{"meta":{"query_hash":"882aa78cefde","filters":{"topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems"},"cohort_total":776,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":776,"exported":776,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/882aa78cefde","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Game+Theory+and+Voting+Systems"},"results":[{"id":"W101946736","doi":"","title":"On Exact n-Step Domination.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.021644334553096722,"score_gpt":0.2227675887907469,"score_spread":0.20112325423765018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101946736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21312237,0.0019093922,0.6050969,0.002050268,0.00038266674,0.00017901926,0.00083703117,0.00047303175,0.17594936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92305243,0.00074102206,0.045637447,0.00061974814,0.0001767341,0.00023286139,0.0004920136,0.00016209559,0.028885689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976968,0.0009492731,0.00009505491,0.00032560513,0.00039080592,0.000542497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161845,0.005767454,0.0005365765,0.0010195068,0.00050339947,0.0005546379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020912047,0.0005786402,0.001238191,0.0013234144,0.0014379224,0.0020891172,0.0018849972,0.0012968626,0.015935767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014771938,0.00038362315,0.0008818254,0.0011357096,0.0024469844,0.004585825,0.002503081,0.002207542,0.0019073426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007180232,0.000050552644,0.0006545584,0.00007620544,0.000027640344,0.00008020823,0.00011842662,0.015954187,0.00042531837,0.96283305,0.004371547,0.015336525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017950571,0.000010477268,0.00016638504,0.00001205572,0.000005087615,0.000053965974,0.000025934703,0.037828557,0.0001658015,0.96027225,0.0014334173,0.0000080180835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018121247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028285203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015935767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014595969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010206482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053310513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1027077394","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9294","title":"Conventional Machine Learning for Social Choice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Conceptualization; Machine learning; Missing data; Outcome (game theory); Artificial intelligence; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.23728863668513883,"score_gpt":0.31389335682755715,"score_spread":0.07660472014241831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1027077394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006902853,0.0054305056,0.9657701,0.0051596127,0.00035464793,0.00012419597,0.00074561016,0.00023587569,0.015276562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61692244,0.00988427,0.34820703,0.0016355984,0.0023870233,0.0010594241,0.0016241674,0.00014406085,0.018135872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694973,0.0017579644,0.00011030996,0.00048029784,0.00058361865,0.000118122945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090636,0.007188808,0.00037939788,0.00093842746,0.00046673435,0.000120237564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051110396,0.0012950345,0.0013675797,0.0017267253,0.0007313758,0.0022122914,0.0017708468,0.001965678,0.007789914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021391625,0.00042326516,0.0010078541,0.0027604785,0.0027998576,0.003513498,0.0017054457,0.0042478167,0.0020222343],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004289013,0.000054164764,0.0010621146,0.00023887018,0.00007872814,0.000050258925,0.000100207784,0.05912683,0.00015052903,0.8606613,0.007528992,0.07090507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011991169,0.000013389062,0.00019775762,0.00003289002,0.0000063686257,0.000015545129,0.0000147663495,0.22143486,0.000052108826,0.7723841,0.0058278088,0.0000085147785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00281301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023836235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007789914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022051926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014628508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02703005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103001999","doi":"","title":"Large Neighbourhood Unions and Edge-disjoint Perfect Matchings.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Mathematics; Disjoint sets; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.012501938988027766,"score_gpt":0.2048596264232903,"score_spread":0.19235768743526255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103001999","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26422736,0.0026547674,0.5784597,0.0028467607,0.00023758766,0.00019140381,0.0011488523,0.00057244976,0.14966114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93238455,0.0006703718,0.043261915,0.0003134786,0.00017492063,0.00016918921,0.0006508658,0.00009748612,0.022277107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966113,0.0016175624,0.00016996861,0.00064228976,0.0005248064,0.0004340433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98484796,0.00952672,0.0019614776,0.0017779687,0.00067190314,0.00121401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025364454,0.0003934741,0.001471619,0.0017325841,0.0024140498,0.0039003284,0.002144804,0.0019341065,0.014187537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021233652,0.00075061043,0.0009953555,0.0018443844,0.0031267982,0.007561487,0.0031453585,0.0018789191,0.0017512727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006488354,0.000030440127,0.0005028352,0.000049657305,0.000020989004,0.00006168182,0.000091051385,0.006144533,0.00022075881,0.98321116,0.0023238969,0.007278139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019829955,0.0000072788757,0.0002403874,0.000014723112,0.000009050176,0.00007906146,0.000047161517,0.01568506,0.00013219436,0.98191595,0.0018436135,0.0000057767106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013970667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019289466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014187537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015341004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084039674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047462046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05600991476203109,"score_gpt":0.26030724144611855,"score_spread":0.20429732668408745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11392634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025158798,0.014495183,0.41066667,0.01960772,0.0011600099,0.00012803718,0.00046798828,0.0001827383,0.52813286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62113756,0.02024671,0.20719482,0.004704815,0.003656392,0.0009589263,0.0008036372,0.0005186248,0.14077856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985322,0.00065301324,0.000092066046,0.00019692033,0.00041593122,0.000109994915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956939,0.003139098,0.00017774112,0.00036934475,0.00053338864,0.000086465225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027001451,0.000758575,0.0013323183,0.0013119114,0.0018866243,0.0029851866,0.0014398029,0.0019435596,0.0095535405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007171876,0.0007548677,0.00078251655,0.002567538,0.0069611156,0.011373869,0.0013764461,0.0062223123,0.002138088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000277216,0.000008653988,0.00002825409,0.00002036918,0.0000022598367,0.000007049934,0.00004960161,0.0001997091,0.000030941508,0.9923348,0.0025016798,0.0048139077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019745326,0.0000016702179,0.000029061233,0.0000094340285,0.0000012882684,0.0000140875,0.000016464866,0.00045197582,0.000034187127,0.9939441,0.0054939296,0.0000017545716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011642688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010674415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095535405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001706529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015295708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03195983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11888698","doi":"10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00499-0","title":"Comments on ECCC Report TR06-133: The Resolution Width Problem is EXPTIME-Complete","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic colloquium on computational complexity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Lemma (botany); Simple (philosophy); Pebble; Resolution (logic); Mathematics; Argument (complex analysis); Reduction (mathematics); Combinatorics; Computer science; Geometry; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06241613730404857,"score_gpt":0.2656478985926266,"score_spread":0.20323176128857803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11888698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046649316,0.0022677581,0.001944415,0.48258573,0.38281253,0.00039322863,0.0026826758,0.0022123943,0.124634765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005907167,0.0035559235,0.0029223235,0.31789097,0.15789045,0.0004710395,0.0030860459,0.0022843787,0.50599164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387205,0.0008226199,0.0006543248,0.0006692229,0.0031956814,0.0007860581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713567,0.0062805098,0.0009607244,0.0028519698,0.016494408,0.0020557616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007271078,0.0014325706,0.0014852739,0.0017101299,0.0034197418,0.006011657,0.004853362,0.02311453,0.20618443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053396087,0.0005866966,0.0018978836,0.0018977012,0.0016711885,0.0048386524,0.0021137302,0.015611947,0.2062316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017974395,0.000010464663,0.000023197352,0.000028738485,0.0000017892039,0.000057165184,0.0000099485715,0.000018562747,0.000053873202,0.0007355028,0.9965063,0.0025364528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006580573,0.00000879429,0.000097677075,0.000043970107,0.000001967263,0.000025527188,0.000017929286,0.000039365943,0.00006169388,0.0004068149,0.9992804,0.000009190128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011921918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010218362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20618443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042399783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004348206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6897557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1238745702","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-057","title":"Budgeted social choice: from consensus to personalized decision making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Variety (cybernetics); Greedy algorithm; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09434534845328871,"score_gpt":0.27366833904457866,"score_spread":0.17932299059128995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1238745702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011285198,0.00025074725,0.98324585,0.00089301827,0.0000444902,0.00012510947,0.00011008553,0.00014500848,0.0039005082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54318994,0.0005885211,0.4459691,0.0005416688,0.0001612611,0.00067234493,0.0003796033,0.00012583064,0.008371791],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952246,0.0026158355,0.00016980205,0.0009370518,0.000692617,0.00036013717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932498,0.004820886,0.0005246689,0.000637239,0.0004081417,0.00035931304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005998473,0.00112864,0.0023833027,0.0010602338,0.00112273,0.002469998,0.003096913,0.0028474608,0.0072389776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015355634,0.0008364652,0.0013912785,0.0017442114,0.0023969258,0.005583088,0.002432478,0.0031338332,0.0008392716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013187055,0.00014302485,0.0008418352,0.00020234722,0.00013403076,0.00015272936,0.00040780456,0.53194976,0.0010203036,0.40096292,0.005108188,0.05894523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042198895,0.00003988303,0.00010509933,0.00001998514,0.00001378176,0.00003124126,0.000048848095,0.65537894,0.000304171,0.34150273,0.002495444,0.00001764835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038441212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003277447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072389776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024009016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021419157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03172338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W130885469","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8829","title":"Preference Elicitation and Interview Minimization in Stable Matchings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Preference; Matching (statistics); Minification; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Work (physics); Machine learning; Scheme (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13783264841163043,"score_gpt":0.2620666541801558,"score_spread":0.12423400576852536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W130885469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016032413,0.000070306465,0.98149866,0.00027234404,0.000009061043,0.00022558527,0.00013193153,0.00015728758,0.0016023035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23611234,0.00012873867,0.75913686,0.0002227026,0.00003941408,0.00080624246,0.0006500121,0.000110584224,0.0027930501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666954,0.025052184,0.0013148879,0.0029360177,0.00300273,0.0009987388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92915076,0.056608614,0.0035373862,0.0062517202,0.003412067,0.0010394899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020861616,0.001317732,0.002115487,0.0022910438,0.0018659916,0.0025405346,0.0033965558,0.0026509394,0.0078633325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09554497,0.0011312589,0.0022514071,0.0036963776,0.0030838489,0.007350404,0.0050296043,0.0028534092,0.001337401],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001067552,0.00038027985,0.004443734,0.0005369622,0.00019459105,0.00023532397,0.0032625666,0.21364728,0.0042165555,0.5160231,0.0044595124,0.25153255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013080555,0.00018563562,0.0005022145,0.000056216824,0.00003839761,0.00009988347,0.00040670435,0.51332325,0.0025826222,0.47911754,0.0035109576,0.00004588284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028049387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033307313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020861616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029476634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029236432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11032808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143402542","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_44","title":"Parameterized Enumeration of (Locally-) Optimal Aggregations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Enumeration; Combinatorics; Upper and lower bounds; Swap (finance); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Computer science","score_opus":0.02725714467181971,"score_gpt":0.22007242875851382,"score_spread":0.1928152840866941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143402542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12918685,0.00038001238,0.845696,0.0008815273,0.000053487427,0.00010460163,0.0013700221,0.0010704752,0.021257147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5888539,0.0004929829,0.385955,0.0002392528,0.00010908298,0.00054498,0.004202415,0.0008866587,0.01871576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976042,0.0009977567,0.00018124118,0.0004447065,0.0004495055,0.00032264224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066895,0.0060886336,0.0006092339,0.0016653218,0.00052552915,0.00044234202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016292724,0.0010477399,0.0018723345,0.0014631636,0.0012523666,0.0042239595,0.0028679399,0.002250802,0.017217312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145246135,0.0011417158,0.0014342094,0.0033621055,0.0014358056,0.0051103584,0.004170096,0.0029782194,0.0020828717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026441607,0.00018563075,0.0020352309,0.00032053582,0.00008838782,0.00015718049,0.00042133217,0.20240757,0.003382485,0.6976267,0.012311182,0.0807994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003622389,0.000019266878,0.00018202455,0.00002832677,0.000017894594,0.00005263744,0.00006474386,0.3405798,0.0006017011,0.6567682,0.0016351314,0.000014013062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000909289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024609833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017217312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00173158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013006069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057597637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1438141466","doi":"10.14778/2809974.2809982","title":"Rank aggregation with ties: Experiments and Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Computer Research Institute of Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Aggregation problem; Strong ties; Theoretical computer science; Learning to rank; Machine learning; Interpersonal ties; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02972460171478562,"score_gpt":0.22784222436726287,"score_spread":0.19811762265247726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1438141466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90697163,0.002211898,0.059890352,0.00212598,0.0009985515,0.003724274,0.002858333,0.00066363835,0.020555325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635307,0.0005569668,0.027531777,0.00045746757,0.0004859642,0.002199383,0.0019643693,0.00020282438,0.010248151],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96691865,0.024724625,0.0014111385,0.0023310203,0.0034536202,0.0011610548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60145724,0.34011197,0.015345426,0.034785014,0.004842597,0.0034577602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034513734,0.0015130508,0.0027621447,0.0013701128,0.00237487,0.0036396747,0.0018572765,0.0031954418,0.024434624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18500243,0.0005803411,0.0016279814,0.0019785452,0.0025608696,0.0035764684,0.0025477465,0.0026456886,0.0029413789],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13266326,0.04316551,0.05783926,0.009323006,0.005586048,0.0009525965,0.005744853,0.11644371,0.013704309,0.10820764,0.06932897,0.43704087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03623623,0.05837093,0.044925306,0.0011082096,0.0059041274,0.0013863213,0.0041887104,0.4757552,0.018306455,0.3196824,0.03346717,0.00066897675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015959357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011662501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034513734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014618691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018746913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1825282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487901217","doi":"10.1023/a:1012059101225","title":"Political Influence, Economic Interests and Endogenous Tax Structure in a Computable Equilibrium Framework: With Application to the United States, 1973 and 1983","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Computable general equilibrium; Homogeneous; Group (periodic table); Economics; Mathematical economics; Politics; Political science; Positive economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Economic system; Macroeconomics; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.025877629360400983,"score_gpt":0.23493999633576018,"score_spread":0.2090623669753592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487901217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79703945,0.002150086,0.15318418,0.0035042767,0.00012038044,0.00015134527,0.0013636191,0.00020352082,0.042283174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97880155,0.0009346689,0.013285306,0.000055506865,0.000039988598,0.00008797295,0.00027317347,0.000036348207,0.006485429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950707,0.00028779524,0.00001849498,0.000063182975,0.000054164982,0.00006930569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947025,0.004579863,0.00024247769,0.00015003022,0.00023105786,0.0000939492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019033127,0.00045692266,0.0009967606,0.0010303608,0.0013093463,0.0036097376,0.001028521,0.0011850281,0.006379501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126683,0.00040830692,0.0007713465,0.00238663,0.001718096,0.0024591696,0.0010158109,0.0015420911,0.00029405975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009993953,0.00014075411,0.005816092,0.0000789398,0.00006248243,0.0001585251,0.0005715114,0.45107952,0.00008705275,0.5238683,0.0036160613,0.01442079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101386504,0.000028055838,0.0035703885,0.0000414706,0.00007378242,0.000027169657,0.00054564484,0.7832303,0.00020975461,0.20802277,0.0041230745,0.000026207916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12002604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1259248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12002604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051901117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036086473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23865485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489745468","doi":"","title":"Strategy-Proof Tie-Breaking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Matching (statistics); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023768397817852543,"score_gpt":0.1602612038950215,"score_spread":0.13649280607716896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489745468","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08149879,0.000116474315,0.90090275,0.0007612262,0.00006694314,0.0003204469,0.00029387334,0.0002925415,0.015747033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7539476,0.00022775732,0.23253514,0.00034404107,0.000106191896,0.0005360297,0.0005426719,0.00011885038,0.01164163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467635,0.002060846,0.0003164881,0.0011097584,0.0010769886,0.0007595616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794312,0.012855729,0.002612546,0.0026584493,0.0011950965,0.0012468621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00513464,0.0008653562,0.001284483,0.0008447857,0.0018512971,0.0036366624,0.0034966464,0.0020419464,0.0090692155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033754878,0.0007526804,0.0015897577,0.0012914587,0.0020068008,0.0057446472,0.003087635,0.0041998024,0.0012977362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015412018,0.0002557327,0.0011132183,0.00023243639,0.00009536259,0.00035743587,0.0006526466,0.08245735,0.0025983213,0.87753016,0.002850332,0.03170283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001200711,0.000101969796,0.00015492042,0.000022783739,0.00001959873,0.00012277381,0.00015085013,0.23331185,0.0014496854,0.7607797,0.0037427726,0.000023047383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011557104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010703895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090692155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012818401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023602399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030339539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491181859","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.04.001","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Comparative statics; Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Population; Resource allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Class (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07436292279732265,"score_gpt":0.26958138631792233,"score_spread":0.19521846352059968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491181859","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30149245,0.0014988235,0.60778713,0.005238587,0.00018169965,0.00030800837,0.00052529474,0.0004289703,0.08253904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96473056,0.00081465027,0.021760043,0.0004385389,0.00017856588,0.00021684852,0.00014664605,0.00011002425,0.011604123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940931,0.0028967452,0.00023605619,0.0007474431,0.0009285838,0.0010980726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953412,0.0340513,0.0035558392,0.0038846447,0.0033409353,0.0017552802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011022581,0.001157516,0.0034195308,0.0024436389,0.0020708386,0.0061343843,0.0041341563,0.0038534245,0.018286781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052938428,0.0011667402,0.0022245965,0.0023834817,0.0045297435,0.01202094,0.0030001197,0.004374251,0.0013051025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028806034,0.00016662038,0.0011079296,0.00018894901,0.00008635327,0.00012428562,0.00035058882,0.027463224,0.0011299717,0.9518358,0.0026137542,0.014644497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108894594,0.00006782143,0.0005147698,0.000036741993,0.0000463686,0.00011821794,0.000116203366,0.08961433,0.00036328952,0.9079139,0.0010681023,0.00003133294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031030036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019066236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018286781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032677832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034341803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061175406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496464339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1851325","title":"On a Three-Alternative Condorcet Jury Theorem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Social choice theory; Jury; Voting; Private information retrieval; Approval voting; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Type (biology); Majority rule; State (computer science); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.035149016385647165,"score_gpt":0.21530561235198659,"score_spread":0.18015659596633943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496464339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07874716,0.001270105,0.576864,0.036969274,0.0016485287,0.0002975575,0.0013085098,0.00031790137,0.3025769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85078007,0.0011105648,0.08428389,0.006916182,0.0016510212,0.0009405136,0.00047915624,0.0002062599,0.053632375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233174,0.0030185222,0.00041142612,0.0012757146,0.001790902,0.0011717444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977773,0.016291708,0.0009353096,0.002443451,0.0019237044,0.00063288386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013851118,0.0010539527,0.002972543,0.0015700699,0.00437488,0.0056848526,0.0044809207,0.0066476376,0.023218554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038094454,0.00084733247,0.002992408,0.0019347104,0.008734535,0.009620636,0.003630173,0.008677733,0.0029058217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031746837,0.000017348038,0.00009622328,0.000021540622,0.000012522712,0.00002305411,0.00005833911,0.0008603641,0.0000563661,0.99416083,0.002623706,0.0020379522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002876974,0.0000067741325,0.000065764274,0.000009387183,0.0000068042077,0.000026523547,0.000013346001,0.005100612,0.000046288693,0.9937245,0.00096363487,0.0000076776505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002661967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019753089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023218554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035072262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042055175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07767373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503218943","doi":"","title":"The Daycare Assignment Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Matching (statistics); Stability (learning theory); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; School choice; Stable marriage problem; Mathematical optimization; Class (philosophy); Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07317586105897277,"score_gpt":0.28847718520716414,"score_spread":0.21530132414819136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503218943","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13788693,0.0018790582,0.6668725,0.013141622,0.0009989667,0.00089065515,0.0037987425,0.00058417884,0.17394727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7714192,0.0015340095,0.1403873,0.0012321388,0.00057025976,0.0007883827,0.0037259357,0.00022277706,0.08011998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972656,0.0009728069,0.00017524767,0.0008756185,0.00034149483,0.0003691686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982508,0.0007713651,0.00021146452,0.00026073886,0.00016457961,0.0003409998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016551141,0.00082169747,0.0011597582,0.00071151706,0.0024058404,0.0038408558,0.0024013745,0.003530464,0.033589456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004525486,0.0005369825,0.0012154435,0.0018799307,0.0015769611,0.0055965846,0.0032065362,0.0027755958,0.0030572684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019462149,0.00020156344,0.0011605116,0.00026122856,0.000083584484,0.00025144615,0.00034060038,0.021295728,0.00069505896,0.9075167,0.018384337,0.049614664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014570267,0.000090042355,0.0005830759,0.00005096095,0.00003554239,0.00043566333,0.000500646,0.042560052,0.0006779692,0.8740808,0.0808025,0.000037127775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001585485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011586054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033589456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016380098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016687266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11236793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507782784","doi":"","title":"Social Norms and Rationality of Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Rationality; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Nash equilibrium; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044273036215001255,"score_gpt":0.2756084852402012,"score_spread":0.23133544902519995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507782784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08721267,0.008276575,0.60028356,0.035183918,0.0006884515,0.00026444858,0.0004811117,0.00022072993,0.26738852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454856,0.002377203,0.04378087,0.0011759672,0.00044856407,0.00035003136,0.00018619247,0.000051113748,0.0061443727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97737175,0.012812552,0.001336273,0.0028621117,0.004350052,0.0012671974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97775716,0.014476293,0.001899703,0.0029194483,0.0024413199,0.00050609704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016006924,0.00079181744,0.0012699516,0.0019634129,0.0016687441,0.0057493085,0.0015541812,0.0027147364,0.0030059144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027077029,0.00041287486,0.0012010044,0.0016504877,0.019999314,0.0066779875,0.0031489132,0.0033750208,0.00051539316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080272475,0.000006394065,0.00017689544,0.000021306378,0.000018143914,0.000014587877,0.00023205834,0.001303108,0.00005148358,0.9950494,0.000270756,0.0028477826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075332646,0.000004215727,0.00007653549,0.0000115447,0.0000028803374,0.0000061402498,0.000043209824,0.0011626817,0.00004079659,0.99675864,0.0018813587,0.0000045260467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037199182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017203342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016006924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00363537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028786887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084653735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509454970","doi":"","title":"ANC Analytical Payoff Functions for Networks with Endogenous Bilateral Long Cheap Talk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Superadditivity; Inefficiency; Stochastic game; Valuation (finance); Link (geometry); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics; Economics; Combinatorics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07546342242587019,"score_gpt":0.28590517371260016,"score_spread":0.21044175128672998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509454970","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028681993,0.000713788,0.8864158,0.0014644233,0.00011969595,0.00013448323,0.0003078086,0.00013262332,0.08202951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.768514,0.0018439011,0.13558511,0.0005203063,0.00021658506,0.00092879083,0.00039258564,0.00016333738,0.091835454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989441,0.0004925465,0.000038829436,0.00013962164,0.00019799187,0.00018687306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974031,0.0017159474,0.00031520327,0.0001441117,0.00026754985,0.000154075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002476154,0.0014749167,0.00079814484,0.0015609249,0.0009779722,0.002413262,0.0022048613,0.002170145,0.017964747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011089152,0.0006324903,0.0010919888,0.001352103,0.0017231527,0.0049205725,0.0021009443,0.0022793673,0.0021115015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001416634,0.00001644762,0.00016146478,0.000049202292,0.0000069227085,0.00005613642,0.0001220773,0.100005515,0.00024049741,0.8920983,0.0018422966,0.005386907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079914835,0.000014434184,0.00012352777,0.000029669094,0.000006722814,0.000046098117,0.000056649118,0.46610233,0.00014114784,0.5298136,0.0036408463,0.000016933775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035163255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029832744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017964747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004050716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014208981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060098052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510153283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2263942","title":"Existence and Outcome-Uniqueness of Stationary Procedural Bargaining Equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Uniqueness; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.027797946229850858,"score_gpt":0.23857919467074096,"score_spread":0.2107812484408901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510153283","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42560086,0.00025287343,0.500311,0.0029010186,0.000092395865,0.000350092,0.0005122446,0.00021361872,0.06976594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592204,0.00022494099,0.031873327,0.00020444092,0.000055294804,0.000312274,0.00023975098,0.00007436225,0.007795238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724835,0.0011316884,0.00018037298,0.00050905533,0.00034016505,0.0005903845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850402,0.009982823,0.0016348183,0.000935891,0.0015951532,0.0008111521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004221551,0.00065016834,0.0016140644,0.0010781788,0.0024239062,0.0047325357,0.002569086,0.0029353634,0.010368944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025130408,0.00086809095,0.0018649757,0.0013210286,0.0035144598,0.0049681747,0.0028758761,0.0035994567,0.0019805215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011831543,0.00013622089,0.0008548465,0.0000578324,0.000036331683,0.00010491587,0.00045554456,0.006676722,0.0015163076,0.9837737,0.00086588133,0.0054032495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090479494,0.000037480986,0.00042708337,0.000025828864,0.000020620235,0.000077643446,0.00026249886,0.041048683,0.00087778067,0.95641357,0.0006995865,0.000018707342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007681923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078787986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010368944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013824701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030228645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03468758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510286099","doi":"","title":"Arrow's Theorem in Spatial Environments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Arrow; Mathematical economics; Social welfare function; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Impossibility; Space (punctuation); Voting; Independence (probability theory); Transitive relation; Majority rule; Economics; Welfare; Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.020392436571973024,"score_gpt":0.18562639762439878,"score_spread":0.16523396105242577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510286099","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060535617,0.0063393624,0.6490402,0.010406428,0.00075071614,0.00009662189,0.0015015132,0.0004339538,0.27089548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7277054,0.009216479,0.15610087,0.0018997254,0.001348775,0.0002724052,0.0008866845,0.0003660785,0.10220352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844944,0.00048812886,0.000092141076,0.0003537866,0.00038051698,0.00023601681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954666,0.0026334305,0.00039894294,0.00037437768,0.0007722464,0.0003542938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023938573,0.00085457717,0.0012085761,0.0029108755,0.0022339458,0.0039048917,0.0014979522,0.0020290532,0.014808076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077634812,0.0005294146,0.0015845523,0.0030629449,0.0037337719,0.008323013,0.0029626146,0.0025488336,0.0025979497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003622949,0.0000021258345,0.000090613474,0.000017280216,0.0000049604355,0.000024417703,0.000040942723,0.0007747988,0.000038924714,0.9951414,0.0013615406,0.0024993282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004597175,0.0000028940126,0.0001300857,0.000009453622,0.000005408862,0.0000524861,0.000022936105,0.0022270605,0.000039604874,0.99089617,0.0066040335,0.0000053819977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035527218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024377971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014808076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018132128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012469284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049538016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516863238","doi":"","title":"Choice, Opportunities, and Procedures: Collected Papers of Kotaro Suzumura. Part I, Rational Choice and Revealed Preference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07968952659356413,"score_gpt":0.24506235395068526,"score_spread":0.16537282735712114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516863238","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05768636,0.6220073,0.1307843,0.09771155,0.005085043,0.00016366402,0.009766752,0.00044190366,0.07635314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40613857,0.44084808,0.066700034,0.0071485965,0.011232987,0.0004889842,0.010815306,0.0010710227,0.05555639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980331,0.00073869445,0.00023804099,0.00034619225,0.00050726265,0.00013660785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97574425,0.017904779,0.0009793093,0.0017423781,0.0030239914,0.00060527434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006334469,0.00086128997,0.0018615439,0.0060906303,0.0017951645,0.003188525,0.0007095906,0.0014086693,0.010205789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022763796,0.00090507645,0.00090675015,0.015323965,0.0017325488,0.0049145874,0.0017804854,0.002199457,0.002763937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030778354,0.00023829531,0.008255276,0.0029835347,0.00030468902,0.00020418335,0.003030394,0.0037631015,0.0012040404,0.35544178,0.36402765,0.26023927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114346,0.00006098511,0.019031795,0.0017332422,0.00032124348,0.00030599686,0.0011025271,0.0036470355,0.0018097471,0.43756455,0.5341788,0.0001297941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043967823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077241054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010205789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030294028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029834402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03414172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524367418","doi":"","title":"Multi-Agent Bilateral Bargaining with Endogenous Protocol","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Renting; Housing discrimination; Census tract; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Economics; State (computer science); Labour economics; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Property value; Business; Public economics; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Finance; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.11391646741605731,"score_gpt":0.31675663113096375,"score_spread":0.20284016371490643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524367418","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020479796,0.00037900274,0.93140525,0.0018609926,0.00028670477,0.0010173868,0.00074624515,0.00047506051,0.0433496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6442028,0.00063965813,0.2916081,0.0007503901,0.00026585188,0.0032622935,0.0006984281,0.00016397602,0.05840849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943625,0.0030435307,0.00032035838,0.0009528914,0.00067866093,0.00064203143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98692024,0.009619788,0.0008760742,0.0011362418,0.0008168807,0.00063089526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007615342,0.0014994357,0.0024158382,0.0010198064,0.0014024162,0.0029484243,0.004029507,0.003850918,0.034247644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020023076,0.00073263707,0.0010907743,0.0015586199,0.0023562808,0.0035770207,0.004376372,0.0032723153,0.004219595],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007537421,0.00024369887,0.00070199225,0.00032799333,0.000107617976,0.00048726113,0.00030993178,0.27213553,0.0011222309,0.6832981,0.008266215,0.032245714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042155935,0.00010377694,0.00010330032,0.000040892144,0.00002483974,0.000075701064,0.000081120874,0.6712945,0.0004149325,0.3190857,0.008319761,0.00003394494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020877656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020395438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034247644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027772144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11456978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153079438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.281870","title":"The Structure Of Equilibrium Payoffs In Superadditive Coalitional Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Superadditivity; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Reservation; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.011212142257051898,"score_gpt":0.2105053707069511,"score_spread":0.19929322844989922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153079438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51507866,0.00031527484,0.44917712,0.0015223677,0.00003888347,0.00019029903,0.00042861694,0.00018849265,0.033060186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96407485,0.00025742367,0.02721586,0.00011120098,0.00004056644,0.0002264948,0.0002934764,0.00005348227,0.0077266814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971533,0.0013886989,0.0001743997,0.000383959,0.0004873262,0.0004123372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739845,0.019471351,0.002263913,0.0011124932,0.0018270655,0.0013407358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003213022,0.00078423053,0.0016218032,0.0018167105,0.0016448911,0.0047569177,0.0027942904,0.0021779672,0.007238542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023958087,0.0010675687,0.0008603447,0.001989279,0.00282743,0.0063222772,0.0018880203,0.0026748092,0.00082404906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011634032,0.00008202974,0.0007308736,0.00005272779,0.00002350241,0.00008334132,0.0004546653,0.028608462,0.000728984,0.9616353,0.00085405586,0.0066297194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002782309,0.000033039727,0.00024837453,0.000012670731,0.00000930014,0.000039085848,0.000094091534,0.09761544,0.00023707117,0.9012963,0.00037433326,0.000012419851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001664257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019242943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007238542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002279865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018432699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02421534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536580421","doi":"","title":"Lucas'Counter Example Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematical economics; Dominance (genetics); Futures studies; Relation (database); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07489978475279653,"score_gpt":0.3060261139288195,"score_spread":0.231126329176023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536580421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10790081,0.0016212863,0.07203482,0.027966153,0.0008992283,0.00007426687,0.00031468485,0.00021114454,0.7889776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92905164,0.000874816,0.013344084,0.0015637055,0.0003032101,0.000106125284,0.00009938867,0.00007354352,0.05458342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927384,0.0002496742,0.00002383436,0.0001120026,0.0002201292,0.00012052598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991737,0.00039372628,0.00008631093,0.0000830722,0.00019118607,0.00007196694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007428246,0.0003753937,0.0005150329,0.0011824945,0.0025326381,0.0020043068,0.0007841733,0.002375758,0.019555062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046137176,0.00016488612,0.0005718842,0.000802618,0.002323743,0.0029286433,0.002217548,0.0020660846,0.0017214967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069243565,0.0000036838653,0.000040405,0.000009025914,0.000001832025,0.00006139149,0.00007488804,0.0003556052,0.00008379483,0.9957985,0.0021270802,0.001436892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028465738,0.000011315915,0.00010686086,0.00002155048,0.0000048404563,0.00017496914,0.0001699327,0.004501858,0.0003060869,0.9541439,0.040520888,0.000009478273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017767872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023968015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019555062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015721074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077132776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065418184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537982990","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.08.002","title":"Centralized allocation in multiple markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Preference; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07626212296768375,"score_gpt":0.24154481937529573,"score_spread":0.16528269640761198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537982990","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2455439,0.0010871111,0.697139,0.0048368815,0.00036841526,0.00016147204,0.00017296677,0.00033631842,0.050353944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95368916,0.0002889272,0.028487315,0.00023379679,0.00019348251,0.00013338933,0.000044953285,0.000054528937,0.016874341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970324,0.0014189151,0.00013632858,0.0004919028,0.00046429827,0.000456215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975664,0.0066410303,0.0010160761,0.0010685263,0.0008639682,0.0006538383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004074828,0.0005560192,0.0030559972,0.00081210386,0.0014696599,0.0043084915,0.0022228453,0.0025628167,0.009964529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014361775,0.00097053434,0.0009812443,0.0011548767,0.002842534,0.0049551986,0.0025010388,0.0022153575,0.0008308356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013112299,0.00009643852,0.00033953125,0.00006301684,0.000058495654,0.00013031915,0.00009451274,0.07615225,0.0007904841,0.91067725,0.0024298877,0.009036729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081662285,0.00002566963,0.00016541402,0.000010986153,0.000020840023,0.000042633663,0.00004262151,0.27667695,0.00021528098,0.7218036,0.00089685275,0.000017495118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012033193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013007716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009964529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020564622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017385026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033334672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538521242","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_37","title":"Network Bargaining with General Capacities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intersection (aeronautics); Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Graph; Class (philosophy); Unit (ring theory); Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.028893049063614132,"score_gpt":0.19625367510515196,"score_spread":0.16736062604153784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538521242","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04535396,0.0016112609,0.58494866,0.0041381433,0.00038427243,0.00014754181,0.00040784653,0.00022089868,0.36278734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7970987,0.0030338932,0.05452791,0.0007833518,0.0007641736,0.00050691026,0.00039651987,0.00020654508,0.14268187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794346,0.0009557793,0.000064754546,0.00036012314,0.0003846099,0.00029135248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951461,0.0034911877,0.00025773598,0.0005611098,0.00027509162,0.00026875114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723213,0.0013548002,0.0013022808,0.0012423375,0.0014635148,0.0040400377,0.0024030898,0.0031683922,0.024090823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010754858,0.0008171106,0.0010469885,0.0023823234,0.003449748,0.0077077644,0.0030280983,0.0036373343,0.0027532054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019545838,0.000010830565,0.000028208566,0.000035873858,0.0000088376855,0.00003104298,0.00004162917,0.018689873,0.00017231163,0.97527367,0.0020123327,0.003675736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013512814,0.000006327852,0.000028413393,0.000017096547,0.0000062437257,0.000033604458,0.000028028722,0.043827493,0.00010531988,0.95269275,0.003233747,0.000007427814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009714923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008873474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024090823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024090619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008912754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08059186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543368412","doi":"","title":"Essays in Power, Freedom, and Success : Concepts, Measurement, and Applications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Freedom of choice; Epistemology; Game theory; Index (typography); Action (physics); Criticism; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032453124151543694,"score_gpt":0.24016323201992956,"score_spread":0.20771010786838587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543368412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011596687,0.31569588,0.061142683,0.16420119,0.035851054,0.00030783916,0.00067647453,0.00015616823,0.41037208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28596586,0.35354978,0.033444826,0.03590896,0.04877817,0.0015223011,0.001123943,0.00048122168,0.23922488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537694,0.0022269266,0.00033456375,0.00044958154,0.0013954036,0.00021645035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804852,0.015241802,0.0010257135,0.0007492117,0.0018526667,0.0006452907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065148473,0.0012689148,0.0010703814,0.00412513,0.0027557951,0.006604331,0.0011938962,0.0025446573,0.011817909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024498072,0.00047890862,0.00089232944,0.0050726268,0.010963542,0.011198658,0.003441113,0.0052531874,0.0023926538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022822445,0.000037603382,0.0002960532,0.0007153062,0.000022725166,0.000031679418,0.0029958053,0.00039133453,0.00015975487,0.83765274,0.110010535,0.0476636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013559843,0.000055169123,0.0013396621,0.002103141,0.000015914971,0.000096133466,0.0023467604,0.0004285905,0.00014476708,0.34571323,0.64771336,0.000029664654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014378855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012335277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011817909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035407434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024863582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039534807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544445256","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.255586","title":"Farsighted Stability in Hedonic Games","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.030293664801967737,"score_gpt":0.20319542157524503,"score_spread":0.1729017567732773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544445256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52631706,0.0009049219,0.4119891,0.00465087,0.00016852039,0.00013214847,0.00036962697,0.00030763246,0.05516015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782766,0.00014097994,0.005994715,0.00015833744,0.00007263458,0.000043402295,0.0000643592,0.000029059498,0.0056687496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957262,0.0022985062,0.00019208649,0.00081941346,0.00046387795,0.0004998836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961501,0.028222227,0.003688227,0.002294092,0.0021571212,0.0021373013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00711455,0.0006998529,0.0021537982,0.0011688509,0.001738832,0.0051986,0.0019381037,0.0025229047,0.009520358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04996131,0.00068776694,0.0008225423,0.0010023172,0.0040224344,0.0066192136,0.0020891817,0.0031322632,0.00071719446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028977712,0.00006414188,0.0014800474,0.00006756949,0.000050903345,0.000104184146,0.0004463435,0.021783719,0.0007224637,0.96316296,0.0018491172,0.009978831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037223526,0.000032540684,0.0003809291,0.000007421073,0.000008300173,0.000030234734,0.00008403313,0.04134707,0.00010971521,0.95761883,0.00033022847,0.000013403896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025349762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002047479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009520358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021963783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013246104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03762573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545756310","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7620","title":"Coalitional Structure Generation in Skill Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"Ministry of Education, Science and Technology; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Bounded function; Partition (number theory); Graph; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Representation (politics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Function (biology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08195544025917015,"score_gpt":0.2679893737776672,"score_spread":0.18603393351849704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545756310","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056487117,0.00019761985,0.9316742,0.0008150591,0.000043999844,0.00029181485,0.00033634837,0.00026657153,0.009887332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5962413,0.00036008525,0.3929932,0.0003787237,0.00006700824,0.00051358313,0.0008416179,0.00018099196,0.00842351],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848264,0.0007420141,0.000057972757,0.00025126227,0.00025178015,0.00021434901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975199,0.0016979292,0.00018104084,0.00023876208,0.00015820118,0.00020427896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015436382,0.00090928294,0.0009889563,0.0006379496,0.00074280053,0.001332378,0.0016728975,0.0012718812,0.0048006703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008475296,0.0004476287,0.0008782692,0.0012154637,0.0013763058,0.003035967,0.0018270174,0.0018364192,0.0005377977],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000137847,0.00018906663,0.00083897775,0.00021487426,0.00005935514,0.00018494371,0.0003424211,0.62433076,0.0016788429,0.32118198,0.004328753,0.046512187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052904197,0.000044174456,0.00011398702,0.000016510756,0.000012986214,0.00003677822,0.00007160491,0.74561656,0.0007874134,0.2505924,0.0026441028,0.00001060196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061657154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048006703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001725235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016668593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016059875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551292152","doi":"","title":"Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and the Nash Bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Allocative efficiency; Transferable utility; Economics; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Cardinality (data modeling); Distribution (mathematics); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07820212990443214,"score_gpt":0.28984303503717423,"score_spread":0.21164090513274209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551292152","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22401235,0.0014640016,0.6008936,0.0060317805,0.00019313904,0.00011030778,0.000184769,0.0001088199,0.16700137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95754844,0.00059285463,0.029249633,0.00024671163,0.0000768007,0.00012070238,0.000038922186,0.000024090983,0.0121017685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985287,0.0007690092,0.00005755878,0.00018586105,0.00024420585,0.00021450533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855393,0.00078027486,0.0002714327,0.00016874484,0.00009145661,0.00013423305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025178327,0.0006777104,0.0008204295,0.00062858034,0.0010412025,0.0025095134,0.0013934193,0.001998786,0.0062873038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005650079,0.00042956907,0.0010145671,0.0007977684,0.003973868,0.0055918763,0.002432707,0.0021588134,0.0005703744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001936605,0.000009329324,0.000047425365,0.000014146835,0.0000065628847,0.000028786726,0.000037389607,0.009677529,0.00022339658,0.9871542,0.00022845755,0.0025534073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015493148,0.000009319903,0.00006285762,0.000006692037,0.0000027399815,0.000017291124,0.000029208439,0.020169364,0.00010395762,0.9788238,0.00075268414,0.0000065429044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008323642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006396509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062873038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001673765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095567317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021033108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552577690","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-21311-3_1","title":"Preference Elicitation and Preference Learning in Social Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Realm; Preference elicitation; Social choice theory; Preference learning; Subject (documents); Social preferences; Usability; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08839179875528548,"score_gpt":0.24018333532145186,"score_spread":0.1517915365661664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552577690","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027745109,0.00080442964,0.9551852,0.0017823809,0.000059418955,0.00010306513,0.00017430176,0.00007266151,0.014073449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7087545,0.0017477991,0.2757376,0.00044587918,0.00026292965,0.0005772502,0.00056941726,0.000086036736,0.0118186865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98723096,0.010296701,0.00042822433,0.00068825955,0.0010403679,0.0003154842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93479633,0.059034698,0.0012134511,0.0030582245,0.0014116408,0.00048568627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011680535,0.0007900511,0.0016243405,0.00083764334,0.0009030552,0.0031297586,0.0018889488,0.0017800998,0.007591289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04452446,0.0008442562,0.0013707659,0.0023379137,0.0037373372,0.007910228,0.0022997218,0.0036704943,0.0007221238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014559984,0.000106966145,0.00070716656,0.00023571959,0.00006951365,0.000048432732,0.00062168937,0.021829272,0.0004914838,0.8998645,0.0023920161,0.07348778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017238124,0.00001744169,0.000116669304,0.00001651579,0.000007970399,0.000016602138,0.000053916865,0.051237084,0.00020980278,0.9472747,0.0010217426,0.000010326214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019155272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017173977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011680535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002056152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013057379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0617733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555886748","doi":"","title":"The allocation between the EU member states of the seats in the European Parliament Cambridge Compromise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Parliament; Member states; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Economics; European union; Politics","score_opus":0.04101790828583755,"score_gpt":0.22122107331380098,"score_spread":0.18020316502796344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555886748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20120096,0.0044962536,0.022069106,0.008377431,0.00075524976,0.00013021195,0.0007622396,0.00014209385,0.7620664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908395,0.00051596464,0.0036006244,0.0008836004,0.00010706213,0.00015314997,0.0002808865,0.00008658091,0.10353277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917766,0.0033000372,0.0004393854,0.0013732692,0.0015215593,0.0015891229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839216,0.0005863587,0.000108682754,0.00021303902,0.0003961787,0.00030354704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00486268,0.00042565286,0.0010651194,0.0019304951,0.002167431,0.008575604,0.0013246433,0.0031391736,0.025601277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014423986,0.00043359905,0.00054937735,0.0014280378,0.001971813,0.0028758745,0.004127567,0.0017698507,0.0041284044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012530167,0.0000067783835,0.00048333607,0.000033918175,0.000023321205,0.000068626,0.0008389411,0.0011104883,0.00040549878,0.9728669,0.0073824567,0.01665445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028097347,0.0001976194,0.022493167,0.0005546593,0.00013162746,0.00032969582,0.0056451852,0.011397078,0.0030733214,0.58838326,0.36734325,0.0001703329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012185653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009375311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025601277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055692196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001746544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08564478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556045938","doi":"","title":"Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristic; Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Political science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05470636016034001,"score_gpt":0.24966453788850218,"score_spread":0.19495817772816218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556045938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949124,0.000049634033,0.0019674818,0.000077830584,0.00002179051,0.00019028939,0.000068255715,0.000018506124,0.0026938207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939084,0.00006897797,0.0044035465,0.0000671753,0.000024763913,0.00024643677,0.00013510797,0.0000132168825,0.0011322998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494165,0.0034215567,0.00026290276,0.0005257325,0.00054931873,0.00029885827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94204974,0.045678694,0.0043803696,0.0056627677,0.000985562,0.0012428238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065393364,0.00066891743,0.0009292428,0.00052055274,0.0007446354,0.0015484286,0.0009813019,0.0010546066,0.005236506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035245955,0.00036181023,0.00047201387,0.0005003876,0.0017703015,0.0011920314,0.0008050914,0.0015867634,0.00054160727],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053590957,0.122602895,0.18142688,0.0023972504,0.0022520116,0.0014036307,0.012779137,0.073508464,0.14993644,0.10566305,0.009292163,0.28514713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018964808,0.17332728,0.19721499,0.0003249734,0.0014442388,0.0017314494,0.0080893,0.33418837,0.08989461,0.15416613,0.019982362,0.00067145855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005802825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055654463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065393364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059065974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051535486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034583688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557733319","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_7","title":"Utility in Social Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Axiom; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Preference; Social Welfare; Social preferences; Mathematics; Welfare; Welfare economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07093094075075075,"score_gpt":0.24007619911331038,"score_spread":0.16914525836255961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557733319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019216029,0.02748741,0.20230605,0.014035997,0.0009449852,0.000090651076,0.00030460831,0.00009910168,0.7355151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65150803,0.016258527,0.026190924,0.001468695,0.0013329069,0.00028057946,0.00026164358,0.000113833885,0.30258492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934787,0.00038908146,0.000014925544,0.00005820766,0.00013456674,0.000055377335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952686,0.00032919063,0.00001945314,0.000041986055,0.000054165226,0.000028307175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086091546,0.00061522407,0.0007359318,0.00072102627,0.00085744023,0.0027296958,0.000645361,0.0012671533,0.009555112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002141875,0.00028747227,0.00032359626,0.0015755667,0.0031357359,0.0032494564,0.00070814934,0.0016039731,0.001215076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016857315,0.000006616322,0.000031460993,0.00001642855,0.0000020551254,0.0000052540354,0.000076745884,0.00061470765,0.000019908846,0.98768556,0.0042160456,0.0073234895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012910779,0.0000020502735,0.000045624045,0.000012490145,0.0000013080319,0.00000915125,0.000038491802,0.0010624574,0.000017506298,0.9864651,0.012343201,0.0000013510534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025554004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026305828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009555112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023717654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009310445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031965017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562643333","doi":"10.65109/lhla5263","title":"Coalitional affinity games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Bounded function; Welfare; Class (philosophy); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physics","score_opus":0.04101661651427376,"score_gpt":0.22262972559299377,"score_spread":0.18161310907872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562643333","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18402404,0.00047544995,0.73145,0.0012213849,0.00009845851,0.00025697998,0.00029591925,0.00013159896,0.08204614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93933666,0.0002179703,0.048036795,0.0002474331,0.000062039646,0.00019424099,0.00013838806,0.000022540935,0.011743991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.00073043257,0.00006522927,0.0002195253,0.00035525355,0.00025159676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975714,0.001245441,0.000302433,0.0002783376,0.00029836758,0.00030398407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011628324,0.00055159786,0.0006098511,0.000525419,0.0012100524,0.0015868025,0.0015508174,0.0012443365,0.006409409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061470577,0.00020468113,0.0005458838,0.000770964,0.0015323602,0.002579532,0.0022099046,0.001302158,0.00055429945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030925825,0.000040736373,0.000570047,0.00003788316,0.000023106906,0.0000978891,0.00023704291,0.018022154,0.000793877,0.96933293,0.0014042127,0.009409177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029045723,0.00004175112,0.00043057033,0.0000146663815,0.000014827819,0.00014279173,0.00017247081,0.17162207,0.00048218807,0.8184505,0.00858522,0.000013810139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002158948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021906057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006409409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011510256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069614046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021441579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569494680","doi":"","title":"Welfare Criteria from Choice: The Sequential Solution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Choice function; Welfare; Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Neutrality; Relation (database); Universal set; Preference relation; Economics; Mathematics; Preference; Computer science; Microeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02440803035362145,"score_gpt":0.18815375820883615,"score_spread":0.16374572785521468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569494680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024389897,0.000754581,0.92859995,0.004907219,0.00014977402,0.00023026108,0.00023923234,0.000087782675,0.040641222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5526625,0.0014201629,0.42404267,0.001067146,0.00048920535,0.0011988899,0.00046886742,0.000218468,0.018432127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239254,0.0047474587,0.0002337971,0.00090197177,0.0013403029,0.00038393636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915365,0.0059664254,0.00061272056,0.0007801258,0.00073938095,0.00036481017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010000404,0.0013277265,0.0015624565,0.0019936687,0.0015270435,0.0029923494,0.001613019,0.0023692404,0.010960466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023249168,0.00061222626,0.0016710525,0.0022995018,0.0056950664,0.007324924,0.0039890655,0.0039061364,0.00081593567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002004298,0.00003437599,0.00015118816,0.00006903176,0.000026408688,0.000024428355,0.00009615256,0.014288301,0.000108210064,0.9696717,0.0015427376,0.013967439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142429735,0.00001537585,0.000042218733,0.000017368739,0.0000040846826,0.000007758458,0.000019070969,0.018775418,0.00006471894,0.9790283,0.0020073329,0.0000041506974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017943205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018287784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010960466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032579422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034354713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052887857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574316389","doi":"10.1007/s00199-015-0867-x","title":"Sharing the surplus in games with externalities within and across issues","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Axiom; Negotiation; Shapley value; Microeconomics; Public finance; Economics; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Game theory; Mathematics","score_opus":0.051546512206519984,"score_gpt":0.2590390413294311,"score_spread":0.20749252912291113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574316389","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.439275,0.00043626977,0.4794561,0.0041652997,0.00015416821,0.00021929637,0.00021360806,0.00015765121,0.07592269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97853535,0.00013876322,0.014264554,0.00016003614,0.000053869677,0.00009720115,0.00005652891,0.000047153902,0.0066465233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331206,0.0040588407,0.00032003218,0.00074026646,0.0007387882,0.0008299332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98460674,0.011103255,0.0011062914,0.0018235621,0.0005666695,0.0007935062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063956827,0.00080781337,0.0021845617,0.0010396899,0.0017946349,0.0065507987,0.0022119894,0.0025990126,0.010389476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025111608,0.0006447063,0.0010322443,0.0013812904,0.0040235617,0.010788637,0.0036739768,0.0027348578,0.00063732394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017384972,0.000096048956,0.00089447084,0.000078791236,0.000072266645,0.000098440694,0.00040677525,0.027458057,0.0010283712,0.95564085,0.0011799602,0.012872201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040184936,0.000030473833,0.00029625752,0.0000141862665,0.000026601205,0.000029225266,0.00016305101,0.039937202,0.00024584422,0.9583411,0.0008650824,0.000010773719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012029564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015550005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010389476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020570122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014780029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034756243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579694900","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8254","title":"Eliminating the Weakest Link: Making Manipulation Intractable?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development; Australian Government","keywords":"Voting; Veto; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Class (philosophy); Link (geometry); Anti-plurality voting; Theoretical computer science; Condorcet method; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14306801433395716,"score_gpt":0.28666344977243496,"score_spread":0.1435954354384778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579694900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11424267,0.0007679653,0.8297955,0.014349733,0.0003655315,0.00039277828,0.0005441513,0.0017501944,0.037791565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70712465,0.00091933686,0.26828817,0.0020858394,0.00057928794,0.00064221263,0.0008657916,0.0009729739,0.018521748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883782,0.0046474114,0.00061918487,0.0022919467,0.002473409,0.0015899368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483663,0.031507216,0.0025280467,0.014562973,0.0020156286,0.0010198726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008423131,0.0010043461,0.003245536,0.0011231042,0.0037934282,0.0065740794,0.004125931,0.0038056963,0.018879268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060435668,0.0012433898,0.0030753755,0.0018412468,0.0057144975,0.016739232,0.0067120763,0.0066090506,0.0038620518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070930476,0.00030332667,0.0022611017,0.00058923446,0.00020713863,0.0006619125,0.0008322247,0.051398896,0.0063943174,0.7750755,0.02188993,0.13967709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013109174,0.000084176245,0.00032368625,0.000058206795,0.0000621167,0.00024878737,0.00015290132,0.10075417,0.0027486198,0.88729215,0.0081047835,0.00003936463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022391384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025712142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018879268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020547465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033059919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06315744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580842649","doi":"","title":"Cooperation and equity in the river sharing problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Negotiation; Equity (law); Function (biology); Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Profit sharing; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Natural resource economics; Computer science; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.04674849471159012,"score_gpt":0.25883128619154305,"score_spread":0.21208279147995293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580842649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7097841,0.0015186463,0.2208553,0.0093197925,0.00011940783,0.0001645995,0.0005314369,0.00011048401,0.057596225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980994,0.0004060468,0.0061632176,0.00017539682,0.000075806776,0.000072303046,0.00011670829,0.000028522692,0.011968116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775165,0.0012640154,0.00008672766,0.00031520645,0.00015671167,0.00042567702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838711,0.013130589,0.0010868312,0.00060425594,0.00039271358,0.00091457367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340768,0.0006408805,0.0024628325,0.0008049706,0.0017349139,0.0036977404,0.0019403896,0.0045858705,0.012782929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018398378,0.0005909171,0.0010224326,0.0013561171,0.0033654273,0.0056473953,0.002545782,0.0021944416,0.0004413956],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015015091,0.0000804186,0.0016964036,0.00008906198,0.000055966106,0.00025532008,0.0002926715,0.088697806,0.0003654288,0.8975333,0.0024691804,0.008314365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010531141,0.000028072533,0.0005102612,0.000025533482,0.00002063844,0.000085854605,0.00020577603,0.13386099,0.00014531866,0.86358744,0.0014073731,0.00001737606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049402067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026560768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012782929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020113413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014274102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042763174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591525418","doi":"","title":"Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance under Responsive Priorities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Toulouse School of Economics; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Monotonic function; Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Resource allocation; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Resource (disambiguation); Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.011742405278199652,"score_gpt":0.17099736111430852,"score_spread":0.15925495583610888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591525418","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066967696,0.00016971944,0.9155129,0.00066631683,0.000069368994,0.00031591306,0.000119703065,0.0002973169,0.01588097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7532214,0.00019230218,0.23558205,0.0004775888,0.00010122465,0.00045227943,0.00016771357,0.00011679132,0.009688677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99013245,0.0042820447,0.000658923,0.0017286189,0.0020313745,0.0011665286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98364866,0.008898018,0.0017963061,0.0028275377,0.002067461,0.00076201453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010538728,0.0008306614,0.001233533,0.00087113533,0.0011897082,0.0032472303,0.0026406983,0.0016003508,0.003378166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025715278,0.00077305845,0.0016950897,0.00096950534,0.0026422548,0.004280771,0.0026152409,0.0035510005,0.00075287017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023266577,0.00019397876,0.001046697,0.00017752328,0.000087236105,0.00022943183,0.0008223136,0.058103878,0.0044577946,0.867177,0.0014431771,0.066028394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013252722,0.00016985604,0.00022747616,0.000028706732,0.000041635096,0.00014249343,0.00014068178,0.17906147,0.003991073,0.8111301,0.0048844954,0.000049374812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022872277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001925652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010538728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017209862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027929314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055734754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602125406","doi":"10.1038/35047160","title":"An electoral butterfly effect","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Confusion; Spoilt vote; Voting; Mistake; Secret ballot; Political science; Presidential system; Presidential election; Column (typography); Contingent vote; Group voting ticket; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Telecommunications; Politics","score_opus":0.007218742189821375,"score_gpt":0.2260777342803046,"score_spread":0.2188589920904832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602125406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77867085,0.0008908627,0.054081548,0.0085313255,0.000214929,0.000051861007,0.00039936777,0.00024206033,0.15691729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885544,0.00017175115,0.0011608221,0.0003632298,0.00004795029,0.0000070887727,0.000033332424,0.000013158642,0.009648232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977726,0.000095366646,0.0000056124222,0.000041686446,0.000033557102,0.000046535824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966613,0.002179774,0.00030748252,0.0004407808,0.00019088021,0.00021977197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695514,0.000116294,0.00041283589,0.0005065816,0.0005602556,0.0010310899,0.00038644523,0.0009893667,0.022528518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059219333,0.00018281928,0.00029385908,0.00045745567,0.0009703208,0.0013104341,0.0005620214,0.00086959236,0.00069502543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023990011,0.00014141925,0.019182157,0.00009916163,0.00011374131,0.00029737613,0.00042684228,0.009136501,0.0044933087,0.90301234,0.018376073,0.04448104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955066,0.00017977928,0.06511505,0.00006668049,0.00015970987,0.0005579129,0.0007329348,0.07477347,0.0018980522,0.8323029,0.023967508,0.000050493076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026511147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005156831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022528518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004932579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030781966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075365424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607481898","doi":"","title":"Strategy-proof Preference Aggregation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indian Statistical Institute","keywords":"Preference; Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Monotonic function; Status quo; Set (abstract data type); Aggregation problem; Revealed preference; Computer science; Relation (database); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024605457295213202,"score_gpt":0.16969774176117491,"score_spread":0.1450922844659617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607481898","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013395595,0.00016156575,0.95408857,0.00064720545,0.00014636772,0.0002720354,0.000486933,0.00071738317,0.03008445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39453173,0.00030942107,0.5846756,0.0004305167,0.0001710318,0.00046405196,0.00068598456,0.00018445161,0.018547121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434304,0.0018927517,0.0005638498,0.0010423184,0.0017775915,0.00038050665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99001044,0.0039718715,0.0007004512,0.0035396332,0.0015389607,0.00023865562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047834166,0.0006715229,0.0007906092,0.0010492866,0.0014683366,0.0029928887,0.0017703284,0.0010646832,0.0066775125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02145966,0.00043924316,0.0013324858,0.0016083117,0.0022400324,0.0032813982,0.0023493348,0.0022122567,0.0021286113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003603282,0.000048338185,0.00046147857,0.000090129004,0.0000457292,0.000117713935,0.00033037332,0.0067202393,0.001788867,0.92014885,0.0059632063,0.06424902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004683318,0.000034957342,0.00021400924,0.00003646203,0.00003647719,0.00017617557,0.00006880586,0.049829576,0.0038379347,0.9197519,0.025939396,0.000027472268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002032124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002212125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066775125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010352096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020244005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025297463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161601248","doi":"10.1007/bfb0006198","title":"Acceptable equilibria in dynamic bargaining games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in control and information sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Embodied cognition; Game theory; Repeated game; Bargaining problem; Sequential game; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01853985780306274,"score_gpt":0.22918072930534822,"score_spread":0.21064087150228547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161601248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116425864,0.00064744265,0.6792918,0.003187943,0.00021798843,0.00023401849,0.00027801516,0.0003418129,0.19937524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664871,0.0006680011,0.0861136,0.00070493174,0.00026218643,0.0008823403,0.00037223927,0.00027830846,0.04423132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302894,0.0036499084,0.0003433038,0.00062959746,0.0015806085,0.00076763093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989288,0.007626117,0.0007269193,0.0006831566,0.00095521123,0.00072058995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048038266,0.0011368656,0.0020985373,0.0017882652,0.0031999012,0.009188943,0.0026637325,0.0035633554,0.014017513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018607695,0.001265237,0.0014819573,0.002541811,0.0051421984,0.007014758,0.0033074878,0.0058771786,0.002072836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019851888,0.000016189757,0.00004038739,0.000016858412,0.000006148978,0.000022022352,0.00020991713,0.002159107,0.00013331138,0.9950523,0.0006809467,0.0016429566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016049082,0.0000051659617,0.000013240649,0.000005632929,0.0000025719676,0.000012176866,0.000050223134,0.00797213,0.00005526711,0.99118596,0.00067733193,0.0000042264405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014254289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016423349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014017513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023572464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017185427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0468933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652252935","doi":"10.65109/csfd9981","title":"Matchings with externalities and attitudes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Research Foundation; Sino-Danish Center; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017396759737642924,"score_gpt":0.18018600354401298,"score_spread":0.16278924380637005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652252935","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15536433,0.00025375243,0.8279369,0.0011334633,0.000049939237,0.00012304579,0.0003747769,0.0003036686,0.01446011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8886595,0.00037286006,0.10040798,0.0002500897,0.00015176882,0.00021988257,0.00046258568,0.00009075149,0.009384506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957488,0.0016007166,0.00027412156,0.00092214206,0.0009264723,0.000527802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907883,0.005294925,0.0013512699,0.0014107968,0.0005408444,0.00061384926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032727337,0.0008637333,0.0012985757,0.0014241555,0.0013990393,0.0042336998,0.0016199982,0.0019995854,0.0074164807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017807925,0.0006113607,0.0016952237,0.0021429178,0.0034790041,0.0088240905,0.0038086476,0.0027529371,0.0009807191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096636846,0.000055802422,0.0011938481,0.000063699925,0.00004047589,0.00014814673,0.00022988128,0.04730656,0.000786165,0.9351122,0.00069577765,0.014270734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022460263,0.000021528298,0.00025275655,0.000013485407,0.000016450233,0.000067093366,0.00005852846,0.10242906,0.0003459314,0.89553225,0.0012280671,0.000012442453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012169199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008242339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074164807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018273427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085854874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024810612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1657709721","doi":"10.1029/2003wr002596","title":"Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flathead; Status quo; Conflict resolution; Conflict analysis; Compromise; Operations research; Drainage basin; Politics; Conflict management; Decision maker; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law; Fishery; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.10980903225742662,"score_gpt":0.31468045960861474,"score_spread":0.20487142735118813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1657709721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6510196,0.0005320496,0.28001148,0.0032073562,0.00010428353,0.00019791424,0.00045805267,0.00013100608,0.064338215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731786,0.00012594537,0.008059858,0.000044336935,0.00002872913,0.000042799544,0.000108194334,0.00001573752,0.004256492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878305,0.0006421217,0.000040825642,0.00010271145,0.00024172125,0.00018956099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929275,0.0050330576,0.00082182005,0.00022480468,0.0007191322,0.00027379807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026833927,0.00024097279,0.00047835696,0.0015323333,0.00095486915,0.0021933978,0.00088764256,0.0008385537,0.006342542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364811,0.00018931789,0.00039249333,0.0015515656,0.0018773772,0.0026270647,0.00089373643,0.000901199,0.0002802882],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018441463,0.000070388436,0.0055974647,0.00006381605,0.000031055635,0.0001913964,0.00055522576,0.25255376,0.000747505,0.7072058,0.0030652639,0.029734023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018928878,0.00002701247,0.0014281198,0.000009057592,0.000009407149,0.000021642356,0.0002704932,0.7843724,0.00019165427,0.21226591,0.001373596,0.000011815717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122980755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075839097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122980755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020348006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013655962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024452984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1688859996","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12026","title":"Economic Engineering and the Design of Matching Markets: The Contributions of Alvin E. Roth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Economics; Welfare; Key (lock); Human welfare; Industrial organization; Computer science; Market economy; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.013222687377341948,"score_gpt":0.18836405140116752,"score_spread":0.17514136402382557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1688859996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047654074,0.051248558,0.6586531,0.10419045,0.002920395,0.00021320644,0.0002065524,0.00019688983,0.13471693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854255,0.028933784,0.1508982,0.005283234,0.0029064955,0.00027583502,0.00007070112,0.00014093058,0.026065487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688333,0.0020840291,0.00010390708,0.00035415695,0.00039545208,0.00017906407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97960097,0.018021269,0.00061882567,0.00045060387,0.00081281917,0.00049556623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070779035,0.00067658623,0.0012492208,0.0014805116,0.0012259142,0.0029052238,0.0010254259,0.0024250422,0.0041708406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025165748,0.0006872087,0.00082500675,0.0013159461,0.0065260567,0.004844605,0.0023792791,0.0030954368,0.00053198205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002968471,0.000041696047,0.00026957743,0.00006943117,0.000017400904,0.000041564792,0.00010531042,0.01962825,0.00015307896,0.9624813,0.005795286,0.0113674635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023837707,0.000024597774,0.00012481076,0.00004725176,0.000008918762,0.00003537859,0.000044188717,0.024279317,0.00011293545,0.95896274,0.016314758,0.00002127595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002667004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095473585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070779035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025026584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020765609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037431955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689287262","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2492300","title":"How to Divide Things Fairly","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012120955479563801,"score_gpt":0.19115298891724428,"score_spread":0.17903203343768048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689287262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10751259,0.0021062384,0.22493616,0.12100919,0.0022773205,0.00028946795,0.00033750467,0.00046676004,0.54106486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82200253,0.00088835036,0.03714157,0.009145484,0.0005242442,0.00031046712,0.00021216112,0.00028110092,0.12949412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773884,0.00096874865,0.00010856151,0.0004352139,0.00045064662,0.0002979831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425757,0.002562853,0.00049806235,0.0013280212,0.0007125251,0.0006409752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032777446,0.00034495577,0.00053506374,0.00069026515,0.0024431532,0.005848463,0.0008488031,0.0031928867,0.026430383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02315271,0.00029322298,0.0004782909,0.00094759924,0.0041675563,0.008842272,0.0026401873,0.0034560717,0.0069801765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054275966,0.000042564945,0.00081080385,0.00004377272,0.00003241618,0.000032956603,0.00073110237,0.0014856475,0.00067952805,0.936291,0.018063216,0.041732818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001218307,0.000011330858,0.00028383583,0.000022792226,0.000010124778,0.000020077485,0.00043231694,0.0019631777,0.00024999547,0.96674514,0.030238887,0.000010141864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022627283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027102295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026430383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011820119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020144235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088418484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175472853","doi":"","title":"Coalitional bargaining with agent type uncertainty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Heuristic; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Bayesian game; Mathematical optimization; Type (biology); Game theory; Rational agent; Bargaining problem; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Repeated game","score_opus":0.19383407547535234,"score_gpt":0.31255340672183773,"score_spread":0.1187193312464854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175472853","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034522165,0.00016164589,0.95676005,0.00032134374,0.000040538274,0.00007901573,0.000072949064,0.0000829733,0.00795932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7326419,0.0003487906,0.25882706,0.00012303784,0.00007339494,0.0002256381,0.00017006771,0.00005826358,0.00753193],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951806,0.002437187,0.00018852456,0.00070517935,0.00096787646,0.0005206685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98573655,0.011082097,0.0009000037,0.0012362087,0.00061298494,0.0004322857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073481593,0.0008421459,0.0020622802,0.0009180449,0.0014090382,0.0035393995,0.0031831446,0.0025150103,0.0038461413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025391117,0.0007054748,0.0013229891,0.0021537726,0.0025272786,0.0043805433,0.0026337174,0.002573163,0.0005849896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001440436,0.00005273694,0.0005819963,0.00003838557,0.00006565016,0.00014809848,0.00026612033,0.5981445,0.0004854291,0.3823184,0.0007851273,0.01696952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033244407,0.000016325585,0.00007559492,0.000007852158,0.000012541373,0.0000315795,0.00005377205,0.8045505,0.00029694618,0.19369762,0.0012113617,0.000012568312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037808698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003590034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073481593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029171172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019744704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038861275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757855250","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdw044","title":"Optimal Voting Rules","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Incentive; Ex-ante; Economics; Class (philosophy); Microeconomics; Replicate; Welfare; Incentive compatibility; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Legislature; Computer science; Majority rule; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.07774187470052134,"score_gpt":0.29399880758031627,"score_spread":0.21625693287979492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757855250","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0828298,0.00091865176,0.81455415,0.0020244687,0.00027623127,0.00040853507,0.00080867345,0.00027331267,0.09790616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7844362,0.0010723498,0.18964694,0.0004937337,0.00017675044,0.0006744345,0.000664583,0.00011586548,0.022719152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955041,0.0018348321,0.00039722526,0.000909464,0.0007670165,0.000587419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598974,0.0020673028,0.00052243983,0.0006349836,0.0005741951,0.00021134542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032737823,0.00045193656,0.0010124795,0.0009062418,0.00089860655,0.0026420688,0.0020230291,0.0019930075,0.0066760676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013556729,0.0004411028,0.00062747684,0.00096730335,0.0011423646,0.0022468336,0.0010442492,0.0011493624,0.001867207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006204751,0.00006772564,0.0009252933,0.00013915377,0.000041183586,0.00006427907,0.00015180945,0.030478692,0.0013080281,0.8976608,0.0058289357,0.06327192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075765296,0.000043356915,0.00048470296,0.00005525774,0.000025271782,0.000087790766,0.00007795757,0.12743104,0.0010395057,0.8598658,0.010791829,0.0000218536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007553358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011076254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066760676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001011804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014888147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022333682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1769021826","doi":"","title":"A Recursive Logit Model for Routing Policy Choice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Logit; Econometrics; Mixed logit; Economics; Logistic regression; Routing (electronic design automation); Machine learning","score_opus":0.1857773199755309,"score_gpt":0.2996714897580311,"score_spread":0.1138941697825002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1769021826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07753975,0.0016085564,0.75995225,0.01588429,0.0006257247,0.00070245453,0.07256563,0.0031286024,0.067992836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6766429,0.002297393,0.07991603,0.0008801841,0.00042155362,0.0013440258,0.019961054,0.00049531704,0.21804154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985423,0.00066586706,0.00006793159,0.00028389908,0.00017857201,0.00026141715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995624,0.003134948,0.00038769186,0.00028814413,0.00041047597,0.00015489486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029930568,0.0007910772,0.0016922461,0.0018294731,0.0006604021,0.0031624732,0.0034368446,0.0039440184,0.10194584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010294843,0.0010034556,0.0014847323,0.0030737855,0.0006262094,0.0038577102,0.0009770952,0.0030907202,0.016851446],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029275095,0.00022841447,0.005880707,0.00024540152,0.00013016949,0.00037265258,0.0002545641,0.4494078,0.0003782796,0.45889175,0.049395155,0.034522448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001615691,0.00007788852,0.0016628756,0.0000646453,0.00006579206,0.00013342366,0.0001000489,0.8522722,0.0001396883,0.1280368,0.01721064,0.00007429127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026368909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026954362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10194584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027804398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015321677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34104282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1809078280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2274167","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items: An Efficient, Envy-Free Algorithm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Algorithm; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.016125720317953212,"score_gpt":0.21679017247716528,"score_spread":0.20066445215921208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1809078280","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09487449,0.00012200728,0.8944473,0.0011685343,0.00008151975,0.00032927096,0.00016358688,0.00037367232,0.00843965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48302504,0.00008203002,0.50285035,0.00035832863,0.000081762286,0.00043715772,0.00030292364,0.000103692495,0.0127587635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967452,0.0013317859,0.00016836273,0.0007398772,0.00049662654,0.0005180475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957178,0.0025319383,0.00021245703,0.00081247377,0.00033578975,0.00038944493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004524382,0.00082505425,0.0025673488,0.0009617098,0.0021722296,0.0030360275,0.0053142114,0.0046108696,0.008201776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010164697,0.00072552613,0.0015074343,0.0014657052,0.0024061014,0.0042152037,0.0036551342,0.0021053937,0.001497143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024735664,0.001301323,0.0038679235,0.00024972894,0.00028775824,0.00025774958,0.0011949649,0.43626317,0.0046064286,0.25715426,0.0141292,0.27821392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035431975,0.00012615294,0.0002468285,0.000019067234,0.000041467334,0.00008505957,0.000097169526,0.8300737,0.00093464355,0.16656177,0.001436417,0.000023350462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026113817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032912362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008201776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018532517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004101676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027437687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832659264","doi":"10.5555/2034396.2034526","title":"Social distance games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Stability (learning theory); Perspective (graphical); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.08985606472725295,"score_gpt":0.22419852035434082,"score_spread":0.13434245562708785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832659264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04325078,0.0012625189,0.8453456,0.0040389933,0.00029541552,0.00049990957,0.00051714294,0.00013318773,0.10465641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.800513,0.0016191128,0.15812448,0.0012022114,0.00030640178,0.0008838281,0.00059219653,0.0000994465,0.036659278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514836,0.0023129296,0.0002773466,0.00081391557,0.0010740643,0.00037336122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528605,0.0029238085,0.00037730904,0.0004513391,0.0005208113,0.0004406228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002458283,0.0012124192,0.0013072784,0.0011187338,0.0018064857,0.0037335518,0.00218944,0.002322412,0.008210889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009334326,0.00039213468,0.00091861933,0.0013272876,0.0039038663,0.0058492785,0.0034176838,0.0024809334,0.001195343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771515,0.0000170812,0.00010339638,0.0000317605,0.000011845406,0.00003704294,0.00012415153,0.0051987325,0.00015502256,0.98870826,0.0008207696,0.004782268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000188636,0.00002260547,0.0000653313,0.00001737077,0.000008577271,0.000066574496,0.00010712325,0.02642087,0.00013074145,0.9604721,0.012660535,0.000009349619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017840314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012875961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008210889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024688847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011952565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027468204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837261747","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1371288","title":"Procedural Choice in Majoritarian Organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.009176513129897647,"score_gpt":0.210570211533956,"score_spread":0.20139369840405835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837261747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314194,0.00028382422,0.09722569,0.0053907833,0.0000741355,0.000129999,0.00012606377,0.000055892782,0.06529412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933832,0.00004146071,0.0020921875,0.0001055635,0.000016140466,0.00002622874,0.000018263712,0.000006201318,0.004310693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442345,0.0038366525,0.00018302561,0.0003732866,0.0003731736,0.00081041764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802259,0.014126172,0.0018884771,0.0014244576,0.0009216104,0.0014133778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071150823,0.00024929954,0.0007822284,0.00046397987,0.001481745,0.0040939795,0.0011570421,0.0024576331,0.009043791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022121178,0.00032462273,0.0005721355,0.0006086256,0.0030698648,0.0022680438,0.0014732806,0.0021471179,0.000587263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029266908,0.0001682657,0.00394445,0.000045866887,0.000040573075,0.000100778234,0.0013066996,0.007912777,0.0007797906,0.97205657,0.0014447756,0.011906773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009200769,0.00009582463,0.0024781919,0.000014700061,0.000020697833,0.000044178036,0.0012719296,0.02786029,0.00032211194,0.9656866,0.0020970632,0.000016300419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023210084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027397873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009043791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015491328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013683393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03762859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1846071202","doi":"","title":"Elicitation and approximately stable matching with partial preferences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Stability (learning theory); Heuristic; Preference elicitation; Inverse; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Minimax; Mathematics; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Data mining; Machine learning","score_opus":0.032697189407766114,"score_gpt":0.19897700157150142,"score_spread":0.1662798121637353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1846071202","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04981966,0.00013952906,0.9441119,0.00039495362,0.000011366021,0.00013460341,0.00016734612,0.00016118649,0.0050594117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.678517,0.00025094868,0.31713888,0.00019508856,0.000038998554,0.0002994602,0.0003990667,0.000069298236,0.0030913097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927174,0.0046835365,0.0003434325,0.0009312055,0.001008295,0.0003161499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98307806,0.011893145,0.0012655351,0.0025681758,0.00083673175,0.0003582803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063065994,0.0007359785,0.0012385825,0.00086902955,0.00097632856,0.0020632423,0.001531138,0.0018491643,0.004939623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034932468,0.00058363157,0.0010115857,0.0016857682,0.0018044637,0.0049133166,0.0023766886,0.0017574097,0.00080568006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052356016,0.00021731334,0.0018473854,0.0002228488,0.00012708252,0.00012198385,0.0006726772,0.32674327,0.0036349103,0.5486558,0.0022910165,0.1149421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006170086,0.00010091894,0.0002527162,0.000026369245,0.000017291608,0.000061575425,0.00007288306,0.5352476,0.0018579402,0.4609496,0.0013294439,0.00002194457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008413747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095184206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063065994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017022727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013391306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03335291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868837168","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_19","title":"Network Bargaining: Using Approximate Blocking Sets to Stabilize Unstable Instances","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Extension (predicate logic); Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Independent set; Nash equilibrium; Bargaining problem; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.0607029547653649,"score_gpt":0.2469232900001583,"score_spread":0.18622033523479342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868837168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029467367,0.00012685177,0.96374166,0.00020245623,0.00007750795,0.0000944846,0.000082790066,0.0005356752,0.005671242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73468995,0.0002371947,0.254652,0.00021532945,0.00012615338,0.0005361638,0.00038743264,0.00057533337,0.008580458],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984875,0.0006010748,0.00007645489,0.00028043034,0.00033462953,0.00022000716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99095786,0.0063739168,0.00061845285,0.0010428512,0.0006056254,0.00040128944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920642,0.0012628675,0.0018915244,0.0015333039,0.0013178963,0.0023570813,0.0034640718,0.0017489034,0.0076034227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017469816,0.0010151371,0.0011902949,0.0013754547,0.0018820883,0.0036044435,0.0032823947,0.002991314,0.00094344263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037366772,0.00010778068,0.00040462264,0.0000818966,0.00006604965,0.000034036333,0.00015675105,0.8167791,0.0017951315,0.12722284,0.0031730935,0.04980499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002288443,0.000018158406,0.000022913126,0.000006507114,0.000008953983,0.0000056802405,0.000013952372,0.94610864,0.0003125702,0.053215664,0.0002590868,0.000004943666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025187538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076034227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020125925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014830169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025436044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1887821823","doi":"10.1111/ncmr.12063","title":"Done But Not Published: The Dissertation Journeys of Roy J. Lewicki and J. Keith Murnighan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; SPARK (programming language); Generative grammar; Path (computing); Association (psychology); Editorial board; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.141387493744458,"score_gpt":0.33378327879456476,"score_spread":0.19239578505010677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1887821823","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019202163,0.026807634,0.0023334457,0.9039003,0.016592743,0.00006861986,0.00010137364,0.000057606267,0.030936092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56923497,0.08129481,0.010352178,0.19364424,0.020562971,0.00056967617,0.00027469924,0.0015571198,0.12250935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93955415,0.037822217,0.0017001795,0.0030848936,0.014749134,0.00308951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89303756,0.052114673,0.0062242714,0.0055095386,0.01642857,0.026685402],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073663995,0.0007509313,0.001834569,0.0025625352,0.02314126,0.04184571,0.0022291956,0.005665074,0.0076594716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14749746,0.0010032137,0.0009707346,0.003014038,0.028852316,0.025023257,0.014740063,0.024832569,0.0038447548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008258184,0.0001302755,0.0011422022,0.000336654,0.000034658657,0.0007626036,0.3678186,0.00011963882,0.00041104454,0.1943549,0.3850961,0.049710725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022482174,0.000059557427,0.0004619605,0.0010005342,0.00001215642,0.00049084355,0.16930678,0.00012243267,0.00019059468,0.038180143,0.7900719,0.000080626174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030845837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004460553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009144378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017908268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3895771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897420762","doi":"","title":"Coalitional affinity games and the stability gap","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Bounded function; Welfare; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Social Welfare; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06042044004555721,"score_gpt":0.22289177964980164,"score_spread":0.16247133960424442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897420762","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34802043,0.0007252839,0.60894305,0.0017058677,0.000058445585,0.000115794355,0.00014623156,0.000096790136,0.040188193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810596,0.0001244945,0.016371539,0.000079982136,0.000034699096,0.00007141901,0.000035703426,0.000012802573,0.002209666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984484,0.00080165727,0.000054851083,0.00019875534,0.00028959743,0.00020672292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929628,0.0050073448,0.0007361615,0.00040254815,0.00048810354,0.00040301064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001858411,0.0005106703,0.00056798116,0.0006692398,0.0011337418,0.001717839,0.0011530333,0.0010657365,0.0035409755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010797542,0.00020782204,0.00045564803,0.000720611,0.0022292084,0.003558263,0.0021368647,0.0014281418,0.0002685307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005154297,0.000041739815,0.0008852843,0.000040600706,0.000023227296,0.00008837077,0.00027972655,0.028315024,0.0011002086,0.95927966,0.00075248594,0.00914212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019367895,0.00003651205,0.00041018517,0.000011267679,0.000010076173,0.00006679072,0.00013450345,0.1480147,0.0004763552,0.8492304,0.0015791464,0.000010603393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013382699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010542007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035409755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001369992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071375654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011845708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1913567289","doi":"10.1007/s00291-015-0413-z","title":"Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OR Spectrum","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Blocking (statistics); Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Power (physics); Operations research; Business; Industrial organization; Computer network; Process (computing); Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02700309089256899,"score_gpt":0.22783416986780383,"score_spread":0.20083107897523483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913567289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33117568,0.00047123144,0.59425265,0.002194413,0.00012154898,0.00009208414,0.00014126174,0.00019193887,0.071359225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98180056,0.00017264325,0.009726337,0.00010938683,0.000081306986,0.00007576931,0.000040320836,0.00005439989,0.007939217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944576,0.0030920617,0.00021500385,0.00057031336,0.00076354697,0.0009014431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9429734,0.0455759,0.003186931,0.0033511312,0.0027082816,0.0022043292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059736897,0.00072614837,0.0019915113,0.0017430186,0.0026460448,0.005440369,0.0031996197,0.0026196649,0.014206383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039737966,0.0008955606,0.0011619001,0.0018634222,0.0067610005,0.009075466,0.0032218655,0.0025253992,0.00083571277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006188098,0.00004225562,0.00037853332,0.000029465155,0.000012861489,0.000039499413,0.00021070182,0.023229558,0.00042324103,0.97216076,0.0005872923,0.002823868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039306145,0.000026409718,0.00017750433,0.000012071099,0.000017054746,0.000045698966,0.00021460478,0.11877535,0.00036047184,0.87951434,0.0007999339,0.000017294993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034815462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026850214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014206383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024120088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021097932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04752505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953722872","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8240","title":"A Dynamic Rationalization of Distance Rationalizability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Voting; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Majority rule; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Preference; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.07806209102858844,"score_gpt":0.27495162629295317,"score_spread":0.19688953526436473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953722872","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052916337,0.00026726752,0.8888759,0.003907044,0.000105468855,0.00017486459,0.00018471443,0.00019824828,0.053370174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912944,0.00023723504,0.09889712,0.0005266388,0.00012127302,0.00034962167,0.00015131496,0.00010414036,0.0083182175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234855,0.002700861,0.000514337,0.0020445841,0.0017669118,0.0006247419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897932,0.0046379627,0.001371779,0.0021649364,0.0015455114,0.00048667815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006055312,0.0007480301,0.0008770353,0.0013166374,0.0012739088,0.0034287646,0.0017301678,0.0020971578,0.0064617293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02109764,0.00038381666,0.0014083345,0.0009482467,0.007996573,0.0066826036,0.003502077,0.0032860474,0.0005892495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011326208,0.000015855952,0.00019876588,0.000020682704,0.00001480262,0.00003164057,0.0001459614,0.010208302,0.00038052857,0.98543984,0.00025169723,0.0032805693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021111558,0.000027349428,0.00011737232,0.000014261955,0.000008637181,0.000022321656,0.0000624164,0.033112627,0.00038273496,0.964172,0.0020476666,0.000011519585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002295744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013426373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064617293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028535258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021064568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032023907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958846608","doi":"","title":"Élections expérimentales : la désertion stratégique et la participation sous différents modes de scrutin","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031372251043978734,"score_gpt":0.3047383116265234,"score_spread":0.27336606058254465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958846608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94626445,0.0006017487,0.009643366,0.0008488189,0.00038037,0.0029292034,0.0012086128,0.0001066086,0.038016837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638817,0.00033248664,0.008018959,0.0005952247,0.0002706115,0.008808809,0.000521779,0.00008791151,0.017482592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832544,0.010823603,0.0007145421,0.0020739383,0.0023895574,0.0007440798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93215257,0.04698482,0.008363924,0.0067456383,0.0046538753,0.0010991917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010700793,0.0005757811,0.0007630639,0.0007933011,0.0026067125,0.0031553693,0.0011273415,0.0011334167,0.018757652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0660945,0.00047741766,0.00070679147,0.0012861976,0.0032082088,0.0014217272,0.001989777,0.0019459281,0.0010785218],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024779629,0.022158569,0.33311123,0.004917771,0.0028887165,0.0008027298,0.07398398,0.013474028,0.03690298,0.16752613,0.024000691,0.29545355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045053265,0.021722494,0.76540613,0.0007405051,0.0016039681,0.00018524531,0.017288161,0.007817464,0.015963588,0.025764514,0.13858081,0.00042165397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03129512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03431694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03129512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003976866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035864674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06275058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959050181","doi":"","title":"Dominating sets with at most k components","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.022151674382142696,"score_gpt":0.21251705296260207,"score_spread":0.19036537858045938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959050181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32299057,0.002284169,0.5621792,0.0049115806,0.00039007558,0.0012390873,0.0064946604,0.0010400865,0.098470606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7728096,0.0017873308,0.15074396,0.0012139276,0.00033662218,0.0012715406,0.004278543,0.00039671108,0.067161776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951019,0.0017286423,0.000358995,0.0011369861,0.0009159586,0.0007575871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98269504,0.0113195805,0.0008670271,0.0023308506,0.0013680636,0.0014195255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023808233,0.0020710977,0.0033152904,0.0021352852,0.002850106,0.008274071,0.0046683475,0.002848547,0.014413232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015300842,0.0016490952,0.0017508067,0.0032951431,0.0023039544,0.0064714346,0.0036551182,0.0030963216,0.004201589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021587329,0.0005209693,0.0044565075,0.0019775366,0.00051010563,0.0011290484,0.0013594567,0.04877157,0.018222498,0.8154739,0.02828609,0.077133656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003809958,0.00016756773,0.0012803434,0.00012160483,0.0002532085,0.0019034318,0.00062934135,0.10117396,0.007271002,0.8613583,0.02536873,0.00009154291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090064446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012898196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014413232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002080522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012935152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04821706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964249253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0645-z","title":"Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University; Lunds Universitet; Concordia University","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Best response; Outcome (game theory); Epsilon-equilibrium; Interpretation (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03412768288190568,"score_gpt":0.2646568772223437,"score_spread":0.23052919434043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964249253","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16616583,0.00022568632,0.81673044,0.0005521177,0.00014373116,0.00015860218,0.00009605298,0.00040982975,0.0155176865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599952,0.00018750298,0.13006397,0.0002881003,0.00010683455,0.00045913554,0.00011085858,0.00014603639,0.0086424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575114,0.0021282919,0.0002912747,0.0005561507,0.0007168477,0.0005562801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989484,0.0054392684,0.0013031743,0.0019214225,0.0011166133,0.00073554955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020843,0.00076738995,0.001747073,0.001620731,0.0015529741,0.0045118826,0.003229295,0.002796236,0.0068707736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020283353,0.0007134842,0.0015532374,0.0013988428,0.0030784428,0.0061856573,0.0027358178,0.0023844389,0.00072610687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005736971,0.000047154906,0.0002731592,0.000028872759,0.000041633037,0.000046435172,0.00015606011,0.020445473,0.0007027713,0.96894306,0.00060788874,0.008650197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004514951,0.000027430488,0.00009673974,0.000010542396,0.000015038682,0.000020954283,0.000033439093,0.10202973,0.00028601385,0.89683056,0.0005895201,0.00001480903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009958654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017331906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068707736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014189645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001466707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026553094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964733860","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.004","title":"On the coincidence of the prenucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Shapley value; Coincidence; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Game theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.08175354098697378,"score_gpt":0.2442883157406177,"score_spread":0.16253477475364392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964733860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24244685,0.0038945642,0.5217536,0.010847738,0.001230989,0.00013454192,0.00033207826,0.0002118368,0.21914779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453571,0.0013989196,0.04111901,0.0009689852,0.0009802161,0.00017879413,0.00018377922,0.00016104404,0.009652144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959722,0.0020239756,0.0001860891,0.00076126744,0.0006719635,0.00038448363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821675,0.0131241195,0.0012428002,0.0014674618,0.0010775873,0.00092046405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007676522,0.00074056594,0.002255672,0.0019621488,0.0036529673,0.0065166065,0.0024550706,0.0034839227,0.008246469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03199948,0.00084901706,0.0015617269,0.0019887222,0.009970058,0.015459247,0.003576562,0.0063191177,0.0007892765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010753596,0.000005243054,0.00003902028,0.000008403479,0.000003687676,0.000011879196,0.000032030424,0.00040547017,0.000047875717,0.99837935,0.00025618952,0.0008000775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045923643,0.0000030691888,0.000025979607,0.0000045547363,0.0000012778991,0.000011457913,0.00000998134,0.0015332866,0.000019947485,0.99808717,0.00029533022,0.0000034439072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009893422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007306725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008246469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025303734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040597856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964891449","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.006","title":"Von Neumann–Morgenstern stable sets in matching problems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Core (optical fiber); Mathematics; Distributive lattice; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Independent set; Lattice (music); Stable marriage problem; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Graph; Physics","score_opus":0.020797984713695847,"score_gpt":0.21480625746833512,"score_spread":0.19400827275463928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964891449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3104168,0.0018540159,0.6232164,0.006182576,0.00026559932,0.00023837612,0.0003050797,0.00017373486,0.057347473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94130003,0.0009979132,0.04138105,0.00047538063,0.00035741666,0.00036328274,0.00020569959,0.000063301675,0.014855899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959474,0.0022967772,0.00017413795,0.00041440298,0.00071197405,0.0004552416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644024,0.010564364,0.0008292723,0.00061628525,0.00074759714,0.00080218236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057760114,0.00083888264,0.003082279,0.0023892066,0.0036998948,0.006291297,0.0029976547,0.004582611,0.008597085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024550645,0.0012584248,0.001704093,0.002965065,0.0046362663,0.0075723305,0.0037789682,0.0038937777,0.0008059976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043674507,0.000030247254,0.00011067659,0.000025729432,0.000018456129,0.000021577647,0.00009643934,0.007303503,0.0001591448,0.9895626,0.00046646004,0.002161476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015098333,0.000006472562,0.00003148558,0.0000048080183,0.0000039983224,0.000008716971,0.0000206442,0.024246566,0.0000610884,0.97540367,0.00019234301,0.000005121263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011822112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009871578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008597085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029210602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002242169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030546844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967607367","doi":"10.1086/319550","title":"Competitive Fair Division","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Proxy bid; Pareto principle; Vickrey auction; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Monotonic function; Common value auction; Set (abstract data type); Auction theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Operations management; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.029476299445128192,"score_gpt":0.2426873438941583,"score_spread":0.2132110444490301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967607367","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017672598,0.001049231,0.5462998,0.0022461999,0.0006998567,0.00061542616,0.0002835013,0.00029961602,0.43083376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.668773,0.0010263083,0.18877122,0.0010270544,0.00054183236,0.0010617166,0.00036599993,0.00017977209,0.13825324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943791,0.0015295217,0.00022522462,0.001244483,0.0016887304,0.00093294267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954176,0.0014589921,0.00032370805,0.0014218225,0.0009857209,0.00039209265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005723475,0.0010115192,0.0013150459,0.0014152478,0.004264999,0.0059598456,0.0028689557,0.0023353791,0.035175838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013534014,0.00044255456,0.0010912752,0.0019588552,0.0053130845,0.00437845,0.0037437095,0.0019686157,0.0036343925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003847027,0.00002304597,0.00007825417,0.00002399672,0.000010272813,0.00002327253,0.000088574205,0.0033692492,0.00023424803,0.97534466,0.0037987034,0.016967276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045484998,0.000039666553,0.00008618564,0.000035933757,0.000016818893,0.00006769609,0.00006608958,0.023755006,0.0008622901,0.9251752,0.049831986,0.00001758738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043419576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005672008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035175838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047567505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059299925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11767489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968974820","doi":"10.1007/s10726-008-9121-2","title":"Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bankruptcy; Dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Soviet union; Political science; Geography; Economics; Economy; Business; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05737976568253775,"score_gpt":0.22870524752469656,"score_spread":0.17132548184215882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968974820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8631705,0.00068017974,0.0710917,0.0033052857,0.00016622881,0.000071051494,0.00033347137,0.00010720059,0.06107438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98962724,0.00015300683,0.003347107,0.00005834664,0.000024194609,0.00003670798,0.000058062215,0.000017204142,0.00667804],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996494,0.00016995786,0.000010104064,0.00004055189,0.000034832356,0.000095127376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980161,0.0014485111,0.00016667461,0.000057647037,0.00012787309,0.00018314774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008980608,0.00053526834,0.0009969334,0.0005380712,0.0010786261,0.002626875,0.0014771832,0.0027022413,0.008750416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00527474,0.00044931757,0.0005920149,0.00064446917,0.001233909,0.0016686289,0.0011109435,0.0017691565,0.00040780552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006593524,0.000037094054,0.0011048653,0.000018893717,0.00001955346,0.000103702005,0.00012136648,0.9559767,0.00014708024,0.039825294,0.0006895514,0.0018898232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024222509,0.0000147250785,0.0002421148,0.000004277268,0.000008515966,0.000010397713,0.00009356121,0.98515576,0.00004626826,0.013912869,0.00048089333,0.0000064040983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06328152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033366453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002261041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12582642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971335524","doi":"10.1006/jeth.2001.2829","title":"Strategy-Proof Probabilistic Decision Schemes for One-Dimensional Single-Peaked Preferences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Class (philosophy); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Characterization (materials science); Probability distribution; Line (geometry); Mathematical economics; Expected value; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10752046308379212,"score_gpt":0.2496006682829871,"score_spread":0.14208020519919498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971335524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039116044,0.00024295264,0.9518502,0.001378636,0.00006917358,0.0002173709,0.00024618788,0.0002083251,0.0066710683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7673795,0.000531683,0.22245628,0.0005466024,0.00023737177,0.000752379,0.0003405568,0.00012939572,0.0076261754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864803,0.0076111923,0.0009998429,0.0015424701,0.001993081,0.0013731709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9127648,0.07128676,0.003805372,0.0073119006,0.0028587496,0.001972397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019425178,0.0015459734,0.0035242457,0.0014423941,0.0020184577,0.006332495,0.0063828356,0.0050691143,0.007921452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07445966,0.0018757677,0.0026899471,0.0022150024,0.005048256,0.014280195,0.005991801,0.0070239776,0.001103733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023452405,0.00009137067,0.00028483776,0.000106920466,0.000054007753,0.00005323193,0.00026142222,0.04229684,0.0005024006,0.94411457,0.0012333523,0.010766456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010586983,0.00004051628,0.00006442516,0.00002167334,0.000020149575,0.000030791634,0.000024744935,0.15824312,0.00024883053,0.8406675,0.0005059577,0.000026495818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015647813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014634904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019425178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037182693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035972171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10273141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973245383","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2012.04.005","title":"Choosing the best among peers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.027247813925103392,"score_gpt":0.2297254077473563,"score_spread":0.20247759382225292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973245383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67765296,0.0017452663,0.20456077,0.014847823,0.00055852113,0.00035459467,0.00049915526,0.00039903334,0.09938189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96311206,0.00027831036,0.022887327,0.00031241568,0.00012836244,0.000069148344,0.00015090818,0.00007216209,0.012989258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968154,0.0016827282,0.000120015924,0.0005691638,0.00042381758,0.00038880526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264175,0.0046485392,0.00040062744,0.0009642621,0.00062402716,0.0007206317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211696,0.0004186911,0.0012419269,0.000971137,0.0014395851,0.0031280038,0.0014935269,0.002015652,0.016032923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018409086,0.00035100314,0.0005871492,0.0007663632,0.00080178404,0.003870132,0.0012546297,0.0015837664,0.0023558931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002721512,0.0014294946,0.04196722,0.0007655158,0.0010200649,0.0014508328,0.0028195076,0.05036445,0.019242154,0.4379635,0.038615145,0.40164077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004038223,0.0006707186,0.005803186,0.000117967415,0.00054115814,0.001312986,0.0040895804,0.32645288,0.011066146,0.61531943,0.03408689,0.00013524308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007149063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013593911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016032923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040909825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007759209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053635538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973794372","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.01.002","title":"Network flow problems and permutationally concave games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Concave function; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Function (biology); Order (exchange); Flow network; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06490588326263746,"score_gpt":0.26044456421553025,"score_spread":0.19553868095289278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973794372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11477822,0.0012829787,0.85778826,0.0043223463,0.00016923281,0.00018980834,0.00044773542,0.00010827544,0.020913126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86509514,0.0028529724,0.09188973,0.0006506054,0.0005578864,0.00061971677,0.00072319765,0.0001510369,0.037459634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981402,0.0011396883,0.00007137631,0.00027277783,0.00019357164,0.00018235743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879111,0.009856638,0.0008937139,0.00036700928,0.000458854,0.00051266636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033568114,0.0012207836,0.0020022306,0.0014594384,0.0014876747,0.0035482093,0.0022113684,0.0036767267,0.0075295926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017040573,0.0010485027,0.001240851,0.0020697922,0.003840529,0.0072591067,0.0015145766,0.0027186302,0.0004924564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054240405,0.000058318965,0.0004315122,0.00007772003,0.00003418825,0.0001037561,0.00012503672,0.10934602,0.00026190645,0.8814725,0.002276303,0.0057585333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003138742,0.000012811941,0.00015978733,0.000010678767,0.000010065553,0.000043669053,0.00004409722,0.2157653,0.00008232084,0.782698,0.0011291037,0.000012822037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046156324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003073784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075295926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029361076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017257319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025188982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974429698","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0815","title":"Epsilon Cores of Games with Limited Side Payments: Nonemptiness and Equal Treatment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Parameterized complexity; Mathematical economics; Payment; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Finance","score_opus":0.04175621839172083,"score_gpt":0.23870608914174649,"score_spread":0.19694987075002565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974429698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44941583,0.0007829654,0.46620592,0.0048587825,0.00022146369,0.00016129554,0.00031212688,0.00020169126,0.07783988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96836287,0.00043932715,0.015835587,0.0005216972,0.00024449476,0.00021952808,0.0001272879,0.00007061987,0.014178706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554884,0.002447882,0.00019430759,0.0005042121,0.00051594747,0.0007889428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745062,0.01898433,0.0020990483,0.0013404053,0.0010697992,0.0020000981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006289816,0.0015361981,0.0033462415,0.0014358035,0.00204706,0.0062083486,0.0032109518,0.0034193033,0.009334339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029654754,0.001172937,0.00171586,0.0009248336,0.00691621,0.010848443,0.0034752355,0.0048927157,0.00054568297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000870425,0.000045540135,0.00015590308,0.000028337445,0.000012329015,0.000058474026,0.000116109964,0.0052271714,0.00015018668,0.99153066,0.00076124887,0.0018270373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038596845,0.000016528576,0.00006426716,0.00000991455,0.000005529072,0.000028676995,0.000034546094,0.02689622,0.0000668696,0.9725927,0.00023802547,0.000008059757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001549202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016144003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009334339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002378746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002031014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0332641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976804489","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0512-3","title":"Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on the political economy of elections and bargaining","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Social policy; Market economy; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.014507229064009367,"score_gpt":0.2331889889553596,"score_spread":0.21868175989135025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976804489","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017152354,0.016155677,0.0022373681,0.04553239,0.9276134,0.000018651217,0.00017751729,0.000081579296,0.0080119455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019639449,0.0073928176,0.00071558583,0.011048438,0.9517032,0.00003795833,0.00014073844,0.00010045221,0.026896872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978656,0.0005385758,0.00023136017,0.0003840411,0.000769258,0.00021111881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819494,0.006775438,0.0006624572,0.0004783579,0.0029847785,0.00090412475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035569177,0.002675056,0.0024906618,0.0036605697,0.0013456213,0.005964797,0.002320816,0.0049479087,0.030828375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015405475,0.00077223824,0.0024388165,0.0018212654,0.0015007377,0.00415163,0.0015679678,0.010814561,0.012628724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012902175,0.000017498729,0.00005291753,0.00008659232,0.00001150143,0.000033243632,0.000015305806,0.00008657423,0.000043257838,0.0042055403,0.9870697,0.008364888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033484677,0.000036694513,0.0006683932,0.00023576595,0.000044455064,0.00015136872,0.00005219671,0.0009168154,0.000125254,0.017365651,0.9803429,0.000027003194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008108145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021017762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030828375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011537474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103131235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977736172","doi":"10.1145/2229012.2229068","title":"Matching models for preference-sensitive group purchasing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Matching (statistics); Group (periodic table); Purchasing; Computer science; Statistics; Business; Mathematics; Marketing; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12564179848036605,"score_gpt":0.2434993389190268,"score_spread":0.11785754043866076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977736172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058444485,0.0003126238,0.9221248,0.00094608986,0.00006144308,0.0001776906,0.00026461738,0.0002037882,0.017464511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860245,0.0004725663,0.08279874,0.00033371084,0.00011379252,0.00032574937,0.00031775038,0.00009303146,0.029520318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984084,0.0007719078,0.000060736387,0.0003106444,0.00022386872,0.00022450156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965708,0.0022509312,0.00040046693,0.00034494253,0.000201957,0.00023081177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028996968,0.0006720229,0.0013049938,0.000775371,0.00089168,0.0021761367,0.0028477681,0.0029877876,0.016430466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010267589,0.0005900726,0.0014739872,0.00147281,0.0018816672,0.0047830194,0.0016550723,0.0023318466,0.0015311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007718394,0.00009197228,0.0005215924,0.000050367005,0.000030067227,0.00012497428,0.00022280049,0.22265682,0.00052955275,0.7641318,0.0019829366,0.009579963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029440635,0.000024550387,0.00012734756,0.0000066967027,0.000008401045,0.000031772015,0.000045986733,0.62828624,0.00010241305,0.3700395,0.0012883231,0.000009322925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031293703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022636682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016430466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024741385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010453983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054965377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979199119","doi":"10.1177/1465116508095146","title":"Legislative Bargaining in the European Union","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Union Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Legislation; Legislature; Voting; European union; Commission; Member state; Bargaining power; Political science; Member states; Law and economics; Stability and Growth Pact; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.06315036859901381,"score_gpt":0.2287019232533354,"score_spread":0.1655515546543216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979199119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16436502,0.005604378,0.2690978,0.00985557,0.00047098176,0.00018505701,0.00023869287,0.00010504815,0.5500775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95770204,0.002077074,0.012137092,0.0008749325,0.00019751396,0.00020646371,0.00011327269,0.000024742103,0.026666911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946907,0.0032699672,0.0001238321,0.00043900948,0.0004891595,0.0009873013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644816,0.002490215,0.00044452297,0.00019672986,0.0002041095,0.000216304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047154054,0.000813601,0.0013066131,0.0011900108,0.0027531243,0.006014581,0.0015697828,0.0048989137,0.014971776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010701832,0.0005580024,0.0014306811,0.0025208138,0.005350887,0.0063219927,0.0028089923,0.0029672242,0.001425266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010932299,0.000019400106,0.00020503331,0.000013901437,0.0000073942015,0.000030573992,0.00016884586,0.017887982,0.000040023482,0.97908944,0.0005314058,0.0019951127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055475437,0.00003735561,0.0003895015,0.00006157354,0.000013081015,0.000032829328,0.00042000742,0.05790612,0.00008423252,0.92948204,0.011500321,0.000017494684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008880131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045346525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014971776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046151197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002116927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050085545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979750001","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2004.09.004","title":"A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise—why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Disapproval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Stability (learning theory); Margin (machine learning); Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Econometrics; Ranked voting system; Bullet voting; Probabilistic logic; Statistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08906049420113245,"score_gpt":0.2904039379392588,"score_spread":0.20134344373812635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979750001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6890256,0.001186837,0.27324,0.003974337,0.00013593702,0.00012016988,0.0005147964,0.0001775332,0.03162476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133074,0.00019658507,0.0032666023,0.00010975122,0.000097910124,0.000030271034,0.0001076617,0.000034382665,0.0048261145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988558,0.00037651832,0.000046485176,0.0003051707,0.00017460619,0.0002414732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984545,0.00977714,0.0020405436,0.0013584663,0.001478189,0.0008006518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035032455,0.0003662315,0.0012279296,0.0018935141,0.0013439787,0.0026651071,0.0015396652,0.0013260255,0.013140662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024467666,0.00029590435,0.001088429,0.0015449323,0.002908369,0.003908462,0.0015356746,0.0012529889,0.0008585574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005246298,0.00007450398,0.012168184,0.00016295,0.00019414989,0.00014898402,0.00093442824,0.041758087,0.00464883,0.8890875,0.0049225506,0.045375183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009705519,0.0002778932,0.015003187,0.000058039204,0.00016075067,0.00017934863,0.0009432249,0.22755878,0.0018152914,0.7495212,0.0043212636,0.00006401829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003217368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022836472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013140662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013655904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006291764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043959856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980974411","doi":"10.1007/s13209-011-0038-7","title":"A characterization of the uniform rule without Pareto-optimality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SERIEs","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Monotonic function; Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.043528481413868315,"score_gpt":0.19606570792009118,"score_spread":0.15253722650622287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980974411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14846964,0.0006693276,0.77922773,0.0012894935,0.00016179266,0.00010013756,0.0002899763,0.0001526061,0.069639266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88372475,0.0007319068,0.103302404,0.00057881064,0.00033694354,0.00020388537,0.00035942683,0.00010032943,0.010661629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576485,0.0013172071,0.00032472494,0.0011745498,0.0008514664,0.0005671908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887956,0.0056216936,0.0017191219,0.0016939406,0.0014080039,0.0006777255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039438517,0.00047692124,0.0013362481,0.0011482637,0.0014664528,0.0035802599,0.0018690286,0.0017754271,0.0057060155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020031508,0.00042252985,0.0011125142,0.0013720492,0.0033996191,0.005234726,0.0019606554,0.0026270824,0.001072967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024510686,0.00002386839,0.00043619104,0.000026396252,0.000012794155,0.00006387707,0.00007706472,0.0034412858,0.0005438857,0.98748696,0.0006666375,0.007196452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022840466,0.00003992351,0.00031481133,0.00003021602,0.000010760136,0.00017744637,0.000056346835,0.04349726,0.00074436644,0.9519877,0.0031010362,0.00001728651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092273037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005806363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057060155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008363509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010712306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020857275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981628825","doi":"10.2202/1534-5963.1272","title":"Choice under Limited Uncertainty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Property (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Intuition; Probability distribution; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Psychology","score_opus":0.011467347122549248,"score_gpt":0.2255307684801177,"score_spread":0.21406342135756845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981628825","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15347783,0.004886572,0.73251283,0.019572463,0.0003474067,0.00020087286,0.00067248923,0.00010860343,0.088220894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94150656,0.0019736767,0.044079274,0.00065693614,0.00039916846,0.00020382185,0.0002221184,0.000035319423,0.010923134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925281,0.0047676675,0.00027010264,0.0010901223,0.0008177773,0.00052625686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820862,0.014572155,0.0011782363,0.0009609398,0.0006224556,0.0005799941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074434886,0.000593399,0.0015101525,0.0007807933,0.001325533,0.0037219755,0.0014028157,0.0031883733,0.0064693624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023952313,0.00054007076,0.0011218752,0.0011892612,0.0033712604,0.0058202934,0.0022888004,0.003141807,0.0005477763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012797925,0.0000358543,0.00097151025,0.00010471902,0.000068016285,0.00024089246,0.00029383833,0.047824454,0.00018401632,0.9338872,0.0012480979,0.015013468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033784,0.000025786925,0.00023380134,0.000022433103,0.000016169335,0.000051577073,0.0000894752,0.058502916,0.00009291605,0.9380742,0.0028437087,0.000013209517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028044933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017457329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074434886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029991644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014630961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03936541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982865661","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.003","title":"Product filters, acyclicity and Suzumura consistency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Relation (database); Filter (signal processing); Property (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10485642638607866,"score_gpt":0.285984099229812,"score_spread":0.18112767284373332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982865661","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2567333,0.0012109958,0.7232274,0.00302374,0.00017500756,0.00011577293,0.00068879424,0.00039403976,0.014431074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86792976,0.0011470364,0.11209977,0.0008802847,0.0005788535,0.0003171819,0.0008213221,0.00025918634,0.015966516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996861,0.0011852029,0.0002170157,0.0009891362,0.0003443316,0.000403303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95041794,0.037609473,0.004031882,0.0042576394,0.0024237374,0.0012594011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072560557,0.000504705,0.0026869758,0.0038022196,0.0028525302,0.004395795,0.0018015981,0.0028352218,0.008742433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04210663,0.0010922992,0.0021616337,0.0032844485,0.004324949,0.008635564,0.0017048995,0.0025526602,0.000697934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010764072,0.000048861646,0.001974055,0.00006686797,0.00006421695,0.000059042297,0.00023279995,0.0065866923,0.00051233725,0.97916555,0.0015572845,0.009624701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040633186,0.000023376952,0.001194671,0.000020204303,0.000036685433,0.00006407243,0.00005395455,0.037545633,0.00033198917,0.95894796,0.0017087824,0.000032188556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036371215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044187265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008742433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016339833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019329011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038374186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983553101","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2005.06.002","title":"The k-level facility location game","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Facility location problem; Monotonic function; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Game theory; 1-center problem; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.16215534261250739,"score_gpt":0.3297216512856123,"score_spread":0.16756630867310493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983553101","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28770816,0.00030280513,0.62121016,0.005527976,0.00011216685,0.0003309061,0.0020235418,0.00032971156,0.08245464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95752066,0.00015816622,0.024060937,0.0002862442,0.0000433889,0.00016392754,0.00034021752,0.000030644263,0.017395796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671113,0.001498093,0.00015609936,0.00050753256,0.00030072327,0.0008264253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950681,0.0029986573,0.00048595713,0.0005360568,0.00034747765,0.0005637836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016284923,0.00058797124,0.0020010285,0.0006199834,0.0011017433,0.0044796723,0.00375868,0.0037080578,0.021744728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008489184,0.0006368701,0.0010391354,0.0014121587,0.002290465,0.005244117,0.0024820052,0.002281395,0.0021286984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052373897,0.00014430292,0.0016712619,0.00017327303,0.000078789875,0.00034444965,0.00021177744,0.15415713,0.0018136047,0.814794,0.0075721755,0.018515518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025885637,0.00013862072,0.000829133,0.000029301833,0.000043185206,0.0002840734,0.00025255833,0.44393396,0.0005046357,0.5492429,0.00441973,0.00006294956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050308835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003894619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021744728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024176787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014943833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072743356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985089376","doi":"10.1142/s0219198906000825","title":"PROPORTIONALITY AND NON-MANIPULABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Axiom; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Bankruptcy; Truncation (statistics); Independence (probability theory); Simple (philosophy); Law; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.026384118455428405,"score_gpt":0.24519600544847145,"score_spread":0.21881188699304305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985089376","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3461893,0.0013026623,0.58154565,0.004478942,0.000113214985,0.00028434244,0.000093126786,0.00009523281,0.06589766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640835,0.00037762668,0.030477248,0.00017553687,0.00012555624,0.00019813064,0.000047433998,0.000016482294,0.004498499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991907,0.0052737603,0.0007788149,0.0014311954,0.0017903392,0.00080680597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509008,0.035425626,0.006432171,0.004338582,0.0014897706,0.0014131329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009645698,0.0006715664,0.0012217823,0.0012136422,0.0015051787,0.0045025866,0.0020393499,0.002534951,0.0046290983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04750074,0.00052822125,0.0015355531,0.0010664836,0.010186342,0.009876908,0.004951281,0.004452842,0.00036408278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005771302,0.00009189003,0.0011965871,0.00008252262,0.00003980506,0.00012220492,0.00037803454,0.009659104,0.0012691914,0.97583336,0.00027375566,0.010995774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048588343,0.00005492507,0.00071726,0.000026133172,0.000016347436,0.00011363213,0.00011282227,0.024594057,0.00092931546,0.9720252,0.001345223,0.000016492582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053042837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033944042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009645698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017916645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05101192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987917715","doi":"10.1561/100.00009022","title":"A Measure of Bizarreness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Path (computing); Population; Mathematics; Compact space; Convexity; Shortest path problem; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining; Demography; Pure mathematics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022831656264808913,"score_gpt":0.2504695862198519,"score_spread":0.22763792995504298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987917715","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15647769,0.001562634,0.79076916,0.001861619,0.00016595957,0.00018082386,0.001567266,0.00038984872,0.04702502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83970153,0.001090118,0.15029885,0.00036080697,0.0003613955,0.0005654179,0.0012199403,0.00023983432,0.0061621373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939551,0.0019248859,0.00055059826,0.0013050777,0.001786661,0.00047761458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726494,0.016197477,0.0034367254,0.003059145,0.00329397,0.0013632958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004466287,0.00082702446,0.0011458299,0.0060302345,0.0019594426,0.004472208,0.0016514143,0.001405674,0.0068435604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026605077,0.0005893183,0.0009767002,0.0042223153,0.005035356,0.0075746384,0.0028434477,0.0022702764,0.0010408562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098633944,0.000057129986,0.0057196966,0.00019898816,0.00012753133,0.00024694882,0.00073697424,0.019008348,0.004803559,0.9390166,0.0026716527,0.027314015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034561457,0.00026103805,0.010419339,0.00010083741,0.000077726654,0.0014565767,0.0005245352,0.073905624,0.0038455622,0.8834961,0.025768321,0.00010976363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059426326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004403785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068435604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015172823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076267536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023620248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989656745","doi":"10.4236/tel.2013.36056","title":"Cycles and Rationalization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Mathematical economics; Sequence (biology); Finite set; Microeconomics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010621399667912116,"score_gpt":0.17605009288604828,"score_spread":0.16542869321813616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989656745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17977959,0.0034189157,0.31594992,0.008791608,0.00026026176,0.00021152252,0.00032686914,0.00029520533,0.49096608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542761,0.0008631337,0.024587382,0.00044351717,0.00016534673,0.00017217129,0.00014917446,0.00007412139,0.01926916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973248,0.0010825593,0.00012814747,0.00063738564,0.00047790707,0.00034907984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976816,0.0010278474,0.00031147216,0.00051362725,0.00029147364,0.00017389008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024242625,0.00043920567,0.0007299529,0.0010880822,0.0014940376,0.0035951037,0.00086771225,0.0014777819,0.009683761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005891077,0.00027617844,0.0007360728,0.0009463784,0.007136917,0.0050753155,0.0023321672,0.0016647729,0.000771595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004225014,0.0000024165877,0.00006256914,0.000006109493,0.0000024969102,0.000009276793,0.00007289766,0.00063355616,0.000039735238,0.997399,0.0001638465,0.0016039353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043382834,0.000002737865,0.000041202275,0.0000052264554,0.0000010176724,0.000008840161,0.000026662028,0.0015268422,0.000034135384,0.9959896,0.0023575304,0.0000019760162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001577169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008891768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009683761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025342577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010459168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032395422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989892391","doi":"10.1142/s0219198902000653","title":"SOME RESULTS ON (PRE)KERNEL CATCHERS AND THE COINCIDENCE OF THE KERNEL WITH PREKERNEL","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Coincidence; Mathematics; Kernel (algebra); Bounded function; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03575786326103469,"score_gpt":0.2363023372751855,"score_spread":0.2005444740141508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989892391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5355209,0.0024116968,0.40140036,0.0023077833,0.0001480682,0.00008934225,0.00021105059,0.0002470827,0.057663716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971999,0.00076268724,0.020367563,0.0001943196,0.00023569001,0.00006394958,0.00014972626,0.00006976531,0.0061572776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983209,0.00031714345,0.00017931066,0.00047744138,0.00034673652,0.00035836443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907393,0.005641783,0.0023029365,0.0009679848,0.00093753845,0.0010757176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00281024,0.0004531803,0.0011248479,0.0018674664,0.0016509381,0.002790936,0.0013425677,0.0012864567,0.008078003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011217597,0.0005833569,0.0015565176,0.002068729,0.0046439148,0.00978993,0.0034886522,0.0033406804,0.00056226517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005113449,0.000044559736,0.0029856751,0.000083048086,0.000025937583,0.00038777303,0.0005698234,0.0013642818,0.0009297965,0.98755336,0.0004814747,0.005523131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018672752,0.00009605426,0.0031334937,0.000035987698,0.00003162544,0.0006522421,0.00040715985,0.008913014,0.0009685288,0.9825781,0.003133755,0.000031384687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008014006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049259234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008078003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013075934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008197505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027023613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990199392","doi":"10.5555/1070432.1070517","title":"A group-strategyproof mechanism for Steiner forests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Steiner tree problem; Combinatorics; Group (periodic table); Connection (principal bundle); Game tree; Computer science; Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical optimization; Tree (set theory); Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Sequential game","score_opus":0.040429501465461766,"score_gpt":0.229505074404459,"score_spread":0.18907557293899724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990199392","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01170877,0.00010002633,0.9852556,0.00020552315,0.000036321784,0.00020733726,0.000052224368,0.00021923397,0.0022149524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3864189,0.00025394146,0.6087991,0.0002793207,0.000074034215,0.0007255987,0.00012955486,0.00010747237,0.0032120773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996561,0.001273354,0.00017786774,0.00059955614,0.0009916471,0.0003966446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736613,0.0010505491,0.00049120263,0.00066619494,0.0001947581,0.00023124216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036352437,0.0012337539,0.0011223926,0.0008187352,0.00083433825,0.0016711775,0.0042822994,0.0019319472,0.0053004115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061998377,0.00068615674,0.0010981101,0.0011212924,0.0014372563,0.0050551225,0.002610073,0.0020770233,0.0007710096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046528966,0.0005039867,0.0009619485,0.00045288372,0.00013783645,0.00024635863,0.0004903958,0.2749471,0.014414484,0.59460354,0.005143116,0.107633084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024061928,0.00030909054,0.0001426479,0.00005273439,0.000041345385,0.0003388571,0.000073176205,0.7708044,0.004388634,0.21285655,0.010708541,0.00004340809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006371897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000727272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053004115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016980586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001967458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01922524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990515691","doi":"10.1007/s100580200076","title":"Strategy-proof allocation when preferences are single-plateaued","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Preference; Pareto principle; Class (philosophy); Economics; Pareto efficiency; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.1864854268960488,"score_gpt":0.2525098562213508,"score_spread":0.066024429325302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990515691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03457293,0.00074449903,0.94364846,0.0023185834,0.00011551305,0.00018744257,0.00015035184,0.0001824562,0.018079747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82636184,0.0013535784,0.15843724,0.0009552612,0.00031405003,0.00062481273,0.00021484001,0.000117556134,0.011620818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902227,0.006219006,0.00047907443,0.0010256233,0.0011490699,0.0009046249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96815133,0.025002085,0.0016996906,0.002954714,0.00143366,0.0007585566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010036452,0.00081208453,0.0026355693,0.00093788904,0.0012645093,0.004644083,0.0029243575,0.003317108,0.0059742555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05043423,0.0010488179,0.0012355591,0.0015168822,0.004510373,0.00826732,0.0027408192,0.0037498393,0.0012368714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645761,0.00004425157,0.00027604634,0.00010185459,0.000040755804,0.00004524803,0.00012520206,0.014470274,0.00044299642,0.97018933,0.0014093517,0.012790167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032862736,0.000015693857,0.00004386914,0.000012020706,0.000006413122,0.000025088977,0.000015882972,0.028544677,0.00011778861,0.9705666,0.0006116398,0.0000074329623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007119353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000802849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010036452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017191832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026506432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053078473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990777695","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0379-3","title":"Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Convexity; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Voting; Truth value; Aggregation problem; Valuation (finance); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Function (biology); Aggregate (composite); Majority rule; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04206439249398311,"score_gpt":0.2360745206155012,"score_spread":0.19401012812151808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990777695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15674052,0.00068964734,0.80298954,0.0042548743,0.00014456814,0.00014069173,0.00050585234,0.0003464925,0.0341878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105959,0.00048970355,0.0709661,0.00036506055,0.00020631499,0.00025098512,0.0005039459,0.00014892317,0.016472979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941947,0.0033379786,0.00022871129,0.0008770043,0.0007902442,0.0005713667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97493017,0.017529188,0.0022375335,0.0026779936,0.0018421931,0.0007829312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054664537,0.0010378037,0.0024323275,0.0021278416,0.0015768079,0.005765894,0.0036089763,0.004204048,0.013836419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043181337,0.0011602069,0.0018716663,0.0028761742,0.0054329922,0.008827999,0.0031835125,0.0029487482,0.0014601015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030773845,0.000019869463,0.00037241023,0.000023287339,0.000021732492,0.00005367273,0.0002001737,0.024581408,0.00010283012,0.96957713,0.00082158606,0.0041951207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016307911,0.000007195618,0.00012496766,0.0000054581437,0.0000060777966,0.000022944934,0.000036919482,0.060488276,0.000028239416,0.9389033,0.00035257504,0.00000769525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048454767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003940899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013836419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027735415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012277167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046287417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W199219868","doi":"10.1007/s00224-016-9687-z","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory of Computing Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stable marriage problem; Generalization; Mathematics; Transitive relation; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Time complexity; Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.03372601474166294,"score_gpt":0.20648129487590292,"score_spread":0.17275528013423996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W199219868","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36533695,0.0013321816,0.5153518,0.007393514,0.0002348115,0.00014758097,0.0006680467,0.00025829903,0.10927675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618019,0.0004783476,0.016290061,0.00039518933,0.00021783078,0.000109617045,0.00026124044,0.000045495075,0.02040029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751794,0.0012897905,0.000082997125,0.00041145392,0.00034416182,0.00035371297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902929,0.0060581295,0.0008365901,0.0011633738,0.0009458388,0.0007031535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021019413,0.0004994303,0.001596267,0.0012251636,0.0025485174,0.0042144894,0.0018205375,0.0024446188,0.012960995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015341199,0.0005980879,0.0011048297,0.00203731,0.0034233045,0.006786116,0.0021557298,0.0026211592,0.0011161136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019358396,0.000015083322,0.00019238591,0.000013943474,0.0000090910435,0.000038961192,0.0001436412,0.0022447426,0.000077348035,0.9941902,0.0007295164,0.0023258103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011109082,0.0000049082296,0.000079302874,0.0000027482724,0.0000028150296,0.000021377467,0.00004332272,0.011185824,0.00002046565,0.9881374,0.00048678907,0.0000040091522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002833458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002156692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012960995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015334988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001226025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043358862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992540444","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.003","title":"Trading water along a river","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Distribution (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Welfare; Process (computing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management; Computer network; Market economy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06191056375167327,"score_gpt":0.2639435744076436,"score_spread":0.20203301065597035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992540444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795834,0.0002470176,0.06655996,0.0049326085,0.00014499608,0.00004249093,0.00016429237,0.000079254154,0.048245933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074835,0.00007355793,0.0023446288,0.000058704696,0.000015078424,0.000008305248,0.000019142199,0.0000073071546,0.006724827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.00020603479,0.00001844468,0.00008548351,0.00004647174,0.000059797025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.0004411631,0.00014614179,0.000087482214,0.0000976618,0.00012805416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050498755,0.0001294774,0.00038815767,0.00024675272,0.0009393373,0.0021559596,0.00059319206,0.0014125832,0.005598987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033370277,0.00020784386,0.00032338744,0.0004448288,0.0012682147,0.0022447524,0.00074382516,0.00070573774,0.00028332582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039511276,0.00019311393,0.02745201,0.00010246231,0.00020018623,0.0012127495,0.0008905141,0.23925838,0.0044526006,0.6873402,0.006138099,0.032364532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065800356,0.000088059336,0.004554501,0.000021131496,0.000051005383,0.00010167331,0.0015409308,0.5378947,0.0008027531,0.4470187,0.0078196395,0.000041162202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008604981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089228125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008604981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008088043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006838376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018730521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992818571","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0890","title":"(Sophisticated) Stable Sets in Exchange Economies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Von Neumann architecture; Set (abstract data type); Rationality; Space (punctuation); Property (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Exchange economy; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05745302908625478,"score_gpt":0.2258838899126072,"score_spread":0.16843086082635242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992818571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39835617,0.00056003133,0.54472595,0.0027872827,0.000076673015,0.00014944682,0.0003981757,0.00016681316,0.052779328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669253,0.00023475909,0.02415003,0.00017414663,0.00006680247,0.00014460027,0.00013746184,0.00002033104,0.008146548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981475,0.00087087153,0.00011233136,0.00031946378,0.00034317584,0.00020672567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096674,0.0059121624,0.0010090444,0.0010151775,0.00064010813,0.00045660164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023316029,0.0005024337,0.0011224198,0.0012876017,0.0017439581,0.004230613,0.0014695353,0.0022466092,0.008005243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013293114,0.0005438858,0.0009278803,0.0013095152,0.003583337,0.0069619166,0.0024290415,0.0023123533,0.0006550973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017609222,0.000010672509,0.00026386607,0.000016991082,0.000009970173,0.000028000522,0.00018443986,0.0048655365,0.0001486557,0.99162626,0.00037182448,0.0024561689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009732065,0.0000051371176,0.0001366897,0.000003560767,0.0000031834668,0.00001884882,0.000038402995,0.013865926,0.000053869117,0.9855106,0.0003500473,0.000004122938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001318886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011240275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008005243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010580684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063790457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026780188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993094949","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2014.07.021","title":"The <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si3.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math>-centrum Chinese Postman delivery problem and a related cost allocation game","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Combinatorics; Graph; Mathematics; Submodular set function; Undirected graph; Directed graph; Connectivity; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Strongly connected component; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012281730963888435,"score_gpt":0.21315306689176525,"score_spread":0.20087133592787682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993094949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005038044,0.00039673867,0.3293309,0.013674327,0.0012286344,0.00035337283,0.049355183,0.008042457,0.5925803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096223645,0.0016585394,0.19657731,0.0026513676,0.00084234774,0.00084519316,0.046450883,0.008944766,0.6458059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996809,0.000080209014,0.000026492993,0.00006130223,0.00011283616,0.000038308903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999074,0.00037515428,0.000061057945,0.00017895068,0.00023927983,0.00007157129],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005940636,0.0005636799,0.0005210834,0.00095241406,0.00070371554,0.0025388338,0.0016532968,0.0012328435,0.3364688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032604437,0.00037441208,0.0005856937,0.0024662532,0.00044522036,0.00343263,0.000965605,0.0014147607,0.11464201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054541553,0.000046818284,0.00017235425,0.00017585672,0.00000571635,0.00007668594,0.0001240486,0.001591169,0.0010114429,0.3260766,0.62029135,0.050373446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006370045,0.000020551453,0.00061119464,0.00004955355,0.000006825303,0.00016433316,0.000085238826,0.017900722,0.0028454664,0.24025396,0.73795515,0.00004323411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008566381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008200598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3364688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016045535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001239254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9464468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19933852","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.0902181","title":"A geometric approach to judgment aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Condorcet method; Arrow; Representation (politics); Social choice theory; Representation theorem; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Voting","score_opus":0.04099715131174911,"score_gpt":0.21637771193740402,"score_spread":0.1753805606256549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19933852","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014482738,0.0010106736,0.90057427,0.0028537754,0.0003223991,0.00014018336,0.0003010724,0.00017869586,0.080136165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5422164,0.0018653536,0.40129268,0.0007599654,0.0012520871,0.00055044703,0.0007040103,0.0003029268,0.051056128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964224,0.001611875,0.00023799385,0.0007108163,0.0007349416,0.00028197342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949414,0.0024662013,0.0005123598,0.0009064518,0.00089045847,0.0002830453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003206998,0.0007592711,0.0011876951,0.0028869924,0.0020934518,0.0051630363,0.0019876407,0.0017248088,0.019052316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015062728,0.0005432309,0.0019574426,0.002197112,0.004161975,0.005605564,0.003309768,0.002239863,0.002327726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009243327,0.000008833968,0.0001902861,0.000026860871,0.000015930635,0.00002967341,0.000085510175,0.013143992,0.00013511178,0.9726477,0.0016423104,0.012064607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061079413,0.000013633788,0.0001550087,0.000014372449,0.0000068671134,0.000040280094,0.000034762343,0.050801132,0.00008244345,0.9412583,0.0075777336,0.000009307407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004199613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036710242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019052316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036172245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015289088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06373638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993688296","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1762669","title":"Bargaining with Linked Disagreement Points","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03283845875683449,"score_gpt":0.20171993288807907,"score_spread":0.16888147413124457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993688296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2099517,0.0006969582,0.4459693,0.0075340252,0.000530449,0.0002998924,0.000380241,0.00025839952,0.33437905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223728,0.00025097234,0.018053886,0.0005192908,0.00025435997,0.00028495578,0.00016818772,0.00006786895,0.058027785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247146,0.004371624,0.0002923789,0.0010166856,0.0010041822,0.00084368343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766267,0.01822996,0.0011192065,0.002089719,0.00088097295,0.0010534818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077344035,0.00096661155,0.0018566878,0.0016520165,0.0035019207,0.007892474,0.0023639032,0.007590125,0.030599497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038945958,0.0010396804,0.00180724,0.002158905,0.0043994887,0.008263188,0.0046361964,0.0065875654,0.004119758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006817813,0.000033588367,0.00015898733,0.000020815174,0.000018510276,0.00008456711,0.00020828948,0.004655283,0.00016434792,0.9906446,0.0008962389,0.003046638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032199445,0.000012227897,0.000046322253,0.0000099094905,0.000007726216,0.00002214106,0.0000743416,0.015164102,0.00008447716,0.9837503,0.0007894939,0.000006702744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006358557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005234104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030599497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018607519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010791817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10236555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994128719","doi":"10.5555/365411.365789","title":"Linear reductions of maximum matching","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium on Discrete Algorithms","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02791080801521452,"score_gpt":0.24951552774059851,"score_spread":0.22160471972538398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994128719","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053982034,0.0026366627,0.6903615,0.009401983,0.0012020916,0.00035511397,0.0016165068,0.0022358762,0.23820825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60978544,0.00206783,0.24208681,0.0041230386,0.0019818698,0.001105299,0.0025873699,0.002115773,0.13414651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963021,0.0015861475,0.00012657398,0.00076635164,0.0007061992,0.00051260757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489516,0.0032728482,0.00022671222,0.000997034,0.00032640362,0.0002818346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002907491,0.0014978517,0.0026760497,0.0020828124,0.0029242185,0.0052785915,0.00445697,0.0024484457,0.033865396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010523544,0.0013678689,0.0035055967,0.0037823156,0.0033562293,0.008489537,0.005796684,0.008505418,0.004968097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108696746,0.00009837771,0.00006663231,0.000101715574,0.000025720914,0.000013242909,0.00013575307,0.007842678,0.00034121712,0.9553246,0.013747819,0.022193527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034392262,0.000012257444,0.000037749644,0.000014843649,0.000012562285,0.000012276078,0.000017298727,0.015309558,0.00031246987,0.9803914,0.0038378667,0.0000072573375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022213103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025976803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033865396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049264967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002578557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113291025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994916611","doi":"10.1007/s00355-005-0057-z","title":"Multi_profile welfarism: a generalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Axiom; Anonymity; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Public finance; Economics; Social choice theory; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026223104817041123,"score_gpt":0.23950218741626156,"score_spread":0.21327908259922043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994916611","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15792921,0.00065384293,0.73770416,0.004323396,0.00028347952,0.00026069707,0.0009132284,0.00026501922,0.09766698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111531,0.0005161545,0.044172432,0.0008272763,0.00052802503,0.00025805226,0.0005055132,0.00015128532,0.04188828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962088,0.0014919328,0.00018849951,0.00097496103,0.0003764359,0.0007594395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922327,0.003651795,0.00083933916,0.0018810679,0.00059654494,0.0007985775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492036,0.0007440428,0.0020914008,0.0013511807,0.0029678082,0.0037433323,0.0028285498,0.0028483004,0.0167616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082148,0.000681855,0.0029982761,0.0017723739,0.0028899203,0.0055970703,0.004568581,0.0051361937,0.0018002087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060022703,0.00006903118,0.00073019316,0.000050830356,0.000030689534,0.00007732342,0.00029908438,0.0034921102,0.00036998303,0.97833556,0.003250905,0.0132343145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027332359,0.000030371359,0.0003831969,0.000015046588,0.0000142136205,0.00014200322,0.00011507199,0.024140682,0.00018266609,0.9719151,0.0030214575,0.000012853225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002082725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019195235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0167616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016801418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011227095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05607313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995228035","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2012.6425887","title":"Emergence of coalitions in mean field stochastic systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Mean field theory; Population; Nash equilibrium; Fraction (chemistry); Stability (learning theory); State (computer science); Infinity; Set (abstract data type); Minor (academic); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.054439650108946344,"score_gpt":0.24542362593389486,"score_spread":0.19098397582494853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995228035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28046808,0.00042972117,0.70908946,0.0009989305,0.000070030364,0.00010273183,0.0000634416,0.00016920792,0.008608311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635661,0.00020986969,0.032516122,0.00010274591,0.000056066558,0.00009807787,0.000051644187,0.000029188122,0.0033701893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890065,0.00040830625,0.000051732306,0.00022222484,0.00025701648,0.0001601253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678963,0.0016782511,0.0006019829,0.000234846,0.00029856767,0.00039669423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018871902,0.00045037997,0.00091685733,0.0009921503,0.0010388453,0.0018509659,0.0010913002,0.0014556062,0.0014991823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006412744,0.00041334052,0.00082456303,0.00047970904,0.0028735923,0.001924548,0.0018535242,0.0011495332,0.00016808396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005442107,0.000055623394,0.0030170218,0.000060857405,0.000068757945,0.00037871822,0.00057996874,0.21172178,0.004235584,0.77258456,0.000616793,0.006626004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028362974,0.0000516932,0.0006311256,0.000012146268,0.000013341086,0.00011050443,0.00015320483,0.7510215,0.0005320196,0.24592471,0.0014995637,0.000021883581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024408079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013868819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024408079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013765339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079757045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009987533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996570526","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0600-z","title":"Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social choice theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Conjunction (astronomy); Complement (music); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05602464863029017,"score_gpt":0.2198874131003893,"score_spread":0.16386276447009915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996570526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4053533,0.00077429455,0.4866727,0.005893231,0.00022385956,0.00020880767,0.0011523342,0.00024628194,0.09947518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93198526,0.00037866522,0.049663603,0.0005708578,0.00018220914,0.0002689617,0.0004559764,0.00009910357,0.01639544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957832,0.0022134476,0.00026526523,0.00077421044,0.00045599902,0.0005079329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832283,0.01133252,0.0015381309,0.002224621,0.0010659012,0.00061055063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043628337,0.00047417395,0.0014939437,0.0018551367,0.003314908,0.0043646507,0.0014551952,0.0024387317,0.011313392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014915799,0.00080803817,0.0017234096,0.002010237,0.0036257487,0.007700681,0.0015530541,0.002550546,0.00070782274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019386187,0.000018179293,0.00032117017,0.000016492431,0.000010808608,0.000029666991,0.00016840018,0.00048343884,0.00023064048,0.9966151,0.000585757,0.0015008835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001947205,0.000008353113,0.00029316955,0.0000067870055,0.000011794413,0.000041476364,0.00008324854,0.0049005,0.00013780198,0.99333763,0.0011534378,0.000006375066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018545504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002990589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011313392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016639576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013828732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037847042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996967738","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00579.x","title":"FIRST IN VILLAGE OR SECOND IN ROME?*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sorting; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Pecking order; Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Competitive equilibrium; Economics; Business; Computer science; Finance; Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03286161172366642,"score_gpt":0.2655408416507969,"score_spread":0.23267922992713047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996967738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13385242,0.0024508336,0.0015102691,0.030459363,0.004408744,0.00014733442,0.0022478963,0.00039632272,0.8245268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35862046,0.0006527901,0.0012248509,0.0037418741,0.00034779997,0.00005996781,0.0005244373,0.000103794184,0.63472396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997793,0.00004472824,0.0000055323594,0.000031925803,0.000012917974,0.0001257345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977154,0.00001533477,0.000028209877,0.000020416866,0.000026566442,0.00013792345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024572932,0.00022551115,0.00029243203,0.0003140045,0.0028905787,0.0010841535,0.0003565756,0.0009904116,0.10742261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038755778,0.00012473493,0.00026099067,0.00038246432,0.0005155214,0.00071785465,0.0006001507,0.00078284845,0.020888047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058572524,0.000335463,0.031492878,0.00043879254,0.00004195563,0.005729847,0.007322268,0.00033601848,0.0017478872,0.12292394,0.635587,0.19345818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040440405,0.00008601416,0.018617446,0.00012436166,0.00000915172,0.0010173487,0.005995761,0.00014622742,0.00033224456,0.0030140115,0.97059447,0.000022552049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012365876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0422342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10742261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060268486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061494386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35936445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998440297","doi":"10.1007/s10100-010-0141-z","title":"Cooperative games under interval uncertainty: on the convexity of the interval undominated cores","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Convexity; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Dominance (genetics); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics","score_opus":0.1167264845443248,"score_gpt":0.31827971286054796,"score_spread":0.20155322831622316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998440297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34712458,0.0007963443,0.60499114,0.0014539696,0.00009657334,0.00015843956,0.0003278839,0.0001216383,0.044929434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561064,0.0008971595,0.03668197,0.00020635869,0.00016004544,0.00024874974,0.00023239088,0.00010622536,0.0053607826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680233,0.0015936488,0.00015700304,0.00047058822,0.00050180976,0.00047464875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746395,0.018676287,0.0022445626,0.0014470007,0.0016650119,0.0013275177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005297029,0.00113034,0.002605478,0.0012982127,0.0014580188,0.0051731346,0.0026807983,0.0015720684,0.0060219886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028306613,0.001045124,0.0017485747,0.0014391971,0.005070625,0.009052655,0.0031366274,0.0044825077,0.00039944152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014513578,0.00005844458,0.00043095896,0.0000632889,0.00002837108,0.00011385897,0.0002916477,0.02873545,0.00057265325,0.9633165,0.0009056405,0.0053381273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006403478,0.00006106531,0.0003619803,0.000040530264,0.000025431713,0.000072259965,0.00013271897,0.14668714,0.00040357144,0.851317,0.00080729334,0.000026931266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018073354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00114321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060219886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018711194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018041871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028013706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998954346","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0784-5","title":"Inefficient committees: small elections with three alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; State (computer science); Majority rule; Economics; Condorcet method; Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Contingent vote; Private information retrieval; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Macroeconomics; Group voting ticket; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02875850210327523,"score_gpt":0.20739214596137043,"score_spread":0.1786336438580952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998954346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6368791,0.0003961158,0.32333156,0.0036593676,0.00013372077,0.0003579152,0.00027578254,0.00014952026,0.03481694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551167,0.00009919334,0.01791632,0.00018614723,0.00009187298,0.0002148139,0.00009015108,0.000033306093,0.005856651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98389983,0.012349638,0.00038492618,0.0011808174,0.0010856711,0.0010991335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94689554,0.041082278,0.0040671783,0.004763796,0.0014158727,0.0017754382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012460808,0.0005512016,0.0020501153,0.0010819538,0.002042795,0.005435843,0.0026164164,0.0031385692,0.008056197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041987684,0.00078855734,0.001003676,0.0011417016,0.0046551344,0.004529715,0.002016144,0.002889243,0.0007186839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006773875,0.00048798768,0.0051251333,0.00015165281,0.000158787,0.0003570223,0.00085100153,0.039422106,0.0016566259,0.9250305,0.006032689,0.020049104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002265744,0.00008816689,0.001315985,0.000020780208,0.00007574621,0.00013996995,0.00042045547,0.14707729,0.000551225,0.8483782,0.0016783498,0.000027272014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015109486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026765321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012460808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016110474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014472117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06589985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999922619","doi":"10.1007/s001820200100","title":"Voting for voters: the unanimity case","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Voting; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Computer security; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04368151745305899,"score_gpt":0.2654214621755924,"score_spread":0.22173994472253344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999922619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4794318,0.0014208053,0.20180328,0.055956423,0.0006731919,0.00048883614,0.0006166943,0.00015869958,0.25945026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97853184,0.0003016744,0.006538374,0.0011839669,0.00047703992,0.00016071527,0.00006241352,0.000034741468,0.012709394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809074,0.010023394,0.0007544946,0.0025855072,0.0017093912,0.004019869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95095104,0.03370729,0.0052178376,0.0056076897,0.0017989044,0.002717205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018555256,0.00080412766,0.0037019923,0.0014235706,0.005567583,0.008266569,0.0033700205,0.01184824,0.02019813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07050253,0.0009868479,0.0017752934,0.0018556463,0.0074971104,0.012357487,0.004193107,0.0073034456,0.0018789342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026977668,0.000078408324,0.0018428876,0.00005073761,0.000046065576,0.000371607,0.0006277414,0.0022305662,0.00020086183,0.9823698,0.0034828344,0.008428681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026247394,0.00004260541,0.00042509608,0.00002440906,0.000037849215,0.00025043936,0.00030525136,0.011514054,0.00016682061,0.9837257,0.0032244585,0.000020776204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002628623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030301402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02019813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017795145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025853133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09813076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000621378","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9179-5","title":"Negotiation over Costs and Benefits in Brownfield Redevelopment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Redevelopment; Shapley value; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Operations research; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Management science; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Telecommunications; Political science","score_opus":0.023755830161397293,"score_gpt":0.22379146151859847,"score_spread":0.20003563135720118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000621378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74315816,0.00094298663,0.038271166,0.0066837487,0.0001790952,0.00015703724,0.000045539076,0.000094489376,0.21046774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983433,0.00004391243,0.0021760175,0.00015415132,0.000019870691,0.000020681846,0.000006737986,0.000011039767,0.014134543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937552,0.003243174,0.00018033972,0.00055176555,0.0008161129,0.0014534225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98433924,0.01217917,0.00085844897,0.0008010932,0.00069120876,0.0011306881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010635123,0.00028079076,0.0005751975,0.0010152347,0.0031984642,0.0052958955,0.001767586,0.0036076151,0.018558744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032625545,0.00041748228,0.00038118908,0.00082842325,0.0034214046,0.004600047,0.0023250587,0.0030311963,0.0007218513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010834122,0.00051091384,0.010396518,0.00008062227,0.000046341254,0.000573807,0.004603154,0.03381831,0.002009726,0.8335153,0.0063955626,0.10696624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001518083,0.00022075321,0.018405806,0.00011043583,0.000062712956,0.00025056253,0.01007212,0.09066762,0.002603531,0.8482589,0.029085658,0.00011007958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013929462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024626238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018558744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004723038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002996948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06208515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.11390321613045822,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.24782670270117096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003305533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046929855,0.0013783037,0.93297845,0.0014487625,0.0002926995,0.0002795724,0.0001212577,0.00036929612,0.016201759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5026545,0.0015548078,0.4661781,0.00088120677,0.00051722716,0.0008921883,0.000398007,0.00074588036,0.026177999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98140115,0.014017858,0.0005546409,0.001155637,0.0020178745,0.0008527507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92809,0.054942016,0.0011161357,0.0111279255,0.003932685,0.0007913304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03113395,0.0010179252,0.0019482028,0.0020105555,0.001353711,0.0035443369,0.0046882397,0.0020706502,0.014538004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08816769,0.00073197024,0.0020938653,0.0023728814,0.002663217,0.008457231,0.004422941,0.0034251756,0.0015315032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015574367,0.00031488462,0.001387968,0.00023732756,0.00015793586,0.000026260936,0.00085323356,0.023944605,0.0010015877,0.6661164,0.005773796,0.2986285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026486034,0.0006649742,0.0014966759,0.00015067373,0.00019726272,0.00018690214,0.00037099418,0.37815323,0.0030309104,0.60162485,0.013791253,0.00006736008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014948501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015097687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03113395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023445974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025726638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16465402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004939158","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00503.x","title":"Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Distribution (mathematics); Politics; Set (abstract data type); Axiomatic system; Political science; Law and economics; Game theory; Computer science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09453656013846388,"score_gpt":0.2946040596407902,"score_spread":0.20006749950232627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004939158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47332457,0.0016779115,0.37652576,0.004845606,0.00016158659,0.00026354037,0.00023921709,0.00018453364,0.14277725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752939,0.00040016067,0.01646642,0.00016403933,0.000046165536,0.000107692336,0.000110714944,0.000024564975,0.007386373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718696,0.0014229662,0.00011654214,0.00041435153,0.00040784143,0.00045141732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209654,0.004312515,0.0015842395,0.00084699265,0.00053154543,0.0006282641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002792205,0.00044574396,0.00077661296,0.0013436134,0.0027453196,0.0030033821,0.0013206946,0.001469301,0.0049403287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012058573,0.00047653518,0.0007258834,0.0011190206,0.0045370813,0.0033403311,0.0035948986,0.0017192585,0.0005610912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015534322,0.000024755573,0.0008884744,0.000038226186,0.000021311898,0.00012474426,0.0004129434,0.023852233,0.0003840679,0.97028726,0.00043853818,0.003511889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003749998,0.00002699786,0.00067160453,0.000024646102,0.000010437389,0.00009768112,0.00036889367,0.076056585,0.00040708174,0.9135438,0.0087426035,0.000012177132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038913426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033630177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049403287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031986756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013672971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023208082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006131948","doi":"10.1007/s00199-005-0058-2","title":"Price discrimination and efficient matching","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sorting; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); sort; Function (biology); Schedule; Revenue; Incentive; Private information retrieval; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010825319548684405,"score_gpt":0.191941477651572,"score_spread":0.1811161581028876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006131948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3259369,0.002478585,0.5170392,0.012392937,0.00042362016,0.00014644502,0.00029466898,0.00019564111,0.14109205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692546,0.0004930149,0.011794526,0.00044171113,0.00022953161,0.00006390234,0.00008488524,0.00003341409,0.017604364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967154,0.0015723801,0.00012679856,0.00047170458,0.0004622229,0.0006515169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805934,0.0075955447,0.0014329918,0.0015956765,0.0007675147,0.0005489482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036126715,0.0004284706,0.0018922619,0.00085005286,0.0014936912,0.003812034,0.0019420998,0.0036093004,0.011684687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025096986,0.00054908416,0.0007271012,0.0014953847,0.0035173965,0.005256295,0.0016961036,0.0029218378,0.0011552492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003527383,0.000047086774,0.00034607496,0.000027220201,0.000011223966,0.0000274361,0.000066423265,0.0058440827,0.0001901151,0.9857552,0.001458697,0.0061911964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015782072,0.000004758881,0.00013904052,0.0000038368507,0.0000031636348,0.000018302862,0.000017167422,0.013623635,0.00004994473,0.98555136,0.0005692073,0.0000036728745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020101622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016359634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011684687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002014764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016463287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039089143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007071308","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.008","title":"Matching markets under (in)complete information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Creative Europe; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Preference; Mechanism (biology); Incomplete markets; Bayesian probability; Economics; Equilibrium selection; Computer science; Best response; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Game theory; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.050791320924413276,"score_gpt":0.233542820059775,"score_spread":0.18275149913536173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007071308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235658,0.0007047353,0.42044556,0.00756993,0.00021062847,0.0002899747,0.0013478468,0.0004327336,0.045432623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96997535,0.000362558,0.017554887,0.00044937208,0.0003321761,0.00013148617,0.0003194144,0.00004412972,0.010830494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947621,0.0022354093,0.00035821644,0.00079846225,0.00078735006,0.0010583971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680489,0.018775752,0.006027228,0.0032218553,0.0021866565,0.0017397305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076296534,0.0005641102,0.003799389,0.0012041935,0.0012842745,0.0063929018,0.0030381195,0.005330577,0.011801026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049370453,0.0010195877,0.0011172317,0.0015848397,0.0030755643,0.012138127,0.0030246351,0.0022843112,0.001022475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002704701,0.00014325038,0.0009629118,0.00010868966,0.000056263583,0.00019194226,0.0001912554,0.030153304,0.0005937931,0.95622116,0.00263197,0.008474872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012540167,0.00004596954,0.0003136987,0.000013076028,0.000018173356,0.000064518994,0.000055240518,0.098336816,0.000199365,0.90020144,0.0006054052,0.000020951604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019523342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013414935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011801026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017423317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023190083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0403499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007779524","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1","title":"Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06625046255528268,"score_gpt":0.2471342989240128,"score_spread":0.18088383636873012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007779524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056337304,0.0004876203,0.9060194,0.002598223,0.00012266554,0.00023043394,0.00025799946,0.00014402802,0.033802357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71933323,0.0012362943,0.24203427,0.0004552883,0.0002502874,0.0012518317,0.00037588237,0.00018567659,0.03487723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780446,0.0012274531,0.00010499549,0.0001982566,0.00035677478,0.0003080214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264413,0.005291915,0.00065925653,0.00045457887,0.00050819904,0.00044188352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004497387,0.001677213,0.0018563546,0.0012036877,0.0013940884,0.0033126117,0.0028589256,0.0031099515,0.008551628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023242304,0.0010108699,0.0014198398,0.0020338886,0.002734477,0.004521977,0.0029021504,0.0035283358,0.0007903599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059209226,0.00009286668,0.00012614627,0.00008807135,0.00003602342,0.00004749938,0.00018519134,0.08712198,0.0005155352,0.8991366,0.0027518363,0.009839064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054294225,0.000012719733,0.00004443897,0.000016067048,0.0000076151427,0.000013823951,0.00004854239,0.16228452,0.000113387694,0.8365583,0.0008374298,0.000008818636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036621701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00396056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008551628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024745127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004355714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028608024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009959931","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807455","title":"Overlapping coalitions, bargaining and networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Function (biology); Game theory; Subgame; Cover (algebra); Mathematical optimization; Complete information; Symmetric equilibrium; Perfect information; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02163739515257339,"score_gpt":0.2064473057702318,"score_spread":0.1848099106176584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009959931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08374355,0.0013172514,0.8731751,0.0013166736,0.000075895245,0.000074371594,0.0000620095,0.000102504164,0.040132705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8880522,0.0010022986,0.10040508,0.00015059928,0.000121746,0.00014463447,0.00011077797,0.00003967594,0.009972985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974343,0.0013151078,0.00008444447,0.00035853154,0.0005263153,0.00028138765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595743,0.0027198656,0.00046137217,0.00046500983,0.00018726988,0.00020910361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025357867,0.00044969592,0.00073963706,0.0011645483,0.0015343066,0.002245657,0.0013204583,0.0014473358,0.0036973928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008422856,0.00040814895,0.00053016376,0.0017776408,0.0034169934,0.0048899977,0.0022452672,0.0014241041,0.0004500459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023393857,0.000014102216,0.00025085922,0.000033528693,0.000014129704,0.00006283837,0.00019856525,0.04392551,0.00031260605,0.9423305,0.00041299724,0.012421051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011151436,0.000012120965,0.0001462894,0.000018200792,0.00000634933,0.00005507318,0.00010403212,0.09113898,0.0003062704,0.9031473,0.0050457087,0.000008386608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015412536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013873648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036973928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015954982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008093343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013410687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010339374","doi":"10.1007/s00199-008-0365-5","title":"A multi-agent bilateral bargaining model with endogenous protocol","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Bargaining problem; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Computer science","score_opus":0.09915231716838434,"score_gpt":0.2365673081796664,"score_spread":0.13741499101128207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010339374","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14820634,0.0006595716,0.7974173,0.0042269826,0.00023803957,0.00023372284,0.00045177917,0.00024047807,0.048325695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275867,0.0003802972,0.04382271,0.0002828775,0.00010195971,0.00023922988,0.00012972896,0.000038185553,0.027418366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.0010479448,0.000096533826,0.00039646242,0.00028467405,0.00032353462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659973,0.0021259584,0.00036465222,0.0002594261,0.00029016327,0.00036020667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032538273,0.00084607094,0.0023549744,0.000708124,0.0014574219,0.0037257157,0.0036906078,0.00496379,0.0124189425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069834497,0.00088216324,0.001077576,0.0015434413,0.002373166,0.004556849,0.0019538538,0.002354525,0.0012862085],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035885142,0.00019604378,0.0004439472,0.000113823204,0.000078874466,0.0005301609,0.00024310587,0.30503964,0.0017812001,0.6822425,0.0018750548,0.0070967865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000235661,0.00007449702,0.0001222395,0.000014091627,0.000037206777,0.00009352747,0.00006167797,0.82046443,0.00022110302,0.17720686,0.001438266,0.000030414816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024907722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017367863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124189425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019310077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001789649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04154557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010912066","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.003","title":"Group strategy-proofness and voting between two alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Voting; Mathematical economics; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14575210552786322,"score_gpt":0.3308931207024684,"score_spread":0.18514101517460518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010912066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533288,0.00053975283,0.40361768,0.006265003,0.00015134618,0.00026875394,0.00028678295,0.000120694545,0.03542123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97863334,0.0001452491,0.01743305,0.00026134518,0.00008285165,0.00015039153,0.00012071201,0.00002135016,0.003151739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98859346,0.0065835956,0.0006579899,0.001573827,0.001331148,0.0012600765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.895355,0.08558776,0.008713911,0.0052315164,0.003029615,0.002082107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012232455,0.00070829206,0.0022120788,0.0014295916,0.0023857153,0.0051256325,0.0024729453,0.004306295,0.0068807695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0800528,0.0007143105,0.0013592914,0.001399651,0.006606853,0.006874119,0.0025830828,0.0037654603,0.00051858637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015295632,0.0000993793,0.001802836,0.00009764533,0.00009348553,0.00015255803,0.0006809784,0.00978662,0.0006798082,0.9779829,0.00094607804,0.007524798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006157367,0.000023265504,0.00031918255,0.000010982658,0.000014412055,0.000053781783,0.00009872381,0.02308208,0.00016413165,0.9758185,0.00034233317,0.000011023866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017157242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013195449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012232455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017107909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002488694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06469214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011679113","doi":"10.1007/s10100-009-0116-0","title":"Cooperative interval games: a survey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Game theory; Interval data; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Operations research; State (computer science); Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Data mining","score_opus":0.18471368184769216,"score_gpt":0.34796021439077696,"score_spread":0.1632465325430848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011679113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10706545,0.5978847,0.20234765,0.0038820147,0.00045747048,0.00027841856,0.0008803341,0.00016074859,0.08704322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46683726,0.4717804,0.04538424,0.0009723146,0.0010716349,0.00032015226,0.0016403171,0.00009381961,0.011899888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853194,0.00037152958,0.00017512916,0.0003307394,0.00039829666,0.00019241255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912704,0.006952648,0.00047164835,0.00033254304,0.00068033073,0.00029250924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115047,0.0009805075,0.0015206133,0.0033486595,0.00073067157,0.003536239,0.0016457464,0.0015238102,0.0055417754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072686765,0.0008458731,0.00083212304,0.0064572124,0.00140171,0.0058248728,0.0012061421,0.0019402964,0.0010712934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024262251,0.0010628378,0.00929337,0.0023803813,0.00016105708,0.00020314331,0.0007931991,0.026412526,0.0010266198,0.34690586,0.013630052,0.5978883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574508,0.00087586994,0.017003663,0.0014458285,0.00020143238,0.0024160573,0.0021891391,0.1015566,0.0013765098,0.5587094,0.3139279,0.00014020361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018125476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013776742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055417754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012722597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014041341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018539071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012697739","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602884","title":"Reasoning about optimal stable matchings under partial information","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Mathematics; Stable marriage problem; Polynomial; Construct (python library); Optimal matching; Order (exchange); Existential quantification; Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.014610879140814128,"score_gpt":0.20010028328558277,"score_spread":0.18548940414476864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012697739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16634358,0.0001633598,0.82767946,0.0011088108,0.000028603667,0.00019753119,0.0006715007,0.0004236685,0.003383556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6793941,0.00019681221,0.31676164,0.00020477765,0.00006443394,0.00019889114,0.0011766296,0.00011164402,0.0018909519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949812,0.0016391382,0.0005207901,0.0012265192,0.0009825039,0.0006499102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97642773,0.01783674,0.0021451374,0.0017345333,0.0011339376,0.0007218539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005890988,0.00094322604,0.0015659141,0.0014874054,0.0016229933,0.0038872156,0.002382602,0.0021113406,0.004123769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031079557,0.0013149236,0.0023963763,0.0020662015,0.0026676508,0.010171612,0.0029642729,0.002787587,0.00046213772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007383379,0.00028741875,0.004606201,0.00046441855,0.00027279533,0.0007007788,0.0008426653,0.36859676,0.0052214838,0.57598066,0.0023055356,0.03998284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119305136,0.000060628467,0.00024703747,0.000020542457,0.00004533787,0.00008062741,0.00015126582,0.41876635,0.0030013626,0.57663494,0.0008469515,0.00002561536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031243376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038700728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005890988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020691059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022166332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031154871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012705428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198910002556","title":"VON NEUMANN, VILLE, AND THE MINIMAX THEOREM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Institut de France","keywords":"Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Minimax theorem; Minimax; Convexity; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Danskin's theorem; Fixed-point theorem; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Brouwer fixed-point theorem","score_opus":0.018777482732672785,"score_gpt":0.2411784849224101,"score_spread":0.2224010021897373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012705428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05782133,0.055971775,0.24496835,0.07360618,0.002639267,0.00013577452,0.00035717312,0.00011163407,0.56438845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89108926,0.017945316,0.028550716,0.0065971767,0.002725712,0.00028538163,0.00010991252,0.0000938257,0.052602638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.00048162212,0.000049259295,0.0002633294,0.0002929762,0.00015000439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984559,0.0011658099,0.00008533129,0.00008817788,0.000141782,0.00006300161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568238,0.00048771044,0.0007490841,0.0011985302,0.0015236862,0.0031701517,0.00078768656,0.0023479583,0.003634826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008013055,0.0003556515,0.00060388,0.001012196,0.00816939,0.0047216443,0.0017332409,0.003916613,0.00050522416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034509612,0.0000021333183,0.000023369854,0.000009418047,0.0000027359845,0.00001222286,0.00003114868,0.0004899109,0.000027715809,0.996911,0.0011555845,0.0013312605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043427735,0.000002773137,0.000039875842,0.000014084696,0.0000014302398,0.000012460619,0.000011282348,0.0008745054,0.000040183917,0.99228036,0.0067147347,0.000004101813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026180146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001394943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003634826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034517713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013733911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025044441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014915043","doi":"10.1007/s11293-013-9397-8","title":"Candidate Ambition and Advancement under Term Limits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantic Economic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Term (time); Politics; Seekers; Public finance; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.019820937106290445,"score_gpt":0.21361110810772257,"score_spread":0.19379017100143214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014915043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93280643,0.00049397047,0.0074410453,0.0030298836,0.00005373038,0.00003288302,0.00017418177,0.000041969197,0.05592588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956049,0.000059804483,0.00025998676,0.00006169835,0.000027483798,0.000009184295,0.000029730618,0.0000047679764,0.003942499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976041,0.00080773904,0.00012933218,0.00033449163,0.00030423648,0.000820073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96411395,0.019763267,0.0057674795,0.0020934246,0.002003582,0.0062583103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007511168,0.00017403065,0.0009407381,0.0008501848,0.0017037424,0.0036563464,0.0009770399,0.0019919549,0.012812123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03962479,0.00024938965,0.0004514399,0.00075070234,0.0021680158,0.0024311603,0.0025730808,0.0026433168,0.0007447663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030119217,0.00082289317,0.19429386,0.00016837772,0.0001487746,0.001081829,0.002545549,0.023363255,0.002074625,0.6792121,0.006776485,0.08650038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019949318,0.000949046,0.08014391,0.0000616964,0.00013087926,0.00064134574,0.0043377234,0.04004491,0.00086735515,0.8640649,0.00849581,0.00006290121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013747659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021697464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012812123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010932091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011762958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042860746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015123404","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.002","title":"A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost sharing; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Spanning tree; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Steiner tree problem; Point (geometry); Fixed point; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Tree (set theory); Fixed cost; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10111342676648626,"score_gpt":0.25791261119516407,"score_spread":0.1567991844286778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015123404","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02459098,0.00014813345,0.96601194,0.00042165097,0.00011834502,0.00010442996,0.000066263216,0.00016329759,0.008374945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4027492,0.00029243645,0.5807134,0.00045156758,0.00018474611,0.00041961833,0.0002317148,0.00024458047,0.014712809],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929714,0.00027303226,0.000030999374,0.000118423435,0.00018118345,0.00009925269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.0003937211,0.000077451834,0.00010224441,0.00015756399,0.00010561351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012551389,0.0008164941,0.0013339828,0.0007511782,0.000649385,0.0012684532,0.0021768506,0.00219319,0.008289031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047848267,0.00038918626,0.0008521277,0.000906834,0.00061131205,0.0017774166,0.0019273958,0.0018369175,0.0008315587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022680522,0.00032922463,0.00031962845,0.00027187713,0.00008798354,0.00015179186,0.0003229466,0.5929264,0.012264319,0.23891331,0.010901073,0.14328466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052814838,0.00008064377,0.00007658491,0.000015866271,0.000017372908,0.000061828185,0.000036073,0.927875,0.0005881783,0.068525776,0.0026562114,0.000013612166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008781571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011211722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008289031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063061627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010036473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02772957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017492304","doi":"10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x","title":"A minimax procedure for electing committees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Approval voting; Mathematical economics; Rendering (computer graphics); Computer science; Operations research; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.06914424310011429,"score_gpt":0.26906980774074224,"score_spread":0.19992556464062794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017492304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003193104,0.0000735856,0.99444807,0.0002678886,0.00004474341,0.00011611359,0.00007872914,0.00025056102,0.001527217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13419311,0.00016740877,0.85266846,0.0002979166,0.00022971384,0.0012242766,0.0006487182,0.00030330455,0.010267091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98938644,0.007477263,0.00038437705,0.0010518106,0.0012432125,0.00045688325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821566,0.012939175,0.000610435,0.00261571,0.0012250085,0.00045302973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160755,0.00091618754,0.0026403328,0.0020973624,0.0017884304,0.002139061,0.004070762,0.003464314,0.010932238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036157336,0.001126059,0.0017066256,0.0024343021,0.002114878,0.0031071187,0.0030627674,0.004209565,0.0026059886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006884207,0.0003333857,0.0014323487,0.00021880792,0.00020885924,0.00011732177,0.00042214492,0.20302448,0.003275494,0.3881161,0.021686535,0.38047612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002435911,0.00017676764,0.00054150075,0.00006890534,0.00004290803,0.00011941949,0.000053857184,0.684279,0.0017635251,0.30739185,0.005276074,0.000042516698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014453654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021888826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01160755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012349901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025988421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0613873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019408419","doi":"10.1287/moor.1070.0294","title":"Truncation Strategies in Matching Markets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Matching (statistics); Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Advice (programming); Complete information; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18420648595213587,"score_gpt":0.3546812017191083,"score_spread":0.1704747157669724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019408419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14226773,0.0030547779,0.79764503,0.0038859616,0.00022809983,0.00044358743,0.00027228132,0.0002984542,0.05190401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845861,0.001613106,0.091300204,0.00085741753,0.00023971264,0.00045421987,0.00021327559,0.00008570603,0.02065039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366814,0.0032427937,0.00038927683,0.00070955994,0.0012616311,0.00072857836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856359,0.009596459,0.0012036043,0.0014185555,0.0011999338,0.00094553863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007868844,0.00073029,0.0017714242,0.0014255187,0.0016215723,0.004042612,0.0021548346,0.0033850246,0.0075874245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029637894,0.00069197925,0.001666549,0.00147583,0.0040623248,0.008803925,0.0031942134,0.002980643,0.0011140301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005616712,0.000036137033,0.00026923243,0.000045606837,0.00001867833,0.00006677609,0.0002644829,0.007633539,0.00047341795,0.9794292,0.0011983764,0.010508371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056886143,0.000045918496,0.00010403344,0.00002062873,0.000010759875,0.000056984805,0.00006677165,0.047772266,0.00021151354,0.9496541,0.0019812789,0.000018882114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001687749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092801655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007868844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025231072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017045683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04161489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024365532","doi":"10.1007/s11135-015-0197-x","title":"Egalitarianism in the rank aggregation problem: a new dimension for democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Condorcet method; Egalitarianism; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Social choice theory; Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Approval voting","score_opus":0.19318677642985135,"score_gpt":0.3334591090208167,"score_spread":0.14027233259096536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024365532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08800167,0.0019623325,0.819399,0.03496917,0.0004382483,0.00009345601,0.00032955394,0.00012784732,0.054678738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92793435,0.0012284528,0.058048703,0.00170383,0.0014515228,0.00017892609,0.00014504157,0.00009722635,0.009211855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98086894,0.012821882,0.0007319726,0.0022828644,0.0021640982,0.0011301881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408994,0.042537093,0.004520563,0.008256908,0.0021528455,0.0016332549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019523889,0.00068544043,0.0037682322,0.0015911987,0.003503903,0.0096575245,0.0030554642,0.005738843,0.0077674864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05796142,0.0007547396,0.0015459821,0.0028316113,0.013891702,0.018178022,0.0056664255,0.008313522,0.00053217576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001367046,0.000012479936,0.00018584299,0.000015193477,0.000012914635,0.00001195189,0.000099585646,0.0028457632,0.000040134408,0.99318486,0.0006399527,0.0029377698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009266928,0.0000036399445,0.00005438374,0.0000046530567,0.0000028600132,0.0000055564597,0.000021958125,0.005555996,0.000014875658,0.9938415,0.00048091693,0.00000427656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023539518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002484404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019523889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033521024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030460532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103253424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024627245","doi":"10.1002/nav.20429","title":"Analytic solution for the nucleolus of a three‐player cooperative game","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Sequence (biology); Solution concept; Function (biology); Nucleolus; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Algebraic number; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Characteristic function (probability theory); Scale (ratio); Cooperative game theory; Game theory; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Probability density function; Statistics","score_opus":0.26565426543922893,"score_gpt":0.37807802645165445,"score_spread":0.11242376101242552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024627245","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08029034,0.00008228098,0.90542775,0.00025931053,0.000018409952,0.00005679486,0.000036667243,0.000087275555,0.013741108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909524,0.00015368793,0.102655515,0.00008044387,0.000016645092,0.00020341769,0.00006032625,0.00006893404,0.0058086636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963844,0.00014432013,0.000009724006,0.000049471615,0.00008092322,0.00007712195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984158,0.0010455181,0.00012770027,0.000046001704,0.00025428465,0.00011066092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012113175,0.00042255176,0.0005227562,0.0008887347,0.00064056175,0.0010134454,0.00085219793,0.0010560614,0.0048279045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004998847,0.0002828365,0.00050611875,0.0003947929,0.0017075057,0.0013802141,0.001073815,0.000888554,0.00040786288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033266657,0.00002912662,0.0004601435,0.000043777767,0.000010635016,0.00010989599,0.0002477572,0.224016,0.0029119444,0.76436424,0.0010442672,0.006728916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011878517,0.000018083512,0.00010859796,0.000013903615,0.0000040271416,0.000039823186,0.00011029066,0.8354224,0.0006387126,0.16246046,0.0011614839,0.0000102565855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014488706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048279045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016402433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012541226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016151011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024661330","doi":"10.5539/mas.v2n4p76","title":"The Shapley Value for Stochastic Cooperative Game","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematical proof; Cooperative game theory; Value (mathematics); Bondareva–Shapley theorem; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Repeated game; Combinatorial game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.05253488490130473,"score_gpt":0.2346072958500699,"score_spread":0.18207241094876517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024661330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048691012,0.0012727919,0.8514385,0.0018178558,0.00041416544,0.00023076082,0.00032337903,0.00015978787,0.09565172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8058603,0.0018463578,0.17792663,0.0008702426,0.00071443577,0.00044077993,0.00042740317,0.00015086451,0.01176313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591994,0.001586548,0.00027580274,0.00064863736,0.0012637379,0.00030532802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972709,0.001230338,0.00021675529,0.00043733232,0.0005624006,0.00028228032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034257013,0.00089119887,0.0014114375,0.0012535756,0.0019449643,0.004708129,0.0016145633,0.002033099,0.00544248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009041745,0.00041263975,0.0010953451,0.0016163966,0.004312589,0.009376583,0.0025065467,0.0033198865,0.00088664045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016414015,0.000015582358,0.00008509403,0.000048395494,0.000017343451,0.000021879188,0.00011139846,0.0035117662,0.00044146136,0.9873718,0.00069970643,0.0076592877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011207895,0.000017889763,0.000054701817,0.000015503592,0.000007398399,0.000029496781,0.000027012145,0.009951767,0.00019832469,0.98655975,0.0031153937,0.000011527479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085150555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007281108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00544248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024599475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023865793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018206894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024830514","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2004.05.003","title":"On demand responsiveness in additive cost sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Axiom; Submodular set function; Economics; Cost sharing; Solidarity; Fixed cost; Monotonic function; Microeconomics; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.028820166648833582,"score_gpt":0.24796845367085876,"score_spread":0.21914828702202518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024830514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42933166,0.001866247,0.42657942,0.015401379,0.0004875761,0.00017635999,0.0005459263,0.00036926416,0.12524217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202056,0.0006120052,0.0050586755,0.0007390423,0.00020302189,0.000077184995,0.0000774899,0.00006845017,0.0111436155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699044,0.0017776993,0.00009834973,0.00029282612,0.00028098922,0.0005596063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703378,0.026262527,0.00093069335,0.0011016133,0.0008105561,0.00055687985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046456787,0.0010119751,0.0030238088,0.0011393836,0.0012378271,0.002924056,0.0021966791,0.0026227192,0.022772862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026320148,0.00083897775,0.0015228058,0.0017847932,0.0029310416,0.005730849,0.003118081,0.0037013784,0.0010781854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020322214,0.000098082855,0.0005626409,0.00013473693,0.00005650588,0.00019678638,0.00042624166,0.102753595,0.0011294113,0.87774813,0.004815248,0.011875386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054468102,0.000058127163,0.0004295786,0.00003141496,0.00005455825,0.000082234976,0.00040267713,0.21230446,0.0002873298,0.78469104,0.0015604667,0.000043701206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035916462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015600296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022772862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001974073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009844416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07618278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025307914","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.01.008","title":"Single-plateaued choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convexity; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Voting; Term (time); Independence (probability theory); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10565601980597178,"score_gpt":0.27020075092955526,"score_spread":0.16454473112358348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025307914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.517207,0.00073104026,0.39872608,0.005856066,0.00024193805,0.000194525,0.00072670035,0.00046365222,0.07585294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568952,0.00017420031,0.023755051,0.00038416113,0.00008638026,0.00011686603,0.0001976787,0.000053140706,0.01833746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997554,0.001212165,0.000094350165,0.00050902466,0.000251098,0.00037938906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850499,0.010440478,0.0006307779,0.0014957669,0.0010906819,0.0012924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003789493,0.00050952233,0.0021086903,0.00088169734,0.00152882,0.0039101443,0.0022725111,0.0031599274,0.016223308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024367955,0.0005857674,0.0013354975,0.0008596248,0.0031333847,0.004789841,0.0023219858,0.0035361568,0.0013538535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001680645,0.00008212624,0.001294505,0.00007553639,0.000055628352,0.00013106636,0.00022337002,0.012128146,0.00075636123,0.9725131,0.002473567,0.010098511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004059407,0.00003755251,0.000389396,0.000014197052,0.000010144947,0.000061616745,0.00007677343,0.076600835,0.00016429549,0.9218385,0.0007511003,0.000014877077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011442379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012998155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016223308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014728745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012222339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054272354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026409515","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.023","title":"On weighted balls-into-bins games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ball (mathematics); Bin; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Geometry","score_opus":0.01958480343885642,"score_gpt":0.21519433549914774,"score_spread":0.1956095320602913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026409515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17601986,0.0009730024,0.76168543,0.0034136677,0.00029612178,0.0003829397,0.0005450218,0.0002027178,0.056481298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87326884,0.0014121489,0.07871458,0.00089315913,0.00032436615,0.0006327787,0.0006886073,0.00017519799,0.0438903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659926,0.0019833732,0.00013430211,0.00033250332,0.00041315818,0.0005374196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893119,0.007927268,0.0007133306,0.0005145255,0.000585646,0.00094738853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002913267,0.0020275146,0.0036645944,0.0014190051,0.0018425725,0.0048526945,0.004780492,0.0039510457,0.014696968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020087654,0.0011438036,0.0013068713,0.0024039655,0.004086676,0.008746066,0.0037827701,0.0036160594,0.0010460583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019606108,0.0000714287,0.0002855424,0.00008112649,0.00003200887,0.00006303465,0.00015822685,0.059681308,0.00042332194,0.9301129,0.002663095,0.00623197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076497614,0.000027203636,0.00009650839,0.000016995991,0.000013472134,0.000022303555,0.00005465318,0.20171255,0.0000906602,0.79689366,0.0009785679,0.000016891541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067180875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060245898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014696968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030117733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020764126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049166203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027085885","doi":"10.5539/mas.v4n7p170","title":"The Weak Stable Sets for Fuzzy Cooperative Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02963755814043703,"score_gpt":0.2462144986982765,"score_spread":0.21657694055783946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027085885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08501913,0.00089495495,0.8758137,0.0008031285,0.00017078855,0.00015790494,0.0001554825,0.00008135206,0.036903575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8615388,0.001280806,0.12162447,0.0005426536,0.00038462417,0.00061819976,0.00024196254,0.000073024385,0.013695371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972127,0.0007615493,0.00018620487,0.00045058233,0.0011423305,0.00024666986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731976,0.0010449352,0.00025673778,0.00017299085,0.0009473392,0.0002582987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027217697,0.00070592976,0.0009833191,0.002313159,0.0020103308,0.0029912572,0.0011313177,0.0010314874,0.0029643083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069647552,0.00044807466,0.001025714,0.0011785434,0.0028249947,0.0050726626,0.0025728755,0.0019270794,0.0005499484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002887737,0.000016291677,0.00017228286,0.000051545307,0.000022197688,0.00004469873,0.00032765267,0.0027075212,0.0024776282,0.9838802,0.00066799147,0.009603075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023831546,0.000058115562,0.00022933126,0.000026740563,0.00002078353,0.00011084332,0.0001483481,0.037383154,0.0014706729,0.954502,0.005998448,0.000027785773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080049806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061433815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029912572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001452203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011861224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014394283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032441230","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.875839","title":"Sharing a Polluted River","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Business; Water resource management","score_opus":0.012186336469017187,"score_gpt":0.19363193782938168,"score_spread":0.1814456013603645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032441230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75091064,0.00019187665,0.11068448,0.0058216956,0.0002498306,0.00013306849,0.0003903119,0.00033966525,0.13127844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97036654,0.0000563903,0.003384175,0.00022495669,0.000029733943,0.000033713382,0.000043583776,0.000025035028,0.025835874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863976,0.00042967073,0.000063642634,0.00036937246,0.0002138555,0.00028366342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981659,0.0003502859,0.00025158963,0.00073716976,0.0001962041,0.00029892172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011340107,0.00021033104,0.0008237138,0.0004379022,0.0022235995,0.0035510294,0.001108246,0.00289411,0.02060558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003913065,0.00030254043,0.0008836115,0.00068587135,0.0021038523,0.0038491895,0.0027395268,0.0015146098,0.0016751178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006195612,0.00033501576,0.018516252,0.00014031089,0.00038070517,0.0018799941,0.0019447744,0.049894158,0.007882492,0.8662617,0.009340662,0.042804405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013176372,0.00047119262,0.00673034,0.000059410388,0.00020238353,0.00062652794,0.003801777,0.11377076,0.0031409638,0.8160225,0.054903734,0.00013852231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029821384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004708681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02060558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008678086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013977035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06893259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032456884","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.030","title":"The stability of decision making in committees: The one-core","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stability (learning theory); Outcome (game theory); Politics; Economics; Political stability; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.044949723734670745,"score_gpt":0.22532244303330234,"score_spread":0.1803727192986316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032456884","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39007348,0.0016603273,0.5570523,0.012285615,0.0003233012,0.00019400941,0.0004433364,0.00032522235,0.037642386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97578317,0.00041327084,0.017710421,0.0004420812,0.0003035967,0.00012167047,0.00009643044,0.00010042625,0.0050288583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929564,0.004211179,0.0002120091,0.0012678853,0.00067450356,0.00067808566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224239,0.05978905,0.0046998,0.0059464443,0.0040853065,0.0030555394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011560334,0.0006561699,0.0033769766,0.0015212006,0.0022823797,0.005454691,0.003011636,0.0035697,0.006829464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074574895,0.0010249902,0.001574685,0.0011478377,0.0072081024,0.0100135235,0.0033374175,0.004460098,0.0008078072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029510894,0.00007734582,0.0010636691,0.00010955047,0.00008542579,0.00008516792,0.00049210904,0.024311129,0.0008019119,0.9567346,0.0036151502,0.012328784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000433218,0.000036101777,0.00033956376,0.000013579959,0.000014162598,0.000025201709,0.000076841556,0.07447566,0.00015887676,0.9243899,0.00040790616,0.000018792172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025620526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016611685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011560334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020975668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022132653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061137617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033719953","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0210-5","title":"General concepts of value restriction and preference majority","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Preference; Transitive reduction; Mathematics; Generalization; Net (polyhedron); Value (mathematics); Preference relation; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04472247469128788,"score_gpt":0.25731025243563577,"score_spread":0.2125877777443479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033719953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02877645,0.0028850783,0.86059964,0.008733083,0.00031254126,0.0001607885,0.00058319577,0.000106793574,0.09784237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81326556,0.0047947164,0.15172857,0.0021101048,0.0019193916,0.0011739212,0.0006440291,0.00011782358,0.024245907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993995,0.0034553495,0.00036807408,0.0007848694,0.000932758,0.00046394445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878015,0.008733876,0.0009541034,0.0014768131,0.0007572518,0.00027649067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074201925,0.0010262551,0.0014363006,0.001691502,0.0015238523,0.005622121,0.0030846128,0.0033894756,0.012512981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0230275,0.0007613777,0.0015580656,0.003129159,0.008211367,0.012888616,0.0026461303,0.004465848,0.0013018957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002408659,0.000004994319,0.000039820025,0.000013326238,0.0000032405499,0.0000055817763,0.000045905093,0.0003691254,0.000027273452,0.99786144,0.00039373827,0.0012332334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023932782,0.000001474667,0.000027681921,0.0000052264086,0.0000014593866,0.000011424042,0.000015964131,0.00090545585,0.00001481705,0.99794406,0.0010684755,0.0000017088094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013540058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091362465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012512981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019357197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015570452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041860104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038047385","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2012.04.002","title":"On graphs which can or cannot induce Chinese Postman games with a non-empty core","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Vertex (graph theory); Traverse; Characterization (materials science); Core (optical fiber); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Graph; Undirected graph; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029788432610125332,"score_gpt":0.24329480211644156,"score_spread":0.2135063695063162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038047385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61873,0.00030085075,0.27310276,0.0020999785,0.00016333014,0.00036517793,0.0006864785,0.00053341896,0.10401794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95572484,0.00033757684,0.027058722,0.0006519481,0.00011926591,0.00043308994,0.00064989424,0.00013934572,0.014885225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973226,0.0009890889,0.00014959766,0.00052574323,0.00033047024,0.0006825068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842939,0.010494508,0.0017470616,0.0010775987,0.0008677953,0.0015192151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022313264,0.0013258157,0.0018437341,0.0019062789,0.0031332343,0.003768932,0.0018301142,0.0026381689,0.006858803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012515933,0.0011350369,0.0015873995,0.001815465,0.0042433497,0.0072353836,0.003353407,0.003106605,0.0007520431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013092683,0.00006359819,0.0002975523,0.00006025187,0.000018137085,0.000090032765,0.00023615583,0.0048404513,0.0008406158,0.98918355,0.0010940718,0.0031446724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065436485,0.000029337016,0.00016179321,0.000015568236,0.000015518326,0.000044952783,0.000073742696,0.018553209,0.00037166846,0.97995275,0.00070197176,0.000014029456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022645527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030518307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006858803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002226033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020951729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022944987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045635999","doi":"10.1257/0002828054825592","title":"Meetings with Costly Participation: Reply","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Economics; Interval (graph theory); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.027528889469893673,"score_gpt":0.26155518356281265,"score_spread":0.23402629409291897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045635999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026373292,0.00052197435,0.00035821387,0.9648768,0.032870457,0.000011409924,0.00010910766,0.000047501107,0.0009408315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057625533,0.0012431178,0.0004009968,0.95526236,0.03265622,0.00005184347,0.00007170095,0.000052377403,0.0044987593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953389,0.0015924006,0.00062410417,0.0010147387,0.00095138204,0.00047849008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96898377,0.02093948,0.0012082916,0.000999761,0.006265722,0.0016029994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008137045,0.0013106756,0.0014570423,0.0010212347,0.003301421,0.00423215,0.0025598516,0.031330824,0.012711728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06787374,0.0007367388,0.001453869,0.0010587223,0.0027026846,0.0070429696,0.0022189578,0.032015648,0.008457915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052621726,0.000020982761,0.00024106818,0.00006805025,0.000020116418,0.00022104388,0.00021389908,0.00007617974,0.00007550931,0.0053206864,0.9897535,0.003936415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015086212,0.000066962486,0.002167847,0.00033171332,0.00007687741,0.00059305644,0.0017620405,0.0008284001,0.0004405469,0.017451355,0.9759576,0.0001728271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005752425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004120263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031330824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027225164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04303336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050536663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0272-x","title":"Subgame perfect implementation of stable matchings in marriage problems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.020809126429007035,"score_gpt":0.2627575820979687,"score_spread":0.24194845566896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050536663","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42923942,0.00029443472,0.52889425,0.0024251586,0.00007186192,0.00046200157,0.0003260808,0.00034354412,0.03794329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612123,0.00015670247,0.031455718,0.00018923265,0.000040033836,0.0003629158,0.00013373366,0.000053159973,0.006396285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354726,0.0041165343,0.00028428502,0.0006004606,0.00059978984,0.00085166877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713175,0.021888636,0.0018713358,0.0022724809,0.001162828,0.001487166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077120466,0.00065049005,0.002815317,0.0010414142,0.001805669,0.0038508994,0.0030035719,0.0027891397,0.009204655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04081311,0.0010475712,0.0014132304,0.0013414129,0.0027659133,0.0049368585,0.0027888466,0.0030471005,0.0007854305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023988442,0.00020645201,0.0007983259,0.000092027934,0.000059113685,0.00007713812,0.00048188024,0.027727239,0.0007763917,0.95328677,0.0016382263,0.014616539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008275434,0.00006134334,0.00018789402,0.000012203822,0.0000148280105,0.000018726922,0.0001284306,0.09480832,0.00023880103,0.90395504,0.00048236613,0.000009374912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022850218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002402165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009204655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018290291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030909656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04078573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051424146","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0511-4","title":"Intergovernmental negotiation, willingness to compromise, and voter preference reversals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Outcome (game theory); Ideal point; Bargaining problem; Economics; Preference; Ideal (ethics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law and economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.027061828627450924,"score_gpt":0.22369747764854733,"score_spread":0.1966356490210964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051424146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9232983,0.00030170075,0.019083848,0.0030833173,0.00005948676,0.000048505764,0.00015711282,0.000032864213,0.05393497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982095,0.00003763893,0.00042396088,0.000046202378,0.000009902309,0.00001208411,0.000019650826,0.0000035935857,0.0012375504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675673,0.0020570345,0.00011765896,0.00023265145,0.0002662472,0.0005696611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269094,0.019548642,0.003726179,0.002056573,0.0010028871,0.0009747876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082969405,0.00024097052,0.00072106544,0.000650152,0.0012820362,0.00318744,0.00094430946,0.0021566038,0.014787047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04024308,0.0002429443,0.0005498326,0.00092511816,0.0018004641,0.002792363,0.000925638,0.0027871404,0.0007769028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028957017,0.0008203342,0.057391737,0.00020318244,0.000289808,0.00051423226,0.0020173772,0.05200627,0.0037627618,0.8216395,0.005688063,0.052771106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029162134,0.00028900252,0.03701707,0.00004202727,0.00012346376,0.0002539926,0.0039422703,0.078567974,0.0016607142,0.87264025,0.005101259,0.00007028396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016511785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026262903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014787047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016156081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008684323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049467623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052020474","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2014.07.005","title":"Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Australian Research Council; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Heuristic; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18400626271027948,"score_gpt":0.2990024360764078,"score_spread":0.11499617336612833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052020474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116028674,0.0013586258,0.843315,0.0064847236,0.00023425369,0.00032787924,0.000667706,0.00061412784,0.030968884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7898865,0.0011045791,0.19422898,0.00073261186,0.000617041,0.0007180021,0.00093470427,0.00033073375,0.011446799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801196,0.005649186,0.00074531866,0.0018078629,0.0027668162,0.0010189383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9014296,0.08302602,0.0036587834,0.008397624,0.0022711132,0.0012169536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011937245,0.0011617347,0.0027264343,0.0026846984,0.0027294583,0.009143137,0.004753115,0.005069711,0.00845568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085858546,0.0014293187,0.0030728169,0.0028979063,0.0054136966,0.013091333,0.004376014,0.0065746126,0.00091400306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015494286,0.00009158523,0.0009667393,0.00010930198,0.00007663508,0.000041181724,0.0002662377,0.06691832,0.00043304212,0.9068241,0.004067616,0.020050323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042352945,0.0000142672425,0.00020111242,0.000013870498,0.000018216157,0.000025921683,0.000025192727,0.1545474,0.00020212802,0.8441225,0.0007689491,0.00001797211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00393022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029698857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066393074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005551009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063130915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052867428","doi":"10.1142/s0219198913400033","title":"CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE KAR AND FOLK SOLUTIONS FOR MINIMUM COST SPANNING TREE PROBLEMS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Spanning tree; Minimum spanning tree; Focus (optics); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06472994470482157,"score_gpt":0.25378321654376934,"score_spread":0.18905327183894777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052867428","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056873288,0.0064618136,0.867158,0.0032654288,0.0003309507,0.00020665718,0.0003901494,0.00016288107,0.065150924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985364,0.014626356,0.266725,0.0010808875,0.00087242667,0.000998636,0.0008130871,0.00025430243,0.016092898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984049,0.0005830612,0.000114109185,0.00028203617,0.00037693864,0.00023889348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962289,0.0025555436,0.0004224266,0.00023676873,0.00039695983,0.00015939833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026384513,0.0010951181,0.0014402797,0.0016268177,0.0011469962,0.0034534368,0.0025825766,0.0025228888,0.009433081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013931428,0.00047050673,0.0012746789,0.003421307,0.001805261,0.0064765294,0.0021560069,0.003365186,0.000920553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037166257,0.000052122123,0.00022808384,0.00035618397,0.00002254284,0.00004308653,0.00017566874,0.035506718,0.0007307445,0.9248121,0.0036215608,0.034413967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019383906,0.00006233235,0.0002685565,0.00014705076,0.000020584766,0.00019562848,0.00021435361,0.094907746,0.0003512666,0.89714354,0.0066439034,0.00002574797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005076419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005425344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009433081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014217468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011219457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031556845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058073069","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0119-x","title":"Top-Pair and Top-Triple Monotonicity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Unanimity; Axiom; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Political science","score_opus":0.014572614985093603,"score_gpt":0.21724274845518812,"score_spread":0.20267013347009452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058073069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16611275,0.0012970075,0.6538776,0.004783181,0.00026951003,0.00016028581,0.00080759835,0.0002559543,0.17243616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221254,0.0006652567,0.058245495,0.00089069124,0.00028893424,0.00034148176,0.00031560825,0.00014473278,0.016982462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961116,0.0019826936,0.00015643124,0.0005419148,0.00061545323,0.0005920472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857298,0.009174972,0.0010107072,0.0021568942,0.0012421985,0.00068540167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004457725,0.0007122386,0.0021335678,0.0011692785,0.002120195,0.0036203365,0.0017992262,0.0017551332,0.018795291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022271706,0.0005321664,0.00178861,0.0012558487,0.003164041,0.008473922,0.002397522,0.0035143746,0.0015211724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039470968,0.00003923371,0.00074711256,0.00006643714,0.000024570143,0.000065015585,0.00012298988,0.0022401486,0.00026528494,0.9803992,0.0029666733,0.013023999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057059287,0.000008399058,0.0002356602,0.000010189938,0.000006157412,0.00007142775,0.000054836626,0.0078970995,0.00011117933,0.9904919,0.0011028546,0.0000044880067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010812362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00133042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018795291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011270676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011837245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06287646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059384236","doi":"10.1007/s10726-009-9160-3","title":"An Agreement Index with Respect to a Consensus Preorder","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Preorder; Mathematics; Index (typography); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.023357741022663383,"score_gpt":0.25080412286548137,"score_spread":0.22744638184281799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059384236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2945847,0.00044370268,0.6483766,0.0009740373,0.0004213262,0.00034267234,0.0011997306,0.0006987409,0.052958593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935119,0.00015505619,0.09884168,0.00007743208,0.00023104035,0.00024486834,0.00074709754,0.0001021586,0.0060887104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945686,0.0018179218,0.00050990784,0.0008373524,0.0017860834,0.0004801236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97117805,0.015515767,0.0029180911,0.0028683278,0.0049031097,0.0026166583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00720229,0.0006230533,0.001246521,0.005973619,0.0014713858,0.0041688783,0.0013708182,0.0015381309,0.006824414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025833325,0.00023778032,0.0007529681,0.0037697542,0.0023509872,0.0063076126,0.0015125077,0.0016832958,0.0010037659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009799849,0.00038948108,0.008456099,0.00023965939,0.0001447747,0.00017050141,0.0005738768,0.0399471,0.009599929,0.8445104,0.006011689,0.0889764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008261541,0.00067604997,0.0054348935,0.00009069168,0.000094197734,0.0003110727,0.00050126464,0.35057506,0.008944792,0.6255689,0.007603232,0.00011722136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047828085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004879834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00720229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021359802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001619311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038089752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059561827","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0242-x","title":"Maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation with variable probabilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017390282155391422,"score_gpt":0.2021745656071914,"score_spread":0.18478428345179998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059561827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074197473,0.0002635885,0.98932856,0.0006864327,0.000034267083,0.000057106765,0.00016957024,0.00013251863,0.0019081857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5094958,0.0009097415,0.470442,0.00041315836,0.0007143006,0.001053174,0.0012316406,0.0002807212,0.01545942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98574466,0.010787338,0.00040444688,0.0012585465,0.0012104576,0.0005945701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94431555,0.05037558,0.0012839944,0.0023248529,0.001337477,0.0003625358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014598628,0.0013105528,0.0053045135,0.0036237817,0.0019894843,0.0055532814,0.0055228444,0.003959424,0.009312502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060661487,0.0025056445,0.0028292197,0.0049635894,0.0039400565,0.00790988,0.0037488597,0.004031379,0.0013173574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015500942,0.00012915037,0.0013131343,0.00016956934,0.00024298375,0.0001356732,0.0004218446,0.36667368,0.00026041974,0.589062,0.0028702617,0.03856631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029148894,0.00001227772,0.00019882758,0.00001741568,0.000019288691,0.000022784512,0.000024101093,0.60741967,0.00009850107,0.39153552,0.000603889,0.000018531946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007366924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007738412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014598628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002889011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021484534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07720584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061176792","doi":"10.1007/s001990050316","title":"Outsiders' threat and consecutive offers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence (biology); Mathematical economics; Economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Key (lock); Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01480560339313146,"score_gpt":0.19213144430074885,"score_spread":0.17732584090761738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061176792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943487,0.00038223792,0.007887418,0.0014759052,0.00008749258,0.000049892005,0.000113847156,0.00003236432,0.046483785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943188,0.00007399839,0.00026856866,0.000060348455,0.00004392387,0.000008259325,0.00003109463,0.0000066755483,0.0051884376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821633,0.0006564695,0.00008549505,0.00022843161,0.00029509197,0.0005181942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580244,0.02986347,0.006293851,0.0018425755,0.0011280595,0.002847755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005673692,0.0002506153,0.0007180835,0.0006162055,0.0012304767,0.0041549355,0.0008742282,0.0019267666,0.018330203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04637442,0.0003303473,0.00040867063,0.0005437925,0.0014664074,0.0027548256,0.0013652887,0.0030662664,0.00093077443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064759064,0.0020662593,0.14290169,0.00028347908,0.00025942922,0.0014642437,0.005633044,0.031758025,0.0045613083,0.7078107,0.009235078,0.087550834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037887687,0.0014506067,0.22583462,0.00008282683,0.00027364324,0.0011542717,0.0066809794,0.083311565,0.0018948487,0.66482955,0.013949757,0.00015846985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012799595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018102531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018330203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088856916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062079466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061320662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061278102","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0775-6","title":"Shapley–Shubik methods in cost sharing problems with technological cooperation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Anonymity; Shapley value; Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Offset (computer science); Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Cost sharing; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05032072340237173,"score_gpt":0.2856103721619279,"score_spread":0.23528964875955619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061278102","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01972811,0.0013525833,0.96534747,0.0010471597,0.000106218584,0.0001304454,0.000092329385,0.000058117897,0.012137521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6855872,0.0024453055,0.2920408,0.00042356207,0.00037498333,0.0007635061,0.00025156635,0.00022784203,0.017885279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950203,0.004004894,0.0001270087,0.0002620984,0.00040339536,0.00018233381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984118,0.013900619,0.00041407705,0.00083537126,0.00042427998,0.00030753788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01025524,0.0017218131,0.0031628083,0.0017639088,0.0014762903,0.003163757,0.0048937513,0.0036365292,0.008298462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022151172,0.0010348936,0.0015000413,0.0028185775,0.004214201,0.00744078,0.0027589353,0.0042554517,0.0006213555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085294,0.000118477285,0.00021477946,0.00020105173,0.00009183976,0.00003275641,0.00019136506,0.14884423,0.00020290319,0.8263937,0.0021950481,0.021428427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049142116,0.000019782177,0.000057441994,0.000023404884,0.000014957526,0.00000799986,0.000035579913,0.2555766,0.00007907922,0.7431464,0.0009760344,0.000013586566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026116488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01025524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032871955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024369159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054235518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061329264","doi":"10.1080/07900620500108494","title":"Water Allocation among Multiple Stakeholders: Conflict Analysis of the Waiahole Water Project, Hawaii","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Water Resources Development","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Water resources; Ditch; Population; Water trading; Competition (biology); Business; Resource allocation; Optimal allocation; Water resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Water conservation; Environmental science; Management; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06511568998868027,"score_gpt":0.2412568649452572,"score_spread":0.17614117495657694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061329264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99452657,0.000070849695,0.0016595164,0.00045273025,0.0000039057704,0.000048154656,0.000057497047,0.0000033628,0.0031773802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831665,0.000047341604,0.00064754457,0.000026983877,0.0000037645789,0.000027911978,0.00005150599,0.0000028118834,0.00087544863],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801093,0.0011984401,0.000059359118,0.00011551034,0.00019771754,0.00041803348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941446,0.004342056,0.00052060094,0.00011661741,0.00045711108,0.00041897816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003966682,0.0003695313,0.00054126355,0.0011428795,0.0016593902,0.002290319,0.0013976265,0.0015780877,0.0035507441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010231696,0.00039733315,0.0004944161,0.0014363847,0.0015233764,0.0016936628,0.001464603,0.0013407187,0.000112730384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017822619,0.0021763516,0.19743975,0.00034576992,0.000873642,0.00774769,0.012512572,0.5857499,0.0028569964,0.14899485,0.006174612,0.03334559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023195692,0.00044788627,0.059085097,0.000060904018,0.00012532293,0.0002157047,0.031430423,0.8701241,0.00085732003,0.033920363,0.0033859937,0.00011495817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0839429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07554517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0839429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00394756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021701553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16690856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063156741","doi":"10.1111/0034-6527.00278","title":"Voting on Majority Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Majority rule; Political science; Library science; Classics; Economic history; Economics; History; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.09021665150497513,"score_gpt":0.3015812920012613,"score_spread":0.2113646404962862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063156741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5836057,0.0015838173,0.2944924,0.006778375,0.00034546503,0.00026431968,0.00126619,0.00017655727,0.111487195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975043,0.00044676298,0.0078212265,0.00027977236,0.0001162589,0.000090657006,0.000342883,0.00002245755,0.01583707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970908,0.0014397863,0.000110971574,0.00046218626,0.00029313948,0.0006030449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924912,0.0045335386,0.0013310192,0.0006745219,0.00044669744,0.00052298704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031485958,0.00043302364,0.0013925432,0.0006745215,0.0009266748,0.003229837,0.0016590962,0.0022820344,0.012162377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014696293,0.00038728316,0.0011054234,0.0007838065,0.0016668848,0.0027808482,0.0011198454,0.001672739,0.0012331236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016696003,0.0000914179,0.0056551974,0.000081434795,0.000097584205,0.00032343183,0.00052206195,0.0990997,0.0004725644,0.8722311,0.0059002712,0.015358215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016094225,0.00008017846,0.0026134907,0.000038551174,0.000048197886,0.00011068015,0.00023352653,0.30739096,0.00017214577,0.6835547,0.0055649867,0.000031636962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052140206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038051214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012162377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094128505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040687263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063679188","doi":"10.1007/s10058-003-0101-3","title":"Probabilistic assignments of identical indivisible objects and uniform probabilistic rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Class (philosophy); Anonymity; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Characterization (materials science); Set (abstract data type); Extension (predicate logic); Commodity; Preference; Computer science; Pareto efficiency; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05515193160101946,"score_gpt":0.26031043679700505,"score_spread":0.2051585051959856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063679188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019779518,0.0023197539,0.9576592,0.0021074638,0.00021915555,0.00012738834,0.00014379484,0.000091524016,0.017552104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.650812,0.0058102924,0.32705253,0.0009387756,0.0009820618,0.000790503,0.0003382612,0.0001232936,0.013152291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977298,0.013784481,0.00120986,0.0027621954,0.0038373226,0.0011080717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96322244,0.026231183,0.002852343,0.00448793,0.0024258087,0.00078030943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011429013,0.0009856396,0.0028985457,0.0017869498,0.0016800833,0.006400952,0.0046933554,0.004238519,0.0060217977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061164938,0.001622787,0.0014291547,0.0031138004,0.011249158,0.011498146,0.0029305248,0.0038622443,0.0008678437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032698506,0.000022226239,0.00020387728,0.000080456695,0.000029351817,0.000021310305,0.0000600275,0.017049383,0.00012340854,0.9705164,0.0007118816,0.011149001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001620515,0.000010828466,0.00010579326,0.00002106784,0.000013021837,0.000024968982,0.000015359725,0.02468851,0.00009456163,0.9735386,0.0014591578,0.000011947731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017171386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014927322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011429013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002714047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019557804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060443103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064898218","doi":"10.1239/jap/1197908809","title":"Bounds for Owen's Multilinear Extension","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Multilinear map; Extension (predicate logic); Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Blocking (statistics); Mathematical economics; Voting; Game theory; Field (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05036639708956518,"score_gpt":0.25760286886966155,"score_spread":0.20723647178009635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064898218","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054050483,0.0016732541,0.8943154,0.0018032764,0.00014373002,0.0001369487,0.00029134643,0.00026786877,0.0473176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82651776,0.0018275816,0.14754811,0.0008593665,0.00045568089,0.00051886396,0.0005101883,0.0003466338,0.021415778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338514,0.0022409505,0.00022181643,0.0011000179,0.0020229039,0.001029236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970688,0.020674879,0.0017006014,0.0023973018,0.0026130816,0.0019262529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009888857,0.0015692681,0.0020020534,0.0033086434,0.0015252429,0.0035332865,0.003408084,0.0017163875,0.0100795375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05531334,0.0007355742,0.0019052732,0.001801972,0.0048250966,0.012795981,0.0077070966,0.0067682224,0.0015712909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114295595,0.00006878142,0.0009122717,0.0000923684,0.000035397334,0.00009380581,0.00024803675,0.048304576,0.0006812927,0.9310548,0.0017564411,0.016638033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001115535,0.00005092003,0.0002502579,0.000059127564,0.000016621185,0.00005479875,0.00005735208,0.24370965,0.00046451003,0.752388,0.002906594,0.000030936415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015223287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011280747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100795375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003381391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014991944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05229789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065446059","doi":"10.1109/scc.2010.54","title":"Applying Bargaining Game Theory to Web Services Negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Web service; Service provider; Service (business); Game theory; Nash equilibrium; WS-Policy; Service level; Service-level agreement; Bargaining problem; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Business; Microeconomics; Quality of service; Marketing; Economics; Web development; Telecommunications; Web application security; Law","score_opus":0.016831437525046546,"score_gpt":0.21458269114824735,"score_spread":0.1977512536232008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065446059","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004023471,0.0007561165,0.96285564,0.0008062013,0.00020510984,0.00012754157,0.0000309653,0.000047118876,0.031147778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56598246,0.0033106343,0.4126107,0.0007040491,0.0005605182,0.0007603544,0.0001313179,0.0001021731,0.015837682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933466,0.004520814,0.00026329004,0.00040624826,0.001037993,0.00042515862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955265,0.003584645,0.00020159628,0.0002116577,0.0003455833,0.00013003132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058892844,0.0011310779,0.0014929405,0.0018106496,0.0017829702,0.0036628784,0.0026018112,0.002413051,0.007171478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280968,0.00077632547,0.00158865,0.0026941642,0.004313871,0.0044567585,0.0028590967,0.003061837,0.0009315362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009942247,0.000018658788,0.00008760904,0.000053345495,0.000021133723,0.00007713141,0.00014364628,0.07989497,0.00013200995,0.91066265,0.0006560463,0.008242842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014766557,0.000012912604,0.000041715084,0.000026502423,0.0000072563266,0.000026866379,0.00007618811,0.20696712,0.00010184309,0.78899807,0.0037137424,0.000012936393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055210823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034359267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007171478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003421733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026750036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03114587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727666","doi":"10.1177/0951629807080774","title":"Justice Preferences and the Arrow Problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Social welfare function; Arrow; Normative; Economics; Condorcet method; Redistribution (election); Majority rule; Voting; Function (biology); Welfare; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032161730264083276,"score_gpt":0.2570972878179075,"score_spread":0.22493555755382424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16519146,0.0028095394,0.31498706,0.043958567,0.0006155985,0.00015364724,0.00032355692,0.00018220117,0.47177824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93776435,0.00074908853,0.034105133,0.0018477952,0.00035077814,0.00015842747,0.00006422364,0.00006529477,0.024894923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466765,0.0029809987,0.00019823627,0.0007463287,0.00067419774,0.00073259586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954776,0.0024839216,0.00044184577,0.00067199825,0.0005688823,0.00035579602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071297106,0.00040646305,0.00073715945,0.0012788336,0.004855454,0.0047278036,0.00079094834,0.0038454176,0.009025793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011235727,0.00039672892,0.0011679066,0.0013105614,0.00851097,0.009120904,0.0034857672,0.0044368603,0.0007466581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050147,0.000004531022,0.00003928004,0.0000051697407,0.0000025912345,0.000009119798,0.00007490271,0.0003718997,0.00003057919,0.99749076,0.00038404972,0.0015820742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045906277,0.000002277431,0.00004071093,0.0000040285113,0.0000015432576,0.000008898367,0.000038385024,0.00065980246,0.00003351164,0.9969945,0.0022088003,0.0000029454081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027524277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016144218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009025793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030020373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019046738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037705958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068870728","doi":"10.5565/publmat_59115_06","title":"Fraction-like ratings from preferential voting","year":2015,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Publicacions Matemàtiques","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Fraction (chemistry); Voting; Statistics; Combinatorics; Political science; Chromatography; Chemistry; Law","score_opus":0.07975917355629482,"score_gpt":0.26112716131416597,"score_spread":0.18136798775787116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068870728","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028702386,0.00007915107,0.9924286,0.000084666906,0.000045049223,0.00008571503,0.000064455984,0.00020935087,0.004132666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17082855,0.00031905278,0.8164501,0.00013460162,0.00022725477,0.00042408623,0.00044566515,0.00023935681,0.010931227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417335,0.0029870186,0.00029375585,0.0008435668,0.0014956743,0.00020660224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188274,0.003998585,0.00043435843,0.0023053703,0.0010789526,0.00030003118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005438197,0.00082970975,0.0011633298,0.0021153733,0.00082666596,0.002555527,0.0019641772,0.0011764097,0.012665212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025659064,0.00060483563,0.0011215215,0.0018516823,0.0017018337,0.0044095544,0.0029192523,0.0021495037,0.0038496929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018400792,0.00005043404,0.00062725757,0.00018187925,0.000047883237,0.00007765874,0.00030600253,0.022327656,0.004469481,0.64087087,0.0055123335,0.32534453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000703751,0.00010872543,0.0006068492,0.0000669389,0.000040808678,0.00038636825,0.00007889887,0.33878195,0.006420514,0.63301283,0.02034019,0.00008560929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048456955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068039936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012665212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000859183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008413262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042369366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070069110","doi":"10.1007/s00182-013-0407-5","title":"Linking the Kar and folk solutions through a problem separation property","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Shapley value; Affine transformation; Steiner tree problem; Set (abstract data type); Tree (set theory); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Connection (principal bundle); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Separation (statistics); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.03995072654535058,"score_gpt":0.2618093603182075,"score_spread":0.22185863377285692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070069110","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044926718,0.00027858943,0.8799057,0.0054053715,0.00020653944,0.00016443832,0.0002135999,0.00032279748,0.06857638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6906341,0.00054708804,0.27469176,0.0016802526,0.00031493956,0.0004705467,0.00034141698,0.00036628864,0.030953653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972351,0.0012078834,0.00012398012,0.0006299582,0.0003638445,0.00043923053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884759,0.008174738,0.00076348963,0.0014440876,0.00060323067,0.0005386006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028052174,0.0008525403,0.0016222477,0.0008410152,0.0019869362,0.003599139,0.0021037282,0.0031944804,0.032667093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032603,0.00066259166,0.0014240999,0.001098008,0.003075456,0.008725713,0.0053919326,0.00620731,0.002026874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006681855,0.00009428426,0.00025093197,0.00010527944,0.000023065679,0.000044328506,0.00025914662,0.00866686,0.00041458046,0.9645208,0.003780539,0.021773333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003196547,0.000022763637,0.000065101,0.000014251262,0.000007971212,0.000031324013,0.00009342967,0.026100826,0.0001522469,0.9720266,0.0014466131,0.0000070288897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084323226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096873567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032667093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000832891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002408442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109282315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071697652","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.004","title":"Threshold strategy-proofness: on manipulability in large voting problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Lipschitz continuity; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Law","score_opus":0.050713419178953466,"score_gpt":0.24800912576121684,"score_spread":0.19729570658226336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071697652","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18298839,0.002164362,0.7673499,0.010087724,0.00025158367,0.00034775276,0.00030633924,0.0004672577,0.036036734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95984054,0.001158286,0.030720398,0.0007734222,0.00043898638,0.00056556804,0.00016783088,0.00018939396,0.006145568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869337,0.0074600745,0.0006884537,0.001599977,0.001982152,0.0013355821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7558341,0.21738592,0.00876496,0.009842119,0.004201335,0.00397163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017101092,0.0019079924,0.004551365,0.0024577992,0.0030232882,0.007881094,0.006069566,0.0063159536,0.0070040645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12674554,0.0017430884,0.003336268,0.0026601357,0.013012025,0.015958471,0.006759352,0.0105297025,0.0006359599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012772414,0.00008876255,0.0005294593,0.0001601862,0.000073032126,0.000115697,0.00042940842,0.020654213,0.0007862311,0.97073495,0.0016282155,0.004672144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006494316,0.000020535042,0.00009641582,0.000019923358,0.000016238857,0.000027024822,0.00003470913,0.055129427,0.0001906877,0.9441457,0.00024016062,0.000014376433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017954329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010836811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017101092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036636319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038063107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09044033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072852712","doi":"10.1007/s00199-002-0279-6","title":"Candidate stability and nonbinary social choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematical proof; Arrow; Voting; Generalization; Impossibility; Property (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematics; Path (computing); Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027414449827399708,"score_gpt":0.2205319971908982,"score_spread":0.19311754736349848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072852712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55968344,0.0017024216,0.39210778,0.009177813,0.00012912054,0.00012370347,0.00040184066,0.00010923208,0.03656464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862089,0.00029052404,0.008044969,0.000106972446,0.00006829887,0.000064205284,0.00011035874,0.000013514725,0.005092266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971608,0.0018559757,0.000080035825,0.0003422154,0.00028195535,0.0002790947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723928,0.022076357,0.0023810675,0.0010389339,0.0012500405,0.00086080516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050085853,0.00043288784,0.0014513507,0.0015145094,0.0020347424,0.004170389,0.0013355197,0.002154108,0.010207301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026990322,0.0003175548,0.0006836949,0.0014907796,0.0040341825,0.0046460824,0.0013706282,0.0015421154,0.0005036953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006618039,0.00003809314,0.001240266,0.00003347573,0.000027223263,0.000039384067,0.00016711296,0.008534628,0.00013049097,0.9847836,0.0009755759,0.0039641056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019598137,0.000011898462,0.00041594898,0.0000060987377,0.000003889336,0.00001610774,0.000079650665,0.03429044,0.000047174766,0.9646083,0.0004946611,0.0000063525736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003071412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003649531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010207301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025172278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013776165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034146786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073696507","doi":"10.1007/s11424-012-0258-3","title":"The sufficient and necessary condition of the major stochastic preference rule in group decision making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Complexity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Mathematical economics; Decision rule; Mathematics; Stochastic modelling; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08141169890930407,"score_gpt":0.2703433213755843,"score_spread":0.18893162246628026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073696507","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3218548,0.0006255749,0.6271942,0.0071994006,0.00038786602,0.00028003214,0.0013019606,0.00022956372,0.04092663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95538425,0.00027948717,0.03943358,0.0006086285,0.00027246328,0.00025039742,0.00030771134,0.000054861623,0.0034087987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521846,0.0016570726,0.00056346133,0.0011948696,0.00063797156,0.0007282252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96705675,0.021016596,0.0028180634,0.0032235328,0.0038954224,0.0019897106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059097554,0.0005081575,0.002019951,0.0009237591,0.0014839253,0.0030815145,0.0017838989,0.00277767,0.0064794933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03817294,0.00080042216,0.0017198536,0.0010259114,0.0038705103,0.0055573117,0.0022353798,0.004361742,0.0010268849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014399197,0.000090798574,0.0014955207,0.000109689776,0.00006525684,0.00020357934,0.0004943061,0.0054996153,0.0019167098,0.9816321,0.0015366689,0.0068117836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010484231,0.00008013081,0.0009100045,0.000030462154,0.0000251956,0.0002560999,0.00019209115,0.039440308,0.00070896436,0.9569766,0.0012360532,0.00003929547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017562171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013622489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064794933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009885574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028656458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031254172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073789589","doi":"10.4236/tel.2012.24068","title":"Revenue Sharing in Hierarchical Organizations: A New Interpretation of the Generalized Banzhaf Value","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Revenue; Aggregate (composite); Productivity; Earnings; Shapley value; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Hierarchical organization; Task (project management); Production (economics); Interpretation (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Statistics; Management","score_opus":0.01225796509326302,"score_gpt":0.20778097467491757,"score_spread":0.19552300958165456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073789589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11166731,0.0008686761,0.85411817,0.002074935,0.000091321774,0.000067956156,0.00016038098,0.00011266082,0.030838627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436155,0.0005792535,0.050119895,0.0002527192,0.00023708555,0.00011971515,0.0000696243,0.000041753483,0.004964302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983158,0.00076381373,0.000050308165,0.00016197866,0.00045460797,0.00025346605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810874,0.00096536,0.00020867461,0.00032336373,0.00022103496,0.00017276751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027610562,0.00046176868,0.0007873376,0.00133273,0.00086174026,0.0022338543,0.002089437,0.0013964395,0.0034076078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006763646,0.0002711846,0.00066660065,0.0013011248,0.0030441626,0.005673498,0.0014053409,0.0018126122,0.00031418327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010968313,0.000008506572,0.0001418122,0.000009205381,0.0000043790924,0.000025101786,0.0000539799,0.013590128,0.00018121958,0.9821181,0.0003803343,0.0034761573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010619528,0.000011588641,0.00012722457,0.000007591433,0.0000027974181,0.000031952106,0.000028007964,0.06886267,0.00007603624,0.92957443,0.0012590167,0.00000798971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015055728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007657311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034076078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008234666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015563846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075144567","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.30","title":"Social Choice as a Continuous Mapping from IRn→IR: A Group Invariance Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mathematical proof; Group (periodic table); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","score_opus":0.054545762031939705,"score_gpt":0.2544953307521742,"score_spread":0.19994956872023448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075144567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034569424,0.0041922703,0.8905042,0.0059053004,0.0004015541,0.00007836383,0.00014974189,0.00008336887,0.06411578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758084,0.00502931,0.099222496,0.0008552114,0.0013137494,0.00042408184,0.00014705319,0.000092968985,0.017106635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790925,0.0012376114,0.00006699363,0.00030598545,0.0003032981,0.00017678672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619687,0.002425189,0.0003193632,0.0006303372,0.00024001095,0.00018826408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028463006,0.00053752406,0.0009947878,0.0014846263,0.0007027505,0.0024236804,0.0015381038,0.0019062627,0.005199096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049478803,0.00033110243,0.0016305697,0.0014645597,0.0052113426,0.0055305576,0.0018454785,0.0026011658,0.000611377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005802507,0.000011729471,0.00011006515,0.000033818957,0.000012886285,0.000020035772,0.00005419082,0.0029239387,0.00016430122,0.9908516,0.00040541883,0.0054062856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067181336,0.000017701714,0.00019732487,0.000018737468,0.000005732837,0.000028023474,0.000031383996,0.013084762,0.000054930708,0.9839574,0.0025916565,0.0000056221043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000790172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035668438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005199096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017691845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006903368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017392755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075784261","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1889(01)00053-7","title":"Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost allocation; Reduction (mathematics); Economics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Total cost; Function (biology); Cost reduction; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.01539574700020116,"score_gpt":0.19474260092555118,"score_spread":0.17934685392535002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075784261","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21437705,0.0005656412,0.718944,0.00301363,0.00038936522,0.00031696766,0.00045439563,0.00025186222,0.06168703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538895,0.0002242736,0.034825265,0.0002973535,0.00013450404,0.00017111306,0.000112263115,0.000067390596,0.010278374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973634,0.0014809248,0.00010151429,0.00031544303,0.00038858407,0.00035019906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936885,0.0042910962,0.0003591123,0.00075568,0.0005633043,0.00034231984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051815584,0.00082795764,0.0023239506,0.0009112192,0.00090522825,0.0031817667,0.0028834273,0.0031168347,0.008817979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017519372,0.0007391228,0.0010927968,0.0011768321,0.0020887016,0.0045158956,0.0014924429,0.0022306289,0.00054960203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028086826,0.00016960224,0.00027838344,0.000105086605,0.00009758413,0.000047075602,0.00013941311,0.16511628,0.0011663913,0.80953664,0.003139586,0.019923197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090299916,0.00004583676,0.00013701998,0.000012097906,0.000021776084,0.000015275315,0.000036335776,0.20601411,0.00036069623,0.79251426,0.00073454523,0.000017759161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017797905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013376863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008817979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024448005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025975767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029499054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076251224","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1809955","title":"The Difference Indifference Makes in Strategy-Proof Allocation of Objects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0371522284156406,"score_gpt":0.21332222902353648,"score_spread":0.1761700006078959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076251224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37993273,0.0006362765,0.51038426,0.012206819,0.0002809971,0.00028642913,0.00023248671,0.00027099773,0.09576909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96908396,0.0001833326,0.02292084,0.00043731858,0.00010763752,0.00015380414,0.00006918138,0.00006539725,0.006978448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885739,0.006237759,0.00067813887,0.0015579294,0.0017433212,0.0012090255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508039,0.038618516,0.0019303343,0.0046158386,0.0020085666,0.0020228028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01629984,0.0007331965,0.0022346452,0.0014536598,0.002644861,0.0063585015,0.0035791423,0.005750557,0.0084790755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06540224,0.0012268177,0.0017698162,0.0013079303,0.0070611774,0.011054199,0.004654931,0.0054517305,0.0008954437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025837336,0.000056302575,0.00050181744,0.00005576313,0.000031656582,0.000064769636,0.00043289352,0.004303692,0.0005891199,0.98578054,0.0007038349,0.0072212284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004589924,0.00002644922,0.00013219238,0.000007044047,0.000010904416,0.00002743648,0.0000655444,0.0126177855,0.00019597172,0.9865128,0.00034978928,0.000008223082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013159899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091530156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01629984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027098928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003101557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08620286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078013764","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00276-7","title":"On resource monotonicity in the fair division problem","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Monotonic function; Endowment; Division (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Arithmetic; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014766753526697216,"score_gpt":0.18677347185957996,"score_spread":0.17200671833288275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078013764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1489514,0.0041150036,0.6513177,0.02357677,0.0009901655,0.0002923979,0.0005348187,0.00020373726,0.17001802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87054193,0.003554799,0.08877537,0.003005306,0.0014019796,0.00050230214,0.0004240378,0.00031707276,0.031477246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949527,0.0028516746,0.00023361313,0.0005874095,0.0006981814,0.00067652797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96744776,0.026986895,0.0012475501,0.0016626642,0.0016865442,0.00096856325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102389855,0.0010316033,0.0031189867,0.0014785301,0.0028210941,0.0055464576,0.0035263044,0.004318957,0.014375639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043469414,0.0008891344,0.0018754033,0.0024526592,0.007018701,0.014297974,0.0035304972,0.0067188637,0.0012529411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058535392,0.000046490488,0.00025936938,0.000063817635,0.00001514373,0.00006068749,0.000118050266,0.009506576,0.0002461571,0.980205,0.002501938,0.0069181896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015492044,0.000008009819,0.00009153456,0.000017652288,0.000005569423,0.000022162607,0.00003461065,0.024860026,0.00008137977,0.97388816,0.0009683396,0.0000070151764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004300531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002579678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014375639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002904559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003250414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054149628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078385256","doi":"10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00057-4","title":"The ultimate control group","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Voting; Organizational structure; Hierarchical organization; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Knowledge management; Operations management; Management science; Economics; Management; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.023485293351820865,"score_gpt":0.2022022072791877,"score_spread":0.17871691392736683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078385256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3145756,0.00068837375,0.13130893,0.0035729958,0.0013385733,0.0006892533,0.0016187581,0.0007137403,0.5454938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8108228,0.00015110502,0.008380838,0.000526169,0.00022540103,0.00042372392,0.0006802389,0.00005184491,0.17873788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989189,0.00018384143,0.00004213065,0.0003301401,0.00023432953,0.0002906918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849343,0.00018447252,0.00015581472,0.0006322261,0.00025106405,0.00028300853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000949783,0.00046080662,0.0006337629,0.0010293958,0.0021298868,0.0035135832,0.00090995285,0.0007955737,0.048185606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032358356,0.00012379268,0.00042459328,0.00042783775,0.0015588076,0.0015001078,0.00221966,0.00097377755,0.009071705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004520452,0.00022852785,0.005173892,0.000060619375,0.000038359987,0.00015609323,0.0013668026,0.00040455585,0.002943831,0.82279223,0.013675803,0.15270728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021502962,0.0006557783,0.013546835,0.00013966169,0.000113094786,0.00059055915,0.0029857995,0.008828958,0.008900953,0.7004626,0.26345614,0.00010471675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072742766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068382226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048185606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030197966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079301774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16119695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079789365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1015567","title":"Weak Undominance in Scoring Rule Elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scoring rule; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014354873973777629,"score_gpt":0.22028000430737196,"score_spread":0.20592513033359433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079789365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314086,0.0004073867,0.1289817,0.0027479543,0.00022290846,0.00013470942,0.00020400915,0.0004026324,0.035490066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119943,0.000072723094,0.004479524,0.00010619766,0.00008136208,0.00004267614,0.000050251656,0.00005045266,0.003917423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867186,0.0076058903,0.00095374126,0.0016359056,0.0012216144,0.0018641978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8437192,0.11012524,0.013873651,0.020432826,0.0061509847,0.0056980676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575949,0.00070502213,0.0042866264,0.0015729923,0.0033855413,0.006717661,0.0029385653,0.0034388946,0.010051695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13141753,0.0014839451,0.0010878547,0.0015655988,0.0059649353,0.0080503505,0.0034647766,0.0061076125,0.0011535739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096997095,0.00028081055,0.007583704,0.00023517571,0.00011633131,0.000528094,0.0011229395,0.024130214,0.0022367286,0.9310687,0.0042046085,0.027522704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109365494,0.00010561753,0.0013837203,0.000021875852,0.000039534836,0.00012739432,0.00028517633,0.06585382,0.00067665585,0.9306141,0.00074817555,0.00003457592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001810062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01575949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013252976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025945802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083345115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079982674","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.045","title":"Circumstantial power: Optimal persuadable voters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.11004846466087169,"score_gpt":0.3286839589659798,"score_spread":0.2186354943051081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079982674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6402551,0.0004256862,0.25556165,0.009734014,0.00034091726,0.00034974611,0.00022962046,0.00026328964,0.09284004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98809487,0.00007457634,0.008036024,0.0001352229,0.00006437827,0.000052991996,0.000024306013,0.000023117393,0.003494463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997572,0.0013259561,0.00010216756,0.0003622692,0.00017522229,0.00046247634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835134,0.012526264,0.0011118883,0.0009294668,0.0006989991,0.0012198751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004893352,0.00083468965,0.0016756296,0.0006995532,0.0013000588,0.0033561797,0.0014438508,0.0039972244,0.014520908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040549282,0.00084972923,0.00061877974,0.00060993154,0.0017650125,0.004332629,0.0017936092,0.0025560693,0.0011637489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003590465,0.000672873,0.004747555,0.0004637737,0.0001765872,0.00075671735,0.0016680821,0.048937038,0.004928916,0.8473314,0.007868052,0.07885854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006015803,0.00032509246,0.00096683577,0.000038588914,0.00007358333,0.00024951936,0.0009600614,0.1031338,0.0010895223,0.89022356,0.0023087743,0.00002911836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004940044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006910843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014520908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008484647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012116521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04857731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080156342","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1350540","title":"Incentives and the Structure of Teams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.004952849377539325,"score_gpt":0.19033968436670695,"score_spread":0.18538683498916764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080156342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84350955,0.0005103261,0.10531191,0.004947149,0.00012828661,0.00013775895,0.0002689399,0.00007307767,0.045112956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248976,0.00008666974,0.004135898,0.000075297954,0.000038404156,0.00004697184,0.000044000357,0.000008280655,0.0030745966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511284,0.003045913,0.00022353468,0.00050932105,0.0004252429,0.0006831301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96406543,0.023001306,0.006087269,0.0020369624,0.0017854243,0.0030236447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056399107,0.00022901838,0.000816155,0.0010686549,0.0014643959,0.0038860212,0.0012278225,0.0022924347,0.0099746995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04569591,0.0004824012,0.00044282043,0.000743846,0.002181648,0.003530356,0.0015894937,0.001347651,0.00088844594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038211167,0.00015541582,0.0136292,0.0000888463,0.00006727924,0.00012393927,0.00086965103,0.02669554,0.0011151371,0.927781,0.003819501,0.025272317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016721708,0.000082247134,0.005311776,0.000028105109,0.000019465688,0.00006767343,0.0005696748,0.05680894,0.00029834238,0.9339496,0.0026744667,0.000022470218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016033158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020308585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099746995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014851325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012770181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033368647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080360262","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2004.02.004","title":"Welfare egalitarianism in non-rival environments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Unanimity; Microeconomics; Economics; Welfare; Robustness (evolution); Social Welfare; Upper and lower bounds; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0152402228181772,"score_gpt":0.21158531591575225,"score_spread":0.19634509309757506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080360262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5909591,0.0008157575,0.20240699,0.009908089,0.0001638681,0.00020479488,0.00034477844,0.00016872206,0.19502793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044997,0.00015927642,0.004498021,0.00024150229,0.00005596954,0.000056068104,0.000032243912,0.000024416373,0.004482524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929671,0.004081789,0.00023486999,0.0007678482,0.0005551939,0.0013932566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804216,0.013447014,0.001627503,0.002465422,0.0010244674,0.0010139811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075705172,0.0006595882,0.0028234974,0.0012545538,0.0025193251,0.006709375,0.0018836315,0.0035735231,0.0114953015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02340854,0.00077947346,0.0013430767,0.0013442227,0.004676639,0.007197443,0.003541186,0.0036794003,0.0007651526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010972138,0.00006193804,0.00070528034,0.000049860304,0.0000455907,0.00008143403,0.00025794154,0.0047588944,0.00026474937,0.9877324,0.0011268907,0.0048052636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003986446,0.000026664806,0.00040022697,0.000008214979,0.000017396354,0.000037318066,0.00015674945,0.009592916,0.00008895171,0.98895836,0.00066558755,0.000007789425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014605423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020095913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114953015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020117136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001600997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040037215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081436998","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.003","title":"What are the current preoccupations of economic voting research?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Voting; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.23367082036630032,"score_gpt":0.3804469898450158,"score_spread":0.14677616947871547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081436998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021834867,0.32355756,0.019622914,0.60978466,0.005657219,0.000039239676,0.00028212345,0.00007656351,0.019144913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39380133,0.4398751,0.01825939,0.06918143,0.07136102,0.0002923612,0.00055866665,0.00014095934,0.006529678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801583,0.0074265627,0.00049105374,0.0015269034,0.0017885269,0.00075114897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8004579,0.17020966,0.006809184,0.0056692087,0.012139777,0.0047143223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038759064,0.0006058629,0.003044992,0.004337447,0.0033693705,0.017146861,0.0039708684,0.0090132365,0.013936747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09986414,0.00083879026,0.0010286572,0.008288247,0.02585411,0.03424886,0.0039101276,0.009189404,0.002255893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931777,0.00040880425,0.0084011005,0.0027121294,0.00012201526,0.000065146276,0.0020741695,0.0015522416,0.00020256836,0.7377763,0.049790397,0.1966019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003999554,0.00007952849,0.0048482073,0.0016510705,0.000029762181,0.00009946951,0.006647859,0.0021676086,0.0000858231,0.9037908,0.08049779,0.000062160114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034115678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056152632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038759064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032200299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004091319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20498002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083273514","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0243-2","title":"Social choice, optimal inference and figure skating","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Set (abstract data type); Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Statistical inference; Computer science; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Posterior probability; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.035218126079915146,"score_gpt":0.281705952480601,"score_spread":0.24648782640068584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083273514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3362557,0.0015801584,0.6265296,0.008792383,0.00017251156,0.00015882328,0.0005498693,0.00016826707,0.025792709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601618,0.00045194096,0.032678854,0.0002326069,0.000097353215,0.00008032541,0.00021264303,0.00004785693,0.0060365372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481094,0.003259741,0.00020577465,0.00080946647,0.0003444789,0.0005695769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586929,0.035774406,0.0020852995,0.001990637,0.00084746664,0.0006094336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008777063,0.0006351092,0.0024261868,0.0014696353,0.0015018021,0.0038453536,0.0025494762,0.003615563,0.011467807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057010625,0.0008167373,0.001092993,0.0016401745,0.0049225036,0.006804041,0.0016629194,0.0026751605,0.00060112594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035144197,0.00021122234,0.0063293655,0.0001863979,0.00014093083,0.0001315977,0.0005411788,0.1239369,0.0003996989,0.83170223,0.0039477316,0.032121398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004149241,0.000019628735,0.0008235404,0.000019492707,0.00002039532,0.00003166517,0.00012207797,0.15037006,0.00014705457,0.8477444,0.0006436039,0.000016651415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009765677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009840337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011467807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021647688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04641813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083969644","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400304","title":"Single-Peakedness and Disconnected Coalitions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Perception; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.045915860756792555,"score_gpt":0.22211010023722397,"score_spread":0.17619423948043142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083969644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963891,0.0008513692,0.23159783,0.0030368175,0.00008861189,0.00015532809,0.0003261337,0.000104747014,0.16745003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98431855,0.00012926904,0.0103857815,0.00012737684,0.000028323182,0.00006726835,0.00011339185,0.00001573255,0.004814266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609876,0.0016127366,0.00023202652,0.00076372793,0.0007663549,0.00052632636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664665,0.0061830617,0.0026366839,0.0017305479,0.0010806177,0.0017224125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041955807,0.00033437196,0.0007107753,0.001742787,0.002225512,0.003741021,0.0009284875,0.0010335176,0.0077362917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015805954,0.0003689901,0.0007385084,0.0017030167,0.006762266,0.0048117293,0.004032273,0.0016250297,0.00049324025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041478797,0.000022553568,0.0025748115,0.000028282577,0.000023309829,0.000118152304,0.0012762061,0.0015834065,0.00021594581,0.9858213,0.00066355127,0.0076310365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024894918,0.000016069042,0.0012873933,0.00001734531,0.0000082999395,0.00017542836,0.0008399159,0.005713441,0.00014101321,0.9871612,0.004601953,0.0000128370175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012387265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077362917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001329838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005987007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025880516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084126087","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2014.06.002","title":"Power theories for multi-choice organizations and political rules: Rank-order equivalence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Perspectives","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Voting; Mathematics; Equivalence class (music); Mathematical economics; Rank (graph theory); Social choice theory; Equivalence relation; Ordinal regression; Shapley value; Ordinal data; Order (exchange); Econometrics; Game theory; Discrete mathematics; Politics; Economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Political science","score_opus":0.07920507547477938,"score_gpt":0.37175037743919237,"score_spread":0.292545301964413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084126087","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109822445,0.002365568,0.7961246,0.0044578966,0.00017074333,0.00016188592,0.00026390015,0.00007541343,0.08655747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199432,0.001433709,0.071748696,0.00045145358,0.00067845674,0.0003537736,0.00028842947,0.000041654097,0.0050604763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929711,0.0033891452,0.00040282652,0.00087878475,0.0018503125,0.0005078494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700281,0.021015199,0.0031935715,0.003024012,0.0019717277,0.000767428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007643581,0.0007436976,0.0013890326,0.0024319955,0.001611078,0.005057037,0.0014952254,0.0017421732,0.0064419406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032885604,0.00035453148,0.0015687734,0.0022218367,0.006961494,0.008621153,0.0023408337,0.0035189197,0.0007629069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004365594,0.0000118832,0.00020181,0.0000142784975,0.0000062267522,0.000013415953,0.00006726291,0.0018630266,0.000050603474,0.9949969,0.00020313443,0.0025671767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006136886,0.0000071154236,0.00014115377,0.0000069643756,0.0000024774745,0.000012277442,0.00001961099,0.009635099,0.000034455436,0.9895465,0.0005847358,0.0000035250582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009454713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005855093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007643581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024767006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010713883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040423572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085950285","doi":"10.1007/s10058-007-0028-1","title":"On complexity of lobbying in multiple referenda","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Democracy; Economics; Direct democracy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.23754783185235623,"score_gpt":0.3042732677913916,"score_spread":0.06672543593903535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085950285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16111119,0.01259863,0.73334306,0.016153567,0.00040038035,0.00026034197,0.00052531325,0.00022631741,0.075381234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92282355,0.0049617807,0.06035438,0.00065184693,0.0006956008,0.0002463316,0.00027113408,0.000113234804,0.009882192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693454,0.0065530175,0.0008164735,0.0018048902,0.0026061602,0.0012849085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9045753,0.07566347,0.0071662613,0.0071932874,0.0034313342,0.0019702164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010257859,0.0008074393,0.004106755,0.002752149,0.0027354015,0.010799249,0.0037330769,0.005415782,0.010846044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057792213,0.001629322,0.002814637,0.0029999374,0.009633347,0.018632445,0.0043271217,0.006133582,0.0009865895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003833675,0.000036556703,0.001036907,0.00011643296,0.00005726155,0.000060845014,0.00021312146,0.027302822,0.00026220837,0.9607687,0.0013420895,0.008764741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015440535,0.000012652557,0.00043293438,0.000025417328,0.000020707028,0.000043115808,0.0000696647,0.035746012,0.00007852643,0.96218115,0.0013563763,0.000018045996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032991075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010846044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002808522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054249346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089349773","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0112-4","title":"Maximal Domain for Strategy-proof Rules in Allotment Economies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Preference; Allotment; Variable (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Disequilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025099615735910543,"score_gpt":0.2341309164835523,"score_spread":0.20903130074764176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089349773","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24750672,0.0013886228,0.66346955,0.004431162,0.00012670502,0.00020869696,0.0009984449,0.0005364637,0.08133366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435574,0.0006765539,0.043942284,0.0004078755,0.00018539715,0.00037877724,0.00075401616,0.00013396308,0.009963936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962155,0.0016801759,0.00024403402,0.00069274346,0.00057992665,0.00058764574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97368264,0.020889936,0.0009196244,0.0014923491,0.0012120685,0.0018033882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054835035,0.0009443023,0.0028091446,0.002653356,0.0032351464,0.0094215255,0.0026227604,0.0027082413,0.009090894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017812937,0.0010457813,0.002129353,0.0021031657,0.0066892635,0.01243828,0.00383572,0.0062094466,0.0009366214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035671565,0.000034989756,0.00011750514,0.000035192963,0.000012913658,0.000031993506,0.00016420991,0.0018190235,0.0001638848,0.9953949,0.00039854235,0.0017911152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025176847,0.000006931932,0.000051235824,0.000011013793,0.0000062242116,0.000016264203,0.00005174854,0.00623564,0.00014305451,0.9929304,0.00051662425,0.000005589418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001984401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013164537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094215255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002824076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023467278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030412078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091587857","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.11.001","title":"Statistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical inference; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Computer science; Majority rule; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical model; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1709722279674939,"score_gpt":0.34039747293678774,"score_spread":0.16942524496929384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091587857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6665496,0.00066535204,0.32165703,0.0014632741,0.00020422241,0.00022594779,0.0008381003,0.0003781915,0.008018364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742727,0.00020876456,0.02272854,0.00018168753,0.000111321664,0.00016091096,0.00085789314,0.00010523674,0.0013730859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815993,0.012025479,0.0010778706,0.0021903764,0.0019692625,0.0011378222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6784496,0.28051704,0.009853258,0.022014072,0.006611014,0.002555109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029864836,0.00050028577,0.0023421259,0.004284966,0.0013951064,0.00510549,0.0025677788,0.002493093,0.0065741013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19034895,0.0006613365,0.0018678149,0.0028515658,0.0035656404,0.0060576624,0.0016786252,0.0022149486,0.00057825044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001385594,0.00035366978,0.03340681,0.00042878327,0.0008600584,0.00020705696,0.0011143333,0.11491572,0.0016589147,0.7605304,0.008893938,0.0762447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014253317,0.00017676852,0.011272931,0.000055440025,0.000118226715,0.00013985528,0.00031302817,0.4018622,0.00081505126,0.5839173,0.0011223786,0.00006426067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010518233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001248645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029864836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017085065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016440621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15794224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092618195","doi":"10.1016/j.indag.2013.07.008","title":"Lexicographic preferences representable by real-branching trees with countable height: A dichotomy result","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indagationes Mathematicae","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Lexicographical order; Branching (polymer chemistry); Countable set; Tree (set theory); Combinatorics; Linearization; Preference; Extension (predicate logic); Discrete mathematics; Nonlinear system; Computer science","score_opus":0.02192167036158392,"score_gpt":0.20884609679383492,"score_spread":0.186924426432251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092618195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57455266,0.000819143,0.34622005,0.0042682346,0.00008840748,0.000046253852,0.00071242393,0.00035429103,0.07293853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501504,0.00058697804,0.037243344,0.000586936,0.00016966679,0.00010949707,0.0006665963,0.00010731194,0.010379307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986255,0.00044365172,0.000088092915,0.0002598664,0.0002831518,0.0002996423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928906,0.0053517385,0.00056574354,0.0004378453,0.0003000698,0.00045399801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014367199,0.00055807177,0.0011326089,0.001620893,0.0018060094,0.005967494,0.0013861748,0.0019117976,0.010165579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060902294,0.0007903614,0.0011680513,0.0025290921,0.0034769152,0.0103710145,0.0025610328,0.0040153284,0.0012060215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006384277,0.000028798671,0.0003478054,0.000031984655,0.000009232275,0.00005766607,0.00026752293,0.0011651807,0.00061876024,0.9939254,0.0005364893,0.002947328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001982822,0.000005959731,0.00011705709,0.000006638791,0.000006471665,0.000046118614,0.000074291005,0.0059181796,0.00015445291,0.99317235,0.00047205578,0.0000066032353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080012134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009135242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010165579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001504276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000618398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03400725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094045559","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2012-0006","title":"A Simple Bargaining Procedure for the Myerson Value","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Negotiation; Graph; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.021792430562208653,"score_gpt":0.2233797024792038,"score_spread":0.20158727191699516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094045559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042756073,0.00015533292,0.879254,0.0010978752,0.00016065425,0.0003796209,0.00009789963,0.00021245956,0.07588611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7157019,0.00018036307,0.26169387,0.00027139325,0.0001210666,0.00058764714,0.00006703778,0.00011452402,0.021262167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966101,0.0019423168,0.00011394914,0.00038003788,0.0007167186,0.00023684667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645895,0.002403678,0.00023525018,0.00046331264,0.00028627092,0.00015252194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049438556,0.0008416717,0.000769484,0.0011153012,0.0017082813,0.0023248552,0.0021331364,0.0027301994,0.014922877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014535307,0.00050529203,0.0010197826,0.0010659427,0.0042957678,0.004949472,0.0023926105,0.0022138192,0.0017214229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033851593,0.000019041305,0.000058478538,0.000020954407,0.0000096797285,0.00003555464,0.000093111914,0.008492842,0.0010033756,0.9829366,0.00076047925,0.0065360144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042068194,0.000030938278,0.00006581322,0.000016195163,0.000008894314,0.000034547866,0.000030385803,0.06999684,0.00081819185,0.92537475,0.003562177,0.000019356472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069881324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007564036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014922877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019562682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014128919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04992205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094786392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.05.004","title":"Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematics; Tournament; Transitive relation; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Finite set; Transitive closure; Set (abstract data type); Closure (psychology); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Axiom of choice; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Set theory; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.024854315058667042,"score_gpt":0.23501538092675447,"score_spread":0.21016106586808744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094786392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77854776,0.00033035793,0.17441057,0.0022114224,0.00010588378,0.000073023264,0.0002561028,0.0001477583,0.04391704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877487,0.00009650431,0.0049833176,0.00010802724,0.000035114284,0.000029918941,0.00004639229,0.000025471187,0.0069265733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990435,0.00040463224,0.000055179255,0.00014953087,0.00013396346,0.00021316155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702663,0.008598709,0.0011898887,0.0015468652,0.0007525469,0.00088531175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028430044,0.000303499,0.0011799128,0.00080392114,0.0010464306,0.0023588447,0.001169903,0.0013940174,0.010884889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02269798,0.0004977356,0.0006359848,0.0006421743,0.0020158812,0.0034924105,0.0014062022,0.0022617704,0.0005761654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016765155,0.000057802394,0.0015206502,0.000042757478,0.00003202195,0.0001390868,0.00021113678,0.014117421,0.0008469443,0.96947247,0.0017567712,0.0116352765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035941346,0.000021196924,0.0005278936,0.0000064153296,0.000010751384,0.000065273314,0.00006532581,0.05326921,0.00021938357,0.94517463,0.0005928595,0.000011214866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015579788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001376161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010884889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007926758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008062484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03641355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095237287","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015","title":"Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Set (abstract data type); Status quo; Computer science; Mathematics; Aggregation problem; Relation (database); Economics; Data mining; Statistics; Voting","score_opus":0.049660570646219655,"score_gpt":0.2229314150855681,"score_spread":0.17327084443934845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095237287","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24054094,0.00058414764,0.7202728,0.002786066,0.00008353006,0.0003051355,0.0008810686,0.0002913932,0.034254953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943164,0.00043126201,0.050361305,0.0003692118,0.00016712151,0.00035681194,0.00067512156,0.00007647843,0.004398732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905991,0.0039272932,0.0009681811,0.001497626,0.0015851863,0.0014226069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96574724,0.021478962,0.003240832,0.004855887,0.0030355996,0.0016414372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472099,0.0009915588,0.001953391,0.0026798972,0.0032393425,0.008867981,0.0030295625,0.003000428,0.007039639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034403924,0.0010645544,0.0026453275,0.0042739003,0.00462068,0.012963648,0.00368185,0.003979708,0.00085292215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040261537,0.000055296354,0.00047922527,0.000040551626,0.00002276446,0.000049979248,0.0003288407,0.0017263409,0.00031336094,0.9919469,0.0006626387,0.004333868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024333558,0.000015111066,0.00019011754,0.000010711203,0.000012431898,0.00005278442,0.00011801976,0.015811365,0.00016562165,0.9830791,0.00050737284,0.000013012275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016441677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012580989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008867981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018907152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00209397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04480529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095409339","doi":"10.1145/1855118.1855133","title":"The story of set disjointness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGACT News","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Media studies; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.036596624647452204,"score_gpt":0.24102023511922727,"score_spread":0.20442361047177507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095409339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008721997,0.039148334,0.026933959,0.4641861,0.008859237,0.000022248918,0.000660705,0.00025045697,0.45121688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7291931,0.03148777,0.011252367,0.07796231,0.017503088,0.00021369026,0.0007400699,0.00094666675,0.13070098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939535,0.003007131,0.00015709874,0.00081757724,0.0015565567,0.00050803245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98617494,0.010026261,0.00038765042,0.001488312,0.001222206,0.0007006975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006126476,0.0004785554,0.00076701783,0.0011036278,0.0057611205,0.0083417995,0.0011794639,0.0032054042,0.014977699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022242092,0.0005429369,0.0007929187,0.0017278625,0.020476088,0.01935698,0.005673678,0.010306418,0.0028450233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002303914,0.0000051479387,0.00008495343,0.000038616465,0.000008175936,0.000034200777,0.0007820066,0.00018221402,0.00003816577,0.8876374,0.10188659,0.009279506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011092734,0.000008305792,0.00011586265,0.00006637955,0.000004327776,0.00009561035,0.0004870685,0.00033022693,0.00010806715,0.6654398,0.33332297,0.0000102544645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004919573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002894724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014977699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050513037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020052618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050105393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095827365","doi":"10.1007/s11127-006-9120-2","title":"Choosing a runoff election threshold","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Surface runoff; Public finance; Condorcet method; Metric (unit); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Voting; Political science; Politics; Law; Operations management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.032929946582231154,"score_gpt":0.21538816422916662,"score_spread":0.18245821764693548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095827365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75604194,0.00012175642,0.10155414,0.0038007614,0.00014595006,0.00031695297,0.0004055663,0.00073995825,0.13687299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863186,0.00003219217,0.00427398,0.00012940094,0.000016509748,0.000038450136,0.000059646067,0.000050679406,0.009080691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984047,0.00038858634,0.000042621225,0.00023949794,0.00020830118,0.0007163363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982059,0.00082432636,0.00012111625,0.00022131509,0.0002134151,0.00041390953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017903211,0.0001830572,0.0006963653,0.0008928882,0.001279196,0.0037549983,0.0007916232,0.0019787617,0.022472765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010281185,0.0003666958,0.0005227692,0.0005631179,0.0007129493,0.0025343953,0.0015237783,0.0018014505,0.0030205646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014390063,0.0015929895,0.034547236,0.0002482301,0.00015452327,0.00061788445,0.0014557188,0.07201732,0.034087304,0.6856008,0.022686228,0.14555274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003646568,0.0009028158,0.03618458,0.000100906596,0.00013928961,0.00033660303,0.004543701,0.3149305,0.020555062,0.59142286,0.030394103,0.00012499791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017863741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004179683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022472765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011806687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014557733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07517892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096644678","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0131-1","title":"Anonymous Single-profile Welfarism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Welfare","score_opus":0.02186610708643378,"score_gpt":0.20583522945013813,"score_spread":0.18396912236370436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096644678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5030554,0.00014992683,0.32746083,0.0023698783,0.00021649628,0.0003106669,0.0007247759,0.0005488234,0.16516313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969848,0.00003127005,0.008292705,0.0001536718,0.000042752792,0.000081179234,0.000110298926,0.000036027533,0.021404184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953928,0.0024003035,0.00014911892,0.00070990605,0.00045452296,0.00089334336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895734,0.0040035374,0.000807836,0.0038476242,0.00095869246,0.0008088582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037071032,0.00040856836,0.0011626823,0.00059237925,0.002800746,0.0030483075,0.0016636717,0.002053303,0.017413734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137672,0.0002836618,0.00061199965,0.0006004385,0.0015002397,0.0032626619,0.0024984751,0.001605715,0.00256736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013216892,0.00044454087,0.004844771,0.00014028103,0.00008312208,0.000237987,0.0012308144,0.011105857,0.0026481564,0.90073866,0.012294523,0.06490967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017731603,0.00024477317,0.0028622872,0.00004469156,0.000052929194,0.00042000634,0.00108886,0.08350759,0.0034803697,0.88598746,0.02206241,0.00007127545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080753246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017043842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017413734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009527617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008787015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05825472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097079137","doi":"","title":"Party formation in collective decision-making","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Democracy; Majority rule; Group decision-making; Pairwise comparison; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Public administration; Business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06556685602417188,"score_gpt":0.310758537828072,"score_spread":0.2451916818039001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097079137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52563477,0.0010412808,0.4046803,0.0038057263,0.00013938901,0.00015518545,0.00015980436,0.00013701718,0.06424643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97702754,0.0002978647,0.01689086,0.00011752987,0.00005947269,0.00009023125,0.000069066686,0.000021588568,0.005425811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962554,0.0020792375,0.000080208156,0.0005307122,0.0003855709,0.0006688825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880114,0.0076715257,0.0017593185,0.0011619733,0.00052168756,0.00087416195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004022035,0.00052336993,0.0012486165,0.00094082736,0.0027660935,0.003568796,0.0014381785,0.002301577,0.0055734995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015513745,0.00047051618,0.0012974001,0.0014357058,0.0037214665,0.0037479498,0.0035909605,0.0019347767,0.00071956526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011786999,0.000073266885,0.002854394,0.000092062175,0.00007816748,0.00022458764,0.0010080123,0.119909,0.0006205311,0.8628144,0.0012797613,0.010927932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078717545,0.000057782716,0.000954699,0.00002469217,0.000028288685,0.00006351294,0.00031316932,0.17243941,0.00033322175,0.8223938,0.00329426,0.000018588746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024317964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017473359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055734995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016658668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092602434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021270812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097665815","doi":"10.7202/602289ar","title":"La démocratie : oui, mais laquelle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037775848122372904,"score_gpt":0.23395994122448804,"score_spread":0.19618409310211515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097665815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058667444,0.01200268,0.018955683,0.19683594,0.0022256456,0.00008530774,0.0002744832,0.0001787978,0.710774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892988,0.0054517593,0.004922951,0.01081433,0.0008344314,0.000095871794,0.00011930993,0.00037194559,0.08809058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753756,0.006572504,0.000260176,0.0016838731,0.002173776,0.0017720985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340457,0.0026405882,0.000620084,0.0014091143,0.0011026683,0.00082310697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008840705,0.00045344193,0.00077226287,0.0014935163,0.0105112465,0.020133246,0.0011231407,0.0026416641,0.016666478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013088796,0.00035282725,0.0005515356,0.0034203331,0.0255758,0.013416991,0.0062362715,0.005791885,0.0025127695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337186,0.00002149198,0.002546526,0.000113815375,0.000020058878,0.00007772045,0.020837747,0.000110596266,0.00028941606,0.9437563,0.009146596,0.02304606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025300196,0.0000509185,0.0053648567,0.0004980039,0.00002488639,0.0002033786,0.04047954,0.00038998798,0.0010857072,0.22628152,0.72553545,0.000060482267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025394002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04441032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025394002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119274575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009006918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08654016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097909533","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2009.07.004","title":"Two-sided matching with interdependent values","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Interdependence; Stability (learning theory); Mechanism (biology); Complete information; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Machine learning; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01813848267765415,"score_gpt":0.2380659692204766,"score_spread":0.21992748654282246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097909533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23113056,0.00026728743,0.74060214,0.0026377328,0.00016163959,0.00030887654,0.0003848135,0.00021463285,0.02429233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91750664,0.00021627067,0.060350798,0.00033482315,0.0001440926,0.0002958557,0.00019124828,0.00006245713,0.020897785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98784477,0.007627974,0.0005805968,0.0014213414,0.0012264806,0.0012988608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94272816,0.044262774,0.003339258,0.0061898767,0.0018513771,0.0016285998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010593709,0.0007845983,0.0034767534,0.0013793501,0.0015263531,0.004939504,0.003937301,0.006531046,0.0120693995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056510776,0.001481479,0.001674409,0.002343402,0.0032669525,0.008559488,0.003568735,0.0034434833,0.0020556962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070531794,0.00030454513,0.0015927248,0.000121302226,0.00013089333,0.00038504135,0.00031058345,0.063640356,0.0011309787,0.90131027,0.00263467,0.027733356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017668898,0.00006639272,0.00019601121,0.0000138045525,0.000029010806,0.00010475087,0.000051362673,0.20154642,0.00033584193,0.79673713,0.0007194556,0.000023140243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008218114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006035083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120693995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016150459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015445711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056025565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099084709","doi":"10.1007/s001820400177","title":"Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictator; Object (grammar); Resource (disambiguation); Simple (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Sequence (biology); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.030265495735515378,"score_gpt":0.25094157691034585,"score_spread":0.22067608117483048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099084709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10617728,0.0018696261,0.8033472,0.006992952,0.00029352386,0.00047604702,0.0009968192,0.00032527582,0.07952136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053696,0.0032443006,0.15153779,0.0017629876,0.00072580995,0.0015521793,0.0010954621,0.0005017954,0.034210037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568754,0.0022765573,0.00025636182,0.00054642453,0.00052078074,0.000712284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724715,0.021648217,0.0015623984,0.0013725198,0.0015569485,0.0013884907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007345399,0.0018242898,0.0049777613,0.0016540941,0.0023634466,0.0054108705,0.003833126,0.0036673674,0.014581483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03343799,0.0015868321,0.0029284884,0.0023508014,0.0048348056,0.01199029,0.003686026,0.0069872965,0.0014055215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013730285,0.00014085438,0.000566769,0.00026618957,0.00006562304,0.00020691757,0.00028264537,0.029318446,0.001074337,0.94914466,0.0051815626,0.013614622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046516274,0.000030271605,0.00019021374,0.00003346175,0.000018949755,0.0001025638,0.000075295626,0.08255645,0.00021599847,0.9151449,0.001568413,0.000017008853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035140573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002903075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014581483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002702253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031631526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048779905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099182741","doi":"","title":"THE ART OF COMPROMISE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Ratification; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Bargaining problem; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public economics; Public administration; Microeconomics; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.055647511207695094,"score_gpt":0.29807586158277993,"score_spread":0.24242835037508484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099182741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056356164,0.004984442,0.53507024,0.017497795,0.0010801599,0.0002566975,0.0006450894,0.0003442538,0.43448567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60286474,0.009087883,0.26112434,0.0048973346,0.0019400218,0.00168462,0.0012952196,0.0006719629,0.11643384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853875,0.0060077985,0.0009283322,0.0040304856,0.0027442102,0.00090173754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905571,0.0046982444,0.0008252901,0.003033513,0.00059916126,0.00028666103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00892011,0.001331334,0.0018557196,0.0016999008,0.0048407027,0.013107232,0.00434745,0.0066270637,0.027690535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024314584,0.000994368,0.0024913906,0.0028363802,0.017998734,0.015426203,0.0075544235,0.007115807,0.006389069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005509669,0.0000043532227,0.000036573045,0.000022377622,0.000008796226,0.000014664621,0.00011802581,0.0019253427,0.000019674906,0.9930576,0.0017738483,0.003013212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006075361,0.0000045432457,0.000015691703,0.000033569944,0.00000478272,0.000021933725,0.000040324485,0.0032972973,0.000037797876,0.9722768,0.024254816,0.000006402178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029982135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002162502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027690535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00542655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004370351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09263402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100581723","doi":"","title":"Condorcet admissibility: Indeterminacy and path-dependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Judgement; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Majority rule; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Voting; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Path (computing); Scope (computer science); Choice set; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07801215494727368,"score_gpt":0.21981548797087425,"score_spread":0.14180333302360057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100581723","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28210938,0.0011863917,0.6392586,0.010453419,0.00014231142,0.00042614652,0.00076907297,0.00021803264,0.0654366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183676,0.0005317692,0.0737371,0.000518147,0.00019939916,0.00045318448,0.0003227461,0.00007764919,0.005792355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776963,0.012390919,0.0012249177,0.003329989,0.003840031,0.0015178052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8474754,0.12769671,0.007605926,0.009622006,0.005463124,0.0021369208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026706625,0.0008591654,0.0025804536,0.0023515902,0.0037610696,0.006991946,0.003113503,0.0035698204,0.007522875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124305904,0.0011692859,0.002833792,0.002963143,0.0123982215,0.01493714,0.006199464,0.009191639,0.00055117055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226828,0.000026613641,0.00081873324,0.000052858388,0.000037460166,0.00010664184,0.00046708842,0.008757258,0.00015491011,0.98290133,0.0006465907,0.0059683523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018787257,0.0000072628536,0.00014655084,0.000012302657,0.000007318393,0.000027088789,0.000038413276,0.024816861,0.00007785565,0.9744803,0.00035818448,0.000008972858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046376707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029887029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026706625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004741472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026646776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14123982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.24666437402838567,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104257901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60260224,0.00043729355,0.37403694,0.0018428075,0.000063912914,0.00015017163,0.000251261,0.00012855353,0.02048679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811297,0.000074951684,0.016386606,0.00007201753,0.00005321068,0.00005778521,0.000114076094,0.000034278026,0.0020773285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872764,0.008182708,0.000523698,0.0016824199,0.00086206704,0.0014726606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607874,0.025094949,0.005340599,0.004191089,0.0027318636,0.0018540112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012050719,0.00077339966,0.0018567921,0.0021625452,0.0024919796,0.0075905523,0.0026030242,0.002811665,0.004618183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04611247,0.0007203069,0.0009855935,0.0016756798,0.0051926803,0.006433163,0.0029086373,0.0023400378,0.00048902223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027419708,0.0001633123,0.008984259,0.000092332986,0.0001247552,0.0001260469,0.0006849065,0.095770776,0.0015364379,0.870388,0.0019393271,0.019915586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031542044,0.000050670376,0.0016895498,0.00002352895,0.000030264282,0.00005280329,0.00034462736,0.25817358,0.0004941684,0.73828685,0.0007908044,0.000031618423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026693896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012050719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001550162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063731074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104879829","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0132-0","title":"Rationalizability of choice functions on general domains without full transitivity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationalizability; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Element (criminal law); Transitive reduction; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Graph; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.02047996664975399,"score_gpt":0.2355434718199226,"score_spread":0.21506350517016862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104879829","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29869607,0.0007690771,0.662743,0.003990435,0.00008890759,0.0002653688,0.0008698685,0.00038234945,0.032194935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96026474,0.0005953779,0.03183285,0.00041605657,0.00018624838,0.00045918516,0.0007045511,0.00013128866,0.0054096053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988782,0.0053378516,0.0006241557,0.0028295175,0.0011846166,0.0012418655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299649,0.052671373,0.0038419587,0.008414237,0.0032457178,0.0018617642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012528758,0.0012602072,0.004468191,0.003237917,0.00171672,0.0066769845,0.0030848018,0.0029106294,0.0056948154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046501122,0.0016943305,0.0038454523,0.0023217958,0.008800808,0.014941126,0.0053765145,0.0069643133,0.0005274168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010589187,0.00005408407,0.00064214447,0.00006184163,0.000054464712,0.00007502545,0.00029031024,0.006831784,0.00035497913,0.9883868,0.00037477145,0.0027678541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028698458,0.000012625702,0.00016553106,0.000008393808,0.000010369003,0.000022768458,0.00004556861,0.016641365,0.000102618484,0.98278606,0.00016927949,0.000006700851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032544937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016146032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012528758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032022535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002301081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066259205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106478571","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773233","title":"Approximately Strategy-proof Mechanisms for (Constrained) Facility Location","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Impossibility; Facility location problem; Mechanism design; Complement (music); Metric (unit); Odds; Mathematical optimization; Space (punctuation); Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.13662674126293997,"score_gpt":0.2585099038521957,"score_spread":0.12188316258925572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106478571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029838935,0.0003190178,0.9608168,0.00082883355,0.000038480102,0.00027977457,0.00037735183,0.00033657323,0.0071641854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7458988,0.0007895532,0.24321069,0.0005086104,0.00014570891,0.0014669683,0.00055879855,0.00015771981,0.0072631524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884769,0.0066172834,0.0007663865,0.0016419683,0.0015193995,0.0009781375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9245694,0.052411947,0.009317096,0.010576156,0.0017151494,0.0014102072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013391993,0.0014181263,0.0028714791,0.0014689419,0.0010529778,0.004802596,0.005044387,0.0040139784,0.01026292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062438786,0.0013213414,0.0019354114,0.0025107039,0.0035657925,0.010850347,0.0038810554,0.0035055617,0.0012863739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018989788,0.00015594391,0.0008495801,0.00031771808,0.00010628662,0.000086300955,0.00021347085,0.13934115,0.0009628858,0.8325851,0.0027724209,0.022419281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022054906,0.00011819672,0.00021434648,0.00006344814,0.000032048243,0.00010929158,0.000055192293,0.2770104,0.00070444064,0.7183867,0.0030504523,0.000034942783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008082515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008620836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013391993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032453432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027252275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070824444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108543606","doi":"10.1007/s00199-008-0393-1","title":"Single-peaked choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Choice function; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Axiom independence; Social choice theory; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0515979672056281,"score_gpt":0.2065663585172052,"score_spread":0.1549683913115771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108543606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07776576,0.0006818381,0.83927625,0.003686669,0.00013960247,0.00019759485,0.0005228512,0.00012282313,0.07760659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89463854,0.00051978335,0.088992275,0.00090305274,0.00014512165,0.00031897443,0.00024909223,0.000059492413,0.014173627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939652,0.002890105,0.00030219532,0.0014074915,0.00094267185,0.00049234007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98530453,0.008708105,0.0013164349,0.0024594371,0.0015093194,0.00070206716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008226891,0.0005752452,0.0013930558,0.0009250812,0.001139019,0.0037720576,0.0016318759,0.0021258874,0.010245584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0209913,0.00046711668,0.0015219583,0.0011525062,0.0041307653,0.0049367766,0.0019654199,0.0029459961,0.0011146399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024280756,0.00002325994,0.0006251364,0.00004590638,0.000029507986,0.00005702603,0.0001395603,0.0022095435,0.00029685823,0.98893565,0.000864644,0.0067486987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014474224,0.000019500652,0.00029745855,0.000017350096,0.000010708472,0.00009943735,0.00007580958,0.010670508,0.00023254988,0.98527956,0.0032720128,0.0000105704685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006444421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056081417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010245584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016307366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090477295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04350847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109005822","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v5n1p122","title":"A Complete Geometric Representation of Four-Player Weighted Voting Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Voting; Mathematics; Simplex; Weighted voting; Algebraic number; Theoretical computer science; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.25369691525398436,"score_gpt":0.34667590273544163,"score_spread":0.09297898748145728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109005822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029142393,0.0002165793,0.91800404,0.0004317559,0.00007911311,0.00010296207,0.00016444256,0.0001285707,0.051730115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.727351,0.0005721516,0.24190052,0.00032534712,0.00017508882,0.00034939623,0.0004890214,0.00013073102,0.028706882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839205,0.0005341355,0.000084777515,0.00030911883,0.00045029874,0.00022964095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926835,0.00017920787,0.00015581702,0.00011015656,0.00020969212,0.00007683679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012089302,0.0006297331,0.0007065268,0.0009189853,0.00076237123,0.002565307,0.0013287391,0.0010483045,0.011842966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023626315,0.00027464915,0.00091271545,0.00090620003,0.0021027634,0.0029918684,0.0018019078,0.0014421991,0.0015884375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007193982,0.000006419498,0.00004001342,0.000012458046,0.0000039824613,0.000025375759,0.000056651952,0.013617316,0.00041407198,0.9803202,0.00044282395,0.0050534643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017661943,0.000029002,0.00006456774,0.000011447886,0.000006009024,0.000051014686,0.00007247455,0.121343054,0.00046619127,0.8682826,0.0096408455,0.00001513671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013235795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080816133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011842966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011999409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010322885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03961867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109728195","doi":"10.1007/s10726-016-9502-x","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0233627466619331,"score_gpt":0.20666433837449197,"score_spread":0.18330159171255886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109728195","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.252866,0.0004920404,0.695096,0.0022614773,0.00008823715,0.0003611267,0.00027156653,0.00016306574,0.04840047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104041,0.00021172491,0.068753354,0.00023871573,0.000070974376,0.0003364751,0.00015496169,0.00005476076,0.019774977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355775,0.0036936975,0.0003254548,0.0007537443,0.00086127874,0.000808074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98770696,0.008772937,0.00092750235,0.0013964244,0.00051746384,0.00067878875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007795891,0.0009937178,0.002493603,0.00095104123,0.0016301855,0.0046984367,0.0030626203,0.0033533627,0.0077033415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023832066,0.00087020657,0.0011096923,0.0015096909,0.0039719,0.0070198514,0.0033457885,0.0025407157,0.0009719659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004149052,0.00015507881,0.00075952406,0.00013678246,0.000075114825,0.000113999406,0.0005914683,0.075074516,0.0017509975,0.8993517,0.0016789661,0.019897042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074002026,0.000068974325,0.00037172236,0.000021877566,0.000014981009,0.00004414259,0.000087264,0.14417097,0.00052544684,0.8535155,0.001088163,0.000016904092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016208884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015447747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007795891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024829167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021863698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04122907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110681344","doi":"10.1007/s00182-010-0237-7","title":"Noncooperative formation of coalitions in hedonic games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Economics; Point (geometry); Repeated game; Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.019829514491124117,"score_gpt":0.257316331565879,"score_spread":0.2374868170747549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110681344","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.403245,0.00029984242,0.56855136,0.0011298034,0.000087531706,0.00023546585,0.00009428695,0.00008329369,0.026273403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715077,0.0001331138,0.021883668,0.00008254424,0.000033461627,0.00016515185,0.00007137575,0.000019332887,0.0061035375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957552,0.0024193432,0.00022571618,0.0005346476,0.0004895329,0.0005754868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98175216,0.012741186,0.001564215,0.0012609859,0.00095453823,0.0017269445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005356613,0.00060639036,0.0019303912,0.0007870635,0.001818233,0.0039934427,0.0024248012,0.0019235032,0.0044538523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020879854,0.00077116606,0.0010178166,0.00094873836,0.0034821283,0.0044565424,0.003521733,0.002191297,0.0004440717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023945376,0.00015445545,0.0013478636,0.00007455556,0.00008322669,0.00017767951,0.00074251334,0.052818727,0.0016329851,0.9306702,0.0010259713,0.011032262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007866743,0.00006197378,0.00036465214,0.000015620442,0.000020658783,0.000056873698,0.00031522926,0.23286627,0.000450129,0.76480067,0.00094959646,0.000019658117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017095349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019467385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005356613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014531846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017988981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028328776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114513404","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2013.11.033","title":"Social exchange networks with distant bargaining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Extension (predicate logic); Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Bargaining problem; Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02023283452738109,"score_gpt":0.21274166859308735,"score_spread":0.19250883406570626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114513404","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24368243,0.0014017547,0.68938655,0.004180503,0.00029781135,0.00020295264,0.00041922907,0.00022823345,0.06020053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461378,0.0006567403,0.02534919,0.0002594013,0.00025970902,0.0001728287,0.00018589741,0.000044184755,0.026934221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685174,0.0019530774,0.00008536319,0.0005675495,0.00030954866,0.00023278415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982418,0.013431563,0.0015774007,0.0012856848,0.0005394082,0.00074789673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038013675,0.0008157732,0.0018089474,0.0017371221,0.0025604642,0.0046187285,0.0024935044,0.004406539,0.019342974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022894762,0.0009913051,0.0009987102,0.0022724506,0.0031580778,0.009666651,0.0035774577,0.0028955692,0.0017808533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009613805,0.00006099226,0.00054710486,0.00005114767,0.000028346596,0.00016522624,0.00023159957,0.038323216,0.00020017484,0.95210505,0.00116424,0.007026815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003631471,0.00002423644,0.00019045718,0.0000160964,0.000018479832,0.00007702765,0.00010231225,0.11740517,0.000093148556,0.880528,0.0014948308,0.000013862234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091635424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009265389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019342974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012521561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006064819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06470877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114708228","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447944","title":"Voting Power in the Electoral College: The Noncompetitive States Count, Too","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Power (physics); Electoral college; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.009559434567578342,"score_gpt":0.2080641625545313,"score_spread":0.19850472798695296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114708228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80931187,0.0004418534,0.029226584,0.006971243,0.00021544732,0.0000891298,0.0007038893,0.000060147468,0.15297984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917922,0.000104753315,0.0011539091,0.00018579401,0.00012871073,0.000023809296,0.00013287005,0.000013947115,0.006463973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839824,0.00046329,0.00008248068,0.00038137808,0.00033018083,0.00034445635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99222696,0.0035906374,0.0009857885,0.0011353419,0.00075457065,0.0013068179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015945558,0.00019986782,0.0007800218,0.0016213777,0.0019951768,0.0047175675,0.0010558154,0.00093394134,0.018627353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012312917,0.00021931551,0.00051462685,0.0018375104,0.002546792,0.0033289492,0.0019210341,0.0022489908,0.0012166053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004729215,0.00024906674,0.04809298,0.00011763598,0.00010358257,0.00013953641,0.0023316361,0.0017642141,0.0015556936,0.8392375,0.009284874,0.096650325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095400086,0.00021155385,0.06579302,0.00008457785,0.000099550576,0.00034850603,0.0034850608,0.024935205,0.0017486807,0.8838201,0.019319685,0.00005863919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019928007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004192816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018627353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006696258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053699355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06231469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116188555","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2014.03.004","title":"School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Diversity (politics); Pareto optimal; Type (biology); Computer science; Pareto principle; Mathematical optimization; Selection (genetic algorithm); Upper and lower bounds; Control (management); Scheme (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.0242208678987575,"score_gpt":0.23589455017930125,"score_spread":0.21167368228054376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116188555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1940808,0.0015782721,0.7485013,0.007813486,0.00031274877,0.0003503462,0.001568881,0.00026256664,0.045531604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97106814,0.00048219427,0.019941341,0.0004719944,0.0003127229,0.00026671728,0.00033712815,0.000054567226,0.0070652827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830497,0.010698817,0.0006553016,0.0021084584,0.0013275181,0.0021602085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8017651,0.17332791,0.008531799,0.010813964,0.0022680608,0.0032932404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020092873,0.0015749609,0.0063025816,0.001799286,0.0010557887,0.008254416,0.0042607286,0.0040639783,0.019968558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098543696,0.0014284975,0.0020801825,0.0022585294,0.0063758353,0.012434688,0.004310413,0.0071949726,0.00072824233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005219682,0.00030752618,0.0019414531,0.00020321974,0.0002636169,0.00011334022,0.00024051903,0.12628886,0.00020291415,0.85219675,0.0028476235,0.014872171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019978988,0.00006576218,0.00059174054,0.000051014264,0.000063244435,0.000021204749,0.00009201161,0.19679452,0.00016589058,0.8009042,0.001010583,0.000040046787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006207819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004529623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020092873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00265441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022915243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106262565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249082","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8","title":"Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Transitive relation; Majority rule; Preference; Preference relation; Cartesian product; Condorcet method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Voting; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.04263526924719818,"score_gpt":0.21985991371969862,"score_spread":0.17722464447250044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48442784,0.0024375382,0.4225617,0.008292515,0.00020751366,0.0001963265,0.0006621605,0.00019807174,0.08101641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97363496,0.00050602073,0.017701868,0.0003441399,0.00014405315,0.00018574003,0.00016632902,0.000040465853,0.0072764046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963403,0.0019771361,0.00013945851,0.0005210121,0.0005263004,0.00049585133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98110294,0.014325557,0.0014125886,0.0014868695,0.0006602268,0.0010117237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058219796,0.00058002316,0.0019633838,0.0018835587,0.0033248288,0.0052772495,0.0017835865,0.0026752048,0.00838276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024268338,0.0005243471,0.0008163315,0.0016542202,0.006268738,0.010557371,0.0027709578,0.0028054402,0.00069237704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045878718,0.000023386858,0.00028129757,0.000023829434,0.000011626593,0.000020702582,0.00010292445,0.0031149872,0.00007478201,0.99126035,0.0010054496,0.004034741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009620394,0.0000033141584,0.00006564178,0.000004115398,0.0000017819885,0.000008380595,0.000025389474,0.0041043824,0.000021973303,0.99543375,0.0003186709,0.0000029254597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030130723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023714462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00838276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023788966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013295156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030789912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118405202","doi":"10.1111/j.1742-7363.2006.00026.x","title":"Relative uncertainty aversion and additively representable set rankings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01745779874170375,"score_gpt":0.23487151142010923,"score_spread":0.21741371267840548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118405202","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062455855,0.0003351187,0.9160593,0.0011879754,0.000084022395,0.00008302276,0.00015182965,0.00010479358,0.019538166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81371766,0.00030286572,0.18106116,0.0003317679,0.00017348134,0.00022560322,0.00021703559,0.00003885101,0.003931572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988749,0.0052522696,0.0006754449,0.0011793706,0.0034250503,0.0007188737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414457,0.009311355,0.0020746768,0.0018636023,0.0018502816,0.0007556358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006881219,0.0008080266,0.0011322,0.0018661479,0.0010785537,0.004259946,0.0015486534,0.0013248911,0.0031178365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022496708,0.00048650923,0.0013089217,0.0013578294,0.0038806533,0.005484877,0.0026863804,0.0036727183,0.00041443505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025545041,0.000028960849,0.00029391528,0.000034244455,0.000033410786,0.00003682228,0.00014261068,0.015252929,0.00053860905,0.9747099,0.00034603075,0.008557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011446975,0.000035281635,0.00018920675,0.000019380663,0.000011536953,0.00004628136,0.00005064814,0.034046408,0.00046606045,0.9632949,0.0018088608,0.000020023237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065460114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069902034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006881219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017314019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011577372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036391795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119398920","doi":"","title":"SOCIAL CHOICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Normative; Axiom; Positive economics; sort; Quarter (Canadian coin); Axiomatic system; Population; Focus (optics); Social theory; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.01941834356611571,"score_gpt":0.1865130449190227,"score_spread":0.167094701352907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119398920","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007666321,0.8085421,0.018095681,0.07957278,0.0026136083,0.00002309904,0.00012303152,0.00003439047,0.08332895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26103303,0.690895,0.009083253,0.009895423,0.014149561,0.00007477532,0.00017873172,0.000059313366,0.01463092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972447,0.0012899066,0.00011517536,0.0005724026,0.00058700924,0.00019080732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707783,0.010332866,0.00039641003,0.00045713643,0.0012454868,0.0004901992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006471321,0.00068007974,0.0012511178,0.0024742114,0.0015192529,0.004491379,0.0012626853,0.0036645075,0.009879081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009600924,0.0004587288,0.0006505924,0.004876489,0.010978755,0.007845906,0.0023588412,0.0054303934,0.0012433992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003141125,0.00003248955,0.00029682493,0.0005196742,0.000015040697,0.000042066302,0.0003440922,0.0008575263,0.000050865045,0.92382884,0.006912252,0.06706893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001358694,0.000029734767,0.00075033325,0.0006020062,0.000009366753,0.00015796798,0.0005677673,0.001443472,0.0000724021,0.7032447,0.29309055,0.000018144197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042834687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023178626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009879081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056584543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023247015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041055083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120496168","doi":"10.1145/2482540.2482607","title":"Two-sided matching with partial information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015436599764296878,"score_gpt":0.18829790747825517,"score_spread":0.1728613077139583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120496168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053230565,0.00017893885,0.93767506,0.000913444,0.000050308532,0.00020579615,0.0004504004,0.00032797182,0.006967484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72309023,0.0002521263,0.26358068,0.00038697524,0.000079835685,0.00038410645,0.00070297834,0.0001425208,0.011380546],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994131,0.0026318345,0.00028806212,0.0013499236,0.0007855696,0.00081344455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012893,0.006353016,0.0007135783,0.0017686245,0.00047326492,0.00056247227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046703243,0.0009804771,0.002132494,0.000796243,0.0012270929,0.0023986264,0.0027633458,0.0024162703,0.008371321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143632395,0.0009118506,0.0015028336,0.0017102545,0.0017725645,0.0054891314,0.003212417,0.0023895293,0.0013696887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082275056,0.00036505138,0.001521789,0.00020689372,0.00012980669,0.00033704907,0.00033284476,0.60764384,0.0021912998,0.31025478,0.004909089,0.071284786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657623,0.00006809303,0.00015317617,0.000013218351,0.000016489597,0.00005895783,0.000037848662,0.7534806,0.00068470696,0.2437965,0.0016058714,0.00001877143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021297247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025894998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008371321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023269786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025985688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028004885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120693554","doi":"10.1007/s00182-011-0274-x","title":"Bidding and sequential coalition formation with externalities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stochastic game; Economics; Bidding; Externality; Markov perfect equilibrium; Markov chain; Partition (number theory); Repeated game; Monotonic function; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Property (philosophy); Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06763808638016416,"score_gpt":0.22991856312608266,"score_spread":0.1622804767459185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120693554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49818864,0.00031392157,0.46528456,0.0019072903,0.000107892854,0.00021861632,0.00027521193,0.0001581411,0.0335456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967357,0.00016526772,0.016535768,0.00012477134,0.00006117957,0.0001561493,0.00012790975,0.000046395344,0.0154255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965784,0.0018813217,0.00016479759,0.00047634743,0.00034276771,0.0005564603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96756715,0.024370752,0.0034418064,0.0018111785,0.001183709,0.0016253432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063863113,0.00071891677,0.0023610091,0.00086197635,0.0013658453,0.0034900166,0.002339939,0.0022244968,0.011764298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030195996,0.000957096,0.0012010838,0.0010808875,0.0029844262,0.005121629,0.0027131538,0.0022044017,0.0008754998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043285143,0.00021398264,0.0029846802,0.00012705987,0.00011833133,0.00042678352,0.00054909865,0.12703708,0.0014047745,0.85331,0.0020009293,0.011394394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014452939,0.00007007104,0.0006919841,0.000014476478,0.000037669102,0.00013529533,0.00019156073,0.28304982,0.00026732558,0.71428007,0.0010867397,0.000030379773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002792205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036581778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011764298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015463032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019034152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039355457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120877841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.611041","title":"Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.005997244464665632,"score_gpt":0.18595410057524678,"score_spread":0.17995685611058115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120877841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4517025,0.004629338,0.0029367104,0.02026371,0.0005109919,0.00004490183,0.00044205165,0.00007752764,0.51939225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96399915,0.00061067735,0.0001689905,0.0008903684,0.00015496515,0.000011225446,0.000042835323,0.000017954333,0.034103837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991153,0.00019373005,0.000037167163,0.00019236823,0.0001981435,0.00026327744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922504,0.0038267882,0.0015242182,0.00059941376,0.00057527155,0.0012239177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014864356,0.00015295841,0.0007727882,0.0010131173,0.0018872693,0.0029787333,0.00066639774,0.00087957055,0.04370543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012310564,0.00026639862,0.00024554218,0.00084835844,0.0021121858,0.0019293845,0.0016169377,0.0018225585,0.0015894882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006513569,0.00010685997,0.035504017,0.00014779942,0.00011602637,0.00090790784,0.002691574,0.0013777947,0.00085912016,0.8539485,0.04311352,0.060575563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072091474,0.00019166427,0.2906179,0.00028393214,0.00036633233,0.0014657499,0.0068613137,0.0051166774,0.0014037663,0.44078752,0.2520528,0.00013137412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10093357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19753055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10093357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003716744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018121031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20069212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122357416","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.3.298","title":"Fidelity Networks and Long-Run Trends in HIV/AIDS Gender Gaps","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Matching (statistics); Fidelity; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Virology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02998159220021788,"score_gpt":0.25314644514476126,"score_spread":0.22316485294454338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122357416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99179286,0.00063928525,0.0036930593,0.00096149155,0.000010132852,0.000008689144,0.00019761281,0.000009985781,0.0026868843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991954,0.00020570231,0.0001686416,0.000017171433,0.00000605401,0.0000041403596,0.000055650886,0.0000012999824,0.00034585875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998072,0.00008207342,0.000008279396,0.00003090884,0.000018344308,0.00005332578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942498,0.0028363352,0.0020760505,0.0002082043,0.00026803833,0.00036159751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013165778,0.00010220069,0.00020590606,0.0005500931,0.00037594038,0.0009573546,0.0003923465,0.0005966156,0.0034073647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010375723,0.00014752022,0.00025966924,0.00056651974,0.0006219361,0.001590402,0.0006340557,0.00064060785,0.00015682122],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048086254,0.00027120454,0.64050174,0.00015029305,0.00023186098,0.00047813437,0.0015881447,0.12971,0.0012568417,0.17837994,0.0038995007,0.043051574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073039155,0.00031337538,0.45442662,0.00012881603,0.00017715835,0.00039393423,0.0031702793,0.40427792,0.00071551284,0.13060454,0.0056624454,0.000056312325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008101091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009468658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009945409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027916755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01882708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122504181","doi":"","title":"Incomplete information and small cores in matching markets","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Singleton; Complete information; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Best response; Microeconomics; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematics; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.01002484689719594,"score_gpt":0.20043354792583648,"score_spread":0.19040870102864055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122504181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63036597,0.0006356308,0.35507753,0.0015563447,0.000032636337,0.00021938045,0.00018484525,0.00014143978,0.011786306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97889644,0.00023684105,0.018554118,0.00008837933,0.000065117325,0.00012204188,0.0000718621,0.00002151798,0.0019437327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944581,0.0030499091,0.00027232495,0.0007251271,0.0008406289,0.00065388565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476557,0.034033585,0.011202744,0.0030382944,0.0024290527,0.001640682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008794304,0.0005673389,0.002147509,0.0014459587,0.0012754106,0.0036190571,0.002180958,0.0023385165,0.004316423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050340764,0.0008315484,0.00094973226,0.0012005675,0.0034358434,0.007515879,0.0026602014,0.0018681154,0.00044497318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573612,0.00024330043,0.0036244036,0.00019496211,0.000087199594,0.0003957556,0.00080324756,0.0408001,0.0020864792,0.93318075,0.001016765,0.017209673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014876017,0.00011163149,0.00076936564,0.000032019794,0.00002188359,0.00014319886,0.0001966012,0.16929613,0.00088178425,0.82752603,0.000849014,0.000023491508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007596901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005040562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008794304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014415866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010797448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046509326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123904319","doi":"10.1007/s003550100124","title":"Efficient solutions to bargaining problems with uncertain disagreement points","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Rationality; Minimax; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Point (geometry); Bargaining problem; Mathematical optimization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Path (computing); Axiomatic system; Economics; Social choice theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.055522921491831044,"score_gpt":0.2305636843382545,"score_spread":0.17504076284642345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123904319","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05789046,0.00048792368,0.91935927,0.0018341192,0.000107611355,0.00017986826,0.00016512284,0.00010156385,0.01987401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900582,0.000918639,0.18792519,0.00031847387,0.00026647505,0.00091093226,0.00030963632,0.00014800823,0.019144408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960658,0.0024647727,0.00017054012,0.00038138768,0.00044300474,0.00047447174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479176,0.013035655,0.0008737997,0.00048668377,0.00042397308,0.000388236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063508474,0.0013668017,0.0027021861,0.0013987422,0.0016524744,0.0043302006,0.0037013823,0.0051572523,0.009832139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02900952,0.0016137932,0.0013294447,0.0018843845,0.0036827214,0.00482159,0.0029532306,0.0036100172,0.0008983069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011143873,0.0000986423,0.00016090792,0.000111972455,0.00004595419,0.000062288775,0.0002772836,0.211541,0.0004415382,0.7730674,0.0021168564,0.0119646825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000898949,0.000022754408,0.00004947684,0.000023513614,0.000010381062,0.000013243864,0.00007448179,0.2583377,0.00013395284,0.74056834,0.00066559674,0.000010532077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013035354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014252316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009832139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002134302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025117444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03358686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124268924","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01512.x","title":"Viewpoint: Decision‐making in committees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Voting; Information aggregation; Process (computing); Perfect information; Imperfect; Focus (optics); Quality (philosophy); Decision-making; Business decision mapping; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Business; Political science; Decision support system; Economics; Engineering; Data mining; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13586755932006936,"score_gpt":0.1974223866401813,"score_spread":0.06155482732011194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124268924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023350805,0.02255142,0.3252465,0.16055474,0.004631268,0.00018660129,0.00038072618,0.000203769,0.46289417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85697484,0.013133163,0.046587322,0.016654132,0.008564999,0.00038977325,0.00024974716,0.00013542114,0.05731053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98974085,0.006251358,0.00025578224,0.0012022041,0.0018801054,0.00066968915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908573,0.0057674837,0.0006541219,0.0009328552,0.001284242,0.00050399406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009249672,0.00058355514,0.0010416697,0.0010029342,0.0014301913,0.004566801,0.0020648618,0.005207564,0.01255477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016994053,0.00029807154,0.0010865203,0.0008958371,0.0069266786,0.005599672,0.0015025788,0.0048806,0.0025935685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074657974,0.000007123146,0.000041787072,0.0000366352,0.0000065540253,0.000011162625,0.00005173629,0.0014144273,0.000048242753,0.9922496,0.0033809366,0.002744423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015669682,0.0000116759675,0.00006275936,0.000047907768,0.000004519251,0.00001622492,0.00004108349,0.003098301,0.000107807085,0.9749281,0.021659978,0.000005911372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022688534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012050598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01255477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031798538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002498328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048917532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124372635","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.007","title":"Incomplete information and singleton cores in matching markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; European Regional Development Fund; Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Singleton; Matching (statistics); Complete information; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian probability; Bayesian game; Information asymmetry; Mechanism design; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Economics; Stochastic game; Computer science; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Repeated game; Statistics","score_opus":0.01157620871886893,"score_gpt":0.19466032380938705,"score_spread":0.1830841150905181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124372635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70645386,0.0011989423,0.25122273,0.0061864997,0.00015861457,0.00024398246,0.00042700852,0.00021921523,0.03388922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97976434,0.00041856265,0.013208602,0.00028262896,0.00020712095,0.00013207221,0.0001322522,0.000040564864,0.0058137504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631304,0.0019784677,0.000220712,0.0004773355,0.00047064415,0.00053974934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254424,0.056773126,0.008043687,0.003135603,0.0029501957,0.0036549962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009685458,0.0005961603,0.004775721,0.0018818349,0.0028014332,0.006366686,0.0032483095,0.004505216,0.010681778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06568511,0.0014671882,0.0013176384,0.0019909637,0.0054482413,0.011356252,0.0036242828,0.003232612,0.00063671684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023965337,0.00011871375,0.0009815996,0.000081195365,0.000030802094,0.00014770658,0.00032192652,0.008256161,0.00024995412,0.9825963,0.0015617843,0.005414232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065574895,0.000023714256,0.00017566886,0.000013413591,0.00000918615,0.00004694286,0.00008291863,0.028713327,0.00007192357,0.9705236,0.00026392154,0.000009823743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015390415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015480113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010681778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017914539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025041527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051222205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125561126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447952","title":"An Algorithm for the Proportional Division of Indivisible Items","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Mathematics; Division algorithm; Algorithm; Computer science; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.015400423767436982,"score_gpt":0.23448274509377978,"score_spread":0.2190823213263428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125561126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009600146,0.000121223246,0.9836574,0.0004531188,0.0001354062,0.00034934792,0.00022194874,0.0012458517,0.0042155217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07516723,0.00008697319,0.9171355,0.00020088436,0.00006331375,0.0005092228,0.00051640964,0.0002317176,0.006088775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961462,0.001101444,0.00036873083,0.0010036521,0.000925978,0.00045400736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341947,0.0035362693,0.00026400687,0.0015835066,0.00088395353,0.00031280544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038473525,0.0010814392,0.002121946,0.001753363,0.0021764257,0.0038217797,0.005280505,0.0035451336,0.021490116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015931161,0.0010519465,0.0017050431,0.0028529603,0.0016828736,0.005429129,0.0047794096,0.0029126075,0.00531317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080922886,0.00041094757,0.0012810853,0.00027767548,0.00011770624,0.00008639211,0.00044505956,0.059490956,0.0043823333,0.12755324,0.018941805,0.7862035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067501666,0.00019355198,0.00047055096,0.00007746204,0.000087158965,0.00026060373,0.00016293692,0.6650744,0.0044142124,0.31672782,0.011798357,0.000057987458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037116709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050903913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021490116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002364642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004793884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071891665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126346078","doi":"","title":"In Defense of Welfarism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.024009381481234576,"score_gpt":0.19901028844430887,"score_spread":0.1750009069630743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126346078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01348335,0.008471722,0.0039542955,0.123520374,0.004326817,0.00002709847,0.00019861215,0.000053611602,0.8459642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6867247,0.0034596936,0.0012239954,0.023495061,0.0028056544,0.00007642927,0.00020917079,0.0001172854,0.281888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977137,0.0009613263,0.00005491767,0.00035534185,0.00031971102,0.0005950292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981591,0.000623143,0.00020287796,0.00031506727,0.00036180843,0.00033798045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024754344,0.00039725172,0.00038294116,0.00096502743,0.005812482,0.0054372894,0.0009155374,0.0036938584,0.032029685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006591445,0.00013216454,0.00031603203,0.0009348081,0.00912882,0.0038510533,0.0036733358,0.004205797,0.0033650307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019838262,0.000005204152,0.00028966216,0.000022998174,0.0000029157477,0.000038558795,0.0019703337,0.000040247967,0.000028234335,0.9439447,0.043842062,0.009795295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014060579,0.000014688723,0.0011331978,0.00019023572,0.000005715331,0.000076696844,0.002743681,0.00015622539,0.0001374727,0.16025598,0.8352643,0.000007717335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016294122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032029685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003894493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026659323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10714996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126468482","doi":"","title":"Aggregation of Rankings: a Brief Review of Distance-based Rules and Loss Functions for the Expected Loss Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); sort; Inference; Class (philosophy); Statistical inference; Function (biology); Parametric statistics; Computer science; Preference; Mathematics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.04596666030695218,"score_gpt":0.27867760560894794,"score_spread":0.23271094530199576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126468482","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080264284,0.8787714,0.09969542,0.0021573368,0.00062896905,0.000083426516,0.00016816976,0.00011344122,0.017579269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016724816,0.8795034,0.09404374,0.0009218324,0.0022264349,0.00021785816,0.00032884793,0.00010755898,0.005925445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969867,0.0010421564,0.00037349487,0.00037383518,0.0011274192,0.0000964277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958617,0.0028797197,0.00026072678,0.00019142297,0.0007464087,0.000060087783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050052544,0.0016308095,0.0030113482,0.005607217,0.00067189196,0.0039527346,0.0024169383,0.0025193708,0.0038853975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068879086,0.0010373618,0.0013203758,0.0110856965,0.0024651624,0.0061319484,0.0012778078,0.003622539,0.003775514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000423497,0.00016088251,0.0005158498,0.0048911106,0.00014014663,0.00015794601,0.00021928547,0.009744935,0.00068740785,0.29347813,0.031797256,0.6581647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026316491,0.00017972586,0.0014664631,0.0030730339,0.00010313605,0.0010434588,0.00019171061,0.010073554,0.0007739566,0.28410444,0.6988353,0.00012894331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028463844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020429173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005607217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00240597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001714191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026470661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126616776","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401242026","title":"The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. By Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. 322p. $90.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Simple (philosophy); Presidential election; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Presidential system; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029619014260147694,"score_gpt":0.2798716266999759,"score_spread":0.2502526124398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126616776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025487863,0.88182515,0.02683365,0.04460879,0.0024695827,0.00008820134,0.0007169832,0.00019640676,0.040712394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1434436,0.76240236,0.034118436,0.010728422,0.004896514,0.00071219984,0.0011571273,0.00035515352,0.042186197],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918035,0.004571463,0.00055388553,0.0010745326,0.0017405918,0.00025596842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806533,0.01565949,0.0012059462,0.00095807656,0.0012024997,0.00032076583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013532251,0.0026242938,0.0028606115,0.0061154207,0.0013921281,0.006570842,0.0029057015,0.0044649853,0.017753778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04033859,0.002623177,0.00089533627,0.01384277,0.0159728,0.015504631,0.004670803,0.00403672,0.0075665955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010919534,0.00008446826,0.0050464985,0.0019801545,0.00021300407,0.000110795976,0.002306033,0.0022306833,0.00022127233,0.19202968,0.29399884,0.50166935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041511496,0.00007325402,0.009558696,0.002697593,0.000078784906,0.00042763405,0.0016232041,0.0023992832,0.00017266381,0.73109704,0.2517362,0.0000940864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011335211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011931026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017753778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037787042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018414143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071566224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127041951","doi":"10.1257/mic.20100029","title":"A Continuous-Time Model of Multilateral Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Limit (mathematics); Bargaining problem; Discrete time and continuous time; Markov perfect equilibrium; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Markov chain; Economics; Infinity; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03594184311080491,"score_gpt":0.22841829458885482,"score_spread":0.19247645147804993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127041951","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043776575,0.00042735448,0.9074181,0.0022470453,0.0001951473,0.00012499804,0.0004702217,0.00018072769,0.045159817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92280066,0.00039320078,0.049597893,0.00025784574,0.00012973745,0.000211998,0.00019946124,0.000034084274,0.026375096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982743,0.00071725436,0.00005425504,0.00031248637,0.00033246464,0.0003091328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973889,0.0013411825,0.00043813887,0.00025413116,0.0002281894,0.0003495207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021028107,0.0006228956,0.00094390917,0.00055399176,0.0007521761,0.0031992611,0.0037259117,0.002653847,0.014998748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006489708,0.00041914155,0.0008259282,0.0010277305,0.0019602487,0.0034846277,0.0014855037,0.0026769456,0.0014557033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004900103,0.00005713993,0.00025681124,0.00003411252,0.000019801342,0.00021836584,0.000108576576,0.2135762,0.00048651596,0.7796381,0.0012547895,0.004300586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004912212,0.00003719584,0.00011765324,0.000010781522,0.000009585079,0.000080481055,0.00004740329,0.7515331,0.00011217999,0.24495916,0.0030228852,0.000020505911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035414551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024372472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014998748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024443471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012747847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050175786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128536578","doi":"","title":"The Eeckhout Condition and the Subgame Perfect Implementation of Stable Matching","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Sequence (biology); Subgame; Mathematics; Stability (learning theory); Extensive-form game; Repeated game; Computer science; Game theory; Equilibrium selection; Statistics","score_opus":0.03285360322336085,"score_gpt":0.319244416640543,"score_spread":0.28639081341718214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128536578","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2457166,0.00021328521,0.6640516,0.0020462382,0.00008496102,0.00027597212,0.0002728191,0.00014193436,0.08719653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93265915,0.00034507134,0.05640193,0.00021354438,0.00006627654,0.00026234362,0.00014406124,0.00003754222,0.00987005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971234,0.0010105192,0.00016604978,0.0005788481,0.0005940735,0.00052699394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353045,0.0035242706,0.0012279962,0.0006833368,0.0006306761,0.0004032651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030934233,0.00050560135,0.0011133326,0.0007441534,0.0010353753,0.002294939,0.0012615552,0.0020212356,0.012680677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018312756,0.00054992666,0.00082663714,0.0011373097,0.0024191975,0.005827505,0.001992427,0.0018842394,0.0014538933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054184286,0.000057741723,0.00037904675,0.00004407168,0.000018439248,0.00012958527,0.00019420355,0.014372032,0.0011953067,0.9756885,0.00067649607,0.0071904473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006794584,0.00010603252,0.0002883291,0.000019640513,0.000014158732,0.00012676606,0.000117657786,0.09517738,0.0011321931,0.9004205,0.0025111916,0.000018246194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014417528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008937935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012680677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010776956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016725075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042421103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947347","doi":"10.5539/mas.v2n2p97","title":"The Stable Set and Weak Stable Set For -person Repeated Fuzzy Cooperative Games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Core (optical fiber); Fuzzy logic; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Missing data","score_opus":0.06569891168925356,"score_gpt":0.23916105867870235,"score_spread":0.17346214698944878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129947347","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13705616,0.00033316723,0.83493036,0.00061964104,0.000093612136,0.00020139509,0.0002226438,0.000082280305,0.026460689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799111,0.0005368656,0.10859391,0.00026036883,0.00013438027,0.0005909356,0.0003278423,0.000036911184,0.009607637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978387,0.0006771764,0.00016553274,0.00038293545,0.00067753624,0.0002581496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772376,0.00078693137,0.00027620874,0.00017027327,0.0007922661,0.0002506364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023014182,0.00064082065,0.0008880397,0.0014146086,0.0014295494,0.001953787,0.0010755069,0.001081487,0.004021342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066153957,0.00024039912,0.0011678098,0.0010503278,0.0021924784,0.0044535645,0.0018610283,0.001624138,0.0005507693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032426986,0.000026921169,0.00035625065,0.000037035286,0.000017156433,0.000068516725,0.0003523061,0.0047116033,0.0013458839,0.98292196,0.00044641847,0.009683537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025090832,0.00007562315,0.00038935876,0.000022529059,0.000014461329,0.00012575854,0.00015506716,0.058033396,0.00084627187,0.9373691,0.0029132254,0.000030111982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011256653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085169176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004021342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012391047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015773741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013452768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130803293","doi":"","title":"House Allocation via Deferred-Acceptance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahier de recherche","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Rationality; Truncation (statistics); Monotonic function; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.20454620346820657,"score_gpt":0.3063175595874251,"score_spread":0.10177135611921856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130803293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18678671,0.00022220834,0.8028215,0.0004888406,0.000064330954,0.00011293342,0.00009244172,0.0002741563,0.009136932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315724,0.000103839586,0.062060457,0.00010291689,0.00005002283,0.000071792434,0.000083609986,0.000039419454,0.0059156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996636,0.0017279487,0.00011160599,0.0005396722,0.0005390525,0.0004458028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926715,0.003819199,0.00088840746,0.0014880012,0.00065912126,0.00047378795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003831832,0.00052478164,0.0011427418,0.00054092886,0.00062190293,0.0015202912,0.0024393478,0.0011954585,0.003483083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013309835,0.00042172844,0.0008715957,0.0006344519,0.001568127,0.0021728715,0.0011413406,0.0015029545,0.00055021764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000563884,0.00037873577,0.0031627363,0.00015915243,0.00011510723,0.0003397766,0.00055793195,0.355722,0.0053388537,0.54575264,0.002927609,0.08498162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001142902,0.00014996166,0.0003652828,0.000011392961,0.000022597142,0.000082711325,0.000043288703,0.7659447,0.0014381664,0.22981177,0.0019950431,0.00002081651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024715178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020615463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003831832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011919609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010179984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020264924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131710566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.545263","title":"Value of Information Gained from Data Mining in the Context of Information Sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Value of information; Value (mathematics); Data science; Data sharing; Business; Computer science; Data mining; Geography; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02507237177107897,"score_gpt":0.22600556073509395,"score_spread":0.200933188964015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131710566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77037024,0.006633116,0.13022736,0.02530627,0.0004138212,0.00017804619,0.00082358473,0.00014578819,0.06590172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952916,0.00047884783,0.0031653184,0.00015044167,0.00013815644,0.000012643601,0.000056508943,0.000013296381,0.0006933218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887024,0.007109229,0.0005306867,0.00090513617,0.0020801013,0.0006722822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8186594,0.15579,0.007078075,0.010372418,0.005295897,0.002804273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016957594,0.0007441094,0.001406667,0.0030221876,0.0011025864,0.0074605127,0.0016167121,0.004504927,0.003836613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106891856,0.00045786117,0.0006811461,0.0031615233,0.0024613629,0.011841537,0.0032339783,0.0027841919,0.00035547063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004105836,0.00087816705,0.05826552,0.0011605567,0.0012450396,0.0018643822,0.0022680939,0.14572006,0.00520567,0.5838961,0.00460242,0.19078818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012947929,0.0007737423,0.010026337,0.00028697704,0.0004370914,0.00070446805,0.0011731313,0.1765028,0.0029842444,0.8032549,0.003630528,0.000096325966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054565066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006418704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016957594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020944763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015355729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08968139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131830370","doi":"","title":"Relative Egalitarianism and Related Criteria","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Characterization (materials science); Preference; Social choice theory; Von Neumann architecture; Mathematics; Economics; Welfare economics; Microeconomics; Pure mathematics; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.009372784815962777,"score_gpt":0.16826176887632346,"score_spread":0.1588889840603607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131830370","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09094682,0.0011222222,0.783653,0.0039436556,0.0002197488,0.00019512924,0.00034423426,0.0001777382,0.119397424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7556715,0.0005633793,0.22746275,0.00073523266,0.00031084035,0.0002993202,0.0002861758,0.00010193477,0.014568865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718137,0.0056647323,0.0009240872,0.0017803959,0.0034029926,0.0010465109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866606,0.0060591483,0.0017688024,0.002284557,0.0025412973,0.0006857123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01154573,0.0008091886,0.0013971553,0.003858969,0.0029421132,0.004939131,0.0022837482,0.0019721857,0.0069415956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026873434,0.00041559935,0.0014758018,0.0046494794,0.0075932397,0.007876472,0.0034898624,0.0028828704,0.0008722055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008290466,0.00000791324,0.00015242722,0.0000143293555,0.00001119899,0.000014605373,0.000097013275,0.0018358883,0.00007077021,0.99283123,0.00031486186,0.0046414207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005850536,0.000010073904,0.00013016879,0.000010386877,0.000005272409,0.00001681183,0.00004511277,0.0046262643,0.00013368626,0.99313873,0.0018709354,0.000006679419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018231483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021894304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01154573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002912893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016263716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06106043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132053184","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.975514","title":"Sharing a Polluted River Network","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.016420746724763034,"score_gpt":0.21491373780732587,"score_spread":0.19849299108256283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132053184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8189263,0.00008107442,0.14978676,0.0015767047,0.00006224467,0.00012948949,0.00027837817,0.00017534636,0.028983636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865502,0.00003970505,0.0050384896,0.000063266256,0.000014380353,0.00003685941,0.000041735326,0.000014121027,0.008201246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854624,0.00061325775,0.00007596726,0.00032394385,0.00020273669,0.00023787735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517435,0.00201646,0.00064518687,0.0013122831,0.00034157396,0.00051026995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015835334,0.00026546002,0.00093927997,0.0006317331,0.0011632278,0.0028510643,0.0016272815,0.0031169725,0.013208755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00774258,0.00039638547,0.0006951864,0.0008819309,0.0013413758,0.004202244,0.0021919862,0.0010035106,0.0010707832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011425526,0.00054984045,0.022331078,0.00020472807,0.0004604783,0.0021583925,0.0012173745,0.29250872,0.010073601,0.61073416,0.006728719,0.051890396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017408968,0.00032427604,0.003476691,0.000023047689,0.00015879206,0.00035939505,0.0010935453,0.54631025,0.0018142406,0.4373807,0.008801083,0.00008391119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020461865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026962275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013208755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008370158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008409134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044187665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133509071","doi":"10.1007/s10107-014-0854-1","title":"Finding small stabilizers for unstable graphs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Vertex (graph theory); Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Discrete mathematics; Independent set; Induced subgraph; Graph; Chordal graph; Computer science","score_opus":0.06825843278489932,"score_gpt":0.24749230820121987,"score_spread":0.17923387541632055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133509071","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33865488,0.00039357092,0.65003014,0.0011763516,0.000071511626,0.00012643207,0.00022278175,0.00029850236,0.009025845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448975,0.00030319326,0.045890797,0.00016783873,0.00010745265,0.00021585186,0.0003154416,0.00017856188,0.007923314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928325,0.0003342396,0.00002276404,0.0001870617,0.000084921514,0.00008782201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98127705,0.015500876,0.0012596895,0.0005216042,0.0006114182,0.0008292642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012913635,0.001136832,0.0015341969,0.002241686,0.001510241,0.0026347572,0.001513617,0.0018002893,0.0062830565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015853409,0.0009984238,0.00095879677,0.0009877731,0.0025800045,0.0029331972,0.0019780272,0.002533077,0.0005187691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026059488,0.00016829699,0.002951484,0.00023805971,0.00013659164,0.00028098497,0.0006312543,0.16725418,0.007125974,0.79791987,0.0057300236,0.017302701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041378684,0.000036944006,0.0002794789,0.000017487517,0.000019563005,0.000028894112,0.00014501982,0.35704094,0.000825962,0.6410422,0.00050740084,0.000014731218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015068493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001948138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062830565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011118101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007438556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021018863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133729570","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Ordering Infinite Utility Streams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Axiom; Anonymity; Utilitarianism; Impossibility; Pareto principle; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.011669988858276265,"score_gpt":0.1650448500505162,"score_spread":0.15337486119223992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133729570","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14459625,0.00039997694,0.8039812,0.0018917021,0.000107743996,0.00006939334,0.0002932833,0.00025683953,0.0484036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082908,0.00033553643,0.082163565,0.00021158103,0.00012444578,0.00013895606,0.0002394899,0.00006058141,0.008435124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950159,0.0020362167,0.0003297905,0.00079410145,0.0013263586,0.00049765495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707354,0.008227989,0.001053729,0.0018705825,0.0010902492,0.0006839948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040473486,0.00044654476,0.0006100159,0.0010587939,0.0017206012,0.0040170564,0.0011780503,0.0011278527,0.0052024117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016308796,0.0004817151,0.0009528143,0.0011645078,0.004249005,0.009766585,0.0032372044,0.0028311266,0.0005243896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003593775,0.00001704485,0.00029262822,0.000023324803,0.0000051615334,0.00007063405,0.00014022148,0.002536911,0.0004035665,0.99037594,0.00024314183,0.005855568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015628513,0.000023352442,0.000110641704,0.000016740503,0.0000063163393,0.00010005372,0.00008404873,0.011393834,0.0008722356,0.98355746,0.0038033144,0.000016364473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006181175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006796029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052024117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013830344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013023347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021404684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134895573","doi":"10.1007/pl00004217","title":"Rationalizable variable-population choice functions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematical economics; Variable (mathematics); Separable space; Population; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Choice function; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03192332397233759,"score_gpt":0.1993347192442331,"score_spread":0.16741139527189552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134895573","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07108872,0.0002980087,0.89530015,0.0027989119,0.000080060156,0.00012308132,0.00033723144,0.00018866468,0.029785166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038744,0.0006284988,0.071965665,0.0004128582,0.00016806295,0.0004155754,0.00032102523,0.000063034306,0.022150882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963103,0.002523096,0.00009271358,0.00040932905,0.00032952678,0.00033496146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891368,0.0083476445,0.0006502336,0.0009509178,0.00066281867,0.00025171967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042289663,0.0009802404,0.001544366,0.0010466708,0.00082203967,0.0037320287,0.002288745,0.0030901073,0.0110809505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01844428,0.00055528915,0.0008919159,0.0011437932,0.0031575705,0.006015847,0.001197157,0.002515448,0.0011133496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142675935,0.000021069294,0.00021029636,0.00001587731,0.000012987423,0.000023851788,0.0000636291,0.014332873,0.000110080335,0.9818642,0.0006221144,0.002708689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002448159,0.000007956624,0.00013057787,0.0000065292047,0.000006792556,0.000017125214,0.000035636334,0.078598484,0.000081180246,0.9202815,0.0008019342,0.000007748294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022526102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023856596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110809505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022497291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001081284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0370695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135240641","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807439","title":"Transshipment prices and pair-wise stability in coordinating the decentralized transshipment problem","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Transshipment (information security); Computer science; Production (economics); Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Matching (statistics); Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.030688248977159903,"score_gpt":0.21519273800696861,"score_spread":0.1845044890298087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135240641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20793982,0.00015103118,0.78291744,0.0005406667,0.0000273232,0.00014420625,0.00009284613,0.000048582966,0.008138056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429663,0.000117705524,0.053716682,0.0000448342,0.0000257254,0.00017478646,0.0000677913,0.000028044888,0.0028581666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980446,0.0010015977,0.0000920504,0.00039585156,0.00025383328,0.00021209677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947515,0.0032820394,0.00081179745,0.00032311777,0.00045517957,0.00037635263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00266384,0.00049370807,0.0010181905,0.000477384,0.0008458324,0.0014642166,0.001118858,0.0012368642,0.004103981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011677931,0.0003321983,0.0005971674,0.0006764124,0.0016899431,0.002914544,0.0014426502,0.0013789928,0.0003231372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002264924,0.00011781341,0.0026300917,0.000109678425,0.00009208813,0.0003225664,0.00043002536,0.4277665,0.003928418,0.53682846,0.0013044905,0.026243417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006383825,0.0001584291,0.00055716303,0.000011166259,0.000020397414,0.000110415436,0.000135819,0.73387057,0.0012772839,0.26290902,0.0008602144,0.000025762061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087105605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052901637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004103981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000800917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008375125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014087856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135391209","doi":"10.1057/9780230236769_9","title":"Intertemporal Social Evaluation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfarism; Social Welfare; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social choice theory; Computer science; Social welfare function; Economics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Political science","score_opus":0.10935414230228907,"score_gpt":0.27860501618116057,"score_spread":0.1692508738788715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135391209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007148692,0.0023991063,0.20767713,0.0038661016,0.00023476008,0.00018816393,0.000356529,0.00011668711,0.7780129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6640797,0.003919135,0.11876415,0.001284181,0.00036807367,0.00075918064,0.0006572758,0.00018580079,0.20998253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996102,0.001979188,0.00015378157,0.00048813692,0.0010461954,0.00023084908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826694,0.00068894133,0.00011226084,0.00033909926,0.00046576554,0.00012703799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042306534,0.0010526573,0.0007135879,0.0017645025,0.0017477376,0.0046298127,0.0009038368,0.0018410096,0.01814775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004876646,0.00028520045,0.00077891425,0.0017992706,0.0047945026,0.00551379,0.0029626866,0.0019774155,0.0019825094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043742516,0.000007053409,0.000041145526,0.000018072575,0.0000055534647,0.00000751191,0.00007720387,0.0007548373,0.00006044293,0.9892267,0.0013552158,0.008441742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004629104,0.000014448612,0.00012687895,0.000050223607,0.00000635458,0.000029451676,0.00009618745,0.0030189755,0.00015034463,0.95209295,0.044402704,0.000006978781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020677685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022360352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01814775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064017735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023794465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06071025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136577698","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2290795","title":"Two-Sided Matchings: An Algorithm for Ensuring They are Minimax and Pareto-Optimal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.016063574430842855,"score_gpt":0.22156189994081643,"score_spread":0.20549832550997357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136577698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012010856,0.00008300952,0.98307955,0.00036611236,0.00005563511,0.00035124805,0.00013394112,0.000767549,0.003152045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13314907,0.00007012035,0.8617339,0.000302912,0.00004807013,0.00070613454,0.0003364477,0.0003713111,0.0032820555],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935364,0.0028443038,0.00047569865,0.0012596715,0.0012572124,0.0006267508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974859,0.016865358,0.0014454912,0.0036184785,0.002399565,0.0008121918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143406615,0.0018126586,0.003120943,0.0031079326,0.0024247572,0.0030712117,0.0054938085,0.0062299096,0.009727171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054337587,0.0019094488,0.0020508168,0.0028838592,0.0031178584,0.006707722,0.006397022,0.0049245753,0.0026728662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013890701,0.0004944722,0.0023028,0.00043093227,0.00024949908,0.00013368083,0.00086324126,0.4385712,0.0050455816,0.19802278,0.01541958,0.33707708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000316785,0.0001375177,0.00017123314,0.0000786886,0.00004239316,0.00005899105,0.00007911616,0.8451562,0.0021538904,0.14931078,0.0024631685,0.000031244632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014989368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018370583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143406615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002244089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005023654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075841546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137333732","doi":"10.1109/infcom.2011.5935232","title":"Seen as stable marriages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Closing (real estate); Computer science; Game theory; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Function (biology); Transferable utility; Management science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.0807555906832923,"score_gpt":0.20198757808955958,"score_spread":0.12123198740626728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137333732","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10004507,0.0015075974,0.5058189,0.0042277947,0.0009620313,0.00058755156,0.0008824081,0.00073286524,0.3852358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8060413,0.001142646,0.10862031,0.0016162449,0.0003507986,0.0007566151,0.00083157973,0.00029451988,0.08034596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675214,0.0010953282,0.00015924465,0.00089871575,0.0004686866,0.00062600017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997382,0.0006494564,0.0003834503,0.00073617016,0.00036018115,0.00048882334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017154776,0.00046916408,0.0010089154,0.0013739531,0.0059575043,0.0049678683,0.0016198409,0.002801179,0.03799326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075195474,0.0005725498,0.0010897523,0.0017999866,0.0050445,0.007057537,0.00490112,0.002337867,0.00529826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013616722,0.00001181997,0.00021266361,0.000014638538,0.000009219283,0.00009480161,0.0003878113,0.00042871095,0.0001781571,0.99143124,0.0014819507,0.005735413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015629947,0.000013542261,0.00013241309,0.00001731028,0.000007000385,0.00013038085,0.00032950516,0.0024660022,0.00013013005,0.97250867,0.024239942,0.0000093687295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015035135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001720575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03799326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011493592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011084846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12710011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137656620","doi":"10.1145/1807342.1807385","title":"The unavailable candidate model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Social choice theory; Computer science; Voting; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Representation (politics); Outcome (game theory); Majority rule; Simple (philosophy); Aggregation problem; Greedy algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.019929405418093387,"score_gpt":0.20364296299150797,"score_spread":0.1837135575734146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137656620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050218698,0.0008467391,0.8756984,0.0054003894,0.00021682648,0.0001738086,0.00082075456,0.0002740016,0.066350505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86183757,0.0006316396,0.10242758,0.0007938388,0.00028283824,0.00037093973,0.0005544674,0.00010574992,0.03299533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616665,0.0018095628,0.0001284212,0.0006073729,0.00083784445,0.00045017665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942116,0.0030825536,0.0005638955,0.0011112643,0.00056051667,0.00047016167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035594313,0.0005636984,0.0013526987,0.0010599191,0.0017980379,0.002729471,0.0032490904,0.002968464,0.016418565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119618075,0.00043972113,0.0011390825,0.0014800337,0.0032222178,0.004701011,0.002479809,0.0030450558,0.0021868444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009227779,0.000040010378,0.00047287185,0.000059145656,0.000027840262,0.0002597242,0.0001601974,0.04651918,0.00033166827,0.94081324,0.003881226,0.0073425956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006010788,0.00006514855,0.0002091337,0.000029150327,0.000021633678,0.00018268662,0.00011592164,0.31659725,0.00024081841,0.67173606,0.010716277,0.000025787711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002878426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016418565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001409424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001959799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05492562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137713285","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414193","title":"Negotiation characteristics in brownfield redevelopment projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Waterloo; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Redevelopment; Negotiation; Environmental planning; Business; Damages; Process (computing); Government (linguistics); Civil engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.042523003317933634,"score_gpt":0.22215919510161372,"score_spread":0.1796361917836801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137713285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706386,0.00013994651,0.00669215,0.0002383876,0.000010087946,0.00017887948,0.000032744818,0.000016634449,0.022052633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701047,0.00004134012,0.0009490621,0.000010435328,0.000003220387,0.000055060027,0.000024829787,0.0000058477794,0.0018998012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431545,0.0034218123,0.00030524455,0.00037268034,0.0009617952,0.0006230267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580792,0.03313139,0.004700156,0.00065971696,0.0017365231,0.0016930707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069663054,0.00016138077,0.00044182324,0.001115095,0.0020718577,0.0031864054,0.0007474975,0.0008765077,0.007998536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04545205,0.0002465333,0.0002411061,0.0011614807,0.001204419,0.0024804145,0.0016960503,0.0008849023,0.0005609882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047478196,0.0021146473,0.3801485,0.0005059552,0.00021955557,0.008386768,0.06245127,0.10165196,0.013575202,0.21630968,0.0049076662,0.20498088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091427,0.0018871005,0.3402343,0.00023890975,0.00012328551,0.0021615946,0.13016811,0.36148638,0.0075580413,0.1157626,0.03965329,0.00031714034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033526649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022141638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007998536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017264591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009590521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03684181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137788969","doi":"","title":"RATIONAL CHOICE ON ARBITRARY DOMAINS: A COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Rationalization (economics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04952519008829365,"score_gpt":0.262016740398584,"score_spread":0.21249155031029038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137788969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04159875,0.03452851,0.7529861,0.01143567,0.00031754328,0.00012943575,0.00040559212,0.00013163353,0.15846686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575913,0.030914778,0.093658574,0.0013696747,0.0019369308,0.0004893647,0.00046425886,0.00009853394,0.013476615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945017,0.0025710664,0.0003918434,0.0007480231,0.0013531019,0.00043437438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892988,0.0073008076,0.0007666091,0.0015155401,0.0008309897,0.00028733906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072003263,0.0010750132,0.0017447685,0.0041601616,0.0016894242,0.0052999714,0.0016902367,0.0029181784,0.0036037967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009837182,0.00076994934,0.0022202155,0.0063155256,0.010307089,0.010180588,0.0028231994,0.0050503523,0.000542701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026077591,0.00000651725,0.00007463038,0.000041468997,0.0000074880722,0.00002833109,0.00005545498,0.0014368163,0.00004068883,0.9953809,0.0003134281,0.002611668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004695654,0.000008298315,0.00011159051,0.000043543714,0.0000067481556,0.000043885153,0.000033772776,0.005287654,0.00006500902,0.98881835,0.0055702375,0.000006208528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016408851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092989823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072003263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002653288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013213357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03807944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138689521","doi":"10.1257/mic.5.2.99","title":"Preference Signaling in Matching Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Air Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Welfare; Mechanism (biology); Value (mathematics); Matching (statistics); Preference; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.021852197636305568,"score_gpt":0.20654216626446914,"score_spread":0.18468996862816356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138689521","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45315132,0.0008389275,0.47190022,0.0058324486,0.00018181081,0.00039608788,0.0005082625,0.00039212272,0.0667987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97560704,0.00027713738,0.018377965,0.00041871687,0.00009339638,0.00011560707,0.000074020914,0.00001754148,0.005018535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576485,0.002415313,0.00019413228,0.00047468863,0.000532481,0.00061858306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886541,0.006827068,0.0019712048,0.0013404025,0.0005795784,0.0006277157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453354,0.000443542,0.0011734315,0.0006121108,0.0013016843,0.0029281364,0.0012781516,0.00304706,0.013732572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025548749,0.00044835877,0.00081471587,0.0010033513,0.0020617514,0.004584767,0.0015020896,0.0018912652,0.0011779817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016800137,0.00013022464,0.0017062479,0.00009889891,0.000034099405,0.00015328446,0.00027490346,0.018351987,0.0019062257,0.9537977,0.0018742891,0.021504216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013793126,0.00007214194,0.00066049845,0.000018497498,0.000020630137,0.000089177236,0.00013387957,0.083821364,0.00056354713,0.9116832,0.0027770672,0.000021913324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010494316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000661525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013732572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013339854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001157024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04594004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141263345","doi":"10.1007/s003550000067","title":"Core in a simple coalition formation game","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Separable space; Class (philosophy); Stochastic game; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08584522714990465,"score_gpt":0.27647019621444513,"score_spread":0.19062496906454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141263345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6143398,0.00022855069,0.34637955,0.001290635,0.0000548508,0.00030450313,0.00024337634,0.00014668032,0.037012063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96546435,0.00014321558,0.023183772,0.000120226854,0.00003402317,0.00021637016,0.00010894789,0.000033438944,0.010695672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812824,0.0010759257,0.00007565514,0.00022626747,0.00022314586,0.0002708101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992677,0.0051171533,0.0006388309,0.00044584888,0.0003952195,0.0007259868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028559174,0.0006867733,0.0017053589,0.00092412444,0.0012268663,0.0027421778,0.0018598789,0.002035467,0.005430522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011449454,0.00054113124,0.0007291527,0.0008232339,0.0028112426,0.004159191,0.0023462388,0.0014408674,0.00041905424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024086078,0.00016154598,0.00074928877,0.00008611703,0.000049342798,0.0001245675,0.00040046914,0.04690665,0.001347535,0.9416077,0.0012097879,0.0071161184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010959084,0.00007682162,0.00032622906,0.000014196566,0.00002273389,0.000059703347,0.0001207629,0.23543797,0.00029041656,0.7625813,0.00094494014,0.000015296924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028426624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026626037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005430522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015821325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0181669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142843716","doi":"","title":"The Discursive Dilemma and Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Proposition; Dilemma; Probabilistic logic; Jury; Mathematical economics; Valuation (finance); Aggregate (composite); Truth value; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0266169856520494,"score_gpt":0.17908824013367883,"score_spread":0.15247125448162943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142843716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13309328,0.0028678551,0.69775575,0.022318024,0.000357047,0.0004424375,0.00042785858,0.00014017957,0.14259759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88016665,0.00061596814,0.11013146,0.00090704,0.00037750648,0.00051686395,0.00021679544,0.000036060832,0.007031615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95707595,0.028788436,0.00211985,0.0034854487,0.007122212,0.0014080673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547655,0.032942604,0.0041394224,0.0042394535,0.0025223696,0.0013906467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03207156,0.0008747844,0.0017229199,0.0026108427,0.0032647762,0.008181376,0.0028115832,0.003793059,0.0051210946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0784364,0.0007976822,0.0012511606,0.002347517,0.0122952545,0.010048991,0.005789148,0.004020215,0.0005776687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036689442,0.000019373367,0.00034709118,0.00004173058,0.000023343526,0.00007744522,0.00061287027,0.005083622,0.000102368766,0.98417246,0.0009137573,0.008569217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016081933,0.000006416723,0.00010346461,0.000013961025,0.000004202022,0.000031188873,0.00008799756,0.0116454605,0.00006106899,0.9864674,0.0015557318,0.000007014054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020207393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001151155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03207156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044760564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024649021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16961265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143362857","doi":"10.1109/aamas.2004.74","title":"Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Coalition Formation under Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Certainty; Core (optical fiber); Bayesian probability; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03862522706976329,"score_gpt":0.23718290842917858,"score_spread":0.1985576813594153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143362857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015175822,0.0004105406,0.9783076,0.0007432711,0.00004742069,0.00005718478,0.00005464588,0.00015105862,0.005052465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8378596,0.0007760888,0.15584564,0.00021827966,0.00013478327,0.00037621747,0.00015677253,0.000068487985,0.0045642187],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770314,0.0013217296,0.00008809721,0.00031480356,0.00039210042,0.00018003737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918355,0.006048022,0.0007012808,0.00040226028,0.00063394057,0.0003790564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043738354,0.0008820389,0.0015561315,0.00072770915,0.0008436462,0.0013833367,0.0017808769,0.0016137902,0.0036210935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019013483,0.00046249467,0.0006753332,0.0007076818,0.002496869,0.003082048,0.0018302491,0.0025567939,0.0005249662],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010175344,0.00006983801,0.000965094,0.000111895715,0.00007037871,0.00007391539,0.00020900025,0.6531241,0.0005497026,0.30977815,0.0015188389,0.033427287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025626976,0.000021228394,0.000101107005,0.000011012862,0.000008810542,0.000010061926,0.000014264906,0.80935615,0.00011603135,0.18963559,0.0006908444,0.00000927055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052266275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00410579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052266275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027718276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019419554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023131311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143947913","doi":"","title":"(Minimal) e-Incentive Compatible Competitive Equilibria in Economies with Indivisibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahier de recherche","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Competitive equilibrium; Microeconomics; Incentive compatibility; Incentive; Mathematical economics; Budget constraint","score_opus":0.21523562304632568,"score_gpt":0.32053494820737577,"score_spread":0.10529932516105009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143947913","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3675802,0.00037548933,0.5773119,0.0015725524,0.000039380844,0.0003132499,0.00026984344,0.0001309073,0.052406438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9056564,0.00023491337,0.088529915,0.00021699803,0.000024724388,0.00044460312,0.000098738004,0.000023106535,0.004770503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757344,0.0011888788,0.00016414264,0.0003384175,0.00040940032,0.00032574314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956594,0.0024075191,0.0008991597,0.00033230227,0.00036087068,0.0003407186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026026703,0.00063807453,0.0009229419,0.0006912882,0.00089712045,0.0025242632,0.0013377673,0.0019434227,0.003872252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009056061,0.00044141826,0.0007170745,0.00081711676,0.0022623162,0.0032323909,0.0018960446,0.0013050559,0.0004959549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011771494,0.00012343786,0.00050450396,0.000102491904,0.000043457978,0.00009634046,0.00018210342,0.035348684,0.0027095939,0.9500384,0.00067093474,0.010062338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015851612,0.000082459315,0.00030793162,0.000028265224,0.00001348999,0.000071126015,0.00009899791,0.116166845,0.0013040598,0.8798536,0.0018904392,0.0000242881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010377122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013647407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003872252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001421158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011524315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013764381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144766726","doi":"10.1287/moor.27.4.647.307","title":"Cost Allocation for a Tree Network with Heterogeneous Customers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Game tree; Tree (set theory); Shapley value; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Cost allocation; Computer science; Cooperative game theory; Graph; Combinatorics; Game theory; Sequential game; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.24337469006307053,"score_gpt":0.3435405823925388,"score_spread":0.10016589232946829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144766726","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17197634,0.00014060289,0.8146402,0.00044874268,0.000035387075,0.00017043125,0.00016172833,0.00009558849,0.012330996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8033618,0.0003266997,0.1877854,0.000115883704,0.00003882999,0.00026812195,0.00024971488,0.000086177104,0.0077674687],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992632,0.00026890583,0.000024886389,0.00014878955,0.000114855095,0.00017934424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988176,0.0007303321,0.00011855404,0.00007582272,0.000099567136,0.00015802842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009861441,0.00082063593,0.00079875847,0.000611946,0.0008676328,0.0014980272,0.0015832417,0.0010498081,0.004953626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032682288,0.00039007768,0.0007976286,0.0009102456,0.0011005402,0.0030099242,0.0014832994,0.0011831243,0.00033379486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023482199,0.00013099948,0.00070855144,0.00011992046,0.000039396582,0.00030246278,0.0002269477,0.7180618,0.003788841,0.2531061,0.0020986348,0.021181507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016888507,0.000039229228,0.00014850107,0.0000065097274,0.000011484934,0.00005333404,0.00007533631,0.93524134,0.0005758097,0.06283939,0.0009840792,0.000008079674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039315866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033420573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004953626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023846284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092080265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017301798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145365446","doi":"","title":"Maximal Decompositions of Cost Games into Specific and Joint Costs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Marginal cost; Joint (building); Mathematical economics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03449669701773585,"score_gpt":0.219522130091668,"score_spread":0.18502543307393216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145365446","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1852551,0.0008398494,0.7644034,0.0007340567,0.0000583352,0.00028190855,0.0010266952,0.00026122716,0.047139376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8349571,0.0007394427,0.14422348,0.00017271696,0.00011820561,0.00056733226,0.0012705483,0.00025210893,0.017698985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964089,0.0011900648,0.0003121015,0.0007136628,0.0006929863,0.000682277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922895,0.0041938745,0.0010514297,0.00084344106,0.00057112105,0.0010505505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003447834,0.001438158,0.0018720102,0.002492379,0.0010986086,0.004907154,0.0018185584,0.0011814896,0.010011552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013630295,0.0012556005,0.0021945648,0.0018307205,0.0022818053,0.0074970573,0.0028152072,0.0027148745,0.00056361244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009445553,0.000043094333,0.001044335,0.00014504045,0.00005959764,0.00005117725,0.0003366968,0.046303853,0.0007987052,0.9334736,0.0018673235,0.015782151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028668752,0.00003148905,0.000847208,0.000049031238,0.000041817864,0.00005521938,0.00014907755,0.12669514,0.00052702613,0.86902624,0.0025271368,0.000021866563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026567348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038683529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010011552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036229522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019014222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03349197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145394968","doi":"10.1007/s11238-005-6849-x","title":"Maximal-Element Rationalizability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Transitive relation; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Rationality; Relation (database); Maximal element; Mathematical economics; Completeness (order theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027765605949643366,"score_gpt":0.2512401148187992,"score_spread":0.22347450886915585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145394968","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10068754,0.0014493058,0.5113169,0.011126584,0.00042120003,0.00019589245,0.0006325374,0.0005004398,0.37366962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92963564,0.0007155226,0.031438697,0.0009836514,0.0004997841,0.00028302803,0.00043362853,0.00013992716,0.035870142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996293,0.0013463531,0.00022581677,0.0009787083,0.00070666434,0.0004494954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215215,0.004656858,0.0003282194,0.001359359,0.0011663197,0.0003371247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031207292,0.0009886232,0.0022386878,0.0014644071,0.0023127242,0.00454491,0.0018763657,0.0021356998,0.01573821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010693545,0.0007126205,0.0017379962,0.0014215473,0.005652027,0.00807829,0.0034527509,0.004628176,0.0019485108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039682,0.000009502683,0.00005186115,0.000017641752,0.00000780374,0.000007994128,0.00009102748,0.00036908963,0.000084626736,0.996988,0.0006637749,0.001698374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000445692,0.0000019432612,0.00002202208,0.000003363394,0.0000026011544,0.000005744491,0.000018444287,0.00082459726,0.000047444017,0.99843067,0.0006372781,0.0000015628008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007597364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01573821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017855631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012048595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052649617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150736298","doi":"10.1007/s00182-012-0356-4","title":"Contractually stable networks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; State University of New York; Northwestern University; Concordia University; Université Paris-Sud; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Unanimity; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Operations research; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024527264487646003,"score_gpt":0.2388360905801483,"score_spread":0.2143088260925023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150736298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29755625,0.0005662959,0.5209717,0.005075506,0.00031799785,0.00038518498,0.0016621744,0.00080670696,0.17265813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146845,0.0004945138,0.037446793,0.00042306617,0.00021489846,0.00034363018,0.001015428,0.00016191573,0.045215126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982476,0.00048596557,0.000092006376,0.0005542046,0.0003895195,0.00023074524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887792,0.004783222,0.0012157661,0.002160579,0.0017860619,0.0012751841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014222405,0.00046202497,0.0009880239,0.0016130873,0.0030135035,0.0045427834,0.0017632666,0.0023275022,0.020919923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140123665,0.0005334253,0.00054139947,0.0013194631,0.0026598487,0.0069855666,0.002346924,0.0022299911,0.0027215327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004483301,0.000029323968,0.00031036432,0.000020102852,0.000009533199,0.000057113182,0.0001181072,0.0020424405,0.00058369944,0.9890407,0.0020805204,0.005663326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024246134,0.000015281246,0.00023803115,0.000011484311,0.0000085582315,0.0000845898,0.000093190334,0.017558215,0.00040650935,0.9756547,0.0058967043,0.000008603156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011062662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013118496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020919923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014222615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001399567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06998408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152684625","doi":"","title":"Large elections with multiple alternatives: a Condorcet Jury Theorem and inefficient equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; State (computer science); Jury; Economics; Microeconomics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Algorithm","score_opus":0.035991428376916004,"score_gpt":0.24214132311234696,"score_spread":0.20614989473543094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152684625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23429663,0.00074053265,0.69384044,0.007756317,0.00013173609,0.0003050786,0.00040050937,0.00015071128,0.06237808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91500103,0.0004944557,0.070157416,0.0005487427,0.0002711345,0.0005345861,0.00020948972,0.0001037637,0.012679389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98647434,0.0079316655,0.00057799043,0.0017898856,0.0018636598,0.0013624312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365782,0.045904573,0.0076822033,0.006369471,0.0021097527,0.0013558369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016790882,0.00077658595,0.002996294,0.0014455594,0.0025938277,0.0056179636,0.0031311677,0.0031033885,0.010385417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0646568,0.00078337453,0.001964109,0.0019438462,0.0048374604,0.008851633,0.0034333153,0.004455946,0.0011627697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006502729,0.000053124928,0.00081875373,0.000053460008,0.000052947595,0.00009923889,0.00020687876,0.018780358,0.00032778157,0.9715865,0.0014481924,0.0065077613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007598671,0.000017812894,0.00026463554,0.00001874212,0.000015506632,0.000038396232,0.00004647979,0.06931842,0.00018403248,0.9290097,0.0009944254,0.000015895479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018086642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015930723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016790882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002727896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022753791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088799715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.13413505250146945,"score_gpt":0.2865264764115325,"score_spread":0.15239142391006305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153583058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10923777,0.002338677,0.6605369,0.004440038,0.0006654079,0.00085399585,0.0005141747,0.0006413034,0.22077174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70903933,0.0013350465,0.13702197,0.0006528733,0.000745768,0.0013337083,0.0010777847,0.0005215227,0.14827205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789305,0.0133047635,0.00079321,0.0018612264,0.0029964151,0.0021138464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953234,0.032888874,0.002687352,0.0062040947,0.003364822,0.0016208345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013807379,0.0009380544,0.0023510195,0.0013121645,0.0028354647,0.004497961,0.0038943307,0.003917578,0.034639243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075003535,0.0011901327,0.0017718652,0.0017971728,0.0031097222,0.006100542,0.0024138074,0.0047353916,0.0063037877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006611196,0.00027584835,0.0014744335,0.00027971467,0.00006390376,0.00010458824,0.00055096555,0.023912983,0.0009324418,0.8237978,0.03415895,0.113787286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021523739,0.0001990125,0.0010096834,0.00008599522,0.000035630143,0.00012371602,0.00020121022,0.07813512,0.0007994394,0.9049636,0.014184503,0.000046877478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023981335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003777652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034639243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022491599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002931103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115879774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154712576","doi":"10.1016/s0166-218x(03)00225-7","title":"On the equivalence between some local and global Chinese postman and traveling salesman graphs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Submodular set function; Mathematics; Travelling salesman problem; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Equivalence (formal languages); Graph; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.024638384827019345,"score_gpt":0.23228552996912247,"score_spread":0.2076471451421031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154712576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76648,0.00075807015,0.14946255,0.0021595748,0.00013101356,0.000101743906,0.00051401905,0.00011911959,0.08027391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97490025,0.00063398405,0.012336738,0.0003837382,0.00012913627,0.00007154021,0.0004097511,0.000064551845,0.011070336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995347,0.00014478211,0.000018750488,0.0001484267,0.000061907034,0.00009137078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995745,0.002714747,0.00056443457,0.0002693243,0.00037866962,0.00032781065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010210294,0.00043612937,0.00086447847,0.0013625622,0.002042238,0.0021618507,0.0012282401,0.0011581866,0.008358505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006157405,0.00036863025,0.00073108316,0.0017113229,0.0026026927,0.0053801844,0.0012909312,0.0018304957,0.00042471554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037012152,0.00001558972,0.0005152513,0.000028543305,0.000009789088,0.00006738058,0.0003026676,0.003023057,0.0002803714,0.99066013,0.0009339927,0.0041261893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022568916,0.000018628567,0.0007360476,0.000013797313,0.000024799354,0.00007126201,0.00020874776,0.02472152,0.00021724455,0.9721767,0.0017759787,0.00001276688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004113663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030003195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008358505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011583974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092822296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02796197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154896738","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_11","title":"Vote Elicitation with Probabilistic Preference Models: Empirical Estimation and Cost Tradeoffs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Preference elicitation; Probabilistic logic; Preference; Exploit; Majority rule; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10948409458443553,"score_gpt":0.24760170507490611,"score_spread":0.13811761049047058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154896738","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27669036,0.0013087479,0.71234536,0.001101616,0.00006938221,0.00030102264,0.000756886,0.00022420805,0.007202395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90014714,0.0007285189,0.092155755,0.0001479074,0.00010201684,0.00047360643,0.0013573426,0.00011562415,0.004772031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97828877,0.0178671,0.0005437661,0.0012421571,0.0015177071,0.000540514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65763366,0.31907618,0.006518789,0.013601264,0.0025149938,0.0006550216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032937065,0.0013151134,0.00263149,0.0014381257,0.0008052525,0.0040533273,0.0033729896,0.0028986754,0.01202107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19822623,0.0018884176,0.002145636,0.0038614757,0.0018077854,0.0085843,0.0024686628,0.0039802073,0.001258655],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003725438,0.0010152652,0.037542086,0.0010636408,0.0009791736,0.00022252554,0.0015330735,0.30527687,0.0019101693,0.371454,0.008914997,0.26636282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001700783,0.00017744357,0.0055899965,0.00008316279,0.00015290976,0.00015731755,0.00024065534,0.7560587,0.0009957523,0.23494013,0.001365033,0.00006886067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017517356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032937065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015393625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083249505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17418993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155654171","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1946886","title":"When Does Approval Voting Make the 'Right Choices'?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Approval voting; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.02110863679188152,"score_gpt":0.19927905571269008,"score_spread":0.17817041892080857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155654171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5559954,0.0016787276,0.07648791,0.1037453,0.0012923512,0.00026128802,0.0009964274,0.00027904194,0.25926355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116737,0.00017612736,0.002554867,0.0012916061,0.00020371981,0.000044735178,0.000084484265,0.00006879968,0.004408308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856835,0.008002986,0.0005466934,0.0019060905,0.0013029204,0.0025578886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94610333,0.03784632,0.005775597,0.0038941733,0.0036638496,0.0027168628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01712774,0.00028554487,0.0016308003,0.0009709098,0.0016612641,0.0075946734,0.001385724,0.00552102,0.016960217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087502636,0.00076861,0.0007188339,0.0009770776,0.004112278,0.0078061777,0.001123754,0.005316707,0.0037239795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012666897,0.00037439013,0.039861813,0.00034962737,0.00030976775,0.00040728066,0.003018402,0.0041671367,0.0021192085,0.8344196,0.030264415,0.08344165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022798881,0.000093425006,0.014734918,0.000066620596,0.00007793084,0.0001725461,0.0026162977,0.016933668,0.0010447392,0.95054585,0.01341659,0.00006946903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034791317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038073182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01712774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016791663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025256348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09058124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.053405751769022736,"score_gpt":0.23241106413992033,"score_spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157458642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54741085,0.0031066553,0.39796653,0.0032762915,0.00014901397,0.00011631136,0.00035636176,0.000079896716,0.047538117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821164,0.00022831163,0.01664333,0.00008807882,0.0000827005,0.00005638184,0.000102807564,0.000011754341,0.00067021314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98046,0.011613428,0.0011164675,0.0020250538,0.0040284526,0.0007565709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939282,0.043525245,0.00688808,0.005662706,0.002833186,0.0018086863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009524928,0.00039289106,0.0011972721,0.004965118,0.0015834987,0.004526588,0.0013903573,0.0017731418,0.0029660533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07851771,0.00037503545,0.00072701566,0.0036049508,0.008554807,0.010627544,0.0057719024,0.0017364316,0.0002561202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012724045,0.00003981375,0.010299461,0.00010207563,0.0001055465,0.0000895367,0.0011379282,0.010368437,0.0012546928,0.94325167,0.00036706266,0.03285649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012714419,0.00006293035,0.0045826617,0.000047565103,0.000012255308,0.00017278086,0.00042776315,0.013030608,0.00045441923,0.97930497,0.0018651453,0.000026146005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047661038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030636223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009524928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001799884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005768819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050373256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157469891","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x08004671","title":"Game theory and the development of resource management policy: the case of international fisheries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Game theory; Relevance (law); Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Positive political theory; Resource management (computing); Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.019924988163741116,"score_gpt":0.17887256809311983,"score_spread":0.15894757992937872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157469891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11791876,0.0058050775,0.23114721,0.04563603,0.0004245376,0.000257308,0.000094292445,0.000058414997,0.59865844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781569,0.0013198877,0.00958324,0.00087067916,0.00009670679,0.00010887189,0.00001542688,0.000012313887,0.009836071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948835,0.0034405226,0.00013385601,0.00029911537,0.00048642888,0.0007565512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298614,0.0052643423,0.00047043426,0.00025184517,0.0005681955,0.00045905134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007358671,0.0005577838,0.00089504407,0.001255381,0.0026076809,0.006200399,0.0016472521,0.004873354,0.005893454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010608328,0.00041273417,0.0008117479,0.0011060054,0.009637251,0.0053070677,0.0031694693,0.0035923633,0.0003202363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052225673,0.000009529793,0.000069054004,0.000012343211,0.0000052630926,0.000037662136,0.00010164996,0.008837668,0.000031879295,0.98948145,0.00039419567,0.0010140785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001540437,0.0000117405725,0.00009082744,0.000033275406,0.0000052842556,0.000014077297,0.00024813975,0.021427467,0.000054714215,0.97235787,0.0057340832,0.0000072929674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012329827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077014505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012329827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005116323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059396148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157924271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.482484","title":"Explicit and Latent Authority in Hierarchical Organizations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Relation (database); Local authority; Primary authority; Business; Control (management); Decision maker; Delegated authority; Asset (computer security); Traditional authority; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Management science; Management; Legal research","score_opus":0.014478125789036093,"score_gpt":0.21184990135185613,"score_spread":0.19737177556282004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157924271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8610398,0.0003215815,0.11119399,0.0034122316,0.00004283364,0.000063134175,0.0001263019,0.000056878962,0.023743208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496055,0.00006368268,0.0023823343,0.000040738843,0.000024531779,0.000021065349,0.000023049473,0.000005181047,0.002478807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967146,0.0018136171,0.00016195359,0.00038186728,0.00039482105,0.00053316884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533094,0.034847833,0.005698379,0.002460233,0.0015221909,0.0021619326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005209813,0.00026014153,0.0010619037,0.000890074,0.0017350619,0.0045509976,0.0013081483,0.002410934,0.00903329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033677403,0.0005583889,0.00054154656,0.0010829263,0.0048624976,0.0066872807,0.0019608159,0.0021541745,0.0004607899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110023946,0.00009293112,0.004185552,0.000042441116,0.000021078575,0.00009406065,0.0011432604,0.012661385,0.0003826278,0.9761212,0.00048472258,0.0046607847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063882566,0.000031009804,0.0019810998,0.000011492377,0.000013979214,0.00003427726,0.00058867683,0.046056516,0.00012111259,0.9505885,0.00049410615,0.000015261647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004701698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062415516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00903329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019843227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001594511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030219376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160350653","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00022-7","title":"On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Preference; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.52330821283842,"score_gpt":0.3133289289670274,"score_spread":0.20997928387139259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160350653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.637576,0.0009327088,0.34934202,0.0042213295,0.00007945209,0.0001312686,0.0014358166,0.0003514939,0.005929856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498154,0.0005862873,0.009555406,0.00034425798,0.000087225075,0.00006642584,0.0011470884,0.00011145197,0.003120287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944246,0.0037583339,0.00016359362,0.00091279583,0.0003329274,0.00040782403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84737504,0.13469324,0.0055298354,0.008558448,0.0026643018,0.00117917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01945613,0.00077507,0.00220689,0.0016649662,0.0010733237,0.0029402117,0.0027138456,0.002418736,0.0078017693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122033186,0.0010892075,0.0022106522,0.0015549666,0.0030141312,0.00621805,0.0018109444,0.003969292,0.00096392835],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001377956,0.0002636428,0.047976296,0.0003500317,0.000681624,0.00057690364,0.0010401863,0.39492494,0.0028281843,0.50132066,0.008785705,0.03987387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081258215,0.00007990494,0.0065273573,0.000051515875,0.0001028596,0.0001523638,0.00014028489,0.80594355,0.00069277943,0.18545438,0.0007202684,0.000053363263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009084011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019282785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001219716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10289508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160358302","doi":"10.5555/2484920.2484983","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Condorcet method; Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Correlated equilibrium; Approval voting; Best response; Economics; Game theory; Repeated game","score_opus":0.05485546299585243,"score_gpt":0.2704340441057674,"score_spread":0.21557858110991496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160358302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82211965,0.0023257537,0.128848,0.003682006,0.00007011168,0.000311877,0.0012959585,0.00020558739,0.041141097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935595,0.00023059321,0.00345054,0.000073342955,0.000037694066,0.000073212344,0.00035567203,0.000020845267,0.0021986233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954332,0.0026298887,0.00021582811,0.000637456,0.0006397441,0.0004439165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93537253,0.04736808,0.008321469,0.004951856,0.0028466317,0.0011393512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010364924,0.00048015144,0.0015635986,0.0019107423,0.0013920744,0.0024884676,0.0015860482,0.001279547,0.0167285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077757396,0.0003773779,0.00077406026,0.001859708,0.0016634602,0.0033243771,0.0015880013,0.002582428,0.0010417828],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007608286,0.0006477641,0.09585603,0.00051008427,0.00052464695,0.0008052496,0.0016815893,0.06812419,0.0014027037,0.7513756,0.012329992,0.06598143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023127787,0.00023919185,0.036473915,0.0001652367,0.00011841821,0.00052095146,0.001513452,0.32449618,0.0011651661,0.6230967,0.011901765,0.000077724944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001703779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015830994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0167285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014347004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000609109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055962384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161458631","doi":"10.1007/s11083-007-9063-3","title":"Domain Closedness Conditions and Rational Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Order","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Rationalizability; Mathematics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Intersection (aeronautics); Rational function; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Contrast (vision); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.02379298697490722,"score_gpt":0.2500888003429157,"score_spread":0.22629581336800847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161458631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20096263,0.0025007036,0.6534644,0.011935926,0.00025905322,0.00013628641,0.0007629712,0.00023595928,0.12974215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95764124,0.0010793515,0.028424127,0.00040200248,0.00027333523,0.00019615256,0.00040594095,0.00007319598,0.011504692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964444,0.001826628,0.0001987264,0.000570201,0.00051164575,0.00044847024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96025145,0.032015007,0.001945557,0.0024418535,0.0021331299,0.0012129333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005281865,0.0007360082,0.0017795643,0.0017790112,0.0021616307,0.006672432,0.0015168958,0.002982917,0.009719233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023627086,0.0007350879,0.0011074714,0.0014947292,0.009307313,0.012992841,0.0021434706,0.004877734,0.000826284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012759238,0.000010762139,0.00007125917,0.0000128844395,0.0000036637255,0.000013558585,0.000071702416,0.0010257472,0.00004848256,0.9976413,0.00034767954,0.0007403199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009950605,0.000002126379,0.000024282353,0.0000036462543,0.0000011866409,0.000006785154,0.000025560059,0.002224898,0.000032931064,0.99731857,0.00034775888,0.0000022686706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002802731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017603356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009719233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026367577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019746253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032514036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164462452","doi":"","title":"The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Variety (cybernetics); Voting; Social choice theory; Yield (engineering); Polytope; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Space (punctuation); Condorcet method; Hamming distance; Cube (algebra); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025983105441961675,"score_gpt":0.2009843725436927,"score_spread":0.17500126710173103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164462452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17975909,0.0025205715,0.7255416,0.009289362,0.00025639968,0.00029735116,0.00093800615,0.00029777852,0.081099845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8708358,0.00074106845,0.1150455,0.0005448311,0.00026931666,0.00029521945,0.00058910286,0.000076883305,0.011602303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675495,0.008461247,0.00056112313,0.0017115116,0.0016981657,0.00081304973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983085,0.012760868,0.0009631595,0.0016614104,0.0007244376,0.0008050243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00850274,0.0007676577,0.0020692577,0.0018709475,0.0029069078,0.0062488616,0.002005279,0.0035038681,0.011758761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03518962,0.00079355063,0.0015499073,0.0027658893,0.006733754,0.010240711,0.0054216394,0.0030298594,0.0010309775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010832993,0.00003218131,0.00077814487,0.00009478768,0.00004048619,0.000103096434,0.00040010182,0.018109838,0.00021701648,0.9579725,0.003390467,0.018753018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018946923,0.000014686776,0.00019426513,0.000016466318,0.00000692112,0.000039229217,0.000095399075,0.031240243,0.0001074006,0.9660909,0.0021666156,0.000008880591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037741025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024630283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011758761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030184272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016173235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044967294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166100185","doi":"10.1287/moor.2014.0662","title":"Strategy-Proofness Makes the Difference: Deferred-Acceptance with Responsive Priorities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Normative; Object (grammar); Mechanism (biology); School choice; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Mechanism design; Simple (philosophy); Linear programming; Strategic dominance; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Machine learning","score_opus":0.13724092116046308,"score_gpt":0.332315853002385,"score_spread":0.1950749318419219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166100185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060888868,0.00021557238,0.9196213,0.0023641125,0.00018281072,0.00016745763,0.0000804182,0.00035611042,0.016123345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80925065,0.00023285764,0.18082687,0.0009795252,0.00018006907,0.00032274,0.00007685482,0.0001205152,0.0080099115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912367,0.004064579,0.00058726495,0.00150424,0.0018176171,0.00078963366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96351904,0.021544537,0.0035911687,0.0057310853,0.0037824896,0.0018315886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013218493,0.0006522198,0.00094673736,0.0008466919,0.0012070162,0.0034727857,0.0025081697,0.0021646165,0.0049859826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05834665,0.00061062665,0.0017428551,0.00081744586,0.004361931,0.0076799616,0.0029491659,0.004974319,0.00082606595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101340964,0.00009529059,0.0005190649,0.000088850924,0.00004116993,0.00014824716,0.00049676566,0.0094634285,0.002638777,0.96631104,0.0008789689,0.019217117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019235307,0.0002318491,0.00026494396,0.000034155408,0.000044307453,0.00019181268,0.00012864119,0.08208971,0.0030451922,0.90790844,0.005823103,0.000045567198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014864518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072031404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013218493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014659453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030173613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06990689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166642883","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-11269-0_26","title":"Improved Parameterized Algorithms for the Kemeny Aggregation Problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Combinatorics; Preference; Running time; Notation; Mathematics; Algorithm; Pairwise comparison; Time complexity; Discrete mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Statistics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03607595728339694,"score_gpt":0.23831189161738128,"score_spread":0.20223593433398435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166642883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014672165,0.00036776945,0.973958,0.0006979846,0.00014531954,0.00016817925,0.00034707505,0.00094295444,0.008700654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17010684,0.00041691732,0.8142883,0.00034805073,0.0003190237,0.000626687,0.0014401551,0.0008525732,0.011601321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554527,0.001576493,0.00030651086,0.0010684852,0.00091792265,0.0005852616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883259,0.0069895433,0.0005496202,0.0030784388,0.00066903344,0.00038734058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051288093,0.0017766022,0.003322998,0.0018948808,0.0024120158,0.0052459114,0.0063316394,0.0037184567,0.018179277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022717154,0.0012411322,0.0026755063,0.0046199127,0.0020039093,0.011407434,0.00555444,0.0067439647,0.0039556646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000825403,0.000667076,0.0010802164,0.00029744362,0.00017399924,0.00010956625,0.00047039404,0.24499556,0.002690713,0.43618378,0.026686158,0.2858197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019127471,0.00004519185,0.00019665634,0.000024870491,0.000036472637,0.000039322265,0.00006226414,0.54134846,0.0007939829,0.45409662,0.0031392723,0.000025654585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042563993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006507518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018179277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004185438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042840955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060815692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168659258","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1503.01488","title":"Random Serial Dictatorship versus Probabilistic Serial Rule: A Tale of Two Random Mechanisms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Comparability; Space (punctuation); Preference; Dictatorship; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.09792675232796814,"score_gpt":0.19926793789427602,"score_spread":0.10134118556630788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168659258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063874334,0.0024265277,0.8440146,0.015526404,0.00057258765,0.00036712067,0.00034000422,0.0003185608,0.072559886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.769925,0.0019252783,0.20396078,0.004149238,0.00067332026,0.000944361,0.00020919548,0.00017889275,0.01803391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361385,0.010349451,0.00076292636,0.0025641776,0.0021086107,0.00060091185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555622,0.02783346,0.0039262706,0.009994674,0.0014520981,0.0012312249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019316422,0.00078773126,0.0015449271,0.0012936026,0.0012973314,0.0050492818,0.0030054944,0.0048986482,0.012251184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060503136,0.00065253564,0.0015694054,0.0011845846,0.008475641,0.010393233,0.0026934415,0.0044118366,0.0012207702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009047606,0.000031918586,0.00044516934,0.0000722809,0.00003362002,0.000027728227,0.000099246055,0.003676278,0.0002435719,0.9812267,0.00087765866,0.013175368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012879143,0.00016452314,0.00039679068,0.000061916806,0.00004079973,0.00012267726,0.00007660184,0.023978202,0.00071961083,0.9665226,0.0077482564,0.000039207236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000501379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039823411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019316422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017446921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017477582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10215622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169261290","doi":"","title":"Decisive Coalitions and Coherence Properties","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Mathematical economics; Social welfare function; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social Welfare; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Social choice theory; Population; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Welfare economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.04917288819541865,"score_gpt":0.23364948992735093,"score_spread":0.18447660173193228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169261290","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37581107,0.0010850535,0.581881,0.0016492065,0.00006663991,0.00018751164,0.0005055165,0.00018817444,0.038625848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95362705,0.00027480317,0.041916877,0.00016525413,0.00008686317,0.00014500348,0.00040348095,0.000043847445,0.0033368964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961547,0.0011868393,0.00034219702,0.0010196576,0.0006688793,0.0006276631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878836,0.0064552496,0.0018601883,0.0014287868,0.0013063095,0.0010657161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004669559,0.00039364086,0.0008144827,0.0028237,0.0033261944,0.0034961298,0.000830642,0.0010753834,0.005397085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013954221,0.0005380361,0.0013614654,0.0018797419,0.0050097257,0.0071174647,0.0032709409,0.0016276404,0.0004815935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028012786,0.000016190586,0.0012196321,0.00003064646,0.000023264136,0.000048417725,0.00044917356,0.00093154446,0.00060418213,0.9913891,0.0003317554,0.0049280627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033180942,0.000059967006,0.001122643,0.000026466647,0.000024722878,0.0001348895,0.0003116736,0.009413995,0.0007678932,0.9826926,0.0053910944,0.00002095344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015102049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013645536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005397085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001412185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010221958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024695277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169640500","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2011.03.014","title":"Incoherent majorities: The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05584404545129463,"score_gpt":0.21617917966632802,"score_spread":0.1603351342150334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169640500","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19454162,0.0013372279,0.7556452,0.014422727,0.0002703282,0.00018975476,0.00038298595,0.00019738413,0.033012707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203405,0.00030712198,0.07351161,0.0007305387,0.00029341443,0.0001997755,0.00020879267,0.00010990562,0.00429833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978819,0.014066148,0.0011854201,0.0024806876,0.0024033654,0.001045391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90275025,0.07802841,0.0038198535,0.009297433,0.0041679475,0.0019360973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023601996,0.0006699427,0.0034780542,0.002333024,0.005139238,0.0069787824,0.0030351272,0.0053237802,0.0071301125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11850842,0.0012768783,0.0018254234,0.0034730448,0.008927954,0.01189196,0.006149852,0.005441783,0.00046124603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011515178,0.0000360069,0.0009101453,0.00006098355,0.000080155936,0.00009922917,0.0010537802,0.005049272,0.00020195758,0.9750538,0.0023008676,0.015038588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016882092,0.0000074953778,0.0002000498,0.000012031261,0.000009414031,0.000025784253,0.000117084965,0.0126704,0.00005832851,0.9863457,0.0005269997,0.000009812055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047848267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005684991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023601996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025863561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021505614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12482077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170563224","doi":"10.1007/s001820200099","title":"Sharing the cost of a network: core and core allocations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Tree (set theory); Solution set; Solution concept; Mathematics; Computer science; Game theory; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.10690966215199764,"score_gpt":0.2699413569966439,"score_spread":0.16303169484464625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170563224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36703494,0.00050116744,0.541812,0.0037629865,0.00011684636,0.00030678714,0.00035971153,0.00015511487,0.085950404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96649027,0.0002583215,0.024820372,0.00015451157,0.000084435385,0.0002065892,0.00007057592,0.00006385843,0.007850989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965243,0.001752233,0.00014301419,0.00046641848,0.00045904328,0.0006549915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831427,0.010476867,0.0013879065,0.002351363,0.0014519439,0.0011891942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047321427,0.0007718866,0.0017582816,0.0011394552,0.0014290375,0.0041067316,0.0022061183,0.0029932188,0.012841435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029194249,0.00062417693,0.00075478817,0.0011187962,0.0030091514,0.012329589,0.0030856086,0.0020434968,0.00051469484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022070803,0.00006267394,0.0004928075,0.000074724296,0.000025247738,0.000045991757,0.00019369257,0.02755502,0.0006348043,0.95412654,0.0019696592,0.014598189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055173514,0.000050232797,0.00041949202,0.000026928534,0.000040715233,0.00008236728,0.00019714238,0.08963311,0.00036613442,0.9074689,0.0016427239,0.000017263803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015475531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001867741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012841435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023855905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021951736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042958856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181417941","doi":"","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences (Doctoral Consortium)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Resource allocation; Optimal matching; Function (biology); Scheduling (production processes); Dynamic decision-making; Mechanism design; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19683862078797457,"score_gpt":0.28583406160738745,"score_spread":0.08899544081941288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181417941","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06958704,0.021295555,0.5610715,0.059039183,0.004836203,0.00027202175,0.0007329445,0.0004427805,0.28272283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6424249,0.021716604,0.169462,0.004584513,0.003909395,0.00057983445,0.00074607297,0.0002786808,0.15629801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984688,0.00068855775,0.000074375734,0.00037235153,0.0002681391,0.00012767455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961098,0.0025339883,0.00022969773,0.0003324158,0.00047417067,0.00031999592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041576177,0.0005515061,0.0006895994,0.00085020874,0.0012379645,0.002908701,0.0007263643,0.0016175992,0.018886365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011024447,0.0004269093,0.0010298608,0.0012018535,0.0022317541,0.0033609984,0.0013698438,0.0027386423,0.0032666929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056867997,0.000111371875,0.00064698176,0.0001108941,0.00003654577,0.00006074143,0.0002051723,0.00671594,0.00038326552,0.9027587,0.023592727,0.065320805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037868547,0.000051300973,0.00065001,0.00010291795,0.000021655926,0.00010224956,0.00009329073,0.02311858,0.00048484013,0.9261897,0.04912045,0.000027036807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020411147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012445974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018886365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020607323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06318116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183276193","doi":"","title":"Multi-Agent Bilateral Bargaining and the Nash Bargaining Solution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Mathematical economics; Session (web analytics); Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Nash equilibrium; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.07757730411552069,"score_gpt":0.29942365200134763,"score_spread":0.22184634788582694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183276193","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03537106,0.0013684602,0.8758498,0.002083963,0.00022878964,0.0001068147,0.000061191524,0.00005792547,0.08487202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85598266,0.0012346948,0.11548992,0.00034900793,0.00017557976,0.00023984563,0.00005578873,0.000036527315,0.02643584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975177,0.001361499,0.00006354045,0.00028501687,0.00050189364,0.000270405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989561,0.0006050702,0.00014398525,0.00007133587,0.00013086747,0.00009267953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036262532,0.00072327117,0.00093475764,0.00064884615,0.0015111472,0.0021662773,0.0014089476,0.0028564075,0.0066454583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067525394,0.0004705027,0.0008532408,0.00086798973,0.0024282304,0.0036805365,0.0018077029,0.0014729167,0.00070288475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015802738,0.000014468889,0.00007651729,0.000025535128,0.000012672018,0.00005242391,0.00009516384,0.06380278,0.00017215898,0.93097353,0.00049236394,0.0042666644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025262014,0.000016892816,0.0000666665,0.00002155594,0.000007577144,0.000031179614,0.00007090125,0.23054738,0.00014370936,0.76488155,0.004175324,0.0000119398965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003133854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023297998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066454583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002572857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021112966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02223134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185101906","doi":"10.4108/eai.8-8-2015.2260798","title":"A Robust Redesign of High School Match","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Preference; Computer science; School choice; Mathematics education; Operations research; Psychology; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12018684546862018,"score_gpt":0.2189373681005564,"score_spread":0.0987505226319362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185101906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10038288,0.0002721056,0.8694572,0.001415248,0.0013363394,0.0010007622,0.0015009402,0.007674732,0.016959792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8217834,0.00008318398,0.15397121,0.0006095974,0.00032766903,0.00038751602,0.0010114611,0.0004485601,0.021377487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220157,0.002148788,0.00038368133,0.0027962567,0.0014226114,0.0010469791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98287636,0.0032095215,0.0011983833,0.009860933,0.0016470419,0.0012077324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057962774,0.0010184102,0.002707438,0.0012776983,0.0012020688,0.0023677791,0.004301058,0.0029976433,0.031096656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03218783,0.0011353494,0.0010771665,0.0015366034,0.0015714759,0.002590755,0.0042129047,0.0020955468,0.009277734],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006037833,0.0017362073,0.011059037,0.00031345963,0.0003004789,0.00034593305,0.0003108465,0.1520606,0.019602919,0.061291736,0.042228423,0.7047125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013676997,0.0012224313,0.008974947,0.00007963413,0.00021030678,0.00057428563,0.00032552116,0.8551811,0.017478041,0.0828905,0.03152062,0.00017498442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033951872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041410667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031096656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013386332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035178615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1040287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189604740","doi":"","title":"Matching Markets with Couples Revisited","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Constant (computer programming); Class (philosophy); Incentive compatibility; Blossom algorithm; Stable marriage problem; Mathematics; Incentive; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01400668201362244,"score_gpt":0.19621154947973635,"score_spread":0.18220486746611392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189604740","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26373062,0.0018632388,0.69427264,0.004709673,0.00020506173,0.0003211545,0.00037518737,0.00028810848,0.034234386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439011,0.0005496825,0.044680692,0.0006638308,0.00017804558,0.0001437646,0.000141851,0.000063777086,0.009677282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960169,0.0020980567,0.00015448191,0.00071231916,0.00056335167,0.00045477608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99196446,0.0047814073,0.001046619,0.0010789786,0.00056106545,0.00056740746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004869356,0.0004560367,0.0015536014,0.0009260199,0.0018762463,0.0032721953,0.0020440873,0.0035368893,0.01258573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024396965,0.0005168646,0.0013171906,0.0014208962,0.0027087037,0.0068159034,0.0032316996,0.0029205699,0.0011406835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021631547,0.0000758934,0.001487376,0.00009305991,0.000057278936,0.00026459887,0.00031451095,0.03309232,0.001253377,0.9367682,0.002924844,0.023452245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001315435,0.0001029927,0.0004281344,0.00002638818,0.000029079476,0.00025134085,0.000120603065,0.21116899,0.0007982135,0.78219247,0.004726065,0.000024134071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012278003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060273375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01258573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011233398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008355962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04210347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189755050","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9329","title":"Matching with Dynamic Ordinal Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Focus (optics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.13376572984644494,"score_gpt":0.2759063819767562,"score_spread":0.14214065213031127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189755050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13669348,0.0004348011,0.8450851,0.0016146118,0.00012263402,0.00023047277,0.0003534898,0.00019844626,0.015266916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8347526,0.0003456541,0.15206544,0.0003179602,0.00011944694,0.00030970303,0.00032219535,0.000050092334,0.0117169535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528235,0.0023736216,0.00026115926,0.0011402878,0.0005274518,0.0004151358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936098,0.0036196425,0.0011611871,0.0008762191,0.00028494294,0.00044829273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037050045,0.0007437457,0.0013738896,0.0006875317,0.0009035458,0.0018385758,0.0022218346,0.0020822722,0.009166681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01497089,0.00060352474,0.0012779223,0.0013893216,0.0014675424,0.0039145704,0.0020821742,0.0017534164,0.0010142506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003698568,0.0003003308,0.0029408406,0.00030032135,0.0002521597,0.00051998225,0.00042401123,0.22677502,0.0026570368,0.7110648,0.002291101,0.052104555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012841908,0.00018652446,0.00040976232,0.000020856176,0.000040331284,0.00016164592,0.00010677592,0.36730513,0.0007930696,0.62592566,0.0048905634,0.000031229774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089509395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083602173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009166681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012204197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007743517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030665636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194229192","doi":"","title":"Near-Optimal Hardness Results for Signaling in Bayesian Games.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian probability; Stochastic game; Bayesian game; Nash equilibrium; Time complexity; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Repeated game; Statistics","score_opus":0.13531819788161886,"score_gpt":0.19857466785420821,"score_spread":0.06325646997258935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194229192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061461594,0.0015098209,0.87056935,0.007727088,0.00039455298,0.00046332754,0.0013623046,0.00067013263,0.055841718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7457166,0.0028095513,0.22242156,0.0032379583,0.0011950982,0.0009951935,0.0020119871,0.00060559425,0.0210065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419796,0.0021554618,0.0002383665,0.0010411132,0.0014518216,0.00091532903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691198,0.024996653,0.0015055429,0.0019639418,0.0011352237,0.0012788792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046376837,0.002461494,0.002099564,0.0012454351,0.0019876824,0.0042073433,0.003518341,0.0032922095,0.011349451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030761821,0.0014136443,0.0032992645,0.0013484522,0.004462417,0.013431079,0.004206596,0.009587902,0.0015820619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004326479,0.00048419484,0.0013117822,0.0006642424,0.00018982748,0.00024498568,0.0005542709,0.16687043,0.0032549603,0.77775145,0.016881779,0.031359404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000774963,0.000085074564,0.00038618754,0.00006815948,0.000054422544,0.0001087138,0.00012180989,0.27527502,0.0010016889,0.71772236,0.005062339,0.00003678822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022737721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021696957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011349451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043935813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035284075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037967682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196894019","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8774","title":"Imputation, Social Choice, and Partial Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Outcome (game theory); Preference; Computer science; Social choice theory; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Missing data","score_opus":0.09775813191491592,"score_gpt":0.2774441489285116,"score_spread":0.17968601701359568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196894019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061577983,0.00058251485,0.9231882,0.0038869223,0.00021978964,0.00014540527,0.001063295,0.00034719933,0.008988655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76054835,0.0005645377,0.22702654,0.00060376927,0.0005245696,0.0004372335,0.0019141973,0.00011934844,0.00826147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98683435,0.008881636,0.00054304564,0.0016038283,0.0013703299,0.0007668194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371742,0.045092292,0.004968023,0.00906095,0.0024210105,0.001283476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016102655,0.0006998856,0.0023279784,0.0021405476,0.0020155734,0.0029024635,0.0036228455,0.0023752374,0.009559363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079030916,0.0007091346,0.002003155,0.0041293474,0.0030854312,0.007495142,0.0025650924,0.0046168678,0.0013458175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010276011,0.00041515616,0.017207727,0.00032745962,0.0003485628,0.00033644328,0.0006267376,0.10148597,0.00078833185,0.7203869,0.01217332,0.14487581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007742296,0.00006547657,0.001388849,0.000045307515,0.000034341294,0.00011203563,0.00006319301,0.21251385,0.000417853,0.78291553,0.002331364,0.000034802277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002283882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035199462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016102655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015976735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025281298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08516002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200931022","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9744","title":"On Manipulablity of Random Serial Dictatorship in Sequential Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Programming language; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13921773962528544,"score_gpt":0.28260444906647036,"score_spread":0.14338670944118492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200931022","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24824834,0.00085531187,0.723116,0.003134215,0.00013677722,0.0005028628,0.00023538133,0.00035664494,0.023414457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92856777,0.00060329854,0.06346113,0.00036837423,0.00014504249,0.000736432,0.00011985038,0.00011629178,0.005881873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833543,0.011120001,0.00084583997,0.0020358127,0.0015004494,0.0011435387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8637896,0.10962346,0.012722567,0.009206143,0.002550446,0.002107847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022966973,0.0015449314,0.0031424656,0.00167409,0.0018941632,0.0041362713,0.0050869347,0.005405464,0.009008029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11312599,0.0013818712,0.002422455,0.0018944831,0.006614763,0.009572356,0.004714871,0.0037741472,0.0008868246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004636235,0.00021207564,0.0019821047,0.00028618518,0.0002850273,0.00040597524,0.000612988,0.2363527,0.0017886028,0.73525786,0.00132,0.021032816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015778824,0.0001860509,0.00028766098,0.000042092543,0.000054874206,0.00008765713,0.00008114857,0.3802266,0.00061827846,0.61740476,0.0008043863,0.000048646416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018734845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012651175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022966973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031758999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028174596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121462405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201352866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2082597","title":"Compatibility in Transferable Utility Cooperative Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Game theory","score_opus":0.02966061845631286,"score_gpt":0.2367247772205053,"score_spread":0.20706415876419246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201352866","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.379919,0.0003193968,0.53504086,0.0027947456,0.00017971537,0.00035500634,0.00023524018,0.00017763245,0.0809785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654297,0.00020061593,0.020583734,0.0002637175,0.00013551678,0.0003489337,0.00012412733,0.00004123729,0.012872357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402547,0.0037180872,0.00029072998,0.00054476556,0.0009244765,0.0004964678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97519255,0.020389715,0.0012878433,0.0009462874,0.0011165446,0.0010670444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005207727,0.00082913606,0.0018018202,0.001352653,0.0020379713,0.0051986594,0.0019524882,0.0038579337,0.009977502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029126273,0.00093794754,0.0011620761,0.0017086506,0.003745641,0.0069569303,0.002740689,0.0033627094,0.0009573838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107353706,0.000074126816,0.0003095243,0.00003844134,0.000014491825,0.00012181243,0.00036925936,0.0068667172,0.000473422,0.9868851,0.0006300869,0.0041097836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087266446,0.000051432922,0.00012802443,0.000009918424,0.000010337438,0.00006369516,0.00009631725,0.03482669,0.00019183,0.9637884,0.0007324971,0.000013591029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010582539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056065386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013025115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015021547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033378005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221798450","doi":"10.1007/s00199-015-0880-0","title":"Joint games and compatibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07963653069165975,"score_gpt":0.2267336211680888,"score_spread":0.14709709047642905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221798450","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14596386,0.0029511515,0.61223274,0.009911281,0.0004640535,0.00014833498,0.000329347,0.00015541783,0.2278438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341089,0.0011848484,0.03354115,0.00073950907,0.00049825903,0.00028803598,0.00025072895,0.00007458687,0.029313946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611676,0.0022339397,0.00018977172,0.00060142705,0.00054221664,0.00031593692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125564,0.006408801,0.0005325117,0.0007683299,0.00058378006,0.00045102058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003746851,0.0008028498,0.0014244316,0.0012106778,0.0018893884,0.005078032,0.0011874321,0.0028072912,0.009729638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014369383,0.0006098275,0.0011209191,0.0012579293,0.0052978955,0.0073998333,0.002638021,0.003675913,0.0008888321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006831322,0.0000085541415,0.00005738909,0.000006279879,0.0000034569903,0.000009990835,0.000055017656,0.0006760897,0.00004240259,0.99777395,0.0003171874,0.0010428133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006843568,0.0000035646456,0.000046573245,0.0000031050024,0.0000018851391,0.000012913905,0.000016408492,0.0024912627,0.000017999733,0.9964455,0.0009514751,0.0000025585814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015569838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089991966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009729638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016241225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013130672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032548845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222250379","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2656968","title":"Implementation by Sortition in Non Exclusive Information Economics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Information economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.013901445123953046,"score_gpt":0.23183418786674712,"score_spread":0.21793274274279406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222250379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42643353,0.00047615232,0.40326986,0.010375169,0.00041112342,0.0003542843,0.00031329892,0.00068434497,0.15768225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97302115,0.00008336185,0.014183765,0.0003734199,0.000067622794,0.00012678283,0.000038133716,0.000049063285,0.012056693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900299,0.00602404,0.00061317853,0.0010082462,0.0011299886,0.0011947306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683498,0.021883884,0.0022639912,0.0046320832,0.0016820149,0.0011882411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008832858,0.0004878741,0.0019316495,0.0011943949,0.002337779,0.0061775753,0.0022962857,0.0037274184,0.011772816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03944626,0.0006958552,0.0013148604,0.0014173796,0.0048821126,0.0071406523,0.0033177275,0.0037607232,0.0008514411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010230921,0.00006636089,0.00075551943,0.000043135096,0.000025389247,0.00004051004,0.00017817537,0.0050260406,0.00019944344,0.98316944,0.0009310515,0.009462565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044930177,0.00002821888,0.0002217892,0.000009687547,0.000014135777,0.000024808849,0.0000930374,0.030288815,0.00031850772,0.96759665,0.0013459959,0.000013462622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027182861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002175526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011772816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026303453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037291348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046713173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22403799","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2012","title":"May's Theorem for Trees","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Discrete mathematics; Calculus (dental); Pure mathematics; Social choice theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.039073634133140474,"score_gpt":0.2686913790498867,"score_spread":0.22961774491674625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22403799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138715105,0.019805564,0.26204282,0.030525029,0.008044126,0.000172609,0.00226042,0.0009776676,0.66230017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46132722,0.026158767,0.1546094,0.013982051,0.011938955,0.0011067576,0.0023018287,0.0013394883,0.32723552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998448,0.00030835473,0.00010492242,0.0005418696,0.0003927387,0.00020394944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784887,0.0010307473,0.00016358233,0.00044185703,0.00035992835,0.00015499735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022466015,0.00095807546,0.0013413024,0.0023577015,0.0030788952,0.0051463763,0.00170196,0.0033164348,0.062455535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008619292,0.0005045593,0.0020464493,0.0017783991,0.005380343,0.007285649,0.00351802,0.005703689,0.018770287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014639888,0.000004477582,0.00010481196,0.000048094258,0.000013330328,0.000059145557,0.000089753594,0.00033186036,0.00008497537,0.9792423,0.008809075,0.011197394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016040822,0.000007707318,0.00014104061,0.000046552013,0.000009235386,0.00016728857,0.00004027804,0.0014199148,0.0000866437,0.9107875,0.08726873,0.000009041577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023012026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017826842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062455535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021139223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016027474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2089346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246303743","doi":"","title":"Dimension of complete simple games with minimum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Extensive-form game; Dimension (graph theory); Sequential game; Combinatorics; Game theory","score_opus":0.02272272766719766,"score_gpt":0.20390912532348976,"score_spread":0.1811863976562921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246303743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79991245,0.0006278503,0.15475194,0.00044246166,0.000057266137,0.00012329125,0.0006818088,0.0002290936,0.043173842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841197,0.0001720148,0.012117953,0.000055275534,0.000069462956,0.000100226134,0.00031889972,0.00003852008,0.0030080432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872583,0.00029954268,0.000082048246,0.0002533497,0.00032191517,0.0003172745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967998,0.0014259431,0.0006786685,0.0002156225,0.00028726,0.00059278804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092660775,0.0006215231,0.001163393,0.0028357774,0.0010725335,0.0033113116,0.00081556453,0.00061529037,0.0065922104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052244756,0.00041906405,0.0014069625,0.001055992,0.0023988648,0.0038000313,0.0016937485,0.0013372634,0.00034773763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011764466,0.000040692594,0.0021872413,0.00009129485,0.0000377983,0.00007707074,0.00026311364,0.0093325265,0.0009268603,0.98111504,0.0007940008,0.0050167516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003895254,0.000056602905,0.001748034,0.000022437893,0.000022353293,0.00010056388,0.00011097234,0.039014798,0.0005183815,0.9565002,0.0018374338,0.000029299965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012085036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086814974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065922104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021951788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006176685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022053182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2250449406","doi":"","title":"Voting rules as statistical estimators","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Estimator; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Interpretation (philosophy); Aggregate (composite); Decision rule; Judgement; Computer science; Scoring rule; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Machine learning; Political science","score_opus":0.07019080891397811,"score_gpt":0.31579130990150645,"score_spread":0.24560050098752834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2250449406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009139949,0.00040954503,0.9810792,0.000745128,0.00014423445,0.00007048174,0.00014518114,0.00012989639,0.008136468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4930059,0.0015274567,0.49217403,0.00085319823,0.00091574015,0.0007929535,0.00074279576,0.0002999498,0.009687995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97997266,0.011542686,0.0015394484,0.0027060371,0.003386499,0.0008526544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573536,0.030134492,0.0034466696,0.0054794555,0.0031360653,0.0004497041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016458632,0.0008125358,0.0015774372,0.0023066015,0.0009380021,0.006905928,0.002414624,0.0027402956,0.0039035045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06104771,0.0007180828,0.0013563714,0.0020542957,0.004934088,0.005779419,0.0017534583,0.0027411985,0.0011513869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010776446,0.000008041022,0.00040394836,0.00004975542,0.000029010955,0.000018718772,0.000095765055,0.014133514,0.00018381097,0.97156435,0.0007034941,0.012798904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013535985,0.000010648294,0.00013439431,0.000026815109,0.000008802232,0.000019898014,0.000017338021,0.07195857,0.00021015822,0.9250037,0.0025860197,0.000010098297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009200808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006837731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016458632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016270624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011107732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08704257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251246349","doi":"","title":"Twofold Optimality of the Relative Utilitarian Bargaining Solution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Bargaining problem; Consistency (knowledge bases); Invariant (physics); Class (philosophy); Sequence (biology); Zero (linguistics); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Combinatorics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.08669268012569117,"score_gpt":0.31705598235925325,"score_spread":0.23036330223356208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251246349","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1578946,0.0005343112,0.48364294,0.013953518,0.0007561472,0.00021164578,0.0005209056,0.00037392078,0.34211203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712011,0.0002507909,0.07141649,0.00075658015,0.0003520613,0.00027101501,0.00026202726,0.00020314334,0.055286817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952662,0.0023830093,0.00029494835,0.00071357284,0.00078237534,0.0005599933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946268,0.0032462985,0.00043539546,0.0005407941,0.00078405906,0.00036661682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590705,0.00045188077,0.0010807115,0.00085608906,0.0013056266,0.0032669585,0.0011666879,0.003041802,0.023149151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022154056,0.0005168035,0.0007500655,0.0006857586,0.0024047282,0.004588032,0.0021382682,0.0029433738,0.0032718037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005974555,0.000019528099,0.000113794835,0.000024676554,0.0000070481065,0.000038556715,0.00011518563,0.0053605163,0.0004969738,0.9855509,0.0019701533,0.006242895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037942875,0.000037905043,0.00019519411,0.000025600331,0.0000077182585,0.000045912024,0.00009388274,0.030009398,0.00056198,0.964576,0.004393137,0.000015357497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048271535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045831574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023149151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018848411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017965261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07744169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262261914","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2671963","title":"Closure and Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03667914818893434,"score_gpt":0.22229679496521101,"score_spread":0.18561764677627668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262261914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5559992,0.0017038,0.12095741,0.009816238,0.0002714406,0.00008318365,0.00045944095,0.00009897228,0.3106103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758138,0.00027511505,0.0039133313,0.00023394225,0.00009513309,0.00003944614,0.00012796624,0.00003085228,0.019470401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981645,0.00084504724,0.00009948741,0.00037431213,0.00021047953,0.00030622722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273866,0.0042782486,0.0006632135,0.00084572576,0.0005295241,0.00094472227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022290398,0.00030502887,0.0008540876,0.0008042488,0.0020343948,0.0050744438,0.0006691572,0.001669657,0.020710029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012637324,0.00027832112,0.0006532092,0.000783079,0.0034797865,0.0051193605,0.0018399915,0.0024467385,0.0011696077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040497107,0.000035619618,0.0005170563,0.000015632484,0.0000068941167,0.000031132877,0.0004056862,0.0004410152,0.00018714015,0.9919727,0.001025465,0.0053212647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010607063,0.000008234267,0.00020997469,0.0000055298597,0.000002664166,0.000025296415,0.00018149316,0.0011257925,0.00005033888,0.9968527,0.0015244951,0.0000029513462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010209121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008863309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020710029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00114206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070464937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069281936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267265090","doi":"","title":"Choice-set forms are dual to outcome-set forms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Dual (grammatical number); Contrast (vision); Duality (order theory); Node (physics); Finite set; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Set function; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07415227302822595,"score_gpt":0.2791299300884275,"score_spread":0.20497765706020155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267265090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07013041,0.00049542665,0.8172004,0.0026020973,0.0001595058,0.00031195668,0.0010652381,0.00016422446,0.1078707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77188176,0.00069484155,0.20605601,0.00069254957,0.00020843884,0.0007841854,0.0008694785,0.000163959,0.018648796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920616,0.0039040926,0.00074736646,0.0013876968,0.001254804,0.0006444422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059707,0.0049964776,0.0011791147,0.0016182736,0.0011117464,0.00049726974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055129067,0.0008375005,0.0009414151,0.00181966,0.0014083505,0.0069513884,0.001199188,0.0021266371,0.0105169425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01381996,0.0006988588,0.0016276296,0.0025725572,0.00623634,0.010104952,0.0032569712,0.0054017664,0.0015755293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038806634,0.0000067072697,0.00007187213,0.000007916899,0.0000032636012,0.0000068671666,0.00008530224,0.00034496695,0.000049765473,0.997823,0.00011456089,0.0014819034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054538104,0.0000046953755,0.00006322047,0.000004655714,0.000002152354,0.00002349565,0.000028567423,0.0014880719,0.000053122858,0.99676466,0.001558313,0.0000035136634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006558054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006394711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105169425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002104268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009698947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035182655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269163318","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.002","title":"Democratic elections and centralized decisions: Condorcet and Approval Voting compared with Median and Coverage locations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Condorcet method; Approval voting; Voting; Quality (philosophy); Democracy; Median; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10868174260374897,"score_gpt":0.30547495532230545,"score_spread":0.1967932127185565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269163318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98274153,0.00059318484,0.0066967756,0.0013430759,0.00012502624,0.000059419664,0.00014345569,0.000037695812,0.008259774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985763,0.000057997215,0.00028053686,0.00004965403,0.00006797032,0.000010213353,0.000059388436,0.000011967101,0.0008859144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825467,0.007228256,0.00041783976,0.0014913313,0.00074513286,0.001862698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6261514,0.32051358,0.028009221,0.01209158,0.005473587,0.00776057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027436303,0.00045449415,0.0018622396,0.0010332346,0.0013962248,0.0046940665,0.0022053185,0.0024303014,0.022872996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1480687,0.00046026355,0.0013647395,0.0012449507,0.0037165158,0.0058974307,0.0020068781,0.0040998496,0.0011293585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.046398,0.0031053515,0.46867508,0.0007826028,0.0021056894,0.0008876226,0.0057357964,0.08090703,0.0023178095,0.2553072,0.013778156,0.11999974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004416922,0.0077994876,0.41184658,0.00019533168,0.0026977195,0.0005318314,0.008860126,0.23782961,0.002716351,0.31768557,0.00510874,0.000311881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061603445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027436303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012557822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017144277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14509875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269596572","doi":"","title":"Information collection in bargaining","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Complete information; Adversary; Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029129795487111913,"score_gpt":0.20442446810153295,"score_spread":0.17529467261442103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269596572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05001896,0.004442889,0.8052249,0.007760061,0.0005503405,0.00024969986,0.00037154078,0.00016129616,0.13122033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911706,0.004352604,0.0655548,0.0010304867,0.00093148457,0.000488846,0.00023822453,0.00011880194,0.036114167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333996,0.0036604528,0.0002421042,0.00082861836,0.0010049421,0.0009238398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850809,0.011426445,0.0014368746,0.0009716085,0.0006631592,0.00042100053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007662897,0.0013162199,0.0016891967,0.0013777456,0.0021678498,0.0051789586,0.0023141417,0.0043364363,0.014798813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023855982,0.0009622611,0.0020536254,0.0024353885,0.004940451,0.009668892,0.0033312882,0.0045897486,0.002061155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006452001,0.00003772086,0.0002648852,0.00007546917,0.000029348752,0.00009372444,0.00022494327,0.035437755,0.00021889084,0.9545505,0.0015458348,0.0074563795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046162964,0.00004085621,0.000119630204,0.00004697017,0.000021296786,0.00004914031,0.00008566292,0.090135224,0.00021926989,0.90532213,0.0038912783,0.000022355289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019333077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010396809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014798813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043346807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018485913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049506962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276643678","doi":"10.3982/te2618","title":"Agendas in legislative decision‐making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Order (exchange); Social choice theory; Independence (probability theory); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Mathematical economics; Law; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024938779298333824,"score_gpt":0.2469426469455868,"score_spread":0.22200386764725297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276643678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19806354,0.004797906,0.5408541,0.010868915,0.0004339417,0.00027367967,0.00039253425,0.00019298532,0.24412243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333451,0.0012390029,0.056397423,0.0003843611,0.00026214053,0.00022998534,0.00016445798,0.000049225113,0.007928342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897349,0.006896309,0.0005251323,0.0009582419,0.0010303545,0.00085502886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98683655,0.008629729,0.001971231,0.0011487369,0.0008873045,0.0005264751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010415365,0.00042575714,0.0006683835,0.0017648336,0.0021084584,0.004919398,0.0010234027,0.0016869177,0.005834261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018842146,0.0005553687,0.0009178376,0.0017655813,0.006930695,0.006023342,0.002255337,0.0026645686,0.000741584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017161845,0.000009682849,0.0003482852,0.000031788288,0.000008798276,0.000014544497,0.00031356566,0.0031043845,0.00012589681,0.98969495,0.00031563098,0.0060154214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001835307,0.000017001796,0.00047691146,0.000045239856,0.000007630201,0.0000122424535,0.00019376897,0.0049881875,0.00016259433,0.9888771,0.0051904004,0.000010596799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021597717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023085559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010415365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022772732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016253963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05508232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287383714","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2500777","title":"Voting Rules in a Changing Environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010947430053413693,"score_gpt":0.1849836240557669,"score_spread":0.1740361940023532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287383714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431145,0.0004657692,0.0888734,0.008717557,0.00023187624,0.00007282483,0.00036095543,0.00012920401,0.058033917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246186,0.00013785524,0.0030595316,0.00020219415,0.000045174726,0.000017439743,0.00006484571,0.000014985187,0.003996134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971842,0.0015162256,0.00009678284,0.0004355666,0.0002865457,0.000480584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878015,0.0076075564,0.0013074996,0.0011789304,0.0010625578,0.0010419608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032190904,0.00018900099,0.0006188172,0.0007705938,0.0013564444,0.004240979,0.001255863,0.002532895,0.007203313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019085966,0.00031601152,0.00046556862,0.0007564757,0.0026988047,0.0035669722,0.0010580069,0.0020806727,0.0010663671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048304937,0.0002876423,0.020331122,0.00009475437,0.00013849919,0.0010965402,0.002323221,0.06778884,0.0025868432,0.8580493,0.009340249,0.037480094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119567674,0.00010198745,0.009974674,0.000024555498,0.000049556093,0.00023728673,0.0024630434,0.13374633,0.00055134523,0.84056777,0.012094071,0.000069766495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039186184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004222381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007203313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013652251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066093734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024097502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290243676","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.416","title":"Matching Service Providers and Customers in Two-Sided Dynamic Markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC-PapersOnLine","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Disjoint sets; Blossom algorithm; Optimal matching; 3-dimensional matching; Service (business); Service provider; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.02961174817971536,"score_gpt":0.25855792580853704,"score_spread":0.2289461776288217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290243676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0456325,0.00012441976,0.9493474,0.00034622077,0.000043249307,0.00015875635,0.000070449714,0.00014958005,0.004127453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7258474,0.0001998624,0.26687405,0.00022439782,0.00005203747,0.00020562386,0.00019102749,0.00009716653,0.0063084182],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950067,0.0020872448,0.00023545032,0.0011304421,0.00085208117,0.0006880548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936271,0.0038124064,0.0007435536,0.0008449276,0.0005196666,0.0004524051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050624376,0.000715106,0.0018361579,0.0009502745,0.0013815522,0.0028114244,0.003342003,0.0028509316,0.0060699712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014695961,0.0007826444,0.0012169587,0.0019035392,0.0020933175,0.0066350573,0.0038970006,0.0021025664,0.0008940515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049061014,0.00023185593,0.0017463197,0.00016128176,0.00013217519,0.00031358915,0.00040656095,0.47458854,0.0033813731,0.42382228,0.002919561,0.09180586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065702836,0.00006699187,0.0001815285,0.000011526374,0.000017425913,0.000098023156,0.00011151611,0.82194227,0.0010909721,0.17381825,0.0025741062,0.000021641343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021709835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012768083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060699712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018606075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014359595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026773036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293507961","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773548","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Resource allocation; Scheduling (production processes); Sequential game; Mechanism design; Optimal matching; Contrast (vision); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16363275091144538,"score_gpt":0.2740471760258787,"score_spread":0.1104144251144333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293507961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07535247,0.00022470251,0.8956926,0.0015752623,0.00013210802,0.00024116444,0.00023543055,0.0001232938,0.026422935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80863845,0.00039250587,0.17458683,0.00054903486,0.0001729084,0.00038749634,0.00018901956,0.00006090862,0.015022852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899511,0.005428608,0.00057082105,0.0020708903,0.0011941292,0.00078441616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98352,0.009517509,0.002276371,0.003246758,0.00073593133,0.00070344744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008095077,0.0007981654,0.0014990567,0.00077314954,0.0012536114,0.0037788728,0.0023964185,0.0029421006,0.013267256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02778926,0.00068406377,0.0016964491,0.0014532047,0.0030851525,0.007732907,0.0028397334,0.0027383845,0.0015137993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008663487,0.000093115996,0.0005274276,0.000055063803,0.000036554055,0.000084998836,0.00015567649,0.017133107,0.0006874343,0.96680933,0.0007740026,0.013556687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056371082,0.000054758373,0.00016684785,0.000012528441,0.0000151154145,0.00006720041,0.000053606946,0.08778247,0.0003194285,0.90928155,0.002173305,0.000016793792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008054766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006482398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013267256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018187991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013662212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044383347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294581381","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-027","title":"Social distance games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Transferable utility; Perspective (graphical); Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.29650249167878373,"score_gpt":0.30827838519997025,"score_spread":0.01177589352118652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294581381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03780582,0.0013778303,0.84853745,0.004301146,0.00031487682,0.0004858626,0.0004954447,0.00013700948,0.106544524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7830514,0.0018740181,0.17335142,0.0012814892,0.0003403535,0.0009327003,0.000604367,0.00009862106,0.03846566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534506,0.0021925548,0.0002681681,0.0007619738,0.0010938159,0.0003384119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955929,0.002708562,0.00035104403,0.00041257511,0.0005165776,0.00041820668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024748459,0.0012530198,0.001256375,0.0011268648,0.0018346163,0.0036936302,0.002153578,0.0022750825,0.0077251573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089404555,0.0003810944,0.0008845949,0.0013362736,0.003839736,0.005852429,0.0035398754,0.002479,0.0011497863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094046145,0.000015940706,0.00009420633,0.00003256575,0.000012023112,0.000037611106,0.00012121103,0.0049877632,0.00014547251,0.9888194,0.0008226816,0.004901705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018906663,0.00002361767,0.00006551992,0.000019071456,0.000009250842,0.0000719855,0.00011284286,0.025706252,0.00013868992,0.9593342,0.014490002,0.000009722612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018127718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012920605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077251573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026058608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012457863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025843203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295870642","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.003","title":"Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social choice theory; Maximization; Social welfare function; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Probabilistic logic; Social Welfare; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Welfare; Economics","score_opus":0.22067793669083208,"score_gpt":0.30804201530508346,"score_spread":0.08736407861425138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295870642","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07160569,0.0011077846,0.85370624,0.0125772115,0.00011634432,0.00011974467,0.00026421034,0.0000695492,0.060433313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93595695,0.0011017318,0.05051472,0.00073218974,0.0003457808,0.00031413342,0.00012813904,0.00006532493,0.010840992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884716,0.008989987,0.000286928,0.0006228661,0.0011072397,0.0005213592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97731483,0.018552426,0.0010400851,0.0013585782,0.0011605583,0.00057360646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013286003,0.0012061548,0.0020403448,0.002063802,0.0009912887,0.006211724,0.0027070285,0.003498864,0.005786495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027640382,0.0007926177,0.0013221488,0.0014890019,0.0059624366,0.0069608847,0.002156571,0.0028986216,0.00044558186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024648545,0.000026851214,0.00023320298,0.00004471327,0.000040133655,0.000019867543,0.0001302552,0.020379141,0.00010061416,0.97440153,0.00070664607,0.0038925034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012220884,0.000010527137,0.00009597365,0.000012978011,0.000008586035,0.00001203618,0.000045588196,0.034145188,0.000037476413,0.96509135,0.00052190153,0.0000060882135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011602178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012606058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013286003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029678985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016569953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07026398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310231013","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v8n4p80","title":"Population Monotonicity in Public Good Economies with Single Dipped Preferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Monotonic function; Population; Pareto principle; Variable (mathematics); Economics; Mathematical economics; Pareto optimal; Public good; Pareto efficiency; Microeconomics; Economy; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization; Law; Mathematical analysis; Demography; Political science","score_opus":0.03709002086767121,"score_gpt":0.21494473051573423,"score_spread":0.17785470964806302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310231013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.563767,0.0008957785,0.38439298,0.00284853,0.000071747105,0.00013983897,0.00027973115,0.00016607494,0.047438204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97140527,0.00040434088,0.022466654,0.0002028871,0.00006887611,0.00011796945,0.00009477792,0.000043701388,0.005195517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977099,0.0012753637,0.00006811378,0.0002925616,0.0002233612,0.00043066317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881887,0.008103385,0.0016421785,0.0007718036,0.0006550644,0.00063888554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032519996,0.00048764556,0.0012188891,0.0007693336,0.00096810784,0.0027219935,0.0015436073,0.0018722035,0.00536584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015194721,0.00053039525,0.0012422942,0.00071067613,0.002840479,0.004593092,0.0017825993,0.0020746419,0.0005902216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001867823,0.00013320344,0.0039263163,0.00016788498,0.0000890141,0.0006621698,0.00035781375,0.12955461,0.002756453,0.84286845,0.0023478803,0.016949406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008371128,0.00010480398,0.0012648859,0.00004357105,0.000028816345,0.00032398145,0.0003392233,0.3112615,0.0011839779,0.6824997,0.0028327669,0.000033054548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012329498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081634085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00536584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012300577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006610545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017950535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318808822","doi":"10.1061/40976(316)262","title":"Bargaining over the Caspian Sea — The Largest Lake on the Earth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Voting; Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Majority rule; Political science; Economics; Economy; Computer science; Operations research; Microeconomics; International trade; Engineering; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020111335177384553,"score_gpt":0.1704867836512753,"score_spread":0.15037544847389073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318808822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388287,0.0021311895,0.18651763,0.004215841,0.00023815199,0.00013330417,0.000104018276,0.000057280067,0.06777383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885994,0.00046226158,0.008575218,0.00004913558,0.000033602628,0.00002452164,0.000037252154,0.0000032553364,0.0022153363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983937,0.0010701673,0.000040819228,0.000106107684,0.00026282726,0.00012641618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856025,0.0011146272,0.00015240416,0.00004383078,0.00007455455,0.000054454624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025692214,0.00030848273,0.00038546784,0.0005362524,0.0015135183,0.0018232985,0.0006362416,0.000807052,0.002851166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050315093,0.0001011499,0.0002951608,0.0007851997,0.0014711686,0.0016042069,0.0008809915,0.0007632995,0.00015231583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043522255,0.00009006014,0.008273539,0.00017189485,0.00007504869,0.0004771224,0.0012973039,0.14633064,0.0026902484,0.68824637,0.00417286,0.1477397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065418404,0.0002994115,0.00640068,0.000100596335,0.00005517857,0.000237793,0.0026736578,0.37820122,0.0027168188,0.5968185,0.012374581,0.000056158795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039925515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003912396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039925515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010355632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009773779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013587534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322698568","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2622664","title":"On the Importance of Uniform Sharing Rules for Efficient Matching","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03540315268522115,"score_gpt":0.23873522174232395,"score_spread":0.2033320690571028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322698568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28570595,0.0024561912,0.60278225,0.010265543,0.000624837,0.0003618932,0.00061897485,0.00027877095,0.09690556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959597,0.0012723673,0.031061094,0.000980217,0.0007662168,0.00021036579,0.00023891845,0.00013357337,0.0057402616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876359,0.0076512825,0.00068268314,0.0014803223,0.0013166328,0.0012331709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7131442,0.2494728,0.01076647,0.018079806,0.004991984,0.0035448023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017935695,0.00083697075,0.0037703398,0.0016006166,0.0024247621,0.0058237268,0.003986378,0.0056054546,0.014836909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17445059,0.0013295669,0.001629477,0.0020430505,0.006959389,0.014698336,0.0035347105,0.0066895327,0.0011325033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023501411,0.00010767624,0.0010218454,0.00013707338,0.000051624025,0.00008867788,0.0001600505,0.020370264,0.00036051875,0.9650105,0.002513248,0.009943393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088212844,0.00003589435,0.00032010258,0.000025515217,0.000022450287,0.000046199577,0.00004740011,0.057792004,0.00014250721,0.9408201,0.0006429739,0.000016620083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015837981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013099519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017935695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021935082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002487405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09485412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328700561","doi":"10.1002/jae.1276","title":"EUCLIDEAN REVEALED PREFERENCES: TESTING THE SPATIAL VOTING MODEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Voting; Econometrics; Euclidean geometry; Dimension (graph theory); Construct (python library); Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.2108864675320102,"score_gpt":0.22169460151805837,"score_spread":0.010808133986048157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328700561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027751,0.00015632923,0.08985351,0.0010714652,0.000031209067,0.000046743513,0.00067827816,0.00009556561,0.005291723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573034,0.00002607052,0.0037599918,0.000045045304,0.000010189646,0.000017890567,0.00018569063,0.0000065608165,0.00021818277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672542,0.026149867,0.0010081797,0.0029943022,0.0017540776,0.0008393585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7275384,0.22730875,0.02152708,0.017773524,0.003937217,0.0019150038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022579169,0.0006888158,0.0014915911,0.0010194756,0.00086181087,0.0020362157,0.0032542124,0.0015637907,0.0076423907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13761769,0.0004622201,0.0017963765,0.0022615176,0.0037518989,0.004078262,0.0031725785,0.0024283172,0.00066398206],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041957055,0.0005368073,0.12813605,0.0004955891,0.0015397626,0.00093485863,0.0014396898,0.37772545,0.0016510736,0.4348084,0.002747084,0.045789596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041617343,0.00073568797,0.02000376,0.000054219046,0.00012991634,0.00025942453,0.0010332336,0.7735955,0.0017016421,0.20076713,0.0012290776,0.00007436891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054675373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023096928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022579169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014454357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012242758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11941147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332995385","doi":"10.1061/40976(316)556","title":"Sharing a Multi-National Resource through Bankruptcy Procedures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Creditor; Negotiation; Natural resource; Resource (disambiguation); Asset (computer security); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Resource allocation; Computer science; Business; Economics; Law; Engineering; Finance; Political science; Computer security; Market economy","score_opus":0.03759553411535578,"score_gpt":0.2076926621290163,"score_spread":0.1700971280136605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332995385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18047313,0.0007027135,0.71013916,0.0013308874,0.00016176606,0.0008524034,0.0001885494,0.00060140074,0.10555005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93182486,0.000319922,0.049908794,0.00016399153,0.00004852557,0.00032708142,0.000082462706,0.000048401474,0.01727596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947455,0.0018518202,0.00041609904,0.00086739275,0.0013967372,0.0007223773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493355,0.0017656853,0.0009612044,0.0015469625,0.00049547385,0.00029711836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006632911,0.00076802575,0.000813172,0.0012870155,0.0018283641,0.0040362542,0.0029284467,0.0017148554,0.008954219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012283667,0.000374378,0.0009395432,0.0011838389,0.0027769925,0.0044317786,0.0032663855,0.00210648,0.00084996736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031102297,0.00033294817,0.0061664153,0.000115650946,0.000138462,0.0006835751,0.0007430045,0.105475634,0.0030203883,0.67601454,0.0058872933,0.20111105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016237388,0.00053888065,0.0058685374,0.0002416797,0.0001907373,0.00078679813,0.0009672527,0.5148226,0.00815706,0.41601908,0.05205988,0.0001850882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003724949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046042437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008954219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022303455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003462828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035078585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343126504","doi":"","title":"Strategic Voting in the 2010 UK Election","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Respondent; Voting; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Compromise; Preference; Cardinal voting systems; Ranked voting system; General election; Political science; Disapproval voting; Pairwise comparison; Group voting ticket; First-past-the-post voting; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Politics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05096776012409773,"score_gpt":0.21804506097740653,"score_spread":0.1670773008533088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343126504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213046,0.0002118372,0.00096266356,0.00037087785,0.000031631855,0.000034706358,0.0010036657,0.000022539081,0.0052315504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962127,0.00008528601,0.00022967701,0.000054163647,0.000009397396,0.000029407825,0.0013921857,0.0000063949933,0.001980766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968251,0.001751757,0.00019586956,0.00025896978,0.0004958241,0.0004725021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906658,0.0049049975,0.002055566,0.0007738207,0.0011672319,0.00043261313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026185615,0.0002809509,0.0005464077,0.000976535,0.0005597496,0.0011412575,0.00048184535,0.0006766656,0.003497364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024796017,0.0002658706,0.00037894683,0.0019315124,0.00053321465,0.00085900456,0.0008334205,0.0007229866,0.0011793015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021904449,0.00036455036,0.8160213,0.0002940981,0.0002765932,0.0009270792,0.003854545,0.06625428,0.00085621065,0.022780498,0.026458176,0.059722204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026694738,0.00057577435,0.860647,0.000105409636,0.00010742154,0.00046621845,0.0041858563,0.10182381,0.0008922067,0.006001114,0.024795946,0.00013224824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09613483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15077782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09613483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033658466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078939233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19115055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372440949","doi":"10.1287/opre.2016.1509","title":"Competitive Equilibria in Two-Sided Matching Markets with General Utility Functions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Microsoft Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Competitive equilibrium; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Constructive; Matching (statistics); Point (geometry); Perfect competition; Complete lattice; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09652070557818943,"score_gpt":0.3410041735002537,"score_spread":0.24448346792206427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372440949","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16205993,0.0004337242,0.80779415,0.0005126096,0.000036490008,0.00017895972,0.00020970491,0.00008356837,0.028690765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91233385,0.00041676906,0.079566285,0.0001303589,0.000061927814,0.00034594286,0.0001662419,0.000041663137,0.0069369795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974847,0.001185032,0.00010962205,0.00034453868,0.00046594368,0.00041018063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960337,0.0024807428,0.00054021797,0.0002580018,0.0003748075,0.00031242645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031061263,0.00087341806,0.0013685869,0.0012962347,0.0012378212,0.002863329,0.0019012602,0.0015359786,0.0060535413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010294217,0.00048555646,0.0012916753,0.0016949938,0.002878671,0.004959077,0.0022089006,0.0017745018,0.0006437816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044925837,0.00004047525,0.00025006078,0.000036871275,0.000019901147,0.00007825326,0.00009774645,0.038771972,0.000510197,0.9560418,0.00035224413,0.0037555243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033234843,0.000028706158,0.00011535024,0.0000109209695,0.000007760866,0.00005654251,0.000053300777,0.21875465,0.00027031012,0.77978027,0.0008739676,0.000014973019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013155275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009929319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060535413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020226894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094679644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020251095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398162565","doi":"10.3917/rpec.162.0171","title":"Three Wives Problem and Shapley Value. Answer to Professor De Mesnard’s Criticism","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de philosophie économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Criticism; Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Political science; Game theory; Law","score_opus":0.10184802595049554,"score_gpt":0.26367000864328677,"score_spread":0.16182198269279124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398162565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025652565,0.012064843,0.0759093,0.42310038,0.0037398438,0.000091533526,0.00033694712,0.00010915146,0.4589954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8049256,0.0063077817,0.023361227,0.040124733,0.0045359046,0.00025029978,0.0001535516,0.00016309234,0.12017789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971711,0.001414536,0.000085781016,0.00046162325,0.0006874563,0.00017943856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493563,0.0034669132,0.00022518159,0.0005604059,0.0005877522,0.00022396681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00438437,0.00048278095,0.0008614566,0.00079690083,0.0024918634,0.0034878282,0.002008853,0.006579594,0.015148445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015219842,0.0003442396,0.0009628622,0.0010080491,0.009355651,0.009125223,0.0026924915,0.008000674,0.0016072661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008720468,0.000007805013,0.0000401171,0.0000136349345,0.000004335105,0.000010914639,0.00007112136,0.00019427974,0.000012560683,0.98693293,0.009243314,0.003460306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012257039,0.000003539287,0.00004091747,0.000015656015,0.0000015660935,0.000014977219,0.00004815058,0.00039819774,0.00002384263,0.98468614,0.014752031,0.0000027419976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020133024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018361037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015148445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034106309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019624813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050676525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402827424","doi":"10.5555/2772879.2773411","title":"Controlling Elections by Replacing Candidates or Votes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Voting; Constructive; Computer science; Approval voting; Control (management); Computational complexity theory; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Condorcet method; Algorithm; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.13559947351797666,"score_gpt":0.2883170122992241,"score_spread":0.15271753878124741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402827424","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23593715,0.00065882166,0.7417897,0.0008545154,0.00024039185,0.0003706658,0.000264723,0.0007137664,0.019170217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386524,0.00016751855,0.05609906,0.00011617477,0.0000930545,0.0001808549,0.00013309473,0.00007054761,0.0044872095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917241,0.0046192203,0.00028943762,0.0013930552,0.001070642,0.00090360414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782098,0.014205501,0.00297083,0.003360073,0.0006813112,0.00057241344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063785305,0.0009070612,0.0015810416,0.00064349204,0.0008455596,0.0033128494,0.002588676,0.0013755419,0.0058743986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030925957,0.00046426101,0.0011529982,0.0011394613,0.002532366,0.0032570686,0.0015763217,0.0018599002,0.00078605535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013804334,0.00042377625,0.0074817645,0.0003639385,0.00022633429,0.00035162017,0.00051533815,0.2196934,0.0092986375,0.5958616,0.0034611947,0.160942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044283515,0.0004986727,0.0011314388,0.000036297326,0.00009866722,0.00019740661,0.000117052725,0.61805,0.0068615065,0.3658997,0.0065890686,0.00007739553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021990528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022583026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063785305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012080974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011632788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03373331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404625657","doi":"10.5555/2615731.2616149","title":"Imputation, social choice, and partial preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Missing data; Conceptualization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Preference; Social choice theory; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09478026045088839,"score_gpt":0.2753525177555754,"score_spread":0.180572257304687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404625657","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00726703,0.0002486011,0.98744327,0.0016221153,0.0000958228,0.000052504554,0.00019160475,0.00008695302,0.0029920249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42849937,0.000898422,0.5580521,0.0010015747,0.00062205497,0.0006113431,0.00085185614,0.00012021068,0.009343095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902175,0.0069654947,0.00031212353,0.0011532163,0.000902376,0.00044929722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97356963,0.019335028,0.002161208,0.0033327844,0.0010385938,0.00056271633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011067029,0.00093471847,0.0020816221,0.0015338558,0.0014538441,0.002214836,0.0039187004,0.0032842082,0.0083785355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04615683,0.0008108002,0.0023232675,0.003014879,0.0027991603,0.0051220814,0.0033702399,0.004627565,0.0009229937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014514875,0.00014203417,0.003066938,0.00021451572,0.00022003365,0.00019288447,0.00029890888,0.09562384,0.00022684038,0.8176393,0.0057503525,0.0764792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038447186,0.000028964778,0.0002986778,0.0000354529,0.000022414008,0.00007113565,0.000048769318,0.20756781,0.00014760313,0.78881377,0.0029075039,0.00001941666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022495184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002557199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011067029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013317658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021744997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05852878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405578672","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-657","title":"The Computational Impact of Partial Votes on Strategic Voting","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07724695675360152,"score_gpt":0.27899106933895806,"score_spread":0.20174411258535654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405578672","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18762861,0.0016862002,0.74180967,0.003425511,0.00049124804,0.00023098629,0.0003677973,0.0007595085,0.06360048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85019475,0.000656075,0.1362782,0.00038347504,0.00026723553,0.00023900071,0.0005296024,0.00021298642,0.011238666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342334,0.0037478188,0.00024309188,0.0007797809,0.0012611146,0.0005447454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757411,0.018896751,0.00080823404,0.0031808051,0.0009278537,0.00044525912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004689123,0.0008783922,0.00169045,0.00077748933,0.0012869855,0.004130428,0.0024712544,0.0014512589,0.009149811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032748096,0.0007551951,0.0013616107,0.0015468525,0.0026099873,0.007887953,0.0031853362,0.0036429188,0.0011921489],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008092629,0.00018171231,0.0026177769,0.00026308474,0.00012318896,0.0001650346,0.00025112124,0.2805456,0.0018944142,0.5674992,0.008491349,0.13715823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070721115,0.0000835819,0.00057136605,0.00002828498,0.00003832728,0.000059451122,0.00004414726,0.6173097,0.0011385321,0.3779975,0.0026390585,0.000019319865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020365354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029164723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009149811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017822252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014717719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03060919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463032555","doi":"","title":"A characterization of voting power for discrete weight distributions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Shapley value; Power index; Mathematical economics; Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Weighted voting; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.10296346771578477,"score_gpt":0.28766885548812776,"score_spread":0.184705387772343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463032555","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18904641,0.00028962287,0.79077005,0.0006383977,0.00004396167,0.00016593223,0.00031575264,0.00012163479,0.018608198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620994,0.0002706067,0.032855265,0.00011596347,0.00008700956,0.00019814212,0.00021713767,0.000078374615,0.004078095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951721,0.0019195132,0.00025477834,0.000928993,0.000981253,0.00074339396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96973175,0.022297882,0.003391806,0.0022306761,0.0013832472,0.0009646432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064097247,0.00084953615,0.0012864143,0.0020374176,0.0009240514,0.0033053383,0.0029426978,0.0016017336,0.007931812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04953845,0.000640436,0.001085949,0.002367055,0.0044397996,0.00729306,0.0018632315,0.002358904,0.0006850978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009598403,0.00006613037,0.0022583546,0.0000817402,0.00004666357,0.00012040783,0.00041691118,0.08997986,0.0021824,0.8898451,0.0006690859,0.014237403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031657164,0.000070795744,0.0010495418,0.000031719603,0.000013649952,0.00014571087,0.00011155486,0.4367729,0.0007065535,0.5596999,0.0013347678,0.00003120729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012527632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005890993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007931812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022390278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085134857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033898234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464078358","doi":"","title":"Misrepresentation in district voting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Probabilistic logic; Voting; Representation (politics); Computer science; Accountability; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.18653050512844216,"score_gpt":0.3116819358125312,"score_spread":0.12515143068408902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464078358","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41076505,0.0010091502,0.53831875,0.002543241,0.00021747728,0.00026808618,0.00048262556,0.00050009065,0.045895513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912437,0.00012476959,0.016771037,0.00014120717,0.000058666297,0.00007631989,0.0001286563,0.000051065672,0.0035239581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96959203,0.019840851,0.0011981286,0.0030454665,0.0041164323,0.0022070839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183812,0.046143606,0.011572835,0.017414598,0.0047577694,0.0017299434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015122587,0.0003995651,0.0013678207,0.0014668886,0.0020310374,0.004173529,0.002212024,0.0016563556,0.0070526367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10882427,0.0005162253,0.00072662154,0.002208209,0.0027792288,0.0047741253,0.0039488543,0.002258289,0.0010441059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000979237,0.00013790892,0.038291864,0.00022344025,0.0001813401,0.0004226991,0.0016886017,0.11726418,0.0017218202,0.7091271,0.0063390546,0.1236228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012687828,0.00030650262,0.013309199,0.00009631233,0.00013292508,0.0007499299,0.0011217608,0.30693683,0.004707103,0.6594908,0.012920209,0.000101488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012869413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015045789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015122587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026561776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013637221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07997686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467276603","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2937201","title":"Investigating the Characteristics of One-Sided Matching Mechanisms: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Matching (statistics); Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Dictatorship; Space (punctuation); Mechanism (biology); Task (project management); Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.10171893914074176,"score_gpt":0.2588623865931234,"score_spread":0.15714344745238162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467276603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48021567,0.0017390896,0.47479108,0.0027590469,0.0002939233,0.00043957276,0.00095624896,0.00034779418,0.038457572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563569,0.00085316563,0.03399533,0.00041134254,0.00020042436,0.00031107827,0.00031618474,0.00007276022,0.0074827997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968401,0.0014091609,0.0002542635,0.00068186416,0.00037879878,0.0004356655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432678,0.032684658,0.012820558,0.006872216,0.002616535,0.0017382146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00764063,0.0005534822,0.0015131609,0.0014444133,0.0010158026,0.0024420053,0.0024994453,0.0022686147,0.020703966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048298225,0.0004778074,0.0014291417,0.0026551876,0.0021379478,0.0048403954,0.0016792023,0.0019715063,0.0014986135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002710108,0.00029487972,0.0038604091,0.00047111127,0.00015049554,0.00018899028,0.00028952942,0.052055992,0.0022794341,0.90539426,0.0054430813,0.029300911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016765644,0.000285314,0.001937562,0.000091801056,0.000060949722,0.000280971,0.00011613599,0.16757369,0.0010292862,0.825958,0.0024514438,0.000047034064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007110887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042868202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020703966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010868675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012214391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06926167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479077205","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2937144","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting under Non-Scoring Rules: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Convergence (economics); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Iterative method; Social choice theory; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1481050922965997,"score_gpt":0.30445444729394866,"score_spread":0.15634935499734895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479077205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7743272,0.00065497204,0.20582846,0.0007697625,0.00005605947,0.00017196834,0.0002947935,0.00017342855,0.017723441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986466,0.00013020652,0.011602742,0.000044115626,0.00002452912,0.00006126134,0.00014398934,0.000036309295,0.0014908115],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946267,0.0028504357,0.00033615643,0.0007874183,0.0008688605,0.00053048035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8138257,0.14102553,0.018055262,0.0117087,0.012838248,0.0025465323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012535053,0.00035429242,0.001103846,0.0014935383,0.00073229504,0.002726555,0.0015008878,0.0012655635,0.005713043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122450694,0.00030824696,0.00093250856,0.001650483,0.0030442888,0.0032438843,0.0014113756,0.0019006586,0.00065998937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014327107,0.0005791562,0.055906065,0.0004470328,0.00046609485,0.00031894312,0.002062413,0.42635396,0.0032400575,0.42343462,0.003965718,0.08179332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011805896,0.00025216275,0.013239295,0.00007566503,0.000059958624,0.000166483,0.00027727854,0.6080292,0.001511368,0.37529713,0.00092265324,0.000050737748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003043516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014245652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012535053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016715459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009793441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066292465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494900181","doi":"10.5555/2936924.2936947","title":"Strategy-Proofness in the Stable Matching Problem with Couples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Complementarity (molecular biology); Stable marriage problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Stability (learning theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08909092805595974,"score_gpt":0.25137584936900165,"score_spread":0.1622849213130419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494900181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23418829,0.00041183547,0.7507626,0.002397568,0.000052176518,0.00045071467,0.0005252182,0.00030834318,0.0109034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8219425,0.00048268653,0.17123552,0.00053230155,0.00011975031,0.0005181155,0.00058031833,0.00011102927,0.0044777608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206865,0.0040263757,0.0006474351,0.0016989004,0.0008050171,0.00075364916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588304,0.03253428,0.0033730038,0.002820947,0.0009972069,0.0014441877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285511,0.0009868479,0.0022062832,0.0010022618,0.0022845913,0.0038344776,0.0024629862,0.003214592,0.008157583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045248564,0.00081068586,0.0020463823,0.0017519663,0.0038212095,0.007815083,0.0036126217,0.0030336962,0.000824853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053614436,0.00044193328,0.0047869356,0.00048782388,0.00035090875,0.0006145879,0.0015084432,0.12220937,0.0032140329,0.8024462,0.0041782213,0.059225332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020051718,0.0001294762,0.0003126884,0.000038667782,0.00003764603,0.00020959019,0.00020764445,0.17716551,0.0008735325,0.81907195,0.0017221555,0.000030591356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012347514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071802596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008285511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011220531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024060614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043818474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503919929","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10440","title":"Using the Shapley Value to Analyze Algorithm Portfolios","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics; Compute Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Portfolio; Algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Cooperative game theory; Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Strengths and weaknesses; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematical economics; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.14428951096714085,"score_gpt":0.30294544640319626,"score_spread":0.1586559354360554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503919929","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10538629,0.000570344,0.87941265,0.0010319051,0.00005541489,0.00023026626,0.00015559969,0.00020199585,0.01295561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8072806,0.000545996,0.18862954,0.00017927782,0.0001131907,0.0002982109,0.00024482812,0.00016178293,0.0025465905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337065,0.0034943037,0.00030536688,0.0005741228,0.0017677873,0.00048773343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753651,0.018574642,0.00175327,0.0022550575,0.001306756,0.00074509636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012596924,0.0013092078,0.0014363779,0.0044967397,0.0012483258,0.0055644237,0.002211116,0.0016598507,0.0032131854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048955273,0.00065792137,0.0012489508,0.004271044,0.0037793033,0.009440587,0.003081065,0.0028199863,0.000311252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011274556,0.00014696563,0.00507545,0.00014337756,0.00018093709,0.0000655387,0.00037292435,0.34331247,0.0015005284,0.58771944,0.0013263323,0.06004339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019315967,0.00008414643,0.0005587941,0.000025902378,0.000019093533,0.000030672305,0.00007666026,0.52771515,0.0008105625,0.46924117,0.0013978763,0.000020739535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015042172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013546145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012596924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036684426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029667474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066619694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503945755","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499845.025","title":"Third Parties: Effects of an Outsider","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dyad; Ask price; Joint (building); Third party; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Computer science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Economy","score_opus":0.028252452317426235,"score_gpt":0.18472411517334894,"score_spread":0.1564716628559227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503945755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50941056,0.001973665,0.01348089,0.0067893546,0.00028849777,0.000244369,0.0005150511,0.00013450778,0.46716312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509088,0.0006100054,0.0009767838,0.0010222481,0.00009385323,0.00008596906,0.00012689541,0.00006596848,0.046109542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958663,0.0023525227,0.00008313206,0.00036092225,0.0005296763,0.00080739235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944325,0.014322458,0.0019518438,0.0017567389,0.0008716578,0.0016541128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005014929,0.0007039701,0.0013143828,0.00069138635,0.003253258,0.006046754,0.0011897837,0.0039409325,0.083875895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014824153,0.0004557851,0.0011084772,0.00087831734,0.0017640389,0.0037552104,0.0051472434,0.004361026,0.0044360035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052550468,0.0049458155,0.065629065,0.00071204326,0.0006804054,0.0061025657,0.0143288765,0.020417754,0.010933756,0.7307254,0.03716073,0.10310857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032472124,0.003172183,0.1313749,0.00090092496,0.0020667228,0.0024184317,0.035372466,0.050573934,0.010285673,0.6050582,0.1551792,0.00035008643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060760705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003953869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083875895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016630976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010441089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513805426","doi":"10.1007/s10458-017-9369-5","title":"Computational aspects of strategic behaviour in elections with top-truncated ballots","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Constructive; Mathematical economics; Preference; Minimax; Focus (optics); Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Computational complexity theory; Theoretical computer science; Political science; Microeconomics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07740140233226057,"score_gpt":0.2746905057048963,"score_spread":0.19728910337263572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513805426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60193247,0.0004319158,0.37350595,0.0029388175,0.000103774524,0.000076326636,0.00029300302,0.00023217783,0.020485587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867072,0.00007599505,0.010973323,0.00006946325,0.000031376912,0.000032616495,0.00009931598,0.000029324137,0.0019814298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978543,0.0012099504,0.000084467225,0.00027464985,0.00025937715,0.0003173043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97565395,0.020638533,0.0012712824,0.0009874356,0.0006777132,0.0007711821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035618169,0.00040513693,0.0017246691,0.0008728594,0.0013445888,0.003941013,0.002401467,0.0020659636,0.0077914884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036056735,0.00080386264,0.0009660112,0.0009384634,0.0030881988,0.005553553,0.0018163595,0.0025073194,0.00040964887],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023672658,0.000112821996,0.0040158005,0.00011789369,0.00007602111,0.00016585385,0.00045931147,0.33673304,0.000729295,0.6468266,0.0016230856,0.0089034885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025597576,0.0000150631295,0.00046832787,0.00000976845,0.000011722297,0.000024774414,0.00009189558,0.6644429,0.0001491924,0.3345417,0.00020860389,0.000010505625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007555264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008219821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077914884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001806312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018650406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026065111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515370313","doi":"10.4169/mathhorizons.24.1.10","title":"The Mean(est) Voting System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Math Horizons","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Graduate students; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer graphics (images); Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.02282378017141655,"score_gpt":0.20141700521129122,"score_spread":0.17859322503987468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515370313","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040801663,0.0006662627,0.7935141,0.0028824303,0.0016263558,0.0009503524,0.014063097,0.033170447,0.11232521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48284522,0.00026647205,0.371973,0.0009869264,0.00058587495,0.00074915,0.017561229,0.0022629849,0.12276909],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685425,0.00090647856,0.00021498417,0.0008588544,0.00077302504,0.00039243582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612314,0.0008631012,0.00012291236,0.0014766153,0.0012395803,0.00017461008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028472778,0.0005411039,0.001195327,0.0014497946,0.0011229953,0.0024753592,0.0018580173,0.0015372282,0.07826289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013131563,0.000489574,0.0010496301,0.001232712,0.000342806,0.0020154025,0.0017323936,0.0012445173,0.037604794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008524078,0.00020720995,0.00487152,0.00016249537,0.000116637886,0.00007600812,0.0000760715,0.01714668,0.00409549,0.02400885,0.23489827,0.71348846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037312318,0.0004124982,0.005390902,0.00007339727,0.00010964901,0.0005106596,0.00012698903,0.7662814,0.018159725,0.07124484,0.13721308,0.00010362842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026600345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004962019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07826289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007904047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001573778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517888522","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1608.05038","title":"Electoral Stability and Rigidity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Santa Fe Institute","keywords":"Rigidity (electromagnetism); Politics; Loyalty; Electoral system; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.13890272249538527,"score_gpt":0.17322932587105128,"score_spread":0.03432660337566601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517888522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32168856,0.004252111,0.2570424,0.025053395,0.000538421,0.00017696133,0.00073740707,0.00031270416,0.39019796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98524505,0.0005218799,0.0062366175,0.00051499176,0.00021207865,0.00004508543,0.0000978992,0.00004237162,0.007083873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609935,0.0016004648,0.0003032777,0.00079625373,0.00063659815,0.00056408485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891481,0.0051747113,0.002085742,0.0018801355,0.001066447,0.00064490736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040135207,0.00030728805,0.0007491648,0.0021999509,0.0023647374,0.0044182567,0.0011855859,0.0016545674,0.01578434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021127347,0.000329846,0.001002864,0.0023858277,0.007358553,0.0053938916,0.004155103,0.0023313842,0.0011688826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038399132,0.000011424828,0.001725411,0.00003907367,0.000020025436,0.000026803486,0.00041284846,0.003108457,0.00013579545,0.98607975,0.000745486,0.0076565533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002069665,0.000039252987,0.003555211,0.000037589652,0.00001282408,0.00010508342,0.00038766387,0.0063966005,0.0002599617,0.9757244,0.01344222,0.000018637302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019655891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010935502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01578434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026397163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000993256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052803934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527480274","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2016.09.011","title":"An elementary integrality proof of Rothblum’s stable matching formulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rounding; Elementary proof; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Hull; Combinatorial proof; Convex hull; Matching (statistics); Discrete mathematics; Regular polygon; Computer science; Graph","score_opus":0.08850971007240122,"score_gpt":0.3358788426814007,"score_spread":0.2473691326089995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527480274","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047530293,0.001084905,0.73899454,0.008608253,0.00061774004,0.000149643,0.00044206582,0.00025768875,0.20231487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448241,0.0011856455,0.10089228,0.002305839,0.00083904644,0.00033904,0.0003254824,0.00030002496,0.04898858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986908,0.00040601633,0.000060456376,0.00028931958,0.00031957243,0.00023387042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969951,0.0017140076,0.00019883472,0.00031512938,0.0005621939,0.00021477272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029477738,0.0009174214,0.0013354135,0.0015583743,0.0018720654,0.0030866724,0.002993556,0.0025916586,0.020255694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010366611,0.0007248448,0.0018301377,0.0020253593,0.0033512977,0.0071696006,0.0035531085,0.005328537,0.0023312634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007331372,0.000012266058,0.000032305543,0.000017315542,0.0000043410773,0.000016316148,0.000051955027,0.0005943126,0.00018258857,0.99590886,0.0011870285,0.0019855283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072775183,0.00000506127,0.00004032559,0.000006933775,0.0000049449786,0.00001686231,0.000014988942,0.0051073846,0.000120004945,0.99312335,0.0015486379,0.0000042744805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009171015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020255694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023596515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015445387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06776202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537425629","doi":"10.1007/s11127-016-0386-8","title":"Paths to victory in presidential elections: the setup power of noncompetitive states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; CONTEST; Economics; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Electoral college; Power (physics); Public finance; State (computer science); Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Macroeconomics; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.021180272451113084,"score_gpt":0.22609426680521458,"score_spread":0.2049139943541015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537425629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87373686,0.0005118309,0.07905926,0.0040499177,0.000056213812,0.0000880907,0.00045228188,0.00014451634,0.041900884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494994,0.0000980921,0.0025740582,0.000068872694,0.00002431806,0.00003641682,0.00008751834,0.000027854163,0.0021328563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939242,0.003970204,0.00016280457,0.00070185814,0.00035624584,0.0008846169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953531,0.08863722,0.0059452895,0.0038937798,0.0014518952,0.00471866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010426679,0.00048306058,0.0015166865,0.0014490631,0.0022629607,0.0074774944,0.0025231494,0.0028332192,0.022768874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062323734,0.0009553782,0.0012448024,0.001430908,0.004243884,0.009198768,0.0033741663,0.0051962333,0.0008318523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001303494,0.0002460507,0.009382745,0.00014987242,0.00016576935,0.00018054238,0.001198976,0.040920217,0.00067578605,0.9214251,0.0030866018,0.021264818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024703392,0.00013688815,0.0041254116,0.000035745965,0.00007275422,0.000076969256,0.0007588462,0.081647694,0.0004397005,0.9110721,0.0013420279,0.000044770662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023084197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004071087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022768874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019565057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020626865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07616949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541059643","doi":"10.3968/8884","title":"Election of Workers' Representatives: Based on Lexicographic Preferences Ordering Method","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Voting; Preference; Order (exchange); Sequence (biology); Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Majority rule; Aggregate (composite); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06397228919364516,"score_gpt":0.3472868641934313,"score_spread":0.28331457499978613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541059643","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021660358,0.00022104997,0.9631979,0.0004824182,0.000093985844,0.00019077772,0.00018019167,0.0001734945,0.013799895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48983917,0.00047348902,0.49330628,0.00015797393,0.00015231533,0.00033758572,0.00054942555,0.00012425748,0.015059617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581736,0.0021470475,0.00018578427,0.00042869532,0.0010671202,0.00035408535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979097,0.0010862459,0.00015653108,0.00027100314,0.00044933325,0.00012709938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024860755,0.00040299987,0.000731274,0.001818768,0.001231356,0.0017956011,0.001218611,0.00067093055,0.004936943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006869114,0.00024717278,0.00074376067,0.0024527714,0.00096894376,0.002114224,0.00090837764,0.0010340805,0.0009565942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026223055,0.00011106087,0.0044871536,0.00021221308,0.00006316614,0.00016637935,0.0006699179,0.04906889,0.002895859,0.66664344,0.009448311,0.26597127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103758844,0.00011911506,0.0016014558,0.00006081969,0.00004943672,0.00025538908,0.00036100482,0.5302376,0.004859187,0.43999025,0.022274591,0.00008740122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003187317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003549794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004936943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001534259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001907359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016515672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549852367","doi":"","title":"Sharing the cost of a network : Core and core allocations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research portal (Tilburg University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Tree (set theory); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Solution set; Transferable utility; Solution concept; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2498699857539379,"score_gpt":0.32352671817900025,"score_spread":0.07365673242506235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549852367","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20241861,0.00029465463,0.7500961,0.0006739825,0.00003587017,0.00013641873,0.0001462492,0.00007798075,0.0461201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231355,0.00034298276,0.068241514,0.0001090509,0.00004369241,0.00020555008,0.00008140552,0.000066606706,0.0077737244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981901,0.00087735604,0.00006340792,0.00028151815,0.0002533051,0.00033429993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750406,0.0012459153,0.00033444856,0.0004313104,0.00025171915,0.00023247022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002309184,0.00058590196,0.00078097265,0.00070460566,0.0007371082,0.0024649797,0.0014815552,0.0013900191,0.007163406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009546541,0.00036707564,0.00053042657,0.0008626632,0.0019729994,0.0067027933,0.0022455426,0.0013191666,0.00038251755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006127749,0.000026373247,0.00026190694,0.000041395102,0.000012544909,0.00003486133,0.00010737789,0.035339426,0.0007899501,0.95058644,0.0007039419,0.012034473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023600927,0.000039935323,0.0003473874,0.000024959803,0.000015925265,0.000062027175,0.00013387641,0.14202721,0.000804607,0.854213,0.002296566,0.000010983273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012561093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012221885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007163406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009535695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023963988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567893196","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.23","title":"Social Evaluation under Risk and Uncertainty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Ex-ante; Mathematical economics; Observer (physics); Social choice theory; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051732212331264224,"score_gpt":0.22325647237612067,"score_spread":0.17152426004485644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567893196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033977035,0.015935948,0.25451237,0.024762524,0.0009580619,0.00013362443,0.00017959386,0.00009987938,0.669441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8485142,0.0145005295,0.052761603,0.0011166059,0.0010265204,0.00022397064,0.00016661093,0.00011299691,0.08157703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957218,0.0023939358,0.00017459666,0.00035084295,0.0010986028,0.00026022742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996786,0.0022927143,0.00016902876,0.00020779793,0.00043507182,0.00010950202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054711606,0.0007776939,0.00089504116,0.0010162973,0.0016337119,0.0053583332,0.0007597281,0.0018769302,0.0068574264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009150187,0.00029784825,0.0007472012,0.0010683928,0.006226135,0.0057060104,0.002669825,0.0024887777,0.0007858778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008644524,0.0000065764953,0.00006374355,0.0000369494,0.000009104725,0.000020173593,0.000300687,0.0054729627,0.00007480388,0.9784781,0.002252511,0.0132757295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028468025,0.000008067859,0.00006577963,0.000050213508,0.000004180831,0.0000124221615,0.00016278597,0.0061537693,0.00006774684,0.9803326,0.013133783,0.000005841449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019963556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00160431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068574264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047735386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019259802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03463465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568493403","doi":"10.17713/ajs.v46i1.133","title":"The Analysis of Ranking Data Using Score Functions and Penalized Likelihood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austrian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Nonparametric statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Embedding; Parametric statistics; Computer science; Parametric model; Sample (material); Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18914408815776917,"score_gpt":0.3157511285966428,"score_spread":0.1266070404388736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568493403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016447213,0.0002031249,0.9820617,0.00034407713,0.0000222642,0.000084560874,0.00017654583,0.00015376118,0.00050677144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49571857,0.0005446733,0.49640658,0.00034150283,0.00023880607,0.00086641026,0.0024803584,0.00033438663,0.003068573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96785307,0.025135666,0.0010449297,0.0021594143,0.0030897614,0.0007171455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85879576,0.11964028,0.006368475,0.009590138,0.004532368,0.0010729408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036867373,0.0015923877,0.003273219,0.006920335,0.0015591808,0.004400796,0.0039744647,0.0024743562,0.0034903353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14487775,0.00093146425,0.0025387034,0.006783449,0.004240967,0.0068454244,0.0028907438,0.004468679,0.0009903716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040091973,0.0003542733,0.024119716,0.0007021157,0.00062841584,0.00043978382,0.0008869584,0.3696942,0.0023107019,0.387308,0.0041986424,0.20895633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021012464,0.00008899489,0.0037163713,0.000053075735,0.000025776035,0.0001211118,0.00011461987,0.86165404,0.0006098965,0.13208763,0.001448538,0.000058881862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028180962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020760808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036867373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002069359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016877546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19497561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569842696","doi":"10.7202/1044716ar","title":"Pivots et élections","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08920177926384794,"score_gpt":0.26765481876704345,"score_spread":0.17845303950319552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569842696","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09889555,0.01071576,0.63433987,0.014793889,0.0015953163,0.00028139597,0.0010848667,0.0003440283,0.23794945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899514,0.004489127,0.04741397,0.0010442443,0.0005763236,0.00023306682,0.00050416595,0.00014425056,0.04608081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959693,0.0023660853,0.00014594951,0.0005526646,0.00055729673,0.00040870183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995637,0.0029260379,0.00045803702,0.00049045624,0.00029006545,0.00019837079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003422566,0.0007528748,0.0013550867,0.0009646846,0.0014660214,0.0054372973,0.0014196011,0.0025293422,0.015181347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012777977,0.00074454886,0.0011016998,0.0015392217,0.0038485313,0.00456788,0.0016831245,0.0033640696,0.0021868702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021208638,0.00000877214,0.0003269823,0.00004534946,0.000010425563,0.000014378346,0.00010890823,0.006476631,0.00008828846,0.98741585,0.000904292,0.004578904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030274747,0.000026236967,0.0003563944,0.000041899133,0.000007028206,0.000031896314,0.000115776515,0.017932422,0.0001349632,0.96880877,0.0125009185,0.00001348661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047666593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004380371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015181347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026869131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050786614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575965070","doi":"","title":"The Simpler, the Better: A New Challenge for Fair-Division Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Distributive justice; Procedural justice; Division (mathematics); Distributive property; Economic Justice; Outcome (game theory); Imperfect; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.04985134622381167,"score_gpt":0.20998089090791816,"score_spread":0.1601295446841065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575965070","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061742622,0.011315186,0.42130563,0.24910805,0.002477753,0.00023764173,0.00018729342,0.00017053846,0.2534553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038447,0.0023860768,0.07180746,0.011399529,0.001547647,0.0003126549,0.00006908761,0.00015269645,0.008480083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984385,0.008506468,0.0005652458,0.0022208209,0.0034237595,0.0008986913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795476,0.012635418,0.0011621525,0.0035892874,0.0018911979,0.0011743219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026511014,0.0006844642,0.0018879295,0.0016397623,0.0053556273,0.008935341,0.002705744,0.0034301076,0.0067892345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034455247,0.000389803,0.001134559,0.0013684501,0.048215978,0.021580601,0.0055641886,0.010640416,0.00075648475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001250865,0.000018903609,0.00013298365,0.000020217156,0.0000049896107,0.0000065728327,0.00042736647,0.00029118216,0.000037399353,0.99340916,0.0009317701,0.0047069774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008068305,0.00000813084,0.00006275353,0.000013988163,0.0000017517425,0.000005949864,0.00016213027,0.0006082173,0.000023475435,0.99570113,0.0034000208,0.0000042563793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029320202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022688652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026511014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005290342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044717793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14020532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576139645","doi":"10.1613/jair.5187","title":"Convergence of Iterative Scoring Rules","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Convergence (economics); Social choice theory; Veto; Majority rule; Iterative and incremental development; Order (exchange); Aggregate (composite); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.3029385508815912,"score_gpt":0.3929278465399769,"score_spread":0.0899892956583857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576139645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032780834,0.00026245066,0.9525408,0.00029155915,0.00009018817,0.00038219502,0.000082082974,0.00034535356,0.013224453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4849329,0.0004892784,0.49928403,0.00037722432,0.00011905533,0.0015144504,0.0004214796,0.00044353397,0.012418051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800534,0.0054841484,0.0009538968,0.0017167261,0.0028567987,0.0009830146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94324213,0.038260236,0.002844868,0.0057107247,0.00892694,0.0010151372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013649496,0.0014522633,0.0020411848,0.0023740206,0.0019091526,0.0031113708,0.0033783526,0.0024491525,0.0054338323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100014545,0.0010212702,0.0019095533,0.001307908,0.0032500713,0.003751154,0.0042256103,0.0036167332,0.0022732746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022647316,0.00020810825,0.006431676,0.00033136475,0.000252254,0.00034064148,0.0015027871,0.3112554,0.0033865508,0.5135826,0.004213867,0.15826842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049473696,0.0001034633,0.00036755757,0.0001093667,0.000031760366,0.00015197175,0.0001373774,0.7401203,0.0021205992,0.2533115,0.0034494314,0.00004719589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033824265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002918478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013649496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016295771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028983005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07218629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583602942","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-53007-9_10","title":"Analysis of 2-Opt Heuristic for the Winner Determination Problem Under the Chamberlin-Courant System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristic; Misrepresentation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Time complexity; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.03331328423480352,"score_gpt":0.24465982905647093,"score_spread":0.21134654482166743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583602942","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16621047,0.0025776527,0.7905786,0.0021257258,0.00043209153,0.00056551816,0.00048209782,0.00075301237,0.036274876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74663913,0.00081264414,0.2360722,0.00073198235,0.00031470024,0.00053702795,0.00063408114,0.00059411186,0.013664064],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972867,0.0014142735,0.00008294956,0.00027589794,0.00039497123,0.0005452089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840739,0.013433182,0.00056028843,0.00057797245,0.0008121125,0.00054257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003868461,0.0012460848,0.0028896001,0.0014185809,0.0015461043,0.0031000078,0.003487976,0.0032444596,0.014294203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150285605,0.00084960746,0.0013675537,0.0015747884,0.0016448114,0.003430887,0.0018136452,0.002913792,0.0008990909],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009980984,0.0004961102,0.0017787657,0.00050577277,0.00015992319,0.00016034575,0.00028304016,0.775474,0.0018536489,0.14437011,0.0139960395,0.059924178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007063872,0.00009031195,0.0002083453,0.00003251779,0.000029158016,0.000040665425,0.000059988906,0.95695966,0.00022422065,0.041738007,0.00053027266,0.00001621969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049864836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057317954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014294203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028301468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005506581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0478189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584545229","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.004","title":"Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Per capita; Parliament; Representation (politics); Unitary state; German; Population; European union; Power (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Law; Sociology; International trade; Physics","score_opus":0.08968767137900256,"score_gpt":0.2712019785617748,"score_spread":0.18151430718277223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584545229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560164,0.0009590648,0.00782522,0.005300254,0.000071812254,0.00012768265,0.0021873508,0.00014658783,0.027365692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847093,0.0002929203,0.0011141581,0.00016863787,0.000017280756,0.00003670302,0.00035600035,0.00002377038,0.013281257],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976156,0.000547444,0.000046848523,0.00020605313,0.00018806297,0.0013960468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195707,0.0044537648,0.000556483,0.00026826112,0.0012591452,0.0015052758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040855547,0.00075420225,0.0025849962,0.0014264325,0.0040330794,0.0073334477,0.0039959527,0.0035349857,0.012758106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010331955,0.000809909,0.0018062509,0.002311975,0.0034527606,0.0024336595,0.0013495442,0.0024566362,0.0007844024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009667806,0.00041559586,0.02570396,0.0001367916,0.0001851567,0.00032182288,0.0012694229,0.6507192,0.00034643392,0.28917906,0.018184524,0.012571163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040684463,0.00012501348,0.01586196,0.00008007473,0.00022971714,0.000042380398,0.0033925893,0.90924025,0.00028765868,0.06415028,0.0060241357,0.000159001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95724237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96311253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04275763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03636094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028834384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26381832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592731255","doi":"10.1007/s10458-018-9387-y","title":"Investigating the characteristics of one-sided matching mechanisms under various preferences and risk attitudes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Comparability; Lexicographical order; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Preference; Probabilistic logic; Mechanism (biology); Space (punctuation); Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07665672668725818,"score_gpt":0.26176025875086656,"score_spread":0.18510353206360838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592731255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.923975,0.00021807262,0.07118414,0.00051315123,0.000020391324,0.00015488135,0.00014701454,0.00009926217,0.003688171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929509,0.00011496458,0.0056000906,0.000035362027,0.000016203941,0.0000734503,0.0000750414,0.000013904608,0.0011201398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637777,0.0017976707,0.0002176629,0.0005728136,0.0003229498,0.0007110743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88659656,0.07975184,0.018310308,0.007601809,0.0037110676,0.0040283334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013255682,0.0004383031,0.0017439622,0.001817367,0.0012098108,0.0034165208,0.0030125182,0.0030136253,0.008087756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07704912,0.00070822594,0.0011284052,0.001606895,0.002266714,0.0065742387,0.0016807809,0.001828244,0.00045657592],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015353898,0.0008941473,0.024906209,0.00036796642,0.00040482153,0.0004118561,0.0014832075,0.10122825,0.009035324,0.82532823,0.0017999405,0.032604624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038928873,0.0004649859,0.007863561,0.00006210014,0.00017149046,0.00030492473,0.00089098455,0.57777977,0.002174285,0.40917066,0.0006383121,0.00008964509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007936921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000693981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013255682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014819426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017878762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070103586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603931501","doi":"","title":"Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Computer science; Adversary; Social choice theory; Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05544442268847323,"score_gpt":0.21448107583875167,"score_spread":0.15903665315027843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603931501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12459862,0.00025645498,0.8532948,0.0010571599,0.00005773548,0.00022267344,0.00023599934,0.00024078322,0.02003579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6798155,0.00017726039,0.3045949,0.00024033147,0.00005182738,0.00032785762,0.00027757644,0.00008353973,0.014431164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720263,0.0013897613,0.00014736658,0.0005493421,0.00037673992,0.00033412245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573344,0.0024968584,0.0005573202,0.0006927398,0.0002584401,0.00026123028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042469497,0.00074582105,0.0013689531,0.0007465364,0.0010924152,0.0027930108,0.0017297609,0.0014614786,0.0058454033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012250532,0.00047245683,0.00062460033,0.001138469,0.002040605,0.0035549658,0.0017590643,0.001497841,0.0009528747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006078198,0.00023542202,0.0019661668,0.00021623679,0.00010506767,0.00010587053,0.00064274896,0.20186938,0.0034956806,0.687848,0.0049845288,0.097923145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011796398,0.00009466856,0.00046432635,0.0000346788,0.000018397252,0.00006607569,0.00012267016,0.36384866,0.0016766887,0.6294258,0.004105849,0.000024157584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011034996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014399751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058454033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016310953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014807598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022460282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604412486","doi":"","title":"Job complexity and wage bargaining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Wage bargaining; Wage; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.12362318906240694,"score_gpt":0.32550432516881594,"score_spread":0.201881136106409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604412486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404195,0.0023572368,0.0426059,0.004475313,0.00033887185,0.00013779332,0.00015512701,0.000058680118,0.1094517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945866,0.00030554712,0.0012311446,0.00017565298,0.000094107905,0.000023891731,0.000020767257,0.000012230558,0.0035500987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961844,0.0018991235,0.00011914625,0.00026664662,0.00055492314,0.0009758119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054366,0.0058927997,0.001770493,0.00065604213,0.00025255483,0.00088438025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004409885,0.00050510356,0.0009926193,0.00067519135,0.0016086608,0.0030029109,0.0007000844,0.0015152344,0.020640831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015240461,0.00024564873,0.000779862,0.0007555363,0.0025825985,0.0019894321,0.0026843653,0.0019014096,0.0010881049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002541095,0.00090859365,0.015839111,0.0004648214,0.0002258191,0.00037166834,0.0019448777,0.1297492,0.0056163,0.74924296,0.003385762,0.08970977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066179736,0.0010137518,0.030411426,0.00016825307,0.00010651017,0.00017893544,0.0026245918,0.0698962,0.0015233492,0.88509226,0.008238723,0.00008417978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012943236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010812047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020640831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013422928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010936012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613277224","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.002","title":"Three little-known and yet still significant contributions of Lloyd Shapley","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Core (optical fiber); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04133412399462716,"score_gpt":0.2569065869552318,"score_spread":0.21557246296060462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613277224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04205563,0.04523822,0.4788096,0.086194195,0.008024157,0.00023954519,0.0006117573,0.00035403264,0.33847293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65965545,0.03352472,0.20182627,0.019781915,0.010967196,0.0003920562,0.0005699229,0.00039155307,0.07289088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746466,0.0013719533,0.0000978489,0.00038604462,0.0005131631,0.00016633439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928604,0.0047709765,0.00029900885,0.0009580181,0.0007185081,0.0003930804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046680705,0.0013533417,0.0011220783,0.0014014776,0.0017626641,0.0045767464,0.0019835918,0.0028369522,0.0053356537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019780856,0.0005498559,0.0008789146,0.002094212,0.0061817337,0.008286777,0.002992166,0.005222082,0.0014282893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027514845,0.00003590995,0.0002297471,0.00009909497,0.00002251207,0.00001595424,0.00018812077,0.0012686212,0.00007944255,0.9698833,0.008640226,0.019509515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007870955,0.0000063050265,0.000083434126,0.00004181451,0.0000073326487,0.000016109834,0.000037848058,0.0015929318,0.00009336091,0.9851762,0.012926451,0.0000102871345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010958303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010178316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053356537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021633592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023365582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02468741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620615090","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091250","title":"Distant Truth: Bias Under Vote Distortion Costs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Voting; Computer science; Distortion (music); Outcome (game theory); Surprise; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social psychology; Bandwidth (computing); Psychology","score_opus":0.20115803981468233,"score_gpt":0.29770024886114627,"score_spread":0.09654220904646393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620615090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42565438,0.0023589372,0.5363439,0.0066000046,0.00017187832,0.00022380696,0.00064358953,0.0002951489,0.027708333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809672,0.00037668485,0.014967108,0.00024239306,0.000117444455,0.0000776921,0.00012909506,0.000056525012,0.0030658056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398816,0.0029601185,0.00026786586,0.0010572423,0.0010065122,0.0007200672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462562,0.040374797,0.005994681,0.004640732,0.0017011319,0.00103239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862802,0.00080986007,0.0021789053,0.0012818151,0.0012030574,0.0035718696,0.0020803527,0.0028994817,0.0075167255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063143276,0.0006115043,0.0012306595,0.0012759871,0.0036828911,0.0053481515,0.0033538595,0.0034956213,0.0005289317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007146848,0.00010396613,0.01012852,0.00033626868,0.00019874584,0.00039741115,0.0005192458,0.15307482,0.0022866456,0.7969796,0.0019634753,0.033296645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016535724,0.000170901,0.0037956324,0.00008021045,0.00009153893,0.00039046348,0.00023795235,0.22405916,0.0019435437,0.76606953,0.0029330475,0.00006260166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020182407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015775868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007862802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010553333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621346283","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091215","title":"Divide and Conquer: Using Geographic Manipulation to Win District-Based Elections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Ballot; Divide and conquer algorithms; Computer science; Voting; Redistricting; Secret ballot; Political science; Computer security; Law; Algorithm; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.16505426797796252,"score_gpt":0.302302601841162,"score_spread":0.13724833386319946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621346283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6542864,0.0010628378,0.2628419,0.002756021,0.0001596576,0.00046025746,0.00032636937,0.0004452587,0.07766139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825477,0.00006892704,0.012857136,0.00012277698,0.000027102771,0.0000696989,0.00007441675,0.00003652172,0.0041956664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957703,0.0026584135,0.00009548613,0.00053260324,0.00037842835,0.00056475523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933698,0.003226345,0.001309915,0.0013754406,0.00025123975,0.0004670924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033707155,0.0003995259,0.0009988039,0.00066865585,0.0018207724,0.0023990339,0.0015600192,0.0013717356,0.012681256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015865108,0.00027328279,0.0005284766,0.0011470759,0.002155621,0.0032069846,0.0026079635,0.001512764,0.0012765098],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019954045,0.0006327385,0.033592466,0.00032855337,0.00035286119,0.0006891656,0.0032100019,0.19649887,0.006179898,0.51830804,0.014967211,0.2232448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009434771,0.0007024786,0.010996848,0.000073988114,0.00015000516,0.00042439406,0.0024195616,0.5029799,0.0038828626,0.4341561,0.043179963,0.00009044531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029315783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051206043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012681256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014099248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010487649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04242301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621370674","doi":"10.5555/3091125.3091251","title":"A Restricted Markov Tree Model for Inference and Generation in Social Choice with Incomplete Preferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Inference; Graphical model; Consistency (knowledge bases); Machine learning; Markov chain; Intuition; Markov model; Ranking (information retrieval); Artificial intelligence; Tree (set theory); Probabilistic logic; Social choice theory; Data mining; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.24764105549389467,"score_gpt":0.3200695065619617,"score_spread":0.07242845106806703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621370674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076497844,0.0001359808,0.9900394,0.00031562676,0.000024132356,0.00004760214,0.00035757388,0.00023970571,0.0011900911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.505409,0.0005567088,0.48367232,0.00035009353,0.00018481589,0.0006822321,0.0017625883,0.00021494909,0.0071672145],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996725,0.0019802903,0.00015304473,0.00060453755,0.00034766627,0.00018951095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026626,0.007907938,0.0005670968,0.00061847555,0.00040370636,0.00023651985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050503667,0.00068980316,0.0016814083,0.001395523,0.00085558224,0.0019221781,0.003407812,0.001856102,0.00772624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015965587,0.0007921333,0.0019223574,0.002145149,0.0016315745,0.0041590296,0.001506064,0.002667595,0.0014538815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012671603,0.000055362674,0.0013399847,0.0000960633,0.000084068364,0.00016237273,0.0002377984,0.593853,0.0005865384,0.377059,0.0019279784,0.024471186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001553744,0.00001345441,0.00009892124,0.0000064869464,0.000008689023,0.000021885846,0.000008257289,0.88187784,0.00006484438,0.1171436,0.0007298647,0.000010699165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008866191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012429795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008866191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001902408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016722749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026709199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622701023","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_3","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Stable marriage problem; Generalization; Transitive relation; Matching (statistics); Partition (number theory); Time complexity; Computer science; Combinatorics; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Linear programming; Binary number; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02694053044147743,"score_gpt":0.2048917570169648,"score_spread":0.17795122657548737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622701023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3989183,0.0019775098,0.27949235,0.006656073,0.00034209798,0.00017530305,0.0011098041,0.00031883415,0.31100968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92333376,0.0009131632,0.01648397,0.00046023808,0.00032823172,0.0001500403,0.0005891033,0.000077578865,0.05766401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863213,0.00061953976,0.00005057549,0.00024988133,0.00021541197,0.00023243103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996779,0.0018059224,0.0003330645,0.0004464344,0.00027448498,0.00036110284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014510757,0.00052340986,0.0011924476,0.0011103039,0.0025937583,0.003249826,0.0012960087,0.002150898,0.018300172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00844399,0.00055149826,0.00089456537,0.0021283561,0.0025141537,0.004922104,0.0022188693,0.0024680956,0.002233967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002642428,0.000015986958,0.00018781552,0.000020430982,0.000009876885,0.00006920194,0.00018919869,0.0012729453,0.00010860922,0.9908167,0.0017046892,0.0055782143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013742453,0.0000056983135,0.000083150175,0.000004378279,0.0000027537878,0.000046736306,0.00004679009,0.004349445,0.00002549541,0.99432844,0.0010894497,0.000003898079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013154937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011837544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018300172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009849857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076962035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06122017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734532307","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2997431","title":"Comparing Direct Algorithms for Two-Player Fair Division of Indivisible Items - A Computational Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.06715913606020675,"score_gpt":0.30465337107787055,"score_spread":0.2374942350176638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734532307","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44710803,0.0020347792,0.52260774,0.0013749201,0.00027656808,0.0005808239,0.0003337381,0.0006001385,0.025083225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.785338,0.00051109074,0.20491892,0.00022675426,0.00011510574,0.00033447277,0.00040486743,0.00016462148,0.007986098],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946333,0.0029227608,0.000251697,0.000771366,0.00081626093,0.000604597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839368,0.10510514,0.0013219323,0.0057182107,0.0023640858,0.00155393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009190198,0.0011364801,0.0023573125,0.0018986505,0.0019248914,0.0042832145,0.004197434,0.0035010856,0.013183421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049935423,0.0008495143,0.0016480647,0.0025603983,0.0024497746,0.0073672268,0.003720326,0.0030545623,0.0012528183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004197402,0.0024009864,0.006408843,0.00061266124,0.0002932859,0.00011147966,0.0008063351,0.553979,0.001224858,0.16850999,0.00709889,0.2543563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053198595,0.0004513036,0.0005438012,0.00003305125,0.00006351304,0.0000789847,0.0002471142,0.8697273,0.0007261844,0.12656374,0.0010043771,0.000028570892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062289145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009837145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013183421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044342536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005378264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736777795","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12362","title":"Assigning Refugees to Landlords in Sweden: Efficient, Stable, and Maximum Matchings*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Refugee; Matching (statistics); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.02097217008433751,"score_gpt":0.23221543219771554,"score_spread":0.21124326211337802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736777795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93227595,0.00015327825,0.059455525,0.001003495,0.000036858593,0.00010885509,0.0001814081,0.00007416422,0.006710539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834552,0.00006190901,0.014277956,0.000050714476,0.000008152308,0.000038808343,0.000068662244,0.0000137893785,0.002024839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977863,0.0013292781,0.00011446243,0.00029136246,0.000087221044,0.00039141314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969778,0.0015829828,0.00055780547,0.00035035342,0.00014126676,0.00038978198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002459105,0.0003407438,0.0010859992,0.00058217207,0.0011957865,0.0018421044,0.001037137,0.0015529209,0.0071640033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009365366,0.00039273547,0.000619399,0.0006791921,0.0011368169,0.0018609494,0.0016834218,0.000946341,0.0007280556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038982744,0.0012877232,0.071975775,0.0008268963,0.00047033667,0.0022748346,0.0038941428,0.29383823,0.011425836,0.40234852,0.013144289,0.19461516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010256424,0.0010432802,0.019596932,0.00020609969,0.00017738935,0.0013815209,0.0088520115,0.5578745,0.00605407,0.38762546,0.016023563,0.00013949261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034228277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034483108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071640033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008035057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008978333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023965955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738541582","doi":"10.1007/s10107-017-1177-9","title":"Stabilizing network bargaining games by blocking players","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.050215524796229226,"score_gpt":0.25902079185972754,"score_spread":0.2088052670634983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738541582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082967795,0.00018752912,0.89258534,0.0007702065,0.00010492989,0.000087666434,0.000065007465,0.0002479474,0.022983555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91027725,0.00035012554,0.06445838,0.0003112653,0.00010849911,0.0003974903,0.000102427024,0.00017589408,0.02381871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778265,0.0012776281,0.00006000261,0.00028718397,0.00025519024,0.0003375065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055195,0.0071380115,0.00074135995,0.0004977151,0.00058508554,0.00048586828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033594174,0.0012489966,0.0016048355,0.0009860336,0.001253634,0.0032891035,0.0027072835,0.0019169918,0.007488529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016734116,0.0009912541,0.00081694743,0.0010777279,0.0027154207,0.0031583644,0.0023449734,0.0025561738,0.001143014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020610905,0.00011527056,0.00033656214,0.00007732525,0.000036590776,0.000075576594,0.00019683276,0.24755116,0.0022223548,0.7386039,0.0021742845,0.0084040575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006907112,0.00003494347,0.000042172345,0.0000135616,0.000018599461,0.000014632922,0.00006262113,0.6529042,0.0004977719,0.3452893,0.0010431716,0.000009989679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023112856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025084144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007488529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002192946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025051594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741216165","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2017/39","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting Under Non-Scoring Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Convergence (economics); Anti-plurality voting; Veto; Heuristic; Quality (philosophy); Scoring rule; Social choice theory; Iterative and incremental development; Process (computing); Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12006604496420994,"score_gpt":0.30264111171508273,"score_spread":0.1825750667508728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741216165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82501936,0.00079390407,0.15454134,0.0005111278,0.000049740574,0.00030534345,0.00025905095,0.00028786567,0.018232206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810776,0.00014711417,0.016489748,0.000041872034,0.000016904882,0.00010269726,0.00024510414,0.000073022224,0.0018058608],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98377305,0.008440676,0.0010290662,0.0019240583,0.0031921424,0.0016410716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7048106,0.23568395,0.01945957,0.021818807,0.014780417,0.0034466244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029584581,0.00060596253,0.0018464132,0.0026115756,0.0012136995,0.0041017714,0.00276173,0.0018566472,0.005519734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22816136,0.00054499006,0.0012603248,0.0017003994,0.0031037237,0.0043888097,0.0020001384,0.0024156661,0.0011243632],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002588615,0.00075538387,0.10647707,0.0007429504,0.0009248785,0.00039653032,0.0033262637,0.4258412,0.004175572,0.3071861,0.004737811,0.14284764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018104192,0.00049958343,0.014935913,0.00013261376,0.00013040545,0.0003426678,0.0007944208,0.73772115,0.0028787798,0.2408183,0.0014740975,0.000091052876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025425327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018022903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029584581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021150007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017182122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1564601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746903696","doi":"10.1177/233150241700500306","title":"Matching Systems for Refugees","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal on Migration and Human Security","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Political science; European union; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics; International trade; Statistics","score_opus":0.0469500361408618,"score_gpt":0.2945206262690592,"score_spread":0.24757059012819743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746903696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05239109,0.026606016,0.2790004,0.09024117,0.0075434875,0.00073402346,0.003170676,0.0010305229,0.5392826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6676946,0.019306187,0.05957076,0.0058942717,0.0029496974,0.0007808846,0.0028274069,0.00034479474,0.24063139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.00039518691,0.000093792376,0.00015513823,0.00014793966,0.00013484107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976451,0.0011037649,0.00022765606,0.00031455024,0.00047574326,0.00023320771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023270482,0.00043966543,0.00064862845,0.0010999962,0.0015598283,0.0033544,0.0011352688,0.0023847623,0.06814187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011161746,0.00030915195,0.0009783449,0.0012005017,0.0010411439,0.0042367685,0.0026361146,0.0023319053,0.007428492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004038926,0.00002718126,0.0006351984,0.0001651353,0.000014692053,0.000066974164,0.00019546221,0.006443755,0.00013921442,0.88768685,0.049154185,0.055430934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005817279,0.00006464837,0.000759713,0.0002937178,0.000018183142,0.0001373255,0.00037301026,0.021359121,0.00023043161,0.759394,0.21728401,0.000027633352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033736483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00248705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06814187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002248475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016480514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22795731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752727483","doi":"10.3166/ria.32.169-195","title":"Jeux de coalitions hédoniques à concepts de solution multiples","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d intelligence artificielle","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Multiple; Mathematics; Computer science; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.0900844578895859,"score_gpt":0.3097086720033993,"score_spread":0.2196242141138134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752727483","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08709021,0.0027480607,0.85491264,0.0039747986,0.0006744523,0.0001487497,0.00016595781,0.00012470866,0.05016042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6907644,0.0038113354,0.22216208,0.0010282561,0.0023935963,0.000982476,0.0004908149,0.00023531687,0.07813156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953041,0.0021443227,0.00017761394,0.0008408107,0.0011359949,0.0003972057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98197526,0.013344613,0.0011258115,0.00063982274,0.0013038586,0.0016106709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007966775,0.0027814498,0.0030331928,0.004358058,0.0040379167,0.008680979,0.003106559,0.0055681556,0.012637485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025514007,0.0013148517,0.0034763652,0.003695691,0.008280262,0.01024294,0.0054925713,0.012454022,0.0010843296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023315464,0.000020760157,0.00009992549,0.00004275299,0.000025755078,0.00003345406,0.000147837,0.0061151832,0.00017669002,0.99040246,0.00057018694,0.002341679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057022942,0.000035097393,0.00017027184,0.00003795143,0.000019156898,0.00007101535,0.00013694208,0.092549056,0.00021297892,0.9032746,0.0034150279,0.000020863365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039003692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027623933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012637485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004868794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018491853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04227662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763695172","doi":"10.1080/00029890.2018.1517571","title":"An Impossibility Theorem for Gerrymandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"American Mathematical Monthly","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; York University; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Supreme court; Impossibility; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Politics; Democracy; Social choice theory","score_opus":0.044888958482563725,"score_gpt":0.2876275542904025,"score_spread":0.24273859580783877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763695172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10088041,0.00154173,0.74001646,0.033691797,0.0010441538,0.00030472723,0.0013205729,0.00096763833,0.1202325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87560695,0.0008011731,0.10182754,0.005772412,0.0009445391,0.000656255,0.0005393128,0.00026162688,0.013590147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885365,0.0040076734,0.0006910431,0.0037710068,0.0017091676,0.0012846361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573255,0.035019554,0.0017404056,0.0033975202,0.0018462777,0.0006707507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012382379,0.0010288905,0.002381103,0.0020194,0.0038567993,0.006334466,0.003078187,0.006011457,0.012746418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069064684,0.0011017753,0.0040017734,0.0015487233,0.011639947,0.014622938,0.0053502144,0.00870719,0.0016736193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027597061,0.000015276793,0.0004155345,0.000053422995,0.000026305339,0.00008622598,0.00014719268,0.0016177836,0.00015280006,0.99001056,0.003189253,0.004258087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000408468,0.000015302336,0.00014707928,0.000034299886,0.000022012364,0.00010849994,0.000036293637,0.0098861195,0.00027750616,0.9859635,0.003446699,0.00002182628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017988108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016685073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012746418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024061906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024149788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06548506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773928400","doi":"10.1111/caje.12308","title":"Can <i>EconJobMarket</i> help Canadian universities?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Matching (statistics); Simple (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical economics; Economics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.12526583528712118,"score_gpt":0.17470580816557227,"score_spread":0.04943997287845109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773928400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253141,0.002760138,0.030399762,0.38249275,0.0011998826,0.00024147998,0.0019393038,0.00084682455,0.50758845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84342366,0.0025591005,0.013772235,0.0145226475,0.00032778236,0.00009292322,0.00076077087,0.00017192667,0.12436893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974235,0.00068197725,0.000049889695,0.00014019907,0.0005842654,0.001120047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415296,0.0011566072,0.0002883433,0.0004531503,0.0021068517,0.0018421907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049156533,0.00030880878,0.0005010159,0.0010948621,0.004284217,0.005971422,0.0019510578,0.0032007438,0.04888433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01568206,0.00017584783,0.00048238874,0.0023813127,0.0020425918,0.003128112,0.0017452403,0.0014664151,0.005087299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026503718,0.00022763855,0.010860934,0.00022881212,0.000031867625,0.00015688414,0.0005539348,0.013665658,0.00053820695,0.5875671,0.21343797,0.17246598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024387779,0.000104465464,0.013167928,0.0003996299,0.0000557661,0.00011757179,0.003570954,0.06209785,0.0013702782,0.32792076,0.5907982,0.00015275156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73483473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8406124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97746056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022539437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051738393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790916376","doi":"10.1007/s10107-020-01483-4","title":"Computing the nucleolus of weighted cooperative matching games in polynomial time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Polynomial; Combinatorics; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.02933425322872214,"score_gpt":0.2293112564682024,"score_spread":0.19997700323948028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790916376","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20924689,0.0003136601,0.77416897,0.0013206289,0.00010237298,0.00016396845,0.0004975649,0.0008092908,0.013376732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81983876,0.00024591794,0.17270622,0.0002595878,0.0000890564,0.00024146683,0.0007053886,0.00041463188,0.005498979],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797636,0.00089137594,0.00007562848,0.0004514928,0.0002511981,0.00035395127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865752,0.01131505,0.00060091255,0.00053025817,0.0004136462,0.0005650458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027938583,0.0011148385,0.0022570333,0.0010678158,0.0011238289,0.0040249242,0.0021499863,0.0016371212,0.0081090685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018199394,0.0009329066,0.0010627091,0.0012070592,0.0022505631,0.005614611,0.002401787,0.002434697,0.00089065987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006648831,0.00030633522,0.0019926454,0.0002935922,0.00010703733,0.00011594176,0.00033967735,0.502145,0.0024363594,0.44448406,0.0063044587,0.04081008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051366518,0.000031073057,0.00013040505,0.000015779095,0.000012649257,0.000016565802,0.00007445726,0.6466839,0.000514627,0.35194698,0.00051253074,0.000009674253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047237417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006587444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081090685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024539395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003037929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027127504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793536574","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12139","title":"Suzumura‐consistent relations: An overview","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Social choice theory; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.08670218871279252,"score_gpt":0.3119330546765016,"score_spread":0.22523086596370911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793536574","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036035527,0.09074853,0.6817609,0.006719097,0.001275382,0.0002625193,0.00072853174,0.00051668077,0.18195276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6965068,0.044439156,0.2324612,0.0019725042,0.0037660713,0.0007080181,0.0009153657,0.00046940168,0.018761516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960896,0.0018695523,0.00030175346,0.0007291035,0.0007558437,0.00025427496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947137,0.0035080966,0.00038278644,0.00071195624,0.0005567845,0.00012670127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006530396,0.0006026944,0.0012947873,0.0037763552,0.001913791,0.0032049625,0.0015381529,0.0017195492,0.007855212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010765762,0.00087000756,0.0014915798,0.0053781923,0.004860274,0.0054631853,0.0021903347,0.0026934491,0.0017433264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012679645,0.000008087683,0.0001698721,0.00012435981,0.000010254842,0.000026696827,0.00013358703,0.0007008408,0.00018787642,0.9835037,0.0011331192,0.013988939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121448265,0.00004537197,0.000488287,0.0001686114,0.000025224397,0.00014680512,0.00009195683,0.0048935204,0.0005897193,0.93114126,0.062369045,0.000027934922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023416881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012983994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007855212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022825806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015550044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03453642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798644134","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_23","title":"Robust and Approximately Stable Marriages Under Partial Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Matching (statistics); Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Preference; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Stable marriage problem; Blocking (statistics); Complete information; Measure (data warehouse); Focus (optics); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.04521455231708309,"score_gpt":0.23090879521485752,"score_spread":0.18569424289777442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798644134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5507469,0.0007372749,0.42046842,0.0038213842,0.00012291418,0.00022353468,0.0023511385,0.0007254293,0.020803062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780301,0.00022903566,0.013564169,0.00026614274,0.0001080637,0.00012821396,0.0005920798,0.000103050814,0.006979131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645233,0.0013235342,0.00019977461,0.00087761576,0.0005122565,0.0006344896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552282,0.028541772,0.0066217976,0.005581739,0.0020516522,0.0019748316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055511515,0.0007417773,0.0034600513,0.0016845898,0.0020128072,0.004561396,0.0032147404,0.003692381,0.0111806765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05496481,0.0013641457,0.001433683,0.002106492,0.0035306718,0.0063670357,0.0034202796,0.0031915335,0.0014514917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054891565,0.00010981381,0.0035535542,0.00011613592,0.00014276682,0.0002469044,0.00051853084,0.061341517,0.0013362429,0.91072905,0.0036225673,0.017734071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006499394,0.000039991424,0.00071014144,0.000016169097,0.000019371204,0.00006394379,0.000106498366,0.14683045,0.00023497565,0.8514217,0.00046732088,0.000024405897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026840908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022778767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111806765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00196636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017624836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037403047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802819107","doi":"10.7202/1044721ar","title":"Évaluation et comparaison des règles de vote derrière le voile de l’ignorance : tour d’horizon sélectif et analyse des règles de scores à deux paramètres","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11402946527699516,"score_gpt":0.30236877609074453,"score_spread":0.18833931081374938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802819107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8535384,0.0031145166,0.11236178,0.0007807847,0.00016378395,0.00037444747,0.0032191942,0.0010615097,0.025385518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960709,0.00052321097,0.027918614,0.000090701324,0.0000327337,0.00026128022,0.0021112747,0.00017072313,0.008182388],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961665,0.0016841389,0.00016215457,0.00047644376,0.0011468829,0.00036384183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98850495,0.008484864,0.0006775446,0.0009046098,0.0011278533,0.0003001414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007665508,0.0007509259,0.0013846772,0.0015240562,0.0004977728,0.0021344908,0.0009302863,0.0010001266,0.0069827056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021763002,0.0003592178,0.0012182131,0.001680312,0.0006297619,0.001323942,0.000928817,0.0011105208,0.0012380247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044965413,0.0002805435,0.05844362,0.00082543335,0.0008794766,0.00012199132,0.0011554913,0.48228708,0.008133833,0.013955651,0.0056101964,0.42381015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047306495,0.0033370808,0.16063204,0.00042752083,0.00055381283,0.00023509756,0.001878693,0.77867293,0.01847632,0.013822565,0.021218797,0.00027198807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011353367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010474664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011353367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021471372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017550447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040539622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803387754","doi":"","title":"Robust design in monotonic matching markets : a case for firm-proposing deferred-acceptance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Incentive; Matching (statistics); Private information retrieval; Business; Monotonic function; Ex-ante; Microeconomics; Compatibility (geochemistry); Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.026932057174573382,"score_gpt":0.23619963022949172,"score_spread":0.20926757305491833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803387754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06474217,0.00053331966,0.9222518,0.0016289316,0.0001015255,0.00041288877,0.0001925719,0.00034591745,0.009790812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872214,0.00040687062,0.11519929,0.0005232924,0.00018815273,0.0006003784,0.00012208913,0.000110151064,0.010635732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98184276,0.010972924,0.0006887657,0.0027158295,0.0020613912,0.0017183472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9209006,0.05202572,0.010324962,0.010101871,0.00392692,0.0027199811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02551921,0.0015051815,0.0034883851,0.001074144,0.0010971485,0.0043204315,0.0052344427,0.0049832747,0.011172704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08959905,0.0014552273,0.0023129443,0.0013428049,0.0039147884,0.0057566483,0.0033485834,0.004617186,0.0018544755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007270375,0.00033660428,0.0017475714,0.000409407,0.00022146553,0.0006744675,0.0005471657,0.14589925,0.003168654,0.80080956,0.0018543126,0.043604538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036613588,0.0005524979,0.00042996215,0.0000706821,0.000082044935,0.00023543161,0.00010540405,0.44823477,0.0015127258,0.54535735,0.0029816914,0.00007139767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000848438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005780791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02551921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018363388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002741089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13496006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808072369","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2018/14","title":"Big City vs. the Great Outdoors: Voter Distribution and How It Affects Gerrymandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Voting; Residence; Redistricting; Power (physics); Political science; Population; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Demographic economics; Law; Demography; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.047292256010841686,"score_gpt":0.22026966409169846,"score_spread":0.17297740808085676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808072369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98252904,0.00021272166,0.0022390687,0.001108744,0.000017862625,0.000012643906,0.00007532548,0.000011351751,0.013793207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911374,0.000030829193,0.00009550361,0.0000328115,0.0000058457763,0.0000018696451,0.000013952694,0.0000033258584,0.0007020778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885964,0.0006104025,0.000019594045,0.00012637631,0.000063488216,0.00032052054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248064,0.0045855236,0.0012771953,0.00038883204,0.00028349817,0.0009843997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020765706,0.00015990644,0.0005157502,0.00042738245,0.0010705634,0.0022262097,0.0006263837,0.00077773683,0.012016596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075148,0.00016372646,0.0002932948,0.0006227202,0.0013332816,0.0013470466,0.0013619531,0.0008704151,0.0007960632],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031606476,0.00070545106,0.6380375,0.0002038379,0.00042534465,0.0013577632,0.005971638,0.05535486,0.004511669,0.20118858,0.011297997,0.0777848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004639106,0.0010954542,0.6701317,0.000117574964,0.0003183067,0.000698857,0.027264126,0.10580974,0.0031184126,0.17286688,0.018000834,0.000114216506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057594874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011626417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012016596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009659013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003121072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04019952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808191459","doi":"10.65109/ckjx2266","title":"Boundedly Rational Voters in Large(r) Networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Bounded rationality; Computer science; Social heuristics; Population; Computation; Voting behavior; Situated; Rationality; Bounded function; Social choice theory; Theoretical computer science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02333990723711495,"score_gpt":0.2209256160149613,"score_spread":0.19758570877784634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808191459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50145674,0.00024377953,0.4774686,0.0019644639,0.000023000479,0.00019082565,0.00019346543,0.00020824731,0.01825085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578337,0.00013100574,0.03818115,0.00015047926,0.000016926608,0.00014953139,0.000098493496,0.000031113446,0.00340768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678695,0.001919876,0.00009188392,0.0005977579,0.0002698608,0.0003337428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98495644,0.011331707,0.0017185488,0.0010248183,0.00040344862,0.0005650448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038346266,0.0004805514,0.00095765566,0.0008990715,0.0017018035,0.0028576371,0.0016300272,0.0017050926,0.0042752237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021154957,0.0006085099,0.00070994574,0.0007843665,0.002864725,0.0047534085,0.0020591149,0.0011517825,0.00056189153],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035635193,0.00007859288,0.006255988,0.000101806996,0.000065076056,0.00053555967,0.0010439293,0.35552955,0.0021736985,0.6185605,0.001423037,0.013875886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011763467,0.00005627275,0.0010572728,0.000023127903,0.000023454975,0.00010960773,0.00056759367,0.5174044,0.0009200504,0.4773246,0.0023714183,0.000024619407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044296836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005345043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044296836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014657463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008627019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020279646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808568836","doi":"10.4018/ijaeis.2018070104","title":"A Decision Support Tool for Agricultural Applications Based on Computational Social Choice and Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montpellier; AgroParisTech; Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA); Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Université Laval; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Harvard University; University of Patras","keywords":"Deliberation; Argumentation theory; Management science; Context (archaeology); Decision support system; Computer science; ELECTRE; Agriculture; Argumentation framework; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Business; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.013256247588382635,"score_gpt":0.22508124423833387,"score_spread":0.21182499664995122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808568836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004753169,0.000056747267,0.98467505,0.00031695183,0.000055524724,0.00031071654,0.00018452673,0.0062688855,0.0033785026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075956784,0.000106570296,0.91824955,0.00017460027,0.000039746035,0.00070194906,0.00039189978,0.00058002915,0.0037989228],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966323,0.0016695851,0.00034495295,0.00039771353,0.000825701,0.00012984088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915314,0.0067762025,0.0002516629,0.0007214344,0.00045418274,0.00026510924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045048995,0.0011193041,0.0009627494,0.0023925959,0.0012458289,0.0041019567,0.0022546644,0.002410934,0.015582981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012541843,0.00063200947,0.00202426,0.0012000941,0.0014465379,0.0028149677,0.0038681729,0.001976011,0.0030619563],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059173733,0.000954844,0.0029241336,0.0011206586,0.00033925864,0.0014471812,0.003727248,0.10507894,0.019432683,0.3202306,0.017450076,0.52670264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002537417,0.00019967477,0.00074389274,0.00027396705,0.000099385616,0.00051336037,0.0003031543,0.63620156,0.01198875,0.21886045,0.13043758,0.00012452822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010074591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001055569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015582981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007510465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012458024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052130282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2863788886","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2018/716","title":"Quantifying Algorithmic Improvements over Time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Compute Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Computer science; Constraint (computer-aided design); Game theory; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Competition (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Theoretical computer science; Operations research; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning; Data mining","score_opus":0.05018963152214823,"score_gpt":0.25659437181152955,"score_spread":0.20640474028938133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2863788886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4007317,0.011736573,0.49543977,0.011709532,0.0012264688,0.0004077195,0.003420554,0.0017400844,0.073587485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484434,0.002241649,0.13942689,0.00055460737,0.00046944068,0.00037121118,0.0018420846,0.00042986905,0.0062209386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854806,0.0037004186,0.00083623285,0.0032784548,0.0057246503,0.0009796694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8999826,0.05611219,0.010040111,0.018526569,0.013248733,0.0020898103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018915825,0.0011872725,0.0009542924,0.005057951,0.0010218906,0.0052329255,0.0018941478,0.0019243564,0.0072460813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15663218,0.0005766422,0.00082094845,0.0042607184,0.0030724164,0.011174274,0.00293855,0.0030791392,0.0014518525],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062586763,0.00031971285,0.04603335,0.0007772561,0.0006139172,0.00014805784,0.0010858419,0.25746572,0.0041562915,0.37427753,0.008880142,0.30561632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007958823,0.0007612683,0.022506794,0.0002562342,0.00022824267,0.00024440538,0.0008081667,0.38594154,0.004153533,0.54825544,0.036652673,0.00011208989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016176044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022590668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018915825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002705856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002645116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100037575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895801305","doi":"10.1007/s00355-019-01221-6","title":"Simple games versus weighted voting games: bounding the critical threshold value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Conjecture; Tournament; Example of a game without a value; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.033131961173566475,"score_gpt":0.2740001441258113,"score_spread":0.24086818295224482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895801305","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20254178,0.0032358917,0.74643993,0.0047625215,0.00027814548,0.00016469504,0.0001829251,0.00018609977,0.042207923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726644,0.0009038658,0.02237116,0.00044610855,0.00018399135,0.00012882966,0.000046857316,0.000069740265,0.003185029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647164,0.0018747614,0.000110344045,0.0005567543,0.0004910388,0.0004954468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487671,0.045038596,0.0021691134,0.0016094443,0.0010652234,0.0013506241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065916483,0.001262936,0.0023155746,0.0022067986,0.0013009945,0.0057470715,0.002931956,0.0039059753,0.004893071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049204186,0.0008997362,0.0009184574,0.0013410157,0.007802806,0.009203181,0.0030079673,0.0042564054,0.0003070494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046172107,0.000037340993,0.000335075,0.00008674171,0.000029795492,0.000043293476,0.00010148748,0.030070588,0.0008368846,0.9645055,0.00088958896,0.003017493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015073344,0.00001293506,0.00011722447,0.00003318235,0.000015061591,0.0000262098,0.000043166856,0.16476035,0.000377435,0.8341861,0.0004000781,0.000013082318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016844205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001370841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065916483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040406636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019956885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034860373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898331662","doi":"10.3982/te2547","title":"Strategy-proof tie-breaking in matching with priorities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020354618876721083,"score_gpt":0.21651862483352463,"score_spread":0.19616400595680356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898331662","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15694253,0.00022305855,0.8162339,0.0008424984,0.00007190834,0.00039515152,0.00031521343,0.00045208988,0.024523564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81484306,0.00030900515,0.1729684,0.0003257577,0.00010608143,0.0004684663,0.0004430539,0.00013588015,0.01040031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314815,0.002761677,0.00055322284,0.0011627725,0.0012120071,0.0011621778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983217,0.00972398,0.002708439,0.0022879483,0.0010920585,0.0009705584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007090199,0.0009606805,0.0013227535,0.0012852675,0.0020328881,0.004416994,0.0027016248,0.002248566,0.006957708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03797579,0.0009662129,0.0020076137,0.0020545267,0.0026402825,0.008032074,0.0036911676,0.0028750761,0.0011127557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014404683,0.00016500062,0.0010558425,0.00020500671,0.00007354456,0.00020772118,0.0006343763,0.036344357,0.0026370834,0.9321782,0.001592407,0.024762433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013005226,0.00007651257,0.00015538566,0.000022890441,0.000029766832,0.00009981595,0.00010345666,0.09321496,0.0011807074,0.90294456,0.0020191625,0.000022788243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002538764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001709215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007090199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021062824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030452758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037496984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900958212","doi":"10.1145/3434410","title":"The Fair Division of Hereditary Set Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Oracle; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Valuation (finance); Bundle; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03356150791834251,"score_gpt":0.22901453069714556,"score_spread":0.19545302277880305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900958212","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18206659,0.00046635786,0.79002005,0.0010573342,0.00009970875,0.00010527648,0.00013800521,0.00024276099,0.025804047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190296,0.0001759857,0.07384319,0.000079753125,0.00009921264,0.0000730501,0.00005438328,0.000046506768,0.006598334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972721,0.0010264721,0.00009455767,0.0005600327,0.0005951386,0.00045178796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547195,0.0023834587,0.0004600974,0.0010215644,0.0002992087,0.0003637775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032777134,0.00045736908,0.00065035175,0.00077285484,0.0015110018,0.0027673326,0.0016141059,0.0009980848,0.007501835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012488182,0.00029689708,0.0005731376,0.0012786984,0.0043042875,0.0061066397,0.0022146904,0.0013971312,0.00053916755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007949751,0.000029183286,0.00045861187,0.000036524747,0.000019934248,0.00004984805,0.00021379607,0.041207835,0.0010510293,0.93942493,0.0007462899,0.016682483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020162033,0.000045760065,0.00018610244,0.000013677721,0.000011860483,0.000053963187,0.00006500351,0.17546414,0.0017301998,0.81943095,0.0029642954,0.000014038527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015447204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010802823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007501835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027600653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014089913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025096178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904714486","doi":"10.3982/te3193","title":"Voting on multiple issues: What to put on the ballot?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Hausdorff Center for Mathematics; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Euclidean geometry; Mathematics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Distribution (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Random variable","score_opus":0.023900900568702414,"score_gpt":0.21586360593847154,"score_spread":0.19196270536976912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904714486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1632713,0.0011563279,0.76118934,0.012105208,0.0005370183,0.0002750029,0.00030397347,0.0001516629,0.061010193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855343,0.00066545216,0.097163364,0.00058450777,0.00034176037,0.00023091256,0.00015410989,0.00010279931,0.015222864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902379,0.006153307,0.0003723805,0.0013972722,0.0008725655,0.0009665405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782889,0.013582848,0.003245775,0.0023376413,0.0014405469,0.001104286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010615863,0.0008064666,0.0019501444,0.0012194024,0.0021099509,0.004386912,0.0024138612,0.0031161606,0.0127112605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045885496,0.00061350054,0.0013243947,0.0021815754,0.003510711,0.009681919,0.0026320934,0.0027524056,0.001999022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023552091,0.00017832592,0.00285391,0.00020640745,0.00010490301,0.00008448492,0.0006684299,0.028700054,0.00074696715,0.8923303,0.0040507982,0.06983993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011313501,0.00021286863,0.0012718091,0.00011668689,0.00007098941,0.000084017716,0.0006728171,0.11847465,0.0013390536,0.8663153,0.011280254,0.00004835912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016758619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013712099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127112605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022082229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016531331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056142747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904805225","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012288","title":"On the Optimal Efficiency of Cost-Algebraic A*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Algebraic number; Heuristic; Mathematics; Cost efficiency; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08247716301350781,"score_gpt":0.25680929752451825,"score_spread":0.17433213451101043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904805225","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4193212,0.0006961157,0.5452149,0.0017793551,0.000053173277,0.00023551741,0.00034108566,0.00031731467,0.03204129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081095,0.0002446383,0.0893171,0.00017311491,0.000029929337,0.00013441942,0.00016887038,0.00008881243,0.0017337587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995216,0.0022436234,0.00039499212,0.00075591507,0.0008136643,0.0005758558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967602,0.023159092,0.002294535,0.0043144524,0.0018096544,0.0008203042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068584885,0.0007234894,0.0013133648,0.0012890311,0.0010760454,0.0028655312,0.0019762602,0.0014466627,0.0049686297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043107633,0.00063432736,0.0008382913,0.0013790722,0.0034762693,0.005768281,0.0031317049,0.0020167092,0.00049179286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027323427,0.00015019596,0.0023755864,0.00018928153,0.000099816876,0.000068800146,0.00032415823,0.17597122,0.0023961922,0.77966,0.0010618452,0.03742975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000631974,0.00015793528,0.00054432935,0.000040427018,0.00004047717,0.00011178407,0.00013988769,0.40314987,0.0021411031,0.59165174,0.0019313451,0.000027914612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012046604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010839619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068584885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019120952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018281708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036271572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905103471","doi":"","title":"Group Fairness for Indivisible Goods Allocation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Set (abstract data type); Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Fairness measure; Public good; Nash equilibrium; Max-min fairness; Function (biology); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Resource allocation; Economics","score_opus":0.17861673615374524,"score_gpt":0.32247238477174256,"score_spread":0.14385564861799732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905103471","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053922556,0.00042857786,0.9341272,0.00096042623,0.00009754713,0.00013662946,0.00010258478,0.00033163693,0.009892791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61006516,0.00029553744,0.3816575,0.00030609124,0.00009599684,0.00025740068,0.00013989682,0.00017551158,0.0070068887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623305,0.0016811287,0.00010869653,0.00077479065,0.0006562414,0.00054606085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544156,0.002748267,0.0003930208,0.0008674949,0.00027626296,0.00027335182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005705534,0.000897003,0.0015212288,0.00088238646,0.0016702437,0.0028077809,0.0024638835,0.0020250443,0.005727004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012479929,0.0004501596,0.0010484038,0.0018886216,0.0028338432,0.004716558,0.0022292645,0.0030699654,0.0007384898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000794541,0.0002598697,0.0011875976,0.00022792025,0.000100163095,0.00012379572,0.0005841634,0.45384476,0.0037225147,0.47039887,0.003741039,0.06501475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082832106,0.000091053116,0.00018824931,0.000023455514,0.00003152984,0.00006232938,0.000081509264,0.5580099,0.0022034382,0.43532538,0.0038811632,0.000019109393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024220403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002681145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005727004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032755458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028929312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030174136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905159666","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011804","title":"Primarily about Primaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Converse; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Quality (philosophy); Ranked voting system; Computer science; Politics; Approval voting; Disapproval voting; General election; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07054627635837617,"score_gpt":0.25168067762827667,"score_spread":0.1811344012699005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905159666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08333432,0.00905452,0.16399354,0.033517435,0.004183096,0.00018451175,0.0016937306,0.00079970126,0.7032391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.810507,0.0040659113,0.028890284,0.009715949,0.0030344888,0.00016378216,0.0012714615,0.0006063132,0.14174491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568534,0.001162865,0.00020498595,0.0017670346,0.0007233053,0.0004564084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899256,0.003974108,0.0010881716,0.003208654,0.0010983092,0.000705147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003663881,0.0007664593,0.0011359114,0.0010381058,0.0033583748,0.006764645,0.0014115396,0.0025668056,0.05299241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024604589,0.0005242085,0.00078247476,0.0013251329,0.0051460494,0.011210295,0.003897771,0.0045809103,0.012359611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022435363,0.00004788514,0.0020437639,0.00016714736,0.000035601883,0.00009725734,0.0005628002,0.00077393185,0.00066167035,0.9119578,0.024797304,0.05863049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055308225,0.00014165265,0.0015978499,0.00018346329,0.00005583693,0.0006068358,0.00038000065,0.00299688,0.0020392516,0.71712875,0.274775,0.000039137503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013131853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011682771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05299241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001539487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010983925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17727727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915782612","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpz021","title":"Vote budgets and Dodgson’s method of marks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Economic Papers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011061972736834546,"score_gpt":0.2159853867931485,"score_spread":0.20492341405631395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915782612","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024306905,0.0005128529,0.8791021,0.003420324,0.00030599293,0.00022479804,0.00017479528,0.00021328924,0.091738895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5336797,0.00039231626,0.4232551,0.0009077439,0.0003942054,0.0008568869,0.00017702891,0.00031184065,0.040025212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903854,0.0062820893,0.0003945276,0.00096029014,0.0015071579,0.0004704841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369205,0.011466273,0.000859447,0.0020633119,0.0014426848,0.00047617476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010692603,0.0005787252,0.0010501482,0.0018916172,0.0012375537,0.0022902035,0.00202614,0.0014347046,0.011447263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03253394,0.00055129034,0.00093726814,0.0009854184,0.0045983577,0.004915854,0.0027027272,0.0030662403,0.0015599917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003425047,0.000011031789,0.00014559053,0.000021641525,0.0000068770228,0.00001254178,0.00008888879,0.003050786,0.00021561563,0.9802325,0.0014327761,0.014747637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006061796,0.000041934934,0.00018240459,0.000048882826,0.000011557948,0.000039799794,0.000046237525,0.031339947,0.00084503606,0.9452384,0.022123436,0.000021760952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011212069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012494411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011447263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013680935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056548536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916806630","doi":"10.4230/lipics.icalp.2019.58","title":"Biasing Boolean Functions and Collective Coin-Flipping Protocols over Arbitrary Product Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Boolean function; Conjecture; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Generalization; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Product measure; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.028998688564719703,"score_gpt":0.2460417792424528,"score_spread":0.21704309067773309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916806630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21624422,0.0009084873,0.7628816,0.0020836575,0.00010839361,0.00017412176,0.00020404202,0.0007378846,0.016657569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164449,0.0004553963,0.07787139,0.0005052396,0.00010261266,0.00037952082,0.00013360541,0.00015270822,0.003954638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99255484,0.003436972,0.0003109296,0.0013718616,0.0015597149,0.00076563226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678927,0.019800775,0.0028611452,0.0068489127,0.0015687817,0.001027701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009075774,0.0010838397,0.0014681512,0.0011139377,0.0013865636,0.0027319256,0.0022661854,0.0020836648,0.0025962896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041672196,0.001077923,0.0013531755,0.0012842317,0.005283035,0.00814123,0.0054663573,0.0035244785,0.0008330918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005969944,0.00010034087,0.0018986219,0.00016012878,0.00013586831,0.00020378185,0.0005597944,0.071690015,0.008223471,0.8896928,0.0012499138,0.025488323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014482,0.00013760116,0.0005196838,0.000050605388,0.000056757777,0.00016532798,0.000056766712,0.21415047,0.006175461,0.7756849,0.00280417,0.00005342186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008957753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063132495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009075774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025839552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014718104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047997892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922743875","doi":"10.3390/econometrics7010016","title":"Monte Carlo Inference on Two-Sided Matching Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Inference; Monte Carlo method; Parametric statistics; Conditional independence; Independence (probability theory); Statistical physics; Mathematics; Observable; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.07711424203231552,"score_gpt":0.23913971675466517,"score_spread":0.16202547472234963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922743875","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06868227,0.00038480049,0.92558897,0.00071154296,0.000057992835,0.00013724396,0.00017643294,0.00021107437,0.0040497533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8177144,0.00049690856,0.17490578,0.00032071522,0.00015483328,0.0005405929,0.000559942,0.00009688969,0.0052100504],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892513,0.008148902,0.0002968392,0.0010823322,0.0007429757,0.00047765512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828122,0.10769838,0.0033151815,0.0040005944,0.0013921756,0.00078141165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020605939,0.000729946,0.0023485504,0.0018668381,0.0010751678,0.002550546,0.002850639,0.0028397457,0.005536966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10102315,0.0012028654,0.0011895241,0.0020138314,0.003925017,0.0046078702,0.0023056495,0.0031816864,0.0005898423],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023501992,0.00013308076,0.0044703977,0.000091527894,0.00012841838,0.00021929448,0.00018473122,0.58891594,0.00023486801,0.38909477,0.00095225027,0.015339634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003012359,0.000016094116,0.00026724074,0.000013482709,0.000010083685,0.00002372383,0.0000211464,0.8611559,0.00008281512,0.13811111,0.0002552277,0.000013052642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008950508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007534177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020605939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002240092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015674804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10897589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923365458","doi":"10.1177/2158244019837468","title":"The Power of None","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Veto; Voting; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Metric (unit); Outcome (game theory); Simple (philosophy); Social choice theory; Action (physics); Weighted voting; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023992592353082747,"score_gpt":0.23145580404393368,"score_spread":0.20746321169085094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923365458","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044242974,0.0013937005,0.7504898,0.009073295,0.0006910285,0.00022051176,0.00044809573,0.0005062832,0.19293424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81733835,0.0005152113,0.15605801,0.0011865391,0.00047094352,0.00040400776,0.0002652604,0.00032546322,0.02343637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695053,0.017801784,0.001377287,0.005347148,0.0045918045,0.0013766332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616637,0.019592611,0.0036453286,0.009662445,0.0036822713,0.0017536358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017383937,0.0011488955,0.0018886063,0.0040497524,0.004244039,0.009352249,0.0028170163,0.0033306028,0.011011031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053222064,0.0009331004,0.0019323389,0.0032321787,0.015397608,0.013369721,0.0065111998,0.0049014227,0.0021126391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036550933,0.000011409146,0.0005018921,0.000043469518,0.000026785034,0.0000208651,0.00017127182,0.0025334023,0.00019061871,0.9767631,0.0015560243,0.01814452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028453624,0.0000479328,0.00030814405,0.000041517404,0.00002115922,0.00009302975,0.000094138646,0.0149551425,0.0005565812,0.9703178,0.013493771,0.000042422875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002734789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024289005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017383937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042036227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033294098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09193611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936689511","doi":"10.46298/lmcs-17(3:22)2021","title":"The Shapley Value of Tuples in Query Answering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logical Methods in Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Technion Hiroshi Fujiwara Cyber Security Research Center; Instituto Millenium; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Shapley value; Tuple; Measure (data warehouse); Aggregate (composite); Context (archaeology); Conjunctive query; Computation","score_opus":0.10069957742795237,"score_gpt":0.35147743510706203,"score_spread":0.25077785767910965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936689511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1320477,0.0014717225,0.8460195,0.002380745,0.00020997689,0.000302754,0.00044505554,0.0002244951,0.01689799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8044799,0.0008859237,0.18913144,0.0003815567,0.00044469364,0.00024426274,0.00044933695,0.00011904109,0.0038637738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899406,0.004638797,0.00047861217,0.0015326313,0.0026589553,0.00075038295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96909785,0.024781706,0.0012888565,0.002158929,0.0014044346,0.0012682431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012076884,0.001337973,0.0027051175,0.0031922173,0.0022457412,0.007780367,0.0037198954,0.0026010852,0.004879484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05331205,0.00071580184,0.0017844789,0.0046804473,0.0048124692,0.018258918,0.005321183,0.0035665145,0.00067579944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035604116,0.00013511247,0.0017160187,0.00029178255,0.00013627297,0.0001312582,0.0011233315,0.087489285,0.001392895,0.8588289,0.002065603,0.046333466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026678432,0.00005887421,0.0001826793,0.000033056353,0.00003499277,0.00006836892,0.00013518803,0.18337516,0.00078750256,0.81370187,0.001573386,0.000022131311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013973162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012076884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035987028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018938935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06386942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939959383","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-16989-3_10","title":"Bargaining in Networks with Socially-Aware Agents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Linear programming; Computer science; Type (biology); Value (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03413777373463098,"score_gpt":0.21974786074035904,"score_spread":0.18561008700572806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939959383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067076705,0.0019786211,0.8018669,0.0031368958,0.00038913736,0.000117004856,0.0001227237,0.00014756717,0.12516443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86555666,0.0019282893,0.07360319,0.00032272525,0.0004416808,0.00031009322,0.00012222634,0.00009546461,0.057619713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744594,0.0014794,0.00008001108,0.00035983344,0.0003430599,0.00029176936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512696,0.0040462576,0.00022072127,0.00026322217,0.00014295864,0.00019976897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002882728,0.00081934436,0.0010772629,0.00059566926,0.0015828226,0.004107978,0.0020889323,0.0029978584,0.00785864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074157375,0.00078144576,0.0008228316,0.0013098059,0.0030566496,0.0050882814,0.002313597,0.00258858,0.0011103182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003981794,0.000028333388,0.00015164778,0.00005250507,0.000020798909,0.00008270305,0.0002268748,0.06425107,0.00043113797,0.9253784,0.0013984265,0.007938168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001788838,0.00001550924,0.000067894725,0.00001843715,0.000008073205,0.000031673142,0.00010388681,0.14316842,0.00017281252,0.8528067,0.0035781336,0.000010534084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094363897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010657862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00785864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016358115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081156625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026289761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942945535","doi":"10.1007/s10107-020-01499-w","title":"An efficient characterization of submodular spanning tree games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Submodular set function; Shapley value; Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Game tree; Convexity; Spanning tree; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Time complexity; Tree (set theory); Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Sequential game","score_opus":0.04265392892600052,"score_gpt":0.2336976143079176,"score_spread":0.19104368538191707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942945535","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16292048,0.00048392595,0.8146161,0.0015347195,0.00007809685,0.00036983672,0.0012158288,0.00051248603,0.018268524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821325,0.00054199895,0.16906016,0.0003749903,0.0001235919,0.0003592624,0.001692622,0.00021392228,0.006308479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985411,0.00046746095,0.000063144136,0.0003648514,0.00027363712,0.00028987188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656194,0.0021979283,0.0003466497,0.00032012284,0.00026267476,0.00031067996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012553511,0.000893793,0.0013493109,0.00069824763,0.0006502502,0.002482375,0.0016723769,0.0010478592,0.006125216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072808773,0.00041662218,0.0009346317,0.0013886496,0.0009206224,0.0041029095,0.0012968243,0.0022824882,0.0006859903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028147266,0.00025948128,0.0016544344,0.000335331,0.00006602098,0.00028057833,0.0005535645,0.24277483,0.01088404,0.6841157,0.013107523,0.045687117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025022468,0.00006389339,0.00026152979,0.000021705384,0.000012229229,0.00012279043,0.00009967675,0.6030028,0.0012599217,0.3921919,0.00292573,0.000012890613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014372962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017024835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006125216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012034007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020490885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943431942","doi":"10.1257/mic.20170077","title":"Strategic Performance of Deferred Acceptance in Dynamic Matching Problems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015429048752555121,"score_gpt":0.21637558710256818,"score_spread":0.20094653835001305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943431942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73867625,0.00050448044,0.22894385,0.0014945323,0.00015897716,0.00037853612,0.00019853204,0.0004363648,0.029208459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97954035,0.00013947216,0.017758219,0.00016486595,0.00004427378,0.000120449426,0.000083024104,0.000041032003,0.002108375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867994,0.007560484,0.0007281286,0.001666897,0.0017072018,0.0015377584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89344674,0.08087523,0.009837582,0.008973062,0.0033409006,0.003526528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017795345,0.0009265994,0.0022337108,0.001021042,0.0015558589,0.0035185316,0.002142923,0.002526673,0.0069673713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10684485,0.00073029037,0.0011733348,0.0010580755,0.0026861962,0.0049013803,0.0028569892,0.0032398906,0.0008451894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045978473,0.0019144302,0.012151614,0.0007490345,0.0005151953,0.00052054645,0.0014650049,0.27467865,0.012217396,0.5857931,0.006847957,0.09854932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005230563,0.00087646506,0.0013984183,0.000050958035,0.00008295423,0.00017538064,0.00022934812,0.595723,0.0028764135,0.396489,0.0015011791,0.00007380565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015642265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095043116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017795345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017401966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028829582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945148302","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104126","title":"Persistence of power: Repeated multilateral bargaining with endogenous agenda setting authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Power (physics); Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Bargaining power; Inequity aversion; Inequality; Game theory; Econometrics; Public economics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13862403162352444,"score_gpt":0.22504615388837915,"score_spread":0.08642212226485471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945148302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296671,0.00021381835,0.13994747,0.0046250927,0.00012268701,0.00010686652,0.000120016746,0.0001746833,0.025022337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942667,0.00002776663,0.002814815,0.00007024827,0.00004354819,0.000029928036,0.000017379443,0.000021659844,0.0027081226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944629,0.0030554133,0.00019837073,0.0007759503,0.000534764,0.0009726492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89654756,0.085135676,0.007436298,0.005929214,0.0020365312,0.0029148064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009053155,0.00055793487,0.0024176892,0.00080490543,0.0017742569,0.0053001572,0.0031948283,0.0041222945,0.0117181875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06909339,0.0010976859,0.0011171284,0.0009870247,0.0052649286,0.006521319,0.0029871473,0.0047153607,0.000715089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014679593,0.0006705919,0.006541789,0.0002279186,0.00028453334,0.0013201884,0.0026112127,0.15062964,0.00311736,0.80742896,0.0034378713,0.022261946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027217477,0.00016553306,0.0012030636,0.000019488281,0.00007096353,0.00014312705,0.000790305,0.35234702,0.0004829794,0.6438815,0.0005685862,0.000055241842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026684946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00221152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117181875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019565532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016602095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047878265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946416250","doi":"10.65109/ryid7073","title":"Multiple Assignment Problems under Lexicographic Preferences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Pareto efficiency; Mathematical optimization; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.050086737340165915,"score_gpt":0.2048897385262412,"score_spread":0.1548030011860753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946416250","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12350464,0.0005220796,0.8621445,0.0013210289,0.00008956208,0.00026120152,0.00025466946,0.00015766152,0.011744702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78057444,0.0006446313,0.20498781,0.00031288966,0.00016239422,0.00050681387,0.00027584794,0.00007689404,0.012458353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481094,0.0030846954,0.00030410738,0.0008110551,0.00051677896,0.00047238162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890843,0.0077268556,0.0014430168,0.0008429461,0.00040322833,0.0004997096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045500104,0.0010818137,0.0017082577,0.0008324772,0.0008921747,0.002268156,0.0019297098,0.0015741483,0.008140952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014774777,0.0007234232,0.001008589,0.001811441,0.0018919278,0.005325061,0.001993907,0.001781813,0.00079914945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036605462,0.00030544464,0.0018516864,0.00040726166,0.00016429002,0.00030403628,0.0002814061,0.23740563,0.0021558928,0.6952194,0.0024000716,0.059138827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022650104,0.00018551876,0.00047612478,0.000039659306,0.00003555634,0.00017494551,0.000140005,0.34516263,0.0013557035,0.6485226,0.00364648,0.000034265755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008260207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008837146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008140952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001538982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010155012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027234197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949490134","doi":"10.1017/s0266466617000329","title":"TESTING FOR A GENERAL CLASS OF FUNCTIONAL INEQUALITIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econometric Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Test statistic; Context (archaeology); Estimator; Applied mathematics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Kernel (algebra); Parametric statistics; Econometrics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1552881800717985,"score_gpt":0.26877654569319215,"score_spread":0.11348836562139364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949490134","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051551502,0.00018127948,0.9428078,0.0010505875,0.000047597157,0.00012407907,0.00035589703,0.0002159296,0.0036651834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763791,0.00026319094,0.21841577,0.0007292866,0.00034790064,0.0008160001,0.0011439213,0.00011883804,0.0017859747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767898,0.013390559,0.0013352027,0.0037739775,0.0036676575,0.0010427657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.844428,0.13549586,0.006069169,0.00860939,0.0041418998,0.001255567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02236068,0.0011306126,0.0020726102,0.0032701073,0.001260188,0.0024386088,0.0036058174,0.0034369912,0.00586015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12641968,0.0005952042,0.00198755,0.0025537566,0.0059714727,0.007431548,0.0035466114,0.0043631587,0.0005147775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026304772,0.00029961867,0.028207272,0.00037450064,0.0003442908,0.001122635,0.0004890902,0.09691203,0.0040148315,0.7675756,0.00236131,0.09803582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007305572,0.00026548497,0.0048949705,0.00007656904,0.00003425552,0.0004999261,0.00018338134,0.36003008,0.0014072947,0.63033265,0.0021541999,0.000048168225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001336793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066281523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02236068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014656865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017863017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11825603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950581823","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1701.04431","title":"Interpolating between matching and hedonic pricing models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Uniqueness; Matching (statistics); Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Marginal distribution; Marginal utility; Exploit; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Game theory","score_opus":0.17195923421611087,"score_gpt":0.19542135364969773,"score_spread":0.023462119433586864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950581823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22687325,0.0007517259,0.71703696,0.0032576625,0.000085457905,0.00009623788,0.00035612372,0.0001272417,0.05141544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774171,0.0003153847,0.014388709,0.00021717288,0.00008448011,0.00005002618,0.000103123726,0.000019674073,0.00740436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990214,0.00041571195,0.000037055168,0.00016633823,0.00016896961,0.00019048362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732935,0.0014055457,0.00047841494,0.0003270194,0.00015812858,0.0003015576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021009243,0.0004733877,0.0009263769,0.0008647364,0.000850873,0.00238411,0.001348081,0.0018559218,0.0091955615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008697453,0.00034401537,0.0009668648,0.001311766,0.0022550453,0.0048943944,0.0025849594,0.0018769704,0.00053300906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023445828,0.000024801877,0.0003045095,0.00001780833,0.000007768658,0.000045568937,0.00006080927,0.02322673,0.00014992293,0.973855,0.00029621422,0.0019872247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012037334,0.000015728343,0.00011393411,0.0000071560166,0.0000039875677,0.00002237835,0.000043196367,0.14922217,0.000078713216,0.8497435,0.0007319435,0.0000053082017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016257084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011414917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091955615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015243087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006369869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030762255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950990081","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1312.1831","title":"Welfare Maximization and Truthfulness in Mechanism Design with Ordinal Preferences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Mechanism design; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Maximization; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Voting; Matroid; Social Welfare; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Epistemology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.11251361856202101,"score_gpt":0.15608373017114577,"score_spread":0.04357011160912476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950990081","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02483921,0.00049829873,0.9688089,0.0012871384,0.00004868262,0.00015382048,0.00008699032,0.00013732881,0.0041396627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7355257,0.00088034454,0.25890836,0.0006134301,0.00031088546,0.0007777646,0.00014583282,0.000059542188,0.0027779804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775753,0.015780393,0.0011107245,0.0019660369,0.0024472568,0.0011203258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238045,0.0565964,0.0077056484,0.008316393,0.0023674292,0.001209702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026384087,0.0017295049,0.0017731703,0.0024116072,0.0012162536,0.0052044704,0.0033706035,0.00330707,0.0042601703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07650445,0.0009980268,0.0024597931,0.0025105497,0.008558881,0.011081166,0.003771237,0.0048853965,0.00050543586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001275409,0.00013776709,0.00064153585,0.00022736948,0.00007739989,0.000071960414,0.00028008135,0.048983295,0.0010470358,0.9329803,0.00042865687,0.01499708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053320113,0.0001690373,0.00016969517,0.000063119944,0.00003110517,0.00005760799,0.000044708187,0.103129014,0.00095516775,0.89447993,0.0008214919,0.000025947294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050588726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029813236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026384087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029229703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002280539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951829998","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1411.3602","title":"Numerical methods for matching for teams and Wasserstein barycenters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Population; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.028813632805206216,"score_gpt":0.2864618798603622,"score_spread":0.257648247055156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951829998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017677844,0.00037763224,0.9951578,0.0002446415,0.00008223955,0.000028850553,0.000026730308,0.00007920721,0.0022351875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21955226,0.0011173947,0.7630846,0.00033610157,0.00022905691,0.0005955233,0.00023126836,0.0004322314,0.014421628],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986273,0.00072332035,0.00007457065,0.00017039447,0.00031227682,0.00009222597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955865,0.002919228,0.00042656664,0.00030461542,0.0005388133,0.00022426793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039772857,0.0009294779,0.0011653617,0.001656108,0.0008089939,0.0016936461,0.0019463153,0.0023070988,0.0069649396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01877516,0.0006026455,0.0010184165,0.0015309112,0.0021702906,0.002582445,0.0030596268,0.002387934,0.0011190344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004605556,0.00004166841,0.00052015943,0.00013152254,0.000038864127,0.000048311034,0.00008802194,0.52424043,0.00088822184,0.43571904,0.002220421,0.03601724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009799636,0.000007438992,0.00004834797,0.000016792605,0.0000031611526,0.000010114472,0.000011878297,0.8824665,0.00014944565,0.11556865,0.0017003439,0.0000075554835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042670993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035759232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069649396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017469716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016358948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023300111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952789100","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1512.03543","title":"Hardness Results for Signaling in Bayesian Zero-Sum and Network Routing Games","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Kempe Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Bayesian game; Time complexity; Stochastic game; Bayesian probability; Polynomial-time approximation scheme; Nash equilibrium; Combinatorics; Repeated game; Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11265315275987423,"score_gpt":0.1933624867395813,"score_spread":0.08070933397970709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952789100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11583045,0.0007096633,0.84858716,0.004842794,0.0001256007,0.00026148342,0.0009505133,0.0005120954,0.028180338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83841395,0.0012165802,0.14076643,0.0012260476,0.00039469314,0.00064712047,0.0011107533,0.00031195147,0.015912518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963767,0.0012953354,0.00015234365,0.0006977897,0.00089169544,0.0005861796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846428,0.012343208,0.0009103902,0.00092182384,0.00056750927,0.0006142624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028485658,0.0019937172,0.0018455646,0.00097605604,0.0012606243,0.00318769,0.002855111,0.0023312233,0.007243489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016610507,0.0009908755,0.0019850507,0.0011620611,0.0031576816,0.008498243,0.0027467206,0.005236909,0.00095801795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033993204,0.00029616946,0.0011572497,0.00043366125,0.00011206884,0.00021412417,0.0005168031,0.264381,0.0032956304,0.69750375,0.0075932946,0.024156429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006618004,0.000046293993,0.00030643085,0.000035060137,0.0000334248,0.00007553537,0.00009871202,0.41333643,0.0010661336,0.5823417,0.0025637476,0.000030375926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022911483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017927387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007243489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033429547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024222364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024254978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952997420","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.11.006","title":"Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Balliol College, University of Oxford; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Bundle; Hamiltonian path; Monotonic function; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03410988676932792,"score_gpt":0.2231898592085411,"score_spread":0.18907997243921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952997420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6196002,0.00028003534,0.36023208,0.00075467763,0.000032062282,0.0001155288,0.0002296286,0.00036700763,0.018388774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90058684,0.00019957687,0.091698185,0.00016943556,0.000034178633,0.0001993817,0.00022663968,0.00016582341,0.0067200293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971933,0.0011935994,0.00013335062,0.00057974615,0.00043294657,0.00046704707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986953,0.0076402193,0.0021672477,0.0017573291,0.000598747,0.00088336377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030080886,0.0008525053,0.0012499326,0.0015144164,0.0021881368,0.0023147594,0.0017013112,0.0021224683,0.0060964464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02175048,0.0013633625,0.0009910389,0.0021704454,0.0037944864,0.00815717,0.0029049197,0.0022030985,0.00076041697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037941654,0.00012997657,0.0014977508,0.00014539967,0.000081656144,0.00025149467,0.00064597855,0.09837486,0.003760461,0.87750775,0.0014140627,0.015811143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000760432,0.00006429566,0.0004721664,0.000027141201,0.000022718257,0.000100572404,0.00012552264,0.12547018,0.0014412351,0.87014776,0.0020310646,0.000021180935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012247238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011976275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060964464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015678857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009827123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020394683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959959662","doi":"10.1007/s40815-019-00684-0","title":"Bi-fuzzy graph cooperative game model and application to profit allocation of ecological exploitation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Profit (economics); Computer science; Graph; Alliance; Fuzzy logic; Profitability index; Non-cooperative game; Computational intelligence; Mathematical economics; Solution concept; Microeconomics; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.02634237352625518,"score_gpt":0.2561009369848292,"score_spread":0.22975856345857404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959959662","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14185603,0.0003759496,0.8430154,0.00068722956,0.00009658619,0.00010816645,0.0001505175,0.00009160317,0.013618565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628779,0.00025112237,0.029021075,0.00005954449,0.000027641765,0.00010145526,0.00005158673,0.000015057904,0.007594513],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994918,0.00021932615,0.000017771696,0.00009182309,0.00009280337,0.00008649145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.0007137516,0.000084784,0.000042417414,0.00019706215,0.00010607241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011936636,0.00056680007,0.0012269182,0.0009527026,0.00085175794,0.001520719,0.001915714,0.0016527278,0.0037676753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031339016,0.00031115615,0.0007923941,0.0012691928,0.001142671,0.0018335824,0.0009047838,0.0009829107,0.00021223514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008493466,0.00008247999,0.0008566965,0.000059715072,0.000051479277,0.00018630101,0.000169268,0.7892531,0.0014907379,0.19606152,0.0011495489,0.010554284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005736521,0.000011171293,0.00009779826,0.0000018653069,0.000008831129,0.00001428352,0.000025653537,0.98040617,0.000053912943,0.019193038,0.00017584911,0.000005776856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01418709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00901791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01418709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018944803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014009438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02820903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962931423","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-17953-3_31","title":"Computing the Nucleolus of Weighted Cooperative Matching Games in Polynomial Time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Polynomial; Time complexity; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.01492737701452467,"score_gpt":0.2122742775948551,"score_spread":0.19734690058033041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962931423","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20138882,0.00043013168,0.7730754,0.0014744546,0.00014403634,0.00026200552,0.0010608913,0.0018118304,0.020352336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75890005,0.00029059662,0.22937824,0.0003175281,0.00014409302,0.00031904993,0.0016678978,0.0006980311,0.008284472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976611,0.00082511606,0.000101356694,0.0006045273,0.0003494071,0.00045853728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884644,0.009297424,0.0005156275,0.0007601681,0.00041514222,0.0005472106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024927645,0.0012633662,0.002347603,0.001079559,0.0013037552,0.004454802,0.0027680327,0.0017602467,0.012096921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016051771,0.0009710811,0.0012691445,0.0014372447,0.0022919474,0.0068522,0.0030746197,0.0024156189,0.0016139807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013525923,0.000434945,0.002673157,0.0005039136,0.0001605354,0.000166534,0.00053378666,0.41045833,0.0049108188,0.47910506,0.014301189,0.085399166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008635456,0.000046910824,0.00018926708,0.000022234208,0.000018663874,0.000029158637,0.00009632831,0.5351375,0.0008636021,0.4625832,0.0009121173,0.000014620998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040073115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064006844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012096921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025337916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002857003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040468216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963124583","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.002","title":"Choice on the simplex domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Simplex; Preference; Axiom of choice; Choice function; Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Revealed preference; Combinatorics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics; Set theory","score_opus":0.0392807111881346,"score_gpt":0.226416320050177,"score_spread":0.1871356088620424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963124583","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17137569,0.00081928715,0.6994629,0.0034590603,0.00019231219,0.00014265337,0.0008831078,0.0002148733,0.12345013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768939,0.0010346374,0.07490336,0.00031972915,0.00022356331,0.0002739048,0.00065867143,0.00024199576,0.04545024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813014,0.00093978026,0.000077224446,0.0002977156,0.00037550883,0.00017961473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463814,0.0033227657,0.000306252,0.00050289725,0.0005097592,0.0007201836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018262151,0.0006422195,0.0017863571,0.0017847074,0.0014969227,0.007188974,0.0014220895,0.0014287496,0.014632245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008300017,0.00058697345,0.0012101717,0.0015232685,0.00305279,0.004433875,0.0025748427,0.0033119188,0.0018105488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025275947,0.000016553055,0.000102481885,0.000012959984,0.00001002959,0.0000192886,0.000040747724,0.0035874331,0.00016844213,0.992622,0.000658161,0.0027366125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012614659,0.000005920152,0.000047220346,0.0000068636405,0.0000024261687,0.00002112977,0.000028101635,0.023610024,0.00010624144,0.9750352,0.0011189999,0.0000051467314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019656536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011644014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014632245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019776188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048949778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963517750","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-1067","title":"How Hard Is It to Control an Election by Breaking Ties?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Computer security; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05275770285323778,"score_gpt":0.2508190768606777,"score_spread":0.19806137400743995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963517750","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13901207,0.0024553624,0.7745386,0.0153856985,0.00067997887,0.0003515375,0.00075206807,0.00065001583,0.06617476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8158585,0.002568683,0.15521498,0.0012876447,0.00073346903,0.00049096666,0.00091064937,0.00049139716,0.022443794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563664,0.0020255744,0.00017389248,0.0009482032,0.00057120825,0.0006444999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97193146,0.023496402,0.0013205117,0.0020990323,0.00061915285,0.00053346733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00470349,0.0009668621,0.001872421,0.00063962984,0.0016348407,0.0051277094,0.003132131,0.0028000176,0.012104462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028678142,0.00076130114,0.0015503346,0.0012089798,0.0031265316,0.009850497,0.0022410206,0.005492178,0.0014682952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003565452,0.00025052292,0.0017544456,0.00046116026,0.00020351371,0.00015279674,0.00042895548,0.20705028,0.0013874097,0.6705689,0.017795432,0.09959013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104463965,0.00008449293,0.00045119654,0.000052230414,0.000051869098,0.00008700865,0.00016255185,0.24583136,0.0008521089,0.74557364,0.0067168875,0.000032140593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030129794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020959566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012104462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023935908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019900808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04049343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964338779","doi":"","title":"Parallel approximation of min-max problems with applications to classical and quantum zero-sum games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"PSPACE; Multiplicative function; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Matrix (chemical analysis); Quantum; Complexity class; Discrete mathematics; Space (punctuation); Consistency (knowledge bases); Combinatorics; Computational complexity theory; Computer science; Time complexity; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.05246998559902656,"score_gpt":0.1708130798477856,"score_spread":0.11834309424875904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964338779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02541796,0.00015384173,0.967973,0.00052405876,0.00004027245,0.000105796506,0.00006192084,0.00036465577,0.005358424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58512455,0.0002503156,0.40775055,0.00026371877,0.00009993583,0.0003891138,0.0001996241,0.00021158977,0.0057107126],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781173,0.00083462195,0.00008369929,0.00037866746,0.0005708038,0.00032048306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949372,0.0037111712,0.00026419773,0.00066456175,0.000249447,0.0001733555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029635571,0.0009424005,0.0014703913,0.00058771914,0.0010515212,0.0016464023,0.0024236988,0.0011914263,0.004248551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010234102,0.0005356465,0.0010946643,0.001099164,0.001728004,0.0032681185,0.002999113,0.00336889,0.0005084104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003484051,0.00017508553,0.0005672382,0.00013864467,0.000048303515,0.00007587095,0.00019300118,0.6287453,0.0021973688,0.30746704,0.0020072316,0.058036465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042655658,0.000028175391,0.000041356652,0.0000051912775,0.0000068677555,0.000018276503,0.00001702557,0.84642154,0.0009472362,0.15167254,0.0007933903,0.0000057414763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024507383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003329666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004248551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023829273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022231298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01728946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964436851","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011853","title":"Group Fairness for the Allocation of Indivisible Goods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Group (periodic table); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Fairness measure; Public good; Function (biology); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.10217581358762721,"score_gpt":0.2747536511323003,"score_spread":0.1725778375446731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964436851","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039633702,0.00038491105,0.94970065,0.0009271342,0.00009254438,0.00011849799,0.000082793114,0.00023020097,0.00882962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.561318,0.00036928212,0.429027,0.00035787444,0.00012611417,0.00031176282,0.00013501938,0.0001997159,0.008155246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961116,0.0018281507,0.000108475135,0.0007630218,0.0006445482,0.00054424256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503773,0.0031559742,0.0004316689,0.0008273587,0.00027684332,0.0002703717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006297975,0.0009769282,0.001470721,0.0009108359,0.0016900742,0.0030901488,0.002578227,0.002167686,0.006037178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014366257,0.0005194026,0.00123406,0.0018206293,0.0033951728,0.0053256056,0.0022197415,0.0033715325,0.0007657975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006978883,0.00020681298,0.0009318388,0.00020377495,0.000095989904,0.00011072166,0.00054429297,0.383903,0.0030356098,0.5558587,0.0034134334,0.050997972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086954795,0.00008660844,0.00017191356,0.00002692316,0.000033316002,0.000055937708,0.00006902847,0.47334662,0.0017999316,0.5200694,0.0042342916,0.000019108831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024939007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002465092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006297975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034599428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028746077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033307254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964439660","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2019/17","title":"A Contribution to the Critique of Liquid Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delegate; Democracy; Dictator; Voting; Delegation; Direct democracy; Computer science; Political science; Majority rule; Ground truth; Positive economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015215874859507863,"score_gpt":0.2315078608418631,"score_spread":0.21629198598235522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964439660","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020913173,0.010176925,0.46525607,0.31517354,0.002840005,0.00015472103,0.0006371713,0.00040432916,0.18444408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8276078,0.009084003,0.06648414,0.05145248,0.008568958,0.00046837467,0.00037358826,0.0004826686,0.03547791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843763,0.008151982,0.0005321898,0.0021784455,0.0039396626,0.00082142826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442137,0.040609855,0.003480199,0.0072324425,0.0035055014,0.0009582548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013219046,0.00080021285,0.0017053003,0.0013567726,0.003334377,0.0076789293,0.0038135718,0.008199915,0.01840682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05237003,0.000616714,0.0015870717,0.0020907451,0.013227981,0.0120381,0.0055396524,0.012815952,0.0032283603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017754877,0.000023147428,0.0003319364,0.00009872568,0.00001909245,0.000035934583,0.00019984278,0.0017269125,0.000053365533,0.97625864,0.014000049,0.007234538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001998638,0.000014288706,0.00014178923,0.000076224926,0.0000071697195,0.000051426563,0.00008642013,0.0052465624,0.000074285126,0.9645371,0.02973118,0.000013610331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022999265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023192456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01840682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003621214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040712743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06990981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968470372","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdz041","title":"(Il)legal Assignments in School Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Set (abstract data type); Blocking (statistics); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Mathematics education; Block (permutation group theory); Computer science; Lattice (music); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Political science; Law; Combinatorics; Programming language","score_opus":0.057501486170694366,"score_gpt":0.29906578118649574,"score_spread":0.24156429501580137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968470372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29560688,0.004378015,0.5393864,0.00726167,0.0002922242,0.00014562749,0.00044538983,0.00016909605,0.15231475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761939,0.00061319926,0.01730628,0.00024544128,0.00010851744,0.00007076897,0.00008949928,0.00001643423,0.0053558694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943891,0.0033255108,0.00025222386,0.0006041305,0.0008042078,0.0006248008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915234,0.005217994,0.0011811485,0.0005375999,0.0009986125,0.00054122915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036235733,0.00024372291,0.0005510366,0.0012446523,0.0015279403,0.0028375036,0.00088519824,0.0012828961,0.008494454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01226964,0.0003285874,0.00061170023,0.002188543,0.0046735215,0.004604058,0.0016951769,0.0016200792,0.0006995761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005404093,0.00002793971,0.0011205879,0.00007792001,0.000010266464,0.00003420347,0.00025258487,0.0066611096,0.00016616737,0.97721213,0.0010321971,0.013350741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029825262,0.000020130172,0.0004897796,0.00003357088,0.0000066741354,0.000030131398,0.00019062926,0.01211175,0.00017226452,0.98208445,0.004823937,0.000006917246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025815167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00150908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008494454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027893241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012538849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028416812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969799729","doi":"10.3998/mpub.9946117","title":"Voting Strategically in a Two-Vote Elections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Royal Society of Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Spoilt vote; Voting; Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Contingent vote; Cardinal voting systems; Group voting ticket; Ranked voting system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09016577812444716,"score_gpt":0.3240180971206687,"score_spread":0.23385231899622155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969799729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2405074,0.00064245454,0.20672816,0.0112087475,0.0015118091,0.00050938496,0.0006801927,0.00035531176,0.5378565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83507967,0.0002521835,0.013681022,0.0007164935,0.00027915149,0.0002012105,0.000339382,0.00012026738,0.14933063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993705,0.003514166,0.0002156316,0.0005507617,0.0008412345,0.0011733726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431556,0.003631099,0.00031475,0.0006528679,0.00046122653,0.0006245068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004856281,0.0005505103,0.0011480225,0.00053164066,0.0020242878,0.0053313156,0.0014412627,0.0035231572,0.023528134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014248629,0.0005233819,0.0007744436,0.00086718285,0.001979632,0.003616297,0.0017900306,0.0032539046,0.0066565885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011202497,0.0003029482,0.0033447095,0.0002224941,0.00013665656,0.00044666952,0.0015259461,0.0168245,0.0027179464,0.8795329,0.031103631,0.06272142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002533979,0.00019914596,0.0016892927,0.00008175787,0.000054232103,0.00018851669,0.0011830139,0.07454652,0.0014942773,0.87452644,0.04570907,0.00007436433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012967169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047047315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023528134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001065735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00158686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07870942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971278755","doi":"","title":"Efficient and Thrifty Voting by Any Means Necessary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neural Information Processing Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Distortion (music); Social choice theory; Pareto principle; Computer science; Anti-plurality voting; Mathematical economics; Majority rule; Social Welfare; Pareto efficiency; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.01461270378024442,"score_gpt":0.20387383084491287,"score_spread":0.18926112706466844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971278755","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020433484,0.00041555974,0.91526103,0.0040421565,0.00024403674,0.00018973672,0.00022078527,0.00037149424,0.058821715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219175,0.00078725105,0.23762159,0.0015075983,0.00046416884,0.0009825021,0.00038952008,0.00036502554,0.03596475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887693,0.004697083,0.0005513028,0.0024943617,0.002328148,0.001159814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97894466,0.009005292,0.0013487813,0.008569697,0.0015512214,0.0005803529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065749045,0.00084648223,0.0022888093,0.00084834587,0.0017154661,0.0040251534,0.0024992037,0.0028035082,0.015248629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043789927,0.0007370091,0.0012209261,0.0012073341,0.005403883,0.0075181494,0.0042662774,0.003924676,0.0041803],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011328795,0.000051586856,0.00033386212,0.00010875342,0.00004349251,0.000052526964,0.00015785427,0.015985796,0.0015893333,0.94179314,0.0038145324,0.035955857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034590685,0.000035718607,0.00013335307,0.00003846895,0.000012812256,0.00005138326,0.000063647436,0.034792062,0.00084689417,0.95667034,0.0073067932,0.000013849785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073544984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011086457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015248629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013775837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023399587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05101174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972474670","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_25","title":"Fair Division with Subsidy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Fair division; Computer science; Conjecture; Constructive; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Constructive proof; Division (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.021127805267941606,"score_gpt":0.20484925860505374,"score_spread":0.18372145333711212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972474670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05016517,0.0010084234,0.38006917,0.005889151,0.0014329647,0.00025059283,0.00039290165,0.00052181876,0.5602698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466863,0.00037595024,0.03401434,0.0011679133,0.0006883221,0.0002560073,0.00015057575,0.0001701549,0.2164905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729294,0.0006214911,0.000098107856,0.0007264415,0.000680588,0.0005804517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975528,0.0009084219,0.00013239316,0.0008759801,0.00024237327,0.00028812885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002481548,0.0006438878,0.0012430174,0.0010129884,0.0026537913,0.0040934645,0.0016633993,0.0026233406,0.0360893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091581615,0.00043149042,0.00096723787,0.0011999786,0.003635009,0.005590649,0.0035093066,0.0034722495,0.0039642015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037386708,0.000027112677,0.000058535858,0.000013860379,0.000006097848,0.000017984383,0.00004945953,0.0011846244,0.00020049306,0.98192686,0.004230704,0.012246759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018415529,0.0000093950375,0.000055029654,0.000006358879,0.0000035310231,0.000019089604,0.000011592363,0.004407199,0.00016684258,0.9901288,0.005170021,0.0000036064914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013163873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016571168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0360893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020930076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025040265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12073076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979339169","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2020.105103","title":"Monotonic norms and orthogonal issues in multidimensional voting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Monotonic function; Voting; Orthant; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Normality; Incentive compatibility; Basis (linear algebra); Marginal distribution; Incentive; Norm (philosophy); Orthogonal basis; Econometrics; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Microeconomics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02909780774738415,"score_gpt":0.23564034955775817,"score_spread":0.20654254181037401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979339169","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38176948,0.0010662783,0.5505507,0.005520588,0.0003475471,0.00012059526,0.00019353577,0.00007494224,0.06035625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476865,0.0003341855,0.045371875,0.00024199116,0.0002391256,0.0001415847,0.0000890021,0.00003428396,0.005861422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920738,0.004820239,0.00060247723,0.00087951415,0.0011110078,0.0005130121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95322263,0.034970645,0.0036970337,0.0036955054,0.0028676747,0.0015464766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009872288,0.00045469022,0.0013966324,0.0014149931,0.0021256672,0.0061208955,0.0016554783,0.0021789363,0.0067118728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05618889,0.0007994236,0.0010677039,0.0016237042,0.006539218,0.011877004,0.0030333109,0.003419365,0.00038562057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025467894,0.000015207139,0.00015873308,0.000010813754,0.0000059499216,0.0000137040115,0.000094152485,0.0012047444,0.00008045289,0.9957222,0.00017183446,0.002496811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013517394,0.00000934319,0.00010684703,0.000005388151,0.0000034626262,0.00001340385,0.00005396006,0.008488786,0.0000642915,0.9909407,0.00029394636,0.000006457277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089052063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071497454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009872288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014997749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012208738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05221027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980153177","doi":"10.1007/s11127-019-00723-2","title":"The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Truncation (statistics); Ranked voting system; Voting; Turnout; Condorcet method; Spoilt vote; Public finance; Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Group voting ticket; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.031795294941642,"score_gpt":0.2340985627719292,"score_spread":0.20230326783028718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980153177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96336615,0.00082185824,0.014832036,0.003271626,0.000082667575,0.000073937976,0.0005761264,0.00008646838,0.016889099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840504,0.000093300245,0.00040454583,0.00008270991,0.000031930726,0.000010277215,0.00010488849,0.000012061882,0.0008553229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.976344,0.01443273,0.0013248455,0.0021470145,0.0026763356,0.003074981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6026879,0.32584962,0.036804818,0.023199981,0.006645667,0.0048119496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032945924,0.0002576259,0.0019091897,0.001981169,0.002414903,0.004978085,0.002697288,0.003243015,0.0127207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19708768,0.0008248287,0.000888755,0.002454578,0.0055582263,0.004452787,0.002438423,0.005051941,0.0009201821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073244553,0.0010240778,0.38075107,0.00064766343,0.00064546213,0.00095857395,0.006047614,0.03000025,0.0029308747,0.46541384,0.016065838,0.08819029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005750331,0.0007413264,0.23114109,0.0003093998,0.00060182717,0.0015368495,0.008191928,0.11881454,0.0030555686,0.6283801,0.0064053056,0.00024700482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055290232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008754748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032945924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018081055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018508021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17423671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987569717","doi":"","title":"(Originally published in Public Choice (1994) 80: 23-34) - Efficiency and consistency in group decisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Group (periodic table); Axiom; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Normative; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Choice function; Element (criminal law); Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.0491774495444998,"score_gpt":0.2779465599993463,"score_spread":0.22876911045484652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987569717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004310578,0.13394865,0.04429992,0.21089013,0.11158565,0.00020432059,0.0071387975,0.0006536158,0.4869684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17247818,0.11928679,0.02509543,0.066157885,0.102991745,0.00087468524,0.006105119,0.0011713223,0.5058389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979857,0.00077726267,0.00014240292,0.00038214034,0.0005778352,0.00013460932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995024,0.0028170275,0.0004035323,0.0003693431,0.001166957,0.00021904109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861364,0.001666726,0.001861256,0.0031066772,0.002344718,0.008786261,0.0013747338,0.0055458155,0.085480794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009806117,0.00058588356,0.0008601111,0.00743996,0.0039942903,0.0073711756,0.001808369,0.0052102255,0.022320582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000635033,0.00003104375,0.00029084733,0.00042562743,0.000042726617,0.000105824955,0.00029601651,0.0005035862,0.00011608164,0.27212685,0.6908119,0.035185978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052731473,0.00003593468,0.0013876777,0.0004858076,0.000037302496,0.0002051954,0.00019955517,0.0006805032,0.0001496275,0.21805969,0.7786708,0.000035231074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079564005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110144755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085480794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042271856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002079001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28596175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989816480","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4061513","title":"The Art of Compromising: Voting with Interdependent Values and the Flag of the Weimar Republic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flag (linear algebra); Weimar Republic; Voting; Interdependence; Political science; Law; Art; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field","score_opus":0.008680888999261765,"score_gpt":0.18815374054346154,"score_spread":0.17947285154419979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989816480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6023622,0.0021741681,0.041709527,0.049319215,0.00033754265,0.00004488952,0.00013540099,0.000053743297,0.30386326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937915,0.00012033789,0.0009133642,0.00041385094,0.000025982983,0.000007632619,0.000006475755,0.000006216137,0.0047146888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971107,0.0017727821,0.00006907798,0.00029706964,0.00016824965,0.00058218016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997251,0.00162112,0.00042345017,0.00040157366,0.000121927544,0.00018085644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004218738,0.00018452945,0.0004488349,0.00038988437,0.0039201174,0.005830691,0.000858126,0.0033858616,0.0054988964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009639582,0.0002295124,0.00036675035,0.00060498435,0.007444239,0.004347886,0.0023868901,0.004220976,0.00034518162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051489253,0.00001734743,0.0012125296,0.000015195987,0.00001130949,0.000069325426,0.0013874549,0.0012611633,0.00013933037,0.98384273,0.0019768006,0.010015355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013720609,0.000026002153,0.0014225467,0.000035001067,0.000014788717,0.00007347241,0.0015211981,0.0047858013,0.00019697558,0.97823524,0.013651109,0.000024075596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058265575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008732769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005830691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020161392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001482558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022311091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994066772","doi":"10.1145/3391403.3399447","title":"One Dollar Each Eliminates Envy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fair division; Subsidy; Liberian dollar; Valuation (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Conjecture; Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.10560137355128887,"score_gpt":0.23643737719131766,"score_spread":0.1308360036400288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994066772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49197352,0.0011162431,0.3355371,0.004946527,0.00028769375,0.00021186833,0.00034591075,0.00022139489,0.1653597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96231264,0.00027659425,0.021819152,0.0003643038,0.000104479346,0.00011190936,0.000057070396,0.000044582655,0.014909229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845064,0.00048053355,0.000055903933,0.00040523004,0.00024425265,0.00036345428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997279,0.0011881618,0.0004790825,0.00059694867,0.00017682914,0.00028007972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019524503,0.0007170799,0.0010344357,0.0005539923,0.0015121447,0.0019645884,0.0013151091,0.0018334255,0.011245844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007482893,0.00034750678,0.00086118665,0.00048305898,0.0036030398,0.004591357,0.0022333337,0.0019490608,0.00089194905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017957186,0.00014891886,0.0017150945,0.00012308669,0.000047273916,0.0001913349,0.00022039887,0.014193888,0.002771328,0.9535345,0.0017699576,0.025104795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009464875,0.0003105758,0.0019078375,0.00007381473,0.000046993027,0.00033121166,0.00017526928,0.036373604,0.0019815802,0.9441068,0.014569673,0.00002789845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015075785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014832279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011245844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016739882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012560292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03762108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995340000","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83508-8_29","title":"Graph Pricing with Limited Supply","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Graph; Set (abstract data type); Revenue; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.023095000448197196,"score_gpt":0.2192333970610218,"score_spread":0.1961383966128246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995340000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24320409,0.0019496831,0.66248876,0.016435646,0.00072794606,0.00021625803,0.0012771459,0.00093588844,0.07276452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381479,0.0009621352,0.0193779,0.0008868657,0.00088515383,0.00015570107,0.00040180562,0.0002538297,0.038928658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978715,0.0009965509,0.00006930706,0.0003777225,0.00035938906,0.00032552177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831061,0.011730205,0.0011951511,0.0016880536,0.00096731837,0.0013132516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002244842,0.00085985335,0.003173787,0.0016318114,0.0012166962,0.0045102313,0.0030062073,0.005157203,0.025527287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02654674,0.0012917822,0.0014175943,0.002045393,0.0030078655,0.009808733,0.002466563,0.004073783,0.002214312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103871746,0.00007206082,0.000332924,0.0000743824,0.00002813843,0.0001343006,0.00007700116,0.029839087,0.00050510565,0.95605963,0.006038118,0.006735452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003887966,0.000012509086,0.000116840674,0.00000805105,0.000009173916,0.00005868555,0.000023748264,0.12600411,0.00007518146,0.87289923,0.00074229186,0.00001126439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002607191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018382532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025527287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019672194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011253125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0853973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996165100","doi":"10.3390/g11010002","title":"A Condorcet Jury Theorem for Large Poisson Elections with Multiple Alternatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Simple (philosophy); Voting; Population; Poisson distribution; Majority rule; State (computer science); Private information retrieval; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017880539866079438,"score_gpt":0.22570683618544982,"score_spread":0.20782629631937038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996165100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028607858,0.00092873926,0.8901706,0.00914443,0.0004795716,0.0005521254,0.00066446076,0.00021789355,0.069234245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6859913,0.0021246334,0.2631496,0.0062937303,0.002579589,0.0040261648,0.00080468674,0.00045189424,0.03457849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97861195,0.009012931,0.001057317,0.0036493705,0.0051999264,0.0024685247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8978537,0.0802948,0.0062867478,0.0069028838,0.006334654,0.0023273127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039152335,0.0017122452,0.004540448,0.0024267328,0.005377807,0.0057087187,0.0053677573,0.0058782846,0.020049911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13123101,0.0013817396,0.005310827,0.0021638481,0.009472366,0.014959658,0.0060296226,0.014360641,0.0029487873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028408036,0.000021065607,0.00026233518,0.00006549985,0.0000324768,0.000087773624,0.00012618565,0.005197297,0.00019772376,0.9884621,0.0024176487,0.0031015375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006669444,0.00002569591,0.00015847385,0.000038084643,0.000018510276,0.000106415915,0.00002033373,0.042416923,0.00023538922,0.9545024,0.002385879,0.000025201934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029373053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001981603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039152335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004864178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067805457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20705986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997772410","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5593","title":"Can We Predict the Election Outcome from Sampled Votes?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Cardinal voting systems; Majority rule; Group decision-making; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Scoring rule; Distribution (mathematics); Social choice theory; Decision rule; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.16506886823427117,"score_gpt":0.27537087784088154,"score_spread":0.11030200960661038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997772410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5139837,0.0014422638,0.45740634,0.008146253,0.0005962036,0.00037290028,0.0034575136,0.00092679844,0.013667998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97530943,0.00035513748,0.019176427,0.00066050934,0.00023456526,0.00019429479,0.0017869794,0.00007054153,0.002212139],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972275,0.0013625016,0.00013219762,0.0006118086,0.0003796814,0.0002862773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757178,0.017899198,0.0016796374,0.0023809117,0.0018727524,0.00044971632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006984872,0.000620333,0.002030932,0.0014039221,0.00061243086,0.002335826,0.0020706435,0.0020224247,0.004707593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07439241,0.00055542483,0.00071115413,0.0014535243,0.001408682,0.006371943,0.0010259692,0.0026314838,0.0020887852],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017790156,0.0006938317,0.23289393,0.00075413333,0.00077077595,0.0003704021,0.000918672,0.3287406,0.0019400427,0.09957938,0.018097356,0.3134619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019042859,0.00019986973,0.025785698,0.00011527366,0.000086321495,0.00016016622,0.0002764094,0.79147375,0.0014056746,0.17663446,0.003595909,0.00007602081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041680094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053965915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006984872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001043198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071231736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03693998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997834681","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5592","title":"The Surprising Power of Hiding Information in Facility Location","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Facility location problem; Novelty; Computer science; Line (geometry); Power (physics); Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10162766712006609,"score_gpt":0.25519604405802315,"score_spread":0.15356837693795705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997834681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18314868,0.002040973,0.7706881,0.014435597,0.00016574418,0.00020174711,0.00040719635,0.00044334913,0.028468579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95764804,0.00088416843,0.037290618,0.000748932,0.00018717925,0.00015315798,0.000087911896,0.00007010144,0.002929845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806253,0.012049714,0.00096526864,0.002390478,0.002845968,0.0011234074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7970278,0.13878523,0.025500985,0.033787485,0.0032392226,0.0016593181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018174455,0.0008105422,0.0021412708,0.0013393097,0.0020482116,0.0052725533,0.0037181356,0.0061527966,0.004471673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10750565,0.0012974876,0.0020021638,0.0022371525,0.009523533,0.013383528,0.005444579,0.00662749,0.00077560754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005568356,0.00013391727,0.0060412646,0.00051721145,0.00032589427,0.0005952472,0.0014598789,0.05528763,0.004359821,0.87816733,0.0034962902,0.049058758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023632833,0.0001767784,0.0016140834,0.00010439897,0.00016602123,0.00063116255,0.00029312188,0.07524862,0.0033624656,0.9109299,0.007140893,0.0000962363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013909361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077214226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018174455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025400163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015990622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09611684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003353436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.005","title":"Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Anonymity; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Population; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Finite set; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05804514265662339,"score_gpt":0.216264277127635,"score_spread":0.1582191344710116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003353436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40415505,0.0011120633,0.5555769,0.0034334462,0.00022023976,0.00009210658,0.0008384364,0.0005318741,0.03403992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553086,0.0004787985,0.03493112,0.00037571328,0.0003586187,0.000093599876,0.00037741582,0.00009466059,0.007981376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960581,0.001723689,0.00027490922,0.0009537515,0.0004968797,0.00049271004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450548,0.03922451,0.0051975213,0.0061960467,0.0024788054,0.0018482971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006262649,0.00036699258,0.0010916387,0.002350285,0.002664685,0.00402527,0.0012746917,0.0017102202,0.008120337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028074697,0.0005390037,0.0011073785,0.0020131615,0.004174841,0.0107159065,0.0021193912,0.0031248678,0.0006461475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011438889,0.000046154742,0.00083838485,0.000037936577,0.000014768425,0.000059134632,0.0002993211,0.0024117692,0.00048180606,0.9832703,0.0011397531,0.011286377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012085861,0.000016863843,0.00020505767,0.000007093605,0.000008235226,0.00004690655,0.0000391685,0.00595299,0.00019547548,0.9926294,0.00087249925,0.000014145511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012570119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009066715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008120337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013224606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001057623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033120453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004178692","doi":"10.1007/s11750-020-00539-0","title":"Sharing pollution permits under welfare upper bounds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Top","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Production (economics); Welfare; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Computer science; Economics; Game theory; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053221146046040065,"score_gpt":0.2280521492269449,"score_spread":0.17483100318090483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004178692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25918418,0.0010528124,0.60831237,0.006270741,0.00026791188,0.00017705234,0.00084766734,0.0005140005,0.12337334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838209,0.00022465287,0.0066580707,0.00040042328,0.00011277796,0.00009558406,0.000065056476,0.000049837166,0.008572572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911163,0.0037060054,0.00035510937,0.0011344941,0.0013124584,0.0023756702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677385,0.022976277,0.0024248457,0.0040252563,0.0015857548,0.0012493576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077339974,0.001162808,0.0038026965,0.0015246193,0.002141923,0.009520961,0.002856552,0.0037804942,0.0114152655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03141908,0.0009722817,0.0014689561,0.0015894315,0.0050445767,0.008764224,0.0042357426,0.0045344136,0.0006487685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019268278,0.00009009037,0.00081876555,0.000112153495,0.000081778424,0.000097261465,0.00013099,0.064807184,0.0007712686,0.9174679,0.002464462,0.0129655255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033181474,0.000035359004,0.0003051402,0.000024876459,0.000028948463,0.000030399673,0.000099274264,0.07473691,0.00037852192,0.9228758,0.0014322624,0.000019403169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042405017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030183655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114152655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035663703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024126468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04090178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004404810","doi":"10.1257/aer.20171553","title":"Strategyproof Choice of Social Acts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Valuation (finance); Social choice theory; Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Social preferences; Economics; Yield (engineering); Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.0778355414064034,"score_gpt":0.28731683910578487,"score_spread":0.20948129769938145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004404810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17470117,0.0007261902,0.75335085,0.004351162,0.00009889188,0.000354288,0.0011106193,0.00017371499,0.0651331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94265103,0.00048130998,0.045361362,0.00024185173,0.000068475594,0.00042343343,0.00029332208,0.000026464148,0.0104528535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949988,0.0031772146,0.00023244455,0.0006701826,0.00046127156,0.00046007303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913182,0.005603159,0.0013549344,0.00089170656,0.0004098995,0.00042197586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046430025,0.0008488108,0.0008401821,0.00097633415,0.00078934943,0.00309009,0.0014273116,0.0018253408,0.0069260034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01359698,0.00042271917,0.0010250537,0.001040771,0.003116857,0.0037586456,0.0011892568,0.0016982469,0.00074289605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034284243,0.000036964833,0.00094816467,0.000042082353,0.000031249667,0.00007723701,0.00015460304,0.02984272,0.00020889303,0.9604661,0.00067109155,0.0074865534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045317647,0.00003882154,0.00044702267,0.000025614218,0.000015727366,0.000044793567,0.000094977775,0.090558216,0.00015661593,0.90483016,0.003729108,0.000013673362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022810032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002040806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069260034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023411624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012741551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024554849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815998","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.14","title":"A market with asymmetric information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02685134156739029,"score_gpt":0.19193291076519584,"score_spread":0.16508156919780553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03963688,0.006607859,0.25574195,0.022797206,0.0011492417,0.00021568677,0.0015165557,0.0005265635,0.67180794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7251817,0.0071946373,0.052744262,0.0027372153,0.0016251445,0.00039922033,0.00094610144,0.00018313382,0.2089887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.00030349233,0.0000310008,0.00015699845,0.00025418558,0.000086735694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.00051198073,0.00008856527,0.00014752978,0.00008411333,0.00009894068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009485535,0.0005788272,0.0006765582,0.0005580843,0.0010595728,0.005220633,0.001142794,0.0026986236,0.021126978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00318035,0.0003653073,0.0007082479,0.0009187677,0.0019339629,0.0075868,0.0016520757,0.0022132474,0.0030191175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098346,0.0000097886195,0.00004281732,0.000019678235,0.000006036526,0.000052388037,0.00004302042,0.0019570414,0.00011869067,0.9876903,0.0061872383,0.0038631132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014384069,0.000010928285,0.00006170087,0.00001934929,0.0000052818327,0.00008515889,0.000025739644,0.012543664,0.00008236183,0.96389616,0.023248123,0.0000071971767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000719133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005144162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021126978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011423489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008877525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0706768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011381676","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200148","title":"Robust Minimal Instability of the Top Trading Cycles Mechanism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Context (archaeology); Instability; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Chemistry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.028557931287384195,"score_gpt":0.20739042509999828,"score_spread":0.17883249381261407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011381676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28422982,0.00025090424,0.69540644,0.0007151756,0.000046317822,0.00015470844,0.00023361614,0.00028109323,0.018681856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630127,0.00007879948,0.034458715,0.0000997075,0.000043972726,0.0001426145,0.00008489823,0.000036503825,0.0020421778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973585,0.0009805065,0.00017846699,0.0005933771,0.0005997845,0.00028930916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130416,0.0043522306,0.0020054637,0.0009340198,0.0009080227,0.00049600285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036407732,0.0004800377,0.0008187793,0.0013715808,0.0010883067,0.0027338045,0.0014558253,0.001032001,0.005667618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018776303,0.00026684272,0.000823197,0.00081745174,0.002327447,0.0042204205,0.0021829149,0.0013758917,0.00045554645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018127466,0.000043749817,0.0018210091,0.00009275395,0.00006252425,0.00011143847,0.00031173823,0.03659191,0.005146544,0.93260264,0.0008719475,0.022162434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047468846,0.00010367061,0.00082715566,0.0000230008,0.000026661046,0.00009312927,0.000110479355,0.18802425,0.0026406136,0.8067827,0.0012881595,0.000032731783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085864693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040899785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005667618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015763899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010268879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019254446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011676169","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.13","title":"Equilibrium with prices and expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Keynesian economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.044080131349965704,"score_gpt":0.21523516608360954,"score_spread":0.17115503473364385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011676169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119648855,0.007832863,0.42001215,0.014534208,0.0009614956,0.000084319814,0.000644212,0.0004313024,0.5435346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.645463,0.01160029,0.103370495,0.0032764385,0.0020766673,0.000471048,0.0011577932,0.00044262345,0.2321417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986065,0.0005914039,0.00004968282,0.00024141361,0.00038797664,0.00012308067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992816,0.0003968002,0.000060240327,0.000114138056,0.00010041018,0.000046750498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014273878,0.0008694072,0.00074253336,0.0005541703,0.00092260906,0.0052224416,0.0012103855,0.0024607587,0.014264612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047337064,0.00044449643,0.0009340375,0.00092722726,0.0024143816,0.005983625,0.0017569019,0.002639282,0.004527684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028025966,0.0000038681696,0.000032124957,0.000013147606,0.000003946622,0.0000178392,0.00005496082,0.0015553554,0.000046787605,0.992702,0.0026637278,0.002903332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002721917,0.0000031792529,0.000028901319,0.000011030412,0.0000016195088,0.000019609826,0.0000146853445,0.003484071,0.00003104408,0.98771244,0.008687409,0.0000032576868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012419984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009252848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014264612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016873676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010370727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047719896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017127111","doi":"10.1007/s40670-020-00955-8","title":"A Primer on the Game Theory Behind the National Resident Matching Program for the Medical Educator and Student","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Science Educator","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Game theory; Underpinning; Computer science; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07173140329398577,"score_gpt":0.34560759973260136,"score_spread":0.2738761964386156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017127111","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024534995,0.030084195,0.6581253,0.12395444,0.005130274,0.00034916468,0.00029572294,0.00023346583,0.17937393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21234713,0.061450507,0.5022074,0.07447545,0.0072347587,0.0017555968,0.00042201238,0.0005309035,0.13957633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765635,0.0016682527,0.00011027639,0.00016481448,0.0002880851,0.00011227459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402726,0.0052556107,0.00015926677,0.0001520868,0.00025311913,0.00015272309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005444078,0.00091968855,0.0007364738,0.0012593439,0.0015316781,0.004988446,0.0021784191,0.0067653824,0.011014678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008332444,0.00069308275,0.0008467219,0.0016938284,0.006141016,0.008971915,0.0017571043,0.010472737,0.0030590917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028731363,0.000022453529,0.00006905451,0.00003894398,0.000002480751,0.000026366224,0.00021214719,0.00094449404,0.00005120906,0.9820479,0.007847703,0.008734347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004205372,0.000019262698,0.0001010763,0.0001864582,0.000002221187,0.00006394714,0.00020526312,0.0025965872,0.00006309295,0.8908996,0.10584527,0.000013122708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041817036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054435306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011014678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034340562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029084077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03684777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021016936","doi":"","title":"Choosing and Sharing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Mechanism (biology); Nash equilibrium; Outcome (game theory); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Control (management); Host (biology); Computer science; Economics; Operations research; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.07898217500931276,"score_gpt":0.3178977305531532,"score_spread":0.23891555554384042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021016936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022384,0.0014020493,0.5523658,0.014738407,0.00047785422,0.0009510428,0.0007714865,0.00035362985,0.33871588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83341694,0.0010093394,0.09419016,0.0013784596,0.00025619194,0.00064702705,0.0005243744,0.00015370689,0.06842375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906895,0.004475455,0.0006432809,0.0017696208,0.0014963608,0.0009257885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918113,0.0029949173,0.000674925,0.003342882,0.0006712975,0.0005047069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007294686,0.00069282256,0.0010993441,0.00094670674,0.00242125,0.004399461,0.0018095113,0.0026263676,0.037066974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020295255,0.00038182206,0.0012744142,0.0011613651,0.00399312,0.0074662175,0.0040227626,0.002015187,0.002885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062483356,0.000040585404,0.0007957858,0.00007044905,0.000038282764,0.00011037508,0.00065438397,0.002128892,0.0006807243,0.964762,0.0026978375,0.027958171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026508755,0.00003717174,0.00031667954,0.000040055358,0.000028034574,0.0001409259,0.00035237675,0.005518488,0.00057379174,0.966067,0.026877252,0.00002158981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012912676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013537026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037066974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017280409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022200085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124001384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022879908","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.09.006","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transitive relation; Corollary; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Norm (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Boundary (topology); Space (punctuation); Welfare economics; Economics; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.17108254771996245,"score_gpt":0.30214675550487113,"score_spread":0.13106420778490868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022879908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102905676,0.001186568,0.78819937,0.0037621232,0.00017353361,0.00012728675,0.0007799587,0.00012489707,0.10274053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83194196,0.00123955,0.13887464,0.00045250636,0.00016722201,0.00027305493,0.00048602573,0.00008101009,0.026484108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971125,0.0015723181,0.0001272454,0.00048827578,0.00031267712,0.00038683816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775285,0.00082490785,0.00051857816,0.0004392675,0.00027867247,0.00018573752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013753067,0.0010541867,0.0010520738,0.00091627834,0.0017662066,0.0042225216,0.0015636784,0.0016941138,0.012314809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047444995,0.00043021716,0.0016003386,0.0018153578,0.0028861512,0.005633152,0.0028799784,0.0013549222,0.0020180466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135894625,0.000021019549,0.00064538594,0.000045578487,0.000017394354,0.00009970687,0.00007403716,0.022644797,0.00027439522,0.970843,0.0006258347,0.0046951794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001201272,0.00003036887,0.00037066467,0.000029386953,0.000018762305,0.000114375405,0.00023702999,0.039465826,0.0003746702,0.9486687,0.010664571,0.000013618518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003148612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038431573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016163606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011057615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024498238","doi":"10.3982/te4712","title":"Two‐stage majoritarian choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Arrow; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Rationality; Independence (probability theory); Social choice theory; Class (philosophy); Preference; Preference relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Transitive relation; Partition (number theory); Mathematics; Revealed preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02144223645004265,"score_gpt":0.22049943612462172,"score_spread":0.19905719967457908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024498238","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085507646,0.00032582376,0.8058239,0.0023092788,0.00018444046,0.00026228253,0.0004170705,0.00020156096,0.10496792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8827174,0.00019056238,0.08618961,0.00033104248,0.00007386345,0.00027786117,0.0001981165,0.00003851061,0.02998304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977869,0.0011765219,0.000100888705,0.00034110833,0.0003280158,0.00026653815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727434,0.0012129676,0.00031468685,0.0006038249,0.00034553913,0.0002485848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030164432,0.00040785334,0.00049507676,0.0004061263,0.0005791133,0.0015809422,0.0013926341,0.0010007775,0.0076333075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004796847,0.0002627569,0.00082019507,0.0004044408,0.0014403269,0.0013262193,0.0009892305,0.0012695416,0.0010861218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000759373,0.000044570792,0.00042398274,0.000036480662,0.000024328629,0.000057592868,0.00015212139,0.017178707,0.00085765665,0.9624548,0.002857891,0.015835965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011994432,0.00012503534,0.00035687833,0.000016194212,0.000012555636,0.00007410521,0.00006562636,0.14359999,0.0007861235,0.8416352,0.013178558,0.000029755305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062067393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009943817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076333075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008733611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072558975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025535941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027093315","doi":"10.1257/mic.20180236","title":"Organizing Time Exchanges: Lessons from Matching Markets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Construct (python library); Preference; Mechanism (biology); Microeconomics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Business; Computer science; Industrial organization; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019011474141382986,"score_gpt":0.22916866006471714,"score_spread":0.21015718592333416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027093315","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13603178,0.0019589895,0.7014271,0.011483381,0.00031236207,0.00027785636,0.00027633132,0.00027863172,0.14795355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8971024,0.0015844424,0.08266207,0.000718691,0.00032933205,0.0002501711,0.00016629268,0.0001305347,0.01705599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977646,0.0011979393,0.00011310271,0.0003889549,0.00024159755,0.00029381408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913681,0.0053099133,0.0010728596,0.0011063195,0.0004573899,0.00068545964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004251657,0.0005153045,0.0012309995,0.000828353,0.001916844,0.0046049054,0.0022375963,0.0037271208,0.014670628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02056455,0.0004995003,0.0012696843,0.0015044414,0.0042729042,0.010730945,0.002681488,0.002275653,0.0013024614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034045854,0.000047775302,0.0007066721,0.000048175178,0.000016992102,0.00007316179,0.0002956349,0.026956994,0.00017298208,0.9563144,0.0013453556,0.013987864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004501227,0.000017298256,0.00017387232,0.000016249527,0.0000059869385,0.000030750787,0.00014025676,0.03478456,0.000109000524,0.9598747,0.0047931797,0.000009201784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035547193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019150713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014670628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019682269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017998394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049078166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029111965","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2432","title":"Best of Both Worlds: Ex Ante and Ex Post Fairness in Resource Allocation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Ask price; Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12477275911177432,"score_gpt":0.34701947911234854,"score_spread":0.22224672000057422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029111965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12420047,0.001256685,0.82199293,0.011553026,0.0002511192,0.00011883612,0.00019739184,0.000089066976,0.04034061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93803596,0.00040718078,0.057030153,0.00075993,0.0001852494,0.00017216268,0.00005900723,0.000039576047,0.0033107004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98433566,0.0098457355,0.0005463638,0.002132552,0.0016178848,0.0015217578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962269,0.029046062,0.0033187733,0.0028919263,0.0014171541,0.0010570426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01744631,0.00067829195,0.00179853,0.0007916164,0.0022388347,0.005278627,0.0019270246,0.0032001566,0.004160013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048682634,0.0005925049,0.00096582907,0.0011804816,0.006513184,0.013818511,0.004255785,0.004338094,0.00036829725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003041959,0.000089378096,0.00095644675,0.000059706388,0.00005749348,0.00008798872,0.00036093287,0.02724046,0.00034381828,0.95554245,0.0011240806,0.013833054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043723932,0.00003890382,0.00023606769,0.000020460891,0.000014854274,0.000048960683,0.0001027859,0.056020144,0.0003606898,0.9417758,0.0013222664,0.000015398538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014690015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013875504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01744631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002776752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028481581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09226602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030978499","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.12505","title":"How Many Freemasons Are There? The Consensus Voting Mechanism in Metric Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Voting; Metric space; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Bounding overwatch; Group (periodic table); Unit sphere; Metric (unit); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Data mining; Physics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11982029349505405,"score_gpt":0.17567857264546877,"score_spread":0.05585827915041472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030978499","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44987875,0.0012815738,0.52732754,0.005083308,0.00013535445,0.00011276053,0.0003125046,0.00022608579,0.015642125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616702,0.00030492403,0.03370472,0.00018020671,0.000069622925,0.00009495095,0.00012290427,0.000050161103,0.0038022513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555016,0.002372978,0.00017769479,0.00085770426,0.00047164876,0.0005698523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981472,0.011251612,0.0029202776,0.0018107282,0.0010828449,0.0014625045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055873385,0.0004953865,0.0014029192,0.0010666583,0.0017315685,0.0033316256,0.0022698487,0.0023512398,0.004307759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03302538,0.0005451779,0.0009532774,0.0010118006,0.0038139415,0.008717242,0.0020161662,0.0015588936,0.00056090724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035488888,0.000060468687,0.0043385923,0.00014480928,0.00012471239,0.00020300256,0.0007163478,0.09870711,0.0021643087,0.8656687,0.0026747074,0.024842288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056247543,0.00008604753,0.0011789518,0.000028662727,0.00002742795,0.000111477566,0.00033622596,0.28981024,0.0009300235,0.70404184,0.0033473505,0.000045517252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002415651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012794178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055873385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001921078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009292154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029549003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037647357","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1604.05771","title":"Multidimensional matching","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Monopoly; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09598282321915978,"score_gpt":0.172917010683524,"score_spread":0.07693418746436421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037647357","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020982934,0.0009972461,0.9385647,0.0018346373,0.00015510112,0.00019694227,0.00032424202,0.000099072815,0.036845125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68308645,0.0027166943,0.26103628,0.001422098,0.000738096,0.0009209853,0.00073716993,0.00016916917,0.049173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951885,0.002144315,0.0003023915,0.00096415804,0.00084502384,0.0005556419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238825,0.0032833181,0.0013586249,0.0016932371,0.0006790284,0.000597537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043312325,0.0012198956,0.0020906895,0.0021747975,0.0020913589,0.004263574,0.0032317424,0.004437069,0.025067693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01842977,0.0008184119,0.002447394,0.003479512,0.0027617668,0.0074811266,0.0050725834,0.003524053,0.002701654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012004685,0.000035003508,0.0002458849,0.000059715792,0.000027543305,0.000055150555,0.000070850176,0.014841739,0.00018071361,0.97574484,0.0012685051,0.007458078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014271368,0.00002715062,0.00017328512,0.00002920015,0.000010192792,0.00009801344,0.000046033972,0.07994568,0.00013870321,0.9146408,0.004862802,0.000013833696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088163425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051543786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025067693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002821295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011461605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08385974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040226918","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3287477","title":"Endogenous Political Rules: A Rationalization Based on Policy Importance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Status quo; Legislature; Rationalization (economics); Majority rule; Politics; Status quo bias; Microeconomics; Economics; Preference; Public economics; Decision rule; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026054582288936267,"score_gpt":0.24114420177634968,"score_spread":0.21508961948741342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040226918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49865144,0.00029875658,0.40853104,0.0073213694,0.00017235453,0.00026584187,0.00023908458,0.00013496909,0.08438519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868038,0.00007356291,0.009734592,0.0001667805,0.00006294954,0.00004857252,0.00003036259,0.000023183917,0.0030562247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567187,0.0021226194,0.00020150405,0.0008029944,0.0006776471,0.000523365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97801936,0.0146836415,0.0023854242,0.0024324749,0.0015976082,0.0008814639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063527226,0.0003800517,0.0009334072,0.0013014891,0.00092056755,0.0049274247,0.001303939,0.001957166,0.007887878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034805458,0.00052694697,0.0007123788,0.00083982473,0.0028672772,0.0038721894,0.0015414453,0.002734975,0.00050355704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015706489,0.000100471785,0.005521497,0.00006171261,0.00009941269,0.000093910974,0.00060398417,0.016111026,0.0013658084,0.9586483,0.0011453395,0.016091453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006289993,0.00004287918,0.003416042,0.000017285198,0.000049259546,0.000037619706,0.0002626806,0.08080761,0.0004439047,0.9136296,0.0012097404,0.000020475843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012362095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016572776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007887878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016313345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012381538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033596814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043086594","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16675","title":"Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Matching (statistics); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Social Welfare; Combinatorics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.09629689056889318,"score_gpt":0.26726188080499436,"score_spread":0.17096499023610118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043086594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2937384,0.00026011452,0.6892258,0.0015172411,0.000050216167,0.00020669229,0.0006143417,0.0006961371,0.013691062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7665377,0.00017197822,0.2252583,0.00022431836,0.000046828733,0.00014462737,0.00045854953,0.0001259927,0.0070317336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776196,0.00083307823,0.00012607622,0.0005213994,0.00038230978,0.00037520676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955505,0.002158,0.00045781472,0.001093428,0.00032984748,0.00041045446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003014892,0.000652327,0.0011136816,0.00083622494,0.0012422777,0.0021876008,0.0015317774,0.0011995198,0.0060621174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014181882,0.00041792588,0.0009882923,0.0014866585,0.0016728682,0.0057404623,0.0020867358,0.0016064798,0.0006214491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068109104,0.00035920733,0.0046901503,0.00020719852,0.00011479029,0.00018161883,0.00071004627,0.15472901,0.0048918934,0.70179415,0.0052590175,0.12638177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054241726,0.00007306342,0.0006852407,0.000020571488,0.000024483123,0.00009495673,0.000103682556,0.23816149,0.0015007226,0.756984,0.0022722362,0.000025324924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025147267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027200112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060621174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018498605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015101669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020279825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046510065","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_19","title":"Descending the Stable Matching Lattice: How Many Strategic Agents Are Required to Turn Pessimality to Optimality?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Infimum and supremum; Combinatorics; Conjecture; Lattice (music); Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Stable marriage problem; Girl; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0933094145277734,"score_gpt":0.2900169059499457,"score_spread":0.1967074914221723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046510065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5903595,0.00047154198,0.36989167,0.009782787,0.00015437022,0.00016670069,0.00032817063,0.0005557813,0.028289445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94377744,0.00017967603,0.051764887,0.00044826255,0.00007487705,0.00011663766,0.00015824585,0.00011018626,0.0033697565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958002,0.0019859432,0.00022334204,0.00072812923,0.00065873156,0.00060374854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796759,0.011927731,0.0023425466,0.00257813,0.0011872762,0.0022884703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00497732,0.00037290546,0.0013683328,0.00063919113,0.0017671603,0.0033414725,0.0016269386,0.0018262977,0.009672418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04366369,0.0006371958,0.0006864141,0.00084117305,0.0032771698,0.008129798,0.0019566622,0.0020302352,0.0015211985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017905626,0.0004870044,0.015427721,0.00032564733,0.00015549922,0.00033893192,0.0011365208,0.07519235,0.011336445,0.7510322,0.008888523,0.1338886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021332079,0.00034080926,0.0019191046,0.00004123381,0.000036859776,0.00034800902,0.0008530476,0.21168852,0.003508404,0.7773928,0.0036113814,0.000046502737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013841458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017722102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009672418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015390745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022410452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032357514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048600008","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01413-7","title":"Preference aggregation for couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Lexicographical order; Axiom; Revealed preference; Rank (graph theory); Preference elicitation; Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Preference theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07007172952497447,"score_gpt":0.24288671215823474,"score_spread":0.17281498263326028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048600008","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2891527,0.0007003399,0.63176477,0.0017406498,0.00015473564,0.0002829486,0.0019637283,0.00028279348,0.07395734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91510195,0.00030807144,0.06750066,0.00021578943,0.0001176861,0.00021745845,0.0014066409,0.00005062504,0.015081099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997127,0.0014209029,0.00018800833,0.00053969596,0.00036395947,0.00036034329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942631,0.0026438106,0.00055445376,0.0014897562,0.00057691854,0.0004720299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031025123,0.00054889737,0.0013040577,0.0015835492,0.0014536863,0.0030814223,0.0009719612,0.0010494156,0.019526897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011121096,0.00045855562,0.0013886668,0.0026547317,0.0009442124,0.0040600104,0.0017803032,0.0015015613,0.0014849973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018324071,0.00011607036,0.0030603008,0.00010992257,0.00009920728,0.00012777609,0.00074009364,0.0067294077,0.0007086263,0.92534095,0.004874748,0.057909798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040572722,0.00007250764,0.0017834139,0.000025825671,0.00004011518,0.00017664573,0.00037738134,0.036765654,0.00031927254,0.9543548,0.0060229586,0.000020877578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022777522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024845412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019526897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087423023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061543816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06532401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082900654","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01283-x","title":"Representative Voting Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Voting; Mathematical economics; Markov perfect equilibrium; Economics; Markov chain; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Public finance; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Nash equilibrium; Macroeconomics; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055204845359337715,"score_gpt":0.25993486762734397,"score_spread":0.20473002226800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082900654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12690137,0.0015369531,0.5149055,0.0075335638,0.0003216312,0.00035470884,0.00070619414,0.0002697374,0.3474703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88150954,0.00067439035,0.026401656,0.00080164615,0.0002181068,0.00032021536,0.00037072724,0.000046482237,0.089657165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762076,0.0014298018,0.000083854386,0.00031443973,0.0002920368,0.00025911623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967289,0.0020598772,0.00026500336,0.00041187057,0.00028773112,0.0002466052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019140856,0.00062768615,0.0012825332,0.00061916263,0.0012972591,0.003349266,0.001358997,0.0022029392,0.015889712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008649684,0.00034110947,0.0006119836,0.00088086893,0.0015941989,0.0029766683,0.0010318245,0.0016107261,0.0015765527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025955904,0.000032343698,0.00015756156,0.00002345305,0.000014043777,0.000033835062,0.000107138636,0.0038925281,0.00013521303,0.98553836,0.0033222605,0.006717368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027223077,0.000013537445,0.00012854411,0.0000083062205,0.000007693252,0.000039413106,0.00005541207,0.023574958,0.00009515744,0.96939003,0.006654886,0.0000048800425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014917958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018058236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015889712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014116956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009936179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053156376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083053135","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.52343","title":"Contractually Stable Networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; State University of New York; Northwestern University; Concordia University; Université Paris-Sud; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Simple (philosophy); Network structure; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Operations research; Economics; Engineering; Theoretical computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04675835153960043,"score_gpt":0.21607103838820596,"score_spread":0.16931268684860554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083053135","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09766772,0.00035686104,0.8389148,0.0019055388,0.00006130792,0.00019107024,0.00037143982,0.00016374586,0.06036759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84932286,0.00058003486,0.13097212,0.00034372025,0.000103040475,0.00041799308,0.00043710275,0.000062952124,0.017760165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982015,0.0006227378,0.000086269225,0.00043788986,0.00043003933,0.00022155633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942569,0.0026486155,0.0009259183,0.000908384,0.0007650619,0.0004951657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021548797,0.0003326049,0.0004692875,0.0014554316,0.002037659,0.0026863625,0.0016542602,0.0016461358,0.008593928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011559969,0.0003275971,0.0005480115,0.0011587136,0.0028200466,0.0056142244,0.0020833702,0.0014962173,0.00088524714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063471243,0.000006586346,0.0002101404,0.00000777015,0.0000037713717,0.00003701664,0.00009180958,0.0074380026,0.00020286127,0.9882344,0.00033678705,0.0034244726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008583279,0.000011572822,0.00011881339,0.000010547227,0.000003945935,0.000050412975,0.00006572289,0.05279466,0.0002837173,0.94052356,0.006121512,0.0000069965818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00171941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012398467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008593928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018020269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011794514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028749526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083277177","doi":"10.1111/coin.12398","title":"Group recommendation with noisy subjective preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Majority rule; Computer science; Noise (video); Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09311460311899544,"score_gpt":0.2496705710176706,"score_spread":0.15655596789867515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083277177","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13320237,0.00040747854,0.86223745,0.0006256841,0.00005130851,0.00014865,0.00020969147,0.00023803092,0.0028794603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88950497,0.00020547233,0.1080558,0.00014018707,0.0000847007,0.0001187903,0.00030448186,0.000031519252,0.0015540884],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98592377,0.008422916,0.00065581873,0.0021957776,0.0022501468,0.00055156474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90854925,0.06935432,0.005580369,0.011798339,0.004064527,0.00065322645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024527656,0.00084302743,0.0021970607,0.0017104669,0.000873674,0.003102253,0.002755837,0.0022837578,0.0015267173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093813464,0.00067629095,0.001174801,0.0017802047,0.001962785,0.004559138,0.0013867875,0.0024108961,0.00050092547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010833573,0.00022653939,0.026971744,0.00045950562,0.000782424,0.00024955077,0.0011920898,0.5898328,0.0023216286,0.18419456,0.0035664756,0.18911931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049118247,0.00007889757,0.0029863806,0.000043127788,0.00005696691,0.00007417624,0.0000921555,0.90959996,0.0008645385,0.08529534,0.0008184259,0.000040972838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053704027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038201115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024527656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015270248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097258424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12971616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087195457","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16650","title":"Achieving Proportionality up to the Maximin Item with Indivisible Goods","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Minimax; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12997399483738775,"score_gpt":0.2795413397289091,"score_spread":0.14956734489152135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087195457","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10248093,0.0003387253,0.8711308,0.0015749554,0.00010428535,0.00022290355,0.00021657631,0.00045616133,0.023474645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73873085,0.00030483122,0.25018567,0.00058863475,0.00013983155,0.0003158322,0.00024674548,0.00028886777,0.009198788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442345,0.0023913912,0.00023520685,0.0012142014,0.0009411967,0.0007945851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884444,0.0066849883,0.0009383483,0.0029127295,0.00044101887,0.0005785557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006234062,0.0012472977,0.001866147,0.0006058577,0.0014763591,0.00367249,0.0027175792,0.0021118673,0.008148094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026826972,0.0006149846,0.0014134127,0.001621777,0.0027505674,0.009872288,0.004270815,0.0039837435,0.0013458251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006781463,0.00032618377,0.0017048874,0.00035096047,0.0001456696,0.00023185417,0.0006090984,0.17769341,0.005912814,0.72599274,0.0041708327,0.08218331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007262682,0.00019248604,0.0003974643,0.00004747116,0.00003768692,0.00019911795,0.00012345334,0.28082207,0.004465103,0.7085721,0.0050431397,0.000027202193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086927763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094494177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008148094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018492285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002101218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032969296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087265189","doi":"10.22574/jmid.2020.12.004","title":"Matching with compatibility constraints: The case of the Canadian medical residency match","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; French; Matching (statistics); Compatibility (geochemistry); Medical school; Phenomenon; Population; Computer science; Mathematics education; Genealogy; Psychology; Mathematics; Medicine; Linguistics; Medical education; Sociology; Demography; Statistics; History; Engineering; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05467545280419437,"score_gpt":0.22530027138302572,"score_spread":0.17062481857883136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087265189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60098344,0.00090803776,0.20721148,0.0139521295,0.00017235194,0.00069384143,0.0018203532,0.00019298765,0.17406538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732957,0.00022949716,0.015447835,0.000514959,0.0000610132,0.00010746616,0.00016988064,0.000018924491,0.0101547325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360585,0.0016339599,0.00020651761,0.0008737178,0.0012430481,0.0024367732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053043,0.0045506894,0.0013065832,0.0011983084,0.00091414235,0.0014998848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048795673,0.0006745112,0.0019226905,0.0011691933,0.005606829,0.003946627,0.00284737,0.004745866,0.012403757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025739528,0.0006014893,0.0011859614,0.0030458216,0.004063492,0.0039891507,0.002828457,0.003016095,0.00069439417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004396452,0.00014759909,0.008890751,0.0001080678,0.00008517641,0.0013927282,0.0009022069,0.04499863,0.0011047627,0.91151977,0.008274858,0.02213581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274476,0.00016804882,0.0066089933,0.000068150075,0.00013835334,0.0014169366,0.0014558935,0.27710512,0.0011192634,0.6823158,0.028846582,0.00012936498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24296689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17891617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008757185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00998861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4831053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088437760","doi":"10.1007/s40505-021-00199-8","title":"On the Continuity of the Feasible Set Mapping in Optimal Transport","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Marginal distribution; Separable space; Stability (learning theory); Metric (unit); Wasserstein metric; Joint probability distribution; Mathematical optimization; Function (biology); Applied mathematics; Random variable; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Economics","score_opus":0.046061688072078597,"score_gpt":0.21677883160036393,"score_spread":0.17071714352828532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088437760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1784386,0.0023428176,0.76603436,0.006754783,0.00030239625,0.00013026991,0.0005812287,0.00015161895,0.045263916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844589,0.0021915599,0.097739674,0.00047941323,0.00047394092,0.00021228152,0.00041134268,0.00024824712,0.013784511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977925,0.0012546722,0.00013010214,0.00034455265,0.00026626704,0.0002118934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779714,0.018082732,0.0009352166,0.00094317924,0.0011549903,0.0009125605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005557583,0.00078973686,0.0020952926,0.0024273123,0.0018422462,0.0040192395,0.002411371,0.003167078,0.009977859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032109585,0.0011646065,0.0019848428,0.002255657,0.005131452,0.010348531,0.0032903014,0.006060816,0.0005656904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007667683,0.00003788549,0.00037331742,0.00007186023,0.000016689952,0.00004755296,0.00020200247,0.018937184,0.00037116048,0.97319025,0.0010230959,0.0056523127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018996607,0.000025728426,0.00022680013,0.000029630131,0.000008206753,0.000025580286,0.00006466855,0.080400616,0.00014741301,0.918225,0.00081425614,0.000013011366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034591868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014261975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020963466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015836767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033379197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089003244","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3666","title":"Preference Elicitation for Participatory Budgeting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory budgeting; Preference elicitation; Knapsack problem; Preference; Voting; Social choice theory; Value (mathematics); Citizen journalism; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.23828201502440952,"score_gpt":0.27747362496714456,"score_spread":0.039191609942735045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089003244","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005636096,0.0001696233,0.9824631,0.00062953134,0.000048898302,0.0002996653,0.00024611602,0.00010972025,0.010397268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31525764,0.00046393496,0.6769423,0.00034612004,0.00009944997,0.001640575,0.00054868014,0.000092348426,0.004609014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729628,0.021471871,0.00095851463,0.0014408234,0.0026100194,0.00055600103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669271,0.02467008,0.0015678281,0.0044690403,0.0019132387,0.00045269687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014800814,0.001030462,0.0012484358,0.0010831099,0.0013161503,0.0027246536,0.0016175029,0.0015022262,0.014904369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057459243,0.00071374263,0.0015264738,0.0025708645,0.0021692459,0.0036542553,0.0033469494,0.0024929543,0.0017897971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023259905,0.00010942457,0.000851856,0.0006057796,0.000104584564,0.000093496405,0.00070001336,0.05778718,0.0028042623,0.8369911,0.0047558006,0.094963945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007874908,0.000069266745,0.00033664732,0.000104965475,0.000024821102,0.00006046447,0.00017145401,0.19272426,0.001283456,0.793208,0.011901364,0.00003660109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022738944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025991115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014904369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020899922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024651953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078275144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089737151","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-57980-7_20","title":"A General Framework for Computing the Nucleolus via Dynamic Programming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Dynamic programming; Programming language; Algorithm","score_opus":0.02581692898765839,"score_gpt":0.24311532235237326,"score_spread":0.21729839336471488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089737151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001542119,0.000113904134,0.99507517,0.00010925634,0.000028138724,0.00001720788,0.00005526697,0.00019566747,0.0028631894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1294743,0.00053799205,0.8627821,0.00019052831,0.00018328434,0.00025773392,0.000418279,0.0006551482,0.005500576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858594,0.0005107939,0.000061758685,0.0003773408,0.00027780453,0.00018637152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780077,0.0013914292,0.00010553075,0.00036683446,0.0001896254,0.00014580601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025310933,0.00128394,0.0021949208,0.0016073702,0.0015206727,0.0041961465,0.004205759,0.0022184427,0.01106824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009142037,0.001215381,0.002035892,0.0030229462,0.0027980371,0.0056319023,0.0034963356,0.0042580464,0.0021668372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003285337,0.00003210224,0.00012529545,0.000060028786,0.00002211556,0.00002893742,0.00004316629,0.14210163,0.0006845797,0.8317991,0.0019914685,0.023078693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010488491,0.000008320241,0.000027287264,0.000013044825,0.000007162373,0.000010493855,0.000008104476,0.38898724,0.0002418236,0.6085783,0.002098656,0.000009084723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041491627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045041274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002154733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018039416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089870068","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v9n6p49","title":"An Introduction to Sequential Pentuals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Extension (predicate logic); Focus (optics); Computer science; Bayesian game; Mathematics; Game theory; Sequential game","score_opus":0.042612677971240916,"score_gpt":0.2758571865768043,"score_spread":0.2332445086055634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089870068","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062919203,0.005697649,0.88661665,0.002202619,0.0014404786,0.00018870414,0.0004305721,0.0003512557,0.09678016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31171945,0.010321822,0.60138035,0.0043845116,0.0039999443,0.0011831494,0.00086947024,0.0008724305,0.065268815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690324,0.0012308612,0.00023772479,0.0007103063,0.0006591776,0.00025868672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741817,0.0015171303,0.00018956137,0.00045739065,0.00024578854,0.00017198602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032097339,0.0012819843,0.0012713554,0.0014402226,0.0019843734,0.0032287685,0.0021866893,0.0020061007,0.017128654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062229903,0.0010645894,0.0021941273,0.0023554785,0.0056395847,0.007448203,0.0032676326,0.006215154,0.0038252561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009363111,0.000009082778,0.00011051421,0.000040112875,0.00000617648,0.00004021591,0.000094322946,0.0011609414,0.00010968106,0.98938936,0.0015312098,0.007499012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090767635,0.000033788136,0.00013091255,0.000046425168,0.000008364372,0.00017032468,0.000027576814,0.0075110868,0.0001485696,0.93892044,0.05297616,0.000017242093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013373634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017128654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001214218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057301044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094200045","doi":"","title":"Clique games: a family of games with coincidence between the nucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Clique; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Coincidence; Intersection (aeronautics); Tree (set theory); Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Game theory; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.0345772706008816,"score_gpt":0.21143136620981928,"score_spread":0.17685409560893767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094200045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056407962,0.0007075217,0.89341825,0.0011605163,0.00021013184,0.00020172502,0.00037666643,0.00019574173,0.047321316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7708769,0.0011053527,0.21266203,0.00066532806,0.00036344997,0.0005687681,0.00054260873,0.00027520698,0.012940369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972301,0.0012750952,0.00011422104,0.00052805856,0.00059703947,0.0002555254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971585,0.0015984818,0.00034810384,0.00028714695,0.0003089558,0.00029883083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001978432,0.00086197146,0.0011539145,0.0013966284,0.0013294809,0.0029001532,0.001487839,0.0013946653,0.0066222935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007517248,0.00047743635,0.0013873422,0.0015254428,0.003129922,0.005894474,0.0020129115,0.002603329,0.00061733276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018721075,0.000015539628,0.00018331467,0.000038194303,0.000015618447,0.000073527146,0.00010551188,0.0050912197,0.00059278845,0.9882854,0.0009826205,0.00459756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022121121,0.000029874067,0.00017997735,0.000022214224,0.000011553508,0.00014061718,0.000058406586,0.03948208,0.00038174822,0.952962,0.0066917995,0.000017601376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016320926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012834828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066222935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017697916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013335268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022153735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096080307","doi":"10.3386/w27981","title":"Personal Power Dynamics in Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Power (physics); Bargaining power; Economics; Microeconomics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.3873747615531023,"score_gpt":0.46286116119962395,"score_spread":0.07548639964652165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096080307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2728045,0.0034243583,0.3455687,0.012493332,0.00055196945,0.00022581039,0.00028937252,0.00017468406,0.36446738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95954156,0.0010615935,0.01151212,0.0003969939,0.00022173974,0.00012844625,0.00006781494,0.000052782198,0.027016949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728954,0.0013346854,0.00006153434,0.00038426605,0.00045272705,0.00047720337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918256,0.0057757488,0.0008795365,0.0004321735,0.0004028436,0.000684121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003832236,0.00066952914,0.00093093363,0.0011147519,0.0026478122,0.004058333,0.0015320036,0.0029859277,0.023551371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016903704,0.00055093155,0.00083700666,0.0013747646,0.0044482783,0.0059265476,0.0028874371,0.0030981223,0.0022718776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042552914,0.000041700663,0.0005618515,0.000028833962,0.000013568599,0.00011440305,0.0007391941,0.018142523,0.00030353756,0.97290796,0.0016076819,0.005496185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047486366,0.000027516151,0.0004872854,0.000029857332,0.000008237991,0.00006968571,0.00043458803,0.101600096,0.00012304769,0.8910509,0.0061016465,0.000019713125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033252793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016637215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023551371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00282102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011299492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07878721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098638685","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2021.06.013","title":"Saturating stable matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Stable marriage problem; Graph; Stability (learning theory); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.10235703068210504,"score_gpt":0.3173001541598679,"score_spread":0.21494312347776284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098638685","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29589304,0.0020496727,0.5122699,0.008508605,0.0005954352,0.0005780964,0.0019173879,0.0020489767,0.1761389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89418185,0.0007763952,0.04747461,0.0019802288,0.0004333299,0.00058882363,0.0011251176,0.00069344987,0.052746236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304754,0.0026763293,0.00031486948,0.0015548451,0.0009496327,0.0014567612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95177513,0.033195183,0.0025254425,0.0057346737,0.0030638687,0.0037057544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063241944,0.0016010047,0.005430844,0.0030961256,0.00463961,0.006371487,0.0055387644,0.0064459303,0.032833625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06755746,0.0020977247,0.0030989512,0.0033302484,0.0044926032,0.011435409,0.008670525,0.008773774,0.005322437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005662258,0.00013505672,0.00062269333,0.00018292735,0.000095314885,0.00014865777,0.00039817384,0.011901182,0.0013623358,0.9605862,0.008712603,0.015288701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008215322,0.00003617396,0.0001129969,0.000023500868,0.000022960192,0.000058115584,0.000066214365,0.04406829,0.00036849012,0.9534834,0.0016633206,0.000014462595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016403213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016215205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032833625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033312915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025229705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10983944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099747567","doi":"","title":"APPROXIMATING A BEHAVIOURAL PSEUDOMETRIC WITHOUT DISCOUNT FOR PROBABILISTIC SYSTEMS ∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"IBM (Canada); York University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Mathematics; Discounting; Extension (predicate logic); Duality (order theory); Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical economics; Interval (graph theory); Order (exchange); Zero (linguistics); Factor (programming language); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Statistics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07432503610903576,"score_gpt":0.26347032472374865,"score_spread":0.1891452886147129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099747567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033674642,0.00018056683,0.9637694,0.0002616775,0.00002928619,0.00004187115,0.00005216249,0.00022830557,0.0017620781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5877386,0.00030369483,0.40793356,0.00011775341,0.00005174496,0.00013080025,0.00021957459,0.00014849044,0.0033558633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532974,0.0017678478,0.0003086101,0.00093189155,0.0012910499,0.00037089727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883151,0.0075754193,0.0010330274,0.0014007785,0.0011373048,0.0005384424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050990903,0.0009302948,0.0010664368,0.001726824,0.0010981796,0.0026810814,0.0018185049,0.0014311969,0.0027744516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025276283,0.00082397077,0.0016460011,0.0014847859,0.002764685,0.0073289336,0.0036608344,0.0029574824,0.0004785002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015083641,0.000048379978,0.001544002,0.00014024787,0.00003741069,0.0000753217,0.00031736188,0.22431616,0.002271589,0.7232106,0.00077974657,0.047108397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072944686,0.000036159086,0.00013846991,0.000011902585,0.000005973842,0.00004037267,0.000018014083,0.75420195,0.0008528486,0.24369048,0.0009815571,0.000014992636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028346328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002029341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050990903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036504832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015145196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02696687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103261436","doi":"","title":"Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Utilitarianism; Majority rule; Approval voting; Social welfare function; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Population; Function (biology); Welfare; Econometrics; Condorcet method; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.05723824996762534,"score_gpt":0.29187001815777924,"score_spread":0.2346317681901539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103261436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32391387,0.00088283996,0.6395962,0.002764299,0.00011116757,0.00019605097,0.00029945237,0.0005554928,0.031680685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617386,0.0003551938,0.030229907,0.00031612624,0.00014804913,0.0003317733,0.00022760645,0.00013089798,0.006521924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665464,0.00780859,0.00046699488,0.0019536698,0.0020666535,0.0010494738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90106624,0.07859748,0.0058586258,0.008909565,0.0036807978,0.0018872321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014906608,0.0007107056,0.0023879749,0.0018125803,0.0014871839,0.0042821467,0.0027645708,0.0024811649,0.0048216586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114813454,0.0010667564,0.0015584336,0.0014294317,0.004950043,0.006016751,0.0034588857,0.0038940553,0.0011157772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019950283,0.00009216436,0.003616668,0.00017287444,0.00010122062,0.00020391977,0.00063052773,0.08566078,0.0018230227,0.8872969,0.002767738,0.017434735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005572768,0.00006713412,0.0009356688,0.000035148183,0.000016524318,0.00014176204,0.000067357425,0.27794018,0.00042312563,0.7194437,0.0008438734,0.000029773173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012611672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010707522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014906608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00227894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013302554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07883459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105359897","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.10.007","title":"Superset-robust collective choice rules","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Transitive relation; Social choice theory; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Preference; Choice function; Property (philosophy); Robustness (evolution); Social preferences; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Data mining","score_opus":0.16765298733793008,"score_gpt":0.27900365248936265,"score_spread":0.11135066515143258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105359897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23537004,0.00036019343,0.7351279,0.0015815534,0.00014879348,0.00012819671,0.0005150167,0.0004623965,0.02630584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489524,0.00021051477,0.038402032,0.00031324936,0.000109179884,0.00017181796,0.0003128908,0.0001550648,0.011372814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721825,0.0012735707,0.00014688984,0.0005678941,0.00045332243,0.00034000108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97355735,0.017029492,0.0025272544,0.0043925834,0.0015791515,0.0009141315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038838582,0.0005611901,0.002124757,0.001053604,0.000991632,0.0025972433,0.0023256217,0.0023838447,0.008487848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029190779,0.00061720476,0.0013371488,0.00078459753,0.0022899616,0.0034558347,0.0022447158,0.0029540774,0.0010505619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012376989,0.000047952803,0.00097216177,0.0000834851,0.00010350854,0.00013642815,0.00015252762,0.0628735,0.0011845997,0.9209649,0.003092218,0.010264869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023400837,0.000022796974,0.00033258836,0.000011962515,0.000013303267,0.000051505638,0.000033747987,0.25490567,0.00028193346,0.7436347,0.00067531806,0.000013081454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014210362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001359933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008487848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010107297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007716924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0283947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108375905","doi":"10.1111/iere.12394","title":"POSITIVELY RESPONSIVE COLLECTIVE CHOICE RULES AND MAJORITY RULE: A GENERALIZATION OF MAY'S THEOREM TO MANY ALTERNATIVES","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Generalization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Independence (probability theory); Scoring rule; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.02569676402253872,"score_gpt":0.2805381728465159,"score_spread":0.25484140882397716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108375905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20378222,0.0011600315,0.6805552,0.0047306004,0.00022289978,0.00020984514,0.00016360455,0.00014979603,0.10902571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95902896,0.00036226932,0.03588451,0.0005561562,0.00017623366,0.00017215252,0.000046781337,0.000019693753,0.00375314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066633,0.004673083,0.00047505062,0.0011848555,0.002389601,0.0006109983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753454,0.016883694,0.002246819,0.002814435,0.0020433695,0.0006663276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010925315,0.00031725856,0.0010575162,0.0011069583,0.0007947956,0.0024165672,0.0014148477,0.0011847612,0.002850689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025508553,0.00027048303,0.0012312445,0.00084260904,0.0051824856,0.0030668015,0.0020356781,0.0020693492,0.00040476365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434048,0.000027921167,0.0005706675,0.000054684515,0.000047886784,0.00008885234,0.00021129003,0.012014593,0.0006206838,0.97408754,0.0008299728,0.0114116855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029179057,0.000034193996,0.00035917683,0.000015970425,0.000016615486,0.000059819027,0.000052774303,0.024624968,0.00043469205,0.97182786,0.0025320083,0.000012844524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095381663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004045968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010925315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013074552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009561581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057779253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110703196","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.08.005","title":"A characterization of exact non-atomic market games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01564100168352522,"score_gpt":0.20338288130289234,"score_spread":0.1877418796193671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110703196","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37771907,0.000416165,0.55280095,0.0017901824,0.00014683786,0.00023809375,0.000539552,0.0002878194,0.066061325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566229,0.0002688047,0.029548956,0.00034796714,0.0001764994,0.00019589315,0.0003856701,0.00009095137,0.012362305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782073,0.0005534169,0.00017868937,0.00041966606,0.00053388585,0.0004937298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883631,0.00710184,0.0013160488,0.0009833307,0.0011875969,0.0010480931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020828727,0.00083926035,0.0017496811,0.0018932483,0.0017139422,0.00454756,0.0036836243,0.002119973,0.011382881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016414283,0.0008602303,0.0013017426,0.0018219434,0.0032364724,0.008058972,0.0026782332,0.0037501904,0.00074694486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034925848,0.000043315504,0.0002960399,0.000028933346,0.000010451377,0.000055475866,0.00014029097,0.0051398817,0.00047204405,0.99079204,0.0007105351,0.0022759587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019731055,0.000020215344,0.00018751733,0.000010034634,0.000007201778,0.00006650511,0.00005782182,0.07196849,0.00016848683,0.92679316,0.00068825344,0.000012492425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017759749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013904002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011382881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017604707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016690238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0380795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116827133","doi":"10.4230/lipics.isaac.2020.39","title":"Market Pricing for Matroid Rank Valuations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap; Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium; Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Matroid; Weighted matroid; Combinatorics; Rank (graph theory); Graphic matroid; Mathematics; Matroid partitioning; Partition (number theory); Conjecture; Base (topology); Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05232919747656014,"score_gpt":0.2469366637237974,"score_spread":0.19460746624723727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116827133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17375456,0.00055000733,0.80555093,0.0012134332,0.00007421691,0.00018151825,0.00021040128,0.00021437822,0.018250545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87193507,0.00034411807,0.121119,0.00015198826,0.00011986006,0.00017300884,0.00015675815,0.0000815097,0.005918663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969042,0.0015799808,0.000106750005,0.00044772017,0.0006107994,0.0003504948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953382,0.0028200531,0.0005115151,0.0006904286,0.00032911045,0.00031058266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037276738,0.00068499014,0.0012635654,0.0009583877,0.0009122707,0.004260619,0.0018605253,0.0016581574,0.005647706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013804645,0.0004986478,0.0010498496,0.0019129562,0.002394487,0.00938814,0.0018171316,0.0019152609,0.00057471794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008855336,0.000088128756,0.00048167928,0.00009584696,0.000032729862,0.00007435467,0.00014212867,0.05046145,0.0012962373,0.92705846,0.0010652171,0.019115265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035529916,0.000053588643,0.0001669169,0.000016399992,0.000014756593,0.00006953939,0.00007311125,0.28872868,0.00071800547,0.7079864,0.0021220497,0.000014976403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006577859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007622986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005647706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019084939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008636692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019714057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117122185","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3081481","title":"Roommate Problems with Externalities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Capital Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Business; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.023144570419003186,"score_gpt":0.21425159941992314,"score_spread":0.19110702900091994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117122185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3930758,0.0011201814,0.38606173,0.016735867,0.00038809355,0.00022627486,0.00064578064,0.00047500836,0.20127134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91683257,0.00040675656,0.013925702,0.00054662285,0.00020569774,0.00017320116,0.00020050608,0.000121708224,0.067587316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979019,0.0010590337,0.000096036485,0.00034427064,0.00019213608,0.0004066375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98245376,0.013345787,0.0013101794,0.0011656376,0.0004977809,0.0012267947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031210957,0.00062959624,0.0019700206,0.0008911739,0.0015808142,0.004320594,0.0021145188,0.005548575,0.037554882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027012523,0.0007716616,0.0012525801,0.0011225657,0.00392495,0.007779049,0.0029927946,0.005350255,0.0016777784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007570374,0.000037601192,0.00035944366,0.000048739534,0.000016752314,0.00010470257,0.00013258815,0.0069769705,0.00017662504,0.985276,0.0028601415,0.003934867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083204366,0.000020627822,0.00014232247,0.00001385214,0.000009701704,0.00006506534,0.00013981816,0.020394625,0.00011621684,0.9771911,0.0018141677,0.000009217523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010612033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090265647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037554882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012721628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085329404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118498665","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01304-9","title":"Robust incentive compatibility of voting rules with positively correlated beliefs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Social choice theory; Voting; Approval voting; Incentive; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Social preferences; Compatibility (geochemistry); Microeconomics; Choice function; Function (biology); Economics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.03528615211707246,"score_gpt":0.2183439714627839,"score_spread":0.18305781934571144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118498665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7095145,0.00020704292,0.2731048,0.0016066642,0.00006581363,0.00031255034,0.0005124885,0.0002088555,0.014467289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856243,0.00010299565,0.011310722,0.00015005458,0.00007968076,0.00015585672,0.00022557504,0.000037649766,0.0023131685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470414,0.009001592,0.0008910162,0.002242681,0.0016133335,0.0015473044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7868853,0.16678871,0.024892954,0.012085731,0.005188611,0.004158726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020176535,0.0011075938,0.004359821,0.0018084999,0.001298883,0.0064688567,0.0029930493,0.004175757,0.006224678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11766953,0.0017937475,0.0018573976,0.0014142737,0.0054978896,0.0062132967,0.00285486,0.00408647,0.00079334574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014605469,0.0006970338,0.00728218,0.00020696082,0.00030596106,0.00046282366,0.0005599172,0.07108129,0.0044435947,0.9004913,0.0014880268,0.011520506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005299619,0.00026489946,0.0040746513,0.000042724398,0.00007208646,0.00013059659,0.00012827573,0.2472655,0.0012509403,0.7457909,0.00037881118,0.00007070681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015324615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010288781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020176535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021538988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029819186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10670495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121219528","doi":"","title":"On the set of extreme core allocations for minimal cost spanning tree problems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Extreme point; Spanning tree; Steiner tree problem; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Tree (set theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Minimum spanning tree; Marginal cost; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.2794885925611124,"score_gpt":0.3453742523837164,"score_spread":0.06588565982260397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121219528","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101811126,0.0004197673,0.8751612,0.0009742497,0.000060025675,0.00021564064,0.00035228312,0.00021545112,0.020790273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.648245,0.0009818595,0.33579335,0.0005350609,0.00017405285,0.0010234963,0.0011246934,0.00039530708,0.011727217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840635,0.0008366547,0.00006043443,0.00024084558,0.0002830362,0.00017268228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575657,0.0027770104,0.000322952,0.0003209853,0.0004412071,0.00038119874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00253631,0.0010276977,0.0018375638,0.0013802935,0.0014380887,0.002704059,0.0016742893,0.0017455003,0.007774579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013928362,0.00072627503,0.0012164767,0.0013896868,0.0021119125,0.0029790804,0.0027134973,0.0025704415,0.00082270143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015405663,0.00011587666,0.00055442326,0.00018221771,0.00005898027,0.00008853936,0.0002908922,0.18218577,0.001414107,0.78180003,0.0060570394,0.027098186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004847367,0.00005201557,0.00014467149,0.000043347754,0.000011629388,0.000050265244,0.000063034415,0.30949983,0.0003909447,0.6877768,0.0019066777,0.000012380906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008608252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009132583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007774579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011750461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026008606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121276871","doi":"","title":"Social Choice, Optimal Inference and Figure Skating","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Statistical inference; Monte Carlo method; Order (exchange); Bayesian inference; Computer science; Posterior probability; Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.061270179531351644,"score_gpt":0.3240809407090894,"score_spread":0.2628107611777377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121276871","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11257358,0.0014731073,0.86195004,0.0055618505,0.00013971093,0.00017954592,0.0005719782,0.00017457423,0.017375614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86452645,0.0012001924,0.12476474,0.0005148568,0.0002366439,0.00030389303,0.000610416,0.00011354234,0.007729303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98974365,0.006780871,0.00029330023,0.0012656187,0.0011577641,0.0007587812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634448,0.031001678,0.0025593305,0.0014541317,0.0009504922,0.00058956177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011877228,0.0010789544,0.0028220343,0.0017821634,0.001297261,0.003282632,0.002711289,0.003344666,0.007566334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05551044,0.0008671134,0.0013912295,0.0021384463,0.006138447,0.0052653756,0.0021597103,0.0031937473,0.0005511491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001681652,0.00011344734,0.0031124323,0.0001835518,0.00013769532,0.00013914952,0.00035166476,0.22719438,0.00024047284,0.73947453,0.0026027735,0.026281724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039772465,0.000026119016,0.00060278445,0.000027422166,0.000014478247,0.000026730888,0.00006979427,0.23260398,0.00011190125,0.76550287,0.0009549681,0.000019165822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00911374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069865584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011877228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043085385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023352448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06281352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121339688","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902823","title":"Learning from a Piece of Pie: The Empirical Content of Nash Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Point (geometry); Status quo; Best response; Nash equilibrium; Risk dominance; Mathematical economics; Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07494899975378698,"score_gpt":0.23747190839721938,"score_spread":0.16252290864343238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121339688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8118953,0.0009376824,0.11687141,0.0065054675,0.00019916042,0.00012026218,0.00033145022,0.00012569112,0.06301348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299955,0.00020039483,0.0033211107,0.00020506686,0.000065406304,0.000034082503,0.00010444424,0.000030044162,0.003039878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630284,0.002341488,0.0001250979,0.00046580855,0.0004936269,0.00027117413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223285,0.06654942,0.0035214971,0.00508709,0.0015744544,0.0009390242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011252319,0.00038106498,0.0011775268,0.00096547714,0.0012902127,0.003954861,0.0017395671,0.002314427,0.016992493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320588,0.0004338556,0.000539495,0.0013811911,0.0036721253,0.009002837,0.0017621985,0.003875441,0.0010905006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010544034,0.0005116556,0.029514324,0.00027334006,0.00021775597,0.00019139057,0.0024264269,0.044068314,0.0009226213,0.83131176,0.0062271096,0.08328092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004694643,0.000056970108,0.008681356,0.00004840282,0.00003285563,0.000052847958,0.00086569827,0.06344661,0.00029179195,0.9245805,0.0018681632,0.000027949704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017637368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016350657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016992493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010088682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007467613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05950862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121444179","doi":"","title":"On Demand Responsiveness in Additive Cost Sharing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University College London; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Monotonic function; Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06372001184919435,"score_gpt":0.31257639166249535,"score_spread":0.248856379813301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121444179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12492689,0.00056657894,0.7529324,0.00438889,0.00018424769,0.00020944787,0.00028457836,0.00021936093,0.11628744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95899343,0.0002959047,0.030068021,0.00067522365,0.00015690237,0.00025190896,0.00009719386,0.0000724127,0.009389069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340725,0.0035298981,0.00022631617,0.0007566681,0.001476382,0.00060349196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98911554,0.007058303,0.001065496,0.0015535295,0.0008558247,0.0003513346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061064605,0.00066829973,0.0010761858,0.0008841277,0.00097213907,0.0024415662,0.00159705,0.0014918915,0.014463872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01947531,0.00041745143,0.0011307535,0.0012727367,0.0034913486,0.004513532,0.0031539865,0.0027891384,0.0011572482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037382368,0.000031075066,0.0002895494,0.00006239995,0.000020412981,0.000063143874,0.0001448738,0.027896129,0.00057913666,0.9599513,0.0010537517,0.009870871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029570363,0.000046592108,0.00037032977,0.00002811135,0.000016101569,0.00006270412,0.00012448839,0.07447308,0.00043873483,0.9201656,0.004220902,0.000023765553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001390399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070041703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014463872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027261167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012126364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048386455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121488979","doi":"","title":"Free Triples, Large Indifference Classes and the Majority Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Transitive relation; Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Computer science; Combinatorics; Voting; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05287045613976756,"score_gpt":0.2956985221404959,"score_spread":0.24282806600072834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121488979","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24426524,0.0008880123,0.66933244,0.0027370811,0.00018844174,0.00016380628,0.0008935374,0.00044677957,0.08108465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062847,0.00040519665,0.079854034,0.00045217742,0.0001554495,0.0001918802,0.00063800544,0.00012985269,0.011888683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777895,0.0007622652,0.00014317718,0.0005295781,0.00047201384,0.0003140523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930373,0.0040274863,0.00074084796,0.0011396898,0.0005365943,0.0005181641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026308717,0.00045584526,0.000981797,0.0014199547,0.0027418362,0.0033240814,0.0015906072,0.001460977,0.0072469898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009332523,0.00044112044,0.0009773853,0.001574263,0.0033108976,0.008088131,0.0027559798,0.002283873,0.0010360274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003187251,0.000015648326,0.00022228892,0.00002300385,0.000007528533,0.000058562335,0.000093493145,0.0026044468,0.00030730036,0.99039793,0.0008496597,0.005388228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015075203,0.000008923265,0.0000830914,0.000007972991,0.0000050634435,0.000050294257,0.000041199146,0.011387803,0.0002741001,0.98582274,0.0022962939,0.0000074638697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021585124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018902267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072469898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014752714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078753236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024243653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121497152","doi":"","title":"From the bankruptcy problem and its Concede-and-Divide solution to the assignment problem and its Fair Division solution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical economics; Fair division; Assignment problem; Transferable utility; Endowment; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.080821229685597,"score_gpt":0.30224194724317427,"score_spread":0.22142071755757725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121497152","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040260453,0.002837314,0.7974029,0.021140924,0.0005780417,0.00023862079,0.00029967338,0.00013364175,0.13710839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5975018,0.005026042,0.28836358,0.0035314772,0.0019457588,0.00094275514,0.0007212593,0.00022930175,0.10173798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788696,0.00089017046,0.00008205966,0.00041373665,0.0004757624,0.0002512887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968977,0.0020123285,0.00020764847,0.0002836554,0.00034669787,0.00025199665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030318722,0.0011434332,0.0010159347,0.0010130559,0.0025352163,0.0043127486,0.0019579877,0.0038983484,0.016207943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010476281,0.0005410446,0.0013672424,0.0015694892,0.005677626,0.009248995,0.0044600284,0.0060617407,0.0010359939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014336171,0.000024597379,0.00007832492,0.00002413591,0.000005323119,0.000031156065,0.00009733482,0.008556785,0.000049764134,0.97879386,0.002364078,0.009960334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015458238,0.0000102952445,0.00005276091,0.000024450448,0.000003384066,0.000019266028,0.00005193679,0.015527709,0.000074609736,0.9771548,0.0070589385,0.000006488574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006722887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00463928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016207943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003906584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003702629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054220915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121611278","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1690472","title":"Overlapping Coalitions, Bargaining and Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Subgame; Game theory; Cover (algebra); Perfect information; Economics; Complete information; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Engineering","score_opus":0.018742475424827532,"score_gpt":0.22212033713083165,"score_spread":0.2033778617060041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121611278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28800297,0.0062378496,0.6053265,0.009231305,0.00029458306,0.0001414064,0.0002750153,0.00011200771,0.09037835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513054,0.0024922984,0.028803969,0.0003034669,0.00034594547,0.00018709824,0.00016773744,0.00003291588,0.01636119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966175,0.002168905,0.000120040626,0.000441256,0.000362595,0.00028979153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829747,0.01367221,0.0014662218,0.00079657056,0.00044408315,0.00064614794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004917839,0.00058899826,0.0014033508,0.0017678947,0.0023730092,0.006065025,0.0016531511,0.00362189,0.009135089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020937143,0.00067503663,0.0006707339,0.0027871085,0.005578362,0.008568136,0.0024816734,0.00235961,0.00063870364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026002981,0.000020931855,0.00032525513,0.00003475272,0.000014965816,0.00002662874,0.00016477563,0.01069241,0.00010490681,0.98383415,0.0006671883,0.0040880744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010928939,0.000003706849,0.00009861791,0.0000075194985,0.0000036230904,0.000014354878,0.00007157827,0.014231226,0.000021853137,0.98467004,0.0008624023,0.000004094391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024263116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022118085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020117708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001073765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030559957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121634132","doi":"","title":"An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.046419941032103104,"score_gpt":0.2534808119740445,"score_spread":0.20706087094194137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121634132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2759067,0.013640901,0.006233649,0.604766,0.012749811,0.0015078771,0.0015688215,0.00035175623,0.083274424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7144912,0.008332798,0.005032253,0.11287641,0.0023626173,0.0032122044,0.00048171816,0.00029201026,0.15291877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997783,0.001046995,0.0001033767,0.00025800522,0.00031760224,0.0004910608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476093,0.0021121055,0.00032778224,0.00013918156,0.0010067675,0.0016532863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003633103,0.0007185165,0.0012657564,0.0012606075,0.012022571,0.0028451763,0.000704406,0.0043964796,0.015511175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009815775,0.0009958418,0.00026373976,0.0015623835,0.0035385974,0.004113448,0.0033016976,0.0076392344,0.0044295937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004389227,0.00018061767,0.004673081,0.00039378487,0.000013399791,0.005298515,0.46030903,0.000098311204,0.007956202,0.014550705,0.48971796,0.01636944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028041102,0.00008129375,0.0053547025,0.00025257337,0.0000104963965,0.0009271571,0.23265812,0.00018869845,0.00064334605,0.0012531158,0.7585033,0.00009920124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01739479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031536832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01739479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005010389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037491287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051890075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121671095","doi":"","title":"On the informational efficiency of simple scoring rules","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Voting; Scoring rule; Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Approval voting; Population; Poisson distribution; Majority rule; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.056509462824124564,"score_gpt":0.2925939810086319,"score_spread":0.23608451818450732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121671095","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31749806,0.0011522903,0.6392953,0.0017867686,0.000118140204,0.00030400275,0.00030793934,0.00020099891,0.03933652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92728144,0.0007889561,0.06723351,0.0002377925,0.00019989983,0.00023953027,0.00019681006,0.00007082595,0.0037512635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817916,0.010902664,0.0010499487,0.0015905091,0.0032142114,0.0014510069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8967787,0.079986654,0.008906059,0.009213191,0.004065522,0.0010497946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013059786,0.0012343639,0.0020754228,0.0017880439,0.0013582918,0.0051747197,0.0030083018,0.0026356108,0.0041154134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07819581,0.0009103662,0.0011014836,0.0020336215,0.004861676,0.0064947517,0.0027265432,0.0023029263,0.00092082325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020610864,0.00020124046,0.001978495,0.00023419921,0.00011564999,0.00019563205,0.0003135233,0.09331394,0.002198576,0.8693731,0.0013274818,0.030542102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010016434,0.0001255268,0.00056471117,0.000037361526,0.000044613702,0.00013486324,0.000053776996,0.29229072,0.0015408574,0.70387846,0.001192571,0.00003641997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075393857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040158592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013059786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014560013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011301743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06906754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121785314","doi":"10.1257/mic.20150147","title":"Two-Sided Investment and Matching with Multidimensional Cost Types and Attributes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplicity (mathematics); Microeconomics; Matching (statistics); Investment (military); Ex-ante; Simple (philosophy); Industrial organization; Investment decisions; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01675893630970254,"score_gpt":0.22793033835715776,"score_spread":0.21117140204745521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121785314","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41176078,0.00022798796,0.54240745,0.0023564708,0.0000829072,0.00025309258,0.00029194079,0.000086240514,0.042533115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95243937,0.00012213676,0.037317097,0.000101446785,0.0000388361,0.0001117137,0.000074658274,0.000012139904,0.009782519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731666,0.0011795165,0.00019219048,0.00054754666,0.0002949039,0.00046914484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939301,0.0027266124,0.0015606306,0.0009832187,0.00028171728,0.0005177716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030052816,0.000487047,0.0009256102,0.00043548984,0.0008117681,0.0033983882,0.0014522376,0.0021274125,0.011929042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015032077,0.0005691349,0.0007375825,0.001014599,0.002056839,0.0054744254,0.0022666631,0.0019505528,0.00085555285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016063996,0.00012657266,0.0038970716,0.00007071229,0.00003076109,0.0001575042,0.00017546165,0.041752476,0.0008542006,0.93330634,0.0010121962,0.01845597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008759659,0.00010096201,0.0020260166,0.000024536834,0.000029714129,0.00017794453,0.00023497306,0.17529227,0.00075786095,0.81820744,0.0030374832,0.000023249313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001470198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012738864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011929042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019305429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009685631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03990662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121806521","doi":"10.1257/aer.91.5.1478","title":"Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Voting; Delegation; Private information retrieval; Obfuscation; Quality (philosophy); Information transmission; Exaggeration; Information sharing; Business; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Computer security; Management; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.03881908141071992,"score_gpt":0.2786429088437875,"score_spread":0.23982382743306757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121806521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32083517,0.008350484,0.16028832,0.044228163,0.0004422869,0.00043907796,0.00026036362,0.00011112714,0.46504498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980488,0.00084668753,0.0059583415,0.0010098474,0.00020874904,0.00016864354,0.000057916404,0.00002136294,0.0112405885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643408,0.024059922,0.0013192223,0.0027521397,0.0043304395,0.0031973596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466745,0.03267885,0.009529016,0.0030143477,0.004337702,0.0037655565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022980282,0.00045276663,0.00093790103,0.0026591048,0.004638679,0.00942799,0.0014651491,0.0047804643,0.010142292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06780569,0.000531763,0.0006804979,0.0025617112,0.010696105,0.005790963,0.0058641345,0.0028356519,0.0012319455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004323712,0.000020296859,0.0019048752,0.00005086315,0.00003326512,0.00011378652,0.0016125923,0.0028149772,0.000164239,0.9758665,0.0027494484,0.014626051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004144955,0.000021610052,0.0013416772,0.00004159119,0.000015882973,0.00006581313,0.0006747335,0.0036486047,0.00013367442,0.9761381,0.017862553,0.0000141953215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030777857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023452858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022980282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062265834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037256517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12153286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121826381","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.11.002","title":"Weak undominance in scoring rule elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Scoring rule; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Weighted voting; Mathematics; Political science; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.06647789912655191,"score_gpt":0.28902348318255816,"score_spread":0.22254558405600625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121826381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72426057,0.00068451214,0.23423694,0.0036446315,0.00032989535,0.00015223303,0.00022208979,0.00045761708,0.036011554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98617065,0.00015148554,0.00770265,0.00015449525,0.00015392787,0.00007483939,0.0000620258,0.0000673312,0.0054626744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98734945,0.0073501803,0.0008283022,0.0015850194,0.0013321381,0.0015548947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8578843,0.103608266,0.011707259,0.015942255,0.0059707193,0.0048871934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015131311,0.00083373825,0.0048430213,0.0017795187,0.003455438,0.0070164185,0.003525815,0.0034444113,0.008027558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13037287,0.0015586992,0.0011993062,0.0016534477,0.0071353703,0.009090607,0.0036293764,0.0064886813,0.0009032441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004693295,0.00015363858,0.0029418552,0.00016602567,0.0000798646,0.00031582636,0.0005975177,0.022147123,0.001328235,0.9541276,0.002521069,0.015151809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007169634,0.00005530314,0.0005890001,0.000017454659,0.00002549461,0.000081658334,0.00012355125,0.06579014,0.00045805215,0.93223774,0.000523348,0.000026503476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021038915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015316352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015131311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001598423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027680802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08002299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121880336","doi":"","title":"How to divide things fairly","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Simple (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Pareto principle; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Machine learning","score_opus":0.020091248080117117,"score_gpt":0.1729502117112033,"score_spread":0.1528589636310862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121880336","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06775328,0.0005329097,0.84745604,0.012091175,0.00031823438,0.00049323565,0.0002997903,0.0006576535,0.070397675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5030476,0.00042660628,0.43202227,0.0023379875,0.00023924738,0.0008675753,0.0004389937,0.0007010137,0.059918784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962358,0.0015215173,0.00020005298,0.00090282294,0.00071182067,0.00042796409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947184,0.0022588698,0.0004754087,0.0016838524,0.0005588222,0.0003046466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042263228,0.0008252587,0.0011116682,0.0007510172,0.0023430844,0.0034727477,0.0019260554,0.0023005786,0.019938836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016209152,0.0004578295,0.0008725047,0.0012052974,0.0034143636,0.0075786826,0.0029120494,0.00244439,0.004365525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031851142,0.00014441468,0.0012202642,0.00013748837,0.0001133111,0.00008529808,0.0006159681,0.05483532,0.0031947726,0.7919872,0.0144917285,0.13285571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007733813,0.000063544285,0.0002653123,0.000040642128,0.000025202082,0.00006168269,0.00020210244,0.07462093,0.0012860418,0.8995809,0.023755677,0.000020653075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025977744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023442896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019938836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002173552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025591066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06670201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121950987","doi":"10.1007/s00182-010-0238-6","title":"Corrigendum to “Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Counterexample; Null (SQL); Domain (mathematical analysis); Object (grammar); Monotonic function; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Invariant (physics); Mathematical economics; Preference; Independence (probability theory); Combinatorics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.036136562314952374,"score_gpt":0.26020456676152703,"score_spread":0.22406800444657465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121950987","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059161783,0.004851356,0.0056567956,0.20531881,0.7277813,0.00009447099,0.0023998967,0.0006359478,0.052669793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026042849,0.008822302,0.010849894,0.19317289,0.21165316,0.00046219514,0.0034951977,0.0012570646,0.54424447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995181,0.0011214763,0.00053532195,0.0008636322,0.0018332119,0.0004653025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98316884,0.004794196,0.00044814148,0.0014525622,0.009802458,0.00033371846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003484926,0.0018758783,0.002796449,0.0033138697,0.0037400865,0.0041583404,0.00440419,0.0074818134,0.07634959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037229378,0.0010200877,0.0026635258,0.0029421984,0.0027289921,0.0043653985,0.002076873,0.0077275704,0.0324761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001273709,0.000005981625,0.000024991485,0.00005404311,0.000008992542,0.00005128228,0.000011884384,0.0000999281,0.000021672597,0.0057124468,0.99136955,0.0026265793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734198,0.000028422384,0.0014137636,0.00025120072,0.00010224602,0.00024381923,0.000099647725,0.0026005376,0.0005339968,0.054925136,0.9396378,0.00009000387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045072094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048197042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07634959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070701255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044848262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25541478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122014683","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3270445","title":"Simple Games Versus Weighted Voting Games: Bounding the Critical Threshold Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics); Bounding overwatch; Mathematical economics; Voting; Mathematics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.029066883930966073,"score_gpt":0.2706636284155989,"score_spread":0.2415967444846328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122014683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23818901,0.0027813572,0.70290285,0.0039422596,0.00033493788,0.00017925882,0.00017872981,0.00023552703,0.051256116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761421,0.0006654523,0.0193059,0.00038009955,0.00016370203,0.000113950715,0.00004742066,0.00007034924,0.0031110237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.0011532039,0.000089213325,0.00046234534,0.00042189422,0.00042890976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95637333,0.037563864,0.0019396731,0.0015196701,0.0011100043,0.0014934705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004689573,0.0010390423,0.0018527498,0.0020314066,0.0011681446,0.0046789036,0.0026138083,0.0033399293,0.005490506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049233697,0.00075117784,0.00075860246,0.0011058811,0.0054574884,0.007166065,0.002789161,0.003773468,0.0003632549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006614366,0.000036210637,0.0003979383,0.00009712896,0.000025780191,0.00005366611,0.00011170299,0.027597997,0.0013557037,0.96502244,0.0010657137,0.004169419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019117811,0.000020290476,0.00013478714,0.000033728807,0.000016192598,0.00003809613,0.000043863474,0.19013791,0.0005892226,0.80846894,0.00048294777,0.000014869952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001138334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009084338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005490506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028083017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016603604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024801135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122019432","doi":"","title":"Quasi-Transitive and Suzumura Consistent Relations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematics; Axiom; Preorder; Complement (music); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.051563335411042695,"score_gpt":0.2904610173136674,"score_spread":0.23889768190262473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122019432","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32174876,0.00080087053,0.60000265,0.0022182679,0.00027796908,0.0002965938,0.0010374399,0.00048789004,0.07312962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880804,0.000329543,0.10731639,0.0005654158,0.00020026718,0.00031135796,0.0008660635,0.00013444072,0.009472623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444795,0.002239147,0.00047075673,0.0011970234,0.0010900295,0.00055504945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988225,0.005658105,0.0019346344,0.002201487,0.0015028495,0.00047803362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050911307,0.00059385755,0.0009838486,0.0021016253,0.0023110788,0.0033449903,0.0011019685,0.0014573317,0.007333959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012308905,0.00088332995,0.0017190597,0.0017827335,0.00381997,0.0053370404,0.0016784015,0.0023718702,0.0010632621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040894593,0.000037499187,0.00062044285,0.000043756958,0.000026930793,0.00009662977,0.000335394,0.00094242615,0.0022421975,0.9908275,0.00074620266,0.0040402263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006861409,0.000097750926,0.0012311388,0.00004452248,0.000047871858,0.000250182,0.00030063925,0.014936407,0.0041339616,0.96816504,0.010692486,0.00003133934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016831493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024228883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007333959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014557394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012538782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026924789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122080645","doi":"","title":"Statistical Comparison of Aggregation Rules for Votes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Statistical inference; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Inference; Computer science; Statistical model; Econometrics; Majority rule; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07766650078858121,"score_gpt":0.3450163302263663,"score_spread":0.26734982943778507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122080645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22121257,0.0006258237,0.77013475,0.0005912865,0.0001578602,0.00029532527,0.0005398357,0.00028777594,0.0061547607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86232334,0.0003856649,0.13356693,0.00021169343,0.00017224644,0.00057516317,0.0012990404,0.0001369755,0.0013288554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95748824,0.027734851,0.002531281,0.004481827,0.0065669892,0.001196734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73267657,0.22680013,0.01021269,0.021307638,0.007717152,0.0012857792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046425782,0.0005478948,0.0020720845,0.0039247973,0.0010875594,0.0045535904,0.0018041106,0.0020462975,0.0029156308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21391568,0.0005197216,0.0017350215,0.002529329,0.0035813623,0.004397463,0.001673334,0.0017858878,0.0005091461],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008727972,0.0001855984,0.023045737,0.00036373382,0.0008464917,0.00017146935,0.0008905121,0.1770385,0.0019935048,0.6374266,0.003923743,0.15324129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106773834,0.0002343063,0.0068969405,0.000073954005,0.00008983458,0.00010348223,0.00017578519,0.51199394,0.001713089,0.47656453,0.0019968182,0.000050510127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059981504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000641864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046425782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015069254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013062833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2455259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122161189","doi":"","title":"Closure and Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Axiom; Axiom of choice; Axiom independence; Closure (psychology); Lattice (music); Mathematical economics; Closure operator; Operator (biology); Generalization; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Closed set; Mathematical analysis; Set theory","score_opus":0.09566640299259345,"score_gpt":0.3105596808963108,"score_spread":0.21489327790371737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122161189","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06772237,0.0055759014,0.63892806,0.010347085,0.00047047276,0.00012361066,0.00075965107,0.00015112545,0.27592167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8625376,0.003712134,0.1040021,0.0016376743,0.0007810504,0.00022072934,0.00052743586,0.00013709137,0.026444118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974021,0.0011109534,0.00012761418,0.0005738524,0.0005275328,0.00025797216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972777,0.0013484185,0.00033514586,0.00049046305,0.00030861897,0.00023973598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027244464,0.00070708146,0.0007477126,0.001382904,0.0019449486,0.0032398922,0.0011242325,0.0015761603,0.012905806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058475262,0.00034139658,0.0012331582,0.0019314473,0.0055105127,0.009920932,0.0036157828,0.0032475467,0.0016802666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004154574,0.000007070026,0.000046075376,0.000013980882,0.0000023992695,0.000013268619,0.00010102646,0.00027427447,0.00011329608,0.99690115,0.00033655664,0.0021868614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003918683,0.000009108864,0.000050153543,0.00001129085,0.0000022699526,0.000040091738,0.000063305044,0.000804475,0.00011343157,0.99163884,0.007259808,0.0000033807135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091080734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006587172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012905806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020095042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000879158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043174207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122265172","doi":"","title":"Stable Agreements in Infinitely Repeated Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Stochastic game; Repeated game; Characterization (materials science); Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Subgame; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.023627187963670596,"score_gpt":0.22363550332069437,"score_spread":0.2000083153570238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122265172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22547653,0.0013090429,0.70593137,0.0020054616,0.00019135837,0.00014069087,0.000116174575,0.00018369948,0.06464563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509451,0.00053916144,0.04156295,0.00014205338,0.00014641331,0.0001362371,0.00009119647,0.000029715184,0.0064072274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941293,0.0028847933,0.00029595464,0.0007635519,0.0013287913,0.00059762475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888954,0.006752886,0.0018453785,0.0009246241,0.00092267164,0.00065896177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033908193,0.0005341236,0.000802509,0.0010119929,0.0018553777,0.00309734,0.0015521441,0.0017131877,0.0032567002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013724772,0.00040058416,0.00090120325,0.0012122558,0.004625477,0.0057320073,0.0024373343,0.002385064,0.0005903888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016907172,0.000018952063,0.00023167365,0.000023674382,0.0000117044665,0.000086358865,0.00034936273,0.0074914596,0.00037921336,0.9871744,0.00023921659,0.003977098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020462232,0.000028701961,0.000100894664,0.000013714,0.000007094288,0.000053234722,0.00012440485,0.039165553,0.00025750254,0.9575264,0.0026908554,0.000011250756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016324422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092929864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033908193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017696704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017932594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122412362","doi":"","title":"Voting on Multiple Issues: What to Put on the Ballot?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Dimension (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Bullet voting; Incentive; Euclidean geometry; Distribution (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Euclidean distance; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06229604003858962,"score_gpt":0.2215551673229096,"score_spread":0.15925912728431998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122412362","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20274179,0.0016984754,0.68562514,0.021217637,0.00056791893,0.00023040334,0.00044026895,0.00018187023,0.087296456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077732,0.00071895076,0.06862669,0.00062185276,0.00037153863,0.00019062165,0.00013902847,0.0000762946,0.021481767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342924,0.0040967716,0.00019667608,0.0009902943,0.00056601694,0.0007210143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848155,0.010078469,0.0018671631,0.0015819786,0.00070763286,0.0009492284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007686465,0.00072379416,0.0017846803,0.0008951601,0.0018503343,0.004490164,0.0023155008,0.002865015,0.014973042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028025167,0.00056769705,0.0010992215,0.0017238295,0.0031282683,0.0075686583,0.0029146106,0.002700294,0.0016733882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041038054,0.00020329341,0.0032704338,0.00026758626,0.00012997657,0.0001439426,0.00067566393,0.06467494,0.0007676459,0.8151293,0.006800729,0.10752614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012875558,0.00023593409,0.0013748847,0.00013098589,0.000065059954,0.00008875416,0.00075423374,0.2311077,0.00091246056,0.7537967,0.011351397,0.000053072843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019676632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020058088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014973042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023913896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013771345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050089836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122442409","doi":"","title":"Manipulation via Capacities Revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mechanism (biology); Meaning (existential); Type (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06475155606554375,"score_gpt":0.23273221094965188,"score_spread":0.16798065488410813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122442409","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15586278,0.0029380303,0.64567274,0.007386418,0.00027386614,0.0003059472,0.0003455359,0.00041878567,0.18679596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652975,0.0009969622,0.022983594,0.00054766575,0.00020127313,0.00020095686,0.000056439694,0.00005914367,0.009656491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907025,0.0037399218,0.00050421676,0.001585293,0.002269866,0.0011981686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98080647,0.009660705,0.0030811152,0.0047419015,0.0010467024,0.0006632184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048609707,0.0009393539,0.001370602,0.0012337815,0.0016057824,0.0042923186,0.002773924,0.0036630977,0.0127247805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020113032,0.00061109534,0.002150894,0.001342388,0.009030605,0.0116237365,0.004970108,0.004125185,0.001096354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117861,0.00002497033,0.00027900937,0.0000770855,0.000022545735,0.0000981152,0.00015490442,0.0091121085,0.0008131643,0.9816089,0.0003674024,0.007410692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051502524,0.00008598809,0.0002624171,0.00006353693,0.000031872143,0.0001946679,0.000083373045,0.03085087,0.0015570336,0.96027446,0.0065053008,0.000038948732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011746152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046722897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127247805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003159851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020123261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042568624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122443520","doi":"","title":"Fixed Point Approaches to the Proof of the Bondareva-Shapley Theorem","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Mathematics; Fixed-point theorem; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Fixed point; Elementary proof; Exploit; Game theory; Point (geometry); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.16050108883682354,"score_gpt":0.2945945058942134,"score_spread":0.13409341705738984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122443520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016463406,0.0045680753,0.86074364,0.008423614,0.0010963484,0.00012318474,0.00037060335,0.00021084626,0.10800025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67826825,0.007803491,0.24263842,0.0035698242,0.0035846676,0.00092322653,0.00059032143,0.00067926396,0.0619425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628687,0.0019276526,0.00012137574,0.00052363635,0.0008385219,0.00030200352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836064,0.008559671,0.00044400763,0.00092537014,0.0013485607,0.00036182316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006758647,0.0022199315,0.0030441107,0.0038206629,0.0024474987,0.004916861,0.005201252,0.0037876393,0.019856835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024536202,0.0012412469,0.003687923,0.0033015138,0.005367515,0.0099585885,0.0039556758,0.010736313,0.0025611436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072399544,0.000015059573,0.000025093343,0.000028850382,0.00001294631,0.0000121094,0.00003979739,0.0018656399,0.00007202069,0.9946727,0.0012480713,0.0020004003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070038277,0.00000304024,0.00001784117,0.000012110096,0.0000034244397,0.0000036983683,0.0000069682637,0.0061382013,0.000033855205,0.99276805,0.0010011971,0.00000462334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021823726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019856835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005475877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026477883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122477571","doi":"","title":"Domain Closedness Conditions and Rational Choice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Domain (mathematical analysis); Intersection (aeronautics); Rational function; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Contrast (vision); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.05130509128278582,"score_gpt":0.31485875798262425,"score_spread":0.26355366669983843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122477571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25927177,0.003543244,0.59221387,0.011610906,0.00030328298,0.00022763811,0.0004681128,0.00040537445,0.13195585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95081586,0.0008381973,0.04261161,0.00063604163,0.00031773813,0.00024596893,0.00031021086,0.00006757194,0.004156826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005353,0.004804353,0.0006161788,0.0021510352,0.0015113179,0.0008635905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686063,0.023735069,0.0015967293,0.0021299177,0.0028244327,0.0011076583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009994794,0.0005512959,0.0010803831,0.0022843243,0.0022009602,0.005533855,0.0009960685,0.002255526,0.0053587956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022614071,0.00056746305,0.0014055483,0.0017036549,0.016921218,0.013511821,0.0046817535,0.0052308138,0.0005519931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017892313,0.00001032522,0.00012283183,0.000018633562,0.000007066077,0.000028792623,0.00021993287,0.000423019,0.00022734425,0.99683565,0.00021876686,0.0018697629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027238002,0.000015428532,0.00010913139,0.000015506312,0.000005170568,0.000031952415,0.00016205618,0.0019087585,0.00029930746,0.9957873,0.0016300876,0.00000806065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012787337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056818424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009994794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002653269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015260697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052858114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122495002","doi":"10.26481/umamet.2006037","title":"Single-Peaked Choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Choice function; Axiom independence; Independence (probability theory); Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social choice theory; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016550327561168716,"score_gpt":0.1649042766052122,"score_spread":0.14835394904404348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122495002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07977989,0.00057956396,0.85964125,0.0025889354,0.00010504084,0.0001818571,0.00043541586,0.000119726,0.056568343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8972876,0.0004626094,0.08911902,0.00067418226,0.00012471904,0.00027962858,0.00022170073,0.000052180327,0.01177834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943235,0.0026995959,0.00028770053,0.0013332871,0.00089974824,0.00045620464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864769,0.007859959,0.0012456666,0.0022606673,0.0015056677,0.00065099454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008470032,0.000558091,0.0012975322,0.00092271186,0.0009860853,0.0032740063,0.0015545705,0.0018476651,0.008205863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020973021,0.0004379529,0.001321245,0.0010889532,0.003578593,0.0043634158,0.0017504435,0.0026537208,0.00090292486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002342956,0.000020621452,0.0006513576,0.000047488702,0.00002706426,0.00005583042,0.0001272707,0.002583086,0.00038509513,0.98826516,0.0006914107,0.0071222084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015416419,0.000022311347,0.0003491577,0.000017831486,0.0000105879835,0.00010460924,0.000075000076,0.014348082,0.000330156,0.98173887,0.002976917,0.000011022158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006552397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055364997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015299371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04479432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122542987","doi":"","title":"Euclidean Revealed Preferences: Testing the Spatial Voting Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Econometrics; Euclidean geometry; Dimension (graph theory); Construct (python library); Euclidean space; Anti-plurality voting; Spatial econometrics; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Combinatorics; Politics","score_opus":0.18182189130449228,"score_gpt":0.30288527560371875,"score_spread":0.12106338429922647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122542987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.807017,0.00027091865,0.18338536,0.001641092,0.000051560688,0.000083687584,0.001306668,0.00017610166,0.0060675694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98975486,0.00006767097,0.009178648,0.00011734453,0.00002792096,0.00004753716,0.0004534901,0.000014895141,0.00033758243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608539,0.030598689,0.0011854807,0.004081265,0.002208592,0.0010720728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6667833,0.28349906,0.021459376,0.022510877,0.003641542,0.0021059024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026817825,0.001156554,0.0023005109,0.0012452803,0.0010402442,0.0025830495,0.0048582545,0.0026970329,0.0085574975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18810377,0.00071796234,0.0022995065,0.0030092788,0.0044476725,0.006676267,0.0042315815,0.0029412755,0.00086876494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061935773,0.0007860482,0.10913667,0.0007936114,0.0022532085,0.0010291095,0.0017702858,0.31778854,0.0024188724,0.49846122,0.003267825,0.056101006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026407,0.0009976383,0.017760262,0.00007069536,0.0001833478,0.00039810786,0.00086529145,0.7112412,0.0023678718,0.2638067,0.0014112843,0.00009509282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043851547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015139551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026817825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013580525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001477879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14182794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122626016","doi":"","title":"Sampling Equilibrium with an Application to Strategic Voting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Population; Sample (material); Sampling (signal processing); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.10537017943718707,"score_gpt":0.31889363842970975,"score_spread":0.21352345899252267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122626016","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02691072,0.00026157877,0.96097696,0.0010596114,0.00007069349,0.00015157857,0.00012892665,0.00013352431,0.010306384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7567469,0.0008010917,0.22268502,0.000642189,0.0004259566,0.0010645447,0.00048185515,0.00017798488,0.016974552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516416,0.0027394192,0.00017844222,0.0007311087,0.0007681422,0.00041876594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985699,0.010069466,0.0011085818,0.00085650885,0.0015133029,0.0007531055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072276914,0.0010026562,0.0016868343,0.0017003826,0.0013288872,0.0024942518,0.0028866204,0.0023735792,0.010083345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033417627,0.00060268806,0.0018575593,0.0014799238,0.0032695977,0.004830022,0.0032132631,0.0030155957,0.0010292007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032798816,0.000037675603,0.00056554977,0.000044022803,0.000023564247,0.000074064126,0.00014663846,0.031767786,0.0006069677,0.95907575,0.00092484383,0.006700313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036154317,0.00005451418,0.00017959297,0.000026247197,0.000011150824,0.000069044276,0.000073164716,0.29265136,0.00035919846,0.7044039,0.0021137916,0.000021918728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020977396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017723476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010083345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002587519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018225585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0382241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122656764","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5","title":"Algorithmic Game Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Technische Universität Berlin; Sapienza Università di Roma; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara; University of Glasgow; University of Edinburgh; Technische Universität Wien; Aarhus Universitet; European Commission; University of Toronto; London School of Economics and Political Science; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; King's College London; Royal Holloway, University of London; University of Essex; University of Patras; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; City University of Hong Kong; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Harvard University","keywords":"Computer science; Game theory; Division (mathematics); Algorithmic game theory; Mechanism (biology); Mechanism design; Matching (statistics); Computational complexity theory; Social choice theory; Theoretical computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Sequential game; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02634159435788425,"score_gpt":0.2293361764770248,"score_spread":0.20299458211914057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122656764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068659033,0.003821008,0.55741423,0.0026728907,0.0006674151,0.00014772448,0.0006518755,0.0005844963,0.42717445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3713671,0.0068132733,0.2434419,0.0016604547,0.0008758739,0.00072204694,0.002197797,0.0007892618,0.37213233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940574,0.00018376517,0.000027087404,0.000110900444,0.00021677458,0.00005578004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949193,0.00025461602,0.000024599527,0.00011174769,0.00008474595,0.000032420165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005458338,0.0009797609,0.00090400607,0.00088689185,0.000816828,0.00300081,0.0011974986,0.0010944282,0.026997456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002394611,0.00047191692,0.00083082926,0.0011442776,0.0013952977,0.0025172492,0.0014689609,0.002455017,0.0062370105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000908553,0.000022509477,0.00007477921,0.0000588581,0.000014650018,0.000017801742,0.000049918886,0.00684634,0.00015934072,0.93809724,0.01734555,0.037304003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068494905,0.0000056289364,0.00005688734,0.000021568989,0.000005734114,0.000027850976,0.000018445382,0.015844807,0.000083367355,0.94946396,0.034460824,0.000004102538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011537699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001336875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026997456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012672987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009773863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09031546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122706039","doi":"","title":"A Characterization of Exact Non-atomic Market Games","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03220877811187452,"score_gpt":0.2697914185515319,"score_spread":0.23758264043965738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122706039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3656675,0.00036941085,0.60395294,0.0008833309,0.00008707336,0.00013786805,0.00020002984,0.00010376926,0.028598119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95505816,0.00017404954,0.036644667,0.00015186315,0.000092020615,0.00011708234,0.00013160419,0.000033116718,0.0075973948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851745,0.00037265688,0.00011203849,0.000349585,0.0004282555,0.00021996698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968528,0.0014165665,0.00054113055,0.00024401974,0.00045499453,0.0004904407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016043413,0.00055537984,0.0006663031,0.00087454985,0.0008510217,0.0024752673,0.001521339,0.0010422495,0.005067467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050219693,0.0003536132,0.0006273145,0.00072498847,0.0028846434,0.005807326,0.0019951228,0.002022729,0.0003112235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019377403,0.000026384929,0.00028585023,0.000032806147,0.000007654367,0.000052384345,0.00012222907,0.0024405792,0.0018144328,0.99253345,0.00019725181,0.0024675166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014879565,0.000037722908,0.00045851985,0.000014085688,0.000008190238,0.00009845308,0.00013506658,0.079458274,0.00091534585,0.9172087,0.0016357872,0.0000150175765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060033234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005263303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005067467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010941483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007013157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016952395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122706814","doi":"","title":"Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Legislature; Decision rule; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09750664438892186,"score_gpt":0.34052007120999844,"score_spread":0.24301342682107657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122706814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639478,0.00022317708,0.009964258,0.00077704625,0.00022610929,0.00057134964,0.00021471492,0.00005982764,0.02401565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865349,0.0001973921,0.0073951273,0.0005062021,0.00012569413,0.0010063872,0.00021928074,0.000052080213,0.003962864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905233,0.0052068876,0.0006068633,0.0010628987,0.0020427331,0.0005572856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88926363,0.08991973,0.007827534,0.009443893,0.0020939587,0.0014511831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149583155,0.00058448996,0.0009915337,0.0006774505,0.0015719644,0.0026987123,0.0018930492,0.0020701913,0.016517298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07825262,0.0005394282,0.0007897749,0.0008604438,0.0031422488,0.0032991173,0.001796197,0.004607326,0.001263794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028937941,0.10715945,0.038409527,0.0021329843,0.0012150308,0.00080136454,0.017313182,0.04099963,0.08676306,0.4787527,0.012036104,0.18547915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020603722,0.08372876,0.06358495,0.00058807794,0.00096314214,0.0009102794,0.011867152,0.15802063,0.05502284,0.5500953,0.0541518,0.000463294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007821922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064224954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016517298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010876277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010914069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122791980","doi":"","title":"Borda and the Maximum Likelihood Approach to Vote Aggregation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Intuition; Social choice theory; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Voting; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03169923201617839,"score_gpt":0.2629821820670539,"score_spread":0.23128295005087554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122791980","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014670451,0.002611897,0.9528519,0.0039466834,0.0002423618,0.00013919976,0.0002854753,0.00019772074,0.025054272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6316755,0.0022198267,0.35023618,0.0006858268,0.00087667414,0.0006823981,0.0005814892,0.00019246306,0.012849705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786885,0.01469015,0.00071140035,0.0020864122,0.0029040624,0.0009194325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827253,0.01243735,0.0009835704,0.0021372945,0.0013318842,0.00038454702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015777636,0.0010860618,0.0025666421,0.0042633186,0.0023852286,0.0074178465,0.0033367453,0.0036663013,0.0063934443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039800223,0.0012457577,0.0029483065,0.0039240215,0.0048245746,0.00836686,0.0037459722,0.00496829,0.0011415114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053277425,0.000026679098,0.00034232993,0.00007508249,0.0000816153,0.00003312629,0.00020623865,0.025335016,0.00009924699,0.94815296,0.0018990147,0.023695452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020104282,0.0000134704105,0.00024234314,0.000020340782,0.000018520013,0.000022430964,0.000025793639,0.08056659,0.00009308874,0.91676414,0.002193937,0.00001935443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037922126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004046803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015777636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005281347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019449763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08344108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122847098","doi":"10.3982/ecta9709","title":"Choosing choices: Agenda selection with uncertain issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Selection (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Status quo bias; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029886444803238557,"score_gpt":0.23782150988580406,"score_spread":0.20793506508256548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122847098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22130953,0.0019027515,0.7355499,0.005086826,0.00024724533,0.00032127477,0.00027588787,0.00011362102,0.035192944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313031,0.0010444437,0.056824435,0.00033107607,0.0004031025,0.00021364872,0.00017082787,0.00006162226,0.009647856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98260695,0.011803437,0.00059013,0.0017162774,0.0017870561,0.0014961724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9328165,0.054279663,0.006362329,0.003438511,0.0017435815,0.0013593311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017597834,0.0007485278,0.0016510244,0.0015317329,0.0016616557,0.005345596,0.00214166,0.0035947072,0.0078576105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07097812,0.0009290981,0.0019220327,0.0015913736,0.00404155,0.007307083,0.0019158808,0.0045511853,0.00093398767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034356472,0.00013084925,0.004811639,0.00021077243,0.00014107743,0.00046968667,0.0011629713,0.107726574,0.0012563984,0.85207224,0.00154432,0.030129876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015150577,0.00010456893,0.0013251145,0.00005225971,0.00005925824,0.00016902591,0.00030238062,0.19253583,0.00071605266,0.79970837,0.004826608,0.000049022678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019732632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011601301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017597834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021702112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012672136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09306741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122870251","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2584131","title":"Maximin Envy-Fee Division of Indivisible Items","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Minimax; Economics; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Actuarial science; Business; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.04024439583781304,"score_gpt":0.22712587372028453,"score_spread":0.1868814778824715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122870251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43753448,0.00060312386,0.48191628,0.0032367625,0.00011226097,0.0004533511,0.0007593918,0.0003489092,0.07503549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370075,0.00020057106,0.03356848,0.00021867626,0.000082823186,0.00018335672,0.00020293087,0.000070505164,0.028465305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636334,0.0015972215,0.0002061349,0.0005717599,0.0005224031,0.00073929713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911404,0.0055500558,0.00062027876,0.0013908573,0.00051538827,0.00078298425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004605832,0.00091197394,0.0030461184,0.0010196747,0.0014053863,0.00522542,0.0037421926,0.0034923623,0.0150727555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019715866,0.0008717344,0.0011689673,0.0016393632,0.002412664,0.0068679363,0.0026498793,0.0029461922,0.0012944734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005368499,0.00022814336,0.0013901911,0.00014198988,0.00007899762,0.00015676848,0.000337229,0.055975012,0.0019013571,0.90633106,0.0031985235,0.029723782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010493688,0.00011164498,0.0009381384,0.00002836182,0.000030879706,0.0001063301,0.00010722877,0.17051736,0.0006502284,0.8257836,0.0015975959,0.000023765964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023541937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022951136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0150727555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032486476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020465243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050423443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122947856","doi":"","title":"Price Discrimination and Efficient Matching","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Sorting; Pairwise comparison; sort; Incentive; Value (mathematics); Schedule; Microeconomics; Function (biology); Revenue; Mathematical optimization; Path (computing); Economics; Private information retrieval; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04580455397954767,"score_gpt":0.29627527674346954,"score_spread":0.25047072276392185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122947856","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34537873,0.00058817817,0.5659113,0.003438922,0.00017274426,0.0002732597,0.00025877828,0.00020988006,0.083768204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96605945,0.00014157596,0.0243578,0.00018510601,0.000073283176,0.000068462316,0.00009027189,0.00003218992,0.008991859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694186,0.0013203156,0.0001483652,0.00061497575,0.0005025867,0.00047195487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992961,0.004183127,0.0009358758,0.0009208701,0.0005087832,0.00049036497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315957,0.0003923766,0.0012614832,0.00059326837,0.0011871402,0.0024639573,0.0012943773,0.0028732985,0.012720252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017089225,0.00047160732,0.00066919613,0.0011203683,0.0023680034,0.0025710368,0.0018737055,0.0018640618,0.0012055724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022675982,0.00023859534,0.0020961869,0.00013079832,0.00006205349,0.00018947142,0.00018319106,0.09203809,0.0018702674,0.8664384,0.004066805,0.032459404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001264418,0.00007431896,0.00060859544,0.000019950478,0.000017375198,0.00015670284,0.00006365817,0.1890045,0.00084244146,0.8060159,0.0030566296,0.000013564856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010834328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066625484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012720252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017265963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014012087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042553484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123221566","doi":"","title":"Efficient Priority Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Computer science; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.011130543157011702,"score_gpt":0.2185824070295392,"score_spread":0.2074518638725275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123221566","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14874472,0.0003556086,0.81851083,0.0009752614,0.00019634077,0.00036652785,0.0003027189,0.00048988615,0.030058105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80164176,0.00024163426,0.18435003,0.00036667282,0.00016742817,0.0003010418,0.000309562,0.00017154464,0.012450307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889774,0.0044202977,0.00077395263,0.0016952321,0.0026589723,0.0014740911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700674,0.017242538,0.0027364444,0.0047597825,0.0040125335,0.0011814407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008566062,0.0006010125,0.0012767883,0.0013455361,0.0014003789,0.0039056465,0.0025198404,0.0015909176,0.0054567405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040511593,0.00061100157,0.00079430453,0.0013015077,0.0020698307,0.0036563964,0.001317983,0.0020814806,0.0011317127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019644889,0.00019596536,0.0020782922,0.0001622009,0.00006513185,0.0002135705,0.00039120534,0.044307314,0.0035122482,0.8893865,0.0040709055,0.055420335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013959403,0.000083114806,0.00040006172,0.000028630751,0.00003163265,0.0001469809,0.00010535152,0.15981379,0.0028879093,0.8285967,0.007740727,0.000025502313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002094787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018172493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008566062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015684263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021663434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045302212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123497234","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.2.624","title":"Inferring Strategic Voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Econometrics; Disapproval voting; Estimator; Bullet voting; Ranked voting system; Approval voting; First-past-the-post voting; Anti-plurality voting; Microeconomics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.05022006673664293,"score_gpt":0.2521699391207547,"score_spread":0.20194987238411177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123497234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65727806,0.00040025942,0.31507963,0.0019903567,0.00009141148,0.00026036648,0.0029052324,0.0002240591,0.021770634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805084,0.00017481015,0.015565361,0.0001470214,0.00003040197,0.00009977847,0.0011867573,0.000018055602,0.002269342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962276,0.0020945256,0.00016715458,0.00073170505,0.00041108436,0.00036794334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98273176,0.011351809,0.0028406424,0.0019914173,0.00074363535,0.00034067902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051115025,0.0005575789,0.0012947675,0.0019794917,0.0008253197,0.0022683428,0.0011965106,0.0015204288,0.006694436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033192024,0.0005272585,0.0010418132,0.0026081062,0.0010111646,0.00234722,0.0011411753,0.0016310037,0.001530087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036488156,0.00035379262,0.23687808,0.00030661415,0.00047516648,0.0003989647,0.0014129515,0.2701929,0.0014472216,0.39236945,0.010350869,0.085449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082336875,0.00012942345,0.024733618,0.000063237974,0.000116545394,0.00021571985,0.00053460797,0.75588006,0.00091223925,0.21105571,0.006223189,0.000053306794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072210496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010858841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072210496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018872558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012361147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027032495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123515295","doi":"","title":"Strategy-Proofness and Essentially Single-Valued Cores Revisited∗","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Rationality; Blocking (statistics); Endowment; Externality; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05760032273124501,"score_gpt":0.24453783534205709,"score_spread":0.18693751261081207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123515295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19566528,0.00071226497,0.74867564,0.0020079543,0.000084889056,0.00020422523,0.00021886756,0.00016693049,0.052263882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071362,0.0003692986,0.08416151,0.00038180198,0.000091697424,0.00021533274,0.0001887006,0.0000804589,0.007375013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964684,0.0017396964,0.00018793433,0.0005293975,0.00061910163,0.000455402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899268,0.0060753003,0.0012527619,0.0010790598,0.0011622132,0.00050376385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048546037,0.00059028744,0.0010676149,0.0009820777,0.0011517775,0.003155791,0.0016456541,0.0014034042,0.0054763756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017672876,0.00055734033,0.0013020942,0.0010056491,0.003835911,0.005132509,0.0024987557,0.00227762,0.00056264264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017130806,0.000025137011,0.00022155733,0.000048181682,0.000017106628,0.00005358125,0.00014731928,0.004870769,0.0005057583,0.98861283,0.00045447348,0.0050262255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019558314,0.00001492376,0.000073002746,0.00001473624,0.000004394504,0.000038324553,0.00003375141,0.021018373,0.00034158106,0.97741425,0.0010219179,0.0000052204637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089071254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007433005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054763756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014292254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013564652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025673926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123526518","doi":"","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Monotonic function; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Population; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14719411838484656,"score_gpt":0.3476790398230877,"score_spread":0.20048492143824112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123526518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18683328,0.0023301658,0.72800684,0.0036958647,0.00012895731,0.0003449734,0.00032833635,0.0005394016,0.07779214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277891,0.001277597,0.058269437,0.0005869292,0.00013245955,0.00043730895,0.00015279841,0.00009447057,0.011259807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945016,0.0029261273,0.0002057562,0.0007576844,0.00090216415,0.0007066259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773433,0.01446635,0.0037258784,0.0021861696,0.001455556,0.0008228379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011217222,0.001210725,0.0016961261,0.0017685117,0.0013022312,0.0042043673,0.0029044142,0.0029249068,0.010282141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02683212,0.00073430303,0.0020505728,0.0016144525,0.0040026954,0.007817768,0.0022081356,0.002399051,0.00083292037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099736186,0.00010560575,0.00084858993,0.0001593684,0.00007532576,0.000112644244,0.00027523813,0.03526909,0.0010349818,0.9460682,0.0009169195,0.015034375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015004576,0.0001498387,0.0005128989,0.000058693575,0.0000540444,0.00016158837,0.000088137145,0.08134073,0.0007571744,0.9118321,0.004859244,0.000035542358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028990915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014961752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011217222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042822305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00290087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059323072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531083","doi":"","title":"Utilitarianism or Welfarism: Does it Make a Difference?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Welfarism; Unanimity; Mathematical economics; Utilitarianism; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Egalitarianism; Dominance (genetics); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Inequality; Axiom; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03835175807714983,"score_gpt":0.22732845530961404,"score_spread":0.1889766972324642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123531083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11122731,0.010324826,0.6046422,0.09738871,0.00221538,0.00010809938,0.00025374859,0.00020496332,0.17363468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94637835,0.0025015175,0.0350417,0.0046394207,0.0012565317,0.00017173243,0.000110200424,0.00015481345,0.009745738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000144,0.005291467,0.00046561356,0.0013401073,0.0017872519,0.0011141467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97934777,0.0123164635,0.0018340079,0.003692526,0.0015159756,0.001293343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015925279,0.00072591484,0.0018447497,0.0013647232,0.0019529827,0.005652048,0.002182272,0.0041925376,0.0072349077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03292752,0.00040491068,0.0011812588,0.001537035,0.020313604,0.019207953,0.0048366203,0.0056782886,0.0011956488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002434309,0.000012020781,0.00021648087,0.000057505604,0.000015713978,0.000019937019,0.0004027022,0.0004318407,0.0001251831,0.9918726,0.00069483713,0.0061267256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073828646,0.000022202088,0.00013563226,0.00004075201,0.000004710177,0.000022172442,0.00021822834,0.00078709633,0.00008125842,0.9953761,0.0032971944,0.00000724638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075846334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008257016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015925279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018840134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016651081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0842219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123584261","doi":"","title":"On Complexity of Lobbying in Multiple Referenda","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Computational complexity theory; Direct democracy; Political science; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Politics; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.07052165456363922,"score_gpt":0.21175280181392403,"score_spread":0.1412311472502848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123584261","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.407934,0.0016181438,0.49996543,0.011839903,0.00017376023,0.0005527191,0.0018548457,0.0008642915,0.07519693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946844,0.00073443714,0.038567025,0.0005636175,0.00024679635,0.00067488424,0.0013107306,0.00025689817,0.010801536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98702323,0.005288235,0.0008529945,0.002231781,0.0024502776,0.0021533282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278248,0.05493156,0.0061782934,0.006417415,0.0020269467,0.0026209534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070456243,0.00097276544,0.003567406,0.0022580063,0.0037534803,0.0098443935,0.0029975337,0.0045330212,0.016797818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052277427,0.001172804,0.0032835742,0.0025325948,0.006383344,0.016000023,0.009496732,0.0066604363,0.0018298223],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977684,0.00010974028,0.0027717268,0.00024174163,0.00008968836,0.00037277353,0.0006469693,0.08036503,0.0009289299,0.8988823,0.0037164867,0.0115768425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057694848,0.000025892457,0.00041841983,0.000022937784,0.000023780407,0.000083906365,0.00009806066,0.11362778,0.00029566098,0.8840156,0.0013022899,0.000028045271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00293146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015663794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016797818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002449176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056194246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123717385","doi":"","title":"Collusion Constrained Equilibrium","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Collusion; Mathematical economics; Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type); Repeated game; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Incentive; Limit (mathematics); Best response; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01164649837200373,"score_gpt":0.22059302676758957,"score_spread":0.20894652839558583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123717385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23934858,0.00036471282,0.6845639,0.0018508949,0.00006286477,0.00030398127,0.00020727998,0.00011422433,0.07318365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630991,0.00018324313,0.030761879,0.0002802715,0.000034547655,0.0002773316,0.00007796713,0.000031423642,0.0052541285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590164,0.001934449,0.00015361523,0.00064105185,0.0008326327,0.0005366323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322635,0.003607272,0.0012725836,0.00083071645,0.00061981037,0.0004432649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002416199,0.0008791328,0.0010355356,0.0009092648,0.0014197864,0.0020043927,0.0015115488,0.0015257166,0.005872338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012086349,0.00039988957,0.00092465075,0.0010479256,0.0033746618,0.00293105,0.0035549356,0.0018309252,0.0006410641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003640105,0.000044530778,0.0008355611,0.000052315532,0.00005489344,0.00016805851,0.00033926714,0.037353657,0.001441791,0.9537446,0.00069129583,0.0052375966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003416119,0.00006293711,0.00031411124,0.000025735486,0.000013807134,0.00009006517,0.00013435088,0.12520248,0.0006283318,0.87084717,0.0026266887,0.000020102445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013600976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086597854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005872338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017144448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011206757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019644916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123884147","doi":"","title":"Fair Allocation of Production Externalities: Recent Results","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Monotonic function; Function (biology); Cost allocation; Normative; Mathematical economics; Axiomatic system; Production (economics); Externality; Subsidy; Game theory; Economics; Cost sharing; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07413946722863461,"score_gpt":0.3086688175391218,"score_spread":0.23452935031048716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123884147","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018281294,0.11006227,0.7378866,0.008775142,0.0011894447,0.000072051844,0.00022774783,0.000278163,0.1232272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69325733,0.13370752,0.13399547,0.002526625,0.007956223,0.0003656874,0.00041935383,0.00044290526,0.027328804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624974,0.0014140137,0.00018812134,0.00080123654,0.0009933469,0.00035362478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877551,0.0083341515,0.0006768916,0.0019690227,0.0010064595,0.0002583781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064702453,0.0013782923,0.0021383485,0.0021358908,0.0014843796,0.0049489816,0.0028870928,0.0024851249,0.008763836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016186826,0.0007234659,0.0014567912,0.0048964317,0.0070160166,0.008971779,0.0031644457,0.0031847972,0.0015628337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025076675,0.000031067346,0.00011569799,0.00017010898,0.000025419717,0.000022726299,0.000041271687,0.008402724,0.00009457658,0.9563433,0.0014567606,0.033271287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008568145,0.000007360635,0.000079773425,0.000037709044,0.000010054465,0.000020567206,0.000009814381,0.0053833458,0.00009416736,0.984125,0.010218125,0.000005446354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018299286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084530504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008763836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004608065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020976637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03421837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124038879","doi":"10.1145/3355902","title":"The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Patras; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016600501705271255,"score_gpt":0.20568765792482002,"score_spread":0.18908715621954877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124038879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058770042,0.00025387845,0.9028935,0.003824628,0.00014625944,0.000078100464,0.00021285575,0.00054223166,0.033278555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86106724,0.00016494069,0.13024454,0.00055132626,0.00014254877,0.0001689032,0.000113674185,0.0002484708,0.007298414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944512,0.0027245556,0.0001783637,0.0010619573,0.0010817924,0.00050203083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177986,0.0046747224,0.00050646625,0.002272379,0.0004935471,0.00027301256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065050833,0.00049152854,0.000899869,0.0005168254,0.0017660235,0.0032972705,0.0017318166,0.0018578228,0.008745091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030804021,0.00041176213,0.000621769,0.00093041355,0.003110979,0.0050176634,0.002715728,0.0028626334,0.0012007796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018045933,0.00009070786,0.0015511522,0.000091553826,0.000040382016,0.00009246771,0.00034191317,0.05764638,0.0026052084,0.8697656,0.007894744,0.059699416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036358982,0.00003101303,0.0003569432,0.000024181785,0.000009752553,0.00007951051,0.000074997486,0.16608602,0.0014868869,0.8246792,0.007118378,0.000016811893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013757698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018451993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008745091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001717916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03440261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124047796","doi":"10.1109/tem.2004.836359","title":"Value of Information Gained From Data Mining in the Context of Information Sharing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Competitor analysis; Context (archaeology); Value of information; Data sharing; Information sharing; Value (mathematics); Data mining; Set (abstract data type); Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024412563971519457,"score_gpt":0.20042463094808466,"score_spread":0.1760120669765652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124047796","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2413563,0.0027427915,0.66806364,0.010601941,0.0003364616,0.00031283195,0.00034275954,0.00012638072,0.07611695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754372,0.00051131134,0.021059638,0.00020542913,0.00013190038,0.00007997462,0.000050227954,0.000032542936,0.0024918148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98571825,0.008839628,0.0005579171,0.0013429443,0.0025518606,0.0009893661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615158,0.029486429,0.0020925512,0.003742723,0.001900245,0.001262379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015720338,0.0011825941,0.0014891394,0.0023786668,0.001643969,0.0072359387,0.0025948074,0.0037986683,0.0034514237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04829143,0.00052951684,0.0009127424,0.0022350044,0.0058196946,0.0130087435,0.0044689123,0.0026194793,0.0003142713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032489383,0.000110634996,0.0021141889,0.0001961689,0.00014453239,0.0003951901,0.0005529479,0.0732621,0.0012228586,0.89068305,0.0007714899,0.030221907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037808564,0.00016530331,0.00069520803,0.000098904806,0.000070337235,0.0002323635,0.00028551885,0.08505632,0.0008868523,0.9093744,0.0030522845,0.00004478392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007501002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005834397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015720338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003935626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022200372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124203765","doi":"","title":"Coalitions, Agreements and Efficiency","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Von Neumann architecture; Externality; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06993435028621095,"score_gpt":0.29778064301789564,"score_spread":0.2278462927316847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124203765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23256058,0.006094034,0.33361304,0.014880888,0.0002778764,0.00020343145,0.00020958805,0.00017832499,0.4119822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959203,0.001306775,0.025793992,0.00035302737,0.00012948911,0.00015146146,0.00010914064,0.000048793027,0.01290442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943281,0.0026933455,0.00030559153,0.00090812595,0.0011265348,0.00063833676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991667,0.0046800068,0.0012449925,0.001241869,0.0006722757,0.0004938476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064286017,0.00044990992,0.000858377,0.0014050831,0.0018743532,0.005326781,0.001229195,0.0019013679,0.0055517307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018487288,0.00034015035,0.0005764005,0.0013656209,0.010293803,0.0076190396,0.0043005254,0.0023127175,0.00073690736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005002757,0.000006637729,0.00015032983,0.000012763553,0.0000054323373,0.000009868734,0.00016093359,0.0014291994,0.000053399042,0.9946085,0.00032064185,0.0032372824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056660942,0.0000033389365,0.00011627507,0.0000107487585,0.000002051548,0.000011072746,0.00010251242,0.002305327,0.00006527468,0.99430794,0.0030676017,0.0000023179343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016761235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010108626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064286017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028842292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018315092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033998072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124262170","doi":"","title":"Persistence of Power: Repeated Multilateral Bargaining with Endogenous Agenda Setting Authority","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Incentive; Legislature; Bargaining power; Markov perfect equilibrium; Power (physics); Persistence (discontinuity); Mathematical economics; Game theory; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09111456587730929,"score_gpt":0.286958501540394,"score_spread":0.1958439356630847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124262170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6399621,0.00027401024,0.3322123,0.002061494,0.00009351777,0.00017729297,0.00014168311,0.0002498587,0.02482773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559237,0.000049284,0.011167936,0.00011125998,0.000036099336,0.00006411646,0.00003942363,0.000029463588,0.002910174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249613,0.0042352146,0.00021963549,0.001423722,0.0008796697,0.00074568467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95944905,0.023919156,0.0070748497,0.006374622,0.0014583094,0.0017241027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084433155,0.00049344386,0.0012278243,0.0005863796,0.0012736049,0.0034578638,0.0018789978,0.002101157,0.00590999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050804902,0.0006312522,0.0010053292,0.0008462742,0.0035586567,0.004318713,0.002689319,0.0027748568,0.00080124254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012796737,0.00061831245,0.014608306,0.00017479066,0.0002737757,0.0013104951,0.003575842,0.16044511,0.0069143022,0.7562251,0.0023044718,0.05226986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000238901,0.0002048957,0.002238037,0.000018788545,0.0000520686,0.00019197918,0.00044908782,0.36403263,0.00092741137,0.6299552,0.0016349736,0.00005607041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020075066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016315326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084433155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016605589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010915134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044653058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124307635","doi":"","title":"Efficiency in Uncertain Cooperative Games","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Transferable utility; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Computer science; Economics; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06285711973525927,"score_gpt":0.31470168237186463,"score_spread":0.2518445626366054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124307635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22140831,0.0009959555,0.72640777,0.001860564,0.00003142957,0.00021311271,0.00029191846,0.00010258262,0.048688307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503312,0.00061789906,0.04123538,0.0001458002,0.00006611427,0.0003592588,0.00025936303,0.000052982236,0.006931892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159056,0.004630749,0.00050074473,0.00087512424,0.0015868745,0.0008159424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843248,0.011445643,0.0015656705,0.0011665334,0.0009922889,0.00050504657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067059086,0.00068377703,0.0014456346,0.0011501334,0.0010838722,0.004260419,0.0014291833,0.0016937525,0.0032645515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024186505,0.0005600984,0.0008702671,0.0015765587,0.004223823,0.00637653,0.0027976832,0.001822765,0.00051780965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049421138,0.000023967592,0.00041970928,0.000058490587,0.000023501641,0.000054237622,0.00022726788,0.041812304,0.00045019257,0.94872546,0.00046024358,0.007695144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023370763,0.000023386883,0.00018005638,0.000020554879,0.000008611245,0.000032077638,0.00007293289,0.089869805,0.0003917784,0.9079434,0.0014258603,0.000008278503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013338069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006170351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067059086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030844645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012695283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035464644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124604040","doi":"","title":"Information Externalities and Intermediaries in Frictional Search Markets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Externality; Search cost; Matching (statistics); Business; Microeconomics; Transaction cost; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Commerce; Economics; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.03274584077152505,"score_gpt":0.2766165255339555,"score_spread":0.24387068476243046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124604040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80269414,0.0010799754,0.16570565,0.0026205652,0.00006628415,0.00017785699,0.0002718924,0.0003343136,0.02704931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526596,0.00016591392,0.002755207,0.000055460005,0.000025671594,0.000023605931,0.000029816854,0.0000109456105,0.0016673852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757594,0.0010020739,0.00016611784,0.0003512788,0.00038842138,0.0005162501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970543,0.01740095,0.00711461,0.0027184254,0.00089461217,0.0013284174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041368706,0.00050117954,0.0014562446,0.0013648818,0.0012275149,0.0045160824,0.0012651266,0.002108681,0.011430629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025514431,0.0006783433,0.0008638202,0.0014464973,0.0036054421,0.008325749,0.0033335974,0.0021957618,0.0005707646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067087414,0.0003241683,0.014851922,0.00027834115,0.00012341824,0.00081882154,0.0011058457,0.086000174,0.0035294995,0.86211205,0.001591185,0.02859376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025384722,0.00018146352,0.0053048506,0.00009200009,0.000118515134,0.0003335003,0.0005917196,0.19941697,0.0017712701,0.7889934,0.0028694686,0.000072987765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009656528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083133136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011430629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015912259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009234617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03823924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124612572","doi":"","title":"Two-Sided Matchings: An Algorithm for Ensuring They Are Minimax and Pareto-Optimal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Matching (statistics); Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Rank (graph theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Algorithm; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.02839328585553937,"score_gpt":0.23512046992050953,"score_spread":0.20672718406497015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124612572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015583738,0.00017096968,0.97643024,0.00031725792,0.0000699112,0.0005186639,0.00018740672,0.0006325961,0.006089233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12563956,0.00012792817,0.86930174,0.000257113,0.000059506023,0.0008088186,0.00043040878,0.00035444222,0.0030204875],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196273,0.0038660027,0.0005310722,0.0012321902,0.0016643454,0.0007436045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839062,0.009717914,0.001397294,0.0025456273,0.0018592266,0.00057382166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01580686,0.0016774246,0.002524399,0.003466313,0.0024318495,0.0032166648,0.004379337,0.0038436463,0.008923293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04396112,0.0013735187,0.0017649469,0.003845076,0.003318669,0.006272384,0.0047084014,0.0032282698,0.002800798],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000732211,0.00037059185,0.003354767,0.00040492773,0.00023199717,0.00018289927,0.0009063998,0.36609682,0.003690165,0.3422136,0.017221805,0.2645938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028963163,0.00017242563,0.00038568227,0.00012144646,0.00003820258,0.00011830732,0.00011584369,0.66723466,0.0021080014,0.3217574,0.007604439,0.000054041517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017209353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018141106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01580686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026067607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050551323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08359563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124632514","doi":"","title":"Equilibrium Selection in Cheap Talk Games: ACDC rocks when Other Criteria remain silent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Neologism; Selection (genetic algorithm); Stability (learning theory); Generalization; Mathematical economics; Economics; Range (aeronautics); Relevance (law); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06956089897769728,"score_gpt":0.30428141052571567,"score_spread":0.23472051154801837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124632514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61532956,0.00062797783,0.31033674,0.0054833544,0.00020580323,0.00046099804,0.0006410538,0.0016151178,0.0652994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713264,0.00009102958,0.024940003,0.0005631723,0.000054269174,0.00016532524,0.00014656982,0.00019624473,0.002516901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893254,0.005398481,0.00061835954,0.0016209434,0.0019030664,0.0011337452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8697074,0.093275614,0.010754728,0.01821055,0.004478832,0.003572837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01647652,0.0008138116,0.0022400068,0.001649403,0.002156408,0.0043606716,0.0019063713,0.0032750226,0.01146823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108234234,0.0006613453,0.001825459,0.0009107925,0.0038790905,0.0064409426,0.0033837494,0.0058812886,0.0019033452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024286024,0.0005641244,0.024256773,0.0006620903,0.0004763301,0.0009726906,0.0027797183,0.04436297,0.01955134,0.7916001,0.014556917,0.09778825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042808268,0.0004534015,0.004020441,0.00009074813,0.00011002662,0.0004452765,0.0006223489,0.18087573,0.0069766277,0.8015663,0.004306257,0.00010475941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012573674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012572388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012722549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001942989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08713722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124727426","doi":"","title":"Product Filters, Acyclicity and Suzumura Consistency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Filter (signal processing); Mathematics; Social Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01337299035858581,"score_gpt":0.16756442600594051,"score_spread":0.1541914356473547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124727426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19218107,0.0017973197,0.7600769,0.0014944171,0.00010732896,0.000110495945,0.0005891552,0.00026707439,0.043376353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605903,0.0009829901,0.12168927,0.00037986934,0.00031034177,0.00020388658,0.00058907765,0.00012222344,0.01513205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981488,0.0005467972,0.00013067818,0.0005313105,0.00041692794,0.00022553082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474937,0.002885646,0.0007166662,0.0007053831,0.00065033097,0.00029253482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003288097,0.00038849306,0.00078297086,0.0024020427,0.0015032822,0.002719882,0.0007240484,0.0009088966,0.0049514966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006582774,0.0004886788,0.0011340588,0.002127444,0.0037403442,0.0060407217,0.0015178524,0.0013157643,0.00046556574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018752453,0.000010169216,0.000394794,0.000021794842,0.000012309118,0.000021095073,0.0001321283,0.0008606404,0.000450198,0.992515,0.00038377434,0.005179302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122129995,0.00003590107,0.0007203819,0.00001783184,0.000015122723,0.00009167222,0.000080970545,0.00825601,0.0010176749,0.98184836,0.007885243,0.00001860178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017009103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016192665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049514966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014124158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082737126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017389297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124812336","doi":"","title":"Candidate Stability and Nonbinary Social Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Arrow; Voting; Impossibility; Simple (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07162636864602516,"score_gpt":0.3120922704124447,"score_spread":0.24046590176641952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124812336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5582453,0.001397295,0.38052422,0.007493171,0.00015945174,0.00017932137,0.0015046002,0.00026998657,0.05022667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688242,0.00030789396,0.015802931,0.0001618767,0.000116701885,0.00015619922,0.00068381056,0.000047005724,0.013899494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976628,0.0012933566,0.00007560118,0.00042211494,0.00030176344,0.00024438853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98093355,0.013039544,0.0019990907,0.0010415069,0.0017733407,0.0012129435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038643237,0.0005279968,0.0013392989,0.00194379,0.0016804249,0.0031376295,0.00093068485,0.0016204123,0.014593347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023341991,0.00028943145,0.0008581828,0.0014215459,0.0023903558,0.0024505637,0.0019305365,0.0011528526,0.00094138185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010355923,0.000023606908,0.0016046055,0.00004915834,0.00003342383,0.00007177854,0.00011787413,0.0089097535,0.00025995783,0.98088235,0.0025985127,0.005345393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030126597,0.000022892304,0.0006148297,0.000014945825,0.0000050568574,0.00003005755,0.000059060832,0.07550099,0.00011862148,0.9221906,0.0014002502,0.0000127190015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018456093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021825586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014593347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021281545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048819542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124855561","doi":"10.5445/ir/1000037498","title":"The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Judgement; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Voting; Majority rule; Approval voting; Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025558300340473527,"score_gpt":0.24222015072709407,"score_spread":0.21666185038662056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124855561","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1251598,0.00073626713,0.841379,0.0028126505,0.00012488799,0.0002719205,0.0006227279,0.00025012746,0.028642578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79950416,0.00040388215,0.19362591,0.000379198,0.00022194682,0.0004896736,0.0005322293,0.00010346173,0.0047394824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345125,0.007903442,0.0008181233,0.0031761513,0.0037713647,0.00087972684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95456225,0.033835687,0.003294766,0.0047653606,0.0024732696,0.0010687006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011412135,0.0008790805,0.0022114138,0.0030126397,0.004109646,0.007823902,0.0031800808,0.0028088584,0.0052843206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050874677,0.0009618583,0.0022763524,0.0035768084,0.008983186,0.012701337,0.005676197,0.004476892,0.0006669311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008337427,0.00002204686,0.000597693,0.0000560555,0.000042173324,0.000095518,0.000462137,0.010477133,0.00042054744,0.9752333,0.0010934229,0.011416505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020200107,0.000015737038,0.00015183842,0.000020106987,0.0000106956995,0.000054953747,0.00007128131,0.050296172,0.000328615,0.9475926,0.0014226588,0.000015219773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031039505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018287871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011412135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031626339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022014952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060353816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125225696","doi":"10.3982/te3668","title":"Voting in corporations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Voting; Consistency (knowledge bases); Axiom; Stock (firearms); Business; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Common stock; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Mathematics; Finance; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02717762957817506,"score_gpt":0.21125965567616584,"score_spread":0.18408202609799076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125225696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1070618,0.002072125,0.42285,0.010930401,0.00044093103,0.00023219484,0.0005694215,0.00028428872,0.4555588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212294,0.0009315281,0.027436208,0.0006269128,0.00021450619,0.00018140157,0.00019950558,0.000033038516,0.049147505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984036,0.0006823786,0.00006886267,0.00030294116,0.00030225748,0.0002398602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868566,0.000557348,0.00017276699,0.0002765639,0.0001810712,0.0001265847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012512321,0.0003246543,0.00041851492,0.0005668133,0.001186541,0.0034100767,0.001162772,0.0017601121,0.011796072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032884486,0.00022764661,0.0005935882,0.0009497893,0.0022979479,0.003698517,0.0013048856,0.0014568038,0.0014589388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004366161,0.0000085446645,0.00022868335,0.0000050025164,0.0000023130508,0.000024238196,0.00006408487,0.003295574,0.000052833602,0.99337006,0.0007210098,0.0022232241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024217245,0.000021776168,0.00027539063,0.000022057624,0.0000070733618,0.00005153708,0.00010827405,0.042588346,0.00017209363,0.92931646,0.027404703,0.000007946396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041162986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022109728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011796072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020386095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097447034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03946185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125361873","doi":"10.1561/102.00000019","title":"Bargaining with Linked Disagreement Points","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Strategic Behavior and the Environment","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Axiom; Welfare economics; Bargaining power; Context (archaeology); Economics; Pareto principle; Bargaining problem; Microeconomics; Humanities; Mathematical economics; International trade; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Geography; Operations management","score_opus":0.061377580888746806,"score_gpt":0.22353436137089483,"score_spread":0.16215678048214802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125361873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034981735,0.00025703546,0.89571476,0.0022415011,0.0001798294,0.00015126698,0.00009220559,0.000054661275,0.06632699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904016,0.0005243101,0.17921388,0.00073500525,0.00034289493,0.0006467599,0.00017606033,0.00007947263,0.027880015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905518,0.005612781,0.00036818307,0.0011661547,0.0015554174,0.00074566784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940455,0.0033739475,0.00083030533,0.00080206175,0.0005471986,0.00040096682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008340908,0.0008861447,0.001104595,0.001168473,0.002232998,0.0053317402,0.002298662,0.0047430387,0.013003528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017539738,0.00063343835,0.0019069187,0.0016128302,0.0047599957,0.007493447,0.0054952702,0.0049956716,0.0020499795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012619432,0.000015410496,0.000089091554,0.000015626849,0.00000898145,0.000056207296,0.00016380713,0.008817967,0.00017362306,0.9877681,0.00029215397,0.0025864337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000262859,0.000017044198,0.000037128004,0.000014485903,0.0000047078606,0.000030355983,0.00006876821,0.033612248,0.00014620968,0.96319634,0.0028358805,0.000010623786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005162029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004101811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013003528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018156455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001157521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04411149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125400653","doi":"","title":"MATCHING MARKETS UNDER (IN)COMPLETE INFORMATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Incomplete markets; Best response; Economics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Correlated equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Repeated game; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.0541435000877123,"score_gpt":0.24033180609191915,"score_spread":0.18618830600420685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125400653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29963404,0.0054714177,0.48499194,0.026953412,0.0011643174,0.00040863294,0.0041638804,0.0014134232,0.17579894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163469,0.0026871623,0.024116714,0.0019428842,0.0017732354,0.00031798639,0.0013576911,0.0002273144,0.051230133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512994,0.0014118169,0.00033660344,0.0011776417,0.0009821254,0.0009619568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760409,0.013685193,0.0043419115,0.0027246173,0.001802117,0.0014052727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005833641,0.0007966799,0.0030883572,0.001708166,0.0013557947,0.006092467,0.0025654375,0.0055241096,0.03146881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043008786,0.00097494863,0.0013947889,0.0020723518,0.0025837277,0.012950251,0.0035526694,0.0025740738,0.0041452493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031978337,0.00011670975,0.0012064355,0.00023613664,0.000080481244,0.0003445789,0.00017878138,0.02632261,0.0005186237,0.9228067,0.015105496,0.032763712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016060268,0.000091687376,0.0007234268,0.000049283695,0.000027765602,0.00022473469,0.000062674786,0.10025593,0.00022607757,0.89177454,0.006358675,0.000044684137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029477754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017615563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03146881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023818156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019627167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105273664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125684913","doi":"","title":"The Ultimate Control Group","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Voting; Group (periodic table); Organizational structure; Hierarchical organization; Knowledge management; Business; Corporate group; Computer science; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Operations management; Management science; Engineering; Economics; Management; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Corporate governance; Market economy; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.036211492730789045,"score_gpt":0.2817118920512784,"score_spread":0.24550039932048934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125684913","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27453864,0.0008225225,0.4834815,0.0031045259,0.00029074136,0.00046303665,0.0006859821,0.0005121625,0.23610091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527293,0.00020679757,0.026240531,0.00046250073,0.00022070725,0.00035195486,0.00037699353,0.000048507554,0.019362768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956404,0.0011209106,0.00023401239,0.0012328442,0.0010740493,0.0006977424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935202,0.0016858957,0.0010637948,0.0017315361,0.0010459936,0.0009525906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028177975,0.0004377365,0.0008427062,0.0019518418,0.003028464,0.0047706263,0.0013456156,0.0015713343,0.010431463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009545585,0.00021941842,0.000687046,0.0010923279,0.007085869,0.004057751,0.0036529119,0.0015959213,0.0013811338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033760858,0.000022280521,0.00078110275,0.000017488046,0.000009919457,0.00004223578,0.0004176899,0.0004883594,0.00058664643,0.98521405,0.0008297037,0.011556586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003100566,0.00009182479,0.0014640557,0.00003242744,0.000016048629,0.00009327179,0.00049400923,0.0059881886,0.001122434,0.972451,0.018187556,0.000028104481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012228575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005581766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010431463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008607366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012078178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03489673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125703050","doi":"","title":"Forming Stable Coalitions: The Process Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"European Social Fund; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Unanimity; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Supreme court; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Political science; Combinatorics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030606268673077065,"score_gpt":0.23943123744355024,"score_spread":0.20882496877047318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125703050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08154154,0.0033890745,0.60065514,0.035305537,0.0010363568,0.0007699515,0.0013659338,0.0005769011,0.27535957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041667,0.002931997,0.036787856,0.0018620881,0.0007716054,0.0008604573,0.00066677673,0.00030756308,0.051644895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922246,0.0029012964,0.00036717663,0.0023396374,0.0013283236,0.00083906495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96613675,0.017521698,0.003783626,0.008109317,0.0026326573,0.0018160269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008396049,0.0008695401,0.0018192537,0.0011838762,0.0030494435,0.009659842,0.0029397532,0.0050375257,0.030356376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066483095,0.0007464404,0.0011196225,0.001556516,0.008157988,0.02105827,0.0043108035,0.0045269877,0.0063102725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000343356,0.000029723094,0.0015900298,0.00006509306,0.000041238494,0.0000981555,0.00055244815,0.004002534,0.0001892688,0.9779869,0.0034574966,0.011952812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038670005,0.000029592145,0.00066089234,0.00004202408,0.000020460988,0.0001640726,0.00031683996,0.009947388,0.00014080231,0.97231513,0.016303211,0.000020875807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024289247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016266666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030356376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024774736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00242731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10155219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125761330","doi":"","title":"Von Neumann-Morgenstern Stable Sets in Matching Problems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Independent set; Lattice (music); Characterization (materials science); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Graph","score_opus":0.052833094896183055,"score_gpt":0.2881627785131244,"score_spread":0.23532968361694134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125761330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3380308,0.0021186355,0.5828308,0.004453062,0.00014100515,0.00031992042,0.00058323465,0.00020647206,0.071316145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295126,0.0011179084,0.058937453,0.00037509433,0.00031456968,0.00049755466,0.0003956794,0.000060603175,0.008788474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956624,0.0021548679,0.00022747506,0.00069736,0.0007725869,0.00048529953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006885,0.0075482647,0.00068850047,0.000496706,0.0006186891,0.00057903584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005032987,0.00086920796,0.0018272862,0.0020255288,0.002386645,0.005619517,0.0015376703,0.0029499163,0.0062004784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018733414,0.00076414994,0.001489182,0.0031348343,0.0048993393,0.008200225,0.003401914,0.0029049418,0.000738941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033627784,0.000023498756,0.00023388545,0.000057942358,0.000018079225,0.000034197823,0.00020264431,0.006089946,0.0002699288,0.9895047,0.00044495804,0.0030865553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014273271,0.00001137077,0.00006202457,0.000010178821,0.0000043215123,0.000019537458,0.000051256306,0.020827373,0.00015309473,0.97844785,0.00039227962,0.0000064752257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008227034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007120319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062004784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028430545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017046194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026617289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125795534","doi":"","title":"Characterizations of the cycle-complete and folk solutions for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Independence (probability theory); Tree (set theory); Steiner tree problem; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Property (philosophy); Piecewise; Spanning tree; Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Statistics","score_opus":0.09818936293547455,"score_gpt":0.28752903567498406,"score_spread":0.18933967273950952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125795534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2675022,0.0014581662,0.6666054,0.003429888,0.00009597972,0.00031598032,0.0013550918,0.00028357524,0.0589537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8514734,0.0018814813,0.12220243,0.00064893125,0.00027298328,0.00080896856,0.0020469062,0.00031120714,0.020353703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871576,0.0003882747,0.00007244278,0.0002887097,0.00029976116,0.0002351069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517953,0.002756149,0.0007057911,0.00030756873,0.0005400715,0.00051093637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019654704,0.0011132064,0.0014849119,0.0015516616,0.0012532969,0.003130559,0.0022037746,0.0025184925,0.010609329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014318526,0.0007477803,0.0010720959,0.0021837126,0.0018274984,0.005680068,0.0021520958,0.002275905,0.0009478199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012018155,0.00012779796,0.00078239094,0.0002830313,0.000050752453,0.000108745335,0.0004818725,0.13280056,0.0015364741,0.8302534,0.0079075415,0.025547288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058282898,0.000071370625,0.00046574083,0.00006792778,0.000019544515,0.00016375912,0.00019847383,0.2730303,0.00049598713,0.7212859,0.004115202,0.000027558503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010107452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010886287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010609329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018355298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011651876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035491765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125965656","doi":"10.1111/joie.12058","title":"Bilateral Bargaining with Externalities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Microeconomics; Division (mathematics); Externality; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Value (mathematics); Division of labour; Economic surplus; Foreclosure; Mathematical economics; Welfare; Computer science; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06255559830554105,"score_gpt":0.2041967837499633,"score_spread":0.14164118544442225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125965656","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084619075,0.00049202447,0.6570837,0.0020704141,0.00013393744,0.00013187503,0.0001164248,0.00007133105,0.2552813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272256,0.0004304798,0.029992852,0.00022362152,0.00013720215,0.00019357869,0.00006568607,0.000037525722,0.041693464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973151,0.0012417309,0.0000874088,0.00039064058,0.0005397751,0.00042538164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973239,0.0015622816,0.00033931292,0.00032289044,0.00022205821,0.00022956399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029502946,0.00067444885,0.0007185127,0.0008105877,0.0015475869,0.0028556662,0.001374366,0.0022105007,0.016352043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008052425,0.00044304974,0.00091939204,0.0010598893,0.0027441215,0.00426068,0.0030607516,0.0023288014,0.0011721189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017055223,0.000009634464,0.00010991729,0.000016097589,0.000008735506,0.000067216024,0.00010621026,0.014783226,0.00032033285,0.9812153,0.00034196203,0.003004307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002206717,0.000017218412,0.00013049072,0.000020329731,0.000011451878,0.00007239784,0.00010405543,0.06868359,0.00020521261,0.92556065,0.0051637944,0.000008770433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001222054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097168534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016352043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022606333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095849816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054702997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125965689","doi":"","title":"A Characterization of Consistent Collective Choice Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Anonymity; Pareto principle; Transitive relation; Axiom; Revealed preference; Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Neutrality; Preference; Class (philosophy); Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03846331325226378,"score_gpt":0.2384546547605135,"score_spread":0.1999913415082497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125965689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22299352,0.00039849567,0.75242704,0.0017553945,0.000059178077,0.00026272173,0.0008034923,0.00033884376,0.020961277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876278,0.00021374374,0.11650856,0.000430638,0.00010419622,0.00061850605,0.001063224,0.00012742839,0.0046557854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915833,0.0025730662,0.0007950186,0.0021846464,0.0020475516,0.00081645284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700141,0.016399588,0.0045701074,0.0040413123,0.0041027647,0.00087218784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061444715,0.0005776269,0.0011330444,0.0019345263,0.0015595417,0.004367049,0.002069298,0.0022067912,0.0049170735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030144498,0.00063198834,0.0012966902,0.0019755138,0.0030975228,0.004405282,0.0020700386,0.0024592562,0.000770939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083656334,0.00011808419,0.003758299,0.00009198705,0.000104184,0.00029767185,0.00076447485,0.016064405,0.0026591786,0.9512616,0.0018393087,0.022957113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006336527,0.00006805411,0.0005695871,0.000044633576,0.00003589382,0.0002090377,0.00023528442,0.059053186,0.0017930538,0.9318091,0.0060897847,0.000028872671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090666546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005337246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061444715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011882969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013268599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0324955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127963604","doi":"10.3982/te4257","title":"Minimally unstable Pareto improvements over deferred acceptance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Oxford; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Pareto principle; Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Pareto optimal; Set (abstract data type); Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Mechanism (biology); Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.019770130869046807,"score_gpt":0.22070411648605975,"score_spread":0.20093398561701295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127963604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49711066,0.00040254727,0.46875235,0.0008612411,0.00005560455,0.00023796869,0.00014294648,0.00023823493,0.032198522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725742,0.00008778852,0.02403681,0.00009868625,0.000038002225,0.00008241747,0.00004230069,0.000022152048,0.0030176917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944458,0.0029923012,0.00017248183,0.0007092706,0.0010636447,0.00061652914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830972,0.009226829,0.002313901,0.00208352,0.0018596158,0.0014189597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007913612,0.000696227,0.0007245892,0.001391723,0.0010757867,0.001815795,0.0016828745,0.0008116555,0.00456404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020154672,0.00025058186,0.0008881582,0.0008172211,0.0021754846,0.0025424096,0.0021954745,0.002079465,0.00037112142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007555514,0.0002954593,0.0038828375,0.00013611233,0.00010043953,0.00014645355,0.00050982647,0.06846015,0.008351455,0.85814863,0.0011223888,0.05809071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021942324,0.0011226992,0.0029384287,0.000041593426,0.00007873079,0.00015780756,0.00020042127,0.26577953,0.0051651234,0.71979713,0.0044409526,0.000058182413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076163275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007985321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007913612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017762868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001108905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04185164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132461504","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105742","title":"The law of large numbers for large stable matchings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Estimator; Consistency (knowledge bases); Econometrics; Law of large numbers; Inference; Fraction (chemistry); Inequality; Statistical inference; Statistics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Random variable","score_opus":0.07666035497076303,"score_gpt":0.2555874198756452,"score_spread":0.1789270649048822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132461504","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069883265,0.0039760135,0.8606233,0.015793169,0.0007321721,0.00023171412,0.0006296432,0.000559886,0.04757082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8710104,0.0035544233,0.08542826,0.0027163331,0.0019054799,0.0012154492,0.0006465969,0.00044214845,0.03308097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909944,0.00453125,0.0003986484,0.0014990754,0.0017393162,0.0008373879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8336848,0.14322256,0.005896119,0.00852222,0.0053821695,0.0032921259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016744342,0.0012636207,0.0046624267,0.0035252809,0.0030236219,0.00812429,0.0041603018,0.006603036,0.015760897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1627177,0.0017304603,0.0020999927,0.0027185474,0.010669152,0.019609988,0.0045920257,0.009719664,0.0019907458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030636493,0.000020142897,0.00036600663,0.000053447602,0.0000205951,0.00004681046,0.000088621055,0.004761174,0.00017211305,0.98883563,0.0022513918,0.003353436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035762685,0.000007838359,0.00014303984,0.000017924667,0.000006955688,0.000041982225,0.000017346512,0.042750835,0.000057726556,0.95618445,0.000721051,0.000015145113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022299995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017754204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016744342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034092015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026281318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08855361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133776100","doi":"10.1007/s00500-021-05604-9","title":"Extension of owen value for the game with a coalition structure under the limited feasible coalition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soft Computing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Probabilistic logic; Stochastic game; Extension (predicate logic); Axiom; Cooperative game theory; Mathematics; Transferable utility; Example of a game without a value; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Non-cooperative game; Simultaneous game; Statistics","score_opus":0.04301354500801664,"score_gpt":0.24010463924852818,"score_spread":0.19709109424051152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133776100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042764828,0.0012761704,0.8717214,0.002424905,0.00035606185,0.00023945408,0.00033689727,0.000091034155,0.080789246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79225373,0.0024352702,0.15225884,0.0010047046,0.00074758,0.00070584915,0.0003985542,0.00020580775,0.04998964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974262,0.0010449472,0.00012259568,0.00044214356,0.00056818506,0.00039588974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941989,0.0036158578,0.0003322974,0.0005581629,0.0007900173,0.0005047181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046067396,0.0012302182,0.0018300958,0.0029634796,0.0014127137,0.0035069932,0.003340658,0.002320263,0.01403157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017480198,0.0005092829,0.0016555508,0.0025595096,0.0041311462,0.0124195255,0.0035464496,0.0042632497,0.0009038274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029447814,0.000035863817,0.00012977456,0.00006887163,0.000015750256,0.000029415733,0.00012922831,0.013095728,0.0002852535,0.9744374,0.0014582266,0.010285064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012282335,0.00002316542,0.00010977413,0.000044742334,0.000010925083,0.00004020411,0.000049211307,0.080883734,0.00016231799,0.91567403,0.0029734569,0.000016283062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022090194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014146725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01403157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003186946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026073214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046940267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134055822","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/589","title":"Distortion in Social Choice Problems: The First 15 Years and Beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Distortion (music); Social choice theory; Work (physics); Social Welfare; Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Positive economics; Public economics; Political science; Engineering; Data mining; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.034671456713883046,"score_gpt":0.22744507210459888,"score_spread":0.19277361539071583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134055822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02409829,0.6156752,0.26519325,0.032535173,0.0032622167,0.0001599479,0.00054796075,0.000118945056,0.058408976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4710304,0.3899982,0.101089895,0.0074610068,0.012775193,0.00044935418,0.0005799372,0.0002937932,0.016322212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906489,0.0044193906,0.0006844005,0.0013911987,0.0023525618,0.00050354557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95947385,0.03170734,0.0018852599,0.003013921,0.0030485513,0.00087100273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013411078,0.0019572228,0.0041226232,0.0025580672,0.0014930392,0.008770432,0.0024078279,0.0037862256,0.0042689904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03976963,0.001332626,0.00268897,0.005870554,0.01308395,0.01572382,0.0049257115,0.009359767,0.0008657265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000907642,0.00005196991,0.0007190153,0.00054790877,0.00007126025,0.000047950216,0.00028878686,0.0051362584,0.000098464996,0.94581145,0.0026870663,0.04444914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019584744,0.000051872565,0.00063700235,0.00041414416,0.000019723146,0.000099765726,0.00012105974,0.0072975964,0.00011232291,0.9520431,0.039148927,0.00003491958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041318485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017428751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013411078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010623944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028902777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077082515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135588428","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16690","title":"Necessarily Optimal One-Sided Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Focus (optics); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Pareto principle; Prefix; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Optimal matching; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.14875177980413837,"score_gpt":0.2815930916186124,"score_spread":0.13284131181447403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135588428","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25546756,0.0004815718,0.72084355,0.0020904057,0.00008467908,0.00030401492,0.001071293,0.00058226584,0.019074688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7490366,0.0003610614,0.23987365,0.000562212,0.00011851801,0.00029924992,0.0012729692,0.00016262675,0.008313096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300474,0.0031112172,0.00042476354,0.0017710546,0.0009367618,0.0007515418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97541106,0.016793128,0.001979332,0.0033635746,0.0010684072,0.0013845739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058896835,0.0008393623,0.0025203798,0.0008248613,0.0015269491,0.0024001237,0.0027050779,0.0026757836,0.0081366915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032926437,0.00077090744,0.0013314779,0.0020749094,0.0023701796,0.0069922484,0.002673025,0.0024301035,0.0013684774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011569018,0.00072908134,0.0041200146,0.00064135715,0.00021335791,0.00037083597,0.0007271076,0.22151148,0.003945953,0.63672715,0.01026041,0.11959641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012280753,0.00016444344,0.0004002452,0.000027949185,0.00002788268,0.00015779781,0.000103993465,0.34233302,0.0012893657,0.6534002,0.0019477645,0.000024489933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001297264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081366915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017977622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018849631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031148016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140464205","doi":"","title":"Investigating the characteristics of one-sided matching mechanisms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10926594919314152,"score_gpt":0.2541527099557087,"score_spread":0.14488676076256718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140464205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76034546,0.0005483311,0.22159988,0.0015859905,0.00006501581,0.00025713726,0.00019075525,0.00017909051,0.015228359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861568,0.00017527492,0.011171087,0.00008140794,0.000037403628,0.00009696592,0.00006526258,0.000021304933,0.002194589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536705,0.002538321,0.0002729297,0.0006754495,0.00048802013,0.0006582981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88761455,0.0786587,0.017394599,0.0094011305,0.0035899547,0.0033410464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010613529,0.00044121192,0.0017255988,0.0017072546,0.0012355385,0.0037051737,0.0034286329,0.003988132,0.009508922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08469413,0.00084858725,0.0010217057,0.0017181868,0.002672091,0.007267947,0.002302611,0.0019547783,0.0006413602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036659307,0.00030959194,0.007827513,0.0001932792,0.00014233314,0.00020573933,0.0005060828,0.046131004,0.0029601315,0.9201287,0.0013101718,0.019918922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021458001,0.00022051345,0.0023876808,0.000042986165,0.00006305086,0.00026837163,0.0003459632,0.34297886,0.00095086585,0.6515141,0.0009681472,0.000044869248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005810695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005120868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010613529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013191861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016364689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05613041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157300277","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.11.016","title":"Large random matching markets with localized preference structures can exhibit large cores","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.031391282146459816,"score_gpt":0.23040248882529402,"score_spread":0.1990112066788342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157300277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.610611,0.00039983765,0.3643556,0.0023771988,0.000071703624,0.00029531424,0.00032809205,0.00049951306,0.021061737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799801,0.00015611987,0.014428303,0.00035995708,0.00008861186,0.0002710098,0.00012424833,0.00007694548,0.0045145936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976017,0.001158419,0.00008531139,0.00041684552,0.0003240797,0.00041368758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96896756,0.020735059,0.004484134,0.002549754,0.0013065799,0.0019570133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042728493,0.0007941267,0.003036257,0.0018368432,0.0016116258,0.0036889056,0.0024644765,0.0034139336,0.0085246125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03216667,0.0017024971,0.0014253103,0.0012110677,0.004577446,0.007713539,0.003309194,0.0025915154,0.00070384465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019562473,0.0001973799,0.0016038029,0.00013107933,0.000085583146,0.00031785446,0.00019359101,0.026886182,0.0016803487,0.96181905,0.002651662,0.0042378553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001078511,0.000047518766,0.00074732676,0.000015815189,0.00001754707,0.00013416502,0.0000833935,0.18299244,0.00036398775,0.81499475,0.0004741938,0.000021080494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008415615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013994824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085246125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012149151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011023711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028517723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158219287","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12304","title":"Individual disagreement point concavity and the bargaining problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Physics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025687331333900464,"score_gpt":0.24333806992245538,"score_spread":0.2176507385885549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158219287","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1505159,0.000515932,0.68823624,0.0049519343,0.00016116249,0.0001564972,0.00019354462,0.0002090592,0.15505978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558445,0.00021819607,0.033713408,0.0004986367,0.00014626476,0.00017205083,0.000092260605,0.00007196716,0.009242529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955819,0.0022724732,0.0001772482,0.00055553083,0.0008630108,0.00054983946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924601,0.004481337,0.0006839136,0.00066052115,0.0013214727,0.00039259586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055449638,0.00043234453,0.0008983364,0.0011789118,0.0019105516,0.0027979545,0.001565815,0.0019292103,0.009285323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013699906,0.00038222756,0.00077216985,0.0012509378,0.004660121,0.00444218,0.0024727772,0.0032221228,0.0009877952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020680045,0.000017233502,0.00020267596,0.000020596945,0.000006804912,0.00003481197,0.00012118609,0.00349809,0.0003275924,0.9910523,0.0009376715,0.0037601553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022379645,0.000014911899,0.00021976494,0.000020183996,0.0000039954,0.000063333,0.00010529736,0.031656764,0.00033370472,0.96512204,0.0024268935,0.00001072056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011159866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005914927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009285323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017791755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001349906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031062543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158708211","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3810746","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items when Envy-Freeness is Impossible","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.023874631061935703,"score_gpt":0.22886709751842998,"score_spread":0.20499246645649427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158708211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5897358,0.00028481294,0.29381678,0.006393672,0.00031155837,0.00049777364,0.00048223935,0.00024067675,0.10823663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.000062097046,0.018757762,0.00031858348,0.00007238738,0.0002280336,0.000090985595,0.000028433893,0.01176527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905674,0.0034281847,0.00058774435,0.0017450134,0.0011087776,0.0025628752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832177,0.009178253,0.0014833899,0.003680321,0.0007986016,0.0016416209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102123115,0.0006766981,0.0025957501,0.000838893,0.0025526213,0.00674101,0.0025817929,0.0048031197,0.013267083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032858983,0.00069028256,0.0012319543,0.0009941563,0.004775492,0.008155045,0.00397067,0.0038803257,0.0012705771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007120935,0.00023560661,0.0029445298,0.00010627545,0.00011522039,0.00046680865,0.0011625455,0.0082561765,0.0019722474,0.9652105,0.0026942608,0.016123662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009784855,0.00007874719,0.0007221863,0.000018916166,0.000019810099,0.0001450882,0.0003740684,0.023044407,0.00065914093,0.97279423,0.002020427,0.000025182222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014925018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013331058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013267083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012207638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054008543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160584640","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.11.001","title":"A recursive measure of voting power that satisfies reasonable postulates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Measure (data warehouse); Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Mathematics; Anti-plurality voting; Computer science; Econometrics; Political science; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.03821358774914554,"score_gpt":0.2367149691258533,"score_spread":0.19850138137670775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160584640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21620919,0.00025995573,0.7346879,0.0016885245,0.0000914714,0.00015562272,0.0003853386,0.00034784197,0.046174057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297153,0.00012301722,0.066465996,0.00023816984,0.00010777059,0.0001862107,0.00019676532,0.00005605218,0.0029107332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381036,0.0020499085,0.0006068583,0.001414134,0.001437565,0.0006812522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856749,0.006944569,0.0018095677,0.0026419526,0.0021479721,0.0007811649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005390841,0.00046533524,0.0010599016,0.0013821615,0.001219353,0.003710927,0.0016919506,0.0017910072,0.0032472182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02197845,0.00036263207,0.0012696589,0.0012003593,0.0043889224,0.006894409,0.0016569732,0.0020242706,0.00059790636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983307,0.000014088264,0.00040135204,0.000015581338,0.0000070045107,0.00001874388,0.00010279399,0.0018106517,0.00040730924,0.9936454,0.00023510262,0.0033340228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018499373,0.00005419475,0.00077367394,0.000015660436,0.00001190529,0.00009706308,0.0000912012,0.027928,0.0007127374,0.9673071,0.0029682543,0.000021726859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008649519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008013185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005390841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016633027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013207444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028509796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161072239","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2105.07161","title":"On the Complexity of Nucleolus Computation for Bipartite b-Matching Games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Complement (music); Computation; Mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Simple (philosophy); Bounded function; Blossom algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.21202732810133296,"score_gpt":0.20381912745689065,"score_spread":0.008208200644442304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161072239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3914481,0.0013070902,0.56693983,0.0063001327,0.0002452841,0.00068301224,0.001939888,0.0018311786,0.029305577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8017654,0.00094748754,0.18771882,0.0008617602,0.00025573795,0.0005899582,0.002032209,0.00065663346,0.005171967],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957878,0.0016317465,0.00023749458,0.0008792313,0.0005955407,0.00086809625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95501995,0.03899051,0.0015635132,0.002520548,0.0008710876,0.001034482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195946,0.0013620303,0.0024453353,0.0014936855,0.0020113823,0.0061278413,0.0033028398,0.0026048336,0.0121527845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026346495,0.0009711652,0.002072065,0.0026064746,0.0027702332,0.010407396,0.0041860607,0.0045530763,0.0013264789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024897726,0.00088162796,0.006686147,0.0011947843,0.00036691432,0.0004650676,0.0010261491,0.43467492,0.010452357,0.42616326,0.018296909,0.0973021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001423827,0.00006299735,0.00047523362,0.000038162812,0.000043323136,0.0000854872,0.0001222733,0.5305325,0.0015522952,0.46569908,0.0012098888,0.000036393438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057021184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056699943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121527845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036441307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003336309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040655136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162326038","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2201.09182","title":"Consolidating Marginalism and Egalitarianism: A New Value for Transferable Utility Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transferable utility; Egalitarianism; Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Division (mathematics); Game theory; Mathematics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13976423499792298,"score_gpt":0.19711087139378802,"score_spread":0.05734663639586504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162326038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0624006,0.0005624353,0.8769063,0.0025849952,0.0001983536,0.00016827181,0.000109475055,0.00017944448,0.05689019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8642454,0.0005121961,0.12607881,0.0004554285,0.00030842825,0.00022826447,0.00007376591,0.00010535266,0.007992323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659026,0.0013970886,0.00017345321,0.00046290702,0.0010182789,0.00035808724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534386,0.0020467965,0.00040605586,0.0010886015,0.00064073503,0.00047391182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039361697,0.00071243686,0.0009270696,0.0012568657,0.0013482274,0.005081047,0.0023725103,0.0022414483,0.0028563007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012565452,0.0003896967,0.0011071138,0.0014642592,0.007483088,0.0101425545,0.0036051031,0.0043096556,0.00047214664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013361814,0.0000142121335,0.0001168409,0.000020713349,0.000008713276,0.000026404445,0.0001304259,0.0023793573,0.00044747512,0.98895186,0.00036003673,0.0075305323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009569803,0.000017065016,0.00006788263,0.000014823472,0.000006085966,0.00004067847,0.000035779958,0.01112136,0.00040982958,0.9849776,0.0032895592,0.00000991076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004764205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042679821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005081047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028881582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017367731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020955145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164797514","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/32","title":"Fair and Efficient Resource Allocation with Partial Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Minimax; Microeconomics; Multiplicative function; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Resource allocation; Welfare; Social Welfare; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01776982881906526,"score_gpt":0.18984186045992588,"score_spread":0.1720720316408606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164797514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058135822,0.00031830338,0.9318971,0.00086480303,0.0000597946,0.00009613684,0.00018461345,0.0001133588,0.008329994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86840415,0.00034219385,0.12552808,0.00019288887,0.00013922245,0.00019741828,0.00014833246,0.000056455494,0.0049912524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929341,0.0034716474,0.0003069705,0.0010174738,0.0014325819,0.0008372325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833174,0.008048708,0.0008606215,0.0017302992,0.0006604945,0.00036810452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006197937,0.0009680954,0.0016886774,0.00076075614,0.000975686,0.0036221826,0.0019714255,0.0015398564,0.0027715177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02271011,0.00064792973,0.0007969759,0.0015021717,0.0025179032,0.006026777,0.002307144,0.0016033738,0.00041934938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036883904,0.00012156492,0.00062194304,0.00015486089,0.0000962555,0.00014561102,0.00024387655,0.45236236,0.003163306,0.50574034,0.0017434681,0.035237618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004482996,0.000051598476,0.00021058613,0.000019988069,0.000017490607,0.000042681484,0.00003709583,0.48482853,0.0010818625,0.5122522,0.0013976309,0.000015491209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015236804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013398144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006197937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002006146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021646607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032778263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169024472","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_25","title":"Two Birds with One Stone: Fairness and Welfare via Transfers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Transfer payment; Mathematical economics; Homogeneous; Payment; Social welfare function; Nash equilibrium; Monotone polygon; Transfer (computing); Constant (computer programming); Mathematics; Computer science; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.020941773936946368,"score_gpt":0.22643459647822117,"score_spread":0.2054928225412748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169024472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5624527,0.000560701,0.31646645,0.0072061587,0.00023962538,0.000117858755,0.00013503066,0.00010171092,0.11271985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97515327,0.0000935839,0.012526122,0.00023287954,0.00005797339,0.00006050799,0.000018148017,0.000028675544,0.011828698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972276,0.0016214711,0.000073410556,0.0004109897,0.00029426822,0.00037218755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912907,0.006106989,0.0006716247,0.0010364286,0.00030351747,0.0005908961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908319,0.00043226665,0.001154638,0.0005505895,0.0020154056,0.003497296,0.0011146681,0.0033987823,0.009131115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015694644,0.00042522702,0.0006124291,0.0006241255,0.0042907293,0.004501114,0.0024526103,0.0022681474,0.0005491412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003212917,0.000073882715,0.00179729,0.000053976426,0.000059591446,0.000210564,0.00065834,0.012566939,0.0010680684,0.9636869,0.0017305359,0.017772695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003553365,0.000036801834,0.00050595554,0.000009055633,0.000020161453,0.000087263965,0.00021045654,0.019888088,0.00020479057,0.9778324,0.0011577745,0.000011658976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011395753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010490278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009131115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009585853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008004893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030546606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169869267","doi":"10.3982/ecta19636","title":"Identification and Estimation in Many‐to‐One Two‐Sided Matching Without Transfers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Identification (biology); Estimation; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.031029469890789793,"score_gpt":0.25529217127391457,"score_spread":0.22426270138312476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169869267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30508468,0.00026359828,0.6878217,0.001256981,0.000047229256,0.00027766425,0.00039259382,0.00018689671,0.004668643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408371,0.00017852959,0.05222614,0.0001788706,0.000054784403,0.00027343578,0.00034701737,0.00003585141,0.005868416],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913483,0.0057653217,0.00034224187,0.0013546097,0.0004921151,0.00069737516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95272213,0.036148265,0.0057302034,0.0036075995,0.0010024545,0.00078930863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019068776,0.00072129775,0.002999515,0.0011939593,0.0009564652,0.0023000096,0.0023883292,0.0025585138,0.007321243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06385134,0.0010369113,0.0016044964,0.0020267554,0.0026711496,0.0038826282,0.0031824894,0.0026860111,0.00070580264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057762535,0.0005514963,0.027393954,0.00025364387,0.00042512736,0.0004934257,0.0006766172,0.49972466,0.0008997638,0.41961518,0.0018232585,0.047565263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001280221,0.00008595047,0.0025853992,0.000025821095,0.000033668257,0.00006325816,0.00020518701,0.7535427,0.00041238326,0.24219091,0.0006944648,0.00003217946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006991112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005276479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019068776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016136972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026447691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10084653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173168623","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16675","title":"Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Rank (graph theory); Contrast (vision); Connection (principal bundle); Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022105704187609838,"score_gpt":0.20269636815515643,"score_spread":0.18059066396754658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173168623","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29777542,0.00024868114,0.6865512,0.0012906503,0.00004147133,0.00018893763,0.0005531351,0.00056350173,0.012787011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80495924,0.00016742678,0.18759578,0.00019337311,0.000041821782,0.0001279167,0.00039618489,0.00010340059,0.006414836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978058,0.00086373836,0.00011965266,0.0004947305,0.00034274947,0.0003732487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544036,0.002294401,0.00046786384,0.0010677595,0.00032910812,0.0004005429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030857068,0.000660343,0.0011436995,0.0008551336,0.0012201174,0.0020793818,0.001526154,0.0011271535,0.0058748913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014310633,0.00041519623,0.00096962764,0.0014361911,0.0017291271,0.005683336,0.0018905732,0.0015230248,0.0005620176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006399449,0.00033293632,0.0049784193,0.00019847497,0.00011935848,0.00017409357,0.0006384259,0.17235303,0.0045737857,0.70045567,0.004539753,0.11099617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053543772,0.0000758476,0.0007550357,0.000020521502,0.000023430885,0.0000858239,0.00010033429,0.25682297,0.0013400078,0.7387443,0.0019529378,0.000025264952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028291456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029587762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058748913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017589311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014215418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0196535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173882028","doi":"10.4204/eptcs.335.1","title":"Proceedings Eighteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017658513109999066,"score_gpt":0.2404549740206308,"score_spread":0.2227964609106317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173882028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014043946,0.05053252,0.11395461,0.09128159,0.044133924,0.00010771696,0.0011165784,0.0004170411,0.68441206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30871773,0.027380869,0.04750963,0.0070137284,0.025087938,0.0004995561,0.0017036111,0.0008947097,0.5811922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862826,0.00053274,0.000083406274,0.0002732125,0.00033050042,0.00015187854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464804,0.0031312674,0.0001272612,0.0007207315,0.0009372254,0.00043551376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027290026,0.0008550904,0.001662094,0.0018791909,0.0022794,0.0106374705,0.0019058028,0.0027205532,0.07709182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00814611,0.00046707396,0.0012505447,0.0019090082,0.004406516,0.007035254,0.0026710886,0.0057100374,0.0077939993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114534065,0.000088442626,0.00041850258,0.00013972087,0.0000578595,0.000117233176,0.00027706622,0.00090190914,0.00020576514,0.8169177,0.13209137,0.048669927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044976503,0.000023851922,0.0004308806,0.00019857439,0.000054206517,0.000092162314,0.00025697143,0.003756382,0.00025862208,0.62470394,0.37016135,0.00001801963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004573801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032302176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07709182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004530358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021021552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2578978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175886919","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16687","title":"Aggregating Binary Judgments Ranked by Accuracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Binary number; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Data mining; Distortion (music); Ground truth; Binary data; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10230192761163202,"score_gpt":0.27713216749757885,"score_spread":0.17483023988594681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175886919","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13676675,0.0008429061,0.851039,0.002063153,0.00019031693,0.00022158951,0.0007362898,0.00048250647,0.007657411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77040255,0.0003754158,0.22397156,0.00031959222,0.00041667942,0.00018080672,0.0012263554,0.00010809856,0.0029990333],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98623335,0.006389545,0.000812377,0.002648212,0.0031272515,0.00078929926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560213,0.028173802,0.00475443,0.0055246665,0.0045094383,0.0010162976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017823953,0.0014305061,0.0024859998,0.0039052593,0.0012018969,0.0040992787,0.0023246163,0.0019838298,0.003169373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059236977,0.00060305896,0.00090539514,0.0033081528,0.0014813818,0.004890028,0.002830918,0.0027812847,0.0008904252],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012998936,0.0005250988,0.042433675,0.0005436092,0.0005985903,0.0003137641,0.0021111595,0.2101894,0.0050387927,0.14036705,0.01073041,0.58584857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096895215,0.00029045026,0.010303683,0.00013854196,0.00013882406,0.00012233353,0.00040915314,0.72999185,0.004208666,0.24931729,0.0048479713,0.00013437464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003893798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047715297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017823953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001580414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012204656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094263196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176515086","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16710","title":"Market-Based Explanations of Collective Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Proportionality (law); Construct (python library); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Actuarial science; Operations research; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14318251301595522,"score_gpt":0.2824055527762517,"score_spread":0.13922303976029646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176515086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08005794,0.001126269,0.6905607,0.022171235,0.00041817004,0.00022508974,0.00047102178,0.00030347772,0.20466608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263474,0.0005223131,0.051869277,0.0010319874,0.0003416179,0.00029320677,0.00019637139,0.00007284989,0.019325025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982253,0.000819143,0.000065049964,0.00029440058,0.00032847552,0.00026765477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965089,0.001899175,0.0004898172,0.0004777042,0.00038431404,0.0002401878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035642784,0.0005001117,0.0005464137,0.0012423783,0.0015106034,0.0029174292,0.0019606992,0.0027732144,0.017915146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008551831,0.0002740371,0.0012507454,0.0009744231,0.003192046,0.005774169,0.0017494472,0.0015762962,0.0010253805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053238027,0.000007876419,0.00011348227,0.000014018396,0.00000440954,0.00003166964,0.00008877593,0.003329945,0.00005786701,0.99410594,0.00072939193,0.0015113995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014812151,0.0000055797814,0.00009221987,0.000005778713,0.0000026730472,0.000016057691,0.00004971289,0.014019526,0.000049986298,0.98289907,0.0028403895,0.000004150411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025013587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021635601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017915146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019111544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094487565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059932172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177345467","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16690","title":"Necessarily Optimal One-Sided Matchings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Focus (optics); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Pareto principle; Prefix; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Optimal matching; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.04611186113605634,"score_gpt":0.2170767207593821,"score_spread":0.17096485962332578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177345467","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24016604,0.00042392785,0.73923653,0.0017352857,0.00007471197,0.0002979843,0.00088104996,0.00043495133,0.016749483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76624423,0.00032384862,0.22422661,0.00048524738,0.000100043115,0.00028266787,0.000997502,0.0001270536,0.007212869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931003,0.0031913274,0.00041609758,0.0017227081,0.0008398143,0.0007297553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97675496,0.016134055,0.0019529788,0.0029865403,0.0009828641,0.0011886231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058324244,0.000816106,0.002552494,0.00075885653,0.0013886516,0.002136888,0.0026750355,0.0025275466,0.0076996135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032140657,0.0007308707,0.0012857126,0.001883158,0.0023474512,0.0065175234,0.0022844523,0.0021919685,0.0011872804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010753383,0.00068299234,0.0044704545,0.0005890561,0.00021640726,0.0003598794,0.00063699146,0.24588552,0.0038323982,0.6205278,0.008645384,0.11307775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012298398,0.00016910429,0.00045248028,0.00002856551,0.000026299223,0.00014801632,0.00010539682,0.38336614,0.0012400744,0.61253643,0.0017795734,0.000024970275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001172689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013866442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076996135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017078194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017381039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030845165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180196532","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/29","title":"Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Matching (statistics); Division (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Arithmetic; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.04559620072985191,"score_gpt":0.2517529842874516,"score_spread":0.20615678355759967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180196532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02760411,0.00012524464,0.9504416,0.00091921084,0.00008796771,0.0001198303,0.00018648285,0.00016223216,0.020353321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384665,0.00029438033,0.23421288,0.0004918334,0.0001974187,0.00029697196,0.00026265736,0.00014546362,0.025631854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443406,0.0020375592,0.00025019716,0.0012514681,0.0011848445,0.0008417638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996005,0.0013556567,0.00044776598,0.0013656794,0.00032707734,0.00049888226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040621744,0.0007552577,0.0015194403,0.0006712225,0.0017232643,0.0040205205,0.0031142104,0.0029116895,0.012135949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008176548,0.00058089866,0.0013131197,0.0014653333,0.0031948057,0.0071828947,0.003940109,0.003259776,0.0020496529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072333576,0.00004725632,0.00020453207,0.000029444458,0.000012439694,0.000081307524,0.00010756939,0.021740736,0.00089749164,0.96782523,0.001011123,0.007970429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004598654,0.000041944204,0.00006850165,0.000010731751,0.0000072528355,0.00009497633,0.00003954123,0.1529756,0.00069240585,0.8404461,0.005561911,0.000014985819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001412267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010821393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012135949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023345826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019713899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04059881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182271809","doi":"10.1017/9781108937535.010","title":"Normative Properties for Object Allocation Problems: Characterizations and Trade-Offs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Normative; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.06114845777570872,"score_gpt":0.1871038393670347,"score_spread":0.12595538159132597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182271809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826691,0.0099343285,0.44423977,0.011250504,0.00044276824,0.00025494027,0.0008002929,0.0003438011,0.49446666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346776,0.008326453,0.10669736,0.0016531682,0.0014100524,0.0013408023,0.0011921538,0.0004151697,0.044287372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926684,0.003507572,0.00064178667,0.00084249186,0.0018421757,0.00049767736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97516125,0.019161876,0.0011364429,0.0018993759,0.0021029878,0.0005381677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291414,0.0010119837,0.0013864455,0.002578036,0.0015731016,0.009339323,0.0015247733,0.0025702482,0.015964027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023261597,0.00066407793,0.0014668362,0.0035908732,0.007363127,0.014463084,0.0021768918,0.005761601,0.0017101617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006765266,0.000010200878,0.00006372552,0.000036175497,0.000004117626,0.0000098440705,0.00007163165,0.0007873173,0.00006021202,0.9932741,0.0012504458,0.0044254535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028336997,0.000003818316,0.00006516589,0.00003229852,0.000002523873,0.00001782731,0.00004573137,0.0026084152,0.00004375519,0.9941401,0.0030335695,0.0000040186287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007247864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061733444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015964027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004485978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013056744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053404987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184470869","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01347-6","title":"Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Context (archaeology); Truncation (statistics); Ballot; Approval voting; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.034021850469177405,"score_gpt":0.24932158966685053,"score_spread":0.21529973919767312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184470869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39808205,0.010955914,0.29841432,0.13781779,0.0029139204,0.00023694863,0.0014373992,0.0006019415,0.14953975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765464,0.00095992745,0.012689914,0.0015931409,0.0011990194,0.000077189405,0.00019365222,0.000105089464,0.005527563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751477,0.01815492,0.0007106691,0.0023384267,0.002066423,0.0015819115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94769245,0.03598393,0.0054557226,0.004875228,0.003713872,0.0022787473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02510657,0.00090236624,0.004159569,0.0019535164,0.0029127903,0.011125496,0.0027814356,0.0059184628,0.010891406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092634335,0.000847987,0.00089135434,0.0033184811,0.0076506585,0.013620707,0.0016510598,0.0059118313,0.0016696816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005156251,0.00033528075,0.006362896,0.00033603763,0.00045762872,0.00008040029,0.00071071356,0.0065723523,0.0002729347,0.86350113,0.03521534,0.08563975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000547186,0.00003636746,0.0011606668,0.000040860734,0.00005308427,0.00004209813,0.00029940673,0.012408573,0.00007664472,0.9835074,0.0022963341,0.000023866449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030209522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049278643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02510657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029978515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030774157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187284326","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/45","title":"Improving Welfare in One-Sided Matchings using Simple Threshold Queries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Property (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Preference; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pareto principle; Rank (graph theory); Pareto optimal; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Multi-objective optimization; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06142487504616668,"score_gpt":0.23602975909305482,"score_spread":0.17460488404688815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187284326","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10324194,0.0005124341,0.888352,0.0011841799,0.00005665506,0.0001856718,0.00022452173,0.0004464646,0.005796246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76599073,0.00050541305,0.2276727,0.0004992924,0.00012891406,0.0002818149,0.0003512964,0.00019734736,0.0043725255],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126375,0.00515508,0.00041153553,0.0014047795,0.00096812507,0.0007966625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720105,0.021813586,0.0016314134,0.0030666378,0.0006808832,0.00079703925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010111919,0.00142574,0.0033602046,0.0010531694,0.0012761307,0.0037857993,0.003501463,0.0030806768,0.0052387794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040874418,0.0008840317,0.0017328885,0.002601465,0.0028439062,0.011620249,0.004148211,0.0033023343,0.0010213557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013029602,0.00089189515,0.003748314,0.00052061747,0.00026313678,0.00034128508,0.0006691871,0.50059116,0.008549998,0.35765836,0.004631316,0.12083172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011542023,0.00017717923,0.00027423783,0.00002151573,0.00003568582,0.00008408539,0.00009579174,0.5732766,0.0013088752,0.423693,0.0008962376,0.000021373107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012384546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010216609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010111919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023636646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016260148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053477526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190367304","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83508-8_30","title":"Fair Correlation Clustering with Global and Local Guarantees","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster analysis; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Correlation; Partition (number theory); Correlation clustering; Similarity (geometry); k-medians clustering; Constant (computer programming); Statistics; CURE data clustering algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Geometry","score_opus":0.01671011317613314,"score_gpt":0.20613986428411818,"score_spread":0.18942975110798504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190367304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04296941,0.00067382463,0.9276673,0.001379552,0.00016286533,0.00012824913,0.0002908482,0.0007209733,0.026007002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8224307,0.000633003,0.12796803,0.0005835987,0.0004747869,0.000339834,0.00041935692,0.0005029649,0.04664784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632215,0.0013226434,0.00010905639,0.0008148146,0.00082829193,0.0006031118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762947,0.0123197,0.0012543111,0.0069485563,0.0017756871,0.0014071591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005865831,0.00098011,0.003011205,0.0015192118,0.0024652763,0.0041545704,0.004401598,0.0032000958,0.010746355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02816866,0.0009746709,0.001236369,0.0028702945,0.0042828606,0.005418755,0.0042217257,0.0034258298,0.0017881546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014495806,0.000045181958,0.00028435705,0.000059430564,0.00003643163,0.000044006116,0.00008928563,0.08524972,0.00062522857,0.88990164,0.0068389974,0.016680703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035718713,0.000029841425,0.00019847468,0.0000148288955,0.000014773197,0.000045135203,0.00002776163,0.22865222,0.0005008415,0.7685333,0.0019255134,0.00002156602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021520671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029194439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010746355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032327748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029091423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035950184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192149637","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2108.03280","title":"A characterization of lexicographic preferences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Indian Statistical Institute; Jadavpur University","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Characterization (materials science); Preference; Contrast (vision); Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Mathematics; Order (exchange); Computer science; Combinatorics; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1178231074961556,"score_gpt":0.16567796103916402,"score_spread":0.04785485354300842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192149637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20343211,0.0007599393,0.72470415,0.0019722234,0.00007741777,0.00018274761,0.00077419216,0.00014466785,0.067952566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507653,0.00048134883,0.14092097,0.0003103946,0.00016874349,0.00021877927,0.00074256834,0.000054232285,0.0063375775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966667,0.0015872275,0.00025013505,0.00054313254,0.00067760004,0.00027525515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403536,0.0037196102,0.0007387363,0.00060030376,0.00052026205,0.0003858294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002321155,0.00045604803,0.00056716,0.0015651702,0.0009313271,0.0025895282,0.00093908136,0.0009554246,0.008545656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007538713,0.0003362037,0.00060899754,0.0019953705,0.0027943142,0.0066367136,0.0017775071,0.0015315287,0.0010410408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007542254,0.000032247834,0.0015931815,0.00008927287,0.000020564154,0.000111506306,0.0005662296,0.0034499932,0.0021644498,0.9714955,0.00086428504,0.019537421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029036719,0.00008479564,0.001070529,0.000053014133,0.000013988206,0.00036275917,0.0006501721,0.02106815,0.0015198085,0.96303767,0.012084306,0.000025670286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003969262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039470955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008545656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090306206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050969236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028588116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197093030","doi":"","title":"Apprentissage de Vote de Majorité par Minimisation d'une C-Borne PAC-Bayésienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Minimisation (clinical trials); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016302372274597757,"score_gpt":0.20644420765705734,"score_spread":0.1901418353824596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197093030","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07125419,0.0007067502,0.9181637,0.0009375602,0.00028718906,0.00012573216,0.0002142806,0.0011328171,0.007177799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7679513,0.0002707259,0.21801183,0.0003510879,0.00022595267,0.00045989885,0.00040684748,0.0005601894,0.011762154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596065,0.0016734949,0.00018195108,0.0008843602,0.0007011505,0.00059825025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98206586,0.01399661,0.00059318554,0.00083324895,0.001714872,0.0007962098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006881154,0.0015661198,0.0027631747,0.0013862322,0.0011475891,0.0036739067,0.002477622,0.0031725273,0.009284214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024507772,0.00072838523,0.0014681107,0.00071730994,0.0017697825,0.0021192178,0.0022368066,0.0030735473,0.0015093704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001785556,0.0002688272,0.00419756,0.0004185933,0.0003090792,0.00021222199,0.00043037976,0.7026133,0.011809319,0.08230264,0.0063731787,0.18927939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047866954,0.00010826705,0.0006004216,0.00003869544,0.000025665771,0.00006820833,0.0000341631,0.9861741,0.0025081127,0.009589868,0.00078077795,0.000023843299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00845432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007952528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009284214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020917542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003100587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036391437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288619","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.013","title":"Round-robin political tournaments: Abstention, truthful equilibria, and effective power","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tournament; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Microeconomics; Politics; Power (physics); Economics; Nash equilibrium; Majority rule; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.016981974734616632,"score_gpt":0.2334617871221687,"score_spread":0.21647981238755207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198288619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7382397,0.0006180278,0.2102519,0.0037601164,0.00013268064,0.00018195146,0.00025673074,0.00012759138,0.0464313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310946,0.00007676379,0.0047168974,0.00008619171,0.000046681365,0.00005421846,0.000036848884,0.000011390773,0.0018615535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379915,0.003948222,0.000218857,0.0006604631,0.00053696113,0.0008363859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596731,0.030447057,0.004077245,0.0022476136,0.0011996919,0.002355252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079871975,0.0005647966,0.0014207839,0.0009960833,0.0015047358,0.0047085644,0.0020078286,0.0020063242,0.008012077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04413592,0.0004711238,0.00082097546,0.0009840966,0.004442416,0.005167986,0.0017792493,0.0026429673,0.0003485735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005006447,0.00020920389,0.0035169618,0.00008343162,0.00010420086,0.00010729048,0.00058247853,0.015863866,0.000795942,0.9598089,0.0021016507,0.016325494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001228016,0.00006520887,0.0012886269,0.00001214255,0.000026117312,0.00005608237,0.00019838,0.062985495,0.00022587061,0.93436456,0.00063279294,0.000021943037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011930526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017292053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008012077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013965466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012499255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042240858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198807627","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3911298","title":"Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items: Compatibilities and Incompatibilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Arithmetic; Law and economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024772933174460828,"score_gpt":0.2270298119091088,"score_spread":0.20225687873464795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198807627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51585335,0.0005492547,0.35494873,0.0071447426,0.0002336966,0.00038621717,0.00022050159,0.00012365804,0.12053992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97743165,0.00008834316,0.016452573,0.0002079422,0.00007295853,0.00016776021,0.000040764837,0.00002054419,0.005517458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98001397,0.012107038,0.001033706,0.0027242566,0.002202235,0.0019188975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509331,0.034943126,0.0033522437,0.0069618197,0.0017694588,0.0020402507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015720868,0.00062970247,0.0021028956,0.0011826556,0.0030023698,0.009353575,0.002519257,0.005222285,0.01368393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07585274,0.0007685272,0.0013244792,0.0014937181,0.0073709944,0.013346487,0.005260907,0.0043683737,0.00088227005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020531262,0.0000805199,0.0010069596,0.000036867263,0.000029189143,0.0000992896,0.0006226806,0.002762653,0.00037120658,0.98635966,0.000581703,0.007843994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004083182,0.00003087493,0.000320081,0.000013675406,0.000014691577,0.0000649269,0.00020851541,0.01118404,0.00023553893,0.9869544,0.0009193373,0.00001301984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082231936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015720868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017600232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023066313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08314091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199006883","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.156","title":"Vote Trading and Electoral Success in Nigerian Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Context (archaeology); Contingent vote; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Voting; Economics; Political economy; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.061705107488953644,"score_gpt":0.29227724257196225,"score_spread":0.2305721350830086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199006883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904793,0.00025303796,0.00004733139,0.0004156835,0.000016642947,0.000007707002,0.00004734014,0.0000010667777,0.008731833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998914,0.000108379165,0.000013390899,0.000013792985,0.000006697496,0.0000023734078,0.000022304772,8.4323466e-7,0.0009182245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992046,0.00029520443,0.000070953734,0.00006849307,0.0001173416,0.00024343512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419504,0.0022065605,0.0018494853,0.00015216366,0.00034635313,0.0012504514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011871052,0.00010404891,0.00024874302,0.00079885975,0.0014255417,0.0024758042,0.00020625288,0.0005448776,0.00914246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068613924,0.0001238026,0.00018334367,0.0012177107,0.0010528598,0.00082543254,0.0011413596,0.0010713664,0.00082156283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016014586,0.00028942086,0.97850424,0.00003468226,0.00002444807,0.00029069692,0.0043600406,0.00035681445,0.00011500692,0.0045333724,0.0006140283,0.010717258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120038085,0.0001495665,0.97665286,0.0000852405,0.000022757577,0.00033286546,0.015524581,0.0009978707,0.0001122128,0.0021063983,0.0039903177,0.00001337373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051568705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008931119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00914246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065179105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005442851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030584574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201202131","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2109.03370","title":"Monotone Equilibrium in Matching Markets with Signaling","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotone polygon; Communication source; Matching (statistics); Sobel operator; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Strongly monotone; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07155029950719388,"score_gpt":0.16714995270322064,"score_spread":0.09559965319602676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201202131","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19985922,0.0004989483,0.7656421,0.0017813045,0.00008001263,0.0002949307,0.0002834136,0.00024296064,0.031317133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924706,0.0003914531,0.10127249,0.00044434782,0.00015054258,0.00034248643,0.00014232779,0.000043873395,0.004741923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491787,0.0024410845,0.00027464272,0.0007740432,0.0009452988,0.00064703403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924735,0.0044138576,0.0013535979,0.0006275191,0.0006729646,0.00045856673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004787589,0.000910629,0.0014442124,0.0011030813,0.0010440367,0.002947065,0.0018820711,0.002778003,0.005339998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014027019,0.0005455327,0.0014162969,0.0012390021,0.0036276975,0.006633203,0.0021693541,0.0022257545,0.0005493588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005126561,0.00005983711,0.00029937908,0.00007269544,0.000022259796,0.000083981955,0.000115129806,0.016934289,0.001889187,0.9757068,0.0003092765,0.0044559413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059177673,0.00007257802,0.00015762949,0.000015194215,0.000010589421,0.000077978766,0.000048765905,0.12993605,0.00060772686,0.8678223,0.0011740581,0.000017867884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008610032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062878133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005339998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021268104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013110489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025319517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202130907","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_12","title":"On the Complexity of Nucleolus Computation for Bipartite b-Matching Games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Computation; Complement (music); Bounded function; Simple (philosophy); 3-dimensional matching; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Time complexity; Mathematics; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.07190557685468692,"score_gpt":0.254570813321545,"score_spread":0.18266523646685812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202130907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23799141,0.002154105,0.641143,0.010579439,0.00050955877,0.0005576259,0.0030181636,0.0021234935,0.10192315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82690823,0.0015684994,0.14472649,0.001457703,0.0007956496,0.00072161324,0.0028316446,0.0011226141,0.01986751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952136,0.0019909937,0.0002395567,0.0008405819,0.00093394023,0.00078136096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564904,0.036924012,0.0012813847,0.003150818,0.001049414,0.0011039851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032564916,0.0013850795,0.0033368624,0.0016317259,0.0029246383,0.008049372,0.0046464326,0.0034603425,0.02664348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029013166,0.0012523845,0.0025319734,0.0034540584,0.0039127287,0.015147122,0.0054360335,0.005946524,0.0027314045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096872036,0.00032708127,0.0014276252,0.00045875905,0.00013105854,0.00013311213,0.00047270497,0.1032269,0.001935508,0.82866997,0.020653522,0.041595105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060489292,0.000020887363,0.0001778941,0.000025641617,0.00001955819,0.00003102574,0.000053744494,0.15416043,0.00030223036,0.84419197,0.00093689834,0.000019243002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058264523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005854211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02664348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004470544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036887624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089131355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204915051","doi":"","title":"Capacity Expansion in the College Admission Problem.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Mathematical optimization; Cardinality (data modeling); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Quadratic equation; Quality (philosophy); Stability (learning theory); Quadratic growth; Preference; Linear programming; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1265936825835625,"score_gpt":0.17577026081593994,"score_spread":0.04917657823237745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204915051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08147448,0.0016365049,0.8785077,0.0035310215,0.0002608167,0.00053369283,0.0009847843,0.00034267074,0.032728452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8439919,0.0011425803,0.13539362,0.00072990876,0.0002767796,0.0004953874,0.0008498446,0.00016962578,0.01695037],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978828,0.0011503882,0.00005179969,0.00036048505,0.00019772665,0.0003568392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689496,0.0023251604,0.00021980505,0.00011079983,0.00016027999,0.00028894702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022038177,0.0010190227,0.0013259407,0.0008461544,0.00092405535,0.0018822852,0.0018365976,0.0021745749,0.016196731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007639498,0.0006185515,0.0010110037,0.0018831454,0.0016853028,0.003162488,0.0017604966,0.0028188655,0.0008875512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030304713,0.00025972637,0.0010612354,0.00032426947,0.00007038967,0.00019507465,0.00012795467,0.8017761,0.0011173522,0.13347545,0.010840809,0.050448496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008240195,0.00010840864,0.0005031648,0.000047438432,0.00003187035,0.00016198393,0.0001746202,0.8467082,0.0007313709,0.14627145,0.0051486227,0.000030454348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059318678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005603244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016196731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020933682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020888438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054183424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211019765","doi":"10.3982/te4229","title":"Robust group strategy‐proofness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Interim; Property (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Social choice theory; Allotment; Mathematical economics; Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Incentive; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.044134648956625,"score_gpt":0.2061035979562817,"score_spread":0.1619689489996567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211019765","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053176552,0.00030306526,0.9151296,0.0024868266,0.00011480681,0.00030126996,0.00051853224,0.000637036,0.027332282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8171729,0.00053015497,0.17146614,0.0011371518,0.00022985636,0.00069274317,0.00062942813,0.0002450942,0.007896503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906427,0.0022658329,0.0008041629,0.0029023772,0.0024383802,0.0009464919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96385676,0.017678821,0.005015502,0.008067729,0.004377441,0.0010036769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008914547,0.0010456399,0.0018507517,0.0013801359,0.0012814746,0.0045518964,0.0023439038,0.0025215116,0.00807376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039397758,0.00061663205,0.0028348404,0.001313136,0.005580597,0.0074115046,0.0037071912,0.00422986,0.0018459248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074895426,0.0000792906,0.00065234775,0.00015633204,0.000099262244,0.0002445989,0.0004001148,0.009975702,0.003004998,0.96400607,0.0018769428,0.01942949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009101481,0.00009255041,0.00019358749,0.000029818239,0.00002695727,0.00019148289,0.000049835297,0.031600263,0.0027987908,0.96066844,0.004230431,0.00002684019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062884664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003231973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008914547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014743416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002538114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047145188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213371989","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2111.08698","title":"On the Randomized Metric Distortion Conjecture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Conjecture; Metric (unit); Social choice theory; Function (biology); Mathematics; Distortion function; Preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Operations management","score_opus":0.07615307681666038,"score_gpt":0.16187889345344364,"score_spread":0.08572581663678326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213371989","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12498547,0.00315748,0.7387889,0.02909136,0.0005819392,0.00035327784,0.0017704335,0.0005469556,0.10072432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87431586,0.0016622329,0.09978084,0.004437682,0.00074482715,0.00066946255,0.0012680345,0.00032220353,0.016798815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876609,0.0058607548,0.0005196619,0.0023739669,0.0026138576,0.0009707312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687247,0.020593697,0.0021757258,0.0057254373,0.0019334345,0.00084697566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012015102,0.0011828555,0.0026817394,0.0011400149,0.0018145295,0.0042170594,0.0030871476,0.0029030694,0.008719369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046831924,0.00067721715,0.0019169196,0.0018060361,0.0066350787,0.009318755,0.004520743,0.0062090377,0.0014854203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024025957,0.00005707759,0.00077978807,0.00009318624,0.00005749695,0.000045795605,0.00009395572,0.024056794,0.00046358566,0.9571926,0.005041508,0.011878023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006346407,0.000040223742,0.000322904,0.000026135676,0.000011646525,0.00009581583,0.000038242553,0.043069486,0.00040167067,0.9522219,0.0036887662,0.000019877267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021985027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012622627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012015102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006095392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024920802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06354272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215512069","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2023.105618","title":"Strategy-proof and envy-free random assignment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Unanimity; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Infinity; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03504836832287392,"score_gpt":0.23293383839418597,"score_spread":0.19788547007131205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215512069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1544572,0.000636831,0.7717972,0.00860077,0.00025368956,0.0004099356,0.00082807854,0.00045135088,0.062565036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312983,0.00053178135,0.040605128,0.0011548917,0.000331597,0.00044361496,0.00035861434,0.00016052228,0.025115615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903245,0.00497921,0.00045900236,0.0012438502,0.0014268825,0.0015664739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93352604,0.051398765,0.0035306155,0.0055345194,0.0037453272,0.0022647178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00962508,0.0014200081,0.0036924845,0.001725653,0.0028848394,0.0056642173,0.0041425987,0.0052667973,0.011859853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07108333,0.0015937187,0.001957998,0.0020838096,0.0064470484,0.0098888995,0.0038319558,0.005802356,0.0016809618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034256,0.00008797394,0.00037552536,0.00006322563,0.000033287204,0.00009792166,0.00023097945,0.013075318,0.00026406444,0.9790861,0.0022217133,0.0043604975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054895154,0.00001574812,0.00008394887,0.00000978284,0.000008240656,0.00004223888,0.000029781011,0.034436032,0.00009378883,0.96474487,0.0004682468,0.000012453229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034002445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023980048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011859853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028381136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049513583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050902903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32690299","doi":"10.1007/s11518-012-5198-x","title":"Dominating attitudes in the graph model for conflict resolution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Decision maker; Perspective (graphical); Conflict resolution; Property (philosophy); Resolution (logic); Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.07152593094850482,"score_gpt":0.2571470287020526,"score_spread":0.18562109775354776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32690299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33919513,0.0006651904,0.6126068,0.0046193586,0.00018210078,0.0001445272,0.000516592,0.00023292776,0.04183723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95348644,0.00047702104,0.025658123,0.00043387778,0.00013684684,0.00014710815,0.00029194882,0.0000922152,0.01927651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812466,0.0011529144,0.00004891787,0.00024146655,0.00015443722,0.00027760683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885229,0.0089734895,0.00061515457,0.00051181595,0.0005456848,0.0008310184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029024153,0.0010330476,0.002283106,0.0015787646,0.0018070464,0.003783755,0.0031632427,0.0034240363,0.012810825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013310887,0.00073213346,0.0011970908,0.0015987151,0.0026230672,0.0052467273,0.0016629464,0.0031901575,0.0012553517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013367923,0.000094553696,0.0008404777,0.00006722494,0.000058794107,0.00013632764,0.00035456012,0.12407189,0.0004444478,0.86314595,0.0030070732,0.0076450426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005885476,0.000021695172,0.00018493412,0.000010327848,0.000022830794,0.000036292193,0.00010176242,0.39253762,0.00006959663,0.6061997,0.00073543016,0.000020997823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006784596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006712175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012810825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00201584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012221291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042856455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350411819","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2194458","title":"Quantile Stable Matchings for Markets with Contracts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Air Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Business; Economics; Financial economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01595657962784045,"score_gpt":0.21454366662797783,"score_spread":0.19858708700013739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350411819","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24208657,0.0008250124,0.73786086,0.002647774,0.00011971648,0.00019395817,0.00065129116,0.00056617893,0.015048745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474347,0.00055225304,0.032484036,0.00037513525,0.0002116876,0.00020313909,0.0005622738,0.00017572749,0.018000983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973761,0.0011552161,0.00012813523,0.00044308227,0.0003389059,0.00055858016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803822,0.012393764,0.0027834373,0.0016730791,0.0013129368,0.0014546405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006441736,0.0006700586,0.0030482013,0.0021318803,0.0019835664,0.0044097556,0.0028900346,0.0032576337,0.0174942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04405119,0.0009102386,0.0013573348,0.0027462612,0.0028908963,0.0062839617,0.002716437,0.0028061927,0.0013092621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015210622,0.00007190384,0.0012501153,0.000054034885,0.00003870001,0.00008030171,0.0001953798,0.023826899,0.0005360203,0.95946395,0.0030226924,0.011307801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005214014,0.000020211019,0.00042355672,0.000010289862,0.00000895878,0.000025048555,0.000052354997,0.11867143,0.00011373356,0.8801039,0.00050394394,0.000014312951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024426512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002012445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0174942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021918393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018073304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058523953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W360948712","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511735127.012","title":"Free cumulants: definition and basic properties","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulant; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.05868647486668859,"score_gpt":0.16702277967594256,"score_spread":0.10833630480925396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W360948712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028334877,0.013577869,0.77560145,0.001824705,0.0007938586,0.000097340664,0.001022591,0.0005407075,0.17820668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6527712,0.018778618,0.23904517,0.0014317443,0.0038496347,0.00049132155,0.0014867106,0.001128358,0.08101719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990237,0.0002930399,0.00005911476,0.00013787115,0.00037173205,0.000114700815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655247,0.0022410273,0.00028050094,0.00033292273,0.00045658374,0.00013660853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016935405,0.00091270235,0.00075680163,0.0031378097,0.0008204596,0.0031938064,0.0009461034,0.0010139351,0.008158987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00827715,0.0003491872,0.0008875622,0.0030684932,0.0023437107,0.0028854131,0.0010402001,0.0021678375,0.0029830048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010031586,0.000009304957,0.00008181551,0.000057592897,0.0000068865775,0.000038515995,0.00008478439,0.0015285857,0.0005345003,0.9762013,0.0036942402,0.017752506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007926721,0.000017240754,0.00028787556,0.000039502283,0.000008483474,0.00018163635,0.000026770293,0.01665178,0.0005769632,0.9625665,0.019612439,0.000022977141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009914492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007572612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008158987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087420695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075693615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027294517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W380080350","doi":"10.32219/isms.69.3_387","title":"TALMUDIC BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM : SPECIAL AND GENERAL SOLUTIONS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientiae mathematicae Japonicae","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Talmud; Bankruptcy; Proportionality (law); Law; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Egalitarianism; Economic Justice; Judaism; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03340314164703588,"score_gpt":0.22614572517736134,"score_spread":0.19274258353032547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W380080350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09032406,0.007482125,0.3508872,0.04671715,0.0019314458,0.00034370704,0.0014207728,0.00062138354,0.50027215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.751741,0.0049431296,0.1094789,0.004229821,0.0033521277,0.00054920727,0.0015915772,0.00014830216,0.12396595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983759,0.00041484294,0.00013077898,0.00042347345,0.0003984882,0.00025655245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838734,0.000625559,0.00020361212,0.0002615873,0.00034270616,0.0001792966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624899,0.0007787128,0.0011344316,0.0016954909,0.001788004,0.003521999,0.001696395,0.0034750672,0.020321282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007461717,0.00045650644,0.0012728628,0.0020881502,0.00490538,0.004337515,0.0037111808,0.004834037,0.0013542953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013350634,0.000018575263,0.000320572,0.000059736456,0.000009288663,0.00020243844,0.00015557832,0.002009034,0.00005027499,0.9692923,0.014065092,0.0138038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014512388,0.000009594664,0.00026190435,0.00004229777,0.00000666347,0.0003474447,0.00015906313,0.006593672,0.00008146922,0.96773034,0.024739675,0.000013337142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028033906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001908206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020321282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025549668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016859343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06798148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40976406","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_3","title":"Plurality Voting with Truth-Biased Agents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Equilibrium selection; Voting; Best response; Risk dominance; Correlated equilibrium; Condorcet method; Focus (optics); Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Repeated game","score_opus":0.04036305987728673,"score_gpt":0.22466575303443995,"score_spread":0.18430269315715322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40976406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19629821,0.0009796512,0.67667377,0.009418896,0.000538949,0.00022386809,0.00028200733,0.00020526254,0.115379356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126128,0.00032761053,0.056253843,0.0006230392,0.00050840195,0.00017835875,0.00017245267,0.000080502534,0.029242942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542345,0.009161426,0.00060660887,0.0015780829,0.0020258145,0.001204705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576259,0.031782366,0.0022495068,0.005451456,0.00181794,0.0010727651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014047384,0.000569733,0.0014603741,0.0008287877,0.0022175172,0.004946073,0.0019773487,0.0033246928,0.009139281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0569566,0.00073303055,0.0008926794,0.0012648369,0.0033152653,0.005408026,0.0031067217,0.0036704824,0.0015852842],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023883468,0.00005722752,0.0011392852,0.00008853155,0.0000654256,0.00018457403,0.0007077707,0.01309732,0.0008307705,0.94921565,0.0045048986,0.02986959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004425836,0.000016445834,0.00013743216,0.000011983931,0.000010670618,0.000056806806,0.00007155847,0.03699721,0.00032123606,0.960366,0.0019571574,0.0000092139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048173926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073225284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014047384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013166242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092642853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07429057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213194262","doi":"10.1007/s00453-019-00636-y","title":"Stable Matchings with Covering Constraints: A Complete Computational Trichotomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Algorithmica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Trichotomy (philosophy); Parameterized complexity; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Time complexity; Bipartite graph; Stable marriage problem; Theory of computation; Discrete mathematics; Corollary; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Graph; Statistics","score_opus":0.03579816660532784,"score_gpt":0.20107689903845288,"score_spread":0.16527873243312505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213194262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09142114,0.001016143,0.84167475,0.017898668,0.00023518903,0.0012233447,0.0060933884,0.0030889495,0.037348453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45234063,0.0016889077,0.5122153,0.004286734,0.0010308294,0.0023524123,0.00909988,0.0017831097,0.015202119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909774,0.0028055417,0.0005992617,0.0024157066,0.0019907288,0.0012113123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95538,0.036824197,0.0015104113,0.004354939,0.0011400672,0.0007904512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048343516,0.0021838935,0.0034585933,0.0016858203,0.0025211857,0.008276094,0.0064060395,0.003971564,0.030003669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028906362,0.0017553889,0.007891786,0.0035657468,0.003375799,0.017042082,0.007155932,0.010837203,0.0036397614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001181691,0.0009872899,0.0035034858,0.002311938,0.00038869394,0.0008039078,0.0014617187,0.12058732,0.0074532577,0.7205806,0.041300803,0.09943932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024166833,0.000095653675,0.00040628138,0.00008160115,0.00009770142,0.00033355126,0.00019629142,0.18622743,0.0015774273,0.80321884,0.0074664545,0.000057116762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044672117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043855584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030003669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004760298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100372255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213232880","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2022.109432","title":"On negative dependence inequalities and maximal scores in round-robin tournaments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Extension (predicate logic); Convergence (economics); Inequality; Combinatorics; Joint probability distribution; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Calculus (dental); Mathematical analysis; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.03811256103290133,"score_gpt":0.23507721129473566,"score_spread":0.19696465026183432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213232880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72217435,0.0009569398,0.21918128,0.00442574,0.0001357358,0.000090515816,0.0006593069,0.00024266899,0.052133493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853194,0.000280826,0.0065530245,0.0002766803,0.000179914,0.00009370634,0.00032682964,0.000080982456,0.0068886676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431854,0.0031835092,0.00019782757,0.000662865,0.00053890154,0.0010984056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8769189,0.10310147,0.0065978453,0.003837933,0.0030800481,0.0064638173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008384195,0.0014365413,0.0035559896,0.0023894145,0.0029172918,0.005052255,0.004455925,0.0024948413,0.012328712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0550204,0.0015367116,0.0014331478,0.0024692558,0.00832591,0.008009811,0.0038334045,0.0059170565,0.00075908046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004998141,0.0001950537,0.0031367661,0.00009026087,0.000058702626,0.0001495901,0.0005669026,0.01707177,0.00079973694,0.9689493,0.0026671577,0.005814881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008941457,0.000057734018,0.0016081621,0.000025446261,0.00002826245,0.0000592366,0.00012691223,0.090824455,0.00020097531,0.90651244,0.00043285365,0.00003415145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054766615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005155569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012328712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027806817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017142278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04434043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226160054","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01563-w","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Voting; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.07287673766957566,"score_gpt":0.2881955577613382,"score_spread":0.21531882009176256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226160054","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31598863,0.00029046755,0.65432763,0.0011531413,0.00007922273,0.00051416387,0.00024517375,0.0004216539,0.026979908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437154,0.00006458647,0.05321674,0.0001241688,0.000044887405,0.0001966815,0.00023127672,0.000042997413,0.0023632774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662474,0.024394616,0.001130752,0.0025932859,0.0038041712,0.0018298811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9269424,0.052674323,0.0052489345,0.008931272,0.0047304407,0.0014726188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02201922,0.00050875265,0.0017345812,0.0011514889,0.001093545,0.0029794925,0.0023491213,0.0017140426,0.004582724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07469912,0.00043613312,0.00086797064,0.0015236948,0.0019008559,0.0034448893,0.002186528,0.002388177,0.0010221257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002407113,0.00064771087,0.0101664765,0.00035765863,0.00024996282,0.00027559628,0.0013015398,0.26366547,0.0053637163,0.48388153,0.006963927,0.22471935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025985224,0.00037859855,0.0014146642,0.00004940748,0.000055675755,0.000113391194,0.0002361267,0.69990873,0.003350225,0.29047796,0.0037140523,0.000041299216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013448405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011134694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02201922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013848165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11645019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226169032","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4050685","title":"Interval Aggregation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016323225682411218,"score_gpt":0.20794675138680682,"score_spread":0.19162352570439561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226169032","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03157812,0.0011140046,0.83668774,0.0006274436,0.00085105945,0.00020410275,0.0022571476,0.0017987106,0.1248816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6076231,0.0011487287,0.3118777,0.00058609695,0.0013524326,0.0004496303,0.0069906507,0.0007709428,0.06920075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984927,0.0003672459,0.00014511571,0.0004294465,0.0004179458,0.00014757861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589694,0.00110717,0.0003147009,0.0016485641,0.000796679,0.00023590967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012735006,0.00054514565,0.0010374098,0.0021044742,0.0010252397,0.0027195986,0.0009557364,0.0008382226,0.032622684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009814283,0.00029153982,0.0009130529,0.0028122799,0.00049927225,0.0023363426,0.0018274036,0.0013719288,0.007374606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023109623,0.00012872161,0.001693902,0.00016417148,0.00007834361,0.00011078151,0.00025666342,0.011049257,0.0026277234,0.65416986,0.031660564,0.29782882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046730616,0.0001177904,0.0015337043,0.00007326883,0.000065132095,0.00025654308,0.00014632211,0.102673404,0.002356544,0.830126,0.06256686,0.000037839418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062566623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056639314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032622684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051314634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004914812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10913378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226355997","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2022.06.009","title":"On the population monotonicity of independent set games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Monotonic function; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Population; Mathematical economics; Profit (economics); Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10093682790227854,"score_gpt":0.315773368045517,"score_spread":0.21483654014323844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226355997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1602848,0.0019910308,0.70395243,0.008747812,0.0004323629,0.00032943385,0.0007883625,0.00018195825,0.12329187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8701417,0.003601371,0.09524261,0.0024869374,0.0011275162,0.0010456531,0.0008783954,0.00035787432,0.025117967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935324,0.003822914,0.0002762853,0.0007120442,0.0008278275,0.00082840165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171444,0.07192392,0.0029944766,0.002380145,0.0036537393,0.0019032226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009236067,0.0014177819,0.0040411027,0.0022041188,0.0023264694,0.0046383464,0.004093204,0.0028240397,0.015821911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05724398,0.0013248263,0.0028988502,0.0022313474,0.0062580123,0.010808274,0.0038571132,0.007598203,0.0013914104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008153761,0.00009152888,0.0008346844,0.000101646256,0.000042222844,0.0001077492,0.00030629156,0.016603071,0.0004410375,0.9704577,0.0031450859,0.007787508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003940015,0.000033525168,0.00036743112,0.00004108318,0.000017640712,0.00007656027,0.000096631,0.098847255,0.00015877157,0.8986565,0.0016435843,0.000021559896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004462847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002687308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015821911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027234836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029448743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05292952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229665373","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.18","title":"Matching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06145682647873667,"score_gpt":0.22515931104917372,"score_spread":0.16370248457043707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229665373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075681806,0.001719989,0.13128312,0.0043905275,0.0007149303,0.00026402748,0.0030417647,0.0010821312,0.84993535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23196435,0.0036719625,0.04987906,0.0029995749,0.0005296804,0.0004837256,0.0072901286,0.0006643563,0.70251715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862266,0.0003921726,0.00007661437,0.0003469604,0.00031786648,0.00024369228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.0001976216,0.00007188231,0.00028903582,0.00013193244,0.00009574746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085120177,0.00059455953,0.00069334905,0.0008901725,0.0014565527,0.003916144,0.0017205129,0.0021936116,0.1755115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043593408,0.00036371851,0.00088187074,0.0020210412,0.0010032405,0.005044715,0.0022276083,0.0015707756,0.052606907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035625104,0.000038166138,0.00029688393,0.00006880081,0.000016274824,0.00006599878,0.0001126174,0.0019789874,0.00023429058,0.8719513,0.075740464,0.04946061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025513678,0.000022616246,0.0003963143,0.00008205099,0.000012087007,0.00023291129,0.00012098569,0.00694357,0.00032990353,0.59373504,0.39808202,0.000016967984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002026472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019897693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1755115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017692551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012037146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230565990","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5","title":"Voting Experiments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05353734937599922,"score_gpt":0.23408007346276782,"score_spread":0.1805427240867686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230565990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1086786,0.0012904818,0.088103585,0.006465831,0.0038184547,0.0031490945,0.005975216,0.0015880085,0.78093076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5775505,0.00094033236,0.029640358,0.0054730256,0.00079641846,0.004042358,0.005746235,0.00056530995,0.37524548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962521,0.0017115319,0.0001857169,0.00067988224,0.0008625152,0.00030811934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975974,0.0050805756,0.0004181131,0.0032496091,0.0009227611,0.000569128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048049297,0.00056546455,0.00070675777,0.0006128393,0.0014468245,0.0015971069,0.0014627317,0.0016602704,0.100172505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01886913,0.0003123873,0.000492253,0.0007448863,0.0015852262,0.0019301067,0.0013086038,0.0022795973,0.017193444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003907678,0.004501701,0.0028618455,0.00065830606,0.0001766514,0.00014413563,0.0009856056,0.0032319864,0.009263515,0.5073742,0.23907664,0.2278177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023957717,0.003669126,0.005125156,0.00022839301,0.00015861102,0.00036029215,0.00061267766,0.0075734565,0.017577536,0.43914938,0.52305174,0.00009780488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009069407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013333694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100172505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011949053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009347447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33511043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231059948","doi":"10.7202/000442ar","title":"Sélection rationnelle","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24059152439023165,"score_gpt":0.31791780072729886,"score_spread":0.0773262763370672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231059948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0909824,0.0030919295,0.25300667,0.019891601,0.0007178109,0.00024983985,0.00045085597,0.00019078648,0.6314181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690017,0.0015267452,0.031533238,0.0029198641,0.0005441162,0.00032182003,0.00016844604,0.000113999005,0.09387016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414474,0.0020573798,0.00026120854,0.0014925166,0.0014766653,0.0005675217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475515,0.0025670659,0.0006410954,0.0009492195,0.0009211033,0.00016638877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051142555,0.0003496217,0.00078761793,0.00090991124,0.001174278,0.0035543984,0.0007921601,0.0014313032,0.015191239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011005643,0.0002949681,0.00082016224,0.0008793854,0.005521313,0.0034066655,0.0018129357,0.0022523273,0.0019204353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011588593,0.000008769447,0.00046334817,0.00002756248,0.000010883497,0.000022987755,0.00014751381,0.0004262063,0.00023845959,0.9919065,0.000989632,0.0057465774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026164984,0.00003147884,0.0010315467,0.000028674716,0.00001259744,0.00015188337,0.00015655781,0.002700087,0.0006967976,0.9560976,0.03905139,0.000015166762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022238926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015817704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015191239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002460597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016228365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050819695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235629671","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.09","title":"A market","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.053550745367935255,"score_gpt":0.21703469778265122,"score_spread":0.16348395241471597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235629671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058466448,0.003394506,0.067347966,0.010958634,0.0011530939,0.00027693936,0.0030509734,0.0009358495,0.9070354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20098716,0.006766409,0.041845378,0.004235272,0.001079168,0.00060360186,0.0036818094,0.0003848305,0.7404163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941635,0.00012873171,0.000027830758,0.00018815267,0.00016496658,0.00007395063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996216,0.00009307248,0.000036749545,0.0001101767,0.0000691739,0.000069297115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056906306,0.00070228754,0.00056426553,0.0007793,0.0015071206,0.0055674193,0.0016450415,0.0028933974,0.13479613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015539504,0.00033562776,0.0009116333,0.0010827035,0.0014750403,0.008078841,0.0017052217,0.001984263,0.032786578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012304426,0.000023014125,0.00008868629,0.00003378701,0.000008086434,0.00007728645,0.000061630824,0.00070428057,0.00021408718,0.94864106,0.04041562,0.009720212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024072304,0.000027055617,0.00017044548,0.00007113578,0.000010372283,0.0002217303,0.00009283235,0.0048450218,0.00024076951,0.55036414,0.44391614,0.000016235344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018605199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014874161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13479613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013279712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012011611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235702973","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.18","title":"Matching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06145682647873667,"score_gpt":0.22515931104917372,"score_spread":0.16370248457043707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235702973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075681806,0.001719989,0.13128312,0.0043905275,0.0007149303,0.00026402748,0.0030417647,0.0010821312,0.84993535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23196435,0.0036719625,0.04987906,0.0029995749,0.0005296804,0.0004837256,0.0072901286,0.0006643563,0.70251715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862266,0.0003921726,0.00007661437,0.0003469604,0.00031786648,0.00024369228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.0001976216,0.00007188231,0.00028903582,0.00013193244,0.00009574746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085120177,0.00059455953,0.00069334905,0.0008901725,0.0014565527,0.003916144,0.0017205129,0.0021936116,0.1755115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043593408,0.00036371851,0.00088187074,0.0020210412,0.0010032405,0.005044715,0.0022276083,0.0015707756,0.052606907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035625104,0.000038166138,0.00029688393,0.00006880081,0.000016274824,0.00006599878,0.0001126174,0.0019789874,0.00023429058,0.8719513,0.075740464,0.04946061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025513678,0.000022616246,0.0003963143,0.00008205099,0.000012087007,0.00023291129,0.00012098569,0.00694357,0.00032990353,0.59373504,0.39808202,0.000016967984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002026472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019897693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1755115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017692551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012037146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237555792","doi":"10.24124/2013/bpgub933","title":"An analysis on sub-regional voting scheme.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; University of Northern British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ranked voting system; Hierarchy; Computer science; Noise (video); Disapproval voting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031273530079378525,"score_gpt":0.2520585772242358,"score_spread":0.22078504714485728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237555792","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21307947,0.0014539168,0.69798195,0.0035258953,0.0001723891,0.00024605598,0.0006488795,0.00014324415,0.08274821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94511324,0.00051871606,0.029180396,0.0002269352,0.000056220884,0.00010883995,0.00024047508,0.00005750612,0.02449759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748456,0.0010804448,0.00008921486,0.0004602586,0.00048387997,0.00040172023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379224,0.0028752955,0.0011085372,0.00082322245,0.0010329876,0.00036776921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004176419,0.0002649634,0.0005831484,0.0010988886,0.0007841756,0.001572647,0.0016645526,0.0010639,0.015965743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011325975,0.00023130898,0.001394935,0.0011956572,0.0014739106,0.0033097097,0.0011558348,0.0016427594,0.0013659474],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092687886,0.00004637469,0.01143697,0.00008527757,0.0000824803,0.00013413563,0.0004639648,0.051722538,0.001602675,0.8903598,0.0033027867,0.04067023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003683218,0.00016931545,0.011279141,0.000074440315,0.00012046359,0.00034917187,0.0005094571,0.46563637,0.0026648063,0.49657565,0.022534447,0.000049890958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047942637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015965743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028960248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010010579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05341071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237813984","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.08","title":"A jungle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06834580833050612,"score_gpt":0.2208226525039916,"score_spread":0.1524768441734855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237813984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022886305,0.025325041,0.037475385,0.01985064,0.004117591,0.000083378865,0.0011514456,0.00086943235,0.90883857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047274683,0.025686733,0.024427745,0.0068654157,0.0025206355,0.00022406461,0.0015860287,0.00087612134,0.8905386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996691,0.000082580074,0.000012014705,0.000075117765,0.00012327087,0.000038034555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996414,0.00014281615,0.000019277548,0.000061567494,0.000079253434,0.00005564584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047502518,0.0007960253,0.00045731547,0.0011309907,0.0014138536,0.0052309777,0.00090730883,0.0013881531,0.06661616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013620723,0.0004118742,0.0005713211,0.0011970807,0.0015000892,0.007508932,0.0017784821,0.0033979316,0.024629656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068266404,0.0000119076785,0.00005346891,0.000048315316,0.0000034449422,0.000042282063,0.00023930948,0.00040218636,0.00014383066,0.8137439,0.155948,0.029356627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018352367,0.0000058882692,0.000055158907,0.00008547237,0.0000012452556,0.0000721789,0.00007722293,0.0005495033,0.000051159997,0.21559645,0.7834991,0.0000046772698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016107629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025365767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06661616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018050522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012387931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238383256","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.16","title":"Extensive games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05984354255903021,"score_gpt":0.2260839841525457,"score_spread":0.16624044159351548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238383256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007324683,0.00993441,0.160386,0.006737175,0.00078549853,0.00020058827,0.0020681054,0.0005095861,0.8120539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41182202,0.020434482,0.07767515,0.004094892,0.0011673908,0.000816981,0.0035651338,0.00029385887,0.48013008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992218,0.0002973323,0.00004040163,0.00013234405,0.00022057415,0.00008751062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994855,0.00027139147,0.000042305455,0.00008177033,0.00007006979,0.0000489082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005897867,0.0010398474,0.00072343566,0.00060538785,0.0009370909,0.0032691795,0.0010904414,0.0015315295,0.037323274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001958146,0.00034909797,0.000546891,0.0009269472,0.0014621761,0.0031302925,0.0013863808,0.0021068107,0.007797344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006514121,0.00001087195,0.00005023501,0.00004234644,0.000007590821,0.00003986739,0.00006670257,0.0022911904,0.00010955459,0.9644659,0.022409659,0.010499603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011988288,0.000011822073,0.00011086715,0.000053293814,0.000005688914,0.00009049775,0.000050422062,0.0057180575,0.00008494652,0.8485521,0.14530234,0.000007853493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014823759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019745925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037323274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015494616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086645316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12485874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241625290","doi":"10.1007/s11238-004-5641-7","title":"The dynamic stability of coalitionist behaviour for two-strategy bimatrix games","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.029289359964888618,"score_gpt":0.28302498621405237,"score_spread":0.25373562624916374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241625290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61086154,0.00041990678,0.3552156,0.0024978777,0.00007872077,0.00013975558,0.00033153556,0.00012264257,0.030332383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98415506,0.00018250901,0.010692839,0.00007880014,0.00003869134,0.00012474338,0.00012705836,0.000033383298,0.004566985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977235,0.0010406385,0.000111861475,0.00041688507,0.00032455788,0.00038246278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97813624,0.016624609,0.0020086796,0.0010026415,0.0011048658,0.0011230026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039506084,0.0005920635,0.0015906661,0.0014086269,0.0020466987,0.004116848,0.0024477292,0.0021615503,0.007529019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03218396,0.0007147143,0.0011428844,0.0011778679,0.0043585068,0.005956804,0.0025501614,0.0026719535,0.0005235391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023698679,0.00006648649,0.0010219817,0.0000725321,0.000059968577,0.000106620464,0.0006867797,0.048984148,0.0012933982,0.9404811,0.0011465104,0.0058434396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005044045,0.00003537234,0.00041193527,0.000013333992,0.000012649607,0.000046783935,0.00020153794,0.24464676,0.00023635654,0.7537362,0.0005823874,0.000026186557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056317737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030078955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007529019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002454913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018822288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025187075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241797199","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.19","title":"Socialism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Political science; Law; Communism","score_opus":0.0766006217045467,"score_gpt":0.23182244797729828,"score_spread":0.15522182627275158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241797199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030156472,0.0020942546,0.01906803,0.00764516,0.00035925824,0.00003650019,0.00031183413,0.00012553195,0.9673439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42801726,0.0064922366,0.020440677,0.0042513506,0.000865828,0.00022862939,0.00094001053,0.00025315955,0.53851086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938154,0.00025314203,0.000019563979,0.00012337393,0.00015088638,0.00007138307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.00013781039,0.00003029921,0.00009533528,0.000062363884,0.00004271643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000619206,0.00045675435,0.00029135172,0.0005888944,0.001418595,0.0031684344,0.0005245336,0.0011584113,0.029443415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012030574,0.00018946054,0.0004898312,0.00060103374,0.0033858712,0.0029302195,0.001435742,0.0016438884,0.0059423028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012727661,0.0000026615794,0.000028586255,0.000009673978,0.0000018327639,0.000007044233,0.00011561336,0.00015570228,0.000026171952,0.98632056,0.009342811,0.0039879177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026670593,0.0000044075823,0.000097098404,0.00003122681,0.0000018217552,0.00003736611,0.00009972671,0.00046935433,0.00004647982,0.779172,0.22003517,0.0000027895205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018012723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022175987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029443415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002278953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009264258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243656117","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2916337","title":"Raffles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.025573351925322393,"score_gpt":0.2343699793679493,"score_spread":0.2087966274426269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243656117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013427578,0.0014521285,0.005774802,0.0044650203,0.0019838996,0.000045980138,0.002953062,0.0030938792,0.97888845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066080317,0.00065323757,0.001771478,0.0006384364,0.0002598065,0.000035764453,0.0015487582,0.0006305972,0.9878539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.00007509751,0.000024363622,0.00014859624,0.00023360712,0.000078873796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886155,0.00023698433,0.00006342988,0.0003195265,0.00025788613,0.00026053935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066384947,0.00088848994,0.00057432865,0.0023935908,0.0013429092,0.0033691432,0.0012320188,0.0018922213,0.7209082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003360307,0.00030223053,0.0005347716,0.0012106448,0.0006355982,0.0025793016,0.0017447385,0.0014189226,0.58363974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059336406,0.000050282328,0.00032905448,0.00011136043,0.000008679969,0.000117231015,0.00009821677,0.00032262583,0.00048826603,0.0611166,0.66661066,0.2706877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007188662,0.000006899911,0.00015127649,0.000036441612,0.0000020918942,0.000076588585,0.000026638148,0.00016465381,0.00018717174,0.0069411118,0.9923947,0.0000051446286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019785517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034060245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075732433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009670178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243955477","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.7797","title":"Turnout and Voting Methods in the United States - How Shiny is the Shining City?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Ballot; Presidential election; Context (archaeology); Politics; Socioeconomic status; Political science; Presidential system; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Statistics; Law; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2792489263635988,"score_gpt":0.41856187359599845,"score_spread":0.13931294723239962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243955477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98580015,0.0022876326,0.0006900352,0.0017585437,0.00003066924,0.000007906556,0.0001502989,0.000013316146,0.00926145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976549,0.000444334,0.00018063436,0.000054247233,0.000012539454,0.000003841138,0.00008443528,0.0000048880565,0.0015601101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983353,0.0010067718,0.000046651825,0.00012707793,0.00023055193,0.00025367946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909958,0.0055038673,0.0016213075,0.0002589286,0.0009403466,0.0006796916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027793823,0.00013292527,0.00031442926,0.0013251058,0.0010763997,0.001963821,0.00028195584,0.00037887637,0.002786988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009341507,0.000141842,0.00024723806,0.001902695,0.0010818033,0.00056398247,0.0009554269,0.0007001635,0.00022399567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007309688,0.00022869934,0.8821471,0.00014480589,0.0002719179,0.00021490997,0.010796644,0.004913801,0.0007208829,0.01570626,0.0042154547,0.07990854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019996602,0.00018112996,0.975037,0.00008440139,0.000069930655,0.00006425072,0.010108415,0.0029667146,0.0004921238,0.003373563,0.007575992,0.000026477253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096227735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18466377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096227735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028213032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008089095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19133526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244809592","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.01","title":"Preferences and utility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.09362604386414197,"score_gpt":0.2297140213759319,"score_spread":0.13608797751178991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244809592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013842491,0.032051384,0.09912998,0.020674253,0.00075804454,0.00007528512,0.0010152448,0.00019972565,0.8322535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5965027,0.036374494,0.042552367,0.005000925,0.0014245352,0.00025505765,0.0014495912,0.00020087844,0.31623936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.00036056264,0.000023702483,0.0001090646,0.00016371222,0.00008248856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.0002285087,0.000035987385,0.000058494454,0.000054832566,0.00004579637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007874513,0.000707069,0.0005075466,0.00064005004,0.00086611963,0.0043782294,0.0005843925,0.001536223,0.01774189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025927126,0.00028799268,0.00040955402,0.0013927474,0.00201641,0.0047280304,0.0012428155,0.002487108,0.003838948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003962703,0.0000064363476,0.000090457994,0.00002419407,0.0000041178328,0.000016595879,0.00015777147,0.0006473101,0.000044208897,0.9800386,0.008323255,0.010643117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002844347,0.00000656286,0.00018678234,0.00004573515,0.0000025653123,0.00006128526,0.00011247589,0.0010231372,0.00003035504,0.93768555,0.06083812,0.000004588165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014876887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013266696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01774189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001576314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007051414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059352517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245645320","doi":"10.1145/2492002.2482607","title":"Two-sided matching with partial information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Preference; Stochastic dominance; Mathematical optimization; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Markov decision process; Mathematics; Markov process; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015436599764296878,"score_gpt":0.18829790747825517,"score_spread":0.1728613077139583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245645320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053230565,0.00017893885,0.93767506,0.000913444,0.000050308532,0.00020579615,0.0004504004,0.00032797182,0.006967484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72309023,0.0002521263,0.26358068,0.00038697524,0.000079835685,0.00038410645,0.00070297834,0.0001425208,0.011380546],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994131,0.0026318345,0.00028806212,0.0013499236,0.0007855696,0.00081344455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012893,0.006353016,0.0007135783,0.0017686245,0.00047326492,0.00056247227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046703243,0.0009804771,0.002132494,0.000796243,0.0012270929,0.0023986264,0.0027633458,0.0024162703,0.008371321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143632395,0.0009118506,0.0015028336,0.0017102545,0.0017725645,0.0054891314,0.003212417,0.0023895293,0.0013696887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082275056,0.00036505138,0.001521789,0.00020689372,0.00012980669,0.00033704907,0.00033284476,0.60764384,0.0021912998,0.31025478,0.004909089,0.071284786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657623,0.00006809303,0.00015317617,0.000013218351,0.000016489597,0.00005895783,0.000037848662,0.7534806,0.00068470696,0.2437965,0.0016058714,0.00001877143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021297247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025894998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008371321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023269786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025985688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028004885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247733441","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-1471-5_1","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Scope (computer science); Computer science; Information retrieval; Programming language","score_opus":0.026218441733865346,"score_gpt":0.1826902060566259,"score_spread":0.15647176432276055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247733441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044674828,0.0027813257,0.008930601,0.0030391067,0.003340801,0.000106251566,0.0017374643,0.00060481543,0.97901285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027177138,0.0020997059,0.00278229,0.0012904365,0.00081362936,0.00008877611,0.0016596385,0.00028428872,0.9882635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944466,0.000070375456,0.000021901658,0.0001243608,0.00027539206,0.00006327551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934655,0.00012008304,0.000026311209,0.000114714916,0.000285525,0.00010672791],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063238485,0.0007208868,0.0004778443,0.001426182,0.0011405422,0.003472733,0.0013684559,0.0015121455,0.44510192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024216268,0.0002656408,0.0004181961,0.001397235,0.00070657866,0.0029556649,0.0018385383,0.0017346076,0.34971926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019019479,0.000036161226,0.000102038815,0.00014838635,0.0000025602965,0.00003580974,0.00012913169,0.00023462484,0.0003418086,0.12338566,0.69661534,0.17894946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014033715,0.0000043328496,0.000062639236,0.000057012032,7.5127235e-7,0.000026879645,0.000027021675,0.000037040565,0.000076011005,0.013038404,0.9866659,0.0000024936503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020148426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031296378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012895874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016995383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7914947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247811935","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.14","title":"A market with asymmetric information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02685134156739029,"score_gpt":0.19193291076519584,"score_spread":0.16508156919780553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247811935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03963688,0.006607859,0.25574195,0.022797206,0.0011492417,0.00021568677,0.0015165557,0.0005265635,0.67180794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7251817,0.0071946373,0.052744262,0.0027372153,0.0016251445,0.00039922033,0.00094610144,0.00018313382,0.2089887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.00030349233,0.0000310008,0.00015699845,0.00025418558,0.000086735694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.00051198073,0.00008856527,0.00014752978,0.00008411333,0.00009894068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009485535,0.0005788272,0.0006765582,0.0005580843,0.0010595728,0.005220633,0.001142794,0.0026986236,0.021126978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00318035,0.0003653073,0.0007082479,0.0009187677,0.0019339629,0.0075868,0.0016520757,0.0022132474,0.0030191175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098346,0.0000097886195,0.00004281732,0.000019678235,0.000006036526,0.000052388037,0.00004302042,0.0019570414,0.00011869067,0.9876903,0.0061872383,0.0038631132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014384069,0.000010928285,0.00006170087,0.00001934929,0.0000052818327,0.00008515889,0.000025739644,0.012543664,0.00008236183,0.96389616,0.023248123,0.0000071971767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000719133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005144162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021126978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011423489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008877525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0706768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248926444","doi":"10.11647/obp.0204.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08768605849367493,"score_gpt":0.23183861649243154,"score_spread":0.1441525579987566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248926444","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026432859,0.0027038786,0.60596687,0.0038836165,0.0005110585,0.00015743444,0.0013320803,0.00059149985,0.3584207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5862698,0.005190259,0.23719832,0.0015166163,0.0005773525,0.00034824005,0.003027168,0.0003450917,0.16552718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857545,0.00063329854,0.00006546444,0.00026823144,0.00032298008,0.0001346145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989812,0.00041688842,0.00006993039,0.00034387756,0.000114484596,0.00007368476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014471111,0.0007572792,0.0006456246,0.00061190256,0.000774758,0.0032119728,0.00093322794,0.0010273923,0.019251285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042280466,0.00041798025,0.0010573207,0.0016033296,0.0009116378,0.0045048073,0.0022819724,0.001865132,0.0040090955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018871944,0.000025288155,0.0002696341,0.000054843054,0.000034267316,0.000051724142,0.0002410755,0.0055073644,0.00036010248,0.9453376,0.010455837,0.037643507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097459715,0.000016289365,0.00023487498,0.000036652054,0.00001673181,0.000096183314,0.000092297334,0.016167028,0.00023953259,0.9396296,0.04344997,0.000011126002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009144429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013701302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019251285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089868787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063385593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064401984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249619156","doi":"10.11647/obp.0211.08","title":"A jungle","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06834580833050612,"score_gpt":0.2208226525039916,"score_spread":0.1524768441734855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249619156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022886305,0.025325041,0.037475385,0.01985064,0.004117591,0.000083378865,0.0011514456,0.00086943235,0.90883857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047274683,0.025686733,0.024427745,0.0068654157,0.0025206355,0.00022406461,0.0015860287,0.00087612134,0.8905386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996691,0.000082580074,0.000012014705,0.000075117765,0.00012327087,0.000038034555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996414,0.00014281615,0.000019277548,0.000061567494,0.000079253434,0.00005564584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047502518,0.0007960253,0.00045731547,0.0011309907,0.0014138536,0.0052309777,0.00090730883,0.0013881531,0.06661616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013620723,0.0004118742,0.0005713211,0.0011970807,0.0015000892,0.007508932,0.0017784821,0.0033979316,0.024629656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068266404,0.0000119076785,0.00005346891,0.000048315316,0.0000034449422,0.000042282063,0.00023930948,0.00040218636,0.00014383066,0.8137439,0.155948,0.029356627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018352367,0.0000058882692,0.000055158907,0.00008547237,0.0000012452556,0.0000721789,0.00007722293,0.0005495033,0.000051159997,0.21559645,0.7834991,0.0000046772698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016107629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025365767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06661616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018050522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012387931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250063613","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14662902","title":"Stability concepts in bargaining games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Mathematical economics; Perspective (graphical); Microeconomics; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Profit (economics); Bargaining problem; Type (biology); Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08132858287818912,"score_gpt":0.2735234264756485,"score_spread":0.19219484359745936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250063613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05071078,0.0028292972,0.8646025,0.0029469095,0.000390733,0.00017168812,0.0002819236,0.0001301185,0.07793605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751699,0.0023459415,0.096948296,0.00083419925,0.0010729806,0.0005998876,0.00037488437,0.00018042666,0.022473577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529845,0.0020209607,0.00027915108,0.000993169,0.0009819396,0.00042638302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927921,0.004502711,0.00080143556,0.0004519295,0.001031339,0.00042050908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045275697,0.0010947823,0.0010404106,0.0024151593,0.0023736358,0.0043652514,0.0017294498,0.0022021437,0.009084689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013670415,0.00053371955,0.0014892898,0.0023242326,0.0067002694,0.009334811,0.0029374394,0.0042314166,0.0012331229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000762183,0.0000064074306,0.00008527302,0.000017560804,0.000006271012,0.000020182662,0.00014707338,0.0028429807,0.00018090493,0.99394494,0.0004377348,0.0023031854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007869839,0.000020755275,0.000092583345,0.000022487886,0.0000073688648,0.000038850394,0.00010447715,0.034647018,0.00020713483,0.96096635,0.0038728984,0.000012293353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014821627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005882742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009084689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030264705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010393066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030391335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252822417","doi":"10.1145/3274641","title":"Leximin Allocations in the Real World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Pareto efficiency; Software deployment; Pareto principle; Mechanism design; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052164521507753046,"score_gpt":0.25934763187686233,"score_spread":0.20718311036910927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252822417","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2837302,0.0005977278,0.68618613,0.0028836646,0.00017631985,0.000394017,0.0006341637,0.0023749385,0.023022745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84551305,0.00015502762,0.14803915,0.00030217448,0.00003904468,0.00029920312,0.00028447277,0.00011756934,0.00525026],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944917,0.0035048241,0.00017502825,0.00082308875,0.00049439515,0.00051099947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909258,0.0048460457,0.0012981553,0.0019676478,0.0005391252,0.00042327982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007516061,0.00066319946,0.0011034549,0.0008194108,0.0013005418,0.0022509035,0.0022868458,0.0013554875,0.008027198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017318474,0.00055063213,0.00038561117,0.002084328,0.0016725918,0.0041469685,0.0020593011,0.0017885452,0.00093052443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012089852,0.00060079363,0.005664754,0.00034341405,0.00012551008,0.00030696587,0.000789303,0.50857073,0.0041157785,0.29029223,0.018200371,0.16978118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036746598,0.00039570697,0.0019899039,0.000041785086,0.000027062124,0.00023983385,0.0007340631,0.74322945,0.0046288325,0.22184688,0.026442494,0.00005650266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026152758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003824518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008027198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002022805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020995722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039749205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254058566","doi":"10.1023/a:1011252808608","title":"Fallback Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Majority rule; Settlement (finance); Bargaining problem; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Condorcet method; Computer science; Voting; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.035788373848755946,"score_gpt":0.23071989224523393,"score_spread":0.194931518396478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254058566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03644319,0.0017181557,0.24571851,0.0056905993,0.0010300394,0.00023137416,0.00027638092,0.00041633335,0.7084755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59133536,0.00077187933,0.032244086,0.001555969,0.00041111442,0.00029355564,0.00029291242,0.00013111703,0.37296394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705315,0.0012318802,0.00010705103,0.00052267674,0.0006884262,0.0003968282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976211,0.0011416944,0.0001428955,0.000577926,0.00034133098,0.00017497006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00295055,0.0008786827,0.0012687765,0.0015381727,0.003342456,0.005295971,0.0017961817,0.0035451353,0.072583854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009926104,0.0003991587,0.0007592461,0.0013313125,0.0024030108,0.0057862042,0.0022985754,0.003984478,0.009213774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029356284,0.000028684999,0.000050411145,0.000015386353,0.0000045412407,0.00002247997,0.00013453129,0.00042923604,0.00013089692,0.98361224,0.0033443607,0.012197725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012150758,0.000014880167,0.00005774517,0.000017337252,0.0000039291954,0.000043237917,0.00007244649,0.0040295254,0.00022095533,0.982451,0.013072233,0.000004568208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007637245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006526227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072583854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019235975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011474212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24281716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254468019","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2004.9736809","title":"Introduction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Decision System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02250606694916769,"score_gpt":0.22218455724742114,"score_spread":0.19967849029825346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254468019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016496838,0.0021080237,0.011010759,0.0104298685,0.008602467,0.00021675948,0.0067431927,0.0011611836,0.9580781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008714059,0.0018315513,0.0041707926,0.0034384879,0.0019393654,0.00019248376,0.0049381386,0.00040254835,0.9743726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.00010488956,0.00003393012,0.00017215137,0.00036889047,0.0000990293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983669,0.00026137917,0.00006938453,0.00024544986,0.00074942264,0.0003074608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010129629,0.0006297691,0.0004193088,0.0016133592,0.0013030426,0.00393132,0.0014017365,0.0015420957,0.5284937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038477527,0.00019879437,0.0004558127,0.0014626168,0.0006550783,0.002203548,0.0020013342,0.0015198259,0.35058498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052551364,0.000050494113,0.00040669492,0.00015236014,0.0000041073104,0.00006030401,0.00018864722,0.00015747339,0.00045405782,0.087185696,0.7525354,0.15875225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033304857,0.000007805938,0.00021616937,0.00004507056,0.0000013509613,0.000032156677,0.000053543445,0.00004243329,0.00011370823,0.008431853,0.9910492,0.0000033579518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021363045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002480892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4715063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011877131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019292333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6725465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255109117","doi":"10.1023/a:1007061304922","title":"The calculus of voting: An empirical test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.18387645130199848,"score_gpt":0.3863806689415928,"score_spread":0.2025042176395943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255109117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406865,0.0004694505,0.013064734,0.0034777794,0.000111454305,0.00027362732,0.00069481,0.00011188433,0.041109804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982564,0.00005790045,0.00056603143,0.00011948781,0.000058514954,0.000042741147,0.00017633893,0.000007998293,0.000714603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98047924,0.010793343,0.0007675789,0.0025155728,0.0034904773,0.0019538049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52941644,0.403597,0.03217747,0.020237906,0.009540238,0.005030978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028987473,0.00064598775,0.0016665077,0.0024461986,0.002319057,0.0035043294,0.0030078029,0.002136155,0.030253122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17826903,0.0003485426,0.0015130327,0.002941583,0.0085629,0.0051340307,0.0027160817,0.0033692487,0.0021217493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029168185,0.0027890094,0.51922846,0.00046324113,0.00072571676,0.0005352738,0.0024831325,0.015877573,0.00045528112,0.39631927,0.009580625,0.048625547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017837851,0.0023926862,0.37115678,0.00019754606,0.0004601554,0.00032929194,0.0057540606,0.204553,0.0010144982,0.40031347,0.011875903,0.00016881782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009935481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003239541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030253122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026791617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026995274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1533022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255765836","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14662902.v1","title":"Stability concepts in bargaining games","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Perspective (graphical); Profit (economics); Computer science; Stability (learning theory); Bargaining problem; Type (biology); Economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08132858287818912,"score_gpt":0.2735234264756485,"score_spread":0.19219484359745936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255765836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05071078,0.0028292972,0.8646025,0.0029469095,0.000390733,0.00017168812,0.0002819236,0.0001301185,0.07793605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751699,0.0023459415,0.096948296,0.00083419925,0.0010729806,0.0005998876,0.00037488437,0.00018042666,0.022473577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529845,0.0020209607,0.00027915108,0.000993169,0.0009819396,0.00042638302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927921,0.004502711,0.00080143556,0.0004519295,0.001031339,0.00042050908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045275697,0.0010947823,0.0010404106,0.0024151593,0.0023736358,0.0043652514,0.0017294498,0.0022021437,0.009084689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013670415,0.00053371955,0.0014892898,0.0023242326,0.0067002694,0.009334811,0.0029374394,0.0042314166,0.0012331229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000762183,0.0000064074306,0.00008527302,0.000017560804,0.000006271012,0.000020182662,0.00014707338,0.0028429807,0.00018090493,0.99394494,0.0004377348,0.0023031854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007869839,0.000020755275,0.000092583345,0.000022487886,0.0000073688648,0.000038850394,0.00010447715,0.034647018,0.00020713483,0.96096635,0.0038728984,0.000012293353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014821627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005882742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009084689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030264705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010393066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030391335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255895831","doi":"10.1017/s0021900200003582","title":"Bounds for Owen's Multilinear Extension","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Regional Development Fund; Royal Canadian Geographical Society","keywords":"Multilinear map; Simple (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Mathematics; Blocking (statistics); Field (mathematics); Game theory; Voting; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05036639708956518,"score_gpt":0.25760286886966155,"score_spread":0.20723647178009635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255895831","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054050483,0.0016732541,0.8943154,0.0018032764,0.00014373002,0.0001369487,0.00029134643,0.00026786877,0.0473176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82651776,0.0018275816,0.14754811,0.0008593665,0.00045568089,0.00051886396,0.0005101883,0.0003466338,0.021415778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338514,0.0022409505,0.00022181643,0.0011000179,0.0020229039,0.001029236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970688,0.020674879,0.0017006014,0.0023973018,0.0026130816,0.0019262529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009888857,0.0015692681,0.0020020534,0.0033086434,0.0015252429,0.0035332865,0.003408084,0.0017163875,0.0100795375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05531334,0.0007355742,0.0019052732,0.001801972,0.0048250966,0.012795981,0.0077070966,0.0067682224,0.0015712909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114295595,0.00006878142,0.0009122717,0.0000923684,0.000035397334,0.00009380581,0.00024803675,0.048304576,0.0006812927,0.9310548,0.0017564411,0.016638033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001115535,0.00005092003,0.0002502579,0.000059127564,0.000016621185,0.00005479875,0.00005735208,0.24370965,0.00046451003,0.752388,0.002906594,0.000030936415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015223287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011280747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100795375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003381391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014991944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05229789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281664098","doi":"10.1257/aer.20210626","title":"Bargaining with Mechanisms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Stochastic game; Bayesian game; Economics; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game","score_opus":0.02387290312974828,"score_gpt":0.2239301995687929,"score_spread":0.20005729643904463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281664098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015499155,0.00525157,0.71887124,0.007816578,0.00067616976,0.0005667813,0.00025122313,0.00021994142,0.25084728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59743303,0.0061504105,0.33138525,0.0029717756,0.0017336131,0.0021512427,0.00038296374,0.00014700358,0.057644688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98137945,0.012180468,0.0009682223,0.0021936484,0.0021358314,0.0011422691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98755604,0.008349989,0.0010388482,0.0020971186,0.0005940159,0.00036398886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015438962,0.0018461812,0.0019797224,0.0018729325,0.0032454513,0.009217945,0.0033580656,0.0077518024,0.020394132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026991038,0.0012244816,0.0025309934,0.0020107066,0.00747146,0.011344342,0.005248261,0.0040688543,0.002993388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000852604,0.000006635288,0.000029067583,0.000032302996,0.000011296568,0.000017947154,0.000060385526,0.0014839242,0.00006189067,0.9955171,0.0005586565,0.002212324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032812244,0.000009559112,0.000021182166,0.000034558347,0.0000064610886,0.00003214821,0.000023361346,0.004046666,0.00006116714,0.9892588,0.006466764,0.0000064232677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006667462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043711372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020394132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035041277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019713063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08165002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283792808","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20418","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Voting; Representativeness heuristic; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Majority rule; Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07176778308177141,"score_gpt":0.24977220366654168,"score_spread":0.17800442058477028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283792808","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1638142,0.00034795445,0.8054937,0.001021975,0.00008191565,0.00051835715,0.00019970522,0.00040070477,0.028121406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894675,0.00014547052,0.09942954,0.00020911827,0.000078989346,0.00037360386,0.0003366561,0.00007406724,0.0046775104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96647215,0.022723999,0.0011763427,0.0029522798,0.004596632,0.0020786664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93942094,0.043410726,0.0041716546,0.0076980353,0.004020444,0.0012781502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025274264,0.00060560426,0.0018853013,0.0011640576,0.0013699268,0.0033000219,0.0030421563,0.0020459236,0.0046189674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089936405,0.00053844217,0.0009976684,0.0016522541,0.0022704008,0.004788075,0.0025241526,0.0027308343,0.0012707689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016011206,0.00040767933,0.007483729,0.00031918386,0.00018489598,0.00030429644,0.0016573267,0.2105207,0.00333794,0.5579669,0.0059214556,0.21029481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025745737,0.0003835036,0.0011967361,0.00005228365,0.000062730265,0.00017124291,0.00029835888,0.6236385,0.0025057313,0.36629382,0.0050880252,0.00005155378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017588843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016614912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025274264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014950495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001887041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13366467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283797980","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20443","title":"Worst-Case Voting When the Stakes Are High","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Multiplicative function; Social choice theory; Bounding overwatch; Voting; Social welfare function; Metric (unit); Function (biology); Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Range (aeronautics); Anti-plurality voting; Outcome (game theory); Social Welfare; Welfare; Computer science; Mathematics; Cardinal voting systems; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.13407582137355206,"score_gpt":0.25368124232547595,"score_spread":0.11960542095192389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283797980","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31175172,0.00055291556,0.66765505,0.0016356985,0.00008329943,0.00012447945,0.0006512487,0.00017974873,0.01736596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95284647,0.00020730344,0.043692686,0.0001331988,0.000053873562,0.00008741716,0.0003333448,0.000047043344,0.002598834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656243,0.006659826,0.0007680915,0.0021772254,0.0025364866,0.0012959691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492637,0.031268146,0.005203867,0.011769665,0.0015402978,0.0009543325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01323757,0.0008688705,0.0022858884,0.0009923441,0.0008946945,0.0051996703,0.0029029744,0.0015230625,0.004009501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062084224,0.0006338693,0.001119557,0.00159666,0.00256554,0.006000219,0.0025895012,0.0035265756,0.00062140287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068755844,0.0002270064,0.0103205275,0.00016640262,0.00031960732,0.00029762465,0.00036776633,0.43074298,0.002960174,0.49321753,0.0024448645,0.058248054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047011705,0.0001286118,0.002924878,0.000028832552,0.00005198771,0.0002773417,0.0002028487,0.47125053,0.0024991003,0.5200012,0.0025429334,0.000044725435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016164535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022428476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01323757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028435546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011514736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0700078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283801145","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20420","title":"A Little Charity Guarantees Fair Connected Graph Partitioning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Partition (number theory); Combinatorics; Fair division; Graph; Mathematics; Vertex connectivity; Connected component; Binary logarithm; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.10955420127919167,"score_gpt":0.25774105692514465,"score_spread":0.14818685564595296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283801145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19213282,0.00042140015,0.79253966,0.001816848,0.000118925826,0.00013233257,0.00028912636,0.001337487,0.011211454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87330925,0.00022041125,0.1203779,0.0004643516,0.0001073954,0.000154361,0.00028568748,0.00031780882,0.004762743],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638915,0.0012352228,0.00013213107,0.0008409185,0.0006515875,0.00075101043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97869176,0.012301126,0.0013081005,0.005192914,0.0012263637,0.0012797595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044230814,0.0011250649,0.0015484699,0.00094621116,0.0021407146,0.0024116887,0.002508375,0.0017121262,0.005209872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02833228,0.00075667753,0.001004267,0.0014206594,0.0029448238,0.0075272024,0.0036027948,0.0026357046,0.00089857617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017882929,0.00028077335,0.0039665196,0.0003411611,0.00010593936,0.0003223506,0.0009231749,0.4883868,0.020114072,0.3907612,0.009937942,0.08307178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010062296,0.00013272367,0.0003754178,0.000027365944,0.000033974975,0.0002087706,0.0001556444,0.66163015,0.006427853,0.3269736,0.0039078435,0.00002609447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024501067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002638819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005209872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021839484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020991066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023391783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283801939","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20419","title":"The Metric Distortion of Multiwinner Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Voting; Metric (unit); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Telecommunications; Law; Operations management; Politics","score_opus":0.09066704021046244,"score_gpt":0.26105593484932416,"score_spread":0.1703888946388617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283801939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061898757,0.0023711568,0.8949883,0.0026111272,0.00027484438,0.00014067777,0.0006302745,0.0002182668,0.03686665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929925,0.0016070529,0.09373875,0.0005103822,0.00028823616,0.00024754676,0.00045584078,0.00021969147,0.009939966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868221,0.0057545006,0.0009104916,0.0019943535,0.0035141888,0.0010042092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642152,0.01926851,0.0034159315,0.00923872,0.002776832,0.0010847943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009101919,0.00093668076,0.0021555186,0.0015936951,0.0012617691,0.0045884633,0.0035964346,0.0019599828,0.005909206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058994047,0.0006153426,0.0016236819,0.001962828,0.004836005,0.008305647,0.004295805,0.0035392193,0.00095955713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013250393,0.000022709904,0.0011758896,0.00010203842,0.000058946258,0.0001324097,0.00019678364,0.07831911,0.0006541613,0.89641273,0.0020415743,0.020751094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024151077,0.000065780354,0.0005100664,0.000039233084,0.000016866634,0.00023163739,0.00006987813,0.17274572,0.0006552268,0.8203701,0.005235465,0.000035801524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021034952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010887188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009101919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045874445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014480499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048136115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285231687","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.220603.085","title":"Analysis on the Market Design of Teacher Assignment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06429708845705093,"score_gpt":0.31136738087256255,"score_spread":0.24707029241551162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285231687","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17887323,0.00045039036,0.73712134,0.003111607,0.000233472,0.0006137392,0.0003560765,0.00021350798,0.079026625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92922837,0.00034298378,0.039754625,0.000267924,0.00014340831,0.0004038368,0.000100464706,0.00006237043,0.029695982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975987,0.0011928031,0.00008048669,0.00033446052,0.00030306407,0.00049051805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992145,0.005147189,0.00083498977,0.00065479404,0.00078265107,0.000435391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043345965,0.00041128963,0.00086919015,0.0008072843,0.0010482725,0.0021111167,0.0015734253,0.0017399257,0.033941668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017457161,0.00038364914,0.0011241335,0.0006991942,0.0019061611,0.0034587332,0.0009879721,0.0015808316,0.0013794623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013826054,0.000121179335,0.001004295,0.00008600903,0.000019460327,0.000088081266,0.00017716203,0.027906315,0.0016076536,0.95329446,0.0024517518,0.013105417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019211904,0.0001906183,0.0013145389,0.00002650192,0.00003104363,0.000090435606,0.0002192767,0.31762496,0.0011120917,0.67242205,0.0067485804,0.000027810032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021893962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015056417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033941668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002567332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017015687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11354613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285601644","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2022/39","title":"Efficient Resource Allocation with Secretive Agents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distortion (music); Preference; Welfare; Social Welfare; Homogeneous; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Social welfare function; Resource (disambiguation); Nash equilibrium; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Political science; Computer network","score_opus":0.08116218144506153,"score_gpt":0.25210033630696244,"score_spread":0.1709381548619009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285601644","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24707085,0.0005270899,0.7401393,0.0007743801,0.000058510363,0.00016640352,0.00015556095,0.00011448138,0.010993421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94665295,0.00023927631,0.048470113,0.000080263875,0.000036828595,0.00009586029,0.000051994477,0.000019439887,0.0043532453],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560803,0.0022893455,0.00021061506,0.0005799025,0.0006002308,0.0007118244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343723,0.0036813375,0.00096279144,0.0011479236,0.00034357765,0.0004270648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041899346,0.0009247445,0.0018732721,0.00053023983,0.00058250735,0.002821337,0.001995947,0.0012826176,0.0025402228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013650183,0.0006133459,0.0007913034,0.0010717426,0.0020745688,0.004105554,0.0024548278,0.0012999963,0.00040117363],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007555875,0.0001533055,0.0013381515,0.00014373743,0.000135989,0.00033367594,0.00030751002,0.67268366,0.0035231963,0.29188105,0.0009291633,0.027814938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009314408,0.00011719364,0.0002573967,0.000016495404,0.000027714215,0.00007122539,0.00009876517,0.80883485,0.0013712161,0.1875576,0.001533638,0.00002079356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014233998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010050659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041899346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017255577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001135477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022158802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285602129","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2022/17","title":"Distortion in Voting with Top-t Preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Voting; Distortion (music); Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Proxy (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Rank (graph theory); Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.08510738125904387,"score_gpt":0.25086985557067976,"score_spread":0.16576247431163588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285602129","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12924024,0.0028523772,0.8448318,0.00281854,0.00017178182,0.00019115204,0.0007715,0.00045296093,0.01866971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149344,0.0015065932,0.07332025,0.0005424493,0.00021134403,0.00028165622,0.00077951694,0.00026542757,0.008158361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847036,0.007439428,0.0008936858,0.0024118104,0.0031057475,0.0014457504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93791085,0.04637155,0.0042587584,0.0077379374,0.0024066302,0.0013142122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016158087,0.001218708,0.0041391244,0.0014877348,0.0013241747,0.005118637,0.0038888867,0.0020804498,0.005022084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08120872,0.0012004536,0.0017673242,0.0021386172,0.0036910677,0.0069034225,0.0032086417,0.004169811,0.0011713175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013608172,0.00009053571,0.005303634,0.00040547983,0.00027094447,0.0003401816,0.00069234194,0.35605,0.0016429437,0.5750599,0.00506954,0.053713713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085987056,0.000117847325,0.0013302658,0.00007078292,0.000056485344,0.00019324038,0.00015200177,0.44618973,0.00095152494,0.54856974,0.0022244197,0.000058046913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004213849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028171837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016158087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005459557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017565507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08545315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287702986","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.15748","title":"Descending the Stable Matching Lattice: How many Strategic Agents are\\n required to turn Pessimality to Optimality?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Infimum and supremum; Combinatorics; Lattice (music); Conjecture; Mathematics; Cardinality (data modeling); Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Girl; Stochastic game; Counterexample; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.27146529189753066,"score_gpt":0.22590825599931455,"score_spread":0.04555703589821611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287702986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54746103,0.00055711594,0.39820233,0.009690715,0.00016597303,0.000172299,0.00070130615,0.0006070845,0.042442206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182031,0.00029909055,0.07338726,0.0005101607,0.00013461513,0.00014442274,0.00039698175,0.00016905804,0.0067552803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968575,0.0013585027,0.00014489477,0.00065570156,0.00047048143,0.0005129229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613155,0.008545805,0.0012920643,0.0020693375,0.00064449717,0.0013168282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003284244,0.00046208178,0.0012970231,0.00070554204,0.0023480519,0.003890352,0.0018463202,0.0016923356,0.010345939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029795568,0.00062275084,0.000969032,0.0011532755,0.003545132,0.008889662,0.0021210688,0.0026481156,0.0013942862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011053178,0.00026422195,0.006575123,0.00022251901,0.00009495693,0.00017294665,0.0008800236,0.0602613,0.004861783,0.8487989,0.009888673,0.06687439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353581,0.00013549616,0.00079587946,0.000034458837,0.000025646616,0.00016404453,0.0005076544,0.16692162,0.0023936233,0.82492995,0.0039226767,0.00003357237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022757968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034971647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010345939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019764493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002396048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03461063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289699818","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1808.04510","title":"On the approximability of the stable matching problem with ties of size\\n two","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Matching (statistics); Approximation algorithm; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Constant (computer programming); Stable marriage problem; Cardinal number (linguistics); Stability (learning theory); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.06251368277924894,"score_gpt":0.16102621900673875,"score_spread":0.0985125362274898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289699818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23629653,0.0032642407,0.71014476,0.007731614,0.0003983423,0.0004076905,0.0011753833,0.0020698716,0.03851154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73901784,0.0019223948,0.24385269,0.0017131185,0.0006084112,0.0005340714,0.0019461566,0.0007794982,0.009625834],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433917,0.0020587565,0.00029844325,0.0012837502,0.0009183009,0.0011015759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9558673,0.0374258,0.0014099525,0.0032788021,0.000956245,0.0010619201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073155235,0.0023884007,0.0024584585,0.0015795166,0.0018987354,0.004641337,0.0052409074,0.00315795,0.009503171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046456076,0.0010293557,0.0031015275,0.0025085385,0.0036749227,0.012009873,0.0044482825,0.0074181347,0.001434034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045284834,0.0011106672,0.012286548,0.0014416565,0.0004981792,0.00037145847,0.0014114357,0.49499306,0.0057289056,0.32469434,0.024760539,0.12817466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024591482,0.00013442586,0.0008356006,0.00007938753,0.00010605197,0.00015536581,0.00016132348,0.708043,0.0011415354,0.28670284,0.0023649791,0.000029576706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006267879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063395733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009503171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040982496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0386886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289753190","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3544489","title":"Three-dimensional Stable Matching with Cyclic Preferences: Computational proofs log files","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Group (periodic table); Stability (learning theory); Existential quantification; Computer science; Statistics; Machine learning; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06527436240273382,"score_gpt":0.23309091937511783,"score_spread":0.167816556972384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289753190","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014351356,0.0006381239,0.4876835,0.0026614603,0.0003301438,0.0011943585,0.15270273,0.28788722,0.05255113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29373127,0.0009727265,0.3976133,0.002332376,0.00033419958,0.00510044,0.18320636,0.08074175,0.035967615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811196,0.00032002843,0.0001933693,0.00032248494,0.0007983162,0.0002539044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902468,0.005565364,0.0004841785,0.002189897,0.0012814724,0.00023224161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020840804,0.0019063044,0.0009640455,0.0017007694,0.00074803864,0.0030844135,0.002763929,0.001664192,0.21404096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022555474,0.0011773093,0.001069833,0.002181565,0.00069491484,0.0035321855,0.0026288808,0.002258132,0.058513768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014472378,0.0004791149,0.0020258669,0.0013719352,0.00008768407,0.0007763061,0.0002748163,0.012418902,0.005756816,0.14086595,0.659602,0.17489341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027066725,0.00013730106,0.0016988657,0.0004314459,0.000069835594,0.0010146034,0.00012823252,0.15647526,0.038070664,0.34211043,0.45698398,0.00017271048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019687891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026905995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21404096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020091238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033610014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71603835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291208850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4188550","title":"Matching with Minimum Quotas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011692275040516203,"score_gpt":0.1931890285247318,"score_spread":0.1814967534842156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291208850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19551504,0.00052799936,0.736771,0.004888445,0.00030666395,0.00042517966,0.0010273998,0.00085203524,0.059686195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330042,0.00017357258,0.042725004,0.00051382114,0.0002045138,0.00029841324,0.00030815526,0.00016577708,0.022606522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989232,0.006154133,0.0005384475,0.0016974694,0.00089039694,0.0014875891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622347,0.026165945,0.0023406951,0.00641304,0.0013689987,0.001476619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007253209,0.0010085328,0.0050665275,0.0015930542,0.0017550488,0.005319628,0.0036120466,0.006540557,0.02270036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053326882,0.0014825447,0.0017780487,0.0026257043,0.002315125,0.008977637,0.0037720662,0.003302005,0.003438594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012997838,0.00031035847,0.0012326379,0.00033307754,0.00013443964,0.00017772082,0.0003009808,0.06560591,0.0018382813,0.86557746,0.008575755,0.0546137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016462954,0.00008139678,0.0002126567,0.000023708832,0.000023521861,0.000070392605,0.000040254232,0.10178457,0.00037171465,0.8955288,0.0016823998,0.000016039476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001246635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008784609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02270036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019721272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020027384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07594031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293064071","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4191231","title":"Justice, Inclusion, and Incentives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Incentive; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016968441033138826,"score_gpt":0.22328251422590528,"score_spread":0.20631407319276646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293064071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6148261,0.0015251107,0.017661124,0.021913147,0.00021490418,0.000100164725,0.00020750098,0.00003297706,0.34351903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942756,0.00016249585,0.0005667218,0.00030339698,0.00006734331,0.000019586381,0.000014551573,0.0000057963694,0.0045844708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476963,0.0027664087,0.00020197839,0.00046821966,0.0006919861,0.0011017789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764356,0.01623785,0.0027779776,0.0010973527,0.001105213,0.0023459652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062950393,0.00023782569,0.0008909998,0.0012556926,0.0036106894,0.0073651387,0.00073935767,0.0026733072,0.014945794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029091496,0.00023643747,0.00030660562,0.0013655709,0.007155404,0.00405439,0.0029103693,0.0022727945,0.00052560214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012490293,0.00021411202,0.0072977906,0.000046465062,0.000023992092,0.00007550307,0.0009869001,0.00086625025,0.00016963518,0.9755044,0.00238504,0.012305038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031216638,0.0000348183,0.0049438197,0.000024047535,0.00001285523,0.000043474836,0.00090568996,0.0016956102,0.000075453725,0.9884044,0.003818073,0.000010556378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036157917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058726803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014945794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018784041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020694663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0499987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294224712","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4200826","title":"Dynamic Marriage Markets","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business","score_opus":0.008476879213095678,"score_gpt":0.1968830831227157,"score_spread":0.18840620390962004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294224712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3731279,0.0013660307,0.15093449,0.010301437,0.00046815828,0.00016989908,0.0013267957,0.00035050715,0.46195483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430001,0.00033990433,0.0041048806,0.00032340773,0.00008626238,0.00006173625,0.00022966103,0.000030880212,0.051823195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949276,0.00017736571,0.000014206242,0.00010407281,0.00009103486,0.00012055469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844414,0.0006597634,0.00020018578,0.0002268402,0.0001780642,0.00029101231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008263529,0.00021926657,0.0006116267,0.00058291527,0.0013077161,0.0029165887,0.0009514885,0.0017151282,0.051282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006551295,0.00029980062,0.0004121389,0.0007087265,0.0011194785,0.0029559503,0.0014229247,0.001282703,0.0029774536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049888877,0.000049463262,0.0005738433,0.000016547763,0.000010277072,0.000067407724,0.000117068324,0.0038705673,0.00027309632,0.9803335,0.0054973993,0.009141002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005368823,0.000027292434,0.0005419899,0.000016841454,0.00001024651,0.00010639946,0.00021113959,0.038086083,0.0001364998,0.94962376,0.011176124,0.000009896144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016324106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001567903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010753225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008145622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1715554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294549788","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2022.105546","title":"Tie-breaking and efficiency in the laboratory school choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee; Osaka University; Yonsei University; Seoul National University; Concordia University; Carnegie Mellon University; Kyungpook National University; University Grants Committee","keywords":"Economics; Mathematics education; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.01852199933674006,"score_gpt":0.22609397870590658,"score_spread":0.20757197936916652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294549788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688345,0.000067685214,0.018019078,0.00049766153,0.000015510308,0.000043280634,0.000077183155,0.000038641792,0.012406508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968047,0.000021422862,0.0013188234,0.000031044507,0.000005525134,0.000022766186,0.000024999306,0.000008942036,0.0017618237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967907,0.002168047,0.0001165773,0.00033927467,0.00021039862,0.0003749897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622244,0.029220553,0.0029641436,0.003561918,0.0006505493,0.0013784535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070904605,0.00022447843,0.001288028,0.0006642377,0.00092016323,0.0030581336,0.0011334065,0.0014800358,0.014211593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03907019,0.00041703304,0.0005736989,0.00066934124,0.0017936912,0.0022565704,0.0013928164,0.0017803886,0.00064361846],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021462403,0.002330245,0.02605217,0.00017800153,0.00031698178,0.00016506437,0.0011380907,0.05774742,0.006003214,0.85862523,0.0033794031,0.04191796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062747387,0.00064317876,0.017310947,0.0000246417,0.00011941301,0.00011851628,0.0011557714,0.24991551,0.0032309107,0.7250645,0.001718784,0.00007038041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016206144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018090301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014211593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011971256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011867654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047542512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294733709","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01429-z","title":"The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Autarky; Group (periodic table); Economics; Alpha (finance); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economy; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.03863432654575027,"score_gpt":0.24293888423506738,"score_spread":0.2043045576893171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294733709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18084988,0.00056079426,0.7346694,0.0077574975,0.00024868466,0.00021726984,0.00035006067,0.00014127775,0.07520517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881587,0.00036595142,0.07119166,0.0004975657,0.00021193262,0.00027283473,0.00013740438,0.00008804421,0.0390759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997633,0.0014254204,0.00007465514,0.00029731565,0.00027999294,0.00028961131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944471,0.0045095733,0.00026123464,0.00031314272,0.00023718207,0.00023162016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041846693,0.00079099357,0.002003276,0.0007787507,0.0013140035,0.003432149,0.0024889142,0.0046497863,0.014041245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017504144,0.00088406116,0.001117781,0.0012978584,0.002900098,0.005625657,0.0024877528,0.0025673404,0.00055445795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015598649,0.00011329648,0.0002974859,0.00009790128,0.000046463094,0.0001009984,0.00019191955,0.11460084,0.00038427953,0.86832243,0.0030398334,0.012648518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008883955,0.0000320532,0.00011437333,0.000017321197,0.000016176386,0.00004722393,0.00008134467,0.18305896,0.00015329267,0.81495637,0.0014195148,0.000014608419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024034611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017926533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014041245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016015315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018774307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046972632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298076138","doi":"","title":"Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mathematical economics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10785993104702887,"score_gpt":0.2698893690050834,"score_spread":0.16202943795805455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298076138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953774,0.00004535408,0.0013927799,0.00009719021,0.000029432162,0.00027275042,0.00008997279,0.000011771635,0.0026833762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936826,0.00006296887,0.0030601781,0.00011695395,0.000051283,0.0004712388,0.00023475946,0.000013330606,0.002306571],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178547,0.0056888843,0.00038329116,0.00076847157,0.00085473515,0.0005191967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8181441,0.16043779,0.008121441,0.009738627,0.0019037978,0.0016542652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127911875,0.0009100465,0.0017480031,0.00048390555,0.0011023502,0.0018911372,0.0015200734,0.0020861996,0.012503415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055302396,0.0007032432,0.000919863,0.00060426316,0.0017625693,0.0018634152,0.0013127283,0.002896467,0.0014502053],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09291857,0.29883406,0.15967506,0.0037491908,0.0026241064,0.0025665953,0.026080282,0.07027988,0.07163438,0.090165436,0.010896724,0.17057577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036928322,0.21245433,0.25158355,0.00043288813,0.0013754218,0.0020934,0.01281269,0.2977965,0.041586567,0.11428564,0.027625274,0.0010253915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001029958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073574105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127911875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007883361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006246277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299935942","doi":"","title":"Strategic, Sincere, and Heuristics Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Political science; Approval voting; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04774050967453589,"score_gpt":0.2524401496118199,"score_spread":0.204699639937284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299935942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952136,0.000036004254,0.0008970569,0.000073637544,0.000025293652,0.0001220848,0.000048177586,0.000008605379,0.003575527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967379,0.000044303,0.0011101807,0.0000510519,0.000022041762,0.00015479392,0.00008973921,0.000011971893,0.0017778747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548364,0.0027754114,0.00029881127,0.0005086224,0.00053669105,0.00039672587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9135316,0.069384664,0.005682593,0.007567687,0.0016576715,0.0021757723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00941693,0.0005466567,0.0010861518,0.0005921789,0.0010065123,0.0027283577,0.00087375136,0.0015300274,0.0076866983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05941805,0.0004202418,0.00042131534,0.0006014531,0.0017318068,0.0015132467,0.00086824654,0.0020066823,0.00068290695],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10750315,0.105020836,0.24436066,0.0017368554,0.0020601596,0.0007948919,0.025632115,0.0667588,0.06767164,0.17061643,0.008650322,0.19919413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01930798,0.09734676,0.36824146,0.00021667963,0.0018529235,0.00093222084,0.014800166,0.25267106,0.02101021,0.2069168,0.016035357,0.0006685191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014802417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014829907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00941693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088451785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010269295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049802065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300338743","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8254","title":"Eliminating the Weakest Link: Making Manipulation Intractable?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development; Australian Government","keywords":"Voting; Veto; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Computational complexity theory; Link (geometry); Theoretical computer science; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05814019840002273,"score_gpt":0.2424080024880448,"score_spread":0.18426780408802207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300338743","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10533718,0.000613701,0.85118484,0.010115937,0.00029035445,0.0003564644,0.00044836165,0.0013797013,0.0302734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7034542,0.00081912853,0.27483165,0.0017010168,0.00049870735,0.0006030303,0.0007899844,0.00082162896,0.016480768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887038,0.004520677,0.00058782566,0.002241894,0.0023932927,0.0015525332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95181096,0.029858248,0.0024282765,0.013130148,0.0018249034,0.00094748306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008058279,0.0009569086,0.0030476262,0.0011085591,0.0033757137,0.0059475247,0.0038387221,0.003501929,0.017122168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055062655,0.001160713,0.002997186,0.0017097497,0.0052410983,0.014803409,0.006272523,0.0062014773,0.0035568785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007098738,0.00031232883,0.0023056474,0.0005977808,0.00021475424,0.00065098953,0.0007610055,0.060852785,0.007367064,0.76398665,0.018201018,0.14404008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012696916,0.00009174448,0.00033371334,0.000057754463,0.00005998107,0.00024451924,0.00013817931,0.11463479,0.003097156,0.87384063,0.007336133,0.000038464215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002021327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017122168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018925167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031156421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057279408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304890599","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2022.10.018","title":"Supermajority politics: Equilibrium range, policy diversity, utilitarian welfare, and political compromise","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Economics; Politics; Voting; Majority rule; Welfare; Convergence (economics); Diversity (politics); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Law; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.11701423733171894,"score_gpt":0.31839188510670346,"score_spread":0.20137764777498451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304890599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7031444,0.00080393505,0.16230065,0.00376765,0.00007159821,0.00008953302,0.00015532036,0.00009991922,0.129567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944073,0.00009761263,0.0030672734,0.000088123365,0.00003759385,0.00003939787,0.000028154453,0.000013760435,0.0022208397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538714,0.0028747867,0.0000898561,0.00050346507,0.00045373692,0.00069104217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98153347,0.01460848,0.0011251526,0.00092363707,0.00059971865,0.0012096588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008279597,0.0003655996,0.0013946508,0.0013072436,0.0015969846,0.005939565,0.001419093,0.0017298508,0.012248115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028272137,0.00036116716,0.00082603603,0.0010217377,0.0031441269,0.005107685,0.003503595,0.0023694423,0.00055357505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025862412,0.00012121284,0.003987972,0.00006307839,0.000081892984,0.00010048868,0.0007732335,0.027321624,0.0011626659,0.94792926,0.001655942,0.016544053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000588912,0.00007856912,0.0022484823,0.000031664214,0.000024559433,0.00012357463,0.00075700803,0.061367616,0.00038436658,0.9330717,0.0018349217,0.000018699197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060406164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008252186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013436396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008958704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04378718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309872526","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.12179","title":"Stabilization of Capacitated Matching Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Equivalence (formal languages); Time complexity; Discrete mathematics; Graph","score_opus":0.11120409639051854,"score_gpt":0.17564256227872999,"score_spread":0.06443846588821145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309872526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27717006,0.0005084448,0.6891068,0.0011732372,0.000077675584,0.00023609592,0.0005408966,0.0005238172,0.030662993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96880764,0.00020519123,0.02589304,0.000101546895,0.000043425873,0.00015295342,0.000252312,0.000053561133,0.004490249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823797,0.0007006377,0.000081680264,0.00041313193,0.00027585603,0.00029075998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966793,0.0020774982,0.00037189585,0.00024284513,0.00035926414,0.00026924943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014626683,0.0007203844,0.0009054534,0.00078032096,0.00075617555,0.0020557176,0.0015511379,0.0010880998,0.0042126104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007353198,0.0004265694,0.00062621024,0.00114941,0.001941402,0.0023066117,0.0013075287,0.0012916642,0.0003915241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029063626,0.0000906481,0.0011585209,0.00018802722,0.000067973786,0.00014614766,0.000349084,0.40285912,0.0056576715,0.5658965,0.002622578,0.020673117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036854657,0.000038997394,0.00016248388,0.000015033831,0.000013975649,0.00002718368,0.00006882009,0.6334783,0.0012476328,0.36378115,0.0011161445,0.000013436073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002190638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014630739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042126104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024770186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011114638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017972112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311298289","doi":"10.22574/jmid.2022.12.003","title":"Centralized refugee matching mechanisms with hierarchical priority classes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Matching (statistics); Axiom; Prioritization; Class (philosophy); Forced migration; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Economics; Management science; Statistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03347255902532067,"score_gpt":0.22362787321576366,"score_spread":0.190155314190443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311298289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112868175,0.0002114995,0.8751473,0.0005451152,0.00007206725,0.00029464473,0.00011892447,0.0003647963,0.010377467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88899064,0.0001348789,0.10268312,0.00012910308,0.000051727962,0.00019062047,0.00008202723,0.0000335209,0.0077043027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948196,0.002208593,0.00034885813,0.0010803035,0.00075247395,0.0007902125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906308,0.003642044,0.0015296771,0.002661384,0.00074680336,0.00078934064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006551348,0.00050095364,0.0012123251,0.00087476097,0.0014293097,0.0035148084,0.003514301,0.0019013997,0.007876498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149473315,0.00056722085,0.0012351084,0.0014166097,0.0017061878,0.0070417193,0.0033348459,0.0016901755,0.0010200833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046309925,0.00031996067,0.0034824254,0.00017885117,0.00013177677,0.0002096349,0.00055032934,0.16649383,0.0034637826,0.75245297,0.0017897965,0.07046356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035171636,0.00025687407,0.0009962831,0.00003325374,0.00008425356,0.00022473607,0.00026337703,0.61526537,0.0028221344,0.37064135,0.008992885,0.00006771869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002349537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002055071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007876498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023296215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023187425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034647286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312308199","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16455-2_2","title":"Cooperative Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06787378741319647,"score_gpt":0.3054897563057985,"score_spread":0.23761596889260203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312308199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011382072,0.0022920684,0.2264593,0.0029753095,0.00065118686,0.00024832884,0.0005630197,0.00025367146,0.7551751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52524996,0.0031367827,0.04312625,0.0018535217,0.00051047787,0.0009336604,0.0008742092,0.0001563282,0.42415878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880326,0.00039692773,0.000048698483,0.00020683979,0.0003644245,0.0001798245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905914,0.00043578752,0.000060206883,0.00018332113,0.0001649943,0.000096529315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075008196,0.0009924944,0.00084219,0.0010539221,0.0013485793,0.0033463703,0.0013761997,0.001578489,0.029137027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030335519,0.00036442242,0.0006106031,0.0010091696,0.0020647764,0.002753305,0.0018877329,0.0016768753,0.0042369193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065825852,0.000012058761,0.000038379974,0.000027360038,0.000006314438,0.000020611258,0.0000693304,0.0014784231,0.00012758198,0.9806983,0.008657082,0.008858002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014813928,0.000010538694,0.00005817487,0.000020548536,0.000007104161,0.00006561649,0.000051459676,0.0080318805,0.000120721634,0.94959325,0.04201996,0.00000581962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022889844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016635093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029137027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016627176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00119271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097473025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313384081","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4315267","title":"Stable and Balanced Outcome of Bilateral Bargaining in Networks","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Economics; Business; Law and economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01764523728104122,"score_gpt":0.21548835667817925,"score_spread":0.19784311939713803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313384081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6119407,0.0002774202,0.32139534,0.0025569983,0.00011066924,0.0002037024,0.000607342,0.00021545238,0.06269238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770496,0.00017919263,0.012491369,0.00010810012,0.000063733954,0.00017267613,0.00022188341,0.000051980052,0.009661445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969554,0.0014369002,0.00013397342,0.00040464845,0.00045970635,0.0006093745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895991,0.006692093,0.0014541218,0.00050620973,0.00078593666,0.00096257887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039542858,0.0007582003,0.0015200633,0.001464951,0.002191741,0.0048730634,0.0016231169,0.0035913237,0.010325702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018837629,0.0006633454,0.0008243643,0.0014789932,0.0029052636,0.004829545,0.0022630491,0.0017709597,0.0012895825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003021478,0.00008769002,0.00074051996,0.000069335634,0.000042167565,0.0001436868,0.00034137527,0.033732284,0.0017576314,0.95561737,0.0015817408,0.005584143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007439459,0.000038587084,0.0003052516,0.000017163986,0.00001213347,0.000036712343,0.00013437707,0.09127843,0.00050038134,0.9070654,0.00052271126,0.000014313174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013492267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001255747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010325702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016767556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016323124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03454292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313415204","doi":"10.3390/g14010002","title":"Exchange Networks with Stochastic Matching","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Sorbonne Université; Université Clermont-Auvergne; Université Côte d’Azur; Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Convergence (economics); Fixed point; Bargaining problem; Extension (predicate logic); Nash equilibrium; Stability (learning theory); Stochastic approximation; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.020201090111851068,"score_gpt":0.19106274782085944,"score_spread":0.17086165770900838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313415204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20289937,0.00026564058,0.7723907,0.00086224225,0.000074109485,0.00013628375,0.00015930572,0.00015471541,0.023057653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95845455,0.00027092634,0.03238,0.00013467274,0.00006454087,0.00016746153,0.00010791186,0.000035084573,0.008384875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801254,0.0010096394,0.00007992487,0.00032664262,0.00029868944,0.00027249282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.0014578204,0.0006031602,0.00031476715,0.0002256131,0.00023706727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018199664,0.0004218939,0.0008018035,0.0009915025,0.001282529,0.0022567303,0.0010439383,0.0017636771,0.0055349045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010316617,0.00040600856,0.0009167731,0.0009412397,0.0017665153,0.0039387075,0.002037113,0.0011174771,0.00055253133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000689483,0.00003506899,0.000666785,0.000037938007,0.000025812917,0.00020474795,0.00016747272,0.17455886,0.0010643525,0.8158881,0.0005914524,0.0066904374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002506131,0.000042850585,0.00030132927,0.000012631361,0.000012920773,0.00009955281,0.0000821106,0.53000593,0.0003738418,0.46665615,0.0023721352,0.000015511612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017084114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001002928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055349045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012559133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007018968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018516123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317676827","doi":"10.1002/jae.3061","title":"Estimating separable matching models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Estimator; Separable space; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematics; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0547326731160269,"score_gpt":0.2375883062032721,"score_spread":0.1828556330872452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317676827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093073614,0.0004012385,0.9021143,0.0003942554,0.000025997093,0.00008834296,0.0005143338,0.00031850892,0.003069507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111989,0.0006015103,0.18081479,0.00015248566,0.000087302826,0.00022961233,0.0015697517,0.00014319812,0.005202501],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956008,0.002868004,0.00015569365,0.0006615554,0.0004524443,0.0002615078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367554,0.012097072,0.0014800419,0.0018951664,0.0005264078,0.00032576948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061950004,0.000966542,0.0020658122,0.002568386,0.0005495266,0.0016170263,0.0017287155,0.0015212782,0.007887214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032330126,0.00082269753,0.0015485036,0.0026665826,0.0012044723,0.0026193673,0.0033837445,0.0021518634,0.001008662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020755047,0.00020034367,0.013852269,0.0003768939,0.00040726032,0.00027892477,0.000555755,0.45882076,0.0011833152,0.38492146,0.003395555,0.13579985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029117748,0.00003152883,0.0012411989,0.00003184103,0.000035563473,0.000037415004,0.00007675486,0.6240127,0.0003441312,0.37240505,0.0017365236,0.000018162209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050362186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007887214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013011972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011993016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032762647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320015990","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4320762","title":"Intermediate Condorcet Winners and Losers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Mathematics; Voting; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01635846676085917,"score_gpt":0.21566822048312362,"score_spread":0.19930975372226445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320015990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87915546,0.00023369002,0.01200404,0.0014582198,0.0003165279,0.00023513865,0.00048110628,0.00011618227,0.10599961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175,0.000039354236,0.0012246002,0.00012059231,0.000043001142,0.000033520348,0.00013056248,0.000023717701,0.026634645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983205,0.000274332,0.00006285348,0.00031189495,0.00027755272,0.0007529126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689746,0.0006533714,0.0003237382,0.0004901058,0.00032088393,0.0013145354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021064389,0.0003246017,0.0013230313,0.0010342776,0.0023758565,0.005940382,0.0011551324,0.001166534,0.042911142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007735674,0.0002684744,0.00068516907,0.00047946814,0.001172384,0.0017060376,0.0023340408,0.0024526978,0.004336951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068553123,0.0017673947,0.14413439,0.00030163405,0.00028488552,0.001703939,0.0060464554,0.0038901914,0.00823911,0.5923417,0.026690744,0.20774427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093677454,0.002890206,0.20105048,0.00032191066,0.00056907133,0.0026081528,0.025875963,0.043234866,0.0071556,0.6368312,0.07829999,0.00022576611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012528821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002972417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042911142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069527025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006242251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14355206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320477987","doi":"10.1016/j.dam.2023.01.031","title":"The speed and threshold of the biased perfect matching and Hamilton cycle games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discrete Applied Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dawson College; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Infinity; Matching (statistics); Combinatorics; Constant (computer programming); Hamiltonian path; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Graph","score_opus":0.024694619992312365,"score_gpt":0.2227033323834754,"score_spread":0.19800871239116302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320477987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67877364,0.0014935788,0.28043097,0.005010258,0.0002163642,0.00023663488,0.0006870547,0.0005109281,0.03264053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97785795,0.0005745978,0.014574263,0.00025738022,0.00011906811,0.00013936439,0.00013723357,0.000103599414,0.006236665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802786,0.00080076884,0.000100916055,0.00037947588,0.00031054288,0.00038046806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94339216,0.044845384,0.0045110425,0.0024065615,0.002323858,0.0025210136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047844206,0.000564499,0.0025186113,0.0024761858,0.0013520251,0.003921231,0.003124002,0.003103657,0.0073906905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072064035,0.0013779334,0.0010405926,0.0015702097,0.003983946,0.008456647,0.0024651578,0.003538192,0.0006446314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026330675,0.000055034827,0.0019350887,0.0001099584,0.000047206766,0.00008167869,0.0004006371,0.035798773,0.0017467364,0.94963896,0.0023398548,0.007582829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000801514,0.00003673538,0.0010532022,0.00003383405,0.00002405425,0.00008408916,0.00010869126,0.18504092,0.00053143606,0.8123261,0.00063634897,0.000044477503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003619453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017910635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073906905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026344778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026229462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025302708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320490855","doi":"10.1145/3580375","title":"A Framework for Computing the Nucleolus via Dynamic Programming","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Treewidth; Computer science; Voting; Theoretical computer science; Matching (statistics); Bounded function; Class (philosophy); Weighted voting; Time complexity; Mathematics; Algorithm; Pathwidth; Artificial intelligence; Graph","score_opus":0.039052003905131416,"score_gpt":0.2713115382756635,"score_spread":0.2322595343705321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320490855","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039593773,0.0001069783,0.9907266,0.00023107619,0.000021616528,0.000043803808,0.00007889619,0.00021267973,0.004618982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18967198,0.00046861154,0.80426157,0.00026676478,0.00010105975,0.00048480043,0.00036393566,0.0003855635,0.0039957324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800223,0.00064864947,0.0000903702,0.0006038909,0.0004027821,0.00025201062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974548,0.0015697948,0.00014832834,0.0004731398,0.00020749444,0.00014651722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019233539,0.0009795588,0.0012038861,0.0015912366,0.0015981604,0.0034688406,0.0027753792,0.0013346621,0.006973659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007005424,0.0007298402,0.0019720353,0.001920556,0.0035198075,0.0067693437,0.004035664,0.0044068005,0.0012139312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024716359,0.00002363004,0.000088935674,0.00005715948,0.000012018781,0.0000326953,0.00009948989,0.043700334,0.0010859033,0.9411487,0.0009786307,0.012747846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014674605,0.000014771728,0.000034856625,0.00001984518,0.000007100353,0.00002207868,0.000030187999,0.13428645,0.0007310528,0.8596252,0.005201568,0.000012273387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037677274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034271178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006973659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029834062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023220587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023329198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351686","doi":"10.1080/10485252.2023.2176180","title":"Model fitting using partially ranked data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of nonparametric statistics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Appeal; Set (abstract data type); Data set; Mathematics; Exponential function; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.2896080796328338,"score_gpt":0.3390403272482709,"score_spread":0.049432247615437075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043868855,0.00015541464,0.954215,0.00028605742,0.000024072779,0.000082404345,0.0003783952,0.0002662885,0.0007235676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66728157,0.00029818164,0.32748726,0.00026487574,0.00005886256,0.00042021467,0.0020833663,0.00019232821,0.0019133319],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99207,0.005769448,0.00032629038,0.0009855381,0.000593663,0.00025503535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728636,0.020757481,0.0011450201,0.0033719987,0.0015940762,0.00026783985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014194268,0.0009053283,0.0017113523,0.0013980564,0.0006976503,0.002599668,0.002393741,0.0018076668,0.0027130211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06827925,0.00078688946,0.0017628352,0.0019546861,0.0011473551,0.00275969,0.0016372645,0.0024377285,0.0006807859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102668,0.000058896567,0.004860729,0.00013338569,0.00013953075,0.00015125061,0.00017029648,0.90975124,0.00054150005,0.056762587,0.0010072989,0.02631295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015924323,0.000017622117,0.00061007077,0.000016304075,0.000007667246,0.00003590026,0.000032269294,0.96313167,0.00017979016,0.035436485,0.00050053286,0.000015710937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007499364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064707664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014194268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001031824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001619874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07506734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321379804","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4364720","title":"Cross-State Strategic Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; State (computer science); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03787119357090294,"score_gpt":0.25772485231151365,"score_spread":0.21985365874061072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321379804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65312517,0.0002862675,0.14769892,0.0020599803,0.00021044142,0.00016320693,0.0007630109,0.00032381702,0.19536915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770835,0.00004067969,0.0024585165,0.000097605225,0.000015355756,0.00003116356,0.00011425385,0.000014635863,0.020144343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846834,0.00060577743,0.00007619394,0.00034755585,0.00015087536,0.00035119106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960361,0.0018305689,0.00035851498,0.0010748937,0.00039180944,0.00030818125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002211233,0.0002966973,0.00086736056,0.0007020085,0.001198206,0.0030039714,0.00085907744,0.0017148033,0.033221323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007956761,0.00033780967,0.000895099,0.00084867206,0.0008347836,0.0020167555,0.0016876094,0.0015457916,0.0032168587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005835962,0.00022887807,0.0093732895,0.000087593915,0.00019820935,0.00020795708,0.0005432661,0.031163279,0.0018217303,0.8991179,0.00757901,0.049095407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114045935,0.0003435763,0.0080181975,0.000047420563,0.00016442877,0.00025897354,0.00086924975,0.2486293,0.002099458,0.7267081,0.012694105,0.00005325336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015845131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034961945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033221323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009788134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090180716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11113644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321598513","doi":"10.3390/g14020019","title":"A Representation for Many Player Generalized Divide the Dollar Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Strategy; Liberian dollar; Mathematical economics; Representation (politics); Normal-form game; Repeated game; Operator (biology); Bargaining problem; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Non-cooperative game; Mathematics; Game theory; Economics","score_opus":0.08290310321348061,"score_gpt":0.2821639099020004,"score_spread":0.1992608066885198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321598513","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021050412,0.00011542226,0.94511974,0.0005333927,0.000064269625,0.00009343723,0.00012066172,0.000104311344,0.032798305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65255475,0.0002977714,0.312881,0.0004085762,0.000114374976,0.0004863702,0.0004002726,0.00009515253,0.032761626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919194,0.00036562965,0.000034246215,0.00012971679,0.00017531445,0.00010311662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995976,0.00015507631,0.00005241051,0.000078516634,0.000059937905,0.000056504894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086352846,0.00052954257,0.0005370365,0.00037592836,0.00063315226,0.0017494679,0.0016509591,0.0012486796,0.009232737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002348214,0.00018873859,0.0007340001,0.0006325096,0.0012197561,0.002249785,0.0013117859,0.0019465125,0.0011075675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014389678,0.00002378651,0.00010614722,0.00001388911,0.000005000785,0.000045458888,0.000086476764,0.045425694,0.0007019356,0.9432058,0.0012626187,0.009108811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020586172,0.000033382166,0.00009794334,0.000009660274,0.0000057132215,0.000078961,0.00004635879,0.43958968,0.00034124576,0.5509761,0.008786596,0.000013869174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021695585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019907362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009232737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011888869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085062685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03088653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327794818","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4387538","title":"The Effects of Delay in Bargaining: Evidence from eBay","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.01939835523691432,"score_gpt":0.2313760963454188,"score_spread":0.21197774110850448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327794818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422743,0.00439505,0.0030088082,0.0031340155,0.000100233214,0.000053500557,0.00028230977,0.000052967698,0.046698898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503505,0.001068766,0.00037208572,0.00023660771,0.00007278046,0.000014690124,0.00006728827,0.000018143151,0.0031145501],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967926,0.001523271,0.00022130777,0.00035831385,0.0004996183,0.0006049027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8537852,0.12267924,0.013607544,0.004972178,0.0028591387,0.0020966406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012599308,0.00034397273,0.0010372867,0.0010944866,0.0017603784,0.003542352,0.0011367773,0.0027255516,0.02399859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07103499,0.00053134095,0.00050934264,0.0012706727,0.0020261218,0.0038634515,0.0017060653,0.0031161087,0.0024703462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048477504,0.0060648024,0.31640545,0.0016482836,0.0012563827,0.0014902053,0.0076832334,0.05883808,0.0084779905,0.25336608,0.022348706,0.27394322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006358073,0.007666635,0.35191497,0.0006411045,0.0017798262,0.0011701464,0.018389432,0.05725129,0.014101125,0.46841007,0.07189702,0.00042033213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067693535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042125746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02399859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001534932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010333472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080283284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365150935","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2023.105654","title":"Opinion aggregation: Borda and Condorcet revisited","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Condorcet method; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Voting; Mathematical economics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Approval voting; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03606433311321091,"score_gpt":0.25634201652297023,"score_spread":0.2202776834097593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365150935","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2132577,0.019990077,0.3432112,0.15170042,0.0036922186,0.00025609104,0.001089537,0.00067476026,0.2661281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96762556,0.0025469535,0.017342092,0.0019267538,0.0019297162,0.000115223076,0.00014889092,0.00012392439,0.008240922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893572,0.0055189533,0.00046664863,0.0016118081,0.0018351022,0.0012102311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96086675,0.025726978,0.003172239,0.00473463,0.0041951663,0.0013043163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020370582,0.0007609853,0.004552592,0.0032126734,0.0045559187,0.011900536,0.004454969,0.010486563,0.012477813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08256767,0.001174754,0.00221061,0.0041091116,0.008197465,0.015970426,0.0027604604,0.008037601,0.0014310715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005112664,0.000018388377,0.00034614623,0.000049559312,0.000045003762,0.000039954786,0.00022780677,0.0013616437,0.000059821687,0.981781,0.0058469507,0.010172714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027774002,0.000008561741,0.00041048334,0.000025416297,0.000022794302,0.00004564927,0.00009117851,0.011243721,0.000041808347,0.9864703,0.0015942752,0.000017982318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057290136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00440575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020370582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046287864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025693877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10773122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376457117","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4444283","title":"Search Frictions, Sorting, and Matching in Two-Sided Markets","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Matching (statistics); Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.021789467088116594,"score_gpt":0.26141065935830393,"score_spread":0.23962119227018733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376457117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88968176,0.0010610835,0.087153025,0.0041591404,0.000110796806,0.00018336791,0.00036291755,0.00018496354,0.017102968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99183065,0.0002582509,0.0032878334,0.00013795175,0.00005378293,0.000041683357,0.00006807298,0.000014045726,0.004307783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962165,0.0018918851,0.00022707155,0.00043982483,0.00033921603,0.00088561594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518156,0.036534257,0.006185819,0.002220181,0.0008427396,0.0024015065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00805717,0.00045646535,0.003826299,0.001607286,0.0018138834,0.004929209,0.002476187,0.0052385363,0.013860618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04720545,0.0008800938,0.0011156002,0.0020340434,0.0035535928,0.006930331,0.0021359895,0.002257947,0.00096114055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017185078,0.00070653774,0.010574579,0.00039809532,0.00019812591,0.00049370166,0.00076410756,0.11290615,0.0015675001,0.83503723,0.0063002426,0.029335096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036590465,0.00015969267,0.0021236923,0.000030966403,0.000046450266,0.00011415704,0.00036717425,0.18919025,0.00020630009,0.8065419,0.0008023548,0.000051147854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026543164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002305951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013860618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017325907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001834514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04636836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377200035","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32726-1_12","title":"Stabilization of Capacitated Matching Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vertex (graph theory); Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Time complexity; Computer science; Graph; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.03869181999386132,"score_gpt":0.2276370828592027,"score_spread":0.18894526286534138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377200035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18192227,0.0011038085,0.70456415,0.0019235552,0.00028325935,0.00022824935,0.00051347434,0.0006647616,0.10879655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421022,0.0005742345,0.020346861,0.00021130891,0.00016795954,0.0003192654,0.00028300483,0.0001446214,0.03585054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989532,0.0004727267,0.000035580535,0.00018887574,0.00013733064,0.00021222164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666506,0.0020266355,0.0003518956,0.00026808312,0.00031920173,0.00036902708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013876025,0.0010418682,0.0016510985,0.0010054503,0.0009193815,0.0026096,0.0025997802,0.0015237305,0.01259677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007778619,0.0006811643,0.00090920716,0.0012381786,0.0020296131,0.0022045842,0.0022751442,0.0019340309,0.001108225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022725857,0.00009125578,0.00023030704,0.00013436687,0.00004507401,0.00006163509,0.00013492492,0.1732347,0.0022513885,0.80413085,0.0054313466,0.014026938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041063933,0.000037408645,0.00009221964,0.000019294574,0.000009538089,0.000013099786,0.0000363299,0.4206028,0.00037187326,0.5775578,0.0012072625,0.000011292828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018927737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014797287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01259677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023481436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013099164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042140365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377294560","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-33780-2_9","title":"Comparing Algorithms for Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items with Limited Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in business information processing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Alternation (linguistics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Preference; Computer science; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.050589247731320966,"score_gpt":0.23142006806942392,"score_spread":0.18083082033810294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377294560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067679115,0.0010362155,0.92310137,0.0009189891,0.00026017247,0.00037637015,0.00021682713,0.0008449266,0.0055660573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38213927,0.0006484276,0.6085884,0.00043532625,0.0002873574,0.0007761203,0.0006823081,0.0004685349,0.0059742336],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868947,0.0072452584,0.0007793993,0.0018263158,0.0020580764,0.0011961564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839869,0.10200455,0.0018625278,0.008091223,0.0025699232,0.0014849176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022356218,0.0019208138,0.0038056853,0.003137531,0.0021753386,0.00588405,0.0073818313,0.0060715685,0.009441666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077955686,0.0015618786,0.0023524382,0.0035600946,0.0044510835,0.012045611,0.005025943,0.003956189,0.0011991594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030673908,0.00058125274,0.0019519987,0.00032056018,0.00025024678,0.000038909282,0.00032992935,0.604877,0.0008818109,0.14095384,0.0058352076,0.2409118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022124047,0.00020037069,0.00026156876,0.0000373071,0.000045946144,0.00002355235,0.000068386405,0.79557,0.0006775024,0.20221704,0.000654183,0.000022848955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033077884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029115055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022356218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056216517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00583483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11823237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379087233","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.19453","title":"Best of Both Distortion Worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Social choice theory; Distortion (music); Anti-plurality voting; Metric (unit); Approval voting; Computer science; Happiness; Cardinal voting systems; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16627440392903214,"score_gpt":0.18530253652666948,"score_spread":0.01902813259763733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379087233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05648682,0.0026615881,0.8895159,0.0048259944,0.00027350977,0.00020142453,0.00074737944,0.00046685582,0.044820555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7717437,0.0023908608,0.2099203,0.00142927,0.00045820876,0.00042240237,0.0009944079,0.0005074458,0.01213332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915139,0.003120228,0.00041318728,0.0020840091,0.0019607395,0.00090783986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832086,0.010977828,0.0014097369,0.0026445189,0.00094097614,0.0008183318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077133863,0.0023128155,0.0029893124,0.0014589104,0.001979,0.0070594954,0.0029439211,0.0027992574,0.009412216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03416211,0.001178686,0.0019799485,0.0014144698,0.003959922,0.00983962,0.005602139,0.0048125125,0.001767352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007110998,0.00017878298,0.0018772453,0.00034778577,0.00035214465,0.0003313263,0.00043689384,0.23496997,0.0018684809,0.6892161,0.009905921,0.05980425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000835004,0.00017405252,0.00045059374,0.00009510706,0.00007808527,0.00040826996,0.00024229553,0.2995925,0.0018632801,0.68460673,0.012344786,0.000060802493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017834633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009412216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032179994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017927259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040792823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379507691","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30403-3_1","title":"Basic Concepts of Voting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in systems, decision and control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Group decision-making; Voting; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Group (periodic table); Majority rule; Management science; Political science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Social psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.10595903788362455,"score_gpt":0.3125713295848964,"score_spread":0.20661229170127188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379507691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056776144,0.0073426506,0.18349552,0.0049202596,0.0013155611,0.00014067542,0.00039065737,0.00011373516,0.7966034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4349499,0.0116962,0.107804306,0.0039809765,0.0042566266,0.001181343,0.00070642465,0.0002460352,0.4351781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988398,0.00046772836,0.00006838532,0.00021704868,0.0002838469,0.00012328824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992092,0.00045751967,0.00005020564,0.00011573123,0.00012772244,0.000039684506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013394131,0.0007799159,0.0007854597,0.0013840352,0.0021635632,0.004182518,0.0012155991,0.0020186326,0.023054248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003358428,0.00039963744,0.0006423377,0.0021190827,0.0051656454,0.005628474,0.001285647,0.002960922,0.0049709803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001029817,0.0000019377396,0.0000073459605,0.0000068163768,6.159202e-7,0.0000020343082,0.000039859293,0.00006652836,0.000018608896,0.99549896,0.0016378545,0.0027184165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001962593,0.000002575139,0.000023200422,0.0000076255997,9.0718703e-7,0.000013391427,0.00002096751,0.0003131627,0.000026235473,0.9721372,0.027451156,0.0000016021486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014540268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010348684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023054248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015735017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009734798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07712412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239398","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25713","title":"Partitioning Friends Fairly","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15226759351797622,"score_gpt":0.281829402677441,"score_spread":0.12956180915946477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23793517,0.001409797,0.66919595,0.004957297,0.0003606233,0.000935458,0.0019773978,0.0016256389,0.08160272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82003003,0.0005867628,0.13771847,0.0005769447,0.00017449615,0.00035410986,0.0019773731,0.0004931508,0.038088713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964721,0.001214418,0.00012465869,0.0012657773,0.00050130254,0.00042184727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938573,0.0026319127,0.00039289484,0.002056985,0.0004375024,0.00062342297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024878853,0.0008805882,0.0015527797,0.00114124,0.004769995,0.0030364795,0.0032751954,0.0023898862,0.031685937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014236184,0.0007803359,0.0010830505,0.00220285,0.0016350253,0.010105062,0.0040526805,0.001291981,0.0042344313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012771741,0.00035021963,0.0048492546,0.00052402826,0.00032444915,0.00089609716,0.0029884793,0.15747307,0.0036903166,0.55864114,0.054886855,0.21409893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023745785,0.0001651234,0.0016547929,0.00008794495,0.00019477113,0.00070014276,0.002189447,0.35748684,0.005096448,0.5350104,0.09711086,0.00006574397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00492195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008266523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031685937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019630129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013693405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106000066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239580","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25704","title":"Class Fairness in Online Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Minimax; AKA; Matching (statistics); Bipartite graph; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Upper and lower bounds; Combinatorics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Graph","score_opus":0.14182090050570234,"score_gpt":0.29490744411552744,"score_spread":0.1530865436098251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061990406,0.00036384456,0.92876834,0.0006883906,0.00011473547,0.00015269895,0.0002055565,0.00038865663,0.0073273587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80357754,0.00028952095,0.18927324,0.0003163906,0.00024567763,0.00020417973,0.00022310208,0.00017140123,0.005698883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925599,0.002822297,0.00028819055,0.0018736606,0.0013354053,0.0011205368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770808,0.01446274,0.0013686179,0.0046243025,0.0013751747,0.0010883758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008030088,0.0009315436,0.0019905525,0.001136779,0.0022692052,0.0031678805,0.0042177783,0.0017738609,0.0062454008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033231713,0.00050827087,0.0011785142,0.0018936791,0.0025429924,0.009068718,0.003424969,0.0026161228,0.0006996641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001130929,0.0004040079,0.0034491897,0.00028001014,0.000118605705,0.00012578892,0.0006466966,0.30174148,0.0044297283,0.551651,0.0049137995,0.13110878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007434612,0.00012797436,0.0004301156,0.00002228808,0.000030980373,0.00009484325,0.00009065866,0.62922364,0.0026073128,0.36284867,0.004427128,0.000021945214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028640206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002064733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008030088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035360977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029186031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042467654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382239735","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25707","title":"Voting with Preference Intensities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Aggregate (composite); Ranking (information retrieval); Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Welfare; Economics; Econometrics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Information retrieval; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.18775751783590278,"score_gpt":0.2621696590128404,"score_spread":0.07441214117693762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382239735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072741166,0.00028539347,0.90870565,0.00094591256,0.00009178926,0.00027425538,0.00033103858,0.00021399053,0.016410785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8056867,0.00031456904,0.186919,0.00034593887,0.00015196456,0.00042072558,0.000381176,0.00007876956,0.0057010306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846675,0.007597271,0.0012143935,0.0023015435,0.0034273593,0.00079195015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826214,0.008347073,0.0019510303,0.0046603763,0.0017600651,0.00065999763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008292209,0.00085017795,0.0017382122,0.0011158304,0.00067257776,0.0032909391,0.0023716704,0.0012721671,0.0059017013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043398738,0.0006448618,0.0011099164,0.0019861734,0.0017796973,0.0049910047,0.0029365136,0.002546386,0.0009501323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050037616,0.00015084971,0.0054631485,0.00019759596,0.00022677792,0.0001047033,0.00049045123,0.10367965,0.0062074754,0.72698164,0.003192094,0.1528052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001330225,0.00018759449,0.00153637,0.00003684529,0.00009397018,0.00013887747,0.00013722153,0.2728895,0.0030149007,0.7150451,0.006738977,0.00004760724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066660414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077218714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008292209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014714614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009766904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04385394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244736","doi":"10.11647/obp.0361.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Social psychology; Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.11173059924757268,"score_gpt":0.24692326285488383,"score_spread":0.13519266360731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027755287,0.0014841246,0.74840367,0.0021338228,0.00029792453,0.00022470218,0.0009238126,0.00038114036,0.21839553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5751343,0.0039357957,0.3413456,0.0011548154,0.0005098267,0.0006151098,0.0027643046,0.0003168712,0.07422345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568367,0.0019108182,0.00027411696,0.00080017356,0.0010094095,0.00032191948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960639,0.0017016217,0.00028584784,0.0013522697,0.00045079412,0.0001456876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039962963,0.0010988384,0.000931561,0.001257031,0.001189144,0.004350977,0.0012193762,0.0011345105,0.015766155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010174161,0.00056826195,0.0016819192,0.0028635156,0.0016361948,0.005985004,0.0035382998,0.0023694173,0.003378802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021023932,0.000029427338,0.0006543966,0.00010944527,0.00005358956,0.00008640206,0.0007847677,0.0064664786,0.0007245938,0.9377668,0.005444734,0.047858387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011533829,0.00002966026,0.0005752635,0.00006543756,0.000039362734,0.00015372,0.00032021003,0.015960606,0.00059143914,0.94056207,0.041668925,0.000021658105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012569262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015766155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012140926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077861594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052743018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244907","doi":"10.11647/obp.0362.18","title":"Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Type (biology); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.0790531699233612,"score_gpt":0.24008562897242908,"score_spread":0.16103245904906788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028189356,0.0016810854,0.6439499,0.012319992,0.0010481046,0.00052198325,0.0025292933,0.0006957172,0.3090645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48025277,0.0035138617,0.30713627,0.004738114,0.0012116749,0.0008873993,0.006395472,0.0006163292,0.1952481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688715,0.0011930544,0.00016482096,0.00095288776,0.00041620346,0.00038593204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973368,0.0014598143,0.00017864938,0.00059710845,0.00023164503,0.00019598543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410645,0.00093821256,0.001405792,0.00082225434,0.0026565064,0.0051696263,0.0026091014,0.004793342,0.08159524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012886825,0.000610801,0.0014557497,0.0019787606,0.0016514969,0.00840404,0.0035952523,0.0023315528,0.011696763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009368263,0.00012774137,0.00058774365,0.0001835097,0.00006635046,0.00015099876,0.00017277936,0.011141388,0.00022451575,0.8854061,0.04947274,0.052372478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042816875,0.000026405542,0.00011281174,0.00003875164,0.00001714197,0.00011461733,0.00012531118,0.018113893,0.00019917992,0.9346468,0.04655149,0.000010763048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018046536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014082687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08159524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018985205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016645454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244946","doi":"10.11647/obp.0362.20","title":"Aggregating preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Social psychology; Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.11173059924757268,"score_gpt":0.24692326285488383,"score_spread":0.13519266360731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027755287,0.0014841246,0.74840367,0.0021338228,0.00029792453,0.00022470218,0.0009238126,0.00038114036,0.21839553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5751343,0.0039357957,0.3413456,0.0011548154,0.0005098267,0.0006151098,0.0027643046,0.0003168712,0.07422345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568367,0.0019108182,0.00027411696,0.00080017356,0.0010094095,0.00032191948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960639,0.0017016217,0.00028584784,0.0013522697,0.00045079412,0.0001456876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039962963,0.0010988384,0.000931561,0.001257031,0.001189144,0.004350977,0.0012193762,0.0011345105,0.015766155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010174161,0.00056826195,0.0016819192,0.0028635156,0.0016361948,0.005985004,0.0035382998,0.0023694173,0.003378802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021023932,0.000029427338,0.0006543966,0.00010944527,0.00005358956,0.00008640206,0.0007847677,0.0064664786,0.0007245938,0.9377668,0.005444734,0.047858387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011533829,0.00002966026,0.0005752635,0.00006543756,0.000039362734,0.00015372,0.00032021003,0.015960606,0.00059143914,0.94056207,0.041668925,0.000021658105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012569262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015766155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012140926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077861594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052743018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245001","doi":"10.11647/obp.0361.18","title":"Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Type (biology); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.0790531699233612,"score_gpt":0.24008562897242908,"score_spread":0.16103245904906788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028189356,0.0016810854,0.6439499,0.012319992,0.0010481046,0.00052198325,0.0025292933,0.0006957172,0.3090645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48025277,0.0035138617,0.30713627,0.004738114,0.0012116749,0.0008873993,0.006395472,0.0006163292,0.1952481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688715,0.0011930544,0.00016482096,0.00095288776,0.00041620346,0.00038593204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973368,0.0014598143,0.00017864938,0.00059710845,0.00023164503,0.00019598543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410645,0.00093821256,0.001405792,0.00082225434,0.0026565064,0.0051696263,0.0026091014,0.004793342,0.08159524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012886825,0.000610801,0.0014557497,0.0019787606,0.0016514969,0.00840404,0.0035952523,0.0023315528,0.011696763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009368263,0.00012774137,0.00058774365,0.0001835097,0.00006635046,0.00015099876,0.00017277936,0.011141388,0.00022451575,0.8854061,0.04947274,0.052372478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042816875,0.000026405542,0.00011281174,0.00003875164,0.00001714197,0.00011461733,0.00012531118,0.018113893,0.00019917992,0.9346468,0.04655149,0.000010763048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018046536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014082687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08159524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018985205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016645454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382299308","doi":"10.3982/te4866","title":"Interview hoarding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hoarding (animal behavior); Matching (statistics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Interview; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.05330914361303197,"score_gpt":0.23246096915942482,"score_spread":0.17915182554639286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382299308","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36998296,0.0011724725,0.52309734,0.004892674,0.00047676172,0.0012287998,0.00063877855,0.0017457167,0.09676449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95406675,0.00017817765,0.029234363,0.0004291566,0.00008003358,0.0002323538,0.00013604852,0.00007521822,0.015567901],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927409,0.004172434,0.00019206789,0.00091280026,0.0007287122,0.0012529753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740078,0.015402129,0.004031534,0.004534626,0.0010933765,0.0009305792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00630176,0.00070122216,0.00094517774,0.00057933864,0.0016519302,0.0014700566,0.001851506,0.0023475818,0.020289542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021432295,0.0005094709,0.0007053814,0.00046382888,0.0014457908,0.0017512752,0.0021977487,0.0016002678,0.001951941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023042592,0.0012043199,0.038506236,0.0011908716,0.00058750535,0.0027876846,0.0048970897,0.12825929,0.027904004,0.36656794,0.042843338,0.38294753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057567324,0.002022744,0.026082383,0.00036951608,0.00033859324,0.00305742,0.0051162466,0.46438828,0.024405086,0.3538092,0.11957818,0.0002566779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021775663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029777805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020289542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001288998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016671179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067875266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383499458","doi":"10.1111/poms.14047","title":"Cooperative security against interdependent risks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production and Operations Management","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Shapley value; Computer science; Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Business; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics","score_opus":0.05782529693162122,"score_gpt":0.2716914992423808,"score_spread":0.21386620231075956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383499458","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30544013,0.000089424495,0.6814201,0.0006870982,0.000029628269,0.00026710224,0.00015082076,0.00027785485,0.0116377715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97102016,0.000063595355,0.026718207,0.000046255704,0.000011154472,0.00013226275,0.000053721556,0.0000197692,0.0019349373],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959579,0.0020175898,0.00021639623,0.00060454715,0.00070935325,0.000494133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98269767,0.009646955,0.00251825,0.0035913559,0.0009892377,0.0005564953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056232433,0.00092952355,0.0009469174,0.0009882898,0.0009944774,0.003076516,0.0019648185,0.002065934,0.0042371927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021746544,0.0005455207,0.0011427646,0.0008719687,0.0024506967,0.0050847484,0.0032238904,0.0020943547,0.000417708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020217593,0.00015404604,0.0023875537,0.00010456131,0.00011182564,0.00020685082,0.00040656613,0.49656326,0.0055847242,0.4596705,0.0012352681,0.033372696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508128,0.00012661112,0.00059719716,0.000022737975,0.00004254342,0.00010874321,0.00015313053,0.6745592,0.0025709872,0.31974766,0.0019529292,0.000033192176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020012846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012062627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056232433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002193088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024081601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029738843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383533351","doi":"10.1145/3580507.3597771","title":"Capacity Planning in Stable Matching: An Application to School Choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Cutting-plane method; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Linear programming; Stability (learning theory); Quadratic growth; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.06749622897133155,"score_gpt":0.2735963548404476,"score_spread":0.20610012586911602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383533351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098974176,0.00062204484,0.87833315,0.002228237,0.000069429065,0.00029207126,0.00067926024,0.00033589316,0.018465815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71195155,0.0007085184,0.2771451,0.00021291542,0.00010172404,0.00042463228,0.0004826287,0.00016446506,0.008808459],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884605,0.00070530945,0.000028520664,0.00015040138,0.0001208728,0.00014872118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939798,0.0049841,0.00041351802,0.00018506144,0.00023866944,0.00019889766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022284354,0.00067587214,0.00082875724,0.0008357909,0.0010284906,0.0013447297,0.0013664634,0.0014816074,0.010901253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009833439,0.00051449274,0.00094293756,0.002324698,0.0014434039,0.0020856198,0.0015237986,0.0025538586,0.00039327648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000705349,0.00010147159,0.0007980183,0.00011922959,0.000025879315,0.000088963585,0.000106093954,0.90137184,0.0004188365,0.078272045,0.0025181589,0.016108857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004018879,0.000028508286,0.00023391345,0.00001299842,0.00000714057,0.000018015739,0.00007705573,0.93697953,0.0004235367,0.060240824,0.0019265112,0.000011761766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027033918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023267314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027033918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030626843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033656736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053753138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383533377","doi":"10.1145/3580507.3597739","title":"Best of Both Distortion Worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Distortion (music); Happiness; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Social choice theory; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0513318316040042,"score_gpt":0.2352154178439645,"score_spread":0.1838835862399603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383533377","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08919187,0.002605969,0.78429854,0.006428205,0.00028116014,0.00024767805,0.0011335154,0.00031421817,0.11549877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8642209,0.0019620731,0.11534016,0.0009352367,0.00027192757,0.00035980227,0.00068163767,0.00022800628,0.016000345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946971,0.002417773,0.00023756998,0.0010923295,0.00091706455,0.00063804316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096864,0.0057992344,0.0007741683,0.0014363718,0.0004502246,0.0005714841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006721827,0.001584756,0.0024089988,0.001741254,0.0017724,0.008085121,0.002081741,0.00258529,0.013917225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025615389,0.0008991105,0.001474633,0.0013340616,0.0030276855,0.006689761,0.0043038647,0.0030391277,0.0020550995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039006316,0.00008639634,0.0012703578,0.00016301863,0.000249236,0.00024041913,0.00034983948,0.110672936,0.0005955551,0.83782,0.0071182805,0.04104392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063002466,0.000091374786,0.00037708084,0.00009525681,0.00005576883,0.00021712636,0.00025334294,0.14450134,0.0005404633,0.8428284,0.010936834,0.00004001489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023318566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021537757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013917225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023060236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046557784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384207628","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.07.003","title":"A planner-optimal matching mechanism and its incentive compatibility in a restricted domain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Stanford University","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism design; Monotonic function; Incentive; Bounded function; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03621576031709306,"score_gpt":0.2445645924853198,"score_spread":0.20834883216822675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384207628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09268185,0.00014025507,0.883454,0.0010665115,0.000025099078,0.0002760584,0.00018296042,0.00016164071,0.02201162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79078865,0.00022126663,0.2028935,0.00020731635,0.00003397213,0.00077689637,0.0001395788,0.000045934714,0.0048928973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944483,0.0033551008,0.00030405915,0.0008126754,0.00074369257,0.00033614872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932749,0.004001552,0.00089972606,0.001037542,0.00042243916,0.00036378522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008917375,0.0005823877,0.0011384891,0.0010962323,0.00085187965,0.0021590784,0.0014995615,0.0018982087,0.0043469695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015281077,0.00068126945,0.0010403983,0.0010325905,0.004002059,0.0043306304,0.0025454804,0.0020553314,0.0006742946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005504872,0.000064800115,0.00025229703,0.00004349528,0.000019778305,0.000031837702,0.00011294876,0.024448548,0.0011195848,0.9669234,0.00026299365,0.0066652712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019315063,0.00017250606,0.00030786658,0.000033717486,0.000016769707,0.000104290295,0.00006382652,0.15370364,0.0017354015,0.83952093,0.004113109,0.000034694494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036224455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025046003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008917375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012245459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019355328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04716015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384405638","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01472-4","title":"Independent, neutral, and monotonic collective choice: the role of Suzumura consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of Tokyo","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Veto; Social choice theory; Monotonic function; Axiom; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Population; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024996483644706708,"score_gpt":0.2400744474934093,"score_spread":0.2150779638487026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384405638","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41496807,0.0009398949,0.46126705,0.008754879,0.0003126646,0.00023406021,0.00019708624,0.00013021626,0.1131961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96096474,0.00016609616,0.034342635,0.00042310054,0.0001261297,0.00020921866,0.000059457252,0.000030867526,0.0036777775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861404,0.009109254,0.000589812,0.0014969765,0.0018022172,0.00086129113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536071,0.030286368,0.004292455,0.0071576573,0.0032012248,0.0014552451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020035453,0.00037572757,0.0014701994,0.0011353823,0.00202465,0.0032760592,0.0018207999,0.0020019875,0.0049391594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043832105,0.0005393904,0.0013499188,0.0008546436,0.008633548,0.0052265874,0.0034588003,0.0032694407,0.000520207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042778654,0.000024848416,0.0009972375,0.00002623167,0.000023458191,0.000048328293,0.00016869808,0.0021286027,0.00030955145,0.9918934,0.00040894162,0.0039279065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054839853,0.000062814026,0.0010017973,0.00003961276,0.00002143132,0.00007016426,0.00016987565,0.019217761,0.00076486636,0.97549176,0.0030821355,0.000023018956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010658015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010467462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020035453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013394105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10595894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312880","doi":"10.1145/3596947.3596969","title":"A Meta-heuristic Approach for Strategic Fair Division Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Division (mathematics); Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Heuristic; Focus (optics); Game theory; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematical optimization; Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.30000350380154034,"score_gpt":0.263481448236266,"score_spread":0.036522055565274325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312880","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112088295,0.0004634272,0.98106295,0.0005637174,0.00005938258,0.00018734887,0.000070609676,0.0001487499,0.006235036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27121642,0.00046844527,0.7239917,0.00035715042,0.00007446434,0.00057621545,0.00019386587,0.0000902961,0.0030314985],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855405,0.0007449591,0.00007353275,0.00020793358,0.00026033525,0.00015920181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775773,0.0015591702,0.00014641922,0.00021408373,0.00020880045,0.00011390142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027274587,0.0014315527,0.0013963664,0.0019728737,0.0009263253,0.002296713,0.002680505,0.0026040198,0.0043914984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006286711,0.0008324776,0.0016991955,0.0018874974,0.0015018294,0.0021598954,0.0016299892,0.0022652766,0.0004684165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063690706,0.00009836822,0.00048404958,0.00012048396,0.00012863718,0.00008603032,0.000109911954,0.8979211,0.00072260114,0.066697866,0.0013461809,0.03222104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029522598,0.000035075638,0.000048368845,0.000030760977,0.000025628182,0.000028270992,0.000036176152,0.96085596,0.0002773723,0.03709363,0.0015307958,0.000008450585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00313693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004881971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043914984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022014272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029131824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015972495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385321339","doi":"10.1257/mic.20210392","title":"Bargaining over Treatment Choice under Disagreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Ex-ante; Stochastic game; Normative; Complete information; Exploit; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.038451944769898,"score_gpt":0.2683439615986128,"score_spread":0.2298920168287148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385321339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21030977,0.0011581144,0.57068205,0.04112075,0.00078339974,0.0010294429,0.0007164303,0.00016797188,0.1740321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435766,0.00034752893,0.03493546,0.0029128948,0.0005034349,0.00078104105,0.00016944463,0.00003867897,0.016735056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96833223,0.021298433,0.0011010086,0.0038486673,0.0026664152,0.0027532452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9515184,0.03949974,0.0029772671,0.0028364873,0.0015654735,0.0016026029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038242817,0.0011821442,0.0022305558,0.0010831816,0.0023170211,0.005947214,0.0027259535,0.010366958,0.015913887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087817386,0.0008374267,0.0015124226,0.0011478142,0.0047142617,0.0061116745,0.0034523834,0.006267618,0.0018732223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064383325,0.00012765874,0.0015929436,0.00013259758,0.00015607415,0.00030864603,0.0011256302,0.023273548,0.001124597,0.9493727,0.0036754867,0.018466314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024162512,0.000060083446,0.0004436527,0.000042567568,0.000035351197,0.00007117077,0.00027502686,0.047273282,0.00025932683,0.94877046,0.0024987378,0.000028811011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013275057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008579444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038242817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039132247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025529892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20224977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385331890","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4521854","title":"Voting Rationales","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02646434669689379,"score_gpt":0.2257290174241604,"score_spread":0.1992646707272666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385331890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104390085,0.0005789603,0.1281151,0.007841304,0.0012428936,0.00087569497,0.002526736,0.0007661417,0.7536631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82190055,0.0002471522,0.022032304,0.0011719974,0.00030026562,0.00047670648,0.0010132067,0.00021474002,0.15264301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936486,0.0018923554,0.00041074026,0.0010706654,0.0018031031,0.0011745543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044096,0.003180515,0.00070675416,0.0026696392,0.0023048662,0.00069727725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00480756,0.00062760065,0.0009661291,0.0022696177,0.0029014328,0.005584631,0.0016773767,0.003622978,0.047293693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023446424,0.00059833593,0.0012035903,0.0013152049,0.0016249082,0.0031354004,0.0017427406,0.0038839786,0.011016854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008301319,0.000060534363,0.001724462,0.00005720139,0.000030325993,0.000085348904,0.0005065714,0.0007810928,0.0014380517,0.95731676,0.0122558605,0.0256608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009961024,0.00008091894,0.0034284873,0.000102581456,0.000080867714,0.00021136133,0.00094337465,0.011443484,0.0022158134,0.86439127,0.11695025,0.00005199215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014931167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002507212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047293693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016533196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018184201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15821314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385656429","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4527879","title":"Uncertainty and Fair Expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03631473808954614,"score_gpt":0.2459973329801375,"score_spread":0.20968259489059138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385656429","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22564772,0.0039845365,0.47034565,0.039026182,0.0009056664,0.00010835888,0.00047736007,0.00020260713,0.25930184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775433,0.0005312689,0.008735489,0.00065347005,0.00034511858,0.000057249083,0.0000797718,0.000044454948,0.012009799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996101,0.0019054317,0.00016622886,0.0006009936,0.00078426173,0.0004419494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698205,0.00956931,0.0010451946,0.0010939125,0.00086569897,0.00044392055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005294223,0.0005028874,0.0009946873,0.0007096542,0.0016577456,0.006161104,0.00086278823,0.0029377397,0.011630225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035134,0.0004463877,0.0007770365,0.0006833486,0.0036930162,0.005861864,0.0015021984,0.0030272622,0.0009808298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017988777,0.000011984732,0.00019042175,0.000011449835,0.000009317771,0.00002144264,0.00011046103,0.0022804555,0.00006916748,0.9934221,0.00096027245,0.0028950495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003847759,0.0000025141978,0.000066489374,0.0000036477131,0.0000018692879,0.000006749609,0.000017037055,0.004084207,0.00002554272,0.9952904,0.0004949994,0.0000028253817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025567608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015423233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011630225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002345655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013241703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03890699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385813978","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.004","title":"Voting with interdependent values: The Condorcet winner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Condorcet method; Interdependence; Mathematical economics; Voting; Private information retrieval; Complete information; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mechanism design; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.0335670792132497,"score_gpt":0.2324053008551947,"score_spread":0.198838221641945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385813978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59117436,0.0023010934,0.19451533,0.04474874,0.0008382987,0.00016921175,0.00020921344,0.00011370832,0.16593008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815615,0.0002843125,0.007536615,0.000583811,0.00013505906,0.000042618034,0.000026552534,0.00002429546,0.009805317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996209,0.0024012353,0.00007803837,0.00051999587,0.00037746126,0.00041425816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98962176,0.006723938,0.0009792793,0.0010057692,0.0006522984,0.0010170087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075168074,0.00045014368,0.0015186808,0.0006277239,0.0026120823,0.005782521,0.0019109162,0.0038344539,0.007278644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028754182,0.00043677486,0.0007373724,0.00080576685,0.0047730496,0.005424643,0.0024284082,0.00462425,0.00059133006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016281649,0.00008555053,0.0023603437,0.000042895917,0.000053739845,0.00022631083,0.0007152788,0.0047032675,0.00021983842,0.9663576,0.007316391,0.017755872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055647404,0.000029292927,0.00063168246,0.000016657405,0.000025563199,0.00012433981,0.00039642988,0.023641877,0.00011390013,0.97215796,0.002786942,0.000019673245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029758897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003720254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075168074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013824952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020086141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03975314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386026790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4547051","title":"Partitioned Promises in a Trust Game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Trustworthiness; Outcome (game theory); Dictator game; Computer science; Game theory; Microeconomics; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04844205257709474,"score_gpt":0.2479815726346952,"score_spread":0.19953952005760045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386026790","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42013305,0.0004742281,0.52866024,0.006007244,0.0001206766,0.00023156278,0.00046149644,0.00024499293,0.043666594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97329354,0.00018897551,0.013075647,0.00014310183,0.00006410924,0.00010979032,0.00007948426,0.000038986625,0.013006361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445844,0.0033933604,0.00022117393,0.0006089109,0.00062640524,0.00069163146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96467364,0.029438337,0.0021893976,0.0013696288,0.0009339861,0.0013949171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057358406,0.00075500045,0.0023430265,0.0008900537,0.0017918309,0.005833694,0.0027129177,0.004673743,0.015624922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034488827,0.0012519611,0.0010255714,0.0013597017,0.0038339472,0.009070346,0.0025643308,0.0039010805,0.0011480345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038818925,0.00010581064,0.00081146706,0.00009838746,0.000053801865,0.00031541975,0.0005512766,0.060805563,0.0008040236,0.92821866,0.0016361491,0.006211259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016191225,0.00007153772,0.0002744558,0.000017943848,0.000035483987,0.00010121634,0.00023471151,0.26132062,0.00024774476,0.7363935,0.0011101731,0.000030731597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043219808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027442074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015624922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030211792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017626423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05227053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386174621","doi":"10.15388/23-infor524","title":"Quasi-Owen Value for Games on Augmenting Systems with a Coalition Structure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informatica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; Nanjing University; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Axiom; Stochastic game; Extension (predicate logic); Mathematical economics; Monotonic function; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Rationality; Axiomatic system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03020988972453831,"score_gpt":0.2264724172038449,"score_spread":0.1962625274793066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386174621","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07188387,0.00065817026,0.8645594,0.0009208221,0.00014484719,0.00012829812,0.00018938373,0.00006614786,0.06144909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8060225,0.0009125329,0.17616728,0.00035828975,0.00020099728,0.00045442025,0.0003239778,0.00006392479,0.015495976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979925,0.0010155851,0.00014569862,0.00028333525,0.00038472217,0.00017811458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969284,0.0018715585,0.0003525392,0.00036820286,0.00031358894,0.00016577714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003070806,0.00059261225,0.00052980357,0.0014480251,0.0009597282,0.002957997,0.00079803803,0.0010566682,0.005734758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077308365,0.0002579774,0.00079667603,0.0011216775,0.0034641759,0.0075708795,0.002097052,0.0022998925,0.0005255826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047466197,0.000004334382,0.00006393055,0.000013390557,0.000002832558,0.0000070963733,0.000037861926,0.0021503197,0.00015164411,0.9947855,0.00014331398,0.0026348857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041160242,0.00001733248,0.00010809015,0.000016392953,0.0000033061424,0.0000222437,0.000030699142,0.020508194,0.00021560966,0.9765003,0.0025663185,0.0000074690106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006661561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006683701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005734758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017194469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009200366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019184709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386567471","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.016","title":"Student-optimal interdistrict school choice: District-based versus school-based admissions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); School choice; School district; Welfare; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04810223679546384,"score_gpt":0.2958868116991121,"score_spread":0.24778457490364825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386567471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97052574,0.00009452464,0.014807133,0.0015958826,0.000035397457,0.000091751346,0.00026384083,0.000057694702,0.012527988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959835,0.000030731193,0.001075371,0.000053680356,0.000012287574,0.000018800407,0.000044807108,0.000007794228,0.0027730593],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960471,0.0023959354,0.000115895054,0.0003150186,0.00016414412,0.00096192467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887052,0.0072047976,0.00088650663,0.00045511127,0.0005110421,0.002237272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569084,0.00037595973,0.0019738907,0.000892593,0.00074519624,0.0038101315,0.0018889785,0.0020087117,0.012559494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017346518,0.00050624803,0.0008540404,0.0010617226,0.0013254054,0.0018572304,0.0019259454,0.0017251397,0.00082733424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010018349,0.0041612256,0.15007901,0.00042512553,0.0008940538,0.0006884486,0.001687486,0.37119865,0.0043735006,0.33870187,0.011995535,0.105776615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009943126,0.0010960295,0.07279338,0.00004552305,0.00024637295,0.00016912946,0.003224059,0.70029825,0.0019577018,0.21700305,0.0020669722,0.000105244864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011512538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019890582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012559494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024088328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024706726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04201573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386999416","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2025.00052","title":"Respecting Improvement in Markets with Indivisible Goods","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.053024222129811456,"score_gpt":0.25761211294164826,"score_spread":0.20458789081183681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386999416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6064556,0.0005747421,0.35220313,0.003006129,0.000103245024,0.00013910225,0.00010985429,0.0002849148,0.037123326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810399,0.000121818455,0.016045563,0.000098415825,0.000042539607,0.000040885094,0.000032445434,0.000026836353,0.0025516208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934569,0.0031539532,0.00036298577,0.0010579735,0.0008532432,0.00111487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975172,0.013499938,0.0045805504,0.0036031,0.0016021691,0.0015422214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095827235,0.0005718286,0.0015678336,0.0011727934,0.001284058,0.0044099037,0.0017488245,0.0028390868,0.0046570613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04159642,0.00034421138,0.0008416445,0.00133982,0.004352159,0.007085256,0.0026592377,0.002692517,0.00029942987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028952654,0.00015938234,0.002514551,0.00012975525,0.00004912509,0.00009336833,0.00043903023,0.03750475,0.002787045,0.92650944,0.00093564304,0.0285884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057798974,0.0001084168,0.0009827539,0.000016251706,0.000018692348,0.000035327186,0.00014058182,0.076560855,0.0010656138,0.9200418,0.000959147,0.00001265333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014518353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00112552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095827235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018201156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015787933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05067891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387514870","doi":"10.1007/s00355-026-01668-4","title":"On the Ordinal Bayesian Incentive Compatibility of Vote Share and Veto Share Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Incentive compatibility; Compatibility (geochemistry); Incentive; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06776049486945887,"score_gpt":0.27073662680897764,"score_spread":0.20297613193951877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387514870","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3053856,0.00079542346,0.611737,0.008233434,0.000203354,0.0004369471,0.001026051,0.00016498382,0.0720172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478907,0.00052854547,0.04123243,0.00061870675,0.00044243655,0.0004935814,0.00040262204,0.000105368235,0.008285743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974848,0.016734533,0.0013476006,0.0025397681,0.002903199,0.0016268783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8279982,0.14592832,0.010573615,0.007016662,0.005263844,0.0032194178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029962491,0.0010677491,0.003705015,0.0029741048,0.0023945803,0.0093988925,0.0038212333,0.0062977304,0.016515044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14153424,0.0023050583,0.002110912,0.0027397482,0.008878103,0.019206448,0.0044519776,0.0071141566,0.0011864032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001692241,0.00010251058,0.0008943562,0.000058984886,0.000035002555,0.000042870324,0.00022212185,0.0059642545,0.00031454122,0.9873214,0.00060635526,0.004268452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008678122,0.000042683307,0.0008768443,0.000030311798,0.000019636369,0.000046783625,0.000064028325,0.03638195,0.00015559616,0.96178156,0.00048814694,0.000025655634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018700154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011053802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029962491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031950513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15845871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705371","doi":"10.1007/s10602-023-09419-8","title":"The pure logic of discrimination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Statistical discrimination; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05887008585413539,"score_gpt":0.26297041914713787,"score_spread":0.20410033329300248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063020684,0.0018856911,0.15424414,0.041747287,0.00078101706,0.00007098148,0.00032817625,0.00011976942,0.7378022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382588,0.00038475866,0.006112234,0.0033290037,0.0005946049,0.000103064645,0.00006243615,0.000051704155,0.051103394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963013,0.0015580121,0.00010742811,0.00072332396,0.0007673548,0.00054246426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592775,0.0024257018,0.00023284889,0.00075646397,0.00042204364,0.00023517074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028860343,0.00033463252,0.0008211843,0.0009357057,0.0032626542,0.0067952303,0.0012725324,0.0037333872,0.016323628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010253585,0.0004197577,0.0005800444,0.0010252661,0.011180704,0.0071724323,0.0021771,0.0048541916,0.0013054799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011926568,0.0000022896138,0.0000149379475,0.0000016418342,8.8427754e-7,0.0000015652319,0.000016638282,0.00006729148,0.000007651593,0.9988686,0.00051778747,0.00049970055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022323493,7.9193677e-7,0.000018662447,0.000001713962,6.6930767e-7,0.0000029999435,0.0000091790125,0.00029333832,0.000012775739,0.99822205,0.0014345266,0.0000010535132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035563058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023982315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016323628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029323157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020055587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054607987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388006681","doi":"","title":"An Integer Linear Programming Approach for Coalitional Weighted Manipulation under Scoring Rules","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Integer programming; Linear programming; Integer (computer science); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.04762045173677849,"score_gpt":0.24847837547560833,"score_spread":0.20085792373882985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388006681","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020463117,0.00013212688,0.9913162,0.00036365434,0.000044536362,0.00006761097,0.00006122915,0.00007553785,0.0058927964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14652838,0.00078379054,0.8359341,0.0005596938,0.00033374867,0.00070902007,0.00043694838,0.00018921768,0.014525024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605644,0.001770651,0.00017293329,0.0006270086,0.0009859113,0.000387174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963697,0.0025681665,0.00028394375,0.00028650527,0.00036458718,0.00012702965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037528046,0.0014311943,0.0012040788,0.0008817788,0.0008964438,0.0031247074,0.0023330294,0.00160366,0.0086934455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008418724,0.00068442343,0.0015257079,0.0019750549,0.0018848771,0.0039387397,0.0021865696,0.005638411,0.0017074822],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055369106,0.00017443253,0.00022995293,0.00021908055,0.00006992759,0.000096791686,0.00016718333,0.33997196,0.0015361493,0.5931929,0.004436722,0.059849516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027127358,0.00004016488,0.00004645826,0.000028776441,0.000017747885,0.00003265279,0.00004078202,0.6894229,0.000665016,0.3046466,0.0050174184,0.00001431574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032196625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003249148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086934455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002151974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023256338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029082537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388182784","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4616402","title":"Some Further Results on Random Obic Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03574875327341229,"score_gpt":0.2411789869298191,"score_spread":0.2054302336564068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388182784","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12355116,0.007508217,0.53900075,0.014808711,0.0015986435,0.0002753475,0.0014490179,0.00047214638,0.31133592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8080524,0.0084888935,0.06645025,0.0056687207,0.004566787,0.00061613857,0.0018273523,0.0007178496,0.103611656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965982,0.0014509067,0.00022023494,0.0005580362,0.0006959695,0.00047671865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971186,0.02163375,0.0015583048,0.0027532706,0.0016996639,0.0011690313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505802,0.0016993645,0.0029933725,0.00321731,0.002809461,0.005100135,0.003135332,0.0034709065,0.03174293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028449578,0.001063485,0.003361238,0.0049289637,0.0040998044,0.0096114315,0.0031850077,0.0075879632,0.0026527958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058480877,0.00008508942,0.00038518687,0.00019153576,0.000026820037,0.000084924766,0.00017350528,0.0058179516,0.0004884422,0.977098,0.0044218027,0.011168305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132255,0.000014918881,0.00019791194,0.000029536654,0.000014290512,0.00004042707,0.000036692654,0.01170229,0.00017182856,0.98511976,0.0026386145,0.000012401493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018155634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016348431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03174293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021645082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014423418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10619068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222085","doi":"10.1007/s11098-023-02058-7","title":"Incommensurability and consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of language; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Metaphysics; Decision maker; Economics; Law and economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Management science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2038176647529995,"score_gpt":0.30985179056318507,"score_spread":0.10603412581018556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28907055,0.00474978,0.48312137,0.037455965,0.00063341873,0.00018075378,0.00036939728,0.00019606404,0.18422276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97466713,0.0004783259,0.020424578,0.00070629455,0.00029306716,0.00013477147,0.00009945333,0.00004992403,0.0031464824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741675,0.01562483,0.0016580606,0.0038271688,0.0033574414,0.0013649751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86699694,0.105331235,0.0052892114,0.015992459,0.0051069506,0.0012832195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023278564,0.0006131516,0.0021826562,0.0026184218,0.0035907524,0.0070651164,0.0036389937,0.0043970393,0.007674007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115730606,0.00091988925,0.0015571491,0.0026314673,0.023406425,0.015161819,0.0045950715,0.006279899,0.00052909605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017750974,0.000013227482,0.00032839132,0.000020761798,0.0000136398985,0.000016912947,0.0002634987,0.00072669156,0.00004049416,0.99661595,0.00024892273,0.0016938389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061484384,0.000002688914,0.0000814655,0.000006407538,0.0000030820029,0.000011111629,0.000056990062,0.00087613374,0.000037889855,0.99849916,0.00041600672,0.0000028895388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014547097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007453415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023278564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002896625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020920427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123110294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388853720","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4640296","title":"Capacity Variation in the Many-to-One Stable Matching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Matching (statistics); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05512915739737241,"score_gpt":0.23787534685962483,"score_spread":0.1827461894622524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388853720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56184,0.001016055,0.37320012,0.006590196,0.0002103606,0.00017731937,0.0010589096,0.00071544363,0.05519159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98488164,0.00020746185,0.0064793765,0.00020654922,0.00008647497,0.00007474426,0.00012995552,0.00008028332,0.007853512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961273,0.002001621,0.0001288944,0.00062177604,0.0003543395,0.00076611165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97205836,0.020551339,0.0020573065,0.0018867702,0.001212973,0.0022331832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005074199,0.000869189,0.00394548,0.0018484215,0.0022563268,0.004727692,0.0040964046,0.0037904582,0.013254248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032561492,0.0010259012,0.0014336604,0.0020019456,0.004277611,0.0075458228,0.0034193275,0.0027713333,0.0013346805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018378423,0.00006496318,0.0005241081,0.000104295024,0.000051122282,0.000116221425,0.00015062216,0.058585115,0.00091067434,0.9317643,0.0023409876,0.005203753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000453829,0.000029976874,0.00025068643,0.000015170346,0.000017795945,0.000057663485,0.00007281663,0.18913937,0.0001978457,0.8098129,0.0003305312,0.0000297945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028538923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018334063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013254248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028088815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021162964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044339895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389599330","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.04783","title":"Parallel Repetition of k-Player Projection Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Princeton University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University; Division of Mathematical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Projection (relational algebra); Property (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Exponential function; Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","score_opus":0.1704372457189613,"score_gpt":0.19048934235844622,"score_spread":0.02005209663948493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389599330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38605976,0.0003120381,0.58888507,0.0008874408,0.00010437812,0.0002702085,0.00024362055,0.0003445347,0.022893066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95597917,0.00017308742,0.03597002,0.00018142485,0.00007400172,0.00026707535,0.00013824036,0.00010042565,0.0071165264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525094,0.0019281455,0.00019317355,0.00086150295,0.00091537443,0.0008508708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746337,0.017763935,0.0023806149,0.0020504284,0.0016955985,0.0014757192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003574695,0.001369066,0.0018855239,0.00091032224,0.0014960805,0.0033039122,0.0032353848,0.0021723837,0.007685222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145178,0.0010037582,0.0017197438,0.0011687529,0.0037036845,0.0068431264,0.003851538,0.0045315414,0.0008257519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006354277,0.00019617223,0.0023575411,0.00023206753,0.00016474393,0.00088179944,0.0006910246,0.16081728,0.007521546,0.80755854,0.0016791305,0.017264731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005724403,0.00009476781,0.00024742124,0.000018836703,0.000020701847,0.00014957847,0.00007562404,0.4129569,0.0016647821,0.584012,0.0006709821,0.000031224445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001968242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013070033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007685222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018103557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016936888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025709629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389766664","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4664827","title":"Shifting Competition, Affirmative Action, and Human Capital Accumulation: A Comparative Static Analysis of Investment Contests","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Affirmative action; Competition (biology); Action (physics); Human capital; Economics; Labour economics; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13474516471402959,"score_gpt":0.33881694688610353,"score_spread":0.20407178217207395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389766664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88417643,0.001217041,0.054497726,0.0015192732,0.000046345795,0.00005790794,0.00027834644,0.000038206395,0.0581687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941187,0.0002658048,0.0016996564,0.000036685837,0.00001970568,0.000018655042,0.000042634434,0.000006661157,0.0037915295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993061,0.0003126617,0.000020152593,0.000085394175,0.00008022759,0.00019551805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992357,0.0059865983,0.0006503956,0.0002771247,0.00025780802,0.00047105533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134879,0.00027110137,0.00091203046,0.0010797601,0.00072929275,0.003177402,0.0010945951,0.0012507937,0.019675191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010060453,0.00024333074,0.00074155006,0.0011321747,0.0018446671,0.002884753,0.00092385506,0.000951314,0.000579767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004271916,0.00016775922,0.0052406867,0.00016809233,0.00009260074,0.00017590911,0.0006410542,0.07470637,0.0021471183,0.8916546,0.0018896721,0.022688938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119074,0.00021052104,0.011944779,0.00006242867,0.000096090866,0.00015310926,0.0013356408,0.21146858,0.00073985197,0.76979744,0.004030214,0.000042342668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032556632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035192424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019675191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022831713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011403983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0658201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390018119","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977806.ch12","title":"Chapter 12: Subgradients, Derivatives, and the Bregman Distance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09064051929964519,"score_gpt":0.21396446914596487,"score_spread":0.12332394984631968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390018119","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021505079,0.020750836,0.861821,0.002162333,0.001918328,0.000072899995,0.00079415593,0.00092584075,0.109404035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06631807,0.040949203,0.70308036,0.0013588443,0.002688901,0.00034351228,0.0022793347,0.0028601426,0.18012166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990816,0.00021360701,0.000046094494,0.00017139055,0.00043837065,0.0000488485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.0003949425,0.000031649186,0.00009436859,0.00019794122,0.000028566434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009840745,0.0011990223,0.0011713917,0.0010483305,0.00056797685,0.0031838787,0.0009913326,0.0010006126,0.023406686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049124956,0.0006065634,0.0006801021,0.002812534,0.0010166318,0.003411109,0.0009808891,0.0036465065,0.011171471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042791224,0.000044508437,0.00018048764,0.00039479608,0.00003917572,0.000037802038,0.000117273616,0.038097072,0.0012796469,0.5241232,0.14689931,0.2887441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011670463,0.000028933997,0.0003401167,0.0002671847,0.00002197206,0.00012061514,0.000048142385,0.09121032,0.0020277067,0.6370209,0.26886377,0.000038679515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027856315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003088683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023406686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014081065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001201156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07830316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390439628","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-48974-7_24","title":"The Price of Anarchy of Probabilistic Serial in One-Sided Allocation Problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Price of anarchy; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical economics; Unit of time; Upper and lower bounds; Computer science; Incentive compatibility; Binary logarithm; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization; Discrete mathematics; Mathematics; Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Price of stability; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05048305999129288,"score_gpt":0.22947470423670743,"score_spread":0.17899164424541456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390439628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06931216,0.0032345834,0.52505136,0.04389068,0.0011290673,0.00012519614,0.00038416192,0.00050432497,0.3563684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83578485,0.0019387736,0.071764626,0.00429209,0.0031215567,0.00044732256,0.00018184114,0.00052708236,0.08194187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932499,0.0038348958,0.00030012228,0.0006021946,0.0016248258,0.00038800243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93722856,0.052228,0.0022137593,0.005948972,0.0014249947,0.0009557969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011307584,0.0007384384,0.0026653593,0.000957216,0.0021558162,0.006112506,0.0030187673,0.006727417,0.019544007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0639275,0.0016421245,0.0011824026,0.0019040512,0.008508962,0.014098786,0.0031770049,0.011485941,0.0016883075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053700067,0.000021485528,0.00008274965,0.00004024063,0.000010353719,0.000030836472,0.00005740456,0.0064239255,0.000068017325,0.9834247,0.0032790792,0.006507461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002767649,0.000009687438,0.000034217286,0.000011983789,0.000003635843,0.000028009033,0.000009015316,0.01343411,0.000035821267,0.9852415,0.0011589113,0.0000055853125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007317045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009462184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019544007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028095667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017832053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06538123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390443667","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-48974-7_33","title":"One Quarter Each (on Average) Ensures Proportionality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Computer science; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematical optimization; Proportionality (law); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.05214071166547784,"score_gpt":0.23934374166527297,"score_spread":0.18720302999979513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390443667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2406043,0.00075494975,0.29851347,0.004960423,0.0021647934,0.0015392179,0.004782828,0.0081105055,0.43856943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7914096,0.00028014026,0.042256333,0.0010405505,0.0005340906,0.0006886368,0.0012492931,0.0013533146,0.16118802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285156,0.0016790469,0.00046630562,0.001619313,0.0017165431,0.0016672171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98101276,0.0036963283,0.0013575616,0.008996806,0.0037811054,0.001155448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040894486,0.00060703186,0.0019713533,0.0012652604,0.0021117798,0.0037086778,0.0026682622,0.0019199006,0.0791576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034648146,0.0006745318,0.00095623924,0.0019532067,0.0010162973,0.003208602,0.0034861218,0.0019991647,0.032621674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002306456,0.0011814699,0.017237257,0.00029613974,0.00019288971,0.00030625725,0.0010082126,0.008604229,0.020781137,0.25164694,0.120304376,0.57613456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007419663,0.0012756129,0.033455864,0.00013620507,0.00024770424,0.0019605535,0.0015567068,0.04470192,0.027815316,0.49422085,0.3936975,0.00018978798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021267696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028347245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0791576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009634753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025744666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26480854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390481379","doi":"10.1109/ssci52147.2023.10372017","title":"Balancing Matching of Two-Sided Agents with Adaptive and Fair Instability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Matching (statistics); Cardinality (data modeling); Stability (learning theory); Relaxation (psychology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Reachability; Blossom algorithm; Computer science; Combinatorics; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.045593555416275584,"score_gpt":0.2369490805311921,"score_spread":0.19135552511491652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390481379","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13846652,0.000031863518,0.8586169,0.00011710229,0.000017890628,0.000073799376,0.000038932547,0.000121351404,0.002515661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92819965,0.000026334696,0.0695118,0.000036095676,0.000014775779,0.00008044657,0.000042639695,0.000030075313,0.0020581037],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975012,0.0010445494,0.00014750096,0.00056536536,0.0004301803,0.00031118133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956044,0.0018937616,0.00071211107,0.0009825109,0.00047766583,0.00032955437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027883973,0.0005667579,0.00094012707,0.00077827217,0.0010229888,0.0016099717,0.0018421008,0.0011369252,0.002500525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097975135,0.00036819963,0.00086645765,0.0010911018,0.0013624766,0.002897624,0.0020092719,0.0009420239,0.00035876842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005481733,0.00018752845,0.0036011832,0.000110105066,0.00012007761,0.00031742346,0.00044864914,0.69341356,0.02006979,0.21808235,0.0008407496,0.06226038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891511,0.00009103347,0.00026350075,0.000004160316,0.000013543621,0.000057079753,0.000055105487,0.9447605,0.0022058852,0.05203018,0.00048548984,0.000014658007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001216169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009467392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027883973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012249775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008877736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014746606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390894138","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4695855","title":"Voting When Rankings Matter: Truthful Equilibria, Efficiency, and Abstention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Cardinal voting systems; Nash equilibrium; Anti-plurality voting; Social choice theory; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Pareto efficiency; Approval voting; Majority rule; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01407295377703951,"score_gpt":0.21407319930137744,"score_spread":0.20000024552433793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390894138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62322414,0.0007899487,0.27459252,0.013676446,0.00022334117,0.0002584626,0.000764241,0.0002340265,0.08623687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875801,0.00011914555,0.0077212686,0.00029968616,0.000081773054,0.00007989646,0.000101279176,0.00003482438,0.003981914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98835015,0.0067878603,0.00052525825,0.001591275,0.0011055676,0.001639944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93165046,0.0524999,0.005533459,0.006100672,0.0025655043,0.0016499894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015058716,0.00050238194,0.0019421672,0.0012413989,0.0019568,0.007068707,0.0020865083,0.0036464185,0.010954058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07716485,0.0005710209,0.0010547412,0.0015094321,0.003930599,0.007508186,0.002048632,0.0034678911,0.0011241891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047082547,0.00019577051,0.0063274344,0.00014117923,0.00013880515,0.00014259963,0.0010570282,0.010852895,0.0011340306,0.94901305,0.0045461697,0.025980392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007958177,0.000029166642,0.0010815852,0.000015508173,0.000028288885,0.000040192008,0.00026710008,0.027402997,0.00035836498,0.96992403,0.00075692206,0.000016329515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013936197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016138016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015058716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017449106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07963902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391026342","doi":"10.1145/3640760","title":"Optimized Distortion and Proportional Fairness in Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Voting; Distortion (music); Anti-plurality voting; Outcome (game theory); Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Majority rule; Unit (ring theory); Disapproval voting; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027595381259119263,"score_gpt":0.23514844381532032,"score_spread":0.20755306255620107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391026342","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19085307,0.0006383477,0.7924742,0.00065807864,0.00011742102,0.00021554377,0.00033309846,0.00030319937,0.014407053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169905,0.00020106898,0.07879635,0.0001234063,0.00005382473,0.00015872772,0.00023182084,0.00009777588,0.003346492],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815611,0.009065022,0.0010793037,0.00258047,0.0039638723,0.001750147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96533173,0.021992771,0.0026505787,0.0067865886,0.0022985865,0.00093987986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012728572,0.0009684003,0.001971629,0.0011070078,0.0011232283,0.003830256,0.0024902783,0.0014128333,0.0034281278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052865356,0.00053513056,0.0013540605,0.0012158199,0.003552656,0.004075565,0.0024115099,0.0017892946,0.00058109197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010982066,0.00012194803,0.0049215555,0.00016408916,0.00020629498,0.00014444915,0.0004752916,0.61878294,0.0032984682,0.31525418,0.001518974,0.05401366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011131188,0.00022621098,0.0014767405,0.000037501337,0.00005562842,0.00015559683,0.00014096497,0.67514336,0.0043686493,0.31605148,0.0021758047,0.00005674973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027859241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016332017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012728572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042254054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067315936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391178295","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4704737","title":"Strategy-Proof Preference Aggregation and the Anonymity-Neutrality Tradeoff","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Neutrality; Preference; Proof of concept; Computer science; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Computer security; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04252557351999512,"score_gpt":0.23808879630244775,"score_spread":0.19556322278245264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391178295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19482853,0.00047748818,0.7268932,0.009330831,0.00017317224,0.00024676597,0.00045872582,0.00017983296,0.06741144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517624,0.00025408706,0.040625785,0.00048077485,0.00018651027,0.00022093707,0.00015444205,0.00006267697,0.006252411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830352,0.011059287,0.0007625408,0.001560674,0.0022489484,0.0013333795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563545,0.03040968,0.0032188382,0.006259807,0.0021110473,0.001646088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014059318,0.000771,0.0016898658,0.0012814404,0.0030186453,0.008593392,0.0021037704,0.003849965,0.006985854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045634005,0.0008635054,0.0016346889,0.0018602746,0.0049357833,0.013439643,0.004715034,0.004307037,0.0011084012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007607615,0.000039117047,0.0002809833,0.000039561543,0.000023904931,0.0000525156,0.0002657979,0.003884771,0.00050213805,0.98745126,0.0008823195,0.006501596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018862593,0.000011102894,0.00009698938,0.0000055225555,0.00000586797,0.000034001758,0.00004555005,0.009678583,0.00015606018,0.9894329,0.0005068232,0.000007820159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007265509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054397597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014059318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002343284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022154409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074353695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391307149","doi":"10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394262","title":"Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items: Consequences of Correlated Preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Ranking (information retrieval); Preference; Minimax; Categorization; Rank (graph theory); Similarity (geometry); Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Economics; Pareto optimal; Metric (unit); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Multi-objective optimization; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.06800067106919737,"score_gpt":0.24427695058094592,"score_spread":0.17627627951174857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391307149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65213615,0.00026523037,0.33192623,0.0011508048,0.000047132955,0.00020562812,0.0001331002,0.000063864616,0.014071926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701375,0.000105493964,0.027815128,0.000088463945,0.000026663793,0.00013939952,0.000042135438,0.000015448784,0.0016297433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892259,0.006580756,0.0005348285,0.0011634133,0.0014844692,0.0010107177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95000553,0.033194438,0.0070061362,0.0064270403,0.0015198012,0.0018470077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015094922,0.000545226,0.0018077907,0.0011505092,0.0019009435,0.003758321,0.0015076761,0.0014380238,0.0036473642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049449626,0.000505746,0.0010336018,0.0016550936,0.0048202104,0.0056829583,0.0024712158,0.0018941488,0.0002909653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000802411,0.00031335003,0.01625177,0.00017501153,0.00024209359,0.00057485705,0.0012208329,0.16024607,0.00408982,0.773299,0.0015374725,0.041247416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011359902,0.00013249481,0.0047440236,0.00003794458,0.000055539836,0.00017244232,0.0004321909,0.249271,0.001806726,0.7420198,0.0011753462,0.000038912523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014851353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015154537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015094922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019475687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015267034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07983053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391617321","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104095","title":"Primarily about primaries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Condorcet method; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Converse; Cardinal voting systems; Computer science; Anti-plurality voting; Ranked voting system; Quality (philosophy); Distortion (music); Political science; Politics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.07772587154186397,"score_gpt":0.27459328879420036,"score_spread":0.1968674172523364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391617321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018832084,0.0019686467,0.019708136,0.01055138,0.0018981808,0.00006310564,0.0009208735,0.00024335878,0.94581425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48115572,0.0018321263,0.005377759,0.0057350975,0.0023795418,0.00010066042,0.000983427,0.00032069554,0.50211495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817777,0.00054413604,0.00007019413,0.0006057883,0.00038453878,0.0002175854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964908,0.0014097401,0.00039187542,0.0008191535,0.0005963875,0.00029211608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014719414,0.0005057385,0.00069833983,0.0013460001,0.0034516647,0.006650497,0.00097252266,0.002169122,0.097665384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010960342,0.0003949107,0.0004048958,0.0017739402,0.002606626,0.009289483,0.0021534131,0.0033219084,0.02323213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174082,0.000038631697,0.0014524135,0.00012961075,0.00002495487,0.00014404964,0.0012039765,0.00019980154,0.0004956883,0.88815266,0.042882994,0.06515783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019990146,0.000053003052,0.001186899,0.00011675188,0.000033497443,0.0003289903,0.0010722714,0.00046692177,0.001158822,0.3852129,0.6103286,0.000021397183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009697408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013650865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097665384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013302795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007933435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32672328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392223779","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/26","title":"Navigating Social Dilemmas with LLM-based Agents via Consideration of Future Consequences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Oxford; Good Ventures Foundation","keywords":"Delegation; Control (management); Business; Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.05002284425876859,"score_gpt":0.2756504319227501,"score_spread":0.22562758766398155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392223779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5072069,0.000180467,0.47161835,0.0022881574,0.00007024611,0.00022249321,0.0000744245,0.00034521852,0.0179937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92491937,0.000053451757,0.0728684,0.00017958895,0.000018935216,0.00014580956,0.000042865642,0.000021240725,0.0017501962],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806195,0.001251126,0.00008113481,0.00024994923,0.00022659318,0.00012928696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938875,0.0038983966,0.00092249963,0.0005032649,0.00028847036,0.0004999188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002962033,0.00063674175,0.00050295884,0.00049130816,0.0009129385,0.0020194617,0.0010521961,0.0014120182,0.0025068305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012920423,0.0003056323,0.00072076655,0.0002898089,0.0019053711,0.0023921635,0.002871157,0.0015831257,0.00023767789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056419504,0.0005815424,0.027437314,0.0003437143,0.00028595806,0.0013095428,0.0072460626,0.46089587,0.025243562,0.3751729,0.002789131,0.09813015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085409294,0.00014102012,0.0017285654,0.000026081894,0.00005324514,0.0001437306,0.0007348775,0.8245441,0.0021460317,0.16607238,0.004276911,0.000047731228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016129384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020581647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002962033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097461994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011246331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015664935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393132206","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114476","title":"On the complexity of nucleolus computation for bipartite b-matching games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Complement (music); Computation; Discrete mathematics; 3-dimensional matching; Bounded function; Simple (philosophy); Time complexity; Algorithm; Graph","score_opus":0.062216164890382175,"score_gpt":0.2716958774834759,"score_spread":0.20947971259309373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393132206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41423243,0.0016297185,0.51077676,0.0112208575,0.00039590453,0.00048341448,0.0023002648,0.0015098796,0.057450816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91490513,0.0008049548,0.07264883,0.00092481903,0.0003859054,0.000365648,0.0014626555,0.00052327575,0.007978874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945527,0.0024433334,0.00027953283,0.00093832583,0.0009071486,0.00087897066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92297167,0.06747692,0.0021584863,0.004220392,0.001579357,0.0015931731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039582374,0.0011255522,0.0032662894,0.001626415,0.002766254,0.007568601,0.0041143736,0.0034872782,0.019480068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041652426,0.0011406993,0.002248396,0.0027959864,0.0038284895,0.01368346,0.0051708748,0.0051073725,0.0015989023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015250191,0.0004783091,0.0029644768,0.0005017041,0.00018191637,0.0002047757,0.00071518647,0.18082899,0.002437123,0.7549216,0.016117632,0.0391233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092763956,0.000031667652,0.00027302702,0.000024881912,0.000026538364,0.000038854156,0.00008395284,0.26864102,0.0003637374,0.7297276,0.00067178765,0.000024067946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006211453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006147623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019480068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003912686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004050268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06516737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393146360","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30273","title":"Temporal Fairness in Multiwinner Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Alan Turing Institute","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Business; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11173800175273614,"score_gpt":0.28370867412422784,"score_spread":0.17197067237149172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393146360","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12961547,0.0007328751,0.8426638,0.0016498765,0.00020576533,0.00012587904,0.00025572962,0.00017218065,0.024578402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939313,0.00026637007,0.053035587,0.0002409383,0.00015114533,0.00013676568,0.00014023938,0.000066315566,0.0066496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906673,0.004495324,0.00045158196,0.0020723608,0.0011593162,0.0011540335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800223,0.013569885,0.0016127421,0.00273196,0.0012530222,0.0008101268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021775,0.0004410965,0.0014881408,0.00076956465,0.0021115125,0.003657625,0.0020538052,0.0016213298,0.006220638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034426276,0.00040259308,0.0011742734,0.0011486384,0.0027932886,0.005955988,0.0020717632,0.0023049738,0.0006359081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011594592,0.000043030166,0.0015239526,0.00006512964,0.00003980991,0.00010165895,0.00033095124,0.031097008,0.00063820026,0.94903815,0.0009367133,0.016069513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026352498,0.00003575449,0.00046511088,0.000017655015,0.000014608129,0.00007587381,0.00009806858,0.11071658,0.0003576769,0.8859152,0.0022578274,0.000019294264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023924273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002807307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01021775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018778077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019241249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054037333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393323735","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56255-6_5","title":"Deliberation and Voting in Approval-Based Multi-winner Elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Deliberation; Voting; Approval voting; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Condorcet method; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.032312067663126304,"score_gpt":0.23181488155606175,"score_spread":0.19950281389293545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393323735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23498233,0.002050599,0.6398661,0.005183587,0.00060082827,0.00022978972,0.00024445154,0.00023173903,0.116610534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95017815,0.0004101382,0.020950336,0.00017685539,0.00023330157,0.00016048734,0.00012409581,0.000066760345,0.027699873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98960495,0.007180322,0.00035214698,0.00087939453,0.00088480406,0.0010984028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650954,0.029944053,0.0014756573,0.0015646401,0.0011752076,0.00074507785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773753,0.00064921664,0.00187731,0.0007701923,0.0019273967,0.005017066,0.0023359582,0.0028180613,0.01195347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042925257,0.0009437581,0.0014469058,0.0012829688,0.0030540396,0.005815566,0.0023925751,0.0041418434,0.001250085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056329626,0.00014079036,0.0013576903,0.00013185678,0.00007959671,0.00016116927,0.0005838693,0.06126308,0.0007076353,0.9006976,0.0039055601,0.030407956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006085985,0.000075667165,0.0005479811,0.000014130076,0.000022619693,0.00004133774,0.00013668418,0.16376507,0.0002968087,0.83352655,0.0014876797,0.000024459587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002164978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024038614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01195347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016748458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016242424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046400607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394927090","doi":"10.1007/s10726-024-09885-x","title":"Two-Person Fair Division with Additive Valuations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Universität Wien","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Fair division; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Arithmetic; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03395908741372207,"score_gpt":0.24856721885162664,"score_spread":0.21460813143790458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394927090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27035686,0.00013178618,0.6853939,0.0009820927,0.00006246756,0.00020928793,0.00011340513,0.00014837863,0.04260186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617475,0.00003812426,0.034708172,0.000053731223,0.000016472837,0.00011693514,0.000029398654,0.000014828869,0.003274895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174374,0.0054264786,0.0003159736,0.0007031442,0.00096096913,0.00084971916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868241,0.0085714385,0.0011890451,0.0019801105,0.0007948599,0.000640359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160258,0.00047566363,0.0012324337,0.00081226986,0.0011478323,0.0041827424,0.0013701029,0.0014044738,0.010491428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02802101,0.0003540578,0.0008857155,0.0010790736,0.0028060046,0.004421333,0.0020422458,0.001207961,0.00069269846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023857322,0.00012411896,0.0011740476,0.00005520925,0.00004245767,0.00008875942,0.00042912725,0.13161314,0.0010724983,0.84639865,0.0007021619,0.018061267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008626184,0.00006705559,0.00044204516,0.000022687935,0.000014033529,0.00004855895,0.00020706761,0.34183273,0.00077680097,0.65419734,0.0022819075,0.000023423067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012488788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076611206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010491428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017877581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012932325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043156087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395097663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4757261","title":"Overlapping Coalitional Games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.023306883529132145,"score_gpt":0.234897395354462,"score_spread":0.21159051182532984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395097663","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24571191,0.00076154136,0.5378379,0.0027917125,0.00023244222,0.00027407124,0.00045541022,0.00015875918,0.21177621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923704,0.00036292925,0.02923113,0.00026559184,0.00011351549,0.00024205577,0.00030769757,0.000036530735,0.045736473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978618,0.0009941794,0.00010442173,0.00035941091,0.00036323754,0.0003168492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953152,0.0028982395,0.000330127,0.0005143566,0.00036172965,0.00058039435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015568659,0.0006682911,0.0010003925,0.00069864106,0.0014679444,0.0031928364,0.0014275272,0.0015513446,0.013256461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799864,0.00038886123,0.0007196719,0.00075431255,0.0017354954,0.0030949456,0.0023367808,0.0019234639,0.0010296508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056338864,0.00004264796,0.00026628273,0.00003300523,0.000019635925,0.000060652445,0.0001706208,0.008124182,0.00037431478,0.9828636,0.0018126187,0.0061759884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039130962,0.000019595123,0.00019609774,0.000015356984,0.000013695697,0.0000691416,0.00011807279,0.07052744,0.00019535502,0.9240213,0.004775543,0.000009232834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013856568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016801585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013256461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013887422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010753722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044347286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395704597","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4808646","title":"A Characterisation of the Αmin-Egalitarian Rule","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.018098768413054384,"score_gpt":0.218498607426974,"score_spread":0.2003998390139196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395704597","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21971744,0.00070151105,0.5932974,0.0027206012,0.00028670224,0.000099158395,0.0005489073,0.00021399082,0.18241422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403812,0.0003876402,0.041992933,0.00069827796,0.00028485444,0.00011282312,0.00022147619,0.0000780109,0.01584269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731004,0.00086969783,0.00018879143,0.00074475055,0.00046648184,0.00042021283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933855,0.0035235954,0.00081906165,0.0012043008,0.0007015018,0.00036591664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024983445,0.0003964308,0.0012043971,0.00095385074,0.0013302205,0.0041105463,0.001960589,0.0020393527,0.009072944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010850035,0.00038711153,0.0007966389,0.0012190551,0.0032924348,0.0035609556,0.0016023398,0.0029595036,0.0014666338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016662403,0.00000656859,0.00019240532,0.000009446013,0.0000051316797,0.00003074055,0.00006834133,0.00062818074,0.00033372897,0.99556386,0.0004870722,0.0026578421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010523683,0.000009284355,0.0001648341,0.0000069879966,0.0000035035964,0.00007087074,0.000026336056,0.007451646,0.00023354993,0.9904022,0.001614823,0.000005353955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006620838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044532306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009072944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087391626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008332478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030351996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396813256","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.02472","title":"Congressional Apportionment: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.02443307860106117,"score_gpt":0.2315951426015077,"score_spread":0.20716206400044654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396813256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022479687,0.0018805639,0.9377603,0.0027272864,0.00019171598,0.00041178422,0.00024867547,0.00017282163,0.034127325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44340336,0.0023720495,0.52063185,0.0010903215,0.0003002502,0.0014176614,0.00036967485,0.00033303228,0.030081876],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973212,0.0016129059,0.000069188296,0.00033119385,0.0003890723,0.00027637204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970402,0.0020461455,0.0002908474,0.00011431578,0.00033575253,0.00017273435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005989748,0.002026143,0.0019357052,0.0025433868,0.0012842959,0.0038792677,0.0025717583,0.003256671,0.007968596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058633927,0.0014191504,0.002248365,0.0021214394,0.0021132655,0.0025228697,0.002474367,0.0032766575,0.0006346557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017373774,0.00005381957,0.0002713696,0.00006510498,0.00006219682,0.000047867434,0.000053574997,0.95188606,0.00014016403,0.034985725,0.0013255425,0.011091177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001803878,0.00003578269,0.00016201432,0.000048070855,0.000026137588,0.000017144423,0.00006075943,0.96981704,0.00012766811,0.026115485,0.0035569281,0.000014978439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011275814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094677145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011275814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004956094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038723124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035959184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396873968","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.04.003","title":"Efficiency and maximality in anonymous two-sided economies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02667816084570245,"score_gpt":0.24565911478874325,"score_spread":0.2189809539430408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396873968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47082245,0.0008828543,0.4270886,0.003413685,0.00008939598,0.00020236372,0.00039015707,0.00021721672,0.09689332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956353,0.00025152648,0.012983772,0.00014618589,0.000064654916,0.000134219,0.00008006254,0.000036147052,0.006739838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920586,0.0044990256,0.0004917351,0.00092887983,0.00091078907,0.0011111211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505548,0.039348423,0.002957757,0.003174763,0.0020875956,0.001876723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285018,0.0007501335,0.0030051016,0.0016503966,0.002371341,0.0066375053,0.002560196,0.0021369145,0.00511322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028574089,0.0009688654,0.0017163745,0.0017641473,0.007417338,0.009020688,0.0039289044,0.0029512502,0.0005053082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063034204,0.000041998916,0.00031299068,0.00003789845,0.000022918039,0.000038323065,0.0001844097,0.007924683,0.00023777857,0.98834395,0.0003788658,0.002413276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021992124,0.00001277397,0.00014105617,0.000008525877,0.000008814396,0.000026339028,0.00006475333,0.013409987,0.00017409609,0.98579085,0.000333082,0.000007759561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017551791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014003462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008285018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002678218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024191502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04381585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396892739","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4826041","title":"Causal Effects in Matching Mechanisms with Strategically Reported Preferences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017761829811088186,"score_gpt":0.22397317393632385,"score_spread":0.20621134412523567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396892739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596132,0.0007022941,0.40516716,0.0065704123,0.00019999295,0.000491453,0.0005354542,0.000777612,0.02594244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812282,0.00024296813,0.014111712,0.000249698,0.00011035852,0.00013388308,0.000101471844,0.00003761487,0.0037841292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860591,0.009028333,0.0008472926,0.0014180107,0.0011498282,0.0014974036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.758918,0.20172049,0.016334616,0.015277098,0.0041626613,0.0035872066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022869203,0.0010003295,0.0024890478,0.002589006,0.0015874412,0.0054567717,0.0034241648,0.0060320958,0.017717028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16479333,0.0021542911,0.0017460105,0.001987009,0.0036571992,0.009489509,0.003851957,0.0039867833,0.0009843563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095527,0.00066303037,0.00805507,0.0003574087,0.00023584912,0.00033317538,0.00071400835,0.02528288,0.0013243086,0.93747336,0.001134089,0.023471579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038725336,0.00018380478,0.0017687641,0.00004585939,0.00020182847,0.0000979283,0.00019610826,0.0918556,0.0007552922,0.9039286,0.0005327111,0.000046267225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015453743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014660773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022869203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016137863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018645579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120945334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396902375","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4826931","title":"Pareto Efficient Recovery Upon Da Mechanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Pareto efficiency; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Multi-objective optimization; Operations management; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020847058955904954,"score_gpt":0.22507041087049007,"score_spread":0.20422335191458513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396902375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16853917,0.0005238331,0.754826,0.0041807233,0.00028432766,0.00038324008,0.00054324506,0.00071160216,0.0700079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920465,0.00033102318,0.03699911,0.00055129826,0.00018332654,0.0003719624,0.00020402754,0.0001403196,0.040753845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970796,0.0015288988,0.00011737716,0.0003512626,0.00041491343,0.00050786807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98884517,0.0066451286,0.0008696738,0.0022560128,0.00073518016,0.00064879365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043064505,0.00086397206,0.0020268818,0.0011671085,0.0013379896,0.0033168318,0.0026973612,0.0040664263,0.013705661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020298908,0.00062283245,0.0011914565,0.0009951356,0.0025652582,0.004201791,0.0028690472,0.0038474184,0.0020925663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014102318,0.000082990184,0.00017497824,0.000059878057,0.000020420237,0.0000783436,0.00006993368,0.01547513,0.0015427653,0.9713287,0.0030841152,0.00794168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099236364,0.000055556186,0.00017292412,0.000022846554,0.000012106111,0.0000873919,0.000047985603,0.14498353,0.00071959186,0.8523245,0.001456538,0.000017830318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061776675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041291147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013705661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014848426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002507879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04585004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398462071","doi":"10.7910/dvn/28117/ezeuvx","title":"dyadicAggregations.2005.to.2013.tgz","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Physics","score_opus":0.04086043162035306,"score_gpt":0.2391402869035337,"score_spread":0.19827985528318065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398462071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018375224,0.000076498225,0.00005585154,0.000049241076,0.000022289401,0.0000061560886,0.9988952,0.00034046973,0.0003705667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008799554,0.00007491331,0.0001986095,0.000037633195,0.000009986698,0.000045577402,0.9981621,0.00008074462,0.0005105997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989619,0.00017391474,0.00017822623,0.0002549,0.00022266044,0.00020831075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796957,0.00043891688,0.0003416621,0.00055174035,0.00045338584,0.00024464956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010857919,0.0023000182,0.001388313,0.0040940596,0.00076455245,0.003139527,0.0024551677,0.0017684384,0.07289534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072390833,0.00092314807,0.0016418822,0.007688491,0.0004029517,0.0016222487,0.0023273518,0.0018250706,0.07291584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006681074,0.00001719529,0.0019769957,0.0003701981,0.000048729442,0.000021036289,0.000026090456,0.00034713137,0.000041866107,0.00057537557,0.9948139,0.0016946949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055865047,0.00003159828,0.011397007,0.0004937277,0.00006492976,0.00009679674,0.000202092,0.001238123,0.00031203992,0.003396371,0.9821613,0.000047480982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044080798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07565603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92710465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013940816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002223661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24385923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398590068","doi":"10.7910/dvn/il8wsb","title":"Replication data for: Are voters’ views about proportional outcomes shaped by partisan preferences? A survey experiment in the context of a real election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.14858605946890022,"score_gpt":0.3214674699157608,"score_spread":0.1728814104468606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398590068","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015185019,0.00014821952,0.0019601327,0.0008989295,0.0002346358,0.0011076896,0.97106814,0.0005657422,0.008831385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03354492,0.000066339366,0.0059777163,0.0005702818,0.000079570804,0.0049790908,0.94395775,0.00015124126,0.010673011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932554,0.002337683,0.0005493679,0.0012310081,0.0018560998,0.00077033375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96435344,0.006573986,0.0032595492,0.01461071,0.009853941,0.0013483829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010495938,0.001099385,0.00096832414,0.0023803795,0.002079458,0.0019415147,0.0037213622,0.0021815745,0.04262262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042387772,0.0005887608,0.0010726199,0.0050385245,0.0011670191,0.00094220915,0.00200261,0.0022825839,0.027324222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080518035,0.00045622207,0.026514115,0.0006601122,0.00015256886,0.00015384865,0.00042857055,0.001009491,0.0006483079,0.0051985215,0.9509452,0.013027797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027525434,0.00030482584,0.14459409,0.0003909563,0.00016022137,0.00023745417,0.0010059066,0.0025865152,0.002125484,0.0044812527,0.84120274,0.00015809595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14387548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27985585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14387548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034466477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060020024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28607607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398605700","doi":"10.7910/dvn/91lrzf","title":"Replication Data for: A Mixed-Utility Theory of Vote Choice Regret","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Replication (statistics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08463487539240472,"score_gpt":0.2813840018490202,"score_spread":0.19674912645661546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398605700","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008949723,0.00021921938,0.0020248194,0.00078879064,0.00016005292,0.0002521617,0.9820279,0.001078097,0.004499302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018537704,0.000091392685,0.0038049864,0.00016606878,0.000047025183,0.0006047267,0.97163707,0.00014176156,0.0049692993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977398,0.00065369275,0.00016654427,0.0004491627,0.0006681087,0.00032272516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919807,0.0014410819,0.0006887295,0.003126601,0.0023130174,0.0004498762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037043465,0.0011970123,0.0008321342,0.0024260601,0.0012378838,0.0021842995,0.0036534844,0.0017151461,0.027208399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020502416,0.000432515,0.0010245597,0.0040822923,0.00081969105,0.0007948293,0.0019003962,0.002331341,0.02271961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022707865,0.00012757823,0.012797953,0.0001884188,0.000065182896,0.00008083615,0.00014858006,0.002062001,0.00011844255,0.0036466473,0.97216773,0.008369478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011554306,0.00008383703,0.064181685,0.0002586851,0.0000624862,0.00025037138,0.0005509906,0.01161337,0.00093971996,0.009574216,0.9112219,0.000107288324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18663874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32301888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18663874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002901975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004190157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37110478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398824474","doi":"10.7910/dvn/s0o9tk","title":"Replication data for: Do people want smarter ballots?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Internet privacy; Computer science; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.060053513003182735,"score_gpt":0.26060031467153194,"score_spread":0.2005468016683492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398824474","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003659863,0.000063082596,0.00008341949,0.00032507165,0.00007096863,0.000029217133,0.99825984,0.000252418,0.0005500541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015069975,0.000044839275,0.00046838744,0.00021825352,0.000024291568,0.00021664782,0.99596304,0.00010064025,0.0014570008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598217,0.0009266298,0.0006082376,0.0007336361,0.0011363742,0.0006129443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98257554,0.004563168,0.0018434677,0.005132375,0.004513394,0.0013721928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059136897,0.002168702,0.001913518,0.003710761,0.0015256164,0.00397552,0.0047689355,0.0048275795,0.06855634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03658075,0.0011915098,0.0020063834,0.006260773,0.0011056603,0.0019572387,0.0035111583,0.0029821186,0.058580097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105115105,0.000034593933,0.0014736104,0.00030053395,0.000036638477,0.00002148906,0.00003786349,0.00017274069,0.0000581877,0.0006103778,0.9960627,0.0010862132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002112464,0.00005674723,0.017340856,0.00057347096,0.00012248252,0.0001500002,0.0004304362,0.0012651356,0.00060629984,0.0038852287,0.9733363,0.00012050682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063811794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11994385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06855634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023332925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053553553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22934377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399110843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4843052","title":"An Empirical Framework for Matching with Imperfect Competition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Imperfect; Competition (biology); Imperfect competition; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.019263502693298993,"score_gpt":0.2779675201409051,"score_spread":0.25870401744760607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399110843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10734621,0.0018485346,0.82700616,0.011065952,0.000188923,0.00037799324,0.0008558826,0.00034441074,0.05096592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93991387,0.00093588384,0.04720268,0.0006095414,0.00041480426,0.00029703532,0.00039043365,0.0000613264,0.01017444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989258,0.007178592,0.00045373317,0.0012073414,0.0008507672,0.001051514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942738,0.043021817,0.006490153,0.004719282,0.0018320096,0.0011987978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015889792,0.0008976395,0.002893099,0.0037087025,0.0020116484,0.0062645273,0.0048605856,0.005125188,0.024002813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081441104,0.0009682808,0.0017196237,0.00483137,0.005037875,0.011698058,0.003392634,0.0038285553,0.0015329921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831643,0.00006409383,0.0012359165,0.000057705,0.00002795631,0.00004195142,0.00014618794,0.00943629,0.000068082125,0.9816674,0.0012174379,0.006008691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004002275,0.00003123873,0.0005792499,0.000028365523,0.000021394315,0.000043713757,0.00018318885,0.06711307,0.00004400605,0.9302349,0.0016663341,0.000014504724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060372553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038077575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024002813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034635058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023946464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084034264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399828139","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54071-4_9","title":"An Introduction to Stochastic Game Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Systems & control","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Game theory; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01609665253905513,"score_gpt":0.21118335547771408,"score_spread":0.19508670293865896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399828139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022372487,0.048742756,0.52290505,0.0083578145,0.003960487,0.00010308562,0.001254065,0.0007546477,0.41168487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13015194,0.08078899,0.18690577,0.0055157193,0.0073525803,0.0006152956,0.0016152787,0.0009545148,0.5861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995863,0.00009916341,0.000026292759,0.000064360494,0.00019419348,0.000029613748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939287,0.00045288863,0.000021611773,0.00003907211,0.000075517295,0.000018105387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053486746,0.0011051187,0.0011408068,0.0009507214,0.00049489114,0.0017649385,0.0008622988,0.0013486473,0.026716184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001614335,0.000632638,0.0007331829,0.0018567188,0.0016306612,0.0021167868,0.0007569632,0.0029533415,0.007337511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049644727,0.000031023817,0.000067982895,0.00013585402,0.000011192232,0.000045253688,0.000085402884,0.0050584604,0.00027212538,0.8923607,0.054686666,0.047240406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040211826,0.000009215197,0.00010019505,0.000068699526,0.0000049853265,0.00007397438,0.000020543235,0.00767745,0.0000945161,0.78609973,0.2058344,0.000012293404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022102294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002624773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026716184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001562722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011514896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08937448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482817","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76933","title":"Assignment Individualization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07711952774724938,"score_gpt":0.27831126361947806,"score_spread":0.20119173587222866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16536246,0.0005208907,0.36402357,0.0066495063,0.0032359606,0.012724043,0.0015863808,0.011972935,0.43392435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4697338,0.00035527648,0.15241021,0.003060498,0.00085273385,0.009275917,0.0020438726,0.0022338934,0.3600338],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830862,0.0058080154,0.0011871369,0.002998589,0.0043697027,0.0025503775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555205,0.007372248,0.0027013975,0.016160885,0.012926377,0.005318604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01576486,0.0010255749,0.0008921862,0.0022700657,0.0038737105,0.0037908687,0.0035719413,0.0010636856,0.090345085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05115791,0.00057225715,0.0008808966,0.001879453,0.0015202493,0.0033440955,0.0076379585,0.0027430751,0.025604056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079952937,0.0018882593,0.006849915,0.0003024576,0.000052785188,0.00016060169,0.0073004714,0.003248688,0.003720262,0.055506907,0.09500001,0.8251701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032675473,0.0015798715,0.019042185,0.0002939616,0.000078761965,0.0005157379,0.0054323524,0.011970797,0.008321128,0.08358192,0.86862385,0.00023272302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002909192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055074953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090345085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003226021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060493965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3022344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400583084","doi":"10.1287/moor.2022.0342","title":"Order Independence in Sequential, Issue-by-Issue Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics of Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Voting; Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.1205292646494297,"score_gpt":0.37553947118519154,"score_spread":0.25501020653576184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400583084","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.314235,0.0005890843,0.64201814,0.003786946,0.00016831537,0.00032086117,0.0005807835,0.00021054313,0.038090285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96603775,0.00030300196,0.020946063,0.00021768539,0.00020606972,0.00024260671,0.00024188985,0.00006376672,0.011741254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896164,0.0055587566,0.00048421606,0.001791597,0.0014961218,0.001707692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953461,0.030528942,0.007906959,0.0042101154,0.0021626786,0.0017303863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012365934,0.00080984156,0.0024490652,0.0011216203,0.0017566017,0.0032578458,0.0022056869,0.0023581402,0.010431679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049566027,0.0008863718,0.0014467845,0.0015882553,0.00347752,0.006499862,0.0027017351,0.0037107172,0.0011648722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005090788,0.00019071785,0.0040902374,0.00015847945,0.00011566409,0.00033849824,0.0005812762,0.06943691,0.0013355105,0.8990937,0.0025294712,0.021620514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015742105,0.00012905829,0.0012914072,0.00002308463,0.000039991795,0.000088536086,0.00013416228,0.24823043,0.0006575266,0.74722433,0.0019846223,0.000039424605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032942742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028775423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012365934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019785056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020044376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0653981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400722659","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v21i3.7409","title":"Condorcet-Style Paradoxes for Majority Rule with Infinte Candidates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"European Commission; Yale University","keywords":"Condorcet method; Style (visual arts); Majority rule; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Voting; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03478268939167749,"score_gpt":0.2533978271974986,"score_spread":0.2186151378058211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400722659","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20809977,0.0009875735,0.4836348,0.01897617,0.0005554709,0.00031878945,0.00050434354,0.00028540724,0.28663763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94261074,0.00026750035,0.043135844,0.00096019404,0.00020614402,0.00032527166,0.00012856207,0.00004154852,0.012324164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323106,0.00326226,0.00041888308,0.0010812876,0.0013351757,0.00067131344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887578,0.007714267,0.0006735456,0.0013989009,0.0007369919,0.000718536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008365282,0.00062773377,0.0012354001,0.0011115909,0.003816618,0.005493032,0.0018617458,0.0037058776,0.010060016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02252127,0.0005022642,0.001903831,0.00080143916,0.0064239986,0.009233881,0.0035528485,0.005236104,0.001082476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002159429,0.000011176387,0.000091723785,0.000017746232,0.0000058764863,0.00006369616,0.00010086202,0.00071385974,0.00010561754,0.99714726,0.000618577,0.0011019416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027041815,0.000009251793,0.00003881075,0.000008456259,0.000003890033,0.000066276625,0.000039976036,0.0050705154,0.00012707194,0.993291,0.001311723,0.0000058612345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064844155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008668157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010060016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018033878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012874268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044240415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401024514","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/316","title":"Balance-Aware Sequence Sampling Makes Multi-Modal Learning Better","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Statistics; Bandwidth (computing); Amplifier","score_opus":0.11389257368702758,"score_gpt":0.2887101568579168,"score_spread":0.1748175831708892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401024514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0588224,0.0006489074,0.9332205,0.00062584656,0.00010565759,0.00015093786,0.00021461028,0.0025685818,0.0036425996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.759925,0.00030088105,0.23286064,0.0009288635,0.00018387719,0.00028601693,0.001019943,0.0005084711,0.0039862585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984079,0.00056088524,0.00006486102,0.00055003335,0.0002571932,0.00015914603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973079,0.0012924072,0.00022570086,0.0005454281,0.00040873783,0.00021988415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035546722,0.0013412826,0.0015630933,0.00100952,0.0009482996,0.0017368583,0.0018256762,0.0017036712,0.0044288677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009902616,0.0005366568,0.001000707,0.00076570443,0.0010763274,0.0039020476,0.0026666727,0.0027419184,0.0014494667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007605785,0.0007131277,0.0071275486,0.0002795214,0.00020217773,0.00012208149,0.00034071406,0.4284938,0.018688692,0.018400904,0.010363968,0.5145069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004112721,0.00010241839,0.00044710457,0.000016979639,0.000020837146,0.000034098255,0.00004314997,0.98030865,0.0028120612,0.014780042,0.0013797262,0.0000136983335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002762326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005137717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044288677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011331734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015628373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018799126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401090986","doi":"10.1007/s13235-024-00582-7","title":"Integration of Sales and Operations: A Dynamic Mixed-Integer Programming Game","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamic Games and Applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Production (economics); Time horizon; Competition (biology); Subgame perfect equilibrium; Backward induction; Production planning; Sequential game; Computer science; Microeconomics; Integer programming; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Game theory; Industrial organization; Operations research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013700618462534928,"score_gpt":0.2496910266844586,"score_spread":0.2359904082219237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401090986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109525084,0.00040061364,0.84487385,0.0021949587,0.0001534486,0.00021810544,0.00026075193,0.0001465783,0.04222659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980549,0.00031239697,0.0775193,0.00016701005,0.000114574774,0.00022351055,0.00014117904,0.00006853732,0.023398617],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975776,0.0011753141,0.00007809253,0.00042226491,0.00039651478,0.00035022484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974795,0.0016641978,0.00022597963,0.00011537729,0.00015846445,0.00035652154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610407,0.0011617297,0.0020876604,0.0007352074,0.0008577315,0.004891012,0.0025918852,0.0030046843,0.008443734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006077413,0.0011859547,0.0013381783,0.0013271234,0.0017266448,0.0054757856,0.002082177,0.0027710723,0.00048618382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003062756,0.0002873946,0.00093525776,0.0000980188,0.000098814795,0.00028441986,0.00025076928,0.49098176,0.0016824849,0.48233393,0.0020830007,0.020657856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004974834,0.00012047534,0.00024023034,0.00001824902,0.000042474527,0.0000556393,0.00009689232,0.8943787,0.00034620563,0.102125905,0.0025021194,0.000023284667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050803213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047535505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008443734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022554994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025713474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028247118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401548647","doi":"10.31124/advance.172355719.91412464/v1","title":"ScholarOne - Paired Voting System(PVS) WINS,TIES,FORS,FIRSTS Sole Author: Denis J. Alarie. P.Eng. Contact Information: 66 Woodbine Ave Kitchener, Ont, Canada N2R1V1 djalarie@gmail.com","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Hierarchy; Legislature; Political science; Weighted voting; Single-member district; Computer science; Welfare economics; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Mathematics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02505848991973021,"score_gpt":0.20421298808408053,"score_spread":0.17915449816435033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401548647","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01996325,0.0006044606,0.60561216,0.0035373701,0.0014086959,0.0006007362,0.0050619654,0.0044649285,0.3587464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44156098,0.000981655,0.3492769,0.00083106174,0.00060085417,0.00086032937,0.0062405136,0.001688765,0.19795892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995095,0.0026788237,0.00025846608,0.00079048175,0.0009549107,0.00022230337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948996,0.0022228349,0.0004247368,0.0013487041,0.00080022385,0.000303944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037053353,0.00049034087,0.0005266728,0.0011079859,0.0016805088,0.0043030963,0.0012511386,0.0010357843,0.06172122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016956164,0.00037703916,0.00047714927,0.0022751733,0.0017646371,0.0028184955,0.0028738885,0.0012750985,0.019561294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017153764,0.000040598003,0.0021525123,0.00021304315,0.000025333096,0.00007613411,0.00042964096,0.0057110954,0.0005438956,0.6754862,0.08272942,0.23242062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007776537,0.00012689905,0.0012373958,0.000120841614,0.000025800364,0.00028545424,0.00032226276,0.026672741,0.0024156985,0.38400838,0.5846374,0.00006934111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025223668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045829895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06172122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001259339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025848867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20647806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401630317","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.08.005","title":"Some further results on random OBIC rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07150923516328772,"score_gpt":0.2876934689098715,"score_spread":0.2161842337465838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401630317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08450255,0.00855163,0.57931316,0.0176512,0.0019381143,0.00021445984,0.0010467304,0.0003600398,0.30642208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545424,0.010638996,0.08872087,0.008026732,0.005668655,0.00062720507,0.0013302863,0.000640683,0.12980407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735296,0.0010432634,0.00018355376,0.00043271147,0.00061216514,0.00037535565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97907525,0.015535031,0.0011147981,0.0020629985,0.001382333,0.0008296601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00424886,0.0015841413,0.0024983422,0.00290123,0.002829267,0.004338436,0.0029544241,0.002997391,0.026742797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02334431,0.0008516406,0.0032829582,0.004399599,0.0040113847,0.009115864,0.0029408392,0.006698446,0.0021802098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029877858,0.000053748197,0.0002471493,0.00013444787,0.000020822967,0.00007302989,0.00012727884,0.004333072,0.00036853,0.9825617,0.0036412864,0.008409049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013110751,0.000011156234,0.00014466548,0.000025100473,0.0000119753995,0.00003925145,0.000033233195,0.0080798,0.00014640733,0.98819786,0.0032878143,0.000009657789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019250079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018584376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026742797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020359512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013143447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08946353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402063987","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01541-2","title":"Natural interviewing equilibria in matching settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Matching (statistics); Natural (archaeology); Social policy; Public international law; Economics; Interview; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.025654887158264285,"score_gpt":0.26141477117026923,"score_spread":0.23575988401200496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402063987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5664978,0.00021245345,0.38378197,0.0026481166,0.000048976894,0.00038255117,0.00060948776,0.00030217273,0.045516454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97679895,0.00006934022,0.018893115,0.00027485125,0.000026696858,0.00021704445,0.00012311476,0.000022436201,0.0035745169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936347,0.0040525286,0.00028837114,0.00083711004,0.000504899,0.00068223313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820248,0.012347009,0.0023083917,0.0013336887,0.0007979579,0.0011881123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00646311,0.0004929954,0.0011935385,0.0010942594,0.002044992,0.0024131231,0.001373484,0.0024375455,0.010286136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02321504,0.0004931413,0.000778666,0.00096208934,0.0023871944,0.0034644012,0.0023014818,0.0014095295,0.0009634303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002894523,0.0002123365,0.002812296,0.000111307134,0.00006945994,0.00037401973,0.00080044486,0.021003788,0.0018210276,0.9621622,0.00244088,0.007902888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015483484,0.000074570446,0.0006596543,0.000022940058,0.0000116537385,0.00015965433,0.0004001767,0.10668998,0.00061867584,0.889102,0.0020783655,0.000027441412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010411915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010509539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010286136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001701563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007699303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034410536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402198930","doi":"10.3934/jdg.2024019","title":"Characteristic functions for cooperative interval games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dynamics and Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal","keywords":"Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.02027894537084587,"score_gpt":0.24000480918490624,"score_spread":0.21972586381406037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402198930","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014434482,0.00010348977,0.9793929,0.000095190524,0.000018098206,0.000059286693,0.0000425707,0.000070742695,0.0057832883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6172852,0.00048019638,0.37662807,0.00012652346,0.00007687484,0.0005557349,0.00021410966,0.00008384139,0.004549316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.00071258564,0.00008514859,0.00017492562,0.0003868512,0.00015749787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996933,0.0018422797,0.00033252427,0.00022832079,0.0004961468,0.00016773555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030046413,0.0007066715,0.0006298471,0.0013767778,0.0006376368,0.0019726849,0.001106855,0.00080154644,0.0018952127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00945467,0.00026705881,0.0007356107,0.0014287736,0.0018146262,0.0035224978,0.0008972372,0.0017721318,0.0003820205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026273765,0.000020049827,0.0003901186,0.000040340976,0.0000142457,0.00003840936,0.00019311643,0.05769575,0.0008719316,0.9137623,0.0007622462,0.026185324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017406046,0.000034206896,0.00022073642,0.000020162563,0.000009060641,0.000057837577,0.00007174652,0.288773,0.00067401136,0.7063799,0.0037200353,0.000021946786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010189969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006009664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030046413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018862392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096717256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01589024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402401495","doi":"10.1109/tcss.2024.3447902","title":"Multigroup Multirole Assignment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.041090567276171254,"score_gpt":0.2510182908002059,"score_spread":0.20992772352403463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402401495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017396608,0.00027942102,0.96277803,0.0005965887,0.00018160212,0.00044920947,0.00016194103,0.00029925114,0.017857328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4998412,0.0004289116,0.47947788,0.0003412862,0.00013331893,0.00077286887,0.00045677216,0.00013955218,0.018408231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948723,0.0026189387,0.00021587174,0.00097433006,0.00081266375,0.0005059851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966883,0.0010217495,0.00036072993,0.000823028,0.00053611863,0.0005701362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034513925,0.0010398384,0.0011264645,0.0008674019,0.0023886384,0.002018692,0.0029643194,0.0017613079,0.014015377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069407085,0.00037023073,0.0012869763,0.0013086736,0.0013434803,0.0038989482,0.0036591387,0.0020415385,0.002312382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039377308,0.0004594266,0.0019361712,0.0004184378,0.00009201454,0.0006285864,0.0012066803,0.15078273,0.005542689,0.6280816,0.015493119,0.1949648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009099044,0.00018809765,0.00049025664,0.0000728837,0.000047859143,0.00038999983,0.00051771227,0.667972,0.0023703657,0.2795229,0.04828775,0.00004907602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022536747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026510581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014015377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013778257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024424526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046886086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404346590","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.23416","title":"Temporal Fair Division","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.11054963835617235,"score_gpt":0.17515771070548755,"score_spread":0.0646080723493152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404346590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048298858,0.0007201148,0.88585484,0.0020371994,0.00039359884,0.00021342185,0.00034792363,0.00022127335,0.061912686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83745456,0.00072967174,0.13135576,0.00062305084,0.00050935196,0.00036740515,0.00030457185,0.00013905788,0.028516624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520016,0.0016759488,0.00018843892,0.00125205,0.00092523365,0.000758136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898325,0.004872007,0.0012853319,0.0021709297,0.001037983,0.0008011638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005799059,0.0009994188,0.0013084306,0.00078535336,0.0027236782,0.0036901645,0.0028550108,0.00159798,0.01340675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017872443,0.00042329158,0.0013494279,0.0016574156,0.003597106,0.0073756287,0.0029785465,0.0026362876,0.001119414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010887478,0.00005939329,0.0005971982,0.00005798072,0.00003607907,0.00008577809,0.0002237588,0.04090428,0.00086366275,0.9386069,0.0020621836,0.01639377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047649944,0.00006978572,0.00023097152,0.000026872713,0.000024565312,0.000099780176,0.00010334071,0.16335143,0.00075096264,0.8219994,0.013277033,0.000018278522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044669867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035148705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01340675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040168464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027925025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404361853","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.03651","title":"Policy Aggregation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.09400119482832181,"score_gpt":0.1842361348404185,"score_spread":0.0902349400120967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404361853","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019454563,0.00040758256,0.95888263,0.0025900062,0.00025803354,0.0002403835,0.0003158709,0.0003792193,0.017471837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68013716,0.0005006231,0.3072875,0.0007535865,0.0004275095,0.00062416546,0.00070284435,0.000218226,0.00934835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867855,0.006484306,0.00063054624,0.0028341992,0.002209487,0.0010560176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410034,0.008649537,0.0014358645,0.0036736368,0.001169697,0.0009708831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010345171,0.001048856,0.0021987818,0.00178605,0.0021377474,0.005781491,0.0025617552,0.0021631967,0.008579278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03133029,0.0006241558,0.0015401704,0.0023427142,0.0024199237,0.004848296,0.0054055797,0.0033520686,0.0012412085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013702048,0.000155338,0.0020440042,0.00017156462,0.00016410733,0.00020401238,0.00045529808,0.134036,0.0008303261,0.7820062,0.004802437,0.07499373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020044847,0.000048843995,0.00028409692,0.000035189532,0.00002690187,0.00005221045,0.00010686735,0.22717114,0.00052736397,0.76282084,0.008885585,0.000020978969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020280434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020082807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010345171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031166924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003136474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054711163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404856498","doi":"10.1007/s10107-024-02169-x","title":"Stabilization of capacitated matching games","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Numerical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03988937002543492,"score_gpt":0.2503558365901486,"score_spread":0.21046646656471368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404856498","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21282329,0.0007594311,0.7320397,0.0026016855,0.00017038976,0.00014857309,0.00035975492,0.0003525743,0.05074455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593309,0.0003979183,0.018897496,0.0001828675,0.00010186966,0.000211706,0.00016698969,0.00008697997,0.020623267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998678,0.0007003679,0.000041794265,0.0002121565,0.00013985,0.00022779788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944788,0.0036548018,0.0006191709,0.00028354547,0.00048728942,0.00047643148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018458071,0.00095339137,0.0017635705,0.001005019,0.000896188,0.0030575667,0.002335176,0.0016087429,0.00862704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011067687,0.00073086924,0.0008428981,0.0011513842,0.002254704,0.0025079348,0.0019937702,0.0019521464,0.00063865556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015149597,0.000099008335,0.00033566263,0.000103139886,0.000039692135,0.00005652855,0.00014109576,0.26126146,0.0012298988,0.7262725,0.0028783628,0.007431137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029761182,0.000024528179,0.000084584906,0.000014645217,0.000008883137,0.000008675216,0.000043740933,0.53333867,0.0002312545,0.4655566,0.0006496139,0.00000905252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032545403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023533672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00862704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029381393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019420082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028860271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404921369","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5040984","title":"Rationing to Avoid Conflict: A  Centralized Assignment Problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Computer science; Economics; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.025957485297827626,"score_gpt":0.2458731409182761,"score_spread":0.21991565562044849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404921369","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18318893,0.000530859,0.7752395,0.004615615,0.00022901427,0.00042291876,0.00028501288,0.0003072703,0.035180904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8900526,0.00030296302,0.09553554,0.00039155287,0.0003035371,0.00028026366,0.00013181323,0.00014588419,0.012855849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918715,0.004844954,0.0003043279,0.0014854082,0.0006054754,0.00088831654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971314,0.02213019,0.0017290764,0.0023388881,0.0009912712,0.0014964993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009905876,0.001130522,0.0051641483,0.001300156,0.0019479943,0.0060809944,0.004553893,0.005498041,0.014209015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030653216,0.0016960115,0.0015202883,0.0023788603,0.003821304,0.008149551,0.0033035448,0.0042278077,0.0010659274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012486503,0.0007848036,0.0015926586,0.00035893286,0.00033434422,0.00038477,0.0006917662,0.20196609,0.0024395427,0.7153325,0.010524788,0.0643411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050485757,0.00011659173,0.00033929042,0.00002873188,0.00007292242,0.00012852284,0.00017109785,0.3165166,0.0005158744,0.6795297,0.0020397955,0.00003604153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015529416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001128768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014209015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002086967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027458651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052387893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405238932","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4988961","title":"&lt;div&gt; Optimal Incentive Design for Decentralized&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;Dynamic Matching Markets&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Matching (statistics); Incentive; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024434836619614094,"score_gpt":0.25193208887938895,"score_spread":0.22749725225977485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405238932","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017279971,0.00020289826,0.95752656,0.0018019188,0.00012533121,0.00025155695,0.000314589,0.00025752443,0.022239547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74528724,0.00037886467,0.21265034,0.00069252326,0.0001866021,0.00069603906,0.00034831953,0.00025294814,0.039507233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979043,0.0009999766,0.0000834843,0.00041797804,0.0003160376,0.00027819027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953543,0.0028859857,0.00039900374,0.00048093474,0.000523021,0.00035667478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036344635,0.00084030227,0.0021795647,0.0006327068,0.0008326771,0.0021490413,0.0021180846,0.0033698396,0.0265186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698999,0.0010465736,0.0007675052,0.0008192991,0.0013808938,0.0033418396,0.0024056288,0.0020369824,0.00242657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044203512,0.00026575633,0.00038931804,0.00027693802,0.000059121394,0.000054623888,0.00016315022,0.2487357,0.003464216,0.6496295,0.01811949,0.07840018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001767218,0.00009372807,0.0001394403,0.000027883243,0.00001741094,0.000026017071,0.000034828772,0.64144164,0.00088065874,0.35232165,0.0048217135,0.000018330225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018312077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001792998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0265186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002085107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024524494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08871359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405685762","doi":"","title":"A Space-Economic Representation of Transitive Closures in Relational Databases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Relational database; Representation (politics); Space (punctuation); Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Political science","score_opus":0.308390224676796,"score_gpt":0.4975971867081915,"score_spread":0.18920696203139548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405685762","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018649649,0.00030573815,0.9726255,0.00045050017,0.00007225457,0.00012586275,0.00044563084,0.0005726604,0.00675224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33874533,0.00062482664,0.6553291,0.00014452348,0.00010394122,0.00029467736,0.00075930124,0.000108609136,0.0038896762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785715,0.00068881875,0.00027087313,0.0003978173,0.0006467677,0.00013860095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964612,0.0016324015,0.00044781537,0.00092752295,0.00040283575,0.00012823446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001521331,0.00047648523,0.00059717684,0.0017425738,0.00083789683,0.003414119,0.0012103607,0.00075710495,0.0037270589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00801116,0.00040819388,0.0008853632,0.002793249,0.001339748,0.006091906,0.0013607466,0.0014554503,0.0007611844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082925915,0.00009372572,0.0003873658,0.00010848386,0.00001632472,0.00016420177,0.00046866166,0.037680812,0.0026298992,0.8631522,0.0024325852,0.09278275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004329357,0.000083112354,0.00021271856,0.000058981936,0.000029668023,0.00027389886,0.00022005966,0.33385956,0.0033575823,0.6411106,0.020707928,0.0000426355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031160377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003512947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037270589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014089154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013049844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012468219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406032700","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.00926","title":"Differentially Private Matchings","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07807108173581999,"score_gpt":0.16957606508081907,"score_spread":0.09150498334499908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406032700","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034659233,0.00051919953,0.9363221,0.0028212215,0.00013512486,0.0002410594,0.0010684239,0.0006083958,0.023625212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7563823,0.0012743758,0.22271757,0.0014323206,0.0005390155,0.0007107481,0.0013224131,0.0003567617,0.015264463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929767,0.0023753745,0.0003067697,0.0018233065,0.0016966875,0.0008209803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808976,0.010306093,0.0014694202,0.005874853,0.0008538337,0.00059827685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050735176,0.0009019176,0.0019811266,0.0015852156,0.0018520225,0.004720266,0.0040528174,0.0030034103,0.010184134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031623907,0.00083123706,0.0016777472,0.003327777,0.004010055,0.012835235,0.0057423785,0.0056453017,0.0022175584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014793163,0.000057004556,0.00040144776,0.00009658767,0.000030496194,0.00004059605,0.00011226506,0.022372741,0.001423492,0.94561654,0.003976018,0.025724897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032970023,0.000027795066,0.00010698793,0.00002156035,0.00001217153,0.00005762096,0.000031284202,0.08205577,0.0012665174,0.91256124,0.003814845,0.000011064194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006782635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000660292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010184134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035348062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002185307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03406936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406114401","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800.1.sa0","title":"Reviewer #2 (Public review): Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through vicarious learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Inequality; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06376751578988195,"score_gpt":0.3040073246044335,"score_spread":0.2402398088145516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406114401","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029078382,0.012559124,0.0011441124,0.25353694,0.72107583,0.0019657442,0.003558169,0.0010600077,0.0048092417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007357817,0.022239719,0.002062028,0.51070213,0.38614514,0.007166969,0.0028566897,0.0010583804,0.060411073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97847855,0.004114993,0.004433935,0.002327519,0.009723863,0.00092106225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78192693,0.023743058,0.011565787,0.007610577,0.16943416,0.005719545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030778363,0.0023718816,0.006623479,0.0053255153,0.0034987342,0.01005205,0.009669185,0.024445366,0.089032464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19050707,0.0021243992,0.0053116987,0.0036062251,0.0032205442,0.0055938917,0.0029056075,0.009037217,0.045731273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007172028,0.000008099446,0.00007083254,0.002407312,0.00004951118,0.000060273753,0.000018757983,0.000017804605,0.000061006052,0.000119595425,0.9925568,0.0045581404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082744635,0.00009212051,0.0018623003,0.008203501,0.00041076494,0.00041874874,0.00017108834,0.00047120266,0.00043448465,0.0016775391,0.9853125,0.000118209624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004898214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007995544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96922165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007015681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011327753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29784328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406347419","doi":"10.1093/9780197798959.003.0004","title":"Local Elections and Ranked Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.025887066842091907,"score_gpt":0.2091551005361348,"score_spread":0.1832680336940429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406347419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01297261,0.0035808038,0.0030477683,0.0021386424,0.00011080273,0.000013833609,0.00010681821,0.000035579913,0.97799313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.620192,0.0033152788,0.001207858,0.00058698794,0.00019907898,0.000022669465,0.00020233112,0.000044096203,0.37422976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921405,0.0004029527,0.000015628799,0.00008598627,0.00016793233,0.000113394985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995485,0.00019707676,0.000042477845,0.000051706455,0.00010489101,0.00005544066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528365,0.00014845606,0.00017714196,0.0005253344,0.001373025,0.002323879,0.00039898008,0.000320131,0.033887446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013562661,0.000085962194,0.00014545216,0.0013124602,0.0018667964,0.0012258108,0.00089249015,0.0009584561,0.0028071431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007768487,0.000010920702,0.00026067698,0.000021903306,0.0000016210626,0.00003194559,0.00044686146,0.0006724557,0.00003023671,0.96408945,0.015067761,0.019358361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000932793,0.000030643176,0.0020121273,0.00010802889,0.0000041034064,0.000100008016,0.0011863647,0.0018806349,0.00015834472,0.35410458,0.6403939,0.000011961318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011409358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02007978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033887446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003179568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095647847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113364816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406457394","doi":"10.2308/tar-2022-0074","title":"Two-Sided Matching in the Audit Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Matching (statistics); Business; Accounting; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02472419149471776,"score_gpt":0.2652120769356813,"score_spread":0.2404878854409635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406457394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7329015,0.00062471826,0.23312427,0.005037076,0.00013934431,0.00063495926,0.0006790824,0.00018820014,0.026670838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98171324,0.00017789975,0.0060340236,0.00022225341,0.00006541247,0.00012713557,0.00013255938,0.000016452543,0.011510976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894037,0.006484921,0.000345331,0.00124367,0.0007499042,0.0017724013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96527284,0.022772789,0.0069469847,0.0019397711,0.0011966293,0.0018710773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014381618,0.00059031445,0.0031570091,0.0013943565,0.0012382399,0.0046947566,0.0024219286,0.003482754,0.02066836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038395494,0.00090410037,0.0014945889,0.0017480829,0.0028495046,0.0044819717,0.0026662317,0.002801468,0.0025112163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001177402,0.0011251479,0.04081359,0.00021826095,0.00030397135,0.0009428046,0.001379669,0.38118732,0.0012406065,0.5208008,0.0048822723,0.04592808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042715823,0.00027384,0.0052276817,0.00003640869,0.000076858465,0.00013624456,0.00044020318,0.7778152,0.00027507634,0.21321274,0.0020122721,0.00006621653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076889424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044193305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02066836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024149893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020670246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07605815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923775","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102646","title":"Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: An experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Labex Ecodec; Osaka University; Providence Health Care","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Turnout; Voting; Jumping; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.037783391519171164,"score_gpt":0.2775468999002912,"score_spread":0.23976350838112004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795425,0.000016980232,0.00044205398,0.00006700036,0.000014015405,0.000028886961,0.000032330146,0.0000058379005,0.0014385326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856937,0.00002348422,0.00057016226,0.000062752166,0.000010177908,0.000051584466,0.000054778007,0.0000056244908,0.0006519529],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985209,0.00085814355,0.00007141388,0.00020714647,0.00016506622,0.00017733019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722535,0.008684857,0.0017168167,0.0013619751,0.00027536895,0.00073556893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222976,0.0004040822,0.0006168599,0.00030764626,0.0006140191,0.0010199924,0.0006111259,0.0008185028,0.006427095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010400567,0.00026195918,0.0003338025,0.00031432707,0.0011974307,0.0007320487,0.0008578986,0.0014093878,0.0005805215],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06012207,0.11538432,0.24135076,0.0012517973,0.0016405663,0.0013526292,0.016727537,0.027226806,0.34270072,0.07656275,0.009816247,0.10586388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012266447,0.11678365,0.49107775,0.00022652802,0.00092358317,0.0010451339,0.012557979,0.17492874,0.065307505,0.11069956,0.013713877,0.0004692767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011625704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018828561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006427095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004317963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035630236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021500826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407780548","doi":"10.1561/2400000040","title":"Integer Programming Games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations and Trends® in Optimization","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Integer programming; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.02348981713826095,"score_gpt":0.2615163708784337,"score_spread":0.23802655374017276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407780548","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070069856,0.020141607,0.7634714,0.0070594535,0.00088668166,0.0005456994,0.0031882357,0.00053763884,0.19716221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26700902,0.070095636,0.57227385,0.0055874363,0.002667286,0.0022973872,0.0048515606,0.000456177,0.07476164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739516,0.0010594926,0.00023119818,0.00041573585,0.00064308563,0.0002553387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835664,0.001095144,0.00015337876,0.00015556446,0.00017273593,0.00006656921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723489,0.0022311308,0.0014137285,0.0011195686,0.0011327108,0.004589263,0.001564955,0.0016534163,0.018475888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004310331,0.0005716809,0.0013447368,0.0029256246,0.001588244,0.0048010848,0.0018988639,0.0038015437,0.0042997287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002857383,0.00006024802,0.00016954924,0.0003366931,0.000029456973,0.00006924638,0.00013009737,0.014589876,0.00034735768,0.92152894,0.01615801,0.04655206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033531025,0.000050024588,0.0001497713,0.00017695436,0.00001824753,0.00022013528,0.00011924536,0.040365115,0.0003029777,0.76867205,0.18986669,0.000025285144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001577634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016084826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018475888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016444793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015420532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06180799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408033501","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76676-3_9","title":"Monotonicity, Substitution Sources, and the Robustness of Disjunct Alternatives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in pragmatics, language and cognition","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Substitution (logic); Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Disjunct; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Programming language; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.03772346783079975,"score_gpt":0.26827439201272557,"score_spread":0.23055092418192583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408033501","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14540577,0.006973447,0.50411224,0.01243012,0.0002465746,0.00012537166,0.0013425355,0.00038571804,0.32897824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.886646,0.0019009172,0.096947424,0.0011778128,0.00043839208,0.00023050274,0.00064536266,0.00029685054,0.011716791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276066,0.004137944,0.0005532565,0.0011452923,0.0010611371,0.00034174914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551624,0.037793618,0.0014044228,0.0041592866,0.0012268112,0.00025349026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008498198,0.0006229042,0.0017427017,0.0026426432,0.0019481519,0.0068890215,0.002428331,0.0032455917,0.013627847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04729174,0.0013296873,0.0020792454,0.0031447965,0.010561739,0.019279404,0.0029919127,0.005724897,0.0013302439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030941053,0.000010312499,0.00016207623,0.000040492137,0.000021075633,0.00004170039,0.00023099895,0.0012699965,0.00017494531,0.99013186,0.0006362029,0.0072495146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053275603,0.0000021734,0.0000578403,0.0000078695475,0.000004228151,0.00002329454,0.000028071714,0.0011910975,0.00006324593,0.99784243,0.0007710283,0.000003377302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012689922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012145807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013627847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017118761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009422609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045589745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408397987","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127233","title":"Unbiased criteria identification for two-sided matching: An environment-based design approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Identification (biology); Matching (statistics); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05475716662173801,"score_gpt":0.2818182935625275,"score_spread":0.2270611269407895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408397987","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025966691,0.000029406847,0.9961958,0.0000583847,0.0000059895156,0.00012024036,0.00001227178,0.000043324108,0.00093788607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15531611,0.0000987402,0.8421956,0.000104206134,0.000014100481,0.0009241613,0.00007440192,0.000054992488,0.0012177778],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763722,0.016270617,0.0009659213,0.0022396392,0.0035444095,0.0006072546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98291576,0.010931397,0.0015178927,0.0018478021,0.0023556498,0.00043150256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018064054,0.0013782714,0.0015231654,0.0025574141,0.00089693465,0.0029512546,0.0023131005,0.0017877794,0.004760908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029073477,0.0010673185,0.0022912845,0.0015954616,0.002423723,0.0030332387,0.0038188107,0.001957084,0.00068564556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021961213,0.00039147088,0.0032735833,0.00048605178,0.00021447716,0.0002322919,0.0008247253,0.5398671,0.0052879173,0.31054503,0.0007785708,0.13787922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006565913,0.00039174466,0.00042866723,0.000079706704,0.00005490683,0.00008808831,0.00015900399,0.86048913,0.0024185139,0.13194098,0.0038427266,0.00004088798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011410422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012515635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018064054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021264742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038867947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095532954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408859475","doi":"10.1109/tsmc.2025.3549602","title":"Group Multirole Assignment With General Conflict","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Political science; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019632687247042046,"score_gpt":0.21027606833455947,"score_spread":0.19064338108751744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408859475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01690791,0.0002456026,0.973755,0.00040216313,0.000077211276,0.00022380891,0.000059687238,0.00014665839,0.008181993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49679235,0.00032776908,0.49417475,0.00025688866,0.0001290385,0.00049051584,0.00019129654,0.00007097677,0.0075663836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938497,0.0032826825,0.00024970033,0.0011460938,0.00094112154,0.00053061015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948744,0.002555749,0.00073577854,0.00087862887,0.0005317553,0.00042361807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038658213,0.0010486556,0.0012416218,0.0009390425,0.0014902182,0.0023366127,0.0032921499,0.0017410922,0.0060351556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009954594,0.0005160371,0.0012440212,0.0015458063,0.0019177456,0.003558077,0.0037001672,0.0025465703,0.00082615967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021821752,0.00020353383,0.001659256,0.00031159495,0.00008954929,0.0005573892,0.0007957979,0.27398688,0.0027440146,0.62279254,0.0050197453,0.09162155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008087427,0.00009947097,0.00026522556,0.00003236512,0.000031885047,0.00031136055,0.00021515625,0.7270662,0.0012500354,0.26159683,0.009017188,0.000033353732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001726012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014467039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060351556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015047259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016965672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020444691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408886298","doi":"10.3982/ecta22762","title":"On (Constrained) Efficiency of Strategy‐Proof Random Assignment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Courant Forschungszentrum Geobiologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025189216508058342,"score_gpt":0.2320330249366767,"score_spread":0.20684380842861838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408886298","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13366449,0.001084542,0.803396,0.0029181258,0.00009516644,0.0003052406,0.00024790858,0.00019685479,0.058091618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92942446,0.00076512573,0.056083288,0.0007130749,0.0001841879,0.00061485264,0.00019507104,0.00016330458,0.011856631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820566,0.012145424,0.00068193517,0.0017494957,0.0014901981,0.0018763014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8772652,0.10210784,0.008105409,0.007464604,0.0034511685,0.0016057446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022181058,0.001211412,0.0019889278,0.0016986973,0.0011714894,0.0042338725,0.0030390944,0.0023148917,0.008265365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08539313,0.00084129046,0.0016019196,0.0014127614,0.0065293564,0.008855278,0.003656164,0.0032652915,0.0010985569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007074574,0.00006836671,0.00070254767,0.00008604729,0.00004719888,0.00006211754,0.00015454531,0.032070853,0.0004920573,0.95994717,0.0006095623,0.0056888517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009239268,0.00007040853,0.00030736235,0.00004283174,0.000020668942,0.000059712558,0.00006077304,0.09067715,0.0005192461,0.90685534,0.0012768843,0.000017268476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013102121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060908234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022181058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035867877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11730605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408978912","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70024","title":"Intermediate Condorcet Winners and Losers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02199859762987923,"score_gpt":0.23023162815847323,"score_spread":0.208233030528594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408978912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38056055,0.00029668637,0.4610966,0.00420285,0.00027961915,0.0004391876,0.00066267996,0.00045761277,0.15200417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511915,0.0000643925,0.044373415,0.00029169253,0.000070947295,0.00016748463,0.00017202031,0.0000633517,0.0036050975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98687184,0.0059066,0.0012653153,0.0021261072,0.0027452933,0.0010847888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96746016,0.014112188,0.004389838,0.0064637573,0.0056991912,0.0018749471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011654494,0.0005432775,0.001044794,0.0021260958,0.0024833146,0.0072963582,0.0018832658,0.0022307988,0.010753206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03902636,0.00043007897,0.0010755602,0.0014883216,0.0072323973,0.0060822847,0.004109572,0.003029413,0.0013096698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001649305,0.000055676923,0.0043293345,0.000085309875,0.00004310938,0.00012351264,0.0010354804,0.00147974,0.0016139862,0.97769564,0.0010302064,0.0123430565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008326802,0.00019175906,0.004291287,0.00017318338,0.00007919119,0.00029528848,0.0029671192,0.018234737,0.0054856837,0.9503688,0.017746313,0.000083438856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017160542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013861939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011654494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019341821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021350607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061635613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409059749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5178085","title":"Disclosure Volume","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Business; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.015852974023998708,"score_gpt":0.22317513264183916,"score_spread":0.20732215861784045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409059749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019725198,0.0019778053,0.0012018388,0.009653528,0.01229929,0.00019968991,0.019731533,0.00067997497,0.9522837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008381807,0.00091535796,0.00041081262,0.0027709182,0.0039603547,0.00014560905,0.0055646966,0.00021574798,0.97763467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984736,0.00018240945,0.00011915975,0.00028302235,0.00081162195,0.00013022847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643624,0.0010997527,0.00029405154,0.0007559618,0.0009538999,0.0004600207],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011919275,0.0005008844,0.00071798527,0.0024348893,0.00091104733,0.004314182,0.00070851855,0.0022677125,0.5138698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905541,0.0002715976,0.00034373967,0.0018596409,0.0003619689,0.0013493823,0.0012477712,0.0018109229,0.41913867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042872456,0.00003231874,0.00030338694,0.000125896,0.000006353162,0.000044985216,0.000018916295,0.00008022993,0.0003336876,0.009013335,0.92359865,0.06639921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013675111,0.00001682048,0.0010533254,0.00011283904,0.0000041929743,0.00008334802,0.000018055314,0.00020735817,0.00032966543,0.004770425,0.99338347,0.0000068112977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004589225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009439699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5138698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094115007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012544332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6934057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409359688","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115248","title":"On the existence of EFX (and Pareto-optimal) allocations for binary chores","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia; Science and Technology Development Fund; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pareto optimal; Binary number; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Multi-objective optimization; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.024383141185406566,"score_gpt":0.2482467532580235,"score_spread":0.22386361207261693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409359688","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33459067,0.001261783,0.5604527,0.0054040104,0.00013470354,0.00034024823,0.0007050268,0.00041933008,0.09669156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89269656,0.0010808918,0.08909763,0.00058856973,0.00015099008,0.00063007313,0.00038664814,0.00019779947,0.015170846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942827,0.0032303466,0.00029310197,0.00060849823,0.0006140772,0.00097119116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938307,0.0516632,0.003451206,0.0026333982,0.0021660018,0.0017793349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009749235,0.0012837009,0.0031042562,0.0028075874,0.0035732193,0.006166984,0.0024727338,0.004641077,0.01474771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06499473,0.0019590212,0.00149231,0.002619022,0.008143194,0.0124245575,0.0057487744,0.005055255,0.0015014132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278782,0.000057737812,0.0003689102,0.00009125614,0.000016636055,0.000032948814,0.00028328763,0.017902456,0.00029709275,0.9730272,0.0012273743,0.0065672374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039316834,0.000017907396,0.00016882383,0.00003774858,0.0000065490885,0.000022706128,0.000114411036,0.03327576,0.00015148633,0.9655588,0.0005944446,0.000011935679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026397917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020588767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01474771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036348416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051559508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409364637","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i13.33499","title":"Constrained Fair and Efficient Allocations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06781769022624423,"score_gpt":0.26858720731393954,"score_spread":0.2007695170876953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409364637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03750405,0.0008216145,0.8718245,0.002674797,0.0001552863,0.00017606684,0.0005007392,0.0002311798,0.08611179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7538691,0.000884257,0.21983759,0.0008310998,0.0003255554,0.00061214546,0.0004201629,0.00020222101,0.023017721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992603,0.003069406,0.0003761986,0.0015173851,0.0015240548,0.0009100131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913044,0.004696731,0.0006335586,0.002386527,0.0007047819,0.00027411117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055395784,0.0009304349,0.0010602276,0.00093840074,0.0019600126,0.005123987,0.0017915692,0.0021110787,0.013236561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02499321,0.0007328106,0.0009166643,0.0017716687,0.0041766968,0.007785382,0.003210515,0.0026495846,0.0010398042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022557986,0.000015911626,0.00010109991,0.000032811975,0.000012587182,0.000017678565,0.00007757656,0.016767856,0.00028566743,0.97296697,0.0011498157,0.008549514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001278457,0.00000663373,0.00006199995,0.00001925239,0.000005798051,0.000017741595,0.000024928559,0.029858582,0.0002682205,0.9649322,0.00478546,0.0000064886067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002240027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002479012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013236561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031164377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028426852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044280708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409365156","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v39i13.33500","title":"Temporal Fair Division","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.08890704066024799,"score_gpt":0.2810345126970807,"score_spread":0.1921274720368327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409365156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041096084,0.00081310765,0.8784488,0.002190825,0.0004317328,0.00022943418,0.00034786714,0.00024939235,0.0761928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8201155,0.00087811553,0.14361618,0.0007188388,0.00058395695,0.000425618,0.00032292973,0.00016413613,0.03317473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952618,0.0016147458,0.00018297319,0.0011906611,0.0009800049,0.0007698186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891962,0.005187608,0.0013166533,0.0022993016,0.0011177947,0.0008824372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061009526,0.0010794305,0.0013057124,0.00083634054,0.0029420028,0.004022679,0.003187772,0.0016468443,0.015259882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018428449,0.00044791854,0.0013548067,0.0018235814,0.0038983873,0.0084846895,0.0033596985,0.0028568085,0.001247145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011423305,0.000059382524,0.0005031187,0.00005735082,0.00003456097,0.00009040293,0.00023606111,0.04031462,0.0007294329,0.9390357,0.0023585176,0.016466565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052683994,0.00007137952,0.00020159123,0.000028828716,0.000026205198,0.00011108892,0.00010677593,0.14817141,0.00073277485,0.8344891,0.015989617,0.000018516443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046504857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003761118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015259882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00438867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031676663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05104941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409840309","doi":"10.54929/3041-2390-2025-04-01-02","title":"Методика оцінки інтеграційної близькості економік України та Канади у 2022–2025 рр.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Вісник Академії праці, соціальних відносин і туризму. Серія: економіка, психологія та управління.","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0243363304487892,"score_gpt":0.22868594606777473,"score_spread":0.20434961561898554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409840309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10611291,0.028256554,0.03664516,0.007941289,0.0033277771,0.00042101057,0.0028184077,0.00046992255,0.814007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69488347,0.03018707,0.032122977,0.0010103008,0.0006077153,0.00042640304,0.002946067,0.0002901738,0.23752594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987109,0.00022362561,0.00008080073,0.00014387799,0.0006221159,0.00021867293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991703,0.00016423113,0.00010209273,0.000101506346,0.00032921004,0.0001326611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001570585,0.0004604944,0.00027003392,0.0022306184,0.001683514,0.0043381248,0.00043908638,0.00071101484,0.020295069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023988204,0.00031179845,0.0004817103,0.0028377115,0.001135105,0.0016064307,0.0017003566,0.0017361061,0.00791457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018337589,0.00009854864,0.010767914,0.0008547553,0.000058602465,0.0012178125,0.008043413,0.0025301904,0.004485227,0.42083338,0.04974923,0.50117755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075123094,0.000037762034,0.014410174,0.0003351231,0.000022814256,0.0004917007,0.002503437,0.00048945105,0.0015461696,0.017847922,0.9622739,0.000034129607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020580845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022012899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032699273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073898225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06789374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409915641","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5205896","title":"Peer Review Market Design: Effort-Based Matching and Admission Control","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Control (management); Business; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02628646071814345,"score_gpt":0.2588843091336224,"score_spread":0.23259784841547898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409915641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07732051,0.0006537925,0.9050449,0.0031636907,0.00035105547,0.0007091022,0.00019853315,0.00063023705,0.011928228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93929094,0.0003497999,0.0444405,0.00034638663,0.00049570913,0.0003492124,0.00010900796,0.00009371863,0.014524848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824373,0.01050959,0.00067699584,0.0023970993,0.0022007544,0.0017782302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942137,0.039319776,0.0046558497,0.005623176,0.0052166325,0.0030474986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017666155,0.0010298049,0.0039605675,0.0020263987,0.0015505309,0.0052164053,0.0060149776,0.0056036403,0.011823818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07856302,0.0010735472,0.0011706187,0.0021358146,0.0025688282,0.006769001,0.0030168707,0.0027546447,0.0019481928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023088653,0.00139549,0.006372462,0.0006024813,0.0005044213,0.00044223084,0.0006220722,0.20012408,0.009772822,0.5398013,0.015158675,0.2228952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032812665,0.00031342392,0.0010958082,0.000029412284,0.000117225005,0.00014725818,0.000082857296,0.74364394,0.00197928,0.24983628,0.0023609388,0.00006540777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014378258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011592358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98233384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019273822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033899073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09342873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410013534","doi":"10.1002/nav.22265","title":"Abundant Neighborhoods, Two‐Sided Markets, and Maximal Matchings","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorics; Mathematics; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.10442767891851185,"score_gpt":0.36241541412433304,"score_spread":0.2579877352058212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410013534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23448569,0.0005240817,0.75039005,0.0006925358,0.00004515913,0.00014106127,0.00037643788,0.00031239048,0.013032574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611118,0.0002352888,0.13477747,0.000104546074,0.000041419873,0.00010975283,0.00031057617,0.00008562719,0.003223469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.00052844494,0.00006598789,0.00028881925,0.00025302044,0.00015958514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677473,0.0019384357,0.00045247996,0.000380123,0.00019586153,0.00025837406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461212,0.0004356422,0.00081937446,0.0009101289,0.0008551145,0.0016398529,0.0011807042,0.00074758433,0.005034226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005403634,0.00043148833,0.0007230062,0.0010281522,0.0014739002,0.0046234597,0.0017173045,0.0011197275,0.00039287235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002589156,0.00020941324,0.0020857924,0.00014789248,0.00006111524,0.00019852506,0.00026154873,0.15608034,0.005755505,0.78591275,0.0035942742,0.04543388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035478268,0.00009915655,0.00043947695,0.000019163197,0.000016053804,0.00012909582,0.000115768096,0.38127244,0.0021754308,0.61233884,0.0033447165,0.000014351409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012852001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001132411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005034226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009593254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063548004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016841233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236827","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102415","title":"On weighted-egalitarian values for cooperative games with transferable utility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Game theory","score_opus":0.05455303857679177,"score_gpt":0.29429639156703175,"score_spread":0.23974335299023997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10467309,0.0008294074,0.854843,0.0017879135,0.00013331481,0.00017707233,0.00020258177,0.00007962664,0.037273962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002794,0.0014306806,0.07669291,0.00060025166,0.00033495174,0.00049638527,0.0002695649,0.0001538921,0.01974198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407476,0.0034097258,0.00026792623,0.0007662473,0.000740481,0.0007408331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711604,0.023306957,0.0016457367,0.0012681866,0.0015154748,0.0011032444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008325505,0.0020365606,0.003076073,0.002384533,0.0018950395,0.0058380784,0.0046419012,0.0036678168,0.00829072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03683987,0.0011795902,0.0018882379,0.0030979319,0.0083320225,0.01300209,0.004119445,0.0052222754,0.0007485132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003347651,0.000028802879,0.00012248002,0.000040817387,0.000020982096,0.00003725454,0.00017078777,0.02756421,0.00023266177,0.9684535,0.000524595,0.0027704374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010998541,0.0000110150095,0.000044583867,0.0000142655235,0.0000060503603,0.000011409884,0.00003100005,0.0652331,0.000053846,0.9342665,0.00030704806,0.000010250614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030524533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022432148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008325505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002657517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04403001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410316541","doi":"10.32920/ifmj.v4i1-2.2037","title":"Choice, Chance and the Database","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Film and Media Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.023880824286297588,"score_gpt":0.24712721369271365,"score_spread":0.22324638940641606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410316541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034499597,0.016140932,0.20034419,0.06154771,0.0022290498,0.00028117336,0.0041715163,0.0016252005,0.6791606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7760636,0.0072386065,0.052422557,0.0068553593,0.0013346819,0.00047440015,0.0046689515,0.0011771816,0.14976475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910404,0.00327147,0.0007891408,0.0024528983,0.0017449862,0.00070107327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832131,0.007920008,0.0008665829,0.005443791,0.0014722603,0.0010842654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009112578,0.0006082713,0.0012863342,0.0022141037,0.005565896,0.020523263,0.003550349,0.003415933,0.08144898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03313011,0.00079103425,0.0010477942,0.0044402,0.012088364,0.041028943,0.0114417495,0.0035482312,0.012162863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010988283,0.00002068214,0.0009853606,0.00008041884,0.000011025794,0.00013057461,0.0012313125,0.0003443889,0.00008521215,0.9511727,0.01382158,0.03200683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003573022,0.000019386762,0.00025025237,0.00013999436,0.000013259956,0.00028116055,0.0010775587,0.0012024435,0.0002864458,0.75536436,0.24129795,0.000031546093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007057046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039101182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08144898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040278803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035072262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27247393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410487845","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102420","title":"Condorcet efficiency: Weighted Bucklin vs. weighted scoring and Borda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.033509841781106386,"score_gpt":0.2733664417933629,"score_spread":0.2398566000122565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410487845","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2906278,0.0022397498,0.64262605,0.003446664,0.00024139127,0.0007245652,0.0008920884,0.0008688814,0.05833276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931954,0.00038611636,0.09523064,0.0006128087,0.00014370054,0.00047369947,0.0007602419,0.00041737108,0.008780002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657993,0.02373563,0.0012173203,0.0036480487,0.00391022,0.001689543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703541,0.092580184,0.0077585597,0.022276426,0.0052970103,0.0017337066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051941212,0.0013454139,0.0030426376,0.004657709,0.0024652153,0.00543393,0.0033938242,0.0026940934,0.008662999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1394015,0.0008024276,0.0022062673,0.0042957743,0.0055798115,0.00906046,0.0029393882,0.0032353848,0.0017775224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011065764,0.00032274524,0.01581933,0.00040106525,0.0006705008,0.00009404715,0.0006204683,0.16729403,0.0010727863,0.675733,0.01055502,0.12631038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001858234,0.0004807396,0.0071154255,0.00016217452,0.00013784748,0.00018251882,0.00036100665,0.42180026,0.0029535864,0.56090087,0.005606513,0.00011328249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036857142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036940041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051941212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040728175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030597828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27469468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411078459","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf039","title":"Public Listing Choice with Persistent Hidden Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10147216431510846,"score_gpt":0.28435576371554183,"score_spread":0.18288359940043336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411078459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95483214,0.00014200644,0.039066337,0.0013905986,0.000017696353,0.000030409197,0.0001520202,0.00005276081,0.0043161083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971276,0.000035266057,0.00080042816,0.00003972143,0.000011788015,0.000005431547,0.000029760251,0.0000028292236,0.0019473344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992204,0.00035344876,0.00002874479,0.00011709662,0.00006626694,0.0002141736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140036,0.0046965345,0.0025027099,0.000601343,0.000280124,0.00051904604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018962772,0.00026458802,0.0008607252,0.00034383996,0.00031846436,0.0017330586,0.00063527905,0.0011551419,0.0066711335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006423795,0.0002926468,0.0004948602,0.0003048684,0.0009938646,0.001863572,0.0006364717,0.0009437015,0.00027365488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002163091,0.00094449165,0.06606318,0.0003242921,0.0003259093,0.0014539505,0.0007537185,0.39312047,0.009496064,0.4704766,0.004496727,0.050381586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030308706,0.0003572717,0.016183138,0.000032557033,0.000098975725,0.00014009264,0.00025523268,0.76005834,0.0016552119,0.21961822,0.0012491192,0.000048814833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026531403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00251084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066711335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012004119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048504738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022317171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411319759","doi":"10.1145/3717823.3718235","title":"Six Candidates Suffice to Win a Voter Majority","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.01540555234623176,"score_gpt":0.22970784848890807,"score_spread":0.21430229614267632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411319759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63000184,0.0006038337,0.25827494,0.009708166,0.0004047892,0.00044861474,0.0009469698,0.000922138,0.09868873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588155,0.000095847885,0.032601263,0.00044702203,0.000093568124,0.00014659783,0.00028354625,0.000087764594,0.0074288095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959829,0.0015178618,0.00023465458,0.00074613764,0.0006921822,0.0008263088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117404,0.0038156987,0.0008126911,0.001762438,0.0010532653,0.0013818649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038847846,0.00048095395,0.0015229275,0.00063837104,0.0025177738,0.0021264893,0.001113488,0.0018365853,0.010623935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01897605,0.0005518723,0.0010351967,0.000643659,0.0015686674,0.003051478,0.0019722204,0.0016365476,0.0038128365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025024284,0.0005939955,0.018593712,0.00043242454,0.0004262463,0.0007573052,0.0013722563,0.026110267,0.022331921,0.76268655,0.023243964,0.14094898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058409874,0.00094390067,0.009625638,0.00010963194,0.000137206,0.0011868853,0.0011583098,0.070408136,0.021356547,0.8556332,0.038753014,0.000103435676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005164586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000856127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010623935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062822876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010131386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03554058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411687202","doi":"10.61091/um123-05","title":"Weighted domination models and randomized heuristics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas Mathematica","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Heuristics; Statistics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.025733011013319405,"score_gpt":0.23997054963815645,"score_spread":0.21423753862483705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411687202","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025937261,0.0009247642,0.9598404,0.00091678696,0.00017467166,0.00025813052,0.00019521597,0.00032691524,0.01142591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74261606,0.001365116,0.23721328,0.00082014746,0.00028479868,0.0009415137,0.00041393487,0.00025272078,0.016092466],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537414,0.002636014,0.00012958806,0.0007335547,0.00056050776,0.0005661972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675644,0.010295026,0.0011098284,0.00094231317,0.00051250396,0.0003838697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048738495,0.0018248379,0.0021976263,0.001693816,0.00096029387,0.0024993096,0.0039975527,0.0019608608,0.0062044547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015448548,0.0008656036,0.0015933051,0.002796433,0.002467037,0.0038426204,0.0016429394,0.002315754,0.0007160467],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011178904,0.000116558695,0.00034564556,0.00013761346,0.00010589304,0.00010602491,0.000077742705,0.7674516,0.00055129227,0.2102119,0.0026381135,0.018145883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052456944,0.00003689484,0.000060889495,0.000011623511,0.000018475563,0.000025012361,0.000017989134,0.88853383,0.00016320658,0.10984323,0.0012244796,0.000011852957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038232137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004821215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062044547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031575896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020793413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02577573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411946105","doi":"10.1145/3736252.3742675","title":"Fairly Stable Two-Sided Matching with Indifferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0197423812436817,"score_gpt":0.21853767037308133,"score_spread":0.19879528912939964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411946105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05442198,0.0001289966,0.9378084,0.00035384245,0.0000402772,0.00015701228,0.00017594238,0.00027623927,0.006637318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62239486,0.00020845316,0.36556363,0.00028906018,0.00006871231,0.0002862827,0.00039849503,0.0001737514,0.010616765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628097,0.0014403205,0.00020977623,0.0009982805,0.0006658885,0.00040482383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898465,0.005993036,0.00068529224,0.0021095737,0.0008615334,0.0005039488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051337555,0.0008533864,0.001667256,0.0011015629,0.0015784184,0.002725479,0.0025955057,0.0024151513,0.0070923036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026871843,0.0006768287,0.0014691743,0.0015098836,0.0020407196,0.004898093,0.0029888065,0.0026081398,0.0016104793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050314376,0.00015886275,0.00136826,0.00011901642,0.00009397794,0.00018687909,0.00047477754,0.13854232,0.0039848154,0.79637516,0.0032244595,0.05496843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007930667,0.0000748053,0.00016116518,0.000017325168,0.000017450897,0.00008406072,0.00004265689,0.35900435,0.0017226244,0.63659966,0.0021731956,0.000023384995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016063146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001443692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070923036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019641062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023613675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027150273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413024579","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70003","title":"Bargaining Between Collaborators of a Stochastic Project","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","score_opus":0.042115979784372114,"score_gpt":0.25136763519950756,"score_spread":0.20925165541513543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413024579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29751095,0.00025439184,0.6269656,0.0031554138,0.00021354528,0.0002443754,0.00011898349,0.00012406212,0.071412675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96757734,0.000102193975,0.016716633,0.00012254124,0.00006667174,0.00013884522,0.00003753187,0.00002737646,0.015210857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922328,0.0044122487,0.00031609714,0.0010944427,0.0009184667,0.0010259394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982029,0.011047726,0.0022734231,0.0021113795,0.0008865188,0.0016518375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009083123,0.00070614414,0.001507394,0.0007555284,0.0022136697,0.004012974,0.0019916347,0.0038830359,0.017428916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025116837,0.00073256233,0.0014672288,0.00096346514,0.003017354,0.0043629785,0.003889223,0.0031968881,0.0014272336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004945232,0.00013963935,0.0017835235,0.00008703891,0.00011594605,0.0007259876,0.0009619387,0.16736569,0.0038431084,0.80755436,0.0014899168,0.015438379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017405025,0.00030667233,0.00072731427,0.000064879976,0.000059874583,0.00024337128,0.00092248357,0.37743783,0.0014151966,0.6098446,0.008726132,0.00007764613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001566026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009982008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017428916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020967738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015652581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058305502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186388","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cdm.v7i2.62146","title":"Tournaments with kernels by monochromatic paths","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contributions to Discrete Mathematics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monochromatic color; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Biology","score_opus":0.018384650141789576,"score_gpt":0.25268886806937596,"score_spread":0.23430421792758638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87866586,0.00020277429,0.11260436,0.00008809209,0.00002712914,0.000042096966,0.00014554104,0.00018181339,0.008042317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862278,0.00007126065,0.011233327,0.000027723067,0.000012530253,0.00002785199,0.000109467466,0.000024572055,0.0022653746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899036,0.0002168143,0.000056400273,0.00026540333,0.00020317707,0.00026776057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978636,0.0007842574,0.00047650345,0.0003381454,0.0001839252,0.0003535753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048619075,0.0003858408,0.0005687854,0.0005787387,0.0007984594,0.0015774883,0.00073772273,0.0004983266,0.0045968406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026319043,0.0003510684,0.00071731675,0.00063973904,0.0013485092,0.0021669774,0.0012535738,0.000878627,0.00035459048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006059217,0.00011157362,0.00461442,0.00014960574,0.00006936788,0.00048725898,0.0007138118,0.026968589,0.016831322,0.9282999,0.0011841761,0.01996401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001992652,0.0003180563,0.0056641083,0.00003174575,0.000056195466,0.0005970803,0.0003547369,0.19253325,0.007497508,0.78681874,0.0058612586,0.00006807854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020101345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017063835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045968406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007957148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003055242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015377939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413238683","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112466","title":"Strategyproof and fair allocation of a perfectly divisible private commodity with (restricted) single-dipped preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Commodity; Microeconomics; Economics; Fair division; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023855711918102537,"score_gpt":0.19711105909737128,"score_spread":0.17325534717926874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413238683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27758658,0.0002480813,0.67894864,0.0030668215,0.00013602812,0.0001857944,0.00029138717,0.00021231767,0.039324384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434192,0.00013113549,0.045980625,0.00015844774,0.000056424666,0.00010818064,0.00006204311,0.000037265985,0.010046706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968346,0.0012662562,0.00015151643,0.0005148213,0.0005748033,0.00065805187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563783,0.0021263466,0.00044324365,0.0010227889,0.00040314827,0.00036663775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039221956,0.0005706379,0.001109511,0.00064094557,0.0010154581,0.0045222174,0.001840391,0.0021971192,0.0036530576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010234189,0.0005654753,0.0008342428,0.0008161767,0.003145281,0.0043681995,0.002138487,0.0021038693,0.0005253647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016285581,0.000064415784,0.00039104169,0.00005409589,0.000032289136,0.000072334056,0.00013202724,0.02801714,0.0023058176,0.9600161,0.00081936823,0.007932494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057525056,0.000038413622,0.00017406236,0.00001318211,0.000012199531,0.00003630341,0.000049112372,0.12546502,0.0010745093,0.8717287,0.0013363267,0.000014635652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019371704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019433561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045222174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024920292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036547135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020742774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414004406","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.08.013","title":"A direct proof of the short-side advantage in random matching markets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Zoo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Direct proof; Proof of concept; Burden of proof; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.015247064194296837,"score_gpt":0.23577293776521224,"score_spread":0.2205258735709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414004406","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14335354,0.0024918076,0.65990144,0.018132389,0.0012532278,0.00030102432,0.00095240894,0.00063159206,0.17298259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9224227,0.0016502693,0.046419278,0.0031530801,0.0016926344,0.0003718666,0.00021195119,0.0002520509,0.02382618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703336,0.0011601606,0.00012594392,0.00047944067,0.000724525,0.0004764715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755161,0.017671313,0.0017636647,0.0022114625,0.0016471717,0.0011904078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036817275,0.0011584045,0.0024415164,0.0013431329,0.0014864929,0.0028770906,0.0032918733,0.003710987,0.02329479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029735034,0.00077453174,0.0017931772,0.0016784734,0.0045849755,0.009197265,0.0042709345,0.006041864,0.0019998117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008652929,0.00008217264,0.00034901645,0.00014252424,0.000035399997,0.00010067608,0.000108109736,0.0037826945,0.0014429465,0.9805915,0.005135844,0.008142586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000579706,0.000027671911,0.00028665402,0.000015992624,0.00001533233,0.0000950091,0.000020924977,0.021643406,0.0003112004,0.97578263,0.0017247245,0.000018472938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001297976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008292387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02329479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015942788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021483533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07792878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414038062","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.002","title":"Optimistic and pessimistic approaches for cooperative games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Generalitat de Catalunya; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pessimism; Computer science; Operations research; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24358349397966222,"score_gpt":0.3496985167450292,"score_spread":0.106115022765367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414038062","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007902415,0.0005918694,0.9712455,0.0011841209,0.00009456769,0.000092033646,0.000058394744,0.000042687643,0.018788388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6754412,0.0020180317,0.3089305,0.00063867227,0.00047636678,0.0006745505,0.00010848035,0.00012596896,0.011586299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203694,0.0050028856,0.00028757978,0.00088905846,0.0012775286,0.00050593895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98352456,0.012360866,0.0014572176,0.0013031849,0.00083874917,0.00051534537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008793706,0.0021602889,0.0012729779,0.0015191567,0.0017768042,0.004312806,0.0033048356,0.0022208008,0.006174353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028504245,0.00091042684,0.0015144626,0.0017363689,0.0060434816,0.0061821057,0.00402627,0.005808906,0.000754634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028949156,0.00001797002,0.00014868978,0.00006288349,0.000023268622,0.00003730516,0.00021348264,0.055048868,0.0003030007,0.93788576,0.00059103995,0.0056386245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014233981,0.000022525352,0.000052369964,0.000030293082,0.0000131867355,0.000025202766,0.000053896547,0.12789528,0.00019689812,0.86930364,0.0023774377,0.000015049044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020147217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019145018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008793706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037552353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022620654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046506166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414266818","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.03","title":"3. Voting with two alternatives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Population; Ranked voting system; Approval voting; Condorcet method","score_opus":0.03828007331560068,"score_gpt":0.243949008341883,"score_spread":0.2056689350262823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414266818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04467709,0.0008308513,0.18480258,0.004652513,0.0003544407,0.00030694949,0.00053761073,0.00017052212,0.7636674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76573795,0.00072282826,0.07445714,0.0015794495,0.0002203873,0.00035373133,0.0005660592,0.000071924595,0.1562906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791914,0.0008388651,0.00008634292,0.00037510734,0.00048327455,0.00029725436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983022,0.0008554988,0.00016629412,0.0004129899,0.00016414262,0.00009886513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016640242,0.00038910614,0.00052598305,0.00040301314,0.0013584049,0.0027352155,0.0011916261,0.0025304398,0.03219147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065896534,0.00023361247,0.0010381092,0.00068338873,0.0016798939,0.002125495,0.001387781,0.001899408,0.004368606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008102121,0.00005474698,0.0009310647,0.00006456679,0.000017871269,0.00015093495,0.00032379336,0.005401615,0.0005651035,0.9345785,0.0077496893,0.05008119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006842405,0.000061874365,0.0010384964,0.00007874343,0.000028154353,0.0005159301,0.000266843,0.039369345,0.0010829443,0.8859766,0.07148754,0.000025044128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029850972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028035187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03219147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011109144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011687034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414269100","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.05","title":"5. Sequential pairwise voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Pairwise comparison; Sequence (biology); Voting; Class (philosophy); Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Set (abstract data type); Binary number","score_opus":0.053884161071052254,"score_gpt":0.24052746208793732,"score_spread":0.18664330101688506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414269100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013896715,0.0008733199,0.43886083,0.0012950065,0.00042410815,0.00044778048,0.0005026678,0.0003697906,0.54332983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3940963,0.0012272191,0.37458488,0.000763679,0.00027649032,0.00059185986,0.0011447251,0.00024604626,0.22706877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979493,0.00083729957,0.000098765544,0.00036197458,0.00055635395,0.0001963356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883014,0.0004271405,0.00009375937,0.00033192785,0.0002296149,0.0000875309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016354129,0.00055164413,0.00057128817,0.00065940974,0.0016226766,0.0020096332,0.0015871978,0.0011769516,0.04529916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049707354,0.00032165786,0.00080613745,0.00118262,0.0012149487,0.0028971678,0.0017252514,0.0013784945,0.007748337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005328082,0.00003623263,0.00027090352,0.00011844791,0.000017459173,0.000067748304,0.00020706399,0.004896519,0.00074155437,0.90095824,0.009348481,0.08328405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034485398,0.00006900069,0.00035802275,0.00007171113,0.00001894783,0.0002845132,0.000115618124,0.032745957,0.0013322065,0.8302082,0.13474357,0.000017801249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019102687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031119657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04529916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011374902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013440101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15154082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414591285","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.11","title":"11. Distributive politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Stochastic game; Shapley value; Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Bargaining problem; Position (finance); Function (biology)","score_opus":0.03635196961157519,"score_gpt":0.23369684532781257,"score_spread":0.19734487571623738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414591285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030739026,0.0016875585,0.03292693,0.0035020018,0.00021043987,0.00004815094,0.00010530812,0.00006392666,0.9583817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47574154,0.0035426796,0.022197837,0.0040785386,0.0009408327,0.0003541553,0.00026492192,0.00018720972,0.49269232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987846,0.00037475603,0.000031501844,0.00030719693,0.00032463268,0.00017725713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.00018151032,0.000038630445,0.00014723468,0.00009612931,0.000051604642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903836,0.00055781653,0.0004991695,0.00050870585,0.0029480418,0.005746998,0.0009624056,0.0019948834,0.03019538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016568729,0.0003514207,0.00062770594,0.0013162456,0.0069454005,0.0055767642,0.0019328429,0.0026348962,0.0061595095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0013276e-7,0.0000021095316,0.000014541462,0.0000040764166,4.057201e-7,0.000005123007,0.000038484017,0.00008700574,0.00000874148,0.9972263,0.0012692328,0.0013430264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003881597,0.000004512378,0.000061405306,0.000018880688,0.0000010620159,0.000048074548,0.000059256956,0.00087035785,0.000029773119,0.9145963,0.08430429,0.000002183436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032771651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034708986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03019538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004438455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019374978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1010136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414592225","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.07","title":"7. Voting with asymmetric information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Contingent vote; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022378202766369936,"score_gpt":0.20369671126108613,"score_spread":0.1813185084947162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414592225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11165549,0.002264483,0.4003362,0.014672645,0.0004205022,0.00025915928,0.0005644409,0.00016050796,0.46966666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92361456,0.0014774898,0.03350086,0.0014238317,0.0005955241,0.00022210451,0.00032736183,0.0000484618,0.038789853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907862,0.0051192264,0.00036156038,0.0009381933,0.0018654395,0.000929437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971367,0.006277194,0.0010475264,0.0017822345,0.0008646008,0.00031475353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006391066,0.00054140465,0.0012760637,0.0008729733,0.0018125837,0.005276241,0.0017150792,0.0036273922,0.014506873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01881899,0.00045663858,0.001501905,0.0011687457,0.003628461,0.006397319,0.002456045,0.0028275268,0.0016788209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025159497,0.000015597561,0.00030674142,0.000030169778,0.000012882166,0.000051139952,0.00010835263,0.0072823158,0.000086852386,0.9852063,0.0016202073,0.0052542873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030412331,0.000015991503,0.00019502848,0.000022392784,0.000009204454,0.000057928846,0.00006707794,0.033966955,0.00011196158,0.9598912,0.005622254,0.000009649073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002644368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018641026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014506873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002429634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013432878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04853034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593506","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490","title":"Models in Political Economy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Mathematical proof; Voting; Core (optical fiber); Politics; Foundation (evidence); Public choice; Voting behavior; Outcome (game theory); Formal description","score_opus":0.04885543382179371,"score_gpt":0.24383772674826906,"score_spread":0.19498229292647534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065288604,0.060915887,0.22515747,0.022799501,0.0023552566,0.00015588495,0.0018686964,0.00095610385,0.67926234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39216214,0.09632211,0.08953304,0.008267225,0.0043894863,0.0013439957,0.0032589997,0.0006588909,0.40406412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991811,0.00035392583,0.000039732997,0.00012212124,0.00022560458,0.00007750759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992077,0.00051120133,0.000058001573,0.00009948469,0.00008002866,0.000043645898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007492619,0.0012368202,0.0012629853,0.0009324619,0.0010702003,0.0034892857,0.0012301966,0.0019730623,0.025941977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019839108,0.0004320271,0.0009895802,0.0021215333,0.0022136222,0.0037710166,0.0013641301,0.002864812,0.0062671816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033761667,0.000009407578,0.00007420006,0.000064763575,0.0000088916895,0.00003516158,0.00007660764,0.0032363343,0.000045782526,0.9718384,0.017070971,0.0075360998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073710535,0.000008005889,0.00007738656,0.00005640354,0.0000052221912,0.000055360302,0.000058179776,0.0058215912,0.000026075497,0.8504078,0.14347106,0.000005469256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031797301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028363112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025941977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025080207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016513225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08678454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593628","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.14","title":"14. Bargaining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Outcome (game theory); Status quo; Subgame; Repeated game; Voting; Sequential equilibrium; Interval (graph theory); Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04788547273774867,"score_gpt":0.23367617405098065,"score_spread":0.18579070131323197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021561214,0.0005765567,0.044881005,0.002552376,0.00044789078,0.00023757848,0.00043565177,0.00018480745,0.9485281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2482241,0.0021851873,0.065360166,0.0040574768,0.0006028983,0.0009965702,0.0016661502,0.00028574714,0.6766217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957663,0.0013760948,0.00025375452,0.0009784657,0.0010174944,0.00060780486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820745,0.00048345196,0.0001308239,0.00062866445,0.0003998438,0.0001498558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041559795,0.0009795901,0.0009185471,0.0011595676,0.005106706,0.007443475,0.002800485,0.003952761,0.13658822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008939678,0.0006512291,0.0014226849,0.0013797672,0.0035564762,0.0048519257,0.003820351,0.0034012077,0.03628753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013849428,0.000014926581,0.000081915154,0.00002383685,0.000005713369,0.000040481234,0.00017379665,0.0005724217,0.00007773231,0.9784021,0.011127231,0.0094660595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023396604,0.00002469739,0.00016370243,0.0001181796,0.000009170276,0.000098681754,0.000303257,0.0021915657,0.00029124532,0.74358314,0.25317642,0.00001655551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038682404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030001525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13658822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045749675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037061225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45693308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593853","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.02","title":"2. Collective choice with privately-known preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Preference; Mechanism (biology); Social choice theory; Preference theory; Selection (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.04950337841267126,"score_gpt":0.23284739081086625,"score_spread":0.18334401239819498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012450798,0.005840772,0.20167156,0.012306135,0.00072189176,0.0001432082,0.00036113782,0.00012904032,0.7663754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56696033,0.0076888464,0.098404795,0.0043128566,0.001795195,0.0008954109,0.00064802484,0.00014484231,0.3191497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890983,0.00043272963,0.000036604775,0.00021259507,0.00031557682,0.000092760914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907863,0.00051868986,0.00008187045,0.00021333418,0.00006943095,0.00003801401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014470773,0.00049155316,0.0005572171,0.000353537,0.0011192178,0.0028524555,0.0009188306,0.0032365017,0.01460367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003543709,0.00024764385,0.00081333285,0.0007852396,0.0028819854,0.0036287936,0.0014877971,0.0022226614,0.0034716935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008351594,0.0000093526105,0.000068553156,0.000047096215,0.000003579911,0.00003308618,0.00011012468,0.0010935051,0.00008788231,0.9779163,0.004840016,0.015782095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007474639,0.000007437118,0.00012073147,0.000042180294,0.0000031982188,0.00006512012,0.000041328924,0.0031415839,0.00008577775,0.9594879,0.03699222,0.0000050447466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007187716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069798384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010788091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070030126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048854172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414593888","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.06","title":"6. Ethical voting and expressive voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Outcome (game theory); Bullet voting; Anti-plurality voting; Turnout; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting","score_opus":0.0406746087399058,"score_gpt":0.24760925357937658,"score_spread":0.20693464483947077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414593888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01359726,0.0055087917,0.07127047,0.0072381077,0.00055199274,0.00006224284,0.000073365605,0.000040614555,0.90165716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7058925,0.0059225406,0.02626646,0.0036852234,0.0012007863,0.0002432201,0.0001708547,0.000095209405,0.25652316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757963,0.0012945632,0.000080270365,0.00025852004,0.0005410969,0.00024594372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978325,0.0013330376,0.00019969829,0.00032994463,0.00020890434,0.000095931864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021275268,0.0003760253,0.00036427565,0.00044606568,0.0014098053,0.0032380386,0.0006339493,0.0017620896,0.015168734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064789443,0.0002426309,0.00061354175,0.0006518346,0.0048791436,0.0038110095,0.0015624899,0.0031553872,0.0021586942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023322007,0.0000064456794,0.00006786385,0.000012492845,7.9217267e-7,0.000010713338,0.00017778491,0.00045675057,0.000022269693,0.99387556,0.0012303819,0.0041367128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056266317,0.000011143984,0.00023843072,0.00006722791,0.000002194893,0.000056659967,0.00019255967,0.0022144744,0.00009355165,0.94197154,0.05514158,0.0000049698724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012427807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012361358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015168734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016556329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011215162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050744474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414594317","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.10","title":"10. Electoral competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Voting; Nash equilibrium; Cardinal voting systems; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game; Competition (biology)","score_opus":0.03785354420940562,"score_gpt":0.22447878556274417,"score_spread":0.18662524135333855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414594317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006749155,0.00059820834,0.0049275653,0.0016620592,0.00015350593,0.000039922506,0.00022440602,0.000039783783,0.9856053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49990568,0.0013320858,0.0072328066,0.0021308414,0.00042113053,0.00023592473,0.0008492193,0.00006672248,0.48782563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885225,0.0003095003,0.000047815283,0.00023311078,0.00029145018,0.00026581038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00023553181,0.0000723614,0.0001502988,0.00014368225,0.000120977005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084321137,0.00028158646,0.0004634203,0.0005262859,0.0020323251,0.0043065976,0.00083622255,0.0018790765,0.06375415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028347676,0.00021721901,0.00048121216,0.000693737,0.0017326724,0.0019096924,0.001573823,0.0017176961,0.012537574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011861618,0.000014472137,0.00015971046,0.000027331944,0.0000024184192,0.000039043927,0.0001082777,0.00024215119,0.000097312346,0.9704324,0.014595399,0.014269533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029892246,0.000037213245,0.0012066058,0.00010361362,0.0000066213083,0.00037602687,0.00036580308,0.002014149,0.00034688725,0.6627264,0.33277178,0.000014986206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002540102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004100751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06375415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018110073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015941543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21327883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414594327","doi":"10.11647/obp.0490.04","title":"4. Voting with many alternatives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Condorcet method; Cardinal voting systems; Probabilistic logic; Population; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game","score_opus":0.0356839149489239,"score_gpt":0.22881984688435655,"score_spread":0.19313593193543266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414594327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04254236,0.001268047,0.37736422,0.0050036716,0.00039321958,0.0003954783,0.0003167401,0.00024908726,0.57246715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6964812,0.0010872144,0.14802876,0.001437994,0.0003299488,0.00045261413,0.00046348767,0.000104964805,0.15161373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639314,0.0016614945,0.00016585761,0.0005659807,0.0008449836,0.00036859317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969349,0.0014319139,0.00025306258,0.0008855027,0.00034487873,0.00014984014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025843128,0.0004801347,0.00064900663,0.0006539863,0.0016690341,0.0032012765,0.0017948184,0.0022245974,0.02842918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478169,0.0003127598,0.0011996484,0.00090438384,0.0022128157,0.0038580417,0.002195275,0.0019145336,0.0036217284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058718964,0.000051164774,0.00051250693,0.000078528814,0.000022899874,0.000076234704,0.00025547692,0.006313811,0.0005705282,0.9290076,0.0050813253,0.057971206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005594872,0.00005190295,0.00042268832,0.00006937743,0.000022634145,0.00020909111,0.0001682894,0.031644743,0.0009997211,0.9150105,0.051324934,0.000020071528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015017056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014900543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02842918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012291846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09510511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414798558","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaf074","title":"The Lottery Problem for Ranking Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Ranking (information retrieval); Feature (linguistics); Probability theory; Decision theory","score_opus":0.015818839887519427,"score_gpt":0.2331200428548962,"score_spread":0.2173012029673768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414798558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06668113,0.0018489875,0.82745737,0.011872191,0.0003522619,0.00015436616,0.00039089535,0.00017904704,0.091063716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90060455,0.00083794945,0.07654738,0.0009440693,0.0005269652,0.00033916117,0.0003214119,0.00010316877,0.019775387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99053556,0.0067830523,0.0003625789,0.00062506815,0.0011277471,0.0005658719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98291564,0.013594038,0.00072306395,0.0010178504,0.0010491833,0.0007002952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00926186,0.0005767956,0.0017299808,0.0014556048,0.0020146787,0.0050888485,0.0017630694,0.0027428493,0.01514257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022814944,0.0005014569,0.0015249397,0.0016051074,0.0055502383,0.007297746,0.0020510324,0.0036527694,0.0011155843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009822995,0.000013786719,0.00008194339,0.000025440668,0.000008977591,0.000014030805,0.000048032947,0.004525711,0.00002955983,0.99144816,0.0011400527,0.0026543734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000908116,0.000004914309,0.000033784785,0.000006420589,0.0000017426901,0.0000088299275,0.000020046833,0.014923529,0.000013482907,0.98415077,0.0008237214,0.0000036680078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014927569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01514257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034457778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020128626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050656915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230070","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i2.36653","title":"Fairness and Sparsity Within Rashomon Sets: Enumeration-Free Exploration and Characterization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Selection (genetic algorithm); Key (lock); Limit (mathematics); Range (aeronautics); Characterization (materials science)","score_opus":0.07487391801485156,"score_gpt":0.2725175185113366,"score_spread":0.19764360049648505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230070","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02383836,0.00015943935,0.9715043,0.0008249118,0.000027375834,0.000079717654,0.00013528862,0.00015518033,0.0032755027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62181383,0.00036768286,0.37039313,0.0008860536,0.00016272382,0.000699123,0.0005908523,0.00027629247,0.0048104054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99210125,0.004550121,0.00026916814,0.00084655854,0.001627328,0.00060554116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573713,0.03377803,0.0021092235,0.0041067037,0.0015487759,0.0010859725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012414855,0.0011728588,0.0020703066,0.0023871444,0.0015098318,0.0039660623,0.0027907053,0.0020512012,0.004777285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059021316,0.0009335441,0.002011501,0.0016540887,0.004179756,0.006526329,0.0071875993,0.0046583633,0.0006878043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024789077,0.00017317435,0.0056688706,0.00017237292,0.000096472395,0.0002259323,0.00061486725,0.27014115,0.00190476,0.6648967,0.0031106218,0.05274719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019573929,0.000058227015,0.00028804224,0.000047055917,0.000010438821,0.00007443031,0.000057122477,0.59342164,0.0006617069,0.40409526,0.0012443685,0.000022031458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011859462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013950326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012414855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001911903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028105688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06565684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415314210","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-05862-1_4","title":"Energy Rents and Distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Distribution (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Apportionment; Energy (signal processing); Income distribution","score_opus":0.02057485662037758,"score_gpt":0.18681103170698754,"score_spread":0.16623617508660996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415314210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0122432,0.005020425,0.030477455,0.004333411,0.0003253334,0.000015138199,0.00018869004,0.0000577193,0.9473385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5175868,0.0045196046,0.0032174431,0.000506345,0.0003348586,0.000031878713,0.00013953041,0.00012155409,0.47354192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983084,0.00003934411,0.000004709469,0.00003211617,0.000059414357,0.000033564436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986434,0.00006295152,0.000008976783,0.000031591768,0.000022140124,0.000009995814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024466257,0.00026981183,0.00037899218,0.00051157427,0.00057396037,0.0021673536,0.0005397175,0.00095710147,0.027935676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011424789,0.00023520578,0.00023185923,0.00082818925,0.0017882439,0.0031978514,0.0007060448,0.0012058669,0.0026180781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053432404,0.000006403889,0.00005007602,0.00000828231,0.000001917268,0.000008423881,0.00002786696,0.001158187,0.00007910882,0.9842137,0.0043101674,0.010130343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018039261,0.00000269451,0.00024548374,0.000014433853,0.0000014122228,0.000032500742,0.000057955574,0.0021003156,0.00012229383,0.9541129,0.043304607,0.0000035083897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033800257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004308952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027935676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001748305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047221707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09345418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415980035","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.11.001","title":"Preconvex games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Convexity; Group (periodic table); Property (philosophy); Transferable utility; Core (optical fiber); Regular polygon; Group cohesiveness; Axiomatic system","score_opus":0.023316871636977224,"score_gpt":0.2345898711109874,"score_spread":0.21127299947401018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415980035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058722846,0.0004439174,0.80676097,0.0017857382,0.00023103385,0.0003334493,0.000583243,0.00017032542,0.13096854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7538005,0.00085755787,0.19919163,0.0010466251,0.00022775523,0.00068942993,0.00059759663,0.00012161261,0.04346723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789065,0.0007024589,0.00012681304,0.00044520578,0.0005251199,0.0003098503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981718,0.0007187418,0.00021590135,0.0002627656,0.00036281263,0.000268009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013356451,0.0011025713,0.00086375565,0.0006674773,0.0012492273,0.0026908196,0.0017272827,0.001306088,0.0073762154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045397286,0.0004064229,0.0007436168,0.0007223574,0.0027507846,0.0035252892,0.002869997,0.002598758,0.0009073578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113963115,0.000016605953,0.00011898798,0.000027884098,0.000007811325,0.00005915338,0.00011889145,0.0062551484,0.0004410591,0.9862533,0.0011595468,0.0055302447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002150673,0.000042261294,0.00012065868,0.000020263831,0.0000079454185,0.00011217822,0.00010118745,0.056064393,0.0005029356,0.9258038,0.017190317,0.000012610593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022721868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028842895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073762154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015651985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013232877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024675906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416054337","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.19365","title":"On Efficient Computation of DiRe Committees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conjecture; Set cover problem; Set (abstract data type); Constraint (computer-aided design); Cover (algebra); Representation (politics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Population","score_opus":0.08647946689419143,"score_gpt":0.1792288755297969,"score_spread":0.09274940863560548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416054337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04559736,0.00041556926,0.9298924,0.0012117485,0.00009899406,0.0003405538,0.001070279,0.003478208,0.017894946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3197306,0.00025565026,0.66505295,0.00043941193,0.00009571711,0.0005276872,0.0035582136,0.0006297317,0.009710064],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972875,0.0008507543,0.00015340034,0.0007519529,0.0004305704,0.000525832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405164,0.003506564,0.00032373556,0.0012964857,0.0005290342,0.00029258622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022933588,0.0011922892,0.0014666757,0.001329122,0.0017612803,0.002993482,0.0027996395,0.0016074689,0.0133927055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01361356,0.00075868843,0.0013551617,0.0022484055,0.0012841694,0.004966963,0.0037908275,0.001963452,0.003118183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088665413,0.00040802135,0.0034769904,0.0006799808,0.00013247752,0.00019710744,0.0005432464,0.3516246,0.004323485,0.28031865,0.030284256,0.32712454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011401565,0.00006585241,0.0003107776,0.00004305251,0.000026365557,0.00007188285,0.00015406615,0.6886745,0.0018681972,0.3021286,0.006524176,0.000018471204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042944998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009686848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133927055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002209549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036750361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044803083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416181515","doi":"10.61091/jcmcc128-17","title":"Asymptotic lower bounds for the feedback arc set problem in random graphs","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feedback arc set; Arc (geometry); Feedback vertex set; Vertex (graph theory); Directed acyclic graph; Upper and lower bounds; Directed graph; Random graph; Independent set","score_opus":0.01826974688101482,"score_gpt":0.24468588096518842,"score_spread":0.2264161340841736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416181515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061991263,0.0072416193,0.8847363,0.004306144,0.00040217195,0.0002243688,0.0014968531,0.003266551,0.03633478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81472236,0.0069658444,0.15379323,0.00283343,0.0017277986,0.0015510516,0.0034436747,0.002211577,0.0127510065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896884,0.003317977,0.00034608305,0.002045731,0.002902403,0.0016993802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8869141,0.08973047,0.005114116,0.010967253,0.0050514983,0.0022226602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007861373,0.002959879,0.0030755056,0.0041271364,0.0029195885,0.0041582296,0.0075408723,0.0033900235,0.012374142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080809765,0.0013890305,0.002289833,0.004238835,0.0052961996,0.014449307,0.0041378117,0.008736216,0.0024752978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008832352,0.0004799942,0.002794245,0.0010436383,0.00027906353,0.00024500862,0.00049515173,0.31950223,0.011200648,0.58875084,0.023337932,0.050987992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006494331,0.00014326503,0.00084622356,0.00016479784,0.000077533,0.0002820511,0.00009313041,0.564225,0.0041850037,0.42569533,0.0041329684,0.00008976788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022906938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022846307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012374142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072239833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024138282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05241388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416643054","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2025.107396","title":"The Condorcet dimension of metric spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Metric space; Dimension (graph theory); Norm (philosophy); Cardinality (data modeling); Metric (unit)","score_opus":0.061380198620925516,"score_gpt":0.3275535329859491,"score_spread":0.26617333436502355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416643054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51302665,0.0040785717,0.42895782,0.0035103816,0.00024519552,0.00012884787,0.0018186454,0.00023119718,0.048002686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93793225,0.0014529817,0.054831453,0.00025414798,0.0003408776,0.00022740781,0.0008702834,0.000066770604,0.0040238104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484056,0.0018980897,0.0003919349,0.0011611296,0.0011712492,0.000537045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98110044,0.010781024,0.0021623578,0.0020802552,0.001953753,0.0019220712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002809977,0.00096466107,0.0011304789,0.0028488734,0.0021074624,0.0054747863,0.0015587177,0.0012603056,0.0028202315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018807242,0.0005959075,0.0008330426,0.002434161,0.005957891,0.007541347,0.0040814937,0.0027574834,0.00061321526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009830642,0.000021696866,0.001321262,0.00008055884,0.00003416529,0.00006380397,0.00023493456,0.005559711,0.0009983781,0.98175836,0.0016262667,0.008202544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001741352,0.0000629442,0.0010496475,0.000030383071,0.000012108117,0.00024009435,0.00011129321,0.029054487,0.00088160025,0.9627384,0.005767215,0.000034446268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000814374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049425825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054747863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016524792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071671954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014860749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417030628","doi":"10.1007/s10726-025-09956-7","title":"Majority Stability of Coalition Structures Under Decentralized Preferences of Autonomous Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Disjoint sets; Outcome (game theory); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.047863454554541315,"score_gpt":0.27250822118067136,"score_spread":0.22464476662613003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417030628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190058,0.00026279787,0.16475995,0.001503644,0.000036455174,0.00007074369,0.00018276481,0.00008471531,0.014093103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941005,0.00006573736,0.0039596166,0.000032955417,0.000027665468,0.000041459753,0.00006503373,0.000015328833,0.0016916886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972203,0.0013037112,0.000121447985,0.00046186952,0.00041846186,0.00047414683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777356,0.022155417,0.0044176932,0.0017306997,0.0023311607,0.0015916037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005194538,0.00040145157,0.001562205,0.00110709,0.0016870302,0.0042441273,0.0021927487,0.0016413642,0.0038303267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034903213,0.0005725774,0.00068575505,0.0009649295,0.0032277005,0.005091797,0.0021473926,0.001718563,0.00036396447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005718613,0.00014710498,0.002979673,0.00009594384,0.00010311646,0.00021954185,0.0010870624,0.09886156,0.0026388713,0.8814285,0.001534364,0.010332432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007196319,0.00005966846,0.0011916969,0.000012222554,0.00001536689,0.000035378835,0.00036179952,0.2779537,0.000607968,0.7193192,0.00035047904,0.000020512756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031833323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005194538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021323236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016317173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027471721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417313618","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102989","title":"Allocating water resources in transboundary river basins: A sequential rubinstein bargaining approach with risk discounting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Mekong river; Discounting; Water resources; Resource allocation; Bankruptcy; Drainage basin","score_opus":0.0374517423262861,"score_gpt":0.2475202213922029,"score_spread":0.2100684790659168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417313618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10485277,0.0002045972,0.8809123,0.00070241484,0.000041185194,0.00011052317,0.000042646538,0.000048572976,0.013085046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913931,0.00021803833,0.077631004,0.00008288977,0.00002624358,0.00012934642,0.000022355183,0.000023892433,0.007935244],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692255,0.0020836443,0.00008699027,0.00041008048,0.00024416903,0.00025243062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979213,0.0013609825,0.00030904202,0.00013057329,0.00016109954,0.000117044015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055126534,0.00063827645,0.0014782251,0.0008517652,0.0007855907,0.0019643183,0.0026377786,0.0016001351,0.0048966827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007440283,0.0007693861,0.0013460648,0.0009644814,0.0021843193,0.0027805627,0.0020660835,0.0015896086,0.00025274395],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006177947,0.000052213,0.00067595235,0.000039728682,0.00005341482,0.00013937178,0.00025373028,0.7552868,0.00084856467,0.23296808,0.00021653251,0.009403936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001909623,0.000054497305,0.0001492024,0.000009970175,0.000019142015,0.000027155482,0.000115691415,0.91102344,0.00021691147,0.087661065,0.0006863988,0.000017437978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060750223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048941504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060750223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003017995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001740441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029154062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417324916","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5910504","title":"Robust Median Voter Rules","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Commit; Cardinal voting systems; Compromise; Anti-plurality voting; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Bullet voting; Complete information","score_opus":0.03154316889420647,"score_gpt":0.22329006768983567,"score_spread":0.1917468987956292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417324916","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23114486,0.0011571719,0.60172033,0.0042064833,0.0006423294,0.00022322997,0.0015384885,0.0011284736,0.15823859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499796,0.0002705548,0.023716167,0.00045302874,0.00023411482,0.00014987952,0.00040324463,0.00019096145,0.02460247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967212,0.001329301,0.00015577687,0.00074624474,0.0005960239,0.00045147553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98735344,0.006283974,0.0015421018,0.0032421045,0.001068466,0.000509836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134204,0.0006285746,0.0021656384,0.0011259582,0.0012749698,0.0038455806,0.0016781818,0.0028284236,0.018651243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692592,0.0006502988,0.0010701317,0.0007773108,0.0016169547,0.002636086,0.0019775934,0.0023623046,0.0036135232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019320258,0.00006495286,0.00074532593,0.00008515295,0.00008720115,0.00010472383,0.00007807467,0.022051023,0.0020860655,0.9501684,0.007249126,0.01708683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005232823,0.000032402648,0.00046328266,0.000021144693,0.000019513094,0.00006851789,0.000033044318,0.08947144,0.00077305734,0.90687114,0.0021773113,0.000016777409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000512657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006143967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018651243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011339491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008562502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06239462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57159709","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7873","title":"Complexity of and Algorithms for Borda Manipulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Computational complexity theory; Bin packing problem; Approximation algorithm; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Bin","score_opus":0.41443430081306726,"score_gpt":0.31196339613060653,"score_spread":0.10247090468246073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57159709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06399635,0.0009806855,0.89376837,0.005031495,0.00021884743,0.0006329958,0.0007549168,0.0022865273,0.032329828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5512739,0.00080551906,0.43390393,0.00075842446,0.0003368637,0.001058696,0.0018523926,0.00070237217,0.009307964],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919572,0.002763892,0.0005110013,0.0016550791,0.0019398003,0.0011731103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742727,0.018404711,0.0014611573,0.0042797998,0.00088004215,0.0007015465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005056394,0.0014720045,0.0024376728,0.0014286946,0.0024711743,0.0075952513,0.00484575,0.004306324,0.013118642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030123428,0.0013005022,0.0038322138,0.0025056407,0.0030374855,0.009546216,0.0051847375,0.0063719545,0.0021750985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009511504,0.000536769,0.0029104648,0.00074141717,0.00028946146,0.0002276261,0.0008021889,0.44100332,0.0037004224,0.36907995,0.018485248,0.1612719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014513088,0.000071952156,0.0003689296,0.000041183514,0.000054843604,0.00013416549,0.00011235055,0.5564611,0.0012783342,0.43726766,0.0040303385,0.000034006567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033554398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013118642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052421154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004701571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043886244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607142973","doi":"","title":"Cognition and the voter calculus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Sage eBooks","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Calculus (dental); Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Neuroscience; Medicine","score_opus":0.02254293810728602,"score_gpt":0.18291779043723508,"score_spread":0.16037485232994905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607142973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029244063,0.038913265,0.05843715,0.05550934,0.0013438202,0.00008818327,0.00053476857,0.00016812947,0.8157612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108695,0.012085882,0.010556621,0.0032000665,0.0013922432,0.00018548111,0.00026869032,0.00010617714,0.06133539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985098,0.00086572836,0.000037754024,0.00020761842,0.00020386075,0.00017521199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721587,0.0021986626,0.00012343952,0.00019243974,0.00016647458,0.00010314171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024385182,0.0007576943,0.00077254116,0.0016473746,0.0018514938,0.0054213894,0.0012307749,0.0026450434,0.021228679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005424365,0.0003090323,0.0010241942,0.00177785,0.008959527,0.006508156,0.0017126878,0.0026558947,0.0021718524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036517217,0.0000067839837,0.000101939884,0.000015200496,0.000003109947,0.00000790749,0.0002421168,0.00065407954,0.0000076035144,0.9950566,0.0019017808,0.0019992534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004424377,0.0000030211277,0.000090787646,0.00001962814,0.0000022681124,0.000008339023,0.00009203144,0.0006327606,0.000007934918,0.9866757,0.012460347,0.0000027394847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004531513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025801028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021228679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040325006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015249003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64006730","doi":"","title":"Approximating Games and Economies by Markets","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Closeness; Combinatorics; Economics; Economy; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.018439324355970975,"score_gpt":0.1932771938395245,"score_spread":0.1748378694835535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64006730","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08190954,0.0026244544,0.867652,0.0016019852,0.00012390123,0.00013230236,0.00014184513,0.00015406955,0.045659956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84711725,0.0029558665,0.13814166,0.00032223295,0.00026309083,0.0003139238,0.00021735393,0.000106174295,0.010562449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968696,0.0018824387,0.0001373822,0.00034806842,0.0005388157,0.00022364609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484587,0.003496039,0.00054293504,0.00060977845,0.0002734661,0.0002319246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029730715,0.0009179705,0.0009998841,0.0013344244,0.000594302,0.0028718738,0.0013224934,0.001405577,0.004796444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018339995,0.00044967752,0.0009816085,0.0013672098,0.004108331,0.0076237307,0.0033834213,0.0022591292,0.00050350954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012800446,0.000008370443,0.00015304115,0.000025572986,0.000008210555,0.000017187764,0.000089813264,0.024862377,0.00010415282,0.97139376,0.00031125473,0.0030135636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010048767,0.000010934225,0.000061082836,0.000010642165,0.000003709268,0.000017738996,0.000038773105,0.07182315,0.00007185404,0.9262027,0.0017452734,0.000003935758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020801171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010312074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004796444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001983101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000598606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01604569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W68565015","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-93952-8_1","title":"Matchings and Perfect Matchings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0226192933945131,"score_gpt":0.18919063553704993,"score_spread":0.16657134214253683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W68565015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045599483,0.007117117,0.32403827,0.0068184044,0.0007841674,0.00015369058,0.00049101503,0.00021047718,0.61478734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77876306,0.004987047,0.049318533,0.0014867005,0.0008816713,0.00024342712,0.0004331499,0.00013609015,0.16375038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980416,0.0007822369,0.00010424849,0.00034665555,0.0004738965,0.00025138972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980453,0.0010639867,0.0001928025,0.0003658037,0.00022256287,0.00010939617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019356267,0.00047044284,0.0009778789,0.0008885793,0.0013025884,0.0032552409,0.0010143627,0.0018283771,0.017847326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007903828,0.0004579096,0.0006583413,0.0016689029,0.0031757923,0.0054304525,0.0013385428,0.0020164512,0.0021444866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043274813,0.000005874406,0.000039397903,0.000014760383,0.0000032347202,0.000005541915,0.000030356725,0.0006300782,0.000037768674,0.9909225,0.0019216503,0.0063844086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032225216,0.0000023518398,0.00003795225,0.0000070279966,0.0000019422482,0.000011742524,0.000014242969,0.0015011801,0.000032069427,0.99330044,0.00508591,0.0000019387116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011300155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009091274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017847326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015547497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010774682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059705257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6905091009","doi":"10.15126/900770","title":"Voting with Interdependent Values: The Condorcet Winner","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Interdependence; Voting; Complete information; Approval voting; Private information retrieval; Mechanism design","score_opus":0.025111190032821192,"score_gpt":0.21750951863416979,"score_spread":0.1923983286013486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6905091009","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33262113,0.00042732205,0.58095664,0.0049957344,0.00036978046,0.00029898708,0.0002392914,0.00017604104,0.079915084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522291,0.00015950986,0.03604899,0.00038235422,0.000108994645,0.00016773594,0.00007239859,0.000038234455,0.010792771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439776,0.0024907235,0.00023578155,0.0011221647,0.0010558192,0.0006977913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929932,0.002324557,0.0015677455,0.0018206009,0.00063568674,0.00065822917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00716031,0.00050317176,0.0010838696,0.00071182434,0.0013212658,0.003247732,0.0023832833,0.0022028426,0.0058407057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017585129,0.00038398703,0.0009984566,0.00087527925,0.0036089693,0.00416947,0.003040849,0.0031290893,0.0006831429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010202,0.000058822265,0.0015605745,0.000046819754,0.00004742214,0.00014669308,0.00028953335,0.0043604723,0.00075741863,0.97192645,0.002006546,0.018698163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010286736,0.00007131947,0.000753274,0.000022519298,0.000034538694,0.00018798781,0.00015394637,0.041747462,0.00089295604,0.95165265,0.0043532755,0.000027083244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079071504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008288903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00716031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010337875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011198118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037867785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906450821","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/9envp","title":"Intergroup Contact and Processes Underlying Performance on Implicit Measures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Set (abstract data type); Interval (graph theory); Control (management)","score_opus":0.08866053886389925,"score_gpt":0.3141106811747072,"score_spread":0.22545014231080795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906450821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85245526,0.00085918896,0.095147505,0.003402724,0.000090161026,0.00007767423,0.00042855064,0.00010770042,0.047431257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906623,0.00013896215,0.0030242142,0.00006330268,0.000044239157,0.00003196102,0.00013906954,0.0000257308,0.0058701476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969222,0.001789751,0.000109168075,0.00038127502,0.00046341793,0.00033415243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697365,0.021214815,0.0034158053,0.002971889,0.0017630291,0.000897868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068725115,0.00044111497,0.00061557424,0.0012662134,0.0008060533,0.004675507,0.00095604116,0.0019605136,0.014660837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062361695,0.00017220172,0.0003632784,0.0015082447,0.0017981294,0.0040969825,0.0019253461,0.0016086961,0.0014351474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057993096,0.00065347314,0.055677906,0.00020399097,0.00016337498,0.00012085812,0.0025418934,0.018834813,0.002499649,0.82707065,0.0045827054,0.087070666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051223004,0.00013406837,0.04337583,0.00008181066,0.000045689783,0.000058233116,0.00087380543,0.07751444,0.0010551732,0.87312794,0.0036341536,0.00004771614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016352766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019863425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014660837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011062757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067973306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049045384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923763398","doi":"10.14288/1.0132995","title":"Blisterine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Musical; Human life; Quality (philosophy); Human being","score_opus":0.07208231327651532,"score_gpt":0.26118736687766536,"score_spread":0.18910505360115004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923763398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002255981,0.0010801516,0.0013930803,0.0015570835,0.0017481608,0.0000823191,0.010025402,0.0010537014,0.980804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046913316,0.00026628235,0.00059478753,0.00014827037,0.00013271351,0.000024816585,0.0032138703,0.00047614524,0.9904518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921227,0.00005692524,0.000022529695,0.00015493273,0.00044122257,0.00011219261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982526,0.00015164024,0.00005467009,0.00025002894,0.0008151365,0.00047593628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007796271,0.00074142887,0.00049761933,0.0028940772,0.0038650264,0.004548719,0.00085033395,0.0009860651,0.4562907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030899092,0.00032558697,0.00023624796,0.0022890246,0.00074040785,0.0014042939,0.0030185878,0.0015951078,0.19705692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091786016,0.00001600408,0.00056365394,0.00010628707,0.0000037560658,0.00011993597,0.00066535687,0.00007629711,0.0004602033,0.00463631,0.90904456,0.08421589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001637207,0.0000030247777,0.0007731381,0.000039408704,7.4986116e-7,0.000031505984,0.00018781272,0.000023208202,0.000098175624,0.00020033041,0.99863774,0.0000032476605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0837589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38811904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4562907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022983088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002668798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930409904","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12310400","title":"artificial intelligence and the future of power pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applications of artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Energy (signal processing); Expert system; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.037306799211496086,"score_gpt":0.2244362061206172,"score_spread":0.1871294069091211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930409904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005736982,0.052557416,0.00039618465,0.06490814,0.007901809,0.000016706583,0.0004138355,0.00012739969,0.87310475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016252266,0.038037907,0.0003667377,0.008302781,0.004751998,0.000026891557,0.0003849882,0.0001243708,0.9317521],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990932,0.00010988032,0.000019690802,0.00008407295,0.0005639858,0.00012923972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932754,0.00018296705,0.000043042593,0.000055880722,0.00025040802,0.00014021614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005359108,0.000502432,0.00032403093,0.0012206429,0.0029906542,0.011195696,0.0005790369,0.0030678893,0.11027779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027795394,0.0003951553,0.0003111357,0.0019521287,0.002209444,0.005800794,0.0015737533,0.0036186103,0.037678916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032765201,0.0000048792635,0.00006742402,0.000029081215,0.0000012207144,0.000024000094,0.0000929906,0.0000563567,0.000022978054,0.03909566,0.93704045,0.023561668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012202855,0.000002078224,0.00024938496,0.00010174576,7.846445e-7,0.000028283028,0.00013242992,0.0000258374,0.000016801529,0.007867666,0.9915699,0.000003892254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021955235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048753195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8897222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045517124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003430693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36891598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931128389","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4993890","title":"NLPModelsIpopt.jl","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.06741478477458283,"score_gpt":0.22808243478644336,"score_spread":0.1606676500118605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931128389","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013620442,0.00029914404,0.5298935,0.0003872986,0.00041241248,0.00019516532,0.016550062,0.39973792,0.051162355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055638555,0.0006502695,0.31285813,0.0017042271,0.00024383132,0.0012092399,0.049134262,0.48615682,0.09240465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922633,0.00015749234,0.00006267338,0.0001803019,0.0002727116,0.00010056657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989409,0.00039746563,0.00005484889,0.0003700516,0.00014366719,0.000093074756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016705403,0.0019669207,0.0010546242,0.0009938825,0.0005816009,0.0028515467,0.0027888652,0.0021405555,0.22928956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048189024,0.0017648411,0.0019897295,0.00063869666,0.0005631697,0.0028353282,0.0034384339,0.00263532,0.14071105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073712313,0.00013592116,0.0007521402,0.0011549656,0.00019983458,0.00039594164,0.00016134433,0.021142954,0.0061527006,0.055138625,0.75169754,0.1623308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039311053,0.00005060486,0.00039612193,0.00025426163,0.00006280303,0.00030361587,0.000030741005,0.17718276,0.014344699,0.060352057,0.7465248,0.00010445628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001865031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027873074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22928956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083424046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001033884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931189902","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4155219","title":"[[Vedere]] » Monster Hunter (2020) film completo streaming ita hd ghr","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Live streaming; Sphinx; Clearance","score_opus":0.06755678543650698,"score_gpt":0.22516756244935673,"score_spread":0.15761077701284976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931189902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090176787,0.00055115053,0.00026415417,0.0012368261,0.0024444894,0.00010076755,0.0041597076,0.0014297169,0.9889115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002778207,0.00041941772,0.0002956034,0.00038158637,0.00024732528,0.000031754087,0.002309775,0.0006163577,0.99292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998555,0.000010300718,0.0000036229198,0.000022245327,0.00006349239,0.00004476391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997346,0.00001410663,0.000008341268,0.000022283488,0.00010250805,0.000118147276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024396958,0.00061977014,0.00022164048,0.0006906797,0.0016363373,0.003456247,0.0006206808,0.0007906341,0.77504814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006717178,0.00032032118,0.0003713695,0.0006064889,0.00023585343,0.0018366309,0.0019675228,0.0012856097,0.51591104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688367,0.000005835158,0.000046408295,0.000038830574,0.0000010558635,0.000025014824,0.000062147665,0.000007779576,0.00012012235,0.0006174509,0.98602504,0.013033378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003693282,0.000004670888,0.00036608469,0.000027167926,8.765858e-7,0.000026029846,0.00007884838,0.000010131436,0.000063407715,0.000058134276,0.9993585,0.0000023864573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016468083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06568657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22495186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088372175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000572021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32086653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931713009","doi":"10.5683/sp3/okuszl","title":"DQ52 [Decima Quarterly 52 December 1992]","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Occupational Cancer Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Survey sampling; Survey research; Survey methodology","score_opus":0.03671766824880663,"score_gpt":0.24385334621715007,"score_spread":0.20713567796834345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931713009","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019313153,0.000032424407,0.00003349044,0.00005209012,0.000019744592,0.000009780827,0.9985708,0.00009922161,0.0009892937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005688682,0.000045738016,0.000115682364,0.000023849037,0.000009501105,0.00004174283,0.99660754,0.000034787186,0.0025522613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841976,0.00011943149,0.00015834086,0.00026073528,0.00063797075,0.00040387354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933682,0.00042494474,0.0005541061,0.000724895,0.0044912207,0.0004365916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012005017,0.0015906412,0.0011832352,0.0063557094,0.0014096844,0.0033306472,0.0023993226,0.0010495171,0.056627735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008414123,0.0007845063,0.0008589468,0.014353872,0.0003626746,0.0009729364,0.0011470459,0.0017184091,0.064728096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025402085,0.000010951494,0.0012907436,0.00009779596,0.0000089418445,0.000010509504,0.00001491935,0.00012787114,0.000013538465,0.00029153188,0.99588925,0.002218542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012218558,0.000013478839,0.030635582,0.00016437023,0.000023986433,0.000027553477,0.000121082325,0.00043049434,0.0001851573,0.00041403578,0.96782863,0.00003355351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7952471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8046028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005356389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011068731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41191745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6938893488","doi":"10.60692/pctck-64410","title":"Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation in Fuzzy Setting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Social choice theory; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification","score_opus":0.034850704417990166,"score_gpt":0.19518130383954183,"score_spread":0.16033059942155165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6938893488","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0674474,0.0007145979,0.88926846,0.0030671712,0.00014786795,0.000106899104,0.00007746216,0.0001008771,0.039069183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821859,0.00031545656,0.1742042,0.0003212694,0.00024206254,0.00010731517,0.000068218425,0.000025226094,0.0028571447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881932,0.0074274074,0.0005340468,0.001258292,0.0017952451,0.0007917537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102975,0.013097496,0.0018345244,0.0017828917,0.0016063678,0.00064888585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014513117,0.00073347567,0.0011252773,0.002626765,0.003459328,0.00476568,0.0015779719,0.0021555608,0.004313291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031860884,0.0004780128,0.0015793743,0.0025800585,0.0053453874,0.0076783844,0.0041309246,0.0028126985,0.00031727005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040448358,0.00003168639,0.00044698594,0.000051081945,0.000042532498,0.00011408118,0.0010334091,0.010225855,0.0004594579,0.9736744,0.00054205203,0.013337989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127255,0.000022077118,0.0002703234,0.000017922059,0.000024603263,0.00004480102,0.00017579479,0.050390743,0.0005754587,0.9468545,0.0015910722,0.000020028423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025680133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022629597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014513117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030340264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07675362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6942333059","doi":"10.14288/1.0371416","title":"Entrance to Stanley Park, Vancouver, B.C.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Exposition (narrative); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.030021125170037112,"score_gpt":0.24063156285899825,"score_spread":0.21061043768896115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6942333059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012924456,0.0012535931,0.0006002778,0.0013274656,0.00042716367,0.000038662172,0.0046949484,0.00048425503,0.9898811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001633043,0.00046850397,0.00014503198,0.00006950924,0.000021794764,0.000010119705,0.00074404385,0.00018304934,0.9967249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957734,0.000031690048,0.000015068074,0.00012639261,0.00013840442,0.00011112594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985291,0.00018299879,0.0000504832,0.00013092248,0.00053270994,0.00057380483],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888815,0.0009696504,0.0009987131,0.0016338348,0.0046878303,0.0056847343,0.0012734067,0.0023307553,0.7858307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020643843,0.0004455432,0.0005534598,0.0027345575,0.001079845,0.0018260211,0.0018860624,0.0023155073,0.546112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007660596,0.00009097314,0.00069976994,0.00017691193,0.000010283249,0.00015167824,0.00016702834,0.00033170197,0.00033608824,0.009786044,0.89950854,0.08866431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008856773,0.000015085879,0.0023038862,0.00017630645,0.0000039034544,0.000032004064,0.00028883596,0.0001645077,0.00016551944,0.0023296848,0.99450386,0.000007598391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12820482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.506682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042693634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059961076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3054865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976942364","doi":"10.60692/9g7vs-n5y13","title":"Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation in Fuzzy Setting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Social choice theory; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy control system; Fuzzy set operations; Fuzzy classification","score_opus":0.034850704417990166,"score_gpt":0.19518130383954183,"score_spread":0.16033059942155165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976942364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0674474,0.0007145979,0.88926846,0.0030671712,0.00014786795,0.000106899104,0.00007746216,0.0001008771,0.039069183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821859,0.00031545656,0.1742042,0.0003212694,0.00024206254,0.00010731517,0.000068218425,0.000025226094,0.0028571447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881932,0.0074274074,0.0005340468,0.001258292,0.0017952451,0.0007917537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102975,0.013097496,0.0018345244,0.0017828917,0.0016063678,0.00064888585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014513117,0.00073347567,0.0011252773,0.002626765,0.003459328,0.00476568,0.0015779719,0.0021555608,0.004313291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031860884,0.0004780128,0.0015793743,0.0025800585,0.0053453874,0.0076783844,0.0041309246,0.0028126985,0.00031727005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040448358,0.00003168639,0.00044698594,0.000051081945,0.000042532498,0.00011408118,0.0010334091,0.010225855,0.0004594579,0.9736744,0.00054205203,0.013337989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127255,0.000022077118,0.0002703234,0.000017922059,0.000024603263,0.00004480102,0.00017579479,0.050390743,0.0005754587,0.9468545,0.0015910722,0.000020028423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025680133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022629597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014513117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030340264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07675362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993093537","doi":"","title":"Musings on matchings, matrices, and multiplicities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Regina","keywords":"Degree (music); Calculus (dental); Field (mathematics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.014020481648978244,"score_gpt":0.19290417364747658,"score_spread":0.17888369199849835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993093537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37783954,0.005795492,0.2939653,0.008670111,0.00079137133,0.00013118482,0.00081399526,0.00027774062,0.31171533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130606,0.0024701948,0.03110574,0.0006303861,0.0010188991,0.00013386924,0.00048295455,0.00016112225,0.050936382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814725,0.00074552826,0.00012467049,0.0004219528,0.0002760286,0.00028450022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893198,0.006818345,0.00119828,0.0010083353,0.0008043066,0.00085097126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001978886,0.000639327,0.0012864028,0.0025519403,0.0022161778,0.003948153,0.0012693136,0.0017135596,0.028241657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015154195,0.00055445614,0.0012413568,0.0023838333,0.0033810537,0.007407658,0.0037562826,0.0026543594,0.00184456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037045527,0.000016596916,0.0002890825,0.000030949952,0.000010755477,0.00003250569,0.00015166447,0.0017380328,0.00020043743,0.9884256,0.0018126664,0.0072546294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085964475,0.000012825098,0.00022109995,0.000021070327,0.000007017032,0.000032977914,0.00006123251,0.0042517087,0.00009619722,0.99318004,0.002100789,0.0000064355318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013863926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013985877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028241657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017458235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007723354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09447777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001968792","doi":"","title":")))))Long time service 18009350647 microsoft-Office-Support-Phone-Number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsoft Office Live Meeting; Phone; Microsoft Office; Microsoft Visual Studio; Visual Basic for Applications; Microsoft excel","score_opus":0.01660994686992205,"score_gpt":0.2338855039540283,"score_spread":0.21727555708410623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001968792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011765506,0.0002317084,0.0019260453,0.000309844,0.0005227399,0.00016681055,0.0027162966,0.022305472,0.9706444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003010107,0.00017413712,0.0009107054,0.00024877972,0.00016020982,0.00007763993,0.0020694851,0.005192685,0.9881563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993507,0.00004953928,0.000032336233,0.00015876339,0.00025406005,0.00015453788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978446,0.00022629961,0.00012871127,0.000316154,0.00061493384,0.000869245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005503291,0.0023297898,0.0012305704,0.0025886516,0.0016677903,0.005106549,0.0012683342,0.0018103127,0.9400111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025099886,0.00091478147,0.00086350495,0.00129041,0.00030682437,0.0027494938,0.0025402277,0.001128846,0.9479572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007351422,0.0000703327,0.00026476692,0.00008322193,0.0000053043627,0.0000541787,0.00004597499,0.000049470043,0.0009402383,0.0010287926,0.9210538,0.076330386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005967098,0.000088211884,0.00090475136,0.000071734976,0.000014019565,0.00016261329,0.00008633931,0.0002682838,0.0010760748,0.0005508266,0.9966904,0.000026995034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033126117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004552908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059988916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007267278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010293974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08556694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002249636","doi":"","title":"Mission NewEnergy Reports Unaudited First Quarter Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Results","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Fiscal year; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Revenue","score_opus":0.0248643767811776,"score_gpt":0.2011972447798544,"score_spread":0.1763328679986768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002249636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047198245,0.0018841032,0.0014639102,0.035908297,0.008280959,0.00026696996,0.07288798,0.0015235743,0.8730645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017865114,0.0013277151,0.0007153396,0.0025068864,0.0010007202,0.00021047311,0.02380317,0.0004931059,0.95207745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968515,0.00022381185,0.0001293044,0.00019398527,0.002156379,0.00044509498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123794,0.0012447019,0.0005528812,0.000636025,0.005756349,0.0005720517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035608304,0.00085248344,0.0007620491,0.004753805,0.002163106,0.0070410627,0.001720575,0.002777564,0.1814623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014652092,0.00043415575,0.0006596155,0.0036924195,0.0006042779,0.0021949448,0.0014783893,0.0029191067,0.090246946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006022515,0.00004072924,0.0003530043,0.000033489476,0.0000049584405,0.00002463481,0.000014435383,0.0001543395,0.000046303663,0.0050380165,0.9854866,0.0087431995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056887828,0.000030555017,0.0062900996,0.00016165191,0.000020685526,0.00003067821,0.00012956225,0.0012104405,0.0009202576,0.0051646815,0.9859512,0.000033243636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062409636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10153369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006372589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070105707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60705185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008125469","doi":"","title":"Andrews Scores in Preeminent Math Competition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.032881888489809316,"score_gpt":0.1724516270736445,"score_spread":0.1395697385838352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008125469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16578364,0.001695652,0.0023879781,0.025639247,0.0016035719,0.00013097592,0.0050927396,0.0006691692,0.79699695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7016938,0.00082033913,0.0019091491,0.0050527095,0.00040026734,0.00010642692,0.0045173615,0.00022133478,0.28527865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165606,0.0008636769,0.00046337344,0.0010448737,0.0045408397,0.0014311795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905956,0.0010912832,0.0008358763,0.0006743189,0.0026401698,0.0041628117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039983974,0.0009925886,0.0010349996,0.0028385553,0.0031947128,0.008269689,0.0015884815,0.0022598354,0.10687274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021712681,0.000427291,0.00058346475,0.002579666,0.0024547882,0.0041862675,0.006225427,0.0026722893,0.036135692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005518016,0.0004135561,0.072251625,0.00015864115,0.00005499615,0.00050341344,0.0014686908,0.0011415662,0.000910122,0.08126064,0.6334573,0.2078276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016520865,0.0006161765,0.15029164,0.00022817,0.000030778752,0.0010809492,0.0031628367,0.0023425906,0.0026504681,0.054909054,0.784363,0.00015915121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024036605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054069925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10687274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006078804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004354573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35752493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009775764","doi":"","title":"An Extension of classical contract net protocol","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.0546836024356591,"score_gpt":0.2584316092550572,"score_spread":0.20374800681939811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009775764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03456448,0.00021394259,0.84638757,0.0028987553,0.00084331766,0.0017009729,0.001358421,0.0018164971,0.110216156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59164006,0.0003415961,0.30791262,0.001150154,0.0005647317,0.001765004,0.0010565153,0.00045594148,0.0951134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938591,0.0023790856,0.00039934547,0.0011094004,0.0017111097,0.0005418934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98902065,0.0038475585,0.00051114225,0.0036239368,0.0023276343,0.00066918717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059753917,0.0005202172,0.0011995758,0.0011219537,0.0020537465,0.002732921,0.0039490196,0.0021472068,0.02019803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016826572,0.00045193252,0.0009354955,0.0014871032,0.0020547728,0.006119393,0.0031849018,0.002621794,0.004296411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005449014,0.00017817608,0.00036877664,0.00017160669,0.000029347499,0.00019406014,0.00021101863,0.008198347,0.0024010215,0.9308215,0.01346001,0.043421112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027978167,0.00016070716,0.00028907845,0.00005309536,0.000050167473,0.0002960563,0.0000627757,0.19997808,0.0031341459,0.7474377,0.04819696,0.00006137597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014847069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013294283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02019803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016655893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004927605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06756908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024973828","doi":"","title":"TSMC Expects Another Weak Quarter as Smartphone Woes Persist","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); The Internet","score_opus":0.020056978885237838,"score_gpt":0.2018708600265335,"score_spread":0.18181388114129568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024973828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379081,0.0015261883,0.011190121,0.31646267,0.011377294,0.00022579994,0.014375905,0.0031084262,0.5038255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4616554,0.00050722045,0.0018694217,0.034263663,0.0012344845,0.00011757434,0.006552766,0.00058568513,0.4932138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986405,0.0001224337,0.000045622037,0.00011662835,0.00050798396,0.00056688295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206734,0.0012506858,0.0007067575,0.00049461925,0.0028515607,0.0026290636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026647686,0.00036742314,0.00040286317,0.0009103613,0.0020215933,0.006838115,0.000844638,0.003861175,0.06811405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013470443,0.00018175086,0.0004900549,0.0008354664,0.0007106196,0.0024215346,0.0013228252,0.00436703,0.022432216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027557887,0.00018589958,0.021389715,0.000056437824,0.00002583153,0.00025372123,0.00020495911,0.0009230957,0.0008217542,0.06291366,0.849637,0.06331238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008488812,0.0002654104,0.027835809,0.00013981356,0.00004106942,0.00024308947,0.002198987,0.010032421,0.0020536345,0.03448446,0.92255116,0.00006934984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030498836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044476848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06811405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002535016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040599774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22786415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027737276","doi":"","title":"Compensation schemes in collective decision making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Solidarity; Compensation (psychology); Path (computing); Scheme (mathematics); Group decision-making; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.00975603146382008,"score_gpt":0.2443103239053514,"score_spread":0.2345542924415313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027737276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031324062,0.0669951,0.2849515,0.04298117,0.0028823502,0.0003293308,0.00037591072,0.000195061,0.5699655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83417886,0.025390163,0.043715615,0.0019983263,0.0027536694,0.00060367805,0.00026590916,0.00006280297,0.09103094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777776,0.0011466736,0.00009738009,0.00024042804,0.0004888996,0.00024881487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975217,0.0013994743,0.00027328116,0.00035379207,0.00032912198,0.00012258273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034974988,0.00057608716,0.000531942,0.00093273557,0.0011026978,0.0025031143,0.00087767735,0.002818746,0.014012716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068167653,0.0002758195,0.00047340896,0.0017171362,0.004150497,0.0036147921,0.0015132099,0.0021635424,0.0016849249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007444933,0.000007812334,0.00005733825,0.000042779757,0.0000039240867,0.000013634792,0.000104382925,0.0018519396,0.000047570586,0.9831912,0.0042032776,0.01046874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063790667,0.000010470877,0.00012893512,0.00006361452,0.0000036224048,0.000017727067,0.000037861624,0.0021284411,0.00003979608,0.9695896,0.027969291,0.000004319644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008723049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005787553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022078508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000985104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046877205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043295445","doi":"","title":"A revelation mechanism for shared conditional preferences in multi-attribute negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Research and Productivity Council","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Incentive; Space (punctuation); Set (abstract data type); Protocol (science); Mechanism (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Strategic dominance","score_opus":0.07308032033529419,"score_gpt":0.25992779637292174,"score_spread":0.18684747603762755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043295445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05659283,0.00011914451,0.93414927,0.0007406184,0.000040606366,0.00036673446,0.00008767513,0.00023042379,0.0076727546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253523,0.000088549335,0.27006063,0.00014695183,0.000039834053,0.0006825998,0.00008283892,0.000036567348,0.0035096635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832728,0.011091676,0.0011245877,0.0015950832,0.0020325857,0.000883302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97119135,0.016357608,0.0033866542,0.0060520354,0.0015336669,0.001478698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0177789,0.00066811184,0.0012120064,0.0010051841,0.002314038,0.003173678,0.0039004304,0.0024460764,0.0053150253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036921024,0.0007003756,0.0014267315,0.0013178204,0.004349267,0.008657918,0.005447326,0.0033506926,0.00066951284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042324793,0.0002080983,0.00095557474,0.0001730427,0.00009580599,0.00026459896,0.001532779,0.03176258,0.005442323,0.9240906,0.0009515607,0.034099773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035113763,0.0003669269,0.00039915077,0.00007288328,0.000057387602,0.00033500418,0.00028599074,0.238249,0.0057574925,0.7462576,0.007767269,0.000100120415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008206766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055787584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0177789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013624999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025050926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094024956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046102925","doi":"","title":"COMMENTARY ON âAPPROACHING LOGOS AMONG REASON, RATIONALITY AND REASONABLEâ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Logos Bible Software; Order (exchange); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.02842979670538642,"score_gpt":0.19341987512694117,"score_spread":0.16499007842155475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046102925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023396306,0.0016861534,0.00014983563,0.9773751,0.016264768,0.0000046166133,0.000029510295,0.000005100009,0.0042508724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013240505,0.0012743279,0.0002283252,0.93936497,0.03848639,0.00004829891,0.000022500808,0.000048181828,0.007286554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735974,0.010686289,0.0019742607,0.0045018075,0.0059608417,0.003279387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8439043,0.13311669,0.0027335964,0.0029200297,0.012322102,0.0050031915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027052807,0.0011238685,0.002823041,0.0022427228,0.015376208,0.012359064,0.007083582,0.10003327,0.010355375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1307338,0.0014009378,0.0016269812,0.0031390614,0.03039995,0.015800556,0.006728019,0.12530215,0.003866578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054716504,0.000014603479,0.00010114999,0.00008782668,0.000016683294,0.00015528216,0.0016508307,0.00006854746,0.000034172765,0.14845651,0.8463143,0.0030454122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012583722,0.000021389276,0.00048331678,0.000951587,0.000038601473,0.00015235355,0.00246404,0.00038609223,0.00017475185,0.18195324,0.8131586,0.00009029163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045784827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053061537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10003327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013679574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015479096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14307064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097576705","doi":"","title":"Evaluating search and matching models using experimental data”, mimeo","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Earnings; Randomized experiment; Measure (data warehouse); Test (biology); Quasi-experiment; Constant (computer programming); Corporation; Control (management)","score_opus":0.4532770094041289,"score_gpt":0.3997619628980919,"score_spread":0.053515046506037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097576705","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4425575,0.0051628686,0.49061638,0.01669113,0.0028528345,0.002315369,0.0077340654,0.0015837076,0.030486224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81973946,0.0026136292,0.15760995,0.0023072546,0.0008015198,0.004148215,0.003958468,0.00033050906,0.00849096],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802304,0.01722087,0.0005061335,0.00085782725,0.00092748954,0.0002573392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69255114,0.28337577,0.0062679886,0.013333729,0.0035327817,0.0009385995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05560762,0.0011264338,0.0015719973,0.00163549,0.0011619007,0.0025005606,0.002653395,0.0025450941,0.015484234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1633919,0.0010210294,0.0019612825,0.0022935725,0.0026488942,0.0034121934,0.0019197654,0.0021304605,0.0018647902],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040020356,0.0033843857,0.045520645,0.0015257342,0.0038826026,0.0005581883,0.0011479147,0.49794006,0.0013996625,0.22429295,0.07951427,0.13683157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010855395,0.0012617242,0.012982484,0.00010851415,0.000398239,0.00009114161,0.00037919413,0.83185464,0.0014771961,0.13652405,0.013710018,0.00012718886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007810813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006696888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05560762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035299086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018154546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29408473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097644020","doi":"","title":"Power in Voting Games and Canadian Politics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Power (physics); Work (physics); Index (typography); Politics; Power index; Weighted voting; Cardinal voting systems","score_opus":0.01245023606593124,"score_gpt":0.18532375540237134,"score_spread":0.1728735193364401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097644020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43762645,0.0049792193,0.10878175,0.0071015605,0.00020257973,0.00021085361,0.00044297095,0.00013312456,0.44052148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707646,0.0007898994,0.004425856,0.0001345673,0.000044034576,0.000026415668,0.000065318956,0.000014133747,0.007423359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975623,0.0007486427,0.0000647831,0.00021534768,0.0008389775,0.0005699016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972915,0.0012612998,0.00038756718,0.00017136434,0.00064009544,0.00024809598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024518461,0.0006160972,0.0005791266,0.0022570128,0.0033714687,0.0041305674,0.0011754854,0.0009568084,0.0054172487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010408569,0.00023985008,0.00041314436,0.004497609,0.005612386,0.0026090827,0.0014285743,0.0010795513,0.00021375094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002129624,0.000011109858,0.0025540602,0.000035814905,0.000010581737,0.000056130706,0.0006759668,0.013147095,0.00013448602,0.96961504,0.0012456793,0.012492699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004749371,0.00003241834,0.01260743,0.00006195683,0.00003130013,0.000075308,0.0018107467,0.07147983,0.0004164749,0.8780635,0.035306316,0.000067260306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6671596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66293603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33284038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025993425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009747793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6696011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097890642","doi":"","title":"Categories","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Constant (computer programming); Degree (music); Social research; Social category","score_opus":0.06197279074637358,"score_gpt":0.18897014750828225,"score_spread":0.12699735676190868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097890642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07281953,0.0011322584,0.13850796,0.0075450675,0.001569812,0.00061116734,0.009660993,0.0015369804,0.76661634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6401748,0.00085018534,0.041958287,0.002103948,0.00039261143,0.00068344065,0.009375419,0.00028432664,0.304177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970788,0.00061882654,0.00018246622,0.0007169442,0.00066411425,0.0007389177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968732,0.00053522317,0.00033580785,0.0007910044,0.00092968467,0.000535131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386093,0.00047344144,0.0005749363,0.0015800219,0.002871796,0.0057283775,0.0023932653,0.0021872346,0.08623202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058365813,0.0004235445,0.000880181,0.0020640022,0.0020246713,0.004403047,0.0032298707,0.0013999669,0.02055299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012602744,0.000041065425,0.0027010432,0.00006776216,0.00001763588,0.00020323557,0.0005887604,0.0008260708,0.00049775845,0.9253938,0.04339885,0.026137948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007002507,0.00006176414,0.0022652643,0.0000711905,0.00001994751,0.0005765259,0.001201069,0.0044324277,0.00061566685,0.59087944,0.39976266,0.000043944437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006623297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055202055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019311357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015417432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097940439","doi":"","title":"and","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Property (philosophy); Social Welfare; Population; Social welfare function; Relation (database); Welfare","score_opus":0.10936105834458197,"score_gpt":0.21498382023167953,"score_spread":0.10562276188709756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097940439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038290739,0.003189909,0.003329204,0.045460418,0.010466693,0.00023092423,0.027297843,0.0012692219,0.9049267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014287086,0.0009551484,0.0020058039,0.0024486824,0.00033258583,0.00005037137,0.005292268,0.00028358752,0.9743445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782467,0.00019648751,0.00008173106,0.00059963664,0.0008630804,0.00043439068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961177,0.00027464528,0.00013345308,0.00038831195,0.0022755922,0.0008103171],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001308098,0.00086161995,0.00096866605,0.0016194977,0.0039746985,0.0044996976,0.0016405104,0.0017122942,0.5869134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004348307,0.0003123209,0.00053335185,0.0017825374,0.0008865863,0.0025780336,0.0030113012,0.0020425227,0.26541257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016155335,0.000031338324,0.0013972181,0.00013582842,0.000014677028,0.00044759118,0.00045736117,0.00014556015,0.0004570154,0.04843863,0.85994995,0.08836328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054966654,0.0000050542753,0.00059498916,0.00003860712,0.0000022671109,0.00008915169,0.00015862119,0.00007198651,0.000097777636,0.001426353,0.9975038,0.000005794468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13099647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2270322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006463006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011568837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100261675","doi":"","title":"Edmonton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disjoint sets; Axiom; Axiom of choice; Partition (number theory); Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Transfinite number; Set theory; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.06792711073459379,"score_gpt":0.19200084799702213,"score_spread":0.12407373726242835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100261675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018642439,0.009406754,0.0027840713,0.0029804858,0.0014522126,0.000040240986,0.0022290323,0.0008340039,0.97840893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007079778,0.0050911675,0.0019957272,0.00050144334,0.00017319123,0.000026514463,0.0011013637,0.00037264996,0.98365813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990662,0.00010755685,0.000040441246,0.00035525952,0.00030703365,0.00012351792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910516,0.00018615731,0.00006530027,0.00019797112,0.00023693341,0.00020858136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060228264,0.0013533277,0.00092988845,0.0023956231,0.0018709209,0.005998217,0.0013555153,0.0022410825,0.63719726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018141305,0.0005950145,0.0007383265,0.0018250766,0.00094678963,0.0028114857,0.0028336276,0.0019722409,0.33071172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044098787,0.00013816575,0.0011059296,0.0006322164,0.000040794384,0.001231563,0.00037546045,0.0012305235,0.0026047844,0.16509658,0.40094012,0.42616275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001565659,0.000018230056,0.00037921665,0.00016379956,0.000005686264,0.00022476503,0.000065676504,0.00018661577,0.00043397144,0.0072217914,0.99127454,0.000010063792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076584825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01547989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025824045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100325569","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Search and Matching Models Using Experimental Data.” Unpublished manuscript","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Earnings; Randomized experiment; Test (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Corporation; Control (management); Constant (computer programming)","score_opus":0.41455397620199314,"score_gpt":0.37533591104318287,"score_spread":0.03921806515881027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100325569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30046853,0.047196474,0.34690878,0.045816507,0.005773495,0.006015901,0.02998332,0.0016763367,0.21616073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8335882,0.015978456,0.09859499,0.0026718837,0.00069218775,0.0039504343,0.015796388,0.00033977305,0.028387668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897376,0.007447334,0.0005082008,0.0006351053,0.0013209693,0.00035089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90410423,0.071142234,0.0061558834,0.009148338,0.008838178,0.0006111226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039612398,0.0008533851,0.0012414603,0.0020129075,0.0008356036,0.0020711992,0.00253891,0.0021707057,0.03899625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09792397,0.000649307,0.0013717068,0.0040064706,0.0015408135,0.0033196218,0.0010546357,0.0014961532,0.0041401936],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002769072,0.0022098867,0.022026846,0.0028222145,0.0024094097,0.00030906792,0.0004950824,0.14429808,0.00091202307,0.26901105,0.313643,0.23909426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004808311,0.0024428049,0.045669667,0.0011029001,0.0017785357,0.00027983426,0.00126887,0.46319067,0.00538449,0.2841768,0.18959521,0.0003018994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010006346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039612398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004438257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021452592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20949286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107853480","doi":"10.4230/lipics.isaac.2025.49","title":"Maximizing Social Welfare Among EF1 Allocations at the Presence of Two Types of Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Constant (computer programming); Expected utility hypothesis; Function (biology); Social Welfare; Social welfare function; Transferable utility","score_opus":0.027448889132929914,"score_gpt":0.2640014466067061,"score_spread":0.23655255747377618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107853480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16702461,0.00028106925,0.82129526,0.00073148333,0.000044751818,0.00014133657,0.0001825243,0.00028868095,0.010010334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8098624,0.0001837906,0.18163083,0.00017448021,0.000056876896,0.00027788684,0.00023478834,0.00014449835,0.007434475],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960064,0.0021251384,0.00011716564,0.00054715574,0.00046295606,0.0007412226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936593,0.004559582,0.00045452634,0.00055964186,0.00036955954,0.00039743198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058922223,0.0015914373,0.0024060807,0.001218914,0.0014334073,0.0027898136,0.0030520817,0.0028112505,0.0038696926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017533863,0.000645969,0.0011271407,0.0016666988,0.0023093908,0.0041460902,0.0027497748,0.0017431953,0.0007666474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051276974,0.00018789682,0.0017617797,0.00016437596,0.00010289259,0.00020716724,0.00033412335,0.7402361,0.0018163755,0.21984255,0.0023624809,0.032471467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000324316,0.00004027188,0.00015975666,0.000015507872,0.000013723695,0.000045012042,0.00005844623,0.8519642,0.0005864209,0.14649503,0.0005789008,0.000010257402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028763232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018387721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058922223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030057658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017382966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031161368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7109962221","doi":"10.4230/lipics.icalp.2025.125","title":"Unbalanced Random Matching Markets with Partial Preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Upper and lower bounds; Rank (graph theory); Stability (learning theory); Work (physics); Line (geometry)","score_opus":0.01564197783520071,"score_gpt":0.22603273638888216,"score_spread":0.21039075855368145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7109962221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36385706,0.0011324512,0.61013764,0.0030696206,0.00009291285,0.00031777436,0.0009187905,0.00036155537,0.020112213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96308964,0.00063853787,0.02967067,0.0006377479,0.00018965504,0.00027707327,0.00035097933,0.00006321759,0.005082361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589527,0.0017900812,0.00018793393,0.0007143321,0.00071129814,0.0007011613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96630514,0.018924467,0.0077396166,0.003485562,0.002053168,0.0014919674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074489927,0.0006738732,0.0020177893,0.0013984399,0.0015451816,0.0033218546,0.00219438,0.0025128222,0.008737372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041379232,0.00078858295,0.0011304402,0.0015954222,0.002864255,0.009535343,0.0026128364,0.0026364543,0.0010070163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050102477,0.00012393265,0.003184448,0.0002018003,0.0000956022,0.00031072748,0.00029246797,0.081099674,0.0031673943,0.8924076,0.0031679124,0.015447369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012731763,0.0001365015,0.0010469288,0.000024533521,0.000025398673,0.00019372931,0.000112072965,0.3849064,0.0009231676,0.61054367,0.0019185845,0.000041714346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009416838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007885093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008737372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001666246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001010582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039394498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115173422","doi":"10.5555/3635637.3662900","title":"Computational aspects of distortion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Research Explorer","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Quadratic equation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Characterization (materials science); Dynamic programming; Linear programming; Rate–distortion theory","score_opus":0.16305408927040713,"score_gpt":0.3476935420688726,"score_spread":0.18463945279846547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115173422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028324232,0.0013800475,0.9388809,0.0033028515,0.00018169894,0.000116446674,0.00048413468,0.0001728774,0.027156822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7446836,0.0016689769,0.2421736,0.00080775254,0.0005082411,0.00047983383,0.00079800934,0.00036622037,0.008513799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910403,0.004270251,0.00047441034,0.0017428555,0.0018168791,0.00065529835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457606,0.04283633,0.0019322551,0.007127926,0.0016355198,0.0007072655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081869615,0.000981934,0.0021070053,0.0014714174,0.001187068,0.0061303764,0.003932453,0.002029422,0.009854689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06339517,0.00075165473,0.0016305534,0.0023815685,0.0051726685,0.009051286,0.0047592684,0.005474184,0.00084532396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012985709,0.00004633444,0.001211897,0.00013451565,0.000058825808,0.0000627618,0.000105418636,0.15674782,0.00042612868,0.8129437,0.0028978765,0.025234839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023591208,0.00003230267,0.00036532074,0.00003623255,0.000016886459,0.0000819569,0.00004477628,0.32596505,0.0004696402,0.67049295,0.0024490398,0.0000223208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023831236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020577868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009854689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004401379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021548686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04329735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746844","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109621","title":"Three-way conflict analysis: From single-level to multi-level preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference","score_opus":0.12044136440382845,"score_gpt":0.29729586762091303,"score_spread":0.17685450321708457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10316113,0.0002781198,0.88864225,0.0006958322,0.00003339375,0.000061281426,0.00016047308,0.000071674775,0.0068958057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847676,0.00016440742,0.112874866,0.00011367553,0.000044821583,0.00008289368,0.00013822276,0.000048656522,0.00176488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516356,0.002865983,0.00024370194,0.000524056,0.00067184644,0.000530878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809124,0.013800817,0.0013407908,0.0018624227,0.001233674,0.00084991695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005745641,0.0005936298,0.0013898927,0.001468103,0.0010504824,0.0044770404,0.0029153202,0.0015389359,0.00798458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02788908,0.0005955989,0.0019522086,0.0022519513,0.0022903406,0.011134858,0.003251431,0.0031278117,0.0004041947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029776193,0.00015900594,0.006833258,0.0001244662,0.00023965098,0.00031475612,0.0009403551,0.10861153,0.00065213075,0.8377891,0.0014080323,0.0426299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020295009,0.000022716176,0.000635236,0.000014686822,0.000037445072,0.000073965115,0.00029955144,0.36369103,0.00023356549,0.63442576,0.000525942,0.0000198213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002105513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00798458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013951403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010658269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03038621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116853749","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-06918-4_168-1","title":"Economic Voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Economic analysis; Economic model; Mechanism (biology); Economic impact analysis; Economic efficiency; Ranked voting system; Economic problem; Group voting ticket","score_opus":0.028833039429458987,"score_gpt":0.2084488638959051,"score_spread":0.17961582446644614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116853749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047770822,0.0033565373,0.042169675,0.0035310418,0.0010565042,0.00013091229,0.0007495806,0.00019060906,0.94403803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28575292,0.008309292,0.03219971,0.0027079189,0.0012468628,0.00038340295,0.0027372916,0.00040480884,0.66625774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792105,0.0006482303,0.00011118966,0.0004612672,0.00061150757,0.00024681026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983517,0.00058521074,0.00012054816,0.0003933384,0.00040578676,0.00014336419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022311383,0.0005771033,0.00059414597,0.0013665434,0.0019378149,0.004524044,0.0014152552,0.0016070481,0.07571547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547459,0.00024766085,0.0005554,0.001790201,0.0019950268,0.0037074257,0.0021501,0.0016417447,0.02152122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021268792,0.000015461412,0.0003837426,0.000075959004,0.000008519398,0.00003879059,0.00016293164,0.00070590316,0.00010772339,0.8830261,0.036851395,0.078602046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001185271,0.000020183317,0.0005643624,0.00014790583,0.000007665013,0.00012436356,0.00017117806,0.0015401496,0.00028612142,0.37565544,0.62145776,0.00001293246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018213895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002682747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07571547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019896377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014717543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25329345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124132873","doi":"10.65109/qbue9343","title":"A truth serum for sharing rewards","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Mechanism (biology); Population; Focus (optics); Rational agent; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.1270212958690132,"score_gpt":0.23774190644978985,"score_spread":0.11072061058077665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124132873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123040326,0.0010129445,0.8267922,0.011134922,0.00026188963,0.00036046485,0.00036219988,0.0004347232,0.03660028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89303374,0.00042431918,0.09587454,0.00062944705,0.0003483911,0.00025700082,0.00015457308,0.00007454221,0.009203356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194837,0.0041403826,0.0004778193,0.0013674414,0.0012720273,0.0007938848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793611,0.013223157,0.002713648,0.0020747301,0.0013942529,0.0012332186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116194375,0.00095351855,0.001661435,0.001127537,0.002159063,0.0056563136,0.002419591,0.0054456014,0.008531382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041885138,0.0007031789,0.0013258638,0.0011750865,0.0034949936,0.009438327,0.00287364,0.0033681872,0.0009414604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032337604,0.00010648405,0.0010496216,0.00016160979,0.0000730128,0.00026712753,0.0007934967,0.02737569,0.0019699004,0.940165,0.0029140227,0.02480073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015158519,0.00013526827,0.00031105726,0.000056698107,0.000052976615,0.00013203552,0.00016276201,0.13544327,0.0011225727,0.8567474,0.0056450306,0.000039436254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014606926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007375073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116194375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002925793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026642834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061450183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124133228","doi":"10.65109/wljk4444","title":"Convergence and Quality of Iterative Voting under Non-Scoring Rules: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Convergence (economics); Quality (philosophy); Cardinal voting systems; Social choice theory; Anti-plurality voting; Iterative method; Path (computing)","score_opus":0.07246094953274916,"score_gpt":0.2804247535261464,"score_spread":0.2079638039933972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124133228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77019995,0.0006841286,0.20662786,0.00090801617,0.000062075145,0.00018053848,0.00034823804,0.00018435123,0.02080481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589814,0.00015551082,0.011716463,0.000055701694,0.000029134055,0.000068137044,0.0001641211,0.00004267243,0.0018700805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477947,0.0027169583,0.00032052113,0.00077389635,0.0008221218,0.0005870488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8282998,0.12931564,0.01716396,0.010981249,0.011584063,0.0026552926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012248559,0.00035949957,0.0011919764,0.0014861256,0.00078813365,0.0028527796,0.001606694,0.0013199835,0.006672221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11640446,0.00032501572,0.0010245079,0.0017658736,0.0031692358,0.0034603933,0.0015399973,0.002063957,0.0007499551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014224263,0.0005686548,0.044663843,0.00045544998,0.00041301493,0.0003218963,0.0020609263,0.36572862,0.0032207412,0.5008866,0.004697086,0.075560726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013298696,0.00024339414,0.011900138,0.000077391196,0.000062244486,0.00017071172,0.00029148156,0.5265541,0.001531537,0.4579714,0.0010093603,0.000055302502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031059242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014559784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001746023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010425712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064777374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124136199","doi":"10.65109/ioem7063","title":"Imputation, social choice, and partial preferences","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Missing data; Preference; Social choice theory; Connection (principal bundle); Term (time)","score_opus":0.03462435112719369,"score_gpt":0.23880549815364085,"score_spread":0.20418114702644716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124136199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077933543,0.0003168597,0.98587406,0.0019628725,0.00011119884,0.000059655013,0.00025775426,0.00010296497,0.0035213989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.412558,0.0011003751,0.57214993,0.0011608939,0.00079445174,0.00067501166,0.0011352111,0.00013988499,0.010286217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019146,0.007024197,0.0003006463,0.0011034373,0.00090451015,0.00047577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747683,0.018430926,0.00203865,0.0032539854,0.0009605534,0.0005477204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011165311,0.0009688654,0.0021669473,0.0016855908,0.0015760221,0.0023415622,0.0039111045,0.0034767685,0.009465421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04704054,0.00085631624,0.0024525824,0.0034787797,0.0027477408,0.0052602836,0.003562641,0.0048193326,0.00108363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015260439,0.00015807341,0.0034380753,0.00022517018,0.00022137228,0.00020056503,0.00030346055,0.08099922,0.00021598533,0.82307506,0.007657981,0.083352454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040109237,0.000028480657,0.00032907724,0.00003859207,0.000023439083,0.00007847348,0.000046637168,0.17631882,0.00013579124,0.8197524,0.0031889707,0.000019200148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024253502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027662618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011165311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013769679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023799322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059048474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124139456","doi":"10.65109/xnmt7187","title":"Strategy-Proofness in the Stable Matching Problem with Couples","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Complementarity (molecular biology); Set (abstract data type); Fraction (chemistry); Preference; Pareto optimal; Pareto principle","score_opus":0.0331748083716797,"score_gpt":0.21328498140262003,"score_spread":0.18011017303094035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124139456","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23455258,0.00047008047,0.7480161,0.0029077108,0.00006058993,0.0005103824,0.00067229563,0.000386177,0.012424085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8137907,0.00055819686,0.1784581,0.00066445017,0.00014349366,0.00056303595,0.00070998486,0.00014487722,0.004967221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912021,0.004491525,0.0007118769,0.0018133102,0.00087852357,0.0009026003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531777,0.037176017,0.0036541135,0.0032617422,0.001103503,0.0016268733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009162001,0.0010752667,0.0024530757,0.001055745,0.0024599792,0.0042401715,0.0027037992,0.0033114296,0.009402031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0491439,0.0009275484,0.0022986347,0.0019122934,0.0040026344,0.008926988,0.0038715622,0.0034578717,0.00096070423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006217888,0.00051345053,0.0048542037,0.00054645166,0.00036973707,0.0006526954,0.0016216123,0.11354178,0.0033106739,0.8086619,0.0053224145,0.059983272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023478815,0.00013369792,0.0003046224,0.000042870837,0.000041853895,0.00023139865,0.00021826677,0.15272328,0.00091493985,0.8432336,0.001887753,0.00003303504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013029092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007713615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009402031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012172004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027283267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048453808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124139667","doi":"10.65109/ztfk5673","title":"Non-Monotonic-Offers Bargaining Protocol","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Monotonic function; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03203287660707355,"score_gpt":0.2543991594358876,"score_spread":0.22236628282881404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124139667","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057885826,0.00019661199,0.9196356,0.00085038826,0.0001671853,0.0006066903,0.00021139423,0.00042345023,0.020022819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.714448,0.00022879911,0.2690723,0.00030788078,0.00011722884,0.0009947569,0.00021779009,0.00010863444,0.014504719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903859,0.005706738,0.00065064407,0.0009481647,0.0017272031,0.00058146275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839258,0.009404326,0.0012452679,0.0031982772,0.0015325575,0.0006937708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012119495,0.00066656095,0.00077642134,0.00063076173,0.0014210646,0.0019302949,0.003985939,0.0016724261,0.007456471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233712,0.00040713508,0.00068950414,0.0008790767,0.0019000625,0.0052459957,0.00255178,0.0025037525,0.0016668377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009150616,0.0002879748,0.0011501517,0.00026883653,0.00010545667,0.00043709992,0.0011467995,0.032854006,0.010891012,0.88022244,0.0025747588,0.06914638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002845381,0.00035328863,0.0005140928,0.000050706672,0.0000688535,0.0005858634,0.00023665898,0.34313628,0.012148177,0.62416524,0.018350309,0.000105997926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041842795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051140826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012119495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077477575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019868654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124144861","doi":"10.65109/fhqu2875","title":"Coalition detection and identification","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.018853154546325412,"score_gpt":0.2113932024848845,"score_spread":0.19254004793855908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124144861","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017392186,0.0011453523,0.9705886,0.001414595,0.00020798169,0.00020392901,0.00026353955,0.00033400638,0.008449806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45599642,0.0012978769,0.5215084,0.00052294537,0.00034142786,0.00042171634,0.0012609663,0.00022468017,0.018425513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349725,0.0025843298,0.00030358302,0.0016731578,0.0013833764,0.0005582277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767113,0.014162188,0.0018797527,0.004129479,0.002311456,0.00080590503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073132077,0.00093240495,0.0022695593,0.004021424,0.0021017282,0.0039323615,0.0032809617,0.0027562787,0.005637678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043511678,0.0009402032,0.0018174043,0.0026987763,0.0030437675,0.0052976143,0.0062759896,0.0033373383,0.001944147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024707208,0.00022837013,0.01425543,0.00040561322,0.00023600325,0.00031143727,0.0009541967,0.07810164,0.003774299,0.44945258,0.017236305,0.434797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034018525,0.00007105557,0.0023553441,0.000103437415,0.000041118514,0.00043833908,0.00044861544,0.5577584,0.0036146166,0.41812214,0.016957754,0.000055053253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032114172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023932448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073132077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021681644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020867437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03867638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124146830","doi":"10.65109/nhmp5816","title":"A parameterized family of equilibrium profiles for three-player kuhn poker","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parameterized complexity; Sequential equilibrium; Feature (linguistics); General equilibrium theory; Equilibrium selection; Thermodynamic equilibrium","score_opus":0.05531465333458402,"score_gpt":0.23445899159166153,"score_spread":0.1791443382570775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124146830","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17133018,0.00037821944,0.80277115,0.00044902373,0.000030420448,0.00020869629,0.00036982726,0.00030069554,0.024161704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93458503,0.00044013152,0.057277367,0.000115528484,0.00002013052,0.00031473278,0.0003633843,0.00009275241,0.006790955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862766,0.00050536863,0.00006772535,0.00026225304,0.00028454378,0.00025250498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969432,0.0014857354,0.0004442381,0.0003645687,0.00044219737,0.0003199834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019022105,0.00080741855,0.00089401455,0.0010227633,0.0014515665,0.0023719606,0.0012413664,0.0014499893,0.004952051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010218869,0.00045572122,0.0012382818,0.00069000956,0.0014714929,0.0027908005,0.0012763513,0.0018077726,0.0010103903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013310112,0.000085679734,0.0027402604,0.00007115643,0.000057306926,0.0005741233,0.00054704264,0.10250533,0.004212523,0.8661535,0.0020266483,0.020893367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035143774,0.00009106729,0.0010021478,0.000047910893,0.00001832949,0.00058941555,0.00028879836,0.46915558,0.0012875499,0.522213,0.0052164146,0.000054665208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014230513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009301073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004952051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009148115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016566217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124158400","doi":"10.65109/zawx5846","title":"One-Sided Matching with Dynamic Preferences","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Optimal matching; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Scheduling (production processes)","score_opus":0.07585162519835566,"score_gpt":0.23776741462017684,"score_spread":0.16191578942182117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124158400","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078024805,0.0002632108,0.8904329,0.0018852627,0.00014698404,0.00026089558,0.00028859376,0.0001418776,0.02855547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8067922,0.00044278536,0.1762353,0.00062368944,0.00020008897,0.00040947477,0.00022148824,0.00006898588,0.015006059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989091,0.0059182732,0.0006191139,0.0022098802,0.0012904003,0.0008713247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98182505,0.010574817,0.0024435453,0.0036474227,0.0007814931,0.00072776334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008952886,0.000807285,0.0015800105,0.0008067199,0.0013099586,0.003965028,0.0024533186,0.0030832023,0.014042466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030028535,0.000742677,0.0017954388,0.0015289438,0.0031990116,0.008184363,0.0028716377,0.0028714163,0.0016076587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008454158,0.00008744711,0.0004787636,0.000054334385,0.00003413464,0.00007973844,0.00014946626,0.014224713,0.000607351,0.9711683,0.00081684324,0.012214388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056830533,0.00004842165,0.00015012585,0.000012431465,0.000014441366,0.00006437036,0.00004798384,0.071355455,0.00028138695,0.9258837,0.002069012,0.00001595203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078480394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006323957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014042466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019461662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014340866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047347963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124162851","doi":"10.65109/hmkl4392","title":"Controlling Elections by Replacing Candidates or Votes","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scoring rule; Computational complexity theory; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.052733706799239916,"score_gpt":0.24463948636480223,"score_spread":0.19190577956556232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124162851","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22738743,0.000748282,0.7486576,0.0010523187,0.0002669671,0.0003593847,0.0002619596,0.000681465,0.020584583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431995,0.00019308912,0.05176017,0.00014793054,0.000108593566,0.00016924451,0.00011958572,0.00006768893,0.0042341505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223095,0.004382753,0.00026669705,0.0012794954,0.00096025364,0.00087987335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778425,0.014409118,0.0031768836,0.0033208407,0.00066657783,0.0005839662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006298351,0.0009833706,0.0016644147,0.00059934874,0.00090174144,0.0034385498,0.0026791834,0.001522929,0.0061315764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032151103,0.00050350087,0.0012041046,0.0010842197,0.002807326,0.0037399996,0.0015730455,0.0019855185,0.0007849363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010234088,0.00036152912,0.0058494736,0.0003228806,0.00019454093,0.00029361979,0.00043945314,0.19236094,0.0074227634,0.6710576,0.0032449013,0.11742897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046868555,0.00043134042,0.00096059695,0.000034317432,0.0000908864,0.00016149941,0.0001082965,0.5328384,0.0056276126,0.45288277,0.006321155,0.000074428965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024653347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022979872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006298351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012973364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012166295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03330922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124168676","doi":"10.65109/azls1622","title":"Sequential decision making in repeated coalition formation under uncertainty","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Reinforcement learning; Bayesian probability; Complete information; Markov decision process; Bayesian inference; Value (mathematics); Optimal decision","score_opus":0.07432751987704807,"score_gpt":0.2690193234111065,"score_spread":0.19469180353405846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124168676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11510495,0.0005445259,0.8784877,0.0009818316,0.00004446527,0.00014957122,0.00009987964,0.00015748829,0.00442958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90101147,0.00029724796,0.09567984,0.00011254158,0.00004601674,0.00020974208,0.00011841243,0.00003525693,0.002489578],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639446,0.0019429552,0.00015316946,0.00064773974,0.0004401886,0.00042141028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986537,0.010405725,0.0012873923,0.000603454,0.0005343436,0.00063206494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460717,0.0008581742,0.0022539254,0.0006816848,0.0010372793,0.0017270705,0.0025581075,0.002245175,0.0029994908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019193303,0.0010066221,0.0008387187,0.00097387354,0.0021943275,0.0035425574,0.0024246858,0.001985356,0.00031444037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021538166,0.00007548374,0.0012242673,0.00007252074,0.0001098678,0.0001612279,0.0002505197,0.9054285,0.00056902017,0.071918815,0.0005845843,0.019389741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521363,0.00003874792,0.00019569068,0.000008685556,0.000012926503,0.00002382248,0.000044217722,0.9000447,0.00025398366,0.09886324,0.0004489309,0.000012907643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070578144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005706857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007460717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021294632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018643804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039456487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124171798","doi":"10.65109/mlhm6027","title":"Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Coalition Formation under Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Bayesian probability; Stability (learning theory); Bayesian inference; Core (optical fiber); Control (management)","score_opus":0.03765475217289617,"score_gpt":0.2417584993406987,"score_spread":0.20410374716780255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124171798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017273061,0.00036123645,0.97683126,0.00069427904,0.00004444884,0.00005695708,0.000049327984,0.00013999827,0.0045493026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8425213,0.00063903705,0.15171301,0.00020288645,0.0001159237,0.00034584632,0.00015256669,0.00006788027,0.0042415727],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748033,0.0014056687,0.000102207,0.00036700896,0.0004395594,0.00020516523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910129,0.006584186,0.0008430213,0.000461235,0.0006642215,0.00043446678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049022664,0.0008463927,0.0015761453,0.0008181768,0.0008090983,0.0013957416,0.0017619561,0.0014330914,0.0034791431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019647071,0.00049030303,0.0007217898,0.00070452987,0.0024209577,0.003082691,0.0018138998,0.0025232863,0.00047172827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009711585,0.00007413946,0.0009792735,0.00010223442,0.00007962428,0.00007123126,0.00020709376,0.6886402,0.00054617453,0.27604055,0.0012485612,0.03191382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025689049,0.00002120848,0.00010290261,0.00001035207,0.0000081908165,0.000009855618,0.000015753274,0.81482214,0.00013132807,0.18418764,0.00065601757,0.0000089133755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051219063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004095755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051219063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002801649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020749725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025925994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124174386","doi":"10.65109/eooo6790","title":"Possible and necessary winner problem in social polls","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded function; Treewidth; Simple (philosophy); Social network (sociolinguistics); Order (exchange); Time complexity; Bounded rationality","score_opus":0.021502068530056363,"score_gpt":0.22064909678930758,"score_spread":0.1991470282592512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124174386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2808189,0.0015196203,0.65644825,0.009224918,0.0004923253,0.0007762453,0.0016393606,0.0006148124,0.0484656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89811385,0.00048320743,0.08873406,0.000595471,0.00032922294,0.0005625891,0.00090842793,0.00019011524,0.010083055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800194,0.0064020315,0.0006283498,0.0021313613,0.0014224376,0.0014138792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96328425,0.029799858,0.0022301336,0.0023597716,0.0009479248,0.0013779615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009909664,0.0007406436,0.0034085617,0.0013726288,0.0037138755,0.00556283,0.0034853464,0.004300041,0.01558132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056261834,0.00131126,0.0024930881,0.0017483826,0.0035043112,0.010476707,0.0036193822,0.0038718947,0.0016234671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001314397,0.0003024601,0.005521696,0.00057863124,0.0002987904,0.0007780255,0.0012131413,0.078968324,0.0017793393,0.84956867,0.013475249,0.046201356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046742082,0.00011642168,0.0010474978,0.000068692185,0.00007895422,0.00021972343,0.00045964323,0.17598267,0.00079373905,0.8150201,0.005699078,0.00004611688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022911308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030013423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01558132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017580354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027735783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05240792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124176716","doi":"10.65109/hjey6402","title":"Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Voting; Social choice theory; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Simple (philosophy); Approval voting; Best response","score_opus":0.0533208407624723,"score_gpt":0.27684617103307196,"score_spread":0.22352533027059968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124176716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652024,0.001891878,0.09361409,0.002995345,0.000062645726,0.00029511948,0.0012215157,0.00016048292,0.034556463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940639,0.00020714905,0.0030398413,0.000068775276,0.000035139634,0.00007128916,0.00038015467,0.00001797237,0.002115697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536395,0.0026624934,0.00022691856,0.0006337615,0.0006349515,0.00047794436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374622,0.045886595,0.008114107,0.0046051946,0.0028369185,0.0010949281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028153,0.00045009455,0.0015689677,0.0019772884,0.0014799682,0.0023946818,0.0015655644,0.0013039098,0.015374866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07457144,0.00036834693,0.00078746706,0.0019328862,0.0016089933,0.0030164921,0.0015290107,0.002578367,0.0010476775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084997574,0.00076253206,0.12014262,0.0005196393,0.0005708552,0.00093022845,0.0019038918,0.066046044,0.0015267105,0.72086424,0.013135093,0.07274815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027132026,0.00028835214,0.049995266,0.00018251766,0.00014429526,0.0006444443,0.0018253707,0.3437564,0.0014503399,0.58779347,0.013552346,0.00009585215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019369345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018166958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015374866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001455934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006145791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054374576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124182908","doi":"10.65109/syka4317","title":"Rating players in games with real-valued outcomes","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rating system; Value (mathematics); Population; Order (exchange); Focus (optics); Rating scale; Measure (data warehouse)","score_opus":0.025341191910555307,"score_gpt":0.22041989058510664,"score_spread":0.19507869867455133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124182908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054015413,0.00024098752,0.93524784,0.00054572156,0.00009917413,0.0004837602,0.00014529173,0.00029235033,0.0089294445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7191264,0.00029454692,0.27528954,0.00016912827,0.0001258589,0.00044759773,0.00022632294,0.00005213361,0.004268536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98768765,0.008121893,0.0007812577,0.0015931227,0.0014807635,0.0003354303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527825,0.009176023,0.0020923414,0.0015337283,0.0013082018,0.000611461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008873037,0.0010333769,0.0012628615,0.0011837533,0.0008601872,0.0025715246,0.0017560482,0.0013314341,0.004727142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03600235,0.0004432056,0.00065206096,0.0009963975,0.0019332607,0.0053794626,0.0021108254,0.001622193,0.0009465818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008355618,0.0002986762,0.011158804,0.0004472698,0.00017664011,0.00035844633,0.0014830411,0.08399545,0.007144996,0.66974807,0.005721353,0.21863163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016852998,0.00024440888,0.002203808,0.00007668073,0.00007363408,0.0002120723,0.00037545196,0.5710289,0.003151628,0.4155417,0.006838,0.000085190375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017669089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008873037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011116279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006074312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046925604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124245142","doi":"10.65109/fiwd8599","title":"Distant Truth: Bias Under Vote Distortion Costs","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Distortion (music); Voting; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Preference; Ballot; Incentive; Cardinal voting systems","score_opus":0.10282461707560399,"score_gpt":0.2665521771959892,"score_spread":0.16372756012038525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124245142","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4389471,0.002535239,0.52047974,0.0071715857,0.00018009437,0.00024317784,0.0007418865,0.0003288049,0.029372409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97997653,0.0004037107,0.015592746,0.00027182183,0.00012551766,0.000085652784,0.00015064463,0.000065949294,0.003327439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382174,0.0030439796,0.00026999158,0.0010729092,0.0010295886,0.0007617594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94524854,0.04105825,0.0059889196,0.0049013547,0.001720593,0.0010823858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008134668,0.0008396731,0.0023097699,0.0013424105,0.0012794032,0.0036507517,0.0021309077,0.002966324,0.008132429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064364515,0.0006472792,0.0012784384,0.0013596851,0.00376303,0.0056653316,0.0034977463,0.0036623806,0.000583934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079281727,0.00011484484,0.010365952,0.00035736093,0.00020715629,0.00040097066,0.00055397674,0.1439535,0.0022453407,0.8040343,0.0023467874,0.034627117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017766656,0.0001751269,0.0037560575,0.00008535159,0.000096167394,0.00041260477,0.00025008642,0.20751652,0.001978536,0.78237927,0.0031078954,0.00006464783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020624646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016490411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008134668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033059148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011074957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043020725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124245703","doi":"10.65109/ddri2515","title":"Computational Aspects of Distortion","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distortion (music); Set (abstract data type); Quadratic equation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Characterization (materials science); Dynamic programming; Linear programming; Rate–distortion theory","score_opus":0.026462541904313255,"score_gpt":0.23027395916419385,"score_spread":0.2038114172598806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124245703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027620113,0.0013584567,0.9398228,0.003217912,0.00017917964,0.00010803405,0.00045433655,0.00017021007,0.027068995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7475311,0.0016612553,0.23940562,0.000812199,0.0005153066,0.00045687918,0.00076993916,0.0003647206,0.008483029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915924,0.0039219223,0.00044160316,0.0016506566,0.0017638269,0.0006295149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94966465,0.039314337,0.0018142564,0.006912347,0.0016264749,0.0006679402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00765047,0.0009540688,0.002035953,0.0014202975,0.0011894505,0.0059814295,0.0038422628,0.0019557683,0.009677425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060096465,0.0007259283,0.0015948382,0.0022923246,0.0051001497,0.0089008445,0.0047565675,0.0053435806,0.00083693245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012386993,0.00004490488,0.0011241493,0.00012762952,0.000055629473,0.00006365335,0.000099862504,0.15908277,0.00042929463,0.8112914,0.0028317724,0.024725117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023317218,0.00003090974,0.00035585667,0.000035076904,0.000016446204,0.00008131914,0.000043206437,0.33403975,0.0004901067,0.6623879,0.0024739802,0.000022263133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023571386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020118945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009677425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004282218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002135389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04045999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124246859","doi":"10.65109/qfmb8557","title":"Best of Both Worlds Fairness under Entitlements","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Contrast (vision); Scoring rule; Measure (data warehouse); Preference","score_opus":0.06486143693713264,"score_gpt":0.264293599976689,"score_spread":0.19943216303955635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124246859","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10043354,0.000090095564,0.88550365,0.0006215269,0.000048441736,0.00015328871,0.0001326583,0.00024534532,0.012771404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866563,0.00008700766,0.20445819,0.0001381872,0.000068349,0.00023706777,0.00014496624,0.00009434591,0.008115557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942405,0.0026079547,0.0002976678,0.0011666965,0.00088402454,0.00080321124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931316,0.0037722958,0.00055747543,0.0016397275,0.00047287942,0.00042599553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060222712,0.00069734297,0.0012253228,0.0006170607,0.0017578363,0.0031490403,0.0022557245,0.0013393576,0.0046962723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018761408,0.0005182044,0.00096423196,0.0011235345,0.0019703112,0.0057152184,0.003219993,0.0023038085,0.00065284077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003599518,0.00013485056,0.0012639215,0.00009871893,0.00008040946,0.0001902474,0.00056246336,0.15735807,0.0028192182,0.7831611,0.0014042294,0.05256678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056793117,0.00007989257,0.00039369904,0.000014751715,0.000028169412,0.00007870137,0.00010215998,0.2913529,0.0022645253,0.7019232,0.0036840115,0.000021110996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019990099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018346257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060222712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001786448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018764803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031849205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124254117","doi":"10.65109/pfxo7533","title":"The Distortion of Approval Voting with Runoff","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Approval voting; Distortion (music); Surface runoff; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.02797601209886822,"score_gpt":0.20617224334196915,"score_spread":0.17819623124310094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124254117","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13430102,0.0014105309,0.8204085,0.003650487,0.00020991781,0.00032366064,0.0006428252,0.0004725556,0.038580477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93864614,0.0005379637,0.051992517,0.0005224162,0.00016037365,0.00019320693,0.00032104016,0.00014275318,0.0074837026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781684,0.012929936,0.00092264527,0.0028256325,0.0032971727,0.001856222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94865406,0.030405538,0.004781864,0.012894269,0.0023570168,0.00090728485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013257328,0.001029568,0.0022496637,0.0009029907,0.0013550564,0.0036955976,0.0029874626,0.0017109994,0.0069008116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0629551,0.0008003482,0.0018857474,0.0014700657,0.0046123974,0.0053678183,0.00319635,0.0035492007,0.0011312723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090421265,0.00011262002,0.004792547,0.00026818353,0.00019555847,0.00020409489,0.0004463955,0.19067883,0.002572618,0.745955,0.0047817295,0.049088165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559609,0.0002436169,0.0023013696,0.000055167715,0.00008418782,0.0003869745,0.0001721273,0.28358105,0.0036450443,0.7013907,0.007880773,0.000073359784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004383654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002696884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013257328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024382318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07011229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124266200","doi":"10.65109/atbh5937","title":"Diversity-seeking Swap Games in Networks","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Swap (finance); Price of anarchy; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Potential game","score_opus":0.022337188712843632,"score_gpt":0.21454990738286683,"score_spread":0.1922127186700232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124266200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6530324,0.00030046346,0.31903923,0.0012084959,0.000033240958,0.00011359277,0.00013010055,0.000122174,0.026020305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98775256,0.00008151728,0.0100927735,0.000070327544,0.000010184127,0.000046727404,0.000022778504,0.000011108845,0.0019119631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986889,0.00077429187,0.00004092111,0.00012619515,0.00016401916,0.0002056904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933355,0.005339451,0.00044573616,0.00024173858,0.00020004151,0.00043764728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018466294,0.0005496651,0.0009287626,0.0010403403,0.0010492046,0.001868689,0.0012356109,0.0014037973,0.0032756918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009280466,0.00028880354,0.000660579,0.00083172036,0.0027852154,0.0036747274,0.001499485,0.0013479296,0.00021149863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016741884,0.000058603153,0.0010455763,0.000065230306,0.000050006085,0.00017699841,0.000349031,0.3198106,0.004248588,0.66403043,0.0010360262,0.008961568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006166173,0.00007398687,0.00034407584,0.0000116859665,0.000012626327,0.00007243768,0.00015020404,0.55649287,0.0010248801,0.44079846,0.00093510293,0.000021941507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014938369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016326297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032756918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020662183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004056869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014991581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124266798","doi":"10.65109/fkii5381","title":"Approximating the Core via Iterative Coalition Sampling","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Google (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Complement (music); Context (archaeology); Shapley value; Voting; Cooperative game theory; Set (abstract data type); Bottleneck; Generalization","score_opus":0.10531399440788725,"score_gpt":0.28358581905764113,"score_spread":0.17827182464975388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124266798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04199193,0.00016610767,0.95367163,0.00037325392,0.000035168898,0.00012451762,0.00009329737,0.00042656824,0.003117516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5934719,0.00014778381,0.40128788,0.00035041675,0.000059380916,0.0004827227,0.0006251834,0.00020092692,0.003373789],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980597,0.0009878423,0.000067899215,0.00032226052,0.00030549764,0.00025674797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887418,0.008415569,0.0005801339,0.0010002692,0.0008530158,0.0004092077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040019806,0.0010000331,0.0016102769,0.001118963,0.0008290538,0.0013700024,0.002320176,0.0013873357,0.0034290468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020289296,0.0005685721,0.0010445258,0.0011958703,0.0014052425,0.0021058135,0.0023742013,0.0019117547,0.0006870833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003051955,0.00021720857,0.004845229,0.00014504882,0.00012879692,0.00015587847,0.0003119678,0.7946233,0.0016421912,0.1117634,0.0056003337,0.08026133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020802881,0.00001795319,0.00008718846,0.000007527166,0.00000702752,0.000012263451,0.000029835517,0.971247,0.00021552491,0.0279583,0.00039292042,0.0000037102848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061491644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011047992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061491644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014975865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026490476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021164715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124273150","doi":"10.65109/ozvm7696","title":"A Restricted Markov Tree Model for Inference and Generation in Social Choice with Incomplete Preferences","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Graphical model; Social choice theory; Markov chain; Consistency (knowledge bases); Intuition; Probabilistic logic; Ranking (information retrieval)","score_opus":0.1485044905168602,"score_gpt":0.29408306744724777,"score_spread":0.14557857693038756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124273150","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075987084,0.00013723031,0.9900095,0.0003274884,0.00002426784,0.000047491107,0.0003686028,0.00027121665,0.0012155359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.502474,0.0005428434,0.48688713,0.00036146014,0.00018282584,0.00064340094,0.0018237091,0.00022752675,0.006857075],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683374,0.0019207571,0.00014850085,0.00057900674,0.00033390554,0.00018400278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908434,0.0074594812,0.00052026927,0.00057534646,0.00036925435,0.00023226322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004982688,0.00068942853,0.0016889095,0.0013532367,0.00086411653,0.0019499181,0.0032966577,0.0018694095,0.007841905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015737649,0.00081274484,0.0019074125,0.0021241899,0.0015525076,0.0041920776,0.0015436573,0.0026480074,0.0014938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013534137,0.000058567413,0.0013569231,0.00009794923,0.000084996514,0.0001728731,0.00024606794,0.59528494,0.00060488156,0.37392393,0.00216438,0.025869105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016186088,0.000012888635,0.00009256686,0.0000064208984,0.00000849521,0.000022518087,0.000007931807,0.88342255,0.000066414104,0.1155935,0.000740094,0.000010459436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009183661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012939124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009183661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019132304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017339133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026351333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124279867","doi":"10.65109/qsmk9882","title":"Boosting Sortition via Proportional Representation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Boosting (machine learning); Selection (genetic algorithm); Complement (music); Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.034568099825554185,"score_gpt":0.26537986135071295,"score_spread":0.23081176152515875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124279867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062071655,0.0002243383,0.924765,0.00066324434,0.00010684638,0.0002886886,0.00013208219,0.0009581928,0.010789935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77273035,0.00013129273,0.21566278,0.00063370244,0.0001262678,0.00036437804,0.00033561373,0.00020318091,0.009812341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945286,0.0026325427,0.00016019243,0.0010650194,0.0009739577,0.000639689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877402,0.007817427,0.0006424335,0.002318099,0.0009694352,0.0005123598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006854339,0.00096397894,0.002020868,0.0011744681,0.0013462597,0.0022638708,0.0020963976,0.001518352,0.006675401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022845022,0.00042058725,0.0009157337,0.0013763425,0.0024204832,0.0029808541,0.0029308202,0.0022141659,0.0012757995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088152307,0.0005899416,0.0074400613,0.00020470307,0.00015613124,0.00012336118,0.00052692293,0.31201673,0.004539521,0.2508083,0.01179313,0.41091964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012495677,0.00021236534,0.0007791138,0.000027038517,0.000031589803,0.00008748524,0.00007734327,0.8402054,0.0027211253,0.15046006,0.005249648,0.00002389135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023302175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029971574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006854339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023635656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029331509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036249638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287268","doi":"10.65109/pgyf2278","title":"How to Fairly Allocate Easy and Difficult Chores","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Minimax; Core (optical fiber); Pareto principle; Polynomial; Pareto optimal; Integer (computer science)","score_opus":0.025259861848490724,"score_gpt":0.19514665645068593,"score_spread":0.16988679460219522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287268","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18788499,0.0004615392,0.758504,0.004201343,0.00018536836,0.00046765173,0.00039343923,0.0005282986,0.047373425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77886575,0.0003148667,0.20354474,0.00032938775,0.00008493815,0.00040493463,0.00017703541,0.0004237699,0.015854552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968784,0.0013292572,0.00017648355,0.00059564394,0.0004353803,0.0005847624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941339,0.0024315617,0.00046915302,0.0017068271,0.0005333125,0.00072521437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058426303,0.0007860104,0.0014062619,0.0008413105,0.0015972324,0.0036752142,0.0018785292,0.0012233485,0.014316755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021188015,0.00065971515,0.00052886613,0.0012636026,0.0023885043,0.010980182,0.0023346727,0.0016800779,0.002071348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006643086,0.00029943534,0.003342463,0.0002477397,0.00010853406,0.000087209904,0.00092141185,0.08489799,0.0075264364,0.6965352,0.00887876,0.19649047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008469217,0.00010323597,0.0009932315,0.000057047127,0.00002618901,0.000073380426,0.0005975102,0.13232203,0.0035416128,0.8504134,0.011746256,0.00004146639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028110808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040628766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014316755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002302394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028065569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04789436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287550","doi":"10.65109/djcw7663","title":"Verifying Proportionality in Temporal Voting","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Representation (politics); Proportionality (law); Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Condorcet method","score_opus":0.056873253561640635,"score_gpt":0.2663791749149699,"score_spread":0.20950592135332924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12861681,0.00012996355,0.86309373,0.0013226506,0.00006943914,0.00013825565,0.000246481,0.000453713,0.0059288675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147754,0.000122734,0.08133111,0.0002706334,0.000094065836,0.0001404795,0.0003047608,0.00008705734,0.0028737998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859461,0.006275825,0.0006654047,0.0030480782,0.0024137234,0.0016508921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9285719,0.052076083,0.007307457,0.008097949,0.00254875,0.0013978104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01070215,0.00089038746,0.0017335238,0.0007827388,0.0016592717,0.0038611216,0.0036283229,0.0025391188,0.006130298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08420976,0.001034691,0.0020277654,0.0012912208,0.0036396147,0.012241437,0.0048525813,0.0042256243,0.000686159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045285057,0.00016805704,0.002858692,0.00015704727,0.00012219614,0.00045125757,0.00047507416,0.16222872,0.002870679,0.8039909,0.0013694726,0.024855096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007075176,0.00006711341,0.00023162951,0.00001352605,0.00002251412,0.00008008384,0.000058404425,0.4502537,0.0015086838,0.54684836,0.0008231169,0.00002217759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032953138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024137017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01070215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019920527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030345717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05659902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124287906","doi":"10.65109/lxne6781","title":"Divide and Conquer: Using Geographic Manipulation to Win District-Based Elections","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Outcome (game theory); Limit (mathematics); Voting; Greedy algorithm; Secret ballot","score_opus":0.07438862143498481,"score_gpt":0.27099729870171774,"score_spread":0.19660867726673292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124287906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680909,0.0011782032,0.23655836,0.0030466316,0.00016853497,0.00048262047,0.0003782428,0.00047865242,0.08961791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829049,0.00007419864,0.012154855,0.0001365646,0.0000292606,0.000073059164,0.0000823841,0.00004020038,0.004504527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568045,0.0026926294,0.00009356405,0.0005221132,0.00039897158,0.0006123699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933543,0.0032469227,0.0012928793,0.0013888201,0.00024229297,0.00047475635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034056522,0.00041083505,0.0010236362,0.00065175904,0.0018535252,0.0025079146,0.0015960543,0.0013758569,0.013721733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016156033,0.00028183544,0.00052803097,0.001180964,0.0021398854,0.0033694694,0.002732622,0.0015834769,0.0014071313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002151755,0.00069921406,0.033648584,0.00033119874,0.00034600106,0.00071158505,0.0032201272,0.18299918,0.0060041454,0.5310075,0.017058184,0.22182253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011238176,0.00079593307,0.011450108,0.00008137845,0.00016556554,0.00044539417,0.0024969545,0.47408333,0.0041866256,0.45739552,0.04767699,0.00009832942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031613472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00554762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013721733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015247108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001111386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045903802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124297895","doi":"10.65109/fkek1875","title":"Soft Condorcet Optimization for Ranking of General Agents","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Waterloo; Google (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Rank (graph theory); Preference; Social choice theory; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.03634292329246118,"score_gpt":0.2602797094126154,"score_spread":0.22393678612015422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124297895","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06840315,0.00048231546,0.92212594,0.0008170365,0.00012135479,0.00023081909,0.00030080893,0.0011845621,0.006334052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71785146,0.00017679909,0.27460936,0.00049164705,0.0001050386,0.00042069328,0.0009257384,0.00038601892,0.0050333375],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960283,0.0019697335,0.00019630499,0.00069991464,0.00072470255,0.00038114664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922438,0.004657832,0.00072814274,0.0010255012,0.00092786195,0.00041683405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062117125,0.0018670302,0.0021022093,0.0013084015,0.0010350365,0.0021312444,0.0018927717,0.0015763689,0.003738726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020075183,0.00063960487,0.001007346,0.0009784204,0.0021327497,0.0022199915,0.0018928878,0.0025168497,0.0009141541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002761402,0.00009727418,0.0021365401,0.0001341699,0.00007826612,0.000053476033,0.00008795083,0.9038704,0.0007886896,0.024844253,0.004579637,0.06305321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017882585,0.000043887507,0.00015352965,0.0000080526215,0.0000042036822,0.000007794685,0.000011324836,0.9884848,0.0002741808,0.0106692165,0.0003188966,0.000006312967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005320032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00536192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062117125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021287298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002468368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0328511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124307392","doi":"10.65109/ospa2496","title":"Liquid Democracy for Low-Cost Ensemble Pruning","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Boosting (machine learning); Ensemble learning; Voting; Pruning; Random subspace method; Social choice theory; Majority rule; Training set","score_opus":0.040389954561411666,"score_gpt":0.259416766444033,"score_spread":0.21902681188262133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124307392","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01964366,0.00025785016,0.9750576,0.00044559737,0.000054200395,0.000048576672,0.000040866435,0.00032173446,0.004129787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7128658,0.00028404055,0.27763116,0.000569144,0.00018372401,0.00039113985,0.00030368313,0.00026166966,0.007509509],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707305,0.001314011,0.00012653285,0.00040514377,0.00076454825,0.00031668635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99174917,0.0050092842,0.00046542066,0.0017491325,0.000747563,0.00027949578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004953412,0.0007380191,0.0017611135,0.0007259761,0.001244598,0.0015022742,0.0019861374,0.0016319714,0.0065293903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01919256,0.0004591365,0.00078950025,0.00086048036,0.0014361461,0.002473317,0.0033018684,0.0031167634,0.0013357957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025575707,0.0002400247,0.0029945022,0.0001697948,0.00013278719,0.00022925237,0.00021045347,0.4845206,0.004530401,0.2545904,0.008545646,0.24358031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017914135,0.000052322506,0.00022659279,0.00001934047,0.000013414958,0.00006160431,0.000016157132,0.8956857,0.0011887987,0.101078294,0.0016328882,0.0000069682746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080790534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015173943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065293903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007820756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011308036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02619648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124312557","doi":"10.65109/snxq9471","title":"Optimal Majority Rules and Quantitative Condorcet Properties of Setwise Kemeny Voting Schemes","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Unanimity; Social choice theory; Axiom; Voting; Pairwise comparison; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.06251242647276015,"score_gpt":0.25568153437111574,"score_spread":0.1931691078983556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124312557","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805343,0.00034827867,0.9114376,0.0010367942,0.00008902493,0.00019597283,0.00035633444,0.00016874059,0.018313764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6838573,0.00044660288,0.3085504,0.00034537597,0.00018792153,0.00054261065,0.0004810699,0.00011362353,0.0054750927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98858404,0.0043576434,0.0007243703,0.0019023595,0.0035368179,0.0008946835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777559,0.013650532,0.0023650366,0.0033943201,0.0021095339,0.0007246283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00908066,0.000761624,0.0016926272,0.0018017096,0.0018021506,0.0049116057,0.003758964,0.0025675164,0.006189129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043036174,0.0007162477,0.0014959488,0.0023996674,0.0052866573,0.009850326,0.0030320538,0.0052315183,0.0008100279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074152355,0.0000361194,0.0002993657,0.000077519806,0.000023232024,0.000023841385,0.00012878665,0.027299533,0.0010113618,0.95487237,0.00078936014,0.015364506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028456621,0.000033407592,0.000092399,0.000018799445,0.000008839477,0.000028274217,0.00003212792,0.06941349,0.0013034431,0.9280792,0.00094692985,0.0000146365255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006805926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009535435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00908066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021299345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0480237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124320356","doi":"10.65109/ldkv5139","title":"Inferring True Voting Outcomes in Homophilic Social Networks","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Polling; Event (particle physics); Ball (mathematics); Outcome (game theory); Stadium","score_opus":0.05673715066368529,"score_gpt":0.23600384691453502,"score_spread":0.17926669625084973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124320356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8426981,0.00049221807,0.14897102,0.001357344,0.000042103384,0.00013201557,0.0019852056,0.00013373652,0.004188266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912082,0.00013480234,0.007417422,0.00007329041,0.000026096366,0.00005744478,0.00066394324,0.000006177239,0.00041248437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964826,0.00196493,0.0001554277,0.00083824806,0.00028634162,0.00027252614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762155,0.018834585,0.0022696203,0.0014620938,0.0007159031,0.0005022021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044542057,0.00069853617,0.00095733727,0.002756676,0.0009059009,0.0016885888,0.0013605873,0.0019102333,0.0020034325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03603924,0.0007082904,0.0005181392,0.0018319042,0.0011166071,0.0039261132,0.0014977041,0.0012135145,0.00078128534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013322383,0.0007562616,0.42348245,0.0005577493,0.0009138408,0.0021615818,0.003500672,0.34315002,0.0029136317,0.11003228,0.005726461,0.10547271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060177183,0.00008612589,0.035887595,0.000077534845,0.00008848401,0.00027430718,0.0008443674,0.8381703,0.00077299366,0.122106954,0.0015834155,0.00004766131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058019543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073107053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058019543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011231632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037334088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023556411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124345595","doi":"10.65109/gtzh3103","title":"Investigating the Characteristics of One-Sided Matching Mechanisms: (Extended Abstract)","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Probabilistic logic; Space (punctuation); Mechanism (biology); Task (project management); Dictatorship","score_opus":0.044987337391405896,"score_gpt":0.22750144237964545,"score_spread":0.18251410498823956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124345595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4897398,0.0019061402,0.46167415,0.003177211,0.00032488594,0.0005107402,0.0011857864,0.00039444142,0.04108685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521965,0.0010070945,0.03693943,0.0005025147,0.00025683813,0.00037889392,0.00043269037,0.00009116785,0.008194885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619114,0.0017399638,0.00029897544,0.000782843,0.00046102426,0.0005260513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350419,0.038038205,0.014075259,0.008015054,0.0028795998,0.0019500074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008634397,0.0005985458,0.0016880254,0.001539399,0.0011312029,0.0026828847,0.002695816,0.0024218063,0.02174147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054565027,0.00053248653,0.0015465498,0.0029444362,0.002255831,0.005538494,0.0018617486,0.0022544297,0.0016390682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033292966,0.0003480852,0.0037634415,0.00053464813,0.00015891388,0.00018762528,0.00030401832,0.05106862,0.002318188,0.9035148,0.006724694,0.030744018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020539187,0.00030654343,0.0018378755,0.00009561415,0.00006537815,0.00027584753,0.00011229339,0.15153392,0.0010463987,0.84203005,0.002441693,0.000049023023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007035975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004291782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02174147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012113376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013734911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07273251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126070541","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_623","title":"Coase Theorem and the Theory of the Core, The","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Core (optical fiber); Transaction cost; Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Pareto efficiency; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03297553705009456,"score_gpt":0.19635213116796799,"score_spread":0.16337659411787342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126070541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010435435,0.010594478,0.26807845,0.013541565,0.001007624,0.00007216725,0.00035483247,0.00014663463,0.6957687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52273417,0.009271027,0.08552581,0.004474624,0.0019592324,0.0004885753,0.0004303027,0.00044490676,0.37467143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912363,0.00031608567,0.000038021164,0.00019178074,0.00022713988,0.00010342491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984314,0.00089378614,0.00008193352,0.00025039565,0.00027425756,0.00006834471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017693461,0.0007346888,0.0010932158,0.0013478359,0.0023286971,0.00497489,0.0014550934,0.0028947943,0.020461624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077047413,0.0005202065,0.0007923364,0.0017071895,0.006516254,0.0083096465,0.0015849115,0.0041380534,0.0035621077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026091627,0.0000017709856,0.000010579481,0.000007920892,0.0000011762895,0.0000034838986,0.000021552605,0.0001333113,0.000023118953,0.9956649,0.002284082,0.0018455572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026151554,0.0000015970139,0.000020184732,0.00000813913,0.0000010566213,0.000012363732,0.000009832356,0.0005508506,0.000037645295,0.99062294,0.00873076,0.0000019830363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003988482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034369898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020461624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032588325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020799767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06845093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126098846","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_818","title":"Coordinated Anticompetitive Practices Based on Algorithms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Action (physics); Stability (learning theory); Field (mathematics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.04952899608942124,"score_gpt":0.2524899164885977,"score_spread":0.20296092039917646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126098846","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04054837,0.0003119838,0.91302085,0.0008562027,0.0001605831,0.00021279363,0.000089424764,0.00093963475,0.043860137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7513397,0.00027964704,0.23012729,0.0002463987,0.00012678631,0.00045181517,0.00017544614,0.00038261697,0.016870257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921951,0.003804359,0.0003335439,0.001468354,0.0014216638,0.000776857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768598,0.013172026,0.0011744774,0.0069202045,0.0013130279,0.0005603727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046047806,0.0007952103,0.001708448,0.0013079192,0.0017182358,0.0047170236,0.0037215988,0.002795949,0.008947371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025684902,0.0007472688,0.0009751042,0.002023066,0.003814155,0.004877174,0.0034100653,0.0028182436,0.0015902035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018317875,0.00013325737,0.0008709824,0.00010724863,0.000084517706,0.000078993275,0.00042769552,0.07773296,0.0025772539,0.8329219,0.0048179044,0.080064155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006067902,0.00007202184,0.00024951913,0.00003255468,0.000033382104,0.00007082043,0.00012882332,0.28010097,0.0020781318,0.70848215,0.008666376,0.00002449803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014362959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019917616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008947371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016990005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018709234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029931962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126465181","doi":"10.21428/594757db.37e4a7ad","title":"Generalized Voting Model To Measure Popularity Of Matchings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Voting; Matching (statistics); Class (philosophy); Popularity; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.07320182927781929,"score_gpt":0.2558495132155546,"score_spread":0.1826476839377353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126465181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20036118,0.0005635507,0.792606,0.00037552314,0.00008646378,0.00016483947,0.0006851449,0.00031559766,0.0048417444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95356774,0.00020793316,0.041452326,0.00010569072,0.00009210301,0.0001739799,0.00069916854,0.00007280669,0.0036282819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952916,0.0025783244,0.00021274961,0.00071456045,0.0006635596,0.00053915684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984769,0.0093057575,0.0015917693,0.002315684,0.0013678323,0.00065000256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004761353,0.00063758093,0.0019112026,0.004004627,0.00087753934,0.0022275704,0.0033292738,0.0022217066,0.0058345976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023752265,0.00044296018,0.0015460419,0.004572777,0.0017158713,0.005210804,0.0017039907,0.0016297424,0.00085554144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046322474,0.00018394554,0.010968368,0.00017900817,0.0003257465,0.00022821897,0.00032417962,0.36043683,0.0039061096,0.5756759,0.0032467237,0.04406175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022279231,0.00005169471,0.0011786433,0.000014367333,0.000033058026,0.00006812947,0.000047833917,0.8862326,0.0003296473,0.111239895,0.0007603908,0.000021444044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034266147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026466136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058345976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017758472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008880321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025180757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133105722","doi":"","title":"Decoding Distortion: Pushing the Limits of Optimal Collective Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Social choice theory; Distortion (music); Matching (statistics); Aggregate (composite); Focus (optics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Quality (philosophy); Proxy (statistics); Heuristics","score_opus":0.045157911881653905,"score_gpt":0.33012288795976796,"score_spread":0.28496497607811405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133105722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06401643,0.0031041892,0.89186877,0.010072615,0.00029623022,0.0001773645,0.00046572325,0.00030473396,0.029693991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82014334,0.0027098765,0.16631694,0.0017413563,0.0005153304,0.0005339871,0.0004622446,0.0003827139,0.007194181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98162526,0.010244212,0.0009331834,0.0027369815,0.0035013973,0.00095895806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046867,0.07623367,0.0044939686,0.009538223,0.0036475854,0.0013998335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018470371,0.0014124763,0.0028055282,0.0013177358,0.0018651019,0.009569174,0.003394684,0.0035604867,0.0050117583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11268417,0.0013833909,0.0017394074,0.0016553239,0.008771415,0.013688062,0.008035468,0.0066629294,0.0009930014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028369966,0.00005772107,0.0011769024,0.0002554606,0.0001158432,0.00018140506,0.00083199516,0.125865,0.0010795143,0.8325704,0.0021133828,0.035468545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003796666,0.000047036447,0.00018918159,0.00006614277,0.000017223496,0.000051734663,0.00011819662,0.11548311,0.0005587125,0.881103,0.0022960426,0.000031563242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002594722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011455581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018470371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048840335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003029865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09768188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135432118","doi":"","title":"The Council of Europe Recommendation on e-Voting and the Voting Client","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WU Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intecsea (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.23457384750992483,"score_gpt":0.33107920966493287,"score_spread":0.09650536215500805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135432118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023917744,0.018947143,0.009873988,0.66656893,0.08380985,0.000500115,0.003070663,0.00063381396,0.21420375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025286892,0.015687147,0.017026197,0.3812264,0.026286503,0.0006718017,0.0028492275,0.00083868846,0.53012717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840296,0.002933459,0.001140561,0.0014260699,0.007889026,0.0025812816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645639,0.014597442,0.0017250741,0.002714325,0.012176495,0.0042227576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120614525,0.0014125328,0.002225728,0.004227031,0.004121075,0.012937992,0.004755859,0.051903557,0.029303882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0363749,0.0008319467,0.0025249561,0.006223692,0.0033372606,0.0077417744,0.0032866688,0.021390676,0.014910369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004310576,0.00011430983,0.00034168572,0.00015686305,0.000015747602,0.00011236946,0.00007791678,0.00020818946,0.00012255154,0.046404403,0.9318912,0.020511633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005426534,0.00003256422,0.0014435134,0.00048954616,0.000036835117,0.00005093267,0.00015182965,0.0003071829,0.00030155852,0.012834969,0.98425424,0.000042496868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072615445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11557264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072615445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006168793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018220093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14438558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148491316","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-07031-9_11","title":"Mean-Field Games for Marriage","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Static & dynamic game theory: foundations & applications","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Innovation and Economic Development Trois Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Remarriage; Context (archaeology); Dynamics (music); Set (abstract data type); Romance","score_opus":0.021310083110910875,"score_gpt":0.26571186413300046,"score_spread":0.2444017810220896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148491316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058763865,0.006165984,0.38253707,0.012326918,0.0007603198,0.00020842481,0.00077451766,0.0003092126,0.5381536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7978267,0.0029982536,0.043753,0.0011114735,0.000734884,0.00040835375,0.0004240356,0.00011493863,0.1526283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932075,0.00032629282,0.000021131971,0.00008173121,0.00014692087,0.00010323638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.00054369785,0.000059332375,0.00008669334,0.000085449705,0.00009538796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010692063,0.0007637001,0.0011992845,0.00083672476,0.0019770374,0.0029804418,0.001664391,0.002588479,0.02192729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004081569,0.00039957155,0.00074666523,0.0013461354,0.002694938,0.004040451,0.0014259279,0.0031609295,0.0017153567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036981921,0.0000054801676,0.000013563117,0.0000073694987,0.0000014238126,0.0000047196963,0.000034510434,0.0010164683,0.000025125675,0.9950316,0.0017821362,0.0020738423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034552356,0.0000017156855,0.000016432949,0.0000029805972,6.253429e-7,0.0000052382998,0.000011735992,0.0020333128,0.0000061277096,0.9960063,0.0019105325,0.0000016197376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041453107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003667437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02192729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031890343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013246123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073354125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W785130179","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8893","title":"Robust Winners and Winner Determination Policies under Candidate Uncertainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Unavailability; Voting; Computer science; Computation; Condorcet method; Majority rule; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0977726672521633,"score_gpt":0.2617441265676452,"score_spread":0.16397145931548188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W785130179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17375998,0.0004416669,0.817453,0.0012990625,0.00007353081,0.00027486877,0.000351595,0.00041840735,0.005927929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90335417,0.00016807727,0.09300212,0.00013552235,0.000056349487,0.00015662446,0.00021840735,0.000082599305,0.0028261978],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939322,0.0023124106,0.0003420288,0.0013155806,0.0009806997,0.0011170299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97225857,0.019893872,0.0027440053,0.0024890394,0.0014973155,0.0011171463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00825788,0.00076970394,0.0024537258,0.0009814135,0.0011820974,0.0035084162,0.0027735692,0.0018099567,0.0052820453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041563,0.0006320182,0.0010298039,0.0013298139,0.001960424,0.0047912365,0.002432478,0.002388602,0.00059288903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007170491,0.00019797511,0.004033338,0.00016817574,0.00015223886,0.0002976126,0.00035356564,0.7332762,0.0023507099,0.20005946,0.0030025535,0.055391125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006306031,0.000108699714,0.00055704184,0.00001739658,0.000028556835,0.00008425094,0.00011648127,0.85585064,0.0012505981,0.14103277,0.00086631684,0.00002420935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025976372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001907553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00825788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018227198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020992814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043672383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79100657","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-05282-8_4","title":"The Cooperative Potential","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Theory and decision library. Series C, Game theory, mathematical programming and operations research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04412933075283775,"score_gpt":0.29389591998532594,"score_spread":0.24976658923248818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79100657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030316794,0.0034003507,0.10716986,0.005790743,0.0005678374,0.000084523286,0.00027052636,0.00012836448,0.852271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75551903,0.002034278,0.01398875,0.0011682165,0.00061026093,0.0003109303,0.0002143829,0.00010896271,0.2260451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921596,0.00026674708,0.00002491929,0.00014952502,0.00021126764,0.00013153434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920124,0.00033189636,0.000060350027,0.00016816962,0.00012456742,0.000113696726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081458985,0.00060785864,0.00065396447,0.0014276407,0.0017864447,0.0033432357,0.0011816736,0.0021181381,0.024877574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030319719,0.0003021438,0.0005324163,0.0011790948,0.0037934303,0.0046827784,0.0024059252,0.0020566403,0.002690675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016858075,0.0000024354981,0.000013080087,0.00000585428,0.0000014434859,0.000007929677,0.000027045198,0.00021132207,0.000043156033,0.9960563,0.0013596191,0.0022700028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038497897,0.0000034779086,0.000024488503,0.000007944054,0.0000021176415,0.000041920815,0.000026626676,0.0015566822,0.000051455263,0.9893635,0.008915375,0.0000026528774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008576522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005667809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024877574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013241235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001093296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08322376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791500286","doi":"10.1007/s12046-015-0374-6","title":"Profit allocation among rational players in a cooperative game under uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sadhana","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Profit (economics); Interval (graph theory); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Shapley value; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.06978624295564397,"score_gpt":0.25207815669361017,"score_spread":0.18229191373796622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W791500286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5452321,0.00033221452,0.43163946,0.0024209204,0.000059465103,0.00019299779,0.000119426266,0.000061354134,0.019942129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870035,0.000096649426,0.009732654,0.00005841742,0.000015763537,0.000068517584,0.000015484746,0.000008575114,0.003000444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974491,0.0014136133,0.0001118404,0.0003507093,0.0002569658,0.0004176806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934366,0.0051753623,0.0004610399,0.00019885418,0.00036822565,0.0003599728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032033266,0.00052455184,0.001404447,0.0005714589,0.0011115115,0.0032550723,0.0018166916,0.002427221,0.0026213038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008735952,0.00051764806,0.0005762428,0.0006537075,0.002494457,0.0030775047,0.0014748934,0.0012482579,0.00022239408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005240938,0.00018984968,0.001979653,0.00012533682,0.00011063215,0.0004259756,0.0007979121,0.28251857,0.00427887,0.6939737,0.0014533706,0.013622051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078197125,0.000074134885,0.00046417915,0.000013371559,0.000030368425,0.00006932878,0.0002715709,0.7446872,0.00048287137,0.2531935,0.00060451444,0.000030719337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027343845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026298072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032550723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002489287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016355516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018061101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88989832","doi":"10.21991/c9cd41","title":"COMMITMENT AND COMMUNITY IN THE INTER-REFERENDUM PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Period (music); Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.09384170883466772,"score_gpt":0.2406480322603349,"score_spread":0.14680632342566718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88989832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389276,0.00033463788,0.0056336187,0.0023531574,0.000040606672,0.000051343297,0.00011763228,0.000017902916,0.05252347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965538,0.000040688785,0.0002054324,0.000068856265,0.000016005248,0.000016625485,0.000025270265,0.000004581415,0.0030687274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785197,0.00062015693,0.000063815874,0.00025474915,0.00018947695,0.0010198444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867666,0.0063886633,0.0021271217,0.0006657279,0.00068129686,0.0033706191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005102463,0.00016273408,0.00085607887,0.00079411454,0.0032013266,0.0047393055,0.0010971653,0.0021213696,0.013594633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016532945,0.00032926287,0.00033897866,0.0009933008,0.0028222816,0.0046373825,0.0034125098,0.0035581903,0.0004341363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020273773,0.0010600063,0.043028012,0.00008530368,0.000090387985,0.00078917504,0.00998475,0.0058934554,0.0016985732,0.89171356,0.003583846,0.040045578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043363,0.0007473021,0.16552588,0.00010042321,0.00008224883,0.0002852101,0.02953772,0.018958315,0.00087731535,0.7661707,0.01709558,0.000114998926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009222406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010630085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013594633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023023984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019253917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045478582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90305737","doi":"10.4000/msh.2922","title":"Annexe bibliographique sur la théorie du choix social","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mathématiques et sciences humaines","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Mathematical economics; Calculus (dental); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Geology; Medicine","score_opus":0.037897300215606694,"score_gpt":0.2729537897314535,"score_spread":0.23505648951584682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90305737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016679595,0.35485512,0.014405344,0.020864394,0.01486406,0.0000986653,0.0073109223,0.0008342581,0.5850992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050699737,0.5664878,0.0164434,0.008624904,0.017597828,0.00058558356,0.018538749,0.0009725752,0.3200495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881256,0.0002963648,0.000125472,0.00018141815,0.0004933541,0.00009092885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679357,0.0015477756,0.00017969662,0.00028034145,0.0011023803,0.00009627167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010248716,0.0009605263,0.0014495109,0.010954803,0.0024424095,0.0044899764,0.0012430069,0.0019461976,0.10930909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057006995,0.0005131593,0.0009243287,0.015857523,0.0021454622,0.004381731,0.0011535957,0.0037175473,0.027327891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054514283,0.00005067971,0.00039271702,0.002720571,0.00007973084,0.00023222258,0.0006002213,0.0009214151,0.00046925843,0.3693606,0.51611423,0.10900381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073752385,0.000007092414,0.00055941055,0.0010852559,0.000017049842,0.00016878621,0.00008929288,0.000113867805,0.00011259413,0.029853491,0.9679739,0.000011900324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022573905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014883016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10930909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037854519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36567533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W99643971","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-058","title":"Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Voting; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Heuristics; Preference elicitation; Minimax; Preference; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.15568759198764767,"score_gpt":0.24653360338674782,"score_spread":0.09084601139910015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W99643971","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011260713,0.00016727224,0.9854543,0.000320738,0.000018358625,0.00015744507,0.00009375769,0.00023761982,0.0022898111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52651536,0.00034431706,0.46850675,0.00025493963,0.00010285022,0.0007534697,0.00041878948,0.00014942484,0.0029539661],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97710365,0.014600129,0.0009776317,0.002618609,0.0035034444,0.0011965223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95176995,0.035851724,0.0029299285,0.006993144,0.0018441753,0.0006111322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134258615,0.0015080143,0.0023737575,0.0012514759,0.0012208626,0.0029500984,0.0036475116,0.002631873,0.0038568596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07114173,0.0010398197,0.0018147789,0.002055835,0.0026832242,0.0056105955,0.0035475974,0.0042488133,0.00096142304],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004267705,0.00016515267,0.0015238078,0.00027015008,0.0001341284,0.00017566532,0.00049197307,0.63151836,0.0027267267,0.28277192,0.0024224978,0.07737289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048964648,0.00008526876,0.00019252425,0.000026559213,0.000022638187,0.0000627839,0.00004999157,0.7931054,0.0013919863,0.2036725,0.0013187497,0.000022509063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018555633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020023906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134258615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00306381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002620647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071003556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}