e-7,0.0003334892,0.00007654274,0.00015625397,0.6678666,0.0003761456,0.00022490427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007896372,0.000089156994,0.9247181,0.000009821652,0.000013804316,0.0000011468139,0.00012056382,0.00011128674,0.000044817047,0.022268377,0.051625606,0.0002076915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016800308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060928526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6455982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038746697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008679063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51391083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106478571","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773233","title":"Approximately Strategy-proof Mechanisms for (Constrained) Facility Location","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Impossibility; Facility location problem; Mechanism design; Complement (music); Metric (unit); Odds; Mathematical optimization; Space (punctuation); Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.13662674126293997,"score_gpt":0.2585099038521957,"score_spread":0.12188316258925572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106478571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03302534,0.0001905669,0.893263,0.00017227585,0.00041961204,0.00058811373,0.000215259,0.00010634104,0.072019495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345165,6.904447e-7,0.002976004,0.00006312576,0.000051364703,0.00007002766,0.000039503026,0.0000094433935,0.0033382096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897873,0.00001630054,0.00045376772,0.00030615804,0.000025027675,0.0002200014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993497,0.00003640054,0.00018406694,0.00024600988,0.000082697705,0.00010111849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017440148,0.000114176684,0.00025461908,0.000070196504,0.00005560128,0.00006413446,0.00015001309,0.00009311695,0.0001235157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020110206,0.00011962083,0.000062175815,0.000116912204,0.000036439174,0.00017084923,0.000017420845,0.00005497253,0.0004986816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020529367,0.000043045908,0.00032980452,0.00005501915,0.000015015196,1.7380216e-7,0.00016949634,0.0002795246,0.00003490697,0.9977302,0.00033648295,0.0009857924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008411896,0.00019566665,0.00018010881,0.0000076131346,0.000003657933,0.0000050606413,0.0008471368,0.014679819,0.0016297674,0.97707856,0.0042812284,0.0002501998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008946863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013542836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052292547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031417574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.640971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108543606","doi":"10.1007/s00199-008-0393-1","title":"Single-peaked choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Choice function; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Axiom independence; Social choice theory; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0515979672056281,"score_gpt":0.2065663585172052,"score_spread":0.1549683913115771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108543606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75292116,0.00083552126,0.00075610436,0.00010499351,0.0012662029,0.00012349844,0.000051263825,0.00012925689,0.243812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790724,0.0000229101,0.000119140896,0.0002746856,0.00056427554,0.000015602953,0.000008155963,0.00004191897,0.019880934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985075,0.00006478737,0.0006345308,0.0004359929,0.000013365765,0.00034385154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.00027698858,0.00034178892,0.0004932681,0.0000073864917,0.00010228285],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011762413,0.00018109205,0.00042294725,0.00015667791,0.00018751284,0.000035092933,0.0003376501,0.00010595594,0.0025668903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552034,0.00022113742,0.0001597492,0.000058425125,0.00015843908,0.00023645406,0.000052028645,0.00014203123,0.014209866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025565061,0.000053431275,0.0172807,0.000010237853,0.00005320389,0.0000054478805,0.0007569078,0.00007396282,0.000073345334,0.9796054,0.0016061069,0.00045570373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014530241,0.00014219416,0.023237541,0.000025752488,0.000008417267,0.00014930715,0.00020928046,0.00038675198,0.0009209331,0.4832043,0.4893928,0.0008696835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075619886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009442478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49640107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017068854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018899193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109005822","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v5n1p122","title":"A Complete Geometric Representation of Four-Player Weighted Voting Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Voting; Mathematics; Simplex; Weighted voting; Algebraic number; Theoretical computer science; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.25369691525398436,"score_gpt":0.34667590273544163,"score_spread":0.09297898748145728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109005822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658012,0.001556356,0.021057287,0.00018363488,0.00047805134,0.0004693667,0.000020452308,0.000009644906,0.010424022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505574,0.000056074474,0.003580689,0.000003932977,0.00017721734,0.000010660065,0.0000011541641,0.000024056526,0.0010904651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971278,0.00019688255,0.0018424189,0.00015392424,0.0003389454,0.00034003504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555147,0.0014701671,0.0017271288,0.0003049221,0.00082645,0.00011984769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008045561,0.000107287786,0.00071448204,0.0015806799,0.00010451322,0.0001605779,0.0004755476,0.00009456107,0.0004024609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020645156,0.00009570461,0.00016825175,0.0011706066,0.0000844577,0.00031279327,0.00008212499,0.00043396975,0.00055218063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053305805,0.0011675719,0.06943225,0.004011081,0.0008440788,0.000052445244,0.005914887,0.0014125746,0.007511614,0.89822114,0.009977989,0.0014010904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006817109,0.0025178648,0.036411326,0.0045964667,0.00008591934,0.0014467062,0.02067559,0.41763452,0.0040773717,0.49457195,0.009769799,0.0013953937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023284713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001287342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41622195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106805564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030847532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70973486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109728195","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9502-x","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0233627466619331,"score_gpt":0.20666433837449197,"score_spread":0.18330159171255886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109728195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055554,0.0009883964,0.08975147,0.00016739934,0.00048019903,0.00014801353,0.000069938884,0.00003061235,0.0028085245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985099,0.00016376405,0.00077284285,0.000041384843,0.000056350633,0.000005565311,0.000005255056,0.000013335106,0.00043163582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988351,0.000030800056,0.00061014,0.0002989616,0.000068886235,0.00015613259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.00034017503,0.00036709046,0.0003750476,0.000026225895,0.00006431433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011303297,0.000108485125,0.00028055685,0.00025717643,0.0000727488,0.000033757027,0.00019168475,0.00010623928,0.0002507174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005274223,0.00008495194,0.000067038745,0.00017103618,0.000041979805,0.00028321464,0.00009715776,0.00004689586,0.00023728791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009758325,0.000123769,0.2510255,0.00003789908,0.000022968801,0.0000012708774,0.0006528699,0.000004421431,0.002226327,0.4942802,0.001401991,0.2501252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024203688,0.0002661789,0.561129,0.00022092831,0.0000055272276,0.0000055579108,0.000073661366,0.0005247803,0.0010497741,0.41530904,0.018714093,0.00028108642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033093536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008907055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3101035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026344123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003413462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34642395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110681344","doi":"10.1007/s00182-010-0237-7","title":"Noncooperative formation of coalitions in hedonic games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Economics; Point (geometry); Repeated game; Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.019829514491124117,"score_gpt":0.257316331565879,"score_spread":0.2374868170747549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110681344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97298276,0.00024339904,0.009635931,0.00039575231,0.0015280574,0.000062140825,0.00005529325,0.00000493276,0.015091746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990347,0.00003940427,0.0002753403,0.00007405025,0.0002212046,0.0000023341029,0.0000035574737,0.000007625506,0.00034178724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880666,0.000064135835,0.00089351035,0.00007527881,0.00006908308,0.00009135154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985785,0.00020621046,0.00086685014,0.0000984041,0.00021646307,0.000033592463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021780794,0.00007069807,0.00025035776,0.00042100548,0.000013419923,0.000028788309,0.00033792635,0.00005728131,0.00036413042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047972333,0.00006973484,0.0001105674,0.000092743256,0.000080902304,0.00042085358,0.000025516056,0.00026429867,0.00006150161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012279346,0.000121224075,0.004434952,0.0000091146485,0.000054280492,0.000007932336,0.002712178,0.00024118647,0.0020131432,0.9891514,0.000050550312,0.0010812444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021132617,0.00022843244,0.017670603,0.00024011878,0.000009428038,0.00032732886,0.0013354464,0.0011390726,0.008679259,0.95997894,0.0080536,0.00022448943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016007949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024984947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029172441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054022956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031140742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3986973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114513404","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2013.11.033","title":"Social exchange networks with distant bargaining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Extension (predicate logic); Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Bargaining problem; Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02023283452738109,"score_gpt":0.21274166859308735,"score_spread":0.19250883406570626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114513404","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16331542,0.0000704412,0.78495187,0.00044037914,0.0003327597,0.0001974144,0.0000023813059,0.000093919014,0.05059544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565005,0.0000014088193,0.0036362635,0.00029617734,0.0003344592,0.0000150037895,8.877531e-7,0.000012484369,0.00005325165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866897,0.00003228236,0.00029529448,0.0004397996,0.00007537647,0.00048829336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993546,0.00008358844,0.0001232722,0.0002535883,0.00004891892,0.0001360157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015332635,0.00012688893,0.00024894698,0.000094794355,0.00040263095,0.0003048623,0.00053679384,0.000046289617,0.000478536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029462928,0.00010546349,0.000040857114,0.00045524805,0.001656649,0.00029156057,0.00017040712,0.00014850168,0.00046807888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056177473,0.000017835753,0.0010719363,0.0000049128903,0.0000042011593,0.0000016875043,0.00057672017,0.000109673936,0.000005706684,0.9965149,0.00007122956,0.0016155802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030785878,0.0002030395,0.0068905875,0.000029016936,0.0000023903817,0.000013815011,0.000041560354,0.38075298,0.000033485172,0.610984,0.0004109686,0.00033027268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015645684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.22025e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83233464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042515218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011039632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61039925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114708228","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447944","title":"Voting Power in the Electoral College: The Noncompetitive States Count, Too","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Power (physics); Electoral college; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.009559434567578342,"score_gpt":0.2080641625545313,"score_spread":0.19850472798695296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114708228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674692,0.0031719427,0.0055766185,0.0037922729,0.0005855829,0.00027761873,0.000022390746,0.000022486189,0.019081865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759394,0.00015819691,0.000009058646,0.00060395635,0.00030871053,0.000009404802,0.000002169248,0.000019926987,0.0012946096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974552,0.00026218043,0.0005408303,0.00020447,0.000076034725,0.0014613259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895,0.00038037167,0.00039705986,0.0002028487,0.000038391554,0.00003134015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011416381,0.00015246509,0.00027633336,0.000108876455,0.00035783337,0.0001405049,0.00057820015,0.00006141066,0.00005577943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023212722,0.0001014036,0.00011383778,0.0002930714,0.000071870076,0.00015462357,0.00002595149,0.0015651761,0.00018113252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002127312,0.00003190293,0.024135247,0.0000026806013,0.0000401264,0.0000012560224,0.00092784635,0.00009910067,0.0000043801583,0.97439265,0.00019708124,0.00014645116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011258941,0.0005435941,0.01672251,0.000037493035,0.000010464014,0.00041208646,0.008352237,0.0021955299,0.000013084102,0.9144003,0.055843797,0.00034302106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002046798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011909478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059992366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044334072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018892488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6799998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116188555","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2014.03.004","title":"School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Diversity (politics); Pareto optimal; Type (biology); Computer science; Pareto principle; Mathematical optimization; Selection (genetic algorithm); Upper and lower bounds; Control (management); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.0242208678987575,"score_gpt":0.23589455017930125,"score_spread":0.21167368228054376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116188555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847888,0.0014547963,0.008404341,0.0005002209,0.0044785747,0.00032850905,0.00005320519,0.00005091887,0.09994061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938461,0.000030072413,0.0003109143,0.00036206457,0.001956688,0.0000109266475,0.0000026495204,0.00005741992,0.0034231513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970981,0.00023619599,0.0017440027,0.00038171274,0.00005852503,0.00048148853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429554,0.0021760552,0.0026211352,0.00049190636,0.0000893051,0.0003260423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006551881,0.0003318215,0.0014270747,0.00039366607,0.0002037481,0.00031589737,0.000635442,0.00017922712,0.0020201537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020364497,0.00030437502,0.00042209128,0.00008810471,0.0003943895,0.00065654377,0.000043440905,0.0005292324,0.0010451801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036389749,0.00013203992,0.03395423,0.000051060528,0.0012541412,0.000007885439,0.0002930535,0.0010219745,0.00006334919,0.95639795,0.001671797,0.0015135723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1116191,0.004276902,0.029229172,0.00057276356,0.00046808147,0.00061544485,0.0015247572,0.0028979294,0.00018097348,0.40490884,0.44127342,0.0024326243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036364803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029142517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55148906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038623437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017493805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249082","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8","title":"Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Transitive relation; Majority rule; Preference; Preference relation; Cartesian product; Condorcet method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Voting; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.04263526924719818,"score_gpt":0.21985991371969862,"score_spread":0.17722464447250044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95590955,0.0021209288,0.00006236116,0.0012989683,0.00026585613,0.0001714879,0.00031536308,0.00003584031,0.03981964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884194,0.00007061553,0.000015659078,0.00015237082,0.00023479691,0.000016354292,0.000005332478,0.000009941999,0.0006529604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992565,0.000053495423,0.00024114201,0.00021587034,0.000024902825,0.00020812433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954706,0.00007252441,0.00016397983,0.00015893219,0.00001488229,0.000042632273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066534034,0.00010734433,0.00028445525,0.000037942144,0.00055995834,0.00006284547,0.00018701705,0.00010958826,0.0002083582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016649907,0.00008818738,0.000056091205,0.00008541796,0.00016526254,0.00011288932,0.0001016281,0.00015962699,0.000020949861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019741412,0.000022786578,0.17365001,0.000032874967,0.000024434354,7.403962e-7,0.0054856213,2.3788107e-9,4.6101377e-7,0.8202891,0.00021010262,0.000264156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017382408,0.00002280263,0.6294857,0.000007939324,0.000011795984,0.0000032310018,0.0014758777,0.000010263773,0.000005077484,0.34349516,0.023584245,0.00015966693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009704459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013764658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47679392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011051711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045275324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43068033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118405202","doi":"10.1111/j.1742-7363.2006.00026.x","title":"Relative uncertainty aversion and additively representable set rankings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01745779874170375,"score_gpt":0.23487151142010923,"score_spread":0.21741371267840548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118405202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9324351,0.00092626875,0.0032562516,0.0005435894,0.0019874612,0.00008002055,0.0002400423,0.000012816952,0.06051844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587786,0.00005447422,0.0001692135,0.00009361178,0.00061199523,0.0000013479317,0.000011588851,0.000012581434,0.0031673494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988388,0.00006528631,0.00074525597,0.00018430281,0.000038147497,0.00012823417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983816,0.00036075778,0.0010479243,0.00009722451,0.00006800541,0.000044458946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912128,0.00010558831,0.00028793706,0.0002556551,0.000055298606,0.00007837953,0.00028490098,0.00006325502,0.00083727494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014566348,0.00011141597,0.00013079625,0.000026825308,0.00009618573,0.00053758273,0.00006120924,0.00015965335,0.0001894636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002374399,0.000024842033,0.011493623,0.0000033525978,0.00017445337,0.000015679087,0.00038179517,0.0012089676,0.00004421321,0.98402387,0.002040716,0.00035107683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012360747,0.000061687686,0.006069825,0.00006367264,0.000009923538,0.00018330557,0.00034037392,0.0005857927,0.00019954533,0.9573194,0.033775385,0.00015506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017576749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007472834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06344273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022774705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002354565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91675735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119398920","doi":"","title":"SOCIAL CHOICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Normative; Axiom; Positive economics; sort; Quarter (Canadian coin); Axiomatic system; Population; Focus (optics); Social theory; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.01941834356611571,"score_gpt":0.1865130449190227,"score_spread":0.167094701352907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119398920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6550871,0.014499134,0.0008855653,0.0007933081,0.0029335802,0.00051215355,0.00031321443,0.00025003226,0.3247259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532464,0.00017748994,0.00052809564,0.000111886715,0.00056778605,0.000033598808,0.00023653945,0.000037412516,0.045060784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978552,0.00007100695,0.0007059501,0.0007672618,0.00015061208,0.0004499891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849236,0.000049012455,0.00082434557,0.00037564416,0.00010540409,0.00015326304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048292943,0.00037728436,0.0005933636,0.00032403218,0.0039495165,0.00010366888,0.00056273286,0.00054144853,0.00007737332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059771482,0.00051035365,0.00029272534,0.00020076083,0.00016882266,0.00015468935,0.0006727146,0.0005597024,0.00034773417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027641965,0.0005544491,0.3387416,0.00048628316,0.0010273616,0.00078906387,0.019834777,0.003985095,0.00024324784,0.61309516,0.016761227,0.0042053503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925476,0.000029224959,0.21571432,0.00015408405,0.00006473937,0.00013345465,0.0007708025,0.00052098185,0.00035688467,0.021659633,0.7583171,0.0010862419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021191847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000817348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74155587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006189109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051869196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120496168","doi":"10.1145/2482540.2482607","title":"Two-sided matching with partial information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015436599764296878,"score_gpt":0.18829790747825517,"score_spread":0.1728613077139583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120496168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7544967,0.0000149630305,0.023009377,0.00022930288,0.00015215935,0.00016028383,0.000003811436,0.00007070295,0.22186269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971352,8.5570235e-7,0.0011218637,0.00029336073,0.00005804512,0.000024630895,0.000005929467,0.0000056029016,0.0013545118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999446,0.0000075704374,0.00030387993,0.0000842964,0.00001612529,0.0001421741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.000026438713,0.00015366817,0.00013703697,0.000015795827,0.00003904652],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028270087,0.00006450386,0.00013176331,0.00006809745,0.00005563323,0.00013071793,0.00007637192,0.000025943667,0.0013051823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023477789,0.000055716544,0.00002361013,0.000070709844,0.0000143352845,0.000880075,0.0000143770985,0.000054012406,0.008490142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051130537,0.000008494159,0.012915596,0.000011312718,0.0000131307825,1.553593e-7,0.00073565653,0.0002630379,0.000012304377,0.9852203,0.0004019533,0.0004129558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058513973,0.0004700202,0.07294815,0.00021294878,0.000014517442,0.00007102333,0.005760583,0.03224996,0.0022337507,0.78776586,0.090535335,0.0018864401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011684144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011553921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2426385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015579833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038674284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120693554","doi":"10.1007/s00182-011-0274-x","title":"Bidding and sequential coalition formation with externalities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stochastic game; Economics; Bidding; Externality; Markov perfect equilibrium; Markov chain; Partition (number theory); Repeated game; Monotonic function; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Property (philosophy); Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06763808638016416,"score_gpt":0.22991856312608266,"score_spread":0.1622804767459185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120693554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891316,0.0004670145,0.0905649,0.00008590562,0.00075428205,0.00004527143,0.000023502495,0.000011751792,0.01891579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985782,0.000053688884,0.00059516804,0.00008395128,0.0002574278,0.0000014011674,0.000001930488,0.000009381329,0.00041885418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999238,0.000052907697,0.00047811575,0.00007683785,0.000067308145,0.00008682963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990394,0.000056189692,0.00068745064,0.00006018609,0.00011638088,0.00004038824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013645854,0.00007281966,0.00016262852,0.00023264166,0.000025161504,0.00005969659,0.00018141752,0.000033184795,0.00027179086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006373997,0.000064745436,0.000052668478,0.000032360855,0.00007055886,0.0006092395,0.000023022303,0.000097748656,0.000029942234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043006014,0.000035672827,0.004764596,0.000014379651,0.00013937439,0.000026179452,0.005133844,0.0000152136145,0.00013349856,0.9877684,0.000020756743,0.0015179921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014580074,0.00035178536,0.013304074,0.0003186716,0.000021717267,0.0014809767,0.0019611039,0.0002776529,0.0025723455,0.97511476,0.0029173181,0.00022158239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021864758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020085745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10944661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005100719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009028243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29759192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120877841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.611041","title":"Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.005997244464665632,"score_gpt":0.18595410057524678,"score_spread":0.17995685611058115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120877841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8989808,0.051558908,0.026308913,0.008866897,0.00071835757,0.0003489468,0.0000034556813,0.0000516375,0.0131621035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947719,0.0013222182,0.000027213398,0.00013023987,0.00034341225,0.0000029693306,5.471708e-7,0.00001428325,0.003387225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985471,0.000051915238,0.0003081818,0.00014929909,0.000030072868,0.000913429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994638,0.00009980924,0.0002300073,0.00014104684,0.000008581412,0.000056773584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044119754,0.00011209599,0.0002790901,0.00006317767,0.00026727538,0.00013470158,0.00019221948,0.000054338572,0.000018477791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019560552,0.00007911712,0.00010023756,0.00009209256,0.00010905439,0.00013920784,0.000026790014,0.0008523045,0.00012476325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087413406,0.0000063912507,0.0022495852,0.000004976879,0.00007804489,7.0568296e-7,0.000421925,0.000030613464,0.0000034236118,0.99458164,0.000028985336,0.0025063197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028979657,0.00018006645,0.0006153798,0.000015061594,0.000009457063,0.00036166437,0.00017420022,0.000012117718,0.000027961183,0.99012005,0.00548318,0.00010286332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023938078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017023375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09579111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028062437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027504537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37028864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122357416","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.3.298","title":"Fidelity Networks and Long-Run Trends in HIV/AIDS Gender Gaps","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Matching (statistics); Fidelity; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Virology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02998159220021788,"score_gpt":0.25314644514476126,"score_spread":0.22316485294454338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122357416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6459492,0.25957164,0.001758515,0.001773974,0.00070659,0.0010468957,0.00007134837,0.00011398604,0.089007884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96298075,0.0334856,0.00021092637,0.0015941368,0.0001272806,0.00010057136,0.00002126302,0.0000306896,0.0014487877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778986,0.00009637475,0.0011382062,0.00056330673,0.000014780751,0.00039745044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.000089477675,0.00067237235,0.00050763745,0.0000097835655,0.00013512446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012638895,0.00023079556,0.0010852508,0.00018956978,0.000046038065,0.00006888687,0.0002472849,0.000053278203,0.0020598767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045057004,0.00025013118,0.00015258855,0.00024394655,0.00017987579,0.0002739079,0.000073344156,0.0001859662,0.0019769438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007826747,0.00006668634,0.6424029,0.0006437042,0.00011911426,0.000004134551,0.00018977285,0.000419073,7.1866725e-7,0.100654975,0.015372831,0.24011827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009953175,0.00020137081,0.8278853,0.00094876124,0.00004136924,0.0000650832,0.00020312559,0.009662103,0.0000013393892,0.0121967215,0.14637025,0.0014292542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008667585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055659697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3170316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101917885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122504181","doi":"","title":"Incomplete information and small cores in matching markets","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Singleton; Complete information; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Best response; Microeconomics; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematics; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.01002484689719594,"score_gpt":0.20043354792583648,"score_spread":0.19040870102864055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122504181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240064,0.000419636,0.006372156,0.00021218667,0.00017217317,0.00038474306,0.00055120676,0.000099999554,0.06778148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736756,0.00009850888,0.0011665347,0.00016991394,0.00003722005,0.000016176955,0.00030914127,0.000039752336,0.00079516607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807465,0.000107726984,0.0006024863,0.0004924788,0.00008111367,0.00064155296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858963,0.00022320866,0.0005600001,0.00037190487,0.000029361003,0.00022591252],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011887293,0.00039256513,0.0006045897,0.0008141519,0.00014871515,0.0011814942,0.0005900703,0.0004530088,0.00009334132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001254868,0.00055477663,0.00017235737,0.00021375545,0.00014949315,0.0015194372,0.0008354064,0.00068356865,0.00014575008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003572354,0.00021429065,0.4007609,0.0013304604,0.00041148296,0.00046830656,0.01855921,0.0048838593,0.000019772962,0.5661913,0.00031569172,0.006487488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195028,0.000060219714,0.3824526,0.0005821595,0.00002528931,0.00012944869,0.0019381463,0.0033699302,0.0000068345885,0.59998226,0.008652428,0.00085036934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010087349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000422769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073361166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014123251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014386595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123904319","doi":"10.1007/s003550100124","title":"Efficient solutions to bargaining problems with uncertain disagreement points","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Rationality; Minimax; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Point (geometry); Bargaining problem; Mathematical optimization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Path (computing); Axiomatic system; Economics; Social choice theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.055522921491831044,"score_gpt":0.2305636843382545,"score_spread":0.17504076284642345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123904319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92686975,0.0010859936,0.0015394997,0.012177247,0.00024515088,0.0005851248,0.00015071598,0.00010322233,0.05724327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998771,0.0000047498925,0.00006539202,0.00026446837,0.00019228063,0.000041299765,0.0000052062783,0.000016023225,0.000639596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990622,0.000022773636,0.00025802947,0.00028923468,0.000043735265,0.00032405992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.000026621776,0.0001138586,0.000113889655,0.000021916807,0.000091135546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037812907,0.000121917656,0.00022353855,0.000077578414,0.00063229806,0.000065118424,0.00009575384,0.000057644007,0.00031046924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046837526,0.00012044458,0.00004383898,0.00021211505,0.00004652077,0.00004169853,0.000045680958,0.00009634456,0.00021277872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010217004,0.00016282055,0.058033206,0.00008450253,0.00008419746,0.000002633357,0.014773153,0.0014281638,0.000009480035,0.92257047,0.0008844266,0.0019567183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058953324,0.0013692938,0.33456996,0.00047685817,0.00009215327,0.000025520694,0.017167736,0.01797773,0.000015920781,0.032838143,0.5866342,0.0029371434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037799208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093851435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88973236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008135393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026027221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49115875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124268924","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01512.x","title":"Viewpoint: Decision‐making in committees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Voting; Information aggregation; Process (computing); Perfect information; Imperfect; Focus (optics); Quality (philosophy); Decision-making; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Business; Political science; Decision support system; Economics; Engineering; Data mining; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13586755932006936,"score_gpt":0.1974223866401813,"score_spread":0.06155482732011194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124268924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849127,0.00154407,0.00035886533,0.0027264797,0.0016725978,0.00019609813,0.00010656065,0.00000729445,0.008475343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963626,0.000089057845,0.0008293662,0.001995468,0.00046570683,0.0000045126117,0.0000034235823,0.000037742993,0.00021212328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674696,0.00005092703,0.0019709307,0.00040158085,0.0000015257158,0.00082808785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997108,0.00023071475,0.0011882274,0.0004666582,0.00007028634,0.0009361025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023283965,0.00028915654,0.0010499698,0.0015565304,0.00014005997,0.00017545193,0.0007883599,0.00022668722,0.00047438705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005368814,0.00038414676,0.00028819748,0.0002456029,0.000092608614,0.000538338,0.000014353688,0.00048793992,0.00016144662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004309093,0.000016561004,0.022655625,0.000014687615,0.00003625273,0.00012678868,0.001385977,0.0035197246,0.0000013923822,0.966499,0.000367397,0.0053335093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007321786,0.00027440873,0.017627547,0.00032379964,0.000006568498,0.00038418474,0.00025389754,0.0012406197,0.000009317896,0.9532517,0.025453275,0.00044245954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027536703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8448878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017176558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048009594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124372635","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.007","title":"Incomplete information and singleton cores in matching markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; European Regional Development Fund; Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Singleton; Matching (statistics); Complete information; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian probability; Bayesian game; Information asymmetry; Mechanism design; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Economics; Stochastic game; Computer science; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Repeated game; Statistics","score_opus":0.01157620871886893,"score_gpt":0.19466032380938705,"score_spread":0.1830841150905181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124372635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784051,0.0007903527,0.0010797728,0.00011130685,0.00048896996,0.00005734406,0.000018108296,0.0000057463076,0.019043306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.000032842658,0.00021482969,0.00007628047,0.00018283678,8.504911e-7,0.0000021788403,0.000008234859,0.00015562118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986378,0.000056613335,0.0010735746,0.000079588506,0.000013859441,0.00013854507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986355,0.00019655761,0.0010297758,0.00009332445,0.0000108436225,0.000034033696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032255282,0.00009023519,0.0003315536,0.00037127503,0.000041124447,0.00008656873,0.00012746277,0.00005618474,0.00013031025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058470705,0.000096881886,0.00006470963,0.000035770423,0.000041694224,0.0007436386,0.000027659395,0.00014241146,0.00008853442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010490519,0.000018749546,0.047480173,0.00003064131,0.000019189523,0.0000034910393,0.0005540692,0.0008476624,0.00003016687,0.9487626,0.00019684357,0.0019515101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008947833,0.000046219215,0.08271929,0.000072510265,0.0000035112325,0.00010240676,0.00035014766,0.0005570779,0.00003258689,0.9050745,0.009996427,0.00015054358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001237104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002430884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043688104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013065049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016468774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39507285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125561126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447952","title":"An Algorithm for the Proportional Division of Indivisible Items","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Mathematics; Division algorithm; Algorithm; Computer science; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.015400423767436982,"score_gpt":0.23448274509377978,"score_spread":0.2190823213263428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125561126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15270633,0.0019124543,0.8437345,0.00026481287,0.00046916102,0.00022419429,0.00002541298,0.000014792879,0.00064835465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819034,0.00015962259,0.00044308224,0.00003106058,0.00042122134,0.000011277531,0.000006333838,0.000017294406,0.0007197347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984331,0.000043326258,0.0005186123,0.00016236625,0.000055715638,0.00078685157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901944,0.0001261484,0.0005618075,0.00019521055,0.000055008797,0.000042376294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007382309,0.000092010945,0.00022301081,0.00010700081,0.00024008709,0.000049711172,0.0003321708,0.000058833393,0.000030772997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010674881,0.00007066012,0.0001285823,0.00010606116,0.000045170847,0.00016566986,0.000014581218,0.0004559757,0.000026338439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009310941,0.00005952208,0.0075006005,0.0000064280607,0.000069566304,3.9357076e-8,0.0001174586,0.0001493595,0.00003331413,0.9385094,0.000024595558,0.05352038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006464256,0.00073967094,0.00479975,0.000014868376,0.000009911143,0.000042639294,0.0003912668,0.03114588,0.00009347015,0.9545886,0.007390489,0.00013705375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040363975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024428828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001164977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013639711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2881436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126346078","doi":"","title":"In Defense of Welfarism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.024009381481234576,"score_gpt":0.19901028844430887,"score_spread":0.1750009069630743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126346078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87804615,0.0065090302,0.0001931595,0.00058896054,0.00058534177,0.00036581533,0.0007703301,0.000035216635,0.11290602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912334,0.0011475154,0.00014244983,0.000020777483,0.000037645215,3.8491123e-7,0.000027840368,0.000010389246,0.007379564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.000065342,0.00058629044,0.0005148246,0.000067316956,0.0002210347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982328,0.00011410519,0.00068442494,0.00084161723,0.000034325538,0.00009273332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045548662,0.00015645195,0.0005379416,0.00022232151,0.0001335783,0.000019203058,0.0005146108,0.00011958838,0.00024790093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070158516,0.00019678366,0.00006720449,0.00015183509,0.00021708159,0.00055743696,0.00027262315,0.00012485214,0.00004187588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063165947,0.0019861062,0.566754,0.0009718618,0.0011118447,0.0013976251,0.0037424911,0.00015450829,0.000657076,0.32683066,0.089402914,0.006359291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011102155,0.0006300035,0.10393663,0.00060688285,0.000265173,0.0003223035,0.0026473475,0.0054323985,0.00049309403,0.017525047,0.8553393,0.0016996978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121166855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012479766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7659364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008607017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008447616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126468482","doi":"","title":"Aggregation of Rankings: a Brief Review of Distance-based Rules and Loss Functions for the Expected Loss Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); sort; Inference; Class (philosophy); Statistical inference; Function (biology); Parametric statistics; Computer science; Preference; Mathematics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.04596666030695218,"score_gpt":0.27867760560894794,"score_spread":0.23271094530199576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126468482","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022250586,0.8262935,0.17221002,0.000032910688,0.0001623111,0.0007901855,0.00015420205,0.000008158489,0.00032642996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003021526,0.99603444,0.00011795158,0.000021614424,0.00022678997,0.00007454061,0.00006654651,0.00004278477,0.00039379008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704057,0.00011559218,0.00166498,0.00029892815,0.00007884697,0.0008010865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604815,0.0004578077,0.0029956256,0.0003303058,0.00012754567,0.000040548406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007107497,0.00027452657,0.0016611697,0.0002539273,0.00018117539,0.000030988616,0.0003555118,0.0001753943,0.000015869331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003646424,0.00020838948,0.0006771526,0.00038730327,0.0001572607,0.00008129812,0.000018475566,0.00089982286,0.000004017229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044041615,0.00009012514,0.00010022908,0.052249692,0.0006660972,2.9858023e-7,0.000060682487,0.0000040003547,3.202093e-8,0.61942965,0.000051117855,0.32730404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080523774,0.00021192573,0.000008607245,0.03651756,0.0006065435,0.0002970187,0.00012499973,0.000071121096,4.7230432e-7,0.047186602,0.913821,0.00034895187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023580045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017002507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91376984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036125115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005786753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84978765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126616776","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401242026","title":"The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. By Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. 322p. $90.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Simple (philosophy); Presidential election; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Presidential system; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029619014260147694,"score_gpt":0.2798716266999759,"score_spread":0.2502526124398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126616776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34799638,0.55552375,0.0011330724,0.015330622,0.00031139096,0.0019623712,0.0000884084,0.00007094095,0.077583075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95992094,0.038507897,0.000111073736,0.0013354641,0.000027262502,0.00002283485,7.5458274e-7,0.000012062251,0.00006173488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974737,0.00022365054,0.00074962294,0.0005467039,0.00022344985,0.000782879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976811,0.0009613151,0.0005842169,0.00031172545,0.000068313755,0.00039333565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012815319,0.00019958086,0.0006220556,0.00005683889,0.00033617747,0.00015216338,0.00031107146,0.000040008406,0.0000132006435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043869223,0.00014913263,0.00006097732,0.0004901256,0.0028205458,0.0002526814,0.00016388504,0.00021423184,0.000010621775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020049749,0.00005388747,0.0100406725,0.00029189588,0.00003312889,0.0000016790937,0.00017522548,2.3837924e-7,0.00006620413,0.96904826,0.00013463102,0.020134147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013872471,0.0015269689,0.05586853,0.00506512,0.00030047537,0.00085374183,0.004225632,0.0008154938,0.00024083463,0.11032326,0.81742615,0.0019665642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048298968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006042023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85872495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091030066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004812092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127041951","doi":"10.1257/mic.20100029","title":"A Continuous-Time Model of Multilateral Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Limit (mathematics); Bargaining problem; Discrete time and continuous time; Markov perfect equilibrium; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Markov chain; Economics; Infinity; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03594184311080491,"score_gpt":0.22841829458885482,"score_spread":0.19247645147804993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127041951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704555,0.00036812553,0.0030666597,0.00020189601,0.00060702895,0.00015499174,0.00022177624,0.00004197845,0.024882006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99191916,0.000073056195,0.0057790815,0.00031962933,0.00032191217,0.0000060711545,0.000007836905,0.000075732874,0.0014975058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705434,0.000057553363,0.001856937,0.00044720687,0.000023135148,0.000560833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652374,0.00009398702,0.0025175854,0.00042669306,0.00005658637,0.00038142956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021381443,0.00030810927,0.0012856717,0.00038285975,0.00009838008,0.00014283726,0.0006001239,0.00009208764,0.00017981169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101415186,0.00037900358,0.00032070882,0.00006647685,0.00035259538,0.00049964484,0.00010876623,0.00033819722,0.0021419928],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011405802,0.0005441524,0.2802117,0.00006606313,0.0019047399,0.00003223466,0.014881065,0.3242597,0.0057544173,0.34487617,0.013750785,0.012578386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009105981,0.0015937696,0.0018712191,0.00015305179,0.00009415704,0.0012510433,0.005897689,0.7123437,0.0030275288,0.22634393,0.03522247,0.0030954434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028311159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008880959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38808402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057721796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019794739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128536578","doi":"","title":"The Eeckhout Condition and the Subgame Perfect Implementation of Stable Matching","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Sequence (biology); Subgame; Mathematics; Stability (learning theory); Extensive-form game; Repeated game; Computer science; Game theory; Equilibrium selection; Statistics","score_opus":0.03285360322336085,"score_gpt":0.319244416640543,"score_spread":0.28639081341718214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128536578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581721,0.0015843019,0.000020536283,0.00083952973,0.0004082207,0.0010571958,0.00020282561,0.00001648103,0.03769881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893082,0.00883206,0.000056359557,0.00003518418,0.00020283613,0.00020565373,0.000034208697,0.00003733106,0.001288168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997295,0.00038688912,0.0011792514,0.00055504555,0.000072360424,0.0005114128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970488,0.0013564308,0.0007621186,0.000720481,0.000052063446,0.000060083697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011222523,0.00020939921,0.0006143012,0.00026040652,0.0003715812,0.00027142424,0.00054557505,0.00019731624,0.0001252204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026220139,0.00017048982,0.00015881228,0.00008811737,0.00055062363,0.00012960543,0.0005074097,0.0009302558,0.000018396287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052544236,0.000117620475,0.06409926,0.0006737636,0.0005398326,0.0000036811975,0.012591913,0.007608993,0.00007045319,0.7789563,0.00014652681,0.13466623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009932,0.00033788342,0.105610915,0.0007324896,0.00005328959,0.000042155334,0.035585713,0.03282355,0.00067994307,0.7411573,0.07134246,0.0017022769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011330504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008159263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13296396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003729494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010881121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69523734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947347","doi":"10.5539/mas.v2n2p97","title":"The Stable Set and Weak Stable Set For -person Repeated Fuzzy Cooperative Games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Core (optical fiber); Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Missing data","score_opus":0.06569891168925356,"score_gpt":0.23916105867870235,"score_spread":0.17346214698944878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129947347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8863487,0.0011514692,0.034527924,0.0003492603,0.00032723902,0.0010108122,0.00028223044,0.00009818391,0.075904176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924207,0.00005916207,0.00035443337,0.00009685146,0.000042725642,0.000099828285,0.000006190237,0.000015664382,0.006904442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850684,0.000015065733,0.0003168927,0.0005877368,0.00007577012,0.0004976867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991098,0.00015582569,0.00020188662,0.00037222728,0.00006143456,0.00009879868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021817007,0.00014940997,0.00027939587,0.000091335256,0.0015320943,0.00022243067,0.00038075756,0.000053292464,0.000013869008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013017192,0.00012437663,0.00003287736,0.00035915902,0.0006430446,0.00024674425,0.00006473423,0.00011134663,0.00006113299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019230566,0.00006618346,0.00506566,0.00006127626,0.000048982627,0.0000022273261,0.021690277,0.0018752646,0.024194779,0.94129544,0.004149041,0.0013585467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00407034,0.0005041888,0.007985989,0.0000732661,0.000022264765,0.000085212116,0.01208436,0.62208325,0.023092745,0.213514,0.11449046,0.0019939258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008678668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020754474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007434207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006518553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130803293","doi":"","title":"House Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahier de recherche","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Rationality; Truncation (statistics); Monotonic function; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.20454620346820657,"score_gpt":0.3063175595874251,"score_spread":0.10177135611921856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130803293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8221274,0.0016979196,0.10418117,0.0007497868,0.00047416872,0.00039046165,0.000007848682,0.00027677728,0.070094496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98320234,0.00007566993,0.0062033073,0.00041946225,0.00015672829,0.00009468786,0.000003287075,0.00004375573,0.009800767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988764,0.00018944404,0.00035698872,0.0002722139,0.000021019454,0.0002839633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913526,0.00020253602,0.00017461763,0.00036432486,0.00003770276,0.00008558021],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025323587,0.00011951213,0.00022331366,0.00008349631,0.00006580841,0.00007851864,0.0002377447,0.00036054157,0.00057462946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005786801,0.00013615677,0.00007751943,0.00022474368,0.000050627637,0.00022397531,0.000023541155,0.00041005487,0.0067975796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029821413,0.0002716963,0.050813086,0.0002176258,0.00018856933,0.0000060019315,0.010398959,0.0002046056,0.010595972,0.8323286,0.010095313,0.08484971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007471967,0.000092345355,0.03222081,0.000059747366,0.000013137024,0.000040613802,0.00052003335,0.007591692,0.0068850736,0.90130264,0.049682412,0.0008443299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002674019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000843128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16107497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036157627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021071222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99397576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131710566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.545263","title":"Value of Information Gained from Data Mining in the Context of Information Sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Value of information; Value (mathematics); Data science; Data sharing; Business; Computer science; Data mining; Geography; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02507237177107897,"score_gpt":0.22600556073509395,"score_spread":0.200933188964015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131710566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97473186,0.000572216,0.022270357,0.00024994925,0.00012683054,0.00010547869,0.000063978805,0.0000046851865,0.001874661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949515,0.00015205759,0.0001521483,0.00007651346,0.00005360203,0.0000013876736,0.000058601767,0.0000032674639,0.00000727685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998571,0.00002433452,0.00088509114,0.00006363045,0.000053367814,0.00040259046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874324,0.000057868103,0.00088599377,0.0002717495,0.000027440905,0.000013705464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004565479,0.00006652773,0.00020130893,0.00019803969,0.000048135516,0.000045396348,0.00058395223,0.00004822462,0.000008490957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026581186,0.00005911393,0.000040564693,0.00017017832,0.00002111371,0.0015226991,0.000048208778,0.00039655538,0.00002529194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033877557,0.00001859101,0.011007344,0.000015938533,0.000044185577,8.876083e-8,0.008870589,0.00078973,0.0000100076,0.97596866,0.0000075866883,0.0032334288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027203627,0.00022547161,0.014645144,0.00017190563,0.000014148034,0.000046086363,0.036667768,0.0060676644,0.00013513795,0.9378031,0.0013153392,0.0001878618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011216089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001901154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03816552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019694629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017413044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2410596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131830370","doi":"","title":"Relative Egalitarianism and Related Criteria","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Characterization (materials science); Preference; Social choice theory; Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Economics; Welfare economics; Microeconomics; Pure mathematics; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.009372784815962777,"score_gpt":0.16826176887632346,"score_spread":0.1588889840603607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131830370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6797779,0.010827547,0.00060450827,0.0011487665,0.0005323933,0.00016344312,0.00003844181,0.00011211246,0.30679485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732801,0.000062209,0.0003407537,0.00011598221,0.00004865063,0.0000020678958,0.000012597599,0.000007686926,0.026129985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990172,0.000048225367,0.00032794976,0.00034155315,0.000049085676,0.00021602576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993741,0.000043267075,0.0002119545,0.0002039297,0.000031334752,0.00013543614],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003691752,0.00014543325,0.00024692217,0.00015129616,0.001991546,0.000040559768,0.00013717527,0.00014842392,0.0000709681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006130536,0.00017919995,0.00009360981,0.00014909948,0.00012356669,0.00040095314,0.00004984874,0.00016229684,0.00012995572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065981985,0.000043492644,0.006403957,0.000008266978,0.000064993,0.00021866139,0.01076236,0.000049563456,0.0009045224,0.9810065,0.00019224406,0.00027947745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028524252,0.00041777652,0.32278526,0.00015269799,0.000076772434,0.0022136562,0.0063260472,0.0033794043,0.0010764587,0.55201894,0.10767067,0.0010298593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021884113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037227204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4289875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008182519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005416477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132053184","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.975514","title":"Sharing a Polluted River Network","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.016420746724763034,"score_gpt":0.21491373780732587,"score_spread":0.19849299108256283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132053184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83497304,0.010516945,0.11295318,0.00026327855,0.0012865812,0.00013286447,0.0000044845483,0.00007854757,0.039791055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082655,0.00026779596,0.00013161683,0.00011789187,0.0011415709,9.949787e-7,0.0000012176702,0.000025581076,0.0074867816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675745,0.00001646272,0.0005670275,0.00022853618,0.000038028025,0.0023925067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.00003971682,0.00036868837,0.00018538118,0.00002065111,0.000090734255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008316154,0.00012551833,0.00025633565,0.00015201865,0.00024161248,0.00006173315,0.00032132588,0.000089956535,0.00009600396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006053174,0.00013670322,0.00013526084,0.00025931344,0.000035562683,0.00016470942,0.00003899264,0.0011313303,0.0004983961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030015046,0.000018283163,0.042424623,0.0000026941807,0.000096530275,0.0000042784286,0.00022228381,0.00011877006,0.000008021513,0.9555947,0.00007670739,0.0014030588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048731497,0.000097725184,0.008725417,0.00001903621,0.0000057894863,0.00028764294,0.00026952877,0.00020373405,0.000008089391,0.97826445,0.011436552,0.00019473118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081547776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024344816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15585348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057592057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009723199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64060396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133509071","doi":"10.1007/s10107-014-0854-1","title":"Finding small stabilizers for unstable graphs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Vertex (graph theory); Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Discrete mathematics; Independent set; Induced subgraph; Graph; Chordal graph; Computer science","score_opus":0.06825843278489932,"score_gpt":0.24749230820121987,"score_spread":0.17923387541632055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133509071","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20291488,0.00017761007,0.7609164,0.00021940115,0.00034289074,0.0009819318,0.000015427251,0.00024187476,0.034189586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566795,8.5748843e-7,0.041882705,0.00005076091,0.000077180885,0.00016081204,0.0000056529466,0.00003643982,0.0011060912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856526,0.000025438938,0.00059770513,0.00032517864,0.00003036653,0.00045603298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889463,0.00047403123,0.00022410265,0.00028607168,0.000021820006,0.00009935121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025161807,0.00014796796,0.00042352825,0.00010992751,0.0001653061,0.00013676526,0.00020457053,0.00008999457,0.00012122562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008847855,0.00015107049,0.00017185288,0.00015989,0.00006560463,0.000083081904,0.000035493733,0.00010124587,0.00032168158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006920289,0.00007335866,0.0010047178,0.0003854216,0.000021297175,3.107171e-7,0.0005279126,0.000012999627,0.000017396736,0.992153,0.000039201022,0.005757502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045098446,0.00011792567,0.00002390316,0.00007757606,0.000009513716,0.000005307482,0.0002554107,0.009021014,0.00011121504,0.93697196,0.052702576,0.0002526189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008699791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023498155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7537646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003401793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004437981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61604756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133729570","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Ordering Infinite Utility Streams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Axiom; Anonymity; Utilitarianism; Impossibility; Pareto principle; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.011669988858276265,"score_gpt":0.1650448500505162,"score_spread":0.15337486119223992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133729570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9502039,0.004581353,0.0009535692,0.0001741851,0.00036643006,0.00013804145,0.0000463461,0.000043838216,0.04349234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976513,0.000065749344,0.00015613751,0.000018762152,0.00004052916,0.0000039992888,0.0000045490465,0.0000069391617,0.002052068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989581,0.000036557776,0.0004289483,0.00027637422,0.00007327626,0.00022671708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990185,0.00009417227,0.00033510724,0.0003996242,0.00006080377,0.000091824455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006516034,0.00012558525,0.00022690675,0.000075774806,0.0025761467,0.000029029621,0.00028598937,0.000090260815,0.000017686509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012476197,0.00012371162,0.00014943467,0.00019416962,0.00029443498,0.0001783315,0.00011431933,0.00014043208,0.000047663045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884869,0.00012798663,0.21002582,0.000045322668,0.000110090696,0.000047005065,0.0074375025,0.0020638718,0.0005097577,0.7778837,0.000018160854,0.0015422861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033667532,0.00025646808,0.72567517,0.00018151956,0.00005451782,0.00034903918,0.015218643,0.0023848847,0.010895182,0.1729942,0.06780403,0.00081960123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020273132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013643821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6048895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00102138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017683729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134895573","doi":"10.1007/pl00004217","title":"Rationalizable variable-population choice functions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematical economics; Variable (mathematics); Separable space; Population; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Choice function; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03192332397233759,"score_gpt":0.1993347192442331,"score_spread":0.16741139527189552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134895573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23653777,0.0021683178,0.024173096,0.0003829313,0.0040572467,0.00037986317,0.0003009457,0.00028243143,0.7317174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308148,0.000013305469,0.00020458392,0.00019711217,0.00055152975,0.000032840668,0.0000452804,0.000027797325,0.06811276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.000062657346,0.00056308706,0.00035455875,0.000014165351,0.0002362793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990275,0.00024538455,0.000294382,0.000357649,0.000009143084,0.00006594769],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011726185,0.00013536088,0.00027179244,0.00014981533,0.00023670499,0.00008178516,0.0001733597,0.00009547088,0.02233689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013773638,0.00017022806,0.00008714185,0.00008532388,0.00003675022,0.00037311864,0.00002702534,0.00010671523,0.016320433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059955255,0.00003202008,0.016477268,0.000009832592,0.00003946255,1.9601326e-7,0.00012443257,0.0023229735,0.0000063425373,0.9759953,0.00473195,0.0002542167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000580244,0.000033585304,0.008880175,0.000014842419,0.000009739393,0.000010825281,0.000068515925,0.012993299,0.000011022691,0.64747727,0.32955587,0.00036461646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018567381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012958829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.694277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017322236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055962846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98444545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135240641","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807439","title":"Transshipment prices and pair-wise stability in coordinating the decentralized transshipment problem","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Transshipment (information security); Computer science; Production (economics); Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Matching (statistics); Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.030688248977159903,"score_gpt":0.21519273800696861,"score_spread":0.1845044890298087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135240641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849237,0.00036413484,0.000976666,0.002602066,0.00019973438,0.00063924707,0.000016736405,0.000044560467,0.010233164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857515,0.00002487677,0.0010103923,0.00008649212,0.00002993374,0.000074394564,0.000002274244,0.000012906405,0.00018356314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853736,0.00006089118,0.0006686662,0.0003656107,0.00004015309,0.00032732045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992902,0.00020733221,0.00016204019,0.00025114167,0.000013653585,0.0000755944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034612897,0.00015059319,0.00030780668,0.00007006042,0.00012496204,0.00009250773,0.00020343724,0.000084531806,0.00054038386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006984736,0.000117199765,0.000063565996,0.00016672097,0.000100096106,0.00014670828,0.00001997775,0.00028441605,0.000025138163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003976046,0.0001643248,0.45155722,0.00014791012,0.000027658876,0.0000012809138,0.008737961,0.000018970693,0.00078181754,0.53495175,0.00002258191,0.003548772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0081367735,0.0003316336,0.62579143,0.00017473144,0.000033505334,0.000027544264,0.0067863725,0.0078097703,0.008374144,0.27369115,0.06714506,0.0016978986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003983076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081071886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2612606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034995068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011928697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59168243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135391209","doi":"10.1057/9780230236769_9","title":"Intertemporal Social Evaluation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfarism; Social Welfare; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social choice theory; Computer science; Social welfare function; Economics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Political science","score_opus":0.10935414230228907,"score_gpt":0.27860501618116057,"score_spread":0.1692508738788715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135391209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005831832,0.0011992108,0.0003991219,0.000026906768,0.0013226044,0.0006212847,0.00024577268,0.0000959408,0.995506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588171,0.000009376732,0.000059892525,0.00016072417,0.0011648535,0.000024435947,0.00012971614,0.00011654584,0.039517332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751604,0.000033220444,0.0011772297,0.0006914347,0.00015371876,0.00042838798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998174,0.00006586458,0.001058833,0.0004803728,0.00010939713,0.00011153507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002651095,0.00047881756,0.0008766259,0.00050209276,0.0001759993,0.00008386454,0.0003700189,0.0006141141,0.0023641929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005374528,0.0005705524,0.000433143,0.000021357342,0.00014753552,0.0000010268323,0.00010407408,0.00042842905,0.002742674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030028577,4.0704765e-7,0.00028409483,0.00005584701,0.00014921132,0.000010637475,0.00058680616,4.5286112e-7,0.000003651991,0.9914007,0.000067404515,0.007410711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005138932,0.00006418453,0.0003576655,0.00009193695,0.00004172095,0.000013580503,0.00003021589,0.000117298754,0.000015174628,0.9837493,0.014387273,0.0006177737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007078144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009695531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95823395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025687696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004553031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136577698","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2290795","title":"Two-Sided Matchings: An Algorithm for Ensuring They are Minimax and Pareto-Optimal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.016063574430842855,"score_gpt":0.22156189994081643,"score_spread":0.20549832550997357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136577698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96516734,0.0027271027,0.03045612,0.00028210567,0.00029220205,0.00029319807,0.000027932363,0.00004034355,0.0007136508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957841,0.00033195908,0.0022743577,0.00007800235,0.0005268349,0.00003159396,0.00000469153,0.00004174715,0.00092672696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975797,0.000047853075,0.00053828314,0.00031436517,0.000038996062,0.0014808021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990359,0.00010153537,0.000506347,0.00018027994,0.000050605402,0.0001253491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027526906,0.00018421904,0.0003816042,0.00014327922,0.00029433344,0.00022819854,0.00023432568,0.00008431283,0.00004068396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095805575,0.00018594504,0.000112298956,0.000053251166,0.000032114927,0.00047230406,0.000030235895,0.00070208847,0.00008210275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051271556,0.00014360229,0.026441457,0.000042742173,0.0003982128,0.0000036458675,0.0022977735,0.0001772787,0.00019055365,0.9080644,0.00010079542,0.06208823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015470547,0.0004367893,0.0036852763,0.0000518817,0.000015803675,0.0004436847,0.0055348566,0.012040714,0.000051714993,0.9749688,0.0008113793,0.0004120304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003222404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018681369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06690437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023163376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088769055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75826186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137333732","doi":"10.1109/infcom.2011.5935232","title":"Seen as stable marriages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Closing (real estate); Computer science; Game theory; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Function (biology); Transferable utility; Management science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.0807555906832923,"score_gpt":0.20198757808955958,"score_spread":0.12123198740626728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137333732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22316311,0.00018405385,0.0009062955,0.000038762108,0.0002863494,0.00006225055,0.000009919197,0.000063386775,0.7752859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92112386,0.0000091137945,0.0004810732,0.0001595099,0.000056138495,0.0000063681505,0.000001395745,0.000011193509,0.07815136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993661,0.000010929977,0.0002553045,0.00018155405,0.000010937795,0.00017516436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960184,0.000019083805,0.00009958258,0.00022094439,0.000008469781,0.00005008099],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054868695,0.00007005086,0.00017031077,0.00006756738,0.00004772123,0.00002364654,0.00014510365,0.000048149566,0.01139408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047189646,0.000072324765,0.0000466547,0.00007528785,0.000020351563,0.00012450063,0.000029191613,0.000051429324,0.011567744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061461046,0.000024043195,0.04005745,0.000008165326,0.000016180236,0.0000018787396,0.0005420637,5.6718045e-7,0.000010671916,0.95807135,0.0011514924,0.00011001956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004980632,0.00014304416,0.03842611,0.000015415588,0.0000043998843,0.000013920224,0.0005556445,0.00013966579,0.0026051998,0.77238905,0.18477522,0.00043427962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091317354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010273235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69796073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013707271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042734305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98950964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137656620","doi":"10.1145/1807342.1807385","title":"The unavailable candidate model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Social choice theory; Computer science; Voting; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Representation (politics); Outcome (game theory); Majority rule; Simple (philosophy); Aggregation problem; Greedy algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.019929405418093387,"score_gpt":0.20364296299150797,"score_spread":0.1837135575734146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137656620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.371616,0.00015778569,0.003054297,0.00067101355,0.00087395427,0.00008999519,0.000018135275,0.00006080409,0.623458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030757,0.000012999442,0.00025528696,0.00012913214,0.00006755064,0.0000081134895,0.0000010155875,0.000008644991,0.09644157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942225,0.000004832179,0.00023137582,0.000144228,0.00001206204,0.000185222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948627,0.00004788323,0.00008995345,0.00032444138,0.000010632737,0.000040831022],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009122439,0.00005899339,0.00010497642,0.000026202124,0.00020907004,0.00008803555,0.0002123904,0.000045610024,0.0004010936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007031675,0.0000437343,0.00003944819,0.00006095802,0.00004551454,0.000073558505,0.000027455513,0.00013908253,0.0026003215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024989665,0.000006119961,0.0035138575,0.0000018294778,0.000006217997,1.4727787e-7,0.0000617944,0.00008998827,0.00011583768,0.99260664,0.0034675351,0.00012756287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024101505,0.000014707074,0.0006682646,0.0000023769317,0.0000016161904,0.0000048257643,0.00005030957,0.12858644,0.00048346457,0.4939667,0.37578171,0.000198587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021400943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023558078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5314597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007362955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008396522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137713285","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414193","title":"Negotiation characteristics in brownfield redevelopment projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Waterloo; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Redevelopment; Negotiation; Environmental planning; Business; Damages; Process (computing); Government (linguistics); Civil engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.042523003317933634,"score_gpt":0.22215919510161372,"score_spread":0.1796361917836801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137713285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80916023,0.000043909804,0.009062558,0.00015194384,0.000493518,0.00016250825,0.0000031670613,0.00003771934,0.18088442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994059,0.000006470934,0.0006135406,0.00018882398,0.00007853526,0.0000048733095,0.0000060322436,0.000006955708,0.0050357464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990825,0.0000062808085,0.0005279421,0.00017155544,0.000017331158,0.00019436241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963695,0.000045900666,0.00015928331,0.00011732821,0.0000102566655,0.000030286976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014950635,0.000066836,0.0001697281,0.00017345419,0.00002796843,0.000024754088,0.00007695505,0.000067862224,0.00028762646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012957382,0.00007435734,0.000022635018,0.0001615729,0.000008949458,0.00007999586,0.000016854965,0.00007835776,0.00031713562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002027355,0.000058008896,0.5399847,0.000023181277,0.0000073861543,0.0000056349086,0.0015329574,0.0000016450471,0.00006734779,0.45548412,0.0003074914,0.0025072207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005310284,0.000049939146,0.95976925,0.00004130972,9.216051e-7,0.0000057952034,0.00042369694,0.00033309395,0.00094264717,0.013930027,0.02367,0.00030229322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012386126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006965419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4415541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065187494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009074288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40762424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137788969","doi":"","title":"RATIONAL CHOICE ON ARBITRARY DOMAINS: A COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Rationalization (economics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04952519008829365,"score_gpt":0.262016740398584,"score_spread":0.21249155031029038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137788969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987381,0.002341417,0.0028111516,0.0011823971,0.0038553388,0.0005562166,0.0028763874,0.00020729036,0.087431714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919041,0.000054818265,0.0018296877,0.0005706151,0.002932284,0.00009381799,0.000720305,0.000018891216,0.0018755144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.00004123842,0.00065576617,0.0005346788,0.00012391113,0.00027666512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987692,0.0002621665,0.0002799244,0.00048934406,0.00007033922,0.00012898493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021361944,0.00025038407,0.0003441335,0.00015955263,0.0005319388,0.0001237125,0.00020074542,0.00008955409,0.00016340574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017711186,0.00025548183,0.00013695894,0.0001801566,0.00019301775,0.0006562346,0.000049943457,0.00015973537,0.0012667589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009635474,0.00033839163,0.005759328,0.000022949303,0.00011697848,0.00003815463,0.00017190853,0.001110219,0.0003061184,0.99040496,0.0014095916,0.0002250298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013035545,0.00020400723,0.010074157,0.00010758042,0.000013556006,0.000126649,0.00004430765,0.0006155886,0.0017979341,0.0044596214,0.98085886,0.000394163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038433552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005407978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98594534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051639375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012512799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138689521","doi":"10.1257/mic.5.2.99","title":"Preference Signaling in Matching Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Air Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Welfare; Mechanism (biology); Value (mathematics); Matching (statistics); Preference; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.021852197636305568,"score_gpt":0.20654216626446914,"score_spread":0.18468996862816356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138689521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819851,0.0004432052,0.000763551,0.0005652081,0.00090485415,0.0002764333,0.00003615542,0.00003866609,0.014986831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593884,0.0002627324,0.002134673,0.0005703648,0.00034901247,0.000031935302,0.0000044165954,0.0000666594,0.0006413819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682915,0.00008802292,0.0017680124,0.00055936933,0.000017424387,0.0007379915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975783,0.00020352237,0.0015673197,0.00039061217,0.000020542851,0.00023966318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016645363,0.0003224582,0.00091006793,0.00053468934,0.00015916649,0.00046833526,0.00066571985,0.00008959717,0.0019148021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049197803,0.00040013395,0.0002148388,0.00011166758,0.00019166175,0.00092243805,0.00010031615,0.000585841,0.0070457333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020297503,0.00033946513,0.719135,0.000104443745,0.0005994825,0.000042993397,0.0061286166,0.014487742,0.0036809423,0.20855397,0.0045989337,0.042125445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049961354,0.0005168029,0.24114491,0.00036433182,0.000029678222,0.0015160617,0.010809235,0.009320913,0.0012862119,0.67577255,0.050232455,0.004010723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017701405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008526412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4779901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080496643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007576903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141263345","doi":"10.1007/s003550000067","title":"Core in a simple coalition formation game","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Separable space; Class (philosophy); Stochastic game; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08584522714990465,"score_gpt":0.27647019621444513,"score_spread":0.19062496906454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141263345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984583,0.00023519389,0.00019876855,0.0009637349,0.00009188719,0.00010755785,0.00004588443,0.000027395963,0.01374653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.000029792323,0.0000040949617,0.00015107855,0.00019817156,0.000012884918,0.000044593322,0.000007297071,0.00023243451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944055,0.000011057056,0.00025222308,0.00012928082,0.000017506547,0.00014937847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976915,0.000020413408,0.0001189794,0.00005546861,0.00001116801,0.000024791347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002936563,0.00006454172,0.00016134401,0.00007520558,0.00013003459,0.00003230451,0.00004756807,0.00007923103,0.00014191368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000462074,0.00007759159,0.000033890756,0.00013869703,0.000021117356,0.00021155842,0.000013605298,0.00007580464,0.00006188303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013968631,0.000034708115,0.28664353,0.00006679949,0.000007240553,0.000002409558,0.0032983674,0.0000059571084,0.000011189369,0.70779616,0.00039567813,0.0017239922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011475292,0.00005178842,0.55566627,0.000023815737,0.0000039329916,0.000008496998,0.0024055182,0.0006688267,0.0000059325234,0.18803436,0.25170836,0.00027518146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052829075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025507572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040878418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021525952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31640932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142843716","doi":"","title":"The Discursive Dilemma and Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Proposition; Dilemma; Probabilistic logic; Jury; Mathematical economics; Valuation (finance); Aggregate (composite); Truth value; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0266169856520494,"score_gpt":0.17908824013367883,"score_spread":0.15247125448162943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142843716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685585,0.0011482347,0.00058969494,0.0011402384,0.00017178053,0.0004591315,0.00024514121,0.00004450394,0.027642788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921244,0.0010594511,0.0005005364,0.000032781023,0.000040199055,0.0000016610563,0.00002801921,0.000017496419,0.0061954875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866086,0.00014560806,0.00035116382,0.0004206958,0.000100375924,0.0003212738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00035825607,0.00040769007,0.0005127272,0.000069819514,0.0001274826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065766735,0.00018795935,0.00035923652,0.0001328209,0.0010462084,0.00002397305,0.00054692425,0.00006824785,0.000098546596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025955882,0.00019225202,0.00016684293,0.00015362505,0.0010206045,0.00017654173,0.00030187686,0.00024212874,0.00006768904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007543222,0.00047371848,0.06401789,0.00030434772,0.00056772854,0.00011911224,0.079038255,0.00028391922,0.0001213363,0.841136,0.004048874,0.009134533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004938115,0.0010870713,0.3460461,0.0005006629,0.00012986986,0.00023506663,0.030493895,0.023773788,0.000050886203,0.14725839,0.44389242,0.0015937609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001247857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006043683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6938776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000988558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004346275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8046695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143362857","doi":"10.1109/aamas.2004.74","title":"Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Coalition Formation under Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Certainty; Core (optical fiber); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03862522706976329,"score_gpt":0.23718290842917858,"score_spread":0.1985576813594153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143362857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024465963,0.000034613957,0.94290876,0.00046134996,0.00017425856,0.00026526637,0.0000040442637,0.00006585699,0.03161991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577045,0.0000057352545,0.0005720384,0.00023180344,0.000072409784,0.000039722825,0.000061818,0.000009414375,0.0032366214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992966,0.000008239664,0.00037459543,0.00013596319,0.000017766624,0.00016685229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996282,0.000029653034,0.0001892018,0.00009883432,0.000020499287,0.000033654775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062821765,0.00007175288,0.00013895221,0.00007877993,0.00013746432,0.000045304707,0.000058838457,0.00005163856,0.00016356054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050201692,0.00007756978,0.00006590999,0.0000648764,0.000012457176,0.00022718369,0.0000096147,0.00005319291,0.00022161729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089422965,0.0000074529853,0.00011967253,0.00002430046,0.0000068528716,4.438869e-8,0.00023261317,0.32096863,0.000014068156,0.67848814,0.000055175347,0.00007414459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024949233,0.0003176873,0.00045276215,0.00006238759,0.0000067951114,0.000006392702,0.0015338499,0.17947173,0.00079955935,0.7805085,0.033956327,0.0003890829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015775669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002088078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015160134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007193575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31632036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143947913","doi":"","title":"(Minimal) e-Incentive Compatible Competitive Equilibria in Economies with Indivisibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahier de recherche","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Competitive equilibrium; Microeconomics; Incentive compatibility; Incentive; Mathematical economics; Budget constraint","score_opus":0.21523562304632568,"score_gpt":0.32053494820737577,"score_spread":0.10529932516105009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143947913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8449962,0.0011925315,0.000732258,0.00009237093,0.0001732536,0.0002112605,0.00005228292,0.00003981508,0.15250999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933728,0.000036823672,0.0028539756,0.0001250174,0.00013583341,0.000046536654,0.000010241044,0.000029405717,0.003389362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983398,0.00036985328,0.0004516486,0.00028506265,0.000024513189,0.0005291479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986023,0.00075747503,0.00023539101,0.0002676831,0.000022888278,0.000114287526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004770209,0.00017669096,0.00046212724,0.0001987454,0.00005721215,0.000056939098,0.00020574075,0.0002660293,0.00032552186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034214658,0.00018330176,0.000064386695,0.00024912864,0.00017997537,0.00040832782,0.000052478783,0.0005454411,0.00048219517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044168803,0.00008378857,0.48031446,0.00004814055,0.000039688122,0.0000014691868,0.012552858,0.000010350344,0.00002731362,0.5065983,0.000044802997,0.0002346602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038819506,0.0005333504,0.65617675,0.0005466177,0.0000336532,0.000055345045,0.032441046,0.0017674336,0.0046204817,0.25706235,0.04102892,0.0018521372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019805435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007422873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24953598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007706734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005089663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74748284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144766726","doi":"10.1287/moor.27.4.647.307","title":"Cost Allocation for a Tree Network with Heterogeneous Customers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Game tree; Tree (set theory); Shapley value; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Cost allocation; Computer science; Cooperative game theory; Graph; Combinatorics; Game theory; Sequential game; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.24337469006307053,"score_gpt":0.3435405823925388,"score_spread":0.10016589232946829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144766726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.687792,0.00188166,0.2230465,0.0016183377,0.00027655467,0.0054552923,0.000237738,0.00009895773,0.07959297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98201805,0.000029264835,0.013585968,0.0000118695325,0.00007587369,0.00031119434,0.000010995132,0.000023198047,0.0039335974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998993,0.000034627006,0.0004422307,0.00018297209,0.00007731179,0.00026986405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991237,0.00022377197,0.000073988536,0.0003381616,0.0001900179,0.000050389728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017366763,0.00007826132,0.00023961533,0.00018237768,0.00024136929,0.0000826226,0.00020588569,0.000052976284,0.00020289813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025313368,0.00007424459,0.000048377507,0.00033743214,0.00009892087,0.00009502484,0.00002461205,0.00009721139,0.00025435834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001817738,0.00037591736,0.00035187273,0.0002720005,0.00009538872,9.610804e-7,0.0038693561,0.08406042,0.00011493839,0.9080429,0.0018507191,0.0009473283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010712128,0.000566491,0.00006231733,0.0001634954,0.000010969686,0.00002137478,0.0010502166,0.9624522,0.0009424336,0.023288144,0.010069924,0.0003012246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035071665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011123763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047538557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011414563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3269347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145365446","doi":"","title":"Maximal Decompositions of Cost Games into Specific and Joint Costs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Marginal cost; Joint (building); Mathematical economics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03449669701773585,"score_gpt":0.219522130091668,"score_spread":0.18502543307393216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145365446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927092,0.026040802,0.0018472782,0.0006146631,0.0014727827,0.0014098904,0.0072210217,0.00009591924,0.034205653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642725,0.009148135,0.001006891,0.000014480951,0.000112737034,0.0000025755253,0.0004660879,0.000028389124,0.0027934846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725217,0.00012218252,0.001036196,0.00116017,0.00012244639,0.00030686424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617213,0.0001667914,0.0017891513,0.001539663,0.00010977449,0.00022250303],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006040611,0.00038936964,0.0012146326,0.00037241203,0.00035769073,0.00010525138,0.0007218703,0.0003229088,0.00015474537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055751574,0.00049865,0.00015919699,0.00010798409,0.00061334483,0.00041235436,0.0016814087,0.0003747138,0.00002326973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026003711,0.0052153915,0.4099892,0.011706904,0.010266406,0.0026274016,0.00900106,0.00071595167,0.0038224931,0.2766942,0.20323208,0.06412851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01185842,0.00102044,0.18807898,0.00492855,0.0012876656,0.0007828982,0.0043919156,0.006813428,0.0013442641,0.034115165,0.7407051,0.0046732128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012109372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010819559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53747296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030291665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036888476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145394968","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-6849-x","title":"Maximal-Element Rationalizability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Rationality; Relation (database); Maximal element; Mathematical economics; Completeness (order theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027765605949643366,"score_gpt":0.2512401148187992,"score_spread":0.22347450886915585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145394968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713516,0.001566366,0.10076537,0.00015086167,0.00018844283,0.00012565538,0.000024458892,0.000036807498,0.025790423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.00003254254,0.0017314426,0.00025588204,0.00014200302,0.0000075248886,0.000004179794,0.0000075885173,0.0011027908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913764,0.00005287391,0.0003975067,0.0002512013,0.000030013996,0.00013073815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00036054043,0.00011146904,0.00022845856,0.000014762521,0.000054997297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039124102,0.0000841956,0.00018101347,0.00006948857,0.000118136784,0.00004237772,0.00009452116,0.000049568025,0.0013699419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022522062,0.00008142705,0.00004649507,0.000067051624,0.000050982104,0.00015635462,0.000044041804,0.00005913392,0.0009393897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012569853,0.000041510422,0.0037778472,0.000005564885,0.0000069677626,3.6342948e-7,0.00023895927,0.00005660217,0.000017028948,0.9687545,0.00019645438,0.026778549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033407833,0.000036548492,0.0071470663,0.000011290587,0.0000018064143,0.0000042257952,0.000048306134,0.0005487813,0.00010984305,0.94093084,0.05072195,0.00010524172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034257491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020974826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12536444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027854197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003931685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150736298","doi":"10.1007/s00182-012-0356-4","title":"Contractually stable networks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; State University of New York; Northwestern University; Concordia University; Université Paris-Sud; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Unanimity; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Operations research; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024527264487646003,"score_gpt":0.2388360905801483,"score_spread":0.2143088260925023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150736298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65492946,0.012665041,0.21283239,0.0006008117,0.014181785,0.00012500786,0.00004882846,0.00003648034,0.10458018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955174,0.00008456245,0.00017826876,0.00038004183,0.0019300412,0.0000011982729,0.0000019240667,0.000016260463,0.0018903133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880934,0.000073129806,0.0007330296,0.00007811257,0.000079290214,0.00022709256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984739,0.00027654498,0.0008893154,0.00011112411,0.00014043636,0.00010870522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955407,0.000095022195,0.00027407336,0.00019253121,0.00002394605,0.000062453764,0.00044497402,0.0000656022,0.0009070248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003770391,0.00009208882,0.000154916,0.000053981643,0.00004976464,0.00051032496,0.00003689427,0.00022202038,0.00029139017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019875316,0.00013329623,0.018504646,0.0000030495837,0.00027137809,0.000010089725,0.00094542047,0.0005781059,0.000041901174,0.9765016,0.00059129705,0.0022204588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029825044,0.0002683958,0.04186039,0.00021406321,0.00004119609,0.000981909,0.0008899183,0.0011638846,0.0005421935,0.6577818,0.29265,0.00062375295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005866229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5041245e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3405879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014011693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99312854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152684625","doi":"","title":"Large elections with multiple alternatives: a Condorcet Jury Theorem and inefficient equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; State (computer science); Jury; Economics; Microeconomics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Algorithm","score_opus":0.035991428376916004,"score_gpt":0.24214132311234696,"score_spread":0.20614989473543094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152684625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381036,0.0010368242,0.0078866435,0.00034348297,0.00049701246,0.00092282967,0.0017814564,0.00020770954,0.049220406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965969,0.000017458358,0.00014990321,0.0002530006,0.00020630848,0.00022660343,0.00016341609,0.00006681948,0.0023196419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803984,0.000026015365,0.000615522,0.0008118253,0.00006253826,0.00044424948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985698,0.00021611404,0.0004716346,0.0005045289,0.000049845185,0.0001881061],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021579955,0.0003880188,0.00069912366,0.00035166895,0.00016268372,0.0051881396,0.000720437,0.00016662084,0.0001425606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002630667,0.00035649593,0.00009582276,0.0002457846,0.00018963614,0.0022002463,0.0016390238,0.00034510336,0.00023243102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011103904,0.00017711728,0.12404951,0.0002912205,0.00022165685,0.000004828048,0.0027318934,0.0003290804,0.000005227111,0.8705205,0.0012539708,0.00030399254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031145131,0.0007680425,0.0754626,0.0013451191,0.000046930538,0.00004559043,0.0018676198,0.015681434,0.000988561,0.7374122,0.15968612,0.0035812592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007759868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011737913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15843214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034539262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005086788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.13413505250146945,"score_gpt":0.2865264764115325,"score_spread":0.15239142391006305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153583058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026210018,0.042630393,0.00005181899,0.0006242563,0.002232769,0.00087390264,0.00048326657,0.000076399716,0.9504062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6914055,0.00238247,0.00024085579,0.00025316948,0.0010731921,0.0001443812,0.000026513368,0.00011821106,0.3043557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.000010217157,0.00072660943,0.000556101,0.000029872346,0.00030822016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866176,0.00047108467,0.0004855459,0.00028683312,0.000050730912,0.000044051343],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007731176,0.00034194943,0.0009737738,0.00013956522,0.00026432326,0.000030976727,0.00022007142,0.00026616635,0.00013846972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004294205,0.00036392699,0.0001640506,0.00002849026,0.00020071176,0.0000795517,0.00017647567,0.00028641493,0.000052024665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014795499,0.00001480725,0.0072740386,0.00084135315,0.00027302414,0.0000030779202,0.0017673695,8.869225e-7,1.5677931e-7,0.98680943,0.0015228192,0.0014782522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063841057,0.000110076915,0.001418052,0.00045398079,0.000029503877,0.0000043784917,0.00080882385,0.0000073472866,0.0000010727359,0.24619982,0.7498083,0.00052022364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008897968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014030548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006365042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000527403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154712576","doi":"10.1016/s0166-218x(03)00225-7","title":"On the equivalence between some local and global Chinese postman and traveling salesman graphs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Submodular set function; Mathematics; Travelling salesman problem; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Equivalence (formal languages); Graph; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.024638384827019345,"score_gpt":0.23228552996912247,"score_spread":0.2076471451421031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154712576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95935386,0.00035616918,0.014736818,0.0001018072,0.00005573926,0.00029737785,0.00007592984,0.00003613453,0.024986172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.000033840275,0.0008020337,0.00012736005,0.00002882427,0.000018149853,0.0000042380484,0.000021179445,0.000050704093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891657,0.000018169627,0.00044752104,0.00030532278,0.000052008436,0.00026039628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990481,0.000319468,0.00022804562,0.0003121205,0.0000070093993,0.0000852445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009681427,0.0002081708,0.00038763587,0.000039712093,0.0001861719,0.00008778472,0.00016458784,0.00008699774,0.000022107504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012796384,0.00015724872,0.00005158722,0.0001403328,0.00019611852,0.00006203304,0.000046420788,0.000142403,0.00007461398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004566473,0.000017792956,0.0057525607,0.00010109496,0.000031974523,6.7132936e-7,0.00071559474,0.000007733937,0.000014476478,0.9932449,0.000009177308,0.000099446705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027280208,0.00003800628,0.0059021073,0.00004166867,0.000012690945,0.0000083648465,0.0005406633,0.00048489784,0.000044688724,0.9923844,0.00005841574,0.00021132964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000624678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017531002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03955982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020917874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005055017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6412417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154896738","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_11","title":"Vote Elicitation with Probabilistic Preference Models: Empirical Estimation and Cost Tradeoffs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Preference elicitation; Probabilistic logic; Preference; Exploit; Majority rule; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10948409458443553,"score_gpt":0.24760170507490611,"score_spread":0.13811761049047058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154896738","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003302434,0.0003352462,0.98621017,0.000095113806,0.00033346275,0.0005207557,0.000018921355,0.00004446015,0.0091394605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677209,0.00001586706,0.031697944,0.00016143802,0.00010879041,0.000017744243,0.000008411629,0.000024702971,0.00024417407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831617,0.0000153173,0.0004743031,0.0008247808,0.00009671083,0.00027272216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988859,0.00020556476,0.000370291,0.00037059828,0.00008450941,0.00008313108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008040136,0.00026948052,0.0004252501,0.00036641792,0.0001209905,0.00015601174,0.0003653414,0.00019971823,0.000010887323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013822844,0.0002483633,0.000033417557,0.00016957337,0.0004734712,0.00033968934,0.00008218856,0.0003411721,0.000025830566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053357642,0.00005213885,0.0012921218,0.00024384254,0.000022512446,0.000008202844,0.005876141,0.17119442,0.0000024912397,0.63057995,0.000007836964,0.19066697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013246661,0.00012095659,0.00040002193,0.00019580236,0.0000039341257,0.0000113024125,1.5860863e-7,0.45785677,0.000007906706,0.5409065,0.00013797269,0.00022620235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050368297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008215847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012790566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072079616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155654171","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1946886","title":"When Does Approval Voting Make the 'Right Choices'?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Approval voting; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.02110863679188152,"score_gpt":0.19927905571269008,"score_spread":0.17817041892080857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155654171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77175385,0.010935699,0.031382658,0.0016427423,0.0032507614,0.0004929642,0.000021731355,0.00015302384,0.18036655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852264,0.00022693542,0.0001110921,0.00012775563,0.00073971594,0.000007743567,0.0000010558207,0.000030567924,0.013528737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973331,0.00008191148,0.0005999598,0.00026343018,0.000054797016,0.0016667903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900484,0.00006168332,0.0005770172,0.00026107198,0.000029985486,0.00006542904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057704276,0.00016918668,0.00028523887,0.00011705476,0.00041616883,0.00010752634,0.0006186426,0.000090020156,0.00035240033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010878426,0.00010915416,0.00018091786,0.00011974645,0.000072650044,0.00018271971,0.00004790931,0.0014443846,0.0004412909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018801838,0.000035063258,0.015250767,0.000006509751,0.00012617133,0.0000019003226,0.0010956852,0.000003055259,0.0000075278626,0.98158157,0.000037880283,0.0018350509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121151,0.00011722577,0.0022300587,0.000018330782,0.00001414838,0.0002879942,0.0010811462,0.0002058398,0.000070201284,0.9701457,0.025187539,0.00022969344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022483245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057990843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21347253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027072642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014855854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6275213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.053405751769022736,"score_gpt":0.23241106413992033,"score_spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157458642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96125937,0.0012232623,0.004833709,0.000817976,0.00034342406,0.00009734861,0.00004187268,0.0000022603576,0.031380795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950904,0.000045556415,0.00033598428,0.00005126505,0.000035274523,1.5081574e-7,5.1793762e-8,0.0000033827203,0.000019309222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990505,0.00011665696,0.0005929299,0.000052342366,0.00007873203,0.00010885195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890226,0.00024741353,0.0005128256,0.00012699174,0.000148819,0.0000616867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004361071,0.000054002794,0.00034388175,0.00006257903,0.000071603274,0.000007750262,0.00014397276,0.000044601074,0.00006842588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015313283,0.00003919626,0.00013576985,0.000054158976,0.0007982055,0.000037109563,0.000051686762,0.00013334754,0.0000018462696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036338406,0.000058095367,0.0054800157,0.000032087108,0.00005953627,4.7272962e-7,0.0004675737,0.000018842484,0.000010449812,0.9938034,0.000028284161,0.000004945801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524436,0.00007973659,0.0017912409,0.000030164805,0.00003432866,0.000014157679,0.00019213109,0.00010191051,0.00052017067,0.9960893,0.00035400878,0.000040429153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011629855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.9238043e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03824967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003097726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001718886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29410213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157469891","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x08004671","title":"Game theory and the development of resource management policy: the case of international fisheries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Relevance (law); Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Positive political theory; Resource management (computing); Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.019924988163741116,"score_gpt":0.17887256809311983,"score_spread":0.15894757992937872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157469891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98274356,0.00066389894,0.0013464802,0.0003586416,0.00007932248,0.00023745505,0.000012063171,0.000006132539,0.0145524675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951331,0.0008061269,0.0021095625,0.00010100993,0.00003131505,0.00003160789,0.0000070051283,0.00001168251,0.0017686118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885017,0.0000479297,0.0007219589,0.00021894855,0.00002346333,0.0001375584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918205,0.00017498416,0.00040199014,0.0002036075,0.0000033860333,0.00003396967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017762868,0.00013177004,0.000270579,0.00009540098,0.00020639754,0.000019284698,0.00018634032,0.00004013683,0.00005779671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001797386,0.000099011886,0.000035438577,0.000029908231,0.00048693788,0.00007052632,0.00023359418,0.00006312691,0.00001847498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022294573,0.00006344867,0.038172267,0.00006392247,0.00042946867,0.000008752551,0.034033027,0.0001480162,0.0000017543928,0.9137465,0.00006176619,0.013048183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051956456,0.000055301138,0.16271403,0.000069602735,0.000029145061,0.00044600244,0.013576888,0.0004933476,0.0010282407,0.06694007,0.7486824,0.00076935464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000142161925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068669688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006227843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018737777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40375873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157924271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.482484","title":"Explicit and Latent Authority in Hierarchical Organizations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Relation (database); Local authority; Primary authority; Business; Control (management); Decision maker; Delegated authority; Asset (computer security); Traditional authority; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Management science; Management; Legal research","score_opus":0.014478125789036093,"score_gpt":0.21184990135185613,"score_spread":0.19737177556282004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157924271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978666,0.0031581917,0.012586969,0.00045363192,0.00020156446,0.00008039104,0.000003299189,0.000015507123,0.0048344266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760795,0.0008187362,0.00007115437,0.000035825524,0.00006187356,0.000002361972,9.142124e-7,0.000013380942,0.0013878152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852526,0.00006721121,0.00036646175,0.00016497426,0.000022968006,0.000853151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966764,0.000034427576,0.00012591887,0.000093231465,0.000017702747,0.00006107935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026998736,0.00008184128,0.00018842399,0.00015455217,0.0001251039,0.00004757743,0.000092678085,0.00006573409,0.00007532845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028091643,0.00008798326,0.000029777097,0.0002738464,0.000020402718,0.00010585233,0.00001256837,0.00089495943,0.0000857287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032279013,0.000030835796,0.11779641,0.000002469931,0.0000150360565,0.000001056119,0.00023300135,0.000016480644,0.000012566598,0.88171077,0.000006534748,0.00017160474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004487892,0.00006365162,0.01051739,0.000008370856,0.000002328376,0.00022672977,0.0003150343,0.00014077724,0.000015601385,0.9860224,0.0021177868,0.00012115172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004281139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001416945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107279025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027494185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016417725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38882032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160350653","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00022-7","title":"On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Preference; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.52330821283842,"score_gpt":0.3133289289670274,"score_spread":0.20997928387139259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160350653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894726,0.00006232404,0.016600536,0.0008014194,0.0001401648,0.00023563136,0.0010685327,0.000034147764,0.086331286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977523,0.0000049218393,0.0014137613,0.00004769242,0.000027475211,0.0000057285924,0.0000053772874,0.0000041270505,0.0007386206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987981,0.00011461374,0.00048020188,0.0003219074,0.00010594499,0.00017926189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976149,0.0017230135,0.0002921929,0.00031555278,0.000022890814,0.000031440326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027798489,0.00008571172,0.00026361272,0.00003456357,0.0004240353,0.000076496595,0.0009862947,0.00007331364,0.0030916785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299917,0.000057233254,0.00003526135,0.0003533653,0.00047860912,0.00019184338,0.000128517,0.00012533982,0.0004239323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004808359,0.00006554028,0.004191506,0.000006779688,0.000010099027,1.1249173e-7,0.0007941029,0.000029957764,0.0000041032995,0.994215,0.00052506273,0.00015293217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070271264,0.00002440981,0.0060674027,0.000024554563,0.0000034675709,4.2345457e-7,0.00013936548,0.20799962,0.000009476724,0.7855517,0.000017921278,0.00009135508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032376507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016349186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20866327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019625788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001847198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160358302","doi":"10.5555/2484920.2484983","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Condorcet method; Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Correlated equilibrium; Approval voting; Best response; Economics; Game theory; Repeated game","score_opus":0.05485546299585243,"score_gpt":0.2704340441057674,"score_spread":0.21557858110991496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160358302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93851197,0.000056183868,0.0037829755,0.00022666948,0.00010779154,0.00007832099,0.000009139691,0.00003038907,0.057196565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961211,0.0000020739994,0.00012888775,0.000082644496,0.000027925164,0.0000073433343,0.0000063050657,0.0000043935624,0.0036192904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.000023996074,0.00046069076,0.00017280344,0.000016949782,0.00012325773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947923,0.00005405057,0.00019787323,0.0002055766,0.00002686193,0.00003639584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004894391,0.00005806702,0.00033359678,0.00024398683,0.000022947403,0.000023865132,0.000090218644,0.000054290093,0.0040167435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074323856,0.000056631096,0.0001591165,0.000654518,0.00002544045,0.00013418774,0.000018199973,0.000044217042,0.0006773414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004799784,0.000052547937,0.781621,0.0000125940805,0.00042197006,6.739924e-8,0.00021033689,0.00008282753,0.00040798617,0.21563935,0.0013537883,0.00019275426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016762102,0.000051269795,0.90897924,0.0000027018507,0.00005756597,5.796025e-7,0.00007499626,0.03765045,0.0005395832,0.04908565,0.0032275498,0.00016278759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013126231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002778555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1665537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023368764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031669238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161458631","doi":"10.1007/s11083-007-9063-3","title":"Domain Closedness Conditions and Rational Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Order","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Intersection (aeronautics); Rational function; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Contrast (vision); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.02379298697490722,"score_gpt":0.2500888003429157,"score_spread":0.22629581336800847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161458631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032721,0.00026938008,0.016031208,0.00035563036,0.0003505214,0.00008245108,0.000045408564,0.000025661986,0.079567656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954236,0.0000031745603,0.0005167749,0.00022940953,0.00016123764,0.000004750765,0.000015734302,0.0000076132296,0.003637701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995068,0.0000075822713,0.00020855163,0.00013862099,0.000013887742,0.00012460034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996743,0.00009610702,0.00008043457,0.00009199016,0.000017458198,0.000039709503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062382483,0.00005299991,0.00010516989,0.00006833443,0.00010093736,0.000028520148,0.00004661325,0.000045746543,0.0006273821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053220458,0.000060858605,0.000018114657,0.00010814498,0.00004487481,0.0000870659,0.000011961866,0.000054668384,0.00046158404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003060317,0.000019759957,0.05190329,0.000007228253,0.00000989245,9.63004e-7,0.0002075483,0.000005509603,0.000053469634,0.94720536,0.0004998806,0.000084055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007424681,0.000028041875,0.2913568,0.00001188227,0.0000026393245,0.000015406498,0.0002133784,0.00008477427,0.0000663251,0.24715109,0.46010554,0.0002216295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003329055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030597712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7000542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013949744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005169869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68693936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164462452","doi":"","title":"The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Variety (cybernetics); Voting; Social choice theory; Yield (engineering); Polytope; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Space (punctuation); Condorcet method; Hamming distance; Cube (algebra); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025983105441961675,"score_gpt":0.2009843725436927,"score_spread":0.17500126710173103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164462452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8060478,0.002855219,0.0014459993,0.0027271775,0.0013393539,0.0020358996,0.0015043875,0.00013973395,0.1819044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98401546,0.0017631243,0.003540994,0.000051607745,0.00010556265,0.000006990861,0.00020057897,0.00005453887,0.010261111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718654,0.00034504628,0.00085312757,0.00088321423,0.00017154636,0.00056051323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966904,0.00042839412,0.0012566972,0.0013629973,0.00010815321,0.00015335214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002777366,0.00041107135,0.00082737365,0.00045954876,0.00055605965,0.0000777411,0.0019787736,0.000411048,0.00024270843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000256429,0.00047308,0.00045232038,0.00022981467,0.0006699736,0.00014412591,0.0016698951,0.0018401516,0.00015014647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016707955,0.0015818267,0.090699024,0.0021951264,0.0015002502,0.00020375282,0.10441886,0.00293713,0.00035932352,0.75229186,0.006052277,0.03608979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042960495,0.00044209958,0.11201222,0.0021008756,0.00012617344,0.000032642707,0.01534492,0.038694967,0.000073769326,0.35968754,0.46479204,0.0023966997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007829597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011771856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4587398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027965134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001608587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166100185","doi":"10.1287/moor.2014.0662","title":"Strategy-Proofness Makes the Difference: Deferred-Acceptance with Responsive Priorities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Normative; Object (grammar); Mechanism (biology); School choice; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Mechanism design; Simple (philosophy); Linear programming; Strategic dominance; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Machine learning","score_opus":0.13724092116046308,"score_gpt":0.332315853002385,"score_spread":0.1950749318419219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166100185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541076,0.0002754536,0.01708727,0.00041341767,0.000054224864,0.00051511475,0.000042299474,0.000021623195,0.027483044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941964,0.000018400715,0.0022733787,0.000010955886,0.000058202204,0.00011582138,0.0000033227873,0.000019568011,0.008080685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867284,0.00017665247,0.00050315616,0.00022290634,0.00015077963,0.00027365322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827844,0.00065091526,0.00009783985,0.00063552323,0.0002940272,0.000043229928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034600112,0.00011222371,0.00030958734,0.0001984762,0.00042471619,0.00024869366,0.0004952057,0.00005991173,0.00014686058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009844188,0.000078003446,0.000043185126,0.00039755154,0.00038073896,0.00012306082,0.00007068175,0.0002590475,0.00014277348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017915734,0.00007588796,0.0012264933,0.00014113564,0.000026097969,4.6232716e-7,0.0035641964,0.0006699083,0.0002964406,0.99356633,0.000050805585,0.00036435048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018096045,0.0016809207,0.043501116,0.0008764553,0.000025469513,0.000056800356,0.027878279,0.122503616,0.0097196,0.78725773,0.0036537377,0.0010366463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104244406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017353914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20630856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032832482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005709203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32666165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166642883","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-11269-0_26","title":"Improved Parameterized Algorithms for the Kemeny Aggregation Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Combinatorics; Preference; Running time; Notation; Mathematics; Algorithm; Pairwise comparison; Time complexity; Discrete mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Statistics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03607595728339694,"score_gpt":0.23831189161738128,"score_spread":0.20223593433398435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166642883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096714175,0.0010917298,0.9931002,0.0006547749,0.0013385767,0.0010958245,0.000038720063,0.000049997336,0.002533458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53705764,0.00020637111,0.44646612,0.0031963054,0.0028163174,0.00021753239,0.000045085122,0.00014344264,0.009851214],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980034,0.0000113735605,0.0006775518,0.0008225719,0.00008080346,0.00040430253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980944,0.0005382837,0.0006261366,0.0006142352,0.0000737176,0.000053243435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075235,0.00029953304,0.00050706207,0.00030242777,0.00025683103,0.0002995461,0.0009171037,0.00022729856,0.000022756501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013624919,0.00024721836,0.00016079574,0.00018538265,0.0002888681,0.00016097157,0.00010810906,0.00033761113,0.000034229604],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026030571,0.000022223647,0.000032212964,0.00006516572,0.00003165214,0.000001992421,0.0006485051,0.005791616,0.000055353965,0.12196105,0.000017951625,0.87134624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039766045,0.00020923825,0.000041457988,0.00014469854,0.000006851442,0.000008591595,2.3368216e-7,0.35874116,0.00020826948,0.6299261,0.009953153,0.00036256047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003130565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018945115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87098366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015636004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006153772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168659258","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1503.01488","title":"Random Serial Dictatorship versus Probabilistic Serial Rule: A Tale of Two Random Mechanisms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Comparability; Space (punctuation); Preference; Dictatorship; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.09792675232796814,"score_gpt":0.19926793789427602,"score_spread":0.10134118556630788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168659258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95242673,0.00016710327,0.028275883,0.000015777705,0.0071504586,0.001032855,0.00062665535,0.00013452338,0.010170018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975256,0.000030419413,0.00018551669,0.000008795578,0.0004858616,0.0000070038363,0.00009031396,0.000055490684,0.0016110234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728453,0.00029035448,0.0008343839,0.0010770333,0.000053112104,0.00046056753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705666,0.00032856868,0.0012765412,0.00094276207,0.00015815771,0.0002373223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023461098,0.0004543559,0.0014053147,0.00034740826,0.00011559356,0.00008107593,0.0008800618,0.0004714309,0.00031008435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005944195,0.00057125767,0.00047472995,0.000363668,0.00021874283,0.00019308265,0.00056068844,0.0005009896,0.00030544546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011203909,0.000200272,0.0010685737,0.0003873161,0.0004596584,0.000058301142,0.00069179595,0.1066495,0.00006189645,0.8790633,0.0001392611,0.000016218404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.043108884,0.00030171152,0.00008309772,0.00019905315,0.00024993258,0.0000048280476,0.00026614702,0.029476639,0.00022409897,0.92472416,0.00040239005,0.00095905445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006369058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008752742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07717287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003180468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018260401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169261290","doi":"","title":"Decisive Coalitions and Coherence Properties","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Mathematical economics; Social welfare function; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social Welfare; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Social choice theory; Population; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Welfare economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.04917288819541865,"score_gpt":0.23364948992735093,"score_spread":0.18447660173193228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169261290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145039,0.006954608,0.011929941,0.0010988255,0.002601165,0.00049558596,0.0015354109,0.00019792197,0.06068268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973941,0.000048879985,0.0008137109,0.00020452203,0.00038684756,0.000024909687,0.000095181946,0.00000632182,0.0010255566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884504,0.0000240511,0.0004806376,0.00037374327,0.00007214738,0.00020436094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992427,0.000063950516,0.00018285727,0.00033027408,0.00007898193,0.00010118352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037833824,0.00014530604,0.00024385458,0.000094288174,0.0004905707,0.00017083342,0.00016638557,0.00006389795,0.000040463066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048331785,0.00014709105,0.000046536145,0.00015703664,0.00025695167,0.0006658353,0.00005400377,0.0001323136,0.00017134036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341369,0.00006625472,0.0058901305,0.00002506328,0.000022394726,0.000025887548,0.000249442,0.00003886538,0.0008538419,0.9919194,0.0007013897,0.00017321152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027505907,0.000689439,0.1030231,0.0015042624,0.00006565428,0.0016696452,0.0009858406,0.001333696,0.013218879,0.32244322,0.5500654,0.0022503075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024786158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015772364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66947615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007852564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006400854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59981984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169640500","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2011.03.014","title":"Incoherent majorities: The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05584404545129463,"score_gpt":0.21617917966632802,"score_spread":0.1603351342150334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169640500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24535504,0.00027178842,0.029479139,0.00014681202,0.00029973517,0.0017045429,0.000052344498,0.00011086491,0.7225797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918002,0.000018412942,0.006895035,0.00007322434,0.000046416855,0.0002569542,0.000008698826,0.000027970542,0.00087310385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987107,0.00001495638,0.0007362115,0.00023441332,0.000051068513,0.00025265664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908906,0.00006752079,0.00038779745,0.00040742784,0.000012153031,0.00003600903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013053622,0.00015594072,0.00030529467,0.000097355696,0.00008442858,0.00004753648,0.0003054908,0.00006949518,0.00028271385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030833362,0.00012716792,0.00005983112,0.00017765469,0.00006255497,0.00007368407,0.00007453592,0.00013792579,0.0005951404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072555154,0.00008899395,0.001041264,0.00014773005,0.000022179085,6.5640205e-7,0.011029609,0.000013441029,0.000014699005,0.9872559,0.00009128913,0.0002870096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045085803,0.000033517994,0.0015285172,0.00008970641,0.000008122249,0.000002107164,0.0031810831,0.0008678172,0.0004165009,0.99135625,0.001812444,0.000253089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009778754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036720754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7464451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063183084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072954067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170563224","doi":"10.1007/s001820200099","title":"Sharing the cost of a network: core and core allocations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Tree (set theory); Solution set; Solution concept; Mathematics; Computer science; Game theory; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.10690966215199764,"score_gpt":0.2699413569966439,"score_spread":0.16303169484464625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170563224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94733953,0.0069976165,0.011142742,0.0013993169,0.0020720917,0.00017660383,0.00005634967,0.000012848116,0.030802913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766666,0.0002409797,0.00009679225,0.00019579925,0.00041662686,0.0000022365077,0.0000010785302,0.000009651944,0.0013701872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990826,0.000025173196,0.0006258015,0.00009308684,0.00006650938,0.00010681895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985652,0.00029165408,0.00083204766,0.00013351171,0.00013822426,0.000039361246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017982194,0.00007222711,0.00020812068,0.00011518603,0.000042574746,0.000040466784,0.000480333,0.000037300433,0.00039847748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027056973,0.000058707934,0.00009239178,0.00007609193,0.00012399477,0.0001268467,0.00006514368,0.00016272276,0.000037247155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004948234,0.000043992975,0.02690365,0.0000062244426,0.00018365162,0.0000054962475,0.001364274,0.0009975771,0.000028985347,0.9673492,0.00049487053,0.0025726077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001031457,0.00012866435,0.02720911,0.0002583112,0.000026858701,0.00044247063,0.00053584925,0.010135969,0.0000436247,0.93808335,0.021927143,0.00017718702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008360163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025978711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05032713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003476326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059086055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4363049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181417941","doi":"","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences (Doctoral Consortium)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Resource allocation; Optimal matching; Function (biology); Scheduling (production processes); Dynamic decision-making; Mechanism design; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19683862078797457,"score_gpt":0.28583406160738745,"score_spread":0.08899544081941288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181417941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791884,0.002329112,0.008994284,0.000035880665,0.0010966249,0.00085165614,0.00019035637,0.00010242258,0.0072113033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941095,0.000059580947,0.00064593164,0.00007350931,0.000086018925,0.00007290951,0.000026490561,0.000046793466,0.004879253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978339,0.00013781026,0.0007675038,0.0006659129,0.00012653846,0.00046835316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852586,0.000071741604,0.00063815544,0.00035774172,0.000095147756,0.00031138308],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010047015,0.0003171711,0.0007034141,0.00018215373,0.00018329805,0.00021947338,0.00026428947,0.00013429548,0.000041663097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007132544,0.00029732578,0.00006766044,0.00016293957,0.00012534272,0.00036649924,0.000094683615,0.00018567815,0.00036144542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091568386,0.0017602213,0.67616284,0.00080015545,0.0028750477,0.00015789058,0.03316357,0.0054507777,0.00021660747,0.27415353,0.0016688,0.0026748597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028906057,0.0037677311,0.5970475,0.0042715133,0.00038654296,0.00030605515,0.04656102,0.24699576,0.00012169865,0.024752172,0.040397577,0.006486388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028280392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016188117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24940136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011959584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035124234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183276193","doi":"","title":"Multi-Agent Bilateral Bargaining and the Nash Bargaining Solution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Mathematical economics; Session (web analytics); Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Nash equilibrium; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.07757730411552069,"score_gpt":0.29942365200134763,"score_spread":0.22184634788582694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183276193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74552995,0.0040002856,0.0002866882,0.0005652188,0.0019267921,0.002090001,0.0001698101,0.00009883854,0.24533242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906127,0.004298129,0.0010231332,0.000162901,0.00023152311,0.00024880582,0.000029154378,0.000086080036,0.0033075633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566406,0.00060349,0.0014272666,0.0012353783,0.00007982397,0.0009899813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974365,0.0006990239,0.0006129522,0.0010190316,0.000055330438,0.00017714076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012472038,0.00040477674,0.0010343326,0.0005831059,0.00043834266,0.0004142145,0.00067948055,0.0005237156,0.000094854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011428534,0.00039884853,0.00024890335,0.0001508402,0.0006252272,0.00014599398,0.0009555948,0.0019508844,0.00008057551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008592921,0.00056432234,0.17489406,0.0007681905,0.0012083426,0.000091020316,0.019239463,0.027466534,0.0001940151,0.70143354,0.0002088434,0.07307239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01637721,0.0003173379,0.037604243,0.0015435714,0.00004662765,0.00013931432,0.004979193,0.58050406,0.0001268179,0.30267024,0.052023146,0.0036682652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029119226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006740881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5530375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000653632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012763104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185101906","doi":"10.4108/eai.8-8-2015.2260798","title":"A Robust Redesign of High School Match","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Preference; Computer science; School choice; Mathematics education; Operations research; Psychology; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12018684546862018,"score_gpt":0.2189373681005564,"score_spread":0.0987505226319362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185101906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5982215,0.00046353106,0.028311042,0.00038026215,0.0006794241,0.0001892129,0.000029533925,0.000082670704,0.37164286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810014,0.0000038012706,0.0024239568,0.00006414859,0.000081660204,0.0000056476115,0.0000021516926,0.000011176317,0.016406065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992363,0.000018999464,0.00041784643,0.00016881737,0.000022038084,0.00013599418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993793,0.000028668144,0.00020104408,0.0002576358,0.00003270413,0.000100643345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011065278,0.00007027824,0.00027150442,0.000091655325,0.000017705286,0.000021152071,0.00015392293,0.000059776994,0.00076351414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019689379,0.000072305615,0.00004566086,0.00013173165,0.0000257225,0.00009903958,0.000025885176,0.0000573297,0.0019136202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018365268,0.00003877106,0.018219028,0.000019450279,0.000020215102,9.717602e-7,0.00016986452,0.00048581025,0.000020754935,0.9718482,0.009105256,0.000053349053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027090719,0.00043887147,0.016507301,0.00008032047,0.000011529705,0.000023860428,0.0013639648,0.003120646,0.0025969394,0.9396971,0.032737955,0.0007124804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075075164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006521147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38277993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003407963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016822783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189604740","doi":"","title":"Matching Markets with Couples Revisited","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Constant (computer programming); Class (philosophy); Incentive compatibility; Blossom algorithm; Stable marriage problem; Mathematics; Incentive; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01400668201362244,"score_gpt":0.19621154947973635,"score_spread":0.18220486746611392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189604740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7974488,0.00009191579,0.002563094,0.00013367593,0.00019691078,0.000082426624,0.00001150242,0.00007266235,0.19939901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123204,0.000006340823,0.0015293215,0.00014624317,0.00010022858,0.00000515223,0.0000039802617,0.000015594282,0.0069610877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936694,0.0000076583665,0.00024819988,0.00020405678,0.000016353264,0.00015678175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994908,0.000055371238,0.00013545615,0.00025642692,0.000013313818,0.000048623384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007875049,0.000084351734,0.00019667893,0.000073443814,0.00007033518,0.000067053734,0.00013151788,0.000053006337,0.0017247604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003244901,0.00007341537,0.000033543005,0.00010205957,0.000029696053,0.000106968815,0.000018425331,0.00015106249,0.0008994629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014870306,0.000016312122,0.040755723,0.00002196063,0.000016790567,0.0000022636423,0.00015675685,0.0000032791963,0.0002659881,0.9582466,0.00028591958,0.00021356763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002189347,0.00018718957,0.20945656,0.00017174732,0.000017135726,0.00017674068,0.00072048587,0.0025949772,0.0011135992,0.39635515,0.38549328,0.0015238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009341281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003867582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56189144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006477366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040118407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189755050","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9329","title":"Matching with Dynamic Ordinal Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Focus (optics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.13376572984644494,"score_gpt":0.2759063819767562,"score_spread":0.14214065213031127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189755050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166913,0.00006095015,0.0025198145,0.0008064175,0.00038374058,0.00028001337,0.000017362021,0.00005481432,0.0791856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832696,0.0000091444435,0.000502458,0.000058092566,0.000053183314,0.000020457615,6.8359844e-7,0.00001769376,0.001011334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853635,0.000011123561,0.00062981696,0.00040003122,0.0001305568,0.00029215196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987459,0.000047394085,0.000654475,0.0001959144,0.00025478625,0.000101487574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010662619,0.00019817635,0.00036675905,0.00012951947,0.00012171991,0.00016087407,0.0008102438,0.000079332494,0.000110795045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021218862,0.00014632715,0.000075533346,0.0003718325,0.00024426088,0.0002637368,0.00010363096,0.00025595925,0.00038058643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013361312,0.000075816184,0.002940717,0.000038958915,0.000021730457,2.6446472e-7,0.0024041957,0.000103567145,0.00056469033,0.9916329,0.000031232605,0.002052332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445125,0.00036532967,0.0004672626,0.00027325342,0.000008873619,0.000009005674,0.00410505,0.003556926,0.012876091,0.97781825,0.00019654783,0.0002689553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019259399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036784808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08163566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059232807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049202456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5967048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194229192","doi":"","title":"Near-Optimal Hardness Results for Signaling in Bayesian Games.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian probability; Stochastic game; Bayesian game; Nash equilibrium; Time complexity; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Repeated game; Statistics","score_opus":0.13531819788161886,"score_gpt":0.19857466785420821,"score_spread":0.06325646997258935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194229192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91911954,0.0002362094,0.06625165,0.00009747897,0.0013991289,0.00074379524,0.0007149075,0.00010379013,0.011333495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931776,0.000019435183,0.0007223306,0.000029233925,0.00017023896,0.0000051011757,0.00009213123,0.000041408537,0.0057425024],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976974,0.00007399247,0.00064884766,0.0011146188,0.00002008661,0.00044506908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982438,0.00012592862,0.00069266616,0.00068976945,0.00009019619,0.00015761273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205334,0.0003062882,0.00073339365,0.00034890685,0.000103049926,0.00012466038,0.0006574663,0.00043578562,0.000035036206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025811687,0.00042983113,0.00025536385,0.00031786694,0.00010231385,0.00017393696,0.0003173583,0.0004771469,0.00019054185],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059123663,0.0001349568,0.016136618,0.0002975656,0.00011891545,0.00008652925,0.0016801341,0.6716174,0.0000048069273,0.30795273,0.0013194804,0.000059626153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046977843,0.00016533874,0.0014506846,0.00040777412,0.0000511913,0.0000039976326,0.000773202,0.59781575,0.000060988765,0.3774177,0.015816532,0.0013390043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057869696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006943361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07405808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037989393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012526622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196894019","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8774","title":"Imputation, Social Choice, and Partial Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Outcome (game theory); Preference; Computer science; Social choice theory; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Missing data","score_opus":0.09775813191491592,"score_gpt":0.2774441489285116,"score_spread":0.17968601701359568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196894019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950907,0.00003444754,0.0020762805,0.0015809899,0.0004215191,0.00024257733,0.000016165695,0.000044992586,0.044676047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.000010164072,0.00009277435,0.00010342733,0.00022032586,0.000017722175,6.1727405e-7,0.000011340381,0.00032790395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986888,0.000015565249,0.00062818016,0.00035654232,0.00007804713,0.00023287183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990163,0.000102872684,0.0005817644,0.00009966499,0.00014724469,0.0000521573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094638433,0.00015312512,0.00031215439,0.00009362814,0.00023853927,0.0001526626,0.00043813584,0.000093791365,0.00011959198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006911388,0.00013097617,0.000075460055,0.00022229902,0.00028111046,0.00018050378,0.00008947688,0.00017284142,0.00014783781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018790073,0.000040657585,0.0066601015,0.000040571056,0.000011962263,1.1667888e-8,0.0012134884,0.0000070591127,0.00063342456,0.98172635,0.000063115294,0.009584457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005062865,0.00016675894,0.0072852927,0.00008156678,0.000009223913,0.000001328715,0.000485471,0.011573652,0.022085475,0.9567112,0.0013046912,0.0002447469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077608755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076240417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048308745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016275833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012332341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53410536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200931022","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9744","title":"On Manipulablity of Random Serial Dictatorship in Sequential Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Programming language; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13921773962528544,"score_gpt":0.28260444906647036,"score_spread":0.14338670944118492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200931022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827769,0.000024260404,0.00088966306,0.0002170849,0.00042986913,0.00038160887,0.000025778918,0.000021928508,0.015232908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996124,0.000007138494,0.00012484817,0.000024056091,0.00004022276,0.00002005329,0.0000011845037,0.000015088396,0.00015500463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825835,0.000032873588,0.0008972944,0.0003903752,0.00015447341,0.0002666579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860495,0.00010967356,0.0008374829,0.00019256548,0.0001830314,0.000072308896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018718299,0.00019913731,0.00051786855,0.00020719068,0.00005801622,0.000084170104,0.0006693191,0.00010194762,0.000075133095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051414,0.00015445045,0.000082744606,0.00039956224,0.00024075573,0.00021155053,0.00008008507,0.00027359417,0.00006422719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015270812,0.00017261229,0.0062314617,0.00008963468,0.000022228465,3.9163265e-7,0.003024715,0.0006204625,0.001244746,0.9864758,0.000006786874,0.00058407057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030567034,0.0005390981,0.0012183832,0.0005461406,0.000008981253,0.00000254269,0.00197166,0.0053586066,0.036982283,0.95280725,0.000009948918,0.00024946735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044153197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001387608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035737537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007633833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058305774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201352866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2082597","title":"Compatibility in Transferable Utility Cooperative Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Game theory","score_opus":0.02966061845631286,"score_gpt":0.2367247772205053,"score_spread":0.20706415876419246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201352866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726034,0.0078975735,0.007288769,0.00018683942,0.00035178207,0.00014542762,0.000012647549,0.000018198107,0.011495399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844515,0.00037369318,0.000021525399,0.00004686734,0.0001692443,0.000005733147,0.0000022453962,0.000012759959,0.00092276814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972113,0.00014337082,0.00060932076,0.0001939105,0.000035818386,0.0018063285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994917,0.00006617992,0.0001514042,0.00017828781,0.000024906914,0.00008753042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008108614,0.0001322784,0.00037019863,0.00012016939,0.00012569528,0.000038890706,0.00018848448,0.000077729965,0.00026082472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121468256,0.00013416933,0.000099609475,0.00019823703,0.000051021674,0.0003974773,0.000012153049,0.0012307485,0.0002097448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197672,0.00014942394,0.3568833,0.0000071809195,0.000034125187,2.5054777e-7,0.0010272666,0.000022918868,0.000011856224,0.64106995,0.000013902149,0.0007478482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016358147,0.0002685323,0.15405239,0.000033246524,0.000008169276,0.00013793322,0.0032086247,0.00082032965,0.00018903047,0.83330053,0.0059031257,0.00044228268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025630547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060914265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20283091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056694786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017232927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54712665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221798450","doi":"10.1007/s00199-015-0880-0","title":"Joint games and compatibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07963653069165975,"score_gpt":0.2267336211680888,"score_spread":0.14709709047642905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221798450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964811,0.00156815,0.0009079096,0.00016328624,0.00078203186,0.00013060604,0.000056825855,0.00006652586,0.09984356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710476,0.000011526911,0.00015406776,0.00013966169,0.00016958498,0.0000088045035,0.0000040864275,0.000017613593,0.002389917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998861,0.000077951205,0.00049815694,0.00035471935,0.00000932759,0.00019880288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915487,0.00010022751,0.00023589417,0.00035348942,0.000008450601,0.00014705319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034392513,0.00012561216,0.0003819172,0.00008867695,0.000051831452,0.000058507707,0.00013234223,0.000064934706,0.0004049757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015692702,0.00014123679,0.000060961276,0.000025160778,0.00013494615,0.00016595975,0.00007024197,0.00009553862,0.0024591316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025985999,0.000018312383,0.025295177,0.000012752984,0.000024825953,7.1604074e-7,0.0011254791,0.000053276166,0.0000042536503,0.9719848,0.00083775003,0.0006166587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006281924,0.000058027093,0.0138805825,0.000010263481,0.0000033554234,0.000014189309,0.00063768536,0.0008766761,0.00008856135,0.96357554,0.019988116,0.00023883134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009757367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000104827595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10062364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011809773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019924542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222250379","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2656968","title":"Implementation by Sortition in Non Exclusive Information Economics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Information economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.013901445123953046,"score_gpt":0.23183418786674712,"score_spread":0.21793274274279406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222250379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743606,0.00052401144,0.01899211,0.00036762375,0.0003693274,0.00015924963,0.000020256053,0.000011964319,0.0051948996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892914,0.0005083202,0.000023950059,0.00010065431,0.00010686314,0.000008779237,0.000044158358,0.000008766799,0.00026935723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984745,0.000025738058,0.0006231809,0.000100244244,0.000023772045,0.0007525735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993298,0.000010691107,0.0004987042,0.000082333434,0.00002234384,0.00005613279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025481442,0.000087284905,0.00016844858,0.00021279861,0.000061384075,0.00008011131,0.00012062099,0.000060251856,0.000028501105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028834653,0.000104523126,0.00004445469,0.00010305011,0.000011423428,0.0010401694,0.000015620137,0.0004353536,0.00024355724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044964272,0.000030740233,0.035809014,0.000006143605,0.000037486112,2.521231e-7,0.0016850992,0.00050315895,0.000014166873,0.95406896,0.00041509082,0.0073848995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019978902,0.00026065175,0.0024437846,0.000008671546,0.0000036712338,0.000061485065,0.009575308,0.0012697639,0.00008677357,0.9760275,0.008054294,0.00021019575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023783538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036216664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03336523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010581192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020275783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42623293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22403799","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2012","title":"May's Theorem for Trees","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Discrete mathematics; Calculus (dental); Pure mathematics; Social choice theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.039073634133140474,"score_gpt":0.2686913790498867,"score_spread":0.22961774491674625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22403799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820363,0.012180098,0.004281583,0.0006049048,0.0029951977,0.001777234,0.0014500516,0.000087295244,0.0945873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96127063,0.0001484058,0.00066425477,0.00033981432,0.0011617163,0.000049278846,0.00008029397,0.000061625666,0.03622397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660724,0.00031583835,0.0016492233,0.00081854383,0.00007406892,0.000535102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933914,0.00083573326,0.004709574,0.0004720154,0.00040406935,0.00018723847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076351094,0.0007969048,0.003895132,0.00047673308,0.00020790043,0.000034676345,0.0006676904,0.00031424192,0.00016942604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085701344,0.0006426283,0.0008199948,0.00015617507,0.0032768669,0.000188404,0.0000935133,0.000892903,0.00006738858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001055922,0.0001760622,0.00007290685,0.000090292284,0.0015970564,0.0000018990797,0.0039099045,0.00031961428,0.0087658735,0.97733796,0.0062006786,0.0004718123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018317549,0.006882541,0.013196774,0.00053605664,0.00013675504,0.00006017638,0.0028716428,0.00010309908,0.0010960731,0.8930154,0.07924071,0.0010290596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036554262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019216639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08432262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042277208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004787397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246303743","doi":"","title":"Dimension of complete simple games with minimum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Extensive-form game; Dimension (graph theory); Sequential game; Combinatorics; Game theory","score_opus":0.02272272766719766,"score_gpt":0.20390912532348976,"score_spread":0.1811863976562921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246303743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220652,0.00036901757,0.0008982798,0.0001243888,0.000078123,0.00010520844,0.00008139667,0.00003975355,0.07623865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976459,0.00004200347,0.000391502,0.000068859554,0.000042136526,0.0000017441049,0.000009394925,0.00001875062,0.0017797103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921197,0.000060197763,0.00022206102,0.00023420741,0.000039761213,0.00023183119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.00017725978,0.00027423512,0.0002719802,0.000022823948,0.000074584255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036981827,0.00011872292,0.000338974,0.0001968756,0.00008058613,0.000026404543,0.0001835485,0.0000941569,0.0006522299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037059803,0.00013230082,0.00007886022,0.00024036525,0.00014475457,0.00013919293,0.000037882488,0.00010559331,0.0002602285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013466232,0.00026866468,0.11915409,0.00011596354,0.00019204171,0.00007618694,0.007510759,0.00056037004,0.0013787224,0.8609061,0.008003754,0.0016986724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010333635,0.0016949041,0.2501634,0.00031998203,0.0001268046,0.00015623776,0.0054240082,0.049956813,0.0017054909,0.075755745,0.6021203,0.0022426774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022982743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020109668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78515035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046213136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006500833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.714146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2250449406","doi":"","title":"Voting rules as statistical estimators","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Estimator; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Interpretation (philosophy); Aggregate (composite); Decision rule; Judgement; Computer science; Scoring rule; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.07019080891397811,"score_gpt":0.31579130990150645,"score_spread":0.24560050098752834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2250449406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5193131,0.0004547702,0.00020622544,0.00009300209,0.0013180104,0.0007178188,0.00048503524,0.00010062161,0.4773114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924935,0.0008902627,0.0022131111,0.000057220863,0.00033597444,0.0001878631,0.00010711767,0.00013208672,0.003582842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952626,0.00025688898,0.0016973905,0.0015067153,0.000092606046,0.0011837488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698657,0.0008375535,0.00065640465,0.0011352448,0.00006497364,0.00031928121],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058306814,0.0004585336,0.0012106808,0.0008885516,0.00022161732,0.0002782388,0.00091455417,0.000698599,0.0010043642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00207201,0.00058205787,0.0002376867,0.00012300456,0.00045530897,0.00013822665,0.0011569497,0.0022024757,0.0015292935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008759163,0.00021759745,0.03695339,0.0004389061,0.00016675441,0.00009480331,0.0010254032,0.0017809848,0.0000036737301,0.9401653,0.000100357145,0.018965252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013094052,0.00030085922,0.02384908,0.0008695433,0.000016828428,0.00008185487,0.0008106184,0.03498197,0.0000950492,0.9029123,0.032642793,0.002129692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076764915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008805526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47372854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007329322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024753134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251246349","doi":"","title":"Twofold Optimality of the Relative Utilitarian Bargaining Solution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Bargaining problem; Consistency (knowledge bases); Invariant (physics); Class (philosophy); Sequence (biology); Zero (linguistics); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Combinatorics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.08669268012569117,"score_gpt":0.31705598235925325,"score_spread":0.23036330223356208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251246349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47693822,0.0007458182,0.000237471,0.00025894528,0.0011945977,0.00096538663,0.0002618967,0.000033070857,0.5193646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961732,0.000563965,0.00072288077,0.000037130954,0.00019694606,0.000061331346,0.00002113234,0.00005392783,0.0021695113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958835,0.000400877,0.0017782558,0.0010022271,0.00010785101,0.0008272422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964399,0.00079451874,0.001027394,0.0015154688,0.000100405356,0.00012234143],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013632797,0.0003118812,0.0009200871,0.0005899619,0.00023859976,0.00007216941,0.0011112655,0.00068248715,0.00012772322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016880883,0.0003282255,0.00042257644,0.0002789776,0.0005763695,0.00016003358,0.0013128651,0.002224696,0.000038742164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019960126,0.00028238495,0.1718713,0.00042182952,0.00034964387,0.000008503252,0.003903868,0.0099685695,0.000052340758,0.80005026,0.000047491183,0.012844229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020190803,0.0002583795,0.1910814,0.0015942494,0.000026906802,0.000017814691,0.0022449335,0.05850345,0.00047792878,0.72027266,0.021862932,0.0016402815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007174264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020059136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51923496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010829639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022869468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262261914","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2671963","title":"Closure and Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03667914818893434,"score_gpt":0.22229679496521101,"score_spread":0.18561764677627668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262261914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95974624,0.016205907,0.0017060522,0.0003701979,0.00035774993,0.000052518946,0.000003937104,0.000020654372,0.02153672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529064,0.00082707556,0.000034083892,0.00003480381,0.00024262196,0.0000016554354,7.235984e-7,0.000009418998,0.0035589756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.0000321628,0.00027138885,0.00013957772,0.000028540453,0.00080874434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958634,0.000018860905,0.00019290295,0.00008892958,0.000023604052,0.000089365494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033557876,0.00007919762,0.00017944354,0.00008118173,0.00007869161,0.00006837621,0.0001366974,0.00005493688,0.00001954789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010623063,0.00007527045,0.000038445312,0.000072979754,0.000031129428,0.00015449009,0.00001901959,0.0006022991,0.00016758968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012290542,0.000011799311,0.082180694,0.0000028238112,0.00004045486,5.467704e-7,0.00031199295,0.0000050824738,0.0000017124098,0.9161155,0.00009832578,0.0012187564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041357346,0.00020728128,0.0018090792,0.0000073015285,0.0000033475253,0.00022720564,0.0011678338,0.000034291814,0.0000048168263,0.98643595,0.009584804,0.000104486215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057688543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091684116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08037162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016139782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019110319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.306944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267265090","doi":"","title":"Choice-set forms are dual to outcome-set forms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Dual (grammatical number); Contrast (vision); Duality (order theory); Node (physics); Finite set; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Set function; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07415227302822595,"score_gpt":0.2791299300884275,"score_spread":0.20497765706020155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267265090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835382,0.002149072,0.0004726137,0.0006538529,0.0107308095,0.0015923947,0.0058040507,0.00041965378,0.09463937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98216444,0.00004060569,0.00042280636,0.0009795557,0.0016588111,0.00040935204,0.0003959592,0.00022723134,0.013701223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267316,0.000112574635,0.003326555,0.0021828315,0.00020754834,0.0014973277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930353,0.0003555511,0.0029217387,0.0024737641,0.00021188782,0.0010017344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040837247,0.0012625988,0.0030241515,0.0012182395,0.0003564583,0.0005028674,0.0015793463,0.0013197009,0.0020410535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014167075,0.0013679045,0.00096178026,0.00037757814,0.00031912525,0.0005521892,0.0013559756,0.0017021861,0.014872065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052617856,0.00012082678,0.92513156,0.0003934153,0.00033774905,0.00003756298,0.0011979528,0.00034954745,0.0000026922405,0.042848244,0.029394064,0.00013377452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004344785,0.00053993403,0.28412023,0.0010376623,0.00017020895,0.00036607395,0.0021238246,0.0007904354,0.000088232904,0.10295548,0.5971596,0.0063035255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005399461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006839366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6410113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003346202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269163318","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.002","title":"Democratic elections and centralized decisions: Condorcet and Approval Voting compared with Median and Coverage locations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Condorcet method; Approval voting; Voting; Quality (philosophy); Democracy; Median; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10868174260374897,"score_gpt":0.30547495532230545,"score_spread":0.1967932127185565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269163318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724656,0.0009862133,0.020430798,0.0023674555,0.000063692954,0.00016798911,0.00002734847,0.0000052693263,0.00348567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737006,0.00033405845,0.0012639532,0.000041796287,0.00012046282,0.0000021805402,0.00000202098,0.000014296857,0.00085119036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986472,0.0003812677,0.0004938328,0.00017552021,0.00011786999,0.0001843104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985085,0.00083467236,0.00017051215,0.00008283812,0.00023183259,0.00017162731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305611,0.00007831047,0.00020616571,0.00025527136,0.00038750158,0.00020249003,0.00010432004,0.0000142260415,0.00006317445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013666619,0.00005511108,0.00001813106,0.00014453864,0.0002293416,0.00029536348,0.000044562094,0.00019540565,0.000022622533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007354955,0.00025703822,0.20945442,0.00008565723,0.00039649862,0.00017750557,0.0034972318,0.00039973744,0.0054557347,0.7638249,0.0034850533,0.0122307865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026478812,0.0040305196,0.82191026,0.0026122625,0.00006478016,0.0059660706,0.002865811,0.016151626,0.00074765296,0.073362865,0.044412985,0.0013963298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073681576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009922409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.690462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035127894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058650683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29803878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269596572","doi":"","title":"Information collection in bargaining","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Complete information; Adversary; Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029129795487111913,"score_gpt":0.20442446810153295,"score_spread":0.17529467261442103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269596572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6070869,0.00096088275,0.008687056,0.00028352047,0.00068627903,0.00086934556,0.00078982685,0.00013070095,0.3805055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273956,0.0005765318,0.003278385,0.00007254863,0.000058055626,0.0000016460739,0.00032861615,0.000029344015,0.002915333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978353,0.0001838006,0.000890427,0.00047733347,0.00014258348,0.00047060652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765366,0.00023960744,0.0011373615,0.00072227465,0.00010047744,0.00014662923],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020983417,0.00034828603,0.00086526433,0.001419754,0.0002740147,0.000045555116,0.000941057,0.00042966925,0.00033350816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027667024,0.00052649516,0.00037213342,0.00041246158,0.00029643744,0.0003912379,0.00094339065,0.0011839774,0.0001754839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002971864,0.0011057651,0.17110188,0.002850219,0.0012221996,0.00020555056,0.40682426,0.007723653,0.00012011928,0.38405478,0.0049281465,0.01689157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009485493,0.0009064675,0.30174938,0.0039842906,0.00016491003,0.000097579104,0.10430077,0.15292041,0.00008046435,0.21259463,0.20952834,0.004187269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008900756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020619985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38565266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048340324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015504472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276643678","doi":"10.3982/te2618","title":"Agendas in legislative decision‐making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Order (exchange); Social choice theory; Independence (probability theory); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Mathematical economics; Law; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024938779298333824,"score_gpt":0.2469426469455868,"score_spread":0.22200386764725297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276643678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6491569,0.0005064374,0.007391998,0.00033774698,0.0008045231,0.0001034033,0.00005624501,0.00003510528,0.3416076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677944,0.000076314995,0.002040037,0.00042286536,0.00013040214,0.000010250321,0.0000063619286,0.000030882824,0.00050346734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982397,0.000060589275,0.000815215,0.00049742404,0.000016682494,0.00037041793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987337,0.00055007404,0.0001890723,0.0004237579,0.00002126375,0.00008216057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012878239,0.00016339832,0.0005119586,0.0001455241,0.00006374002,0.00009442741,0.00023934583,0.00014039366,0.0029306696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066362135,0.00019905412,0.0001344167,0.00018658735,0.00023910693,0.00015907727,0.00012241483,0.00023186822,0.0015302043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003455499,0.000052602005,0.005007219,0.000008351713,0.000019736735,0.000019583105,0.00075489806,0.00028897714,0.000003882488,0.992274,0.000043576973,0.0014926062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045237035,0.000022818027,0.0023214186,0.000054528406,0.0000025598022,0.00002147136,0.00017711872,0.005343659,0.000091308466,0.98363215,0.007627262,0.00025330918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007570349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026576554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34762248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014243241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037321577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287383714","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2500777","title":"Voting Rules in a Changing Environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010947430053413693,"score_gpt":0.1849836240557669,"score_spread":0.1740361940023532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287383714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93442065,0.0030014417,0.053436425,0.00031633332,0.00024308082,0.000078905134,0.0000020509308,0.00001988172,0.008481257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743426,0.00031134245,0.00008352089,0.00005228791,0.0002997149,0.0000041506937,0.0000011042101,0.000018916351,0.0017947217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977116,0.00005395915,0.00043950145,0.00018871452,0.000031892054,0.0015743197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995233,0.000042534793,0.00027611782,0.00011236418,0.0000037100697,0.00004198341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064075156,0.000104908475,0.00023575351,0.0004039665,0.00012421979,0.000044328,0.00018409669,0.000054464057,0.000055878896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086959924,0.00011558815,0.0000776519,0.00012524484,0.000018297376,0.00011616806,0.000030029203,0.0007777429,0.0005509365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005242089,0.000021616543,0.024121666,0.0000047544518,0.000018832807,6.384693e-7,0.00032047453,0.00022673701,0.000015814257,0.97158813,0.0000018717768,0.0036742191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007470918,0.00014562401,0.0031480577,0.000045818302,0.0000034177197,0.0001376164,0.00091073615,0.005143047,0.00002157109,0.9800545,0.009379788,0.00026271612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031611595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039828345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06301361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005187499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038950173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7081358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290243676","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.416","title":"Matching Service Providers and Customers in Two-Sided Dynamic Markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC-PapersOnLine","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Disjoint sets; Blossom algorithm; Optimal matching; 3-dimensional matching; Service (business); Service provider; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.02961174817971536,"score_gpt":0.25855792580853704,"score_spread":0.2289461776288217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290243676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98581403,0.0008999586,0.00011682354,0.0017327091,0.00038006858,0.00028326001,0.000055148055,0.00006823554,0.010649745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908143,0.00002553844,0.0071502323,0.00066018035,0.00007275603,0.000016743534,0.000024672174,0.000035537163,0.0012000412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.000059705464,0.0005216185,0.00043874996,0.000049825605,0.0003588114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.000112779664,0.00023257485,0.00025152747,0.00002821134,0.0001591607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013650702,0.00020083529,0.00042260188,0.00023800065,0.000057304453,0.000075133925,0.0001873839,0.00008270177,0.00004823626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015056503,0.00022426217,0.000047766734,0.00030921656,0.000043366552,0.00029517588,0.0000685763,0.00022215093,0.00029011015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022002212,0.001590487,0.49708778,0.0026259942,0.00082249334,0.00049256015,0.14536206,0.015447831,0.005113191,0.29720792,0.00014561716,0.031903837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.039267287,0.0007197866,0.19888736,0.0020537563,0.00012550323,0.00060802937,0.079870395,0.4121545,0.00023290906,0.23596565,0.022989213,0.0071256217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018283078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016362172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39670667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013857403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030025503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9145146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293507961","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773548","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Resource allocation; Scheduling (production processes); Sequential game; Mechanism design; Optimal matching; Contrast (vision); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16363275091144538,"score_gpt":0.2740471760258787,"score_spread":0.1104144251144333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293507961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96693975,0.0024217202,0.016070949,0.00004501442,0.0010459893,0.00085740385,0.00015392092,0.00010432514,0.012360907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356234,0.000063800864,0.0007463915,0.000067445624,0.000080125785,0.00006956376,0.00002108415,0.000043865715,0.005345411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810284,0.000113264716,0.00064960483,0.0006090512,0.00011188327,0.00041332806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872243,0.00006100225,0.0005331268,0.0003358002,0.000078544974,0.000269076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009922164,0.00027963865,0.0006087131,0.00016927281,0.00017098688,0.00018950463,0.00024968942,0.00011985536,0.000030192246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006067974,0.0002601006,0.000057762492,0.00015569812,0.00008585756,0.00033758293,0.00008856243,0.00016346756,0.0003929615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010248078,0.0023454567,0.47379324,0.0011278423,0.0037737528,0.00017492656,0.06104506,0.009063665,0.00023357126,0.43971673,0.002324186,0.0053767688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027734114,0.0037898591,0.48793563,0.0044261306,0.00033839775,0.0002822982,0.05672893,0.3242237,0.00009923174,0.038913824,0.049127776,0.0064000967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023470754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012762034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4008029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010669548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025629575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294581381","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-027","title":"Social distance games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Transferable utility; Perspective (graphical); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.29650249167878373,"score_gpt":0.30827838519997025,"score_spread":0.01177589352118652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294581381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071178496,0.00006163119,0.1987492,0.0024728326,0.003150084,0.0002758963,0.00014865454,0.00019297002,0.72377026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969404,0.00001757983,0.00038955305,0.00026929975,0.00032793885,0.00002981597,0.0000095195655,0.000018747292,0.0019971563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829566,0.00003322663,0.00082277996,0.0004712616,0.000100101664,0.0002769502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991406,0.00003775931,0.00039702692,0.0002269748,0.00012497547,0.00007266312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056586,0.00018721462,0.00029167713,0.00020419074,0.00012979534,0.0001235534,0.0005274612,0.0000948631,0.004410337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019985971,0.00020897428,0.00014350971,0.00013924927,0.00018218343,0.00020311047,0.00006107517,0.00021854209,0.0058866628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006472734,0.00015041984,0.00066024764,0.000005514214,0.00003297793,0.000008158385,0.0020311137,0.0000076055226,0.00013220299,0.9886453,0.00017398784,0.008087745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003863238,0.00008824821,0.0022489326,0.000049921175,0.0000025852548,0.0000051972797,0.0005957379,0.0038785157,0.007577054,0.97955304,0.005640057,0.00032210108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014871942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033025593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008358472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019422565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295870642","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.003","title":"Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social choice theory; Maximization; Social welfare function; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Probabilistic logic; Social Welfare; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Welfare; Economics","score_opus":0.22067793669083208,"score_gpt":0.30804201530508346,"score_spread":0.08736407861425138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295870642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6147351,0.003530668,0.25587803,0.003189006,0.0057774,0.00068945816,0.00015303113,0.000416628,0.11563064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970292,0.000005862305,0.00037139645,0.00017278056,0.00067092397,0.000027946087,0.000008466373,0.000019105502,0.0016943406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984944,0.000050909075,0.0006992652,0.0003799017,0.0000523079,0.00032323436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.00009068112,0.00020288915,0.0002487309,0.00007101676,0.00012758786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013567741,0.00014520105,0.00030064216,0.000116525945,0.00020571655,0.00010305643,0.00026961477,0.00010642913,0.00051449874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055310567,0.00017001071,0.000111953574,0.00035480486,0.00011988737,0.00023019308,0.000054278767,0.00017162842,0.009844102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034245957,0.000112699905,0.0018895156,0.000015409953,0.000028660905,0.0000029828157,0.0025233475,0.00038101754,0.000013977549,0.98262686,0.0012133125,0.011157992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013627743,0.00033101861,0.0015008844,0.00004551521,0.000020307445,0.000018822338,0.005783486,0.016096316,0.0007341877,0.60548574,0.36898363,0.0008637847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057833886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083645056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38229406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008108933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003160827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99092686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310231013","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v8n4p80","title":"Population Monotonicity in Public Good Economies with Single Dipped Preferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Monotonic function; Population; Pareto principle; Variable (mathematics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Public good; Pareto efficiency; Microeconomics; Economy; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization; Law; Mathematical analysis; Demography; Political science","score_opus":0.03709002086767121,"score_gpt":0.21494473051573423,"score_spread":0.17785470964806302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310231013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942686,0.00038986985,0.0003325111,0.0016261617,0.0004836797,0.000058279777,0.000045521727,0.0000032129892,0.002792188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787396,0.0013774424,0.00035676654,0.000049934846,0.00013690868,0.000003804523,0.0000016156024,0.000009725022,0.00018981087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989029,0.000015539741,0.00073212787,0.0001886091,0.000019070898,0.00014173136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876136,0.00009333904,0.000957583,0.00009550549,0.000059835125,0.0000323748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005855395,0.00010430952,0.00032132227,0.00025528343,0.00002719778,0.0001058481,0.00026232947,0.00005662647,0.000028708571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007185411,0.00008337409,0.000052587096,0.000039321516,0.000054873497,0.0007397566,0.000034669065,0.00007524273,0.000014354765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104527724,0.000076468255,0.31472668,0.0000035231512,0.00006184315,0.000003864096,0.0001226864,0.00051596825,0.000011177299,0.6754416,0.000007933437,0.008923708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003647836,0.0005312092,0.48932803,0.00028404748,0.0000060228867,0.000151812,0.00010352071,0.002104335,0.00031091776,0.46809688,0.03495448,0.00048091396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007619759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023290142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20734473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015912288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023094948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3399897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318808822","doi":"10.1061/40976(316)262","title":"Bargaining over the Caspian Sea — The Largest Lake on the Earth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Voting; Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Majority rule; Political science; Economics; Economy; Computer science; Operations research; Microeconomics; International trade; Engineering; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020111335177384553,"score_gpt":0.1704867836512753,"score_spread":0.15037544847389073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318808822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97792095,0.0012083887,0.0000024608369,0.0012797213,0.00019910284,0.00022860186,0.00009225084,0.000020112182,0.01904841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97283053,0.00013241262,0.000002058026,0.0014703873,0.00018253647,0.000027594304,0.000011538639,0.000023812898,0.025319112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889743,0.00009769039,0.00029562772,0.00029197492,0.000075465185,0.00034183124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992843,0.00013799341,0.000116032854,0.00040263444,0.000001307039,0.000057730645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005509984,0.00019037692,0.00020298299,0.00005023644,0.0010193753,0.00008848118,0.00032063993,0.00004199674,0.0013219229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007728513,0.00008734515,0.00008702414,0.000056327684,0.00057320955,0.00007207647,0.0001425853,0.00027111731,0.0008984555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006924005,0.00010302796,0.9680874,0.000008797033,0.0001402746,0.000052091415,0.011641651,0.00030889438,0.00012718688,0.015008223,0.004036039,0.00041716933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032572413,0.000043854754,0.23258881,0.000016208382,0.000006248308,0.000052398147,0.00025841888,0.0002532709,0.00042308006,0.00088912254,0.7649426,0.00020025636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010687172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001619399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014180258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.764459e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322698568","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2622664","title":"On the Importance of Uniform Sharing Rules for Efficient Matching","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03540315268522115,"score_gpt":0.23873522174232395,"score_spread":0.2033320690571028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322698568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724332,0.0014914451,0.019791814,0.00041629965,0.00026112466,0.00014395735,0.000012431012,0.000010485542,0.0054392475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989051,0.000046742607,0.00006049405,0.000060465925,0.00013213388,0.0000065448266,0.0000013728793,0.000016105136,0.0007709898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855727,0.000014384699,0.00045470495,0.00014230759,0.00004365481,0.00078770705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913406,0.000107211046,0.0004958941,0.00018317072,0.000036797806,0.000042887554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006790638,0.00008916375,0.00020651854,0.00008360847,0.00013025779,0.00003899715,0.00032074968,0.0000384801,0.000012938675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021717399,0.000068498164,0.00010991499,0.00007624249,0.00002418603,0.000052974396,0.000024432058,0.00047450056,0.00004528382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036061825,0.000025213707,0.0032991883,0.000007037601,0.00004466538,1.629883e-7,0.00036910048,0.0016288608,0.0000060966845,0.99443686,0.000028383114,0.00011837545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038022283,0.00017560279,0.00016060495,0.000027391337,0.000003865725,0.000031161708,0.0014115743,0.0021808003,0.00003603605,0.9950487,0.00045915207,0.00008485829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025990355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039709776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026471956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036938724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014612445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27932742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328700561","doi":"10.1002/jae.1276","title":"EUCLIDEAN REVEALED PREFERENCES: TESTING THE SPATIAL VOTING MODEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Voting; Econometrics; Euclidean geometry; Dimension (graph theory); Construct (python library); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.2108864675320102,"score_gpt":0.22169460151805837,"score_spread":0.010808133986048157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328700561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69987243,0.0005069915,0.047083158,0.000055025906,0.0007730482,0.00026604175,0.000028357923,0.000033993103,0.25138098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99191076,0.00002898356,0.007333698,0.00014459534,0.0003792764,0.0000066236994,9.026474e-7,0.00003273047,0.00016241129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749017,0.000024079916,0.0017713831,0.00027994384,0.00007072156,0.0003637206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996272,0.0004315797,0.0027432137,0.00030925102,0.000108479035,0.00013544485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004525501,0.00020439854,0.0006416383,0.0007554661,0.00019452388,0.000106184896,0.0007578598,0.00012257349,0.00017685824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008436243,0.00017018759,0.00018465979,0.00089550955,0.00007783404,0.0002473742,0.000090943744,0.00046702896,0.00019058518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019816021,0.00032249003,0.13626686,0.00014742678,0.00034349106,0.000010963568,0.0069648465,0.012267324,0.000065157634,0.8251604,0.000549144,0.017703736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029127093,0.00073750125,0.07352154,0.00017342568,0.00012279717,0.00015667955,0.002191036,0.12626077,0.00049473584,0.7884761,0.0035789337,0.0013737866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054105552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005724538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29203838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011034899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050477032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6940049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332995385","doi":"10.1061/40976(316)556","title":"Sharing a Multi-National Resource through Bankruptcy Procedures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Creditor; Negotiation; Natural resource; Resource (disambiguation); Asset (computer security); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Resource allocation; Computer science; Business; Economics; Law; Engineering; Finance; Political science; Computer security; Market economy","score_opus":0.03759553411535578,"score_gpt":0.2076926621290163,"score_spread":0.1700971280136605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332995385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792963,0.002340026,0.000035163164,0.00021957737,0.00012540762,0.00020259054,0.00007845703,0.00006358004,0.017638875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567502,0.00012509366,0.00018177983,0.00038083998,0.00015394145,0.000033876167,0.00003830909,0.00003556634,0.042300373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843776,0.000024918723,0.000485347,0.00056416605,0.00009661187,0.00039120397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.000026082296,0.00014862754,0.0002094742,0.0000036080671,0.00009864542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027582285,0.00023743264,0.00032930035,0.0001442979,0.00043345103,0.00006156527,0.00024257641,0.00007139435,0.00067551085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013062898,0.00020877414,0.00008707885,0.00006354934,0.00035847546,0.00024371332,0.00020453148,0.00016965084,0.000745467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121443714,0.00037684667,0.9682305,0.00011777636,0.00015947253,0.0000766404,0.019312479,0.00057726924,0.0013272767,0.006857675,0.0026814945,0.00016114302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020905852,0.00007889449,0.12968293,0.00008785307,0.000011334944,0.000300658,0.00037298744,0.00134609,0.0031413338,0.004935054,0.85705894,0.000893364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007812479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019585406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85437745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064101834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021997519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343126504","doi":"","title":"Strategic Voting in the 2010 UK Election","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Respondent; Voting; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Compromise; Preference; Cardinal voting systems; Ranked voting system; General election; Political science; Disapproval voting; Pairwise comparison; Group voting ticket; First-past-the-post voting; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Politics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05096776012409773,"score_gpt":0.21804506097740653,"score_spread":0.1670773008533088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343126504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95161784,0.0022822025,0.0027970271,0.00017555934,0.00053828047,0.00011137433,0.0000013587718,0.000016508464,0.04245985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980632,0.00022634747,0.000019443565,0.000064274995,0.00024731713,0.00000511793,7.8240197e-7,0.000012475795,0.0013610246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980621,0.00007819714,0.00045992437,0.00016464609,0.000034997185,0.0012001585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947006,0.00003322909,0.00032076554,0.00013391594,0.000015606514,0.000026431018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062654535,0.00010491068,0.00017605223,0.00016709247,0.00016598344,0.000061675266,0.00031736674,0.00007314664,0.0001521248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046261248,0.00008741028,0.000086224296,0.00023958638,0.00002420394,0.00013494896,0.000009970694,0.0014445917,0.0001988731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015148279,0.00003585617,0.030025793,0.000002202243,0.00002426594,0.0000019130728,0.0007372773,0.000010080598,0.000013997517,0.968795,0.000017786519,0.0003206985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032297647,0.00019844274,0.008728218,0.000010914222,0.000003961495,0.0003810674,0.0027674383,0.00030288688,0.000018805164,0.98690003,0.0002320837,0.00013317446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057553506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014091494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046445377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027041158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013400051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6276113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372440949","doi":"10.1287/opre.2016.1509","title":"Competitive Equilibria in Two-Sided Matching Markets with General Utility Functions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Microsoft Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Competitive equilibrium; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Constructive; Matching (statistics); Point (geometry); Perfect competition; Complete lattice; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09652070557818943,"score_gpt":0.3410041735002537,"score_spread":0.24448346792206427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372440949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88204545,0.000069864545,0.0040784585,0.0010268092,0.00011119051,0.0003085683,0.00011101424,0.00002409995,0.11222457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776728,0.0000104175015,0.00050247106,0.000020592264,0.00010876491,0.00010037782,0.000013136266,0.00001614599,0.021555256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850917,0.00028490924,0.0003733191,0.0003784225,0.0000772837,0.00037690415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.000319238,0.000029602877,0.00036388673,0.000107536405,0.00007645513],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195215,0.00009247771,0.00020538892,0.000343769,0.00030124135,0.0001436212,0.00018655446,0.00004073683,0.0016273466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003362512,0.00007248348,0.000033677363,0.00044597438,0.00015566385,0.00035144555,0.00007807068,0.0002186225,0.0012239466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008037546,0.00009605536,0.03805445,0.000009357391,0.000022140757,0.0000058741994,0.00049652107,0.00025461416,0.001820747,0.9584291,0.00021994016,0.0005108091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011698473,0.0007081546,0.7225385,0.0010918651,0.000010690032,0.0000899082,0.0049852193,0.060528073,0.0020764573,0.12886477,0.06561727,0.0017906434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014296952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003427423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82956433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013990054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066715234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398162565","doi":"10.3917/rpec.162.0171","title":"Three Wives Problem and Shapley Value. Answer to Professor De Mesnard’s Criticism","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de philosophie économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Criticism; Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Political science; Game theory; Law","score_opus":0.10184802595049554,"score_gpt":0.26367000864328677,"score_spread":0.16182198269279124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398162565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6823522,0.02280001,0.0109382365,0.22813937,0.002922986,0.0021919894,0.00060466095,0.00015322106,0.04989733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680127,0.00049866305,0.01306758,0.0028335573,0.0044254614,0.00028338193,0.000013841367,0.00014771055,0.010717102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657327,0.00021750676,0.0011697499,0.0009777474,0.000030918443,0.0010307813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759895,0.0002993479,0.00047694534,0.0006969133,0.00010441092,0.0008234088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036998729,0.0004916228,0.0011042784,0.00031408182,0.0001788564,0.00022829782,0.0005157465,0.0005655359,0.00013158216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066275854,0.00068451994,0.00020864053,0.00025729515,0.00027035145,0.00048022752,0.00023953698,0.0005510278,0.0008415991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010953525,0.00018013493,0.025793286,0.00091666175,0.00015415359,0.000049259514,0.0036709765,0.0006462908,0.000035957226,0.96529657,0.0020010318,0.0011461439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096310885,0.00042321175,0.0023029507,0.0008244735,0.000049291906,0.00025174252,0.00021238244,0.0049316506,0.000100679186,0.9178938,0.07127419,0.0007725016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006167463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003300535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2856605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000715739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020776733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402827424","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773411","title":"Controlling Elections by Replacing Candidates or Votes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Voting; Constructive; Computer science; Approval voting; Control (management); Computational complexity theory; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Condorcet method; Algorithm; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.13559947351797666,"score_gpt":0.2883170122992241,"score_spread":0.15271753878124741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402827424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044522,0.0018638344,0.28267005,0.00336223,0.0004448491,0.0011775265,0.0014565975,0.0002119371,0.10436077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98710936,0.00012663245,0.0019651442,0.0000147119545,0.00006751766,0.0000015672866,0.00003660221,0.000017215014,0.010661273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984118,0.00028068322,0.00026036176,0.00040515309,0.00014090423,0.00050112436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831104,0.0007206774,0.00021322534,0.00033699788,0.00015625182,0.00026182577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030797624,0.000116800926,0.00040092177,0.00049473473,0.00045922064,0.00004685683,0.00040400136,0.00007216029,0.00017323984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009415354,0.00013785172,0.00010478228,0.0004991004,0.00033541655,0.00025160477,0.0001570451,0.00037737383,0.0004270316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045372187,0.0010636807,0.17398265,0.0006206959,0.0012378641,0.00023461964,0.039620347,0.00097457116,0.042346224,0.42684254,0.3050683,0.0034712474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010755192,0.003072468,0.0067723487,0.0006024399,0.00005455001,0.00007653215,0.03869854,0.13059874,0.002270586,0.37783027,0.42770928,0.0015590294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004490058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007837456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38265714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012845774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107075844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6787654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404625657","doi":"10.5555/2615731.2616149","title":"Imputation, social choice, and partial preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Missing data; Conceptualization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Preference; Social choice theory; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09478026045088839,"score_gpt":0.2753525177555754,"score_spread":0.180572257304687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404625657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763652,0.0011395193,0.0141585935,0.00006984799,0.0012298323,0.00057327957,0.00013223343,0.00006743336,0.006264055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718004,0.000051046452,0.000099794204,0.000092096,0.00037300916,0.000050238315,0.0000144875385,0.00002381245,0.0021154631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998412,0.00013463726,0.00058118504,0.0005003519,0.000060435057,0.00031136026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916977,0.00008914514,0.00042506316,0.0001424769,0.000045248773,0.00012831633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008411097,0.00021330186,0.0004546896,0.000110726985,0.00033848613,0.00017193894,0.00012964472,0.00012650898,0.00003850895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010068,0.00021061847,0.000055591066,0.000093070536,0.000101006466,0.00021800799,0.000070237315,0.000105020845,0.00014434785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052388128,0.0003054935,0.54774415,0.0003517014,0.0005045026,0.0000039072397,0.009532149,0.00019943004,0.000048109057,0.43168625,0.002327711,0.007244233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037888275,0.00033557168,0.70954347,0.00013710548,0.00005016912,0.0000146626235,0.001549595,0.15438901,0.000017888788,0.004129336,0.12512708,0.0009172944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009501271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002284391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4275569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002657489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000655975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8588772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405578672","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-657","title":"The Computational Impact of Partial Votes on Strategic Voting","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07724695675360152,"score_gpt":0.27899106933895806,"score_spread":0.20174411258535654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405578672","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032165044,0.002715016,0.78188235,0.00027605327,0.000661398,0.0011133796,0.00035261697,0.00004223374,0.20974047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939226,0.00011626196,0.00031447984,0.00001584393,0.00024210797,0.000046213834,0.000029039424,0.000020660704,0.005292813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871933,0.000013959278,0.0007703024,0.00029542638,0.000040500065,0.0001605024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989866,0.00021434756,0.0005179457,0.00020580128,0.000033473418,0.00004183072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059743307,0.00016096405,0.0003445426,0.00015079399,0.00017844907,0.000063835585,0.00020189131,0.00013550647,0.00003439217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027130798,0.00014442785,0.00012623619,0.00006172517,0.00024553927,0.000023920593,0.000022005204,0.0002199745,0.000113296126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014836648,0.00001580296,0.00048475488,0.000013286204,0.000035062505,1.3034928e-7,0.00006705316,0.007553011,5.7884085e-7,0.97779524,0.000107675936,0.013912592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632431,0.000069268084,0.000072007155,0.00004992401,0.000005434787,6.707946e-7,0.000078378645,0.028510574,0.000015377684,0.9650048,0.006029745,0.00014750281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042295258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012319763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050395356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024160388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58895963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463032555","doi":"","title":"A characterization of voting power for discrete weight distributions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Shapley value; Power index; Mathematical economics; Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Weighted voting; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.10296346771578477,"score_gpt":0.28766885548812776,"score_spread":0.184705387772343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463032555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18295673,0.0000051860293,0.80680317,0.0030406162,0.001190253,0.00022571847,0.0011341955,0.000032694614,0.0046114717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987535,0.0000127714775,0.0002775246,0.00005118835,0.00015217086,0.000031286916,0.000050334493,0.000012813457,0.0006584262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853784,0.000021260126,0.0008568454,0.00032451388,0.000068351845,0.00019119591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988352,0.00015882013,0.0005554012,0.00017754329,0.00022155783,0.000051491264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000514103,0.00012861821,0.0002468209,0.00016782816,0.00007024599,0.000050945528,0.00027822168,0.000067237655,0.00096880744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007327356,0.000110172994,0.00013256195,0.00009494438,0.00010807869,0.00019180361,0.00003807433,0.00006151639,0.00041407932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056805296,0.000055074055,0.00048430913,0.0000068484974,0.00002844204,4.4695526e-7,0.00013927724,0.0000037050472,0.056928214,0.9362942,0.000009582681,0.005993109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014456426,0.00025391957,0.0031597402,0.00043012647,0.0000064216324,0.00000438595,0.000107462765,0.009359915,0.30802697,0.6734083,0.0047037923,0.00039438132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001784712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000074363766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072711424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020631334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464078358","doi":"","title":"Misrepresentation in district voting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Probabilistic logic; Voting; Representation (politics); Computer science; Accountability; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.18653050512844216,"score_gpt":0.3116819358125312,"score_spread":0.12515143068408902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464078358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61327446,0.000042371375,0.2360239,0.015272405,0.0038053566,0.00037340625,0.00014764651,0.00012654196,0.13093391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706405,0.000025075895,0.00011012206,0.00012473481,0.00018871814,0.000024754447,0.000004516953,0.000011508119,0.0024465434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831426,0.000042075513,0.0008643875,0.0004272041,0.000101530815,0.000250558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990827,0.0002107112,0.0003753851,0.00018539054,0.00008776997,0.000058088128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008510279,0.00013449593,0.00022101418,0.00030965227,0.000041343377,0.00010872031,0.00033203932,0.00007569629,0.0020142954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001039816,0.00012022652,0.00008104258,0.00016395809,0.000053733915,0.00022595169,0.000048671125,0.00012716526,0.004469774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037419257,0.00008212128,0.01737784,0.0000035994153,0.000013595065,0.000007533857,0.00017470015,0.000096308504,0.0016084913,0.95462567,0.00005555581,0.025917172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020348982,0.0001313705,0.021226212,0.00045372924,0.000002591526,0.000009644879,0.00040357272,0.019118268,0.033406246,0.92107683,0.0033962973,0.0005717242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002211153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008587714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38378957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002520532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016673363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467276603","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2937201","title":"Investigating the Characteristics of One-Sided Matching Mechanisms: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Matching (statistics); Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Dictatorship; Space (punctuation); Mechanism (biology); Task (project management); Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.10171893914074176,"score_gpt":0.2588623865931234,"score_spread":0.15714344745238162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467276603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96570957,0.00055262644,0.028889142,0.00015499342,0.0012813758,0.00084266724,0.00045965772,0.00005858409,0.0020513886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716836,0.00009406549,0.00054797786,0.000108235974,0.00012225818,0.000048210743,0.0000071602285,0.00004217166,0.001861552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977903,0.000109411085,0.0011526134,0.00046622125,0.000106832835,0.0003746321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978251,0.0002752822,0.0012730483,0.00041447073,0.00007640802,0.00013567509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001625599,0.00026031106,0.0006307005,0.00011971198,0.00024255409,0.00008709798,0.00031917944,0.00012781279,0.00007546003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029384208,0.00018182595,0.00011035367,0.00011185153,0.00014370495,0.00023637169,0.00012219646,0.00013824551,0.0001671598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056461202,0.00041983445,0.03448032,0.0004787495,0.0008771533,0.000014512546,0.008496135,0.000040740277,0.013151461,0.936724,0.00027642172,0.0049841786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059188353,0.00044339037,0.90043783,0.004067403,0.00013509704,0.000051780164,0.006829965,0.010519904,0.0017008836,0.0626836,0.0054524234,0.0017588702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011955372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006096806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016182905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7414647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479077205","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2937144","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting under Non-Scoring Rules: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Convergence (economics); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Iterative method; Social choice theory; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1481050922965997,"score_gpt":0.30445444729394866,"score_spread":0.15634935499734895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479077205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728614,0.0012603739,0.022156008,0.00002362666,0.00082725,0.0005294886,0.0003278833,0.000028877756,0.0019851013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969792,0.00018457387,0.0002321813,0.00003635205,0.00008309442,0.000031183732,0.000004515056,0.000029099214,0.0024197963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769396,0.0001021135,0.0011393017,0.0006176564,0.000086294785,0.0003606738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825495,0.00022989124,0.0009989254,0.00026749785,0.00009221973,0.00015653188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014658544,0.00027436728,0.000711976,0.00014361019,0.00016903754,0.00006775562,0.00017058462,0.00012622632,0.00006641935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012572437,0.00022496625,0.00009040811,0.00009103087,0.00017065831,0.00036655506,0.000110402936,0.00010247811,0.00010676156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016468564,0.00038124243,0.51872987,0.0008298827,0.0007809198,0.000012594934,0.0074657705,0.00010618872,0.006329121,0.46331602,0.00011140882,0.0017722978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003476592,0.00017591393,0.98172957,0.001023683,0.000022873593,0.000010244282,0.002996762,0.007148131,0.0005509977,0.0010819616,0.0010691507,0.0007141409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014411003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024896017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4629997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006609747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012580841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9173857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494900181","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2936947","title":"Strategy-Proofness in the Stable Matching Problem with Couples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Complementarity (molecular biology); Stable marriage problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Stability (learning theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08909092805595974,"score_gpt":0.25137584936900165,"score_spread":0.1622849213130419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494900181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975434,0.0021143635,0.012858631,0.00014091712,0.0003512111,0.001481865,0.00020496245,0.000048777332,0.007365245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955309,0.00011420143,0.00014004736,0.00006591947,0.00007188257,0.00015510985,0.000004977613,0.000033709843,0.0038832594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818337,0.00014242576,0.00062156335,0.0005189613,0.0000923764,0.00044130342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990079,0.00012146318,0.00041435318,0.00033643024,0.00003953333,0.00008031578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001609966,0.0002536167,0.00045040285,0.00012983897,0.00019429595,0.00018221524,0.0003112181,0.00008959535,0.000041440515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019706598,0.00014572057,0.000046384823,0.00018108923,0.00008806914,0.00034901928,0.000053328335,0.00012362181,0.000139649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025044705,0.000775795,0.4081325,0.0005355697,0.0004757508,0.0001241179,0.013637824,0.0018963295,0.0002800459,0.5697916,0.00080112787,0.0032988556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024390215,0.002063346,0.7553023,0.0056725857,0.00012567622,0.0003354585,0.050954,0.0375052,0.00013410168,0.025207015,0.094025455,0.004284639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021130696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019239618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54458463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006897611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016949969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59423125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503919929","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10440","title":"Using the Shapley Value to Analyze Algorithm Portfolios","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics; Compute Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Portfolio; Algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Cooperative game theory; Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Strengths and weaknesses; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematical economics; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.14428951096714085,"score_gpt":0.30294544640319626,"score_spread":0.1586559354360554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503919929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615132,0.00011620188,0.08702477,0.009456955,0.0014797574,0.0011594293,0.0001385683,0.000100464174,0.039010674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732023,0.000018133416,0.0010792348,0.00029372776,0.00018262563,0.000019165705,1.5911945e-7,0.00002121712,0.0010655134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981936,0.000015809477,0.0008391892,0.00045571246,0.00012310427,0.0003725463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986173,0.00010834776,0.0006349567,0.00031942216,0.00022573609,0.00009425982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015115754,0.00020590384,0.00036447117,0.00017022532,0.00023032949,0.00013058864,0.0011434997,0.00008644373,0.0003285342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006814447,0.0001199825,0.00016827595,0.000566285,0.00023115656,0.00018722742,0.00019157398,0.00016058174,0.00051403797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029230638,0.000047699246,0.0013414581,0.0000118758035,0.000026535941,2.0064822e-7,0.0006676317,0.000047290265,0.010283879,0.9731331,0.000099353754,0.01431176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005811506,0.00019798485,0.0008279775,0.0005041424,0.00002247395,0.00001097816,0.0010916202,0.022915915,0.20098065,0.7712195,0.0016981447,0.00047249167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016977944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057814136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20191358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007385335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003152379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66070896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503945755","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499845.025","title":"Third Parties: Effects of an Outsider","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dyad; Ask price; Joint (building); Third party; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Computer science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Economy","score_opus":0.028252452317426235,"score_gpt":0.18472411517334894,"score_spread":0.1564716628559227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503945755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047312756,0.0005178018,0.0004503702,0.0000044997737,0.0005258001,0.00036358126,0.0002597857,0.000087781715,0.9930591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07788444,0.000071904884,0.000027467595,0.00003237573,0.00014189963,8.2166054e-7,0.000022262693,0.000046310637,0.92177254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871814,0.00003343396,0.0004272378,0.00050515414,0.000054413045,0.0002616248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.000097377146,0.0007153062,0.0006850471,0.00005599808,0.00013770242],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027696238,0.00030865916,0.00079111615,0.00024171609,0.000097620534,0.000028445262,0.0004602787,0.00039880528,0.000014259871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027105001,0.00041171117,0.0002646774,0.000009589552,0.00019262636,0.00012064266,0.00014150566,0.00030603507,0.0000904304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004974148,0.000018892231,0.000035684083,0.00033919618,0.00015941465,0.00010512604,0.00018540707,0.000005651123,0.0000076260035,0.99613595,0.0027572927,0.00019999397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007536492,0.00017143792,0.000067660316,0.00031190703,0.000083503284,0.0000120477225,0.000041856125,0.000099494835,0.0003797843,0.0011605878,0.9963548,0.00056324614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027237216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026070759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101757185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022796643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513805426","doi":"10.1007/s10458-017-9369-5","title":"Computational aspects of strategic behaviour in elections with top-truncated ballots","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Constructive; Mathematical economics; Preference; Minimax; Focus (optics); Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Computational complexity theory; Theoretical computer science; Political science; Microeconomics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07740140233226057,"score_gpt":0.2746905057048963,"score_spread":0.19728910337263572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513805426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989032,0.0003640788,0.0011476614,0.00004460432,0.00051701406,0.00049069413,0.000096537246,0.000032144915,0.008275278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982796,0.000016266222,0.00015490856,0.000013172762,0.000041805117,0.000040454823,0.000022005608,0.000023316026,0.0014085051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985602,0.000040154002,0.00068023195,0.0003962451,0.00005453222,0.0002686678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987189,0.00002751817,0.0007580336,0.00035570425,0.000048770977,0.00009107434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055678544,0.0001838277,0.00047552586,0.00019376843,0.0002996519,0.00018819924,0.00023037773,0.000097438606,0.000036430374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022840355,0.0001806894,0.000054080076,0.000079998776,0.000090829235,0.00018099985,0.00004357414,0.000121921694,0.000050071867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017265236,0.00027034417,0.81454813,0.00010223927,0.00007933712,0.0000211034,0.0007024827,0.0054010544,0.00002928535,0.17875923,0.000022272416,0.0000472691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021151593,0.00016241125,0.94787985,0.0001513563,0.00001635894,0.000038308495,0.00048703348,0.04680965,0.000031160318,0.0015465918,0.0004382554,0.00032386414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004658769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002858911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17721264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085420565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043645785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515370313","doi":"10.4169/mathhorizons.24.1.10","title":"The Mean(est) Voting System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Math Horizons","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Graduate students; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer graphics (images); Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.02282378017141655,"score_gpt":0.20141700521129122,"score_spread":0.17859322503987468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515370313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7580619,0.0018945328,0.024340365,0.001917174,0.003979848,0.00042469113,0.00013539218,0.0004988446,0.2087473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256665,0.000014065897,0.00006413702,0.000017614344,0.00030185888,0.000025674475,5.484367e-7,0.000022718827,0.0069867373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989079,0.0000369907,0.00045657196,0.00025235792,0.000030862484,0.00031527202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990021,0.00026631838,0.00026532085,0.00038827327,0.000018492154,0.000059481776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015389612,0.000111021065,0.00021882319,0.000050159215,0.0003450719,0.00009216172,0.0002972701,0.00005962917,0.00002510352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017274734,0.00006765931,0.00009376254,0.0001062436,0.000058512986,0.00008920767,0.000054454835,0.00006963121,0.0037987703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039146903,0.0000066818693,0.0035979636,0.0000176993,0.000019050194,0.0000019916868,0.000139267,0.0000010192155,0.00005073505,0.9941491,0.0003994886,0.0016130834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016399428,0.00032974614,0.010609669,0.0006461821,0.000026233949,0.00012587321,0.0022705072,0.0029447917,0.00058669795,0.07528129,0.9044048,0.0011342604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043119388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016752501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008776417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008890977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517888522","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1608.05038","title":"Electoral Stability and Rigidity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Santa Fe Institute","keywords":"Rigidity (electromagnetism); Politics; Loyalty; Electoral system; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.13890272249538527,"score_gpt":0.17322932587105128,"score_spread":0.03432660337566601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517888522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716961,0.000251193,0.011778641,0.000057417343,0.0006412999,0.00021580377,0.00028376403,0.000096163654,0.01497966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773383,0.000069020316,0.000018911915,0.00002274627,0.00013225041,7.7508616e-7,0.000008896647,0.000019124027,0.0019944264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983906,0.00008057106,0.00030385389,0.00092124555,0.000011829677,0.00029187213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866277,0.000098764904,0.0003977079,0.0006736952,0.00003872451,0.0001283569],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007951307,0.00023304945,0.0004950706,0.0001434772,0.00010674437,0.000053820804,0.00036069666,0.0002914638,0.00032709877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089452,0.0002637687,0.00015238252,0.00012193783,0.00017089208,0.00014775316,0.00043301523,0.00033478087,0.00034889314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035804453,0.000041016232,0.2577511,0.000110515626,0.0000609299,0.00001361122,0.000082114275,0.00009855924,0.000013432001,0.7416737,0.000091438465,0.000027745362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006381962,0.000055499793,0.024463253,0.00008588985,0.00002526589,0.0000028334582,0.000038885802,0.0051609166,0.00014862328,0.96482825,0.003917098,0.000635259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027295214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045970923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23328786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001894747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032615266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527480274","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2016.09.011","title":"An elementary integrality proof of Rothblum’s stable matching formulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rounding; Elementary proof; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Hull; Combinatorial proof; Convex hull; Matching (statistics); Discrete mathematics; Regular polygon; Computer science; Graph","score_opus":0.08850971007240122,"score_gpt":0.3358788426814007,"score_spread":0.2473691326089995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527480274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481545,0.000028815499,0.046847895,0.0031762845,0.00006848656,0.0003573457,0.00010883259,0.000015541546,0.001242278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979933,0.0000043265427,0.001195166,0.00011181465,0.00007715542,0.000058276615,0.000024231242,0.000012668334,0.00052306266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987996,0.0001622212,0.00044736813,0.0002415587,0.00008321736,0.0002660062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937147,0.00007848169,0.000055826447,0.0003595649,0.00007764558,0.000057034984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032973709,0.00006863306,0.0001593858,0.00025604814,0.00021617135,0.0000798494,0.00022084206,0.000035019053,0.0004900683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012021202,0.000056634377,0.000039464998,0.0002045211,0.00007446931,0.00075278146,0.000035456516,0.00011657287,0.0001021845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043449756,0.00020597836,0.034186404,0.000068613444,0.00005366141,0.0000013643726,0.002056029,0.004789926,0.20642297,0.74806553,0.0010145177,0.0030915486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008197523,0.0022770527,0.100290366,0.0012329593,0.000025062081,0.000020506355,0.005965525,0.08162148,0.46814933,0.28542835,0.04412709,0.0026647653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018384355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030491306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46263722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013329009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020014033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5365904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537425629","doi":"10.1007/s11127-016-0386-8","title":"Paths to victory in presidential elections: the setup power of noncompetitive states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; CONTEST; Economics; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Electoral college; Power (physics); Public finance; State (computer science); Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Macroeconomics; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.021180272451113084,"score_gpt":0.22609426680521458,"score_spread":0.2049139943541015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537425629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712025,0.0003226844,0.0018972695,0.0039547523,0.0006483381,0.00028742081,0.00013672933,0.000031133906,0.021519158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714416,0.000015498752,0.00001816307,0.00020145555,0.00010210555,0.000043633503,0.0000018202605,0.000011519108,0.0024616432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990601,0.000057513556,0.000408412,0.00021677153,0.000035421854,0.00022179223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990625,0.00039363196,0.00018934347,0.0002569428,0.000047627902,0.00005000084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095320307,0.00008147055,0.00019271931,0.0002012174,0.000050835173,0.00004396467,0.00024981797,0.00004310738,0.0006033335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068617385,0.000059108206,0.0000534791,0.00031281885,0.00004867563,0.00022712797,0.00005666898,0.00007282735,0.0003523766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034108958,0.0002039943,0.45927256,0.000032554504,0.00008214583,0.0000012827412,0.004777591,0.000024483687,0.0005374489,0.5306432,0.0034615034,0.00092911144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084764656,0.00013853922,0.5418215,0.000085178406,0.0000032321884,0.000003583044,0.0004611531,0.000043333377,0.0004615548,0.030476006,0.42538866,0.0002696146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005541104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005564733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5001672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007795079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023641294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541059643","doi":"10.3968/8884","title":"Election of Workers' Representatives: Based on Lexicographic Preferences Ordering Method","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Voting; Preference; Order (exchange); Sequence (biology); Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Majority rule; Aggregate (composite); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06397228919364516,"score_gpt":0.3472868641934313,"score_spread":0.28331457499978613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541059643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96139324,0.00030742638,0.012398352,0.00038163032,0.00011863058,0.00019575536,0.000022584065,0.0000752585,0.025107153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969956,0.00006491632,0.002118766,0.000016481752,0.000022098227,0.00003621274,0.000013971193,0.000009762195,0.0007221758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894965,0.0001641319,0.00047433304,0.00023569836,0.000038471513,0.00013771592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983651,0.00037280345,0.0005105556,0.00060765765,0.000115012765,0.000028862363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010595841,0.00010800602,0.00023321327,0.00012340402,0.00019596946,0.00008982233,0.0003573989,0.00007932919,0.00009229744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039351135,0.00007977167,0.00009683696,0.0002941772,0.0002082176,0.0004195288,0.00004287806,0.00010659307,0.00005350006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002878729,0.00018202665,0.71251184,0.0000957935,0.0000916893,1.2067001e-7,0.0019225312,0.0009119493,0.008449203,0.2571063,0.00016036772,0.018280324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033574817,0.0006595216,0.72130364,0.0012038918,0.000024076257,0.000005378597,0.0018164637,0.0064180573,0.0519184,0.19841713,0.013899254,0.0009767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002093191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023504512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058689166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045116572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072180574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32529944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549852367","doi":"","title":"Sharing the cost of a network : Core and core allocations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research portal (Tilburg University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Tree (set theory); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Solution set; Transferable utility; Solution concept; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2498699857539379,"score_gpt":0.32352671817900025,"score_spread":0.07365673242506235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549852367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893905,0.0019763475,0.0011159201,0.00039615633,0.00047852774,0.0013324113,0.00029397622,0.00005882732,0.30495736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770278,0.0008540704,0.000042240088,0.000010853535,0.00017447578,0.0000054823226,0.000048720878,0.000020592097,0.021815775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842685,0.000064731124,0.00039799474,0.00054106774,0.0001093185,0.00046002507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828804,0.00028339232,0.00039500208,0.00072049105,0.00017542446,0.00013762822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026928394,0.00016387764,0.00043512156,0.0004849282,0.00036572004,0.00007122667,0.00086576573,0.00023434714,0.0002996294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019488505,0.00017199083,0.00013193837,0.0007301593,0.00044169757,0.0000889416,0.0012572615,0.0009532709,0.00004396252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035587465,0.000047448404,0.12030111,0.00014670817,0.00014265039,0.00006889534,0.000519929,0.0016020087,0.0000037778516,0.87513363,0.0017847662,0.00021348007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016464135,0.0003010435,0.08381563,0.0018130878,0.00009922175,0.000073391624,0.008795094,0.024871472,0.000020096408,0.4608425,0.41635716,0.0013648773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010769973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020000568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41457242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087404005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099644094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70135826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567893196","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.23","title":"Social Evaluation under Risk and Uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Ex-ante; Mathematical economics; Observer (physics); Social choice theory; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051732212331264224,"score_gpt":0.22325647237612067,"score_spread":0.17152426004485644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567893196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021626395,0.00022716518,0.00085292326,0.00002370639,0.0002417749,0.00035828713,0.00056866655,0.000052743646,0.99551207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049598273,0.00010173935,0.000014017784,0.000017518163,0.00025430007,0.0000016143897,0.00003201332,0.000027274746,0.94995326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989201,0.00009926711,0.0002496149,0.00044995116,0.000064397915,0.00021669138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891263,0.00009504457,0.0006201951,0.00024660447,0.00005993998,0.000065590604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000886776,0.00021425752,0.00042042386,0.00016385979,0.00030133643,0.000045776032,0.00023604074,0.00037914107,0.0000766463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025086762,0.00024438227,0.00013513338,0.0000096271815,0.00016510322,0.00008416432,0.0001384111,0.000246394,0.000010523683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004464575,0.000005848359,0.000073880976,0.00004434574,0.00012735958,0.0000025588563,0.00034119643,0.000012573273,4.176833e-7,0.9923696,0.003878608,0.0030989554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075724715,0.000026459491,0.00013469414,0.00005020512,0.00007869865,0.0000016837932,0.000040452964,0.0002007791,0.0000012033955,0.11417996,0.88424593,0.00028268722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009092453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015387443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88036734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004122319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073417556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99656194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568493403","doi":"10.17713/ajs.v46i1.133","title":"The Analysis of Ranking Data Using Score Functions and Penalized Likelihood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austrian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Nonparametric statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Embedding; Parametric statistics; Computer science; Parametric model; Sample (material); Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18914408815776917,"score_gpt":0.3157511285966428,"score_spread":0.1266070404388736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568493403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394696,0.0014673171,0.25429487,0.0002457656,0.0011316787,0.00010842542,0.0025872122,0.000003364251,0.00069178996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967595,0.00012835518,0.0028102398,0.0000051261295,0.00011096794,1.6205726e-7,0.000010719391,0.0000072761354,0.00016766452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.00004055463,0.00079354347,0.00011403932,0.000050601804,0.00012962289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965788,0.0003244262,0.0023636855,0.0005713062,0.000103141305,0.000058633865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025216872,0.00007175316,0.00042411863,0.00018381428,0.0004661086,0.00021269437,0.0005215596,0.000035566525,0.00004616292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014155245,0.000059121205,0.0000641161,0.00012473867,0.00014481827,0.00021667169,0.000097127704,0.0001369074,0.0000028599322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028293434,0.00009782458,0.6486703,0.00009227726,0.006815961,0.000046055677,0.0009448366,0.0010007278,0.00012724623,0.31990585,0.0021838478,0.019832103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007195864,0.0004962569,0.6627058,0.0005395614,0.0064225555,0.00022166477,0.002540878,0.13063332,0.00005998579,0.16088709,0.027445942,0.0008510894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013857106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053470856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25728992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018493307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034350305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35849777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569842696","doi":"10.7202/1044716ar","title":"Pivots et élections","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08920177926384794,"score_gpt":0.26765481876704345,"score_spread":0.17845303950319552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569842696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7470871,0.0022390308,0.013219306,0.006987415,0.016132338,0.0011622495,0.0017262459,0.0003216956,0.21112457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873556,0.0007845883,0.0023171953,0.0022546407,0.0025639972,0.00026110903,0.00020080469,0.00016962973,0.104092404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451905,0.0005128595,0.0022635937,0.0017324771,0.000033184122,0.00093884754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952449,0.0006898952,0.0019156282,0.0017104195,0.00013404786,0.0003050948],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041285097,0.0008224415,0.001702037,0.00043720947,0.000378397,0.0005384818,0.0010149719,0.0014024801,0.004816924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007532437,0.0011322445,0.0007764024,0.00025805802,0.00044967857,0.00042682723,0.0007074346,0.0014007705,0.01358746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046990408,0.0002633513,0.0118961865,0.00030765077,0.000451904,0.000005426268,0.003538333,0.0006418266,0.000017375636,0.97575337,0.0063771293,0.0007004362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005100832,0.00017332156,0.01176078,0.00040607227,0.00004011106,0.000046459525,0.00015626485,0.0015103632,0.00025649802,0.38804954,0.5959975,0.0010929907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029585552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067679526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58962035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074892596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021135224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575965070","doi":"","title":"The Simpler, the Better: A New Challenge for Fair-Division Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Distributive justice; Procedural justice; Division (mathematics); Distributive property; Economic Justice; Outcome (game theory); Imperfect; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.04985134622381167,"score_gpt":0.20998089090791816,"score_spread":0.1601295446841065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575965070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4240287,0.015415313,0.028926045,0.013600257,0.002837137,0.0038668436,0.0094692875,0.0012693714,0.50058705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919198,0.00005304367,0.0002240104,0.0007841837,0.0003650042,0.00007006526,0.000079442565,0.00009135569,0.006413099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805224,0.00009056135,0.00074546365,0.00047239728,0.00007077647,0.0005685904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782944,0.00083292834,0.0003848444,0.000744617,0.000017175735,0.00019097459],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014553061,0.00028289456,0.00033140476,0.00008781731,0.0005613025,0.0010535383,0.0011027235,0.00014714965,0.00043860858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005527306,0.00018554252,0.00032920542,0.00021454852,0.00014853443,0.0016157106,0.00023018038,0.00034948395,0.0035791518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015246142,0.0000833075,0.019813532,0.000027699594,0.000081660124,0.0000020412676,0.00036076602,7.58526e-7,0.0000017200435,0.9503561,0.0055842167,0.023535732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028975672,0.00008499827,0.0018161797,0.000019094985,0.0000042369556,0.0000021276066,0.000081585196,0.000036478494,0.00006758988,0.5475882,0.44982558,0.00018411891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007064346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019392014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5678911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020671609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003293003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576139645","doi":"10.1613/jair.5187","title":"Convergence of Iterative Scoring Rules","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Convergence (economics); Social choice theory; Veto; Majority rule; Iterative and incremental development; Order (exchange); Aggregate (composite); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.3029385508815912,"score_gpt":0.3929278465399769,"score_spread":0.0899892956583857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576139645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93289274,0.0009046464,0.06152641,0.000590921,0.0007359217,0.00010716957,0.000023775608,0.000004988462,0.003213408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998506,0.00025481894,0.0004630317,0.0000054804505,0.00030149275,0.000001921471,1.0743134e-7,0.000009858399,0.0004572761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979412,0.00014948721,0.0012678949,0.00016615934,0.00016632762,0.0003089493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978035,0.0007095098,0.0006421495,0.00019829794,0.0005422935,0.00010423416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007160239,0.000081172286,0.00036157938,0.000534904,0.00009159543,0.00004696596,0.00044706056,0.00006431526,0.0006970987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018743766,0.000060375332,0.00013351277,0.00035082546,0.00031225674,0.00033338988,0.000062142055,0.000250953,0.00067788985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015595973,0.00011131935,0.008551246,0.00004215546,0.000051800438,0.0000148079225,0.0016555334,0.000041594252,0.019883027,0.9468264,0.00009862858,0.022567522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007085726,0.000655829,0.0009883773,0.0005478309,0.0000028899535,0.000027994578,0.0015500364,0.00046385024,0.26648325,0.7271086,0.0019416896,0.00015881273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045796543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051585694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24660023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086697015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006296147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87131286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583602942","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-53007-9_10","title":"Analysis of 2-Opt Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem Under the Chamberlin-Courant System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristic; Misrepresentation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Time complexity; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.03331328423480352,"score_gpt":0.24465982905647093,"score_spread":0.21134654482166743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583602942","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005734653,0.0007568327,0.9938264,0.00046497656,0.0010892901,0.0006492317,0.00007573384,0.000018467206,0.0025455903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625385,0.000013259857,0.0023835422,0.00010808266,0.00024758728,0.000026899823,0.00000588311,0.000020945161,0.00093996455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825877,0.000020535792,0.0007148805,0.00060259347,0.0001237434,0.0002794894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964078,0.0011096637,0.0012425737,0.0010763138,0.00013143924,0.0000321879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031787045,0.00024236487,0.0006793,0.0005059291,0.0004491924,0.00023359554,0.0013459236,0.00016794258,0.000011351222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010760334,0.0001560524,0.00028220008,0.00021583999,0.00054130907,0.00010455016,0.00015432353,0.00025640434,0.000011181923],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021277367,0.000022156508,0.0007031368,0.00033472062,0.00041993754,0.000003108578,0.0021157197,0.15949517,0.000008885193,0.7949174,0.0000076049405,0.041950878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019360491,0.00007275146,0.0015571968,0.00026349557,0.000187991,0.0000111549325,0.000004476071,0.89068735,0.000031333024,0.10551791,0.0011593234,0.00031339235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007890615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014321481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014452024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005141459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584545229","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.004","title":"Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Per capita; Parliament; Representation (politics); Unitary state; German; Population; European union; Power (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Law; Sociology; International trade; Physics","score_opus":0.08968767137900256,"score_gpt":0.2712019785617748,"score_spread":0.18151430718277223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584545229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517121,0.000042951553,0.0001606775,0.00082828477,0.00007233398,0.00009050091,0.000005392132,0.0000041549256,0.04708364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995112,0.000002160548,0.00012601783,0.00009001741,0.000030639963,0.0000089151235,2.5262872e-7,0.0000026263456,0.00022821753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999207,0.000021692164,0.0002988825,0.0002033269,0.000049735085,0.0002193239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.00006691235,0.00014242988,0.000077760145,0.000004786773,0.00003539462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846778,0.000065756285,0.00023380866,0.000031366966,0.00044250785,0.00022335509,0.00021012563,0.00004744478,0.00014656993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117835596,0.000061121405,0.00001829087,0.000062525156,0.00034324187,0.00026384517,0.000054862998,0.00007703313,0.00001768545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024128083,0.000025695366,0.06676821,0.00003492396,0.0000021247392,0.0000033748456,0.002386643,0.000043147298,0.0000031713407,0.9304442,0.000032661093,0.00025343962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017776956,0.000011700494,0.14554195,0.000022097203,3.4143756e-7,0.0000018311562,0.0005760993,0.03393069,0.0000037126842,0.8195442,0.000071393166,0.00011820317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24717487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5630938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3159189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012572644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062990075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75783825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592731255","doi":"10.1007/s10458-018-9387-y","title":"Investigating the characteristics of one-sided matching mechanisms under various preferences and risk attitudes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Comparability; Lexicographical order; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Preference; Probabilistic logic; Mechanism (biology); Space (punctuation); Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07665672668725818,"score_gpt":0.26176025875086656,"score_spread":0.18510353206360838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592731255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768859,0.00075158896,0.020129582,0.000042699146,0.00089063094,0.00052068505,0.00017409225,0.000046154983,0.0005586245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791574,0.00021518536,0.0009146355,0.00007913761,0.00014639509,0.000033019463,0.000008881765,0.000028908544,0.0006580654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981262,0.00014171486,0.000922435,0.00044279217,0.00006824468,0.00029860574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824744,0.00017031592,0.0010839786,0.00033536312,0.000051801653,0.00011111186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016733507,0.00022865541,0.00056493,0.00009942518,0.00045285196,0.0002125634,0.00022950313,0.000120095436,0.0000306372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012993616,0.0001887551,0.00005685723,0.00009134869,0.00022943516,0.00013774622,0.00013772794,0.00016322504,0.000050858747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018904824,0.00029821327,0.4653366,0.0007898906,0.00091679266,0.0000030406109,0.021359997,0.0002073628,0.0012588742,0.50692695,0.00007468347,0.0028086933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013393055,0.0003308321,0.939127,0.0006785968,0.00012151275,0.000032081443,0.0026739044,0.027866721,0.00025065345,0.025394803,0.0014583621,0.00072621665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044367574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013542743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48153216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040662864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019666193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76972103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603931501","doi":"","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Computer science; Adversary; Social choice theory; Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05544442268847323,"score_gpt":0.21448107583875167,"score_spread":0.15903665315027843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603931501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6483192,0.0029819082,0.0039295144,0.00029256122,0.0011261569,0.00087915367,0.00470869,0.00018267133,0.33758017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97816074,0.0005420677,0.0019104293,0.00003202744,0.00015191062,0.0000042864526,0.00037164008,0.000077540404,0.018749384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967077,0.00036222424,0.0009325578,0.0011382092,0.00023403318,0.0006252818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953541,0.0003987728,0.0014775479,0.0022587948,0.00017413756,0.00033663993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001909961,0.0005574477,0.0013647426,0.001533781,0.0002691946,0.00008168237,0.00310911,0.00049112487,0.00027756795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005991651,0.0007187656,0.0006220642,0.00053457584,0.00045054907,0.00025751945,0.0049900473,0.0013543154,0.0001448554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085095695,0.0015030692,0.08240152,0.001997568,0.0020607517,0.00038147296,0.046574704,0.0027543143,0.00021328598,0.8481648,0.009840937,0.003256636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007296884,0.0011915008,0.016401613,0.0027719815,0.00028939729,0.00005630131,0.010786852,0.041559808,0.00018027182,0.43747535,0.47798178,0.004008239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021339636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028214962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46814084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039150068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002756962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604412486","doi":"","title":"Job complexity and wage bargaining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Wage bargaining; Wage; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.12362318906240694,"score_gpt":0.32550432516881594,"score_spread":0.201881136106409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604412486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5806325,0.000121699275,0.0000045293136,0.00019895175,0.00015512161,0.000141325,0.000028821836,0.000015585983,0.41870147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953316,0.0006691845,0.00025391197,0.000050191557,0.00014742932,0.000024774245,0.0000033662395,0.000029351579,0.0034902063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982241,0.00007421154,0.0005404325,0.00055781193,0.000034072953,0.0005693814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841565,0.00023029631,0.00027440858,0.0009091708,0.000022410906,0.00014808882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004019019,0.00014468662,0.00043661008,0.00024811993,0.00069355126,0.00036697107,0.0005768857,0.00012977398,0.00014707244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092078,0.00017684312,0.000067403475,0.000040682775,0.00056961854,0.00029640712,0.00034556622,0.00043874866,0.000118078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036562455,0.000041942338,0.41080526,0.000034584813,0.000036538335,0.000015914162,0.000582929,0.000036099595,0.000036682166,0.5592206,0.000027466036,0.029125437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016959094,0.00014980703,0.74214846,0.00011822494,0.0000022249817,0.000027050837,0.0008645611,0.009423807,0.00007550646,0.19827627,0.046596102,0.00062211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027663697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021279261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41521126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016087574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026970773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72114533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613277224","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.002","title":"Three little-known and yet still significant contributions of Lloyd Shapley","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Core (optical fiber); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04133412399462716,"score_gpt":0.2569065869552318,"score_spread":0.21557246296060462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613277224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99429697,0.0010683092,0.00018890489,0.000249571,0.0005267342,0.0002609659,0.0012142677,0.000019757312,0.0021745404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890786,0.00020886495,0.000095036456,0.000018163613,0.00009834772,0.000040292693,0.000010533238,0.000017330463,0.0006035913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878323,0.000009276152,0.0005635863,0.0003787453,0.000012742494,0.00025244488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872005,0.000061025185,0.0005787604,0.00050371746,0.000018203362,0.00011823123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062882446,0.0001569133,0.00052020414,0.000083183855,0.00021872977,0.00016843036,0.00022903034,0.00011733978,0.00026755035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008512596,0.00017187426,0.00008465635,0.000012667933,0.0002913613,0.00022154415,0.000119711745,0.000104971965,0.00010724058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022990176,0.00006626629,0.6662151,0.000039354643,0.000047442692,0.0000030337499,0.00028974155,0.000003778016,0.00020825664,0.32801473,0.0003094375,0.0047798436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011767244,0.0001347652,0.9634874,0.000052048978,0.00004992529,0.000018659153,0.0001329672,0.0007798141,0.00034195933,0.02075658,0.012692064,0.0003770897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013544111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019232382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30725813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039671573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016209811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70088285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620615090","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091250","title":"Distant Truth: Bias Under Vote Distortion Costs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Voting; Computer science; Distortion (music); Outcome (game theory); Surprise; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social psychology; Bandwidth (computing); Psychology","score_opus":0.20115803981468233,"score_gpt":0.29770024886114627,"score_spread":0.09654220904646393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620615090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466056,0.0028105935,0.025378965,0.00013183075,0.00784083,0.001124676,0.00060692645,0.00010690983,0.015393633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907749,0.00012815766,0.000068136505,0.00006008065,0.00023561831,0.000055471395,0.000027854521,0.000049536135,0.0086002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780107,0.000102265614,0.0008237092,0.0007205379,0.00009712136,0.00045528862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976549,0.00007727305,0.001173064,0.00080986094,0.000058933343,0.00022594184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011135543,0.00032204684,0.00062591484,0.00013289222,0.00085884565,0.00047513854,0.0004158488,0.0001645373,0.000039911538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023084201,0.00031526654,0.00014335917,0.000058182835,0.00017128291,0.0004430297,0.00015543318,0.00016412859,0.00040989163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018102823,0.0006177056,0.3878356,0.0002632208,0.0007880718,0.00007370565,0.0021105474,0.00027443407,0.00009931234,0.6029382,0.0020662982,0.002751922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047294972,0.00028474999,0.88010436,0.0005606143,0.00007006936,0.000035938592,0.0016593559,0.043967467,0.00005752911,0.0032468315,0.06392293,0.0013606312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036980493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013112965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59969133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021964553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012326471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621346283","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091215","title":"Divide and Conquer: Using Geographic Manipulation to Win District-Based Elections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Ballot; Divide and conquer algorithms; Computer science; Voting; Redistricting; Secret ballot; Political science; Computer security; Law; Algorithm; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.16505426797796252,"score_gpt":0.302302601841162,"score_spread":0.13724833386319946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621346283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432294,0.00073346746,0.052878227,0.000090434645,0.00084964203,0.000850488,0.0002317435,0.000042664084,0.0010939523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985039,0.000033195003,0.00023764437,0.00008689786,0.00011141735,0.000051684212,0.000013819006,0.000031731404,0.00092968123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984473,0.000074054486,0.00053779525,0.00054430537,0.000062089915,0.0003344517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986813,0.000058057132,0.00056670385,0.00043530524,0.00005723238,0.00020138436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070581544,0.00023508866,0.00042997903,0.00025499938,0.0009471124,0.00041195826,0.00019130128,0.00011393416,0.000030693922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015290997,0.00025171076,0.00007237884,0.00010087644,0.00009092241,0.00028213474,0.000097249926,0.00010793434,0.00006800283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036925016,0.00013853898,0.94101524,0.0001005837,0.0001971623,0.000011295124,0.0004599307,0.001026636,0.000193562,0.05625463,0.00020199188,0.00036351182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014374439,0.00013297993,0.81696403,0.00024505457,0.000038708808,0.000012236146,0.00021786646,0.17226136,0.000032452528,0.0006344024,0.007485597,0.0005378625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046176575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007673866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17123471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066978355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009993149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621370674","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091251","title":"A Restricted Markov Tree Model for Inference and Generation in Social Choice with Incomplete Preferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Inference; Graphical model; Consistency (knowledge bases); Machine learning; Markov chain; Intuition; Markov model; Ranking (information retrieval); Artificial intelligence; Tree (set theory); Probabilistic logic; Social choice theory; Data mining; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.24764105549389467,"score_gpt":0.3200695065619617,"score_spread":0.07242845106806703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621370674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97708255,0.00034530266,0.01949986,0.000051260267,0.00021792333,0.0010477289,0.0002909727,0.000019063318,0.0014453087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971264,0.00007030891,0.0007123099,0.000025099589,0.00015499743,0.00019890515,0.000027237853,0.000022034543,0.0016627082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985779,0.000059423684,0.00050166337,0.000518744,0.000054655728,0.00028763388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890155,0.00006982522,0.00063940295,0.0002472763,0.000061068364,0.000080883336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004895331,0.00021492859,0.00046620256,0.00014426534,0.0006049654,0.00031374377,0.0002165886,0.000121990764,0.000003820153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014819353,0.00019895073,0.00003527239,0.000056132427,0.00010446559,0.0003833971,0.00008321104,0.000102383034,0.0000054001407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037540338,0.00038019483,0.8845105,0.00045313293,0.0003817456,0.000009758411,0.008260901,0.002050811,0.00027082796,0.097638026,0.00071967626,0.0049489895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021227968,0.000112028894,0.30709997,0.00007551853,0.000011433756,0.0000016173218,0.00018039571,0.6890396,0.000003706248,0.00053865986,0.0005707817,0.00024353563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018812155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011819646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6869888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048982598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019189343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81129754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622701023","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_3","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Stable marriage problem; Generalization; Transitive relation; Matching (statistics); Partition (number theory); Time complexity; Computer science; Combinatorics; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Linear programming; Binary number; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02694053044147743,"score_gpt":0.2048917570169648,"score_spread":0.17795122657548737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622701023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039730435,0.00052714493,0.9274165,0.000095900024,0.001131921,0.00023401067,0.000026678665,0.00005253468,0.06654226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629151,0.000021977037,0.026487837,0.0004504299,0.00079359725,0.000008770028,0.00000824903,0.0000426226,0.009271378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998028,0.000015018717,0.00048589625,0.00092915475,0.000114757495,0.0004271946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865246,0.00015258965,0.00042725046,0.0006298073,0.000048102112,0.00008978815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012792874,0.00031576998,0.0006016291,0.00042528388,0.00014215754,0.00025847138,0.00088150695,0.00020306351,0.00021089871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045265122,0.00027905617,0.00006430871,0.00017642877,0.00040585123,0.0001437541,0.00017290373,0.0003970129,0.00023101356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024473728,0.00002127267,0.0045765406,0.00013275981,0.000035763103,0.000020173744,0.0007325393,0.026107226,0.000013657517,0.9140891,0.000051796207,0.054194704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004388909,0.00038944292,0.000735619,0.000481065,0.0000069446314,0.00003562999,2.944617e-7,0.053460266,0.00021001256,0.9206888,0.022529012,0.0010240162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008438957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009891083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113088165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007503813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734532307","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2997431","title":"Comparing Direct Algorithms for Two-Player Fair Division of Indivisible Items - A Computational Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.06715913606020675,"score_gpt":0.30465337107787055,"score_spread":0.2374942350176638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734532307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338005,0.00085632084,0.061127894,0.00006897159,0.00048276506,0.0003921954,0.000029934135,0.000018682249,0.0032227011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878937,0.000026252152,0.00021373508,0.0000074545915,0.00023288127,0.000014317332,0.000005963677,0.000025586718,0.00068443984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978896,0.00004827954,0.0007281855,0.0002777743,0.00008399907,0.0009721746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982298,0.00012988503,0.0012070929,0.00029718853,0.000076426404,0.000059579947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055063516,0.00015368161,0.0005347205,0.00020796851,0.0006961742,0.00019922029,0.000553143,0.00005070133,0.000014562907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018553517,0.00015822594,0.0001736426,0.00006622694,0.0000500864,0.00031688326,0.00007514192,0.0005405404,0.00003365438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006776464,0.0003689284,0.5924011,0.000021621428,0.00042387692,0.0000011419935,0.0008338225,0.0051371343,0.000014444168,0.39851046,0.000029923589,0.0021897708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006226604,0.0014886012,0.15928188,0.000088591725,0.000038114318,0.00005933079,0.0018085629,0.041105174,0.000045870907,0.78872645,0.0006580451,0.00047274076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028195113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021249618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43311924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024058718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015690987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64522666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736777795","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12362","title":"Assigning Refugees to Landlords in Sweden: Efficient, Stable, and Maximum Matchings*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Refugee; Matching (statistics); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.02097217008433751,"score_gpt":0.23221543219771554,"score_spread":0.21124326211337802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736777795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897538,0.00059570465,0.00034404415,0.00023722422,0.0010038341,0.00015650969,0.000029708839,0.000006404484,0.007872793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830437,0.00004338867,0.0005951475,0.00011908577,0.00014080078,0.0000018860067,0.0000011564367,0.000025407291,0.0007687519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984203,0.000032406937,0.0009629344,0.00025500872,0.000020881705,0.0003084725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988136,0.00008498513,0.000720088,0.0001922872,0.000024685061,0.00016429974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020363955,0.00015477341,0.0006179829,0.00051533297,0.000049617214,0.00013700814,0.000252118,0.000084410625,0.00014047648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007256379,0.00016799715,0.00008906519,0.0001503943,0.000025413845,0.00023694751,0.000059913258,0.00024339712,0.00021308755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001825655,0.00006562074,0.8988369,0.00007776485,0.00006603209,0.000015174626,0.0018990573,0.0105521595,0.00008094392,0.087296784,0.00014732424,0.0007796933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013435845,0.0028687366,0.60241324,0.002658625,0.00005348368,0.0010915351,0.005549035,0.012731856,0.00096102786,0.2881544,0.06711623,0.0029660172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048450856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019577605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29642367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017802347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002334693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6850725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738541582","doi":"10.1007/s10107-017-1177-9","title":"Stabilizing network bargaining games by blocking players","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.050215524796229226,"score_gpt":0.25902079185972754,"score_spread":0.2088052670634983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738541582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4960039,0.0032642516,0.24913596,0.00062644813,0.0011009973,0.0012494355,0.000029502258,0.0006518785,0.24793763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841025,0.0000042817164,0.014584046,0.00004933127,0.00024721026,0.000045655608,0.0000031795357,0.0000448328,0.00091895537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815077,0.00002759011,0.0007099169,0.00041193087,0.000062491294,0.0006373269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983405,0.00022460287,0.0006150847,0.0006699711,0.000017701319,0.00013212636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023625663,0.00020165787,0.0005247892,0.000047442314,0.0008148762,0.0006843355,0.0005123122,0.000117763375,0.00020399933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010302903,0.00021346557,0.00013930374,0.00006553987,0.00015252188,0.0002681503,0.00016161546,0.00023536092,0.00047697063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008296935,0.00008148831,0.021721074,0.00016392353,0.000069909605,0.000006836915,0.0011380514,0.000044618002,0.000026346339,0.9591218,0.0004258449,0.017191766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010527112,0.00015605456,0.0007603498,0.0008031815,0.000032126267,0.000030624673,0.001231265,0.023751026,0.000253401,0.8739367,0.09685637,0.0011361869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026038893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018371753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48809862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004879868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065134263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87048733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741216165","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2017/39","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting Under Non-Scoring Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Convergence (economics); Anti-plurality voting; Veto; Heuristic; Quality (philosophy); Scoring rule; Social choice theory; Iterative and incremental development; Process (computing); Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12006604496420994,"score_gpt":0.30264111171508273,"score_spread":0.1825750667508728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741216165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369423,0.00014152125,0.0097878305,0.000059272756,0.00025425592,0.000064177395,0.000020213914,0.000010270861,0.052720204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755275,0.000012734768,0.0004651177,0.00002577564,0.000044453063,0.000002476727,7.614022e-7,0.0000060120683,0.0018898932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992349,0.000016055625,0.00041560456,0.00019871454,0.000016218444,0.00011851135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990551,0.00008325746,0.00054561323,0.00026080338,0.00002180543,0.00003343636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010752705,0.000073685,0.0002816559,0.000039895636,0.00019627796,0.000081869905,0.0001597726,0.000039964103,0.000103861654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017740073,0.00007596901,0.00003977798,0.000016323986,0.000101313235,0.000232257,0.000075822354,0.000054730725,0.00007071946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037927155,0.000007074602,0.32306284,0.00004045583,0.000013620582,1.1755599e-7,0.0003693636,0.000006247677,0.0002245499,0.6761916,0.0000040125456,0.000076307064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046718057,0.00003487692,0.9493394,0.00007676803,0.0000024408764,0.000001175604,0.00047815146,0.0022421756,0.0028301796,0.044081118,0.0002173868,0.00022915241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088005746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038791582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6321105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010381423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003811615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3097926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746903696","doi":"10.1177/233150241700500306","title":"Matching Systems for Refugees","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal on Migration and Human Security","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Political science; European union; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics; International trade; Statistics","score_opus":0.0469500361408618,"score_gpt":0.2945206262690592,"score_spread":0.24757059012819743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746903696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918013,0.00053510285,0.0006896285,0.00039641184,0.0007211919,0.00013371794,0.000030102437,0.000013428703,0.0056790696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752915,0.00005117572,0.000027164288,0.0000705449,0.0005872526,0.0000066512152,0.0000030215208,0.000009134231,0.0017159061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993123,0.00002185481,0.00037849075,0.00014128309,0.00002669899,0.00011939894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.00003071384,0.0006923491,0.0001847778,0.000030607735,0.000066568915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012867637,0.00008124345,0.00021871396,0.000084703555,0.0012775395,0.0008461395,0.00013949454,0.000059178674,0.00002813846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006127536,0.0000783359,0.00007281352,0.000009005944,0.00003055257,0.00027207177,0.000013598991,0.00015300474,0.00003227927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014773502,0.0000262279,0.006506102,0.000038134287,0.00001682682,0.0000011313408,0.0011602975,0.000011307774,0.000030710926,0.9913589,0.00079669326,0.000038891594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076924,0.0003120028,0.026146423,0.00015717343,0.000008726502,0.000049173614,0.00040797214,0.0008030983,0.00003709315,0.6983768,0.2723536,0.00027102407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011993098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009773779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2929821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028931578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039571955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752727483","doi":"10.3166/ria.32.169-195","title":"Jeux de coalitions hédoniques à concepts de solution multiples","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d intelligence artificielle","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Multiple; Mathematics; Computer science; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.0900844578895859,"score_gpt":0.3097086720033993,"score_spread":0.2196242141138134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752727483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1846408,0.01273462,0.7524793,0.004830966,0.003700592,0.00044663763,0.00030167404,0.00015629042,0.040709127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93363625,0.00094860827,0.0049696225,0.00033871725,0.0013030584,0.00004128502,0.000019222685,0.000040598476,0.058702625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727577,0.00021183897,0.0010103458,0.0005684336,0.00004167378,0.00089195376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982855,0.0003562834,0.0004521071,0.000569571,0.00014554914,0.00019104456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024201088,0.00025171333,0.00043921656,0.00017323853,0.0005073713,0.00016897761,0.00040882413,0.0003266903,0.0029950999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007163232,0.0003571988,0.00023066532,0.00038458014,0.00081837154,0.00027804187,0.00008602568,0.00030825144,0.005449026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048744376,0.00047835786,0.014528873,0.00033034573,0.00009623334,0.000014364187,0.023454426,0.004988246,0.002458703,0.9280486,0.008687164,0.016865926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111168396,0.00042008527,0.00068397267,0.0009374819,0.00003538842,0.00013108682,0.004174035,0.4765605,0.04996983,0.09862479,0.36765358,0.0006980867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008220245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021812726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82942384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003707557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007266488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763695172","doi":"10.1080/00029890.2018.1517571","title":"An Impossibility Theorem for Gerrymandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"American Mathematical Monthly","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; York University; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Supreme court; Impossibility; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Politics; Democracy; Social choice theory","score_opus":0.044888958482563725,"score_gpt":0.2876275542904025,"score_spread":0.24273859580783877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763695172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6784034,0.0002602437,0.20312206,0.00024088728,0.000791092,0.0016267165,0.0008440234,0.00036994336,0.11434167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980394,0.0000041836356,0.018180491,0.0001405576,0.0005781532,0.00029484348,0.00004435436,0.00009142858,0.00027198147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705964,0.00008056095,0.0012217142,0.0010325819,0.00006344881,0.00054202316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675554,0.00039136122,0.0010851803,0.0014720579,0.000070207745,0.0002256689],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002425954,0.0004082898,0.0013617257,0.00014227432,0.00014289234,0.00020898279,0.0007748861,0.0002206816,0.00030372554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063579174,0.0004140178,0.00039750323,0.00012088699,0.0006006238,0.0001081713,0.00025210922,0.000351661,0.00042303235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008537158,0.00039007457,0.002176633,0.0008388044,0.0001743333,0.0000020153539,0.0025425486,0.00017140554,0.000023461193,0.99269,0.00025905482,0.0006462824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984608,0.00033147994,0.0012651422,0.00011903371,0.000022527307,0.0000019235536,0.00025520756,0.031002983,0.00005970897,0.9654554,0.0007896811,0.00049843546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001328611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008174119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30199066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012287045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003222053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773928400","doi":"10.1111/caje.12308","title":"Can <i>EconJobMarket</i> help Canadian universities?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Matching (statistics); Simple (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical economics; Economics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.12526583528712118,"score_gpt":0.17470580816557227,"score_spread":0.04943997287845109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773928400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253617,0.0004163248,0.000016703663,0.005953639,0.004228446,0.00021348224,0.0013041317,0.000008361258,0.06249721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179757,0.00007513865,0.00012157108,0.0009192201,0.0009795709,0.000006045003,0.000017120276,0.00008024914,0.0060035074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967756,0.00005369693,0.0013164917,0.0005250438,0.0000020673929,0.0013270666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992722,0.000095946314,0.002088044,0.0011509189,0.0001653347,0.0037777554],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020223695,0.00039129792,0.0010651434,0.0014075814,0.0011814449,0.00069882034,0.0018938422,0.0003341906,0.0012113428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003699684,0.00055748987,0.00039800256,0.00008212422,0.00038758788,0.00092163694,0.000040649935,0.0005270305,0.0002510543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024969851,0.000005780237,0.048794236,0.000031720097,0.00018940282,0.00024795794,0.0012307644,0.00041274,0.0000014979958,0.9471093,0.0015284027,0.000423269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017959104,0.00036786663,0.01945852,0.00023802808,0.000050895644,0.0009605999,0.0026024084,0.00089663005,0.000052022468,0.6152354,0.3569256,0.0014161024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94236493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3553972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00503576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043107513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790916376","doi":"10.1007/s10107-020-01483-4","title":"Computing the nucleolus of weighted cooperative matching games in polynomial time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Polynomial; Combinatorics; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.02933425322872214,"score_gpt":0.2293112564682024,"score_spread":0.19997700323948028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790916376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602081,0.00027075806,0.025197402,0.0014540865,0.00007563637,0.0005695508,0.000009892024,0.000086133514,0.012128402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954814,7.336995e-7,0.0041561397,0.00012750784,0.000093489914,0.0000079217325,0.0000018185505,0.000020210231,0.000110790534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862224,0.0000639518,0.00077966944,0.00023214963,0.000044452245,0.00025754631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916,0.00032503987,0.00028475322,0.0001538056,0.000016272486,0.00006010935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010515994,0.00012794489,0.0004850995,0.000051809853,0.00008036228,0.00007217193,0.00025391023,0.0000615096,0.0001878596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003020912,0.00010378962,0.000089983434,0.00027690138,0.00010495458,0.00007878118,0.000095449635,0.00020940688,0.00048548705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006657346,0.00028754753,0.003212809,0.0005905534,0.00010968109,0.000012187014,0.043577183,0.00035624512,0.0004873493,0.940377,0.00017778263,0.010745091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038301095,0.000769597,0.0019845178,0.0012370339,0.000051334417,0.0000464553,0.009789056,0.7250158,0.0018693953,0.23957023,0.014254132,0.0015823037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026050086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001074813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002407861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008528184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6240116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793536574","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12139","title":"Suzumura‐consistent relations: An overview","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Social choice theory; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.08670218871279252,"score_gpt":0.3119330546765016,"score_spread":0.22523086596370911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793536574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91454935,0.0044562505,0.003468613,0.00093533035,0.009447771,0.00010722396,0.00009918834,0.000028645554,0.06690764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952919,0.00012885297,0.00044370152,0.00036052754,0.0018206005,0.0000018040869,0.0000043926902,0.000018769993,0.0019294445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984785,0.00008302453,0.0010769145,0.00018012946,0.00004067855,0.00014075421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998237,0.00016723528,0.001146951,0.0002155072,0.00014131768,0.00009198903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027637102,0.00011235411,0.00030378648,0.00031042955,0.00006261554,0.00010345487,0.00060861395,0.00006839816,0.0036361096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002067629,0.00011922654,0.0001954524,0.000034943227,0.00012810691,0.00061972725,0.000047365746,0.00014022605,0.0023248456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010393407,0.000052627598,0.006180406,0.0000026872133,0.00021275257,0.000006467878,0.0004954245,0.00008857527,0.00002474223,0.99075896,0.0005961647,0.0014772489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008010863,0.00023491612,0.0061213886,0.000076621945,0.000012660996,0.0002711766,0.00031559684,0.0004916999,0.00015603195,0.9190584,0.07226079,0.00019964331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020321248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012783551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08074257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005212301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798644134","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_23","title":"Robust and Approximately Stable Marriages Under Partial Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Matching (statistics); Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Preference; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Stable marriage problem; Blocking (statistics); Complete information; Measure (data warehouse); Focus (optics); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.04521455231708309,"score_gpt":0.23090879521485752,"score_spread":0.18569424289777442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798644134","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16958404,0.0002483643,0.8274604,0.0002144769,0.0019518659,0.00022277942,0.000026276703,0.00004311083,0.00024868027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96410453,0.000017919268,0.03518181,0.00032679795,0.00033450738,0.000013845469,0.000009376618,0.0000084808,0.0000027418553],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984248,0.0000299961,0.0005405087,0.0005629779,0.000076234006,0.00036542752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.000104803876,0.0003890532,0.00046249075,0.00005448554,0.0000696947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020568038,0.00020333563,0.00036888017,0.00038820124,0.00015775199,0.00067073415,0.00055813824,0.0002022838,0.00003437165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016071972,0.0002099279,0.00003984067,0.0003469736,0.00036437262,0.0005359794,0.00075877603,0.00034741548,0.00008093452],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038418188,0.00007993575,0.03642866,0.00072815304,0.000037624708,0.0000037426005,0.007252873,0.869411,0.000024896657,0.05466676,0.0000804517,0.031247463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023874127,0.000057071236,0.0070142485,0.00018033956,0.0000023976563,0.000009946451,0.0000032513624,0.7136832,0.0005504254,0.27752087,0.0003494092,0.00039012323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017057978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000128077145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010793842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006550505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802819107","doi":"10.7202/1044721ar","title":"Évaluation et comparaison des règles de vote derrière le voile de l’ignorance : tour d’horizon sélectif et analyse des règles de scores à deux paramètres","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11402946527699516,"score_gpt":0.30236877609074453,"score_spread":0.18833931081374938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802819107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334309,0.008813681,0.048141208,0.0013625727,0.00065784797,0.0004804445,0.00030226438,0.0001622204,0.006648835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733415,0.001260959,0.018635659,0.0010323933,0.0008719957,0.00013841529,0.00006569129,0.00012710496,0.004526267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946257,0.0014508273,0.0014563625,0.0010077064,0.0000592616,0.00140018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628687,0.0013489964,0.0010464605,0.0007555993,0.00020045417,0.0003616346],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006534164,0.00065240526,0.0011883752,0.00044392282,0.000736853,0.0006970487,0.0006958587,0.00062259386,0.00028432344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016638389,0.0008402426,0.00041969406,0.00047489328,0.001060981,0.0010806947,0.00014654755,0.0005660186,0.00032536528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033258152,0.0005379186,0.5234212,0.000589354,0.0005218596,0.000013674789,0.025040185,0.012881435,0.0011462265,0.40883544,0.001441909,0.025238227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00219156,0.0012171139,0.36738816,0.0015897275,0.00019354018,0.00019921594,0.0034601982,0.056825712,0.033491813,0.50005955,0.031455692,0.0019277395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04031294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06366851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15603305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010329926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006640065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803387754","doi":"","title":"Robust design in monotonic matching markets : a case for firm-proposing deferred-acceptance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Incentive; Matching (statistics); Private information retrieval; Business; Monotonic function; Ex-ante; Microeconomics; Compatibility (geochemistry); Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.026932057174573382,"score_gpt":0.23619963022949172,"score_spread":0.20926757305491833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803387754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85255224,0.000338614,0.11866397,0.00013067463,0.00015852961,0.00057409256,0.00014781713,0.000107094216,0.02732695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858707,0.000014901978,0.011410281,0.00012188372,0.000077686615,0.000035469737,0.000020542839,0.000070616676,0.0023778968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773395,0.00015009509,0.00046390138,0.0006482361,0.000067172485,0.00093665166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985288,0.0004971496,0.00031391025,0.0003821605,0.000045697372,0.00023232456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015830841,0.00032599762,0.00047137807,0.0004556685,0.00036801852,0.0006804527,0.0005103066,0.00023797207,0.00017470434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018888726,0.00044600037,0.00020245652,0.00040883172,0.00019224641,0.0014977312,0.00016883801,0.00025523262,0.00015540466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003857816,0.0014401634,0.29752654,0.0009663453,0.0012170417,0.011216336,0.045744892,0.008874244,0.0010372172,0.59146374,0.0061593484,0.030496279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012485981,0.0012524726,0.10718141,0.0009653396,0.0001548726,0.0061355643,0.017230636,0.16828336,0.00071030995,0.6512175,0.030380268,0.0040022642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018348619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037503407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19034514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011093095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009109138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808072369","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2018/14","title":"Big City vs. the Great Outdoors: Voter Distribution and How It Affects Gerrymandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Voting; Residence; Redistricting; Power (physics); Political science; Population; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Demographic economics; Law; Demography; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.047292256010841686,"score_gpt":0.22026966409169846,"score_spread":0.17297740808085676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808072369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521232,0.00012999565,0.021607451,0.0055243433,0.00076504727,0.00017771381,0.000041225736,0.00006116503,0.019569833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313235,0.0000146484535,0.000024642733,0.0002821573,0.0005143181,0.000008351749,0.00000628917,0.00000968527,0.0060075815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999327,0.00002756603,0.00014759769,0.00025829286,0.000022138305,0.00021738754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994839,0.000076556884,0.00012428388,0.00024868653,0.000017647866,0.000048922477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008475993,0.00011304884,0.00019942813,0.000037653677,0.00021617489,0.00017612244,0.00012520762,0.00007254626,0.00015579439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001189933,0.00008557601,0.000050910712,0.00010066204,0.00012923258,0.0001249407,0.000065336266,0.00008660196,0.00017625072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007836123,0.00005616843,0.3841617,0.00011790258,0.00014231441,0.0000040585305,0.002126894,0.0000038304997,0.00016283934,0.58522695,0.021292288,0.006626717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019115297,0.0006524313,0.5386386,0.00014766346,0.00003357353,0.00007465419,0.000757873,0.0069441022,0.003248384,0.059129644,0.38728902,0.0011725727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104181876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095628515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5260973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034404613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032517057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34896883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808191459","doi":"10.65109/ckjx2266","title":"Boundedly Rational Voters in Large(r) Networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Bounded rationality; Computer science; Social heuristics; Population; Computation; Voting behavior; Situated; Rationality; Bounded function; Social choice theory; Theoretical computer science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02333990723711495,"score_gpt":0.2209256160149613,"score_spread":0.19758570877784634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808191459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50986445,0.00029390652,0.13959529,0.000598269,0.0016081536,0.00018065113,0.000019329183,0.000071787304,0.34776816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936054,0.000003285842,0.0001917618,0.0005244426,0.0003586894,0.0000058440287,0.0000062419153,0.000008182887,0.0052961544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992468,0.000015550018,0.00032541578,0.00018748926,0.000013500197,0.0002112913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996953,0.000033163968,0.00008882297,0.00013847195,0.000012461326,0.000031798296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000902631,0.00006429852,0.00014812121,0.000099859506,0.00006541646,0.000047852893,0.00010503801,0.00006119102,0.0013024386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044362067,0.0000712545,0.00003596634,0.00014714463,0.000041375715,0.00011617565,0.000021860804,0.000072031275,0.0013287201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079018055,0.000025238696,0.09039003,0.0000022464917,0.0000061766636,6.6412156e-7,0.00017309893,0.00007570903,0.0000018221969,0.9078911,0.0013604589,0.000065586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024416125,0.0002424656,0.28496036,0.000049636747,0.000002844481,0.0000130922745,0.00036811622,0.19855434,0.00007797648,0.29996747,0.21253148,0.00079060433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008574748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022267386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60792357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035355246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006128702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808568836","doi":"10.4018/ijaeis.2018070104","title":"A Decision Support Tool for Agricultural Applications Based on Computational Social Choice and Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montpellier; AgroParisTech; Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA); Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Université Laval; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Harvard University; University of Patras","keywords":"Deliberation; Argumentation theory; Management science; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Computer science; ELECTRE; Agriculture; Argumentation framework; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.013256247588382635,"score_gpt":0.22508124423833387,"score_spread":0.21182499664995122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808568836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530288,0.00005830171,0.043545175,0.00048878073,0.00090103806,0.0004477912,0.00044989586,0.000012273898,0.0010679621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822634,0.000008272629,0.0005937858,0.00019540265,0.0005917757,0.000031185005,0.0002476141,0.0000033997683,0.000102228885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892396,0.000014096216,0.00073215173,0.000096570824,0.00014189289,0.00009131646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989614,0.00010970619,0.00075789075,0.00003126339,0.00009262751,0.000047131816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035297478,0.00010700855,0.00017402637,0.00012331158,0.00016959036,0.00020630105,0.000114226474,0.000057227182,0.000026065718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025139205,0.00007906678,0.00007022947,0.0000462101,0.000059329486,0.0008633916,0.00002034138,0.0000627231,0.00005277108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001625926,0.0012586708,0.1462532,0.00046309712,0.0015940826,0.000002580135,0.019145144,0.05924448,0.00322525,0.66998816,0.028070388,0.06912901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032086158,0.00060920906,0.931043,0.00008851439,0.00002166604,0.00020546926,0.0024025606,0.007069716,0.00010093042,0.0017263136,0.053180646,0.00034333512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007156252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.096476e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7847898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011587645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004893322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32242495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2863788886","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2018/716","title":"Quantifying Algorithmic Improvements over Time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Compute Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Computer science; Constraint (computer-aided design); Game theory; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Competition (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Operations research; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.05018963152214823,"score_gpt":0.25659437181152955,"score_spread":0.20640474028938133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2863788886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.788543,0.00012293417,0.0044316766,0.00007666914,0.00094107684,0.00017237029,0.000028496082,0.000120856996,0.20556295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97467756,0.0000022247457,0.00058317214,0.00026997653,0.00036572648,0.000005743685,0.0000033065387,0.000016840386,0.024075434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999133,0.000010073441,0.00034840786,0.0002598503,0.00001977706,0.00022890866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995227,0.000021461516,0.00014965431,0.00024320754,0.00001680702,0.000046156034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006373622,0.00009280324,0.00019561559,0.00009508858,0.00009660763,0.000055767778,0.00015480643,0.000055974862,0.003936961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003763661,0.000097714925,0.00005812441,0.00011398414,0.000045773468,0.0001414648,0.00004428342,0.00005443805,0.020049071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021943613,0.000110553556,0.0617756,0.000037842427,0.00011596195,0.0000025408872,0.0006612614,0.0000031071,0.003565595,0.92325467,0.0074450965,0.0030058022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005121712,0.001287156,0.11522892,0.0001525724,0.000025113048,0.000019316858,0.00026649496,0.19881143,0.011376111,0.16983303,0.49522775,0.0026503757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017027395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006805268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75342166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030546267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004150733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895801305","doi":"10.1007/s00355-019-01221-6","title":"Simple games versus weighted voting games: bounding the critical threshold value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Conjecture; Tournament; Example of a game without a value; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.033131961173566475,"score_gpt":0.2740001441258113,"score_spread":0.24086818295224482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895801305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628914,0.0012903874,0.000060128783,0.0034470977,0.0013379784,0.00020497333,0.00006165921,0.0000723228,0.03063407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.000016362086,0.0000120739705,0.00025237064,0.0008340505,0.000012860381,0.000011269099,0.00002722075,0.0004443245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.000047653473,0.0003667438,0.00035623537,0.00006084277,0.00039131782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920326,0.00036871535,0.00015573949,0.00018089624,0.000029817438,0.00006156579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007475342,0.0001640459,0.00034464625,0.00006131696,0.0007429575,0.00022315582,0.00021552497,0.00014533699,0.00032944517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025617942,0.00014772131,0.00012545424,0.00017317783,0.00012784622,0.00020741817,0.000080543,0.0002663409,0.0002443223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019130151,0.00001667613,0.08079573,0.00006374987,0.00004255858,8.935443e-7,0.0014697897,0.0000032516698,0.00000838438,0.9170109,0.00028278588,0.00028616114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041499604,0.00035704247,0.21559638,0.0001317915,0.000091316586,0.00001003763,0.015572667,0.0047408063,0.00006597021,0.12482473,0.6330468,0.0014124754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023933456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026794254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79218614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005197143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009849775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898331662","doi":"10.3982/te2547","title":"Strategy-proof tie-breaking in matching with priorities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020354618876721083,"score_gpt":0.21651862483352463,"score_spread":0.19616400595680356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898331662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82307416,0.000086392676,0.002719787,0.00017033957,0.00021260891,0.00015668305,0.000025462563,0.000043403703,0.17351115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986056,0.000012316137,0.0005286951,0.00017745045,0.0003102517,0.00001367607,0.0000035427295,0.000042218413,0.0003062494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844605,0.000038155657,0.0006434208,0.00042044974,0.000018148254,0.00043380278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991826,0.00013106345,0.00022078004,0.00035817013,0.000019325695,0.00008807651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238886,0.00019467698,0.00046581257,0.00016516513,0.000097998134,0.00013164285,0.00028972985,0.00012309871,0.000747592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049897215,0.00019983917,0.000058334394,0.00011484121,0.0006815132,0.00022965785,0.00006507736,0.00021556941,0.0005917205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008632774,0.000029454304,0.005230165,0.000023147335,0.000019723226,0.0000028914662,0.00087048166,0.00014117153,0.0000053408517,0.9928943,0.0000059290473,0.00069107476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005814954,0.00023503216,0.0020997138,0.00006498637,0.0000038434882,0.00002071296,0.00047346344,0.003078203,0.00021829392,0.9918421,0.0010488142,0.0003333668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009029019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008084617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17553143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114321236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029482817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81856084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900958212","doi":"10.1145/3434410","title":"The Fair Division of Hereditary Set Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Oracle; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Valuation (finance); Bundle; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03356150791834251,"score_gpt":0.22901453069714556,"score_spread":0.19545302277880305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900958212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83969074,0.0014937286,0.15517476,0.0006827057,0.0013391637,0.00014456469,0.00015021126,0.0000230319,0.0013010942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880487,0.000532757,0.00022956224,0.00003342278,0.000036881225,0.000010625761,0.000014791589,0.00001142487,0.00032567856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916124,0.000034764158,0.00046295716,0.0002161088,0.000014949195,0.00010995689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991829,0.00027878935,0.0002198694,0.0002492204,0.000033580138,0.000035683468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004180646,0.000085860076,0.00020578709,0.0000609645,0.0002281314,0.000084007115,0.00010894297,0.000056296885,0.000009323677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022429549,0.00008595831,0.00006792752,0.00007840578,0.00004357445,0.00010969586,0.0000072635266,0.000083061415,0.000032921645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069501344,0.00020435358,0.001922199,0.00015029895,0.00032937914,0.0000040949676,0.0014199407,0.34822336,0.000034379937,0.5508794,0.00019632874,0.09656673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024623857,0.00054322626,0.02396592,0.00018271862,0.000048336384,0.000116066134,0.0045459815,0.5158175,0.0010501465,0.41828218,0.032117624,0.000867911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006604605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017244914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16759415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029892139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001565617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904714486","doi":"10.3982/te3193","title":"Voting on multiple issues: What to put on the ballot?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Hausdorff Center for Mathematics; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Euclidean geometry; Mathematics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Distribution (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Random variable","score_opus":0.023900900568702414,"score_gpt":0.21586360593847154,"score_spread":0.19196270536976912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904714486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897935,0.00008987293,0.00020328355,0.0072158636,0.0013762789,0.0005597141,0.000039445556,0.00006401497,0.100658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99240756,0.000049664384,0.000078650475,0.0052373516,0.00031241417,0.000029187406,0.000005153051,0.000056836,0.0018231862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981689,0.000075362055,0.0006395671,0.000607703,0.0000322131,0.00047629268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975043,0.0013964507,0.00020919711,0.00071844296,0.00001653084,0.00015505905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020506366,0.00025242675,0.0004990975,0.00012748354,0.00012886377,0.00035305353,0.00064883917,0.00013724176,0.00237473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072173233,0.00021548457,0.00016848117,0.00010536396,0.00015901765,0.00019648971,0.00013017168,0.000294874,0.03399014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010298077,0.000056653025,0.0021313343,0.000011401552,0.000030180361,5.952525e-7,0.00046226903,0.0014610806,0.000009670773,0.99501437,0.00021260614,0.0005068337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010735099,0.00088320073,0.002285253,0.00027399504,0.000008307765,0.0000062718273,0.0012480365,0.036598463,0.000993736,0.8967614,0.058925837,0.00094200077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014344423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031430118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10261403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013023349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010229767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904805225","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012288","title":"On the Optimal Efficiency of Cost-Algebraic A*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Algebraic number; Heuristic; Mathematics; Cost efficiency; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08247716301350781,"score_gpt":0.25680929752451825,"score_spread":0.17433213451101043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904805225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246645,0.000034052107,0.00038223813,0.0010947912,0.00051306916,0.0006164574,0.000022619824,0.000020565018,0.072651684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998573,0.000011335673,0.000035723966,0.00014903826,0.000040210918,0.000021739841,3.4266512e-7,0.000015455418,0.0011531281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839705,0.000015065815,0.0008027677,0.0003724048,0.00013025697,0.00028247785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831915,0.00026947618,0.0008547194,0.00032948403,0.0001852444,0.00004194199],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014651922,0.00018219688,0.00038844897,0.00012771862,0.000112595706,0.00007214428,0.0011529641,0.00008901149,0.00087283057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007629261,0.00012458453,0.0001709806,0.0004219735,0.00028371887,0.000106667474,0.00011863194,0.00028301275,0.0012497167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081217506,0.00011920831,0.0012118999,0.00004444927,0.000015859072,4.50023e-8,0.00093237736,0.00018927535,0.004152385,0.9923905,0.00007320994,0.0007895514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006957186,0.0006202926,0.0006738438,0.00043257882,0.000009471025,0.0000023297289,0.0017248299,0.018256757,0.33489904,0.6426309,0.00035707123,0.00032336972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037756632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012830284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34975967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033015185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025961104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905103471","doi":"","title":"Group Fairness for Indivisible Goods Allocation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Set (abstract data type); Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Fairness measure; Public good; Nash equilibrium; Max-min fairness; Function (biology); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Resource allocation; Economics","score_opus":0.17861673615374524,"score_gpt":0.32247238477174256,"score_spread":0.14385564861799732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905103471","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2958802,0.00011864831,0.52531046,0.0021994165,0.003008108,0.001726526,0.00039243838,0.00017389446,0.17119032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755347,0.000006001764,0.00049694174,0.0002416592,0.00016975192,0.00008360733,0.00006125188,0.000015534572,0.001371798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986382,0.000026867769,0.0005796862,0.00042283454,0.00010940785,0.00022301066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905974,0.0002297956,0.00028885086,0.00018144035,0.00018836533,0.000051809242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013733492,0.00013564843,0.00023983495,0.00021622257,0.000109818924,0.00012976436,0.00029466656,0.00011342328,0.00088853843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033949135,0.00015671641,0.0000854696,0.00022820145,0.00004657852,0.00020985375,0.000022648517,0.00012756839,0.0040910053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045974863,0.00008887183,0.0008625656,0.000024070045,0.000013585626,9.0268955e-8,0.00018526828,0.0005021076,0.00039330064,0.99324095,0.000058149933,0.0045850887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006106696,0.00017865558,0.0010657029,0.0000369716,0.0000016674505,7.7311546e-7,0.0002000633,0.034752585,0.0033681018,0.9570862,0.0030223455,0.00022588378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036152596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020548468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70167327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095599346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046390403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99668443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905159666","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011804","title":"Primarily about Primaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Converse; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Quality (philosophy); Ranked voting system; Computer science; Politics; Approval voting; Disapproval voting; General election; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07054627635837617,"score_gpt":0.25168067762827667,"score_spread":0.1811344012699005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905159666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73442066,0.000099995144,0.00033970468,0.001032185,0.0009530822,0.00047608255,0.000022418759,0.0000550786,0.2626008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554926,0.000020131045,0.0001813169,0.00019906998,0.000080905964,0.00001617036,7.237368e-7,0.00001951481,0.003932883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983414,0.000008131017,0.000803832,0.00044210587,0.0001031728,0.00030139156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866927,0.00007403061,0.00072908314,0.00028263897,0.00018887932,0.000056098226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009676964,0.00019384234,0.00042947303,0.00012730728,0.0001169023,0.00016513075,0.0008998071,0.00011010998,0.00068972283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003936663,0.00016521201,0.00015420085,0.00033290725,0.00022140803,0.00024039939,0.00015769589,0.0002615999,0.0024051527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006129675,0.00007007694,0.011296776,0.000082147344,0.000018657518,6.540257e-8,0.0006985686,0.0000146218135,0.003756086,0.9817874,0.00008514955,0.0021291503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005609375,0.00021883806,0.004682333,0.0002789853,0.000007671872,0.0000030834499,0.0007023067,0.002816373,0.10324589,0.88480645,0.0028126875,0.00036929385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068008216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032869145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26112866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052331237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032945663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915782612","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpz021","title":"Vote budgets and Dodgson’s method of marks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Economic Papers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011061972736834546,"score_gpt":0.2159853867931485,"score_spread":0.20492341405631395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915782612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6988249,0.00034757386,0.0001874717,0.00012982897,0.00059908,0.0001719347,0.000064859436,0.000021401509,0.29965296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913472,0.00012345775,0.0012592543,0.00012461044,0.00006190006,0.000008437698,0.0000052197906,0.00002487337,0.007045057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874085,0.00002759981,0.0005736864,0.00039590747,0.000013214686,0.00024874636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990471,0.00012730915,0.0003946255,0.00034991794,0.0000053999966,0.00007567274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010868934,0.00015192552,0.0005327772,0.00012973168,0.000037696675,0.000028892124,0.00018264762,0.000110133944,0.00079077913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030401616,0.00017592654,0.00011400388,0.00003903101,0.000038118036,0.00014478726,0.000060236172,0.00010024033,0.0003956069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007395314,0.000031537977,0.33860567,0.00018320013,0.00019658107,0.0000011142787,0.00075804483,0.00046719826,0.0008527134,0.6500519,0.0003430212,0.008435037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036509468,0.00042615668,0.18077606,0.000122019235,0.00003557261,0.00006971111,0.00093521323,0.011678225,0.0011892403,0.0546172,0.74508286,0.0014167874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001905835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029556464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74473983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073673444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013097315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916806630","doi":"10.4230/lipics.icalp.2019.58","title":"Biasing Boolean Functions and Collective Coin-Flipping Protocols over Arbitrary Product Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Boolean function; Conjecture; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Generalization; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Product measure; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.028998688564719703,"score_gpt":0.2460417792424528,"score_spread":0.21704309067773309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916806630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92723036,0.00011730627,0.01052109,0.00024922815,0.0010963189,0.016014246,0.004380508,0.00017836122,0.040212587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909868,0.00000670173,0.00089775096,0.00023822396,0.00024031436,0.0020786796,0.00046460994,0.00005263072,0.005034241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976576,0.000027906653,0.0012599487,0.000381734,0.000085567124,0.00058722583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833935,0.00013249164,0.00072631065,0.00054741243,0.00010880839,0.00014565008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010196209,0.00032008905,0.0006130623,0.00030304413,0.00051741337,0.00037440174,0.00026308038,0.00015697407,0.00014075244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021716599,0.00034194934,0.00019868906,0.0003640228,0.000118061784,0.0010786506,0.00013733307,0.00038743133,0.00048264317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061739906,0.0009965887,0.59758914,0.0036850856,0.00096910953,0.0000037496236,0.018487398,0.00023974117,0.00021016777,0.36314145,0.011818025,0.0022421852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016343907,0.0017169288,0.10018156,0.0022518924,0.00012928211,0.00027756274,0.008021557,0.042910587,0.0014172925,0.058493465,0.76465714,0.0035988258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023954966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064910687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75283915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023647136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006601113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922743875","doi":"10.3390/econometrics7010016","title":"Monte Carlo Inference on Two-Sided Matching Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Inference; Monte Carlo method; Parametric statistics; Conditional independence; Independence (probability theory); Statistical physics; Mathematics; Observable; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.07711424203231552,"score_gpt":0.23913971675466517,"score_spread":0.16202547472234963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922743875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81260824,0.0005452914,0.0019842521,0.0000953301,0.001283925,0.00027800185,0.00008706216,0.000094395706,0.18302347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922889,0.000049197886,0.0002996482,0.00035547497,0.00014973001,0.000020017176,0.0000055015234,0.000046899222,0.006784663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799854,0.00003284284,0.0008180412,0.0006410764,0.000051587762,0.00045791775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808776,0.0005238946,0.00051849085,0.000702243,0.000031640368,0.00013599497],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013264301,0.00025095764,0.0006313465,0.0011238782,0.000096219206,0.00017659628,0.00046237162,0.0001268412,0.0007186059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030576898,0.0002967357,0.00017511434,0.00085277704,0.000027702874,0.00052734726,0.00009558513,0.00030152814,0.009289473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001732341,0.00007002351,0.035525158,0.000040511444,0.000048937447,0.0000025371962,0.0006303745,0.093606964,0.0000054116936,0.8692946,0.00014484147,0.0006133413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037303069,0.0006081361,0.018067839,0.00021418271,0.000016760316,0.00001485914,0.00069286895,0.21354099,0.00017785565,0.7444646,0.016352227,0.0021194143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033327664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011621293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1796806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019084626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019461333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923365458","doi":"10.1177/2158244019837468","title":"The Power of None","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Veto; Voting; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Metric (unit); Outcome (game theory); Simple (philosophy); Social choice theory; Action (physics); Weighted voting; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023992592353082747,"score_gpt":0.23145580404393368,"score_spread":0.20746321169085094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923365458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.507236,0.00063035585,0.00006689281,0.00018197898,0.00044564495,0.00026297456,0.000018379049,0.000004900222,0.49115288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589876,0.000013980548,0.000035749013,0.000053505755,0.000015161046,0.000005254069,7.738257e-7,0.000007006202,0.040881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995154,0.000015105447,0.0002405849,0.000113910944,0.000012263828,0.0001027043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939954,0.00006662071,0.00017459865,0.00033593306,0.000007349756,0.000015969124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011233396,0.00004172893,0.00016289405,0.000019100515,0.000045963,0.0000636142,0.0004671675,0.000025598021,0.0010187927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041513296,0.000033167627,0.00003661349,0.00006807847,0.000022394963,0.000091961236,0.00012125689,0.00004577854,0.002847165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026016784,0.0000253679,0.057056006,0.000012687445,0.000033546545,4.929183e-7,0.00069052493,0.000006971401,0.00010847146,0.94040984,0.000723321,0.00090676255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014744635,0.00024975525,0.09020464,0.000105483785,0.0000038698017,0.000004580695,0.0011341464,0.00016343824,0.0009592598,0.15485704,0.750483,0.00036035493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010422828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009320793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7855528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008584315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005147875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936689511","doi":"10.46298/lmcs-17(3:22)2021","title":"The Shapley Value of Tuples in Query Answering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logical Methods in Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Technion Hiroshi Fujiwara Cyber Security Research Center; Instituto Millenium; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Shapley value; Tuple; Measure (data warehouse); Aggregate (composite); Context (archaeology); Conjunctive query; Computation","score_opus":0.10069957742795237,"score_gpt":0.35147743510706203,"score_spread":0.25077785767910965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936689511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35370618,0.00077113125,0.64246917,0.0001852325,0.00066063734,0.00005731746,0.0000014674724,0.000009693036,0.0021391916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6676004,0.000026822261,0.33222777,0.000082446175,0.000034736877,0.0000036009878,8.266774e-8,0.0000024084438,0.000021727707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984773,0.0002482965,0.0005674024,0.000387137,0.00004729938,0.0002725573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835914,0.0011120737,0.00014897189,0.00031512734,0.000026070118,0.00003859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009305538,0.00007401939,0.00028567488,0.000120524244,0.00008624717,0.00008160323,0.0005652932,0.000046299192,0.000014009546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010256806,0.000059270173,0.000050887564,0.0009827235,0.00032608485,0.00012004236,0.00027969366,0.00015945366,0.000007723896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035763699,0.000043803997,0.0404475,0.000014465401,0.0000019394968,0.000009103943,0.00041768447,0.0041348157,0.0009003668,0.91965926,0.0000015602518,0.03436591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021858295,0.000058244284,0.22290668,0.000087224056,5.468982e-7,0.000015130534,0.00007296828,0.26252687,0.004116824,0.5088435,0.0009715941,0.00018185377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054036045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013699958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4108158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043862834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003005261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32251322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939959383","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-16989-3_10","title":"Bargaining in Networks with Socially-Aware Agents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Linear programming; Computer science; Type (biology); Value (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03413777373463098,"score_gpt":0.21974786074035904,"score_spread":0.18561008700572806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939959383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010192243,0.00065162865,0.97893775,0.000273303,0.0006020258,0.00062720967,0.00009346123,0.000032085765,0.017763335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6503335,0.00015212236,0.34839404,0.00027010703,0.00027783512,0.000025427773,0.00007136538,0.000047876674,0.00042774246],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998998,0.000005560105,0.00062736473,0.00012601288,0.00005275529,0.00019035007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988699,0.0001658533,0.00059176073,0.00030876737,0.00004097551,0.000022774102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055312156,0.00019022817,0.0004299301,0.00018222004,0.00033482746,0.00009827744,0.00073483423,0.00018947088,0.0000025072552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025813966,0.0001663793,0.000111834415,0.00014028711,0.00019665228,0.00016325324,0.00022151052,0.0003433779,0.0000017163743],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015018733,0.000004584689,0.00013756241,0.00007714784,0.000039916435,3.7501902e-8,0.0009283343,0.7643636,7.365318e-8,0.23365451,0.000012457731,0.0007802749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038200966,0.00007006968,0.00036912347,0.00048525547,0.000017270611,0.000004493348,0.0000135963255,0.9781989,0.000002057931,0.005152834,0.014933884,0.00037052066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044102897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111864145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006576162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007576205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6784751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942945535","doi":"10.1007/s10107-020-01499-w","title":"An efficient characterization of submodular spanning tree games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Submodular set function; Shapley value; Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Game tree; Convexity; Spanning tree; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Time complexity; Tree (set theory); Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Sequential game","score_opus":0.04265392892600052,"score_gpt":0.2336976143079176,"score_spread":0.19104368538191707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942945535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79982644,0.000037586753,0.19843188,0.00016556527,0.00003841194,0.0002142285,0.0000074744817,0.00007853038,0.0011998774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522704,5.256421e-7,0.004558144,0.000046428253,0.00008663593,0.000015826256,0.000011582706,0.000020986392,0.000032847503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989028,0.000026503249,0.0005834031,0.00024332675,0.000045157874,0.00019881206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935645,0.00003527924,0.0002935725,0.00018967819,0.000019888323,0.000105127074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061591814,0.00010456136,0.00036012183,0.000055155786,0.000044724606,0.000054254033,0.00016462081,0.000057560537,0.00010694469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021476204,0.000108551205,0.00007851737,0.00018158575,0.000049074653,0.000086041306,0.000027019307,0.000080115286,0.00018198977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026211077,0.00040788902,0.006486933,0.00088720425,0.00004438571,0.000004616429,0.0094262585,0.00026114966,0.011906961,0.9574729,0.0000027288488,0.013072767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016865126,0.001211166,0.012305787,0.00068430626,0.00005266996,0.000018541696,0.0020381836,0.88336766,0.017402738,0.07297221,0.006943163,0.0013170586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026820146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.770446e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012343778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003679732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44265896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943431942","doi":"10.1257/mic.20170077","title":"Strategic Performance of Deferred Acceptance in Dynamic Matching Problems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015429048752555121,"score_gpt":0.21637558710256818,"score_spread":0.20094653835001305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943431942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848749,0.0006614222,0.000092717055,0.00010099494,0.0009866984,0.0003048104,0.000066868655,0.000021279793,0.012890285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780726,0.00076869567,0.00062260823,0.00010454311,0.00008111372,0.000009547714,0.0000065836616,0.000063817286,0.000535839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684954,0.00005300544,0.0019600613,0.0005212662,0.000021349304,0.0005947515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686944,0.000100667385,0.002414769,0.00047316417,0.000019377128,0.00012257515],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015259754,0.00030642765,0.0011545356,0.00053225335,0.00007069794,0.00012590717,0.0006873704,0.000091004724,0.00047685657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009857765,0.00038089268,0.0002316221,0.00015279144,0.00018603604,0.00061435526,0.000078360055,0.00050839246,0.0015807634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022902952,0.0001633361,0.84028226,0.00023286842,0.000249128,0.000004925955,0.0020295337,0.08357797,0.002171128,0.067275,0.000033239514,0.0037515836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016261576,0.0042673326,0.44070336,0.0016440359,0.00008088078,0.0022843597,0.02384723,0.1845236,0.0019904529,0.30199844,0.015114009,0.0072847167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035124004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001530273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39957887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007382507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011383377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945148302","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104126","title":"Persistence of power: Repeated multilateral bargaining with endogenous agenda setting authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Power (physics); Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Bargaining power; Inequity aversion; Inequality; Game theory; Econometrics; Public economics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13862403162352444,"score_gpt":0.22504615388837915,"score_spread":0.08642212226485471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945148302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845578,0.00045181712,0.0016013562,0.0010649017,0.00032138912,0.00009630501,0.00006230759,0.000018924076,0.011825176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971302,0.000037355698,0.0023134155,0.00024111324,0.00018561156,9.763231e-7,0.0000029065095,0.000027640637,0.000060758714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979001,0.00006666432,0.0014327681,0.0002560512,0.000036433234,0.0003079595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969157,0.00010350095,0.0024220464,0.00020374364,0.00013726548,0.0002177361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023100614,0.00016727862,0.0007036392,0.00019856337,0.00009395253,0.000112196496,0.00041369445,0.000096318305,0.00013966742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045547224,0.00016995742,0.00022141128,0.00017073986,0.000075728916,0.00056905445,0.000057768702,0.00031976268,0.000027328508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005514963,0.0003557433,0.72664404,0.00032216287,0.0016393731,0.00017327782,0.033994626,0.0069288015,0.0020630425,0.22346528,0.0004400573,0.0034221085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05227263,0.02920102,0.25197232,0.0021605145,0.00078919786,0.012893752,0.09452106,0.21981898,0.024875112,0.0692055,0.23055546,0.011734466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018547124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032351454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47467172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012115081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010198354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69306624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946416250","doi":"10.65109/ryid7073","title":"Multiple Assignment Problems under Lexicographic Preferences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Pareto efficiency; Mathematical optimization; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.050086737340165915,"score_gpt":0.2048897385262412,"score_spread":0.1548030011860753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946416250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8202242,0.00035980446,0.0044825594,0.00012564083,0.00055049197,0.00034027433,0.000013294481,0.000085978645,0.17381775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838406,0.000015956048,0.00013303233,0.00012670532,0.000039742776,0.000025601148,0.000005362108,0.000013375154,0.015799655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901766,0.000020592684,0.0003796,0.00032189887,0.000030566654,0.00022966968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941516,0.00006937636,0.00017589913,0.00027653176,0.000011044179,0.000051975254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005949438,0.00011272665,0.00024637158,0.00012568576,0.00004682364,0.000063588035,0.00018300682,0.00007387644,0.0020108547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017610659,0.00010516761,0.0000818341,0.0001479403,0.000027882685,0.00013766764,0.00003433957,0.00008875208,0.0043858825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042240304,0.000056191602,0.43237707,0.000034315668,0.000034492183,1.03045615e-7,0.0001654227,0.0005264611,0.000105339815,0.5663931,0.00013715269,0.00016612306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022106192,0.0004826983,0.2051954,0.00012345116,0.00000857244,0.0000063629795,0.0014381412,0.007670245,0.00074605044,0.7222187,0.058838043,0.0010617278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018490573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041885516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22718169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002419183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005756826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949490134","doi":"10.1017/s0266466617000329","title":"TESTING FOR A GENERAL CLASS OF FUNCTIONAL INEQUALITIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econometric Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Test statistic; Context (archaeology); Estimator; Applied mathematics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Kernel (algebra); Parametric statistics; Econometrics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1552881800717985,"score_gpt":0.26877654569319215,"score_spread":0.11348836562139364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949490134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81278443,0.010395383,0.022277797,0.0001314879,0.007107628,0.0011213005,0.004003159,0.00012910123,0.14204969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984068,0.00002485228,0.0017891263,0.000060667124,0.0014293913,0.00024580423,0.00013849312,0.00007335626,0.012170323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971115,0.00008982504,0.0015485471,0.00078527315,0.00004302967,0.00042184847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939866,0.0016892079,0.0030048161,0.0010866165,0.00013554176,0.00009718234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717078,0.00036730635,0.0012921204,0.001403715,0.00023113914,0.00017292231,0.0007962942,0.0004149954,0.00050014426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004748148,0.00044350623,0.0004988313,0.00025317352,0.00020236446,0.00016861595,0.00044090083,0.0003855051,0.00015731185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007153835,0.00007098951,0.0152330445,0.0007097511,0.00028289517,6.170846e-7,0.00030019152,0.00081642874,0.0000065838785,0.97936726,0.00036445458,0.0027762197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063120207,0.000120274155,0.021875395,0.00012146955,0.000028602017,0.0000042206802,0.00011165091,0.0019418392,0.000050516435,0.9664506,0.0081445975,0.0005196872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011302899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003171489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17128353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017003447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010729882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950581823","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1701.04431","title":"Interpolating between matching and hedonic pricing models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Uniqueness; Matching (statistics); Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Marginal distribution; Marginal utility; Exploit; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Game theory","score_opus":0.17195923421611087,"score_gpt":0.19542135364969773,"score_spread":0.023462119433586864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950581823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85901976,0.00036150365,0.11872217,0.00003031842,0.00038464955,0.00018978478,0.00006983601,0.00008327989,0.021138676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743325,0.00010364269,0.00018985479,0.000016476999,0.00018651031,5.971153e-7,0.000012502449,0.000036098176,0.0020210452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833775,0.000051054765,0.0004040148,0.00087096373,0.000014625221,0.0003216141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801606,0.00011774155,0.0009560314,0.0007716137,0.000026067395,0.00011249027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095879077,0.00027283846,0.00065996667,0.00026696722,0.00034695634,0.00021979284,0.0006452156,0.00029755282,0.000020762418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006033751,0.00037085474,0.00016296918,0.000072998446,0.00009642605,0.00038034088,0.0010273443,0.0006274891,0.00008712993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011936168,0.0000145740105,0.09394887,0.00026783903,0.00016577648,0.000026303278,0.001349855,0.04684876,0.0000032916485,0.8571471,0.000007551722,0.00020816035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029148874,0.0000198347,0.0035150258,0.0003886391,0.000035410667,0.0000025620952,0.00019038103,0.14361008,0.0000050085014,0.85140055,0.00010525479,0.0004357446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010018809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025402134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13841349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015414608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025058333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950990081","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1312.1831","title":"Welfare Maximization and Truthfulness in Mechanism Design with Ordinal Preferences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mechanism design; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Maximization; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Voting; Matroid; Social Welfare; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Epistemology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.11251361856202101,"score_gpt":0.15608373017114577,"score_spread":0.04357011160912476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950990081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7726078,0.00007451566,0.22330277,0.000034420005,0.00018590246,0.0003848364,0.000025016014,0.000044959077,0.0033397865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987903,0.00009790237,0.00031104413,0.000009839831,0.00002665962,0.00000554183,0.000013946562,0.000020493613,0.00072427077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986976,0.000093995586,0.0002581637,0.0007158612,0.000015045166,0.00021936643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922794,0.0000617511,0.00028448756,0.0003245022,0.000029880168,0.00007143632],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004694143,0.00022663786,0.0004259495,0.00033122275,0.00009496012,0.000090881884,0.00030177063,0.00025070927,0.00021010073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033521366,0.00025375863,0.000042510317,0.00024141079,0.00006703502,0.0002153878,0.00017910947,0.0002911803,0.00006420172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006583546,0.00003787486,0.019503018,0.00012145507,0.000044176104,0.000024059013,0.00026878793,0.032266486,6.972415e-7,0.9475457,0.0000048813613,0.00011699898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009060976,0.00013742133,0.010063065,0.000194004,0.000028628732,0.0000065983977,0.000621407,0.10339014,0.000043452466,0.88384193,0.00014642157,0.00062080246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066803914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063053485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2261825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009076744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023394045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951829998","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1411.3602","title":"Numerical methods for matching for teams and Wasserstein barycenters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Population; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.028813632805206216,"score_gpt":0.2864618798603622,"score_spread":0.257648247055156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951829998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15555045,0.0020655727,0.83300614,0.0020301698,0.0039699445,0.0015534466,0.0001558547,0.00029525725,0.0013731925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6328809,0.00006963118,0.36604014,0.000066121465,0.0002980881,0.00035130212,0.000028414488,0.00006612441,0.00019927138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727786,0.000025045,0.0012199628,0.0009751971,0.00003144209,0.0004705264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976706,0.00014317784,0.0011536751,0.00088146096,0.0000689943,0.00008210468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022211643,0.0004164205,0.0014065121,0.00078201795,0.00016103331,0.00006528241,0.00078821916,0.0010032898,0.0000060148777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007034153,0.00047616742,0.00038798607,0.00016402086,0.00030728607,0.00011354809,0.0005467746,0.00067799195,0.0000117557265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008050452,0.000078044766,0.0039123488,0.0024701995,0.0004138952,6.799972e-7,0.00021057072,0.0011150734,0.0005312901,0.9609413,0.00009479348,0.030151274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016624825,0.00031325512,0.0003698939,0.0008859768,0.0000959612,0.0000112235475,0.00008780906,0.014760515,0.004376899,0.7081404,0.2683058,0.0009898004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008679588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054713146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47733048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010552857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043779888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952789100","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1512.03543","title":"Hardness Results for Signaling in Bayesian Zero-Sum and Network Routing Games","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Kempe Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian game; Time complexity; Stochastic game; Bayesian probability; Polynomial-time approximation scheme; Nash equilibrium; Combinatorics; Repeated game; Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11265315275987423,"score_gpt":0.1933624867395813,"score_spread":0.08070933397970709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952789100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.865218,0.00080031855,0.115663685,0.00007681813,0.0016904495,0.00085032795,0.0003298566,0.00010977757,0.015260763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644184,0.000052223164,0.00033991082,0.00003325954,0.0002519704,0.0000031794245,0.00004450564,0.000033406122,0.0027997226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978841,0.000083038605,0.0005863857,0.0009870131,0.000015843954,0.00044360216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984386,0.00019808106,0.00069801376,0.0004644996,0.00006859186,0.00013220671],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025853838,0.000272365,0.00071938906,0.00025515634,0.000120536264,0.00012688496,0.0003950131,0.0003616631,0.0000059464387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028929627,0.00037361783,0.0001414543,0.00027158274,0.00007234047,0.00018925575,0.00036229397,0.00040277862,0.000025435447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033381747,0.000049398885,0.06322932,0.00026830827,0.00011025462,0.000031273885,0.001139046,0.36208147,0.0000023582688,0.57175004,0.0009150718,0.000089626505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023600443,0.000075946366,0.0018264292,0.0005660426,0.00003899824,0.0000027536744,0.00048425395,0.26996797,0.000011054505,0.7201718,0.0036912132,0.00080347917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035410107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008011691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14842175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019354314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004865177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952997420","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.11.006","title":"Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Balliol College, University of Oxford; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Bundle; Hamiltonian path; Monotonic function; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03410988676932792,"score_gpt":0.2231898592085411,"score_spread":0.18907997243921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952997420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564655,0.003543215,0.00045969643,0.00042060053,0.0010919881,0.00054518663,0.0010371101,0.000105160325,0.007150485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409014,0.00040336882,0.0007631107,0.000093781244,0.00025807763,0.00034487457,0.00030194875,0.000074121934,0.003670562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764276,0.00003750361,0.0008763013,0.0010270432,0.000024189983,0.00039221227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978634,0.00007797136,0.0006816381,0.0011756931,0.0000357993,0.00016548623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046315242,0.00041360446,0.000959179,0.00019560555,0.00016031011,0.00046305868,0.0004903835,0.000374168,0.00096903567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044512424,0.00046987893,0.00017278097,0.00005571832,0.00017128671,0.00017204422,0.0005229404,0.0004505976,0.00022081986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107962056,0.000754272,0.6359009,0.00078602304,0.00086681737,0.000091013935,0.006119236,0.0015044077,0.00006921064,0.34441072,0.004088909,0.005300487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008136977,0.00068595505,0.83481896,0.0017457799,0.0010761985,0.0008080653,0.010024381,0.006355479,0.00067615515,0.041705526,0.08596998,0.007996575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001853222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3027052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010002232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959959662","doi":"10.1007/s40815-019-00684-0","title":"Bi-fuzzy graph cooperative game model and application to profit allocation of ecological exploitation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Profit (economics); Computer science; Graph; Alliance; Fuzzy logic; Profitability index; Non-cooperative game; Computational intelligence; Mathematical economics; Solution concept; Microeconomics; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.02634237352625518,"score_gpt":0.2561009369848292,"score_spread":0.22975856345857404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959959662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96011776,0.00034743536,0.03303751,0.0004373809,0.001042609,0.00045147873,0.000045580568,0.0000095779515,0.0045106807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988266,0.000035182416,0.00035948586,0.000064630396,0.00016868989,0.000027187178,0.000007428899,0.000011511273,0.0004992519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849594,0.000053171574,0.0010167771,0.00019293906,0.00013535786,0.000105835825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980728,0.00010042894,0.0011067397,0.000122233,0.0005270843,0.00007068727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012455015,0.000106213534,0.00036651664,0.00039844296,0.000021563068,0.00006660848,0.00027761,0.000082452934,0.000011823616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015384705,0.0001013203,0.000077027595,0.00014138538,0.000029040157,0.00032283313,0.00003220432,0.000106800115,0.00009296877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018520767,0.000120086814,0.04264399,0.00008232055,0.00021424163,0.0000018881257,0.0022717488,0.13954394,0.0071221283,0.8071712,0.00021262528,0.00043058392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010216087,0.004140692,0.21704711,0.0020290131,0.000105052306,0.0006406454,0.008740491,0.43543938,0.004201254,0.30724844,0.0081624845,0.002029328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004378093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003688373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49992278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105349274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002862983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41317222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962931423","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-17953-3_31","title":"Computing the Nucleolus of Weighted Cooperative Matching Games in Polynomial Time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Polynomial; Time complexity; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.01492737701452467,"score_gpt":0.2122742775948551,"score_spread":0.19734690058033041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962931423","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14106672,0.0022903061,0.7903977,0.0007529979,0.0040627676,0.0013580532,0.00009653851,0.00007949436,0.05989541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481654,0.000009436183,0.003360683,0.00029104296,0.00027947588,0.0000011083757,0.0000036889523,0.00002937675,0.0012086574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979403,0.000038869588,0.0008455213,0.0007054062,0.00010485269,0.00036505554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807304,0.00065078726,0.00064832775,0.0005380952,0.000052113523,0.000037663547],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019433459,0.00028940855,0.00077376474,0.0005230299,0.00011594575,0.00013243027,0.0010277344,0.00020915657,0.000092939605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072039074,0.00024704737,0.000106018524,0.0003040647,0.00046682282,0.00014561188,0.00035507235,0.00060845603,0.00023581697],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011157179,0.00013816907,0.0071163992,0.000354087,0.00012951295,0.00004495412,0.027423497,0.25047386,0.0005139657,0.6169849,0.00010446755,0.096604615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011333842,0.00029365957,0.0026917146,0.0017582362,0.000009084433,0.00004260235,0.0000064882297,0.77822584,0.0005885088,0.21152559,0.0024953648,0.0012295368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014395405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004385113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016559233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012105074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963124583","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.002","title":"Choice on the simplex domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Simplex; Preference; Axiom of choice; Choice function; Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Revealed preference; Combinatorics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics; Set theory","score_opus":0.0392807111881346,"score_gpt":0.226416320050177,"score_spread":0.1871356088620424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963124583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142863,0.00006573141,0.0007843543,0.0021648835,0.00044649662,0.00013845837,0.000010607559,0.0000065839786,0.08209659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725217,0.000014949758,0.00047744348,0.00069157674,0.00027918819,0.0000020269356,2.889998e-7,0.000021228352,0.0012611428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856204,0.00003089815,0.0010507641,0.00013221109,0.000029005794,0.00019509152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756503,0.0010149565,0.000984835,0.00033304785,0.000023702954,0.00007843749],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002624068,0.00012103365,0.0005144822,0.00010080493,0.00004843739,0.000081287784,0.00041277823,0.00007579816,0.0019699335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004046877,0.00008753626,0.0002350623,0.000056891287,0.000045042118,0.00013976268,0.000034400116,0.0002645255,0.00441543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000183153,0.00006640517,0.0009975227,0.00003052517,0.000057237015,9.441721e-7,0.00023845836,0.00021354327,0.000009922294,0.9976142,0.0006578385,0.00009510915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749602,0.0001705228,0.0006622399,0.000060125938,0.0000049264936,0.000048168356,0.00025339064,0.0011569222,0.000058999056,0.92881167,0.06815921,0.0001388902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014980903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.1607157e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082965866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008327595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017040074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963517750","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-1067","title":"How Hard Is It to Control an Election by Breaking Ties?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Computer security; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05275770285323778,"score_gpt":0.2508190768606777,"score_spread":0.19806137400743995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963517750","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012549275,0.00086258684,0.9517764,0.0019967337,0.00042682514,0.0007515429,0.00030651054,0.00003799104,0.043715943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6520891,0.0005070499,0.0021617927,0.0024925433,0.0012326943,0.0005874512,0.0001395669,0.0001205269,0.34066927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984642,0.000014507766,0.00060777634,0.00062476995,0.000043858206,0.0002448327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990701,0.00003579571,0.00035445773,0.00038022606,0.000041204974,0.000118202835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005249273,0.00023478194,0.0004982323,0.00031312378,0.00017576932,0.00022773222,0.00025080185,0.00027813658,0.00008917474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026354122,0.00029559646,0.00007853199,0.00009564576,0.000096598545,0.00011327046,0.000022311724,0.0002651604,0.00031274333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017674098,0.000023028078,0.00016882118,0.000024944306,0.000031102598,1.9781314e-7,0.00039902332,0.000037175127,0.000026163563,0.9228787,0.012872772,0.063520394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023216064,0.000056880264,0.000006449264,0.000038802522,0.00001007411,0.0000011779388,0.00020649555,0.0019062347,0.00017897929,0.3854595,0.611825,0.00028718315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007561492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004757443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087714725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010680072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964338779","doi":"","title":"Parallel approximation of min-max problems with applications to classical and quantum zero-sum games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"PSPACE; Multiplicative function; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Matrix (chemical analysis); Quantum; Complexity class; Discrete mathematics; Space (punctuation); Consistency (knowledge bases); Combinatorics; Computational complexity theory; Computer science; Time complexity; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.05246998559902656,"score_gpt":0.1708130798477856,"score_spread":0.11834309424875904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964338779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81512576,0.000024028954,0.17970173,0.00008813375,0.000046021974,0.00032319108,0.000019832625,0.00002935603,0.0046419674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764866,0.000009859434,0.00087154977,0.000020069127,0.000023710923,0.000005281229,0.000004528653,0.000010474357,0.0014058932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929607,0.000013790921,0.00019538455,0.00033611883,0.000012768506,0.00014583963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934214,0.00005085061,0.00019835812,0.00028203567,0.00003562963,0.000090992944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002576079,0.00009631617,0.00021367587,0.00013906066,0.000071819544,0.000020329402,0.0001617151,0.000075592194,0.000021459318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002199577,0.0001042424,0.0000357336,0.00028879516,0.00011112953,0.00013872253,0.0000384827,0.00011809637,0.0000902553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029486011,0.00006729585,0.03371929,0.00004665051,0.000020357738,9.71411e-7,0.0002131877,0.0021747039,0.0002917272,0.96331125,0.000041023715,0.000084054045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033024494,0.00076619576,0.054024663,0.00015239144,0.000084246145,0.000024237404,0.0009784864,0.14951591,0.000670308,0.7407608,0.048428234,0.0012920569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056810022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005002281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22255042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001559656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010220484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42508817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964436851","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011853","title":"Group Fairness for the Allocation of Indivisible Goods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Group (periodic table); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Fairness measure; Public good; Function (biology); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.10217581358762721,"score_gpt":0.2747536511323003,"score_spread":0.1725778375446731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964436851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626175,0.0001331722,0.0102304965,0.0014490846,0.0011107156,0.0013284144,0.0000515515,0.000029171886,0.02304986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998968,0.000021562859,0.00013895199,0.0000545465,0.00006017282,0.000047192276,0.0000010071911,0.00001350853,0.0006950515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987469,0.0000070010447,0.00069090776,0.00027922052,0.00007825245,0.00019774766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985231,0.00020338467,0.00082930183,0.00023402374,0.0001850359,0.000025128991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014722651,0.0001282537,0.0003053155,0.00009114571,0.000102783226,0.00006620518,0.00085678714,0.000079195706,0.00013776688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035425337,0.00009230182,0.00014038003,0.00030501344,0.00015420326,0.00015561159,0.000082193576,0.000133071,0.00014140746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006543544,0.00006757846,0.005036468,0.00011848609,0.000024930432,4.8722373e-9,0.0008611195,0.000055589793,0.005804931,0.9844006,0.000033191765,0.003531715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756695,0.00032595103,0.0026019167,0.0002402319,0.000015654501,8.886179e-7,0.0019831748,0.017081559,0.18467736,0.7919696,0.00081116933,0.00021684107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083691964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006723172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19243096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023902445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017231881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3763959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964439660","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2019/17","title":"A Contribution to the Critique of Liquid Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delegate; Democracy; Dictator; Voting; Delegation; Direct democracy; Computer science; Political science; Majority rule; Ground truth; Positive economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015215874859507863,"score_gpt":0.2315078608418631,"score_spread":0.21629198598235522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964439660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95320374,0.0001466502,0.008144413,0.0028957808,0.00035112663,0.0002934957,0.000029371115,0.000020273392,0.03491513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529165,0.000004273026,0.000069785296,0.0006008838,0.00005098557,0.000007824381,0.000002031398,0.0000056689714,0.003966888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940246,0.000021103086,0.0003101057,0.00012969671,0.000014233514,0.00012241922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995033,0.00008080205,0.00011126035,0.00023831529,0.00003897091,0.000027332384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009480306,0.000050731465,0.00018380297,0.000051905274,0.000032534343,0.000013606021,0.00014822328,0.00003842645,0.0005969401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019979775,0.00004049524,0.00005527624,0.000114518225,0.000011304655,0.000060249768,0.000026742555,0.00004971502,0.0028526762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002771205,0.000014147036,0.008810427,0.00001077644,0.000009387603,9.29547e-8,0.00015608381,0.00004124189,0.00029704894,0.9901167,0.00049127487,0.000025065237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021829596,0.0018615152,0.060927466,0.00018101458,0.000013888465,0.000022358516,0.00077683444,0.0032336467,0.034204084,0.30670878,0.5890075,0.0008799741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009706125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007835978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68340796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016616763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004944684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968470372","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdz041","title":"(Il)legal Assignments in School Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Set (abstract data type); Blocking (statistics); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Mathematics education; Block (permutation group theory); Computer science; Lattice (music); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Political science; Law; Combinatorics; Programming language","score_opus":0.057501486170694366,"score_gpt":0.29906578118649574,"score_spread":0.24156429501580137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968470372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4963957,0.42775288,0.0000033908348,0.0013419016,0.0011839657,0.00080896134,0.00004362815,0.000015678239,0.07245388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202415,0.07539009,0.0000185052,0.00057006534,0.00012435143,0.000049943348,0.0000015130361,0.000014989876,0.0035890886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848175,0.00006464413,0.0009758507,0.0002588187,0.000019019564,0.00019990126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860036,0.00029059823,0.0006114187,0.00045838024,0.000012431164,0.000026787116],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023339943,0.00013994778,0.0009000121,0.00007521071,0.000035902052,0.000012226231,0.00034175388,0.00003058458,0.0005628515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003394933,0.00011142945,0.00014272297,0.00008643316,0.00006573395,0.00013817508,0.00011008421,0.00011688327,0.004527406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018872879,0.00007805665,0.35745275,0.009154955,0.0006358992,0.0000010773753,0.0004981107,0.0001266049,0.000014494762,0.6217223,0.008901327,0.0013956021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026571637,0.00030437316,0.1287501,0.020482019,0.00008652208,0.00001669781,0.0012419665,0.00035139947,0.00012079572,0.06345525,0.7813595,0.0011742113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012462113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017552771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7724582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017003265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969799729","doi":"10.3998/mpub.9946117","title":"Voting Strategically in a Two-Vote Elections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Royal Society of Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Spoilt vote; Voting; Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Contingent vote; Cardinal voting systems; Group voting ticket; Ranked voting system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09016577812444716,"score_gpt":0.3240180971206687,"score_spread":0.23385231899622155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969799729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014897056,0.0013223691,0.0000895198,0.00017169048,0.0006819572,0.0011638338,0.0005291888,0.00011682326,0.98102754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58857036,0.00008769597,0.0000977024,0.000039517385,0.0008871094,0.000067678695,0.000050676732,0.00012381366,0.41007546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950671,0.00014007266,0.001777077,0.0013221627,0.0003536868,0.0013398863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735796,0.00047330014,0.0007481244,0.0007838585,0.0003205078,0.0003162529],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006654304,0.0005314947,0.0012079593,0.0018824368,0.0005143119,0.0002815231,0.00082331756,0.00056994683,0.004442508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005212873,0.0006373856,0.0003749811,0.000602079,0.00046446297,0.00028293917,0.00029425762,0.0023082334,0.0036640256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007053335,0.00007648491,0.0017425364,0.00013147402,0.00012246433,0.0004168282,0.00015107602,0.000020217953,0.000015077263,0.994604,0.0025212239,0.00012808185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022984766,0.0007977169,0.00088927464,0.0015783769,0.000020309399,0.00023434615,0.0002960247,0.0022035935,0.000034686796,0.61475784,0.37515986,0.0017294656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009900259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071667237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5736733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036311525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033991298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971278755","doi":"","title":"Efficient and Thrifty Voting by Any Means Necessary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neural Information Processing Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Distortion (music); Social choice theory; Pareto principle; Computer science; Anti-plurality voting; Mathematical economics; Majority rule; Social Welfare; Pareto efficiency; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.01461270378024442,"score_gpt":0.20387383084491287,"score_spread":0.18926112706466844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971278755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96543264,0.0024691883,0.004896344,0.00016983869,0.0010274263,0.00044492964,0.000060544287,0.00016300866,0.025336076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885637,0.0000039891606,0.000030023653,0.0002161826,0.00006360589,0.000017300168,0.000024967952,0.00001362116,0.00077394454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985534,0.000029685678,0.00086432474,0.00020468283,0.00007448566,0.0002733992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989181,0.000042338124,0.0007526793,0.00015755964,0.00005663887,0.00007264934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095625373,0.00016202166,0.00033480334,0.00015222705,0.00018832806,0.000485703,0.00015072775,0.00010274334,0.00002279916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060245897,0.00016177515,0.000040125098,0.00020815185,0.000033615426,0.00096705405,0.000038355072,0.00015004087,0.00049668684],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014886438,0.0001988422,0.37524936,0.0130978655,0.00014260838,0.0000027205308,0.03052442,0.13344604,0.0009846401,0.42040423,0.0077832197,0.018017182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006411161,0.000060914183,0.0020690195,0.00026003737,0.0000040613804,0.00003757633,0.0015983806,0.9746266,0.00005239345,0.00013354057,0.020165492,0.00035083844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009083985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5015477e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043277032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011110811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6596999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972474670","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_25","title":"Fair Division with Subsidy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Fair division; Computer science; Conjecture; Constructive; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Constructive proof; Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.021127805267941606,"score_gpt":0.20484925860505374,"score_spread":0.18372145333711212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972474670","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033786844,0.0006496002,0.9464765,0.00015503395,0.0015452655,0.00032426734,0.000021760405,0.000057110447,0.047391776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884803,0.000012610491,0.0065618274,0.00032752161,0.0002497099,0.0000024426042,0.000005564227,0.000039771294,0.0039525153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802333,0.0000089757295,0.00047065242,0.0009888788,0.0001233024,0.0003848392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850965,0.00019475345,0.00041100013,0.00076314405,0.00004817471,0.000073260286],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010565224,0.00031276396,0.0005888393,0.00053163833,0.00010991334,0.00018965328,0.0008557634,0.00022358933,0.000121810386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042790012,0.00028048625,0.00008308552,0.00021832164,0.00032312976,0.00020224364,0.00022187625,0.00046076722,0.00081790844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030069887,0.000046370213,0.015740262,0.0001898502,0.000038946408,0.000048408732,0.001335349,0.036883947,0.000020328476,0.87781537,0.00003147124,0.06781961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010245522,0.00084729906,0.0050494303,0.0015121436,0.000009443412,0.000072426585,8.090882e-7,0.08317455,0.00028676642,0.88589406,0.020156687,0.0019718565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031982985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035916284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98546934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014635504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086283006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979339169","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2020.105103","title":"Monotonic norms and orthogonal issues in multidimensional voting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Monotonic function; Voting; Orthant; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Normality; Incentive compatibility; Basis (linear algebra); Marginal distribution; Incentive; Norm (philosophy); Orthogonal basis; Econometrics; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Microeconomics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02909780774738415,"score_gpt":0.23564034955775817,"score_spread":0.20654254181037401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979339169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928104,0.0036655616,0.00045116278,0.0009628244,0.00039438697,0.000072965035,0.000016805854,0.00000816073,0.0016177249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984914,0.000109048095,0.00050498155,0.00031132487,0.00038203332,0.0000011744067,7.2909717e-7,0.000018332057,0.0001809619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847907,0.00006674748,0.0010397764,0.00020473283,0.000020069612,0.00018962262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987445,0.00023130183,0.0007997202,0.00008324967,0.000014491858,0.00012673928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023470507,0.00012864154,0.0005319194,0.00017006429,0.00004245308,0.0000349873,0.00016301582,0.00007332382,0.00020134822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002302868,0.0001305958,0.00011740408,0.000050389557,0.000049963102,0.00029954116,0.00005565601,0.00026761656,0.00014993623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013867852,0.000026564714,0.08667806,0.00002686615,0.000058413225,0.00001707634,0.0012781662,0.0012080526,0.000118081996,0.9098641,0.000112572896,0.00047333183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009550162,0.0011093412,0.16527212,0.00045798236,0.00004682254,0.0006576453,0.0032911184,0.0445913,0.0010383597,0.7239603,0.048393432,0.0016314508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010609571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006192484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18590388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007327918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003085611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5325542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980153177","doi":"10.1007/s11127-019-00723-2","title":"The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Truncation (statistics); Ranked voting system; Voting; Turnout; Condorcet method; Spoilt vote; Public finance; Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Group voting ticket; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.031795294941642,"score_gpt":0.2340985627719292,"score_spread":0.20230326783028718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980153177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97746235,0.0021362188,0.000052564403,0.0015946017,0.00033387824,0.0002503464,0.000017368126,0.00001831995,0.01813434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964955,0.00018220706,0.000014034773,0.000058159007,0.000043897875,0.000026366903,0.0000015741502,0.0000063584926,0.0031719166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991183,0.000054685846,0.00040397048,0.00021652502,0.000031641892,0.00017486143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987028,0.00073298643,0.0002730561,0.00022006265,0.00003853395,0.0000325549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013479405,0.00007071876,0.00017123189,0.00011314784,0.00008679925,0.000081381964,0.00020063015,0.000049214177,0.00010071095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009846359,0.00006412493,0.000029960476,0.0003086114,0.00011182602,0.00027765438,0.000025692196,0.00010778286,0.00007820736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034273448,0.000018294899,0.65996945,0.00006841311,0.000011015943,2.9139319e-8,0.00014838265,0.0000046430623,0.00013933427,0.33938846,0.000034438566,0.00021414761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004924697,0.00005206477,0.905958,0.000037993825,0.00000350142,0.0000050207022,0.000082568076,0.0006685337,0.00009604992,0.015776275,0.07669101,0.00013651888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007205941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003703438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32361218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036793157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002591765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2614939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987569717","doi":"","title":"(Originally published in Public Choice (1994) 80: 23-34) - Efficiency and consistency in group decisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group (periodic table); Axiom; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Normative; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Choice function; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.0491774495444998,"score_gpt":0.2779465599993463,"score_spread":0.22876911045484652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987569717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69643676,0.26799333,0.0006837105,0.00070936023,0.00035304402,0.00050981145,0.000088390276,0.000021421618,0.03320416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685504,0.022428371,0.00018760066,0.00020372536,0.00005916302,0.000036387388,0.0000378977,0.000014762544,0.00017705328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996736,0.00013866459,0.002114614,0.00050350087,0.000038268146,0.00046896268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768025,0.0005177624,0.0009854669,0.00062516617,0.000020770141,0.00017057668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061981757,0.00021484894,0.0016352697,0.0013392061,0.00005298317,0.00007065692,0.00038783692,0.00010446738,0.0008849186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011377864,0.00022665635,0.0003629762,0.0013420609,0.00009875134,0.00075786293,0.000088444984,0.00017764834,0.00021283227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022014517,0.00011741038,0.7222055,0.00037080323,0.00016126953,5.149767e-7,0.00007463751,0.000031195326,7.154474e-7,0.276257,0.00009428663,0.0006844553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019311082,0.00011899403,0.84160703,0.003047304,0.0006327692,0.000018957757,0.000334001,0.008752013,0.0000031376803,0.015904956,0.12624319,0.0014065477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012859913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011471917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28041828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026173858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040602583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9689238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989816480","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4061513","title":"The Art of Compromising: Voting with Interdependent Values and the Flag of the Weimar Republic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flag (linear algebra); Weimar Republic; Voting; Interdependence; Political science; Law; Art; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field","score_opus":0.008680888999261765,"score_gpt":0.18815374054346154,"score_spread":0.17947285154419979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989816480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98284435,0.0072820056,0.001248823,0.0026946436,0.0003214802,0.00021518121,0.000006318516,0.0000069333437,0.005380244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752575,0.00019261865,0.000007289044,0.000035965884,0.00006222922,0.0000053751864,3.44193e-7,0.000012741209,0.0021576965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983947,0.00031435722,0.0005382414,0.0001282054,0.00008991084,0.0005345302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985329,0.00021076322,0.0009681168,0.0002375868,0.000033129305,0.000017530889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117804175,0.00008479103,0.00024031222,0.000051970106,0.0007174341,0.000059248283,0.00052281946,0.00001560197,0.000018388333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013075939,0.000043856562,0.00011518367,0.00015531192,0.00022967748,0.000059556194,0.00016087003,0.0009952863,0.0000020256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013899025,0.00002348332,0.008828485,0.000007787077,0.00018328267,2.0758036e-7,0.001095435,0.00017659322,0.000017964589,0.98869306,0.000055844335,0.00077887514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029157097,0.0005691387,0.0065231714,0.00006582378,0.00004521976,0.00090931763,0.014524484,0.0024136838,0.00012799841,0.964987,0.0067202616,0.00019821603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051290277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079487356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023706077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000144765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5517996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994066772","doi":"10.1145/3391403.3399447","title":"One Dollar Each Eliminates Envy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Subsidy; Liberian dollar; Valuation (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Conjecture; Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.10560137355128887,"score_gpt":0.23643737719131766,"score_spread":0.1308360036400288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994066772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17947307,0.007433895,0.023530973,0.0069849156,0.0041752215,0.0010759297,0.000538018,0.0007290601,0.7760589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884965,0.00014202791,0.0015427587,0.00042495818,0.00057425146,0.000040584422,0.00007335396,0.00005250383,0.008653086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979792,0.00003994551,0.00084909983,0.0007880084,0.000039202692,0.00030451478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998588,0.00007969619,0.0005374555,0.00064228906,0.000026358259,0.00012619086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008789717,0.00027501426,0.0008672005,0.00015330147,0.000067918845,0.00015973487,0.0005685245,0.00038221426,0.0011687108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021532117,0.00034738504,0.0002554578,0.00011455172,0.000046546815,0.00005736535,0.000552777,0.0005813458,0.005881264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015987687,0.00008569466,0.0039937925,0.00048442077,0.00018850104,0.0000049648133,0.0008485999,0.00012664539,0.00003720931,0.9910688,0.002380238,0.0007651735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004803997,0.000103918326,0.006596243,0.00019731717,0.000031022955,0.0000034878094,0.00021018246,0.0024578825,0.000800586,0.9049642,0.08303568,0.001119072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031392713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012268047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80902344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006693075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002238041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995340000","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83508-8_29","title":"Graph Pricing with Limited Supply","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Graph; Set (abstract data type); Revenue; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.023095000448197196,"score_gpt":0.2192333970610218,"score_spread":0.1961383966128246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995340000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34616256,0.000727997,0.65119576,0.00025295193,0.0012896947,0.00018335073,0.000008421485,0.000048478978,0.00013078345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363022,0.000020222002,0.062963255,0.0004268256,0.00023679614,0.000015591071,0.00001016512,0.000021169404,0.0000038137364],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975111,0.000046305868,0.00055928074,0.001266873,0.000111061825,0.00050536485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982887,0.00021306737,0.0004156309,0.0009073106,0.000085646265,0.00008963794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015727297,0.00029554858,0.0006243226,0.00069204,0.0001488361,0.0006012858,0.0010342894,0.00020610307,0.000029181163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018526107,0.000287498,0.00009916819,0.0014358893,0.0003061715,0.00018997828,0.0007261258,0.0007615071,0.00002182135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026504014,0.00017570678,0.207337,0.0004172902,0.000065274326,0.00012227491,0.008998112,0.74096096,0.00014467472,0.009542271,0.000007370576,0.032202568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011744652,0.00037665997,0.08786918,0.002891855,0.000017600887,0.00017001895,0.000017680406,0.65774035,0.0056702024,0.24151261,0.00020772846,0.0023516316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028698155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011124262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5901396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015214976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014580443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996165100","doi":"10.3390/g11010002","title":"A Condorcet Jury Theorem for Large Poisson Elections with Multiple Alternatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Simple (philosophy); Voting; Population; Poisson distribution; Majority rule; State (computer science); Private information retrieval; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017880539866079438,"score_gpt":0.22570683618544982,"score_spread":0.20782629631937038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996165100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96599185,0.00045274128,0.009329436,0.00015419887,0.00040447648,0.00051184546,0.0002637778,0.00007378303,0.022817882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852968,0.000010395228,0.00033353778,0.00011352607,0.000110924266,0.000066253284,0.000016806633,0.000024466979,0.014027325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.000018033235,0.00022927264,0.00027369097,0.000019779949,0.0002550279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993564,0.00016921229,0.00019023402,0.00022026578,0.000026794018,0.000037104528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004693819,0.00010926514,0.00026717933,0.00009938436,0.00007843225,0.00004702226,0.00013244148,0.000047750513,0.00023624681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008860852,0.000100244666,0.000079195444,0.0000946162,0.000023008834,0.00012375007,0.000016782467,0.00007631645,0.0004621397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087359236,0.00006324293,0.15543026,0.000046358575,0.00007876907,4.2374165e-7,0.0010344783,0.000036351797,0.00018033682,0.8424636,0.00039536937,0.00018345227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009555731,0.0014406355,0.092809245,0.00019789759,0.000030367986,0.00003529713,0.0026809934,0.013165723,0.00576788,0.18187541,0.69116944,0.0012713835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037380694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002881255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025961735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009122391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5940025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997772410","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5593","title":"Can We Predict the Election Outcome from Sampled Votes?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Cardinal voting systems; Majority rule; Group decision-making; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Scoring rule; Distribution (mathematics); Social choice theory; Decision rule; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.16506886823427117,"score_gpt":0.27537087784088154,"score_spread":0.11030200960661038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997772410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250865,0.00016235086,0.0033445954,0.05275259,0.0011034018,0.00080507185,0.00020760173,0.00013920877,0.016398698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985998,0.00003576976,0.000073159536,0.0006764961,0.00029473018,0.0000247348,0.0000017700103,0.00001961922,0.00027389303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982171,0.000018193809,0.0009150728,0.0004499919,0.000111397,0.0002882684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986419,0.0001482289,0.00076666294,0.00021213193,0.00014137341,0.00008971977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068756787,0.00020302905,0.00039278262,0.00006036165,0.00022742302,0.000168424,0.0010179166,0.00010013665,0.00036181218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012178266,0.0001458819,0.00016574521,0.0004484908,0.00019821958,0.00013167264,0.00012620396,0.0003815283,0.00037508694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010343058,0.000050385235,0.013500344,0.00003814827,0.000040989766,1.2888454e-7,0.0040722145,0.000041072613,0.004091947,0.97442687,0.00021776398,0.0034167154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006901874,0.0002688741,0.002465602,0.00013526861,0.000020536998,0.000001539149,0.0023010024,0.02553938,0.0844977,0.8823952,0.0019610475,0.0003448355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053232035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041731582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09203166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004675004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024544794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5948891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997834681","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5592","title":"The Surprising Power of Hiding Information in Facility Location","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Facility location problem; Novelty; Computer science; Line (geometry); Power (physics); Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10162766712006609,"score_gpt":0.25519604405802315,"score_spread":0.15356837693795705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997834681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803373,0.00005760133,0.0032956712,0.0023798996,0.0002454727,0.00032254777,0.000019280313,0.000018042343,0.013324181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998292,0.000016915728,0.00003303224,0.00007368647,0.000014962784,0.0000069192697,5.5693107e-7,0.0000033517538,0.000021408869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868935,0.000011760689,0.0009096778,0.00015726792,0.00007640744,0.00015554548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.00009494503,0.0007435665,0.00011548004,0.000215469,0.00003086573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013076387,0.000095113086,0.00021773847,0.00006796756,0.00010275646,0.00008830458,0.00048329888,0.000056333276,0.00003358994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016574088,0.00007381714,0.0000593865,0.0004626382,0.00014447654,0.00035462377,0.000071847724,0.00017208444,0.00011982835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008335906,0.000023604387,0.005326897,0.00007411937,0.000006587519,1.699476e-8,0.007024623,0.00020999537,0.0014318769,0.9812822,0.000021525506,0.004515229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013248346,0.00038168285,0.008513707,0.00056515355,0.000009128604,0.0000015695557,0.019355308,0.06394298,0.3353428,0.56949437,0.0017566447,0.0005041754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010779516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006611793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4117878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003500316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002289643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30101752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003353436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.005","title":"Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Anonymity; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Population; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Finite set; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05804514265662339,"score_gpt":0.216264277127635,"score_spread":0.1582191344710116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003353436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96998847,0.00027664343,0.010034343,0.0034019458,0.00016326336,0.00008451999,0.00001605241,0.000011563308,0.016023211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965531,0.00009067875,0.0022982412,0.00070889725,0.00024836554,8.5573555e-7,2.8074567e-7,0.000016855816,0.00008268385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867857,0.000016315445,0.0009967801,0.0001411997,0.000018904308,0.00014826297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874747,0.00017436531,0.0007545333,0.00009579642,0.000019236759,0.00020860152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093827385,0.000108369044,0.0005661696,0.00006948868,0.000035263798,0.00008241385,0.00020082033,0.0000702969,0.00022463675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043688712,0.0001071665,0.0001306137,0.000046411966,0.00006424922,0.00023967435,0.00007284534,0.0001819696,0.0002505311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006723499,0.00009577504,0.0061289747,0.00023675791,0.00013728582,0.000009230289,0.0013685322,0.00011535266,0.00006728891,0.99023646,0.00077299203,0.00076410593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014494872,0.00042894768,0.0017463204,0.00008125281,0.000028379543,0.0002603068,0.00036642898,0.011451994,0.00031061034,0.97163904,0.011884259,0.00035295667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011167921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.4977174e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026564684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002984056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012183209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004178692","doi":"10.1007/s11750-020-00539-0","title":"Sharing pollution permits under welfare upper bounds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Top","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Production (economics); Welfare; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Computer science; Economics; Game theory; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053221146046040065,"score_gpt":0.2280521492269449,"score_spread":0.17483100318090483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004178692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86508423,0.0008546271,0.0018761687,0.013187012,0.00052725757,0.00011624083,0.00004263047,0.00013825066,0.11817357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951651,0.000005268789,0.00004402223,0.0011198183,0.00025973126,0.000004497119,0.0000060518496,0.000015571872,0.003379914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992784,0.000008225689,0.0002542068,0.0002631119,0.000019000816,0.0001770356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965626,0.000006412473,0.00009657274,0.0001591405,0.000008586781,0.00007302421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002226114,0.000082442755,0.00017879406,0.00004777883,0.00011920553,0.00006390161,0.00015488965,0.000062171755,0.0010816979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004950092,0.00009573878,0.00006772595,0.00012816468,0.000019104622,0.000121620484,0.00004861236,0.00009580515,0.0017184434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007682328,0.00001076676,0.024861662,0.00002608344,0.000015989453,0.0000013996782,0.0008538251,0.00013767528,0.000042200027,0.9733977,0.0003619364,0.00028311665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013859731,0.00019569283,0.17761925,0.000054971722,0.000015896008,0.000019896574,0.0015363418,0.01028472,0.00039065024,0.10055227,0.7069982,0.0009460823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056885474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020688565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8728454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004186206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040729005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004404810","doi":"10.1257/aer.20171553","title":"Strategyproof Choice of Social Acts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Valuation (finance); Social choice theory; Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Social preferences; Economics; Yield (engineering); Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.0778355414064034,"score_gpt":0.28731683910578487,"score_spread":0.20948129769938145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004404810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3970876,0.09905492,0.00059644633,0.021459753,0.0007608538,0.0016861239,0.0005276731,0.00021656342,0.47861007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274486,0.004014494,0.00007611916,0.0026987526,0.00023538357,0.00001727166,0.000008762313,0.000023271017,0.00018109582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847823,0.00004739015,0.0009198431,0.00033469324,0.000015433798,0.00020441622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984337,0.00006273346,0.0011860044,0.00020954463,0.000010852238,0.00009712843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047321137,0.00014409577,0.0010136691,0.00003605427,0.000038141592,0.000016687498,0.00030744376,0.000027621412,0.0008265992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012442755,0.00016501224,0.00020993497,0.00015567192,0.00014732909,0.00012334021,0.00004046729,0.0001022457,0.0020165525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024952722,0.00007408016,0.02239393,0.0042773164,0.00029022427,0.0000022181916,0.00094968796,0.0000431639,0.00005919843,0.9200372,0.01506398,0.036784057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040320563,0.0002485957,0.011499616,0.00029922125,0.0000345398,0.0000031035504,0.00014341495,0.00025585474,0.00006884969,0.0023652865,0.98418397,0.000494348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013228878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056737604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96911997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004715014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028430379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815998","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.14","title":"A market with asymmetric information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02685134156739029,"score_gpt":0.19193291076519584,"score_spread":0.16508156919780553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002470741,0.00069672655,0.00031127286,0.0011454961,0.0004588162,0.00088884146,0.00021301954,0.00007341835,0.9962099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003458495,0.000039658487,0.0003101188,0.0027016862,0.00018415309,0.000051359293,0.00022694538,0.000085069914,0.9929425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982633,0.000014881709,0.00086724304,0.000484142,0.000093884526,0.00027653095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788374,0.00006567321,0.0011969663,0.0005812372,0.000077423465,0.00019495108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010657683,0.00036445385,0.00080485275,0.00054225,0.00011612289,0.0031948094,0.0011825756,0.00033097618,0.0076354477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016057337,0.00037885687,0.00013707716,0.00017467912,0.00007173219,0.006381081,0.00030497924,0.00047997377,0.0051180194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057249705,0.000005176875,0.00009564102,0.00006332267,0.0001272409,0.000004776906,0.00011469587,0.0000025168742,9.971091e-9,0.6467965,0.35139713,0.0013356943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005916281,0.00013206217,0.00006685493,0.000110926936,0.000016354728,0.000009673417,0.000045672205,0.00006004145,4.577145e-7,0.031442944,0.9670243,0.00049907464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014359113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009720282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61562717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018338986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010748253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011381676","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200148","title":"Robust Minimal Instability of the Top Trading Cycles Mechanism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Context (archaeology); Instability; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Chemistry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.028557931287384195,"score_gpt":0.20739042509999828,"score_spread":0.17883249381261407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011381676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99128705,0.00031444145,0.0004398946,0.00079652405,0.002650316,0.0002379595,0.00038991746,0.000021161748,0.0038627482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834144,0.000040825198,0.0006519379,0.00037096484,0.00023256776,0.000017805201,0.0000036190415,0.000050817318,0.00029004453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724597,0.00016931279,0.0016131764,0.00046764378,0.000032276213,0.0004715982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964725,0.00016708557,0.0026128402,0.0006049707,0.000016163538,0.00012646991],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024782622,0.0002492011,0.0008388618,0.0002501833,0.0006243925,0.00009719919,0.0011232834,0.00004439654,0.0014301518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005818225,0.00026944844,0.00048948993,0.00014799567,0.00036726816,0.00026115286,0.0003359072,0.00061864406,0.000090690126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023497366,0.00031229437,0.37871602,0.00004381058,0.0005502624,0.0000047204467,0.0035144768,0.018832,0.0007477281,0.59135586,0.0017836702,0.0039042025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007153769,0.0017888792,0.18621983,0.00009088235,0.00017812291,0.0024268338,0.034250334,0.025159229,0.0043784226,0.5427827,0.19154672,0.0040242546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034283136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029535475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19249618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010682218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015022678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011676169","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.13","title":"Equilibrium with prices and expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Keynesian economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.044080131349965704,"score_gpt":0.21523516608360954,"score_spread":0.17115503473364385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011676169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007058945,0.0032186084,0.00007014462,0.0018739025,0.00023664659,0.00060822617,0.00012870759,0.000056204204,0.993737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014741266,0.000028130473,0.00047996384,0.00092953705,0.00020516026,0.000052114578,0.00010328281,0.00011221308,0.9833483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985548,0.000008185994,0.00049647404,0.00068222,0.000049591577,0.00020871457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987095,0.00006304907,0.00062405725,0.0003949684,0.000037926115,0.00017051201],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031876063,0.00028506562,0.00063849916,0.00015939992,0.000086844186,0.002272791,0.00066563167,0.00019500997,0.0019768248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004870168,0.0002950398,0.00006887345,0.000051421586,0.00012790921,0.002248331,0.00028461375,0.0002865912,0.0007756769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026331214,0.0000069901434,0.00014278268,0.000055634326,0.00014475027,0.000009434964,0.0005531065,0.0000016648587,7.0469923e-7,0.94187874,0.05704584,0.00013404366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038842656,0.00011877789,0.000038123333,0.00009854297,0.0000176554,0.000009655489,0.00022726145,0.000026422289,0.0000019396687,0.05390202,0.94474024,0.00043095608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061150626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001627843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056650675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006130944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017127111","doi":"10.1007/s40670-020-00955-8","title":"A Primer on the Game Theory Behind the National Resident Matching Program for the Medical Educator and Student","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Science Educator","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Game theory; Underpinning; Computer science; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07173140329398577,"score_gpt":0.34560759973260136,"score_spread":0.2738761964386156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017127111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7716635,0.00083984894,0.00029773757,0.22255483,0.0016734113,0.0010530642,0.0000130402195,0.000035206827,0.0018693357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838453,0.000027994682,0.0000377507,0.013826628,0.0015485536,0.00038368188,7.4367716e-7,0.0000124312455,0.00031691176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997803,0.0001225999,0.00046134615,0.0004786289,0.0007299269,0.000404505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590075,0.0031670942,0.00020002475,0.00024539206,0.000052309526,0.00043443972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01497568,0.00014101432,0.00020612069,0.000050124654,0.00079414394,0.00029505536,0.0015746269,0.00007758741,0.00094150705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011505227,0.00006728876,0.00008400486,0.00030851254,0.0014250434,0.000098365395,0.00021847736,0.00044223797,0.00015430452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026360853,0.00020601749,0.0046204044,0.00001964599,0.00003991075,9.133809e-7,0.0155258505,0.0000023625119,0.0000051178367,0.9665855,0.0067450935,0.0062228013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015007881,0.00086857745,0.14053248,0.0003311989,0.000052058484,0.00008775963,0.039720397,0.005219553,0.00020554887,0.23168145,0.57892376,0.0008764359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005039576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000933287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73490405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008120294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000784251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021016936","doi":"","title":"Choosing and Sharing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Mechanism (biology); Nash equilibrium; Outcome (game theory); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Control (management); Host (biology); Computer science; Economics; Operations research; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.07898217500931276,"score_gpt":0.3178977305531532,"score_spread":0.23891555554384042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021016936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67693347,0.0014148063,0.000029305778,0.00011782394,0.00071790727,0.00045827514,0.00005770474,0.00004826597,0.32022247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097985,0.0039763465,0.0004130881,0.000068110945,0.000412731,0.000062874584,0.000021736663,0.00008454994,0.0039807246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638015,0.0000725145,0.0012167982,0.0013449889,0.000059413414,0.00092611957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796325,0.00036632,0.00042997953,0.0009896122,0.000038617167,0.00021224718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008087655,0.00032010375,0.0008432517,0.0010996952,0.00019184612,0.00034849573,0.000694726,0.00057972904,0.00011478721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005434064,0.0004264749,0.00014943483,0.00014770348,0.00025713403,0.00013617982,0.0014115772,0.0018704085,0.00008077233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017747066,0.00028768898,0.48453256,0.0014709884,0.00033441168,0.00010417868,0.003500043,0.0051168054,0.00005851638,0.35509214,0.00006854684,0.14925665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003270319,0.00027971523,0.14225936,0.0024689985,0.000018780922,0.00011303561,0.0024356397,0.06772878,0.00025312812,0.6177621,0.15963283,0.003777315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024977376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000099350545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006739075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006619725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022879908","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.09.006","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transitive relation; Corollary; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Norm (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Boundary (topology); Space (punctuation); Welfare economics; Economics; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.17108254771996245,"score_gpt":0.30214675550487113,"score_spread":0.13106420778490868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022879908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58215874,0.0006011119,0.027435973,0.032984946,0.00015667651,0.0012436352,0.00018202922,0.0007469921,0.35448986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603766,0.000092357004,0.0006898508,0.00009654582,0.00013226036,0.000005756221,0.000039810733,0.0000157974,0.03855103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666846,0.00037767662,0.00062428036,0.00094103225,0.00020552611,0.0011830119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674964,0.0004923266,0.0003320619,0.0012501932,0.00064266025,0.0005331353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005407779,0.0002099438,0.00042599256,0.0057089888,0.001426581,0.0004209153,0.0018077522,0.00019739788,0.00014005817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016545355,0.0002822209,0.0001850673,0.010549073,0.00028310064,0.0018795178,0.00019911597,0.0007741494,0.00062372314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003471671,0.00037770453,0.028410032,0.0000076582855,0.00003839194,0.0000099461695,0.00039582944,0.00007438344,0.00014269572,0.9667369,0.0027668606,0.0010048538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016954764,0.00053495,0.19305398,0.000028206463,0.00000730111,0.00002014552,0.0021202986,0.00094332197,0.0001248286,0.13676281,0.66416144,0.0005472594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024686055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001789774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8299741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006277392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014632205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024498238","doi":"10.3982/te4712","title":"Two‐stage majoritarian choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Arrow; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Rationality; Independence (probability theory); Social choice theory; Class (philosophy); Preference; Preference relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Transitive relation; Partition (number theory); Mathematics; Revealed preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02144223645004265,"score_gpt":0.22049943612462172,"score_spread":0.19905719967457908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024498238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66793066,0.00023109224,0.00067522697,0.0010146091,0.001304058,0.00022620354,0.00043264023,0.000109871806,0.32807562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444973,0.000011214812,0.00029752884,0.0008596637,0.00030228982,0.00006309554,0.00002899673,0.00005132473,0.0039361767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981938,0.00009254081,0.00071890093,0.00051411043,0.000025923631,0.0004547397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987424,0.0002494863,0.00028047158,0.0005669108,0.000009408307,0.00015133047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001958251,0.00019000887,0.00046087624,0.00015124996,0.0003718583,0.00008304592,0.00057470996,0.00005755181,0.014735044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015545987,0.00024844974,0.00017034718,0.00013749223,0.00027293322,0.00012817471,0.00030556653,0.0003790543,0.0015792645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035137284,0.00006913418,0.0034832098,0.000009698189,0.000034717053,0.0000032523978,0.00023268673,0.0011871948,0.000005948499,0.994658,0.00013725949,0.00014376633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008414336,0.00011428516,0.00051143084,0.0000023984633,0.0000058696824,0.00001767304,0.00031889544,0.0068698996,0.000026822512,0.8589258,0.13199776,0.0003676843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013293859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008833435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32651904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002357301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024475676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027093315","doi":"10.1257/mic.20180236","title":"Organizing Time Exchanges: Lessons from Matching Markets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Construct (python library); Preference; Mechanism (biology); Microeconomics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Business; Computer science; Industrial organization; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019011474141382986,"score_gpt":0.22916866006471714,"score_spread":0.21015718592333416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027093315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97535753,0.0022579737,0.0016528751,0.00273598,0.0018540635,0.000108334665,0.00045109692,0.000079403,0.015502765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98819834,0.001220864,0.0040034563,0.0015623487,0.0015126114,0.0000076255014,0.000060959344,0.00015428758,0.003279499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996754,0.00013349131,0.0015391951,0.0008178663,0.000024080746,0.0007313889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968104,0.0003428105,0.0018249163,0.0006543264,0.000042040152,0.00032552495],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013247492,0.0003989793,0.0012064477,0.0002793307,0.00036827388,0.0006027081,0.0006424051,0.00012372016,0.004827607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010340203,0.000534539,0.00036655157,0.00013742397,0.00020282944,0.0005628263,0.00021414943,0.0005763593,0.011914815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009180032,0.0014238355,0.23651975,0.00024707842,0.010047302,0.0013271138,0.028826281,0.0061932374,0.05016397,0.46804553,0.07194598,0.12434191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052626706,0.00030340208,0.03574542,0.0003866933,0.00018148472,0.0044679567,0.014683532,0.003825721,0.008466893,0.34865895,0.5730232,0.004994078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060093816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009810947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50107723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008938419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019524114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029111965","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2432","title":"Best of Both Worlds: Ex Ante and Ex Post Fairness in Resource Allocation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Ask price; Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12477275911177432,"score_gpt":0.34701947911234854,"score_spread":0.22224672000057422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029111965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823618,0.0003112174,0.00011191489,0.0012577919,0.000045612705,0.00027080596,0.00005153309,0.0000152559105,0.015574084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834975,0.00010604229,0.00005608144,0.000015027932,0.00004119945,0.000030591254,0.000034967397,0.000012247467,0.016206361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998982,0.00012383907,0.00036986015,0.00023957614,0.00006223113,0.00022248336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994379,0.00015943243,0.00003056281,0.0002474229,0.000082676794,0.000042002146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033021811,0.000057366782,0.00016798702,0.00071552204,0.00013966103,0.0000933487,0.00015472293,0.0000556828,0.00009569392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046063634,0.000064592336,0.000019483054,0.0010393444,0.00010402309,0.00016173955,0.000076766075,0.00016767408,0.00059403054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059125352,0.0002566755,0.0835023,0.0002291854,0.00003201497,0.000010305898,0.009060663,0.0064881546,0.0049539036,0.8910494,0.0014659598,0.0028923345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004042346,0.0010986709,0.5347097,0.0011007331,0.0000088760835,0.00002699282,0.031238992,0.27633092,0.0029554148,0.025949452,0.1212508,0.001287127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015105092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011425995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8650999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004071722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029565286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7635259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030978499","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.12505","title":"How Many Freemasons Are There? The Consensus Voting Mechanism in Metric Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Voting; Metric space; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Bounding overwatch; Group (periodic table); Unit sphere; Metric (unit); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Data mining; Physics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11982029349505405,"score_gpt":0.17567857264546877,"score_spread":0.05585827915041472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030978499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95555294,0.0011346076,0.029007042,0.003171629,0.0011257121,0.0006598895,0.0002476133,0.00015795647,0.008942617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965965,0.00012276838,0.00009545887,0.0001022488,0.00016053845,0.0000026625664,0.00000788545,0.000044921177,0.0028669916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786603,0.00020416996,0.00039245706,0.0010704484,0.000032610275,0.00043429306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762934,0.00036093863,0.0011044237,0.00074226724,0.000044571425,0.00011844957],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010603806,0.00037571666,0.00078278955,0.0005040095,0.00019043664,0.00025316456,0.0010293731,0.00036671406,0.00006585266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043331363,0.0003941358,0.00031239062,0.0009592996,0.00012579602,0.00009059513,0.0007118042,0.00097169686,0.00026738623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000221004,0.000039283444,0.031779855,0.0001437158,0.00013737229,0.00024840556,0.00033124507,0.008530717,0.0000069492366,0.9585851,0.0001573581,0.000017887112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010563938,0.00006545643,0.014233433,0.00033052734,0.00008864003,0.000010723749,0.00541993,0.14529161,0.000067982655,0.82995725,0.0023697715,0.0011082718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069328566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028219845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13676089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021103391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003976306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037647357","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1604.05771","title":"Multidimensional matching","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Monopoly; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09598282321915978,"score_gpt":0.172917010683524,"score_spread":0.07693418746436421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037647357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8746607,0.00022807765,0.08128083,0.00009782747,0.0015999847,0.00020840451,0.00021851461,0.00014733279,0.041558344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98467845,0.00004716766,0.00013716306,0.000060669114,0.00020350267,7.6370605e-7,0.000015322406,0.00003205956,0.014824901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840736,0.00005500046,0.00035240938,0.0008601888,0.000015362533,0.00030965696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985803,0.000112100555,0.00050728815,0.00064915896,0.000036098805,0.000115084425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006138527,0.00025156347,0.0004719513,0.00024130406,0.00012859175,0.000034236476,0.00044852853,0.00030280338,0.0005035663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046643025,0.0002873209,0.00025604572,0.000117831056,0.00008096842,0.00013628582,0.0005449901,0.00036714316,0.0032177006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024797446,0.000038293027,0.010360426,0.00006054751,0.000088301924,0.00004951752,0.00014345777,0.007987373,0.00002107921,0.98099273,0.00020769598,0.000025762269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060734607,0.00002051826,0.002472366,0.00021895884,0.000017739956,0.00000401407,0.0000691217,0.008979599,0.00003694448,0.981497,0.005499531,0.0005768569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016209162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007180705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11001776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017694816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030195402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040226918","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3287477","title":"Endogenous Political Rules: A Rationalization Based on Policy Importance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Status quo; Legislature; Rationalization (economics); Majority rule; Politics; Status quo bias; Microeconomics; Economics; Preference; Public economics; Decision rule; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026054582288936267,"score_gpt":0.24114420177634968,"score_spread":0.21508961948741342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040226918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52362114,0.0020529686,0.1942613,0.0066427747,0.0011669178,0.0005027869,0.00011176444,0.00016274996,0.2714776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607694,0.00005076248,0.000071220646,0.00091242394,0.0017753041,0.0000058409964,0.000011832429,0.000025215939,0.001070485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975858,0.000054541553,0.00049476925,0.0002272472,0.00006532175,0.0015723723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992724,0.000054137745,0.00030556132,0.00020104006,0.000064012886,0.0001028222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087062,0.00012973826,0.00021073598,0.00027899098,0.00026929946,0.000072091105,0.00020658443,0.00007968442,0.00018714154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034687688,0.00013614523,0.00010344937,0.0002048261,0.00007541713,0.00011943271,0.000009826498,0.000503005,0.0008106412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034666125,0.00005749747,0.009510867,0.0000038035475,0.000028952725,0.0000012500112,0.00007802168,0.000035466393,0.000024860685,0.9900123,0.00002942984,0.00018291653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000610545,0.00050357584,0.00093902217,0.000016122629,0.0000041206404,0.00018771121,0.00014888892,0.0021787826,0.000080019374,0.9915646,0.00359269,0.00017397315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090556765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065840766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4724558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011186888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008124559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043086594","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16675","title":"Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Matching (statistics); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Social Welfare; Combinatorics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.09629689056889318,"score_gpt":0.26726188080499436,"score_spread":0.17096499023610118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043086594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558188,0.00048526647,0.0006326147,0.009081913,0.0016675539,0.0007539596,0.00025619112,0.00010011437,0.031203628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817795,0.00015388208,0.00023845093,0.00017088115,0.00030905023,0.000063682666,0.000011255793,0.00005516392,0.0008196953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671006,0.000031980853,0.0014497337,0.0011182299,0.0001941601,0.000495859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731505,0.00008176097,0.0017063662,0.0003994189,0.00038853707,0.00010888221],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014825403,0.0005253992,0.0011011433,0.00021806567,0.0004895259,0.0006757455,0.0014962626,0.000523989,0.00046122668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005941229,0.00051495316,0.00035333773,0.0003231371,0.00049462664,0.00023426327,0.0012788762,0.0010950478,0.00009855962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007072576,0.00012968082,0.0020108665,0.00060699636,0.000089264875,0.0000012257742,0.004798166,0.000021344384,0.0009836978,0.98659027,0.000094623894,0.0046031643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011757641,0.00014507769,0.0038779948,0.0013989846,0.00007438497,0.000018638832,0.0075794677,0.0041250773,0.03695145,0.94180703,0.0025240502,0.0013802554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045377063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034999444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0447832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009400576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007323648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046510065","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_19","title":"Descending the Stable Matching Lattice: How Many Strategic Agents Are Required to Turn Pessimality to Optimality?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Infimum and supremum; Combinatorics; Conjecture; Lattice (music); Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Stable marriage problem; Girl; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0933094145277734,"score_gpt":0.2900169059499457,"score_spread":0.1967074914221723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046510065","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47102442,0.00020282158,0.5241649,0.0021782382,0.001891669,0.0003701777,0.0000342702,0.00003881817,0.00009466733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451818,0.00000622664,0.052975364,0.0013469177,0.0004004685,0.00003691633,0.000005975972,0.000027336739,0.0000190154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641526,0.00018111366,0.00071533857,0.001644003,0.00021519311,0.00082906894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974174,0.00030052208,0.00057729013,0.0013748368,0.000113780654,0.00021619341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005199662,0.00040150277,0.0007680156,0.00041629982,0.00044324753,0.0025576428,0.0021717823,0.00022017834,0.00003509654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004105185,0.00036991373,0.00014982258,0.0013192199,0.00015225021,0.00034325258,0.0021763844,0.0008834253,0.000047801477],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024788034,0.000117678646,0.026637783,0.000526381,0.000051144976,0.00007589281,0.014368589,0.9396463,0.00028859984,0.014414126,0.000022153787,0.003826554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005982154,0.00016817811,0.08194278,0.0034710353,0.000025956942,0.00006238903,0.0004102286,0.5890859,0.002372532,0.3190495,0.00028582232,0.0025274835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043892305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015442121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47415736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047462876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014505834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048600008","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01413-7","title":"Preference aggregation for couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Lexicographical order; Axiom; Revealed preference; Rank (graph theory); Preference elicitation; Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Preference theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07007172952497447,"score_gpt":0.24288671215823474,"score_spread":0.17281498263326028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048600008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825002,0.0016982863,0.0004873042,0.0033553415,0.0005792962,0.00038400744,0.0007046142,0.00006289063,0.0102280835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984141,0.0000091396005,0.000020039903,0.00012247596,0.00022252425,0.00011863872,0.0000407322,0.000009562747,0.0010428139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950546,0.000015348827,0.00016968943,0.00016851196,0.00002012476,0.000120847966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00004185612,0.00013605306,0.000057143483,0.000012937493,0.00001972082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035025924,0.000057032823,0.00013916468,0.000038535414,0.00080536277,0.000032597727,0.00008260999,0.00003181947,0.00022021892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005450916,0.00007167599,0.0000452687,0.00007561161,0.000021596868,0.00006529505,0.00003720855,0.00007027985,0.000009024022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012112254,0.000022838063,0.03089063,0.000055105374,0.000017740158,1.381212e-7,0.001483499,0.00001192904,0.0000075188796,0.96376264,0.0007971032,0.0029387705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007421523,0.00011976377,0.05686929,0.000005330793,0.000007893961,0.0000016437559,0.0021041753,0.0003790197,0.0000121545745,0.10331915,0.83619714,0.00024229854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012722032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014998975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031985503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046445602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61942804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082900654","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01283-x","title":"Representative Voting Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Voting; Mathematical economics; Markov perfect equilibrium; Economics; Markov chain; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Public finance; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Nash equilibrium; Macroeconomics; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055204845359337715,"score_gpt":0.25993486762734397,"score_spread":0.20473002226800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082900654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.908877,0.0013963986,0.00042049855,0.027506232,0.00028841125,0.0001997364,0.00012675996,0.00013586147,0.061049078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.000007496878,0.00002339374,0.0006868401,0.00065838895,0.000006458961,0.0000064663604,0.000012991764,0.00034437852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992991,0.000025345784,0.00023713647,0.00025963777,0.000020740019,0.00015802415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.00004202201,0.00015513772,0.000050357346,0.000014202769,0.00006462512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018749907,0.000085765605,0.00023054103,0.000024690864,0.0002742881,0.00005754143,0.000087264445,0.00006266944,0.00019619217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020882636,0.000099007484,0.00006154409,0.00012486012,0.000048453203,0.00012017334,0.000045242217,0.000115913725,0.00012751721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009616055,0.000012909967,0.19255278,0.00007990872,0.00004785305,0.0000026086025,0.012204377,0.0000030140818,0.00001853347,0.7921107,0.0019462309,0.0010114866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018358931,0.00018394132,0.45711812,0.00003658057,0.000025863457,0.000004322561,0.017579164,0.0007723651,0.000115876835,0.029796295,0.49162093,0.00091065344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016831247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061587893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011194044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027636065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40374082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083053135","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.52343","title":"Contractually Stable Networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; State University of New York; Northwestern University; Concordia University; Université Paris-Sud; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Simple (philosophy); Network structure; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Operations research; Economics; Engineering; Theoretical computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04675835153960043,"score_gpt":0.21607103838820596,"score_spread":0.16931268684860554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083053135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8906013,0.0025098373,0.025786793,0.00085836777,0.0008152574,0.00069994444,0.0005310948,0.000087006854,0.07811043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409027,0.00085484504,0.0008744576,0.00008199953,0.00016955523,6.8335646e-7,0.00009522404,0.000028190361,0.013804777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978462,0.0001463612,0.00052912364,0.000772433,0.00010345652,0.0006024415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978805,0.00020883542,0.00074017904,0.00082718796,0.0001340551,0.0002092136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002316205,0.00030681875,0.0010706668,0.00043113093,0.00022150735,0.00008041279,0.0010472384,0.00055380585,0.002330613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007068882,0.0004584095,0.0003657963,0.00022098036,0.00022337887,0.00028681205,0.0005153094,0.0009262224,0.00085524155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085982773,0.0013716589,0.054252762,0.0019085379,0.0019902186,0.00065111334,0.016699323,0.044681396,0.00015521763,0.813168,0.038767565,0.025494402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010550554,0.0018136069,0.31398162,0.002286386,0.00034377736,0.00008006397,0.011603444,0.14604242,0.00024726646,0.14571233,0.3607663,0.0065722526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026622205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038748235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6674557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015758842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090253656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083277177","doi":"10.1111/coin.12398","title":"Group recommendation with noisy subjective preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Majority rule; Computer science; Noise (video); Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09311460311899544,"score_gpt":0.2496705710176706,"score_spread":0.15655596789867515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083277177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08999835,0.000111160036,0.89566183,0.0011374047,0.00016036941,0.00016957117,0.000046902,0.00006984499,0.012644566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953948,0.0000057522357,0.003877999,0.00048055343,0.00009959369,0.000014258488,0.000054833425,0.000009852634,0.00006231777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919236,0.000027319182,0.0003257216,0.00030300472,0.000033150616,0.00011842856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.00016169462,0.00020953211,0.00006131767,0.000052776388,0.00006545749],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023953579,0.00009691943,0.00016753394,0.000053477408,0.000080059806,0.000057162848,0.00015347032,0.000033580007,0.00047519125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008456733,0.00009757602,0.000032599688,0.0002377162,0.00005203506,0.00018757132,0.000024710836,0.000102882266,0.00093540514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007071107,0.000047760863,0.021093631,0.00003236616,0.00004534546,0.0000013918445,0.002171613,0.026191782,0.0000046976043,0.9450689,0.00015181192,0.0051199696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027658537,0.0007272011,0.023738116,0.000058262438,0.000007217278,0.000013821156,0.0009797813,0.17633778,0.0003367903,0.7891304,0.007848577,0.00054548477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032791224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005494274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90539646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028753986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012377473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087195457","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16650","title":"Achieving Proportionality up to the Maximin Item with Indivisible Goods","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Minimax; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12997399483738775,"score_gpt":0.2795413397289091,"score_spread":0.14956734489152135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087195457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95796424,0.000074256175,0.002401357,0.008063294,0.0005451342,0.00049224304,0.000040827053,0.000040211587,0.030378435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971941,0.000010464098,0.00030640498,0.00032421414,0.00010831222,0.00004261675,0.0000013528374,0.000017048482,0.0019954648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983243,0.000019833735,0.0007255887,0.00047515376,0.000150953,0.0003041786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986278,0.00009577307,0.00058135827,0.00031353254,0.0003054764,0.00007609915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014950712,0.00018382208,0.0003323611,0.000084497166,0.00027710552,0.00022704543,0.0007908175,0.00007153903,0.00029448583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090393703,0.00012409964,0.000107804015,0.0007013229,0.00016777248,0.00016480582,0.00019416896,0.00028584496,0.0003293366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006392554,0.00007535005,0.015272127,0.000057150322,0.00003065776,4.5377763e-7,0.0020249502,0.00006236265,0.00140487,0.9773942,0.00013187362,0.0034820556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013970546,0.0006195543,0.027451394,0.0011923575,0.000046682388,0.000049812865,0.01018715,0.0038898208,0.396409,0.55022967,0.008753796,0.0010310392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066220535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036384714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42716455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049305327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068736714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50606364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087265189","doi":"10.22574/jmid.2020.12.004","title":"Matching with compatibility constraints: The case of the Canadian medical residency match","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; French; Matching (statistics); Compatibility (geochemistry); Medical school; Phenomenon; Population; Computer science; Mathematics education; Genealogy; Psychology; Mathematics; Medicine; Linguistics; Medical education; Sociology; Demography; Statistics; History; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05467545280419437,"score_gpt":0.22530027138302572,"score_spread":0.17062481857883136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087265189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77233213,0.00036168797,0.2175453,0.0067621153,0.00044167554,0.00027737333,0.00003171853,0.00000603096,0.0022419821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871045,0.00001826627,0.0006807848,0.0005049199,0.000072852534,8.152336e-7,1.02105176e-7,0.0000037230125,0.000008112184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990863,0.00012905027,0.0005213438,0.00009187229,0.00007076898,0.000100630175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.00008563518,0.00048963935,0.00011141052,0.00006334991,0.00017590554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027738155,0.000069386806,0.00022658902,0.000045923105,0.00026278265,0.00003798222,0.0001952515,0.00007024219,0.00014964685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027379775,0.000039838484,0.00004781735,0.00011745483,0.00022751135,0.0001311591,0.000017894794,0.00026497117,0.0000054975953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029571294,0.0000107496035,0.00038129397,0.00003090449,0.000028176499,0.0001472789,0.0017688364,0.00020458423,0.000022404742,0.99701965,0.00008009376,0.00027645388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029100082,0.0009919299,0.0025002884,0.0007568116,0.00008493929,0.023963073,0.00836215,0.008631103,0.0023811786,0.94762516,0.0013542239,0.00043913742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068155983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00603007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2263783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041119125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043102057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088437760","doi":"10.1007/s40505-021-00199-8","title":"On the Continuity of the Feasible Set Mapping in Optimal Transport","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Marginal distribution; Separable space; Stability (learning theory); Metric (unit); Wasserstein metric; Joint probability distribution; Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Random variable; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Economics","score_opus":0.046061688072078597,"score_gpt":0.21677883160036393,"score_spread":0.17071714352828532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088437760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92843467,0.00041723283,0.0004480987,0.005687263,0.0016014345,0.0009831231,0.0008825695,0.00004343109,0.061502203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659073,0.000028757277,0.00004841339,0.000607075,0.00020587127,0.00008586443,0.000017605369,0.000055667744,0.0023600233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970266,0.0003692861,0.0014241986,0.0007737529,0.00003883152,0.0003673216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681604,0.00070470286,0.0013129864,0.0010922672,0.000012045908,0.00006197585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005192787,0.00037927722,0.0010246646,0.00014921479,0.00010836808,0.000054727232,0.001423671,0.00030573335,0.0030334715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028586932,0.00030899417,0.00051566825,0.000089110814,0.00024765855,0.000024402385,0.00037916098,0.0010816432,0.0014369136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011658125,0.00004381092,0.011301901,0.00013921558,0.0001124376,0.0000028963802,0.0028713949,0.007074746,0.000007330652,0.9764145,0.0018623933,0.00005278397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011144396,0.000060926308,0.038082566,0.0006449323,0.000023467886,0.000006325417,0.0012789557,0.0009029636,0.00029625132,0.90136,0.055419568,0.00080963236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023962554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002143939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075054534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021617963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008282601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089003244","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3666","title":"Preference Elicitation for Participatory Budgeting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory budgeting; Preference elicitation; Knapsack problem; Preference; Voting; Social choice theory; Value (mathematics); Citizen journalism; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.23828201502440952,"score_gpt":0.27747362496714456,"score_spread":0.039191609942735045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089003244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63209033,0.00016051943,0.23624639,0.0021960426,0.00066319125,0.0009267078,0.000020780744,0.00016624457,0.12752983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970766,0.00000349425,0.0017102017,0.000655763,0.00005523118,0.000060239116,0.000001172838,0.000005759168,0.0004315851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909997,0.000007427514,0.0002590646,0.00035306092,0.000044326775,0.00023614598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959546,0.000030273846,0.00014471242,0.00014012413,0.00001765647,0.0000717557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013637166,0.00006111207,0.000109236644,0.000080524136,0.00020989907,0.00009230304,0.00032131287,0.000013071569,0.00003432052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021702934,0.000069479545,0.000029212955,0.00036258248,0.0000899298,0.00023208713,0.00007122705,0.000030679344,0.00036109856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007029166,0.0000122956535,0.008543307,0.00009062346,0.000005886455,3.608533e-7,0.001060705,0.00034591614,0.00014924808,0.98805547,0.0002549133,0.0014742595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002272447,0.0005809704,0.1507457,0.00014358795,0.000034838748,9.811389e-7,0.004095201,0.3419472,0.0034214174,0.27725914,0.21815366,0.0013448878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047792664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.206377e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7107963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027965249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035769883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46413118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089737151","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-57980-7_20","title":"A General Framework for Computing the Nucleolus via Dynamic Programming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Dynamic programming; Programming language; Algorithm","score_opus":0.02581692898765839,"score_gpt":0.24311532235237326,"score_spread":0.21729839336471488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089737151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042353812,0.00080609234,0.993409,0.0012687237,0.0021216227,0.0007298694,0.000022288292,0.00008517534,0.0011337309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70131654,0.0000067691954,0.29603937,0.0012433558,0.0010722978,0.000013327494,0.0000074480417,0.000059733266,0.00024113365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976604,0.000016113141,0.000690547,0.0010120309,0.00010398798,0.0005169404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981437,0.0005375967,0.00059393875,0.00057905196,0.000056542245,0.00008920735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014254292,0.00034763754,0.0006095541,0.00023703749,0.00038722402,0.00039103575,0.0012861077,0.0002854014,0.000020250754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020835445,0.00031108083,0.00020689741,0.00028111943,0.00043284192,0.00010219594,0.00035544875,0.0007354003,0.00008196372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011310709,0.000013507529,0.00014523462,0.000107139305,0.000029462779,0.000007751472,0.0018053784,0.013764532,0.0000065185186,0.7268363,0.0000069929674,0.25726587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000960334,0.00007537274,0.000038889626,0.00015867298,0.0000038347866,0.000012077572,4.4549262e-7,0.45778087,0.000007761444,0.5377689,0.0037842374,0.00027290848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018445211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018991546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70089304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018471666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056452653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089870068","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v9n6p49","title":"An Introduction to Sequential Pentuals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Extension (predicate logic); Focus (optics); Computer science; Bayesian game; Mathematics; Game theory; Sequential game","score_opus":0.042612677971240916,"score_gpt":0.2758571865768043,"score_spread":0.2332445086055634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089870068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49479607,0.000081908314,0.48940775,0.013166504,0.0016049681,0.00011973335,0.000538307,0.000008868882,0.0002758922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98569965,0.000010607317,0.012659634,0.00033299607,0.0012650038,9.473174e-7,0.000007769148,0.0000050675612,0.00001829792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991524,0.000034191504,0.0005335971,0.00014919601,0.000062543004,0.000068031906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992201,0.00004935715,0.00032515483,0.00006473763,0.00020947463,0.00013120468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086363347,0.00005733928,0.00017089577,0.000056190467,0.000025406414,0.00008930157,0.00017612561,0.000023756538,0.0002519656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007302914,0.0000590654,0.000028324304,0.000043396365,0.00003090916,0.0001612872,0.000025653444,0.00009193858,0.000026291604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023779568,0.00009828597,0.019490113,0.000030348394,0.00008736126,0.000010176224,0.001893196,0.0014059076,0.00041186425,0.9699552,0.0021594872,0.0042202724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010973625,0.0014495566,0.026699098,0.000022714357,0.000017929762,0.000083215404,0.00021007197,0.00799963,0.0004757189,0.85420716,0.10741646,0.000321108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016556969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026418425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49090362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037936607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001479474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27588466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094200045","doi":"","title":"Clique games: a family of games with coincidence between the nucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Clique; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Coincidence; Intersection (aeronautics); Tree (set theory); Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.0345772706008816,"score_gpt":0.21143136620981928,"score_spread":0.17685409560893767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094200045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361867,0.004844071,0.0018136767,0.0021129977,0.00017080733,0.0012384448,0.0021641762,0.000053129865,0.051416043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935502,0.0024985482,0.0012103568,0.00008643121,0.00008981587,0.0000037825207,0.000055825345,0.0000476007,0.002457441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713534,0.0005924895,0.0007293721,0.00087389513,0.00022120617,0.00044770385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939163,0.0013089263,0.002275449,0.0021956149,0.00014908049,0.00015463425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030198626,0.00048072674,0.0015263695,0.0002538478,0.0007997637,0.0000887399,0.0031060204,0.0002907899,0.00005773508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000438747,0.00039228395,0.0005188178,0.000121645964,0.004418238,0.00017047575,0.0024088668,0.0013039279,0.000019994492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005040699,0.00041203902,0.14827412,0.0029022654,0.004749995,0.00020066103,0.20254451,0.001272975,0.00006865251,0.6248994,0.0018353846,0.007799304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010892931,0.0011274507,0.6010159,0.0058393446,0.0010514496,0.00017309874,0.04945684,0.027635898,0.00004142595,0.2414951,0.058674302,0.0025962153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015941821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010908531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45274183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009976022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096080307","doi":"10.3386/w27981","title":"Personal Power Dynamics in Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Power (physics); Bargaining power; Economics; Microeconomics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.3873747615531023,"score_gpt":0.46286116119962395,"score_spread":0.07548639964652165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096080307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049137,0.0013470383,0.000016465881,0.00067626167,0.0007491512,0.00036823782,0.0006693897,0.00001735532,0.9912424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871624,0.00025758788,0.00007375312,0.000026593809,0.00060946087,0.000052488173,0.0004037261,0.0000659323,0.009794199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996542,0.00013311418,0.0016012073,0.00080482446,0.00040336375,0.0005155183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976384,0.00077889883,0.00075131044,0.0002578503,0.00044401205,0.00012950426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012163533,0.0002505823,0.001000551,0.0014766068,0.00008729084,0.00008286231,0.00062897184,0.0005073363,0.0015477191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026584845,0.0003245382,0.00026260526,0.00034214757,0.00020281743,0.00017040361,0.0001986954,0.0012557346,0.0014277035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037587288,0.00005139114,0.021354651,0.00014407373,0.00011068002,0.000006109146,0.0003056299,0.00010657376,0.0000019661447,0.96899205,0.008791975,0.0000973264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007700936,0.00017736244,0.0035904406,0.00027757246,0.000003741755,0.000026437538,0.00059293024,0.016007617,0.000008156455,0.9449188,0.033086322,0.0005405155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016726094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033521352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98380256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005098552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014842551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098638685","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2021.06.013","title":"Saturating stable matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Stable marriage problem; Graph; Stability (learning theory); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.10235703068210504,"score_gpt":0.3173001541598679,"score_spread":0.21494312347776284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098638685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493022,0.00051526295,0.0044022086,0.013380933,0.00028459352,0.00015799014,0.000042275373,0.000040106876,0.03187441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869319,0.00001699422,0.0021020884,0.0008526056,0.00018478202,0.00003690633,0.000029019644,0.000016983417,0.009828707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988001,0.00014598803,0.0003202086,0.000306953,0.000073917334,0.0003528226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937403,0.00011288577,0.000024135365,0.000327025,0.000095377094,0.000066551715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020714477,0.00006998782,0.00015692446,0.00016039051,0.0005609375,0.0004664663,0.00016897895,0.000040398514,0.00090483483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005960043,0.00008087211,0.00004780079,0.00044707392,0.000060956678,0.0003067286,0.000077331635,0.00032987792,0.0017568434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004641438,0.00006279164,0.004077739,0.000040692026,0.000041625244,0.000038661357,0.0020912343,0.006316582,0.0460761,0.9288381,0.012156192,0.0002556935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002834935,0.00019792591,0.0150318425,0.00042401254,0.0000112382595,0.00021583648,0.008759391,0.09112828,0.045003116,0.04771009,0.7865234,0.002159947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048293313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010329865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88112795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008974347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003835797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099747567","doi":"","title":"APPROXIMATING A BEHAVIOURAL PSEUDOMETRIC WITHOUT DISCOUNT FOR PROBABILISTIC SYSTEMS ∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"IBM (Canada); York University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Mathematics; Discounting; Extension (predicate logic); Duality (order theory); Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical economics; Interval (graph theory); Order (exchange); Zero (linguistics); Factor (programming language); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Statistics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07432503610903576,"score_gpt":0.26347032472374865,"score_spread":0.1891452886147129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099747567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.627163,0.0006275941,0.3344714,0.000043674525,0.0012162256,0.0014199194,0.0000794721,0.00016094191,0.034817774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010974,0.0000011893022,0.003332635,0.000030068131,0.00022082555,0.0001301021,0.00001364487,0.00003735639,0.006124448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791723,0.000015505992,0.0011066813,0.000412889,0.000048786405,0.0004988848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873275,0.00027937317,0.000517199,0.00031384607,0.000052697298,0.000104143175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004461249,0.00018135425,0.0004994067,0.0003944709,0.00015974716,0.00015027115,0.00022571345,0.0001041624,0.000043416112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005893406,0.0001746949,0.00013239567,0.0004433761,0.00004968528,0.00017048861,0.00003213333,0.00010816452,0.00016805684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002662515,0.000088607354,0.12279352,0.00024241168,0.000027863362,0.0000011020893,0.00031718556,0.00010178014,0.00002404751,0.8760399,0.00010272781,0.0002341849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01669173,0.003032905,0.17000483,0.0011735782,0.00029055256,0.00058142893,0.014899835,0.38295698,0.00094010046,0.35362786,0.047756974,0.008043257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033550904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020999403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5224121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001434542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103402635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7123851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103261436","doi":"","title":"Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Utilitarianism; Majority rule; Approval voting; Social welfare function; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Population; Function (biology); Welfare; Econometrics; Condorcet method; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.05723824996762534,"score_gpt":0.29187001815777924,"score_spread":0.2346317681901539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103261436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7731819,0.0006955427,0.000029273935,0.00017905887,0.0013308706,0.0007077913,0.00010418168,0.000053034353,0.22371833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994351,0.0017822859,0.0003955693,0.00005586105,0.00041545098,0.00022097224,0.000046112236,0.00010557001,0.0026271595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948993,0.00034369994,0.0018690253,0.0015794897,0.00008691783,0.0012215993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696225,0.0007301298,0.00052763714,0.0015358975,0.000043163946,0.00020089708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00946037,0.00044159577,0.00134234,0.0015261093,0.00013715697,0.00025200512,0.0012037046,0.00074395275,0.00021628206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012464714,0.00058772584,0.00027103114,0.00018087936,0.00026981003,0.00015105595,0.0010898187,0.0023793061,0.0004965743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017230485,0.0005357045,0.31120357,0.0016113345,0.00023651858,0.0000917651,0.0028545896,0.039389707,0.000025993855,0.5938281,0.000056076577,0.049994368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028435853,0.00025865505,0.17030777,0.0022883825,0.000009368041,0.000027826523,0.0011274565,0.09056974,0.00006588967,0.6781548,0.051855367,0.0024911456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007057644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043370406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2211691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013107117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001790962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105359897","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.10.007","title":"Superset-robust collective choice rules","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Transitive relation; Social choice theory; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Preference; Choice function; Property (philosophy); Robustness (evolution); Social preferences; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Data mining","score_opus":0.16765298733793008,"score_gpt":0.27900365248936265,"score_spread":0.11135066515143258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105359897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48205695,0.00014491695,0.006708045,0.00815145,0.00018627799,0.00025179717,0.000058397545,0.00011873722,0.50232345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974285,0.0000010986873,0.0009560089,0.0005814436,0.00030634308,0.000011678953,7.6693783e-7,0.000007076303,0.00070711673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.00003217786,0.00031986533,0.00028272904,0.00006614642,0.00025519135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995266,0.00021139719,0.00012204395,0.000050562827,0.0000132387695,0.0000761481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080472,0.00009141782,0.00029904567,0.000034827422,0.0004842826,0.00013473428,0.00030174956,0.000062491905,0.0011007093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007959979,0.000084738764,0.00008741956,0.00041454902,0.00035280036,0.00013883809,0.00005182405,0.00008756481,0.0020957133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023330886,0.00003265243,0.0025449628,0.00003248913,0.000010125743,5.6544263e-7,0.005612791,0.000009220247,0.0000126402465,0.99052507,0.0011506865,0.00006646161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029877303,0.00014176985,0.0040000235,0.000019236877,0.000006632942,0.0000017869877,0.0024641813,0.0066486658,0.000056325905,0.9752791,0.010751861,0.00033164036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030616564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024183394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5153715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004133022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022710277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108375905","doi":"10.1111/iere.12394","title":"POSITIVELY RESPONSIVE COLLECTIVE CHOICE RULES AND MAJORITY RULE: A GENERALIZATION OF MAY'S THEOREM TO MANY ALTERNATIVES","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Generalization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Independence (probability theory); Scoring rule; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.02569676402253872,"score_gpt":0.2805381728465159,"score_spread":0.25484140882397716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108375905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9269634,0.010354815,0.0006902776,0.0016309953,0.0008832268,0.0008082884,0.00062537356,0.000018236315,0.05802541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865837,0.0047949194,0.0005123114,0.00090479455,0.00015343023,0.000053784333,0.000037853184,0.000022901468,0.00693628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864596,0.00008458874,0.00070952665,0.00039396115,0.00003569138,0.00013024967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988403,0.00022285647,0.0006011913,0.0001997729,0.000079195735,0.00005670456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009450486,0.00014710447,0.0005226268,0.00020227385,0.00003418861,0.000044259097,0.00028635596,0.000046203375,0.0009245333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026906878,0.00016151281,0.00010158963,0.000072640534,0.000045082095,0.00022648036,0.00009414824,0.00007097975,0.0009796818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006759617,0.000032670912,0.054048944,0.0003145942,0.00021242257,9.901353e-7,0.00047398522,0.000083927596,0.00009839729,0.94293565,0.0005945059,0.001136303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002675692,0.0004783407,0.4508953,0.005673796,0.00006835659,0.00009232886,0.00020472152,0.004540241,0.0014380191,0.21371157,0.31883785,0.0013837611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021112841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009811476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7292241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024319005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030821244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110703196","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.08.005","title":"A characterization of exact non-atomic market games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01564100168352522,"score_gpt":0.20338288130289234,"score_spread":0.1877418796193671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110703196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538758,0.000025492449,0.02647946,0.0001820548,0.00031891424,0.000083671766,0.000019483428,0.0000055421,0.01900959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791807,0.000052637533,0.0011867064,0.00007145088,0.0002190981,0.0000017418384,0.0000013304677,0.00002191161,0.00052704394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810004,0.000031026455,0.0015605591,0.00012565844,0.000024934563,0.00015776673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974383,0.00023160382,0.0019673186,0.00022729764,0.000045922614,0.00008951785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025955746,0.0001214709,0.00077199755,0.00020038648,0.000024997538,0.00004109555,0.00026088854,0.0000945851,0.0006051172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754925,0.00011984343,0.00021649168,0.000058686004,0.000055668035,0.00024324388,0.000029674547,0.00013390875,0.00017345583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013170605,0.00032904552,0.006327026,0.0005069081,0.00020914477,0.0000016295329,0.00097601616,0.00006968363,0.0024325082,0.9869094,0.00029820987,0.0018087495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002121486,0.0005207922,0.017851338,0.00044438205,0.000051454917,0.00020069181,0.00017712255,0.06140801,0.005095475,0.89817375,0.013430873,0.00052459567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012221551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.1793763e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088735595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053517844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019887586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116827133","doi":"10.4230/lipics.isaac.2020.39","title":"Market Pricing for Matroid Rank Valuations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap; Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium; Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Matroid; Weighted matroid; Combinatorics; Rank (graph theory); Graphic matroid; Mathematics; Matroid partitioning; Partition (number theory); Conjecture; Base (topology); Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05232919747656014,"score_gpt":0.2469366637237974,"score_spread":0.19460746624723727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116827133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22167817,0.00046445706,0.66763985,0.0042849537,0.0029040005,0.006083822,0.0075061535,0.0005394761,0.088899136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848785,0.000022532498,0.010000816,0.0022153887,0.00051655987,0.00033577386,0.00041835709,0.000079469966,0.0015326006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972542,0.000024088285,0.001697382,0.00030943763,0.00009137961,0.0006235384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981347,0.00026241384,0.0008450071,0.000415614,0.00013092124,0.000211343],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016215366,0.0003114302,0.0006701877,0.0002008821,0.00036988998,0.00026356647,0.0005222832,0.00018584904,0.00027104717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059974915,0.00033967348,0.00038709588,0.0002614652,0.000061511804,0.00073511974,0.0001110144,0.00023904149,0.00060738996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010160146,0.000492826,0.040582076,0.0055024093,0.0010233143,0.000002544481,0.046003994,0.0013746137,0.00010784765,0.7943325,0.105327144,0.0042347168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008006504,0.00063839415,0.0018091708,0.00018831801,0.00008044556,0.000022906039,0.002946868,0.27911282,0.00033108328,0.024915043,0.6807705,0.0011779479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010067487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028920142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76941746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009922429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003155077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117122185","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3081481","title":"Roommate Problems with Externalities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Capital Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Business; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.023144570419003186,"score_gpt":0.21425159941992314,"score_spread":0.19110702900091994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117122185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9298445,0.0050090435,0.012480388,0.00093250157,0.00050687307,0.00014427019,0.000010605084,0.00004268583,0.051029112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782525,0.000687234,0.000041226183,0.000029456663,0.00033332355,0.0000063089415,6.931688e-7,0.000025366098,0.020623932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800825,0.000022176997,0.00036237994,0.0001926565,0.00004281176,0.001371743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874425,0.000015054154,0.00075902755,0.00039282723,0.000028134113,0.00006073649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028724633,0.00013135214,0.00026821363,0.00008430817,0.0006668768,0.0004057047,0.0005515236,0.0000520528,0.00006726364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005839971,0.00011456372,0.00008099944,0.000027435892,0.000080115584,0.00042132213,0.00003608884,0.0008022491,0.00029195144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024610155,0.00001929149,0.054112416,0.000011769988,0.000105772364,0.0000029923128,0.00024612475,0.000033583747,0.000008489836,0.94460464,0.000016358621,0.0008139481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000711143,0.00025437336,0.0063396525,0.000064331885,0.000006758729,0.0005107473,0.00043174016,0.000077411685,0.000024433477,0.9828939,0.008470548,0.00021495853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029370244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043240082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048407942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002462574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015052664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5129144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118498665","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01304-9","title":"Robust incentive compatibility of voting rules with positively correlated beliefs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Social choice theory; Voting; Approval voting; Incentive; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Social preferences; Compatibility (geochemistry); Microeconomics; Choice function; Function (biology); Economics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.03528615211707246,"score_gpt":0.2183439714627839,"score_spread":0.18305781934571144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118498665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987055,0.0006495758,0.00028428782,0.00044863316,0.00010499865,0.00009471515,0.00024874412,0.000023309436,0.008275179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951637,0.000007077585,0.00009187658,0.000045685123,0.000090368754,0.0000031503362,0.000044904784,0.000011866169,0.00018868466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914944,0.00005313426,0.00033133617,0.00027071068,0.000033063363,0.000162341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.00009178851,0.00030036195,0.00008427431,0.00010307534,0.00003704086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002815089,0.000105754145,0.00035678258,0.000037308208,0.00029302842,0.000033383953,0.00006664585,0.000090459704,0.0000895968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117455194,0.00011247298,0.000057631347,0.00017245556,0.00011143485,0.000108947526,0.00004427943,0.0001377183,0.000011925991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020753807,0.00008212454,0.7160189,0.00011439213,0.00009161133,0.0000036462131,0.003038297,0.000020494512,0.00001947518,0.2802422,0.000019378263,0.00032871598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068304234,0.000059441878,0.99326247,0.00007871105,0.00001566877,0.0000032399296,0.0020648502,0.00016350647,0.00011565443,0.0024543765,0.00090961513,0.00018941466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055573974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000130172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27778783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036358386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015958509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4586515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121219528","doi":"","title":"On the set of extreme core allocations for minimal cost spanning tree problems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Extreme point; Spanning tree; Steiner tree problem; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Tree (set theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Minimum spanning tree; Marginal cost; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.2794885925611124,"score_gpt":0.3453742523837164,"score_spread":0.06588565982260397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121219528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76177764,0.00061654294,0.000140835,0.0014482245,0.001107354,0.0047859973,0.0019357818,0.000050014674,0.22813761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338704,0.0004220073,0.0002730611,0.0000511907,0.0002761023,0.0011317482,0.00015266378,0.00007879757,0.004227415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996882,0.00014421712,0.0013557895,0.00086406985,0.00008608216,0.00066779216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995846,0.0017378167,0.0008576462,0.0012406169,0.00018074896,0.0001372126],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008625524,0.00030337588,0.00084358454,0.0005576359,0.00017743079,0.00011924485,0.001066263,0.00039464986,0.00008574339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00225102,0.0003010139,0.00026192312,0.0001626418,0.00034072073,0.00007212206,0.00045617658,0.0010185298,0.000047955822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000467949,0.00044408752,0.020592501,0.0011482448,0.000487603,0.0000046871,0.0063382974,0.07220222,0.00007999807,0.8727263,0.0028713273,0.022636756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032534676,0.000990491,0.0059701893,0.0018564687,0.000029390781,0.00001260512,0.0049104406,0.17817885,0.00016957273,0.6338257,0.16913028,0.0016725467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013022419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023524702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23890063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000632496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028907522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121276871","doi":"","title":"Social Choice, Optimal Inference and Figure Skating","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Statistical inference; Monte Carlo method; Order (exchange); Bayesian inference; Computer science; Posterior probability; Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.061270179531351644,"score_gpt":0.3240809407090894,"score_spread":0.2628107611777377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121276871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7740214,0.00046213408,0.000023471719,0.00023108405,0.00035760424,0.00048512302,0.00017942941,0.00005097583,0.2241888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927087,0.0005453274,0.00045354257,0.000048595943,0.00074024586,0.0001491291,0.00007819846,0.00007349248,0.0052028103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964275,0.00017172184,0.0012365722,0.00120224,0.00007419727,0.00088777166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978941,0.0006907404,0.0006172518,0.0006049969,0.000059846796,0.00013308105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034459538,0.0003756968,0.0009609764,0.00064918335,0.00033286837,0.0003876012,0.00065070536,0.00071452756,0.000111307134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008177859,0.0004941146,0.00018020971,0.0001503941,0.0003459489,0.0001558395,0.000993394,0.0019747578,0.000064966014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012244821,0.00045289076,0.6548311,0.0017339402,0.00035036076,0.00005102524,0.004061071,0.022399724,0.00004256592,0.17711857,0.0006633543,0.13817292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004211192,0.00040995982,0.46641245,0.001384965,0.000030069417,0.00003114631,0.0016131337,0.11370807,0.000096505144,0.15952791,0.24780454,0.004770045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063523627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021874174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24714118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051231973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013809427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121339688","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902823","title":"Learning from a Piece of Pie: The Empirical Content of Nash Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Point (geometry); Status quo; Best response; Nash equilibrium; Risk dominance; Mathematical economics; Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07494899975378698,"score_gpt":0.23747190839721938,"score_spread":0.16252290864343238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121339688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797322,0.0065603154,0.0075951796,0.00023582649,0.00014472008,0.00006599337,0.00000707089,0.000010485611,0.0056482004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799246,0.0002314672,0.00003777079,0.000027209651,0.00023574935,0.0000018852952,0.0000027675267,0.000016299087,0.0014544028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812543,0.00009855112,0.0007901083,0.00015376907,0.00005996299,0.00077215076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.00019483731,0.00086438697,0.00015165373,0.0000488027,0.000026209449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033613215,0.000105540916,0.000370545,0.00009301887,0.00012914011,0.00002463581,0.00028024803,0.00006731909,0.000057788624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019699257,0.00008665281,0.00017285175,0.00014731036,0.00007336671,0.00008010618,0.00003065567,0.0010270311,0.000030744046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045019842,0.00005972009,0.20598446,0.000005400428,0.0001492109,6.967643e-7,0.0007494079,0.0006285483,0.0006722818,0.79059464,0.000040314357,0.0010702995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011296191,0.0004886068,0.038647126,0.00006577274,0.000024191455,0.000072546965,0.004992795,0.0013917433,0.0004915703,0.95038897,0.0021014772,0.00020559733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084849744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012045302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16733734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001735928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015751428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44619963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121444179","doi":"","title":"On Demand Responsiveness in Additive Cost Sharing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University College London; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Monotonic function; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06372001184919435,"score_gpt":0.31257639166249535,"score_spread":0.248856379813301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121444179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7172711,0.0003458905,0.000011052644,0.00011591563,0.0008938167,0.0011989608,0.0003722445,0.000028513326,0.27976248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99070287,0.0024736752,0.00006806839,0.00012315845,0.00015377135,0.00057545275,0.0000719326,0.00010231359,0.0057287435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951381,0.0004525482,0.0014873776,0.001743108,0.00008702661,0.0010918168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648345,0.001380035,0.00054481,0.0013367785,0.00006402021,0.00019089335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008894787,0.00043391055,0.0011874846,0.0017116752,0.00015292781,0.00023130424,0.0009791101,0.00070127443,0.00036713714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022925287,0.00057253183,0.00022048866,0.00029796924,0.00023626708,0.00013332545,0.00072060013,0.0024744614,0.00027415162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016307599,0.001028864,0.12695333,0.00083045574,0.0003493045,0.00039557193,0.003440255,0.077239394,0.000027569115,0.75347507,0.00029029304,0.0343391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064472286,0.000643746,0.119025454,0.0044908384,0.0000122765805,0.00004788778,0.0024708973,0.026541442,0.0004830032,0.7310155,0.10489002,0.0039316975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017738441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029380893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27403376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019195051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020598859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121488979","doi":"","title":"Free Triples, Large Indifference Classes and the Majority Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Transitive relation; Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Computer science; Combinatorics; Voting; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05287045613976756,"score_gpt":0.2956985221404959,"score_spread":0.24282806600072834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121488979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8273647,0.0030716415,0.000059062037,0.0006277579,0.0010528179,0.0011780557,0.00088443764,0.000055609005,0.16570593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98539305,0.00939947,0.000186414,0.0001368506,0.00040077235,0.00017844282,0.000044125634,0.00006350057,0.004197374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581295,0.00039159876,0.0014072414,0.0011966774,0.00010436849,0.0010871902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568605,0.0016427226,0.0006421066,0.0017787231,0.00006054296,0.00018983395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148723675,0.0003925899,0.001188246,0.00070143864,0.00034982737,0.00037757662,0.0015350834,0.00069708785,0.00015638712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002123412,0.00037364746,0.00023797766,0.00019265215,0.00077781454,0.00012161118,0.002173396,0.0026170525,0.000055100776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000533852,0.0003067425,0.16452959,0.00061783346,0.00028421666,0.00003215134,0.0034270624,0.0001169383,0.000004096872,0.812346,0.00025707454,0.01754446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005349881,0.00008171932,0.08152602,0.00030557803,0.000012299236,0.000022622226,0.0013446582,0.005966669,0.000031012754,0.84731174,0.05711139,0.0009364301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050807116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064670516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16150856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004962307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014869613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121497152","doi":"","title":"From the bankruptcy problem and its Concede-and-Divide solution to the assignment problem and its Fair Division solution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Fair division; Assignment problem; Transferable utility; Endowment; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.080821229685597,"score_gpt":0.30224194724317427,"score_spread":0.22142071755757725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121497152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520506,0.0094150165,0.0002733066,0.009833671,0.00075539947,0.0044220076,0.00072806055,0.00006764954,0.022454243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263847,0.00492758,0.00016923045,0.00012944578,0.00037770625,0.00045986124,0.00005158761,0.000054309396,0.0011918276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996248,0.00047314056,0.0010716779,0.0013089181,0.00014042406,0.0007578458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758035,0.0008022353,0.0005302981,0.00071430375,0.000106734886,0.00026607627],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092721,0.00038944936,0.0007206707,0.00024902806,0.0005188269,0.00048911443,0.00065723143,0.00042633017,0.000029440387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007050025,0.00032000802,0.00009047986,0.00013117994,0.00020644508,0.00022952791,0.0020713285,0.00120913,0.000060419046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001131213,0.00081658195,0.09044792,0.0024412326,0.0016313937,0.000031893644,0.06336386,0.042225342,0.0013691824,0.41506785,0.0056553506,0.37581816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048179096,0.001172868,0.05356787,0.0031305838,0.00008212881,0.00004781121,0.0050118803,0.2574137,0.00029914328,0.5144927,0.15680821,0.0031552042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005849487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038837307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37266296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006581157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014267878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121611278","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1690472","title":"Overlapping Coalitions, Bargaining and Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Subgame; Game theory; Cover (algebra); Perfect information; Economics; Complete information; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Engineering","score_opus":0.018742475424827532,"score_gpt":0.22212033713083165,"score_spread":0.2033778617060041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121611278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61295533,0.09907097,0.24754097,0.0009341597,0.005243251,0.0005562414,0.000085310014,0.00017135467,0.033442393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988008,0.009017022,0.00014832482,0.000097824384,0.0013691427,0.00001149514,0.00001780669,0.00004866909,0.0012816899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687356,0.00007104866,0.00079781114,0.00044487976,0.000043948574,0.0017687452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00008605516,0.0009183296,0.00032076935,0.000037485544,0.000113345115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006220404,0.00026921649,0.00058564206,0.0002391522,0.00033393854,0.00029891208,0.00035425718,0.000485529,0.00006392934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016368029,0.0003149176,0.00018513933,0.00008097337,0.000066626286,0.00012842669,0.00022251256,0.007665688,0.000049632294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009990021,0.000016567474,0.0059392243,0.000018110819,0.00018796981,0.000002028164,0.00019596692,0.000721053,0.000004949975,0.9916367,0.000044388693,0.0012230836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033646153,0.00005600719,0.000907091,0.00012331632,0.000018286326,0.00034181649,0.000397899,0.0057435175,0.0000011223832,0.9877225,0.003984538,0.0003674149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015647555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015253866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3750527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040496414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038211382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121634132","doi":"","title":"An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.046419941032103104,"score_gpt":0.2534808119740445,"score_spread":0.20706087094194137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121634132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.727529,0.007168111,0.16026117,0.0009251121,0.024448635,0.0016249534,0.0096250465,0.0008185104,0.06759944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910735,0.00007774411,0.0025797207,0.00021990489,0.0024900811,0.0001510701,0.002558726,0.000057027915,0.00079222745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678946,0.00013946056,0.0012163733,0.0012465417,0.00017706402,0.00043111958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661505,0.00010718415,0.0009888634,0.0018564073,0.0001856066,0.00024689134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017191276,0.000526858,0.00093486113,0.00025879947,0.0004369552,0.00050122564,0.0009507412,0.00032532556,0.00015564331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025191804,0.00052569987,0.00019360002,0.00019706861,0.00041636053,0.00068726484,0.00052152766,0.0008113086,0.000503639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112909234,0.00024372397,0.009026435,0.0009912772,0.0002787603,0.00012302719,0.0003271889,0.0030674152,0.000062660336,0.98410934,0.0014522631,0.00020499816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001922274,0.0007029955,0.009579883,0.0057251593,0.00017846066,0.0009238944,0.0002273882,0.006411185,0.0013488369,0.05257976,0.91680735,0.0035928022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011205098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008404351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034292502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026994123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121671095","doi":"","title":"On the informational efficiency of simple scoring rules","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Voting; Scoring rule; Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Approval voting; Population; Poisson distribution; Majority rule; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.056509462824124564,"score_gpt":0.2925939810086319,"score_spread":0.23608451818450732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121671095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7589586,0.00016297269,0.000027075424,0.00020369206,0.00028080159,0.0004768925,0.00017559902,0.000018292038,0.23969607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998312,0.0007283614,0.000092771494,0.00008242502,0.00013574799,0.00006836034,0.00004019175,0.00002574008,0.000514386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974364,0.00013424932,0.001290966,0.0005090972,0.000098630466,0.00053064205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717444,0.001075178,0.0006727059,0.0009438057,0.000059198406,0.00007465845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061031687,0.00023055058,0.00060478394,0.0006467793,0.00017215908,0.00012566218,0.0009622725,0.0002724301,0.0001957376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012392246,0.0002220637,0.00020882238,0.00014180205,0.00023036645,0.00009907588,0.00042883784,0.0011607555,0.00013756346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055922697,0.00015284483,0.004333955,0.00019453879,0.000056702655,0.000002031688,0.00086875074,0.045239557,0.0000059000977,0.936652,0.00007620675,0.01236156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078659994,0.00029320907,0.02106491,0.00068302074,0.0000041934522,0.0000063736084,0.00078419474,0.049391363,0.0002511784,0.91121006,0.014752403,0.00077250134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007606465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014248658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23935342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039843237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014033461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90554947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121785314","doi":"10.1257/mic.20150147","title":"Two-Sided Investment and Matching with Multidimensional Cost Types and Attributes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Microeconomics; Matching (statistics); Investment (military); Ex-ante; Simple (philosophy); Industrial organization; Investment decisions; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01675893630970254,"score_gpt":0.22793033835715776,"score_spread":0.21117140204745521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121785314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99411345,0.00080624345,0.0007395672,0.0005934139,0.00040653435,0.0002046936,0.000103913866,0.000027069094,0.0030051074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088186,0.00029955574,0.006720222,0.0013120916,0.00048714908,0.000009100455,0.000006614534,0.000050960858,0.00023242961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998225,0.000044678334,0.0007810845,0.00049832877,0.000015340318,0.00043561522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826884,0.00019727864,0.0009956353,0.0002361208,0.000029323981,0.00027277585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009412205,0.00027822,0.00067832053,0.00022805922,0.00037107078,0.00023739107,0.00016924612,0.000048070047,0.00015463265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032639993,0.00028696965,0.000063235246,0.000050913906,0.00081638305,0.00037567352,0.00010867433,0.00025393133,0.0004029896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005348083,0.00012528447,0.38745683,0.00004151452,0.0011050926,0.000027128584,0.0037802083,0.0009311883,0.0010704116,0.5936543,0.001774583,0.009498683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026194032,0.0068536503,0.23707083,0.0009064753,0.00036440894,0.018802969,0.01789753,0.021178572,0.0058200564,0.32021666,0.33637416,0.008320657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005490264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024088993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33459958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026674752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006361154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121806521","doi":"10.1257/aer.91.5.1478","title":"Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Voting; Delegation; Private information retrieval; Obfuscation; Quality (philosophy); Information transmission; Exaggeration; Information sharing; Business; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Management; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03881908141071992,"score_gpt":0.2786429088437875,"score_spread":0.23982382743306757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121806521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86849815,0.069333166,0.000024256206,0.0017340655,0.00019436926,0.00034098703,0.000018443685,0.00003351768,0.05982305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93146783,0.06581437,0.000039160794,0.0021419812,0.00004645027,0.000028466477,0.0000050603167,0.000018006493,0.00043870343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855953,0.00006639102,0.0007983173,0.00032982024,0.000009399698,0.00023653341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895865,0.00011106811,0.00050163514,0.00034579143,0.000004004429,0.000078876685],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094618136,0.00015143126,0.0008925908,0.000113709175,0.000031347998,0.000034416968,0.00021160964,0.000026940867,0.00024994256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052593838,0.00017089279,0.00007216782,0.000118796495,0.0001769925,0.00013126343,0.000059195347,0.00012556129,0.0011356835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011551232,0.00003946909,0.81736517,0.00037286975,0.00003701411,0.000010791785,0.00027388308,0.0000070581254,0.0000013377252,0.12627314,0.0011119372,0.054495778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004395482,0.00011629251,0.15244724,0.001144133,0.000008155779,0.00008810392,0.00010815869,0.0003016212,0.0000027035737,0.0064079696,0.83851,0.000426115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016849439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053059397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083797946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000645524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121826381","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.11.002","title":"Weak undominance in scoring rule elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Scoring rule; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Weighted voting; Mathematics; Political science; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.06647789912655191,"score_gpt":0.28902348318255816,"score_spread":0.22254558405600625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121826381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.606816,0.00020967792,0.002399273,0.0012332705,0.00013904201,0.00011252302,0.00000209766,0.000040021183,0.3890481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981931,0.000004682215,0.0006223061,0.00008040014,0.00010267304,0.0000075782914,1.3823676e-7,0.0000028146283,0.0009862959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.00001995015,0.0003409017,0.00020453751,0.000042956588,0.00026453094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971956,0.0000775241,0.00011113443,0.00006015614,0.000005769162,0.00002585675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013954064,0.00006707544,0.00023390548,0.00008856907,0.00026296263,0.000071696755,0.00019494774,0.00004728797,0.0001323598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023605909,0.00006619373,0.000054554464,0.00044645063,0.0001375696,0.00015193323,0.000014429013,0.00008364211,0.00043298316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014337613,0.000054842007,0.0013739509,0.0000063158445,0.0000010979891,3.6675544e-7,0.000706615,0.0000072949083,0.00003353614,0.99683595,0.00004036588,0.0009382137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278324,0.000034334204,0.015775407,0.000024047793,7.423163e-7,0.0000016836614,0.00024045311,0.0006480363,0.00004670498,0.98232704,0.0006735185,0.00010017353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027059643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008769369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39137712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050178194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009810602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5565267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121880336","doi":"","title":"How to divide things fairly","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Simple (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Machine learning","score_opus":0.020091248080117117,"score_gpt":0.1729502117112033,"score_spread":0.1528589636310862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121880336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72042066,0.0004375725,0.042835325,0.008018997,0.0004867663,0.00064862054,0.00054173707,0.00023343785,0.2263769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738335,0.000056410834,0.004689909,0.00035511376,0.00009967304,9.1233335e-7,0.000031328225,0.000037277216,0.020895863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810773,0.00019372809,0.00036843962,0.00067699765,0.00013640164,0.0005167294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979862,0.00031893566,0.0004253946,0.0008767554,0.00007628993,0.00031640197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012586706,0.00028611923,0.0006839441,0.00040893565,0.00042549786,0.00006899829,0.0012500524,0.00013093636,0.00024376655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004888966,0.00037702124,0.00035391247,0.00028616132,0.00032626593,0.00042361682,0.00052760594,0.00037872195,0.00037261556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000557464,0.0004308762,0.030511325,0.0003804623,0.00047604463,0.000054741864,0.074348964,0.00017846128,0.0014400814,0.8680249,0.008773619,0.014823052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018633531,0.0006866632,0.031314433,0.00029280368,0.000047096084,0.0000282193,0.010220424,0.0061498694,0.00010462096,0.054329798,0.8939107,0.0010520268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019257067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047159035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8851371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011103818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031996056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121950987","doi":"10.1007/s00182-010-0238-6","title":"Corrigendum to “Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Counterexample; Null (SQL); Domain (mathematical analysis); Object (grammar); Monotonic function; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Invariant (physics); Mathematical economics; Preference; Independence (probability theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.036136562314952374,"score_gpt":0.26020456676152703,"score_spread":0.22406800444657465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121950987","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026151411,0.008880773,0.2352931,0.008033427,0.5680704,0.0036029771,0.0028267824,0.0003238057,0.14681733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5341126,0.00033424242,0.0016830951,0.0021266672,0.019560417,0.00012171197,0.00019316364,0.00037020756,0.44149792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734175,0.00009390541,0.001667344,0.0003798018,0.00019833367,0.00031888086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957542,0.00021604204,0.0028766177,0.00037181302,0.0006107194,0.00017059757],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448102,0.00032161037,0.0008148828,0.0008658747,0.00006443362,0.00020306751,0.001611909,0.00052482425,0.00023691407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013812154,0.0003370287,0.0005231041,0.00011178324,0.00008079971,0.00021218741,0.00011458742,0.001162867,0.00037358757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008182649,0.00030940844,0.00018025316,0.00014385174,0.0010364103,0.00001950193,0.003008445,0.000390683,0.00018817736,0.48417336,0.50454706,0.0051845647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059576385,0.00023767928,0.00013834807,0.0003061876,0.000028955024,0.000083348416,0.00007939992,0.00017850914,0.00011988696,0.1601438,0.83777696,0.00031115423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000293177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000269499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54850996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030713147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001583041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122014683","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3270445","title":"Simple Games Versus Weighted Voting Games: Bounding the Critical Threshold Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics); Bounding overwatch; Mathematical economics; Voting; Mathematics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.029066883930966073,"score_gpt":0.2706636284155989,"score_spread":0.2415967444846328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122014683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440546,0.007870224,0.02195645,0.0017366003,0.0032121844,0.00019193598,0.000013161019,0.00009652336,0.020868316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962324,0.00032269757,0.00005739907,0.0001634596,0.0022783156,0.0000061565115,0.0000020178904,0.00004292161,0.00089463056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639606,0.000099481535,0.0007045922,0.00035058465,0.00009969983,0.0023495683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998769,0.00037796824,0.00035944176,0.00030976528,0.000077884615,0.00010597127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060838913,0.00021519644,0.00036094428,0.00016226289,0.00093162345,0.00031579667,0.0005709818,0.00012049555,0.00019531544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068644574,0.00017930454,0.00020499204,0.00028509783,0.0002722839,0.0002978507,0.000070635135,0.0015520861,0.0006029708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007787601,0.00002918624,0.005029288,0.0000063755538,0.00013400344,0.0000019437991,0.00048168685,0.0000090328485,0.000024672596,0.9933761,0.00018273752,0.00064714684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010926768,0.00063171383,0.0006610545,0.000043900356,0.000031734395,0.00024580047,0.0025083125,0.0052798684,0.000119432494,0.9653884,0.023642395,0.00035468876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076585544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016786276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052177798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062685704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002742598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.775017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122019432","doi":"","title":"Quasi-Transitive and Suzumura Consistent Relations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematics; Axiom; Preorder; Complement (music); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.051563335411042695,"score_gpt":0.2904610173136674,"score_spread":0.23889768190262473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122019432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5992811,0.0020176303,0.00009510797,0.0013049403,0.0006718585,0.0011582389,0.0004257327,0.00007718606,0.39496824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077326,0.0041026208,0.00040747738,0.00010496536,0.00019429269,0.000110490255,0.00006533783,0.0000556414,0.004185925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648666,0.00024539014,0.001280739,0.0011920715,0.00006578971,0.0007293234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777,0.00062338624,0.00045024516,0.00086746446,0.00007449688,0.00021440804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043936605,0.0003502693,0.0009705292,0.0008040575,0.00023601772,0.00023876755,0.00043134004,0.0005981048,0.00014578468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005187417,0.00045239402,0.00021663561,0.00015234007,0.00039320238,0.00013598376,0.0003511581,0.0017365534,0.00013114525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023512614,0.0010023973,0.07327235,0.00060024415,0.0005086352,0.000099900026,0.005655866,0.0061133676,0.00003183321,0.84756064,0.0002393499,0.06468027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037302787,0.0010245127,0.1369725,0.0016444711,0.00004201731,0.00012061541,0.0040872963,0.042458314,0.000069019836,0.7192527,0.08741241,0.0031858487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018664922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017545043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3914922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006911789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016373913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122080645","doi":"","title":"Statistical Comparison of Aggregation Rules for Votes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Statistical inference; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Inference; Computer science; Statistical model; Econometrics; Majority rule; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07766650078858121,"score_gpt":0.3450163302263663,"score_spread":0.26734982943778507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122080645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.905109,0.0010669283,0.0023922569,0.00015462209,0.0009821414,0.0016373436,0.0032580718,0.000045624416,0.085354015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314344,0.0003001095,0.004344649,0.000008567187,0.0002490118,0.00023220248,0.00045956485,0.000059205748,0.001203265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967046,0.00013017368,0.0017277575,0.00079823885,0.00006518862,0.00057407975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969277,0.0013632532,0.0008503346,0.0006741943,0.00009607517,0.00008846412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003551623,0.00025344465,0.0011243292,0.00061849726,0.000105829764,0.000105021914,0.00053058076,0.00046046972,0.00006524109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011089807,0.00032407127,0.00020218696,0.00007931857,0.00029692712,0.00007077347,0.00029956133,0.0007474802,0.0000323858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032052599,0.0006653052,0.21377417,0.0019495949,0.00020621897,0.0000032407036,0.0008667571,0.020266902,0.000023501067,0.6529003,0.0005924044,0.10843111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021392794,0.0004926835,0.06925783,0.000830986,0.00002062984,0.000003723008,0.00065894553,0.18621212,0.0006817332,0.6979505,0.04045051,0.001301084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039062556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018690243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16594522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043162965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011821285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122161189","doi":"","title":"Closure and Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Axiom; Axiom of choice; Axiom independence; Closure (psychology); Lattice (music); Mathematical economics; Closure operator; Operator (biology); Generalization; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Closed set; Mathematical analysis; Set theory","score_opus":0.09566640299259345,"score_gpt":0.3105596808963108,"score_spread":0.21489327790371737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122161189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6909113,0.001873335,0.0000021553722,0.00018052991,0.0006730716,0.0004667509,0.00019446985,0.000037978676,0.30566043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893473,0.0046624593,0.00018234267,0.000034594406,0.00032943362,0.0001396435,0.000039904677,0.00005627588,0.0052080615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968701,0.00020600349,0.0010238125,0.0011400323,0.0000689182,0.00069115974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802977,0.00031711423,0.0004285974,0.0009042834,0.00007572715,0.00024448519],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00645163,0.00031592484,0.0009122835,0.0006363808,0.0001151487,0.0002733734,0.0006899608,0.0006087588,0.000119315075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007369042,0.00037406693,0.00012219521,0.00011614742,0.00033286953,0.0001262308,0.0010080303,0.0015488019,0.000116607276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023886301,0.00039163543,0.66022325,0.0013723637,0.0004416751,0.00004866227,0.0052673924,0.004023823,0.000010692202,0.2417606,0.0009035033,0.08531757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015893747,0.00031056438,0.03818353,0.0005994461,0.000009793992,0.000028831406,0.0017481775,0.007119206,0.000027167023,0.8065295,0.14235272,0.0015016843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023908177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018334968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6220397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004323755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019475662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122265172","doi":"","title":"Stable Agreements in Infinitely Repeated Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Stochastic game; Repeated game; Characterization (materials science); Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Subgame; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.023627187963670596,"score_gpt":0.22363550332069437,"score_spread":0.2000083153570238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122265172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96375376,0.0045196353,0.0017038223,0.00024104417,0.00029830402,0.00010213944,0.000004393565,0.000026575248,0.029350352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847823,0.0026289157,0.000021927104,0.000076638076,0.00014581598,0.0000046586974,0.0000031132643,0.00002025478,0.012316389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973074,0.00005359814,0.0006810654,0.00022971282,0.000045287346,0.0016829078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932986,0.000033040888,0.0003633837,0.00018985457,0.000023965908,0.00005991434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037416762,0.00013127377,0.0002988384,0.0003288765,0.000102084174,0.0000723168,0.00025226033,0.00007884727,0.00025874827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001345009,0.00014311408,0.00008434743,0.0003683869,0.00002237513,0.0002503635,0.00002533818,0.0009835707,0.0005153745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062787934,0.00009492114,0.33723587,0.000005830364,0.000086002954,0.000015201948,0.00039938113,0.00014693219,0.000030107707,0.6591591,0.000073704934,0.0026901173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001642995,0.00027225382,0.018894088,0.000051416668,0.0000054182383,0.000423368,0.0013876924,0.00034033807,0.000027309316,0.94434625,0.03227758,0.00033126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035912206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061561284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3183418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000635426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016941132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66242677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122412362","doi":"","title":"Voting on Multiple Issues: What to Put on the Ballot?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Bullet voting; Incentive; Euclidean geometry; Distribution (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Euclidean distance; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06229604003858962,"score_gpt":0.2215551673229096,"score_spread":0.15925912728431998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122412362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667862,0.000102057646,0.0027095266,0.0026039837,0.0018148179,0.00094361365,0.00021499745,0.00010370135,0.024721073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913116,0.000055063498,0.00040198883,0.00031477303,0.0002511069,0.000003387117,0.000020161347,0.000041610485,0.007600287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786377,0.00011888631,0.00044985005,0.0010212146,0.00013399612,0.00041229805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737066,0.00036901704,0.00083478965,0.0011777085,0.00009085124,0.00015697969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898673,0.0003671163,0.00075307855,0.0003842228,0.00036248565,0.00016412798,0.001542416,0.00036829727,0.0024740428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047525964,0.0004127217,0.00038127584,0.00019563417,0.00020880952,0.00017238811,0.0012313257,0.00067244994,0.010994733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096241676,0.0009206643,0.10288503,0.000792274,0.0011097654,0.000044394834,0.08515846,0.0058831563,0.000089916226,0.7888609,0.009053959,0.0042390632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067178826,0.0023265209,0.2578619,0.015832685,0.00020549587,0.000014733333,0.1023229,0.02618192,0.0033215825,0.17281182,0.40467018,0.0077323634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010465131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008637038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61604905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018724719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002956188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122442409","doi":"","title":"Manipulation via Capacities Revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mechanism (biology); Meaning (existential); Type (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06475155606554375,"score_gpt":0.23273221094965188,"score_spread":0.16798065488410813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122442409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20436114,0.003925051,0.09082525,0.0005143599,0.0020382134,0.0007384164,0.0001659063,0.0004497979,0.69698185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877757,0.00005811713,0.00092587585,0.00022551944,0.0003826151,0.0000132663645,0.000119226934,0.000023084976,0.01047662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985318,0.000035430425,0.0007480791,0.0004545754,0.000026910968,0.000203207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883145,0.000027800601,0.0005390554,0.00052604306,0.000028557837,0.000047113008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088900997,0.00021268679,0.00055117847,0.00023882315,0.0000633023,0.00010983359,0.00024106492,0.00030788954,0.00086016353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005201364,0.0002479582,0.00017194243,0.0000795619,0.000035404097,0.00007905544,0.00009555517,0.00031868916,0.001423974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006480851,0.000024978255,0.003149708,0.00020377233,0.00004631054,0.0000019444446,0.000615592,0.0005123685,0.000006554516,0.99347377,0.0013505896,0.00060796016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015504131,0.000029029512,0.007983058,0.00015111166,0.000008598537,0.0000060020975,0.000075971155,0.0068635046,0.000044042543,0.97255504,0.011652226,0.00047637633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002878931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070100227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78341454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090706715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006901167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122443520","doi":"","title":"Fixed Point Approaches to the Proof of the Bondareva-Shapley Theorem","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Mathematics; Fixed-point theorem; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Fixed point; Elementary proof; Exploit; Game theory; Point (geometry); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.16050108883682354,"score_gpt":0.2945945058942134,"score_spread":0.13409341705738984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122443520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44501296,0.0012761549,0.000071286784,0.0091852015,0.0025111532,0.004789004,0.0010065126,0.000043116586,0.5361046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915892,0.00032655735,0.00013989622,0.000097977674,0.0003649723,0.0004652143,0.000016289021,0.00008009938,0.0069197924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605024,0.00043674378,0.001423103,0.0011315439,0.00013289989,0.0008254729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418896,0.0005562275,0.0011951711,0.0038434812,0.00007119115,0.00014494476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011787442,0.00038729733,0.0010422828,0.0003902085,0.0005013965,0.00032659533,0.0036851165,0.0004494009,0.000112916896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022569925,0.00029286626,0.00047793402,0.00015726105,0.00068320235,0.00010371875,0.0028494138,0.0018406055,0.00006519076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035004705,0.0005216463,0.04177806,0.0013273779,0.0005993609,0.000008694877,0.012540733,0.029081635,0.000026353226,0.8271895,0.0010424844,0.0855341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020054532,0.00040821897,0.042669006,0.0022460516,0.000038143447,0.000036300375,0.00446399,0.026994035,0.001970535,0.63663554,0.28024042,0.0022923225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026533369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040002758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54657626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005194609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028464454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122477571","doi":"","title":"Domain Closedness Conditions and Rational Choice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Domain (mathematical analysis); Intersection (aeronautics); Rational function; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Contrast (vision); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.05130509128278582,"score_gpt":0.31485875798262425,"score_spread":0.26355366669983843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122477571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79681736,0.00070033665,0.000030860287,0.0008266977,0.00074001437,0.0006946864,0.00069296884,0.00004547381,0.19945158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904564,0.0018736585,0.0005640387,0.0001264847,0.0008241143,0.00029969582,0.00019488246,0.00006605572,0.005594654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968655,0.00019140547,0.0011291137,0.0010791176,0.000070290356,0.0006645696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978099,0.00072191015,0.00043386608,0.00077847484,0.00005842265,0.0001974099],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035988202,0.00030962678,0.0007528031,0.0007442732,0.00026842614,0.00026693207,0.0005419653,0.00051216193,0.00045308526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038642663,0.00040865052,0.00015505005,0.00012726444,0.00040790703,0.0001817521,0.0005989446,0.0013886034,0.00014835852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071110415,0.00036926783,0.09246682,0.00042896598,0.0002559906,0.000020370288,0.0016909711,0.008329175,0.000049419083,0.88366675,0.00035928754,0.012291893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023889479,0.00012674945,0.11778033,0.00043894158,0.000009623264,0.00004418581,0.0009797701,0.009808584,0.000038090064,0.43146178,0.4353874,0.0015355946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014107517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029506866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45220494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006277097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017285929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122495002","doi":"10.26481/umamet.2006037","title":"Single-Peaked Choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Choice function; Axiom independence; Independence (probability theory); Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social choice theory; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016550327561168716,"score_gpt":0.1649042766052122,"score_spread":0.14835394904404348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122495002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888805,0.01917751,0.0016325215,0.00034029773,0.0025911406,0.00038999665,0.00032616116,0.00026477728,0.2863971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94135123,0.000048207658,0.00050873647,0.00009446774,0.00053801225,0.000022692848,0.00015673671,0.00004036526,0.05723953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772495,0.000079078956,0.0007274298,0.0008691765,0.00013470944,0.00046465866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980032,0.000106085194,0.0008806232,0.0007191284,0.00008803309,0.0002029169],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046457202,0.00041593713,0.00066049024,0.0003815795,0.0025385541,0.0001289176,0.0006421909,0.0005409944,0.000072992596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009760451,0.0005566175,0.0004270164,0.00019236658,0.0002196213,0.00019895069,0.0006077029,0.000592277,0.000392538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030193006,0.0008919701,0.25202867,0.00066633994,0.00091513497,0.001418335,0.012215924,0.019959414,0.0019539138,0.7003301,0.007473976,0.0018442936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023701591,0.00016050124,0.13058177,0.00058136275,0.00018463828,0.0006274597,0.0015989495,0.005158806,0.002068838,0.045196332,0.8090997,0.0023715412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054693066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016037836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80162567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004787439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027011317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122542987","doi":"","title":"Euclidean Revealed Preferences: Testing the Spatial Voting Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Econometrics; Euclidean geometry; Dimension (graph theory); Construct (python library); Euclidean space; Anti-plurality voting; Spatial econometrics; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Combinatorics; Politics","score_opus":0.18182189130449228,"score_gpt":0.30288527560371875,"score_spread":0.12106338429922647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122542987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5488055,0.00037703244,0.00030055267,0.00015119433,0.0008993388,0.0012338193,0.00018556544,0.00010201089,0.447945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939146,0.00057326176,0.0011909027,0.000073453186,0.0005231999,0.00029232047,0.000029149616,0.000113312155,0.0032898246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.994883,0.00038087557,0.0019314137,0.0015103098,0.00010760642,0.0011867743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957547,0.001210053,0.001146392,0.0015722106,0.0001262889,0.00019035352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037761,0.0004832279,0.0010875477,0.0005774886,0.0004319585,0.00033686162,0.001910135,0.0006121024,0.00013612266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029555794,0.0004770474,0.00027936918,0.000221779,0.000398537,0.0001509722,0.0015890404,0.0028144838,0.0001601031],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030396567,0.00061214366,0.29819146,0.0016700061,0.0006200904,0.000046542955,0.011094847,0.20246261,0.00007345935,0.3139154,0.00018817357,0.1708213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080379116,0.0001455694,0.015331304,0.00094780617,0.000014920749,0.00001662424,0.00073687016,0.6377833,0.00003870321,0.34076908,0.0021580725,0.0012539586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015331606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005856608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4451091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060888357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031154277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122626016","doi":"","title":"Sampling Equilibrium with an Application to Strategic Voting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Population; Sample (material); Sampling (signal processing); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.10537017943718707,"score_gpt":0.31889363842970975,"score_spread":0.21352345899252267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122626016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8689252,0.00017271415,0.0005230294,0.00018335726,0.0003085629,0.0012595439,0.00015086497,0.00010042629,0.1283763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951277,0.00017417909,0.0019365326,0.00006259944,0.00047121206,0.0004022596,0.00007485237,0.00012427947,0.0016264082],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585867,0.00015460745,0.0012237813,0.0016622721,0.00009225482,0.0010084013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973753,0.00026555982,0.0005487447,0.0013904537,0.000083620806,0.00033632142],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041913707,0.00040113405,0.0008785727,0.00087390427,0.00016816478,0.0004279276,0.001031178,0.00045802965,0.0001320798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017616984,0.00048512785,0.00012543496,0.0002872228,0.00014149031,0.00020045231,0.000566194,0.0014484834,0.0002408761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004583307,0.0008126966,0.069634855,0.0013489592,0.00031794547,0.00003364425,0.003587832,0.4985823,0.00034335206,0.36413795,0.00001922833,0.0607229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003030974,0.0019257421,0.017428447,0.0016939804,0.000024794988,0.00008065491,0.005074775,0.7459817,0.00024213368,0.18567443,0.033660762,0.0051816246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028306362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002617473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24739937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007939746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010826514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122656764","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5","title":"Algorithmic Game Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Technische Universität Berlin; Sapienza Università di Roma; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara; University of Glasgow; University of Edinburgh; Technische Universität Wien; Aarhus Universitet; European Commission; University of Toronto; London School of Economics and Political Science; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; King's College London; Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Essex; University of Patras; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; City University of Hong Kong; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Harvard University","keywords":"Computer science; Game theory; Division (mathematics); Algorithmic game theory; Mechanism (biology); Mechanism design; Matching (statistics); Computational complexity theory; Social choice theory; Theoretical computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Sequential game; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02634159435788425,"score_gpt":0.2293361764770248,"score_spread":0.20299458211914057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122656764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026941515,0.0010803852,0.9730287,0.00014518428,0.004785321,0.0002996541,0.00005264635,0.00017701108,0.02016168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7730903,0.00020018831,0.03193101,0.003103259,0.007956385,0.000096845266,0.00008048493,0.00040820593,0.18313332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744505,0.000044212156,0.00068406557,0.0011128103,0.00011976044,0.0005940761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796027,0.0006728818,0.0004238509,0.0008054614,0.00004199027,0.000095545736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003695579,0.00033277154,0.0006722501,0.00093704043,0.00012474542,0.00023290592,0.0013730419,0.00031399555,0.00007159151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032127384,0.00035540343,0.00014597189,0.00078374613,0.00052101904,0.00016700833,0.00036416017,0.0006498349,0.0021751563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002027477,0.00006989142,0.0008492421,0.00031493776,0.00006967794,0.00013710375,0.004122802,0.027437527,0.000012821425,0.67510253,0.00072770147,0.2911355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016697767,0.000060425784,0.0002513566,0.00023672894,0.0000026149676,0.000017500017,3.5917822e-7,0.0391681,0.00003568057,0.9536754,0.0059336503,0.0004511933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017978367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012946992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037547943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020303005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122706039","doi":"","title":"A Characterization of Exact Non-atomic Market Games","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03220877811187452,"score_gpt":0.2697914185515319,"score_spread":0.23758264043965738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122706039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85828394,0.00011872177,0.000021760221,0.00009987733,0.0007434902,0.0009294751,0.00033381017,0.000028317016,0.13944063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864706,0.0035049955,0.00013513614,0.000033353557,0.00026297724,0.00030204732,0.0001232932,0.00009269897,0.009074945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961716,0.00021054405,0.0017465443,0.0010571326,0.00007775254,0.0007364589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697614,0.00033076465,0.0011492085,0.0012937076,0.000094458606,0.00015572875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043321196,0.00036698423,0.0012474227,0.0010984213,0.00008295358,0.00017147273,0.00091935776,0.0006167519,0.0011159285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043426038,0.00045913298,0.0002824995,0.000182769,0.00025883858,0.00020870166,0.000727016,0.0011659431,0.00021240758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011113248,0.002422753,0.60288453,0.009236387,0.0020139348,0.00006566213,0.010840685,0.0029442848,0.014107736,0.14749044,0.0011826237,0.20569962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045434926,0.0005962935,0.58518267,0.0033959502,0.000034581695,0.000038801358,0.0014487762,0.16526063,0.0045998287,0.13992035,0.09079551,0.0041830954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002725091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023204444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20151652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056542654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017342505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122706814","doi":"","title":"Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Legislature; Decision rule; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09750664438892186,"score_gpt":0.34052007120999844,"score_spread":0.24301342682107657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122706814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8006141,0.00018994378,3.1949844e-7,0.000032486787,0.000112113405,0.00038464152,0.00003080956,0.000010062796,0.19862552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998266,0.00038630617,0.00033052507,0.000028231032,0.00006711775,0.00007723525,0.000032742355,0.00003016471,0.000781681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978846,0.00019632408,0.000860242,0.00054807664,0.000054086562,0.00045670746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989492,0.00022607685,0.00019984103,0.0004914988,0.000015210429,0.00011813881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031771287,0.00015140894,0.00045162428,0.0004187992,0.000099728255,0.00013441095,0.0006603442,0.0001388352,0.0005276477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009782628,0.00019145817,0.000058150395,0.00018776453,0.00019029283,0.00052572216,0.00010689675,0.00033439722,0.000050851344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033601555,0.0011935809,0.2143327,0.00011139915,0.00016497436,0.000039502072,0.02876476,0.009983517,0.004367034,0.66357076,0.00004530445,0.074066296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.064273454,0.009597076,0.35509554,0.0021622076,0.000020218044,0.000041820458,0.05660728,0.062305138,0.05239608,0.27339274,0.117866494,0.006241949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068840606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040427689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39017802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045174893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008531815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7807438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122791980","doi":"","title":"Borda and the Maximum Likelihood Approach to Vote Aggregation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Intuition; Social choice theory; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Voting; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03169923201617839,"score_gpt":0.2629821820670539,"score_spread":0.23128295005087554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122791980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43964937,0.0014987716,0.00044985913,0.0011927931,0.0008608211,0.0023925651,0.00023454883,0.00006690677,0.5536544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931262,0.0014027801,0.001122581,0.00016214291,0.00047491663,0.0005285725,0.00006880766,0.00008440593,0.003029607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963183,0.00031023147,0.0012180138,0.0012385315,0.00008631302,0.000828621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976032,0.00048565285,0.00047713166,0.0011991834,0.00005833899,0.00017651104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00828315,0.000356062,0.0009376752,0.00067961024,0.000251927,0.0004253541,0.0008507319,0.0004553493,0.000010580785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060442573,0.00035009443,0.00020239112,0.00021972213,0.00039741833,0.00010543334,0.0009976205,0.0014301116,0.000060579052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009346777,0.0007269283,0.06527683,0.0013829679,0.0005213647,0.00001803682,0.005241739,0.02801764,0.000010598829,0.56076515,0.0011330754,0.335971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050284346,0.000174059,0.031425837,0.00053542666,0.0000219045,0.00003982161,0.0010196281,0.0707299,0.000042314434,0.7824321,0.10670672,0.0018438963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013791071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033449085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5534768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051535893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103071776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122847098","doi":"10.3982/ecta9709","title":"Choosing choices: Agenda selection with uncertain issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Selection (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Status quo bias; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029886444803238557,"score_gpt":0.23782150988580406,"score_spread":0.20793506508256548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122847098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59533346,0.003639434,0.1600438,0.008639786,0.0012041854,0.0010660522,0.00021493682,0.00066496746,0.22919336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95291877,0.00022372817,0.019662919,0.00009611897,0.000116939795,0.00007246441,0.00022419331,0.000071035545,0.026613805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967467,0.0012029841,0.0006895693,0.00088766933,0.00010412716,0.00036892464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963782,0.0004550357,0.0010609392,0.0013724377,0.00061440206,0.00011900167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006867828,0.0003371294,0.00054633134,0.00027413585,0.00038792324,0.0005885258,0.0008635999,0.00040343165,0.00035346398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082897354,0.00037169276,0.00016064812,0.00034904297,0.00016960515,0.00017658685,0.00037222035,0.0009987709,0.00020635851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003799802,0.00060034404,0.046781447,0.00063405634,0.00028714605,0.0000053236913,0.017135315,0.00069583737,0.00087955256,0.9224347,0.0012746315,0.009233681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029529275,0.0000053288186,0.03579744,0.008202115,0.00013790687,0.0000902833,0.00061972707,0.08353399,0.04144587,0.14733212,0.6760555,0.003826781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050373077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027448027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77510256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012911722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097720396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122870251","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2584131","title":"Maximin Envy-Fee Division of Indivisible Items","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Minimax; Economics; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Actuarial science; Business; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.04024439583781304,"score_gpt":0.22712587372028453,"score_spread":0.1868814778824715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122870251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541655,0.008797103,0.014534022,0.00022906424,0.000716745,0.00011775606,0.000015354028,0.00002646677,0.021397986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622506,0.0003621785,0.00007746329,0.00002445371,0.00020269117,0.0000024377418,0.0000032616474,0.000023628243,0.0030788176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774206,0.000058954865,0.0007047689,0.000205073,0.000082348364,0.0012068085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890816,0.00004353849,0.0006430522,0.00022927433,0.00005616752,0.00011981371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062820325,0.0001354323,0.00038102877,0.000270956,0.00008513867,0.000048463968,0.00035804,0.00009907835,0.000055296045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022162242,0.00013723416,0.00013556294,0.00022545505,0.000042414442,0.00022579076,0.00004851041,0.000814737,0.0003838477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003049141,0.00007867168,0.053703796,0.000011446996,0.00009406582,0.0000014619677,0.0006582271,0.00010810861,0.000044882585,0.9417571,0.00018433522,0.0033274374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011019196,0.0005617088,0.002865003,0.000036701997,0.000007885949,0.00014177617,0.0013333219,0.00027770747,0.0001717598,0.98016816,0.013106106,0.00022792985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001278671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046922203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05083879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040591139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032339367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55962473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122947856","doi":"","title":"Price Discrimination and Efficient Matching","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sorting; Pairwise comparison; sort; Incentive; Value (mathematics); Schedule; Microeconomics; Function (biology); Revenue; Mathematical optimization; Path (computing); Economics; Private information retrieval; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04580455397954767,"score_gpt":0.29627527674346954,"score_spread":0.25047072276392185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122947856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235198,0.00084632455,0.00008617984,0.00036737946,0.0005588471,0.00058800686,0.00009548338,0.000042144446,0.17389579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934612,0.0024188599,0.0004958747,0.00004554805,0.00034597545,0.00012256105,0.000033864646,0.00006302504,0.003013104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696594,0.00014957883,0.001051805,0.0010777706,0.000070965536,0.0006839511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982219,0.00037319702,0.00046755682,0.0007404074,0.00004052676,0.00015641474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005132691,0.00029349417,0.0006853671,0.0007771448,0.00018944763,0.00027784577,0.0005064009,0.0004006851,0.00009497352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038401925,0.00036492306,0.00012829226,0.00011376994,0.00019214622,0.00010249991,0.00085741736,0.0013023183,0.00008476185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018183132,0.0008069793,0.039189983,0.0020030783,0.00028712724,0.000038194205,0.015861679,0.15102583,0.00010005646,0.6175842,0.00006721482,0.17285377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040906393,0.00036901477,0.17974907,0.0025904467,0.000031625023,0.00009897385,0.007382117,0.32757622,0.00018453755,0.37969473,0.093772195,0.0044604377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001650128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008161793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23788951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079336646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007645492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123221566","doi":"","title":"Efficient Priority Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Computer science; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.011130543157011702,"score_gpt":0.2185824070295392,"score_spread":0.2074518638725275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123221566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77311593,0.0009783317,0.0046747,0.00019046581,0.0004984323,0.00044174065,0.0009531221,0.00020087832,0.2189464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98656994,0.000056345187,0.0015054754,0.00017048074,0.00010668389,0.000022710336,0.00020207047,0.00009814567,0.01126817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668413,0.00022967701,0.00066044816,0.0011172524,0.0001597663,0.0011487053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975894,0.00027899246,0.00070439273,0.00089043874,0.00006435215,0.00047240983],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016396346,0.00063222286,0.0009361646,0.00058851,0.00031109943,0.0012167102,0.0011425837,0.00077684736,0.00044606382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025126815,0.00087735,0.000575575,0.0002856084,0.00028843145,0.0003736921,0.00087181473,0.0010052706,0.0011332298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015497806,0.0007625216,0.13364732,0.0006410766,0.00087682565,0.00074072997,0.0054864013,0.0048043714,0.000044072178,0.8478017,0.003398491,0.0016415581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003593721,0.00022752353,0.15814507,0.00065078115,0.00019542583,0.00036257494,0.002372121,0.014152102,0.00006983707,0.696018,0.120890416,0.003322452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019544557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032806067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.213454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001998447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000242357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123497234","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.2.624","title":"Inferring Strategic Voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Econometrics; Disapproval voting; Estimator; Bullet voting; Ranked voting system; Approval voting; First-past-the-post voting; Anti-plurality voting; Microeconomics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.05022006673664293,"score_gpt":0.2521699391207547,"score_spread":0.20194987238411177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123497234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57271,0.056749806,0.00039477143,0.0017079826,0.0007166086,0.0010418035,0.000025890064,0.00019350828,0.36645964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906038,0.0064831562,0.00024818367,0.0015425733,0.00015890859,0.000101392645,0.0000059359204,0.00003271707,0.00082332874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818313,0.000046583606,0.0009863414,0.00041346767,0.000014109278,0.0003563627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851614,0.00007655238,0.00088004785,0.00040004312,0.000012412775,0.00011482329],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008489178,0.00019056718,0.00083203544,0.00008628524,0.000071398514,0.00009253907,0.00031297302,0.000027859112,0.0024490585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005915389,0.00020934484,0.00017544365,0.0001285544,0.0001130533,0.00028375714,0.000052935142,0.0001363103,0.027029157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013103206,0.000030250605,0.050108798,0.00085711846,0.000103902144,0.000001604011,0.00009453984,0.0000778215,0.000010140181,0.9175805,0.0030369584,0.028097047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017919954,0.00075526774,0.08524186,0.0074617006,0.00012148375,0.00023515646,0.0015395231,0.017243572,0.00006558809,0.19908786,0.68095917,0.0054968004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014103898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001560945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7184926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011981044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018995677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123515295","doi":"","title":"Strategy-Proofness and Essentially Single-Valued Cores Revisited∗","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Rationality; Blocking (statistics); Endowment; Externality; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05760032273124501,"score_gpt":0.24453783534205709,"score_spread":0.18693751261081207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123515295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7121948,0.006358592,0.045984544,0.00029082253,0.0021835424,0.00095782895,0.0002474009,0.0003488617,0.2314336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934757,0.00007300157,0.00051707256,0.000118402335,0.00045801222,0.000024263574,0.00006899448,0.000052405325,0.0052121864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769676,0.00008281196,0.00095850247,0.0008863348,0.000045673645,0.00032990708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981924,0.000080837424,0.00081364746,0.00073794584,0.000056236662,0.000118876895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015447892,0.00035958074,0.0009697436,0.0002303964,0.000100526915,0.00046643772,0.00040649486,0.0004209402,0.00046337146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016832365,0.0003874842,0.00016236035,0.00008998229,0.000110610985,0.000090757014,0.00042760646,0.00041833153,0.0003865753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025741983,0.00008215516,0.007045555,0.0011414901,0.00014982616,0.0000052995233,0.0002080612,0.00029421304,0.00010378912,0.9888369,0.0008581201,0.0012488394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014137072,0.00030152278,0.014275763,0.0010965384,0.00008561794,0.0000393188,0.00016764244,0.018655904,0.00075646164,0.9405861,0.020242233,0.0023792158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019578353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014809459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28128085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045436595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021866921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123526518","doi":"","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Monotonic function; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Population; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14719411838484656,"score_gpt":0.3476790398230877,"score_spread":0.20048492143824112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123526518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8222054,0.0018796165,0.00015658284,0.00008665348,0.00075754704,0.001261098,0.00032789007,0.000060317732,0.17326489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471825,0.0019428255,0.00039218875,0.00002643019,0.00022291759,0.00024939154,0.00013986035,0.000059535916,0.0022485955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961946,0.00031192275,0.0013869964,0.0012310989,0.000103966195,0.0007713994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974595,0.0003940394,0.0007233598,0.0009775531,0.00018276255,0.00026279036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052209855,0.00043146824,0.001202223,0.00063221686,0.00017135308,0.00037305165,0.0006714943,0.0005247864,0.000084420295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003425846,0.00053651334,0.0001213098,0.00020044058,0.00041284098,0.00023670413,0.0006313897,0.001498682,0.0000916197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012406062,0.0016248876,0.14765023,0.0040689684,0.0016237766,0.0001000023,0.03209508,0.17592824,0.0001754303,0.41685236,0.0009336963,0.21770675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004311604,0.0008782856,0.050879207,0.0009807524,0.00003652683,0.0000617148,0.014154703,0.26864362,0.0002511142,0.63017696,0.025968509,0.003656973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024388423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038412312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21404979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009550512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003259314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531083","doi":"","title":"Utilitarianism or Welfarism: Does it Make a Difference?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Welfarism; Unanimity; Mathematical economics; Utilitarianism; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Egalitarianism; Dominance (genetics); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Inequality; Axiom; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03835175807714983,"score_gpt":0.22732845530961404,"score_spread":0.1889766972324642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123531083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2430471,0.0034370953,0.23943931,0.11995502,0.003444036,0.0019966238,0.0025244977,0.0010282724,0.38512805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451223,0.0003335182,0.007240852,0.00033682663,0.000076349075,0.00009671256,0.00029724184,0.000064304724,0.0464319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954574,0.0017174581,0.0011114152,0.0011716506,0.00011835039,0.0004237109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953013,0.0009717305,0.0010066188,0.0020926166,0.00039594693,0.00023176885],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052527958,0.00041583957,0.0008339407,0.00019501541,0.00032201098,0.0005157902,0.0015933266,0.00044814128,0.0010882253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023781373,0.00038765842,0.00031374078,0.0002882887,0.00020047674,0.00007487787,0.0010300773,0.0008777333,0.000545463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027609947,0.00027640568,0.0035852604,0.00036197278,0.00013848233,0.000010159853,0.015414598,0.000007694441,0.000089592104,0.9748423,0.0010640646,0.0041818637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015722477,0.0000025932143,0.024532992,0.003207081,0.00007944502,0.000017033723,0.0011360053,0.019606922,0.003543694,0.62467283,0.3196478,0.0019813618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002476171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002495941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001200074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012785743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123584261","doi":"","title":"On Complexity of Lobbying in Multiple Referenda","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Computational complexity theory; Direct democracy; Political science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Politics; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.07052165456363922,"score_gpt":0.21175280181392403,"score_spread":0.1412311472502848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123584261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8463448,0.00038899237,0.002747489,0.0000667664,0.001370482,0.00031796793,0.00060516875,0.000066021996,0.14809228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956757,0.000021499563,0.00044571765,0.000014481445,0.0001354502,0.0000026644109,0.00012500228,0.00001953639,0.0035599584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980661,0.000116976335,0.0006814396,0.0007394281,0.000110945395,0.00028510112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820375,0.00016168112,0.00089297077,0.00057062285,0.000084061525,0.00008691515],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044575956,0.0003196393,0.00073982246,0.0009991737,0.00029625403,0.000052827603,0.00059535884,0.0003968746,0.000042436648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016508346,0.00043112843,0.00026797986,0.00031558893,0.0005919346,0.00017542476,0.00039533732,0.00068865024,0.000060978287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000237489,0.00027504817,0.05268451,0.00028518392,0.00007621376,0.00017190912,0.00026012489,0.03394919,0.00011176531,0.9117579,0.00014720025,0.00004345961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012214418,0.0007111085,0.55865884,0.009297286,0.00020213451,0.00015005755,0.0020929687,0.027725628,0.0054844823,0.23032297,0.14684969,0.0062904293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025226136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029647865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6814349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088905514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020254325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123717385","doi":"","title":"Collusion Constrained Equilibrium","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Collusion; Mathematical economics; Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type); Repeated game; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Incentive; Limit (mathematics); Best response; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01164649837200373,"score_gpt":0.22059302676758957,"score_spread":0.20894652839558583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123717385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6758625,0.0004909478,0.0071058376,0.0007029378,0.0005277702,0.0004838251,0.0017762665,0.00027163877,0.31277826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765845,0.000044702243,0.0005761524,0.00020167569,0.00019006757,0.000023231923,0.00022465167,0.00010605283,0.02097502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676967,0.0001863202,0.00068456464,0.0010676729,0.0001477381,0.0011440394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974138,0.00042378786,0.00076804624,0.00082660693,0.000070019785,0.000497712],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013109699,0.0006166724,0.0009409309,0.0006294032,0.00022649394,0.0010507233,0.0012344355,0.00083297404,0.0008219998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025062173,0.00075843267,0.0005368134,0.0002641942,0.0004408752,0.0009681595,0.0014379254,0.000685134,0.0009860476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005156929,0.0004619106,0.09345246,0.0006670115,0.0011477993,0.0012534007,0.0044660936,0.00026290287,0.0010818458,0.88393915,0.009376795,0.003374913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039520287,0.00029185746,0.027523411,0.0009154548,0.000113413225,0.0003284786,0.001334974,0.0032353878,0.00019139677,0.8833357,0.076546066,0.0022318382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092455324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024354993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30179593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017387958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030380412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123884147","doi":"","title":"Fair Allocation of Production Externalities: Recent Results","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Monotonic function; Function (biology); Cost allocation; Normative; Mathematical economics; Axiomatic system; Production (economics); Externality; Subsidy; Game theory; Economics; Cost sharing; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07413946722863461,"score_gpt":0.3086688175391218,"score_spread":0.23452935031048716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123884147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700731,0.0010651972,0.000030741314,0.001541869,0.0022910994,0.0012864125,0.0004292701,0.000064432345,0.29256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694419,0.0182179,0.00042220682,0.000025822163,0.00080772146,0.00016831608,0.00011808061,0.000062257524,0.01073581],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569035,0.0002397534,0.0021533587,0.0012134562,0.000102223574,0.00060088385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685967,0.00026637717,0.0011979647,0.0013975065,0.00016536073,0.000113092356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00784842,0.0002937423,0.00084607233,0.00085955113,0.0000956976,0.000093155366,0.0007173331,0.00046863596,0.00012657802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017870315,0.0003771281,0.0001870448,0.00019617412,0.0002497742,0.00017220656,0.00045975528,0.0011318458,0.00007978287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001994848,0.0019204521,0.029934134,0.003190778,0.00079541,0.000018378445,0.01555267,0.15413383,0.00040747953,0.20532358,0.0009993748,0.58572906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004606456,0.0007016953,0.04153823,0.0035085527,0.000029052746,0.000046526737,0.005041699,0.023017922,0.0043613845,0.22927004,0.68466586,0.0032125541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031127056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018041812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011094895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019325239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124038879","doi":"10.1145/3355902","title":"The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Patras; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016600501705271255,"score_gpt":0.20568765792482002,"score_spread":0.18908715621954877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124038879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.957339,0.00023323193,0.03611337,0.0011769957,0.0006579748,0.00022188395,0.00005802058,0.000021009157,0.0041785063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887854,0.00019939496,0.0002591154,0.00003750792,0.000015633652,0.000011053721,0.000005513172,0.000013192782,0.000580037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.00001682434,0.00037139273,0.00021042707,0.000012841449,0.00012657004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932295,0.00014605273,0.000227212,0.0002515346,0.000021189817,0.0000310886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003834059,0.00009034488,0.00020141865,0.00007691816,0.00019872586,0.00006285073,0.0001527799,0.000055350985,0.000050401326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009375008,0.00008930906,0.000066919114,0.00007178434,0.000040511444,0.00012604948,0.0000058135256,0.00007927219,0.00012063247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008744132,0.00009706034,0.004027463,0.00006763876,0.00012541251,1.9428263e-7,0.00050831016,0.05506663,0.000009428224,0.84751314,0.00001631435,0.09248097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023487974,0.00051227346,0.03875622,0.00006389368,0.00002535284,0.000020577838,0.0018217253,0.121609546,0.00046902546,0.7845451,0.049174644,0.0006528335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009722428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020338279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09182814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031639793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008214345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36419177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124047796","doi":"10.1109/tem.2004.836359","title":"Value of Information Gained From Data Mining in the Context of Information Sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Competitor analysis; Context (archaeology); Value of information; Data sharing; Information sharing; Value (mathematics); Data mining; Set (abstract data type); Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024412563971519457,"score_gpt":0.20042463094808466,"score_spread":0.1760120669765652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124047796","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16892159,0.000019040059,0.82900107,0.00007047045,0.0002860598,0.0002160601,0.00014331265,0.000021598971,0.0013208281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770284,0.000015532338,0.0021668496,0.000044944813,0.000009509247,0.000016939579,0.00003149909,0.0000045293436,0.000007379291],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919695,0.0000056124886,0.000568614,0.00008508604,0.000048598882,0.000095163574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993576,0.000041412397,0.00018445299,0.0003956252,0.000009061957,0.000011837322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006279276,0.00007627194,0.00015337057,0.00032569893,0.000023585399,0.000026488768,0.0003395368,0.000031743446,0.000010390464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010511598,0.00007879085,0.0000342323,0.00022034848,0.000009301106,0.00070984714,0.0000046257114,0.00007669423,0.000027308433],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018739396,0.000050812327,0.000088907684,0.00021539835,0.000076680786,3.5486664e-7,0.006240986,0.889978,0.000013057687,0.09953288,0.000009275855,0.0037748963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070107076,0.00029899486,0.025077429,0.0014829356,0.00011107452,0.000004298689,0.016445894,0.9272551,0.0044708834,0.0078093633,0.009131673,0.0009016602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037195664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000079726815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82878125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048737562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002911693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32129976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124203765","doi":"","title":"Coalitions, Agreements and Efficiency","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Von Neumann architecture; Externality; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06993435028621095,"score_gpt":0.29778064301789564,"score_spread":0.2278462927316847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124203765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62344736,0.0019485863,0.000023286011,0.00029458015,0.0008191555,0.0007905681,0.00039440303,0.000050107556,0.372232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804492,0.0076738275,0.00017371975,0.000062515195,0.0002083719,0.00016136728,0.00004015107,0.000055268192,0.0111755915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666876,0.0001745518,0.0011588265,0.0011485027,0.00007153395,0.00077784434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808055,0.00032044094,0.00041760516,0.00095015333,0.000042038744,0.00018920051],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003848089,0.0003061417,0.00076549465,0.0007996465,0.000216806,0.00024161804,0.0006108478,0.0004406983,0.00050150417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047759543,0.00039444605,0.00014623253,0.00014382468,0.0003176577,0.00010557307,0.0008314404,0.0012396165,0.0002429066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015186479,0.0017785998,0.32907408,0.002752561,0.0006381293,0.00012649312,0.0070815543,0.008448376,0.000038393242,0.53091794,0.0010522403,0.117939755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005276399,0.00066500244,0.07460851,0.001887285,0.000025965497,0.000093035305,0.0031471269,0.10523169,0.00008769212,0.42867407,0.3759938,0.004309412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017243851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048868453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37494156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005046124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005573003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124262170","doi":"","title":"Persistence of Power: Repeated Multilateral Bargaining with Endogenous Agenda Setting Authority","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Incentive; Legislature; Bargaining power; Markov perfect equilibrium; Power (physics); Persistence (discontinuity); Mathematical economics; Game theory; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09111456587730929,"score_gpt":0.286958501540394,"score_spread":0.1958439356630847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124262170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837819,0.00044385536,0.000024644412,0.00005523391,0.0005750048,0.00092126685,0.00034714624,0.00005683712,0.21379413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960765,0.0005194529,0.0009764346,0.000030086454,0.00010545388,0.00007915362,0.00006606642,0.00010968309,0.0020371405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512506,0.00032562262,0.0017458571,0.0015665244,0.00013113518,0.0011058149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626386,0.0005617661,0.0012442541,0.0016066015,0.00015185552,0.00017165378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066064596,0.00047702072,0.0014491933,0.0008541173,0.0001972496,0.00016501978,0.0010539368,0.0005991876,0.00016580457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006846185,0.0005489584,0.00032242047,0.00023386748,0.00035036274,0.00017070342,0.00086290407,0.0019886002,0.00007071336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013536803,0.0008678829,0.7902546,0.003112667,0.0016168258,0.0003618406,0.028825926,0.11837069,0.0014074406,0.031846516,0.000046848323,0.021935089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026229225,0.008309763,0.31810436,0.018479148,0.00024905638,0.0013021266,0.05489761,0.43073872,0.010234791,0.06466257,0.047883384,0.018909251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039065024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054430897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47215024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085011724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031108348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124307635","doi":"","title":"Efficiency in Uncertain Cooperative Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Transferable utility; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Computer science; Economics; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06285711973525927,"score_gpt":0.31470168237186463,"score_spread":0.2518445626366054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124307635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6313406,0.0010492752,0.000027917327,0.0002979952,0.00079573353,0.0009842366,0.00015581443,0.000044740336,0.36530367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850624,0.005253568,0.00015719989,0.00007827154,0.00025979124,0.000331593,0.0000532951,0.00008233266,0.008721543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499923,0.00038382504,0.0017375547,0.0015802758,0.00008852855,0.001210603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738806,0.0006659223,0.0004967399,0.0011941919,0.000073505216,0.00018154876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069075543,0.00044812966,0.001276832,0.0015125365,0.00014400997,0.00024881892,0.001122868,0.00067221007,0.00042591544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012211292,0.0005536868,0.00022243134,0.00047337866,0.0003807879,0.00014555322,0.00080285914,0.0023458684,0.00026120164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042427675,0.001690117,0.34279776,0.0009666879,0.00029754653,0.00041624243,0.00980765,0.3038663,0.000044351436,0.27346173,0.00027545154,0.06595188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009538826,0.0012319845,0.08456246,0.00408813,0.000018737319,0.00012164612,0.013079334,0.29540578,0.0003042678,0.35099375,0.23330393,0.0073511465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008379531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000621649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35658213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015859111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029899421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124604040","doi":"","title":"Information Externalities and Intermediaries in Frictional Search Markets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Externality; Search cost; Matching (statistics); Business; Microeconomics; Transaction cost; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Commerce; Economics; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.03274584077152505,"score_gpt":0.2766165255339555,"score_spread":0.24387068476243046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124604040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151247,0.00028000958,0.000026953236,0.00027696727,0.0010280297,0.00048175978,0.00023650106,0.000024527526,0.082520545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949493,0.0029508872,0.0001781409,0.000050231964,0.00023041281,0.0001670588,0.000071567476,0.00002927714,0.0013731155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738497,0.00017931405,0.0012224413,0.0005056311,0.00008631904,0.0006213562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835193,0.0005902017,0.00031152027,0.0005545751,0.000060777318,0.00013097683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006165403,0.00025362815,0.0006196422,0.0014346276,0.00012083371,0.00042131238,0.00051664846,0.0005852423,0.00023643514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007956671,0.00031937027,0.00009618059,0.00011831716,0.00044966186,0.0004750359,0.0008845097,0.0024863326,0.00006937575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040803492,0.00019688858,0.47673208,0.0013123923,0.0001391721,0.000021521211,0.016268855,0.0017454836,0.000016857586,0.42118186,0.00008271959,0.08189413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025562728,0.00016235663,0.5718871,0.0010774104,0.00000490318,0.00006503056,0.0084702205,0.047527205,0.00009049781,0.28776452,0.07877921,0.0016152692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044624734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035098993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13341734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047795204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015624394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124612572","doi":"","title":"Two-Sided Matchings: An Algorithm for Ensuring They Are Minimax and Pareto-Optimal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Matching (statistics); Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.02839328585553937,"score_gpt":0.23512046992050953,"score_spread":0.20672718406497015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124612572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93350935,0.0008693011,0.02440042,0.00478758,0.0013247109,0.0014395113,0.00033778438,0.0004646827,0.032866683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981481,0.000033358378,0.016862541,0.00015844635,0.0006228407,0.00040539523,0.0000827269,0.00006313055,0.00029055445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739575,0.00013937007,0.0008712392,0.00081256824,0.00012872466,0.00065234053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798626,0.00029461982,0.00065375125,0.00048617067,0.00019162221,0.00038757955],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011297498,0.0003729775,0.00061678386,0.0003274331,0.00059643935,0.0004331906,0.00042143065,0.00030128518,0.000040588628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043108047,0.00039624417,0.00017287445,0.00018154224,0.000021701215,0.0007701324,0.00012967085,0.00033386072,0.000042587122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004367034,0.00022016262,0.0028755988,0.00008419818,0.0001118149,0.000014932487,0.0021852283,0.000074946045,0.00037339446,0.99083394,0.0001658014,0.0030163089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061266655,0.000452668,0.045955572,0.000505255,0.00009680617,0.0015971371,0.0054917606,0.04571913,0.001016564,0.06049027,0.830038,0.0025101642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014359428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007682447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021424246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124632514","doi":"","title":"Equilibrium Selection in Cheap Talk Games: ACDC rocks when Other Criteria remain silent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Neologism; Selection (genetic algorithm); Stability (learning theory); Generalization; Mathematical economics; Economics; Range (aeronautics); Relevance (law); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06956089897769728,"score_gpt":0.30428141052571567,"score_spread":0.23472051154801837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124632514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73707247,0.0007736526,0.000050334835,0.00022609689,0.0011949637,0.0012752258,0.00019092225,0.00009037696,0.25912598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871652,0.0011664187,0.00037294262,0.00010998219,0.0005727638,0.00045140443,0.000042840024,0.00017394344,0.009944476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423695,0.00048093015,0.0020316383,0.0018038223,0.00010060058,0.0013460849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974602,0.00032843152,0.00075154833,0.0011521605,0.000074438496,0.00023325198],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00784696,0.0005489023,0.0013729982,0.0015466831,0.00009373713,0.00028442527,0.0011163559,0.0010126971,0.0016276856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073725765,0.0007067193,0.00031762832,0.00025166484,0.00023232569,0.00027580178,0.00096890604,0.0022844155,0.00026498956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038494503,0.005593979,0.600392,0.009179941,0.0020355866,0.00036401578,0.0545605,0.034416493,0.0047181724,0.18791886,0.0038377305,0.093133315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060047624,0.0010404268,0.0436191,0.003946642,0.000030549283,0.00011971621,0.003966001,0.06613646,0.00219774,0.63354236,0.23374236,0.0056538833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022555308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013572187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5567729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017848646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023115307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124727426","doi":"","title":"Product Filters, Acyclicity and Suzumura Consistency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Filter (signal processing); Mathematics; Social Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01337299035858581,"score_gpt":0.16756442600594051,"score_spread":0.1541914356473547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124727426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921529,0.017826915,0.000245875,0.00063897023,0.0020931175,0.0004327067,0.000300405,0.00013384491,0.056799162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849408,0.0002957728,0.00059034163,0.0000920439,0.00030225332,0.000021325483,0.00006292202,0.000025739826,0.013668773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998001,0.00006246554,0.000573129,0.0009035258,0.00009901545,0.0003609092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982236,0.00008024654,0.0006741664,0.0007041685,0.000084861575,0.00023297929],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006177638,0.00036004174,0.0006166867,0.00027878693,0.002691442,0.00011689415,0.00043839755,0.00043414443,0.00006386115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001535661,0.00044871873,0.0002345469,0.000117454234,0.000417111,0.00019785567,0.0007329729,0.00086656323,0.00011221207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027772563,0.00027379274,0.20898394,0.000638237,0.00060500414,0.00067906576,0.017299578,0.00067209447,0.003049749,0.7646359,0.0013644734,0.0015204137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004169802,0.00026914797,0.41114175,0.0009949937,0.00041861716,0.003917881,0.0075278357,0.0058904015,0.0076215733,0.14336972,0.41007087,0.0046074037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019814601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008561617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6212662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012051751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031151672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124812336","doi":"","title":"Candidate Stability and Nonbinary Social Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Voting; Impossibility; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07162636864602516,"score_gpt":0.3120922704124447,"score_spread":0.24046590176641952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124812336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8160996,0.00054525916,0.000005200228,0.00039574614,0.00057363417,0.000610817,0.00034557306,0.00004538512,0.18137883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935391,0.0031558138,0.00007095066,0.000062184125,0.0005626434,0.00016550756,0.00006477092,0.00007436223,0.0023046755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960229,0.00028899312,0.0012357628,0.001424776,0.00007259626,0.0009549662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977684,0.00054895505,0.00050521764,0.00091363426,0.000058296,0.00020547774],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005628277,0.00038087147,0.0010728571,0.00057473226,0.0003269895,0.00025990282,0.0006783263,0.00065549894,0.00037779778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006204614,0.0004955297,0.00016656959,0.00017030617,0.0004988281,0.000154257,0.001183195,0.0018946383,0.00006976071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046728362,0.00089410227,0.8289785,0.002130337,0.000541321,0.00011168736,0.007807323,0.00090945495,0.000093852184,0.08760599,0.00035839138,0.07010179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00523274,0.00063678896,0.37525615,0.00073658605,0.000033819186,0.00008125932,0.003703727,0.02047228,0.00015736975,0.29425907,0.29495797,0.0044722552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010671656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085229287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45372233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009286474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016228486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124855561","doi":"10.5445/ir/1000037498","title":"The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Judgement; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Voting; Majority rule; Approval voting; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025558300340473527,"score_gpt":0.24222015072709407,"score_spread":0.21666185038662056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124855561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560848,0.0033743372,0.00096435356,0.0012596109,0.008892417,0.0017790637,0.00016904107,0.00050632394,0.026970074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937308,0.00008601937,0.00094617874,0.000038308084,0.00039887303,0.00035770054,0.000041648138,0.00006245953,0.0043380433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996206,0.00008219597,0.002008533,0.0010097633,0.000113608396,0.0005799287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954259,0.000105031424,0.0022861967,0.0018496995,0.00023390635,0.0000993088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011142731,0.0005304752,0.0012142804,0.00057674904,0.00075992045,0.0003611872,0.0021265668,0.0011793887,0.000057839155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051435095,0.00048589378,0.00038590326,0.00045123877,0.0010282454,0.00037681052,0.0016350572,0.0016617085,0.00026521386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037973117,0.00015948933,0.020133356,0.00052718975,0.0007426573,0.000043126183,0.0003418096,0.000319151,0.0021498648,0.97185636,0.002652761,0.0010362917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003924237,0.0007882693,0.019609805,0.0058770464,0.00050002884,0.00081595476,0.0014920413,0.010511062,0.051547106,0.41259354,0.48711598,0.0052249217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013309063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006974328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55926275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030769376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015541809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125225696","doi":"10.3982/te3668","title":"Voting in corporations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Voting; Consistency (knowledge bases); Axiom; Stock (firearms); Business; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Common stock; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Mathematics; Finance; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02717762957817506,"score_gpt":0.21125965567616584,"score_spread":0.18408202609799076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125225696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8358765,0.0002305804,0.0028408717,0.0008985218,0.00041272846,0.00008324684,0.000044073207,0.000038620354,0.15957482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984057,0.000022904236,0.0005185716,0.00033121585,0.00011021452,0.000009609372,0.000016863185,0.000020717074,0.00056422804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871457,0.000042405794,0.00064175914,0.00033298964,0.000009080479,0.00025919062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.00016281703,0.00015899006,0.0002634095,0.000016994329,0.00007407288],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094038417,0.00010679288,0.00033615588,0.0000912265,0.00005530193,0.000070869544,0.00014542723,0.00009647868,0.0014052797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033881294,0.00013881804,0.000081044214,0.00014396533,0.00016752363,0.00011555781,0.000060522783,0.0001627758,0.0012541973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062643708,0.00004639427,0.025034392,0.000008540935,0.000009279442,0.00000667805,0.000140339,0.0003369971,0.00001003307,0.9742199,0.000016878312,0.00016426455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382278,0.000016626842,0.0038918082,0.000016454305,0.0000021201024,0.000018874356,0.00012513166,0.013397692,0.00018491282,0.97930247,0.0024511162,0.00021053551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011673924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030223402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16252914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008254542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002988246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125361873","doi":"10.1561/102.00000019","title":"Bargaining with Linked Disagreement Points","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Strategic Behavior and the Environment","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Axiom; Welfare economics; Bargaining power; Context (archaeology); Economics; Pareto principle; Bargaining problem; Microeconomics; Humanities; Mathematical economics; International trade; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Geography; Operations management","score_opus":0.061377580888746806,"score_gpt":0.22353436137089483,"score_spread":0.16215678048214802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125361873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582111,0.004469108,0.00064252183,0.0002519145,0.0005555324,0.0011530733,0.00014950433,0.000040003062,0.034527227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979768,0.00025906067,0.00019761488,0.000049350365,0.00020964727,0.0003557362,0.000045913628,0.000039593422,0.00086631783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983395,0.00008924782,0.0005799809,0.00053357956,0.00007961004,0.00037810873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865675,0.00004935948,0.0005155707,0.00065278687,0.0000035926414,0.000121918325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014646606,0.0003529627,0.0005963619,0.00005463526,0.00017591938,0.00012667681,0.00028649985,0.00020008188,0.0005713095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000035375103,0.00024961165,0.00012649002,0.000027704664,0.0003506059,0.000055748747,0.0003246772,0.0005555223,0.0002829586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009992415,0.00025501155,0.057797015,0.00006730852,0.00018899901,0.000010111558,0.0024307056,0.00017674427,0.000012230239,0.9384682,0.00000932153,0.00048442418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0107403025,0.00047064797,0.22338618,0.0005016723,0.0009859762,0.00007209552,0.004926561,0.000760769,0.0000764863,0.7509714,0.0040331986,0.0030747356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014721371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033993929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18749684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009192281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000100427915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125400653","doi":"","title":"MATCHING MARKETS UNDER (IN)COMPLETE INFORMATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Incomplete markets; Best response; Economics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Correlated equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Repeated game; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.0541435000877123,"score_gpt":0.24033180609191915,"score_spread":0.18618830600420685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125400653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000688,0.000348258,0.108950734,0.00024317723,0.0019933057,0.00041995832,0.00011100431,0.000117276744,0.48774752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964243,0.00003131041,0.00095945713,0.00049143523,0.00011564268,0.00001602014,0.00007424356,0.000017003556,0.0018705988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826425,0.000026494587,0.0011020169,0.0002760435,0.000035990928,0.00029522838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988843,0.00008472977,0.0005594891,0.0004021275,0.000018467013,0.00005084045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025923133,0.00019866326,0.0004605013,0.00057595497,0.0000434372,0.0001640013,0.00029848758,0.0003033494,0.0006527176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003596463,0.00023532528,0.00012322908,0.000115908115,0.000020597688,0.00028823252,0.00025839696,0.0004891187,0.0021303718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017622802,0.000019951041,0.00535205,0.00024466205,0.000029682,0.0000015312219,0.0010342083,0.002861679,0.0000010922159,0.98968786,0.00016893152,0.0005807472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038920244,0.000009091421,0.072078615,0.00017817029,0.000002678721,0.000005618584,0.0004475013,0.0030412409,0.000005937612,0.8990098,0.024331627,0.00050046394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010085448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006777136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5963555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016800509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015672555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125684913","doi":"","title":"The Ultimate Control Group","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Voting; Group (periodic table); Organizational structure; Hierarchical organization; Knowledge management; Business; Corporate group; Computer science; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Operations management; Management science; Engineering; Economics; Management; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Corporate governance; Market economy; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.036211492730789045,"score_gpt":0.2817118920512784,"score_spread":0.24550039932048934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125684913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33484948,0.0029778604,0.000033248052,0.0009885925,0.0022037257,0.0017840308,0.0005881042,0.00012293742,0.656452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97993827,0.010831993,0.00007733571,0.00011421185,0.0004873851,0.00043732373,0.000040402294,0.00010098904,0.007972099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954412,0.00036811785,0.0016288236,0.0012099086,0.000088860106,0.0012631208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619776,0.0012696271,0.0005807565,0.0017121475,0.000044778535,0.00019490396],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00870105,0.00040997352,0.0009928265,0.00047488222,0.000513887,0.0005389134,0.0015438071,0.00057509757,0.00032256686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005670514,0.00040430605,0.00036126425,0.00014829457,0.0004901468,0.0001140271,0.0004869124,0.0021695376,0.0005929705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011117972,0.00070900324,0.06972658,0.00068279856,0.0010872737,0.00009975328,0.0020625414,0.034253232,0.00003142183,0.5795656,0.00080803665,0.309862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033325863,0.00021945928,0.025093045,0.0004606554,0.0000143776015,0.00003027565,0.0006452951,0.062327553,0.000019329113,0.3077024,0.5984283,0.0017267048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002456438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016361673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64847994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007190427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125703050","doi":"","title":"Forming Stable Coalitions: The Process Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"European Social Fund; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Unanimity; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Supreme court; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Political science; Combinatorics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030606268673077065,"score_gpt":0.23943123744355024,"score_spread":0.20882496877047318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125703050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8443393,0.008402519,0.0019015388,0.0017775743,0.009022049,0.0015720555,0.0013867535,0.00028225093,0.13131598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284036,0.00014980978,0.00035499255,0.0021001247,0.0006118453,0.0005806324,0.00009680892,0.00013667558,0.0131287705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958356,0.00017053426,0.0018015736,0.0012068519,0.00010071972,0.00088471797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610066,0.00035875483,0.0017719532,0.0014653909,0.0000991587,0.00020408802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029008843,0.0006651375,0.001264646,0.00041540674,0.0006294019,0.0004220837,0.0011020894,0.0005564813,0.0028745625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029532678,0.0006708929,0.0005082526,0.00024647734,0.00045495035,0.00037751827,0.00028448232,0.0012125446,0.0027938215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027837705,0.0002017619,0.64992523,0.0010614193,0.0005390086,0.000016209358,0.0027962036,0.00075362565,0.000006277497,0.30999398,0.034596905,0.000081524246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024326718,0.00015683997,0.024840968,0.0017367692,0.00021926926,0.00046370964,0.0045491657,0.001610125,0.00035920323,0.48541862,0.47357184,0.0046408367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026746397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063942694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6250843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048670615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002859144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125761330","doi":"","title":"Von Neumann-Morgenstern Stable Sets in Matching Problems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Independent set; Lattice (music); Characterization (materials science); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Graph","score_opus":0.052833094896183055,"score_gpt":0.2881627785131244,"score_spread":0.23532968361694134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125761330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79297376,0.0007321247,0.000020830335,0.00016615658,0.0010295277,0.0010765406,0.00024637638,0.00006209742,0.2036926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853654,0.0014769565,0.0002791489,0.00004896764,0.00025858404,0.00032150818,0.00014018931,0.00014592445,0.008792168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943113,0.00029679813,0.0021727672,0.0016621536,0.0001098574,0.001447141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726677,0.0003715266,0.0007632776,0.0013736291,0.000052050345,0.00017277492],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007392899,0.0005090475,0.0013540197,0.0015173532,0.00016434307,0.00039787052,0.0011151652,0.00073942397,0.00015607101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022998934,0.0006717227,0.000257214,0.00027774344,0.00018522675,0.00024979285,0.0011160203,0.002539587,0.00023539357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017031438,0.00095853925,0.5584058,0.0028762869,0.00023622288,0.00017131388,0.005075405,0.34582692,0.000083387255,0.051610123,0.00028991624,0.034295756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047616237,0.00035523166,0.15438488,0.0039867917,0.000015054084,0.000060804883,0.0017479748,0.09676186,0.00012294103,0.6213537,0.11173474,0.0047144205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041947416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032599408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5697436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015380407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018374731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125795534","doi":"","title":"Characterizations of the cycle-complete and folk solutions for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Independence (probability theory); Tree (set theory); Steiner tree problem; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Piecewise; Spanning tree; Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Statistics","score_opus":0.09818936293547455,"score_gpt":0.28752903567498406,"score_spread":0.18933967273950952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125795534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483104,0.0005306796,0.00031029826,0.0011810908,0.001143821,0.0044391314,0.0018151847,0.00003649458,0.04223293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994972,0.0009792926,0.00028570835,0.00003263197,0.00017648305,0.0010470286,0.000078974255,0.000061555074,0.0023663573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971666,0.00013128028,0.0011934922,0.0007383661,0.00004954542,0.00072071666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751425,0.0005869651,0.0007906577,0.00090652716,0.0000953853,0.00010623604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029614032,0.00024874147,0.0007323738,0.000429838,0.00036421441,0.00016432513,0.00069512345,0.00032470998,0.0000476403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006895168,0.00025802132,0.00022855795,0.00014150213,0.00038933085,0.00012829938,0.0008983165,0.00070293085,0.000015407912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015302874,0.0007840827,0.12756753,0.0039237,0.00091670617,0.0000020285333,0.009674996,0.037983872,0.0021993965,0.75009775,0.00034472882,0.06635218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036488394,0.00032563382,0.17586151,0.002251232,0.000048864553,0.000023179044,0.0019061652,0.36739358,0.00014705436,0.31666094,0.12974428,0.001988726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016982149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014469748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4334368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026932202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011858438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125965656","doi":"10.1111/joie.12058","title":"Bilateral Bargaining with Externalities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Microeconomics; Division (mathematics); Externality; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Value (mathematics); Division of labour; Economic surplus; Foreclosure; Mathematical economics; Welfare; Computer science; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06255559830554105,"score_gpt":0.2041967837499633,"score_spread":0.14164118544442225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125965656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770758,0.0001015934,0.0016259936,0.0002544216,0.001338502,0.000058856982,0.000014127036,0.000010064633,0.019520618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967986,0.00001987619,0.0004441007,0.00015447778,0.0020019182,0.0000011122283,9.4975644e-7,0.000023606137,0.0005553707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847144,0.000046958845,0.0010916919,0.00014900204,0.000022941158,0.0002179906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980307,0.00013739955,0.0015041734,0.00017465651,0.000041244115,0.0001117746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022965744,0.00013750122,0.00056738977,0.0002242049,0.000064990636,0.00013605172,0.00027046754,0.00013277063,0.00014484713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019692264,0.00012571216,0.00013263398,0.00006532906,0.00005693275,0.00037652886,0.000023852734,0.00032363928,0.00007537124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044347008,0.00006211693,0.14868356,0.000011717056,0.00026123686,0.000010091612,0.0008980812,0.0048549543,0.000017541552,0.83964276,0.0006803469,0.004434143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019821974,0.0050485847,0.00674337,0.0008610235,0.00010185512,0.0015382157,0.002053696,0.0067580147,0.0017898324,0.5379015,0.41534016,0.0020417408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000368416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031938202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4146598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010073803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000442576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125965689","doi":"","title":"A Characterization of Consistent Collective Choice Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Anonymity; Pareto principle; Transitive relation; Axiom; Revealed preference; Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Neutrality; Preference; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03846331325226378,"score_gpt":0.2384546547605135,"score_spread":0.1999913415082497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125965689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220627,0.0010507628,0.012544319,0.000107876935,0.0076191123,0.0007345062,0.022023305,0.000107230146,0.03375022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98783845,0.000041846062,0.00093283126,0.00003820722,0.0013172873,0.00014419784,0.006990236,0.000030535244,0.0026664045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740094,0.0000719152,0.0013802393,0.00074072805,0.00014908164,0.0002570832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971766,0.00016013398,0.0015688878,0.0007382797,0.0002755213,0.00008060979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006177601,0.00033758942,0.0007821768,0.00030351858,0.0003123331,0.00015557246,0.00037752913,0.00029559978,0.000049095906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005867125,0.00040294582,0.00022776247,0.0002244351,0.00036587633,0.00033806654,0.00042964768,0.00039732116,0.000090904294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012331744,0.00041700277,0.05532721,0.0010973276,0.00040038384,0.000038411283,0.00041225212,0.00062192534,0.005267436,0.93541765,0.0008241215,0.00005293489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038468845,0.00036018278,0.44168672,0.0065204627,0.000380079,0.000339702,0.00013304321,0.003999471,0.035111442,0.08942576,0.4139264,0.0042698733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026048978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006463702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005249574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004946974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127963604","doi":"10.3982/te4257","title":"Minimally unstable Pareto improvements over deferred acceptance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Oxford; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Pareto principle; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Pareto optimal; Set (abstract data type); Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.019770130869046807,"score_gpt":0.22070411648605975,"score_spread":0.20093398561701295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127963604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8429167,0.00050816697,0.0007907517,0.00033153893,0.00078590726,0.00015737025,0.00019168602,0.00006822904,0.1542496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565405,0.00012384396,0.00072898366,0.00095912063,0.00021112994,0.000025173189,0.000029328248,0.000054204957,0.0022141621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977894,0.00005182846,0.0008986107,0.0006744444,0.00002707733,0.00055865047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863213,0.00015960787,0.0003007606,0.0006768453,0.000040069648,0.0001905734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009183614,0.00024728442,0.0006066508,0.00007717431,0.000119476616,0.00018535883,0.00037616066,0.00017749457,0.004493804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027476478,0.00030229884,0.00020203459,0.00014467433,0.00028376677,0.00024574253,0.00016998744,0.00020714792,0.0016945017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004870929,0.00008975528,0.006651022,0.000026942454,0.000071804985,0.000007370186,0.00014932435,0.000037753536,0.00022834646,0.99199784,0.00021531437,0.00047579862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011236495,0.0000795042,0.004208063,0.000026471836,0.000014475153,0.00001374003,0.00020511888,0.0034006126,0.001764744,0.9662251,0.022380084,0.00055847183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016358652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014548475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1527373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015916303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056801648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132461504","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105742","title":"The law of large numbers for large stable matchings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Estimator; Consistency (knowledge bases); Econometrics; Law of large numbers; Inference; Fraction (chemistry); Inequality; Statistical inference; Statistics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Random variable","score_opus":0.07666035497076303,"score_gpt":0.2555874198756452,"score_spread":0.1789270649048822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132461504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.641218,0.11276294,0.09001398,0.0033177251,0.017035136,0.0009781668,0.0026983775,0.00008429322,0.13189138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962515,0.00038805947,0.00043299395,0.00011934189,0.00032592416,0.0000047118933,0.0000026671137,0.000029968829,0.002444819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807644,0.000022708246,0.0013381623,0.00016571485,0.00004746489,0.00034948855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761266,0.001006834,0.0009892457,0.00021154643,0.00009676763,0.00008293206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066640642,0.000121487894,0.00050238695,0.0005619737,0.00017288598,0.00021378855,0.0003913192,0.00008767698,0.00013916711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053973234,0.00010045758,0.00038259165,0.00067181245,0.0000357446,0.00041991493,0.00004439323,0.00023075458,0.00008467278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025759398,0.000062586005,0.002897132,0.0001672156,0.00018673869,0.0000025214258,0.0004651913,0.000034947505,0.000004698513,0.9920363,0.003923262,0.00019368758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006046987,0.00017856991,0.00035609392,0.000070808695,0.00002435851,0.000026177511,0.0005963709,0.0014522001,0.00009980998,0.15597764,0.84046847,0.00014479569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002314236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001608116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098427125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039155053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4096541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133776100","doi":"10.1007/s00500-021-05604-9","title":"Extension of owen value for the game with a coalition structure under the limited feasible coalition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Probabilistic logic; Stochastic game; Extension (predicate logic); Axiom; Cooperative game theory; Mathematics; Transferable utility; Example of a game without a value; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Non-cooperative game; Simultaneous game; Statistics","score_opus":0.04301354500801664,"score_gpt":0.24010463924852818,"score_spread":0.19709109424051152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133776100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.762786,0.0011036851,0.23315409,0.0013367569,0.00037895946,0.0003741083,0.00007306806,0.000041001575,0.00075236685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985403,0.00000561782,0.00067434413,0.00037086356,0.00015734577,0.000004727711,0.000033440123,0.000017928294,0.0001954606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990982,0.00007355074,0.00035677524,0.00024700232,0.00004400037,0.00018050917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985301,0.00063772587,0.00038350243,0.00031895252,0.00010897177,0.000020754773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090409553,0.00010141475,0.00022694244,0.000038274815,0.00023845208,0.00007018745,0.000136843,0.00006121603,0.000020810781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013813916,0.00006805564,0.00008253055,0.00022226361,0.00007026064,0.000062603205,0.000044427572,0.00011995742,0.0000056428944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005550949,0.00003844799,0.0036733332,0.000113338945,0.00009713,9.931912e-7,0.0015555527,0.0277419,0.0006078707,0.9652842,0.00016822535,0.0006634509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038533348,0.00052345794,0.13466015,0.000943158,0.00015058384,0.00017314925,0.011490431,0.4096453,0.0047566793,0.41902456,0.013928967,0.00085024326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005753221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020200241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5462597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003080416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025023108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27752283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134055822","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/589","title":"Distortion in Social Choice Problems: The First 15 Years and Beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Distortion (music); Social choice theory; Work (physics); Social Welfare; Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Positive economics; Public economics; Political science; Engineering; Data mining; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.034671456713883046,"score_gpt":0.22744507210459888,"score_spread":0.19277361539071583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134055822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499136,0.0036233168,0.0003682853,0.0016997735,0.0009442424,0.00042476435,0.000054207052,0.000037764643,0.042934027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749124,0.000088310524,0.00002877685,0.00019245058,0.00027325447,0.00006036548,0.000025382727,0.000017481558,0.00182276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889326,0.000032014806,0.00048297405,0.0003994592,0.000025621162,0.00016668417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993625,0.00006412487,0.0003018667,0.00023718906,0.000012222047,0.000022062968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008790601,0.00013338981,0.00035237792,0.000094985924,0.000101171965,0.00016621703,0.00018863978,0.00021044935,0.00015868028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000726834,0.00013146896,0.0000839314,0.00010562356,0.000055515327,0.00006557306,0.0002612179,0.00037178278,0.000049071656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001554027,0.00022486993,0.47371396,0.0010758273,0.00017530221,0.000010132529,0.023379775,0.00076174806,0.000003520427,0.49472752,0.0033133975,0.002598405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006406635,0.000028062343,0.8117723,0.00016790102,0.000014152769,0.000004756709,0.0009445308,0.00096903654,0.000004437864,0.090702765,0.094142914,0.0006085071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009073351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001729689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40402475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008975278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015370111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5361149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135588428","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16690","title":"Necessarily Optimal One-Sided Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Focus (optics); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Pareto principle; Prefix; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Optimal matching; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.14875177980413837,"score_gpt":0.2815930916186124,"score_spread":0.13284131181447403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135588428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9258071,0.00034219446,0.0036583904,0.0028158664,0.0023272212,0.00078075525,0.00011854306,0.00011898518,0.06403092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966709,0.000114004855,0.0012465706,0.00020596774,0.00026598008,0.00006560138,0.000008060448,0.000054156415,0.0013687842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964112,0.000025842215,0.0017423062,0.0011008069,0.00020854133,0.0005113026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651855,0.00013142306,0.002132141,0.00059488154,0.0005024511,0.000120546974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017000654,0.0004849473,0.0011164099,0.00025096856,0.0002178028,0.0007088087,0.0021068742,0.00046322503,0.0007012167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001244421,0.00048066108,0.0004662903,0.00039886552,0.00033405572,0.00024878787,0.0011816113,0.001264313,0.00038464318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075780656,0.00023437983,0.00079888786,0.00038444228,0.00010840002,8.3457996e-7,0.0032034938,0.00048103667,0.002552085,0.99043083,0.00010600871,0.0016238355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053038388,0.00013204184,0.0005521881,0.0024975552,0.000045179648,0.0000063074267,0.0025621206,0.013225698,0.1229686,0.85687625,0.00022932861,0.00085168006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044542734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001582168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13355455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116845426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012013736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140464205","doi":"","title":"Investigating the characteristics of one-sided matching mechanisms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10926594919314152,"score_gpt":0.2541527099557087,"score_spread":0.14488676076256718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140464205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276592,0.00052938785,0.06752864,0.00016155324,0.0012935754,0.0007542121,0.00037771644,0.000049510127,0.001646213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663997,0.00007849398,0.00062632357,0.0001136623,0.00011232219,0.000043474654,0.0000051919997,0.00003683872,0.0023437233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805313,0.00014164776,0.0009745806,0.00041095034,0.00008945834,0.00033022682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817914,0.00023463131,0.0010328634,0.0003734209,0.00006317602,0.00011677607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014770504,0.0002241982,0.00057110575,0.00010514149,0.00022471124,0.000072248404,0.0002870093,0.00010660203,0.00005124188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002554304,0.00015348177,0.00009446022,0.00011214091,0.00012926193,0.0001907092,0.0001275177,0.00010805232,0.00014717237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026711316,0.00018765786,0.04949922,0.00024483431,0.00048627323,0.0000060223133,0.0057068923,0.000026364836,0.0068744393,0.9345158,0.00017870689,0.0022470786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0114524895,0.0009879706,0.7851835,0.0076948353,0.00025842016,0.00009854651,0.012344644,0.035476595,0.0033214183,0.1251157,0.014699197,0.0033666862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007529811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008852188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8094001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005064976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012015306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6258805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157300277","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.11.016","title":"Large random matching markets with localized preference structures can exhibit large cores","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.031391282146459816,"score_gpt":0.23040248882529402,"score_spread":0.1990112066788342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157300277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99543375,0.0004206901,0.00036597086,0.00011067823,0.00044940563,0.00040822948,0.0008850201,0.00014758174,0.0017786619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965308,0.00015265243,0.000088050554,0.00009239499,0.000111428,0.0001109067,0.0000725962,0.00004700945,0.002794177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.00004030401,0.00057000254,0.00057612837,0.000027766207,0.00057869253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990958,0.00008797774,0.00031462076,0.0003507122,0.000010312895,0.0001405789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009362002,0.0002610114,0.0006226845,0.00019747693,0.00022596208,0.00018125957,0.00021382576,0.00012830159,0.0008491642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018671064,0.00024985103,0.00009340524,0.00009518844,0.00006926651,0.0001728116,0.00011159651,0.00017690797,0.00032494485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049039454,0.00010498716,0.75671786,0.00017454247,0.00015510901,0.00004464362,0.004464598,0.00015982422,0.00004819605,0.23386547,0.0017311746,0.0020432158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013615828,0.0002351315,0.8745877,0.00018265154,0.00010923869,0.00011203363,0.0038775743,0.0033187747,0.00020590342,0.040459413,0.0616622,0.0016335599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038004425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19340606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006079947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022556995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158219287","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12304","title":"Individual disagreement point concavity and the bargaining problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Physics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025687331333900464,"score_gpt":0.24333806992245538,"score_spread":0.2176507385885549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158219287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.867207,0.0063472344,0.0059122243,0.0044516567,0.003456067,0.00018322121,0.00016633558,0.000014899957,0.11226135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979498,0.0001283724,0.00031200462,0.0005246908,0.0004929094,0.0000030041824,0.0000038015366,0.0000105374265,0.0005748756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868405,0.00014586723,0.0008479208,0.00015405072,0.000046305122,0.000121836114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835503,0.0005058625,0.00088565744,0.00012713527,0.00007184316,0.00005445826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049963715,0.00009717956,0.00032246465,0.00009645559,0.00006185592,0.00017107997,0.00038876093,0.000041798718,0.0006164456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026858848,0.00008029407,0.00015254348,0.00002075335,0.00016239552,0.0002483323,0.00013866206,0.00018623528,0.00008536693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001502381,0.000025228292,0.0075210873,0.000003443283,0.00043616135,0.000016553084,0.0013762434,0.00013428996,0.000011381002,0.9888164,0.000160188,0.001348796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024484955,0.000033649354,0.0031063778,0.000047318932,0.000017233813,0.000361718,0.0011340603,0.00015567409,0.00015292075,0.9862679,0.006164037,0.00011058545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014155049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004431148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13074279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109316374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051208935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6749647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158708211","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3810746","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items when Envy-Freeness is Impossible","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.023874631061935703,"score_gpt":0.22886709751842998,"score_spread":0.20499246645649427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158708211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562139,0.017149659,0.012884275,0.0006647514,0.00067922793,0.00011848796,0.00005228789,0.000030951345,0.012206495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188006,0.000865531,0.0001483872,0.00011551311,0.00025111804,0.0000037525513,0.000008730369,0.000036043755,0.006690878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718994,0.000090902875,0.000759974,0.00037086906,0.000106229825,0.001482104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986474,0.000074577896,0.0007058323,0.0003817714,0.00009179732,0.0000986128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034871565,0.0001974276,0.00054100534,0.0002642795,0.00021386509,0.00011533079,0.00042078272,0.00012514801,0.00038998944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133182,0.00021104593,0.00026990872,0.00033914016,0.000047758942,0.00032996328,0.00006592972,0.0010166852,0.00019768013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034815253,0.00016373055,0.11936145,0.000056920373,0.00032515754,0.00000832474,0.002098817,0.00009899109,0.0011556022,0.8716948,0.0003205114,0.0046808766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021855398,0.0004173909,0.005237199,0.00014786921,0.000026177247,0.0003558323,0.004463874,0.0005134455,0.0053461115,0.97425854,0.0065480806,0.0004999361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029972053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017696843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11412425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038974348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052342145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160584640","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.11.001","title":"A recursive measure of voting power that satisfies reasonable postulates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Measure (data warehouse); Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Mathematics; Anti-plurality voting; Computer science; Econometrics; Political science; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.03821358774914554,"score_gpt":0.2367149691258533,"score_spread":0.19850138137670775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160584640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96721625,0.020212803,0.000021578448,0.0002298459,0.002345087,0.0005306184,0.001164875,0.000075473064,0.008203469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683285,0.00032228575,0.00022612202,0.000026663307,0.00015278152,0.00010561754,0.000045137844,0.00007464561,0.0022138793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771,0.00003472125,0.0009726521,0.0008753551,0.00003185344,0.00037543033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983841,0.00010457109,0.00088778854,0.00049039326,0.000027785009,0.00010533418],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010198451,0.00039986425,0.0011233485,0.00028027117,0.000076256634,0.00021812574,0.00029988348,0.00044480895,0.00043475383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006107897,0.00045364315,0.00031698975,0.0000449357,0.00014201782,0.000103633596,0.00062376325,0.0005529762,0.00025430333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007435459,0.00010917803,0.48978308,0.0014068376,0.0006224744,0.000027384622,0.0067110495,0.0002051871,0.000062417195,0.4940735,0.002221871,0.0047026635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023864557,0.0006334877,0.46788415,0.00610981,0.00102127,0.0002961724,0.007116987,0.0019088435,0.0016076127,0.48516312,0.020764425,0.005107672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011767366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007454135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029616617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001423898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055673292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161072239","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2105.07161","title":"On the Complexity of Nucleolus Computation for Bipartite b-Matching Games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Complement (music); Computation; Mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Simple (philosophy); Bounded function; Blossom algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.21202732810133296,"score_gpt":0.20381912745689065,"score_spread":0.008208200644442304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161072239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8515726,0.00008460078,0.14355312,0.00013369205,0.00048333564,0.00031836965,0.00016817126,0.00003238693,0.0036537421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999136,0.00002014439,0.00018907277,0.00007121164,0.000050045175,0.0000016030438,0.000042819,0.00001831991,0.00047078342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988957,0.00008230896,0.00034667226,0.0004886358,0.000015576286,0.00017110184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984405,0.0003509754,0.0006788786,0.00042221876,0.000068832655,0.00003860716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007076186,0.00016206439,0.00044388894,0.00013344974,0.00013450987,0.000056378132,0.00035598772,0.00013557343,0.000082479455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010740409,0.00017682083,0.00027161307,0.00017024668,0.00017953392,0.00006995171,0.00020731697,0.0002400502,0.000044378845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003419829,0.000054384313,0.0010719537,0.00014969884,0.00009183082,0.0000027277094,0.0005323875,0.14267413,0.0000068954846,0.8552772,0.00008441441,0.000020181022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032419985,0.000044948265,0.0018904553,0.00017390076,0.00002326601,5.7250145e-7,0.00050727255,0.1509975,0.00006458645,0.8455696,0.00018905367,0.00021465283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025776462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037980695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14756343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081164144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024209638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72105443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162326038","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2201.09182","title":"Consolidating Marginalism and Egalitarianism: A New Value for Transferable Utility Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transferable utility; Egalitarianism; Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Division (mathematics); Game theory; Mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13976423499792298,"score_gpt":0.19711087139378802,"score_spread":0.05734663639586504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162326038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82628757,0.0013073961,0.13846576,0.0002993844,0.0012458587,0.0011606454,0.0011908343,0.0001629303,0.02987961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874532,0.00012451454,0.00049188425,0.00009210577,0.00011516056,0.0000057104467,0.00006188094,0.00003449342,0.011621042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980025,0.00011003941,0.0004423529,0.0010622159,0.00001907481,0.00036377148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986487,0.00023403102,0.00035104036,0.0005785422,0.000029666367,0.00015800714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013332356,0.000286431,0.0006733149,0.00020807318,0.0003038226,0.00010359751,0.0004541917,0.00023414989,0.0006299023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112053574,0.00041239755,0.00026024575,0.00018177021,0.00009804639,0.0001542197,0.00031846724,0.0004758321,0.00002724952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009416489,0.000043480122,0.010216683,0.00031808767,0.00014438246,0.000015446643,0.0009073631,0.0068849265,0.000003196495,0.9809589,0.00033959237,0.000073826486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015577564,0.0000922521,0.0019106092,0.00009118413,0.00009840722,0.0000074056125,0.00091553724,0.06417302,0.000022990409,0.8868875,0.043507,0.00073636894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019938357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035799625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16116562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014548111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001012657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164797514","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/32","title":"Fair and Efficient Resource Allocation with Partial Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Minimax; Microeconomics; Multiplicative function; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Resource allocation; Welfare; Social Welfare; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01776982881906526,"score_gpt":0.18984186045992588,"score_spread":0.1720720316408606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164797514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87569165,0.00039371796,0.07424332,0.00036960377,0.00030429932,0.00032339286,0.000031406595,0.00007890179,0.048563715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858505,0.000012607987,0.0005386251,0.0001220215,0.00006970296,0.00003098649,0.00012466565,0.000009222078,0.0005071113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991015,0.000023083689,0.0004567524,0.00025564994,0.00003158901,0.00013139127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921817,0.000025997422,0.00037894858,0.00029700165,0.000032953925,0.00004691325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064980116,0.00013177168,0.00027341768,0.00011662753,0.00006048336,0.0002511757,0.00009746941,0.00014726655,0.000086504464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051000334,0.00013077905,0.000038612958,0.000071678245,0.000033433298,0.0001112893,0.00014861165,0.00018829005,0.000094783856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008840809,0.00010816657,0.01769939,0.0011486018,0.00018512845,0.0000030406832,0.010945105,0.07282817,0.000006491187,0.8946836,0.000545272,0.0017585923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004336353,0.0005291258,0.05702139,0.0019887034,0.0001092116,0.000108044165,0.013121626,0.49709433,0.0019394193,0.015151726,0.40464982,0.003950226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001719024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008221273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042558608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021424208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53330153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169024472","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_25","title":"Two Birds with One Stone: Fairness and Welfare via Transfers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Transfer payment; Mathematical economics; Homogeneous; Payment; Social welfare function; Nash equilibrium; Monotone polygon; Transfer (computing); Constant (computer programming); Mathematics; Computer science; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.020941773936946368,"score_gpt":0.22643459647822117,"score_spread":0.2054928225412748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169024472","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39128637,0.0006493497,0.60639423,0.00060326455,0.0007556836,0.00018505976,0.000014530527,0.000038218535,0.00007331073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691517,0.000024969066,0.030390082,0.0002121046,0.00016958917,0.000018082597,0.0000068043287,0.000024621366,0.0000020842072],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976652,0.000050381692,0.0004758698,0.0012604637,0.00011488467,0.00043316575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988373,0.00010514282,0.00021180265,0.00066870294,0.000068169495,0.00010886062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013097296,0.00030428456,0.0006713124,0.00042601567,0.0001928984,0.00047900627,0.0007264471,0.00018306312,0.000034827644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048963586,0.0003076744,0.00006671789,0.0007664567,0.0004795485,0.00020272483,0.00042606553,0.000661129,0.0000069130847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010324404,0.000444299,0.10814019,0.001800722,0.00019282663,0.00017421723,0.021451384,0.5456978,0.0005873224,0.04899833,0.0000013975692,0.27240825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030443158,0.0008487951,0.071751505,0.002865683,0.00004803357,0.0003133256,0.000068246074,0.6813536,0.007923748,0.22776368,0.00017562005,0.003843377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061319483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030235355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5778653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012252928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008806885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169869267","doi":"10.3982/ecta19636","title":"Identification and Estimation in Many‐to‐One Two‐Sided Matching Without Transfers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Identification (biology); Estimation; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.031029469890789793,"score_gpt":0.25529217127391457,"score_spread":0.22426270138312476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169869267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8935742,0.0013493906,0.09486039,0.00089017366,0.00052331353,0.00036066707,0.000055624154,0.0001063269,0.008279909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981236,0.000044837423,0.00075877324,0.000068247384,0.000060069866,0.000050146264,0.000011258822,0.000027938408,0.0008551257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852896,0.000025444508,0.000710122,0.0004862518,0.000026460277,0.00022277755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943644,0.00016756941,0.00009417251,0.00020783041,0.000008066978,0.00008589947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014560871,0.00012860715,0.00032820294,0.0017948144,0.00005984609,0.0002999092,0.00013311245,0.00006109458,0.00014627534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017361373,0.00016438444,0.000052961404,0.0011330568,0.000023833487,0.0004179127,0.00002333832,0.00013938024,0.0012960809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025050394,0.00008081331,0.023041464,0.00029001734,0.00008377054,0.000005773189,0.0043937718,0.00335531,0.00034429753,0.9446273,0.0001191832,0.02363329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017422829,0.0002391601,0.18413515,0.0005538594,0.0000340022,0.000033446922,0.00051398686,0.19526474,0.000827333,0.6093708,0.0059925923,0.0012925889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017531666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019561061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3352564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000136858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008925881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173168623","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16675","title":"Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Contrast (vision); Connection (principal bundle); Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022105704187609838,"score_gpt":0.20269636815515643,"score_spread":0.18059066396754658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173168623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8264611,0.001319835,0.0009516115,0.007160422,0.0005926671,0.00012156311,0.00013822311,0.00011039792,0.16314423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98542464,0.00003472428,0.00025679864,0.00044391883,0.000219139,0.000008589634,0.000022132946,0.000025003203,0.013565048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988297,0.00003438993,0.00042882183,0.0004059604,0.00003281494,0.00026829116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994754,0.000048460024,0.00016373348,0.00021715132,0.000027698787,0.00006752838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005536424,0.00015102548,0.00038548163,0.000067258086,0.00030980344,0.00013997064,0.00014589507,0.00013031301,0.0016954563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007764984,0.00017324781,0.00009585588,0.00015160782,0.00005830784,0.0001688551,0.00010946366,0.000139725,0.00039570016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077368895,0.000037421345,0.02377634,0.00006557688,0.00004081036,0.000013661868,0.00083281775,0.0000017623728,0.00007014399,0.9731834,0.0009981924,0.0009721657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016571735,0.00005488712,0.10551991,0.000037485905,0.000018742952,0.000111777204,0.0025840162,0.0003050253,0.00082933484,0.14556877,0.74237585,0.0009370126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021702856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005554931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8276146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029173278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011794774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173882028","doi":"10.4204/eptcs.335.1","title":"Proceedings Eighteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017658513109999066,"score_gpt":0.2404549740206308,"score_spread":0.2227964609106317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173882028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7890936,0.00042179893,0.004738476,0.000809176,0.0001798445,0.00021387721,0.000005272345,0.00004336073,0.20449458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900883,0.00004969288,0.0006890487,0.00010763522,0.00009546291,0.000012997119,8.1465834e-7,0.000011862876,0.000023677161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777544,0.000017372025,0.00058645144,0.0008368356,0.00014685834,0.00063706766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.00014232047,0.00020231491,0.00014179466,0.00028666397,0.00013597212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003395715,0.00019254524,0.00044018333,0.00023644663,0.00015451555,0.00019588057,0.0005154822,0.0000950467,0.00015540939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005424976,0.00019004359,0.00005557275,0.0009673124,0.0026364215,0.00030097153,0.00026179603,0.00038838302,0.000031268028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029595554,0.00015985071,0.002332759,0.000064052154,0.0000073628867,0.0000011477628,0.00074739644,0.0000011134468,0.00056490395,0.995784,0.000012134882,0.00029568482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037212097,0.00031114995,0.0029130422,0.00012314595,0.0000029709242,0.000034660232,0.000057759473,0.025843149,0.011180318,0.95884836,0.00010012295,0.00021321427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014302792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.2710264e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2099152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016483275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002010228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175886919","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16687","title":"Aggregating Binary Judgments Ranked by Accuracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Binary number; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Distortion (music); Ground truth; Binary data; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10230192761163202,"score_gpt":0.27713216749757885,"score_spread":0.17483023988594681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175886919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94233006,0.00041484347,0.00043042714,0.0025288991,0.0008107525,0.0003112634,0.000064169806,0.000059604332,0.05304998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738747,0.000073219984,0.0002024455,0.00027900148,0.00007599111,0.000020541298,0.000002932217,0.000020737716,0.0019376645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813044,0.000017077293,0.00091836386,0.0004926574,0.0001102811,0.00033117423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839985,0.00013619263,0.00088917103,0.00025310845,0.00025779565,0.00006389706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085357105,0.00020145575,0.0004025932,0.0000836603,0.00021548892,0.00017835984,0.0007141047,0.000105532585,0.00052183616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015210997,0.0001882012,0.00015764132,0.00048337784,0.00016757609,0.00025844254,0.00018432118,0.00028004433,0.0004941268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005207426,0.00019678523,0.0020698423,0.00008414162,0.000047874437,8.528027e-7,0.0010412155,0.000017386987,0.046834674,0.942417,0.0008969115,0.006341235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008414427,0.00010546731,0.00029878772,0.00048891467,0.000012287366,0.0000071150357,0.0015245109,0.005016932,0.6417965,0.3483453,0.0019375418,0.00038248114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054489283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027545054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5949618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049209244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035645407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7674622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176515086","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16710","title":"Market-Based Explanations of Collective Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Proportionality (law); Construct (python library); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Actuarial science; Operations research; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14318251301595522,"score_gpt":0.2824055527762517,"score_spread":0.13922303976029646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176515086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6106017,0.00016131224,0.009757882,0.0025607462,0.0008392303,0.0004902608,0.00020758266,0.000043483255,0.3753378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686193,0.000017333461,0.0006075077,0.00007629445,0.000030503743,0.000020148622,0.0000010800142,0.000010714934,0.0023744602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986448,0.000016058199,0.0007577879,0.00030894048,0.000093795185,0.00017858756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826443,0.00031290017,0.0006295222,0.00020719708,0.0005385835,0.000047373305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007571694,0.00012388498,0.00034021132,0.00016136702,0.00013952596,0.00005586997,0.00047971404,0.00007735077,0.0008590845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024070581,0.000114662405,0.00015228972,0.00072649267,0.00017927677,0.00009651053,0.00007421342,0.0001547745,0.00009446596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058871385,0.0001731011,0.002274797,0.000027453752,0.000023175568,2.4735664e-7,0.00063105545,0.00006669341,0.004277242,0.99104846,0.000292374,0.0011265373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005150249,0.00009764231,0.0017528236,0.00029947175,0.000009934754,0.000002097963,0.0013657607,0.010892779,0.36201018,0.6229882,0.00036019782,0.0001693972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031095242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014850523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38626027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052725987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012101621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94063723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177345467","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16690","title":"Necessarily Optimal One-Sided Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Focus (optics); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Pareto principle; Prefix; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Optimal matching; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.04611186113605634,"score_gpt":0.2170767207593821,"score_spread":0.17096485962332578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177345467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5974853,0.00061314885,0.012926864,0.0010600332,0.0005252753,0.00006509491,0.000021977694,0.00010510761,0.38719723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629146,0.000014758648,0.0030030156,0.0005711334,0.00012553106,0.0000055914657,0.000010116113,0.000017078033,0.033338178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902666,0.000019479277,0.0004061625,0.00030593487,0.000022921773,0.00021887524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994207,0.00007049303,0.00013680631,0.00028438785,0.000025287147,0.00006232405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052731903,0.00009485675,0.00028582025,0.000060510996,0.00007874277,0.00010843936,0.00014334319,0.00007178476,0.0029921636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015907554,0.00011368406,0.0000917423,0.00015786031,0.000021558819,0.0001585827,0.000059470232,0.00010946638,0.002924483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000501563,0.00005457948,0.0073063374,0.000019727462,0.000034906912,0.000008864118,0.00033098483,0.000079876554,0.00021064271,0.99079525,0.00097629876,0.00017750845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025783426,0.00015359474,0.040705822,0.00017562481,0.000025218415,0.00013992385,0.0019730928,0.005793637,0.015269717,0.6782451,0.25324434,0.0016955779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014385894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000116884785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002582335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014431828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180196532","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/29","title":"Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Matching (statistics); Division (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Arithmetic; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.04559620072985191,"score_gpt":0.2517529842874516,"score_spread":0.20615678355759967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180196532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75819254,0.0022284077,0.02750833,0.0005261243,0.0036423113,0.00032112031,0.00007355982,0.00023361575,0.20727396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990434,0.000056217996,0.0024600606,0.0001998181,0.00026786412,0.000028445596,0.00009394778,0.000052590207,0.0064070574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766886,0.00007128891,0.000983339,0.0008839771,0.000050808118,0.0003417028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822813,0.00014167963,0.00062060106,0.00087216176,0.00003756696,0.00009984735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015305079,0.00031463167,0.00086461124,0.00021603389,0.00011562693,0.00039316367,0.00047537932,0.00030136717,0.0014703933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018297436,0.0003568072,0.000338193,0.00011397291,0.00002843915,0.00013455495,0.00092793256,0.0005747056,0.0010208036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006969837,0.00010012323,0.006962449,0.00033767466,0.00017823353,0.000027336342,0.0020045042,0.004050145,0.00010585433,0.9849948,0.00046164833,0.00077024725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013823424,0.00005930907,0.013426233,0.0016761032,0.00003198308,0.00002648721,0.0019317244,0.007859577,0.0009830119,0.95983416,0.01049689,0.0022921772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015063954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008299615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23224144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010259435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030129659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182271809","doi":"10.1017/9781108937535.010","title":"Normative Properties for Object Allocation Problems: Characterizations and Trade-Offs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Normative; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.06114845777570872,"score_gpt":0.1871038393670347,"score_spread":0.12595538159132597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182271809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091031153,0.00023978562,0.0025755651,0.000108833,0.0003854654,0.0015058718,0.002016759,0.00020154442,0.9920559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04237223,0.00013639794,0.000030304906,0.000037490234,0.000106795356,0.0000127506855,0.00017328258,0.000056113262,0.95707464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990172,0.000017144925,0.00033427667,0.000406996,0.00003233193,0.00019209363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991113,0.000060622337,0.00046585765,0.0002447029,0.000049826063,0.00006772027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002664803,0.00023733496,0.00043532494,0.00023861883,0.00024483673,0.000070072325,0.00020003023,0.00023311816,0.0000016202143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027348357,0.00029556444,0.00011858007,0.000012133575,0.00013324789,0.00015366121,0.00008832002,0.0001712219,0.000032180225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029890967,0.0000061445594,0.000010409494,0.00043807182,0.00013277066,0.0000023833918,0.0007368614,0.0000063856237,0.00003672353,0.99727523,0.0011668073,0.00015831007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007189505,0.000114780014,0.00018005476,0.0004912747,0.00008464235,0.0000075247067,0.00015994633,0.0011325643,0.00014407089,0.0008384689,0.99548554,0.0006421786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067396526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029023622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009366777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000276716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184470869","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01347-6","title":"Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Context (archaeology); Truncation (statistics); Ballot; Approval voting; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.034021850469177405,"score_gpt":0.24932158966685053,"score_spread":0.21529973919767312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184470869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144358,0.006190932,0.00015479217,0.006260715,0.00084494276,0.00010493921,0.00011436858,0.00007687111,0.07181662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942032,0.00012197671,0.000035326702,0.00034147748,0.00062087557,0.000011261404,0.000011959476,0.000015751375,0.004638142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922585,0.000021254304,0.0002525367,0.00027471402,0.000024189943,0.00020147236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.000027138625,0.000110312554,0.000110760884,0.000039833758,0.00004598199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018166548,0.00009614657,0.0002272443,0.00005567325,0.00053738104,0.00009506632,0.000065606546,0.000100361875,0.0005094305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006167704,0.000120149314,0.000078167905,0.00025390706,0.000030993215,0.00013459302,0.000033931727,0.00013623822,0.00017171507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005831491,0.00008558162,0.15135568,0.00010108467,0.00011371514,0.000007525449,0.0024307554,6.4313457e-7,0.00006604775,0.8399979,0.0016206277,0.0042145923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073360256,0.0000510716,0.060106326,0.000051460687,0.000022864566,0.000013513694,0.0021957287,0.00006175539,0.00036219583,0.07112518,0.8648167,0.00045957594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034159533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057180005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003370127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011684756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55779064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187284326","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/45","title":"Improving Welfare in One-Sided Matchings using Simple Threshold Queries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Property (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Preference; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pareto principle; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06142487504616668,"score_gpt":0.23602975909305482,"score_spread":0.17460488404688815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187284326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615975,0.0005171976,0.0026454164,0.00034759173,0.0002516648,0.00009385459,0.000021430871,0.00005816605,0.034467164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973412,0.000005609181,0.001386583,0.00016883432,0.0000703353,0.000005405226,0.0000079096735,0.00001923144,0.000994865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987495,0.00002040204,0.0005598999,0.000353798,0.0000264334,0.00028994447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941313,0.00004361562,0.00018747013,0.00028743115,0.000022054133,0.0000462956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062941614,0.00012223166,0.00036247,0.0001283917,0.00011798231,0.00012144976,0.00012524483,0.0000881873,0.000757186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019010571,0.00014976705,0.000077178454,0.0002428905,0.000024971634,0.00026851683,0.00006989367,0.00014739454,0.00008122341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007607144,0.00004898495,0.07619007,0.000077089884,0.000016986,0.000017717748,0.00067122956,0.00023263546,0.0012440932,0.9211635,0.000016891274,0.00031320876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003567448,0.0001281025,0.101288185,0.00041261938,0.000026265012,0.00013024067,0.01400511,0.06585664,0.02070457,0.77523386,0.016024008,0.0026229443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018783698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038660783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14592962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008172396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019536308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82906556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190367304","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83508-8_30","title":"Fair Correlation Clustering with Global and Local Guarantees","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Correlation; Partition (number theory); Correlation clustering; Similarity (geometry); k-medians clustering; Constant (computer programming); Statistics; CURE data clustering algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.01671011317613314,"score_gpt":0.20613986428411818,"score_spread":0.18942975110798504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190367304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013789396,0.001469329,0.9870942,0.00010589427,0.00078289147,0.00013385202,0.000017227754,0.000030854586,0.00898676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98269236,0.000022626467,0.016423266,0.00021520464,0.00018511442,0.0000020333298,0.00000516584,0.000016000551,0.00043822505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998585,0.000008808337,0.00036353897,0.00071801303,0.00007777671,0.0002469033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925506,0.000095472205,0.00024513944,0.0003098118,0.00004031382,0.000054229582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053704495,0.00022465675,0.00041215445,0.00016654629,0.00011428305,0.00019380201,0.00028468814,0.00017420221,0.000030647854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030547937,0.0002212121,0.00004125008,0.0001783416,0.00042807095,0.0001632813,0.00019167883,0.00026405178,0.000029528763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004195574,0.00002475763,0.012546809,0.00020538257,0.00004313837,0.00010822452,0.001113052,0.20639312,0.000003737508,0.5018398,0.0000062199297,0.27767378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041703097,0.000180074,0.0021247289,0.00081119506,0.0000064018523,0.00023541068,0.0000020400407,0.78656197,0.000018317587,0.20786873,0.0011732707,0.00060086086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050689614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020463149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001658962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052992367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9020768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192149637","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2108.03280","title":"A characterization of lexicographic preferences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Indian Statistical Institute; Jadavpur University","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Characterization (materials science); Preference; Contrast (vision); Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Mathematics; Order (exchange); Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1178231074961556,"score_gpt":0.16567796103916402,"score_spread":0.04785485354300842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192149637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97702795,0.00014898993,0.015789652,0.000011415743,0.0005614323,0.00015799412,0.00014077987,0.000043167427,0.006118598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980807,0.00027980882,0.000024238912,0.000012838329,0.00005191529,9.0669437e-7,0.00011796499,0.000014624511,0.0014170228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881226,0.00006298435,0.0003709556,0.00058222935,0.0000131255765,0.000158467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859065,0.00003127992,0.00076630816,0.0004927804,0.000066618384,0.00005235942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035302853,0.00016713911,0.00048504892,0.00030525605,0.00004777867,0.00004554452,0.0003765388,0.00024736434,0.00025211409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003742744,0.00022829877,0.00021619411,0.0003808671,0.00008368041,0.00014437042,0.00024803515,0.00024062245,0.00004415635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003601286,0.0001694236,0.18366876,0.00053378765,0.00026181794,0.000023366227,0.00087110617,0.0038883972,0.0007981409,0.8096397,0.000005348384,0.00010415986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019095339,0.0002889041,0.2819123,0.0017260081,0.00023678999,0.000009115312,0.0016107315,0.053416878,0.0040637953,0.6502074,0.002078555,0.0025399707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017733865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026869693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15943225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037211477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035470883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9309754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197093030","doi":"","title":"Apprentissage de Vote de Majorité par Minimisation d'une C-Borne PAC-Bayésienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Minimisation (clinical trials); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016302372274597757,"score_gpt":0.20644420765705734,"score_spread":0.1901418353824596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197093030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65476817,0.005482425,0.27360865,0.019515188,0.001153702,0.00053062977,0.00026429121,0.00017508931,0.04450188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121773,0.001442126,0.039871372,0.00013364268,0.00012822331,0.00010950465,0.0008258869,0.00009969154,0.04521223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902384,0.00564651,0.0015535676,0.001421923,0.0001675418,0.00097201025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278635,0.0016353629,0.0016798327,0.002637309,0.00088522286,0.0003759224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016958266,0.0005632747,0.0009803309,0.00028943768,0.0005965671,0.00091848813,0.0014348428,0.00076085585,0.00054210366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029992538,0.00081542815,0.000536321,0.00074720115,0.00039390867,0.00029609055,0.00086595997,0.0010299956,0.00024014387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036311856,0.0015972374,0.07185726,0.0010237818,0.0004388787,0.000043028973,0.043915745,0.00080208876,0.003701821,0.8423858,0.0014021215,0.0327959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047207144,0.000006577161,0.4003441,0.013863363,0.0004429685,0.00034588313,0.0050846073,0.13782302,0.12826802,0.12043555,0.1840015,0.0046636704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064026243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00375115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005557763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003091728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288619","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.013","title":"Round-robin political tournaments: Abstention, truthful equilibria, and effective power","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tournament; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Microeconomics; Politics; Power (physics); Economics; Nash equilibrium; Majority rule; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.016981974734616632,"score_gpt":0.2334617871221687,"score_spread":0.21647981238755207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198288619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893538,0.0013331991,0.00009148494,0.00029168394,0.00083054276,0.00022930591,0.00014204388,0.000031791897,0.0076961853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646807,0.000056050612,0.00008443916,0.00014475835,0.00013057534,0.000058809357,0.000014042647,0.000026415615,0.003016842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848753,0.000038584203,0.00054401206,0.0005217727,0.00001576204,0.00039231917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928606,0.00007807045,0.00018057758,0.0002493579,0.000016859112,0.00018909441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042531834,0.0001834485,0.00046051104,0.0000917702,0.00010678478,0.00023384443,0.00008394695,0.00012706633,0.0007783143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395706,0.00021566363,0.000108629814,0.000038651364,0.00010423719,0.00027288892,0.00010158848,0.00013433106,0.00031252348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022263153,0.00012653763,0.2716681,0.000042255684,0.00008883506,0.00002511013,0.00047657933,0.000002257324,0.0003808499,0.7246855,0.00020522809,0.0022764795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033156485,0.0003285766,0.9046228,0.00011487247,0.00010955765,0.0005814156,0.0026117968,0.0003728286,0.0007283229,0.058787093,0.027340367,0.0010866971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016233182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001617045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013597487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017420942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198807627","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3911298","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items: Compatibilities and Incompatibilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Arithmetic; Law and economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024772933174460828,"score_gpt":0.2270298119091088,"score_spread":0.20225687873464795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198807627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791441,0.014552164,0.0019601702,0.00017797468,0.00024799234,0.00007544057,0.000023041212,0.000028151839,0.0037909735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789363,0.00062245165,0.00010961483,0.000028509583,0.00010116845,0.0000020711861,0.000005024831,0.00002440859,0.00121314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803513,0.00010763138,0.00063517,0.00026834285,0.000065957705,0.0008877885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990298,0.0001607617,0.0004501077,0.00022360717,0.00007448887,0.000061192826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029533375,0.00014483057,0.00048097214,0.00018381546,0.00013792215,0.00007584163,0.0001643552,0.000062812745,0.00005760323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020530482,0.0001517087,0.00011550411,0.00017806557,0.00010319018,0.0002484232,0.00005003889,0.00067454926,0.000017639877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013635014,0.000059201284,0.20129128,0.00005808071,0.00009563673,0.0000012476296,0.0022051188,0.00005513075,0.000098423254,0.7950877,0.000016217624,0.0010183033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012091902,0.00039393667,0.02254637,0.0001254361,0.000011768905,0.00018312235,0.028890856,0.00056991284,0.0006227653,0.94449955,0.0006627991,0.0002842803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032642903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045490358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17874491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024098618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026658797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6186501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199006883","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.156","title":"Vote Trading and Electoral Success in Nigerian Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Context (archaeology); Contingent vote; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Voting; Economics; Political economy; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.061705107488953644,"score_gpt":0.29227724257196225,"score_spread":0.2305721350830086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199006883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909394,0.003078088,0.00047336632,0.003922137,0.0010175608,0.000015621186,0.000005358924,0.0000028765924,0.00054558704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989161,0.0001918068,0.00015646109,0.00044470685,0.00018909996,6.1007137e-7,0.0000020107582,0.000004464592,0.00009477657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991745,0.00008888902,0.00046540124,0.00012702987,0.000017765533,0.00012642337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993873,0.00017714767,0.0002946017,0.00004015992,0.00006733178,0.000033454326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005527046,0.00006324923,0.00029335843,0.00018222858,0.000037983245,0.000019761868,0.0001239794,0.00013673182,0.00005787778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026022462,0.000068448666,0.0000430584,0.00001080761,0.00016785221,0.00012515923,0.00003231006,0.00024054591,0.0000034577267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050722974,0.000031270058,0.3977485,0.000007442853,0.00009618684,0.0001766148,0.001806336,0.0000041024705,0.00037135932,0.5987586,0.00004326215,0.00090565026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008271824,0.00008241232,0.29490858,0.000019293633,0.000005306857,0.0010718029,0.0001637993,0.00012308653,0.00018777298,0.70144737,0.0010783914,0.00008499717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029529365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011887143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102839924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003309293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025921923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27912554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201202131","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2109.03370","title":"Monotone Equilibrium in Matching Markets with Signaling","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotone polygon; Communication source; Matching (statistics); Sobel operator; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Strongly monotone; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07155029950719388,"score_gpt":0.16714995270322064,"score_spread":0.09559965319602676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201202131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677935,0.00039503124,0.01874556,0.00003020949,0.00037244355,0.00024497876,0.000034802786,0.00007210187,0.012311367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973,0.000048809034,0.00017062503,0.000037889753,0.00007474863,0.0000017479309,0.000028589264,0.000042939748,0.0022946496],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980463,0.00010535326,0.00043377402,0.0010145238,0.00002039807,0.00037966284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861413,0.000104497514,0.00049532636,0.00065191806,0.00003668222,0.000097428674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089105516,0.0002934176,0.0006748558,0.00038397533,0.000059189802,0.000118297416,0.00048738625,0.00028182112,0.00022965933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035300614,0.00038718205,0.00016339499,0.00042421246,0.00006279063,0.00024402147,0.00047042585,0.00064089615,0.000108251006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024674702,0.00019373679,0.17431737,0.0005474257,0.00026252508,0.0011201232,0.0017630017,0.51771724,0.0001458992,0.30363736,0.000015698293,0.000032852968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006225777,0.00024738794,0.071848616,0.0046107257,0.0001829407,0.00006915301,0.0073323455,0.27205873,0.0011774082,0.6299491,0.0010236592,0.0052741915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067656353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009263235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3263117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023085476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005945479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202130907","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_12","title":"On the Complexity of Nucleolus Computation for Bipartite b-Matching Games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Computation; Complement (music); Bounded function; Simple (philosophy); 3-dimensional matching; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Time complexity; Mathematics; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.07190557685468692,"score_gpt":0.254570813321545,"score_spread":0.18266523646685812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202130907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065603,0.0004045159,0.98507017,0.0006343293,0.0011345099,0.00036930633,0.0000693801,0.000022209468,0.0057352637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98432577,0.000007150211,0.014644291,0.0005427688,0.00019235982,0.0000067211226,0.0000103557595,0.00002272158,0.0002478883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846673,0.000021611,0.00059452443,0.0005771524,0.00009529591,0.00024467593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791455,0.0009673477,0.0005838086,0.00041400123,0.00008446053,0.000035817335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015203006,0.00020822132,0.00051837857,0.0002700668,0.0001738827,0.0001279675,0.0005508711,0.00012391683,0.00005127639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019089361,0.00018242275,0.00014883887,0.00017460342,0.00067959813,0.00008031206,0.00014103646,0.00027685886,0.000027689248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008032495,0.000015821202,0.000041596315,0.00006816954,0.000013561911,0.0000012030114,0.0006722468,0.034612186,0.000016084337,0.9569106,0.000015112104,0.0076253586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374324,0.00008186075,0.00012349208,0.00032161403,0.000002820531,0.0000035503324,9.288253e-7,0.11006682,0.00019719539,0.8882606,0.0006130597,0.00019063716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000367285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000338163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97776544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008986029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049033024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7438984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204915051","doi":"","title":"Capacity Expansion in the College Admission Problem.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Mathematical optimization; Cardinality (data modeling); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Quadratic equation; Quality (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Quadratic growth; Preference; Linear programming; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1265936825835625,"score_gpt":0.17577026081593994,"score_spread":0.04917657823237745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204915051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769332,0.00024430745,0.002503694,0.0001654871,0.00048434193,0.0004280679,0.00010213855,0.000042188924,0.019096566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742657,0.0001138183,0.0000793752,0.000094605886,0.00007247253,0.0000028740744,0.000027198652,0.000018365672,0.0021647003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826825,0.00022016269,0.0004028783,0.00080296927,0.000024144196,0.00028158166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985743,0.000110685774,0.00041181414,0.00078779086,0.000039574632,0.00007582059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013411924,0.00023247361,0.0004741335,0.00023841312,0.00013529492,0.00007048602,0.0006882366,0.00033944746,0.00019152398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009462212,0.00024196455,0.0002057236,0.0004920664,0.00006745318,0.00015038927,0.00034911497,0.000679236,0.00013794564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044087625,0.00025106955,0.039335627,0.00029302822,0.00005164516,0.0002495997,0.0029979213,0.022631824,0.00002228452,0.93370146,0.00038637652,0.000035100617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025397101,0.00017586877,0.054997504,0.0014457884,0.000075927484,0.00003953077,0.00643663,0.07513596,0.00017952645,0.84479994,0.012215254,0.001958382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000834743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021307117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08890151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019383703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006498386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211019765","doi":"10.3982/te4229","title":"Robust group strategy‐proofness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Interim; Property (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Social choice theory; Allotment; Mathematical economics; Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Incentive; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.044134648956625,"score_gpt":0.2061035979562817,"score_spread":0.1619689489996567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211019765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66407984,0.000772405,0.008221247,0.0006895328,0.000910309,0.00015026762,0.00012786486,0.00011302036,0.32493553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718916,0.00008774058,0.0006695151,0.00038769023,0.00030064484,0.00001604006,0.000037892547,0.000046462254,0.0012648433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814945,0.00006134777,0.0007534216,0.0005802391,0.000017673809,0.00043785843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988661,0.0001596715,0.00020976285,0.0005632137,0.00003066851,0.00017060105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010986471,0.00020718007,0.00053922704,0.00007483478,0.000114257244,0.00017523016,0.00030151365,0.00017885488,0.0040204013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017465401,0.0002482139,0.00017783933,0.00013489353,0.0003421471,0.00017901637,0.000106872154,0.00023164654,0.0023474025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020944008,0.00008854431,0.0010824418,0.000026994994,0.000043053144,0.000010710176,0.00009229419,0.0006315966,0.000017523756,0.99723643,0.00007684214,0.00067265297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049605785,0.000055067463,0.00095009094,0.000016336853,0.000007768331,0.00004246845,0.00018409468,0.0056372215,0.00027946534,0.984852,0.007109254,0.00037015608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010521052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000786888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33310935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089251145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031851956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213371989","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2111.08698","title":"On the Randomized Metric Distortion Conjecture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Conjecture; Metric (unit); Social choice theory; Function (biology); Mathematics; Distortion function; Preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Operations management","score_opus":0.07615307681666038,"score_gpt":0.16187889345344364,"score_spread":0.08572581663678326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213371989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88416314,0.00094468566,0.08081758,0.0002453071,0.0018270054,0.00069352967,0.00007923436,0.000095606454,0.031133913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936036,0.0001819779,0.000010094419,0.00016004076,0.00011296477,0.000004307448,0.000041088435,0.00002555698,0.0058603906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998173,0.00034053708,0.0004291796,0.000794066,0.000024256236,0.00023896802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974389,0.0008223985,0.0007532275,0.000867856,0.000046954432,0.0000706272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018030191,0.00027648042,0.0009030511,0.00032437666,0.00017539777,0.00012061303,0.00055156066,0.00032019286,0.0006999214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075435184,0.0002530011,0.0006068945,0.00052730663,0.00015492293,0.00007568649,0.0002654044,0.00066799385,0.00040479001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000874024,0.000054404387,0.00068492524,0.000051387593,0.00024716053,0.000036395508,0.0002514811,0.037274137,5.158596e-7,0.9602751,0.00023690972,0.000013557886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022605786,0.000056041154,0.0006256923,0.0002370047,0.00018679553,0.00000555928,0.00040588816,0.056296375,0.000052310268,0.91690415,0.0017174693,0.0009069045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002552354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017748991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10944044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002293915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036217993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215512069","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2023.105618","title":"Strategy-proof and envy-free random assignment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Unanimity; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Infinity; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03504836832287392,"score_gpt":0.23293383839418597,"score_spread":0.19788547007131205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215512069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96517015,0.002487617,0.0014142587,0.000457715,0.0016017779,0.00015103735,0.00006710265,0.00002787079,0.0286225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579054,0.00019747746,0.000051927575,0.000060947383,0.00047170548,0.0000036729095,0.000001363177,0.000023216124,0.0033991567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845964,0.000093179035,0.0009946778,0.00019110228,0.000024723264,0.00023669846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982547,0.00039282808,0.0009344208,0.00028848552,0.000014038561,0.00011550915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057688677,0.00013794091,0.00054890587,0.00031138,0.00007767335,0.00008495948,0.00034990546,0.000083721825,0.0004805589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021744432,0.00013621991,0.00016565208,0.00006482906,0.000080856524,0.00026289487,0.00007936185,0.00018798208,0.00049782766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002187427,0.000030265921,0.0049358583,0.000035708035,0.00020723057,0.00002026516,0.00058447133,0.0015125652,0.00009724634,0.98623866,0.0037324294,0.00238657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031101601,0.00019013208,0.0040359367,0.00004608597,0.00001593372,0.000097565266,0.00072006613,0.00059398083,0.00024026952,0.97970265,0.011029363,0.0002178762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006698228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000213181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030620413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099625766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003164856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6398734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32690299","doi":"10.1007/s11518-012-5198-x","title":"Dominating attitudes in the graph model for conflict resolution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Decision maker; Perspective (graphical); Conflict resolution; Property (philosophy); Resolution (logic); Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.07152593094850482,"score_gpt":0.2571470287020526,"score_spread":0.18562109775354776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32690299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8721038,0.017365701,0.106758885,0.000058611942,0.002723399,0.0005042144,0.0000111628415,0.000012598887,0.00046159214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918985,0.00003712733,0.00024168337,0.000009096239,0.00043212966,0.000024408582,1.5499569e-7,0.000009428155,0.00005614473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984353,0.00002971798,0.000902458,0.00012963654,0.00014331208,0.00035953204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988721,0.00019183914,0.00058180664,0.00014381531,0.00012514277,0.00008529147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017589733,0.00010770145,0.00037838126,0.00047532865,0.00014764424,0.00021769345,0.00031128016,0.000055677363,2.1864369e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004948245,0.00008240383,0.00006074359,0.0003730005,0.00005930847,0.0007695812,0.000018266865,0.0001411562,0.000001999887],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012572315,0.000052876654,0.0393063,0.00080472504,0.000031426265,0.000002132773,0.012341315,0.26867017,0.0031197492,0.67545897,0.00015426872,0.00004548096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005097245,0.00007454117,0.007109964,0.00067439995,0.000007462619,0.00034227903,0.002481609,0.98668474,0.000020122696,0.00014443156,0.0017514989,0.00019922557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053530577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.274506e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71801454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113342554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002640934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60962856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350411819","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2194458","title":"Quantile Stable Matchings for Markets with Contracts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Air Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Business; Economics; Financial economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01595657962784045,"score_gpt":0.21454366662797783,"score_spread":0.19858708700013739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350411819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91850317,0.008493251,0.06123191,0.0003444242,0.000617561,0.00029900568,0.00002751269,0.000039672454,0.010443509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931482,0.00027107948,0.00027329367,0.000085965854,0.00036985398,0.000014649674,0.000003369187,0.00003590137,0.005797673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971858,0.000028958799,0.00039047928,0.0001554066,0.00003801214,0.0022013197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919266,0.000101621335,0.00042083312,0.00014334985,0.000033146865,0.000108422486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055696894,0.00013669716,0.00030497776,0.00010428891,0.00021744473,0.00007869032,0.00018233285,0.00006724346,0.000081453356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009216068,0.00012413361,0.00009561802,0.00008717416,0.000023466075,0.0004623566,0.000011448944,0.0006231279,0.00015291042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001557004,0.00007143316,0.025122292,0.00001396985,0.0001307558,3.3299244e-7,0.00025669322,0.000009216226,0.000030933228,0.97337455,0.00017657652,0.0006575414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026859601,0.00058448955,0.009753448,0.00006233475,0.000034456694,0.00079007127,0.0017366172,0.00026618433,0.00016699065,0.8595845,0.12375835,0.00057659886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006368342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006255867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123581775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032222268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001575334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5062022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W360948712","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511735127.012","title":"Free cumulants: definition and basic properties","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulant; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.05868647486668859,"score_gpt":0.16702277967594256,"score_spread":0.10833630480925396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W360948712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028855272,0.0011753257,0.00023835697,0.000013704488,0.00023539935,0.00026944524,0.0013062889,0.00009659754,0.99377936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058678783,0.00009150248,0.00003261522,0.000034525565,0.00015602197,8.9916597e-7,0.00004857108,0.00004183545,0.9409152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989628,0.000017638202,0.00029874156,0.00047006324,0.00004042296,0.0002102982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990169,0.00003150039,0.00037124485,0.00046822376,0.000038429924,0.000073715295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001988733,0.0002713471,0.00047940362,0.00021417804,0.0001668542,0.00006409029,0.0003028166,0.00030019818,0.0000070089354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016776394,0.00034356833,0.00012465302,0.0000057176917,0.00019301959,0.000101714366,0.00020802647,0.0002565589,0.000057465917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003357584,0.0000066421812,0.000038162616,0.00015364899,0.000063684616,0.00003420528,0.000039891034,0.0000018732469,0.000005674836,0.98406,0.015498739,0.00006392578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076450047,0.000053209267,0.00009113483,0.00029594012,0.000055621487,0.000018548813,0.000024210674,0.00008846586,0.00005472242,0.0027774367,0.9952042,0.0005720098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005015002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041484095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98128253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010297608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001615204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W380080350","doi":"10.32219/isms.69.3_387","title":"TALMUDIC BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM : SPECIAL AND GENERAL SOLUTIONS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Talmud; Bankruptcy; Proportionality (law); Law; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Egalitarianism; Economic Justice; Judaism; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03340314164703588,"score_gpt":0.22614572517736134,"score_spread":0.19274258353032547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W380080350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.598249,0.001043065,0.004008989,0.0022848754,0.0007592609,0.00056388945,0.0000653539,0.0001608397,0.39286473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879064,0.000016688185,0.0061597247,0.00015572127,0.00055312994,0.000015400821,0.0000059170725,0.000016677972,0.005170355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820155,0.000034943423,0.00067893445,0.00049350684,0.00007704653,0.00051401625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903274,0.00005894176,0.00028716016,0.00044022896,0.0000285239,0.0001523905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018693738,0.00017894492,0.00041292972,0.0002226404,0.00036513282,0.0002140083,0.0003087539,0.00008911939,0.00085607293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016352323,0.00018333696,0.00012240524,0.00036738807,0.00015724002,0.00024158212,0.00008823778,0.00014460573,0.0013435743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036927013,0.00011440419,0.00014261378,0.000032781954,0.000016044598,0.0000018309804,0.0006535282,0.000010253862,0.00023385524,0.995934,0.0022967837,0.00056018034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005402149,0.00011541066,0.00532629,0.00007147878,0.000015114743,0.000055099666,0.000086860804,0.0032920106,0.00008220672,0.97177273,0.018267496,0.0003750595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073146994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005192904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38965738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048743514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021575237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40976406","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_3","title":"Plurality Voting with Truth-Biased Agents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Equilibrium selection; Voting; Best response; Risk dominance; Correlated equilibrium; Condorcet method; Focus (optics); Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Repeated game","score_opus":0.04036305987728673,"score_gpt":0.22466575303443995,"score_spread":0.18430269315715322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40976406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012623581,0.00038605786,0.9405138,0.00022230753,0.0020426793,0.00049946207,0.0000350162,0.00009889867,0.043578193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98558086,0.0000045154234,0.011205923,0.0004586605,0.00041143666,0.000008064918,0.0000069645835,0.000040463718,0.0022831238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761,0.000016997787,0.00067171647,0.0010650228,0.00013580549,0.0005004569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824816,0.00029825277,0.0006318248,0.0006346275,0.00006910402,0.000118028736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013100253,0.00037235653,0.0006631917,0.00043316197,0.00018238738,0.0002996382,0.0009025487,0.00023386131,0.00050424924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013458604,0.00034444575,0.000100383324,0.00023310092,0.00044304106,0.00026358038,0.00019877624,0.0005168733,0.0006057586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030084366,0.0000636682,0.008081446,0.00025255565,0.00007397407,0.000061788785,0.0017534981,0.028631926,0.000009686992,0.88382643,0.00005918864,0.077155724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012539541,0.00041752012,0.006132945,0.0014685451,0.00001618104,0.00008560682,0.0000012946971,0.27937496,0.00018519293,0.6991922,0.0096257785,0.0022457906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011455167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030881714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97295725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020482163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006171567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213194262","doi":"10.1007/s00453-019-00636-y","title":"Stable Matchings with Covering Constraints: A Complete Computational Trichotomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Algorithmica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Trichotomy (philosophy); Parameterized complexity; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Bipartite graph; Stable marriage problem; Theory of computation; Discrete mathematics; Corollary; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Graph; Statistics","score_opus":0.03579816660532784,"score_gpt":0.20107689903845288,"score_spread":0.16527873243312505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213194262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22418022,0.00033238187,0.72161543,0.002851186,0.0003034552,0.00062169274,0.0008990824,0.0003158534,0.048880704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874281,0.0000018524207,0.01117429,0.0010296035,0.00013057674,0.000013311207,0.00003189542,0.000024976041,0.0001653572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989519,0.000019708086,0.00039430615,0.00033925957,0.000049792365,0.00024503155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939597,0.00010130375,0.00023025388,0.00011906392,0.00002968078,0.0001237218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026840894,0.00014013187,0.0003481629,0.00006211426,0.00010926624,0.00008825371,0.0001815296,0.000043676555,0.00048364035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042550742,0.00014966438,0.00005562706,0.00022832496,0.00009910664,0.00016599966,0.000036539917,0.0001549024,0.0008229136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015181114,0.00012951998,0.0128942495,0.00020793102,0.000362451,0.000077043376,0.0041991537,0.009213496,0.00011833759,0.9675328,0.001923112,0.0031900678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010360781,0.0011044829,0.013545012,0.0002609732,0.00005527057,0.000386525,0.0018800581,0.4645705,0.000292077,0.17880443,0.3261172,0.0026227022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006463527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.825458e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7887284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035699122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021229165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213232880","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2022.109432","title":"On negative dependence inequalities and maximal scores in round-robin tournaments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Convergence (economics); Inequality; Combinatorics; Joint probability distribution; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Calculus (dental); Mathematical analysis; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.03811256103290133,"score_gpt":0.23507721129473566,"score_spread":0.19696465026183432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213232880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97513884,0.00006365698,0.021850629,0.0006602591,0.00030927663,0.0003737282,0.0010531702,0.00002130357,0.00052914774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913842,0.0000038452404,0.007423787,0.00090008986,0.000023242137,0.00009530435,0.000020406203,0.000015351578,0.00013378872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984014,0.00020827894,0.0005803074,0.0004338474,0.000084340776,0.00029185036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.00047076718,0.00026104934,0.00023555101,0.0000133486865,0.00005140817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015420752,0.0001502173,0.0003139504,0.00015730585,0.00019276336,0.000080328326,0.00019158452,0.00002720488,0.00024687636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005002741,0.00018357876,0.000029843066,0.00014764286,0.00014415594,0.00011648223,0.00012994758,0.00032038268,0.000030354813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008590238,0.00009368756,0.086001724,0.0000740686,0.00001667054,0.000016350916,0.002771749,0.0003740753,0.00003325469,0.9100039,0.0003483184,0.00018027725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005433846,0.00018711467,0.036951922,0.000021736272,0.000002554125,0.000006266382,0.000132756,0.0004731652,0.000016870932,0.96123236,0.00021010615,0.00022176084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009528108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013623979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05122844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034680532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017670638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74861246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226160054","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01563-w","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Voting; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.07287673766957566,"score_gpt":0.2881955577613382,"score_spread":0.21531882009176256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226160054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793887,0.00117432,0.00014404034,0.003128061,0.0010296692,0.0005376394,0.00070107024,0.00008882534,0.013807671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984606,0.000008414845,0.000047126327,0.00019614807,0.00046215608,0.00013591997,0.00040608295,0.000034926154,0.00024863312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982674,0.00015180923,0.0006399735,0.0005935111,0.000075186916,0.0002721062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.00011500632,0.0006026492,0.0002143128,0.000017908884,0.00004137042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012928048,0.00021156251,0.0005513641,0.00027165035,0.00043816803,0.00015614979,0.00031382148,0.00028319017,0.00036531116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017611943,0.00028791494,0.00014660279,0.00023315886,0.00005906423,0.00008168141,0.00041046643,0.000830907,0.0000151623335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017807477,0.000101814345,0.8374964,0.0005019873,0.00007733272,0.000006169603,0.0062350505,0.0006504262,9.4880363e-7,0.15272988,0.00045502282,0.0017271833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016888542,0.000054554155,0.9090617,0.0001019855,0.00003441534,0.0000012987341,0.006201622,0.0014255464,0.0000054089087,0.040931623,0.03957508,0.0009179131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021451206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015576524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11179826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011935055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002510022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226169032","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4050685","title":"Interval Aggregation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016323225682411218,"score_gpt":0.20794675138680682,"score_spread":0.19162352570439561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226169032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94603693,0.00792453,0.021289445,0.0010820703,0.0017042708,0.00012936232,0.000019803745,0.000054492084,0.021759106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914045,0.0001537485,0.000016211448,0.00009684834,0.00023040788,0.000009219833,0.0000033978176,0.00001555445,0.008070148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846137,0.00006454177,0.0003645017,0.00014758279,0.000041276773,0.0009207212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949825,0.000019655037,0.00032080946,0.00011717918,0.000011201039,0.0000329013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041165045,0.0000728846,0.00015998191,0.00014697653,0.00036189434,0.000041802232,0.00025603204,0.000021796044,0.0005166884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005140136,0.00008648103,0.00010726339,0.00014795616,0.000014382459,0.00012146043,0.000052750776,0.0011846784,0.0002442881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018818339,0.00002969091,0.0057092397,0.0000018562595,0.000048310685,0.0000013316999,0.00027339792,0.00011255859,0.000009795696,0.9906319,0.00011576814,0.0030473727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036166937,0.00025397324,0.0003637228,0.0000033699328,0.000002944724,0.00048144627,0.001471435,0.00030588845,0.00000979016,0.96981895,0.026807787,0.00011902768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004979549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029686484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045367543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009726939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001544887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56573755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226355997","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2022.06.009","title":"On the population monotonicity of independent set games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Monotonic function; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Population; Mathematical economics; Profit (economics); Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10093682790227854,"score_gpt":0.315773368045517,"score_spread":0.21483654014323844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226355997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989478,0.000041829197,0.00023184107,0.0074799657,0.00012346017,0.0003354871,0.00011525507,0.000008951762,0.0021852413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985542,0.000003342181,0.000022869517,0.00047484148,0.000032001804,0.00016891948,0.000027086991,0.000008785057,0.0007079479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998864,0.00034355724,0.00029187638,0.00018826536,0.00013531986,0.00017700846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993539,0.00021595582,0.00004968522,0.00032989605,0.000026798632,0.000023771347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037233909,0.00005175076,0.000117502335,0.00023312877,0.0006683394,0.00006598512,0.0002865881,0.000017641076,0.0010319543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002889721,0.000046792313,0.000048014714,0.00032601706,0.00005675894,0.00007822583,0.00010425472,0.00035330054,0.00012879167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015989535,0.00005368465,0.009222657,0.0000059599884,0.000019525172,0.0000010031864,0.00091802946,0.095154606,0.00069636817,0.8907532,0.0031119813,0.000047002297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034623635,0.0018967468,0.38602537,0.00012210259,0.000016517319,0.000037556263,0.010797112,0.34137508,0.0060680765,0.16789794,0.08066796,0.0016331814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014621109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052485415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72285527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014698075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012818419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229665373","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.18","title":"Matching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06145682647873667,"score_gpt":0.22515931104917372,"score_spread":0.16370248457043707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229665373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009024853,0.0019228365,0.00015326487,0.0018313408,0.0011817942,0.00058040215,0.00015311972,0.00009170174,0.9940765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004786614,0.000035060424,0.00021026502,0.002873806,0.00044003545,0.000023627901,0.000105665895,0.00015144337,0.9913735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793595,0.000013750734,0.00086109934,0.00082928076,0.000060486913,0.00029942344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818426,0.00005621953,0.00085768546,0.00066260784,0.00003088084,0.00020833024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834416,0.0003719232,0.0009469743,0.00017927826,0.00014394279,0.0027901907,0.0016612503,0.0003779941,0.012606441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057160796,0.0004537357,0.0002411857,0.000043575714,0.00006906433,0.0021522006,0.00057475147,0.0006034648,0.011457083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109404455,0.000005352516,0.000018839297,0.000043547458,0.00010859684,0.000013786189,0.00025893733,0.000003750477,4.4757232e-7,0.8404565,0.15878521,0.00029410323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001827843,0.000024514062,0.000003965404,0.000078542944,0.000006935451,0.00000392691,0.000035278474,0.0000059441177,7.56202e-7,0.3625266,0.6367911,0.00033965442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002636644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014614346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47800592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014836676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006504301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230565990","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5","title":"Voting Experiments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05353734937599922,"score_gpt":0.23408007346276782,"score_spread":0.1805427240867686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230565990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000070851296,0.0015570978,0.0018207723,0.00005310862,0.0012328536,0.00015272961,0.000084087194,0.000106042615,0.99492246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03152637,0.000016562039,0.0000853254,0.00013369299,0.0007173396,0.000013262833,0.000014142313,0.00006124806,0.9674321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861765,0.000009890801,0.0006436927,0.0004387543,0.000026033833,0.000263982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899155,0.000063687796,0.0005225397,0.00034166852,0.000014079585,0.00006647819],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054398645,0.00022464746,0.00053134235,0.00016292713,0.000063510655,0.00004795909,0.00028015976,0.0002725938,0.0052143056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004477171,0.00020845469,0.00016890562,0.000022714763,0.00004018707,0.00007999619,0.00007348722,0.00013854617,0.02309626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021485187,0.000007582422,0.00022554828,0.00003052165,0.000047308888,0.000002073062,0.00006946479,1.4532675e-7,0.0000030254155,0.9536978,0.045650817,0.00026355303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002066899,0.000021555923,0.000017146038,0.00015496762,0.0000024264673,0.0000031737322,0.0000062072713,0.000011348131,0.00003734095,0.14119428,0.8580068,0.0003380681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009626337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.750171e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017455142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024774092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231059948","doi":"10.7202/000442ar","title":"Sélection rationnelle","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24059152439023165,"score_gpt":0.31791780072729886,"score_spread":0.0773262763370672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231059948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09242785,0.14655583,0.0123907095,0.30827323,0.009900973,0.0006670701,0.00013765722,0.00040549983,0.42924118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97109854,0.0011098854,0.00047964067,0.0029469698,0.004886183,0.0000075702487,0.000015708018,0.000020145051,0.019435346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985897,0.00008092058,0.00060834177,0.0003808868,0.00003300043,0.00030718304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991856,0.000052988707,0.00033616033,0.00030052123,0.00004815813,0.00007653411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007738636,0.00018650854,0.0003605612,0.00018274241,0.000182656,0.000104501436,0.00016364892,0.00020790075,0.00040247437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013949354,0.00025973766,0.00015086813,0.00018279861,0.00007164606,0.00042443056,0.000015713806,0.0002159018,0.0015386262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018118786,0.00016804191,0.0011501561,0.000040422023,0.000028437078,0.0000042634338,0.0006514354,0.000066914174,0.00008255351,0.982674,0.012085761,0.0030298831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023972351,0.00028244997,0.0022210493,0.00010797589,0.000009434144,0.00001545727,0.00002596261,0.001306722,0.00047318614,0.8607404,0.13430233,0.00027528516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007032065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005905552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014519278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011467049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235629671","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.09","title":"A market","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.053550745367935255,"score_gpt":0.21703469778265122,"score_spread":0.16348395241471597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235629671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015859449,0.0023290166,0.00004743121,0.0023832798,0.0010965916,0.0007095594,0.0002505623,0.0000821625,0.9930998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012000321,0.00005179982,0.0001357809,0.0029649788,0.0004210848,0.00003574115,0.00008563124,0.00014246901,0.99496245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783736,0.00001838686,0.0008718665,0.0008943548,0.00006250446,0.00031551925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804354,0.00006724114,0.0008522181,0.0007601911,0.00003843634,0.0002383671],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011868813,0.00039236512,0.0010038451,0.00019517975,0.0001158018,0.002440689,0.001750877,0.000422845,0.04734201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015224774,0.00047598997,0.00026597537,0.00005257666,0.000091958194,0.0018247026,0.0005740391,0.00054487406,0.009518625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017335251,0.0000048757456,0.000030770414,0.00003101476,0.00009241687,0.00001146268,0.00005777789,3.4801693e-7,9.032363e-8,0.5367648,0.46275413,0.00023495097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000302182,0.000045147415,0.000014680328,0.000087139306,0.0000104961955,0.000005467087,0.000018069552,0.00002329321,5.177278e-7,0.18198654,0.81705254,0.00045395008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011404391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001057192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3547783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015187508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008113693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235702973","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.18","title":"Matching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06145682647873667,"score_gpt":0.22515931104917372,"score_spread":0.16370248457043707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235702973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009024853,0.0019228365,0.00015326487,0.0018313408,0.0011817942,0.00058040215,0.00015311972,0.00009170174,0.9940765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004786614,0.000035060424,0.00021026502,0.002873806,0.00044003545,0.000023627901,0.000105665895,0.00015144337,0.9913735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793595,0.000013750734,0.00086109934,0.00082928076,0.000060486913,0.00029942344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818426,0.00005621953,0.00085768546,0.00066260784,0.00003088084,0.00020833024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834416,0.0003719232,0.0009469743,0.00017927826,0.00014394279,0.0027901907,0.0016612503,0.0003779941,0.012606441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057160796,0.0004537357,0.0002411857,0.000043575714,0.00006906433,0.0021522006,0.00057475147,0.0006034648,0.011457083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109404455,0.000005352516,0.000018839297,0.000043547458,0.00010859684,0.000013786189,0.00025893733,0.000003750477,4.4757232e-7,0.8404565,0.15878521,0.00029410323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001827843,0.000024514062,0.000003965404,0.000078542944,0.000006935451,0.00000392691,0.000035278474,0.0000059441177,7.56202e-7,0.3625266,0.6367911,0.00033965442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002636644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014614346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47800592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014836676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006504301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237555792","doi":"10.24124/2013/bpgub933","title":"An analysis on sub-regional voting scheme.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; University of Northern British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ranked voting system; Hierarchy; Computer science; Noise (video); Disapproval voting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031273530079378525,"score_gpt":0.2520585772242358,"score_spread":0.22078504714485728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237555792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152886,0.00026473321,0.00040498137,0.00003277806,0.00058008434,0.00018194586,0.00003944959,0.000094251525,0.08311312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588674,0.0000147325945,0.00018134157,0.00014373548,0.00028079288,0.000037408492,0.0015013377,0.00004481028,0.03892848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982178,0.000032604377,0.0007522068,0.00065702817,0.000057070443,0.00028329864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.000068668705,0.0007177522,0.0004532513,0.00005833414,0.00010719281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066281995,0.00028207953,0.0007430682,0.0008168638,0.00013117578,0.00016310354,0.00032963738,0.00033994854,0.0022617306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058843485,0.0003051766,0.00037097628,0.00045666716,0.000015815336,0.00016908892,0.000006952094,0.00027062456,0.0039458643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002390626,0.000113867995,0.019663326,0.00007019,0.000652357,0.0000011139746,0.00041381182,0.00021456525,0.00009094662,0.9775899,0.0008227291,0.0003432969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024785772,0.0011533458,0.67506427,0.0006665075,0.0010907192,0.000007800702,0.008996976,0.19457804,0.005359874,0.067289904,0.035527505,0.007786522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067838316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031105493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006889546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014787078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237813984","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.08","title":"A jungle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06834580833050612,"score_gpt":0.2208226525039916,"score_spread":0.1524768441734855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237813984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000041803296,0.0026823534,0.000059428465,0.00217346,0.0011942483,0.0006826464,0.0001935342,0.00008785285,0.9929223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030586347,0.000030965115,0.00013145011,0.0027416407,0.00035378878,0.00002031214,0.00011689221,0.00014182462,0.9934045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790365,0.0000134182565,0.0008462753,0.0008680864,0.000060717164,0.00030788063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981248,0.000049174025,0.00081901345,0.00073535467,0.00003993442,0.00023173414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085589674,0.00037547795,0.0009777881,0.00018871052,0.00012386999,0.002329301,0.0016976869,0.00040997064,0.016650323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001227953,0.00045548883,0.00025865607,0.000054745673,0.00009017951,0.0018694226,0.0005660108,0.00052747823,0.014909528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009348222,0.000006928884,0.000028743661,0.000031871117,0.000099281955,0.0000113048745,0.0001256174,0.0000011556808,2.631512e-7,0.6845874,0.31484812,0.00024992437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030012062,0.000051879288,0.0000076553015,0.00007753188,0.0000102493195,0.0000034299858,0.000023584354,0.000015195395,0.000001216749,0.1940901,0.8049866,0.0004324524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013877527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013703829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49049732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015653107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008431686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238383256","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.16","title":"Extensive games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05984354255903021,"score_gpt":0.2260839841525457,"score_spread":0.16624044159351548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238383256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005101387,0.0043718726,0.000078966645,0.002757584,0.0012976954,0.0007628682,0.00022266385,0.00008783055,0.9904154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028297112,0.000087709086,0.00013838845,0.0046298713,0.00048317006,0.000036052366,0.0001245575,0.00015648978,0.991514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976401,0.000017095972,0.00091508805,0.0010153546,0.00006957686,0.00034281902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777627,0.00007730484,0.0010059151,0.00080765976,0.00008547188,0.0002473709],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007651501,0.00044115004,0.0011685431,0.00021334643,0.00012706003,0.0023326771,0.0016111878,0.00044129524,0.012890241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021965028,0.0005241249,0.0002955767,0.00005448574,0.00013127032,0.0019736942,0.00057131867,0.00058618165,0.011755274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014940503,0.0000056308922,0.000021253405,0.000030736872,0.0001254317,0.000020957405,0.00014205987,0.0000022201752,3.7779782e-7,0.65458834,0.3446417,0.0004063838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002961472,0.000057156532,0.000014981239,0.00010093658,0.000013528604,0.000007457373,0.00005087886,0.0000129318,0.0000020713182,0.20312697,0.79582286,0.00049405894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012510546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009398609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45146134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015134341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008895041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241625290","doi":"10.1007/s11238-004-5641-7","title":"The dynamic stability of coalitionist behaviour for two-strategy bimatrix games","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.029289359964888618,"score_gpt":0.28302498621405237,"score_spread":0.25373562624916374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241625290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339902,0.0018119152,0.062216315,0.000051368737,0.00021015445,0.00027025814,0.00017633307,0.000018964729,0.0012545291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.000058765498,0.00037627263,0.000016779068,0.000025987847,0.000020028107,0.0000074443806,0.000010922259,0.00013338018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989741,0.00005475666,0.0005399495,0.00023321777,0.00003109773,0.0001669083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827975,0.001067831,0.0002572732,0.00031201553,0.000039796243,0.000043334923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045411657,0.00009950403,0.00025381884,0.00005170405,0.0002942822,0.000069529924,0.00015591476,0.000057691264,0.00003263311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003309883,0.000078253885,0.00009726216,0.000083921586,0.0002051641,0.00009618367,0.000032095628,0.00006830315,0.000024536965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036830394,0.000049474653,0.0012872146,0.000021073201,0.000009476609,2.9995195e-7,0.00022539867,0.000086687476,0.00012388344,0.9936986,0.0000056099743,0.0041239653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009303108,0.00014539987,0.0038620352,0.000030521234,0.0000070331953,0.000005714774,0.00049727,0.00013842674,0.00068463135,0.99334204,0.00025912208,0.000097478194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003182343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025190311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065360256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033609173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015716134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31911007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241797199","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.19","title":"Socialism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Political science; Law; Communism","score_opus":0.0766006217045467,"score_gpt":0.23182244797729828,"score_spread":0.15522182627275158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241797199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024911942,0.002263804,0.000046768164,0.0039481055,0.0015252855,0.00063932367,0.00024438353,0.00008965534,0.9912402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021244625,0.00004860118,0.00009505157,0.0039632986,0.0007378325,0.00003021614,0.00014379619,0.00014801553,0.99270874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979087,0.000016613085,0.0008628375,0.0008319944,0.00006635945,0.00031345658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819964,0.000051960396,0.0009331722,0.0005571996,0.00004384809,0.00021417206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009669467,0.00037793475,0.0010254673,0.0001634336,0.00016615252,0.0025155721,0.0016875258,0.0005112469,0.01556175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012291773,0.0004718895,0.00029583796,0.00004827121,0.00011383328,0.0018006841,0.0005214123,0.0005669612,0.011773543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007923901,0.000004755851,0.00001412678,0.000024288178,0.00010075277,0.000008659241,0.00016146082,4.9139317e-7,2.1770911e-7,0.64215046,0.35726145,0.00026543438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024017639,0.000027996693,0.0000055131422,0.000049050588,0.000009595089,0.0000022581175,0.0000231261,0.000005694003,8.795927e-7,0.30476484,0.6944895,0.00038137453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018990911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013204269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33738562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018527416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010218562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243656117","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2916337","title":"Raffles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.025573351925322393,"score_gpt":0.2343699793679493,"score_spread":0.2087966274426269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243656117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8689368,0.0070989416,0.009147826,0.0018422796,0.0014332164,0.00009899259,0.000008657412,0.00004298171,0.11139035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853885,0.00084729865,0.000028554692,0.00003985691,0.00050307804,0.0000018410599,5.29532e-7,0.000016187543,0.013174149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823374,0.000017651648,0.00031976952,0.00015861554,0.00002550124,0.0012447551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899185,0.000016830933,0.000560786,0.00036035324,0.000016951071,0.00005320649],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003319715,0.00009169659,0.00021352095,0.00007782658,0.00068743725,0.00024660045,0.00055170566,0.00005863552,0.00009199005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021196215,0.00009430892,0.00011514175,0.000022655075,0.000053157048,0.00027695048,0.00003829076,0.00078061566,0.0009345071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522461,0.000015071244,0.023270944,0.0000024800163,0.000055487413,0.000001446687,0.0000724501,0.000004068074,0.000011548022,0.9742828,0.00007335344,0.0022018396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039915036,0.000076975106,0.0056055156,0.00001083064,0.000003249534,0.00017020131,0.00022141253,0.000056650064,0.000020966674,0.9757561,0.017544467,0.00013445597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009193292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012784048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11645175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024260522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243955477","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.7797","title":"Turnout and Voting Methods in the United States - How Shiny is the Shining City?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Ballot; Presidential election; Context (archaeology); Politics; Socioeconomic status; Political science; Presidential system; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Statistics; Law; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2792489263635988,"score_gpt":0.41856187359599845,"score_spread":0.13931294723239962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243955477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7920407,0.000397312,0.0056103393,0.19085613,0.00027012525,0.0008841276,0.000022169676,0.000064676315,0.009854403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968059,0.00056628697,0.00074608374,0.0004113103,0.00020947824,0.00010093509,0.00000576783,0.000032919706,0.0011212982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718386,0.0003287569,0.00058833614,0.00072384294,0.00026057713,0.0009146022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701315,0.0013442527,0.0005832039,0.00056935503,0.00035875197,0.00013131414],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02187479,0.00027492465,0.0004762337,0.0005263307,0.0018400551,0.004449301,0.0019621593,0.00016615899,0.000021503205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042900117,0.00019408396,0.00008160945,0.00057393056,0.0013717151,0.0009804125,0.00057570136,0.0013933975,0.000036251324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003015915,0.00003297758,0.118889526,0.00012326075,0.0000519275,0.000005308112,0.043444786,0.0000021645155,0.000071595205,0.8344494,0.0013022746,0.0015966194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073833816,0.00018921253,0.033649217,0.00044176055,0.00001017966,0.000026949023,0.035961907,0.022354258,0.00033923524,0.884161,0.021622662,0.00050527084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028227272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058985355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2047652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000942497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057181223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244809592","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.01","title":"Preferences and utility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.09362604386414197,"score_gpt":0.2297140213759319,"score_spread":0.13608797751178991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244809592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007000935,0.0035897319,0.00002559189,0.0012186011,0.00050578587,0.00059500214,0.00019681141,0.000049226128,0.99374926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04576776,0.00011514518,0.00009852906,0.0011467254,0.00018002132,0.00002446535,0.00006991497,0.00006051486,0.95253694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.000018417984,0.0006474031,0.00080952985,0.00004638909,0.00021419671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.00007165404,0.00058632775,0.00047248634,0.000030826035,0.00018989375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000997681,0.0002972541,0.0007884164,0.000107873915,0.00011409071,0.002036676,0.00092406594,0.0003214671,0.0064814365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013676856,0.0003314751,0.00010472745,0.000031170304,0.00014683763,0.001634043,0.00049912237,0.0004011709,0.0012149224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019977306,0.0000061652054,0.0004813885,0.00006406379,0.00008998605,0.000002536937,0.00015920537,1.6457928e-7,9.118052e-8,0.8766688,0.121073455,0.0014341683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019326009,0.000039861858,0.00012975541,0.00005407296,0.000007732178,0.0000021350627,0.000024265342,0.000019526626,5.9937497e-7,0.28542352,0.7138345,0.00027074353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021152753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002770481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004497307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005457173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245645320","doi":"10.1145/2492002.2482607","title":"Two-sided matching with partial information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Preference; Stochastic dominance; Mathematical optimization; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Markov decision process; Mathematics; Markov process; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015436599764296878,"score_gpt":0.18829790747825517,"score_spread":0.1728613077139583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245645320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7544967,0.0000149630305,0.023009377,0.00022930288,0.00015215935,0.00016028383,0.000003811436,0.00007070295,0.22186269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971352,8.5570235e-7,0.0011218637,0.00029336073,0.00005804512,0.000024630895,0.000005929467,0.0000056029016,0.0013545118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999446,0.0000075704374,0.00030387993,0.0000842964,0.00001612529,0.0001421741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.000026438713,0.00015366817,0.00013703697,0.000015795827,0.00003904652],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028270087,0.00006450386,0.00013176331,0.00006809745,0.00005563323,0.00013071793,0.00007637192,0.000025943667,0.0013051823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023477789,0.000055716544,0.00002361013,0.000070709844,0.0000143352845,0.000880075,0.0000143770985,0.000054012406,0.008490142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051130537,0.000008494159,0.012915596,0.000011312718,0.0000131307825,1.553593e-7,0.00073565653,0.0002630379,0.000012304377,0.9852203,0.0004019533,0.0004129558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058513973,0.0004700202,0.07294815,0.00021294878,0.000014517442,0.00007102333,0.005760583,0.03224996,0.0022337507,0.78776586,0.090535335,0.0018864401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011684144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011553921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2426385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015579833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038674284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247733441","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-1471-5_1","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Scope (computer science); Computer science; Information retrieval; Programming language","score_opus":0.026218441733865346,"score_gpt":0.1826902060566259,"score_spread":0.15647176432276055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247733441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015252466,0.00041539976,0.004674243,0.00057021313,0.0017252857,0.00009301542,0.000020931655,0.000082982566,0.9924027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015081678,0.000032707372,0.000088930305,0.0001325172,0.0035311687,0.000002803985,0.00002660287,0.000042965803,0.9810606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999023,0.0000035388036,0.0004637721,0.00037113484,0.000016389138,0.00012213731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991688,0.000020398,0.00036390458,0.0003928239,0.000015553067,0.000038506787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005750716,0.00016199671,0.0004144697,0.00015328439,0.00004043864,0.00003378284,0.00012971871,0.00023199157,0.013661357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032693435,0.00018323821,0.00012680158,0.000010475703,0.00003400687,0.000030310346,0.00002544452,0.00017553827,0.03272115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021423393,0.000001808131,0.000015198734,0.000023929259,0.000027239124,3.2073933e-7,0.00001452687,0.0000027002395,4.76316e-7,0.957766,0.04150396,0.00064169447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004568174,0.000017949225,0.0000064867486,0.000009131721,0.000002518903,0.0000036772876,8.251302e-7,0.000020886999,0.0000025642667,0.3411733,0.6585723,0.00014463377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000134767415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003273021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6170684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043585533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003410821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247811935","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.14","title":"A market with asymmetric information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02685134156739029,"score_gpt":0.19193291076519584,"score_spread":0.16508156919780553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247811935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002470741,0.00069672655,0.00031127286,0.0011454961,0.0004588162,0.00088884146,0.00021301954,0.00007341835,0.9962099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003458495,0.000039658487,0.0003101188,0.0027016862,0.00018415309,0.000051359293,0.00022694538,0.000085069914,0.9929425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982633,0.000014881709,0.00086724304,0.000484142,0.000093884526,0.00027653095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788374,0.00006567321,0.0011969663,0.0005812372,0.000077423465,0.00019495108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010657683,0.00036445385,0.00080485275,0.00054225,0.00011612289,0.0031948094,0.0011825756,0.00033097618,0.0076354477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016057337,0.00037885687,0.00013707716,0.00017467912,0.00007173219,0.006381081,0.00030497924,0.00047997377,0.0051180194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057249705,0.000005176875,0.00009564102,0.00006332267,0.0001272409,0.000004776906,0.00011469587,0.0000025168742,9.971091e-9,0.6467965,0.35139713,0.0013356943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005916281,0.00013206217,0.00006685493,0.000110926936,0.000016354728,0.000009673417,0.000045672205,0.00006004145,4.577145e-7,0.031442944,0.9670243,0.00049907464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014359113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009720282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61562717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018338986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010748253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248926444","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08768605849367493,"score_gpt":0.23183861649243154,"score_spread":0.1441525579987566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248926444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018077522,0.003174684,0.00004143687,0.0012369823,0.00094079034,0.0006417577,0.00014970585,0.00008912841,0.9937074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008600226,0.000060730996,0.00024935088,0.0017677733,0.00041508256,0.000037312035,0.00011345156,0.00011426257,0.9886418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775213,0.000018991248,0.00094863353,0.0008967772,0.00007188426,0.00031160333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978194,0.00008576839,0.0012800782,0.0005991783,0.000046434874,0.00016912197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009831471,0.00038909714,0.0009615508,0.00016779923,0.00016291485,0.0028955617,0.0017729154,0.0003879876,0.010294713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022508681,0.00044725568,0.00020842397,0.00005575202,0.00010204341,0.002177549,0.0005466855,0.0005758735,0.0054492457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001071957,0.000006065971,0.000121196026,0.000057921152,0.00012316772,0.0000075849334,0.00022378755,0.000002414136,3.1047153e-7,0.8437938,0.15418562,0.0014674335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021022705,0.000053024964,0.00001092188,0.00019159933,0.000009592877,0.000003011172,0.00004375764,0.00002321396,0.000002206239,0.22534743,0.7736789,0.00042612274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002011818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002266973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6194933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011477855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008970257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249619156","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.08","title":"A jungle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06834580833050612,"score_gpt":0.2208226525039916,"score_spread":0.1524768441734855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249619156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000041803296,0.0026823534,0.000059428465,0.00217346,0.0011942483,0.0006826464,0.0001935342,0.00008785285,0.9929223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030586347,0.000030965115,0.00013145011,0.0027416407,0.00035378878,0.00002031214,0.00011689221,0.00014182462,0.9934045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790365,0.0000134182565,0.0008462753,0.0008680864,0.000060717164,0.00030788063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981248,0.000049174025,0.00081901345,0.00073535467,0.00003993442,0.00023173414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085589674,0.00037547795,0.0009777881,0.00018871052,0.00012386999,0.002329301,0.0016976869,0.00040997064,0.016650323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001227953,0.00045548883,0.00025865607,0.000054745673,0.00009017951,0.0018694226,0.0005660108,0.00052747823,0.014909528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009348222,0.000006928884,0.000028743661,0.000031871117,0.000099281955,0.0000113048745,0.0001256174,0.0000011556808,2.631512e-7,0.6845874,0.31484812,0.00024992437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030012062,0.000051879288,0.0000076553015,0.00007753188,0.0000102493195,0.0000034299858,0.000023584354,0.000015195395,0.000001216749,0.1940901,0.8049866,0.0004324524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013877527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013703829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49049732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015653107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008431686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250063613","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14662902","title":"Stability concepts in bargaining games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Mathematical economics; Perspective (graphical); Microeconomics; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Profit (economics); Bargaining problem; Type (biology); Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08132858287818912,"score_gpt":0.2735234264756485,"score_spread":0.19219484359745936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250063613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7667937,0.0030091181,0.0026580333,0.00010417523,0.0010283235,0.00024957518,0.00006112978,0.000070808215,0.22602507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731445,0.00005238279,0.0008964032,0.00012704999,0.00011534962,0.000044174158,0.000041123276,0.000024561235,0.0013845181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777746,0.0001004941,0.0009988417,0.0007887508,0.000028932036,0.00030551702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986843,0.0001445442,0.00038905843,0.00068792806,0.000030667405,0.00006351028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021758531,0.00022373689,0.0008360438,0.00015217785,0.000031382653,0.00015541591,0.0003145531,0.00032248106,0.002916264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042788786,0.00027409202,0.00018235488,0.00014004947,0.00006239413,0.00009125643,0.0004323117,0.0005929717,0.00022185962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114587565,0.00013468602,0.41087332,0.0003370493,0.000068379515,0.000019894722,0.006030994,0.00043733994,0.000014939495,0.5812641,0.000110932255,0.00069692277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00242148,0.00011487076,0.20662382,0.0014727795,0.000018727926,0.000015343041,0.01563013,0.014585071,0.0017469177,0.7382694,0.015768075,0.0033333858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009355293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019278332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23052068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015709964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005760847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252822417","doi":"10.1145/3274641","title":"Leximin Allocations in the Real World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Pareto efficiency; Software deployment; Pareto principle; Mechanism design; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052164521507753046,"score_gpt":0.25934763187686233,"score_spread":0.20718311036910927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252822417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.896181,0.000043339,0.084399305,0.0035614818,0.0004996281,0.00022789511,0.000029453151,0.00002816902,0.01502973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998328,0.00010375944,0.00073069165,0.00033479952,0.0000846066,0.000027418377,0.000008005279,0.000009631126,0.00037312094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927896,0.000027286984,0.00034084584,0.0002207802,0.000010534831,0.00012160919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950325,0.00012344304,0.00011507768,0.00022067201,0.00001289278,0.000024669873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005164833,0.00008313114,0.00013625008,0.00022050676,0.00018945141,0.00008224031,0.00015983687,0.000037974,0.000036646383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009636249,0.00008553325,0.00003749209,0.00017023974,0.000081580496,0.00016242228,0.0000030747267,0.000094718474,0.0001705697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004519951,0.00022819966,0.004178854,0.000016574057,0.000048440437,6.422239e-7,0.004979575,0.016134562,0.0000042603765,0.92121875,0.000105934894,0.053039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283444,0.000377862,0.11300231,0.000038114988,0.000015967695,0.000012172807,0.0011411484,0.1105153,0.0000749115,0.75156635,0.021483548,0.0004888925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045101848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017664564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16965243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043684133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009288869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34879446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254058566","doi":"10.1023/a:1011252808608","title":"Fallback Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Majority rule; Settlement (finance); Bargaining problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Condorcet method; Computer science; Voting; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.035788373848755946,"score_gpt":0.23071989224523393,"score_spread":0.194931518396478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254058566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.883628,0.0015642743,0.07442498,0.000106131665,0.00046171257,0.00010992489,0.0000062609174,0.000058935286,0.039639793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980294,0.00020349488,0.0007388593,0.0002239776,0.00011678468,0.0000042155552,0.000007558347,0.000010732731,0.00066497293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921286,0.000017006056,0.0003572324,0.00024163468,0.000030862513,0.00014041203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.000115317904,0.0001400074,0.0001519374,0.000012864648,0.000058645233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073348935,0.00008102532,0.0001712766,0.0001274745,0.0001121884,0.00007528271,0.00007464797,0.00006994379,0.00030528195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016190395,0.00008622334,0.000039620518,0.000156109,0.000016050348,0.00020827811,0.000027139044,0.00006554667,0.00075689616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004826439,0.00003766174,0.1617286,0.0000049832,0.000009402745,0.0000035999497,0.0005512857,0.00002270272,0.00007265261,0.782527,0.0005876892,0.054406088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014230654,0.00014139085,0.3739456,0.00005810111,0.0000045928805,0.000045686862,0.00028334055,0.009033482,0.000023973356,0.46799448,0.1466837,0.00036258835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027518374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009444841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31453258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020755613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017297178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254468019","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2004.9736809","title":"Introduction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Decision System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02250606694916769,"score_gpt":0.22218455724742114,"score_spread":0.19967849029825346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254468019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8518695,0.0013971524,0.1338237,0.0006884653,0.006062888,0.000082429724,0.000007536477,0.000022322325,0.006046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609506,0.000010703731,0.001788699,0.000019062403,0.001791906,6.503457e-7,2.5301836e-7,0.000010572218,0.00028310093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985212,0.000021973088,0.0011489133,0.00012513266,0.00007143374,0.00011135047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984882,0.000054323955,0.0010913186,0.00019978046,0.00009607907,0.000070324386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025248427,0.00007470235,0.00038236196,0.00028657276,0.000054407497,0.00005563736,0.00019129328,0.00006343583,0.00007476748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026177877,0.000065912616,0.00015789767,0.00018844545,0.000013328597,0.00022617889,0.000015393,0.00012910181,0.0014350426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014700479,0.00009146758,0.0028612935,0.000069445334,0.0000793656,0.00007275149,0.00063659844,0.0030670709,0.0002636476,0.9847551,0.0053061866,0.002650064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008559944,0.0013679372,0.013218063,0.0016978397,0.00004290166,0.011494272,0.0043498306,0.000268345,0.0022929567,0.27491036,0.68095934,0.00083821185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059159415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5875302e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70984477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020453817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016853643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255109117","doi":"10.1023/a:1007061304922","title":"The calculus of voting: An empirical test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.18387645130199848,"score_gpt":0.3863806689415928,"score_spread":0.2025042176395943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255109117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77779835,0.00045649323,0.00024469275,0.00223284,0.00013445724,0.00006663751,0.000017692839,0.0000070445235,0.21904176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956482,0.000021664677,0.000058970993,0.00007305967,0.000569828,3.400488e-7,3.4371092e-7,0.000022827688,0.0036047646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970123,0.0009817666,0.0010402132,0.00015202118,0.0001867426,0.00062692206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969738,0.0019494073,0.0001943961,0.00027873775,0.0002128798,0.00039078368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015669433,0.00008144873,0.00027258106,0.00015768911,0.00021236767,0.00010444694,0.0006946745,0.000029250441,0.0005018327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005760924,0.0000591698,0.00013223536,0.00024499864,0.0004628787,0.00011178203,0.000055767043,0.0006495273,0.000792691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007451765,0.00021201151,0.014885854,0.000016984679,0.000024405292,0.00008093128,0.00038664363,0.000010852381,0.000054604327,0.9792985,0.001315674,0.003639073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002648988,0.0070841913,0.41068688,0.00032837933,0.000017671773,0.0006309183,0.0021247184,0.0043479134,0.00091862417,0.082193,0.48844475,0.00057395647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028579134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016453105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89710546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061475934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005067019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255765836","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14662902.v1","title":"Stability concepts in bargaining games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Perspective (graphical); Profit (economics); Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Bargaining problem; Type (biology); Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08132858287818912,"score_gpt":0.2735234264756485,"score_spread":0.19219484359745936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255765836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7667937,0.0030091181,0.0026580333,0.00010417523,0.0010283235,0.00024957518,0.00006112978,0.000070808215,0.22602507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731445,0.00005238279,0.0008964032,0.00012704999,0.00011534962,0.000044174158,0.000041123276,0.000024561235,0.0013845181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777746,0.0001004941,0.0009988417,0.0007887508,0.000028932036,0.00030551702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986843,0.0001445442,0.00038905843,0.00068792806,0.000030667405,0.00006351028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021758531,0.00022373689,0.0008360438,0.00015217785,0.000031382653,0.00015541591,0.0003145531,0.00032248106,0.002916264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042788786,0.00027409202,0.00018235488,0.00014004947,0.00006239413,0.00009125643,0.0004323117,0.0005929717,0.00022185962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114587565,0.00013468602,0.41087332,0.0003370493,0.000068379515,0.000019894722,0.006030994,0.00043733994,0.000014939495,0.5812641,0.000110932255,0.00069692277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00242148,0.00011487076,0.20662382,0.0014727795,0.000018727926,0.000015343041,0.01563013,0.014585071,0.0017469177,0.7382694,0.015768075,0.0033333858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009355293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019278332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23052068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015709964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005760847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255895831","doi":"10.1017/s0021900200003582","title":"Bounds for Owen's Multilinear Extension","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Multilinear map; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Mathematics; Blocking (statistics); Field (mathematics); Game theory; Voting; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05036639708956518,"score_gpt":0.25760286886966155,"score_spread":0.20723647178009635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255895831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540259,0.00019402432,0.035161443,0.0001398621,0.0007017421,0.00040835893,0.00001570459,0.000017030401,0.009335925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501253,0.0000039590736,0.014359582,0.00009997744,0.00038211883,0.0000045072698,0.0000012867575,0.000014372961,0.000121635225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983235,0.000009847366,0.00116416,0.0002112794,0.000047265832,0.00024395518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983432,0.00022964078,0.00094962766,0.00025020746,0.00012804936,0.00009925936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008378692,0.0001102818,0.0004354494,0.00011890596,0.00008850427,0.000034488563,0.0001890449,0.000107860134,0.000045720528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035114394,0.000103576924,0.0001973624,0.00011579748,0.00006657715,0.000099775854,0.000022432907,0.00018616905,0.00004186526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024617584,0.0006969015,0.01697313,0.00036462455,0.0001229048,0.000005630435,0.0016430204,0.00054173754,0.002353055,0.96351546,0.0009948283,0.01032692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020561132,0.00035012074,0.016112465,0.000034381384,0.000016200736,0.000027329665,0.00021714884,0.00077502633,0.0035062842,0.8925842,0.08403739,0.00028333737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003959032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035572984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08304256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010758765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021900454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42237443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281664098","doi":"10.1257/aer.20210626","title":"Bargaining with Mechanisms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Stochastic game; Bayesian game; Economics; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game","score_opus":0.02387290312974828,"score_gpt":0.2239301995687929,"score_spread":0.20005729643904463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281664098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075118415,0.14745,0.013593484,0.005194534,0.001872632,0.0024673007,0.0005290872,0.0004963133,0.75327826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898577,0.0033594507,0.0008975737,0.0041133747,0.00005916583,0.00025072263,0.000016992,0.000046245972,0.0013988067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985827,0.000081913844,0.0006087562,0.00042738297,0.000023943312,0.00027525635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861187,0.000055306224,0.00080416066,0.00044939065,0.0000049769205,0.00007427833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014650075,0.00015487775,0.0007398776,0.00008943483,0.00019049905,0.000024732693,0.00035245554,0.000009211445,0.0029967087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022911116,0.00016825434,0.00011841676,0.00018414791,0.000078919475,0.00009676244,0.0001032375,0.00016375445,0.0015860101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011446466,0.000025603124,0.0026877115,0.00011105246,0.00008328268,0.0000061591277,0.00012370561,0.00027103003,0.0000023736518,0.9846188,0.002301749,0.009757076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005025901,0.0007305944,0.0008497971,0.0002825126,0.00003165372,0.00018583612,0.0006869993,0.0005531627,0.000009739467,0.044742446,0.9506194,0.0008052813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022064694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006314246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94831765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021838484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002992874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283792808","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20418","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Voting; Representativeness heuristic; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Majority rule; Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07176778308177141,"score_gpt":0.24977220366654168,"score_spread":0.17800442058477028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283792808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94120175,0.00013073134,0.003241307,0.0004603505,0.00039350704,0.00022436526,0.000055984987,0.00006766081,0.054224353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978445,2.7872142e-7,0.000328696,0.0003150462,0.00003783054,0.00006259235,0.00003219195,0.000011949718,0.0013669234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990266,0.00008273011,0.00043150358,0.00024922902,0.000040451992,0.00016948034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.000104247,0.00019969541,0.00017585623,0.0000051135034,0.000022792863],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018014909,0.00006753345,0.00018376358,0.00024594954,0.00013574774,0.00003749756,0.00020376862,0.000024877154,0.0010612592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008342159,0.000086755834,0.0000506271,0.0003542742,0.00001620379,0.00007862129,0.00008266699,0.00017257105,0.0001238518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013363158,0.000090387555,0.54013354,0.000013199617,0.000009740332,0.0000035571327,0.0008103711,0.0060882038,0.000010697241,0.4517171,0.0006511019,0.00045872128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076103024,0.0004787382,0.5571662,0.000043872988,0.000014214916,0.000029610037,0.01077457,0.20059276,0.00086308294,0.15410174,0.06665689,0.0016680199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040205967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025611978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29761538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000653915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009092983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283797980","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20443","title":"Worst-Case Voting When the Stakes Are High","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Multiplicative function; Social choice theory; Bounding overwatch; Voting; Social welfare function; Metric (unit); Function (biology); Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Range (aeronautics); Anti-plurality voting; Outcome (game theory); Social Welfare; Welfare; Computer science; Mathematics; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.13407582137355206,"score_gpt":0.25368124232547595,"score_spread":0.11960542095192389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283797980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97559226,0.00015443643,0.0010128017,0.0058855144,0.001215515,0.00058450823,0.00011979147,0.0000724635,0.015362698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981036,0.0000053740905,0.00009549043,0.00029345253,0.0001362285,0.00007501521,7.591599e-7,0.000023297727,0.0012667703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981822,0.000030215477,0.00085024117,0.00044507041,0.0001444076,0.00034787421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981608,0.00016647457,0.001188822,0.0002804588,0.00014974191,0.000053729556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021559028,0.00020044851,0.0003609469,0.00012832966,0.0008823021,0.00018997655,0.0012212932,0.00005295459,0.00086450257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061876944,0.00015453159,0.00015591407,0.00043594776,0.00023892263,0.00015579432,0.00036443849,0.00051418884,0.00018542008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005399411,0.0000891703,0.0021734836,0.000031528532,0.00002448516,0.0000032050732,0.0032468378,0.0002014414,0.00029610939,0.9916476,0.0002608068,0.0019713347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054458993,0.00020803888,0.00037969355,0.00012020312,0.000016694248,0.00009432449,0.01818815,0.010754346,0.013016494,0.9547733,0.0020127173,0.00038155974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003549255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030492514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036874283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008123633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022816761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9465697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283801145","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20420","title":"A Little Charity Guarantees Fair Connected Graph Partitioning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Partition (number theory); Combinatorics; Fair division; Graph; Mathematics; Vertex connectivity; Connected component; Binary logarithm; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.10955420127919167,"score_gpt":0.25774105692514465,"score_spread":0.14818685564595296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283801145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587101,0.00013075375,0.00080284197,0.0018877793,0.0008768684,0.00043618397,0.000119934695,0.00009791893,0.036937624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989076,0.000015163593,0.000068147216,0.00016550653,0.00006977311,0.00009232064,0.0000023978644,0.00001676822,0.00066230283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983,0.000024958159,0.00078794314,0.00043936737,0.00012981288,0.000317903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877673,0.00008275171,0.00071723043,0.00021440245,0.00015572608,0.00005315312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013433088,0.00017393904,0.0003633205,0.00017999708,0.00055248186,0.00011531092,0.0008604792,0.00005499081,0.0014938964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004820195,0.00016956306,0.00017151223,0.00064462033,0.00021524892,0.00017150583,0.00023612905,0.00038704756,0.00020818133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070326045,0.0001446111,0.003581889,0.000035340887,0.000022397722,2.9097285e-7,0.0018164474,0.00010283463,0.0027952082,0.9906184,0.00014434177,0.000667899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055389068,0.0002610942,0.0010512334,0.00009664812,0.000008681746,0.000007658164,0.003152166,0.0065356498,0.0437465,0.9436152,0.0011700938,0.00029970027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001742072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009393636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04700323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006119234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026242704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283801939","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20419","title":"The Metric Distortion of Multiwinner Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Voting; Metric (unit); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Telecommunications; Law; Operations management; Politics","score_opus":0.09066704021046244,"score_gpt":0.26105593484932416,"score_spread":0.1703888946388617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283801939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96735483,0.00033737812,0.0018334145,0.0015136029,0.0014794254,0.00053053297,0.00005700442,0.000040485123,0.026853338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987879,0.000016294674,0.000047143152,0.0000363208,0.000053630825,0.000041005766,5.862861e-7,0.000013501999,0.0010036628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.00002390732,0.0009237808,0.00028527962,0.0001453085,0.00023753935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819946,0.0001834366,0.0012269149,0.00019186754,0.00016549752,0.000032799744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022644103,0.00012820047,0.00028185156,0.00015820503,0.0005546785,0.00006166543,0.00096443255,0.000038268587,0.00018386065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010094796,0.00009772618,0.00015618159,0.00076034386,0.00021886194,0.00010319496,0.00024522052,0.0002873083,0.00005332652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061858016,0.00008782168,0.003893153,0.000027960883,0.000019223431,5.6348767e-8,0.00096935366,0.00025259526,0.001565256,0.9859097,0.00007265266,0.007140381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118963646,0.0006266811,0.0041181557,0.00016350302,0.000030173354,0.00000800373,0.008676781,0.044938926,0.21808356,0.71776795,0.004878246,0.0005890332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118205404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000612549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26814172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007842082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019988687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42661944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285231687","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.220603.085","title":"Analysis on the Market Design of Teacher Assignment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06429708845705093,"score_gpt":0.31136738087256255,"score_spread":0.24707029241551162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285231687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42145863,0.074654944,0.014962233,0.011943141,0.0030167166,0.014741487,0.00052356714,0.00014568194,0.45855358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68790245,0.30607083,0.00046736607,0.00011910164,0.00008285165,0.0014819279,0.000027979038,0.00006191633,0.0037855469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938533,0.0008071042,0.0017799049,0.0018471528,0.0002705689,0.0014420223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996804,0.00095233193,0.00066063827,0.0012823922,0.0001556001,0.0001450271],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018893164,0.0005023042,0.0012539171,0.0044470886,0.0008593712,0.00036317194,0.0014935565,0.00010946899,0.00048396632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001981702,0.0005137436,0.00012960298,0.003155226,0.0010318815,0.0013860768,0.0023934057,0.0008353153,0.000026776866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006735108,0.0006200044,0.036594745,0.0008660163,0.00043874327,0.00003695883,0.00028798636,0.1591369,9.1377655e-7,0.7526593,0.0003521094,0.048332784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033253385,0.00030612905,0.102715224,0.00028933163,0.00006586692,0.00000557645,0.0072624534,0.02829608,0.000010632646,0.23764196,0.6189395,0.0011418676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005695651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000783768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61858743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086038426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040537558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285601644","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2022/39","title":"Efficient Resource Allocation with Secretive Agents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distortion (music); Preference; Welfare; Social Welfare; Homogeneous; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Social welfare function; Resource (disambiguation); Nash equilibrium; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Political science; Computer network","score_opus":0.08116218144506153,"score_gpt":0.25210033630696244,"score_spread":0.1709381548619009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285601644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8667615,0.00003287818,0.0029638796,0.007921987,0.0011247179,0.00067224796,0.00014112347,0.0000743816,0.12030727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981581,0.000004940795,0.00013898154,0.00026062466,0.0000927329,0.00008916231,0.0000057076268,0.000021479687,0.0012282678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981856,0.00002049106,0.0007739535,0.00047476424,0.00030622474,0.00023900894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841976,0.00006486412,0.0009976908,0.0001925195,0.00026764505,0.00005750262],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281589,0.00019216804,0.00028322375,0.00024434348,0.00040679582,0.00010929855,0.0010067903,0.000046475543,0.0009787054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028841835,0.0001664514,0.00012761321,0.0003794264,0.00019463956,0.000080040554,0.0003159043,0.00037631922,0.0001638518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023229746,0.0002287319,0.0013558089,0.000026491873,0.00005719374,6.2506933e-7,0.0028236576,0.011781018,0.00052822946,0.9824851,0.00017123483,0.0003095997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004169205,0.0014295011,0.005991605,0.00084207504,0.000044756012,0.00007570808,0.021961482,0.37547633,0.07482091,0.49737105,0.020221898,0.0013477538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009567949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062172116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48511407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024074773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030474335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285602129","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2022/17","title":"Distortion in Voting with Top-t Preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Voting; Distortion (music); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Proxy (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Rank (graph theory); Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08510738125904387,"score_gpt":0.25086985557067976,"score_spread":0.16576247431163588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285602129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95528215,0.00003731286,0.0010357513,0.0027525541,0.00096656807,0.00034392258,0.000052928583,0.00003815702,0.039490625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908,0.000009461294,0.00012243024,0.00009441961,0.00007826509,0.000087268876,0.000003051771,0.000014777206,0.000510332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822366,0.00001707346,0.00087465177,0.0004263392,0.00022657712,0.00023171777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872863,0.00006091689,0.00088631455,0.0001293526,0.00015583994,0.000038965583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012338449,0.00016997321,0.00029821755,0.0002918307,0.0002461613,0.0001038623,0.00087759,0.000044326236,0.00066742237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002998386,0.00014591705,0.00009598371,0.00039689548,0.00014133494,0.00022679713,0.00023927729,0.0004091088,0.000064843465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015572143,0.00018219925,0.04531852,0.00002790823,0.00002275791,6.3465654e-7,0.0017450027,0.0014667861,0.00028184403,0.94957083,0.000023735513,0.0012040668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000254733,0.0008320666,0.024732443,0.0007005614,0.000013167877,0.000031906216,0.008843597,0.0351612,0.03040201,0.8964431,0.0018222921,0.00076289015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028100895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084010935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05312769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022198724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028892802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7307807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287702986","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.15748","title":"Descending the Stable Matching Lattice: How many Strategic Agents are\\n required to turn Pessimality to Optimality?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Infimum and supremum; Combinatorics; Lattice (music); Conjecture; Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Girl; Stochastic game; Counterexample; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.27146529189753066,"score_gpt":0.22590825599931455,"score_spread":0.04555703589821611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287702986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92988837,0.000069608155,0.055857237,0.001822994,0.0009986192,0.00079772883,0.00036929306,0.00016184615,0.010034311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474925,0.000026517144,0.00038778724,0.00048304757,0.00024266708,0.0000050653894,0.00001991428,0.000056208817,0.00402952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970801,0.00022099722,0.00052501756,0.0014793036,0.000055547735,0.0006390297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743307,0.00013460625,0.0008183925,0.0011521907,0.00007225585,0.0003894739],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015564313,0.00045036298,0.0008352314,0.00027332906,0.00039839046,0.00053106534,0.001475745,0.00028313792,0.00014694576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014999509,0.00050419825,0.0003046425,0.000680271,0.00006677845,0.00029839075,0.0013115049,0.00076524355,0.00082147843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014828074,0.00008791309,0.021830287,0.00043750892,0.0002724702,0.00017718229,0.002061911,0.123599835,0.000050746636,0.85079986,0.00051960663,0.000014412568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015116152,0.00023689002,0.037068512,0.001190439,0.00026496433,0.000012936443,0.01164887,0.105134696,0.00017798154,0.8326679,0.0069065276,0.003178683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060911017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057333782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06486091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046925052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057113837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289699818","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1808.04510","title":"On the approximability of the stable matching problem with ties of size\\n two","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Matching (statistics); Approximation algorithm; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Constant (computer programming); Stable marriage problem; Cardinal number (linguistics); Stability (learning theory); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.06251368277924894,"score_gpt":0.16102621900673875,"score_spread":0.0985125362274898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289699818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96076924,0.00006480018,0.005471396,0.00009405421,0.00045345043,0.0011404917,0.00020814137,0.000020890684,0.031777553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478793,0.000046769077,0.000110082525,0.00003227615,0.000060772276,0.0000029021978,0.000002079379,0.00003702847,0.004920178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707097,0.00044365966,0.00090374507,0.0010734239,0.00006758848,0.00044062544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936957,0.0011126916,0.0026964382,0.0021980032,0.00022116471,0.00007599624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033214125,0.0004474238,0.0010298548,0.0001471647,0.00039506704,0.00005782899,0.0017772653,0.00025770915,0.0004642864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023072769,0.00033264692,0.0004420572,0.0007217477,0.0013065875,0.00017964306,0.0008609636,0.0007704497,0.000073951305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041914624,0.00029699586,0.05520224,0.00073812145,0.00034401717,0.0000016519493,0.002164344,0.08835403,0.000018251756,0.8524214,0.000027393937,0.000012386269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013805375,0.00045622964,0.009420575,0.0012964739,0.00016476258,0.0000030684384,0.0027058427,0.015688805,0.0011224753,0.9667828,0.00029247554,0.00068592955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011515747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011787046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1143614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022343028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015597319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289753190","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3544489","title":"Three-dimensional Stable Matching with Cyclic Preferences: Computational proofs log files","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Stability (learning theory); Existential quantification; Computer science; Statistics; Machine learning; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06527436240273382,"score_gpt":0.23309091937511783,"score_spread":0.167816556972384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289753190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6404593,0.00085339707,0.13389432,0.0006936138,0.0008927622,0.002277889,0.005339837,0.0018004802,0.21378842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991108,0.000011660061,0.0027008918,0.00007715508,0.00032777217,3.3884243e-7,0.0038848917,0.0010547993,0.0008345086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789304,0.00014278278,0.0005708002,0.0008191617,0.00017416399,0.00040003585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983344,0.000051160256,0.0005627818,0.0005394501,0.00037457614,0.00013761377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014208409,0.00026078906,0.00040087602,0.00031478313,0.0014293324,0.0010067988,0.0010445415,0.00016630952,0.01231448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002057578,0.00027254075,0.00007525223,0.00022753888,0.00023252513,0.00020024537,0.0016000036,0.00054513826,0.010434133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007331219,0.0012110029,0.0009700198,0.0024910031,0.0012940724,0.000050223844,0.008373096,0.09881725,0.000120510434,0.6542904,0.21425445,0.017394878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012378683,0.00065642013,0.006029044,0.0009112191,0.000033130054,0.00016079136,0.00019674846,0.017146936,0.000051878367,0.50094026,0.47144565,0.0011900796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012847525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003053116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3506487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016912883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011284909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291208850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4188550","title":"Matching with Minimum Quotas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011692275040516203,"score_gpt":0.1931890285247318,"score_spread":0.1814967534842156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291208850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97399896,0.0035617715,0.008393077,0.0005789075,0.00044998378,0.00011021869,0.000014667058,0.000036577287,0.012855858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99221563,0.000099077864,0.00004750126,0.00011971813,0.00019463837,0.000012833184,0.0000026317964,0.000028094168,0.0072798943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980108,0.00006268512,0.00036065734,0.00020124653,0.000059625716,0.0013049871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993814,0.00003138345,0.00036461386,0.00016080227,0.000011427764,0.00005034718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036033082,0.00011080882,0.00023007455,0.00015445474,0.00053376023,0.000059827384,0.00030593324,0.000023696355,0.00033984098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012655413,0.0001116538,0.0000839221,0.00018491872,0.000020685791,0.0001262389,0.00005091041,0.0015040511,0.0001490598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050921408,0.000040703086,0.005346213,0.0000037980312,0.000099365694,0.000005751905,0.0006489754,0.00054883555,0.000017928049,0.99277264,0.000053229836,0.00041161783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066905044,0.0004988305,0.00027529243,0.0000065090494,0.00000680912,0.0013683274,0.006021365,0.00008603322,0.00000572655,0.9710977,0.019751126,0.00021321335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012113351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090619345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021674944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069181575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025267378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65344375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293064071","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4191231","title":"Justice, Inclusion, and Incentives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Incentive; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016968441033138826,"score_gpt":0.22328251422590528,"score_spread":0.20631407319276646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293064071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96020037,0.0256987,0.004035804,0.0010793501,0.00081287423,0.00011016556,0.000035513858,0.000029631545,0.007997593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411947,0.0011871468,0.000019600442,0.00014509962,0.00016882116,0.0000057629195,0.0000018030363,0.000013862546,0.0043384167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851173,0.00006814894,0.00031800056,0.00017231512,0.000044675344,0.0008851287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995399,0.000036896934,0.00026664542,0.000098260745,0.000011915927,0.000046381745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004062879,0.00008101604,0.0001754536,0.00014622374,0.001323642,0.000027530585,0.00021795255,0.000023358269,0.0001782079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006576876,0.000091298825,0.000051333354,0.00014443469,0.00003064628,0.00011734969,0.00040576738,0.001041293,0.00003974222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021707916,0.000033341523,0.0058819815,0.0000064562555,0.000042841246,0.0000018392944,0.0008948309,0.000040202955,0.000021164584,0.9916944,0.00009420973,0.0012670583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042607414,0.00018739673,0.0009757296,0.0000035515081,0.000009305203,0.00034687846,0.002881822,0.00019678983,0.0000038016212,0.9530131,0.041827716,0.0001278204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003560562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019772277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041733503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044202755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013614628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294224712","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4200826","title":"Dynamic Marriage Markets","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business","score_opus":0.008476879213095678,"score_gpt":0.1968830831227157,"score_spread":0.18840620390962004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294224712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219247,0.013454508,0.00569691,0.0010981726,0.001940603,0.00019344671,0.00005630326,0.00007171343,0.055563625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97114974,0.00041568567,0.00002662945,0.000112441005,0.000101261016,0.000014142445,0.000004761303,0.000028277858,0.028147064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976578,0.000108936416,0.0004534078,0.00022552899,0.00005637442,0.0014979722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933356,0.000038556474,0.0003610476,0.00019966398,0.000010559985,0.000056625853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006207629,0.000114728624,0.00023738158,0.00018843847,0.000513622,0.00005278892,0.0004034373,0.000033883545,0.0015722781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060560422,0.00013717843,0.00014761576,0.00017502221,0.000021105065,0.00008815677,0.00008520308,0.001644347,0.00034845498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004648821,0.000048514612,0.0037476297,0.000004281701,0.00009545714,0.000006319315,0.0001494399,0.000103387414,0.00001882964,0.99389726,0.00024616934,0.0016362312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005788629,0.0001941005,0.0016744127,0.0000033982599,0.0000051634324,0.0008405018,0.001182133,0.0008176535,0.0000016399964,0.9403501,0.05414723,0.00020476477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035381898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046779576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053901058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012830406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021186058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294549788","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2022.105546","title":"Tie-breaking and efficiency in the laboratory school choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee; Osaka University; Yonsei University; Seoul National University; Concordia University; Carnegie Mellon University; Kyungpook National University; University Grants Committee","keywords":"Economics; Mathematics education; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.01852199933674006,"score_gpt":0.22609397870590658,"score_spread":0.20757197936916652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294549788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98698384,0.0038926813,0.000115688024,0.0005247452,0.00080979057,0.000093895105,0.000031314656,0.000005107595,0.007542915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879324,0.000029631914,0.000021528445,0.00065510254,0.00028900598,0.00000646365,3.959815e-7,0.000012891145,0.00019170738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986116,0.00027426283,0.0007588127,0.00015101365,0.000028681752,0.00017557116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984179,0.0005036029,0.0008245502,0.0001944196,0.0000101116775,0.000049399223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008879006,0.000094584386,0.00030947663,0.00027641456,0.00016912495,0.000065744454,0.00044165133,0.000031600735,0.0005161298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024638715,0.000086471424,0.00008089322,0.00011272026,0.000056441186,0.00021076029,0.0000717042,0.00042276652,0.00005437916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007684033,0.000097030024,0.10021258,0.000021135469,0.000050727667,0.000019920284,0.0030949407,0.0019804058,0.000043308723,0.89274776,0.0010786818,0.00057669455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035580164,0.0006436897,0.09972375,0.000075270815,0.000030572082,0.0006939233,0.013481935,0.0011020654,0.00004691125,0.6045645,0.275401,0.0006783661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024540948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050064405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28818324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019315643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043908254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5651259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294733709","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01429-z","title":"The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Autarky; Group (periodic table); Economics; Alpha (finance); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economy; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.03863432654575027,"score_gpt":0.24293888423506738,"score_spread":0.2043045576893171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294733709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662913,0.0016642826,0.00004129315,0.0093787005,0.00040455748,0.00047448743,0.00026878546,0.000056538436,0.021420026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983913,0.0000058041906,0.000005064392,0.000073468196,0.00021105137,0.0001351729,0.000031179476,0.000010530833,0.0011364294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.000032856296,0.00030672774,0.00023081095,0.00004645049,0.00021418167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996945,0.000028879702,0.00016706766,0.0000749337,0.000011995528,0.000022578646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009161706,0.00007333244,0.00013907997,0.000053507087,0.0014845562,0.00007352379,0.0001552434,0.00003951323,0.00027716366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044347362,0.00007392402,0.000050319446,0.00015800014,0.0000379587,0.00010056996,0.00014279806,0.00021724348,0.000016617852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121694975,0.00003169723,0.1583668,0.000034520555,0.000013023052,0.0000014563245,0.0021326377,0.0000260833,0.0000039248366,0.83794445,0.000266442,0.0011667914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011018717,0.00011698177,0.41012594,0.000019891631,0.000006769866,0.0000124078715,0.0061118654,0.0014157473,0.0000017885196,0.19357112,0.3870721,0.0004435503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003846886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015853335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64437336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105577106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011128033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298076138","doi":"","title":"Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10785993104702887,"score_gpt":0.2698893690050834,"score_spread":0.16202943795805455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298076138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777287,0.0040989607,0.00030094318,0.00038844388,0.0010248116,0.0023254475,0.00030088014,0.000564917,0.013266888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940001,0.00015483938,0.00041407888,0.00008666612,0.0005135464,0.0003564618,0.00025018034,0.0001735463,0.0040506218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945769,0.00039158177,0.0014832665,0.0023386767,0.00022329148,0.0009863309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953288,0.00016035192,0.0013082409,0.0024276401,0.00024074753,0.00053425046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014059222,0.00089729036,0.0014187297,0.0023570913,0.00077199226,0.00095612014,0.0016361522,0.00070318877,0.00052747986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009147507,0.0012679024,0.00026976527,0.001140102,0.00029721195,0.0015752257,0.00090769614,0.001518169,0.0003206552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026031735,0.016502677,0.15677786,0.00038465395,0.0012274731,0.000082974446,0.062430404,0.0012246505,0.0006110737,0.7590868,0.0009288,0.00048235364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03233639,0.007370781,0.40092334,0.0011192799,0.001351126,0.0005110489,0.17939103,0.020419365,0.0011042093,0.31148458,0.026380923,0.01760795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03718299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017640855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4476022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010625819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028116364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299935942","doi":"","title":"Strategic, Sincere, and Heuristics Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Political science; Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04774050967453589,"score_gpt":0.2524401496118199,"score_spread":0.204699639937284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299935942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506647,0.0007861145,0.019751165,0.00033366587,0.0005225304,0.00052517763,0.00008044426,0.00015538147,0.027180823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370426,0.00004990613,0.0039798403,0.00002920614,0.00007517729,0.000051703886,0.00013407205,0.00005451766,0.0019213199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963495,0.0015803198,0.000763472,0.0009019403,0.00009673997,0.00030804158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970607,0.00039871258,0.00084837986,0.0011666771,0.00036571204,0.00015978642],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064765494,0.00032030363,0.0004914065,0.00020853608,0.0004413067,0.000709063,0.00062107213,0.0003235677,0.00012238609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035967943,0.00039331208,0.00010245267,0.00014311999,0.00015018099,0.00016591679,0.0005315966,0.00083108846,0.000058770576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001643166,0.0017516052,0.0130051505,0.0001097329,0.00009830171,0.0000043838704,0.011732219,0.00008575553,0.00090108527,0.9711163,0.000025273872,0.0011537448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007192334,0.000052373616,0.10100239,0.0031097056,0.00024109244,0.00020828903,0.023110375,0.23610759,0.028734306,0.5888095,0.0051725446,0.006259525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020092833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014287999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38230684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001108463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006627023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300338743","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8254","title":"Eliminating the Weakest Link: Making Manipulation Intractable?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development; Australian Government","keywords":"Voting; Veto; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Computational complexity theory; Link (geometry); Theoretical computer science; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05814019840002273,"score_gpt":0.2424080024880448,"score_spread":0.18426780408802207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300338743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33729994,0.0012881305,0.026559351,0.004735968,0.0013469605,0.00017964822,0.000010857255,0.0001240557,0.6284551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917125,0.000009318904,0.0006781301,0.0003405493,0.00032308765,0.0000065477075,0.0000061171145,0.000013317944,0.006910443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999168,0.000032007425,0.00039165196,0.0002103253,0.000022781835,0.00017526801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993596,0.00013662134,0.00020082919,0.00025435345,0.00003010773,0.000018495226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009429,0.00007694744,0.00015355405,0.00004170922,0.00017862691,0.00013571217,0.0001220281,0.000057225483,0.0008511992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002783727,0.00006821794,0.000057457666,0.00017794788,0.000017307422,0.0001363671,0.000044012646,0.00013137834,0.0006396652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000161205,0.00001328682,0.015714677,0.00001794619,0.000013936115,0.0000036447516,0.0003942732,0.00022264862,0.00007396034,0.9797567,0.00012674635,0.0036605378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010384462,0.000081852486,0.23097207,0.00027920117,0.000030771513,0.00021516571,0.005167451,0.104586534,0.0028853551,0.37888008,0.27470332,0.0011597319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033157194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030380947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65441257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003243758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008138554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93200344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304890599","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2022.10.018","title":"Supermajority politics: Equilibrium range, policy diversity, utilitarian welfare, and political compromise","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Economics; Politics; Voting; Majority rule; Welfare; Convergence (economics); Diversity (politics); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Law; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.11701423733171894,"score_gpt":0.31839188510670346,"score_spread":0.20137764777498451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304890599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192979,0.00058971933,0.00011387941,0.016754245,0.0002778181,0.00013902143,0.00025616353,0.000008437489,0.06256282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753183,0.0000073761876,0.00012397232,0.00023978502,0.00074207725,0.000001532611,0.000007969882,0.000019598916,0.0013258429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971867,0.0011862838,0.00063797797,0.00022010766,0.00030764213,0.00046124612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.00021167379,0.00012409945,0.00017851533,0.00018545597,0.00031857452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009887485,0.00009826263,0.0002672875,0.0005843749,0.0012285264,0.00015544653,0.0005322267,0.000018205488,0.0009247292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007814615,0.000107498505,0.00009373533,0.00026296108,0.00023434714,0.0002602052,0.0011778631,0.00071826705,0.000097358396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006988961,0.00011007042,0.034714624,0.000019048934,0.000037182406,0.00011142867,0.00091751537,0.00006561183,0.000026548474,0.96317947,0.0007055881,0.00004303452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005641007,0.002444812,0.6068228,0.000053341777,0.000015412481,0.0013227499,0.0040368913,0.0021916847,0.000041024698,0.17844583,0.19834192,0.0006425556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032921118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013262232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78473365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026789235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011279585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309872526","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.12179","title":"Stabilization of Capacitated Matching Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Equivalence (formal languages); Time complexity; Discrete mathematics; Graph","score_opus":0.11120409639051854,"score_gpt":0.17564256227872999,"score_spread":0.06443846588821145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309872526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583577,0.00020109741,0.02409703,0.000016148724,0.00069399836,0.00021893586,0.00029411007,0.00007301961,0.016047982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964384,0.00008087195,0.000058259935,0.000014343522,0.000032772616,0.000001197065,0.000066887005,0.000025639849,0.003281625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998702,0.000096682896,0.00042409237,0.0005748562,0.000018074386,0.00018432981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847174,0.00008181556,0.0008072861,0.0005462742,0.000042416905,0.000050471048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072019827,0.00017437401,0.0004685859,0.00032954582,0.00009487099,0.000023717872,0.00044816852,0.00015095143,0.0009990103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064432075,0.0002534214,0.0001843942,0.00034273954,0.00007333907,0.00011398682,0.0003836111,0.00035663325,0.00007298603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026110745,0.0000587001,0.029010266,0.00022043797,0.000084875915,0.00001060986,0.0012724439,0.23348208,0.000018801838,0.73576504,0.000039434002,0.000011192952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007174294,0.00009265773,0.0061853942,0.00014292027,0.000053367334,0.0000022748366,0.0027351577,0.04784071,0.0001047806,0.938586,0.0027991293,0.00074016216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006326358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002057067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20282097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018886005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032434702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311298289","doi":"10.22574/jmid.2022.12.003","title":"Centralized refugee matching mechanisms with hierarchical priority classes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Matching (statistics); Axiom; Prioritization; Class (philosophy); Forced migration; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Economics; Management science; Statistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03347255902532067,"score_gpt":0.22362787321576366,"score_spread":0.190155314190443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311298289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21248817,0.0003322336,0.7855083,0.00021809382,0.00071443914,0.0001575121,0.000017905948,0.00001847083,0.00054487045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896767,0.00007410193,0.020564573,0.00013608346,0.00008874216,0.0000070772385,0.0000012668418,0.000011684702,0.00014882234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987301,0.00017678634,0.00060355803,0.00017922229,0.00011445559,0.00019583081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990029,0.000062272156,0.0006736511,0.000119948614,0.000034729233,0.00010650444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027912543,0.00012270364,0.00037650092,0.00022279462,0.00042491942,0.000071384486,0.0001875086,0.000051864154,0.000149616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048202146,0.000111202935,0.000073259056,0.00015517844,0.000043163403,0.00031696123,0.000052565734,0.00038295405,0.000008146581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025734934,0.00007128283,0.0000523993,0.000019368134,0.000043337863,0.00004117731,0.00041765106,0.0007331605,0.0008310895,0.9972645,0.00004369417,0.00022499399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016748415,0.0010078021,0.000137113,0.00004702874,0.000021582455,0.0012246057,0.00044360975,0.00077836297,0.0012823996,0.9862422,0.006929927,0.00021053315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000136859735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.279257e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011037082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007829633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4534724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312308199","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16455-2_2","title":"Cooperative Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06787378741319647,"score_gpt":0.3054897563057985,"score_spread":0.23761596889260203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312308199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010169668,0.01953977,0.018586718,0.00080954,0.0003999118,0.002773518,0.0006115188,0.00045241564,0.94665694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1570622,0.0030058997,0.006719976,0.00022507618,0.00039364278,0.00047751772,0.00019344501,0.00030482162,0.8316174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569595,0.0007508303,0.0013795428,0.0011549434,0.0003188868,0.0006998607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942612,0.00412457,0.00019295613,0.0009292902,0.0001143694,0.00037761382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010899236,0.00058728957,0.0012268596,0.00077293103,0.00144474,0.0013768292,0.00063586695,0.00043452965,0.015248728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00134518,0.00053066306,0.00019927925,0.00026358073,0.0018318386,0.001212119,0.0009960475,0.0014912746,0.0008635997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006906607,0.00010313065,0.0000039692054,0.00020587743,0.00014077069,0.000026682806,0.0024518718,0.000028423376,0.0000026298003,0.971692,0.00027172518,0.024382252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037150513,0.0005525895,0.0000027934914,0.00027863355,0.00002138674,0.00010332916,0.0014645137,0.00023929225,0.000020608162,0.8170976,0.1793543,0.0004934356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034828745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014949305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17908257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000513982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090578884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313384081","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4315267","title":"Stable and Balanced Outcome of Bilateral Bargaining in Networks","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Economics; Business; Law and economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01764523728104122,"score_gpt":0.21548835667817925,"score_spread":0.19784311939713803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313384081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894643,0.0055951383,0.0025680743,0.00008471525,0.000230035,0.00006946241,0.0000073205733,0.000007865044,0.001973087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986977,0.00028574927,0.000022067354,0.00004279142,0.000058067457,0.000005105145,0.0000015731061,0.000013138062,0.00087383605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982922,0.00006227658,0.0005629846,0.0001463721,0.000030898278,0.0009052436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.000038626622,0.00033838645,0.000093454255,0.0000074890218,0.00002975874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004450344,0.000078247474,0.000299426,0.00018119035,0.0001283238,0.0000210981,0.00015260176,0.000029781024,0.00008567083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034366793,0.00008852695,0.000050574665,0.00018662491,0.000018749388,0.00009982802,0.000058438683,0.0010340388,0.0000032860455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002834159,0.000018982153,0.4829427,0.0000037208458,0.000024399964,0.0000015209968,0.00020875983,0.0044821147,0.000013278664,0.511964,0.0000036938613,0.000308485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020361084,0.0005178713,0.037774056,0.00002030745,0.0000061567002,0.00032942416,0.0027246699,0.015647024,0.000010579319,0.9392482,0.0013676286,0.00031797247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014936336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058631133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44516864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033796576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006649642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44924414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313415204","doi":"10.3390/g14010002","title":"Exchange Networks with Stochastic Matching","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Sorbonne Université; Université Clermont-Auvergne; Université Côte d’Azur; Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Convergence (economics); Fixed point; Bargaining problem; Extension (predicate logic); Nash equilibrium; Stability (learning theory); Stochastic approximation; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.020201090111851068,"score_gpt":0.19106274782085944,"score_spread":0.17086165770900838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313415204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84968644,0.0041205813,0.11667039,0.00035856807,0.0012193237,0.0003196216,0.00008060648,0.00017369006,0.027370788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537474,0.000003865743,0.00012782848,0.0001921436,0.00014291072,0.000067603876,0.0000074775908,0.00002132812,0.004062087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932677,0.000027206586,0.00019903375,0.00021241808,0.0000273494,0.00020724867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995621,0.0000465157,0.0001600008,0.00019079981,0.0000048894844,0.00003569691],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005674488,0.000084047315,0.00019496211,0.00008516494,0.0002183941,0.0000347075,0.00015820701,0.000019510566,0.00102539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010519631,0.00008982205,0.000038797472,0.000147092,0.000024273651,0.000057719782,0.00007701626,0.00016051267,0.00011719447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010929881,0.00012029282,0.011373643,0.00006806449,0.00012192656,0.000025738073,0.007446893,0.3621833,0.0000067759083,0.6132337,0.0024384025,0.0028719832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006505664,0.002376077,0.040644962,0.00025580305,0.000075338845,0.0006459848,0.015062694,0.22258292,0.000018762981,0.34969753,0.3581158,0.0040184734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008385791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069621237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35567737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004410978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046303226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317676827","doi":"10.1002/jae.3061","title":"Estimating separable matching models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Estimator; Separable space; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematics; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0547326731160269,"score_gpt":0.2375883062032721,"score_spread":0.1828556330872452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317676827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39524552,0.008715467,0.32858336,0.00017803311,0.004102676,0.0001783827,0.000042535652,0.00009629026,0.26285776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842144,0.000076472454,0.01450597,0.00008438653,0.00065876445,0.0000042306747,0.0000014763242,0.000042810458,0.00041145313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979457,0.000008966122,0.0014117082,0.00027646875,0.00005766067,0.00029949244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858356,0.00028203824,0.00076820777,0.00020400781,0.000033612378,0.00012859903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033118904,0.00017064344,0.0006044567,0.0015830708,0.0000924537,0.00036326237,0.0003415912,0.000109914414,0.00024607484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007938595,0.00018057929,0.00022652627,0.0010225017,0.000028331568,0.0006347717,0.000048633487,0.0004056782,0.00064007024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015299742,0.00003640568,0.00021715865,0.0001758917,0.00013310424,0.000016259552,0.0010456218,0.13125594,0.000021572787,0.86375505,0.0006776816,0.00265005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026810644,0.000049760518,0.000082252765,0.00009155547,0.000016260228,0.000085666696,0.00021331897,0.14058234,0.000049240676,0.846614,0.011696678,0.00025082324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009720007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4966908e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58896893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019519037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039164475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8227021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320015990","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4320762","title":"Intermediate Condorcet Winners and Losers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Mathematics; Voting; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01635846676085917,"score_gpt":0.21566822048312362,"score_spread":0.19930975372226445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320015990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913408,0.0019991572,0.00063739007,0.0005795173,0.00056061783,0.00006891204,0.000009473655,0.000062808926,0.0047413236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903667,0.0022779526,0.0000052215846,0.00008785574,0.00022368222,0.0000030189863,0.000003649742,0.000020729334,0.0070111942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981092,0.00003083837,0.00035630705,0.0001888697,0.000028499271,0.0012862367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953306,0.000049509472,0.00021634212,0.00011358915,0.0000127115245,0.0000747916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003149576,0.00010580794,0.0002346665,0.00023990912,0.00013179971,0.00006927902,0.0001712432,0.000059361013,0.000044794033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109905486,0.00011003289,0.00006998527,0.00021567156,0.000059811966,0.00014805733,0.000035281624,0.0007295783,0.0007623577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019516548,0.000008359206,0.021775845,0.000010336009,0.000106129686,0.0000051971065,0.0004671158,0.000024582527,0.00003662247,0.9752331,0.00034404625,0.0019691922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084667484,0.00018912155,0.0058774054,0.000021438656,0.0000065143086,0.0002161862,0.0025066556,0.0005208245,0.000017150636,0.9794566,0.010120911,0.00022049094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030510379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044419212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01589844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019862213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097492346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320477987","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2023.01.031","title":"The speed and threshold of the biased perfect matching and Hamilton cycle games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dawson College; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Infinity; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Constant (computer programming); Hamiltonian path; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Graph","score_opus":0.024694619992312365,"score_gpt":0.2227033323834754,"score_spread":0.19800871239116302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320477987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98373187,0.00029206986,0.00027877244,0.00016389854,0.00009573509,0.00029830422,0.000029583402,0.000041665844,0.015068093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912333,0.00012307373,0.00017051425,0.000028897515,0.00002957526,0.000012806154,0.0000019646777,0.000023207294,0.00048660982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915797,0.000010416481,0.00040754254,0.00018174229,0.00004920693,0.00019312084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989526,0.000339157,0.00029008335,0.00037923877,0.000007077683,0.00003180395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011868268,0.00012122993,0.00028196914,0.00004941907,0.0002421312,0.00008465165,0.00019992405,0.000051913557,0.0000066674806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006198148,0.00007824539,0.000057251087,0.00018251283,0.00016252843,0.000036323778,0.00011187968,0.00010229205,0.000038664544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006224248,0.00001012911,0.0010376283,0.00020212973,0.000033601496,2.6591223e-7,0.0054631867,0.00008292614,0.0011309965,0.99181247,0.000048183523,0.00017228314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004110963,0.000020508085,0.0049249395,0.00009976835,0.000018285093,0.0000053540048,0.0040796814,0.010104312,0.0013789145,0.9781643,0.0005895507,0.00020327087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013897987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048739116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015391474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008407367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003979552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31907547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320490855","doi":"10.1145/3580375","title":"A Framework for Computing the Nucleolus via Dynamic Programming","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Treewidth; Computer science; Voting; Theoretical computer science; Matching (statistics); Bounded function; Class (philosophy); Weighted voting; Time complexity; Mathematics; Algorithm; Pathwidth; Artificial intelligence; Graph","score_opus":0.039052003905131416,"score_gpt":0.2713115382756635,"score_spread":0.2322595343705321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320490855","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2814235,0.00005846095,0.7162268,0.0012946556,0.00048328546,0.0003214913,0.000033430337,0.000089212874,0.00006917356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98772675,0.00007673601,0.0118019385,0.00015467315,0.000056105902,0.000049560454,0.000017334702,0.000026877273,0.000090049485],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990794,0.000016918862,0.00038351212,0.00029492314,0.000012007957,0.000213242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900675,0.00052356697,0.00020338544,0.00021130581,0.000015908246,0.000039077917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006258384,0.00011526833,0.00019948056,0.00014590543,0.00047375352,0.00013615954,0.00015981532,0.00007844466,0.0000064313585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034225646,0.00012013937,0.000095530886,0.00017464327,0.000045595454,0.00009195427,0.000008090286,0.00012731006,0.00011157545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004216048,0.000062694315,0.00027377924,0.00006178274,0.00012233891,4.040661e-7,0.0021237463,0.14343354,0.0000031514476,0.29585832,0.000017052738,0.55800104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027798195,0.000083922125,0.0018614588,0.000018830437,0.000007953618,0.0000047062695,0.00028399585,0.5982756,0.0000061751252,0.39648256,0.0025543016,0.00014253348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024848854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013570036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70630324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045944354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007156814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48991412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351686","doi":"10.1080/10485252.2023.2176180","title":"Model fitting using partially ranked data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of nonparametric statistics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Appeal; Set (abstract data type); Data set; Mathematics; Exponential function; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.2896080796328338,"score_gpt":0.3390403272482709,"score_spread":0.049432247615437075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22250865,0.000598695,0.77348,0.00007214392,0.0012450182,0.00010381631,0.0011083188,0.000031742005,0.00085163943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90179,0.000116655254,0.09724355,0.000058241876,0.00031741607,6.043416e-7,0.000024893137,0.00003273388,0.00041589743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977965,0.00005324183,0.0014580953,0.00023803461,0.00012505501,0.00032909322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683654,0.00084530714,0.0015792128,0.0004814783,0.00013497782,0.00012247244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041504703,0.00013885778,0.0005719992,0.0008837786,0.000113360475,0.00011093224,0.0006753682,0.00008485853,0.00005618786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045549604,0.00014807256,0.0000779081,0.0013590574,0.000047406746,0.00029699432,0.00014759795,0.00027802828,0.00021203121],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022693328,0.00036560948,0.057906922,0.00039891267,0.0009928319,0.00045095853,0.0016727062,0.4339083,0.00028237037,0.44654277,0.044963885,0.012287788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057663495,0.00006748989,0.0016960328,0.000042469233,0.000035001318,0.00005375522,0.00008235139,0.9360595,0.000010609079,0.0596779,0.0015243201,0.00017394213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029693238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022696995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67928135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007695114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086232154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6038224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321379804","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4364720","title":"Cross-State Strategic Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; State (computer science); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03787119357090294,"score_gpt":0.25772485231151365,"score_spread":0.21985365874061072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321379804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98251176,0.0015417166,0.0017345039,0.00019906048,0.0006495515,0.000070829075,0.000013296943,0.00012260002,0.013156702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97717077,0.0005452471,0.000009120986,0.00003338022,0.0003290177,0.000003525831,0.0000043057753,0.000032347747,0.0218723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996938,0.000037640846,0.0005919341,0.0002471611,0.000046248402,0.002139034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993094,0.000051709132,0.0003852202,0.00014955108,0.00002963386,0.000074461524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059858277,0.00013558014,0.000258837,0.00024645022,0.0003026143,0.00021754557,0.0003042986,0.00006580569,0.00011335993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008763611,0.00014580322,0.0001423019,0.00041336086,0.000040276253,0.00021116178,0.00003376711,0.0011254868,0.0032934397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011288507,0.000012265567,0.03433816,0.000008749245,0.00006846793,0.0000061555374,0.00016236848,0.0005978998,0.000028187673,0.96410364,0.00002269711,0.0006401389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004365694,0.00010625822,0.0044989395,0.000014042742,0.0000025025158,0.00017184633,0.00059115124,0.0016797539,0.000017571907,0.99065846,0.0016232978,0.00019960114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060315113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007755664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029839223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003445657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021602502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321598513","doi":"10.3390/g14020019","title":"A Representation for Many Player Generalized Divide the Dollar Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Strategy; Liberian dollar; Mathematical economics; Representation (politics); Normal-form game; Repeated game; Operator (biology); Bargaining problem; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Non-cooperative game; Mathematics; Game theory; Economics","score_opus":0.08290310321348061,"score_gpt":0.2821639099020004,"score_spread":0.1992608066885198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321598513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98031527,0.0013290863,0.0046352088,0.0034620678,0.0016291853,0.0006425391,0.00015645019,0.00021641456,0.007613805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974905,0.00009997041,0.00014192903,0.00026533342,0.00036919126,0.000195351,0.000030159912,0.000024290874,0.023968734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990353,0.000040139053,0.00036947685,0.00027717932,0.000031362077,0.0002465457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913913,0.0002693467,0.00020145698,0.00034000553,0.000018972087,0.000031076004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010865392,0.000100331374,0.0002486015,0.00010863861,0.00014488703,0.00009267846,0.00020833184,0.000057322504,0.00011088805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032334824,0.00008390489,0.00014808288,0.00028826846,0.000038745005,0.000094848314,0.00004409398,0.000056052937,0.00083097286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006197359,0.00002516205,0.03185373,0.00007125866,0.00013801861,0.000002903497,0.0030525527,0.00081953633,0.00034828816,0.88786364,0.073145896,0.0026170341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013538324,0.00006556074,0.05686445,0.000035060188,0.000019412308,0.0000066348352,0.0007690065,0.009102842,0.0012565226,0.4320509,0.49810705,0.0003687189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007993009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010067723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45581272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018174023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057747384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327794818","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4387538","title":"The Effects of Delay in Bargaining: Evidence from eBay","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.01939835523691432,"score_gpt":0.2313760963454188,"score_spread":0.21197774110850448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327794818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736518,0.023571204,0.00096745003,0.00027305423,0.00053766853,0.00010332601,0.0000027963836,0.000019923826,0.00087275234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122643,0.007424518,0.000007734924,0.000017440652,0.00014117984,0.0000069171724,8.0511074e-7,0.000015117227,0.001159857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980488,0.00010006705,0.000535662,0.00016674554,0.000047031146,0.0011017261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982708,0.0011186388,0.00036066608,0.0001977874,0.000017378554,0.000034739176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005757365,0.000092557384,0.00024858947,0.00015733656,0.00013401879,0.000042369746,0.0003795467,0.000060364706,0.000009510311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012013923,0.00007730452,0.00009581432,0.00037504904,0.000040824045,0.00013392782,0.000037672497,0.0008024332,0.00022673543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004679482,0.000019453146,0.1045441,0.000016228512,0.00011516116,0.000008422879,0.0011019795,0.000122016674,0.00032749138,0.89004815,0.000103041835,0.0035471877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044447492,0.00019908222,0.019469343,0.00017897502,0.000005091567,0.000020734966,0.0006966757,0.0006324277,0.00019872282,0.97718835,0.0008454706,0.00012065289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030148763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046441852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087140225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025170034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017637413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34862176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365150935","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2023.105654","title":"Opinion aggregation: Borda and Condorcet revisited","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Mathematical economics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Approval voting; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03606433311321091,"score_gpt":0.25634201652297023,"score_spread":0.2202776834097593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365150935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97916526,0.0042714295,0.00048403814,0.00051979267,0.0019593854,0.000109960136,0.000052898944,0.000036351797,0.013400865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968534,0.00069441483,0.000049622042,0.00011463515,0.0005990081,0.0000016001399,0.000004479221,0.000018308829,0.0016645031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873674,0.000074101736,0.00085284,0.00015743353,0.000016453812,0.00016240508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852276,0.00027961147,0.0009451551,0.0001485113,0.00002118674,0.000082790044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039232722,0.00010328544,0.00042481645,0.00033119577,0.00007079046,0.000067352994,0.00015878073,0.000069442794,0.00036453368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020492148,0.00010867408,0.00011250056,0.000097524615,0.00006221841,0.00027992128,0.000037974714,0.00014245228,0.00076667557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006178129,0.0000099711915,0.015492648,0.000045620025,0.00009538883,0.0000063615744,0.00060708664,0.00008325523,0.000026489139,0.97780156,0.0038552657,0.0019145537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015346463,0.00017789836,0.015327188,0.00018903724,0.000012140068,0.00017138761,0.0006366102,0.0012582312,0.00012087042,0.8793469,0.10092496,0.00030013704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004287072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.2720131e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09845469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006600927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020141008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376457117","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4444283","title":"Search Frictions, Sorting, and Matching in Two-Sided Markets","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Matching (statistics); Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.021789467088116594,"score_gpt":0.26141065935830393,"score_spread":0.23962119227018733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376457117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905293,0.002088786,0.0012033309,0.00046162194,0.00023292394,0.00008170142,0.0000028680768,0.000044849494,0.0053546387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950274,0.0017499968,0.000025427502,0.000028409953,0.00016331009,0.000004635949,0.0000020517853,0.00002092872,0.002977793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977947,0.000079221834,0.00049646763,0.00021213782,0.00004094655,0.0013765331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952316,0.000110004396,0.00018640747,0.00011241496,0.000012423553,0.000055581586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077710366,0.000098532786,0.00022559494,0.00044112065,0.00021003281,0.00008963964,0.0001439484,0.00004353244,0.00003946731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014571613,0.00011036848,0.00005687616,0.00038399917,0.00002116106,0.00017228344,0.000044033666,0.0011199294,0.0002758471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017324806,0.00001628306,0.11923877,0.00001012906,0.000040935185,0.0000064123155,0.000744032,0.00020531524,0.00005369268,0.87743986,0.000033730943,0.0021935063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006577931,0.00004238826,0.028055273,0.000039563223,0.0000024045544,0.00019744318,0.0026729894,0.0014425272,0.00001294904,0.9663518,0.00037484447,0.00015000241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003408552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042069698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0911835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031769872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012531293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4865598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377200035","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32726-1_12","title":"Stabilization of Capacitated Matching Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vertex (graph theory); Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Time complexity; Computer science; Graph; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03869181999386132,"score_gpt":0.2276370828592027,"score_spread":0.18894526286534138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377200035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007665782,0.00030818363,0.97901535,0.0000821187,0.0017658046,0.0002232194,0.000053097658,0.00007889691,0.010807546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254864,0.000027696373,0.0057575456,0.00007831123,0.0001598056,0.0000029939504,0.000009577323,0.000038026734,0.0013774068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984009,0.000011880458,0.0006615326,0.00058234326,0.000093422954,0.0002499019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866664,0.000279718,0.0005234049,0.00042391894,0.0000645989,0.000041709172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014236363,0.00019809748,0.0004935925,0.0006881842,0.00006866203,0.00007430888,0.000518342,0.00017492988,0.000050634957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015642805,0.00021526328,0.00008054992,0.0003483711,0.0003118372,0.00014005108,0.00013571288,0.0002646038,0.00013431876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007528103,0.000018333563,0.0013199213,0.00024740794,0.000023040366,0.000008493666,0.004483572,0.07084124,0.00012601475,0.9040202,0.000008332624,0.018895948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001275169,0.00005935001,0.00036033572,0.00039654406,0.000002498636,0.0000046726523,0.0000012606097,0.033633877,0.00031763164,0.9644417,0.000353304,0.00030128795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000821672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004730483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98488283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010097681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000471091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87781817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377294560","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-33780-2_9","title":"Comparing Algorithms for Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items with Limited Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Alternation (linguistics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Preference; Computer science; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.050589247731320966,"score_gpt":0.23142006806942392,"score_spread":0.18083082033810294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377294560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012092509,0.00027298997,0.9558818,0.00021451243,0.00050929695,0.001081226,0.00018210159,0.00018437684,0.040464498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929132,0.00005136479,0.0039136093,0.00016867642,0.00013746753,0.00010193883,0.001964338,0.00006021228,0.00068920443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978141,0.0000060335447,0.0016140218,0.00019213461,0.00012224776,0.0002514624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965681,0.0001502449,0.0024738042,0.00024301429,0.0005320326,0.000032806412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008409136,0.00032028637,0.000694292,0.0013646828,0.00013334403,0.00025275326,0.0002453576,0.00041603274,0.0000140928205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042343242,0.00032999314,0.000067423294,0.0005281095,0.00006993914,0.002729856,0.000046127807,0.00027743712,0.00008692204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004336666,0.000052402374,0.007296323,0.017336493,0.00022034353,9.545005e-7,0.01443035,0.23956074,0.000006031241,0.5140266,0.00008293609,0.20655319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068931296,0.00036400795,0.014166887,0.013397557,0.00013764808,0.00003350637,0.00042451985,0.5544837,0.0006365025,0.31681386,0.08917423,0.0034744418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005551868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032372147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001395328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009924005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379087233","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.19453","title":"Best of Both Distortion Worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Social choice theory; Distortion (music); Anti-plurality voting; Metric (unit); Approval voting; Computer science; Happiness; Cardinal voting systems; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16627440392903214,"score_gpt":0.18530253652666948,"score_spread":0.01902813259763733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379087233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513927,0.00023093022,0.026469717,0.000035851466,0.0016679268,0.00022673201,0.00027412316,0.00012590656,0.019576114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96859425,0.00013809443,0.00002471948,0.000008526832,0.00010321771,8.745247e-7,0.000036427948,0.000030868745,0.031063018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868935,0.000040437233,0.00042209483,0.00062234147,0.000015110314,0.00021069175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984671,0.000065000204,0.0007304475,0.0006341928,0.000033203058,0.00007006171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005868669,0.00018408865,0.0004972801,0.00036633448,0.00006338232,0.000022235114,0.00045110367,0.00024122719,0.000128671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006364387,0.00025884795,0.00024682132,0.00034625837,0.00009544961,0.00008993511,0.00032417412,0.00029577824,0.0010485462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033305045,0.00009748923,0.13796143,0.0002995371,0.00013265703,0.000030035013,0.00027152384,0.034391683,0.0000051044226,0.8264015,0.00033376887,0.00004201344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010630126,0.00016482123,0.0522371,0.0007016606,0.00012912435,0.0000024828084,0.00045998217,0.033182368,0.00008414723,0.90302634,0.007673706,0.0012752654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000975682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102409474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08572433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015952018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025474352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507691","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_1","title":"Basic Concepts of Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Voting; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Group (periodic table); Majority rule; Management science; Political science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Social psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.10595903788362455,"score_gpt":0.3125713295848964,"score_spread":0.20661229170127188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010287789,0.28771228,0.0019963668,0.00014834639,0.014235205,0.0026369372,0.0011091639,0.00020716604,0.68166673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8540874,0.0017361119,0.000009943381,0.000038889186,0.0002547193,0.000038097623,0.0000036122233,0.00005762293,0.1437736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699956,0.000046751356,0.0019752218,0.00059521396,0.00010588671,0.0002773769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996214,0.0019905267,0.0012561496,0.00036769148,0.00011304072,0.000058608846],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027480947,0.00034502582,0.0020824315,0.00046413922,0.00009435903,0.00003634201,0.00023193951,0.0002958027,0.000039059054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095470314,0.0003394207,0.00018306573,0.00007945532,0.00024202872,0.000055722743,0.00013189783,0.0002338775,0.00030968423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006355842,0.00000921968,0.0028875438,0.00050550845,0.00035452627,0.000027073822,0.00085858005,0.000055117653,0.0000013419242,0.99216014,0.0014326076,0.0016447845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013324378,0.00074637274,0.0026804104,0.0213003,0.00020069336,0.000087092,0.008814152,0.0038076798,0.00000345346,0.5410759,0.40511614,0.0028434324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044758774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034920107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8437996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008579231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014098108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239398","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25713","title":"Partitioning Friends Fairly","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15226759351797622,"score_gpt":0.281829402677441,"score_spread":0.12956180915946477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84473085,0.000034369725,0.0007133229,0.0026448239,0.0009689477,0.00028396648,0.00004073869,0.00019316479,0.15038979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975351,0.000019660856,0.00006569803,0.00008388338,0.00010765369,0.000030055498,0.000001372288,0.000017009259,0.002139569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852127,0.000007740454,0.00069482066,0.00036089637,0.000090155605,0.00032514692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905515,0.00006873173,0.0004895295,0.00018691286,0.00014085812,0.000058836114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011413845,0.00014842929,0.00028699334,0.00019059495,0.00021543076,0.00013562791,0.0006401255,0.00008301181,0.00036998204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044587324,0.00013355837,0.00012999766,0.00080640777,0.00018985599,0.00019898728,0.00011813826,0.00020368029,0.0026941074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019957917,0.000034145694,0.0032121537,0.000032260363,0.000015197043,2.2552044e-7,0.0011238534,0.00005593216,0.0018687281,0.99184954,0.00028249607,0.0015055157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026502557,0.00010899138,0.0016999395,0.00017427027,0.000005877322,0.0000019011782,0.0014340983,0.009753555,0.06289707,0.922522,0.0011502443,0.00022552807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051916802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000466472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15280423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029991703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015414409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239580","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25704","title":"Class Fairness in Online Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Minimax; AKA; Matching (statistics); Bipartite graph; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Upper and lower bounds; Combinatorics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Graph","score_opus":0.14182090050570234,"score_gpt":0.29490744411552744,"score_spread":0.1530865436098251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748501,0.00002195433,0.00026619987,0.001950354,0.00054876116,0.00024793722,0.000036800455,0.00007845287,0.021999419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861115,0.000030799187,0.00006282236,0.00009139877,0.00008108271,0.000018156072,0.0000018759514,0.000018594876,0.0010840932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983527,0.000010386953,0.00083661795,0.00038174583,0.00008537835,0.00033318883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912864,0.00008950863,0.00046178023,0.00018074682,0.00009358937,0.00004574667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012800804,0.00016081872,0.00036322005,0.00030436157,0.0000949432,0.00009022905,0.00077029853,0.000097762524,0.00012084057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043211575,0.00014518412,0.00010333949,0.00096537464,0.00013497676,0.00017667234,0.00015309658,0.0002953548,0.0008300901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032228483,0.00008574831,0.0050861966,0.00006014178,0.0000075795256,5.120016e-7,0.0016666406,0.0002166165,0.0022127267,0.9881997,0.000054603606,0.0023773068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003865552,0.00006195322,0.0043734494,0.00030474394,0.0000024453113,0.0000016361944,0.0032250367,0.015909163,0.016539708,0.9590526,0.00026880862,0.00022175576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018172005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049270333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029147055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048512855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018130537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239735","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25707","title":"Voting with Preference Intensities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Aggregate (composite); Ranking (information retrieval); Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Welfare; Economics; Econometrics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.18775751783590278,"score_gpt":0.2621696590128404,"score_spread":0.07441214117693762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429302,0.00002513109,0.0007991739,0.0019133309,0.00044275957,0.00034556567,0.000026014233,0.00017381593,0.053343985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968644,0.000013573474,0.000117538744,0.00009106306,0.000076929704,0.000028002276,9.943706e-7,0.000022054463,0.0027854766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984331,0.000009026898,0.00066143577,0.00042208392,0.000111701134,0.0003626233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987817,0.00009813087,0.0005956449,0.00019447405,0.0002719938,0.00005808857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010251217,0.00019637175,0.00036967197,0.00020974618,0.00019286017,0.00014110607,0.00073523,0.00007957793,0.00013380297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005474016,0.00015136224,0.000091790884,0.0007832854,0.00030158146,0.00020739283,0.00014967169,0.00026067538,0.0009946395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000663658,0.00003232794,0.0048098676,0.00006617924,0.000020967775,3.8754519e-7,0.0016282621,0.000078538935,0.0013693253,0.99033314,0.00015989761,0.0014347212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008093483,0.0004892786,0.0046062446,0.001036772,0.000016388698,0.000012021078,0.007266385,0.030099515,0.13092008,0.82415193,0.00067333895,0.0006471022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007602973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013319927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16618122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000328107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023891263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244736","doi":"10.11647/obp.0361.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Social psychology; Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.11173059924757268,"score_gpt":0.24692326285488383,"score_spread":0.13519266360731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034852,0.0014035715,0.000017511054,0.0004792757,0.0017539747,0.0006345959,0.0001736474,0.0001639481,0.9953386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021331643,0.00009734404,0.00010254061,0.0004991283,0.00032570635,0.000055448912,0.00012521703,0.00015206201,0.9965094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976767,0.000018307468,0.0009679556,0.000859507,0.000078741425,0.00039884078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977232,0.00014677779,0.001214873,0.00073891296,0.000054104315,0.00012213667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018661381,0.00037771498,0.0008918106,0.00032091315,0.00019479645,0.0029310912,0.0017350107,0.00044680064,0.0070286696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025672052,0.0004332511,0.00020719362,0.00007894421,0.00010733343,0.0020647575,0.0005812603,0.0005156886,0.011369986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063635125,0.0000055958435,0.00014201539,0.00005263825,0.00012448154,0.000007750033,0.00018626914,0.0000045719453,1.5849004e-7,0.82863784,0.16922958,0.0016027584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017536379,0.000033896114,0.000026656957,0.00026991862,0.0000077954655,0.0000024066749,0.00005004712,0.000017279352,0.000001095735,0.30363017,0.69539,0.00039539425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039208352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007338879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52616036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121855504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244907","doi":"10.11647/obp.0362.18","title":"Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Type (biology); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.0790531699233612,"score_gpt":0.24008562897242908,"score_spread":0.16103245904906788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017834704,0.0008223087,0.000062600186,0.00068372017,0.0022552188,0.0005732744,0.00017849776,0.00017262252,0.9952339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011689088,0.000059660444,0.000087059365,0.00080579106,0.0003564805,0.000037160364,0.0001220163,0.00021238644,0.99715054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978605,0.0000132368095,0.0008793313,0.0007935034,0.00006649213,0.000386949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980809,0.00009823912,0.0008123205,0.00082379364,0.0000361949,0.00014856092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019136751,0.00036062775,0.0008757254,0.00035161292,0.00017331078,0.0028257698,0.001624367,0.00043769134,0.008485527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065529326,0.00043898606,0.00023970689,0.000062543986,0.00007278686,0.0020365075,0.00061255426,0.00053808687,0.024426745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006347841,0.0000049093715,0.000022154669,0.000039326384,0.00010951061,0.000014061149,0.00021345765,0.0000072624257,2.2199741e-7,0.82543594,0.17382532,0.0003214998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014992528,0.000015250163,0.0000099210465,0.000111040405,0.0000055361734,0.000003081065,0.000040161685,0.0000043316636,3.6192338e-7,0.4174717,0.5818775,0.0003111757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005272486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049517337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015787214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058704623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244946","doi":"10.11647/obp.0362.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Social psychology; Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.11173059924757268,"score_gpt":0.24692326285488383,"score_spread":0.13519266360731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034852,0.0014035715,0.000017511054,0.0004792757,0.0017539747,0.0006345959,0.0001736474,0.0001639481,0.9953386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021331643,0.00009734404,0.00010254061,0.0004991283,0.00032570635,0.000055448912,0.00012521703,0.00015206201,0.9965094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976767,0.000018307468,0.0009679556,0.000859507,0.000078741425,0.00039884078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977232,0.00014677779,0.001214873,0.00073891296,0.000054104315,0.00012213667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018661381,0.00037771498,0.0008918106,0.00032091315,0.00019479645,0.0029310912,0.0017350107,0.00044680064,0.0070286696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025672052,0.0004332511,0.00020719362,0.00007894421,0.00010733343,0.0020647575,0.0005812603,0.0005156886,0.011369986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063635125,0.0000055958435,0.00014201539,0.00005263825,0.00012448154,0.000007750033,0.00018626914,0.0000045719453,1.5849004e-7,0.82863784,0.16922958,0.0016027584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017536379,0.000033896114,0.000026656957,0.00026991862,0.0000077954655,0.0000024066749,0.00005004712,0.000017279352,0.000001095735,0.30363017,0.69539,0.00039539425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039208352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007338879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52616036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121855504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245001","doi":"10.11647/obp.0361.18","title":"Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Type (biology); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.0790531699233612,"score_gpt":0.24008562897242908,"score_spread":0.16103245904906788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017834704,0.0008223087,0.000062600186,0.00068372017,0.0022552188,0.0005732744,0.00017849776,0.00017262252,0.9952339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011689088,0.000059660444,0.000087059365,0.00080579106,0.0003564805,0.000037160364,0.0001220163,0.00021238644,0.99715054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978605,0.0000132368095,0.0008793313,0.0007935034,0.00006649213,0.000386949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980809,0.00009823912,0.0008123205,0.00082379364,0.0000361949,0.00014856092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019136751,0.00036062775,0.0008757254,0.00035161292,0.00017331078,0.0028257698,0.001624367,0.00043769134,0.008485527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065529326,0.00043898606,0.00023970689,0.000062543986,0.00007278686,0.0020365075,0.00061255426,0.00053808687,0.024426745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006347841,0.0000049093715,0.000022154669,0.000039326384,0.00010951061,0.000014061149,0.00021345765,0.0000072624257,2.2199741e-7,0.82543594,0.17382532,0.0003214998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014992528,0.000015250163,0.0000099210465,0.000111040405,0.0000055361734,0.000003081065,0.000040161685,0.0000043316636,3.6192338e-7,0.4174717,0.5818775,0.0003111757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005272486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049517337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015787214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058704623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382299308","doi":"10.3982/te4866","title":"Interview hoarding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hoarding (animal behavior); Matching (statistics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Interview; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.05330914361303197,"score_gpt":0.23246096915942482,"score_spread":0.17915182554639286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382299308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.721893,0.00024079575,0.0023720572,0.0021765744,0.0012484503,0.00018102572,0.000083127234,0.00038535817,0.27141958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976228,0.00016370579,0.00011538872,0.00049257313,0.00021902854,0.000018449091,0.0000145794,0.00003985977,0.0013136228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985614,0.000046266017,0.00061725255,0.0003680298,0.000012040975,0.00039505365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991381,0.00018666052,0.00016105399,0.0003887007,0.000009552923,0.00011593066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024695112,0.00014852622,0.0004332215,0.00018314527,0.00008730499,0.00008376782,0.0003306926,0.00010376127,0.0015484958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020495131,0.00016991427,0.00016999891,0.00020425067,0.00024766725,0.00011903515,0.00013226103,0.00014753472,0.020314734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006737289,0.000011778005,0.00070006127,0.000024909725,0.00002772645,0.000002109356,0.00018967241,0.00007652354,0.000004745076,0.99732333,0.0005360913,0.0010962972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023677558,0.000035318484,0.00070785737,0.000023078903,0.0000037257544,0.000007022418,0.00012334168,0.00793025,0.00005769873,0.95437306,0.0362665,0.00023535563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004251499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.1833583e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27572978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006324416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007678006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383499458","doi":"10.1111/poms.14047","title":"Cooperative security against interdependent risks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production and Operations Management","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Shapley value; Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Business; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics","score_opus":0.05782529693162122,"score_gpt":0.2716914992423808,"score_spread":0.21386620231075956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383499458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468959,0.0004048539,0.004263138,0.0048924615,0.0022682643,0.0009557517,0.000040934076,0.00035348543,0.13992526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98637795,0.0003834493,0.000104125895,0.00013439852,0.00014865724,0.00007471297,0.000031306132,0.000009903878,0.0127354935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991939,0.000041856292,0.00027800625,0.00033317978,0.000026062336,0.00012699135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969596,0.000005391443,0.000046256893,0.00019303206,0.000024611578,0.00003475066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978496,0.00008426388,0.00012071748,0.00020291469,0.00028585648,0.00012691325,0.00007073524,0.000021244801,0.00008455237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005972363,0.000091074755,0.0000266804,0.00027222963,0.000032831824,0.0001731976,0.00007971576,0.000072647825,0.0013402194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009007555,0.00009834211,0.0032208574,0.000090143745,0.00012256215,0.0000056179024,0.0045093168,0.010188093,0.000037581278,0.9710939,0.0068338043,0.0037907937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031206934,0.00041891576,0.10219761,0.00041204752,0.00009047221,0.00003865136,0.02828772,0.115154006,0.0018316584,0.098074,0.64777297,0.002601296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026396596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037776706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003268767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018630867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383533351","doi":"10.1145/3580507.3597771","title":"Capacity Planning in Stable Matching: An Application to School Choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Cutting-plane method; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Linear programming; Stability (learning theory); Quadratic growth; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06749622897133155,"score_gpt":0.2735963548404476,"score_spread":0.20610012586911602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383533351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607249,0.000017324619,0.010860577,0.00021287217,0.00012935036,0.00020395637,0.000016986187,0.00015593009,0.02767811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964053,9.3366646e-7,0.00035584712,0.0001892909,0.00010821721,0.000053594416,0.000012276879,0.000013867994,0.0028606553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.000017926113,0.000319226,0.00028469082,0.000019787716,0.00022721013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951404,0.000051565592,0.00008059445,0.00024889855,0.000008062689,0.00009684686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011937956,0.00007374485,0.00017558798,0.00026198325,0.00006124163,0.00005784522,0.00016403715,0.00005189584,0.00012563884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010325039,0.00008801756,0.000020309177,0.00048826513,0.0000064503047,0.00021484049,0.00003141368,0.00010000306,0.0038850603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009579089,0.000044914974,0.5745745,0.000037106925,0.000007528752,0.0000011347305,0.002023389,0.01527351,0.0006783645,0.4062047,0.00085748965,0.0002878302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051551504,0.00007243939,0.7688042,0.000048379785,0.0000013712433,0.0000019840556,0.0011054878,0.022696322,0.00035988027,0.15690221,0.04900514,0.0004871111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001942834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2493025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006251051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005159342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99689054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383533377","doi":"10.1145/3580507.3597739","title":"Best of Both Distortion Worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Distortion (music); Happiness; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Social choice theory; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0513318316040042,"score_gpt":0.2352154178439645,"score_spread":0.1838835862399603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383533377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79392004,0.00014516577,0.0017268843,0.00012544877,0.0004766117,0.00006338536,0.000024415107,0.00007935128,0.20343871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564674,0.000013602667,0.000038947004,0.00001725722,0.000048935322,0.0000042754427,0.0000059820477,0.0000071532713,0.043396443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947417,0.0000065795584,0.00029016266,0.000114538285,0.000012480275,0.00010206595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996719,0.000028040566,0.00012792525,0.00014428727,0.000006157625,0.000021727381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050226535,0.0000421611,0.00014830429,0.00012933312,0.000025831849,0.000008238677,0.00007504291,0.00002970177,0.00038734762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042022264,0.000045413377,0.000048931506,0.00025548623,0.000020585836,0.000053635187,0.000016949913,0.000029977162,0.002817317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004009947,0.000027141608,0.10424275,0.000033793694,0.000012463284,6.3364485e-7,0.0002585859,0.000048246893,0.0000621859,0.8928167,0.0019343955,0.0005590985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012942324,0.0003404307,0.36127734,0.00014404369,0.00001376962,0.0000055934343,0.0009910765,0.006076802,0.0020664304,0.3643056,0.26264185,0.0008428697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017479778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018039253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5285111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014527359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024323888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384207628","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.07.003","title":"A planner-optimal matching mechanism and its incentive compatibility in a restricted domain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Stanford University","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism design; Monotonic function; Incentive; Bounded function; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03621576031709306,"score_gpt":0.2445645924853198,"score_spread":0.20834883216822675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384207628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981572,0.00029498982,0.000042425425,0.00012584237,0.0002829252,0.00034263864,0.00025227075,0.000067459834,0.00043423168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00010799948,0.00010576824,0.000025309659,0.000044888868,0.00007070866,0.000021429887,0.000019167202,0.00035832173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985838,0.000038184226,0.00055626105,0.0004885489,0.00001426663,0.00031894314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947166,0.00006415957,0.0002039409,0.00016640333,0.000005171164,0.00008868054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007406936,0.00016082804,0.00043336564,0.00025788517,0.00009366881,0.00008299533,0.00010803188,0.000110310335,0.000079165955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017552924,0.00019053656,0.000045553592,0.00011089006,0.000040967207,0.00019292094,0.00011504808,0.00015464377,0.00024365864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010709751,0.00013205549,0.40313485,0.00011569902,0.00004376304,0.000050300536,0.0083574075,0.0002187968,0.0003886915,0.5860553,0.0001309377,0.0012651421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018181611,0.00012604243,0.9039787,0.00007568979,0.000013457203,0.000027540565,0.002711079,0.008224882,0.00008762531,0.08156082,0.0008149447,0.00056103145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061871036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015341889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5044944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088301225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010690747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7769855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384405638","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01472-4","title":"Independent, neutral, and monotonic collective choice: the role of Suzumura consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of Tokyo","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Veto; Social choice theory; Monotonic function; Axiom; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Population; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024996483644706708,"score_gpt":0.2400744474934093,"score_spread":0.2150779638487026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384405638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97266847,0.0020409408,0.0000013369383,0.0014070786,0.00015640624,0.00022910464,0.00013292443,0.00004008672,0.023323672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985636,0.00011339912,0.0000014053916,0.00006136233,0.00015990088,0.000027755998,0.000006374665,0.000014699584,0.0010515043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916345,0.00004055238,0.00030820922,0.00024179945,0.000031070253,0.00021492451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940985,0.00017647553,0.00022274588,0.00011895553,0.00003159378,0.00004039537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004648682,0.00011264268,0.00030067997,0.00009469755,0.00056167773,0.000057267764,0.00012282064,0.00011706398,0.000041309017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011322916,0.00010431283,0.00007132675,0.00034704464,0.00015822939,0.000098210156,0.00006799387,0.00015773569,0.000027739734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014814183,0.000030624466,0.39161128,0.00008460165,0.000117994765,0.0000010405605,0.006331673,0.0000041953476,0.00006933161,0.6001148,0.00042412992,0.0011954933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006972139,0.00007407558,0.85701853,0.000017314245,0.000021059066,0.0000032799962,0.006901747,0.00013792014,0.00007228266,0.091027506,0.04380493,0.00022416272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008961184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018035396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5090873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028122635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019015944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43200275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312880","doi":"10.1145/3596947.3596969","title":"A Meta-heuristic Approach for Strategic Fair Division Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Heuristic; Focus (optics); Game theory; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematical optimization; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.30000350380154034,"score_gpt":0.263481448236266,"score_spread":0.036522055565274325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16699599,0.0018478077,0.37704885,0.00048965344,0.0010665326,0.0026848365,0.00047220354,0.0012351891,0.44815895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97776383,0.000011070065,0.0012118429,0.00003961358,0.000068038404,0.00028001866,0.00006351714,0.00002715954,0.020534921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987558,0.000020331623,0.00049201626,0.0003975856,0.000027031712,0.00030719454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934447,0.0001251032,0.00018251699,0.00026922557,0.000020055106,0.000058642843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016714705,0.00014041475,0.0004620925,0.00018166476,0.000113414855,0.00008619527,0.00019965215,0.00007576758,0.0002013609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005887803,0.00012298132,0.00023753216,0.00033120156,0.000024928466,0.00009243142,0.000039235238,0.00007100385,0.0009907864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004743796,0.000049671027,0.0006885601,0.00018230079,0.00029127477,4.507566e-7,0.00018562042,0.0030073368,0.000019854957,0.9946055,0.00091486593,0.0000498237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006914362,0.00018653343,0.0007535069,0.000010004736,0.000098183125,0.0000029318437,0.00040858507,0.1855907,0.000034194574,0.8018807,0.009909441,0.00043379414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051138966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020554874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017506192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065384556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385321339","doi":"10.1257/mic.20210392","title":"Bargaining over Treatment Choice under Disagreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Ex-ante; Stochastic game; Normative; Complete information; Exploit; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.038451944769898,"score_gpt":0.2683439615986128,"score_spread":0.2298920168287148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385321339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828213,0.0005522846,0.0004992617,0.00096843473,0.0017059145,0.00022601473,0.00020383247,0.00014111878,0.012881824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318516,0.001437632,0.00025698025,0.0007596803,0.0011052787,0.000027951337,0.000029781897,0.00010445511,0.0030931046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693215,0.00006117297,0.0014553339,0.00065886206,0.000023863035,0.00086863054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739534,0.00027186278,0.0014628461,0.00053666986,0.000014240425,0.0003190467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012075905,0.00040658165,0.00097376073,0.00055592647,0.00035803972,0.0003415006,0.0005082578,0.00008376285,0.00093129434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040082494,0.00046526396,0.00041442065,0.00021824306,0.00024130232,0.00042223654,0.0001083339,0.00027518478,0.011418662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014313385,0.0002668962,0.5617443,0.000022573633,0.0019973814,0.00003794003,0.0027873828,0.028734135,0.0004394677,0.35722613,0.013299296,0.033301413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054547647,0.0012711089,0.16656251,0.00007406142,0.00008112059,0.0003945543,0.0061236606,0.011255021,0.00032377098,0.09307657,0.71290326,0.0024796086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008336682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015215047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.699604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017791196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010191878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385331890","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4521854","title":"Voting Rationales","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02646434669689379,"score_gpt":0.2257290174241604,"score_spread":0.1992646707272666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385331890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96173835,0.0037533462,0.015221182,0.0016225601,0.0009361198,0.00010465265,0.000011241984,0.00016392097,0.016448632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861321,0.00046033267,0.000020660033,0.000046854144,0.00045013794,0.000003462566,0.0000051315164,0.00001744133,0.012863907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982053,0.00002734009,0.0003789978,0.00015018188,0.00003445901,0.0012037124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955684,0.000059800448,0.00023662348,0.0000878372,0.000019377136,0.000039539933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042974874,0.00007973969,0.00016377037,0.00020145626,0.00022422995,0.00006417871,0.00017964009,0.000045784298,0.00007590495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017812583,0.000086347354,0.00009369595,0.00027645615,0.000018720839,0.00014770291,0.000020653482,0.0006239122,0.0027595775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039947427,0.00000762085,0.014560209,0.000003538517,0.00004396336,0.0000012999021,0.00012004408,0.00015124524,0.000021081314,0.98418486,0.00020696427,0.00069519517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027153915,0.000054889402,0.0035295908,0.000011468179,0.0000024082717,0.00012522332,0.00066466635,0.0012021102,0.000013455198,0.98346645,0.010523224,0.0001349806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017833594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005476428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02439373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024635665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015141336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385656429","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4527879","title":"Uncertainty and Fair Expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03631473808954614,"score_gpt":0.2459973329801375,"score_spread":0.20968259489059138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385656429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090896,0.038222466,0.03399765,0.003590672,0.0045669577,0.0006033825,0.00022702079,0.00033236513,0.009369872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986861,0.0036235556,0.000051234452,0.00002769446,0.0005663338,0.000024570656,0.000020734642,0.000051045557,0.008773854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735653,0.00005971057,0.0006814197,0.00042869014,0.000045999714,0.0014276174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885446,0.00008896659,0.00065319607,0.000280289,0.000038125963,0.00008498329],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029597504,0.00022266383,0.0004744499,0.00032946942,0.00023711544,0.00018153198,0.00034005768,0.00022588046,0.000032824286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020042776,0.00024872727,0.00018394498,0.00012712956,0.00005554235,0.00008488432,0.00018141839,0.0028309193,0.00046210943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104997725,0.000019279501,0.0036861352,0.000035293797,0.00025092775,0.0000027118426,0.000924858,0.00082737557,0.000001840337,0.99344915,0.00016133167,0.00063059595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002664854,0.000066486355,0.00082448445,0.00005853001,0.000013547687,0.000095637435,0.003136535,0.000835726,0.0000012319616,0.99286234,0.0015712035,0.00026778696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030250658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004980808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077771366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045554846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385813978","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.004","title":"Voting with interdependent values: The Condorcet winner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Condorcet method; Interdependence; Mathematical economics; Voting; Private information retrieval; Complete information; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mechanism design; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.0335670792132497,"score_gpt":0.2324053008551947,"score_spread":0.198838221641945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385813978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99110126,0.00023815074,0.000099200384,0.00038146361,0.000557529,0.0002446299,0.00007168004,0.000105917956,0.007200162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388653,0.00003040006,0.000026056177,0.00011862132,0.00019650298,0.00007020606,0.000012070779,0.00003253045,0.005627082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883735,0.00003058123,0.0004320548,0.00037321667,0.000016740101,0.00031006653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999342,0.00007333566,0.0002322789,0.00027881938,0.0000067183946,0.00006679682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011451178,0.00015804954,0.00030267754,0.000105680185,0.0001871811,0.00016091335,0.000217172,0.0000549035,0.00030144735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013472577,0.0001234312,0.000072387586,0.00006953333,0.00011829114,0.00013842824,0.0000993458,0.00014105502,0.0018365385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043737666,0.000056046287,0.7348601,0.000058617956,0.00014411981,0.00003146862,0.0052664997,0.00048971816,0.00004717974,0.24719794,0.003747346,0.00805719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032645834,0.00042210682,0.89217246,0.00018253179,0.00012077726,0.00029902524,0.010484873,0.009019039,0.00018928004,0.010712913,0.071592405,0.0015400237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021611493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056721146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23648502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047581103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008108961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386026790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4547051","title":"Partitioned Promises in a Trust Game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Trustworthiness; Outcome (game theory); Dictator game; Computer science; Game theory; Microeconomics; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04844205257709474,"score_gpt":0.2479815726346952,"score_spread":0.19953952005760045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386026790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663114,0.011407083,0.006682736,0.0017507102,0.0030295826,0.00073425676,0.00011133527,0.00019426674,0.009778621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855424,0.0034375917,0.000021560616,0.00002829546,0.00059770886,0.00006884531,0.000020663543,0.000064607826,0.010218316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962709,0.00009205775,0.0010816151,0.00048631005,0.00005885601,0.0020102577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986522,0.000056300218,0.0008381226,0.000347861,0.000029490397,0.00007599104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058859237,0.00025834874,0.00066547917,0.00053461833,0.000088956964,0.0001637579,0.00049613306,0.00029780748,0.00010036221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028055022,0.0002967326,0.00025954202,0.00022690721,0.00004199599,0.0001154113,0.0001540974,0.003771701,0.0010601874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000538193,0.00009595389,0.02889847,0.00008619346,0.00022238403,0.000014252877,0.0006781744,0.0015461337,0.0000046862997,0.9679167,0.000105354506,0.0003778238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006137884,0.000088850145,0.0039313463,0.00016373962,0.000009198913,0.00007364017,0.00062609656,0.00063745177,0.0000060158754,0.99208915,0.0014385738,0.00032217446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031999443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008467146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024967123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012990243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007182411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386174621","doi":"10.15388/23-infor524","title":"Quasi-Owen Value for Games on Augmenting Systems with a Coalition Structure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informatica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; Nanjing University; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Stochastic game; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical economics; Monotonic function; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Rationality; Axiomatic system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03020988972453831,"score_gpt":0.2264724172038449,"score_spread":0.1962625274793066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386174621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035216,0.00011165836,0.021268921,0.0003988238,0.0014618592,0.0017135127,0.0009842721,0.00049871084,0.07004062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808836,0.0000026164616,0.00023607774,0.00011431423,0.000118313386,0.00007986361,0.00007705815,0.00001793182,0.0012654925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989854,0.000014238167,0.00054227526,0.00013640858,0.000049076953,0.00027261165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918425,0.00015283265,0.00036231428,0.00022775542,0.000026001739,0.000046839872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078680704,0.000120982215,0.00028217703,0.00019381686,0.00013413023,0.00014695853,0.00013482719,0.00007182487,0.000024605266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012477738,0.000107407526,0.000054088217,0.00020169865,0.000023971234,0.0002518516,0.00001822441,0.000082345505,0.00062603364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039196908,0.000018388064,0.0010515028,0.000541529,0.00005657897,7.5017385e-7,0.002420719,0.0027128593,0.0000039517163,0.99130267,0.0016371026,0.00021472834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005640294,0.0028486678,0.007075927,0.0019406673,0.000059972284,0.00007331554,0.0132254725,0.5375056,0.0003869837,0.15158325,0.2778205,0.001839338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030772673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017285618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044825978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010483987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80466044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386567471","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.016","title":"Student-optimal interdistrict school choice: District-based versus school-based admissions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); School choice; School district; Welfare; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04810223679546384,"score_gpt":0.2958868116991121,"score_spread":0.24778457490364825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386567471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99244326,0.00037144538,0.00018429452,0.00040313895,0.0017422168,0.00041092906,0.0006279442,0.00025367696,0.003563115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666035,0.000036548183,0.000112538226,0.000115736075,0.0003121289,0.00021596694,0.0001455491,0.000054414395,0.0023467878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977791,0.00003781222,0.00084268925,0.0007310775,0.00004144346,0.00056788273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982088,0.00022595201,0.00037646986,0.0005521891,0.000016653921,0.00061990647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006220221,0.0003227505,0.0005786149,0.00040969776,0.0002663333,0.00028935625,0.0004004054,0.00018702277,0.0025851976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002516781,0.00036824352,0.00024470416,0.0002374375,0.00008380418,0.00022141599,0.00012987485,0.00029315,0.0043320917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019018518,0.00026719642,0.97689986,0.000071641414,0.00010464139,0.00002705925,0.00012505503,0.0018988821,0.000046182377,0.007881624,0.009571019,0.0029166462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051969467,0.00036429855,0.93613976,0.00007145331,0.00008643369,0.000004523244,0.00054099486,0.008297667,0.00007433339,0.00018228049,0.048165776,0.000875526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027988615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040043826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0407601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003090996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119118624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386999416","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2025.00052","title":"Respecting Improvement in Markets with Indivisible Goods","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.053024222129811456,"score_gpt":0.25761211294164826,"score_spread":0.20458789081183681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386999416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7620477,0.00015083785,0.0034343721,0.00050071307,0.0020604844,0.0013411824,0.000036205045,0.00022174428,0.23020673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895195,0.00004254436,0.0011621008,0.00007281053,0.00005965366,0.00014648463,0.000004583869,0.00003055774,0.008961811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972849,0.000022441476,0.00067368674,0.0012410197,0.00016915388,0.0006088109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984625,0.000040849656,0.0005425637,0.0008652868,0.000015633337,0.000073172836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007484228,0.0002362466,0.00039804805,0.001336379,0.00018935157,0.00041692075,0.0011954535,0.00007526792,0.000053109536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085036365,0.0002500203,0.000055938403,0.0013431225,0.00018625938,0.00019527093,0.0017636201,0.00036347003,0.00044942772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057803485,0.00019530584,0.27447683,0.0013728276,0.00012625562,0.00013994974,0.001997426,0.006730222,0.000030119008,0.7082672,0.00048064918,0.006125406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013996281,0.00022557045,0.6863744,0.0016886803,0.000020280613,0.000003070433,0.002030701,0.0108362315,0.00021215502,0.28900653,0.006682489,0.0015202432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003564791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007647806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41926065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003749649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029982191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387514870","doi":"10.1007/s00355-026-01668-4","title":"On the Ordinal Bayesian Incentive Compatibility of Vote Share and Veto Share Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Incentive compatibility; Compatibility (geochemistry); Incentive; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06776049486945887,"score_gpt":0.27073662680897764,"score_spread":0.20297613193951877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387514870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842595,0.0007535539,0.00004217978,0.003812099,0.00045690892,0.00048257754,0.0065984987,0.00005495926,0.0035397164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906445,0.00003439252,0.000008307963,0.000084032006,0.00030033637,0.000038378494,0.0001955057,0.000029395933,0.00024522518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985174,0.000102227474,0.0005241402,0.00056610786,0.00006192524,0.0002281835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987629,0.00026741062,0.0005596564,0.00029423388,0.000060465136,0.00005533993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079053605,0.00024602065,0.00064461393,0.00009555775,0.00045643706,0.00011399448,0.00028602078,0.00028794233,0.00016990365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033522965,0.00022449638,0.00015286989,0.000108682645,0.00018121983,0.00005757521,0.00041515316,0.00050606456,0.000028901162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006215277,0.00008940264,0.27061063,0.0016758167,0.00028541798,0.0000032189546,0.0065545505,0.000017152666,0.0000018879407,0.7178063,0.0017305341,0.0011629664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039031287,0.00007886247,0.7497602,0.00042424983,0.00003112555,5.6198286e-7,0.0019477496,0.00032391696,0.0000067371147,0.24281356,0.0038015458,0.00042114916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014878437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030797464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47914958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005821271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001660614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91546965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705371","doi":"10.1007/s10602-023-09419-8","title":"The pure logic of discrimination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Statistical discrimination; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05887008585413539,"score_gpt":0.26297041914713787,"score_spread":0.20410033329300248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01917546,0.00030096187,0.0045769233,0.01067803,0.0007396839,0.0001913072,0.00018880199,0.00007835565,0.9640705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841225,0.0000044700223,0.000024750896,0.0003258323,0.00014487075,0.000023835235,0.00002529016,0.00000394401,0.0010347534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.00001995606,0.00045419933,0.00016940925,0.000020359637,0.00029169375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992387,0.00035026149,0.00012795498,0.00017027081,0.000036282505,0.00007652425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070003484,0.00007458728,0.00017715307,0.00008826511,0.0001893836,0.000037103167,0.00017161827,0.000056236127,0.000107866705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036035368,0.00006433768,0.00009170702,0.00012976374,0.0010323419,0.00010597473,0.000042826163,0.00008002149,0.0015869053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033894712,0.000012892916,0.0028883207,0.000019266372,0.000016962704,8.900619e-7,0.00001676558,0.000027316302,0.0000030297663,0.9962303,0.00073167164,0.00004920798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325901,0.000013951058,0.0028675261,0.000009695685,0.0000024158392,0.000005965302,0.000110525834,0.0006755195,0.00004739579,0.92218745,0.07388997,0.00007635293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010602428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013743327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005689259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049497423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388006681","doi":"","title":"An Integer Linear Programming Approach for Coalitional Weighted Manipulation under Scoring Rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Integer programming; Linear programming; Integer (computer science); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.04762045173677849,"score_gpt":0.24847837547560833,"score_spread":0.20085792373882985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388006681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09658837,0.0003684209,0.88828635,0.0006239938,0.0002950827,0.0006977139,0.00016674348,0.00019456641,0.012778774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8372922,0.00002189161,0.1575893,0.000042700027,0.0001265362,0.0002134065,0.0027039207,0.00005752253,0.001952556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967,0.0011704504,0.0008394184,0.00086294394,0.00009515525,0.0003320571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645483,0.00056811806,0.000911476,0.0012618751,0.0006757729,0.00012792244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008844069,0.00028830822,0.00049153366,0.00025576135,0.00034134262,0.0004163126,0.0007501377,0.00033248286,0.00006362913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048924924,0.00034685593,0.0002293066,0.00014206726,0.00011921861,0.00018014153,0.00027696014,0.0004073425,0.00005305707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012500133,0.0003290388,0.0030233571,0.00032803373,0.00006616735,1.4804434e-7,0.0017687157,0.0015881631,0.000049624396,0.98997957,0.000041735235,0.0028129688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007700453,0.0000016481371,0.0035893763,0.0010095501,0.000033092438,0.000006121781,0.0002037627,0.79151034,0.0013395026,0.18992595,0.010834563,0.0007760435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004848189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007324781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8000536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013328601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053802287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388182784","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4616402","title":"Some Further Results on Random Obic Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03574875327341229,"score_gpt":0.2411789869298191,"score_spread":0.2054302336564068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388182784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90339136,0.044576265,0.004149645,0.008611705,0.015799085,0.0012868651,0.0010179281,0.00057973113,0.020587431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579008,0.010103602,0.00002427096,0.00011408678,0.003129066,0.000029475661,0.000056850276,0.00012671256,0.028515099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952081,0.0001655586,0.0013975591,0.00072962395,0.000106655265,0.0023924988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974906,0.00023153324,0.0014532395,0.0006679256,0.00004254151,0.00011418251],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010383125,0.00041558017,0.0009328357,0.00056902156,0.00022186842,0.00023841384,0.0008261399,0.0004375048,0.000043061882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004822989,0.00042329868,0.0005448093,0.00012849979,0.000057369478,0.00012069544,0.00019402964,0.005206491,0.005170559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005329073,0.000074741896,0.00039570083,0.000046065314,0.0005842335,0.000011191405,0.0005696796,0.0012065137,0.000004630907,0.99503434,0.0006910196,0.0008490035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024636667,0.00021901848,0.00047112297,0.00020552534,0.00002026209,0.00006161357,0.00032353774,0.00021053804,0.000009714813,0.9901775,0.0053821397,0.0004553432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020172217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012448571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05450949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012001945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006005033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222085","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-02058-7","title":"Incommensurability and consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of language; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Metaphysics; Decision maker; Economics; Law and economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Management science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2038176647529995,"score_gpt":0.30985179056318507,"score_spread":0.10603412581018556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93146884,0.006091278,0.000008890504,0.038319293,0.0004258446,0.00014190572,0.000046426587,0.00019991907,0.02329759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989461,0.00038277652,0.000022939372,0.00027765209,0.00015416273,0.000022750517,0.0000018585007,0.000008469019,0.00018332455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991225,0.000030213034,0.0003632834,0.0002803157,0.00002267344,0.00018101088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.0003342429,0.00008877096,0.00017046688,0.000023697747,0.000050881332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010469285,0.00009691127,0.00036436642,0.0000724776,0.00018662002,0.000017314442,0.00007453965,0.00004669704,0.000020686935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085422065,0.00009255772,0.000050009072,0.00021183885,0.0002437417,0.00005061546,0.00013831284,0.00009897911,0.0006703724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060759207,0.000017121676,0.086044416,0.00006579914,0.00006700439,0.0000034702814,0.000462248,0.0000012398765,0.0000035693813,0.91278505,0.00034945656,0.00019452455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017232492,0.000035524285,0.0526986,0.000013665338,0.0000030022975,0.0000027394235,0.00014468296,0.000068239104,0.0000037803607,0.9423466,0.0044004596,0.00011041046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013241451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000218684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06747721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021650143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019240113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86165047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388853720","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4640296","title":"Capacity Variation in the Many-to-One Stable Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Matching (statistics); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05512915739737241,"score_gpt":0.23787534685962483,"score_spread":0.1827461894622524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388853720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82946086,0.0013520052,0.15992194,0.00300437,0.0017908112,0.0005499472,0.00006562407,0.00006386935,0.0037906053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964905,0.00068436173,0.00014848271,0.00013378392,0.00065786514,0.00003855376,0.000008348532,0.000045080385,0.0017930593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671954,0.00019977681,0.00087844906,0.0004175721,0.000096721706,0.0016879356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867433,0.0001252543,0.0006938369,0.0004256954,0.000029910998,0.00005096241],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01682302,0.0002157409,0.00048753305,0.00043415098,0.00020334845,0.0002866462,0.00080191274,0.00021960179,0.00003427282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002013278,0.00021088147,0.00016328173,0.00029607047,0.000015852593,0.0001259521,0.00016039303,0.0042788284,0.0006592707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015872138,0.000050028368,0.002495158,0.000044319455,0.00011628097,0.0000019987451,0.003766377,0.0043447223,0.00001768232,0.9889279,0.000038482038,0.00018120043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022337647,0.000053566273,0.0116627645,0.000104083156,0.000009913768,0.000040591774,0.0007647246,0.00050141045,0.0000022887023,0.98592526,0.00048252888,0.00022948926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025022747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015700461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16702963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013629956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033196885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389599330","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.04783","title":"Parallel Repetition of k-Player Projection Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Princeton University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University; Division of Mathematical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Projection (relational algebra); Property (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Exponential function; Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.1704372457189613,"score_gpt":0.19048934235844622,"score_spread":0.02005209663948493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389599330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302716,0.0001315411,0.04859829,0.000060915387,0.0015785107,0.00043851385,0.00019997358,0.00022716727,0.018493488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834003,0.0002116594,0.00010103415,0.0000105889285,0.00011127029,0.0000024471055,0.00004567103,0.000028839362,0.016088195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986126,0.000056672725,0.00042541715,0.00069000875,0.000016810847,0.00019849096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984949,0.00006166815,0.0007724351,0.00056695135,0.000055680786,0.00004833609],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006928394,0.00018260063,0.00045510998,0.00040500757,0.000063658495,0.00002589821,0.00031047701,0.00029490798,0.00012016241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008842242,0.00024813923,0.00023212447,0.00031847873,0.00007263262,0.00011759925,0.00022880136,0.00029973843,0.00064011425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007512048,0.00008190571,0.037736658,0.00039228227,0.00015736416,0.000026428661,0.00035300915,0.07948538,0.000012801982,0.88114923,0.00049559254,0.000034213765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010178278,0.00015438412,0.026962247,0.00048225644,0.00007496775,0.000005570751,0.000575289,0.07499958,0.00014802294,0.8907359,0.003970835,0.00087307004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007090017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037233694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053128693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012150642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028908664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389766664","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4664827","title":"Shifting Competition, Affirmative Action, and Human Capital Accumulation: A Comparative Static Analysis of Investment Contests","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Affirmative action; Competition (biology); Action (physics); Human capital; Economics; Labour economics; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13474516471402959,"score_gpt":0.33881694688610353,"score_spread":0.20407178217207395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389766664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984518,0.0015458486,0.012280975,0.00022793357,0.0002835376,0.0002980881,0.00016556568,0.00003920427,0.00064088125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987941,0.0003311197,0.000071130125,0.000029555606,0.00012725824,0.000020534442,0.00014964347,0.000024407864,0.00045227114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997258,0.00019347166,0.0012759621,0.00039551855,0.000091884714,0.00078514975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708366,0.00021426438,0.0022306694,0.00024000392,0.00015206025,0.00007935459],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00324833,0.0002632674,0.0010955674,0.0009105191,0.00026904308,0.00012900439,0.00023226463,0.00014362333,0.000050488623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100554746,0.00029683497,0.00026287968,0.00046546521,0.00012059314,0.0001724257,0.00012819719,0.0014982267,0.00003078419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016437982,0.000060960636,0.03382301,0.00008041095,0.0039836043,0.0000010154441,0.007521979,0.008461645,0.000011067207,0.9460054,0.000012063645,0.000022398439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054885884,0.00019267832,0.06557149,0.00015611481,0.00037136162,0.000016008586,0.00942524,0.0051415698,0.00001288295,0.91818947,0.0000516835,0.00032267175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067656266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025373092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031748474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079344766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027691486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390018119","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977806.ch12","title":"Chapter 12: Subgradients, Derivatives, and the Bregman Distance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09064051929964519,"score_gpt":0.21396446914596487,"score_spread":0.12332394984631968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390018119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015503402,0.00077706727,0.0030913018,0.00039090082,0.0006945449,0.0033790723,0.0011182304,0.00016726335,0.9888313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063488685,0.00036705067,0.0015594545,0.0002813142,0.0013450101,0.0004144594,0.00008004519,0.00028677346,0.9321772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983467,0.0000035452624,0.00079184974,0.00049204717,0.000066407,0.00029944704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827456,0.0004751826,0.0008117586,0.00033533078,0.00001951253,0.00008367585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013660528,0.00039189786,0.0009277191,0.000045191115,0.0003968603,0.00014169251,0.00021969582,0.0004993479,0.000020091122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004217185,0.00031975622,0.0004028732,0.000014974104,0.00066196936,0.00002453319,0.00013907027,0.00043542412,0.00003380065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045713496,0.0000064714673,0.0000024831622,0.0002332279,0.00029648084,2.0687649e-7,0.0028956323,3.0698268e-7,0.0000025743223,0.99449795,0.0008337106,0.0011852413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021428042,0.000031460764,9.719234e-7,0.00018121347,0.00007224293,0.0000028743227,0.0003779541,0.000108951695,0.000012327868,0.87319654,0.12350818,0.0003644473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006718534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005510739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12267447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031394964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012459212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390439628","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-48974-7_24","title":"The Price of Anarchy of Probabilistic Serial in One-Sided Allocation Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Price of anarchy; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical economics; Unit of time; Upper and lower bounds; Computer science; Incentive compatibility; Binary logarithm; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Discrete mathematics; Mathematics; Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Price of stability; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05048305999129288,"score_gpt":0.22947470423670743,"score_spread":0.17899164424541456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390439628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047410913,0.0016079583,0.9215185,0.0012585437,0.005850825,0.0034511,0.00010776657,0.00010840284,0.01868599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687624,0.000048306443,0.0023775056,0.000025975462,0.00014138652,0.000014678468,0.0000044557637,0.000022197994,0.00048925495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981281,0.000025869984,0.0009486769,0.00051188417,0.000119968456,0.0002654784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997841,0.0007611129,0.00076163764,0.0005187619,0.00008732149,0.000030177747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003040968,0.00016832595,0.00048955425,0.0004594856,0.00006625918,0.00005200458,0.00081142253,0.0001563684,0.0000074341906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000618798,0.00015252593,0.000066994064,0.0004837886,0.0005285252,0.00009089018,0.00018816923,0.00027857,0.000019287823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032496166,0.000053138436,0.0011928673,0.00047119177,0.000022451062,0.000002081804,0.0027107324,0.12673867,0.00017980479,0.8523383,0.000003367464,0.016254893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024114372,0.00015173954,0.0018258588,0.0007836768,0.0000027305455,0.0000022085048,9.170235e-7,0.051675275,0.00024966567,0.94465965,0.0001798642,0.0002272808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015939465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004122261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94946533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012056965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001148249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6219827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390443667","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-48974-7_33","title":"One Quarter Each (on Average) Ensures Proportionality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Computer science; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematical optimization; Proportionality (law); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.05214071166547784,"score_gpt":0.23934374166527297,"score_spread":0.18720302999979513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390443667","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00334773,0.00032312976,0.9361246,0.0013080484,0.0043667736,0.0006703268,0.00012295698,0.0002368723,0.05349955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904543,0.0000149256675,0.0025463786,0.00065880996,0.0008211256,0.000011953868,0.00001843792,0.000046286143,0.0054277782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755454,0.000020658714,0.0007402584,0.0010764248,0.00019384082,0.0004142606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839365,0.00029530673,0.00046919956,0.00069893687,0.00005761318,0.00008530527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245705,0.0002986357,0.0005876235,0.00059971743,0.00016814614,0.0001814999,0.0007060978,0.00027352787,0.00013587158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001434443,0.00032541927,0.00014002249,0.0002231142,0.00034977155,0.00012144105,0.00015844085,0.00059213414,0.0013906555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020670373,0.000070340546,0.001993726,0.00012718466,0.00004016436,0.000031618714,0.0008429934,0.015727585,0.000011952223,0.95193577,0.000091575464,0.029106429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021292179,0.00016823938,0.004227002,0.00033367527,0.0000031072236,0.000008113915,2.0455079e-7,0.0125075765,0.000088693116,0.97915554,0.0027390388,0.000555886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042318654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002957969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98710656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017864809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006619892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390481379","doi":"10.1109/ssci52147.2023.10372017","title":"Balancing Matching of Two-Sided Agents with Adaptive and Fair Instability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Cardinality (data modeling); Stability (learning theory); Relaxation (psychology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Reachability; Blossom algorithm; Computer science; Combinatorics; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.045593555416275584,"score_gpt":0.2369490805311921,"score_spread":0.19135552511491652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390481379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96771234,0.000039483908,0.0026197114,0.000043285658,0.00008051107,0.00011998991,0.000023262972,0.000062553256,0.029298853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884665,0.0000049825894,0.0004394275,0.000028520128,0.000017885224,0.0000055666364,0.0000025804864,0.00001035498,0.0006440469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927545,0.000020736074,0.00031153063,0.00022041494,0.000022158307,0.00014974084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995077,0.00011252508,0.00016675588,0.00016107535,0.000014426376,0.000037471917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088882464,0.000078689794,0.00026128234,0.00010199532,0.00005072219,0.00001721085,0.000069923684,0.000028302757,0.00009040146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052492807,0.00007243764,0.000027799824,0.00023524404,0.00004378748,0.00011706658,0.00004683013,0.000061014085,0.000086305285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004437269,0.000030393205,0.37865618,0.00010013928,0.00006262709,0.00000382776,0.0037055507,0.00049420516,0.00013033746,0.6163033,0.00007571445,0.0003933246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022267867,0.00029660965,0.6778499,0.00022686673,0.000011562921,0.000012067715,0.006435063,0.021058187,0.0009719407,0.28999704,0.00037220612,0.00054175657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068638026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000953339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32630628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002012816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062237095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29539213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390894138","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4695855","title":"Voting When Rankings Matter: Truthful Equilibria, Efficiency, and Abstention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Cardinal voting systems; Nash equilibrium; Anti-plurality voting; Social choice theory; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Pareto efficiency; Approval voting; Majority rule; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01407295377703951,"score_gpt":0.21407319930137744,"score_spread":0.20000024552433793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390894138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218427,0.04852208,0.0135886865,0.000934465,0.0030288624,0.00032072808,0.000041851243,0.000098866374,0.011621778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894872,0.0008847461,0.000059240087,0.000060026578,0.0008383458,0.000011812813,0.000010864103,0.00007957208,0.008568246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961325,0.00007977164,0.0011309886,0.0007092547,0.000087321016,0.0018601664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858314,0.00006691133,0.0009313048,0.00028814524,0.000036856865,0.00009364677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006946401,0.00035833244,0.00068805006,0.00048051993,0.00020891883,0.0006205876,0.0004757841,0.00033023302,0.00016640945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090072914,0.00038753398,0.00034208322,0.00011735831,0.00007042117,0.00012913924,0.00050454907,0.004172048,0.00095528504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000294025,0.00003692043,0.0070339725,0.0003763054,0.00037202935,0.0000065248155,0.0011146463,0.00013550906,0.000046361856,0.9887687,0.00016610762,0.0019135297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040129136,0.00008976469,0.00046239642,0.00039423484,0.000052661788,0.00048012508,0.00034637743,0.0039698714,0.000006782147,0.99225634,0.0011198244,0.0004203467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019064452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005193882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06764446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007614875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003402989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391026342","doi":"10.1145/3640760","title":"Optimized Distortion and Proportional Fairness in Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Voting; Distortion (music); Anti-plurality voting; Outcome (game theory); Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Majority rule; Unit (ring theory); Disapproval voting; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027595381259119263,"score_gpt":0.23514844381532032,"score_spread":0.20755306255620107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391026342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6286426,0.00039079002,0.36958507,0.0004934767,0.00035110654,0.0001299646,0.000027591406,0.000037868736,0.00034151133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981075,0.00018948769,0.0014512851,0.00003311446,0.00003405208,0.000024888475,0.0000137595625,0.000013837689,0.00013207947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991738,0.000014668093,0.000393165,0.00030239482,0.000010900353,0.00010502816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970835,0.00009246218,0.00008319659,0.00007349033,0.000007358031,0.00003511476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041163113,0.00009292643,0.00017394818,0.0002318985,0.00009201446,0.00012839212,0.000043932203,0.0000575227,0.000020606252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011325782,0.00011190103,0.000036613066,0.00008688675,0.0000341734,0.00024295851,0.000003877172,0.0001073606,0.000028079516],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087740475,0.00013496279,0.003291904,0.00020526632,0.000091880844,0.0000047608196,0.0017711354,0.23181108,0.000009656003,0.56977785,0.000011027897,0.19280273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077345746,0.00009202915,0.016759256,0.000096147654,0.000010389929,0.000029714192,0.00017704743,0.8160222,0.00003591115,0.16472219,0.0009855351,0.0002961102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005838554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019787663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5842111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007014003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011161578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45631915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391178295","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4704737","title":"Strategy-Proof Preference Aggregation and the Anonymity-Neutrality Tradeoff","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Neutrality; Preference; Proof of concept; Computer science; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Computer security; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04252557351999512,"score_gpt":0.23808879630244775,"score_spread":0.19556322278245264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391178295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89193344,0.08505363,0.0041111726,0.0029546008,0.0016320505,0.0007712498,0.000099290955,0.00007440029,0.013370184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899778,0.0058569442,0.000012594283,0.000040741306,0.0005839038,0.000032143776,0.00000955451,0.000036133384,0.0034501865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969535,0.0002316757,0.00091198774,0.000548592,0.0000754115,0.0012788584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856555,0.00011983661,0.0008012563,0.00040236788,0.000038222486,0.00007279127],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009447828,0.00030810805,0.00062065845,0.00016922595,0.00023950526,0.00051815424,0.0005356601,0.0003074236,0.000035005738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012519142,0.0002428909,0.0002662746,0.00013495093,0.00019074841,0.00011244457,0.00023895163,0.00587359,0.00008892639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000708178,0.000018857709,0.0005765825,0.0001390503,0.00028508002,0.0000017214325,0.00061551895,0.00018155073,0.0000017549804,0.99334174,0.000036694073,0.00473062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066293706,0.00008309704,0.00050285755,0.00014985322,0.0000491632,0.00019174187,0.00047435495,0.0013041251,0.000023809234,0.9958385,0.00045502285,0.00026453976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031045594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034283762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09804437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005238377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006759804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391307149","doi":"10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394262","title":"Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items: Consequences of Correlated Preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Minimax; Categorization; Rank (graph theory); Similarity (geometry); Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Economics; Pareto optimal; Metric (unit); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.06800067106919737,"score_gpt":0.24427695058094592,"score_spread":0.17627627951174857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391307149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472401,0.0001823545,0.00044123415,0.00007667194,0.00025613693,0.000115813535,0.000047069483,0.000059845952,0.05158074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693793,0.000050555846,0.000062542465,0.000009151182,0.000011206007,0.0000070021147,0.000017022061,0.0000053903323,0.0028991732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910617,0.000023627668,0.000578849,0.00015111551,0.000028767396,0.00011149687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922514,0.00012749285,0.00043595134,0.00015192908,0.000037970483,0.000021517135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086354977,0.00006260522,0.00026568625,0.00023616363,0.000025036627,0.000009666489,0.00015850594,0.00006750607,0.0003051566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014837498,0.00006161182,0.00004624176,0.00049099716,0.000112447495,0.00009741299,0.000023405337,0.00004516629,0.00038437056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009083434,0.000032436612,0.21385065,0.00011197177,0.000051714258,2.9544665e-7,0.0010867706,0.00031386013,0.0012389682,0.7825839,0.00041471218,0.0003056478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012174208,0.0005930933,0.29323554,0.00037547117,0.000020884294,0.000005485734,0.0048761605,0.00838206,0.05964905,0.6273261,0.0036963962,0.0006223969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050316926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001514991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15525785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008110205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017180282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4940434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391617321","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104095","title":"Primarily about primaries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Condorcet method; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Converse; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Anti-plurality voting; Ranked voting system; Quality (philosophy); Distortion (music); Political science; Politics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.07772587154186397,"score_gpt":0.27459328879420036,"score_spread":0.1968674172523364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391617321","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18857712,0.021827195,0.4610217,0.0027393447,0.010055439,0.00062727847,0.00015136298,0.0010827545,0.31391782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642056,0.000048107566,0.00039628916,0.0001581061,0.000359731,0.000017454437,0.0000054552643,0.000023852206,0.0025704575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864787,0.000019255449,0.0006232473,0.00040911025,0.0000362452,0.00026426022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999417,0.00014587227,0.000084163024,0.0002712814,0.000021328377,0.00006035864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009134585,0.00013100103,0.00022966297,0.00015497225,0.00011324575,0.0003455426,0.00023854159,0.00008111792,0.0007409913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018889838,0.00014154249,0.00010819729,0.00033103407,0.00012534595,0.00023754123,0.000049550283,0.00017136648,0.012200469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007757347,0.00002342414,0.00043353444,0.0000520314,0.00002212999,0.000009056954,0.00080571795,0.000054319662,0.00012389036,0.97572863,0.0002818824,0.022457646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067195006,0.000044763132,0.00034863222,0.000063646345,0.000004174967,0.000008293002,0.000153594,0.0068310713,0.004802881,0.9007219,0.086779594,0.0002347468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015042938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020479796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80784345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056627876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025038411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98856866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392223779","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/26","title":"Navigating Social Dilemmas with LLM-based Agents via Consideration of Future Consequences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Oxford; Good Ventures Foundation","keywords":"Delegation; Control (management); Business; Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.05002284425876859,"score_gpt":0.2756504319227501,"score_spread":0.22562758766398155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392223779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681918,0.0014471773,0.005045922,0.002609709,0.0023434055,0.00066378503,0.00070997747,0.00017303317,0.018815167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978734,0.000005594408,0.0009323623,0.0001613982,0.0005300231,0.000042728836,0.00009487663,0.000034593955,0.0003250017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828905,0.000060468654,0.0008548983,0.000532071,0.00006242047,0.00020107899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986993,0.00007643479,0.00086606765,0.00024966255,0.000066951194,0.000041596348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008199243,0.00025829804,0.0006651232,0.000083407554,0.0001296178,0.00014250119,0.0001852451,0.0003219052,0.00048444918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003620299,0.00024382789,0.00016976763,0.00012953415,0.00022208947,0.00004433835,0.00009616132,0.00068924687,0.00013966481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007085475,0.00013885378,0.012139219,0.0032289186,0.0006235795,0.00002752241,0.005695656,0.0028009124,0.00015158537,0.9729487,0.0010209669,0.0011532848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021038672,0.00056313316,0.0035188857,0.0035466347,0.00028224502,0.00004521119,0.0032801358,0.057588283,0.007968106,0.9100257,0.008479357,0.0025984403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060728024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006637611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06292295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005597521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000897554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99430126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393132206","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114476","title":"On the complexity of nucleolus computation for bipartite b-matching games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Complement (music); Computation; Discrete mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Bounded function; Simple (philosophy); Time complexity; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.062216164890382175,"score_gpt":0.2716958774834759,"score_spread":0.20947971259309373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393132206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30086985,0.00007953486,0.692304,0.001314889,0.0007176957,0.00019046674,0.000027731397,0.00005657881,0.00443924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954339,0.0000010461384,0.0042216657,0.00021045844,0.000099258505,0.000007470531,0.0000011862419,0.000009005697,0.00001599519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989672,0.00003890936,0.00035508617,0.00033734768,0.00007229864,0.00022921505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987605,0.0008360735,0.000091745176,0.00022356797,0.000038419657,0.000049693197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003035899,0.00009136341,0.0002024152,0.00013066121,0.0002148227,0.00019821952,0.0004334607,0.000026338856,0.0000681528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013211691,0.00006740331,0.000087544555,0.00038332812,0.0024086803,0.00012455278,0.00009067575,0.00010138545,0.00014055299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010270824,0.000020208869,0.0000163757,0.00004191581,0.0000070849837,3.5484913e-7,0.00078688347,0.0007982401,0.000059386577,0.9970093,0.00007680366,0.0011731851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047202626,0.00008473575,0.00017706752,0.000057096328,0.0000014480532,0.0000017762319,0.0000111726695,0.35836017,0.000259612,0.6408162,0.00012609726,0.000057390684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000065178388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1967807e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69456404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029974759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001590644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8874883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393146360","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30273","title":"Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Alan Turing Institute","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Business; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11173800175273614,"score_gpt":0.28370867412422784,"score_spread":0.17197067237149172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393146360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470729,0.00028527272,0.0020057154,0.0019727887,0.0014704103,0.00042496892,0.000027331142,0.00011212768,0.04662849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.0000109730045,0.00012313192,0.000051215196,0.00011659725,0.000022823027,6.168315e-7,0.000021430347,0.0010831559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982782,0.0000100603975,0.00087433663,0.00045837043,0.00007929258,0.00029973115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993602,0.0000887069,0.00028402093,0.0001362402,0.00008616791,0.00004468172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013981315,0.00017843126,0.00033676845,0.0002617999,0.000079283665,0.00021217858,0.0006156402,0.00010318161,0.00020893943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000427803,0.00015128434,0.00012818706,0.000642336,0.00015944545,0.0002630472,0.0001060408,0.00034298623,0.0005915837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023762375,0.000058382673,0.008556986,0.0001303851,0.000011026594,8.9612894e-7,0.0015670789,0.000054414726,0.00134559,0.9838296,0.0000478939,0.0043739765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048677153,0.00012045229,0.0017117423,0.001405314,0.0000070749284,0.000006674726,0.0018290575,0.12108542,0.055551454,0.81653255,0.0012363384,0.0004652737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021944928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029651004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16729708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062484614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025232071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7603809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393323735","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56255-6_5","title":"Deliberation and Voting in Approval-Based Multi-winner Elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Deliberation; Voting; Approval voting; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Condorcet method; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.032312067663126304,"score_gpt":0.23181488155606175,"score_spread":0.19950281389293545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393323735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034586138,0.0014224517,0.9898587,0.00029710765,0.0012494847,0.00027769987,0.000013764911,0.000060335064,0.0033618666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780631,0.000008412589,0.01984949,0.00029000966,0.00025692515,0.0000107445085,0.000005769212,0.00003222142,0.0014833391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829763,0.000010406706,0.0005307468,0.00082067045,0.000059191636,0.0002813391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933195,0.00016425087,0.00017979555,0.0002447016,0.000031673466,0.0000476045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011882355,0.0002281732,0.0003585764,0.0009142761,0.00011571222,0.00027118213,0.00025943015,0.00020839373,0.000017567701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084863386,0.00024443062,0.000057531543,0.00033807894,0.00019702887,0.00015223428,0.000099114535,0.0005153132,0.000074850366],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016233254,0.00008800546,0.008949533,0.0004661918,0.000031264644,0.00006795641,0.0024311882,0.17995057,0.00012605777,0.71689343,0.000014952818,0.09096463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025319966,0.00005256562,0.00052444794,0.00039643917,0.0000031881143,0.000019319848,3.2604382e-7,0.8521441,0.00008574948,0.14502355,0.001119278,0.00037783102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006856114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003301221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018071984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057569177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394927090","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09885-x","title":"Two-Person Fair Division with Additive Valuations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Universität Wien","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Arithmetic; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03395908741372207,"score_gpt":0.24856721885162664,"score_spread":0.21460813143790458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394927090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6918279,0.0037604696,0.2865954,0.00035890343,0.0009912592,0.00035261447,0.00012443619,0.00018292485,0.015806103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980595,0.00006552871,0.0010390991,0.00008660278,0.000119752905,0.000019933017,0.000047844962,0.000018693243,0.00054305687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909985,0.00003175974,0.00028273888,0.0003792098,0.00006719289,0.00013924496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993575,0.00030716715,0.00009473785,0.00015400776,0.000026255191,0.000060324535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079937046,0.0001159452,0.00018166123,0.00024895015,0.00015661794,0.00020285041,0.00006690852,0.00006028956,0.00029330235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011058769,0.00010131756,0.000049250277,0.0002966975,0.000030546737,0.00038904476,0.00001860812,0.000105983636,0.0006116011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051089002,0.00004993454,0.0074136048,0.000026446596,0.000039611557,0.0000063380367,0.0022808856,0.0001145626,0.00008297732,0.8670073,0.0014868282,0.1214404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003583376,0.0011135262,0.37627438,0.0010921912,0.00006279472,0.00007586027,0.0026393742,0.18190639,0.00022852662,0.3430464,0.08878323,0.0011939511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042831052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025750787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048924747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007849113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78610986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395097663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4757261","title":"Overlapping Coalitional Games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.023306883529132145,"score_gpt":0.234897395354462,"score_spread":0.21159051182532984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395097663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5969221,0.22216739,0.024722904,0.0058784448,0.015632967,0.0007138845,0.00064720056,0.00042335223,0.13289176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781654,0.003622368,0.000054466058,0.000103668826,0.0020505695,0.000019129297,0.00002951441,0.000066706576,0.015888188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964184,0.000063967265,0.000955325,0.00054793153,0.000083920924,0.0019304266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988004,0.000061518156,0.000679157,0.00032473417,0.000043792494,0.00009037573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053048395,0.0003097256,0.0006137029,0.00040217026,0.00015874427,0.0003569905,0.0005052971,0.00032263814,0.00025944217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011839681,0.00034459418,0.00047473077,0.00013025393,0.000053800115,0.00008152573,0.00035714766,0.00622031,0.0016750998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011610487,0.00002734649,0.00074452383,0.000117668234,0.0004685848,0.000006512847,0.00022164184,0.00022899633,0.000005626582,0.9970261,0.00056001905,0.00058141083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019867685,0.00005680874,0.00020216382,0.00026274988,0.000024124603,0.0003736464,0.00037077398,0.0005176904,0.0000033693377,0.98272115,0.0149071505,0.0003617093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013062509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006693523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3812433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015471814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395704597","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4808646","title":"A Characterisation of the Αmin-Egalitarian Rule","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.018098768413054384,"score_gpt":0.218498607426974,"score_spread":0.2003998390139196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395704597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97191584,0.01171437,0.00086870993,0.0018081197,0.004125118,0.00025591743,0.00011057879,0.000029259672,0.009172099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179614,0.0006775687,0.000013474171,0.000034198663,0.0006804955,0.000010461678,0.0000071762447,0.000036754387,0.006743739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977565,0.00008394396,0.0008726899,0.0002975883,0.000063824766,0.0009254425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984296,0.000027737467,0.0010499534,0.00041871122,0.000038861832,0.000035149977],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004657068,0.00019207112,0.0004496997,0.00019117072,0.000105120445,0.000108760694,0.00058902806,0.00022724057,0.00006759667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011526419,0.00016108375,0.0004166262,0.00013717524,0.000049629278,0.00005375706,0.0003009628,0.0035308846,0.00022596504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012089937,0.00002745901,0.002607608,0.00011680243,0.00027625723,5.6051977e-7,0.0008147093,0.000044827004,0.000048598642,0.9951277,0.000055337652,0.0008680478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001343469,0.00004006784,0.002708372,0.00019059524,0.00002846825,0.00008144024,0.00029416764,0.00017862995,0.00005364271,0.9937207,0.002403442,0.0001661024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026784913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119694676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019880304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007755512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007865603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396813256","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.02472","title":"Congressional Apportionment: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.02443307860106117,"score_gpt":0.2315951426015077,"score_spread":0.20716206400044654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396813256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00584215,0.0003313536,0.6479574,0.00010491122,0.000881116,0.00028514068,0.000011913679,0.000120493154,0.34446552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824873,0.00001634469,0.010306274,0.000060375547,0.00003899557,0.000046110134,0.000005929697,0.0000075756197,0.0070310924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900806,0.0000088175075,0.0002450998,0.0004644147,0.00007965687,0.00019394381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967855,0.00001280471,0.0000774806,0.00017593933,0.000010630093,0.000044581586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015218871,0.00007545689,0.00009758601,0.00033237867,0.00018732694,0.0002430782,0.00023696895,0.000019744024,0.00021545359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023771649,0.00007571961,0.000036156212,0.00067227974,0.00016102204,0.00041974735,0.000094752424,0.000054338485,0.00038651138],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024710746,0.000039400955,0.00091807626,0.000066670815,0.00001632195,0.000003598827,0.00036871585,0.04083694,0.000008360484,0.9567829,0.00019530577,0.0007612763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017125187,0.000019496434,0.0034731962,0.00006426266,0.000005490785,0.000004775134,0.00037370503,0.9715024,0.00003592157,0.016134795,0.008019855,0.00019483545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000063696716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.155643e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010062115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075567527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4967951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396873968","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.04.003","title":"Efficiency and maximality in anonymous two-sided economies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02667816084570245,"score_gpt":0.24565911478874325,"score_spread":0.2189809539430408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396873968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851899,0.006071498,0.00004291146,0.00020756364,0.0007209114,0.00023430897,0.00012996083,0.00006662871,0.0073363287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980593,0.00027301555,0.000066595334,0.00004902533,0.00011032134,0.00006198765,0.0000061483343,0.000025116997,0.0013484899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984178,0.000020292335,0.00063695986,0.0006036611,0.000009179585,0.00031210497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948955,0.00009360225,0.00010779311,0.0002165663,0.0000031334205,0.00008935251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086812646,0.00018902251,0.0004471771,0.00024537276,0.00006581527,0.0002735938,0.00011181251,0.00009406189,0.00034850527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017975983,0.00021545142,0.000070252405,0.00005641075,0.0001267094,0.000287712,0.000075486896,0.00015325786,0.00039153095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020123987,0.00007005587,0.57630247,0.00013021367,0.000029806422,0.000032614804,0.0015617056,0.00007936577,0.00004715888,0.409479,0.00015123983,0.012096241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026231057,0.0002740036,0.873875,0.00027563114,0.00006389342,0.00035429728,0.0013943381,0.022215396,0.00017918786,0.06578571,0.03127442,0.0016850063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025864755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3436933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010916867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019003923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8785854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396892739","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4826041","title":"Causal Effects in Matching Mechanisms with Strategically Reported Preferences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017761829811088186,"score_gpt":0.22397317393632385,"score_spread":0.20621134412523567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396892739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828727,0.0048163612,0.10435705,0.00016812434,0.0004753455,0.0001626423,0.0000030264166,0.00007027385,0.0070744697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980673,0.00027253077,0.0001990526,0.000019737206,0.00012696898,0.000010091931,0.000002182455,0.00002566369,0.0012764636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788487,0.000059959366,0.00053030776,0.00030527168,0.000057819685,0.0011617633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950844,0.00008179781,0.0002113445,0.00012855478,0.000014018964,0.000055831722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035829078,0.00015162482,0.0003000946,0.00024018226,0.000082727645,0.00022841633,0.00017892463,0.00008584371,0.000043047457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036533256,0.00012613373,0.00006593187,0.00026852105,0.000021137668,0.000253738,0.000015033204,0.0014089437,0.00010445995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027405835,0.000024867859,0.0014284407,0.000042778836,0.00013313799,0.00008074253,0.0002971428,0.0001091459,0.000097179356,0.99691534,0.0000026970004,0.000841138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003030471,0.00042613497,0.001035335,0.00018868154,0.000009583556,0.0008155496,0.00053883524,0.00034897448,0.000032122836,0.9960112,0.00011551021,0.00017505513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019677872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082111725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115194604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038110887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043238612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396902375","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4826931","title":"Pareto Efficient Recovery Upon Da Mechanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Pareto efficiency; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Operations management; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020847058955904954,"score_gpt":0.22507041087049007,"score_spread":0.20422335191458513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396902375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84345025,0.0697851,0.038962442,0.001421121,0.016533263,0.0006672509,0.00025145628,0.00025746433,0.028671633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871687,0.0032332721,0.00005655336,0.00006485035,0.0013411338,0.000027199038,0.000019180748,0.00010502046,0.007984051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535066,0.00010313149,0.0011938659,0.0007855682,0.00010548562,0.0024613107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826473,0.00006377388,0.0009256003,0.000567707,0.00004817323,0.00013001585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008007004,0.00043055418,0.0008098488,0.00055303087,0.0001961213,0.00048675807,0.0007391403,0.00047259615,0.00016966314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014184546,0.00046155532,0.00060269627,0.00019514354,0.0000292235,0.000051918192,0.00052101817,0.0067823003,0.0021232227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031003223,0.000049709364,0.00005801486,0.00011815458,0.00045829476,0.000012426817,0.0002396951,0.0025625436,0.000012458463,0.995143,0.00014464954,0.0011700672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002367217,0.00017864372,0.000017167147,0.0002619167,0.0000433179,0.00030072007,0.00035550265,0.0027252082,0.00003270638,0.9923148,0.0030446276,0.00048862345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016412885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001226831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14371848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002451107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010927117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398462071","doi":"10.7910/dvn/28117/ezeuvx","title":"dyadicAggregations.2005.to.2013.tgz","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Physics","score_opus":0.04086043162035306,"score_gpt":0.2391402869035337,"score_spread":0.19827985528318065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398462071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062357205,0.00002308858,0.00017835206,0.00006048377,0.002344113,0.00044429384,0.99381834,0.000079545985,0.002989443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000118373304,0.00017307341,0.00027085104,0.0006362104,0.00078466884,0.00006536902,0.9920813,0.00004839174,0.005821792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742585,0.00007320449,0.0009654608,0.0008476268,0.00011457246,0.0005732915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654126,0.00008439256,0.00072442536,0.0021241156,0.00006539775,0.00046039227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020486007,0.0004045847,0.00083751144,0.0006234274,0.00014558557,0.00020612066,0.0012039477,0.00041374651,0.02525608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008465154,0.00048398215,0.00016199212,0.00030143582,0.0000872395,0.00030719177,0.0004041334,0.00045185394,0.7288614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021512842,0.00007272211,0.000044491237,0.0000879572,0.00008484875,0.00002288088,0.000058657522,0.000025713109,3.8333482e-7,0.005169201,0.994369,0.00004265709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040422316,0.0000541021,0.000032570435,0.00010594877,0.000030897587,0.000017505688,0.000037577294,0.000026923319,0.000001549737,0.002345794,0.9963849,0.0005579618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016448701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003071302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7036053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002365335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009871259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398590068","doi":"10.7910/dvn/il8wsb","title":"Replication data for: Are voters’ views about proportional outcomes shaped by partisan preferences? A survey experiment in the context of a real election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.14858605946890022,"score_gpt":0.3214674699157608,"score_spread":0.1728814104468606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398590068","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038663123,0.000051044237,0.00020298525,0.000022296876,0.0003505866,0.0010125848,0.99443495,0.00001036417,0.00004884873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028459422,0.0004298361,0.000044809814,0.00014409883,0.00006886918,0.0003403731,0.97037464,0.00001553399,0.00012240336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970444,0.00031561387,0.0013044765,0.0009766495,0.00011089697,0.0002479727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438953,0.0002744473,0.0018420247,0.0033802346,0.00007052603,0.000043243323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045893625,0.0002540421,0.00078492163,0.00013209853,0.00008801057,0.00010694443,0.0012239454,0.0002118172,0.0010182372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014151726,0.00022496295,0.00010206587,0.00019793565,0.00007118378,0.0002825052,0.00021911203,0.00022923098,0.0007458411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000773578,0.00025905322,0.009170038,0.00016925651,0.000089691835,0.0000012954678,0.00017622461,4.200597e-7,0.000013101682,0.00065792026,0.9892891,0.0000965202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005157105,0.000059445552,0.0153594455,0.00010350702,0.000023069433,0.0000027426606,0.00042677548,0.00015157233,0.000015432677,0.00011008446,0.9830016,0.00023064842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005586615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058861384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02459311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009835701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072648196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398605700","doi":"10.7910/dvn/91lrzf","title":"Replication Data for: A Mixed-Utility Theory of Vote Choice Regret","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Replication (statistics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08463487539240472,"score_gpt":0.2813840018490202,"score_spread":0.19674912645661546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398605700","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017247401,0.000021926058,0.0019272759,0.000007288208,0.0013017348,0.0006716613,0.99545264,0.00003869674,0.00040627987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00091034,0.00008099362,0.00040324323,0.00009404313,0.00061090116,0.000048408077,0.99715453,0.000034300763,0.0006632082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967339,0.00014661232,0.0012260734,0.0014746768,0.00007316878,0.0003455665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857463,0.00052626693,0.0017682062,0.011763537,0.00009891377,0.00009675983],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071174838,0.00032348925,0.00087013445,0.00023123842,0.00012779555,0.00006822608,0.0028070647,0.00041207855,0.002652196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214252,0.00036709744,0.0001593428,0.00018523248,0.00025175652,0.00043654535,0.0008631623,0.00026248966,0.012045266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011315417,0.00009505726,0.00016492826,0.0005676822,0.00014944478,7.6705936e-7,0.000015991174,3.0978194e-7,0.000002014955,0.011802181,0.9868788,0.00020964495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045563566,0.00007438964,0.00026746833,0.00012664539,0.000082397084,0.000004299411,0.000016787553,0.00021256405,0.00002089766,0.008388611,0.9900093,0.00034101313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067003624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033546708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010987586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059408016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060273327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398824474","doi":"10.7910/dvn/s0o9tk","title":"Replication data for: Do people want smarter ballots?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Internet privacy; Computer science; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.060053513003182735,"score_gpt":0.26060031467153194,"score_spread":0.2005468016683492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398824474","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004696957,0.00003335362,0.001513775,0.00003309006,0.0018023531,0.00052478985,0.9954903,0.000044059136,0.00051127345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003158435,0.00039797477,0.0004082824,0.00025712923,0.0006738728,0.000097104785,0.9967204,0.000044039305,0.0010854008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968236,0.00005985391,0.000957236,0.001691838,0.000069596455,0.0003978467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867756,0.00016500821,0.0008286561,0.010150458,0.00006158762,0.0001167071],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022776537,0.0003302242,0.0008063371,0.00019726559,0.00017704915,0.00032172893,0.002089534,0.00034723603,0.010893474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013983144,0.00039192606,0.00015756648,0.00019341374,0.000043566324,0.00046533722,0.0009356328,0.00029490152,0.069896705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024074641,0.00008554552,0.00011418859,0.0003328293,0.00012601506,0.0000065767063,0.000034269386,0.0000018521961,0.0000014086539,0.0064438637,0.9926975,0.00013191854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044818412,0.00003117214,0.0000984473,0.00009707706,0.00006162286,0.000017631754,0.000073966,0.00029452366,0.0000022246643,0.0012154927,0.997209,0.0004506677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050365814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031713402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05900323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094047486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067161774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399110843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4843052","title":"An Empirical Framework for Matching with Imperfect Competition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Imperfect; Competition (biology); Imperfect competition; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.019263502693298993,"score_gpt":0.2779675201409051,"score_spread":0.25870401744760607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399110843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40040457,0.0031951924,0.59469754,0.0005053671,0.00038836632,0.000109279266,0.00001365874,0.00006384476,0.0006221512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972063,0.00022293074,0.0012680421,0.0000906092,0.00080490764,0.000013068701,0.0000071134546,0.000040627463,0.0003464504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982763,0.00003873145,0.00032976156,0.00025927357,0.00003538885,0.00106053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995073,0.00013744646,0.00012547873,0.00014361233,0.0000194876,0.00006667085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002924596,0.00012622702,0.00023361019,0.0001530941,0.00020215295,0.00025519732,0.00017430147,0.00009357996,0.000054624554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035271172,0.00011156722,0.00011444628,0.00015270413,0.000025284999,0.0002784996,0.000007152618,0.0011444094,0.0001204346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004751428,0.000028904831,0.002211818,0.000029037568,0.000102073696,0.0000022082752,0.00047329752,0.00012482336,0.000021984544,0.9957429,0.000015785781,0.001199631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021541427,0.00072523864,0.00025655865,0.00010282976,0.000011758516,0.00037981785,0.0006811769,0.001694577,0.00001486625,0.9922873,0.0034608287,0.00016962917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020527734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005303027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5968017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040645243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022617127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49719533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399828139","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54071-4_9","title":"An Introduction to Stochastic Game Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Systems & control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Game theory; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01609665253905513,"score_gpt":0.21118335547771408,"score_spread":0.19508670293865896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399828139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003540136,0.02285107,0.14044328,0.001563807,0.030271733,0.004162588,0.0021857463,0.00087799877,0.7972898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55153227,0.0000037000543,0.0000042773886,0.0000862769,0.00598778,0.00009822076,0.000030931442,0.00012958693,0.44212696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968896,0.00006493243,0.0013211332,0.0011822471,0.00009602975,0.00044605427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774915,0.00013974246,0.00063559716,0.001143255,0.0000851502,0.00024708232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838296,0.00053659285,0.0013662921,0.00067526,0.000088409855,0.00032998726,0.00044381994,0.0004877753,0.0004763073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011457732,0.00058096385,0.0002950147,0.000071598326,0.00006553538,0.00015118423,0.000039140734,0.00045591884,0.013509453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008053165,0.0000149023945,0.000004855097,0.00023487785,0.00032204814,0.000010936886,0.00036277453,0.0024469313,0.000022638476,0.9936909,0.0025378738,0.00027069676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050551817,0.00030218044,0.00000798232,0.00036112923,0.00010092185,0.000057623154,0.00008182052,0.0025503803,8.4396277e-7,0.3904889,0.6047642,0.00077848777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058375947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001039161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60320204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002839516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031619686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482817","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76933","title":"Assignment Individualization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07711952774724938,"score_gpt":0.27831126361947806,"score_spread":0.20119173587222866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69137853,0.0012868642,0.0008428988,0.008900307,0.0017331049,0.0006172728,0.00091012905,0.00041499818,0.2939159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943377,0.00013271328,0.000016549258,0.0005905616,0.00024275246,0.000027002769,0.00003167039,0.00002299989,0.0045980643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869585,0.00005590413,0.00034082512,0.00043535657,0.00005027059,0.00042181063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992567,0.000074487456,0.00014518133,0.000233317,0.000030274721,0.00026008257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014397656,0.0001415068,0.00023057598,0.00068871205,0.00018210296,0.000039916795,0.0002895637,0.00029437177,0.00053694565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006641477,0.0001640937,0.00007499129,0.0005608566,0.00007403896,0.00011889083,0.000020182237,0.00097608333,0.0054662866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003965604,0.0000080306,0.018076252,0.000006815664,0.0000236759,0.0000044430553,0.0066762217,0.00003708666,0.000008869726,0.96539676,0.009569871,0.00018798241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092686334,0.00022492449,0.16352324,0.00019214451,0.000012013448,0.000015513535,0.03889278,0.002986354,0.0002357583,0.42047894,0.3713242,0.001187279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013841162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020095748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089467055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096506985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400583084","doi":"10.1287/moor.2022.0342","title":"Order Independence in Sequential, Issue-by-Issue Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Voting; Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.1205292646494297,"score_gpt":0.37553947118519154,"score_spread":0.25501020653576184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400583084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8695419,0.0064233635,0.038177606,0.0028068468,0.0007148287,0.001265099,0.0002199541,0.00011466073,0.08073576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823821,0.000055620105,0.0029563436,0.000008133021,0.00008790073,0.000053299467,0.000010081167,0.000025378475,0.014421111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847525,0.00007796471,0.0007277239,0.00028447298,0.00014355667,0.00029104034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.00025808474,0.00003876708,0.00029273954,0.00013877764,0.000045429264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051221885,0.000094309966,0.0002753109,0.00054552045,0.00012334052,0.00027709288,0.00032261503,0.00010470854,0.0014845313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008729419,0.00009972855,0.000041282223,0.0009328921,0.00010047228,0.00028802306,0.00010100535,0.00039941733,0.0021747395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024907374,0.00021430063,0.00074815645,0.0008078002,0.000035062025,0.000008270056,0.005248921,0.0021647438,0.002150428,0.9845591,0.0038300178,0.00023070714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007176822,0.00023231508,0.0001411003,0.0015915063,0.000008641435,0.000033427397,0.0050071413,0.8293904,0.01072591,0.101541184,0.04991788,0.00069282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046597194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111704205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079328274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006297014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400722659","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v21i3.7409","title":"Condorcet-Style Paradoxes for Majority Rule with Infinte Candidates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"European Commission; Yale University","keywords":"Condorcet method; Style (visual arts); Majority rule; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Voting; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03478268939167749,"score_gpt":0.2533978271974986,"score_spread":0.2186151378058211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400722659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741632,0.0036584248,0.0074161384,0.0046258303,0.0011132084,0.00032911016,0.00013590492,0.00004259137,0.008515646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959694,0.000032901255,0.00044128727,0.00007237046,0.0003349501,0.000006175448,0.0000019355564,0.000016469467,0.0031245213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990075,0.000034874618,0.0005470515,0.00014117037,0.00003795279,0.00023144766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991712,0.00019453785,0.00036122178,0.00016863026,0.00003806079,0.000066345325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014741301,0.00012756199,0.00035529735,0.00012322485,0.000094956435,0.00015926348,0.00031019223,0.000055222496,0.00017554485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000760556,0.00007882017,0.00015677222,0.00014627664,0.000109834604,0.00018150368,0.000014610105,0.0002550551,0.00013778414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032206392,0.00007105635,0.022346862,0.0002859973,0.00053590594,0.00009469494,0.0024967548,0.0004399529,0.00018747897,0.9669796,0.0051725926,0.001067001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021612463,0.0022309641,0.012615157,0.0006706094,0.00016174777,0.002171358,0.0021706251,0.0013635571,0.0014880833,0.87636226,0.097963735,0.00064063753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022538554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006401794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09279114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037167352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028976558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32141933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401024514","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/316","title":"Balance-Aware Sequence Sampling Makes Multi-Modal Learning Better","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Statistics; Bandwidth (computing); Amplifier","score_opus":0.11389257368702758,"score_gpt":0.2887101568579168,"score_spread":0.1748175831708892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401024514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69498175,0.0031371622,0.26519367,0.0010469358,0.0023362539,0.00025218175,0.0001230169,0.00087886455,0.032050136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839648,0.000024137462,0.0016858187,0.00019879258,0.00025654957,0.000013920191,0.000013802209,0.000030934763,0.013811245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885213,0.000016400027,0.00039670558,0.00041707297,0.000025618963,0.0002920967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995702,0.00011008334,0.0000774491,0.00017577529,0.000012753151,0.00005376267],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070438243,0.00013944204,0.00025114245,0.00013857956,0.00011423166,0.00021939234,0.00016073686,0.000087434164,0.00093383715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007089268,0.00014326608,0.00010276992,0.00017341027,0.000038876246,0.00021345784,0.00004087393,0.00027673226,0.0033468998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011312396,0.000049150953,0.23906684,0.00047682156,0.0001445278,0.000048538222,0.002522386,0.0021050025,0.0011920072,0.7467495,0.0008742776,0.0067596235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083029905,0.00014852652,0.014917078,0.00064148067,0.000017877981,0.00009547686,0.0010909558,0.4751573,0.0007488128,0.05215889,0.45266712,0.001526216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091358124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001002659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6945906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058010835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009848721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401090986","doi":"10.1007/s13235-024-00582-7","title":"Integration of Sales and Operations: A Dynamic Mixed-Integer Programming Game","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamic Games and Applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Production (economics); Time horizon; Competition (biology); Subgame perfect equilibrium; Backward induction; Production planning; Sequential game; Computer science; Microeconomics; Integer programming; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Game theory; Industrial organization; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013700618462534928,"score_gpt":0.2496910266844586,"score_spread":0.2359904082219237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401090986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42539966,0.017101903,0.55440736,0.00068736257,0.00015109779,0.0007517413,0.0002310371,0.00014187754,0.0011279712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964101,0.0005469482,0.0015455326,0.000016969629,0.000025397287,0.00027180836,0.00007394906,0.000017145301,0.0010921978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914527,0.000013281069,0.00039539472,0.00030702088,0.0000196785,0.00011936739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996209,0.00006554532,0.0000737777,0.00017606883,0.000023298171,0.000040391606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088782,0.00010893148,0.00020745854,0.0001608785,0.00007092886,0.00013695007,0.000075454926,0.00006330418,0.0000133292815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024454797,0.0001079564,0.00004710752,0.00020445458,0.00011367443,0.00013402927,0.0000295422,0.00009934954,0.00004346375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021530257,0.000035570603,0.00037573362,0.00017718808,0.000035451023,3.1157066e-7,0.0008219709,0.000087999724,0.0007137143,0.9415525,0.000013151634,0.05618421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033408226,0.000116025454,0.008684295,0.0004047746,0.00004872314,0.000057135494,0.0021299745,0.7950042,0.000055697423,0.12063103,0.07205152,0.00048256322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005497502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009732459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82092154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026598946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010296206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44023344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401548647","doi":"10.31124/advance.172355719.91412464/v1","title":"ScholarOne - Paired Voting System(PVS) WINS,TIES,FORS,FIRSTS Sole Author: Denis J. Alarie. P.Eng. Contact Information: 66 Woodbine Ave Kitchener, Ont, Canada N2R1V1 djalarie@gmail.com","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Hierarchy; Legislature; Political science; Weighted voting; Single-member district; Computer science; Welfare economics; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02505848991973021,"score_gpt":0.20421298808408053,"score_spread":0.17915449816435033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401548647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3170186,0.034404185,0.061698545,0.014140673,0.07028919,0.01065822,0.014495195,0.0056139906,0.4716814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670363,0.00004377317,0.0007506463,0.0005803776,0.00090940634,0.00026027733,0.00085329294,0.00017216346,0.029393734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250686,0.00023896493,0.0040171403,0.0014927723,0.00039029022,0.0013539678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469024,0.00033352737,0.002341895,0.0017724719,0.0002618866,0.0005999603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048921686,0.0012621076,0.00250709,0.0008108915,0.0007427647,0.0019655218,0.0014822555,0.0017167482,0.00044656888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066495244,0.001405161,0.00065119937,0.0005528732,0.00010081889,0.0009632342,0.0018447629,0.0037644212,0.0012581514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001198187,0.00012581986,0.01520485,0.007099793,0.00165444,0.00012709125,0.0045389533,0.0019675,0.000013767218,0.9136346,0.054292735,0.0012206392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046111047,0.00039131846,0.0032590355,0.0077712443,0.000569861,0.00033637238,0.01090324,0.12339597,0.0007161457,0.025346337,0.8150834,0.007615983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45800865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14766437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88828826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027615973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014423404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401630317","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.08.005","title":"Some further results on random OBIC rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07150923516328772,"score_gpt":0.2876934689098715,"score_spread":0.2161842337465838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401630317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51665044,0.0016343639,0.0012571253,0.009311875,0.0013997785,0.000324578,0.00012794555,0.00029303168,0.46900085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960692,0.000008130527,0.00016193543,0.00015223512,0.0006026934,0.000013528186,0.0000011439149,0.000009224169,0.002981901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988762,0.000037412778,0.00042365806,0.00032295962,0.0000800039,0.00025976993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.00042363597,0.00008505165,0.00008914191,0.00000546733,0.000039052375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708744,0.000100624726,0.00027445186,0.000095299714,0.00026947126,0.00028888218,0.00024532925,0.00007081559,0.00033766872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033564653,0.00007895885,0.00012374697,0.00024036286,0.00029317106,0.00015973859,0.000029181552,0.0001017205,0.0066500003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011122332,0.0000321751,0.000018591052,0.00004190445,0.000010773436,0.0000019697013,0.002316814,0.000003347878,0.000008639513,0.99618757,0.0008621542,0.0005049494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022722722,0.00005445962,0.00014913181,0.00006672434,0.0000027951116,0.0000014637145,0.00023242705,0.0015371054,0.000029487317,0.98815465,0.009417663,0.00012683825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015018871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.001248e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47941875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035100133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012915483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402063987","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01541-2","title":"Natural interviewing equilibria in matching settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Matching (statistics); Natural (archaeology); Social policy; Public international law; Economics; Interview; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.025654887158264285,"score_gpt":0.26141477117026923,"score_spread":0.23575988401200496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402063987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976534,0.008374271,0.000036225123,0.004346372,0.0009286794,0.00008162802,0.00002822701,0.00008537676,0.00958523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865395,0.000015410678,0.000015489233,0.00019208116,0.00045263217,0.000007162616,0.000008031753,0.000018432878,0.00063681876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918306,0.00002469068,0.00030752274,0.00025898393,0.000020098594,0.0002056696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997932,0.000055456592,0.000059855058,0.0000611604,0.0000055199826,0.00002483345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006198951,0.00010018804,0.00022890666,0.00011835516,0.00013474321,0.00018080583,0.00009502907,0.00007588499,0.00008917922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000463704,0.000110700494,0.000073736854,0.00018224471,0.00002542443,0.00026115752,0.000058754995,0.00023960459,0.00008411027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005371965,0.00001435609,0.022902207,0.0007082194,0.00004656537,0.000013903104,0.015191573,0.0000017013607,0.00014316315,0.9525531,0.0005232854,0.007896542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010824561,0.00006418915,0.17608002,0.0011369598,0.000022108483,0.000027118622,0.007386295,0.0027589686,0.000028870967,0.3047372,0.50551003,0.0011657582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036781523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049695107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6478159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004599362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041531607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4514235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402198930","doi":"10.3934/jdg.2024019","title":"Characteristic functions for cooperative interval games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dynamics and Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.02027894537084587,"score_gpt":0.24000480918490624,"score_spread":0.21972586381406037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402198930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85902405,0.007597007,0.1250366,0.0018039263,0.003363562,0.00015720137,0.00047758035,0.00002237936,0.0025177088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936257,0.00019142972,0.00020375209,0.000056927674,0.0003348001,0.000004688058,0.000006894151,0.000014402158,0.0055614156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992327,0.000012726287,0.0004995417,0.00012372287,0.000018904493,0.00011239867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00014654185,0.0002298586,0.00006380724,0.000059044887,0.000051460378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063951215,0.00008818769,0.00030499283,0.00017639755,0.00005509459,0.00018053505,0.0000742885,0.00004794752,0.00004759248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012738476,0.00007739447,0.00013130908,0.000078032965,0.000041660867,0.00017803108,0.000015324802,0.00013867073,0.000019881465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009014066,0.0000715948,0.0060729557,0.00030337635,0.00039703533,0.000016989112,0.0016470182,0.00007682639,0.00007561728,0.9734625,0.00244668,0.015339234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002101462,0.0029150776,0.028386645,0.0015040874,0.0002043252,0.0009740029,0.0038525409,0.49154517,0.00006228641,0.22806622,0.23941262,0.000975558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003744759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000055268006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7453963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046958165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019891506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3156055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402401495","doi":"10.1109/tcss.2024.3447902","title":"Multigroup Multirole Assignment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.041090567276171254,"score_gpt":0.2510182908002059,"score_spread":0.20992772352403463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402401495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018303225,0.00054278446,0.9704304,0.00026583864,0.004809697,0.00031694226,0.00034002104,0.00026869954,0.0047223903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962202,0.000003477313,0.00015920657,0.000052856023,0.00041232686,0.00010153224,0.000011188367,0.000032827513,0.0030064243],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987085,0.000063950494,0.00054901605,0.00036585005,0.000099256955,0.00021345561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995053,0.00020439345,0.00010911097,0.00009021915,0.000027440576,0.00006355259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005470094,0.00015680229,0.00027977244,0.00019833347,0.00035179267,0.00021284942,0.00011718859,0.000118336655,0.0001525153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003464145,0.00017957068,0.00019376834,0.00024543863,0.000046533074,0.00014316228,8.4453956e-7,0.00020408112,0.002188186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030848445,0.00029513665,0.00013284008,0.00024399332,0.0003646219,0.000013646428,0.0033381716,0.5085375,0.00007156835,0.48153728,0.0015390231,0.0038953708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009928265,0.00016014215,0.0010791329,0.00021878832,0.000029288574,0.000028699826,0.0007822394,0.93043745,0.00009423003,0.025113918,0.040326856,0.0007364348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025138658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004102933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97791696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023341739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022211305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404346590","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.23416","title":"Temporal Fair Division","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.11054963835617235,"score_gpt":0.17515771070548755,"score_spread":0.0646080723493152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404346590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165545,0.0009293103,0.01263649,0.000108732915,0.0027295165,0.00028055595,0.00026056403,0.00030696797,0.06619337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774183,0.000059745704,0.000037332207,0.000035787696,0.00018264216,9.455892e-7,0.000039619033,0.00004293392,0.022182662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818945,0.000046785342,0.00039289944,0.0010550381,0.000016770533,0.0002990664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998711,0.000051195162,0.00035633842,0.00073743437,0.000028232096,0.000115837334],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067448313,0.0002861937,0.0005200672,0.0003825231,0.000097017786,0.00011938868,0.0005939845,0.00036614147,0.000310845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042705477,0.00036426392,0.00034268963,0.00031933846,0.000080945785,0.00009366544,0.0011231771,0.0007058156,0.005236152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014689672,0.00004642593,0.024091128,0.00027702493,0.000114010574,0.00012798897,0.00022342271,0.011280435,0.0000023054217,0.9628511,0.00090795034,0.000063525324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002627286,0.0000428966,0.0018254037,0.0002370858,0.000030523912,0.0000024311275,0.00011334876,0.049740057,0.000014070269,0.93634063,0.010835403,0.00055541337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039817987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023854001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060863845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019184133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036658414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404361853","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.03651","title":"Policy Aggregation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.09400119482832181,"score_gpt":0.1842361348404185,"score_spread":0.0902349400120967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404361853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84065723,0.00080585055,0.008953104,0.00027908917,0.0020282643,0.00030254302,0.00026521643,0.0003073892,0.1464013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717555,0.00013403838,0.00002421041,0.0000606006,0.00042880565,9.932008e-7,0.000026232039,0.000034243036,0.027535357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985965,0.00003741084,0.00031323725,0.0007904242,0.0000118232765,0.00025058852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989118,0.00004041548,0.00032949826,0.00060001126,0.000028695003,0.00008957751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047484765,0.00022080081,0.00037847183,0.00057057186,0.000075562966,0.00009945089,0.00043228327,0.00030934252,0.00014586927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008186954,0.00030023867,0.0002484825,0.00045426408,0.000067244466,0.00007855122,0.0005965516,0.00051420805,0.00441418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009680993,0.0000222236,0.0030962722,0.00019565415,0.000088619694,0.00004327833,0.00022108492,0.012764789,0.0000016932488,0.9831644,0.00028758985,0.000104660365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016121038,0.000017869706,0.00051735423,0.00014700704,0.00002145807,0.0000028599648,0.000054420685,0.032354407,0.00001868302,0.96291536,0.003462694,0.00032668223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006536886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021233938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13109829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002798476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006968676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404856498","doi":"10.1007/s10107-024-02169-x","title":"Stabilization of capacitated matching games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Numerical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03988937002543492,"score_gpt":0.2503558365901486,"score_spread":0.21046646656471368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404856498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5998094,0.001679646,0.3787262,0.00016609597,0.0003368646,0.0003715126,0.000018336397,0.00031731575,0.018574595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927356,0.0000028100164,0.0066540865,0.000006834868,0.000040645566,0.00002028672,0.000004136852,0.000022549264,0.0005130333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989961,0.000019201218,0.0005761274,0.0001963128,0.00003641044,0.00017589593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951166,0.00017035821,0.00010858254,0.00015530184,0.000016003518,0.000038113598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010668412,0.00009010727,0.00027162675,0.00012076252,0.0000335913,0.0000951666,0.000095301366,0.000055770655,0.00026317706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020681958,0.00008682767,0.00008734594,0.00024377137,0.000058474125,0.0001291195,0.00002198898,0.00009378736,0.00042207603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001932973,0.00004663765,0.00028056616,0.0010854678,0.00002956708,0.0000020965447,0.0035468598,0.000023693194,0.00013400681,0.9907224,0.000016164402,0.0041106194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009282677,0.000048539245,0.000054177424,0.00043960134,0.000009558461,0.000010658477,0.000712012,0.012295109,0.00043730845,0.98096365,0.004774522,0.00016205556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015316753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.090363e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3929262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026508214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056930744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5425074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404921369","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5040984","title":"Rationing to Avoid Conflict: A  Centralized Assignment Problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Computer science; Economics; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.025957485297827626,"score_gpt":0.2458731409182761,"score_spread":0.21991565562044849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404921369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4866395,0.11427039,0.25476107,0.01820921,0.015495753,0.004802668,0.00045570638,0.00073758536,0.10462812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97847915,0.0015733906,0.0003286876,0.00018006015,0.00096345064,0.00008217038,0.000019894496,0.00008435105,0.01828886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955818,0.000104160565,0.0012340625,0.0006651956,0.00010466221,0.0023101338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986014,0.000045919467,0.0007345384,0.00037548793,0.00005392836,0.00018876347],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063288664,0.00036896288,0.0007200334,0.00041915366,0.00022320688,0.00059194595,0.00055628,0.00028523567,0.00018794289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010973433,0.0003986705,0.00035720944,0.0001936798,0.00002664184,0.00007438171,0.00036541824,0.00464789,0.0016344422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035289064,0.00004380064,0.00046091832,0.00014598038,0.00048975606,0.000005753469,0.0015307274,0.002039539,0.00005686153,0.99388367,0.00056402164,0.00074368296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042960746,0.00015972981,0.000043375647,0.00042909055,0.00003620179,0.00014160783,0.00047819995,0.0005425078,0.000058200058,0.96709013,0.03011909,0.00047223625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001711171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008857598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49183965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025027597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010684248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405238932","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4988961","title":"&lt;div&gt; Optimal Incentive Design for Decentralized&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;Dynamic Matching Markets&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Matching (statistics); Incentive; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024434836619614094,"score_gpt":0.25193208887938895,"score_spread":0.22749725225977485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405238932","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40483674,0.09937471,0.4749242,0.0013815245,0.009589734,0.0035693638,0.0011507423,0.00050169235,0.0046712793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510536,0.02496429,0.0060159126,0.00013518754,0.0016967928,0.000340868,0.00027244503,0.0005594087,0.014961464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858018,0.0007406899,0.0035987638,0.002505917,0.0004685898,0.0068842233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935804,0.00075421,0.0032973299,0.0014210118,0.000352886,0.00059418136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015477394,0.0017606626,0.0028448966,0.001459598,0.0010786302,0.0014725651,0.0025617832,0.0014206395,0.0005984347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063941465,0.0019698218,0.0019332345,0.00069653953,0.00029102853,0.000557649,0.0012288665,0.0073415744,0.0013015103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022635388,0.00071845145,0.000879736,0.00152646,0.0068286555,0.000084701554,0.0034612748,0.023290718,0.0011606525,0.9461229,0.0045484975,0.009114436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030937342,0.00057751377,0.00056811003,0.0013946148,0.00056278415,0.0007612395,0.00050748495,0.020411082,0.00008097948,0.9106882,0.058660857,0.002693367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010501401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060313084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5462169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067877485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003074316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405685762","doi":"","title":"A Space-Economic Representation of Transitive Closures in Relational Databases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Relational database; Representation (politics); Space (punctuation); Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Political science","score_opus":0.308390224676796,"score_gpt":0.4975971867081915,"score_spread":0.18920696203139548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405685762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659429,0.007839719,0.0016243799,0.00011789613,0.00038211557,0.00033231213,0.00047913412,0.00001194383,0.023269603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817425,0.0008945214,0.00026067457,0.00002350476,0.00014665996,0.00001938904,0.00005799438,0.000025078141,0.00039791976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976907,0.00015687407,0.0014609148,0.00038711127,0.00009065729,0.00021376161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976421,0.0004400833,0.0014828064,0.0003186514,0.000059565416,0.00005682129],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018430204,0.00017296632,0.0007721824,0.0009425488,0.00007666909,0.00017920964,0.00067877665,0.000071712,0.0035372728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020189422,0.00020080128,0.00016187379,0.000490946,0.000107613516,0.0018003748,0.000131025,0.00019040387,0.000042000942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015264438,0.0001481317,0.88438904,0.00005043839,0.0000694608,0.000006298864,0.0002155243,0.0045101186,0.0029900405,0.10475478,0.0024756314,0.0002378861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006531206,0.0000067360547,0.9144656,0.00019525073,0.000012268049,0.000005488754,0.00008790776,0.00050731935,0.006179983,0.075573646,0.0020858068,0.00022685564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009598183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044905837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03223136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010625607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000492704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406032700","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.00926","title":"Differentially Private Matchings","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07807108173581999,"score_gpt":0.16957606508081907,"score_spread":0.09150498334499908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406032700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87849706,0.00018936755,0.059127424,0.00007358222,0.001701044,0.0003031448,0.00028735085,0.00019161814,0.05962942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628386,0.0000881071,0.00008734996,0.00008308625,0.000109670276,0.0000012109097,0.000036017314,0.00002064874,0.036735334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982141,0.000060095354,0.0004302821,0.0009551754,0.000014858084,0.00032543959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984038,0.00006939488,0.000554854,0.00084365753,0.000032790293,0.000095541596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045982504,0.00030521362,0.0006321494,0.00035936714,0.00013239596,0.00009593148,0.00088592264,0.00036248894,0.0002997623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054269916,0.00041374442,0.00031922362,0.00025180608,0.000073498384,0.000110847126,0.0008756935,0.0005632616,0.0007031963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029474933,0.000061372644,0.021365035,0.00024769103,0.000161779,0.000027068432,0.00019429023,0.008373978,0.000004933307,0.9692897,0.00020135814,0.000043293327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063221727,0.000028009657,0.006725641,0.00029149986,0.00005767857,0.0000015067684,0.00005248098,0.018543992,0.000050564955,0.9623272,0.010576166,0.00071304047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003357897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000214573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084341526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001691056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037732745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406114401","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800.1.sa0","title":"Reviewer #2 (Public review): Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through vicarious learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Inequality; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06376751578988195,"score_gpt":0.3040073246044335,"score_spread":0.2402398088145516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406114401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003511532,0.8872832,0.00068614073,0.015323031,0.0027160873,0.001883103,0.0016300193,0.00011724227,0.09001005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005237299,0.73327583,0.00022921823,0.0057404456,0.00017711916,0.00008829814,0.0008704784,0.000054729117,0.25432658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949985,0.00050085783,0.0025811496,0.0011886109,0.00018699531,0.00054389174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951677,0.0004920115,0.002703434,0.0010511052,0.00045026885,0.00013550669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040943325,0.00067688164,0.0034793885,0.0002286933,0.00020082947,0.00006568351,0.0007298103,0.00040406524,0.0024195693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051873475,0.0006215434,0.00048132424,0.0005787263,0.00020233025,0.0002215736,0.00038743718,0.0009083887,0.00007170445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020989679,0.00021587171,0.0037622913,0.20274986,0.00057971367,0.000013295838,0.0008788368,0.000005872442,0.000001295111,0.07713499,0.6903443,0.024292702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002563203,0.00012256484,0.00004842358,0.030745797,0.00017993603,0.000010747701,0.00008775492,0.000012711633,0.000002965307,0.0024889687,0.96543163,0.000612156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002062183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033213285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014378385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012849463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406347419","doi":"10.1093/9780197798959.003.0004","title":"Local Elections and Ranked Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.025887066842091907,"score_gpt":0.2091551005361348,"score_spread":0.1832680336940429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406347419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004255692,0.0024193511,0.008971045,0.00016659104,0.00049846707,0.00015806212,0.000071514776,0.000073623116,0.9875988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05890772,0.00015093294,0.00005713228,0.00020968214,0.00013159313,0.00000699057,0.000012953832,0.00002232396,0.9405007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902344,0.000004696773,0.0004396887,0.0003701188,0.000014896666,0.0001471791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993745,0.00011792941,0.00018858329,0.00024989323,0.000018839177,0.000050230225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027789833,0.00018396153,0.0004495074,0.00023804356,0.00009894352,0.00004746199,0.00010775025,0.00027352554,0.0014506271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037704285,0.00021266287,0.00010341446,0.00003051258,0.000077449644,0.00004587836,0.000044723944,0.00024513784,0.0008154543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034971722,0.0000046149066,0.00013852319,0.000050533792,0.00009520477,7.3276175e-7,0.000018638384,0.0000018627751,2.6537177e-7,0.993867,0.004967576,0.00085155683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018758184,0.00002293734,0.000099051475,0.000058565663,0.00001225045,0.0000045981096,0.000004816932,0.00016786037,0.0000026621335,0.2383331,0.7608949,0.00021165858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018049369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009338307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051843537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014997029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406457394","doi":"10.2308/tar-2022-0074","title":"Two-Sided Matching in the Audit Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Matching (statistics); Business; Accounting; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02472419149471776,"score_gpt":0.2652120769356813,"score_spread":0.2404878854409635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406457394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12170637,0.28667605,0.00038729573,0.020805692,0.0010885885,0.001352654,0.000013624208,0.00008474442,0.567885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98115057,0.0067342487,0.000047485053,0.009232754,0.00013550273,0.000065639935,0.0000020044336,0.0000121655685,0.0026196374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865377,0.0001719564,0.000680702,0.00022067725,0.000036674977,0.00023619668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834853,0.00064709596,0.00036212275,0.00061895367,0.000014452499,0.000008827729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010464042,0.00012316756,0.00040508076,0.000076832526,0.00017158175,0.00011625637,0.0007774986,0.000030670784,0.0002819727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082656334,0.00007943168,0.00011766862,0.0005441275,0.000035244873,0.000118705575,0.00009301326,0.00025790054,0.0005248801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006000915,0.000033977365,0.012855918,0.0019942492,0.0000427184,0.0000031198902,0.0006376679,0.000017015054,0.000004869875,0.95524794,0.023867799,0.005288708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005227435,0.000010868207,0.030823087,0.012610663,0.00005509579,0.000024638899,0.0004941968,0.00034565176,0.0000055316423,0.43541738,0.5193,0.0003901584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033873515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037859343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003595523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013555486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67464465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923775","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102646","title":"Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: An experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Labex Ecodec; Osaka University; Providence Health Care","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Turnout; Voting; Jumping; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.037783391519171164,"score_gpt":0.2775468999002912,"score_spread":0.23976350838112004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88771075,0.00039001412,0.00006172388,0.0006875217,0.00019879443,0.00012874133,0.000002607351,0.0000030766244,0.11081677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991398,0.0000013317214,0.0000131997185,0.0005414797,0.0001616419,0.0000013325546,1.4015774e-7,0.000012409371,0.00012866993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983266,0.0003958511,0.00088608894,0.00015292128,0.000024676016,0.00021387074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904084,0.00031349473,0.0003628953,0.00019368873,0.000022697064,0.000066365414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033450886,0.000104916704,0.0003101255,0.00015180712,0.000089756,0.0000768755,0.00030295944,0.000012481973,0.000053245472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017083841,0.00007178383,0.000067019646,0.00008147355,0.000095174655,0.00013106632,0.000065969645,0.00027435247,0.000018361712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035331544,0.0002748514,0.021015357,0.000008950158,0.00004306885,0.000009791576,0.002250581,0.0000510617,0.000018455945,0.9760889,0.000036835878,0.0001668291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022153463,0.011837559,0.60144186,0.0019923341,0.00015696006,0.0002777171,0.17535643,0.011824949,0.0035462752,0.12310498,0.046528265,0.0017791843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030342804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000669248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005938598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014491863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29272595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407780548","doi":"10.1561/2400000040","title":"Integer Programming Games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations and Trends® in Optimization","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Integer programming; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.02348981713826095,"score_gpt":0.2615163708784337,"score_spread":0.23802655374017276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407780548","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03799195,0.0013883193,0.7447245,0.0020549179,0.0010039589,0.00029741233,0.000030523355,0.00014171122,0.21236667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872628,0.000038010196,0.0058515347,0.00004540616,0.000022108074,0.000035653913,0.000073046474,0.0000064583937,0.0066650184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993632,0.000015559199,0.00031166617,0.00019076622,0.000011004019,0.0001078327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999726,0.000032717136,0.000096042524,0.0001115326,0.000017279535,0.000016449578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029585726,0.000067979614,0.00013698915,0.0005412607,0.000095194424,0.000115074494,0.000051319606,0.000049365593,0.00025202933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006353389,0.00007845883,0.000025512853,0.0005724016,0.000033826476,0.00018266552,0.00001961145,0.00006051036,0.00001972107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060988723,0.000063266016,0.031469945,0.000019117208,0.000018411185,3.643659e-7,0.0003993446,0.029747797,4.5486735e-7,0.90698564,0.00014292613,0.031146657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023039912,0.000100280035,0.059084795,0.00024999375,0.000025591684,0.000006687784,0.00082923286,0.6816505,0.000015202574,0.09741029,0.15766829,0.0006551191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086431435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044714096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94927084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003659603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052208816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3199458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408033501","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76676-3_9","title":"Monotonicity, Substitution Sources, and the Robustness of Disjunct Alternatives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in pragmatics, language and cognition","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Substitution (logic); Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Disjunct; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Programming language; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.03772346783079975,"score_gpt":0.26827439201272557,"score_spread":0.23055092418192583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408033501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18205285,0.37070158,0.0019643712,0.00031655602,0.0017217536,0.0016887195,0.00063084514,0.00007376267,0.44084954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981477,0.010253395,0.000049036807,0.000024398241,0.00017978135,0.000040111598,0.000031672917,0.00002468046,0.0079199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.000032448366,0.00065972755,0.00030014507,0.000052123814,0.00013066243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989257,0.00034795905,0.0004968115,0.00016100875,0.000048006743,0.000020528285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010710101,0.00022861343,0.00069373,0.00019851825,0.00008198023,0.000045426852,0.000089110974,0.00012006063,0.000023287552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023356757,0.00017894413,0.00008571696,0.00004007123,0.0007707445,0.000035620702,0.0001366679,0.00023893136,0.000016826662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003890622,0.000006825396,0.00012847636,0.0010848826,0.00037330843,0.000009165856,0.01394213,0.00001708789,9.816525e-7,0.9836077,0.000008825621,0.0007816723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010533034,0.000050110953,0.00011289723,0.0018094452,0.0001762956,0.000018036159,0.0075552026,0.0018633672,0.000025297895,0.98665965,0.00037631745,0.00030006713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005217229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009855009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002863341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005089124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72971296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408397987","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127233","title":"Unbiased criteria identification for two-sided matching: An environment-based design approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Identification (biology); Matching (statistics); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05475716662173801,"score_gpt":0.2818182935625275,"score_spread":0.2270611269407895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408397987","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025021457,0.00072736025,0.9906139,0.00017320368,0.00017689061,0.003089284,0.0001219604,0.00014813231,0.002447145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96447736,0.0000032130936,0.021447122,0.00013747392,0.00016126454,0.011651215,0.00026374008,0.000041994455,0.0018166365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817383,0.00009909305,0.0007584233,0.0006604043,0.00004765678,0.0002606193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983395,0.00019694798,0.00044085755,0.000895437,0.0000419269,0.00008533995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012212371,0.00020415436,0.00038259925,0.00023111983,0.0003673792,0.000220237,0.00036356802,0.00009637203,0.000020123412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027010095,0.00021326248,0.00006958138,0.00024841152,0.000065832035,0.00018161428,0.000014391097,0.00007399715,0.00012101325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111765476,0.0005222847,0.00042928944,0.00024323283,0.00010500567,2.2291921e-7,0.0010120842,0.020078512,0.006640346,0.9691696,0.0014065197,0.00028110115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009169982,0.00046263533,0.0017705348,0.00045283342,0.00011391634,0.000021295968,0.0064122104,0.69761646,0.010253869,0.07325838,0.19797058,0.0024973059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021637951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021995854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96916676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013294385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000363643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8696592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408859475","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2025.3549602","title":"Group Multirole Assignment With General Conflict","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Political science; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019632687247042046,"score_gpt":0.21027606833455947,"score_spread":0.19064338108751744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408859475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25518408,0.005420309,0.68546045,0.00011501747,0.0055307094,0.0018335426,0.0002796556,0.00026743993,0.04590875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95478845,0.00010488829,0.00005275219,0.0000755904,0.00012117395,0.0002643845,0.0000047393255,0.00004289433,0.044545144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977813,0.0001366173,0.0009215109,0.00064198783,0.000108411,0.00041017073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988126,0.000107623964,0.0003447237,0.0005367886,0.000046414574,0.00015181799],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007876588,0.00034714636,0.00073188735,0.00036250797,0.00028084413,0.00032666695,0.00021666088,0.0002109477,0.000021710028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033118044,0.00033094495,0.00010598126,0.00026797835,0.00011232676,0.000104617946,0.0000030677108,0.00026221463,0.00018738583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029490664,0.00072021846,0.0064898147,0.0015596707,0.0011791365,0.00003256061,0.0021646556,0.045126725,0.00082956016,0.93889576,0.001561542,0.0011454349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01878546,0.0037232134,0.006520224,0.005881877,0.00052033196,0.00060036255,0.01114914,0.3016095,0.0024753127,0.0023988823,0.64102703,0.005308694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013720917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041220017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014725605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017772209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408886298","doi":"10.3982/ecta22762","title":"On (Constrained) Efficiency of Strategy‐Proof Random Assignment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Courant Forschungszentrum Geobiologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025189216508058342,"score_gpt":0.2320330249366767,"score_spread":0.20684380842861838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408886298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26812068,0.0020139667,0.022890935,0.0002583499,0.0008372964,0.0004612584,0.00013484673,0.00004683944,0.70523584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504024,0.000021409116,0.00006825258,0.00011174242,0.00003786953,0.000028358329,0.000005185614,0.000012294645,0.004674626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821675,0.00003752277,0.0009831424,0.00043517322,0.000034029228,0.00029340576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985012,0.0005014029,0.00047593762,0.00043055357,0.000024335823,0.0000665714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013453417,0.00017412788,0.0006367706,0.0013280902,0.00008227489,0.00004744922,0.00033681,0.00010322196,0.0010273237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005138014,0.00018837082,0.00019407678,0.0011923555,0.00010265877,0.000088474844,0.00004197488,0.00014431858,0.00040811414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226853,0.00029323777,0.006333219,0.000071162045,0.00009830626,0.0000012719365,0.00007934868,0.0014303277,0.000020371375,0.9879704,0.00075094646,0.0028891324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0161815,0.002318203,0.031626012,0.00042573505,0.0000657738,0.000008415045,0.00071842485,0.012623966,0.008953205,0.8727821,0.052484754,0.0018119201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003241934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010502654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107248845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036214966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408978912","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70024","title":"Intermediate Condorcet Winners and Losers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02199859762987923,"score_gpt":0.23023162815847323,"score_spread":0.208233030528594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408978912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93490463,0.0028445895,0.002695871,0.0012924201,0.0024072153,0.000084610634,0.00002793928,0.000016433289,0.055726275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951693,0.00014734772,0.00006931037,0.00044380486,0.00021622276,0.0000020211696,0.0000011554081,0.000013543259,0.0039373226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842405,0.000115136325,0.0010196428,0.00018975229,0.000015068321,0.000236351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984105,0.00031867146,0.0009149332,0.00020518589,0.000031215608,0.00011946642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054648914,0.00013400761,0.0005322873,0.0005768828,0.00006645463,0.00014526922,0.0003465811,0.00009305224,0.00040222993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039644507,0.00013709732,0.00014819151,0.000080111386,0.00018339728,0.00046012743,0.0000713819,0.00023389471,0.00013199258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042233263,0.000020756832,0.02392357,0.000029433102,0.00020468295,0.0000035232174,0.00033766206,0.000019849418,0.00001643998,0.97103655,0.0016973743,0.0026678958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019388779,0.00013136564,0.012540429,0.00009064723,0.00002220704,0.00007933041,0.0017900335,0.0002743148,0.000081854945,0.8829754,0.099810526,0.00026499026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007992269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004164375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09811315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001694817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007958282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55906665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409059749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5178085","title":"Disclosure Volume","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Business; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.015852974023998708,"score_gpt":0.22317513264183916,"score_spread":0.20732215861784045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409059749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.341625,0.17515382,0.15401998,0.008281004,0.019777594,0.0014135542,0.0009851846,0.00043967,0.29830417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771331,0.0032075709,0.0000576883,0.00008378502,0.0009396468,0.000016041044,0.000020389332,0.00003169791,0.11851013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618393,0.00008795406,0.0009829164,0.0005255388,0.00005883417,0.0021608197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983443,0.00003775534,0.0009514161,0.00052879524,0.000052977524,0.00008477661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050800648,0.00032383777,0.0007484453,0.0003661453,0.00021554023,0.00020401704,0.0008650453,0.0004135738,0.00018690024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016764151,0.00035808503,0.00046478666,0.00015775293,0.000048179612,0.00010093341,0.0003029153,0.0056677647,0.0006102991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017325558,0.00004663297,0.015376726,0.000074969226,0.00040015546,0.0000023434761,0.00018865523,0.00029745072,7.297348e-7,0.98161584,0.0006527752,0.0013263735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003032116,0.00007070777,0.0007166387,0.0001362732,0.000025426853,0.00007605578,0.00024875783,0.00035005584,0.0000022471866,0.9610466,0.036665883,0.000358172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019953115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017394761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53550804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013016593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012234942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409359688","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115248","title":"On the existence of EFX (and Pareto-optimal) allocations for binary chores","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Science and Technology Development Fund; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pareto optimal; Binary number; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.024383141185406566,"score_gpt":0.2482467532580235,"score_spread":0.22386361207261693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409359688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60508233,0.00017480597,0.3790977,0.002424837,0.0003767761,0.00031125994,0.000020179123,0.000024186633,0.012487926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623835,0.0000058146156,0.003254467,0.00036563416,0.000025884749,0.00002110288,4.6370795e-7,0.0000034320767,0.000084877494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991577,0.000027699904,0.0002846357,0.00030082068,0.00004023613,0.00018885959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854773,0.00092276186,0.00009336774,0.00034536776,0.000050771607,0.000039988772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020770805,0.000077411336,0.00017677552,0.00012026384,0.00027346177,0.00006751697,0.0005384029,0.000029160783,0.000021467957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040595373,0.00005778468,0.00004412386,0.0003566225,0.0019733782,0.00006773571,0.000132911,0.00007176817,0.00001600532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013178079,0.000025399686,0.00032177928,0.000019362411,0.000005193569,9.398322e-8,0.0002473724,0.00016096163,0.000038771883,0.99864054,0.00006250607,0.00046486413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001182428,0.00014978778,0.0025458403,0.00006399052,0.0000027314356,9.534639e-7,0.00003192901,0.11005737,0.0005638893,0.8861013,0.00028875057,0.00007518823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004102812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6405706e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.391156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017289833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021271046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409364637","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i13.33499","title":"Constrained Fair and Efficient Allocations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06781769022624423,"score_gpt":0.26858720731393954,"score_spread":0.2007695170876953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409364637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8056579,0.00016283139,0.0047116852,0.0046880525,0.00059019035,0.0004763436,0.000030778097,0.000056150573,0.18362607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982835,0.000016192005,0.00014593365,0.00014360817,0.000022819631,0.000019141715,3.4523404e-7,0.0000059639965,0.0013624979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989052,0.0000063743314,0.00056052767,0.00030439667,0.000044015236,0.0001795074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992808,0.00008015679,0.00030925748,0.00014381346,0.00014815912,0.00003780531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067965174,0.000122793,0.00024788076,0.0001502773,0.0001647816,0.00009566594,0.00040186816,0.000067073204,0.00008681885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051977043,0.00010819573,0.00006630406,0.00036111052,0.00033880217,0.000057356476,0.00009642884,0.00014791582,0.00009341316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019167011,0.00006376789,0.0017545336,0.000046598125,0.000014748944,3.7974818e-8,0.00052549277,0.00005086881,0.0018981124,0.9933638,0.00005205482,0.0022107975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054771575,0.00007909838,0.0019480513,0.00033403677,0.000012044871,0.000002100553,0.0016709282,0.027689222,0.05606051,0.91128814,0.0006457807,0.00021533312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043670243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004202409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1926256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026150925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028121369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4412094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409365156","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i13.33500","title":"Temporal Fair Division","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.08890704066024799,"score_gpt":0.2810345126970807,"score_spread":0.1921274720368327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409365156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7137097,0.00013697986,0.0056117806,0.0037178996,0.0014006863,0.0005008283,0.000028520099,0.00009017371,0.2748034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959295,0.000013067232,0.00013603171,0.00016819598,0.000043871063,0.000016512098,5.8836076e-7,0.000009944886,0.003682281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985167,0.0000086157,0.00077383214,0.00038391206,0.00007094347,0.00024602795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902207,0.000063746666,0.00049152283,0.00022014465,0.00016144585,0.00004109355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094724476,0.0001638167,0.00034215054,0.00019123603,0.0001716736,0.000120752586,0.0008286238,0.00009956725,0.00020826489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005377151,0.00013861762,0.00014303128,0.0005164318,0.00019916709,0.0001573705,0.00016742141,0.0002255863,0.00041184048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034436365,0.00008141853,0.010119187,0.00005466245,0.0000157629,7.858027e-8,0.0003627052,0.0000135744485,0.0015300912,0.9831954,0.00025916257,0.004333505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032194817,0.000086639986,0.0019061179,0.00032444188,0.0000051566194,5.278324e-7,0.0005533074,0.0043114447,0.07389232,0.91711706,0.0015926992,0.00017809185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009637809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063615707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28221977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042821528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025922885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56526625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409840309","doi":"10.54929/3041-2390-2025-04-01-02","title":"Методика оцінки інтеграційної близькості економік України та Канади у 2022–2025 рр.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Вісник Академії праці, соціальних відносин і туризму. Серія: економіка, психологія та управління.","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0243363304487892,"score_gpt":0.22868594606777473,"score_spread":0.20434961561898554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409840309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37843993,0.030931773,0.011229282,0.008985578,0.024772372,0.006137742,0.0029257464,0.0037606412,0.53281695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863638,0.001226306,0.0013461555,0.0049247458,0.0025186338,0.0008636623,0.0005567782,0.0006177146,0.124308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98175466,0.00087215635,0.006308444,0.005241263,0.00094385043,0.0048796027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878418,0.0014364261,0.0028424282,0.005630061,0.00079996145,0.001449311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006996492,0.0030627658,0.004914186,0.003520503,0.0020710572,0.0014686133,0.004847215,0.0022924037,0.005779406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029793398,0.0035559114,0.0023135457,0.0050575575,0.0012276052,0.0019867388,0.0016910321,0.003341471,0.016174864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007348364,0.0019469375,0.06906663,0.0015033119,0.0018314624,0.00032143472,0.0020916439,0.0005067857,0.0013528197,0.7764215,0.1345885,0.009634172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008236137,0.00089091435,0.03186093,0.0015934673,0.0004855197,0.00018475125,0.0023010673,0.0030588508,0.004157381,0.15433398,0.786887,0.0060100276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031387631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080337946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65229845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015677966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008365925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409915641","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5205896","title":"Peer Review Market Design: Effort-Based Matching and Admission Control","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Control (management); Business; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02628646071814345,"score_gpt":0.2588843091336224,"score_spread":0.23259784841547898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409915641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005393792,0.44824094,0.51279306,0.0142149925,0.0019376896,0.0015607009,0.00017812944,0.000107922155,0.015572772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005018,0.05154256,0.0006110787,0.0013750182,0.00045436496,0.000060757233,0.000024519932,0.000058807207,0.045371108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649733,0.00025085735,0.0011167636,0.0005330404,0.00013436632,0.0014676204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979472,0.00020936152,0.0011487787,0.0004045788,0.00015102369,0.00013905848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021089995,0.00036677052,0.0010565353,0.00028484798,0.00023775188,0.00017688962,0.000486518,0.00030523218,0.00021004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006967511,0.00036822204,0.00031817285,0.00011438067,0.00003334642,0.0000902239,0.00011875123,0.0035892306,0.00003913164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049987587,0.00018850272,0.006814158,0.006212895,0.0014632292,0.000019977753,0.0002538655,0.0021789323,0.000008666405,0.9566378,0.011826866,0.013895254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013159637,0.00014910607,0.00029422593,0.004973089,0.00012816374,0.00012746325,0.00006435168,0.0025733346,0.000004745218,0.96090573,0.0289279,0.0005359189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007250029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018048426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007322819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013698189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410013534","doi":"10.1002/nav.22265","title":"Abundant Neighborhoods, Two‐Sided Markets, and Maximal Matchings","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.10442767891851185,"score_gpt":0.36241541412433304,"score_spread":0.2579877352058212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410013534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37748772,0.004953058,0.02940573,0.0031029696,0.0016771811,0.0013577313,0.00043084435,0.00021053263,0.5813742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851005,0.0001955519,0.0007190601,0.00016248165,0.00018688985,0.000040956642,0.000015082755,0.000029962193,0.013549526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740136,0.00022911186,0.0007134994,0.0006700794,0.00016495588,0.0008210011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751174,0.001422468,0.00016351485,0.0005541055,0.00015812869,0.0001900331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072123664,0.00021461307,0.0005073611,0.0005641563,0.00042981765,0.00035517378,0.0005214592,0.00017680695,0.00025201234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005332115,0.00022939897,0.00008951913,0.00056916557,0.00047245092,0.00012839214,0.00040660246,0.0008098408,0.0005491901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014302132,0.00008202288,0.019561589,0.00017434284,0.00006112092,0.000032247663,0.0001838158,0.000016377642,0.00012302035,0.9741348,0.0035192147,0.0019684439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00128661,0.00016186101,0.031781062,0.00015538167,0.0000096888025,0.000017188724,0.00027729856,0.0059530092,0.00019495212,0.89989275,0.059903525,0.00036666048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009170847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004313438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6076128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018617616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101508595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9354618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236827","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102415","title":"On weighted-egalitarian values for cooperative games with transferable utility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Game theory","score_opus":0.05455303857679177,"score_gpt":0.29429639156703175,"score_spread":0.23974335299023997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3904631,0.00012683075,0.12234858,0.004170759,0.00023453328,0.00071242836,0.00008471586,0.00007928297,0.48177975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995716,0.0000010187363,0.0009846749,0.00023590661,0.00004474483,0.000059933802,0.0000011474833,0.000004493147,0.0029521107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903244,0.00004106869,0.0003160849,0.00030796893,0.000052592368,0.00024983578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935675,0.0004332058,0.0000663039,0.000086828855,0.00002815339,0.000028735725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017203304,0.00010628794,0.00034022782,0.000065745204,0.00065080007,0.00013037864,0.00021780387,0.00006280551,0.00027469176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002223368,0.000079598736,0.00007825423,0.00033226245,0.0004374231,0.000107986234,0.000011237845,0.000070050904,0.00006698383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002510819,0.00009112417,0.00033744727,0.00006053039,0.000021289074,1.327644e-7,0.0015004757,0.000004994668,0.000002436523,0.9972767,0.000447665,0.00023206898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027992067,0.00017695931,0.00044351438,0.000053699972,0.000006325434,2.3996202e-7,0.0007057142,0.0030583832,0.00015623604,0.99299955,0.0020024746,0.00011695934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003246877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011325748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60525286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032060823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003278011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5005494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410316541","doi":"10.32920/ifmj.v4i1-2.2037","title":"Choice, Chance and the Database","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Film and Media Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.023880824286297588,"score_gpt":0.24712721369271365,"score_spread":0.22324638940641606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410316541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.905768,0.05580139,0.0035639955,0.0040622093,0.00738611,0.00020613598,0.00022224073,0.000037774917,0.02295216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963341,0.0013958957,0.00004013591,0.0002220318,0.00084233074,0.000007209903,0.0000025215495,0.000009961446,0.0011458404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999365,0.0000440498,0.00026300136,0.000165689,0.000025145373,0.00013712533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989252,0.0007698286,0.000122055695,0.00008642667,0.000017101245,0.00007939965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010818164,0.00008659881,0.00019529117,0.00010754633,0.00011718126,0.00026391717,0.00008953819,0.000030240304,0.00023259426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051821134,0.00005902076,0.000048646176,0.00006681702,0.00012363945,0.00036331223,0.000042391282,0.00038481824,0.000107472355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031164658,0.000047765396,0.007947827,0.00015457814,0.00038122368,0.00011142026,0.025641674,0.000003506653,0.00017612395,0.93633807,0.010430043,0.018456135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036004332,0.00013966025,0.018945996,0.0012195267,0.00005560704,0.0025170357,0.0031466354,0.012153085,0.00031357593,0.1947119,0.76266354,0.0005330044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029017321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009905613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7522335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017364913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000099594545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2546744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410487845","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102420","title":"Condorcet efficiency: Weighted Bucklin vs. weighted scoring and Borda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.033509841781106386,"score_gpt":0.2733664417933629,"score_spread":0.2398566000122565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410487845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7900607,0.00039495857,0.006298476,0.0017686766,0.00026028068,0.00019791088,0.000009045534,0.0000808847,0.20092906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744576,0.00000761237,0.00057394634,0.00026526637,0.000080994876,0.000014130698,6.590482e-7,0.000005497321,0.0016061156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986864,0.000041582676,0.0004887757,0.00037343174,0.00007160726,0.0003382352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994021,0.0002617497,0.00016233072,0.000105119754,0.00001813185,0.000050569186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019729512,0.00012572312,0.00040755374,0.00014612399,0.000644709,0.00020669478,0.00030286206,0.000092270915,0.00025689782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024799586,0.00011258355,0.00006613697,0.0006524127,0.0005802812,0.0001264748,0.000094247094,0.00011207375,0.0001974094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040984937,0.000043742944,0.0054130442,0.00006597404,0.000010746927,6.7006033e-7,0.0006515068,4.929987e-7,0.000022258306,0.99329644,0.00019162205,0.00029938284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031718466,0.00003877897,0.0032356482,0.00007656321,0.0000073318174,0.0000016655248,0.0003495172,0.008323932,0.00014898715,0.9839412,0.0033622503,0.00019697243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004326451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027580702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20738508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003661476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025836482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49586454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411078459","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf039","title":"Public Listing Choice with Persistent Hidden Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10147216431510846,"score_gpt":0.28435576371554183,"score_spread":0.18288359940043336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411078459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06572399,0.7022563,0.00011506415,0.011441387,0.0008495412,0.0008659101,0.000049466045,0.00004994249,0.21864837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445909,0.052437004,0.000102666345,0.0012287073,0.00008364935,0.00007835821,0.00000551559,0.000007627722,0.0014655192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989097,0.00003519891,0.000766275,0.00012862223,0.000014979143,0.00014520797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986674,0.00026929317,0.00067737367,0.00031705684,0.00005277161,0.000016062417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016527779,0.000111465386,0.0005703313,0.00009393136,0.00013786217,0.000030181702,0.00026053115,0.00002065329,0.000051318166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055204664,0.00007877779,0.00013524521,0.00012546101,0.000112580834,0.00025261458,0.000086427666,0.00007028675,0.00024070102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074046334,0.000014764555,0.017119952,0.008237644,0.0009232055,8.3125165e-8,0.0008925499,0.00002491094,2.1870022e-7,0.9596542,0.005400559,0.0077245026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012605783,0.00021857816,0.01279106,0.019196866,0.00027968764,0.00001520469,0.0047802655,0.000585669,0.000019628245,0.030030182,0.93014884,0.0006734376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057307105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001366409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119558325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025880501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411319759","doi":"10.1145/3717823.3718235","title":"Six Candidates Suffice to Win a Voter Majority","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.01540555234623176,"score_gpt":0.22970784848890807,"score_spread":0.21430229614267632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411319759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6210442,0.0001917882,0.0062163165,0.0024276625,0.0007839232,0.00019157458,0.000032811462,0.00008552202,0.36902618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93262064,0.0000025030488,0.00028258914,0.0011420464,0.00006557351,0.000014041295,0.0000029831117,0.0000069201355,0.065862685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991353,0.000015415566,0.00034584434,0.00027925294,0.000013331327,0.00021082786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995179,0.0000656566,0.00006190167,0.00028060016,0.000015953525,0.00005795876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058617437,0.00009481601,0.00024187633,0.00017658072,0.00006875704,0.00006866752,0.00018987556,0.0000606684,0.0006761892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012738993,0.00010018513,0.000057426805,0.00028094364,0.000016376875,0.000071351365,0.000060961393,0.00007703667,0.0030631737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017423283,0.000051871197,0.09213735,0.00002920452,0.00002819222,0.0000011218497,0.00023381476,0.000017775617,0.00003604547,0.8957196,0.011518697,0.00020888922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804618,0.0001608617,0.09281118,0.00009766557,0.000011559328,0.000003992632,0.00032160894,0.0013014933,0.0018355573,0.17277528,0.7290252,0.0006751579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001192595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027217073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004782284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010181385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411687202","doi":"10.61091/um123-05","title":"Weighted domination models and randomized heuristics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas Mathematica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Heuristics; Statistics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.025733011013319405,"score_gpt":0.23997054963815645,"score_spread":0.21423753862483705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411687202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10481278,0.0040834565,0.412777,0.0008861897,0.00043469074,0.0010033859,0.000060352977,0.00014018104,0.47580197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906066,0.000052362666,0.0040423083,0.000080899445,0.000019313806,0.000051167855,0.000004784095,0.000010547017,0.0051320316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998848,0.0000633489,0.00066887774,0.00023709358,0.000026105785,0.00015652365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877983,0.0006903922,0.000195362,0.00026772963,0.000029399656,0.00003728131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020295414,0.00012134481,0.00063148636,0.00017990463,0.00008615865,0.00005562281,0.00011380526,0.00007726443,0.00013344434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066439784,0.00011603972,0.000091719725,0.00014196022,0.00012543944,0.00010220998,0.00004529446,0.0000767443,0.00014537339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003271193,0.000044287328,0.00003616144,0.00021373107,0.000056389646,4.7168302e-7,0.0007092647,0.000004228526,0.0000023739842,0.99804217,0.00033124993,0.00023255398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008692489,0.000006996914,0.00002728378,0.00007665037,0.000019515554,0.0000018194237,0.000089862195,0.12781058,0.000023982706,0.86237067,0.000787684,0.000092475864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012130465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.033871e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025171385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007635946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47319627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411946105","doi":"10.1145/3736252.3742675","title":"Fairly Stable Two-Sided Matching with Indifferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0197423812436817,"score_gpt":0.21853767037308133,"score_spread":0.19879528912939964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411946105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6408445,0.00016701671,0.017413015,0.00020231107,0.00019975146,0.000096350595,0.000008819312,0.00006799666,0.34100023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967709,0.000003719498,0.0006786365,0.00021447742,0.000028315908,0.000012224054,0.0000027810097,0.000007550684,0.031343278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992122,0.000016391778,0.00030626653,0.00024439348,0.000018161025,0.0002025818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953353,0.00009110422,0.00012654542,0.00020560836,0.000012698919,0.00003051539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047459485,0.00010075731,0.0002650826,0.0001565633,0.000108685956,0.00011430779,0.0001719471,0.000038910282,0.00041846375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028996697,0.000086708525,0.000034178018,0.000219364,0.00003149726,0.00014842684,0.000031974425,0.00009564083,0.00032791478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011369173,0.000019244335,0.071682714,0.000023075738,0.000036311456,0.0000010426346,0.0003590732,0.000063220716,0.000020322812,0.9274271,0.00017702115,0.00017951053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013849459,0.00011011879,0.040709395,0.00021168578,0.000010397805,0.000005217161,0.0018684729,0.0007879338,0.0008901962,0.94507635,0.008484668,0.00046059993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009574619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016946923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3268645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027374388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015883043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45818847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413024579","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70003","title":"Bargaining Between Collaborators of a Stochastic Project","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","score_opus":0.042115979784372114,"score_gpt":0.25136763519950756,"score_spread":0.20925165541513543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413024579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813044,0.0016613236,0.0055085043,0.00024321712,0.0005964194,0.0001657224,0.000059329308,0.0000045192087,0.010456573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992765,0.00005709356,0.00012611301,0.00005312964,0.00019022735,0.0000018430894,6.5953935e-7,0.000010349806,0.00028404273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985364,0.000051135372,0.0011472217,0.000103504695,0.000012872659,0.00014884956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803966,0.00039409634,0.001271109,0.0001976206,0.00006638542,0.00003112787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028077278,0.00010188641,0.00062361563,0.00029235616,0.00008009637,0.000041360672,0.00034699857,0.00006328141,0.00001983244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026106994,0.000084496045,0.0001523251,0.00023583129,0.00008061724,0.00012310511,0.00003523247,0.00017195557,0.000012018431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036117734,0.00006501819,0.036874652,0.00008106788,0.00089745026,0.0000015409937,0.002763942,0.0072975783,0.00002482432,0.94926417,0.00078662316,0.0015819517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010347584,0.000851721,0.014501163,0.00081622496,0.0003171247,0.0000606911,0.0047901617,0.0048656147,0.0011116106,0.9389068,0.022653122,0.00077816634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002068635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037091281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02237349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000608562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012336725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34456486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186388","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cdm.v7i2.62146","title":"Tournaments with kernels by monochromatic paths","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contributions to Discrete Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monochromatic color; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Biology","score_opus":0.018384650141789576,"score_gpt":0.25268886806937596,"score_spread":0.23430421792758638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186388","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48157492,0.0012284277,0.49601173,0.00064575,0.00033136056,0.0008387179,0.0015845008,0.0001381798,0.0176464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404174,0.0000065830554,0.0032857351,0.000121324454,0.00011406277,0.00010296893,0.00003816447,0.0000330741,0.0022563252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985244,0.000027806009,0.00063779147,0.00020424351,0.00006428608,0.00054147316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987592,0.0001102195,0.00034642746,0.00045068612,0.00005430971,0.0002791746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009707692,0.0002004008,0.00046741613,0.0001049672,0.00018957446,0.000103017155,0.00023937847,0.00007979324,0.00026866893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782239,0.00018077328,0.000084583975,0.00024916563,0.000044899894,0.00025364314,0.000058594003,0.00011781086,0.0022919278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009783527,0.00034016257,0.010625504,0.00010948622,0.00015541655,0.0000014497296,0.0031933931,0.00003294945,0.00026988494,0.9796542,0.00552823,0.000079555095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008891592,0.0015747107,0.01618269,0.0022630459,0.00046635867,0.00036514213,0.0072347675,0.014702933,0.009674391,0.71180165,0.22093605,0.0059066857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015014912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011354156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51246685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016766404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001110533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413238683","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112466","title":"Strategyproof and fair allocation of a perfectly divisible private commodity with (restricted) single-dipped preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Commodity; Microeconomics; Economics; Fair division; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023855711918102537,"score_gpt":0.19711105909737128,"score_spread":0.17325534717926874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413238683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98949695,0.00020200478,0.0023878296,0.0009096695,0.00016265285,0.00026175368,0.000059022892,0.000034035314,0.0064860624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990926,0.000035766225,0.0004136995,0.0002596479,0.000029634877,0.000019366933,0.00001743633,0.000012932986,0.00011894564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887645,0.00003407601,0.000523115,0.00035422936,0.000014239848,0.00019789295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912614,0.00010441997,0.00041912848,0.00029182303,0.000016611853,0.0000418786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003690144,0.00015549808,0.00039563622,0.00021767747,0.00008118063,0.00008903362,0.00020597166,0.00006938106,0.000019463589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032095293,0.0001666854,0.000044907192,0.0001487103,0.000130485,0.00022712586,0.000051602827,0.00011523204,0.000014915207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013907335,0.00017372354,0.39939132,0.00032111892,0.00027288529,0.0000010499755,0.00063598005,0.0024203337,0.0029953266,0.59180725,0.0003009263,0.001541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006193285,0.0013032944,0.77351516,0.00066284783,0.00011985957,0.000016193078,0.00070929865,0.014654722,0.019178517,0.17065176,0.011012484,0.0019826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014884208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000661916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42115548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006658792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022056618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67972326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414004406","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.08.013","title":"A direct proof of the short-side advantage in random matching markets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Zoo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Direct proof; Proof of concept; Burden of proof; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.015247064194296837,"score_gpt":0.23577293776521224,"score_spread":0.2205258735709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414004406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656942,0.0012081433,0.00006854944,0.000104424544,0.00054297666,0.00040785878,0.000072403716,0.000011694302,0.03188973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698615,0.0000623597,0.000032874217,0.000045353543,0.000024093479,0.000076932985,0.0000017437588,0.000011818325,0.0027586445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988011,0.000038804905,0.0006558168,0.0002955608,0.000010679207,0.00019805573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.00009246446,0.00018425858,0.00029195036,0.000004305249,0.000027327884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171169,0.00012795246,0.00047520487,0.00014726385,0.000055686647,0.000037435904,0.00019549472,0.00007588575,0.000078175166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028096701,0.00011666451,0.000116347226,0.00007356486,0.00006921937,0.000109279215,0.000095178795,0.00011491823,0.000011026595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106188505,0.00009769451,0.9365443,0.00012056244,0.000039376184,0.0000025546703,0.0007162522,0.00011615662,0.0001744084,0.05285431,0.00009613239,0.00913205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002333648,0.00003206113,0.9740584,0.00030465695,0.000042783988,0.000011693979,0.0007223235,0.0006025345,0.00248952,0.010834414,0.008181212,0.0003867619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032407505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022172612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042019896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006596908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022015143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47574407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414038062","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.002","title":"Optimistic and pessimistic approaches for cooperative games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Generalitat de Catalunya; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pessimism; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24358349397966222,"score_gpt":0.3496985167450292,"score_spread":0.106115022765367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414038062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3425462,0.011436172,0.3046449,0.0069162725,0.00094625965,0.0009567085,0.00017870132,0.000018570325,0.33235618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897017,0.000049479953,0.0020368828,0.000067306704,0.00021423596,0.0000058808564,0.0000034771629,0.000011696783,0.007909341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870837,0.0003403062,0.000548575,0.00016685446,0.000070220616,0.00016566584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998714,0.0006471959,0.000131971,0.00009609907,0.00034403134,0.000066673456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00848766,0.00007339106,0.00021955928,0.00028947,0.00026574382,0.0002189727,0.00021113985,0.00002046104,0.000073957075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027528016,0.00006694276,0.000050067178,0.00016239307,0.00014542561,0.00013288931,0.000049750448,0.0002635204,0.000037592086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011550205,0.000061352264,0.0011239067,0.00007050602,0.000078507204,0.000010458855,0.0005500892,0.0019218803,0.00006213555,0.99058205,0.0038971994,0.0015264144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014654382,0.0065350085,0.10898513,0.0019888398,0.000084508865,0.00043243272,0.008242717,0.14086346,0.0012829507,0.24916977,0.4661787,0.0015820988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014556884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5926757e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044500557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086679225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32955596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414266818","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.03","title":"3. Voting with two alternatives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Population; Ranked voting system; Approval voting; Condorcet method","score_opus":0.03828007331560068,"score_gpt":0.243949008341883,"score_spread":0.2056689350262823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414266818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003411142,0.0017294599,0.00040206948,0.0005583111,0.00078966795,0.00072730565,0.00012850108,0.00007061374,0.99555993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009364232,0.000021095306,0.0003710168,0.00084453076,0.00024636448,0.0000410342,0.000068961934,0.000091504866,0.98895127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978779,0.000020126185,0.0007728518,0.00089153845,0.00007160796,0.00036600573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800617,0.00011667066,0.0010233654,0.00065451395,0.00007989199,0.00011936661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012058351,0.00042639664,0.0009460094,0.00037533123,0.00018239157,0.002473075,0.0015594057,0.00022093522,0.0040064324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009285129,0.00044214507,0.0001554915,0.000070797636,0.00013373356,0.0021273908,0.00045632556,0.00052146456,0.0008921357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029011037,0.000011856993,0.00047086863,0.000056233064,0.00028106605,0.000013861226,0.00014794608,0.000017731587,1.6334681e-7,0.9414707,0.056597523,0.0009030416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007321267,0.000063067215,0.000024837198,0.0005264243,0.000019349518,0.00000629937,0.000044218552,0.00006632021,0.0000035036016,0.06793334,0.9300366,0.00054387806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046960716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008933526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87353736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001892852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011887774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414269100","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.05","title":"5. Sequential pairwise voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Sequence (biology); Voting; Class (philosophy); Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Set (abstract data type); Binary number","score_opus":0.053884161071052254,"score_gpt":0.24052746208793732,"score_spread":0.18664330101688506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414269100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008961071,0.0026265245,0.0002650591,0.0009678622,0.002429779,0.0008109989,0.00022847344,0.00010757571,0.9925548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033180448,0.000033211894,0.00017661211,0.0012151321,0.0004201899,0.000040518,0.00015739055,0.000101033016,0.9945379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972878,0.00002813051,0.0011598289,0.0009931424,0.00007441714,0.00045665383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978312,0.000081299375,0.0010356277,0.00081820576,0.00007489231,0.0001587532],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019984941,0.00046173812,0.001062955,0.00042599384,0.00023200906,0.0029192173,0.0017803746,0.0005736785,0.011888027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019685552,0.0005732754,0.00034891148,0.00007375569,0.000114224466,0.0020626143,0.00076620106,0.0006412138,0.0027755226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012806527,0.0000097419515,0.00008128331,0.00007043922,0.00015052913,0.000010244249,0.00006403051,0.0000050834255,2.8699236e-7,0.69214046,0.30661976,0.00083529606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040573164,0.00003085895,0.0000091577185,0.00032067156,0.000023094875,0.0000044181807,0.00002189435,0.000070619535,0.0000026481723,0.07808553,0.92047435,0.000551022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038567657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041660587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.614055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029819674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017274378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414591285","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.11","title":"11. Distributive politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Stochastic game; Shapley value; Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Bargaining problem; Position (finance); Function (biology)","score_opus":0.03635196961157519,"score_gpt":0.23369684532781257,"score_spread":0.19734487571623738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414591285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008903302,0.0019136826,0.00020283819,0.001255292,0.0015491027,0.0007362887,0.0018055774,0.000066247965,0.99246204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026021092,0.00004250187,0.00007352717,0.0012672761,0.0002920959,0.000036438047,0.00047320314,0.00007257925,0.99514025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763733,0.00001960758,0.00096178567,0.00083361403,0.00006345191,0.0004842173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978458,0.00013148507,0.0008023195,0.00093767897,0.00009856882,0.00018410165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010446382,0.00043239864,0.0010423209,0.0002993275,0.00021372859,0.0021621124,0.0016822194,0.0005457494,0.006784215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023091235,0.00052493194,0.00028243617,0.00006810326,0.00015870937,0.0014485194,0.00066687143,0.0004967969,0.0020121348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000458852,0.000010817303,0.00017671837,0.000040679464,0.00011025244,0.000005974127,0.000050930095,7.287556e-7,3.4287613e-8,0.6693585,0.33010504,0.00013573279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026925153,0.00002413663,0.000032882013,0.00015997452,0.000017525892,0.0000024796352,0.000030787305,0.000008034683,0.0000017661044,0.26722378,0.73182863,0.0004007411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005509143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038541835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40213475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043939464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019012949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414592225","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.07","title":"7. Voting with asymmetric information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Contingent vote; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022378202766369936,"score_gpt":0.20369671126108613,"score_spread":0.1813185084947162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414592225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000061516143,0.000918484,0.0009194964,0.00043949374,0.0007081803,0.0008243294,0.0001289621,0.00007379364,0.9959811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054428093,0.000020325537,0.00035247704,0.0012934629,0.00011627993,0.000040814255,0.00022013173,0.00004845011,0.99246526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815685,0.000012705673,0.0009602818,0.00046354486,0.000082418985,0.00032419118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978531,0.00009935029,0.0012493826,0.0005760761,0.00011422596,0.00010787328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421971,0.0003573106,0.0007745902,0.00097228703,0.00018187726,0.0033322615,0.0011714314,0.00037377368,0.0018579774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020317607,0.0003777457,0.00013293364,0.00020743102,0.00006593907,0.0062056873,0.0003397986,0.0004892039,0.0019957144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021388705,0.0000061947894,0.00022983213,0.00009084931,0.00013054405,0.0000020711293,0.00008994965,0.000013472558,1.0178627e-8,0.86106783,0.1347225,0.0036253578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005158601,0.00006518129,0.000050802657,0.0003055098,0.000018522891,0.0000049995347,0.000044951365,0.00008223987,9.447395e-7,0.020478988,0.9779711,0.00046094938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027849426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021867669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84324855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024968936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014450982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593506","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490","title":"Models in Political Economy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Mathematical proof; Voting; Core (optical fiber); Politics; Foundation (evidence); Public choice; Voting behavior; Outcome (game theory); Formal description","score_opus":0.04885543382179371,"score_gpt":0.24383772674826906,"score_spread":0.19498229292647534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005123964,0.0016958446,0.00014578832,0.002025436,0.00081411056,0.00091034645,0.00017074596,0.000043897202,0.9941887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003433172,0.000010610045,0.00008640702,0.0038323442,0.00020615068,0.00013612224,0.00016732265,0.00006639798,0.9920615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698937,0.000048789763,0.001246149,0.000965702,0.000036807633,0.00071319204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982263,0.00016041758,0.00048215967,0.0008827146,0.0000434526,0.00020498522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017680848,0.0003895942,0.001240585,0.0006998966,0.0000772276,0.0022492367,0.0019390348,0.00051059586,0.0021151737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010744096,0.0004999116,0.00021785493,0.00014381163,0.00011102167,0.003504072,0.0006018168,0.0007036205,0.0010135678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009199202,0.000024168019,0.00008336377,0.0000775218,0.000048332382,0.000007963676,0.00005048453,0.000025098352,6.004852e-9,0.6741349,0.325477,0.00006196484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032199523,0.000012943801,0.0000062684253,0.00013615227,0.0000039871256,0.000001773193,0.000029308,0.00022640632,2.3194515e-7,0.4861359,0.5128548,0.00027019955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006146048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006255994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18799898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010705771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006668899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593628","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.14","title":"14. Bargaining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Outcome (game theory); Status quo; Subgame; Repeated game; Voting; Sequential equilibrium; Interval (graph theory); Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04788547273774867,"score_gpt":0.23367617405098065,"score_spread":0.18579070131323197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002173425,0.0038347899,0.0001290115,0.00059660285,0.0016308827,0.0006337832,0.00016561075,0.00008242289,0.99292475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013761295,0.00006291647,0.00019844601,0.0018791395,0.00025666473,0.00003908138,0.00011841079,0.000090555324,0.99597865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976645,0.000017887101,0.0009804941,0.0008824485,0.000060281738,0.00039434864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793065,0.00011379767,0.0008059636,0.0009386762,0.000068129695,0.00014280017],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00176559,0.00040582396,0.0010228336,0.00042207795,0.0001903244,0.0025655604,0.0017695671,0.0005356963,0.013296332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022059683,0.00050138903,0.0002577747,0.000069434114,0.0000918694,0.0019060519,0.00063669414,0.00059927936,0.0035266476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008666711,0.0000059889944,0.000058528898,0.000029633313,0.00011778965,0.0000060092457,0.00007143396,0.000002277246,9.277167e-8,0.6592665,0.33961937,0.00081372727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030061314,0.000025509255,0.0000083512305,0.0002264633,0.000011887367,0.0000024927483,0.00002364292,0.000016932694,0.0000010351318,0.2333128,0.7656648,0.00040546394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001914895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017267936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42604545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021826498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014203419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593853","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.02","title":"2. Collective choice with privately-known preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Preference; Mechanism (biology); Social choice theory; Preference theory; Selection (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.04950337841267126,"score_gpt":0.23284739081086625,"score_spread":0.18334401239819498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006158803,0.0019075373,0.00006610127,0.0004529013,0.0007712828,0.0014369647,0.00023833953,0.00007713248,0.99498814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030420972,0.00004368613,0.00019574289,0.00058770785,0.00018395574,0.00013113552,0.00009568096,0.000078658675,0.99564135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975854,0.000029018314,0.00080572517,0.0010801532,0.000089257184,0.00041043764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976196,0.00022607234,0.0010179043,0.0008472985,0.0001434655,0.00014562136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093955226,0.0005048695,0.0011498415,0.00043887435,0.00025681194,0.0027205078,0.0018164406,0.0004757972,0.005984259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019525427,0.0004985545,0.00015088348,0.00015839207,0.00017887726,0.0021254937,0.00046431652,0.0006078771,0.0007784506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074485004,0.000027360498,0.00090841146,0.00009486758,0.00045446077,0.0000056024114,0.00036591146,0.0000055104792,1.379398e-7,0.80061156,0.19672441,0.00072729343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060212106,0.0001571179,0.00018054731,0.0004479134,0.000028850753,0.0000031847487,0.000040076062,0.000008553236,0.0000040459963,0.112508416,0.88543904,0.0005801587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005850246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024836668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6887146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005302683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069993257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593888","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.06","title":"6. Ethical voting and expressive voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Turnout; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting","score_opus":0.0406746087399058,"score_gpt":0.24760925357937658,"score_spread":0.20693464483947077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003843013,0.0034972806,0.00029111505,0.0022167144,0.00092773186,0.00068022986,0.000112537746,0.00007066259,0.9921653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01799312,0.000039831957,0.00032117352,0.0023489736,0.00029033463,0.000036872872,0.000054951994,0.00008728662,0.9788275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973479,0.000043167827,0.0010539888,0.0010515695,0.00007600389,0.00042740148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790305,0.00029356987,0.001046936,0.0004982266,0.000081420236,0.00017677693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025031883,0.00043995373,0.0010781141,0.00033206708,0.00030823227,0.002893242,0.0011120045,0.0011188979,0.0020757494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069808384,0.00052361673,0.00018456487,0.00005794267,0.00018068663,0.0013663952,0.0010029133,0.0015693012,0.00036032338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013895524,0.0000061765677,0.00024107884,0.000121040735,0.00012693818,0.000010409748,0.00021874851,0.0000036703773,7.132023e-7,0.886072,0.11218862,0.0009967578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045195897,0.000033913133,0.000036005935,0.0007731832,0.000022329858,0.000008746728,0.000072334806,0.00019694696,0.0000034368488,0.05466089,0.94315743,0.0005828431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020828364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023943428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83141106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014140923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099161334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414594317","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.10","title":"10. Electoral competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Voting; Nash equilibrium; Cardinal voting systems; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game; Competition (biology)","score_opus":0.03785354420940562,"score_gpt":0.22447878556274417,"score_spread":0.18662524135333855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414594317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000042312818,0.0019217865,0.00006897994,0.00061420543,0.0009488157,0.0006231297,0.00022854474,0.00007383862,0.9955165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00087442546,0.00002309924,0.00007307271,0.00076010235,0.00024659606,0.000036642734,0.00037346862,0.00006491523,0.9975477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998094,0.000019369936,0.0007935631,0.0007181717,0.00005536464,0.0003195296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983591,0.00006754907,0.0006883299,0.0007019212,0.000075036565,0.0001081088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009943636,0.00034464503,0.0008382353,0.00035271412,0.0001525061,0.0020919954,0.0012353843,0.00043364355,0.08282963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094084055,0.00043108672,0.00022342574,0.00006521193,0.00008548331,0.0016167075,0.0003363424,0.00042227612,0.012028264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002009478,0.000009573197,0.00002624155,0.00003885107,0.000080347694,0.000002979642,0.000014434845,0.0000013159625,1.7764036e-7,0.647911,0.35149515,0.000399795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003329367,0.000059405087,0.000013933551,0.00019265359,0.000012611678,0.0000024965782,0.000005678697,0.000018609162,0.000001656417,0.105217606,0.89373994,0.00040249745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002402901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042322925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54269344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026496744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011434808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414594327","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.04","title":"4. Voting with many alternatives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Condorcet method; Cardinal voting systems; Probabilistic logic; Population; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game","score_opus":0.0356839149489239,"score_gpt":0.22881984688435655,"score_spread":0.19313593193543266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414594327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029997153,0.0019127573,0.00051821367,0.0006387736,0.0007648914,0.0007392871,0.00013129991,0.00006994795,0.99519485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068552224,0.000029439941,0.00032648328,0.00083348167,0.00021372533,0.000042031934,0.000064354695,0.000092159644,0.9915431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787784,0.000018096687,0.00077514484,0.00089075667,0.00007198327,0.00036619828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980394,0.000103279664,0.0010088062,0.00065832655,0.000073116884,0.000117052754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011269181,0.00042637385,0.0009409273,0.00038162476,0.0001813895,0.0024330874,0.0015892736,0.00029235432,0.004399733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008468073,0.00044309944,0.0001594769,0.000066046465,0.00012953766,0.0020713382,0.00046275483,0.0005207507,0.0009847496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028411408,0.000011748457,0.00040264503,0.00007254169,0.00027860445,0.000015269732,0.00013916969,0.000008443646,1.33755e-7,0.92205644,0.076251656,0.00073491543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005052754,0.00006725908,0.000047617235,0.00055118103,0.000018888995,0.0000062799154,0.000050378258,0.00006096305,0.0000029673881,0.057594374,0.9405566,0.00053825974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029428347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004185827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018900505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010406757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414798558","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaf074","title":"The Lottery Problem for Ranking Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Ranking (information retrieval); Feature (linguistics); Probability theory; Decision theory","score_opus":0.015818839887519427,"score_gpt":0.2331200428548962,"score_spread":0.2173012029673768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414798558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10817341,0.0071120863,0.6853662,0.0028503167,0.0007136035,0.00067969837,0.00006556354,0.00011413462,0.194925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779458,0.000027230311,0.0001997841,0.00025705906,0.000049089784,0.00006272269,0.0000059558547,0.00000600719,0.021446329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991951,0.000038164842,0.00037669175,0.00020375197,0.000013300156,0.00017300493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989497,0.0005372233,0.00017190257,0.00030385068,0.000022760916,0.000014529741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002570936,0.000070336195,0.0002635477,0.00023034104,0.0002965761,0.00010085694,0.00022136007,0.00004008622,0.000052060812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014811754,0.00005693252,0.00031371816,0.000658784,0.000036085996,0.00004645335,0.000025574795,0.000050703304,0.00006886438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022756067,0.00000932514,0.019893987,0.00001586114,0.0011878941,1.08748026e-7,0.00013873834,0.00021025706,0.0000037059697,0.9762491,0.00048145818,0.0017868296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002940062,0.000011022333,0.0034923786,0.000012194983,0.00028894466,1.4633069e-7,0.00018013989,0.0042212023,0.00004823412,0.910334,0.08100121,0.00011654104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037198293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034388195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86977243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024259456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006328853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23216407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230070","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i2.36653","title":"Fairness and Sparsity Within Rashomon Sets: Enumeration-Free Exploration and Characterization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Selection (genetic algorithm); Key (lock); Limit (mathematics); Range (aeronautics); Characterization (materials science)","score_opus":0.07487391801485156,"score_gpt":0.2725175185113366,"score_spread":0.19764360049648505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97999257,0.000103342674,0.0009012558,0.016558407,0.00021517962,0.00028214097,0.000047966656,0.000023456412,0.0018757068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768984,0.00069523015,0.00021437112,0.0008146551,0.000025391164,0.00001419139,0.0000059561803,0.0000071240456,0.0005332214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991636,0.000019169918,0.00034358524,0.0003023273,0.00005955662,0.000111724854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915755,0.000107959,0.0003622073,0.00015871272,0.00017932462,0.000034246343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018593784,0.00012740423,0.00025619977,0.00004300738,0.0004167131,0.00022255526,0.00022329728,0.00021940988,0.0000048200714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072618213,0.00011559834,0.000044007324,0.00014677523,0.00020361485,0.00037634236,0.0002117737,0.00045365823,0.0000011971539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015508534,0.00002100123,0.023624573,0.00030325667,0.000030663443,1.6653322e-8,0.014546374,0.0000011015775,0.0028983823,0.95818913,0.00012742732,0.0002425608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008795124,0.000096631775,0.052628413,0.0005115746,0.00003103079,0.0000020742284,0.004156636,0.0142874,0.0047955518,0.92163664,0.0006597802,0.00031475586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004379494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061640394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036552496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019547368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031443433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47139636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415314210","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-05862-1_4","title":"Energy Rents and Distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Distribution (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Apportionment; Energy (signal processing); Income distribution","score_opus":0.02057485662037758,"score_gpt":0.18681103170698754,"score_spread":0.16623617508660996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415314210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033929075,0.0022709214,0.0053455927,0.00008428823,0.00046387315,0.000052945612,0.00047305622,0.00003918194,0.9912362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08102626,0.00037006137,0.0000152168095,0.00009219927,0.00009819118,0.0000033424426,0.000186772,0.000012602911,0.91819537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991844,0.0000035176413,0.00037850923,0.0003089895,0.000014002181,0.000110577465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994855,0.000033196127,0.0002182896,0.00021154206,0.000013328841,0.00003817429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021225632,0.00015081832,0.00034894128,0.00008962052,0.00005163971,0.000038247894,0.000088741595,0.00022944917,0.0006396849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017795388,0.00017143195,0.000073752846,0.0000146870225,0.000035162084,0.000036272344,0.00005796425,0.000096309166,0.00023179129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029945759,0.0000034152952,0.00012295708,0.00003234038,0.00003660292,0.0000011540018,0.000005539347,1.3620799e-7,1.3214488e-7,0.9900927,0.008083895,0.0016181521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007456859,0.000010947475,0.00004339244,0.000056163033,0.0000043070854,0.000001526936,0.0000011774138,0.000051866715,0.0000025475795,0.36900342,0.63062656,0.00012351929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008454292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009447759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6225427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047303947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068210143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415980035","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.11.001","title":"Preconvex games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Convexity; Group (periodic table); Property (philosophy); Transferable utility; Core (optical fiber); Regular polygon; Group cohesiveness; Axiomatic system","score_opus":0.023316871636977224,"score_gpt":0.2345898711109874,"score_spread":0.21127299947401018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415980035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433061,0.0023902163,0.00018111497,0.000335573,0.001262891,0.00024450143,0.000089677145,0.00007018544,0.052119773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777829,0.00016003013,0.00011054337,0.00020534024,0.000098194556,0.00009426251,0.0000066947528,0.000016733546,0.021525305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868184,0.000014643429,0.0005644744,0.00045346102,0.000008003343,0.00027757086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936306,0.000046476216,0.00018902004,0.0003224386,0.0000067595706,0.0000722363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000464679,0.00016691299,0.0004259305,0.00018703257,0.00010100946,0.0001229943,0.00017925169,0.00012058863,0.00082868256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019315268,0.00019584918,0.000105269515,0.000052577652,0.000088894645,0.0001709914,0.00007384028,0.000116483505,0.0008494076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014908013,0.000060218972,0.46669924,0.000053143056,0.00005444835,0.0000021960936,0.0003236852,0.000011300065,0.00002848384,0.51596546,0.0027503264,0.014036576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016310173,0.0001032157,0.58851546,0.00009819743,0.000063797546,0.00003057891,0.000603264,0.0010116673,0.0004202857,0.05104714,0.35565096,0.00082440296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025916577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003408522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46491835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073151095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018166373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416054337","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.19365","title":"On Efficient Computation of DiRe Committees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conjecture; Set cover problem; Set (abstract data type); Constraint (computer-aided design); Cover (algebra); Representation (politics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Population","score_opus":0.08647946689419143,"score_gpt":0.1792288755297969,"score_spread":0.09274940863560548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416054337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582606,0.00035997518,0.008648834,0.000039447666,0.0010956152,0.00019303756,0.00016600505,0.00008078378,0.03115573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799025,0.000018536904,0.000018077852,0.000019422208,0.000049597184,4.906435e-7,0.00001780625,0.00002153995,0.0018642504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888307,0.000045859084,0.00033782542,0.00056407845,0.000016756028,0.0001524091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990225,0.00010264663,0.00041219662,0.0003796117,0.000033601253,0.0000494803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044673614,0.00018016403,0.00042730922,0.00034649658,0.000051235966,0.00003203644,0.0003021047,0.0001860791,0.0000528753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038179325,0.00022756786,0.00021529442,0.00024705788,0.00008027776,0.000018451567,0.0003512584,0.0003696724,0.00072620413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017797303,0.000059667014,0.0009915815,0.00024413459,0.000061763916,0.0000138933165,0.00026036045,0.37874162,0.0000014952952,0.6194482,0.00013402419,0.00002544522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029573884,0.000073268435,0.0012252732,0.00046656324,0.000033845154,9.036601e-7,0.00013472469,0.3698861,0.000044043358,0.62722653,0.0002974721,0.00031553267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015026916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005764145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039729707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001226009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018398763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93341273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416181515","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc128-17","title":"Asymptotic lower bounds for the feedback arc set problem in random graphs","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feedback arc set; Arc (geometry); Feedback vertex set; Vertex (graph theory); Directed acyclic graph; Upper and lower bounds; Directed graph; Random graph; Independent set","score_opus":0.01826974688101482,"score_gpt":0.24468588096518842,"score_spread":0.2264161340841736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416181515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79891145,0.015565827,0.02846976,0.0022697796,0.14501224,0.0039498196,0.00005765409,0.000044849512,0.0057186326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967559,0.0003666548,0.001078575,0.00007015869,0.0014917203,0.000018954604,0.0000018118868,0.000066539396,0.00014970521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340737,0.00025913707,0.0046300157,0.00055330485,0.00028981,0.0008603517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895662,0.005133606,0.0039624027,0.00057322177,0.00056989334,0.00019466577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131113855,0.0006476737,0.0025198304,0.000814112,0.00078727177,0.0009917488,0.001161594,0.00049100735,0.000015486821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019149153,0.00057933736,0.000804826,0.0010961273,0.00027126924,0.00035098544,0.00035403448,0.0011977875,0.0000069062257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009694236,0.0009897256,0.0016860733,0.0014061893,0.00066455593,0.000010127178,0.002602226,0.00035284422,0.000014843118,0.9899084,0.00069174217,0.00070386054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021859061,0.001097676,0.0002990309,0.0024349575,0.00026267365,0.000040150535,0.0012475688,0.019373918,0.000038618884,0.9470249,0.005783923,0.0005375659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039817867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002318812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19784445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028834696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036861748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416643054","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2025.107396","title":"The Condorcet dimension of metric spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Metric space; Dimension (graph theory); Norm (philosophy); Cardinality (data modeling); Metric (unit)","score_opus":0.061380198620925516,"score_gpt":0.3275535329859491,"score_spread":0.26617333436502355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416643054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439565,0.0042899875,0.007338629,0.019500589,0.00056318514,0.00045708191,0.000032232285,0.000027143424,0.023834642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360055,0.00013494538,0.000105555664,0.00014686502,0.000035901692,0.00003616138,0.000004654558,0.000005439706,0.0059299436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906164,0.00016970806,0.00031859046,0.00017757587,0.000061331775,0.0002111655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883753,0.0007369356,0.0000239114,0.00030700196,0.00007075065,0.00002388016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003415047,0.000052227915,0.00013712535,0.0005100801,0.000532946,0.0002532195,0.00024935527,0.000032210464,0.000069848254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007804548,0.000041955576,0.00004746345,0.0010356747,0.00019955664,0.00012917782,0.000053046897,0.00017768567,0.00012961663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007622166,0.000017492419,0.001626178,0.000026853531,0.00004569843,9.3614346e-7,0.00022895126,0.0025574183,0.0045357803,0.9803051,0.010099156,0.0005488231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013183668,0.00022049925,0.01523972,0.00033714587,0.000011789144,0.000005092139,0.0019539092,0.10028348,0.01368473,0.015368626,0.8510869,0.0004897323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043525704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042915646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96493644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005614967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003402862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40990436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417030628","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09956-7","title":"Majority Stability of Coalition Structures Under Decentralized Preferences of Autonomous Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Disjoint sets; Outcome (game theory); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.047863454554541315,"score_gpt":0.27250822118067136,"score_spread":0.22464476662613003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417030628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604896,0.00078680116,0.036795676,0.000030965726,0.00037399595,0.0001780671,0.00006725452,0.000013166591,0.0012644902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992023,0.00010890723,0.0005983391,0.000027007567,0.000008987919,0.0000035618787,0.000019003899,0.0000032737944,0.000028579683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989374,0.000059473274,0.00064698694,0.0002174927,0.000044579512,0.000094052935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991984,0.00019224023,0.0003593826,0.00018243857,0.00003996287,0.000027596378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007292957,0.00008058799,0.00029918444,0.00014161861,0.000051030118,0.000020747424,0.00009183989,0.00009055543,0.00021151494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018065027,0.00007999206,0.000056283596,0.00016873764,0.000054323362,0.0001229121,0.0000326161,0.000050806026,0.000003384627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001499301,0.00009896652,0.21099187,0.00011937969,0.000031223604,6.752651e-8,0.00044559306,0.000041151856,0.00043975178,0.7784998,0.000084883344,0.009097413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005865353,0.000040809307,0.5657873,0.000038534592,0.0000069931593,2.7300976e-7,0.00016640426,0.0008165445,0.0016712494,0.43048072,0.00034472492,0.00005990627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019072044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004218408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35479543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034874596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011184705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32619816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417313618","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102989","title":"Allocating water resources in transboundary river basins: A sequential rubinstein bargaining approach with risk discounting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Mekong river; Discounting; Water resources; Resource allocation; Bankruptcy; Drainage basin","score_opus":0.0374517423262861,"score_gpt":0.2475202213922029,"score_spread":0.2100684790659168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417313618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835716,0.008986278,0.0017681239,0.0010437306,0.0002052605,0.00009699128,0.0000052415044,0.000009543553,0.004313248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820995,0.00026372215,0.0008279622,0.00024117918,0.00017996383,0.000008347976,0.0000013687217,0.000013121051,0.00025441038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982488,0.00015981011,0.00095562777,0.00025593644,0.00006500106,0.00031478284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989285,0.00019900943,0.00065993454,0.00011414821,0.00006911727,0.000029310579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002686839,0.0001747185,0.0007386207,0.00043682574,0.00028466477,0.000037480077,0.00022315852,0.00009061515,0.000006689848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012645367,0.000124371,0.0001365901,0.00018927522,0.00042868563,0.00022056416,0.00005686857,0.00045553024,0.0000064363026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011751611,0.00032593854,0.8412318,0.00027266337,0.0029653935,0.00014841864,0.06856752,0.018749734,0.00019730431,0.06547488,0.0002793851,0.0006117514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02540072,0.0033746888,0.17148794,0.0041255504,0.0008001815,0.0024614201,0.055384066,0.017424315,0.00065499765,0.5893114,0.12676555,0.0028091464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009872103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059556965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6697439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024699157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5071702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417324916","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5910504","title":"Robust Median Voter Rules","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Commit; Cardinal voting systems; Compromise; Anti-plurality voting; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Bullet voting; Complete information","score_opus":0.03154316889420647,"score_gpt":0.22329006768983567,"score_spread":0.1917468987956292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417324916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31495553,0.098044105,0.28931826,0.01866706,0.025286185,0.0015973576,0.0011913009,0.00048698302,0.2504532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571027,0.0053984704,0.0003628303,0.00017476395,0.0015931694,0.000021468586,0.00004011305,0.000045939985,0.035260532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605113,0.00009237835,0.0010346209,0.00054908835,0.000066571876,0.0022062126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983272,0.000070524715,0.0009227901,0.0005142709,0.000057417026,0.00010779108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050837584,0.00034795314,0.000766533,0.000504884,0.00020573802,0.00021456133,0.00089897274,0.0004605929,0.00019157665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017712516,0.00038039766,0.00042625522,0.000121992554,0.000057093115,0.000107670916,0.0002796366,0.0052917935,0.00063759467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018803945,0.000043297372,0.0034200326,0.0000773554,0.00042091424,0.0000036706347,0.00023284512,0.0006479089,8.129322e-7,0.9926755,0.0005007745,0.0019580985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003492293,0.000055561395,0.000304548,0.0001687102,0.000025257074,0.000088282206,0.00024670974,0.00055386435,0.0000049298087,0.9875937,0.010231628,0.0003775734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026801424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004079117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6421472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012968865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012009306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57159709","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7873","title":"Complexity of and Algorithms for Borda Manipulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Bin packing problem; Approximation algorithm; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Bin","score_opus":0.41443430081306726,"score_gpt":0.31196339613060653,"score_spread":0.10247090468246073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57159709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517703,0.00006788433,0.012769478,0.00034178235,0.00035916409,0.00064218644,0.00007162474,0.00002594581,0.03395161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979008,0.000012480547,0.001850357,0.000022073298,0.00003349576,0.000015600343,6.3387336e-7,0.000008793417,0.0001557717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989894,0.0000047532135,0.00059227296,0.00023100509,0.00004029195,0.00014224504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901754,0.00004231502,0.0006253756,0.000109335306,0.00017404287,0.000031411553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007509189,0.0001020573,0.00028147842,0.00008162884,0.00007778143,0.000024065392,0.00030674352,0.000058160098,0.000083689854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025882456,0.00009064114,0.000073754054,0.00013403852,0.00030060488,0.00011613061,0.00005509976,0.00007568058,0.00001735353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006990207,0.00006142333,0.003307982,0.00008765963,0.000012140749,1.3936735e-8,0.001398365,0.000001806642,0.0011747597,0.990598,0.000010514319,0.0032774147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030704574,0.00016683842,0.003582401,0.00008322438,0.0000058260703,9.120742e-7,0.0004950122,0.01372156,0.09339381,0.888364,0.000051604842,0.00010408245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001442006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071826653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012155656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075457983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36962384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607142973","doi":"","title":"Cognition and the voter calculus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Sage eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Calculus (dental); Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Neuroscience; Medicine","score_opus":0.02254293810728602,"score_gpt":0.18291779043723508,"score_spread":0.16037485232994905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607142973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041525258,0.003307014,0.00044108467,0.0000806705,0.00050664326,0.0004014761,0.0001455543,0.00004328611,0.994659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13315979,0.0001090064,0.000010948175,0.0003391052,0.00046158396,0.000031448442,0.000021176858,0.00003857898,0.8658284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989842,0.000038667346,0.00044745582,0.00031371549,0.000030359437,0.00018557467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914,0.00013052796,0.00037089482,0.00029995668,0.000013762869,0.000044819968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006607027,0.00019958419,0.0004892049,0.00009605238,0.0001694938,0.00005910919,0.00015200375,0.00024264793,0.00009707163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004277015,0.00016705361,0.00014810884,0.000011682486,0.00034762087,0.000025885758,0.000058793885,0.00032250956,0.00073387934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193632,0.0000047580156,0.000017037897,0.00007222544,0.00010203782,0.000016821044,0.001235063,2.3184354e-7,0.0000010065227,0.9913441,0.0045466293,0.0026181769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352301,0.000029463421,0.000049958002,0.0001666157,0.00002942774,0.00006395581,0.000019345647,0.000059714475,0.000011791925,0.44771022,0.5501788,0.0003284139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031036412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009050163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5456322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041432268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002538704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94327784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64006730","doi":"","title":"Approximating Games and Economies by Markets","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Closeness; Combinatorics; Economics; Economy; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.018439324355970975,"score_gpt":0.1932771938395245,"score_spread":0.1748378694835535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64006730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6806615,0.0014227725,0.002044665,0.00029131517,0.00011676587,0.00007879797,0.0000144004525,0.000054380107,0.31531537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97804254,0.0001136626,0.00055252865,0.00018044775,0.00005241489,0.000009794978,0.0000031993718,0.000011919821,0.02103351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992012,0.000012929486,0.00036626108,0.00023375251,0.000007652067,0.00017825315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957794,0.00007211998,0.00015437108,0.00014133507,0.000004930098,0.000049318944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070232234,0.00009085676,0.00023075899,0.00006179143,0.00007325517,0.00008291396,0.000082370374,0.00004852584,0.0007301293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006933527,0.00009753575,0.000031979478,0.00005224353,0.00003950655,0.00015982594,0.000031599302,0.000053536314,0.00033724675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017100514,0.00003976838,0.25362477,0.000050765633,0.000043695713,0.000001745426,0.00050002337,0.000004228271,0.000049771184,0.7322229,0.0076644495,0.005780749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017084909,0.00011974628,0.038789257,0.00006445519,0.0000086724085,0.000120098506,0.001662585,0.01581241,0.0005077804,0.26579684,0.6742511,0.0011585582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006179635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003936446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66658664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015607884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017840636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7994404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W68565015","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-93952-8_1","title":"Matchings and Perfect Matchings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0226192933945131,"score_gpt":0.18919063553704993,"score_spread":0.16657134214253683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W68565015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00307434,0.0024962241,0.00022672405,0.00033744678,0.00030363133,0.00019882502,0.000058788602,0.00012446797,0.99317956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11546266,0.00025920474,0.00024269291,0.00057905965,0.00023947483,0.0000027605165,0.000014200114,0.000064090615,0.88313586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985301,0.0000062836893,0.0006298555,0.0005586509,0.000033955672,0.00024116838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990364,0.000063797655,0.0004448414,0.000344559,0.00001380227,0.000096652],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074712135,0.00034265034,0.00075027865,0.00022890436,0.000107407024,0.00012908716,0.00019803751,0.00034765128,0.0019406469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021564134,0.00037058568,0.00017055102,0.000016488517,0.000058075922,0.00011774555,0.000063211475,0.0003717129,0.0027771867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061953415,0.0000058641244,0.00013936608,0.000063745225,0.0000418166,0.0000056950503,0.00024614463,6.1872294e-7,0.000002688225,0.99527013,0.0015257099,0.0026920522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014417156,0.000056123372,0.00014682005,0.00009424137,0.0000082045035,0.00003314827,0.000008542779,0.000022475388,0.0000034227362,0.6156943,0.38341737,0.00037118208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099702906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006959611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38189164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048449696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075540243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6905091009","doi":"10.15126/900770","title":"Voting with Interdependent Values: The Condorcet Winner","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Interdependence; Voting; Complete information; Approval voting; Private information retrieval; Mechanism design","score_opus":0.025111190032821192,"score_gpt":0.21750951863416979,"score_spread":0.1923983286013486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6905091009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31870165,0.0023248226,0.039131135,0.0018624872,0.0015447804,0.0002829075,0.000025733032,0.00034445876,0.63578206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729434,0.0000031926402,0.000080306716,0.00027148638,0.00023336952,0.000009995969,0.0000022070797,0.000022225877,0.026433807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920416,0.00003230781,0.00030024708,0.00025769148,0.000025450066,0.00018016713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995681,0.00011802115,0.00006684827,0.00020696089,0.000009506261,0.00003054206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014119116,0.000100798025,0.00016088269,0.00007142361,0.000091886286,0.0002353566,0.00020181948,0.000029885588,0.0007743063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030664305,0.00006173186,0.00006422628,0.00013589776,0.000054074335,0.00011726908,0.000044356857,0.00015218824,0.0025700424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048169277,0.000008589643,0.0035693322,0.000037459315,0.000068856534,0.000009045352,0.0014266652,0.00008400568,0.00000853058,0.99244,0.0018947598,0.00044797314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018047119,0.00064107234,0.00933896,0.0011252563,0.000072867755,0.0004994345,0.010382973,0.08594371,0.00093658845,0.25808826,0.62929714,0.00186905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083197876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017148557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7343517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000307013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064924907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906450821","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/9envp","title":"Intergroup Contact and Processes Underlying Performance on Implicit Measures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Interval (graph theory); Control (management)","score_opus":0.08866053886389925,"score_gpt":0.3141106811747072,"score_spread":0.22545014231080795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906450821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015843883,0.0008082709,0.0017980487,0.00014259231,0.0012663362,0.0006181545,0.000036754784,0.000078837,0.97940713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8445587,0.00018601301,0.0009630259,0.00030203772,0.000263867,0.000043382694,0.000001852674,0.00013410328,0.15354699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981552,0.000019492749,0.00038299174,0.0009075518,0.0001042627,0.0004305336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842256,0.00011502266,0.0005739181,0.0007178756,0.00004282122,0.00012778892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020442412,0.0002708775,0.0005575565,0.00039267767,0.0003415714,0.0009756549,0.0020435026,0.00026209146,0.0012876643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070014864,0.00025776052,0.000032679432,0.00066189293,0.0004578018,0.00036184688,0.0004171611,0.00028665346,0.0018272618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008010525,0.00013149157,0.051824965,0.0007030505,0.00010218113,0.0000040663876,0.0018495334,0.0000045677025,0.000043411503,0.87797314,0.057851437,0.009432063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003831224,0.00069821114,0.007554536,0.005763001,0.000011095374,0.00001705976,0.00030971188,0.00013048247,0.00013158227,0.055441685,0.92843145,0.0011280694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025806957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045058518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008283704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923763398","doi":"10.14288/1.0132995","title":"Blisterine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Musical; Human life; Quality (philosophy); Human being","score_opus":0.07208231327651532,"score_gpt":0.26118736687766536,"score_spread":0.18910505360115004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923763398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.5790575e-7,0.0005964485,0.00017960614,0.0000505825,0.0015207463,0.0004277281,0.0009216181,0.00010066625,0.99620223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000071718176,0.00002660736,0.00023318864,0.000054270637,0.0003772367,0.000090038855,0.000053987293,0.00022077147,0.99887216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992325,0.000020757127,0.00028069297,0.00029936075,0.000017641492,0.00014909892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992227,0.00001198921,0.00029491112,0.00038245402,0.00001604594,0.000071931056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041322224,0.00013564785,0.00041166303,0.00017660113,0.00029620918,0.00078835164,0.0004195574,0.00015781568,0.032477565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006213046,0.00016175516,0.000050152823,0.00055548246,0.00002773673,0.000054978915,0.00015164154,0.00011761963,0.0028707352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034022992,0.000033719916,0.0000102671565,0.000013668793,0.0000492262,0.0000013294293,0.000026814258,0.0000013277262,6.387114e-8,0.013319105,0.9865277,0.000013408175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002906379,0.000033963373,0.0000019835484,0.00004314748,0.000004759272,0.000008893242,0.000023221244,0.000016069525,3.3484102e-7,0.014612198,0.9847736,0.00019118743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018075053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003334081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02960683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007316476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004330163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930409904","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12310400","title":"artificial intelligence and the future of power pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applications of artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Energy (signal processing); Expert system; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.037306799211496086,"score_gpt":0.2244362061206172,"score_spread":0.1871294069091211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930409904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006880519,0.0048887995,0.0015326965,0.00055454497,0.00047073752,0.00029751033,0.00035109604,0.0001861626,0.9916496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27545983,0.0010408362,0.00009996017,0.000116015515,0.0011478062,9.857539e-8,0.00026730236,0.006206013,0.7156621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901545,0.000110534835,0.00034893234,0.0003149264,0.000053718413,0.00015646296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992952,0.000017552211,0.00025121606,0.00034431927,0.000045767058,0.000045994224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011958468,0.00012031073,0.00026247776,0.00025384955,0.00023426152,0.0003037672,0.000530768,0.00011132285,0.056831893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001733568,0.00010476615,0.00006373634,0.00025759172,0.00028822297,0.00003495813,0.0004028979,0.00024568243,0.056849204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002183581,0.000016992475,3.6088932e-7,0.00012527381,0.00005241846,0.0000015224565,0.00074097654,0.0000011153991,0.000003190801,0.6705331,0.3216119,0.0068912874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000616598,0.00004513646,0.0000044526787,0.000073591946,0.0000072325215,0.000017228249,0.0003231056,0.000051800747,0.000008899626,0.034874775,0.96442676,0.000105357256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022498425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.2840556e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6428149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002313102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.099476e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9440303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931128389","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4993890","title":"NLPModelsIpopt.jl","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.06741478477458283,"score_gpt":0.22808243478644336,"score_spread":0.1606676500118605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931128389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008527435,0.0023519336,0.003789413,0.00016545669,0.0004020607,0.00027373637,0.00075354433,0.0007954182,0.99138314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036416035,0.00039971457,0.00028828764,0.0001626432,0.000849967,7.032825e-8,0.0036820658,0.01207902,0.94612217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840707,0.0001500706,0.00039434078,0.0006153327,0.00007988082,0.00035330793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872166,0.000012071996,0.00035492488,0.00069005834,0.00009113286,0.00013014712],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008291605,0.00020532998,0.00038818855,0.00041728796,0.0006378079,0.0005734674,0.0009147992,0.00020630601,0.17265914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033631801,0.00026031618,0.00010966469,0.00036632322,0.00009794872,0.00006300331,0.0006385228,0.00031323155,0.044609576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005845086,0.000063320345,0.0000028710497,0.00016302113,0.00008395493,0.000010633875,0.00025428578,0.000008664455,0.000024665726,0.21433721,0.7813342,0.0037112935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025187532,0.0000461837,0.000023575107,0.00012053321,0.000005512984,0.00004375343,0.00006502558,0.000113330956,0.000011333267,0.0017082737,0.9973338,0.00027677065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070143404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.964421e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010668206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019402037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931189902","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4155219","title":"[[Vedere]] » Monster Hunter (2020) film completo streaming ita hd ghr","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Live streaming; Sphinx; Clearance","score_opus":0.06755678543650698,"score_gpt":0.22516756244935673,"score_spread":0.15761077701284976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931189902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18912287,0.0016953246,0.012912138,0.013511587,0.0011364311,0.0018545825,0.0042302622,0.0016617429,0.77387506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904015,0.00014229462,0.00012004925,0.00089679455,0.0007556908,6.314683e-8,0.0010226358,0.0017307117,0.0049302257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664354,0.0004051224,0.0009925603,0.001032598,0.00017637026,0.0007497991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979775,0.0000698209,0.0005219799,0.0007064438,0.00026412186,0.0004601552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012583353,0.00035149982,0.0005991252,0.00023800491,0.002069884,0.0018457196,0.0015667672,0.00017849321,0.04898815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010076584,0.0004509809,0.00019296193,0.00071873557,0.00022160445,0.00045535457,0.0016100977,0.0006121419,0.079393566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044276472,0.0006217876,0.0008302057,0.0011915073,0.000712331,0.00014052844,0.023253584,0.0010418053,0.0014251712,0.1775745,0.757513,0.035252806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009105032,0.0004177732,0.0015066761,0.00010723389,0.000023305234,0.000062722924,0.0017210966,0.008082314,0.00006550226,0.00049361686,0.9861027,0.00050653005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044772205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.1473547e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80127865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019069073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045170095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931713009","doi":"10.5683/sp3/okuszl","title":"DQ52 [Decima Quarterly 52 December 1992]","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Occupational Cancer Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Survey sampling; Survey research; Survey methodology","score_opus":0.03671766824880663,"score_gpt":0.24385334621715007,"score_spread":0.20713567796834345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931713009","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011746311,0.0008225189,0.00005229316,0.00010057931,0.0010700367,0.00033027292,0.98178536,0.00004840913,0.01567306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009834544,0.000106630825,0.000042298878,0.00032572256,0.00071093783,0.00004444394,0.99587154,0.000057017995,0.0018579528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976017,0.00006693087,0.0010021758,0.00075161643,0.00007519959,0.0005023687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971923,0.00018825723,0.0008563432,0.0015995365,0.000030074032,0.00013348753],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010268366,0.0004203478,0.0010175155,0.00032615222,0.000090288086,0.00018311366,0.0007873467,0.00055901404,0.001107804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015259812,0.00046845403,0.00030651488,0.00016246729,0.0000627993,0.00014519038,0.00006167857,0.0004201297,0.007505963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016630196,0.000059833503,0.00016073018,0.00016480716,0.00009980668,0.000013421559,0.00010269082,0.0000034906923,2.5741548e-7,0.009259401,0.9899826,0.00013635025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003630457,0.00013974473,0.00044510287,0.00008201229,0.00002402988,0.000016377724,0.000036596364,0.000019186393,0.0000010689199,0.0086897155,0.9896306,0.0005525164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04548219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068442207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038637966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104155704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034151682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6938893488","doi":"10.60692/pctck-64410","title":"Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation in Fuzzy Setting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Social choice theory; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification","score_opus":0.034850704417990166,"score_gpt":0.19518130383954183,"score_spread":0.16033059942155165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6938893488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97612745,0.000088687826,0.002931811,0.00004142116,0.0005262712,0.00022867596,0.00003258648,0.00006884431,0.019954259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995337,3.8972607e-7,0.00016122917,0.00006673757,0.00010099229,0.000031980624,0.000007240529,0.000007358023,0.00009034443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881744,0.00003191131,0.00075484655,0.0001020156,0.00003923004,0.00025453928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930954,0.000009016901,0.00044665052,0.00015504737,0.000016886552,0.00006284084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016755818,0.00010862549,0.00021568457,0.00031871765,0.00008929843,0.000099675155,0.000063966814,0.00007274003,0.000011872786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031326555,0.000113961156,0.000030573246,0.00014695135,0.0000119598535,0.0010284432,0.000033142107,0.00007200317,0.0007998211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006667677,0.0000015921628,0.8711816,0.00022933692,0.0000107004025,1.9480926e-7,0.080729894,0.00006046039,4.5411622e-7,0.047297426,0.000011809798,0.00046986694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023736055,0.000048532354,0.9394826,0.00076568755,0.000012495069,0.00007374486,0.042293265,0.009467699,0.00029926313,0.00026276766,0.004166899,0.00075342046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020717205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5524023e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06830102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011305796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033139838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6942333059","doi":"10.14288/1.0371416","title":"Entrance to Stanley Park, Vancouver, B.C.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Exposition (narrative); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.030021125170037112,"score_gpt":0.24063156285899825,"score_spread":0.21061043768896115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6942333059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002486643,0.00026882553,0.0028778836,0.000036748603,0.004829038,0.0009957477,0.0007133852,0.000108123524,0.99016774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00026470196,0.000052955947,0.0009744642,0.00017370109,0.00066026434,0.00023782665,0.000010538803,0.00025879455,0.9973667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998663,0.000033014127,0.00041466762,0.0005555386,0.000032109074,0.0003016785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890864,0.00003397405,0.0003415177,0.0005637557,0.000025055331,0.00012706725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044354782,0.00021754386,0.00054625963,0.0002337399,0.0006088923,0.00060507306,0.0006649425,0.00020477726,0.038974922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092513066,0.00026601067,0.00009185807,0.0008290297,0.000042408443,0.00007005516,0.00014143987,0.00012088527,0.0054942863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229927,0.00005508422,0.000048989303,0.000020286438,0.0000824996,0.0000012296592,0.00006979995,0.0000046819546,2.9800685e-7,0.009894556,0.9897684,0.000041918465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028887094,0.00008748857,0.000007534447,0.00012864894,0.0000071705804,0.0000019941522,0.000043176962,0.00001594381,0.000005293522,0.006269562,0.9928187,0.00032561418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019152256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03634846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033480637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013132482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004817335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976942364","doi":"10.60692/9g7vs-n5y13","title":"Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation in Fuzzy Setting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Social choice theory; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification","score_opus":0.034850704417990166,"score_gpt":0.19518130383954183,"score_spread":0.16033059942155165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976942364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97612745,0.000088687826,0.002931811,0.00004142116,0.0005262712,0.00022867596,0.00003258648,0.00006884431,0.019954259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995337,3.8972607e-7,0.00016122917,0.00006673757,0.00010099229,0.000031980624,0.000007240529,0.000007358023,0.00009034443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881744,0.00003191131,0.00075484655,0.0001020156,0.00003923004,0.00025453928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930954,0.000009016901,0.00044665052,0.00015504737,0.000016886552,0.00006284084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016755818,0.00010862549,0.00021568457,0.00031871765,0.00008929843,0.000099675155,0.000063966814,0.00007274003,0.000011872786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031326555,0.000113961156,0.000030573246,0.00014695135,0.0000119598535,0.0010284432,0.000033142107,0.00007200317,0.0007998211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006667677,0.0000015921628,0.8711816,0.00022933692,0.0000107004025,1.9480926e-7,0.080729894,0.00006046039,4.5411622e-7,0.047297426,0.000011809798,0.00046986694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023736055,0.000048532354,0.9394826,0.00076568755,0.000012495069,0.00007374486,0.042293265,0.009467699,0.00029926313,0.00026276766,0.004166899,0.00075342046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020717205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5524023e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06830102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011305796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033139838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993093537","doi":"","title":"Musings on matchings, matrices, and multiplicities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Regina","keywords":"Degree (music); Calculus (dental); Field (mathematics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.014020481648978244,"score_gpt":0.19290417364747658,"score_spread":0.17888369199849835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993093537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9140701,0.00416723,0.00007991491,0.057541553,0.0008737505,0.000191441,0.00012880393,0.00008675492,0.022860441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2988755,0.0009882835,0.00040350622,0.000023182178,0.00009049971,4.6185548e-7,0.00009282941,0.000049023205,0.6994767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993431,0.000015731443,0.00003153214,0.00039326088,0.00004731855,0.00016906629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999194,0.000054950746,0.00045274314,0.00021534167,0.000028027453,0.000054907014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030192782,0.00018763218,0.00047128744,0.0004668475,0.00013445668,0.000049317823,0.00020007632,0.000240515,0.000016096279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022511902,0.00026273725,0.00012850759,0.00016537281,0.00006247853,0.00012415875,0.00003342877,0.00026490283,0.00030721468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015821343,0.000030214094,0.00078684755,0.002580144,0.00023458172,0.00005522326,0.013664161,0.000024402694,0.000056853627,0.7733048,0.20768896,0.0014156074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003074526,0.00009530997,0.0009075444,0.0008799739,0.000052738993,0.0000061777982,0.02294097,0.0002739085,0.000016709202,0.0026390916,0.9715256,0.00035449417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015803505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019906356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7706657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006518729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017937316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001968792","doi":"","title":")))))Long time service 18009350647 microsoft-Office-Support-Phone-Number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsoft Office Live Meeting; Phone; Microsoft Office; Microsoft Visual Studio; Visual Basic for Applications; Microsoft excel","score_opus":0.01660994686992205,"score_gpt":0.2338855039540283,"score_spread":0.21727555708410623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001968792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017768171,0.000013965992,0.0012005627,0.00025953748,0.0016746138,0.001106894,0.00063025625,0.00059520936,0.9927421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066076736,0.00012978949,0.00040646817,0.0005064249,0.0007594512,0.0001970409,0.00013207966,0.00082459074,0.9904365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931929,0.00035345188,0.0016304848,0.0036382414,0.00017705692,0.0010078751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183214,0.00035425668,0.001934358,0.0053958334,0.000098166915,0.0003852389],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005566365,0.0008874609,0.0016028641,0.00047007832,0.00018040268,0.00027291485,0.002294244,0.0011225725,0.9637964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082369545,0.0010139663,0.00051583356,0.00031822728,0.00019680381,0.00024892486,0.001407928,0.00072695763,0.99774796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010163533,0.00030567526,0.015576624,0.0006214648,0.00066969474,0.000054486387,0.0006709756,0.000012626301,0.0002592241,0.010726202,0.9692321,0.0017693137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009366556,8.6524216e-7,0.0013199527,0.0004645484,0.000051471114,0.0000888801,0.000018758454,0.000034153338,0.00027646683,0.0053386902,0.990285,0.0011845686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008441794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014079837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033951562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033477103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120787314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002249636","doi":"","title":"Mission NewEnergy Reports Unaudited First Quarter Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Results","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Fiscal year; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Revenue","score_opus":0.0248643767811776,"score_gpt":0.2011972447798544,"score_spread":0.1763328679986768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002249636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014075373,0.0009743449,0.00054936256,0.00020406503,0.0032597051,0.0002322191,0.00023885886,0.00025308548,0.9941476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02011132,0.000078494944,0.0002780382,0.00011229207,0.0014533878,0.00001102662,0.00015397559,0.00027183356,0.97752964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761945,0.00003261927,0.0010869821,0.00080281275,0.00005137914,0.00040678386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976176,0.00003609699,0.0013035133,0.00087524694,0.000015092145,0.00015247734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069168356,0.00036081325,0.00074024114,0.00042344307,0.000076336386,0.00004689179,0.00024696172,0.0007441677,0.01870138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002099262,0.00035963824,0.00021983864,0.0001693366,0.00005535333,0.00008573222,0.000065947876,0.00023826465,0.0057041002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041195533,0.00006284866,0.0006413283,0.000053422766,0.000035386583,0.00003523648,0.00012477917,0.000001913668,4.5092608e-7,0.044838883,0.95409703,0.00006749824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044916917,0.000070912974,0.00088701595,0.0001999692,0.000008027572,0.000018956445,0.000012075291,0.000016524345,0.000007611149,0.0066543818,0.991192,0.00048339312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019299702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006905603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0381845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004588739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022399734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008125469","doi":"","title":"Andrews Scores in Preeminent Math Competition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.032881888489809316,"score_gpt":0.1724516270736445,"score_spread":0.1395697385838352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008125469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77586174,0.00016251265,0.0028292951,0.000939831,0.00015975477,0.00038726587,0.00077258114,0.00018307444,0.21870394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444723,0.0001043354,0.000054937438,0.00012384223,0.00006726116,2.127438e-7,0.00013600278,0.000023462148,0.0050427434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983202,0.00007945891,0.00039728725,0.0006625844,0.00008571669,0.00045475742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885195,0.000105275125,0.00033134452,0.00035175774,0.000045209814,0.0003144582],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021174204,0.00030482045,0.0006396527,0.0007010211,0.00026586393,0.00015409994,0.00071481324,0.00020201906,0.00013781084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006624292,0.00041737102,0.0002458094,0.0011456376,0.0002004219,0.001308131,0.00034357145,0.0003924594,0.0005819349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048189927,0.00031255186,0.22065455,0.000103384635,0.00008885959,0.00044012108,0.002276842,0.0002096942,0.000042778818,0.7737646,0.0011929519,0.0004317738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074529373,0.0007146608,0.022865288,0.00028562546,0.000056055036,0.0000383919,0.007369942,0.0038955107,0.00011473183,0.0041518616,0.95138943,0.0016655735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027342062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021917373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95019644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026681705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041923355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009775764","doi":"","title":"An Extension of classical contract net protocol","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.0546836024356591,"score_gpt":0.2584316092550572,"score_spread":0.20374800681939811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009775764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50574243,0.000048663933,0.0014379713,0.00057832355,0.00037470562,0.022775298,0.00006556493,0.00011765262,0.46885937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958799,9.648804e-7,0.00034210688,0.00005568041,0.00010790978,0.0022162416,0.000001311982,0.000011762813,0.0013841485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999179,0.000031472322,0.00040381632,0.00020703768,0.000024958314,0.00015371815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993519,0.000039233466,0.00022831495,0.00029987504,0.000019481726,0.00006117201],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047069578,0.00007535766,0.0002696375,0.00006115072,0.000036036414,0.000019321391,0.00013295058,0.00007389106,0.0027172058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067104396,0.00007628543,0.000057498175,0.00007485163,0.00004666951,0.00011210237,0.000011650086,0.000089768866,0.00047337072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056024066,0.0004907858,0.017606465,0.000068627014,0.000017852575,0.0000054226234,0.00044317043,0.00002621572,0.0074980897,0.9645669,0.003142779,0.0060776863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004923112,0.0017864872,0.067014985,0.00016881063,0.000011964634,0.00004085466,0.00010668817,0.14319466,0.006108608,0.4314709,0.34425226,0.0009206582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000839577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011510618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53309596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000142667595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002341943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99819446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024973828","doi":"","title":"TSMC Expects Another Weak Quarter as Smartphone Woes Persist","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); The Internet","score_opus":0.020056978885237838,"score_gpt":0.2018708600265335,"score_spread":0.18181388114129568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024973828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033944502,0.0038472703,0.00040997102,0.00024439747,0.0022092739,0.0003538261,0.00009632425,0.00024401609,0.99225545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07223989,0.000051503343,0.00008885618,0.00030969255,0.0006836799,0.00002425129,0.000018767645,0.0004499923,0.9261334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837905,0.00003349193,0.00048806603,0.00066866877,0.000046185913,0.000384558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.00004453789,0.00051907,0.00078635087,0.000010342864,0.000068599365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035575588,0.00036765655,0.0008208166,0.00042643215,0.0000437456,0.00009760351,0.0003641369,0.0004463418,0.05784786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002283589,0.00037021705,0.00026332194,0.0001295343,0.0000635068,0.00006124787,0.000045175824,0.00019409218,0.097583756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086444425,0.00004962825,0.0015251507,0.000098891374,0.0001470878,0.000002249712,0.0003631613,7.3516566e-7,0.0000054961097,0.2478081,0.74991983,0.000071034956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046020868,0.00007232466,0.00013647192,0.000120389326,0.000008207861,0.0000060129405,0.0005613036,0.0000124410235,0.000017841656,0.0015830818,0.9964859,0.0005358427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013392871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011640127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24656604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060272254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017422404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027737276","doi":"","title":"Compensation schemes in collective decision making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Solidarity; Compensation (psychology); Path (computing); Scheme (mathematics); Group decision-making; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.00975603146382008,"score_gpt":0.2443103239053514,"score_spread":0.2345542924415313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027737276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73636967,0.0004870565,0.0023096222,0.00003001635,0.00025121382,0.00035633854,0.00014766015,0.000080700775,0.2599677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665951,0.00006328339,0.0010067447,0.00006480051,0.00006080494,0.000021524573,0.00052317895,0.00008294574,0.031581584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767953,0.00011672296,0.0006058158,0.00072908186,0.00013854566,0.00073033187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982873,0.0005030521,0.0006345442,0.00034632563,0.00006689261,0.000161895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088704337,0.0004391599,0.0007169425,0.0011701107,0.0002497583,0.00070893375,0.0005836055,0.00060355413,0.00042606564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030602617,0.0006345782,0.00026692162,0.000782253,0.00007797027,0.0011227241,0.000097294935,0.0005544118,0.00035055735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019608457,0.00078336545,0.39631948,0.0005149788,0.0007520508,0.0014050691,0.024205906,0.0011124149,0.000113985865,0.5469323,0.0030096392,0.02289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035746563,0.00022088291,0.35076725,0.0015237315,0.000074053685,0.0001462913,0.011564936,0.0052868477,0.00006475815,0.59927285,0.025805805,0.0016979508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011261471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000858732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23022546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027682264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021091766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043295445","doi":"","title":"A revelation mechanism for shared conditional preferences in multi-attribute negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Research and Productivity Council","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Incentive; Space (punctuation); Set (abstract data type); Protocol (science); Mechanism (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Strategic dominance","score_opus":0.07308032033529419,"score_gpt":0.25992779637292174,"score_spread":0.18684747603762755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043295445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832051,0.000012135537,0.11139176,0.00044884,0.0007240912,0.0004872576,0.0006436996,0.000039664214,0.0030474379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927034,0.0000016345231,0.006144972,0.00006102971,0.00008624662,0.000105986954,0.00019273587,0.000008281581,0.0006957321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992962,0.0000130723465,0.00033510508,0.0001999546,0.00002039516,0.00013525876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954164,0.000085208936,0.00020068503,0.00010485652,0.00004019948,0.000027426193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063467945,0.00006821038,0.00015491563,0.00011768121,0.00006004906,0.000037483525,0.00009405189,0.00009985795,0.00051515084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034093656,0.000079818135,0.000041737436,0.000083394356,0.000014178454,0.00018965533,0.000010422001,0.00010815284,0.00014458408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007047841,0.00003676855,0.021459071,0.000017995646,0.000006606373,1.3373014e-7,0.0002877419,0.000014950495,0.0042494223,0.97368634,0.00016050658,0.00007342923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008464787,0.000033650053,0.08089173,0.000014475779,0.0000019553322,0.0000014311188,0.000041002993,0.01315434,0.0010062752,0.90293354,0.0009401353,0.00013499915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021003967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010059807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10949826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023667892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011139664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.564054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046102925","doi":"","title":"COMMENTARY ON âAPPROACHING LOGOS AMONG REASON, RATIONALITY AND REASONABLEâ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Logos Bible Software; Order (exchange); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.02842979670538642,"score_gpt":0.19341987512694117,"score_spread":0.16499007842155475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046102925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98659277,0.0001730204,0.0005136693,0.0035818478,0.00015505031,0.00020905903,0.00019833496,0.00004735327,0.008528877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571633,0.000029195055,0.00026742552,0.00030399696,0.00008491444,6.8332065e-7,0.000019340581,0.000017739181,0.0035603617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998655,0.00017113124,0.00029005003,0.0005081533,0.00009212415,0.0002835481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987248,0.00023905055,0.00041813802,0.0004200118,0.000041168263,0.00015680637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002029247,0.00017797959,0.00038728653,0.00020140318,0.00043587387,0.00003159557,0.00033890686,0.00017101718,0.0004516196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019680079,0.00019145562,0.000123332,0.00016097097,0.00028242407,0.0007421833,0.00017311504,0.0002197707,0.00022219353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023621858,0.00009609681,0.9269709,0.000045416215,0.00008670709,0.000008189921,0.00077639776,0.000007847781,0.00019789589,0.06975657,0.001152722,0.00066502916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018867311,0.00013984906,0.96175224,0.00022098108,0.000019826472,0.000008470832,0.0004615156,0.0000720845,0.00033602258,0.023955971,0.010762519,0.00038381762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025916458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008451457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045800596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015413173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011546546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78073335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097576705","doi":"","title":"Evaluating search and matching models using experimental data”, mimeo","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Earnings; Randomized experiment; Measure (data warehouse); Test (biology); Quasi-experiment; Constant (computer programming); Corporation; Control (management)","score_opus":0.4532770094041289,"score_gpt":0.3997619628980919,"score_spread":0.053515046506037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097576705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966345,0.0018285373,0.021024933,0.00007146428,0.00009423817,0.000117935735,0.000026622414,0.000036791404,0.010454476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711706,0.000006027207,0.027814861,0.000091006434,0.00016899766,0.0000021148637,0.0000060177454,0.000017331806,0.00072304654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897754,0.000032135216,0.00036106573,0.00037658776,0.00003627327,0.00021636952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994497,0.000044139873,0.00007537491,0.00036557228,0.000008648562,0.000056599132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019287056,0.00009454046,0.00019875668,0.00008411742,0.00014889156,0.000107019434,0.00021010128,0.00004339245,0.00024725075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018197306,0.00010505822,0.000021829626,0.000061865474,0.000029198543,0.0006168938,0.000220782,0.00008878845,0.000112080175],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032665284,0.00016281834,0.0032466429,0.00006806172,0.00008401882,0.0000023111443,0.00865177,0.11555509,0.008222794,0.85855156,0.00008684138,0.005335446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029607912,0.000022416249,0.00004736863,0.00001739282,0.000002112188,0.00001436724,0.0007834554,0.98861635,0.00080416014,0.009096651,0.00014795004,0.00015170222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005424884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000836965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87306124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049441194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008597728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.428415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097644020","doi":"","title":"Power in Voting Games and Canadian Politics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Power (physics); Work (physics); Index (typography); Politics; Power index; Weighted voting; Cardinal voting systems","score_opus":0.01245023606593124,"score_gpt":0.18532375540237134,"score_spread":0.1728735193364401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097644020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66528666,0.00033088116,0.00007639527,0.00021654672,0.00009145304,0.000039746374,0.000013138478,0.000011670398,0.33393353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930649,0.0000016219935,0.00009518836,0.00017567248,0.00004792904,0.0000017720505,0.0000018203616,0.000007929022,0.006603157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934214,0.0000073738133,0.00025648353,0.00014374683,0.000006978137,0.00024330195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997803,0.000027207994,0.000049523293,0.00007683435,0.0000052282094,0.00006090445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035569633,0.00005854336,0.00013759534,0.000198079,0.000041586787,0.0000416229,0.000050235307,0.000047830938,0.0002135137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003675491,0.00006784687,0.000016837193,0.000083140985,0.000022044007,0.000059465554,0.000009379799,0.000054822136,0.00014486599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8313932e-7,0.0000036275765,0.3186082,0.0000032886567,0.0000010983875,0.0000017586767,0.00006722689,0.000011071015,0.0000010953083,0.68117243,0.00011910607,0.000010905032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045654335,0.000027427637,0.7644325,0.000027829752,9.584027e-7,0.000015359677,0.0003514067,0.0019301116,0.00004161025,0.17591406,0.05645361,0.00034860338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26821917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09702518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5052584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057378307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011641664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9194518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097890642","doi":"","title":"Categories","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Constant (computer programming); Degree (music); Social research; Social category","score_opus":0.06197279074637358,"score_gpt":0.18897014750828225,"score_spread":0.12699735676190868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097890642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07921834,0.0008770126,0.0016609555,0.00039915723,0.00035621502,0.000039131322,0.000005149414,0.000076150616,0.9173679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269572,0.0000121530275,0.000100632584,0.00013664627,0.00006831024,0.0000032262774,5.0543974e-7,0.0000055071296,0.07271581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959284,0.000004168911,0.00017794105,0.000111439185,0.000006594884,0.00010699594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997689,0.000015640997,0.000053143795,0.00013262607,0.000004336958,0.00002532269],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018248089,0.000042969954,0.00010795928,0.00004313212,0.000040725216,0.000026418256,0.00007554056,0.000026830096,0.0067793117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030698204,0.00004450409,0.00003160834,0.000069080335,0.000018502671,0.000070719085,0.0000100552115,0.00003344261,0.012663885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.343304e-7,0.000012041332,0.010887288,0.000003634805,0.0000048739666,5.564373e-7,0.00026632054,0.0000023156817,0.000002849775,0.98441476,0.004209401,0.00019561601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032743573,0.00004912096,0.0043837116,0.0000046633877,0.0000014510854,0.000011862573,0.00019937863,0.0029702599,0.00021955057,0.34682825,0.6447014,0.00030288644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052387215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002732533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84773886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009121309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":3.4356816e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097940439","doi":"","title":"and","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Property (philosophy); Social Welfare; Population; Social welfare function; Relation (database); Welfare","score_opus":0.10936105834458197,"score_gpt":0.21498382023167953,"score_spread":0.10562276188709756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097940439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42868936,0.0005820577,0.0014397781,0.00023073856,0.00017914984,0.000026606314,0.0000023754967,0.000028973687,0.56882095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98878604,0.0000023822213,0.00023254238,0.00010490072,0.00003688923,0.0000011383061,3.0711792e-7,0.0000028039735,0.010832968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977016,0.0000032272299,0.000095430696,0.00007360673,0.000004241512,0.000053343767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998518,0.000008024794,0.00002818014,0.000062692365,0.0000041636235,0.000045122455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003895452,0.000023887163,0.00006979792,0.000024958834,0.000010919817,0.000016422504,0.000028116548,0.000016150947,0.000077905934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044270007,0.000024030503,0.000007821045,0.000026789508,0.000011914588,0.000044523615,0.000011814086,0.000017145729,0.00089689874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011002942,0.0000033708397,0.037053548,0.0000017627572,0.000002161882,2.5323308e-7,0.00018085769,9.604099e-7,0.0000010947601,0.9613993,0.0012260855,0.00012947667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004927425,0.00005734146,0.009639214,0.0000037987152,7.866802e-7,0.000013157279,0.00034000046,0.00082470523,0.000053184223,0.6989006,0.2895226,0.00015192926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005173759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001803317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56009674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053702274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014881259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100261675","doi":"","title":"Edmonton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disjoint sets; Axiom; Axiom of choice; Partition (number theory); Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Transfinite number; Set theory; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.06792711073459379,"score_gpt":0.19200084799702213,"score_spread":0.12407373726242835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100261675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42667633,0.00026642607,0.001833144,0.00010572671,0.00019915451,0.000034107805,0.0000032608843,0.000054223077,0.5708276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566217,0.000015667725,0.00021448935,0.00014562793,0.0000829918,0.0000030381725,9.4134856e-7,0.0000059769613,0.042909555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956566,0.0000045958236,0.00019226759,0.00012181064,0.000007969229,0.00010768028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997506,0.00001455614,0.000058898815,0.00014050494,0.000004977243,0.000030440231],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021338544,0.000043558306,0.00012100458,0.000045178364,0.00006292524,0.000006980333,0.00007732509,0.000029704997,0.0010499983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028780425,0.000045888733,0.000040471514,0.000060720304,0.000022582019,0.000064522406,0.000010933752,0.0000357569,0.0050151497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019592042,0.000016840138,0.05246522,0.0000030251904,0.0000059336176,0.0000030667031,0.00023795167,0.0000045002307,0.000015895317,0.94389915,0.0032826406,0.00006380464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008188861,0.0001067165,0.1672668,0.000010857314,0.0000016254069,0.00012021078,0.00012018705,0.0009945144,0.0007664685,0.17941995,0.64983857,0.0005351925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114943425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032862035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000118978405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002398443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100325569","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Search and Matching Models Using Experimental Data.” Unpublished manuscript","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Earnings; Randomized experiment; Test (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Corporation; Control (management); Constant (computer programming)","score_opus":0.41455397620199314,"score_gpt":0.37533591104318287,"score_spread":0.03921806515881027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100325569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654069,0.0014213583,0.016382048,0.00016150122,0.00018128059,0.00015357664,0.000034470624,0.000056204044,0.016202642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789925,0.000005436589,0.019269122,0.0001589456,0.00020532543,0.000003373522,0.0000130299195,0.000022614986,0.0013296569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986782,0.000045252284,0.00046388194,0.00047896698,0.000052687563,0.00028101954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929005,0.000041927575,0.000101681966,0.00047327377,0.000015391553,0.00007768438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025581405,0.00012354416,0.0002513549,0.00013574382,0.00017901613,0.00028987377,0.00031245928,0.000057566776,0.00034650377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003279599,0.00013504436,0.00002727584,0.000094108196,0.000036630834,0.0014780482,0.00031043813,0.00012414744,0.000083758896],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003527834,0.0001624852,0.003224142,0.000076830394,0.00008475275,0.0000029358475,0.007441525,0.061634574,0.0041885544,0.9193549,0.00030547462,0.003488522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004244378,0.00002542596,0.000086019856,0.000020087153,0.0000029228524,0.000017677861,0.0014887633,0.98604184,0.00053994474,0.010836084,0.00031939213,0.00019742774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074774073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013453127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92440724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007344773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011966166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55069494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107853480","doi":"10.4230/lipics.isaac.2025.49","title":"Maximizing Social Welfare Among EF1 Allocations at the Presence of Two Types of Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Constant (computer programming); Expected utility hypothesis; Function (biology); Social Welfare; Social welfare function; Transferable utility","score_opus":0.027448889132929914,"score_gpt":0.2640014466067061,"score_spread":0.23655255747377618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107853480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532418,0.00017181186,0.0058806324,0.0007230641,0.0008498721,0.00086659606,0.0011210975,0.000037026286,0.0371081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730897,0.000011890904,0.0002762117,0.000108092565,0.000040833133,0.00005575652,0.000096003365,0.000015777914,0.002086464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815226,0.000028443945,0.0012912342,0.00015164104,0.00007703603,0.00029936622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832857,0.00013903792,0.0009458884,0.00042214885,0.00012800649,0.000036335317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009322061,0.0001705566,0.00045418684,0.00020035528,0.00037932655,0.000056275105,0.000556335,0.00011122591,0.000105339146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018498288,0.0001529912,0.000223919,0.00029080876,0.00023173059,0.00032928464,0.00023507114,0.00015824822,0.000044675813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008317524,0.00018284703,0.168756,0.001249993,0.00041592336,2.8895153e-7,0.013771701,0.00085255597,0.000027310529,0.8108015,0.0029556055,0.0009030794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016546741,0.00054917013,0.305849,0.0017661132,0.00044103124,0.000022311076,0.024130192,0.11535066,0.00866758,0.07842341,0.445767,0.0024868082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011424684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006108318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7323781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007767342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001999973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62387997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7109962221","doi":"10.4230/lipics.icalp.2025.125","title":"Unbalanced Random Matching Markets with Partial Preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Upper and lower bounds; Rank (graph theory); Stability (learning theory); Work (physics); Line (geometry)","score_opus":0.01564197783520071,"score_gpt":0.22603273638888216,"score_spread":0.21039075855368145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7109962221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8207225,0.00021241828,0.08594117,0.00026200435,0.0014778634,0.0013199911,0.000698326,0.00018973784,0.089176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995038,0.000028582548,0.00173387,0.00045003195,0.00011160199,0.00017286562,0.00015041002,0.00002918551,0.0022854842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757767,0.0000356242,0.0013854222,0.00030318293,0.000087594344,0.0006104822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984003,0.00021676059,0.00068837637,0.00050904875,0.00008047338,0.000105071886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013691006,0.00033378054,0.0007486584,0.00029793987,0.00032493417,0.0003369245,0.00052839634,0.00018720243,0.00011408904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119323005,0.00029732464,0.0001901393,0.0002905637,0.000110745204,0.00071822526,0.00011383236,0.00030694506,0.00024395119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003634261,0.00056299806,0.22533187,0.00297736,0.0013227871,0.000006187308,0.016179267,0.00088554557,0.000027166543,0.738303,0.0051057446,0.0056638005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05413235,0.0011131851,0.031597283,0.0032266953,0.00023548193,0.00008970057,0.009897919,0.052925687,0.0020082311,0.20226952,0.6386841,0.0038198463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041054638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001975209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63357836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008510517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042589476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115173422","doi":"10.5555/3635637.3662900","title":"Computational aspects of distortion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Research Explorer","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Quadratic equation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Characterization (materials science); Dynamic programming; Linear programming; Rate–distortion theory","score_opus":0.16305408927040713,"score_gpt":0.3476935420688726,"score_spread":0.18463945279846547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115173422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79434806,0.0066576307,0.010539359,0.001354179,0.0028584765,0.00037338055,0.000093417795,0.00015965199,0.18361586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973719,0.00003057251,0.00008897381,0.0000086164555,0.0003771223,0.00003391273,0.000015645954,0.000016110449,0.0020571048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988866,0.00004169655,0.0003922427,0.00028687678,0.00013614504,0.0002564659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929917,0.0003211842,0.00005407348,0.00017702256,0.000080565194,0.000067992536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029346847,0.00007071063,0.00018578504,0.00045207655,0.0000760007,0.000073217154,0.00016611103,0.000055559747,0.0016629101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031023155,0.000073021925,0.00008266819,0.00048691427,0.00013143019,0.00020890844,0.0000523148,0.0002455447,0.000659184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012077499,0.000045858145,0.0015254611,0.00007089196,0.000038775946,0.000010691719,0.0030139792,0.00031554996,0.0000676736,0.9770884,0.017150559,0.00066011073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013120068,0.0000960198,0.0013560435,0.00011228921,0.0000014244441,0.000004095536,0.00040672126,0.0074291127,0.00036588506,0.9272262,0.06276125,0.000109756635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003289868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.6475897e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2030239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010238871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003831599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746844","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109621","title":"Three-way conflict analysis: From single-level to multi-level preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference","score_opus":0.12044136440382845,"score_gpt":0.29729586762091303,"score_spread":0.17685450321708457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42746377,0.0009144529,0.5651693,0.00042551165,0.001226511,0.00008931256,0.00026882833,0.000018781808,0.004423535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96511585,0.00002942818,0.034019053,0.00016582775,0.00022565454,0.000005566625,0.000016443444,0.000012007176,0.00041017644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829423,0.000031088177,0.0010655063,0.00027652347,0.0001321305,0.00020054568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998283,0.0001804255,0.00095765747,0.00018562895,0.00029966526,0.00009359099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011262514,0.00016413395,0.00055972167,0.00088945334,0.00006449751,0.00025485785,0.00075631187,0.00008793469,0.00015997961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005486556,0.0001624264,0.00027762353,0.00042450833,0.000034226676,0.0003084839,0.00010541985,0.00020989329,0.00006291738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005922903,0.0007770489,0.45549405,0.000047697285,0.0131249,0.00007073031,0.004470365,0.004754923,0.001746936,0.4895308,0.0006281691,0.028762091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058668754,0.00036474733,0.6582243,0.0027379969,0.0006941447,0.00007483564,0.002011724,0.10152713,0.005944204,0.20387815,0.017250173,0.001425755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037937664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010741656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5376521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015861733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034064455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6623556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116853749","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-06918-4_168-1","title":"Economic Voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Economic analysis; Economic model; Mechanism (biology); Economic impact analysis; Economic efficiency; Ranked voting system; Economic problem; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.028833039429458987,"score_gpt":0.2084488638959051,"score_spread":0.17961582446644614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116853749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040176023,0.0013297576,0.00084975315,0.0001438309,0.0015668315,0.00017349994,0.00022434512,0.00011938443,0.9955524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038621318,0.000055633187,0.00012597263,0.00020203955,0.00039687078,0.0000054966395,0.000026393142,0.00004542898,0.96052086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837905,0.000004335579,0.00084586104,0.0005327628,0.000013852913,0.00022411218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989128,0.00009157515,0.00052722776,0.00040303724,0.000010585712,0.00005478706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057771686,0.00027828218,0.0007009013,0.00030331805,0.00007903978,0.00007354976,0.00030376535,0.00034688026,0.007400544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027723434,0.00034304854,0.00026577848,0.000011651522,0.000042427957,0.00006638726,0.00009674032,0.00026868418,0.01694476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026182638,0.0000026541104,0.00023489723,0.000058439593,0.00008425215,0.0000018595487,0.000019787813,0.0000118491735,1.0570266e-7,0.9866608,0.012364606,0.0005581252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011631818,0.000013338728,0.000017233178,0.000106039144,0.0000072621674,0.0000026514065,0.0000034819848,0.00027546685,0.0000027396839,0.2941603,0.7049814,0.0003137839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000727606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003497747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69261676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017564058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003114848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124132873","doi":"10.65109/qbue9343","title":"A truth serum for sharing rewards","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Mechanism (biology); Population; Focus (optics); Rational agent; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.1270212958690132,"score_gpt":0.23774190644978985,"score_spread":0.11072061058077665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124132873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3244812,0.0018296253,0.03149192,0.00016377983,0.0070922626,0.0010566188,0.00047213043,0.00014694649,0.63326555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518065,0.000058505844,0.0018105317,0.00014731381,0.00043564997,0.000061005037,0.0000046346604,0.00006653488,0.045609325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970361,0.000020367848,0.0012824555,0.0009001762,0.000028580223,0.0007323489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828935,0.00012690056,0.0006028984,0.00074133906,0.000053433665,0.00018609555],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002582234,0.00031240255,0.0007531504,0.00026663337,0.0002477525,0.00013486594,0.00060580805,0.00027288587,0.0057874816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030125695,0.00037645287,0.00040181694,0.00022976921,0.00007461659,0.00031791418,0.00014812824,0.00017848253,0.0015818287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008828699,0.00012761411,0.04307805,0.00025186848,0.00014032969,0.0000015608883,0.0026577567,0.0000033034962,0.000002395977,0.9522242,0.0002791238,0.0011455071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029224777,0.000965389,0.027347185,0.00024271682,0.00006926293,0.000020858335,0.001569006,0.015768463,0.0014928665,0.8949978,0.05303951,0.0015645168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019888702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014161211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6273253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087323926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023856388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124133228","doi":"10.65109/wljk4444","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting under Non-Scoring Rules: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Convergence (economics); Quality (philosophy); Cardinal voting systems; Social choice theory; Anti-plurality voting; Iterative method; Path (computing)","score_opus":0.07246094953274916,"score_gpt":0.2804247535261464,"score_spread":0.2079638039933972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124133228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944328,0.0010618401,0.031767115,0.00018140922,0.0010937407,0.00030811634,0.0002157612,0.000025819818,0.021018209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929689,0.00032931997,0.00038939982,0.00006263272,0.00015463987,0.000009005111,0.0000018926527,0.000031449224,0.0060527194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621373,0.00009439032,0.002262875,0.0008236718,0.000076278455,0.0005290356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658066,0.0009373974,0.0017260404,0.0004575921,0.00011916764,0.00017914813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035113022,0.00035560483,0.0010678896,0.00021427778,0.0001846749,0.00009828868,0.00028813383,0.00022741049,0.0015420736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039244306,0.00031322727,0.00019541859,0.00017388174,0.00037435684,0.00062383746,0.00015607136,0.00018307919,0.00042847186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397649,0.000116375384,0.13375925,0.00047452212,0.00017829749,0.0000011532726,0.00202258,0.000014707443,0.004221244,0.85719043,0.000013695061,0.001933749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035400947,0.000350392,0.9176801,0.001736447,0.000031696683,0.000009028269,0.0035013033,0.0015860148,0.015417446,0.05412528,0.00053987216,0.0014823346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005274313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042336746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010043257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040361796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124136199","doi":"10.65109/ioem7063","title":"Imputation, social choice, and partial preferences","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Missing data; Preference; Social choice theory; Connection (principal bundle); Term (time)","score_opus":0.03462435112719369,"score_gpt":0.23880549815364085,"score_spread":0.20418114702644716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124136199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88082623,0.0006999268,0.014023514,0.000776947,0.0014934676,0.00023036213,0.000043943186,0.00005475543,0.101850875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309987,0.000051049436,0.00009806957,0.00019339415,0.001258428,0.000012286949,0.000006859171,0.000019405037,0.005260642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980989,0.000113038914,0.0008373733,0.00053575204,0.000037902733,0.0003770397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998943,0.00024579102,0.000493442,0.00016541278,0.000037940383,0.0001144692],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015285648,0.00021402692,0.00052001147,0.0001322052,0.00040213024,0.00029949658,0.00017487642,0.00021080469,0.00092672685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002793636,0.00024363883,0.00009240704,0.00016092468,0.00017033098,0.00026492454,0.000070391434,0.00015845751,0.00068818807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009992936,0.000053660053,0.11894281,0.00010040714,0.00006156077,9.754563e-8,0.0017253138,0.000017622688,0.000003512697,0.86616105,0.0005937594,0.012330231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023751806,0.00055355096,0.38110074,0.00006235896,0.000054118584,0.000006633204,0.000674773,0.048527494,0.00010549345,0.32945356,0.23583566,0.0012504213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022668894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033290995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53670746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002279856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015371712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124139456","doi":"10.65109/xnmt7187","title":"Strategy-Proofness in the Stable Matching Problem with Couples","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Complementarity (molecular biology); Set (abstract data type); Fraction (chemistry); Preference; Pareto optimal; Pareto principle","score_opus":0.0331748083716797,"score_gpt":0.21328498140262003,"score_spread":0.18011017303094035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124139456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86775,0.001873507,0.012423106,0.0019552454,0.00028370155,0.0010196639,0.00009714987,0.000044363624,0.11455329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855576,0.00019199286,0.0002048023,0.0001353799,0.00013191489,0.000074764735,0.0000021036738,0.000041147687,0.013660272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973187,0.00013957066,0.0010644348,0.0006664992,0.00008312216,0.00072766765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982477,0.00041359928,0.00056126446,0.0006638181,0.000039031325,0.00007459884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272169,0.0003315563,0.00061229186,0.00019666909,0.00022489855,0.00039794465,0.00069591386,0.00015415644,0.0010836027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033049902,0.00018155784,0.00008456568,0.00046618856,0.00016097627,0.000609458,0.000063483465,0.0002471472,0.0006828013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009233489,0.00020397405,0.06236064,0.00020324416,0.00006102712,0.000013372766,0.0025758592,0.00052688055,0.00004997624,0.93041164,0.00012661627,0.0033744487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008282082,0.0018014951,0.06774738,0.0032215298,0.00005640936,0.00015706038,0.024714151,0.0024356968,0.00051925087,0.8497778,0.03829497,0.0029921408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008783493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000731071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11780765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010638147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007115165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124139667","doi":"10.65109/ztfk5673","title":"Non-Monotonic-Offers Bargaining Protocol","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Monotonic function; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03203287660707355,"score_gpt":0.2543991594358876,"score_spread":0.22236628282881404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124139667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041265868,0.00010748192,0.021601876,0.0005933957,0.0016111005,0.11802571,0.000053991615,0.00018261753,0.81655794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94285625,0.000008858875,0.0010723682,0.0004228768,0.00043454257,0.045227267,0.0000033842628,0.00009135837,0.009883118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590105,0.000038217473,0.0018871466,0.0010735164,0.00007468674,0.0010253616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771726,0.000079239326,0.00091329543,0.0009134336,0.000055203123,0.0003215744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022414303,0.0005266751,0.0010202916,0.00039032806,0.0004097093,0.00036338757,0.0006613784,0.00040901214,0.0024552888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015577725,0.0006257653,0.00039477643,0.000544886,0.00017389635,0.0004922835,0.00017298808,0.00051891233,0.009268324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012503592,0.0003827285,0.012464709,0.0002965151,0.00018211873,0.000020871383,0.0024113331,0.0036258693,0.00005139988,0.9794402,0.00023029593,0.0007688947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02937026,0.0036045439,0.016504364,0.0020096172,0.00007665223,0.00011918269,0.0040020472,0.016699836,0.009321139,0.6573495,0.25504205,0.0059007793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040904977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001966448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90159035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042734607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016826368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124144861","doi":"10.65109/fhqu2875","title":"Coalition detection and identification","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.018853154546325412,"score_gpt":0.2113932024848845,"score_spread":0.19254004793855908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124144861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94817823,0.00030072214,0.024703564,0.00028820816,0.0044995192,0.00025487054,0.00003749976,0.00004990722,0.021687452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99142665,0.0000826134,0.000086397704,0.000046474248,0.00035465314,0.000014784178,0.0000059010945,0.000017231901,0.00796528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858123,0.000032171887,0.0007254336,0.00043721223,0.000024208632,0.00019977163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904126,0.00006244144,0.00044507676,0.00032396807,0.000038392627,0.000088870394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018508205,0.00013455155,0.00023432972,0.00019203853,0.000239122,0.00027820145,0.00009692863,0.00023392326,0.000829972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001895624,0.00017431876,0.00006045985,0.00015673212,0.0001027351,0.00037185464,0.000030153424,0.00027827933,0.0011566939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018598943,0.00006930015,0.013515715,0.00010507088,0.000030732645,3.998833e-7,0.00056405674,0.0000024478834,0.028682513,0.94573796,0.000050879957,0.011222303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018640509,0.00030357132,0.42281595,0.00006445152,0.000060468683,0.00013123518,0.0013512443,0.04854707,0.039051823,0.39905894,0.08529656,0.0014546572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020552812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019970963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.546679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002192044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061427263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124146830","doi":"10.65109/nhmp5816","title":"A parameterized family of equilibrium profiles for three-player kuhn poker","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Sequential equilibrium; Feature (linguistics); General equilibrium theory; Equilibrium selection; Thermodynamic equilibrium","score_opus":0.05531465333458402,"score_gpt":0.23445899159166153,"score_spread":0.1791443382570775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124146830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460097,0.00208161,0.02108809,0.00045827552,0.001974797,0.003384719,0.0004949978,0.00006038754,0.02444743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98135114,0.000032240954,0.0041585234,0.00021119034,0.00027546188,0.0005012991,0.000022941975,0.0000857977,0.01336143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958268,0.0000647815,0.0023219667,0.0008575335,0.00007037433,0.0008585383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684554,0.00055444805,0.0013218868,0.0008789425,0.00020244572,0.0001967205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001613163,0.0004684885,0.0015285427,0.00032984445,0.00010555576,0.0002310574,0.00059054844,0.00040412758,0.003406711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003492966,0.00048846664,0.0006193282,0.0003151999,0.00023142555,0.00057682005,0.00015519776,0.00019184932,0.002010892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065723597,0.0009994444,0.07944231,0.0026846523,0.0012100543,0.000001876175,0.0013010905,0.00015739909,0.031374466,0.86679643,0.009008002,0.006367035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013074658,0.004136523,0.10445718,0.0008441367,0.00023358263,0.000022231407,0.0021011618,0.22450224,0.019256378,0.5827721,0.044346042,0.00425377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006991387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011804468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28402433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056269695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005531715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124158400","doi":"10.65109/zawx5846","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Optimal matching; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Scheduling (production processes)","score_opus":0.07585162519835566,"score_gpt":0.23776741462017684,"score_spread":0.16191578942182117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124158400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76665175,0.0018293792,0.014036725,0.00040032083,0.0010870964,0.00037164334,0.000049567323,0.000095294556,0.21547824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97605854,0.000077496625,0.0017711634,0.00013119134,0.00014127686,0.000019582552,0.000012105867,0.0000498055,0.021738864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739623,0.00009412137,0.0010518162,0.0007577744,0.00009535371,0.00060471275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.00015907458,0.0007297328,0.0006188023,0.00008406175,0.00033981277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020888261,0.0003405207,0.0008486705,0.00026460623,0.00016302464,0.00037071374,0.00049014273,0.00021020196,0.0007458332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014473294,0.0003557979,0.000106666106,0.00035676194,0.00014166282,0.00052448927,0.000109414315,0.00033007096,0.0030631593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003339356,0.00047956296,0.046133325,0.0002883145,0.0005344882,0.000010978188,0.011678058,0.0020260997,0.000018008659,0.93411887,0.00027083617,0.0041075386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049648606,0.0022228926,0.022876976,0.0012253495,0.00010832093,0.00006175829,0.014836315,0.019539954,0.0001624991,0.92389953,0.007459368,0.0026421878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009207598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044891564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20940678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018051572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011235659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124162851","doi":"10.65109/hmkl4392","title":"Controlling Elections by Replacing Candidates or Votes","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scoring rule; Computational complexity theory; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.052733706799239916,"score_gpt":0.24463948636480223,"score_spread":0.19190577956556232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124162851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42694634,0.04430027,0.08655058,0.004803979,0.011144297,0.0017511565,0.00094954943,0.0005759497,0.4229779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782559,0.00017568006,0.00023633084,0.00031428202,0.00042595837,0.000024197578,0.000015983605,0.00004823791,0.12050345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968963,0.00010603445,0.0014441003,0.0007693958,0.00006204025,0.00072208146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997783,0.00040526438,0.0007256427,0.00053726253,0.0001542596,0.0003945866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028373469,0.00034932204,0.00092067424,0.00028147962,0.0003709371,0.00044145988,0.00031448758,0.00026011522,0.00111339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001712813,0.00035320563,0.00017481452,0.0005514715,0.0001015717,0.000437066,0.00006595443,0.00032716017,0.00199365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00110802,0.0005002531,0.101538256,0.0001681201,0.00086513,0.000017865263,0.0044548176,0.0013385438,0.0002954048,0.7761083,0.112850375,0.0007549115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010271111,0.0020783085,0.00022638401,0.00038865805,0.0001648021,0.00019357353,0.0095151765,0.133478,0.004443432,0.11300037,0.72330236,0.0029378408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004272574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042938156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66310793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034325192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014109298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124168676","doi":"10.65109/azls1622","title":"Sequential decision making in repeated coalition formation under uncertainty","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Reinforcement learning; Bayesian probability; Complete information; Markov decision process; Bayesian inference; Value (mathematics); Optimal decision","score_opus":0.07432751987704807,"score_gpt":0.2690193234111065,"score_spread":0.19469180353405846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124168676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8236879,0.00049703085,0.15540582,0.00013232326,0.0013223599,0.00042100457,0.000049711176,0.000057074558,0.018426787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971763,0.0002934888,0.00053411536,0.00022896817,0.00017344509,0.000015769216,0.000051872943,0.00002936723,0.0014966769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966495,0.0001574798,0.0019945346,0.0005904238,0.00009039683,0.0005176577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998386,0.00022549287,0.000794874,0.0004463477,0.00006858034,0.00007866027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227972,0.00027536633,0.00060063094,0.0006290997,0.0003269188,0.00011489148,0.00022770544,0.00033843293,0.0015079826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021242713,0.0003353782,0.00018904707,0.00063837325,0.00009936338,0.00087731844,0.00008069329,0.0002955847,0.0010081774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009475497,0.0005834042,0.058672346,0.00032187364,0.00011610027,0.000091558126,0.008067331,0.15754731,0.00014342392,0.76638746,0.0015437361,0.005577878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060949665,0.00042211666,0.08093253,0.0016039192,0.000026955011,0.0004684087,0.002926407,0.6500581,0.0003657269,0.24937418,0.005899957,0.0018267499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005282659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002690589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006437082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045422716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124171798","doi":"10.65109/mlhm6027","title":"Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Coalition Formation under Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Bayesian probability; Stability (learning theory); Bayesian inference; Core (optical fiber); Control (management)","score_opus":0.03765475217289617,"score_gpt":0.2417584993406987,"score_spread":0.20410374716780255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124171798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022312982,0.00028945354,0.94780976,0.0011567938,0.0009995938,0.0010127517,0.000023310546,0.00007770062,0.026317684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842955,0.000105945976,0.00063265127,0.00039728513,0.00028861238,0.000092535185,0.00018138056,0.00003542279,0.009836634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974983,0.000043735767,0.0013938858,0.00044562444,0.000058124697,0.00056034257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985205,0.00011366917,0.0008628827,0.00028894935,0.00008480318,0.00012918413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019546982,0.00027313293,0.0004891054,0.0002533848,0.00053425744,0.000227345,0.00017937162,0.00023604021,0.00068214355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015220168,0.0003320135,0.00026932414,0.0002140574,0.000057519246,0.0006773622,0.000040150557,0.00021380335,0.0005427288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046090063,0.000033429624,0.000113652044,0.00016412757,0.000037503825,1.6215509e-7,0.0007752874,0.4904232,0.000011100632,0.5080726,0.00006372395,0.0002590855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052325837,0.0010336557,0.00027225344,0.00032871668,0.000041998326,0.000013152785,0.004760413,0.57653797,0.00063888635,0.37535268,0.034870572,0.0009170982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035548184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005514873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96611655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000697438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004899214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124174386","doi":"10.65109/eooo6790","title":"Possible and necessary winner problem in social polls","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded function; Treewidth; Simple (philosophy); Social network (sociolinguistics); Order (exchange); Time complexity; Bounded rationality","score_opus":0.021502068530056363,"score_gpt":0.22064909678930758,"score_spread":0.1991470282592512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124174386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074305,0.0013539786,0.0007975546,0.0017398769,0.0006208432,0.00036375487,0.000037907164,0.000036738027,0.3876188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730457,0.000087373875,0.00034551622,0.00040729143,0.0005517905,0.000013925004,0.0000039316437,0.000036013844,0.02550843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974629,0.00013347367,0.001113998,0.0006593284,0.000038765105,0.00059150025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990487,0.00013536063,0.0004306362,0.00024840416,0.00002093474,0.00011595824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002784322,0.0002777713,0.0007794091,0.00038609392,0.00026249836,0.00024867215,0.00024255324,0.0003111602,0.0007353447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007599801,0.0003239106,0.00010535252,0.00042032747,0.00015118197,0.00036517295,0.00013055382,0.0002982014,0.00055125216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030266752,0.00012810034,0.17639475,0.00022568474,0.000033402008,0.0000015295686,0.0017017707,0.000025020208,0.00001939952,0.81702346,0.00096286216,0.00345374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00505,0.0005351534,0.26841512,0.0003146037,0.000026375148,0.00002399347,0.0013691176,0.015433496,0.00015084747,0.63885,0.06796812,0.0018632008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045701317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067712106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055939057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022038534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124176716","doi":"10.65109/hjey6402","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Voting; Social choice theory; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Simple (philosophy); Approval voting; Best response","score_opus":0.0533208407624723,"score_gpt":0.27684617103307196,"score_spread":0.22352533027059968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124176716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415862,0.0005692939,0.005491693,0.00060303195,0.00070968305,0.00032899348,0.00006295226,0.000035676618,0.050612457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98763514,0.00004585583,0.00013675193,0.00014164332,0.00011632787,0.000017139988,0.000018648145,0.000017520224,0.0118709635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683446,0.00014723757,0.0019003908,0.0006137016,0.000059899412,0.00044428435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978185,0.00023147085,0.0010148182,0.00065853517,0.00012375423,0.00015290745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016365901,0.00024032731,0.0013149199,0.00088872993,0.00009262981,0.00013130119,0.00029886133,0.00027550996,0.020732589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024346575,0.0002653465,0.0007351906,0.0025266341,0.00013350394,0.00042793553,0.00008512365,0.00019373144,0.0018205903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028994646,0.0002969159,0.86706984,0.000104252475,0.0032283554,2.8618362e-7,0.00084321504,0.0003798581,0.00036323423,0.12502274,0.0018232112,0.0008391195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042678317,0.000215879,0.7741257,0.000018537854,0.0005496931,0.0000014280608,0.00029922032,0.1952684,0.00051486486,0.024239888,0.0038425953,0.0004970247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033184357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076931974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19488853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011274899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024034494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124182908","doi":"10.65109/syka4317","title":"Rating players in games with real-valued outcomes","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rating system; Value (mathematics); Population; Order (exchange); Focus (optics); Rating scale; Measure (data warehouse)","score_opus":0.025341191910555307,"score_gpt":0.22041989058510664,"score_spread":0.19507869867455133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124182908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8504391,0.00035519322,0.0008210833,0.0005229394,0.00057373435,0.00079930027,0.000016911408,0.000060502884,0.14641126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96465605,0.00009332897,0.0011826628,0.0002877057,0.00008968548,0.00009328883,0.0000045143934,0.00005869493,0.03353405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996585,0.00010731143,0.0016267329,0.0008005465,0.00007133228,0.0008090879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803215,0.0003131688,0.00078886363,0.00063623436,0.00005050188,0.00017906672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016132965,0.0004370422,0.0011802311,0.0004799527,0.00015159645,0.00036777774,0.00038716212,0.000237518,0.0036210236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020986941,0.00040525376,0.00016226228,0.00049873145,0.00013859315,0.0006843688,0.00008386171,0.0003667384,0.0032123914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022755285,0.00010797512,0.7391501,0.00008650793,0.000103155486,0.0000057097755,0.0021170229,0.00036120732,0.000011817885,0.25707117,0.00025619817,0.0007063914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043768557,0.0005778179,0.92533255,0.00042884896,0.000023748118,0.00001767422,0.009930563,0.041497804,0.00015882254,0.014601986,0.00131216,0.001741174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008727847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049289904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24246918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016849114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000450592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124245142","doi":"10.65109/fiwd8599","title":"Distant Truth: Bias Under Vote Distortion Costs","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Distortion (music); Voting; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Preference; Ballot; Incentive; Cardinal voting systems","score_opus":0.10282461707560399,"score_gpt":0.2665521771959892,"score_spread":0.16372756012038525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124245142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69200414,0.0022331749,0.028608406,0.0016795631,0.017166544,0.0005334497,0.00035024332,0.000095104144,0.25732934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592673,0.0002079198,0.00005709006,0.0001120531,0.00063301926,0.000014728689,0.00001979651,0.000059818325,0.039628282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967035,0.0000831712,0.0014725557,0.00096475764,0.00008071627,0.00069530983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952157,0.00022067277,0.0021467784,0.0020811532,0.000058176283,0.00027753267],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023992746,0.00041783598,0.00087966066,0.00019030749,0.0015091075,0.0012627656,0.0009457727,0.00032943796,0.0010284313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009436933,0.00046899822,0.00038501582,0.0000945642,0.0003768598,0.0007485463,0.00022985257,0.00032643744,0.0031373396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007132068,0.00017580668,0.0730266,0.00008200447,0.00013335052,0.0000079111815,0.00023704491,0.00003295764,0.000012725576,0.92209387,0.0005814479,0.0035449415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003985193,0.0005550602,0.59521824,0.00059542997,0.00011274521,0.00003218328,0.0009121696,0.010171256,0.0006718687,0.26226988,0.12270679,0.002769181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015973697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043030566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.659824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052954006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039792754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124245703","doi":"10.65109/ddri2515","title":"Computational Aspects of Distortion","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Quadratic equation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Characterization (materials science); Dynamic programming; Linear programming; Rate–distortion theory","score_opus":0.026462541904313255,"score_gpt":0.23027395916419385,"score_spread":0.2038114172598806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124245703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24117899,0.020886688,0.16483533,0.00063533563,0.007078248,0.00029124614,0.00031767727,0.00011348973,0.564663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99030286,0.00005049104,0.00019704523,0.000024976509,0.00022911925,0.0000034174761,0.00001829686,0.000020174235,0.009153624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984763,0.000026179856,0.00091968564,0.0003608672,0.00004127228,0.0001756789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.00016684188,0.00022188376,0.0001684411,0.000030129282,0.00005504444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086545135,0.0001310127,0.0003577031,0.00027184212,0.000052213152,0.000097395794,0.00012166254,0.000100498495,0.0026532107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053417847,0.00015545666,0.00019171028,0.00033127717,0.0000864362,0.00019057999,0.000030070121,0.00012483944,0.001972766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072514563,0.0000633961,0.0020715897,0.0004992799,0.000108091815,0.0000038990224,0.00066112494,0.0024827078,0.0000066341427,0.99189544,0.00054411695,0.0016564754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023289435,0.00016371335,0.007680772,0.0003343572,0.000021022952,0.000014878858,0.00014067107,0.15632829,0.0001694674,0.8070417,0.027560815,0.0003113921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007105239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000040739887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7491239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009451586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046512418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124246859","doi":"10.65109/qfmb8557","title":"Best of Both Worlds Fairness under Entitlements","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Contrast (vision); Scoring rule; Measure (data warehouse); Preference","score_opus":0.06486143693713264,"score_gpt":0.264293599976689,"score_spread":0.19943216303955635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124246859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71639293,0.001467197,0.0043619648,0.00045954663,0.004708978,0.00046061922,0.00033619895,0.00010077148,0.27171177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82169443,0.00024391123,0.000041025298,0.000059450205,0.00014381362,0.000010895201,0.000018888622,0.000037034064,0.17775054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749553,0.000051932515,0.0013254132,0.00051971874,0.00007380184,0.000533617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985081,0.00012918527,0.0006405482,0.0005694143,0.000040471677,0.000112265545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018031803,0.0002389098,0.00068467605,0.0005809984,0.00012445598,0.00008586165,0.00041711883,0.00016940277,0.008520239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006146014,0.00028883654,0.00024044413,0.0010982177,0.00012169522,0.00019700556,0.00019178876,0.00015138682,0.014488835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018223616,0.00024218025,0.09555153,0.00040966153,0.00030136522,0.0000035227702,0.0007147263,0.00045089194,0.000048657646,0.89851326,0.0030035765,0.00074239913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007658667,0.0012802785,0.20218755,0.0016557293,0.00026937062,0.00001328072,0.013487198,0.023367317,0.0028051168,0.49916828,0.24428526,0.0038219423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051193655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076301156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39934498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069514026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003011996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124254117","doi":"10.65109/pfxo7533","title":"The Distortion of Approval Voting with Runoff","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Approval voting; Distortion (music); Surface runoff; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.02797601209886822,"score_gpt":0.20617224334196915,"score_spread":0.17819623124310094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124254117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93898284,0.0010604049,0.008672116,0.00053415087,0.0017982553,0.00043917558,0.000047074605,0.000101000696,0.04836496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714215,0.0000954254,0.000049735834,0.000013108375,0.00018594443,0.000016823657,0.000007019825,0.000031250653,0.028179191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801743,0.00005796498,0.0010338697,0.00038354786,0.0000648152,0.00044235832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982284,0.0003428881,0.00089128915,0.00042415797,0.000050701252,0.00006259738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031970937,0.00018216956,0.000430318,0.0001579524,0.0004458231,0.000106926906,0.00032609142,0.000102173835,0.0001010198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020102227,0.00013900705,0.00014373449,0.0007975031,0.00022555109,0.00013982473,0.00008139923,0.0001737964,0.0007678929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009772955,0.000053031756,0.071845055,0.00019997147,0.00015924432,0.0000022692643,0.0013171018,0.00085086067,0.000019245697,0.9193188,0.00051236607,0.0056243436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006661761,0.0032625939,0.39765725,0.0014320271,0.00021939824,0.00007386817,0.024489261,0.27236462,0.00404411,0.09050714,0.19549164,0.0037963348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014300921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005634231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82881165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055078755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028061506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124266200","doi":"10.65109/atbh5937","title":"Diversity-seeking Swap Games in Networks","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Swap (finance); Price of anarchy; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Potential game","score_opus":0.022337188712843632,"score_gpt":0.21454990738286683,"score_spread":0.1922127186700232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124266200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50868005,0.012502908,0.060781986,0.0008776777,0.005905624,0.0004891099,0.000015676549,0.00007428974,0.41067266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95142466,0.0005251915,0.000056718614,0.0005921685,0.00015491927,0.0000065699646,0.000002478076,0.000014668163,0.047222637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997433,0.00009551692,0.0011026626,0.00069786055,0.000031703712,0.0006392281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877495,0.00028413255,0.00035016783,0.00048793684,0.00002509451,0.00007771735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022752692,0.00027164284,0.0007822932,0.0007526277,0.00065459113,0.0001392521,0.0005620647,0.00033060787,0.000908685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015654942,0.00036095097,0.00021395666,0.0010159264,0.00010230043,0.00025581228,0.001326139,0.00045789944,0.00033297687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563256,0.0000812709,0.5332521,0.00007914012,0.00006577069,0.00000630478,0.0009697571,0.002619495,4.7544202e-7,0.46108413,0.00048554328,0.001330329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003808681,0.00015852498,0.41169453,0.0013982175,0.00005523455,0.0000046293057,0.0031988155,0.36135903,0.000027652752,0.15089037,0.06581175,0.0015925522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011352022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028771025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44274458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022663847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026250922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124266798","doi":"10.65109/fkii5381","title":"Approximating the Core via Iterative Coalition Sampling","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Google (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Complement (music); Context (archaeology); Shapley value; Voting; Cooperative game theory; Set (abstract data type); Bottleneck; Generalization","score_opus":0.10531399440788725,"score_gpt":0.28358581905764113,"score_spread":0.17827182464975388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124266798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10443254,0.015647005,0.7885736,0.0012257617,0.005588968,0.0008149344,0.00023354788,0.00021652861,0.08326711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98584193,0.00006835222,0.0010210692,0.00029687618,0.0007034761,0.0000471655,0.000027319977,0.00004984854,0.01194396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734485,0.00009100066,0.0013561546,0.0006857088,0.000056588575,0.0004656715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785954,0.0012150819,0.00037154183,0.00043412042,0.000042547046,0.00007718089],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036860553,0.00030246854,0.0004968552,0.00019323116,0.0005532571,0.0011059438,0.0003153346,0.00017948503,0.002119569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029196197,0.0002519258,0.00026754348,0.00051286834,0.00014659934,0.0004199996,0.00010380063,0.000505921,0.0025459765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009449533,0.000030452926,0.00044706516,0.00043545806,0.0001544918,0.000003554341,0.0073487666,0.00036516864,0.000057110155,0.98747563,0.00057222415,0.0031006536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017573863,0.000088470915,0.00015877705,0.00057645346,0.000027885842,0.000041586118,0.0018221297,0.48929456,0.000077994686,0.49042618,0.016890498,0.0004197324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114657385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008955546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016440492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003207347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124273150","doi":"10.65109/ozvm7696","title":"A Restricted Markov Tree Model for Inference and Generation in Social Choice with Incomplete Preferences","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Graphical model; Social choice theory; Markov chain; Consistency (knowledge bases); Intuition; Probabilistic logic; Ranking (information retrieval)","score_opus":0.1485044905168602,"score_gpt":0.29408306744724777,"score_spread":0.14557857693038756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124273150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559374,0.0002012183,0.028963909,0.00051288324,0.00018780584,0.0008095613,0.0002055781,0.000017030223,0.013164651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937237,0.00011152895,0.0019313358,0.000041831136,0.00037552917,0.00012405282,0.000024891491,0.000023788605,0.0036433707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979813,0.000052097766,0.00081245636,0.00069155084,0.000047581274,0.00041498814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820334,0.00019879187,0.0010038653,0.00043401742,0.00007756553,0.00008239557],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082556176,0.00027868862,0.0006507165,0.00024352195,0.0010136876,0.000760106,0.0004264284,0.00023888699,0.000036147027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050444185,0.0002858874,0.000060006452,0.00010707779,0.0002083056,0.00069832045,0.00011813715,0.00019314005,0.000008485715],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004640999,0.00022923133,0.49160856,0.00037700482,0.0001355868,0.0000014935456,0.0036484157,0.0014976488,0.00013723808,0.48614728,0.00037043125,0.0153830005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020352888,0.00022692673,0.19843252,0.000056975925,0.000014634728,8.866659e-7,0.00007438436,0.7759602,0.000019674328,0.02251213,0.00027813355,0.0003882488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008864092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078048026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007061206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008102815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124279867","doi":"10.65109/qsmk9882","title":"Boosting Sortition via Proportional Representation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Boosting (machine learning); Selection (genetic algorithm); Complement (music); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.034568099825554185,"score_gpt":0.26537986135071295,"score_spread":0.23081176152515875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124279867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20105106,0.0016467614,0.29205206,0.002028291,0.0043797214,0.0007770514,0.000047211804,0.00012656664,0.49789128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93475515,0.000053269723,0.00048769082,0.00030200495,0.0002657336,0.00003549203,0.00004702046,0.0000154363,0.064038225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734044,0.00006878948,0.0015296517,0.0006578842,0.000053427484,0.00034982638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985754,0.00013016422,0.0007498652,0.0003885736,0.000092561604,0.00006342239],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015032819,0.00020032747,0.00043641077,0.00040450355,0.0003482403,0.0001801737,0.00018328172,0.00019445577,0.0023775608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004041491,0.00025725554,0.00019328397,0.00060711714,0.000092016555,0.00039377293,0.00007950023,0.00021108058,0.0012707355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037093072,0.0001394879,0.1334045,0.00018059643,0.00011322928,0.0000023830457,0.0002244358,0.0003412521,0.00013761318,0.858998,0.001383158,0.0050382544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015693296,0.00014580497,0.13399255,0.00045551895,0.00006257234,0.000018276827,0.00076270546,0.07225643,0.0025572584,0.76706445,0.020298185,0.0008168839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027315834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016586195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7337041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016377309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056506862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287268","doi":"10.65109/pgyf2278","title":"How to Fairly Allocate Easy and Difficult Chores","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Minimax; Core (optical fiber); Pareto principle; Polynomial; Pareto optimal; Integer (computer science)","score_opus":0.025259861848490724,"score_gpt":0.19514665645068593,"score_spread":0.16988679460219522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435364,0.0053537507,0.0026308028,0.01079723,0.0026656357,0.00090072403,0.0004632591,0.00009768111,0.03355454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741457,0.00009455781,0.00013162247,0.0007577666,0.00022110822,0.00009899507,0.0000103459015,0.000042482232,0.12449745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975687,0.00011704985,0.00069911627,0.0009259986,0.000079870544,0.0006092668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986577,0.00011132776,0.00035950888,0.00052391854,0.00003878943,0.00030876134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014855982,0.00032470544,0.00068251987,0.00033821483,0.00073403807,0.0006188023,0.00048269244,0.00009046231,0.0015475632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019591604,0.0003891427,0.00013569131,0.0006000761,0.000084460255,0.00023323903,0.00061624387,0.00034663582,0.00036913308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116187926,0.0002696806,0.030484378,0.00014512321,0.00021164164,0.000016772097,0.004386072,0.00078992714,0.00016462363,0.9527711,0.006580816,0.004063648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013183462,0.0011271851,0.026873404,0.000032073534,0.000025774088,0.000056315715,0.0068595307,0.004095817,0.00012940688,0.0110044945,0.9472152,0.0012624301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002690186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037535392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014176426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002177965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287550","doi":"10.65109/djcw7663","title":"Verifying Proportionality in Temporal Voting","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Representation (politics); Proportionality (law); Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Condorcet method","score_opus":0.056873253561640635,"score_gpt":0.2663791749149699,"score_spread":0.20950592135332924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643364,0.017147213,0.0077638454,0.0013057019,0.0059835324,0.0005833274,0.000118895914,0.0002089283,0.10255217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98552024,0.000055084263,0.0002523814,0.00007697028,0.00047294865,0.00002119932,0.000014779202,0.000041553973,0.0135448435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967103,0.00007964674,0.0017678243,0.0008464861,0.000059856095,0.00053587224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991918,0.00014975929,0.00026794613,0.00027033806,0.000020696936,0.000099437435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004837282,0.00026296946,0.00057552726,0.00047145798,0.000119751654,0.00045129878,0.00022995367,0.00022551535,0.0024597025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020494983,0.0003104002,0.00022143123,0.000759865,0.000088722874,0.0005096059,0.000095269264,0.000517139,0.0026337104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101536825,0.00007101082,0.28287852,0.00073398405,0.00004403987,0.000043195287,0.00078236277,0.00012788299,0.000007721524,0.7138731,0.00017403823,0.0012540111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014651166,0.00029054968,0.1589368,0.0037379859,0.00003521929,0.00011069596,0.0020345803,0.42996043,0.000208636,0.21072766,0.18988967,0.0026026592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081124716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011614697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5031454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027842782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091330345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287906","doi":"10.65109/lxne6781","title":"Divide and Conquer: Using Geographic Manipulation to Win District-Based Elections","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Outcome (game theory); Limit (mathematics); Voting; Greedy algorithm; Secret ballot","score_opus":0.07438862143498481,"score_gpt":0.27099729870171774,"score_spread":0.19660867726673292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880648,0.00040619937,0.09876759,0.0010728046,0.0010214866,0.0005337144,0.00012621075,0.00004199621,0.009965178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974559,0.00003766678,0.00038549487,0.00019475215,0.00023027525,0.000017735787,0.000009556868,0.000036043555,0.0016325982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787194,0.000060224378,0.0008464564,0.0006921547,0.000049096103,0.00048015712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978459,0.00015332438,0.00081037404,0.0008793513,0.00006319608,0.00024785302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001288041,0.00029016324,0.0005477535,0.00051255233,0.0018361027,0.0010573074,0.00032791335,0.00020473184,0.0005685746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050283497,0.00036539344,0.00015261695,0.00022624507,0.00016593329,0.00043743325,0.00012560921,0.00019441736,0.00022042083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027206861,0.0000806266,0.6830047,0.000071961986,0.000074059695,0.0000023278108,0.00009771129,0.000830276,0.00014492062,0.3148786,0.00008475193,0.0007028678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012118693,0.00027525547,0.83354276,0.0002643505,0.00007528764,0.000012823149,0.00008826196,0.12153451,0.00037584399,0.031220939,0.010294003,0.0011040693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002563846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002086714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28365767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010037281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002976083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124297895","doi":"10.65109/fkek1875","title":"Soft Condorcet Optimization for Ranking of General Agents","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Waterloo; Google (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Social choice theory; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.03634292329246118,"score_gpt":0.2602797094126154,"score_spread":0.22393678612015422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124297895","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074079886,0.0014251876,0.8473003,0.00027072118,0.0029582577,0.000924346,0.00021742056,0.000028331971,0.072795555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447121,0.00009273785,0.0063672247,0.00030224555,0.00015337902,0.000035018882,0.000037472357,0.000022470222,0.04827737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777156,0.000042631556,0.001381475,0.00044620337,0.000027762251,0.00033036404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857247,0.00020977193,0.0007215741,0.00034893816,0.00010227137,0.00004497803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444481,0.00020006958,0.0007292483,0.00037592716,0.00016018687,0.00008166745,0.00028166836,0.00020352459,0.0013908787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002889442,0.0002532753,0.0002677057,0.00034269862,0.00007467769,0.00015726514,0.000067740715,0.00008416357,0.00003126403],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010515501,0.00010856472,0.011385498,0.0006419357,0.0002533166,1.9700691e-7,0.0002864584,0.1367145,0.00003282053,0.8476251,0.0015947674,0.0012517036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028292525,0.00011440692,0.0007065301,0.00020258372,0.00005181748,6.704963e-7,0.00014443512,0.9557264,0.0010793504,0.023884527,0.01494376,0.00031627764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009520637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000040822115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8706322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006805731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044474007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124307392","doi":"10.65109/ospa2496","title":"Liquid Democracy for Low-Cost Ensemble Pruning","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Boosting (machine learning); Ensemble learning; Voting; Pruning; Random subspace method; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Training set","score_opus":0.040389954561411666,"score_gpt":0.259416766444033,"score_spread":0.21902681188262133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124307392","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2911995,0.024827052,0.4420715,0.0041657565,0.019876132,0.0033027388,0.0006795845,0.0005960365,0.21328168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174432,0.00030794356,0.0007616328,0.00028227436,0.0011682543,0.000117409036,0.0000255021,0.000114728915,0.07977903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964623,0.00004615205,0.0014939262,0.0010614351,0.000045560584,0.0008906111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981133,0.0007400232,0.00030592832,0.0005683037,0.000060641236,0.00021182088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028340288,0.00040831487,0.00079937885,0.00046214613,0.0004254331,0.00076782075,0.00041841457,0.00033059253,0.0016515049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003546942,0.00048195085,0.00051782886,0.00050900545,0.000082230734,0.0005673912,0.000110957575,0.00035004754,0.0054154578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014934989,0.00009666474,0.0004920493,0.0017872797,0.00024007965,0.000012142355,0.0014775562,0.00025321922,0.00021025918,0.98371845,0.005478296,0.006084658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011420602,0.0007666841,0.00015030477,0.0015982867,0.000084874635,0.00003782806,0.0007223171,0.15396053,0.003936698,0.13450655,0.7015648,0.0015290543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005799012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012303214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8492119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018615295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009685757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124312557","doi":"10.65109/snxq9471","title":"Optimal Majority Rules and Quantitative Condorcet Properties of Setwise Kemeny Voting Schemes","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Unanimity; Social choice theory; Axiom; Voting; Pairwise comparison; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.06251242647276015,"score_gpt":0.25568153437111574,"score_spread":0.1931691078983556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124312557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91954577,0.06810627,0.0033166285,0.00031982939,0.000983462,0.00041624712,0.00032492244,0.00008018965,0.006906664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98984766,0.0007005912,0.0025621639,0.000029336534,0.00014053546,0.000017534581,0.0000070235833,0.00004666408,0.006648493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712056,0.000106745254,0.0014505974,0.0007822154,0.00006757374,0.0004723108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998821,0.00026326955,0.00043692684,0.00027201386,0.000086333355,0.00012040927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022619946,0.000370882,0.0009784389,0.00036456817,0.00019114836,0.00040278787,0.00023381304,0.00020245498,0.00049441727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003422354,0.00037057436,0.00019572699,0.00029231363,0.00052409427,0.0005804922,0.00020705773,0.00032066842,0.0003450189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008739091,0.00008257992,0.00811687,0.00324493,0.00045637685,0.0000077563855,0.006002366,0.00010504022,0.00089738064,0.9802399,0.00008923014,0.00067014596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035724668,0.0023989868,0.0053713326,0.009373265,0.0003922773,0.00012651228,0.032768857,0.826873,0.040595774,0.025693214,0.04897648,0.0038578205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003008929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011727069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95454675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058398677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064743275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124320356","doi":"10.65109/ldkv5139","title":"Inferring True Voting Outcomes in Homophilic Social Networks","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Polling; Event (particle physics); Ball (mathematics); Outcome (game theory); Stadium","score_opus":0.05673715066368529,"score_gpt":0.23600384691453502,"score_spread":0.17926669625084973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124320356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9332005,0.001626163,0.015109936,0.0062671825,0.0020383259,0.00062085426,0.000048447306,0.0001541252,0.040934462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959153,0.000046156892,0.00006353427,0.0015508345,0.0011895339,0.000017571545,0.0000058498144,0.000069045265,0.0011421676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959568,0.00012794361,0.0020668884,0.000878904,0.000058590118,0.0009109174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851215,0.00026691201,0.0007374146,0.00023639083,0.000023653412,0.00022347426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708371,0.00044191448,0.001476301,0.00026539998,0.00030707987,0.00028398455,0.0005295458,0.00041132234,0.0009034131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004830878,0.00055594475,0.00039863682,0.0008037064,0.00009680827,0.0003753976,0.0002675793,0.00079661957,0.0007558604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027014346,0.00008931351,0.6484782,0.0001240853,0.000092626215,0.000012568212,0.0039871167,0.006857369,0.0000020177142,0.33916017,0.000087258006,0.0010822708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030655698,0.00023232127,0.42620474,0.00013019431,0.000026702457,0.000004911144,0.0017761907,0.5570952,0.000010240322,0.005502405,0.00435844,0.0015930836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023548065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008538598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55023783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014924725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028136776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124345595","doi":"10.65109/gtzh3103","title":"Investigating the Characteristics of One-Sided Matching Mechanisms: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Probabilistic logic; Space (punctuation); Mechanism (biology); Task (project management); Dictatorship","score_opus":0.044987337391405896,"score_gpt":0.22750144237964545,"score_spread":0.18251410498823956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124345595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93335694,0.000358577,0.03914466,0.0024942874,0.0020691748,0.00060775876,0.0003877359,0.00007462445,0.021506244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927689,0.00016340743,0.0015024274,0.00033078113,0.00031903078,0.000019281108,0.000004701254,0.000066487024,0.004824984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957496,0.00012121263,0.0026899248,0.00065749104,0.00012328164,0.00065849425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454427,0.0013673091,0.002830868,0.0009690375,0.00010837243,0.0001801452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045369193,0.00039852355,0.001075121,0.00020611183,0.00034225202,0.00016219335,0.00079869427,0.00028527883,0.0021663974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014914803,0.0002867358,0.00031051866,0.00027060177,0.0003456263,0.00039432908,0.00021815512,0.00033183978,0.0009596001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017610913,0.00012468947,0.0024102777,0.00022514712,0.00019826362,0.0000014695352,0.0019777652,0.0000035002295,0.013646154,0.97410136,0.000044704346,0.0072490517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010669009,0.00018596635,0.07590104,0.001715276,0.000056632285,0.000012912313,0.0013995642,0.00034161113,0.0120172035,0.90581214,0.0007257576,0.0007650079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002980319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001806447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07349076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010876361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007147412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126070541","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_623","title":"Coase Theorem and the Theory of the Core, The","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Core (optical fiber); Transaction cost; Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Pareto efficiency; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03297553705009456,"score_gpt":0.19635213116796799,"score_spread":0.16337659411787342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126070541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034506022,0.006095125,0.0002847552,0.0010049227,0.0007113197,0.0005984683,0.00018718229,0.000019780702,0.9907534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31682903,0.00028765947,0.000005371751,0.00075753394,0.000092023096,0.0000116621395,0.0000023150596,0.000020277821,0.68199414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871916,0.0000838803,0.00069000345,0.0003004146,0.000047806057,0.00015876272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966038,0.0015717932,0.00073894765,0.0010270384,0.000035490088,0.000022929866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038457043,0.0002471106,0.0006025698,0.00006966266,0.00024681725,0.00005212388,0.0007764768,0.00019990047,0.00076052774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026763947,0.00010930671,0.0003254858,0.000049584498,0.0012493599,0.00002725758,0.00029199425,0.0004072171,0.00009616293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006495892,0.0000051617503,0.00014904313,0.00004870051,0.00015156638,2.8291817e-7,0.0003732286,0.0000017515085,2.2783465e-7,0.9960372,0.0023960543,0.0007718329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040468536,0.000011233354,0.00011155763,0.00010419741,0.000039909177,0.00000485419,0.00011457206,0.00006468272,0.0000065724525,0.8557344,0.14328003,0.00012329835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006218979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020921048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31648394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019313267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028471999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8327245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126098846","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_818","title":"Coordinated Anticompetitive Practices Based on Algorithms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Action (physics); Stability (learning theory); Field (mathematics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04952899608942124,"score_gpt":0.2524899164885977,"score_spread":0.20296092039917646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126098846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001956852,0.00035159712,0.002931553,0.00059547805,0.0009984641,0.00032334993,0.00034851054,0.00012884266,0.99430263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060985554,0.00004630356,0.0004196074,0.0007590976,0.00018910038,0.000011119432,0.00006707061,0.000047738467,0.9374744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837196,0.000021299693,0.00066911057,0.0006619676,0.000044584696,0.00023109815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973963,0.00046626147,0.0015002487,0.0005078343,0.00006548644,0.00006385939],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007951232,0.00034669403,0.00075714337,0.00048761623,0.00010158469,0.00010217375,0.00029287193,0.00038060476,0.004024725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029149695,0.00037466566,0.0002147854,0.000059113343,0.00006928531,0.00008544085,0.00004697582,0.00043501495,0.0035048584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747287,0.000038216873,0.00018722929,0.00008862147,0.00010019502,0.000013956958,0.000016690368,0.00001995253,3.4936932e-7,0.99618584,0.0026617858,0.00065970013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006098102,0.00020375472,0.00016369809,0.0005514026,0.000031638298,0.0000026053895,0.000018040595,0.006594595,0.000029258195,0.100236386,0.890898,0.0006608495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010251446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007585651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010321297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047182344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126465181","doi":"10.21428/594757db.37e4a7ad","title":"Generalized Voting Model To Measure Popularity Of Matchings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Voting; Matching (statistics); Class (philosophy); Popularity; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.07320182927781929,"score_gpt":0.2558495132155546,"score_spread":0.1826476839377353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126465181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8016855,0.0008855059,0.15591703,0.0006072851,0.00047905525,0.00016694645,0.000059422764,0.00014675935,0.0400525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877363,0.0000023024324,0.004775979,0.0001704986,0.00006603802,0.0000069824714,0.0000025886684,0.000019906482,0.0072193956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904007,0.000014562822,0.00047784136,0.0002677952,0.00003081555,0.00016890235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965084,0.000023599792,0.00007554926,0.00017350126,0.000018039826,0.000058475405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012563581,0.0000949657,0.00029179512,0.00015696557,0.00003892437,0.00006034721,0.00015205107,0.000063277635,0.00014117229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008388659,0.000097410586,0.00011055445,0.00019234513,0.000010817146,0.00010738199,0.000043824926,0.000093863346,0.00038539668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739703,0.000012455897,0.0024294124,0.000095283314,0.00002559271,8.866002e-7,0.00066499476,0.0027058846,0.00043175335,0.9928133,0.0005800587,0.0002346203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034443315,0.000053076266,0.0008609536,0.00022587371,0.000012858721,0.0000095489195,0.00010736274,0.6254476,0.001383985,0.36364812,0.007413695,0.0004925347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041019314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018091749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62916523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032339383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000096564745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4953623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133105722","doi":"","title":"Decoding Distortion: Pushing the Limits of Optimal Collective Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Social choice theory; Distortion (music); Matching (statistics); Aggregate (composite); Focus (optics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Quality (philosophy); Proxy (statistics); Heuristics","score_opus":0.045157911881653905,"score_gpt":0.33012288795976796,"score_spread":0.28496497607811405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133105722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9079721,0.018264668,0.014104046,0.00022098058,0.008937121,0.0008540765,0.00008088464,0.000060610437,0.04950552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761881,0.00033983035,0.00068410527,0.000028776256,0.00050817156,0.000069390306,0.00003304158,0.00011934833,0.022029223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962357,0.00013366499,0.0018621149,0.0010272055,0.00017716526,0.000564108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946791,0.0020846957,0.0022165908,0.00073549175,0.00018878213,0.000095346746],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028857668,0.0005685801,0.0012432622,0.0006360134,0.00074133807,0.00044433514,0.0007819778,0.00052372843,0.0006472722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001772877,0.00055954687,0.0006396401,0.0012483353,0.00013697633,0.00024395468,0.00011516903,0.0009607575,0.00055232225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001640896,0.0003912667,0.006081454,0.0035299463,0.0022919127,0.000070745606,0.5961491,0.029723313,0.0003672809,0.33658668,0.0027325465,0.020434842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033283168,0.0020045186,0.03108222,0.049008764,0.001949867,0.00024158892,0.43295956,0.19439766,0.0048363814,0.23027964,0.042225696,0.0076857954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015778239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015218419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16467436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006173121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023694977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135432118","doi":"","title":"The Council of Europe Recommendation on e-Voting and the Voting Client","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WU Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intecsea (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.23457384750992483,"score_gpt":0.33107920966493287,"score_spread":0.09650536215500805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135432118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69066423,0.0014538148,0.00029793594,0.016827073,0.00036548404,0.00060751487,0.000015812158,0.00002785456,0.2897403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968768,0.000102171674,0.000013752944,0.00010044075,0.00010347039,0.0000062275126,0.0000011319875,0.0000071756463,0.0027888424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872756,0.00029456397,0.00039726082,0.00020345302,0.00011781887,0.0002593367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811023,0.0013017133,0.00018990025,0.00020457956,0.00016358933,0.000029991408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022300625,0.000059973056,0.00015522091,0.000059472404,0.0005156731,0.00011770666,0.00022353668,0.000032017146,0.000024693216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031942567,0.00003833744,0.000034726007,0.00026267816,0.00017408466,0.00004906144,0.0000548929,0.00030264189,0.00012214882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094991534,0.00002251718,0.0016604558,0.000010317524,0.000009004556,2.921691e-7,0.0012471762,0.000026086998,0.000022067525,0.9837848,0.00051190145,0.012610412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048748907,0.0013310835,0.059286024,0.00034465909,0.000008639525,0.000015861142,0.0021327937,0.054399744,0.0006752701,0.12184014,0.7545781,0.00051277963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008033362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013709023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117774245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046992864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77289957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148491316","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-07031-9_11","title":"Mean-Field Games for Marriage","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Static & dynamic game theory: foundations & applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Innovation and Economic Development Trois Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Remarriage; Context (archaeology); Dynamics (music); Set (abstract data type); Romance","score_opus":0.021310083110910875,"score_gpt":0.26571186413300046,"score_spread":0.2444017810220896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148491316","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019667266,0.0007811024,0.5297585,0.0007152149,0.00036335603,0.0022478472,0.0024957282,0.00017232182,0.46344623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0638398,0.00029757447,0.005398137,0.0005790489,0.00022197324,0.0034206896,0.0020473436,0.00017153186,0.9240239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968307,0.00004670184,0.0015194706,0.0010276451,0.00008957926,0.00048592986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949576,0.0019730043,0.0012123471,0.0015338042,0.00019215407,0.00013106632],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015808772,0.00056786824,0.0010099473,0.0006948962,0.00045999498,0.00022508643,0.0008058803,0.00041433107,0.0018157918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318897,0.00069953006,0.0004662835,0.00019637487,0.00026229056,0.00016765679,0.000116958945,0.00045285636,0.0021380805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028832856,0.000054945125,0.000005753943,0.00023280902,0.00038052886,3.6665966e-7,0.00039320896,0.000031668515,0.0000037427694,0.98572636,0.0019210434,0.01122072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028707893,0.000048239435,0.0000078614685,0.00009313779,0.0001196316,0.000002501613,0.000086538996,0.0013300248,0.000001751182,0.5964697,0.40117162,0.00038189546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003626106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009886488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5243604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036217066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017824261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W785130179","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8893","title":"Robust Winners and Winner Determination Policies under Candidate Uncertainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Unavailability; Voting; Computer science; Computation; Condorcet method; Majority rule; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0977726672521633,"score_gpt":0.2617441265676452,"score_spread":0.16397145931548188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W785130179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95994616,0.000034600533,0.004131026,0.002612136,0.00038353432,0.00024566596,0.000018141278,0.000040732215,0.032587998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987698,0.000022364035,0.00014290138,0.00023748,0.00009098307,0.000011844702,8.2060865e-7,0.000014114282,0.00070967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876225,0.000014190209,0.00055665825,0.000342167,0.00007266124,0.00025205783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990463,0.00008394186,0.00050332636,0.00015929535,0.00014554731,0.0000615896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010041787,0.00016773975,0.00030124767,0.00014281021,0.00017602109,0.00014593962,0.00041176024,0.00008858108,0.00007461033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044864538,0.00014007282,0.000067873116,0.00024405311,0.0003063486,0.00018462252,0.000092051465,0.00016369743,0.00008183654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028342483,0.000029325529,0.0020937067,0.000037719306,0.000009648481,2.9011952e-8,0.0009568996,0.00037491712,0.0015432343,0.9907346,0.000037791455,0.0041537937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068376845,0.00019504836,0.00283322,0.00021141928,0.000012926142,0.0000049169553,0.0016393412,0.078234285,0.031048294,0.88470095,0.0006867031,0.00036452606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033640102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042943393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106033646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041231986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012823275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5712004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79100657","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-05282-8_4","title":"The Cooperative Potential","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04412933075283775,"score_gpt":0.29389591998532594,"score_spread":0.24976658923248818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79100657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024558648,0.026387524,0.08069569,0.00264704,0.0012232419,0.0049359296,0.0005120163,0.00060554355,0.8584344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2243279,0.0030487818,0.007062529,0.00014095567,0.0006896043,0.00027258898,0.00008212788,0.0002509515,0.7641246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962993,0.0005485386,0.0012744969,0.0009015801,0.00027276593,0.0007032952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374497,0.004586424,0.0001839234,0.000987201,0.00016969655,0.00032778087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122031495,0.0005213376,0.0008928422,0.0003898465,0.0023952515,0.0025226616,0.000711932,0.00064377586,0.0018190097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016170847,0.00037537,0.00018606671,0.0001693681,0.003255767,0.00084141584,0.00068624044,0.0018279861,0.00095468474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065961544,0.000055562094,0.0000011575394,0.00009100119,0.000110606874,0.00001480063,0.0010931116,0.0000071585036,0.00001689131,0.9688798,0.0001281911,0.02894206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252511,0.0003312699,0.000002749871,0.00023411846,0.000020820265,0.00011270807,0.00086204265,0.0003020574,0.00008517727,0.8882652,0.10905628,0.0004023224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022714596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049174128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19976926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021765218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082333645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791500286","doi":"10.1007/s12046-015-0374-6","title":"Profit allocation among rational players in a cooperative game under uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sadhana","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Profit (economics); Interval (graph theory); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.06978624295564397,"score_gpt":0.25207815669361017,"score_spread":0.18229191373796622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W791500286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98028386,0.00024948563,0.0029932638,0.0004778324,0.00031894128,0.0002700866,0.000025012105,0.000028834296,0.015352707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967718,0.0000034305144,0.000040764164,0.00015420288,0.0000855199,0.000040702864,0.000036214817,0.000011123551,0.0028562078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991527,0.00004627517,0.00035212788,0.00024019844,0.000037140955,0.00017154591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954623,0.000043403354,0.00014996875,0.00014432265,0.00004749223,0.00006857295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009374263,0.00009457788,0.00019915932,0.00013869014,0.000031807762,0.000042558764,0.000106831685,0.000074710195,0.00010911754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016060646,0.000103993814,0.00003058008,0.00021811163,0.000053385957,0.0001985222,0.000018205754,0.00010650486,0.00047020652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004039131,0.000037458158,0.114281155,0.000011691873,0.000027872546,0.0000020441996,0.0029828781,0.053728838,0.00002398758,0.82805794,0.00073175586,0.00007397225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070694797,0.00052325433,0.45824435,0.00022835872,0.000015329037,0.000014467669,0.012318274,0.21417756,0.0006042627,0.29214138,0.013020621,0.0016426543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062770635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005184783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53591657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018980159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050534378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.604371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88989832","doi":"10.21991/c9cd41","title":"COMMITMENT AND COMMUNITY IN THE INTER-REFERENDUM PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Period (music); Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.09384170883466772,"score_gpt":0.2406480322603349,"score_spread":0.14680632342566718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88989832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43366414,0.0026406734,0.046122186,0.0036263245,0.0024917996,0.0012168194,0.00071096525,0.00015771549,0.5093694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984725,0.000022645556,0.000270852,0.0008526134,0.000042272164,0.00009769229,0.000043766144,0.0000071271065,0.00019054084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824077,0.00021842889,0.00071593124,0.00031066305,0.00006487757,0.00044930755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998983,0.00016593549,0.00023085983,0.0004852334,0.000044523462,0.00009044701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016398851,0.00024045359,0.00037188557,0.00023712536,0.0011342091,0.000088832756,0.0004930246,0.00013801921,0.0002658255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002824837,0.00021226864,0.00011480537,0.00022648355,0.002778434,0.00037134305,0.00017556529,0.00064395444,0.00032746274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029642222,0.00023205661,0.118220106,0.000018202245,0.000033804128,0.000008930534,0.0015485781,0.000008165235,0.000004669474,0.87919796,0.00053771195,0.00016020462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034182146,0.00037477206,0.054165855,0.0003184891,0.000033095122,0.0009891884,0.030587278,0.0005750089,0.00006871919,0.75494516,0.15349667,0.0010275743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007523887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050254236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56480837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011360155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085866915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90305737","doi":"10.4000/msh.2922","title":"Annexe bibliographique sur la théorie du choix social","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mathématiques et sciences humaines","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Mathematical economics; Calculus (dental); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Geology; Medicine","score_opus":0.037897300215606694,"score_gpt":0.2729537897314535,"score_spread":0.23505648951584682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90305737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61023456,0.011332046,0.0032482906,0.014823756,0.003885331,0.0003954471,0.00019093884,0.00019843351,0.35569122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839292,0.002543013,0.0016249571,0.00073449087,0.00049252185,0.000041790565,0.0000057315037,0.000041996598,0.01058626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966343,0.00076732936,0.0009790827,0.00073448865,0.00014103243,0.0007437438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978702,0.0008781166,0.0007305378,0.00029340727,0.00011217213,0.00011554313],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010003573,0.00037991328,0.0006963787,0.0016934563,0.0009811879,0.0010247317,0.000676178,0.00033851995,0.00085671607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010368292,0.0004221306,0.0003135672,0.0033511391,0.0014931654,0.0013216316,0.00008984268,0.0003245666,0.00028096285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036338001,0.00016303442,0.042950816,0.00017714428,0.000034583783,0.000009615077,0.0039950204,0.000057027697,0.000011870274,0.93639255,0.016049799,0.0001549105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042634283,0.00018681085,0.008403604,0.00022075658,0.000015066087,0.00007799949,0.00095205504,0.00080998585,0.00011380053,0.69902176,0.28908232,0.00068948546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040356838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012232458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37369472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005750795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011291493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W99643971","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-058","title":"Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Voting; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Heuristics; Preference elicitation; Minimax; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.15568759198764767,"score_gpt":0.24653360338674782,"score_spread":0.09084601139910015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W99643971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90706176,0.000020286983,0.008512798,0.000019120538,0.000038381586,0.0027415869,0.0000027942206,0.000030729047,0.081572525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957704,5.66985e-7,0.0032439004,0.000030820138,0.000018752262,0.00071685604,0.0000025577824,0.000006474848,0.00020970523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993899,0.000017047443,0.00032853437,0.0001521686,0.000011772564,0.00010061318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975544,0.000015732883,0.00014000811,0.00006302817,0.0000067875194,0.000018980514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008730423,0.00005431943,0.00011860811,0.00011570404,0.000032710297,0.000024101782,0.000046318528,0.000036905545,0.00013721576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055442168,0.000060115304,0.0000130800145,0.000088021516,0.000015212607,0.00020583782,0.000016844526,0.000045734065,0.00008596475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010989288,0.000039879367,0.28670305,0.0000425624,0.000003495386,3.1810606e-7,0.0019000347,0.000015166252,0.000067824134,0.71063894,0.0000095905825,0.0005681625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028256648,0.00030663225,0.7660255,0.0002377818,0.0000034127972,0.000013257067,0.0029525473,0.07920711,0.0029477652,0.14401427,0.0007633451,0.00070273655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002954839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004352234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56662464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025149347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019637828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2451431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}